Skip to main content

Author: Salafi Dawah Manchester

https://yootheme.com/support/question/137985

Poem: The Righteous Husband

Written by Salafi Dawah Manchester on . Posted in Family & Women, Morals and Manners - 'Akhlaaq'.

Poem: The Righteous Husband

He is a protector and like a lion when the need should arise,
Abusiveness and oppression is not that upon which his manhood relies.
His words are kind, gentle, and soft upon her ear,
Yet clearly spoken and loud enough for her heart to hear.
He comes home to his wife with contentment and anticipation,
Being very attentive to her needs, endowing upon her total elation.
He fears his Lord, The Most Merciful and Sublime,
By being mindful and aware of how he provides her the time,
To have peace and relaxation of her soul, her body, and her mind.
He is the friend and companion the one whom she will always admire,
Protecting not only himself but also her from the fire.
He is the one who’s hard to find all throughout the land,
The favor and blessing from her Lord, The Righteous Husband.

[source: http://www.salafitalk.net/st/viewmessages.cfm?Forum=6&Topic=4699]

The Month of Al-Muharram and Fasting on the day of Ashoorah

Written by Salafi Dawah Manchester on . Posted in Aqeedah (Creed & Belief), Da'wah - Calling To Islam, Deviated Groups, Sects and Parties, Innovations In Islam (Bidah), Islamic Jurisprudence - 'Fiqh', Methodology - 'Manhaj', Muharram and Ashoorah, Scholars of Islam, Shi'a, Worship - 'Ibaadah'.

In The Name of Allaah, The Most Merciful, The Bestower of Mercy

O people! Fear Allaah (The Most High) and thank Him for the apparent and unapparent blessings He has bestowed upon you.  He has not ceased granting you occasions of good and virtue.  The month of hajj has elapsed and now you have reached the month of Al-Muharram, which Allaah has specially chosen.

Firstly: Muharram is amongst those months in which Allaah made fighting forbidden.  Allaah (The Most High) said:

(إِنَّ عِدَّةَ الشُّهُورِ عِنْدَ اللَّهِ اثْنَا عَشَرَ شَهْراً فِي كِتَابِ اللَّهِ يَوْمَ خَلَقَ السَّمَوَاتِ وَالأَرْضَ مِنْهَا أَرْبَعَةٌ حُرُمٌ)

‘’ Verily, the number of months with Allah is twelve months (in a year), so was it ordained by Allah on the Day when He created the heavens and the earth; of them four are Sacred.’’ [9:36]

These four months are: Dhul Qida, Dhul Hijja, the Month of Muharram and Rajab—Allaah made fighting forbidden during these months in order that those who performed the Hajj and Umrah are safe in their journey to Hajj and Umrah.  However, when Islaam came—all praise is due to Allaah—safety became widespread and the disbelievers were driven away and Jihaad in the path of Allaah (The Might and Majestic) was established whenever that was possible.

Indeed this month of Muharram has virtue; the Messenger (sallal-laahu-alayhi-wasallam) said: ‘’The best fasting after the month of Ramadhaan is the fasting in the month of Muharram.’’  So it is desired to increase in fasting during this month.  It is the month that the companions—during Umar’s time (radiyallaahu-anhu)—chose to be the beginning of the Hijri calendar.

Virtues of the Month of Muharram

Amongst its greatest virtues is that the Day of Ashoorah is found within it.  It is a Day in which the Prophet (sallal-laahua-alayhi-wasallam) selected for the performance of fasting.  Likewise, Moosaa (alayhis-sallam) fasted on this day in order to thank Allaah for drowning pharaoh and his people.  And after the death of Moosa (alayhis-salaam), the Jews also used to fast on this day of Ashoorah.

When the Messenger (sallal-laahu-alayhi-wasallam) arrived in Madeenah, he found the Jews fasting on this day of Ashoorah, so he said to them: ‘’What is this fasting of yours?’’  They said: ‘’It was the day Allaah gave victory to Moosa and his people and humiliated pharaoh and his people.  Indeed, Moosaa fasted on this Day, so we also fast. So the Messenger (sallal-laahu-alayhi-wasallam) said: We have more right to (follow) Moosaa than you.’’

The Messenger (sallal-laahu-alayhi-wasallam) continuously fasted this day and commanded the companions to fast as well.  However, the Messenger (sallal-laahu-alayhi-wasallam) want us to oppose the Jews, so he commanded us to fast a day before Ashoorah (i.e. the 9th of Muharram) before fasting on the 10th (i.e. Day of Ashoorah); and it is stated in another narration: ‘’A day after it (i.e. a day after Ashoorah); but fasting on the 9th day of Muharram before fasting the 10th of Al-Muharram (i.e. the day of Ashoorah) is more established.

