Skip to main content

Author: Abdullah Jallow

An Incident Between AbuBakr And Rabee’ah: A Lesson In Maturity, Fair Play, Accountability, And Responsibility During Disagreement

In The Name of Allah, The Most Merciful, The Bestower of Mercy.

Rabee’ah Al-Aslami, may Allah be pleased with him, narrated:

I used to serve Allah’s Messenger, peace and blessings of Allah be upon him, so he gave me a piece of land and gave Abu Bakr, may Allah be pleased with him, a piece of land. Then, the worldly life came and we argued over a bunch of palm trees. Abu Bakr said, “It is in my piece of land” and I said, “It is in my piece of land!” There was an exchange of words between Abu Bakr and myself, then Abu Bakr said something to me that I disliked and he regretted that. He said to me, “O Rabee’ah! Say in return to me what I said to you so that it becomes a retribution”. I said, “I will not do so!” Abu Bakr said, “Say it, or I will call Allah’s Messenger on you!’ I said, “I will not do so”. Abu Bakr abandoned the piece of land and went to the Prophet, peace and blessings of Allah be upon him, while I followed him. The people from (the tribe of) Aslam came and said, “May Allah have mercy upon Abu Bakr! Why would he call Allah’s Messenger on you when he has said to you what he has said?” I said, “Do you know who that is? That is Abu Bakr -the Truthful! He is the one who was in the Cave with the Prophet and the elder of the Muslims! So beware that he turns around and see you helping me against him and it makes him angry, then Allah’s Messenger comes along and become angry because of Abu Bakr’s anger, and then Allah becomes angry due to their anger, thus, Rabee’ah is destroyed!” They said, “So what do you want us to do?” I said, “Go back to where you came from”.

Abu Bakr went to Allah’s Messenger and I followed him by myself and continued until he got to the Prophet and informed him of our conversation as it happened. He (the Prophet) raised his head to me and said, “O Rabee’ah! What is going on between you and As-Siddeeq?” I said, “O Allah’s Messenger! This happened and that happened, so he said something to me that I disliked, and he told me to say the same thing back to him so that it be would be a retribution”. Allah’s Messenger said, “Do not return his comment to him, rather say ‘May Allah forgive you O Abu Bakr! May Allah forgive you O Abu Bakr!’ Thus, Abu Bakr turned his face and began to cry”

Al-Allamah Zaid Bin Hadi Al-Mad’khali, may Allah have mercy upon him, said:

This hadith contains an amazing story from which we can take an exhortation and a lesson. Firstly, it is a proof regarding the purity of the hearts of the Sahabah towards one another, and that when disagreement occurred between them regarding a worldly matter, they did not boycott one another – neither harboured resentment nor hatred; rather one gave sincere advice to the other.

This story shows that the Sahabah were people of fair play and justice, and they feared falling into disobedience and evil deeds. If punishment was legislated for an evil deed, they wished that such punishment is received in this worldly life and not the afterlife. This story shows the virtue of AbuBakr – his status in the eyes of the Sahabah,  the Prophet and in the sight of Allah, for indeed the Prophet used to hold him in high regard and raised him to his rightful status, as Allah stated in the Qur’an:

إِذۡ هُمَا فِى ٱلۡغَارِ إِذۡ يَقُولُ لِصَـٰحِبِهِۦ لَا تَحۡزَنۡ إِنَّ ٱللَّهَ مَعَنَا‌ۖ

The second of two, when they were in the cave, and he [Muhammad] said to his companion [Abu Bakr], “Be not sad [or afraid], surely Allah is with us”. [at-Tawbah. 40]

AbuBakr was the Prophet’s companion in the cave. He is the most virtuous person in the Ummah after the Prophet based on the consensus of Ahlus Sunnah Wal Jama’ah – past and present. Indeed, the Prophet said to some of his companions regarding AbuBakr, “Would you not leave my companion for me” – meaning AbuBakr [i.e. refrain from annoying or harming AbuBakr.] [Al-Bukhari 3661]

This story shows the virtue of being forgiving and pardoning the one who wrongs you when you are able to do so and based on benefit, for indeed being forgiving, and pardoning others will not increase you in anything except honour and a higher status in the sight of Allah.

This story also shows that the companions of the Prophet were not infallible. Mistakes did occur from them unintentionally, but they were a people whom Allah favoured with the companionship of the Prophet and they did not persist upon mistakes as it is seen in this story. Indeed, disagreement did occur between them, but they humbled themselves to the truth- neither repelled the truth with falsehood nor indulged in oppression; rather they hastened to Allah’s Messenger to resolve the (disagreements) that occurred between them. The Messenger resolved those issues and all of them were pleased with the judgement and submitted with full submission.

This story shows the virtue of supplicating for others, especially for the one who wronged you. So, you supplicate for him that [Allah] rectifies his affairs and forgives him, for indeed you have an angel who says, “Aameen and may Allah grant you the same”. Therefore, one should be eager for this!

This story shows that to fulfil the rights of the people in this worldly life is better than leaving the matter until the day of judgement when none will  pardon another person, even if such person is the closest relative to him.

This story shows the virtue of Rabee’ah Al-Aslami who advised his companions that neither should they be his supporters nor argue on his behalf against AbuBakr because he knew the status of AbuBakr in the sight of Allah and the Messenger.

What do we derive as benefit from this story:

We should pardon and maintain love for one another when disagreement occurs between us regarding a matter of the Dunyaa. A person should be eager to give people their rights and also seek the forgiveness of the one he disputed with.

An Excerpt from at-Taleeqaat Al-Malihah Alaa Silsilah Al-Ahadith as-Sahihah 1/42-44.

O you who believe! Be not like those who annoyed Musa

In The Name of Allah, The Most Merciful, The Bestower of Mercy.

Musa, peace be upon him, was a very shy man and used to cover his body completely. No part of his skin was seen due to shyness. So, he was hurt by those amongst the children of Israel who said:

“He covers his body in this way only because of some defect in his skin- either leprosy or scrotal hernia, or he has some other defect”.

