Skip to main content

Month: April 2025

An element of self-growth in our social interactions

Written by Abdullah Jallow on . Posted in Brotherhood, Methodology - 'Manhaj', Morals and Manners - 'Akhlaaq', Pearls of Wisdom, Purification of The Soul, Qur'aan, Scholars of Islam, Worship - 'Ibaadah', Zuhd (Abstinence).

In The Name of Allah, The Most Merciful, The Bestower of Mercy.

Allah, The Exalted, said:

وَٱلَّذِینَ إِذَا ذُكِّرُوا۟ بِـَٔایَـٰتِ رَبِّهِمۡ لَمۡ یَخِرُّوا۟ عَلَیۡهَا صُمࣰّا وَعُمۡیَانࣰا

And those who, when they are reminded of the Signs of their Lord, fall not deaf and blind thereat]. [Al-Furqan. 73]

Imam Muhammad ibn Saalih Al-Uthaymeen, may Allah have mercy upon him, commented on this Ayah:

The identity of the reminder giver remains undisclosed, encompassing all individuals who provide reminders. This serves to demonstrate that the acceptance of the reminder is not contingent upon the particular person delivering it, as some only accept the truth when it is presented by a specific individual. If the reminder comes from someone else, it is not acknowledged, similar to how the people of the Scripture treated the Prophet, peace and blessings of Allah be upon him, as well as others who only accept the truth from a particular group or person. Allah said:

وَلَئِنْ أَتَيْتَ الَّذِينَ أُوتُوا الْكِتَابَ بِكُلِّ آيَةٍ مَا تَبِعُوا قِبْلَتَكَ

And even if you were to bring to the people of the Scripture all the Signs, they would not follow your Qiblah (prayer direction)]. [Al-Baqarah. 145]

So here, Allah says: [إِذَا ذُكِّرُوا – And those who, when they are reminded]. The individual providing the reminder remains unknown (in this Ayah), indicating their acceptance of the truth based on its validity and not due to who says it. The acceptance or rejection of the reminder is not contingent upon the person delivering it, but rather on the content of the reminder itself. This underscores the benefit of not disclosing the doer of the action (i.e. the reminder giver). [1]

NB: There is an exception in this matter and that is a Sunni, Athari – adherent to the Sunnah – does not lend an ear to Ahlul Bidah. Shu’aib, may Allah have mercy upon him, said: I said to Ibn Seereen: “What is your view concerning listening to the people of desires (i.e. ahlul bidah)?” He said: “We neither listen to them nor honour them”. [2]

[1] An Excerpt from “Tafseer Surah Al-Furqan. Ayah 2. Shared by our Salafi brother and colleague Abdul Malik (Abu Zakariyyah Al-Congoli (may Allah preserve him)

[2] Siyar A’laam An-Nubulaa. 4/611

[32] The Ascent and Decline of The Ottoman Empire

Written by Abdullah Jallow on . Posted in History of Islam, Morals and Manners - 'Akhlaaq'.

In The Name of Allah, The Most Merciful, The Bestower of Mercy.

Sultan Abdul Aziz (1277 – 1293 AH / 1861 – 1876)

He ascended to the throne following his brother in the late year of 1277 AH. During his reign, a revolution erupted in the island of Crete, which was suppressed in 1283 AH /1863. The Suez Canal was inaugurated in 1385 AH / 1869, and during the early years of his rule, the Judicial Regulations magazine and the Maritime Trade Law were published. He traveled to Europe and contemplated taking advantage of the rivalries among European nations; however, he discovered that they were united in their opposition to the Ottoman Empire, viewing it as an Islamic state. The Europeans could not shake off the deep-seated animosity rooted in their history, although they often disagreed among themselves based on their individual interests.

They were determined to exert pressure on the Ottoman government to continue its reform efforts and purported advancement along Western lines, European thought, and secular principles. Sultan Abdul Aziz was committed to following the path established by his father, Mahmud II, and his brother, Abdul Majid. He retained all officials responsible for implementing the reforms. Among the most significant administrative reforms during his reign was the enactment of the Provincial Law in 1281 AH (1864). Additionally, a Supreme Judicial Court, known as the Council of Judicial Decisions, was established. In 1385 AH (1868), a State Council modeled after the French system was created, referred to as the Council of State, which had the crucial responsibility of discussing the budget.