So we fast on the day of Ashoorah (i.e. the 10th of Muharram) in order to follow the example of Allaah’s Prophet Moosaa (alayhis-salaam), and it was the day in which Allaah gave victory to the Muslims (of Bani Israaeel).   It is victory for the Muslims until the Day of Judgement and a blessing from Allaah (The Mighty and Majestic) for which He is thanked through the act of fasting.

Fasting on the Day of Ashoorah is a Sunnah Mu-akkadah [i.e. a practice the Prophet (sallal-laahu-alayhi-wasallam) performed continuously).  Therefore, the Muslim fasts on the 9th of Muharram and the 10th of Muharram, and this is a Sunnah that has continued—all praise is due to Allaah—and fasting on this day is emphasized, whilst seeking Allaah’s reward and in order to thank Him.

The way of the Prophets and their true followers is that they thank Allaah for giving them victory through performance of acts of obedience and remembrance of Allaah.  However, they do not innovate anything in this affair because that was the way of the people of the Pre-Islamic period of ignorance.  It is not permissible for a Muslim to exceed the limits in this affair.

As for the shia, they make the Day of Ashoorah a Day of sadness, weeping and wailing—may Allaah disfigure them—because it was the day Husain (radiyallaahu-anhu) who was murdered.  Indeed calamity is not to be faced with wailing, sins and evil deeds; rather it should be faced with obedience to Allaah and hoping for Allaah’s reward.  There is no doubt that the killing of Husain (radiyallaahu-anhu) was a calamity, but Allaah commanded us to exercise patience and hope for His reward during calamities.  What is legislated on this Day of Ashoorah is that we fast and there should be no newly invented matters in the religion.

Likewise, there are those ignorant ones amongst the Sunnis who consider this Day as a day of happiness and some of them call it the New Year; so they behave generously towards their children, serving them food and bestowing gifts to one another.  Indeed, these affairs are innovations and newly invented matters in the religion, and they are not permissible.  This action of those ignorant Sunnis is the other side of falsehood compared to the actions of the shia! The shia grieve and the ignorant Sunnis display happiness.  Do they (i.e. these ignorant Sunni) show happiness for murder of Husain (radiyallaahu-anhu), because this ignorant act will be considered as a manifestation of happiness due to the murder of Husain (radiyallaahu-anhu) on this Day.   Therefore, it is obligated upon the Muslim to follow the Sunnah and abandon innovations in the religion.  Innovations in the religion are not opposed with other innovations worse than them; rather innovations are opposed by abandoning them and reviving the Sunnah. [source: http://alfawzan.af.org.sa/node/15019  Paraphrased and abridged]

Also see another beneficial article here: http://www.salafitalk.com/threads/1785-When-does-the-fasting-of-Muharram-begin-or-the-fasting-of-Aashooraa-begin-Imaam-Ibn-Baaz

Partners in False and Excessive Speech –Yahyah Al-Haddaadi and His Deviant Friend, Mourad Al-Jazaa’iri

Written by Salafi Dawah Manchester on . Posted in Hadaadis.

In The Name of Allaah, The Most Merciful, The Bestower of Mercy

The Messenger (sallal-laahu-alayhi-wasallam) said:”The over-stringent ones are destroyed.”

Imaam Nawawi (rahimahullaah) said: ”The over-stringent ones are those who look too deeply (into affairs) and are excessive- those who exceed the Hudood (prescribed legislated sharia boundaries) in their statements and actions.” [Saheeh Muslim Number:2670 and Sharh Saheeh Muslim: Vol 16. Page:180 or page:220]

There is no doubt that Yahyah Al-Hajoori and his followers are well-known for their vile attacks and false-excessive judgements against the Mashaayikh of Ahlus Sunnah.  Al-Allaamah Ubaid Bin Abdillaah Al-Jaabiri and Shaikh Abdullaah Al-Bukhaari are amongst those who received the severest, the most evil judgements and attacks from Al-Hajoori and his followers-all in the name of defending Al-Hajoori upon falsehood.

Al-Hajoori (may Allaah guide him) said about Al-Allaamah Ubaid Al-Jaabiri (may Allaah preserve him):

“By Allaah! It is feared for him (i.e. Shaikh Ubaid) heresy (zandaqa), it is feared for him that he may exit the Religion if he opposes the Religion and he remains upon this lying – it is not far fetched the statement of Allaah: “So when they turned away, Allaah turned their hearts away, and Allaah guides not the rebellious!”  Yahyah also said: “Allaah has disgraced Ubaid just as He disgraced the Shaitaan” [source: http://www.salafitalk.com/threads/472-Shaikh-Yahyah-al-Hajoori-His-Ghuloo-and-Going-Beyond-Bounds]

Likewise Yahyah Al-Hajoori Al-Haddaadi (may Allaah guide him) said about Shaikh Abdullaah Al-Bukhaari: [listen to audio here] Trans: ”May you perish O Bukhaari just as the two hands of Abu Lahab perished, and perish he!” Reader: The remaining speech in the audio is too shameless and vulgar to be transmitted and one becomes amazed that such shameless speech can be uttered by a person who attributes himself to knowledge.