Allah wished to free Musa, peace be upon him, from that which they said about him; so one day whilst he was in seclusion, he took off his clothes and put them on a stone and started taking a bath. When he finished the bath, he moved towards his clothes to take them, but the stone fled with his clothes. Musa picked up his stick and ran after the stone saying: ‘O stone! My clothes’ until he reached a group of the children of Israel who saw him without [clothes], and found him the best of that which Allah had created, and Allah freed him from what they had accused him of. They said: “By Allah! Nothing is wrong with Musa”. The stone stopped there, so Musa took his and put on them, and thereafter started hitting the stone with his stick. By Allah, the stone still has some traces of the hitting- three, four or five marks. This was what Allah referred to in His statement:

 يَـٰٓأَيُّہَا ٱلَّذِينَ ءَامَنُواْ لَا تَكُونُواْ كَٱلَّذِينَ ءَاذَوۡاْ مُوسَىٰ فَبَرَّأَهُ ٱللَّهُ مِمَّا قَالُواْۚ وَكَانَ عِندَ ٱللَّهِ وَجِيہً۬ا

O you who believe! Be not like those who annoyed Musa (Moses), but Allah cleared him of that which they alleged, and he was honourable in the sight of Allah.[Al-Ahzab. 69]

Al-Allamah Zaid Bin Hadi al-Mad’khali, may Allah have mercy upon him, said:

This hadith (reports) one of the most amazing stories – a story through which Allah raised the status of Musa, peace be upon him. In this hadith, there is a clarification regarding the fact that the Messengers and the Prophets were put to trial at the hands of the evil ones in  their nations, so they exercised patience whilst facing harm, received abundant reward from Allah, The Mighty and Majestic, and carried on propagating Allah’s message. Indeed, the Messenger, peace and blessings of Allah be upon him, informed us that Musa, peace be upon him, was harmed by Bani Israa’eel but he exercised patience. In this hadith, there is proof to show that the miracles of the Messengers and Prophets are affirmed. And with regards to this particular miracle, the stone- an inanimate object – moved and fled with the thobe; then Musa, peace be upon him, was finally able to catch up with it. He hit it several times and left a mark on it. This is the great miracle that has been mentioned in this hadith.

Source: An Excerpt from at-Taleeqaat al-Malihah Alaa Silsilah Al-Ahadith As-Sahihah 1/135

Reflections on some statements of Al-Allamah Rabee Bin Hadi Al-Mad’khali – [112]

In The Name of Allah, The Most Merciful, The Bestower of Mercy.

The Shaikh, may Allah have mercy upon him, said:

Wherever those who adhere to the Salafi methodology and its students are or wherever they go, it is incumbent upon them to step up and aid one another to raise the word of truth, Tawhid and Sunnah; subdue Bidah, misguidance and doubts; establish Allah’s proofs against all the various misguided people, make known the reality of the liars and fakers. They should know that the opponents of truth have reached the highest level of plotting and planning, and from that is their preoccupation with the task of silencing many amongst Ahlus Sunnah and those who adhere to truth- restraining them from confronting the falsehood that is covered in the garb of truth. This category of people amongst those who adhere to falsehood are more severe in employing lies, duplicity and pretending to possess that which they do not possess. Thus, they are as the Messenger, peace and blessings of Allah be upon him, stated:

“The one who pretends that he has been given what he has not been given, is just like the (false) one who wears two garments of falsehood”.

We find them as ones who praise the people of falsehood the most and making their affair appear pleasing, while they are the most severe in speaking ill against those who adhere to the truth and its callers. Indeed, they have set up corrupt principles to aid falsehood and those who adhere to misguided methodologies- waging war against those who adhere to truth by devising plots and repugnant things, manifesting their hatred and enmity against those who adhere to truth and hastening – without boredom and tiredness – to instruct the youth to oppose the people of truth, striving hard to aid falsehood and to topple those who adhere to truth.

Books Do Not And Have Never Replaced Shuyukh and Younger Teachers

In The Name of Allah, The Most Merciful, The Bestower of Mercy.

Books Do Not And Have Never Replaced Shuyukh and Younger Teachers; Never a Point of Confusion Among Salafiyyun Nor Has Ever Been For The Past 30 Years or More.

Imam Al-Barbahari, may Allah have mercy upon him, said:

“And know, may Allah have mercy upon you that knowledge is not in being able to narrate much and in having many books, rather the scholar is the one who follows the knowledge and the Sunnah, even if his knowledge and his books are limited, and whoever opposes the Book and the Sunnah, he is a proponent of Bidah, even if he narrates much and has many books”.

Al-Allamah Rabee Bin Haadi al-Madkhali, may Allah preserve him, stated:

He [Al-Barbahari] sees that the abundance of books and knowledge is not a criterion for the required knowledge of Shariah. Knowledge is what benefits; even if this scholar has little knowledge and few books, he will benefit from his knowledge and it is benefited from with regards to belief, methodology, and application. This is the knowledge that counts in the Sight of Allah- the knowledge He loves, loves, and praises its possessors. Allah said: 

إِنَّمَا يَخْشَى ٱللَّهَ مِنْ عِبَادِهِ ٱلْعُلَمَٰٓؤُا۟ إِنَّ ٱللَّهَ عَزِيزٌ غَفُورٌ 

It is only those who have knowledge among His slaves that fear Allah]. [35:28]

Hence they [the scholars] said, “Knowledge is to fear Allah”. If one with a lot of knowledge does not fear Allah, he is not a scholar and his knowledge has no value because it is a source of evil to him. The Qur’an is proof for or against you, so evil is the state of that scholar- I seek refuge in Allah – who is under the threat of punishment. The Quran is proof against you, the Sunnah is proof against you and knowledge is proof against you, and Allah’s refuge is sought. He may have many books, but he is misguided. He may have a lot of knowledge of the Arabic language, Tafseer, Hadith, and so on, but he is misguided. This is the knowledge that harms and does not benefit, and it is from this that we seek Allah’s protection, and Allah’s Messenger taught us to seek (Allah’s) protection against it. However, knowledge (in and of itself) is beneficial, so if there is a lot of knowledge and books, it is very good, and there are Imams who have abundant knowledge and many books. If the two are combined: a lot of knowledge and many books, it is desirable; and if devoid of benefitting from this knowledge (i.e. due to misguidance or not acting upon it), then neither an abundance of books or knowledge is beneficial, for it is a source of evil on the person. This is why (Allah stated that) some Prophets said: [وَمَآ أُرِيدُ أَنْ أُخَالِفَكُمْ إِلَىٰ مَآ أَنْهَىٰكُمْ عَنْهُ – I wish not, in contradiction to you, to do that which I forbid you]. [11:88]