In the field of education, a secondary school was established in 1285 AH /1868, known as “Galatasaray.” The curriculum offered at this institution was superior to that of other secondary schools, with all subjects taught in French, except for the Turkish language. The primary objective of founding this school was to produce a group of young individuals capable of fulfilling public service roles. The student body comprised individuals from various religious backgrounds, predominantly Muslims, but also included Greeks, Armenians, who were Christians, as well as a number of Jews. In fact, the school attracted a significant number of students, reaching a total of 600 in 1869, encompassing Muslims, Christians, and Jews.

Despite the reform measures implemented during the reign of Sultan Abdul Aziz, European nations deemed them insufficient as evidence of the Ottoman Empire’s genuine desire for reform. They believed that the efforts to improve the conditions of Christian subjects and to eradicate the widespread corruption within the administrative and governmental systems were inadequate. Many contemporary observers in Europe viewed these corrupt practices as a significant threat that could ultimately lead to the collapse of the state. [Footnote a]

Many English contemporaries, along with others, believed that the dissolution of the Ottoman Empire had become inevitable due to its failure to adopt European reform methods. In 1865, British Foreign Secretary Lord Clarendon stated that the only way to improve the situation of the Ottomans was to completely remove them from existence. This sentiment underscores the animosity that Christians held towards the Ottoman Empire, which had previously defeated them, particularly following the conquest of Constantinople. [Footnote b] The Ottoman Empire failed to adopt European reform principles due to the complete disconnection between European ideals and the principles of the Ottoman state, which were derived from the Book of Allah and the teachings of His Messenger.

The Deposition of Sultan Abdul Aziz:

He had traveled to Europe, where he observed the collusion among European nations against the Ottoman Empire. He sought to take advanatge of the existing conflicts of interest between Western European countries and Russia to benefit the Ottoman state. Consequently, he began to frequently invite the Russian ambassador to Istanbul. This action alarmed the European powers, leading them to spread rumours about his extravagance and wastefulness. Ultimately, Mehmed Pasha succeeded in deposing him and, along with his associates, orchestrated his assassination in the year 1293 AH / 1876. Medmed Pasha was a member of the Donmeh Jews, [Footnote c] and Masonic propaganda promoted him throughout the Arab and Western regions as a great hero and the champion of reform and freedom within the Ottoman Empire, earning him the title of “Father of the Constitution.” His supporters utilised various media outlets, including newspapers, magazines, and radio broadcasts, to elevate his status, leading him to attain high-ranking positions such as the governorship of Syria and Iraq, as well as the Grand Vizier, the highest office in the Ottoman Empire. Subsequently, he began to undermine and sabotage the system, driven by his Jewish and Masonic affiliations. He, along with the global Masonic network of Donmeh Jews, established the “Committee of Union and Progress,” which adopted the same emblem as Masonry and set its headquarters in Blanick. Eventually, some of his actions were revealed to Sultan Abdul Hamid, who subsequently arrested him, dismissed him from his position, and later exiled him. [Footnote d]

The assassination of Sultan Abdul Aziz can be attributed to his outright rejection of Western constitutions and customs that were incompatible with Islamic values. He made significant strides in reforming the Ottoman Empire, particularly in the military sector. He strengthened the army by replacing outdated weaponry with modern arms, sourcing the necessary equipment from the finest weapon manufacturers in Europe. Additionally, he implemented military organization based on contemporary standards and established military units composed of members from various tribes and provinces, equipping forts and castles with the most advanced artillery available.

The Ottoman Empire’s artillery became a benchmark for advancement, thanks to the reforms implemented by Dar al-Madani al-Tubkhana, where modern equipment and machinery were introduced. This transformation enabled the production of all types of new weaponry. Additionally, significant improvements were made in the naval sector, with Ottoman experts replacing foreign specialists despite their objections and those of their countries. Under his leadership, the Ottoman Empire emerged as one of the leading maritime powers globally. He initiated the dispatch of naval missions abroad, procured armored vessels, and established several factories for their production, as well as for machinery and boilers. The Izmit manufacturing facility regained its former glory, while numerous shipyards were renovated. He also founded the Journal of Judicial Regulations and worked diligently to uphold justice, holding accountable high-ranking officials such as Khosrow Pasha, Atif Pasha, and Tahir Pasha. This commitment to justice and reform was evident to the public, but it did not sit well with European nations, which preferred a state of oppression that would hasten the empire’s decline.