However, this du’aa of Al-Hajoori is enough a calamity-wishing that a Muslim ends up like Abu Lahab.  Look at the extremism of this person! When one looks at the tafseer of this ayah and what the Ulama have mentioned about Abu lahab, he/she realizes the severity and excess thoughts and ideas in Al-Hajoori’s brain.  Imaam Muhammad Ibn Saaleh Al-Uthaymeen (rahimahullaah) stated in his Tafseer of Juz Amma that [Allaah began with (mention) of Abu Lahab’s two hands: ”Perish the two hands of Abu Lahab” because they are the instruments of work and movement, giving and taking]. Likewise, we find the scholars mentioning that Allaah censured Abu Lahab with this great censure, which is ignominy for him in this life and the next–a complete loss and wretchedness, and he will achieve no success. He died a disbeliever and was not benefited by his worldly possessions.

We seek Allaah’s protection from falsehood, insanity and fanaticism. This is what the haddaadi Yahyah Al-Hajoori invokes on Shaikh Abdullaah Al-Bukhaari: ”May you perish O Bukhaari, just as the two hands of Abu Lahab perished, and perish he.”  This is how Al-Hajoori deals with the Mashaayikh of Ahlus Sunnah—a typical trait of the Haddaadiyyah.

                                Likewise, Mourad Al-Jazaa’iri’s behaviour is very similar to that of Al-Hajoori, so examine what he said on 23/08/2013 against those who reject Al-Hajoori’s misguidance and Guluww!!! Misguided Murad said: ”May Allaah Almighty curse the liars and expose the hypocrite double standard.’’ This madness was uttered on behalf of defending a haddaadi.

On the other hand, Mourad’s also slanders Shaikh Rabee saying that the Shaikh is blindly followed and has produced no evidence against Hajoori. Then Murad further manifested his misguidance and madness saying that Shaikh Rabee should listen to the advice of Al-Hajoori Al-Haddaadi Al-Mubtadi and that Shaikh Muhammad Bin Haadi has produced no evidence etc. Likewise, Mourad uttered other disgraceful speech against Shaikh Ubaid and Shaikh Abdullaah Al-Bukhaari.  This is what has afflicted Mourad al-Jazaa’iri–sheltering an innovator and attacking the Mashaayikh of Ahlus Sunnah.  Ustaadh Abu Khadeejah (may Allaah preserve him) reminded us recently, saying:

Ibn Battah: One of the Salaf was asked, “Who is the Sunni?” He answered: “The one who does not get angry when bid’ah (or its people) are spoken about.”  By Allaah, this is a defining and distinctive trait of the Salafis past and present. They are the most knowledgeable of the people in the arena of aqeedah and they are the sternest against the opposers (mukhaalifeen).  They are the gentlest between each other; they are the most obedient to Allaah and the most God-fearing; they hold to the Rope of Allaah, which is the Book and the Sunnah and the Jamaa’ah. They hate division and splitting and partisanship. They are like one body in their mutual love, mercy and compassion – when any part of this body is in pain, the rest of the body feels restless and feels the pain.  The Salafi upon the path of istiqaamah does not let down his ‘ulamaa when they are attacked and reviled nor the students of knowledge who call to Allaah. He doesn’t forsake the people of truth, or turn his back on them, or backbite them, or revile them. If he is not able to aid the truth, or aid the people of truth, he should at least remain quiet and not oppose them – rather he should make du’aa for them, for indeed the Salafi is upon clarity, always, till his death.  Cultivate these traits in yourself and your families. [end of quote]

So where is Mourad’s jealousy in defending the people of truth in this regard; rather he defends an excessive haddaadi innovtor, curses the opponents of this haddaadi and speaks against the Mashaayikh.  Indeed, Mourad (may Allaah guide him) is upon falsehood and evil in his affair.  It is enough that he attacks the Mashaayikh based on his fanatical love and defense of Al-Hajoori…what an evil state of affairs! Ibn Asaakir (rahimahullaah) said:

”Know O my brother! May Allaah grant us and you His pleasure and make us from those who have awe of Him and fear of Him as He should be feared. Indeed, the flesh of the scholars is poisonous and Allaah’s way of disclosing the hidden affairs of those who diminish their worth is well known. [Tabyeen Kadhib Al-Muftaree Fee Maa Nusiba Ilal-Imaam Abil hasan Al-Ash’aree: page 29]

Therefore, Mourad should take heed and repent to Allaah (The Most Merciful).  We ask Allaah to return Mourad, Hajoori and the Hajaawira to correctness or protect us from their acts of misguidance, falsehood and excesses….Aameen

To be continued….In-Shaa-Allaah

Imaam Tirmidhi’s (rahimahullaah) Rulings on Ahaadeeth [Brief comment by Shaikh Muhammad Bin Haadi]

Written by Salafi Dawah Manchester on . Posted in Scholars of Islam, Seeking Knowledge.