Allah said:

أَتَأْمُرُونَ ٱلنَّاسَ بِٱلْبِرِّ وَتَنسَوْنَ أَنفُسَكُمْ وَأَنتُمْ تَتْلُونَ ٱلْكِتَٰبَ أَفَلَا تَعْقِلُونَ

Do you order righteousness of the people and forget yourselves while you recite the Scripture? Then will you not reason? [2:44]

Allah said:

يَـٰٓأَيُّہَا ٱلَّذِينَ ءَامَنُواْ لِمَ تَقُولُونَ مَا لَا تَفۡعَلُونَ

ڪَبُرَ مَقۡتًا عِندَ ٱللَّهِ أَن تَقُولُواْ مَا لَا تَفۡعَلُونَ

O you who believe! Why do you say that which you do not do? Most hateful it is with Allah that you say that which you do not do. [As-Saff.2-3]

Some people are merely speakers and they do not act, therefore, a Muslim must combine statements and deeds so that his actions confirm his statements. He calls to belief and believes, and calls to action and acts. This is beneficial knowledge, calling to the Sunnah and adhering to it, fighting Bidah and being serious about fighting it, and being one of the people who are most distant from it. [1]

Al-Allamah Salih Al-Fawzan,may Allah preserve him, said:

Learning from books without referring to the scholars! This is a path of deviation, and many have deviated because of it. He (i.e. the person) will either misunderstand what is in the books or understands in a way other than what is intended because it has not been explained and made clear to him. The author (of the book) may be deviated in his views or knowledge and fills it (i.e. the book) with mistakes in affairs of knowledge. Then this ignorant youth reads and adopts it. Therefore, the books are not to be solely depended upon. And even if the books are sound, you will not be able to understand by merely seeking after it (i.e. reading). The khawaarij were not misguided and misguiding others with their intellects and fear of Allaah, except that they disassociated themselves from the scholars and depended on their own understanding and that of those like them. They took instructions from one another, and thus they caused harm to themselves and to the Ummah. This is the result of disassociating from the scholars. [2]

Imaam Muhammad Bin Salih Al-Uthaymin, may Allah have mercy upon him, said that from that which is incumbent upon a student of knowledge to comply with is that he acquires knowledge directly from the Shaikhs, for indeed he will reach -by way of that- several benefits as follows:

The path to acquiring knowledge will be shortened for him instead of moving from one book to another whilst trying to find out the view that carries more weight (in a particular subject matter) and the reason behind it; also trying to find out the weak view in (that particular subject matter) and the reason behind it. Instead of going through all this, the teacher will give him what he seeks after through an easy path, present to him – two, three or more than three – different views of the people of knowledge together with a clarification of the view that carries more weight and the proof. Indeed, there is no doubt that this is beneficial (or advantageous) for the student.

He will be facilitated with the ability to grasp a subject matter quickly, because when the student of knowledge reads to a scholar, he will grasp the subject matter many times quicker than when he reads books (on his own). This is because when he reads books, he may come across difficult and obscure statements (or expressions), so he needs contemplation and repetition, which requires time and effort, and he may understand those statements wrongly and then act upon them.

Close connection (or attachment) between the students of knowledge and the erudite scholars- junior people of knowledge attached to senior people of knowledge.

These are from the benefits of acquiring knowledge directly from the Shaikhs; but as mentioned earlier, it is obligated on a person to choose a scholar who is reliable, trustworthy and strong – one who has real knowledge and understanding and not superficial knowledge; truthful and firm in fulfilling what is entrusted to him and known for fulfilling acts of worship, for indeed a student follows the footsteps of his teacher. [3]

Al-Allamah Ubaid Bin Abdillah Al-Jabiri, may Allah preserve him, was asked: Is it permissible for the one who seeks knowledge from some Shaikh – by way of books and audios – to say to him [i.e. the Shaikh], “Our Shaikh” and thus he becomes a Shaikh of his?

Answer: There’s no harm in considering someone as one’s Shaikh, but I bring your attention to the fact that there are two ways of acquiring knowledge. The first path is seeking knowledge in person and sitting to acquire knowledge from the scholar directly- sitting in his presence, learn good manners from him and good Tarbiyah. This is the ideal way and the loftiest. This is the way of the Sahaabah in acquiring knowledge from their Prophet [peace and blessings of Allaah be upon him]- those who were with him in Madeenah and those who traveled to him. They acquired knowledge directly from the Prophet and taught their people. Likewise, this is how the Taabi’oon acquired knowledge from the Sahaabah- took knowledge (directly) from the Sahaabah, especially the seniors. Likewise, those who followed the Taabi’een did the same up to this era of ours. This is the correct and loftiest path of acquiring knowledge from a Shaikh.

The second path is to acquire knowledge from books and audios. There is no harm in this and it benefits, but it does not contain that which is found in the first method; rather it is for a woman and the one who is unable because of the difficulty in reaching the Shaikh due to distance, for one may not be able to sit in the presence of a scholar even in his own country. Not all women are able-some of them are sometimes able and unable at other times, and some are not able. So, these people benefit [i.e. from the books & tapes], but also they are not advised to enter into challenging (or very difficult) issues related to differences of opinion between the scholars; rather they entrust those affairs to the people of knowledge. And whoever is a teacher – one who gives instructions in knowledge (i.e. nurtures others) or an Imaam of a Masjid in his city district or town, we advise him to be at the service of the people and that he takes those questions of theirs which he is able to answer and respond to them in his city district. And those questions that carry a difference of opinion and require investigation, he offers his services to the people by sending those questions to the people of knowledge and taking answers from them. This is a good service with regards to the Muslim helping another Muslim. [paraphrased] Listen to audio here: https://safeshare.tv/x/aIVf6vxUqh8#

Imam Muhammad Ibn Salih al-Uthaymin, may Allah have mercy upon him, was asked: “How does a student of knowledge combine between the lessons of Sharia colleges with the lessons of scholars in mosques?”