Furthermore, he implemented financial reforms, mandated a balanced budget, abolished outdated financial lists, and settled the state’s debts, leading to a monetary system and a more organized financial situation. European nations were alarmed by the rapid actions taken by this sultan, which disrupted their plans to eliminate the “sick man” of the East. Consequently, they devised a conspiracy to depose and subsequently assassinate him. The origins of the conspiracy surrounding the assassination of Sultan Abdul Aziz can be traced back to a well-orchestrated plan devised by the consuls and representatives of European nations in the Ottoman capital. They executed this plan through their agents, who were influenced by their ideologies, including prominent figures in the government. Notably, the Freemason operative known as Mehmed Pasha admitted during his trial to his involvement in the deposition and murder of Sultan Abdul Aziz, a fact that is historically recognized and documented in various records.

An Excerpt from ‘Ad-Dawlah Al-Uthmaaniyyah Awaamil An-Nuhood Wa Asbaab As-Suqoot. 6/435-438

—————————————–

Footnote a: This tactic is widely recognized as one employed by the opponent, who instigates internal conflict and subsequently presents itself as a benefactor or rescuer, similar to a fireman arsonist.

Footnote b: Read on this link: https://salafidawahmanchester.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/05/Part-One_Our-Ottoman-Brothers_Ascendancy-And-Decline.pdf

Footnote c: One of the works written on this subject matter is the book title: “The Secret Jews” by Joachim Prinz 1973. ISBN 0-394-47204-7

Footnote d: The author offers limited information in this section about the degree of this individual’s participation in the sultan’s assassination. However, regardless of his level of involvement or collaboration with external enemies of the state, the seriousness of taking a Muslim’s life is well-known. The Prophet, peace and blessings of Allah be upon him, said: “The murder of a believer is a greater tragedy to Allah than the end of the world”. [Sunan al-Tirmidhi 1395]

The Judiciousness, Patience and Sovereignty that won’t be rivaled until the end of time

Written by Abdullah Jallow on . Posted in Aqeedah, Aqeedah (Creed & Belief), History of Islam, Methodology - 'Manhaj', Morals and Manners - 'Akhlaaq', Purification of The Soul, Qur'aan, Scholars of Islam, Worship - 'Ibaadah'.

In The Name of Allah, The Most Merciful, The Bestower of Mercy.

The Most Judacious of All Time

Allah, The Exalted, said:

وَوَهَبْنَا لَهُ إِسْحَاقَ وَيَعْقُوبَ ۚ كُلًّا هَدَيْنَا ۚ وَنُوحًا هَدَيْنَا مِن قَبْلُ ۖ وَمِن ذُرِّيَّتِهِ دَاوُودَ وَسُلَيْمَانَ وَأَيُّوبَ وَيُوسُفَ وَمُوسَىٰ وَهَارُونَ ۚ وَكَذَٰلِكَ نَجْزِي الْمُحْسِنِينَ
وَزَكَرِيَّا وَيَحْيَىٰ وَعِيسَىٰ وَإِلْيَاسَ ۖ كُلٌّ مِّنَ الصَّالِحِينَ
وَإِسْمَاعِيلَ وَالْيَسَعَ وَيُونُسَ وَلُوطًا ۚ وَكُلًّا فَضَّلْنَا عَلَى الْعَالَمِينَ
وَمِنْ آبَائِهِمْ وَذُرِّيَّاتِهِمْ وَإِخْوَانِهِمْ ۖ وَاجْتَبَيْنَاهُمْ وَهَدَيْنَاهُمْ إِلَىٰ صِرَاطٍ مُّسْتَقِيمٍ
ذَٰلِكَ هُدَى اللَّهِ يَهْدِي بِهِ مَن يَشَاءُ مِنْ عِبَادِهِ ۚ وَلَوْ أَشْرَكُوا لَحَبِطَ عَنْهُم مَّا كَانُوا يَعْمَلُونَ
أُولَٰئِكَ الَّذِينَ آتَيْنَاهُمُ الْكِتَابَ وَالْحُكْمَ وَالنُّبُوَّةَ ۚ فَإِن يَكْفُرْ بِهَا هَٰؤُلَاءِ فَقَدْ وَكَّلْنَا بِهَا قَوْمًا لَّيْسُوا بِهَا بِكَافِرِينَ
أُولَٰئِكَ الَّذِينَ هَدَى اللَّهُ ۖ فَبِهُدَاهُمُ اقْتَدِهْ ۗ قُل لَّا أَسْأَلُكُمْ عَلَيْهِ أَجْرًا ۖ إِنْ هُوَ إِلَّا ذِكْرَىٰ لِلْعَالَمِينَ