Shaikh Muhammed ibn Haadee (may Allaah preserve him) was asked whether the ruling of at-Tirmidhee when he makes a hadeeth “Saheeh” can be relied up. He answered: At-Tirmidhee’s rulings of Saheeh upon a hadeeth are stronger than his Hasan rulings. Also, he has been described as somewhat lenient. So when looking at Imaam at-Tirmidhee one should look to see who agrees with him from the well-known and bonafide scholars of hadeeth. [Source: https://twitter.com/AbuKhadeejahSP]

Updated: Question to Sh. Hassan Al-Banna On Women Setting Up Da’wah Groups & Duroos

Written by Salafi Dawah Manchester on . Posted in Da'wah - Calling To Islam, Family & Women, Fatawa-Rulings, Methodology - 'Manhaj', Scholars of Islam, Seeking Knowledge.

Link to Audio: CLICK HERE

Question:

Our Shaykh, the question is: Here in the west, particularly in America, Canada, and Britain, we have well-known Salafee Masaajid, and centers; classes and lectures are held therein with some of the students of knowledge and visiting scholars whenever possible. When this is the case, is it okay for the women who live near to these Salafee centers to establish Da’wah groups distinct from the centers and Masaajid in their areas, in which the people are gathered upon good?

And what is your advice to the women who are the founders of these organizations?

Answer:

It is incumbent that they ask the men and not suffice with their (own) knowledge; because the knowledge of the women is deficient. They have to ask the men. When she has a problem then she must ask (the men) and when there is a matter which is common and easy which everyone knows, then she can speak regarding it. As for in cases of necessity in which there is a question then she is to ask a Shaykh and take from him; either by way of the telephone or when a Shaykh comes to them then she can ask him. The women may have distinct lessons, but it is  a must that scholars supervise them, even if by way of the telephone. And they are to ask them.

However, the woman is not to suffice with herself; because the men have learned and are able to study and travel to the lands and that is not easy for the women. So it is a MUST that she refer to the men.

Perhaps she may say: “I am a Shaykhah!” Huh? You are a Shaykhah? You have studied?
You are (but) a student; a student of knowledge. Allaahul-Musta’aan. May Allaah bless you and may Allaah reward you with good.
Questioner:

May Allaah give you life; may Allaah reward you, our Shaykh.

Shaykh Adds:
The Prophet (upon him be prayers and peace) said: “Convey from me, even if only one verse.” The woman may convey. If you know a verse; you understand it and you act upon it, then mention it to the people. Similarly for the woman; she may speak with it to the people.
HOWEVER, sitting and giving lessons all day and the people coming to her, she does not have the ability to do this. She has other more important matters; (such as) the children; the home; her husband; and so on. They are affairs which every woman knows their value. The role of the woman is great in the cultivation of the children; and Islaam has given her a great station; and that is remaining within the home; and she is (therein) an Ameerah! She cultivates the children upon good. However, she is not like the European woman, doing whatever she wants; no. All of it is within the limits of the Sharee’ah. And may Allaah bless you and reward you with good.

Translated by Raha ibn Donald Batts 

 

 

Hadith: The Old Woman of Bani Israa’eel – As-Saheeha (313)

Written by Salafi Dawah Manchester on . Posted in Aqeedah (Creed & Belief), Da'wah - Calling To Islam.

[AS-SAHEEHAH (no. 313)]:

Aboo Ya’laa reported in his ‘Musnad’ (3/441), and al-Haakim (2/404-405 and 571-572), through three chains from Yoonus ibn Abee Ishaaq: from Aboo Burdah: from Aboo Moosaa who said: ‘The Prophet (sallal-laahu-alayhi-wasallam) came to a bedouin who treated him generously, so he said to him: ‘Come to us.’ So he came to him, Allaah’s Messenger (sallal-laahu-alayhi-wasallam) said [and in one narration: Allaah’s Messenger (sallal-laahu-alayhi-wasallam) stopped off  as a guest with a bedouin, and he treated him generously. So Allaah’s Messenger (sallal-laahu-alayhi-wasallam) said to him: ‘We will remember this, so come to us.’   So later the bedouin came to him, and Allaah’s Messenger (sallal-laahu-alayhi-wasallam) said:

‘Ask for whatever you need.’ so he said: ‘A she-camel with its saddle, and some goats which my wife can milk.’  So Allaah’s Messenger said: ‘Are you unable to be like the old woman of the Banoo Israa.eel?’  [So his Companions said: ‘O Messenger of Allaah! And what does ‘the old woman of the Banoo Israa.eel’ refer to?’