Answer: I cannot answer this, because everyone knows himself, but I can say that if the regular university lessons clash with the lessons of the scholars, I think a person should be keen on the university lessons if he is to succeed because the period of study at the university is short. And as you now know that positions of leadership in Dawah, education, administration and headship are based on certificates. If a person does not have a certificate, no weight will be given to him regardless of the level of his knowledge. If a student of knowledge seeks knowledge at the university in order to obtain a certificate with which he can reach leadership positions, then this is a good intention and there is nothing in it that would be tantamount to seeking knowledge for other than the sake of Allah in his intention. This is why if two people are presented: one of them has a university degree and the second does not have a certificate, and the second is more knowledgeable than the first, the one who has a certificate is given priority in leadership positions. Therefore, I see that if the lessons in the Sharia colleges clash with the lessons in the Mosques, the student gives precedence to university studies; but if there is no clash, then studying in mosques is compatible with studying at university. The affair is clear that it is possible to combine this and this, given that studying in mosques has now become easy, because most of those who study in mosques have a recorder that records their lectures, the students’ questions and answers. Therefore, if a person takes some of these audio tapes and listens to them in his spare time, it is as if he has not missed anything. [4]

Imam Abdul Aziz Bin Baz, may Allah have mercy upon him, was asked: The questioner mentions that he is a fifteen-year-old young man and wants to seek Islamic knowledge, so what is your advice? What are the things that he must do and fulfil? He says: Bearing in mind that our city has few callers to Islam and students of knowledge.

Response: We advise him to seek knowledge in the schools -intermediate and secondary- opened by the government, or the institutes of knowledge. He strives to reach them (or enroll). And if they have gatherings of knowledge by the judges or others, he attends the gatherings of knowledge if it is available at night or during the day- combining this and this. He enrolls in regular schools and makes an effort. He reads to the scholars in his township if they have gatherings of knowledge at night or during the day- attend the gatherings, benefit and strive hard to memorize the Noble Qur’an and memorize beneficial books, such as Kitab at-Tawhid, Kishf Ash-Shubuhat, Thalaathah Al-Usul and Qawaa’id Al-Arba’ah by Shaikh Al-Islam Muhammad Bin Abdil Wahhab, may Allah have mercy upon him, and also Al-Aqeedah Al-Waasitiyyah by Shaikh Al-Islaam Ibn Taymiyyah, may Allah have mercy upon him.  These are good books that are important to memorise. And books like An-Nawawi’s forty hadeeth and its completion by Ibn Rajab’s Khamseen Hadeeth Min Jawaami Al-Kalim. He memorises these great and beneficial hadiths. In any case, the advice for this young man is that he strive to seek knowledge in regular schools, and from the Shaikhs if he has someone from the Shaikhs to read to in the gatherings of knowledge. [5]

The Aim Should Be Rectification of The Soul 

Ibn Qutaybah, may Allah have mercy upon him, said:

In the past, a student of knowledge used to listen in order to know, (endeavoured) to know in order to act and sought understanding of the religion ordained by Allah in order to benefit (himself) and others. (However), it has now become the case that a student of knowledge listens to accumulate, accumulates to be mentioned and memorises to outdo (others) and boast. [6]

Imam Ibn Al-Qayyim, may Allah have mercy upon him, said:

At-Takaathur means to compete one another in piling up something by way of mutual rivalry, but Allah did not mention the thing that is piled up, therefore the meaning is general. Everything a person competes in – other than obedience to Allah, obedience to the Messenger and that which benefits a person’s Afterlife – by way of mutual rivalry is included in this affair. It enters into every matter, such as wealth, status, leadership, women and speaking; or knowledge, especially when it is not utilised as proof; also collecting books, writing books, engaging in the discussion of numerous topics of the religion, categorising and initiating it. At-Takaathur occurs when a person seeks to amass more than others and this is blameworthy, except in that which earns a person Allah’s love, pleasure and reward, because seeking more than others in this affair is competition in good and to excel one another. [7] [end of quotes]

All praise and thanks be to Allah, what is mentioned above has never been a matter of confusion or ambiguity for the past 30 years. This is because we have never met any Salafi who holds that simply having books is enough, as everyone understands the importance of sitting with scholars in person or learning from their trusted students- in the East or the West. None of us were confused and still not in doubt – about the basis or secondary sources of knowledge. If someone is known to cling to books in isolation, neglecting the gatherings of knowledge or relying solely on their own understanding, then that presents a different situation. Right now, those among us who have never travelled to study, such as myself, are still living in the West and doing what we have always done for the past 30 years by the Tawfiq of Allah – reading and attending the study circles of the well known students of the scholars. Learning continues by the grace of Allāh and to this day many Salafis continue to travel to the land of the Muslims to seek knowledge from the Mashayikh. In addition, even though many of the senior Scholars have passed away, their senior students remain in both the East and the West.


[1] Awn al-Baaree Bi-Bayaan Maa Tadammanahu Sharh As-Sunnah Lil-Imaam Al-Barbahaaree 2/688-689

[2] Tawjeehaat Mihimmah Li-Shabab Al-Ummah. Page 7

[3] Sharh Hilyati Taalibil Ilm. pages 105-106. slightly paraphrased.

[4] Majmu Fatawaa 26/161-162

[5] https://binbaz.org.sa/fatwas/16293/%D8%A8%D9%8A%D8%A7%D9%86-%D9%83%D9%8A%D9%81%D9%8A%D8%A9-%D8%B7%D9%84%D8%A8-%D8%A7%D9%84%D8%B9%D9%84%D9%85

[6] Al-Ikhtilaf Fee Al-Lafdh 18. [Quote was shared by one of my colleagues at school – Abu Zakariyyah (Abdul Malik Al-Congoli, Al-Ifreeqee) – may Allah preserve him]

[7] An Excerpt from Al-Fawaa’id. Pages 58-59

 

Be considerate of others’ feelings: eat or politely refrain, but don’t criticise, frown, or belittle

In The Name of Allah, The Most Merciful, The Bestower of Mercy.