And We bestowed upon him (i.e. Prophet Ibrahim) Ishaque (Isaac) and Ya’qub (Jacob), each of them We guided, and before him, We guided Nuh (Noah), and among his progeny Dawud (David), Sulaiman (Solomon), Ayub (Job), Yusuf (Joseph), Musa (Moses), and Harun (Aaron). Thus do We reward the good-doers. And Zakariya (Zachariya), and Yahya (John) and ‘Iesa (Jesus) and Iliyas (Elias), each one of them was of the righteous. And Isma’il (Ishmael) and Al-Yas’a (Elisha), and Yunus (Jonah) and Lout (Lot), and each one of them We preferred above the ‘Alamin (mankind and jinns) (of their times). And also some of their fathers and their progeny and their brethren, We chose them, and We guided them to a Straight Path. This is the Guidance of Allah with which He guides whomsoever He will of His slaves. But if they had joined in worship others with Allah, all that they used to do would have been of no benefit to them. They are those whom We gave the Book, Al-Hukm (understanding of the religious laws), and Prophethood. But if these disbelieve therein (the Book, Al-Hukm and Prophethood), then, indeed We have entrusted it to a people (such as the Companions of Prophet Muhammad) who are not disbelievers therein. They are those whom Allah had guided. So follow their guidance. Say: “No reward I ask of you for this (the Qur’an). It is only a reminder for the ‘Alamin (mankind and jinns).” [Al-An’aam. 83-90]

Imam Ibn Al-Qayyim, may Allah have mercy upon him, said:

The Messengers are the most judicious among all of creation without exception, and their followers constitute the next most judicious group. Among the adherents of the scriptures and the great legislated laws, those who follow the Messengers are deemed the most judicious, with Muslims ranking highest among them. Among Muslims, the companions of Muhammad, peace and blessings be upon him, are regarded as the most judicious, followed closely by those who emulate their faith precisely. Furthermore, the people who steadfastly adhere to the authentic Sunnah of the Prophet and the sound reports passed down from him are considered the most judicious within the Muslim Ummah after the companions and those who have followed their example.

The clear proof to demonstrate that the Messengers are the most judicious among the entire creation is that the beneficial knowledge they conveyed, the righteous deeds, and beneficial guidance for both this life and the hereafter, have not been conveyed by others or even something close to it.  There is nothing – from any perspective – that emerged from other judicious people that can be compared to what the Messengers conveyed concerning beneficial knowledge,  righteous deeds and actions, and the beneficial matters of true well-being in both the present world and the afterlife. Whoever reflects on their life stories, both specific and general, their patience and perseverance, their abstention from the fleeting pleasures of this material world, their fervent desire to seek Allah’s pleasure and the eternal rewards promised in the hereafter, their pure manners, their unparalleled truthfulness among all beings, possessors of the purest hearts and souls, custodians of the greatest trust (namely, divine revelation and prophethood), the most honourable companions one could have, the purest in their inner-most conscience and their private matters, would not doubt that they are the most judicious among Allah’s creation without exception. It is undeniable that those who closely follow their example will inherit a greater share of judiciousness than others. [1]

Patience

Al-Allamah Abdur Rahmaan Bin Yahyah Al-Mu’allimee, may Allah have mercy upon him, stated:

Allah tested Prophet Ayyoub, peace be upon him, and Prophet Ya’qub, peace be upon him, when he lost his two sons [Yusuf and Binyameen- peace be upon them] as well as the effects of the severe grief in his heart. Allah said:

وَتَوَلَّىٰ عَنۡہُمۡ وَقَالَ يَـٰٓأَسَفَىٰ عَلَىٰ يُوسُفَ وَٱبۡيَضَّتۡ عَيۡنَاهُ مِنَ ٱلۡحُزۡنِ فَهُوَ كَظِيمٌ۬