He said: ‘When Moosaa left Egypt at night with the Banoo Israa.eel they lost their way. So he said: ‘What is wrong?’ So their learned men said:[‘We shall tell you.] When death came to Yoosuf he took a solemn agreement from us in Allaah’s Name that we would not depart from Egypt until we carried his body along with us.’ He said: ‘Then who knows the place of his grave?’ [They said: None of us knows where the grave of Yoosuf is, except for ] an old woman of the Banoo Israa.eel. So he sent for her, and she came to him.

He said: ‘Guide me to the grave of Yoosuf.’ She said: [‘No, by Allaah! I will not do so] until you grant me my reward.’ He said: ‘And what reward do you want?’ She said: ‘That I should be with you in Paradise.’ So he disliked to grant her that, but Allaah revealed to him: ‘Grant her her due reward.ý So she went with them to a pond: a place where water gathered, and she said: ‘Drain this water away.’ So they drained it. She said: ‘Dig, and extract the body of Yoosuf.’ So when they lifted it out and placed it upon the ground the path suddenly became bright like the light of day.’

The context is Aboo Ya’laa’s, and the (bracketed) additions along with the other narrations are al-Haakim’s, and he said; ‘Saheeh’ to the standard of the two Shaikhs, and Ahmad and Ibn Ma’een judged that Yoonus heard the hadeeth ‘There is no marriage except with a guardian’ from Aboo Burdah.’ And adh-Dhahabee agreed.

And I say: It is to the standard of Muslim alone, since al-Bukhaaree did not report any of Yoonus’s narrations in his ‘Saheeh’, but rather in his ‘Juz.ul-Qiraa’ah…..’

Translated by Ustaadh Abu Talhah (may Allaah have mercy upon him and his wife).  This hadeeth was sent to us by brother Haroon As-Salafi (may Allaah preserve him)

Two Leaders Who Gave up Their Leadership in Order to Worship Allaah – As‐Saheehah (no. 2833) of Shaikh al‐Albaanee

Written by Salafi Dawah Manchester on . Posted in Da'wah - Calling To Islam, Morals and Manners - 'Akhlaaq', Purification of The Soul, Worship - 'Ibaadah'.

As‐Saheehah (no. 2833) of Shaikh al‐Albaanee (rahimahullaah):

‘The Banoo Israa’eel appointed a leader  (Khaleefah) to be in charge of them after Moosaa (alayhis-salaam.) So he stood praying above Jerusalem, in the moonlight. So he remembered some things which he had done, and he departed, and he let himself down with a rope. So in the morning the rope was hanging from the mosque, and he had gone. He said: So he went off until he came to a people on the coast. So he found them striking bricks, or making bricks. So he asked them: ‘What do you take for these bricks?’ He said: So they informed him, so he made bricks along with them. So he used to eat from the wages he earned with his hand, and when it was time for Prayer he would stand and pray.

So the workers informed the chief of their town that amongst us there is a man who does such and such. So he sent a message to him, but he refused to go to him. This happened three times. Then he came riding upon his riding-beast. So when he saw him he fled, so he followed him and overtook him. He said: ”Let me speak to you.” He said: So he stood until he spoke to him, and he informed him of his story. So when he informed him that he was a king, and that he had fled from fear and awe of his Lord, he said: ”I think that I will join you.” He said; So he followed him,and the two of then worshipped Allaah until they died at the Rumaylah of Egypt.

Abdullaah said: ‘If I were there I would be able to find their graves, because of the description which Allaah’s Messenger (sallal-laahu-alayhi-wasallam) gave to us.

Reported by al-Bazzaar in his Musnad (4/267/3869), by way of `Amr ibn Abee Qays: from Simaak- meaning Ibn Harb: from al-Qaasim ibn `Abdir-Rahmaan: from his father: from `Abdullaah ibn Mas`ood: from the Prophet; and he said: ”We do not know anyone to have reported it from Simaak: from al-Qaasim except for `Amr; and al-Mas`oodee reported it from Simaak: from `Abdur-Rahmaan: from his father, and he did not mention al-Qaasim.”