Abu Hurairah, may Allah be pleased with him, said: The Prophet, peace and blessings of Allaah be upon him, never criticised any food, but he would eat it if he liked it; otherwise he would leave it”. [al-Bukhaari 3563]

Meaning, he never criticised food that was permissible to eat, but as for forbidden food, he used to criticise, dispraise and forbid one from eating it.

Imaam An-Nawawi [may Allaah have mercy upon him] said, “One of the etiquettes of dealing with food is that one does not criticize it, such as saying, ‘Salty, sour, insufficient salt, coarse, need more such and such, not well cooked and what is similar to (these descriptions). [1]

Imaam Abdul Azeez Bin Baaz, may Allah have mercy upon him, said:

“This is from his [i.e. the Messenger’s] noble manners. He would neither say that it is salty nor the opposite of it.

Question: What if one says the food is such and such in order to warn (or notify the people)?

Answer: There is no harm in doing so, for warning (or notifying) is something else because it is done to educate (people about food etc). [2]

Ibn Umar, may Allah be pleased with and his father, reported that there were some people with Allah’s Prophet, peace and blessings of Allah be upon him, from among his Companions, Sa’d, may Allah be pleased with him, being one of them. There was brought to them the flesh of the lizard when a lady amongst the wives of Allah’s Prophet said: “It is the flesh of the lizard”. Thus, Allah’s Messenger said, “Eat, for it is lawful, but it is not my diet”. [3]

Abdullah Bin Abbas, may Allah be pleased with him and his father, reported:

I and Khalid Bin Al-Walid went to the apartment of Maimunah, may Allah be pleased with her, along with Allah’s Messenger, peace and blessings of Allah be upon him, and there was presented to him a roasted lizard. Allah’s Messenger stretched his hand towards it, then some of the women who had been in the house of Maimunah said, “Inform Allah’s Messenger what he intends to eat”. Allah’s Messenger lifted his hand. I said, “Messenger of Allah! Is it forbidden?” He said, “No. It is not found in the land of my people, and I feel that I have no liking for it”. Khalid said, “I then chewed and ate it, while, Allaah’s Messenger was looking (at me)”. [4]


[1] An Excerpt from Fath Al-Bari. Chapter 21: ‘The Prophet Never Criticised Food’. 9/678. Publisher: Dar As-Salam, 1st Edition 1421AH (Year 2000)

[2] Al-Hulal Al-Ibreeziyyah Min at-Taleeqaat Al-Baaziyyah Alaa Saheih Al-Bukhari 3/120’ footnote 2.

[3&4] http://www.sahihmuslim.com/sps/smm/sahihmuslim.cfm?scn=dspchaptersfull&ChapterID=823&BookID=21]

The Detriment of Lingering Bad Habits

In The Name of Allah, The Most Merciful. The Bestower of Mercy.

Allah, The Most High, said:

فَمَا آمَنَ لِمُوسَىٰ إِلَّا ذُرِّيَّةٌ مِّن قَوْمِهِ عَلَىٰ خَوْفٍ مِّن فِرْعَوْنَ وَمَلَئِهِمْ أَن يَفْتِنَهُمْ ۚ وَإِنَّ فِرْعَوْنَ لَعَالٍ فِي الْأَرْضِ وَإِنَّهُ لَمِنَ الْمُسْرِفِينَ

But none believed in Musa (Moses) except the offspring of his people, because of the fear of Fir’aun (Pharaoh) and his chiefs, lest they should persecute them; and verily, Fir’aun (Pharaoh) was arrogant tyrant on the earth, he was indeed one of the Musrifun (polytheists, sinners and transgressors, those who give up the truth and follow the evil, and commit all kinds of great sins). [Yunus 83]

“But none believed in Musa except the offspring of his people”.

Meaning: Youth from the Children of Israel, (who) exercised patience ( in a state of) fear due to the firm Iman in their hearts.

“Because of the fear of Firaun and his chiefs lest they should persecute them” by (turning them) away from their religion (i.e. from Musa’s message of Tawhid).

“And verily, Firaun was an arrogant tyrant on the earth”.

He had  Qahr and Ghalabah in the land – (complete dominion over others in a manner that presented no chance for the oppressed to resist and prevailing with injustice) – thus their fear of his vengeance was justified, especially that “he was indeed one of the musrifeen”– Meaning, those who encroach the limits imposed by Allah through rebellion and transgression.

Old Habits Die Hard

And the wisdom – Allah knows best – behind the fact that only a small group of youth from his people believed in Musa is because the young people are more receptive to the truth and quicker to submit to it. This is unlike the elders and others who were raised upon disbelief. Because of the deeply rooted corrupt beliefs in their hearts, they are often further from the truth than others. 

An Excerpt from Tafseer As-Sadi

 

What Was Said About These Three Matters Should Give Us Pause

In The Name of Allah, The Most Merciful, The Bestower of Mercy.

It used to be said that whoever perpetrates these three acts  will be haunted by them:

 

Rebellion Against Allah’s Commandments 

Allah, The Most High, said:

يَا أَيُّهَا النَّاسُ إِنَّمَا بَغْيُكُمْ عَلَىٰ أَنْفُسِكُمْ

O mankind! Your rebellion (disobedience to Allah) is only against your ownselves. [Yunus: 23]

 

Evil Plotting

Allah, The Most High, said:

وَلَا يَحِيقُ الْمَكْرُ السَّيِّئُ إِلَّا بِأَهْلِهِ

But the evil plot encompasses only him who makes it. [Fatir 43]

 

Breaking Pledges

Allah, The Most High, said:

فَمَنْ نَكَثَ فَإِنَّمَا يَنْكُثُ عَلَىٰ نَفْسِهِ

Then whosoever breaks his pledge only breaks it to his own harm. [Al-Fath 10] [1]

 

The Man Who Came to Imam Ibraaheem Bin Ad’ham, rahimahullah to Seek Advice 

Imam Abdul Ghani Al-Maqdisi, may Allah have mercy upon him, stated:

A man once came to Ibraaheem Bin Ad’ham and said: “O Abu Ishaaq! Indeed, I have transgressed against my Nafs [through evil deeds], so present to me that which will be a deterrent for my nafs and will save [or rescue] my heart”. So, Ibraaheem said to him: “If you accept five things and fulfil them, neither will you be harmed nor will the enjoyment bring you destruction. The man said, “Mention them to me O Abu Ishaaq”.