And he turned away from them and said: “Alas, my grief for Yusuf (Joseph)!” And he lost his sight because of the sorrow that he was suppressing]. [Yusuf 84]

Allah tested Muhammad, peace and blessings of Allah be upon him, during the early years of his (Prophethood) and obligated to him to call his people to abandon the Shirk and the misguidance they were nurtured upon by their forefathers. He made that clear to them in private and public- day and night. He approached them in their hangouts, gatherings, and towns, and carried on doing so for nearly 13 years whilst they inflicted severe harm on him, even though before this he lived for 40 years or more without being harmed. He was from a noble, honoured, and respected tribe – a noble, honoured, and respected household. He grew up with noble manners due to which he was honoured and respected by the people, but despite this, he was very modest.

The one with these qualities received severe harm and faced extreme hardship. This harm intensified with mockery- this one spat in his face and that one attempted to place his feet on his neck while he prostrated to his Lord (in prayer), and another person placed the intestines of a camel on his back while he prostrated, and such and such person grabbed the collar of his garment to strangle him. His uncle (Abu Lahab) followed him wherever he went and warned against him, saying, “He (i.e. Muhammad) is a liar. He is insane”. The foolish were incited against him and they pelted him with stones until blood flowed from his two feet. Others boycotted him and his close relatives – for a long time – so that they died out of hunger. Some people tortured his followers with various types of torture, and amongst them were those who were forced to lie down on the sand during the hottest time of the day and were denied water. One of them was burnt with fire until the only thing that extinguished the fire was the fat on his back. A woman amongst them was tortured, but when they realised that she would not renounce Islaam, they stabbed her in her private area and murdered her. All this torture was not due to anything else other than the fact that the Messenger was calling them to remove them from the darkness of Shirk and enter them into the light of Islaam- to remove them from corruption and enter them into upright conduct, distance them from the anger of Allah and guide them to the means of attaining Allah’s Pleasure, and remove them from the path of eternal punishment and guide them towards the path of permanent bliss. However, they did not pay attention to this although its proofs were very clear; rather the only thing that concerned them was that he was calling them to other than what they desired.

Also, Allah tested the Prophet, peace and blessings of Allah be upon him, through the death of his parents when he was very young, then the death of his grandfather, the death of his uncle who used to protect him, and the death of his wife who used to console him. The calamities did not cease, even though he is the leader of the children of Adam and the most beloved person to Allah.

Therefore, ponder on all of this to know – based on true knowledge – that the mutual rivalry – in which we engage and greedily exert ourselves to acquire the enjoyment of the worldly life – is nothing compared to attaining Allah’s Pleasure and eternal bliss in paradise. As for the misery and hardships of the worldly life which we flee from, they are nothing compared to Allah’s displeasure, His anger, and eternal punishment in the hell fire. Anas Bin Malik, may Allah be pleased with him, reported that Allah’s Messenger, peace and blessings of Allah be upon him, said, “A person amongst the inhabitants of Hell – who lived the most enjoyable life amongst the people of the world – would be dipped in fire only once on the Day of Resurrection and then it would be said to him, ‘O son of Adam! Did you find any comfort, did you happen to get any material blessing?’ He would say, ‘By Allah! No, my Lord’. Then a person amongst the people of the world would be brought – who lived the most miserable life (in the world) – from amongst the inhabitants of Paradise and he would be dipped once in Paradise, and it would be said to him, ‘O son of Adam! Did you face any hardship? Or had any distress fallen to your lot?’ He would say, ‘By Allah! No, O my Lord, never did I face any hardship or experience any distress’”. [Sahih Muslim. 2807] [2]

Sovereignty

The Greatest King of all Time Prophet Sulayman, peace and blessings of Allah be upon him, his father and all the Prophets

The Greatest King of all Time (Prophet Sulayman), The Ant, The Hoopoe, The Upright Scholar, The If’reet and The Intelligent Queen!

[1] An Excerpt from As-Sawaa’iq Al-Mursalah 4/1514]

[2] An Excerpt from ‘Aathaar Ash-Shaikh Al-Allamah Abdur Rahman Bin Yahyah Al-Mu’allimee. 11/311-313