I say: The narration of al-Mas`oodee was reported by Ahmad (1/451) and Aboo Ya`laa (9/261/5383), by way of Yazeed ibn Haaroon: al-Mas`oodee related to us: from Simaak ibn Harb: from `Abdur-Rahmaan ibn `Abdillaah: from Ibn Mas`ood who said:…, and he mentioned it.

And the two of them are supported by Qays ibn ar-Rabee`: from Simaak ibn Harb-with it, and he also did not mention al-Qaasim in its chain. This was reported by at-Tabaraanee in al-Mu`jamul-Kabeer (10/216/10370), and in al-Awsat also (2/112/1/6743), and he said:

‘No one reports it from Simaak except Qays ibn ar-Rabee’!

That is what he said! However al-Mas`oodee supported his narration, as did `Amr ibn Abee Qays-as has preceded; and even though he differed with them by mentioning al-Qaasim ibn `Abdir-Rahmaan in the chain; and their narration is more correct, even though they each had something regarding their memorization, however each one strengthens the other; and `Amr ibn Abee Qays-and he is ar-Raazee was truthful (sadooq), but made mistakes-as occurs in ‘at-Taqreeb’. So if he correctly preserved it, then it is possible to say that Simaak heard it from al-Qaasim from his father, then he heard it from his father directly; and perhaps what al-Haythumee did indicates this, as he said (10/219):

‘Reported by al-Bazzaar, and by at-Tabaraanee iin ‘al-Awsat’ and in ‘al-Kabeer’, and its chain is ‘hasan’.’

I say: So he combined the narrations of al-Bazzaar and at-Tabaraanee, despite their differing concerning their narration from Simaak. So it is as if he is indicating that there is no difference which will cause any harm between them.

And before this he brought the narration of Ahmad and Aboo Ya’laa, and he said after it: ‘And their chain contains al-Mas’oodee, and his memory deteriorated.’

And as-Suyootee fell short in ‘al-Jaami’ul-Kabeer’ (no. 6404) when he attributed it to ‘al-Mu`jamul-Kabeer’ alone!!’

The wording of the narration of Ahmad (1/451/4312) is:

‘Whilst a man from those who came before you was in his kingdom he reflected, and he knew that it was going to come to an end for him, and that his situation was preoccupying him away from the worship of his Lord. So he crept away one night and escaped from his castle, and he came to the coast, and he used to make bricks for wages. So he would eat, and he would give what remained in charity…..’ and: ‘… so the two of them worshipped Allaah-the Mighty and Majestic-together. So they supplicated to Allaah to cause them to die together. He said: So they died.’

‘Abdullaah said: ‘If I were at the Rumaylah of Egypt I could show you their graves, based upon the description given to us by Allaah’s Messenger).’

Translated by Ustaadh Abu Talhah Dawood Burbank (may Allaah have mercy upon him and his wife).

This narration was sent to us by brother Haroon Al-Banghaali (may Allaah reward him)

Mourad Al-Jazaa’iri–Claims devoid of reality in the name of defending an innovator…

Written by Salafi Dawah Manchester on . Posted in Deviated Callers & Individuals, Hadaadis.

In The Name of Allaah, The Most Merciful, The Bestower of MercyAllaah (The Most High) said:

وَمِنَ النَّاسِ مَنْ يُعْجِبُكَ قَوْلُهُ فِي الْحَيَاةِ الدُّنْيَا وَيُشْهِدُ اللَّهَ عَلَىٰ مَا فِي قَلْبِهِ وَهُوَ أَلَدُّ الْخِصَامِ

‘’And of mankind there is he whose speech may please you in this worldly life, and he calls Allah to witness as to that which is in his heart, yet he is the most quarrelsome of the opponents.’’ [Al-Baqarah: Ayah 204]

Imaam as-Saa’di (rahimahullaah) mentions some characteristics of this type of person—that his speech attracts the attention of the listener and seems as if it contains benefit. However, his speech opposes his actions, and when you argue with him, you find him to be from the most difficult, quarrelsome and bigoted amongst the people. Indeed-all praise be to Allaah-the trustworthy Salafi students of knowledge at Al-Maktabah Salafiyyah and elsewhere in the UK have not ceased to continue their war against the people of falsehood.  They carry out this task with evidences from the Book, the Sunnah and understanding of the Salaf, whilst referring to the knowledge based clarifications of the scholars of Ahlus Sunnah in our era.  As for the people of falsehood, they employ lies, slander and claims devoid of reality in their war against the Salafiyyoon.  They employ these satanic tactics when deprived of sound proofs and manifest evidences, in order to confound truth with falsehood.

 

Partners in Evil–Mourad and Al-Hajoori

The Haddaadi innovator [Al-Hajoori] initiated the means to splitting and division through his innovations, yet he accused the Salafiyyoon of causing division and splitting.  Likewise, Mourad blindly defended him and accused the students of knowledge and the UK Salafi Maraakiz of causing division and splitting, as he stated in one of his disgraceful emails: Liars, hypocrites, dividers, two-faced, causers of friction between the scholars and circulators of despicable emails….”  