Ibraaheem said:

“The first is that when you want to disobey Allaah – The Mighty and Majestic- do not eat His provision”. The man said, “Where would I eat from when it is case that all that is in the earth is from His provision?” He said, “O you! Is it right that you eat His provision and disobey him?” The man said, “No; mention the second to me”.

Ibraaheem said, “If you want to disobey Allah, do not live anywhere in Allaah’s earth”. The man said, “This is greater than the first affair! When it is the case that the east, the west and whatever is between them belongs to Him, then where would I live?” Ibraaheem said to him, “O you! Is it right that you eat His provision and live on his earth, yet you disobey him?” The man said, “No; mention the third”.

Ibraaheem said:

“If you want to disobey Him whilst you are being provided from His provision and living on his earth, then do so in a place where He cannot see you”. The man said, “How can that be when it is the case that He knows everything that is hidden”. Ibraaheem said, “O you! Is it right that you eat his provision, live on his earth and you disobey him whilst he sees you and what you do?” The man said, “No; mention the fourth”.

Ibraaheem said:

“When the angel of death comes to take your soul, tell him, ‘Delay its departure until I perform sincere repentance and perform righteous deeds for the sake of Allaah’”. The man said, “He (the angel) will not accept that from me”. Ibraaheem said, “O you! When it is the case that you cannot repel death until you repent and you know that there is no delay when it comes to you, then how do you hope to escape?” The man said, “Mention the fifth affair”.

Ibraaheem said:

“When the Zabaniyah [i.e. guardians of hell] come to you on yawmul qiyaamah to take you to the fire, do not go with them”. The man said, “Neither will they leave me nor accept that from me”. Ibraaheem said to him, “So, how do you hope for safety then?”

The man said:

“O Ibraaheem! This is enough! This is enough! I seek Allah’s forgiveness and repent to Him.” [2]


[1]Kitab Uyun Al-Akhbar /149 by Al-Allamah Ibn bn Qutaybah, rahimahullah

[2] at-Tawwaabeen 285

Reevaluating the Concept of “Abrahamic Faiths” in Modern Discourse

In The Name of Allah,The Most Merciful, The Bestower of Mercy.

It’s time for Abrahamic faiths to Reclaim Religion from Fascism and Unite in Peace – [Brief Discussion With Mr Wael Aleji and Mr David Alton at Alarabiya News

1_Mr-Wael-Aleji-and-Mr-David-Alton-at-Alarabiya-News

[1] Sects and Splinter Groups

In The Name of Allah, The Most Merciful, The Bestower of Mercy.

The Shia

The Jarudiyyah among the Zaydiyyah

Firstly: They are the followers of a person known as Abu al-Jārūd. They claimed that the Prophet, peace and blessings of Allah be upon him, appointed Alī as leader by description and not by name. They also claimed that the Companions disbelieved by abandoning the pledge of allegiance to Alī. Furthermore, they said that al-Ḥasan ibn Alī was the leader after Alī, and then his brother al-Ḥusayn became the leader after al-Ḥasan.

The Jarudiyyah divided into two sects with regards to this order of succession to leadership. One group said: Ali – by statement – appointed his son Al-Hasan as leader, then Al-Hasan appointed his brother Husayn as leader after him, and then the Imamate after Al-Hasan and Al-Husayn became a matter of consultation (shura) among the children of Al-Hasan and Al-Husayn. Whoever among them emerge, unsheathing his sword in support of his religion- a scholar and knowledgeable – he is the leader.

The second group among them claimed that it was the Prophet, peace and blessings of Allah be upon him, who clearly appointed Al-Hasan as leader after Ali, and Al- Husayn as leader after Al-Hasan. Thereafter, they split into sects regarding the awaited Imam. Some of them did not specify a person to be awaited, and said: “Whoever unsheathes his sword and calls to his religion among the children of al-Hasan and al-Husayn, he is the lmam.

Among them are those who await Muhammad ibn Abdillah ibn al-Hasan ibn al-Hasan ibn Ali ibn Abi Talib, and they neither believe that he was killed nor died, claiming that he is the awaited Mahdi who will emerge and rule the earth. The statement of these people about him is similar to what the Muhammadiyyah among the Imamiyyah say regarding their awaiting of Muhammad ibn Abdillah ibn al-Hasan ibn al-Hasan ibn Ali.

And among them are those who await Muhammad ibn al-Qasim, the governor of Talqan, and do not believe that he died.

And among them are those who await Muhammad ibn Umar, who departed from Kufa, and they neither believe that he was killed nor did he die.

This is the view of the Jarudiyyah, and making Takfir of them is an obligation because they make Takfir of the companions of Allāh’s Messenger, peace and blessings of Allah be upon him.

To be continued InShaaAllah.

Source: An Excerpt from Al-Farq Bayna Al-Firaq 49-50. Publisher: Maktabah Imam Al-Wadi’ee 1st Edition 1434H (2012)

 

 

 

Attributing Disorder and Turmoil to Salafiyyah: Ephrem Kossaify’s Claim Uprooted

In The Name of Allah, The Most Merciful, The Bestower of Mercy.

Abu Hurairah, may Allah be pleased with him, reported that the Prophet, peace and blessings of Allah be upon him, said, “Verily, a slave (of Allah) may utter a word which pleases Allah without giving it much importance, and because of that Allah will raise him to degrees (of reward): a slave (of Allah) may utter a word (carelessly) which displeases Allah without thinking of its gravity and because of that he will be thrown into the Hell-Fire.” [Al-Bukhari 6478]

This hadith serves as a powerful reminder of the dangers associated with our speech and the repercussions of speaking without knowledge or reverence for Allah. Ephrem Kossaify displayed a troubling and hazardous lack of understanding regarding Salafiyyah while discussing issues of white supremacy, racism, and the murder of George Floyd in the following manner:

“It could be that those Arabs who say white nationalism is America’s greatest peril are in fact exposing their own anxieties about ethnicity, sectarianism and violent extremism. “Islamic extremism, be it in its Salafist or Muslim Brotherhood versions, uses force to change the world view, starting in their own country, and expanding to include infidels of other nations. Look what just happened in France,” El-Hady said, referring to Samuel Paty, a teacher who was beheaded near his school on Oct. 6 for showing cartoons of Prophet Muhammad in class. The perpetrator, an 18-year-old ethnic Chechen named Abdullakh Anzorov, is alleged to have had ties to Islamic extremist groups abroad. “These terrorist organizations that have plagued the Arab world are much more dangerous than white nationalism,” said El-Hady]. [source: Arab News. October 26, 2020, EPHREM KOSSAIFY. Updated 27 October 2020]

We begin by reminding this audacious slanderer of Salafiyyah about the seriousness of making uninformed judgments on religious issues. Shaikh Al-Islam Ibn Taymiyyah, may Allah have mercy upon him, said:

Since the true followers of the Prophets and the adherents of the Prophetic Sunnah are those who possess knowledge and justice, their discourse towards unbelievers and proponents of religious innovations must be based on knowledge and justice rather than conjecture and what the soul desires. And because of this, the Prophet [peace be upon him and blessings of Allah be upon him] said: “The judges are three: one will go to Paradise and two to Hell. A man who knows the truth and judges with it will enter paradise; a man who knows the truth but judges with the opposite of it will enter the fire, and a man who judges for the people based on ignorance will enter the fire”. [Abu Dawud 3573]

And if it is the case that the person who judges between people over matters of wealth, blood (such as murder cases, physical assault, etc.), and honour will burn in hell if he is not a just scholar, then what about the person who renders judgements on creeds, religions, the fundamentals of belief, divine knowledge, and the broad fundamental principles relating to many subject subjects without knowledge or fairness, as is the case with those who advocate for religious innovations and desires – those who adhere to ambiguous, dubious topics, disregard the unambiguous texts that the Prophets [peace and blessings of Allah be upon them] transmitted, cling to issues that are vaguely related through analogy and opinion, and then present issues whose differences cannot be equated or reconciled. [Al-Jawab As-Sahih 1/26-30]

Furthermore, it is unnecessary to engage in discussions surrounding white supremacy, racism, and terrorism, as any reasonable individual recognizes the profound immorality inherent in these ideologies. Ephrem’s perilous ignorance and misguided assertions led him to draw unfounded parallels between Salafiyyah and the methods employed by terrorists. However, this slander is far from novel; it represents a familiar strategy employed by many secularists, Zionists, demagogues, journalists, rabble-rousers and their cohorts, aimed at undermining the legitimacy of Salafiyyah. Thus, it is imperative that we illuminate the misconceptions held by this charlatan and others who seek to obscure the true essence of Salafiyyah. Saudi Salafi Scholar, Al-Allamah Rabee Bin Hadi Al-Mad’khali, may Allah preserve him, stated:

The creed and methodologies of the kharijites somewhat influenced the political groups that emerged during this era. And as a result, they do not place any value on matters other than politics, do not care about improving the Ummah’s situation through (sound) creed and knowledge, and do not consider matters pertaining to the Ummah’s return to the Book, the Sunnah, and the piety and steadfastness that the pious predecessors were upon in all aspects of the Religion. Rather, they make the Ummah more corrupt in creed and conduct. Thus, you see them waging war against the scholars (i.e. the upright scholars) and the people who (truly) follow the Qur’an and the Sunnah while pledging loyalty to those who promote misguidance and innovation in religion. They set up false goals and catchphrases for proponents of misguidance and innovations in religion, and among them are Sayyid Qutb and his followers, who adopted the creed, methodology, and political views of the Khawarij, the Rawafid, the Mu’tazilah, and the Jahmiyyah, particularly when it comes to the topic of Takfir based on oppression and ignorance. He said that all human societies are ignorant pre-Islamic societies, with the Muslim Ummah being the worse in their apostasy and state of pre-Islamic ignorance. Later, the Baatiniyyah path was added to this (methodology of his, such as) assassinations, and blowing up (buildings, people, etc.). Then, on the basis of a daring conspiracy against the leaders (of the Salafi Methodology), his adherents claim to represent the Salafi Methodology. As a result, if you are aware of this, you will be able to identify the treacherous ones and know that the Salafi Methodology is free from this kind of Takfir and devastation. If you are aware of this, it would be equivalent to an act of evident oppression when the Raafidah, the secularists, and the rationalists attribute (false) Takfir, and destruction to the Salafi methodology.  (1)

Saudi Salafi Scholar, the Mufti. Al-Allamah Salih Al-Fawzan, may Allah preserve him, stated:

Salafiyyah is to follow the path of Salafus Saalih (The pious predecessors) – the companions of Muhammad, the followers of Muhammad’s companions and the virtuous generations. Allah [The Most High] said:

وَٱلسَّـٰبِقُونَ ٱلۡأَوَّلُونَ مِنَ ٱلۡمُهَـٰجِرِينَ وَٱلۡأَنصَارِ وَٱلَّذِينَ ٱتَّبَعُوهُم بِـإِحۡسَـٰنٍ۬ رَّضِىَ ٱللَّهُ عَنۡہُمۡ وَرَضُواْ عَنۡهُ

And the first to embrace Islaam of the Muhaajiroon (those who migrated from Makkah to Al-Madinah) and the Ansaar (the citizens of Al-Madinah who helped and gave aid to the Muhaajiroon) and also those who followed them exactly (in Faith). Allaah is well-pleased with them as they are well-pleased with Him]. [9:100]

Allah [The Most High] said about Muhammad’s companions:

إِنَّ ٱلَّذِينَ ءَامَنُواْ وَهَاجَرُواْ وَجَـٰهَدُواْ بِأَمۡوَٲلِهِمۡ وَأَنفُسِہِمۡ فِى سَبِيلِ ٱللَّهِ وَٱلَّذِينَ ءَاوَواْ وَّنَصَرُوٓاْ أُوْلَـٰٓٮِٕكَ بَعۡضُہُمۡ أَوۡلِيَآءُ بَعۡضٍ۬‌ۚ