Mourad is a deluded individual whose false accusations are not founded upon anything else but bigoted partisanship and love of Al-Hajoori Al-Haddaadi Al-Mubtadi.  He harbours extreme hatred against the Salafi Maraakiz and boldly utilizes such blameworthy hatred against those he considers to be Juhhaal -a common word he utters against those he feels are deserving of vilification for transmitting the verdicts of the scholars against Al-Hajoori Al-Haddaadi al-Mubtadi.  Indeed, he rejected the truth and became obstinate upon falsehood, so it is not surprising that he has resorted to such evil behaviour towards some of the Mashaayikh, the students of knowledge and the Maraakiz of Salafiyyah.

Mourad is a deluded fanatic who also accuses the Salafi students and Maraakiz of causing divisions whenever they transmit the verdicts of the scholars against Al-Hajoori Al-Haddaadi Al-Mubtadi, yet it was Hajoori who innovated and when reprimanded he started unleashing his vile speech against Shaikh Ubaid, Shaikh Abdullah Al-Bukhari, Shaikh Muhammad Bin Haadi and even Shaikh Rabee. So who is guilty of causing splits, the innovator or those who repel his innovations?!  Al-Allaamah Zaid Bin Haadi Al-Madkhali (may Allaah preserve him) said: ”The Mubtadi (the innovator) is the reason for the splitting in the ummah; because splitting is connected to innovation and unity is connected to the Sunnah.’’ [End of quote,  Source: Al Ajwibah Al Mukhtasar Alaa  As-ila Al-Ashrati Page43-44]  However, Mourad deliberately refuses to acknowledge the fact that Al-Hajoori is the culprit due to being submerged in desires and unjustified hatred.

 

Mourad Accuses The Students and Maraakiz of blameworthy Blind following

Mourad is a deluded falsifier who also accuses the students and Maraakiz of Salafiyyah of blameworthy blind following, however he deliberately refuses to acknowledge the fact that he has been clinging to Al-Hajoori Al-Haddaadi al-Mubtadi, whilst the evidences against him are manifest to all-scholars, students and the maintainers of the Salafi Maraakiz in the West. Ibn Abdul Barr (rahimahullaah) said: “According to the scholars, Taqleed (i.e. blind adherence) is other than Ittibaa [i.e. adherence to an authentic affair narrated from the Messenger-sallal-laahu-alayhi-wasallam, and obviously with the correct understanding of the Salaf]; because ittibaa is to follow a person based on what is apparent to you of the superiority of his statement and soundness of his school of thought. And Taqleed is that you speak with his statement, whilst you neither know the angle of his speech nor its meaning and you reject speech besides it; or his mistake is made manifest to you, but you follow him and venerate his opposition, whilst the corruptness of his speech is clear to you. This is what is forbidden to speak with in the religion of Allaah.”  [End of Quote: Jaami Bayaan Al-Ilm Wa-Fadlihee: 2/787]

All praise be to Allaah, the Salafi students and the Maraakiz of salafiyyah have not defended Al-Hajoori after his innovations and calamities were made manifest; rather Mourad defends him to this day and  curses some of those who transmitted the verdicts of the scholars against Al-Hajoori Al-Haddaadi. Deviant Mourad and Al-Hajoori are amazed with themselves and that is why uttering sinful statements, slander and deceit has been much easier for them than submitting to the truth.  This is exactly what Al-Hajoori is upon because despite his destructive innovations, [see here http://www.alhajuri.com/index.cfm] he boldly proclaimed: ”Whoever says that the Dawah in Dammaaj has changed, then upon him is the curse of Allaah, the angels and all the people.” [Quoted in Al-Qawl Al-Jaliyy Libayaani Maa Ghayyarahu Al-Hajoori Min Da-wati Imaam Al-Waadi-ee: PDF page: 1]

The Messenger (sallal-laahu-alayhi-wasallam) said: ”three things destroy: The greed that is obeyed, the desires that are followed and a person being amazed with his own opinion.” [Silsilah Al-hadeeth as-saheehah: Number: 1802: 4/412-416]

Shaikh Raslaan (may Allaah preserve him) said: “This (i.e. these three affairs) are never in harmony with a (person’s) complete return to the command of the Prophet (may Allah’s peace be upon him). The Shaikh also said: Indeed the great religion of Islaam is founded upon knowledge and not ignorance; but when a person is amazed with himself and his opinion, and when splitting occurs in the Ummah in the big affairs of knowledge and every foolish one formulates his own independent judgment, there comes about an uncontrollable chaos and it then proceeds upon a path that has no halter, and it becomes an affair of trial, corruption, confusion and deviation, and an affair in which truth is confounded with falsehood…” [For further details see: Ash-Shi-aaraat Wahdahaa Laa Takfee: pages: 35 and 39 Footnote 1]