Verily, those who believed, and emigrated and strove hard and fought with their property and their lives in the Cause of Allah as well as those who gave (them) asylum and help, – these are (all) allies to one another [8:72] until Allah stated:

وَٱلَّذِينَ ءَامَنُواْ مِنۢ بَعۡدُ وَهَاجَرُواْ وَجَـٰهَدُواْ مَعَكُمۡ فَأُوْلَـٰٓٮِٕكَ مِنكُمۡ‌ۚ

And those who believed afterwards, and emigrated and strove hard along with you, (in the Cause of Allaah) they are of you]. [8:75]

Allah said in Surah Al-Hashar:

لِلۡفُقَرَآءِ ٱلۡمُهَـٰجِرِينَ ٱلَّذِينَ أُخۡرِجُواْ مِن دِيَـٰرِهِمۡ وَأَمۡوَٲلِهِمۡ يَبۡتَغُونَ فَضۡلاً۬ مِّنَ ٱللَّهِ وَرِضۡوَٲنً۬ا وَيَنصُرُونَ ٱللَّهَ وَرَسُولَهُ ۥۤ‌ۚ أُوْلَـٰٓٮِٕكَ هُمُ ٱلصَّـٰدِقُونَ
وَٱلَّذِينَ تَبَوَّءُو ٱلدَّارَ وَٱلۡإِيمَـٰنَ مِن قَبۡلِهِمۡ يُحِبُّونَ مَنۡ هَاجَرَ إِلَيۡہِمۡ

(And there is also a share in this booty) for the poor emigrants, who were expelled from their homes and their property, seeking Bounties from Allaah and to please Him. And helping Allaah (i.e. helping His religion) and His Messenger (Muhammad). Such are indeed the truthful (to what they say); And those who, before them, had homes (in Al-Madinah) and had adopted the Faith, love those who emigrate to them.” [59:8-9]- up until His [The Most High] statement:

وَٱلَّذِينَ جَآءُو مِنۢ بَعۡدِهِمۡ يَقُولُونَ رَبَّنَا ٱغۡفِرۡ لَنَا وَلِإِخۡوَٲنِنَا ٱلَّذِينَ سَبَقُونَا بِٱلۡإِيمَـٰنِ

And those who came after them say: “Our Lord! Forgive us and our brethren who have preceded us in Faith]. 59:10

The Prophet, peace and blessings of Allah be upon him said:

“This ummah will split into seventy-three sects; all of them will enter the fire except one. They said, ‘Which is that (saved sects) O Messenger of Allaah?’ He replied, ‘Those who are upon that which I and my companions are upon today’. The Prophet said, ‘Adhere to my Sunnah and the Sunnah of the rightly guided Khulafaa after me’. (see footnote a)

We are required to adhere to the Salafiyyah Methodology, and we must give up any other approaches that go against it. Salafiyyah is the Methodology that has been obligated on us to follow and we are to abandon all other methodologies that are in opposition to it. The adherents to Salafiyyah are the saved sect, Ahlus Sunnah Wal-Jamaa’ah, and they are the aided group till the Day of Judgement. May Allaah include us among them.  However, in order for a Muslim to adhere to this methodology, they must be aware of its basics. And to avoid the various methodologies that are in conflict with Salafiyyah, (one) must be aware of them.

As a result, Salafiyyah on the path of the pious predecessors must be (adopted) on the basis of knowledge and discernment. It is insufficient for a person to identify as Salafi while being either unaware of or opposed to it. Allaah [The Most High] said:

 وَٱلَّذِينَ ٱتَّبَعُوهُم بِـإِحۡسَـٰنٍ۬

And also those who followed them exactly (in Faith).

They follow them (i.e. the pious predecessors) based on knowledge, never engaging in either extreme or negligent behaviour. They don’t overstate the case or fail to give it its due, unlike those who identify with the four imams’ schools of law (Abu Haneefah, Maalik, Shaafi’ee, and Ahmad), although disagreeing with them on matters of creed and worship. And like the one who ascribes to the path of the pious predecessors, however, he either declares Muslims to be unbelievers or rebels against Muslim rulers, or he takes further steps in the direction of extremism.  This person is not a Salafi; instead, he is referred to as a Khaariji or a Mutazili. Or like the person who claims to follow the methodology of the pious predecessors but agrees with the Mur’ji’a’s stance on the subject matter of Eemaan and Kufr. This isn’t Salafiyyah. Therefore, it is imperative to pay attention to this matter and avoid combining the Salafi methodology with other methodologies that are opposed to it and then declaring that all of these methodologies, including the Salafi methodology, are not from Islam. This is careless speech and oppressive judgement, and it amounts to deceiving the people. (2)

The clarification provided by Al-Allamah Rabee Bin Hadi Al-Mad’khali, may Allah have mercy upon him, and Al-Allamah Salih Al-Fawzan, may Allah preserve him, are undeniably ample to dispel the nefarious allegations put forth by the deceitful and audacious Ephrem Kossaify. May Allah guide him or protect us from his slanders Amin.

———————————————–

Footnote a: https://salafidawahmanchester.com/2022/06/09/the-jews-divided-into-seventy-one-sects-the-christians-divided-into-seventy-two-sects/

Regarding the Muslim Brotherhood, their situation is well known. Click here to read. By Shaikh Abu Iyad (may Allah preserve him): [The other hidden face of the so-called “Muslim Brotherhood”: http://www.ikhwanis.com/authors/Abu.Iyaad.cfm ]

Visit links for more details on this subject matter

http://www.salafis.com/index.cfm

A response to Western academics who categorise Salafis into Quietists, Politicos and Jihadists – and why this is a false categorisation.


[1] An Excerpt from Shaikh Rabee’s Book Titled: (من هم الإرهابيون) pages 104-105

[2] An Excerpt from Al-Bayan Li-Akh’taa’I Ba’dil Kuttaab. 2/173-174