 

A Gradual Process of Deterioration in the name of defending Hajoori Al-Haddaadi

We seek Allaah’s Protection from persisting upon error after its clarification.  Instead of humbling himself to the truth, Mourad persisted upon falsehood and made false claims devoid of reality.  Examine the following statements of Mourad:

[1] Mourad said: ”Praise be to ALLAH Almighty that he made me a person who does his utmost not to make injustice to others, and also he made me, not to be loyal only to Salafia, the scholars and the true Salafi.” [Date:  Tue, 31 Jul 2007]

Comment: Mourad commits injustice by sheltering an innovator[Al-Hajoori]  and waged war against those who refuted Al-Hajoor’s innovations. So is this behaviour of his loyalty to salafiyyah, the scholars and the true salafis?! How do you judge O Mourad!

 

[2]Mourad said: ‘’From the beginning of this fitnah, I have always followed the advises of the Scholars, and looked to the proof to find out who is wrong and who is right, and I will continue to do so. [21/12/2011]

Comment: Is Mourad following the advises of the scholars at present?!  Where are his knowledge based clarifications to free Al-Hajoori from his innovations;rather mourad speaks with his desires and ignorance.

 

[3] Mourad said: ‘’The Noble Shaikh Yahya is NOT Ma-asoom, if he make mistake and we will all make mistake in some point in our life, He should be advised with evidence and kindness.’’  [21/12/2011]

Comment: The evidences have been established on both Al-Hajoori and Mourad, but they have persisted upon obstinacy.  Yahyah persisted upon falsehood and transgression for 7 years and has been advised; likewise Mourad has persisted upon falsehood after yahyah was declared an innovator based on manifest proofs. 

 

[4] Mourad said: I am NOT with anyone but the SCHOLARS, Shaikh Yahya does NOT take the blame of the wrong doer, if anyone has an issue with someone who oppressed him or slandered him, he should take it up with him and refer the issue to the scholars if it is NOT solved.’’  [22/12/2011] 

Comment: Mourad is not with the scholars, rather he is with Al-Hajoori.  Mourad himself slanders the Mashaayikh and suggests that Shaikh Rabee listens to Al-Hajoori’s advise .  Likewise, Mourad claims that Al-Hajoori is not responsible for the evil of the wrong doer; see here: http://salaficentre.com/2013/07/yahya-al-hajoori-the-weak-seeking-aid-form-the-weak-to-refute-the-scholars-of-ahl-us-sunnah/

Mourad Lying is Haraam akhi–have some shyness in Allaah’s presence…

 

Mourad said:  ‘’ Bazmool is a treacherous double standard person.’’ [08/10/2013]

Comment:  That is because Shaikh Ahmad spoke against Al-Hajoori and praised Shaikh Firkoos and Shaikh Muhammad Al-Imaam; so Mourad decided to unleash his vile statements and slanders against Shaikh Ahmad.  Rather you have slandered the Shaikh in the name of defending an innovator.  The Messenger (sallal-laahu-alayhi-wasallam) said: ”If you have no shyness, then do as you please.”

 

Finally: On 17/10/2013 Mourad sent an email containing much frustration and too comical to quoted in this article. So one realizes why Shaikh Rabee warns against this self-amazed idiot when he became obstinate, foul-mouthed and deceitful. This is the Email Shaikh Mourad Al-Jazaa’ri! He is filled with false claims and deception, which he utilizes in the name of defending and finding excuses for a Haddaadi innovator.   Remember these words once again…..

Allaah (The Most High) said:

وَمِنَ النَّاسِ مَنْ يُعْجِبُكَ قَوْلُهُ فِي الْحَيَاةِ الدُّنْيَا وَيُشْهِدُ اللَّهَ عَلَىٰ مَا فِي قَلْبِهِ وَهُوَ أَلَدُّ الْخِصَامِ

‘’And of mankind there is he whose speech may please you in this worldly life, and he calls Allah to witness as to that which is in his heart, yet he is the most quarrelsome of the opponents.’’ [Al-Baqarah: Ayah 204]

Imaam as-Saa’di (rahimahullaah) mentions some characteristics of this type of person—that his speech attracts the attention of the listener and seems as if it contains benefit. However, his speech opposes his actions, and when you argue with him, you find him to be from the most difficult, quarrelsome and bigoted amongst the people.

May Allaah guide Mourad or protect us from his falsehod and foolishness…Aameen