Shaikhul Islaam Ibn Taymiyyah (rahimahullaah) said:
”It is befitting that a person utilises wealth in the manner he utilises his donkey for riding, and in the manner he utilises the toilet for defecation.”
[Quoted by Imam Muhammad Ibn Saaleh Al-Uthaymeen (rahimahullaah) in Sharh Riyaadus-Saaliheen cassette number:17]
@Athariyyah: Visual Update | £383k = 54.7% RAISED MaShaAllaah! Let’s keep the momentum going O’People of good. #MasjidAthari
http://t.co/afBXsLXMZE
We remind our brothers and sisters in Manchester to aid our brothers @Athariyyah, and do not also forget them in your supplications–that Allaah makes this project successful.
“The Sahaabah never differed in Aqeedah; rather the differing (in Aqeedah) took place after them.”[1]
Al-Allaamah Saaleh Al-Luhaydaan (may Allaah preserve him) was asked about the one who says that the sahaabah differed in aqeedah; so he said: [“أستغفر الله – none says this except a Mubtadi Daal (i.e. an innovator, astray one). [2]
Audio
Al-Allaamah Ahmad Bin Yahyah An-Najmi (rahimahullaah) was asked about the one who says that the Sahaabah differed in Aqeedah; so he replied: “The one who says that the sahaabah differed in Aqeedah should support his speech with evidences; otherwise he is a liar, false accuser…. [3]
The Shaikh (rahimahullaah) also said:
Has lying and false accusation been made easy for the utterer (of this statement) to such a level: Falsely accusing the Companions of the Prophet (sallal-laahu-alayhi-wasallaam)?! [4]
The Shaikh (rahimahullaah) also said:
”Indeed this speaker who says that the Sahaabah differed in Aqeedah–it is obligated on him to keep quiet and should be prevented from speaking about Aqeedah; because he is ignorant about it.” [5]
The Shaikh (rahimahullaah) also said:
As for differing in the rulings pertaining to subsidiary issues of (the religion) based on Ijtihaad, then this did occur between the Sahaabah and each of them stated what he saw to be the truth, and none amongst them found fault with anyone. Not a single one of them reproached the one who was in opposition to him; but the aim of this speaker–false accuser–is to pave the way for the differing of hizbiyyah (i.e. to find room– by way of this false claim–for the differing of the people of illegal partisanship against the sound Manhaj positions of the Salafis). And he has established against himself that he is a hizbi…. [6]
Ref 2: Clarification: The Muta-aalim (Pseudo Shaikh Asim Al-Hakeem) has not been declared an innovator; rather this is a general ruling and not specific to anyone until the evidence is established against such an individual. However, it shows the severity of Asim’s devilish insinuations and ignorance.
Refs 3, 4, 5 & 6; see Al-Fataawa Al-Jaliyyah Vol2: Page: 104–108: question number 63]
O Allah, I ask You for the good of it, for the good of what it contains, and for the good of what is sent with it. I seek refuge in You from the evil of it, from the evil of what it contains, and from the evil that is sent with it. [ Muslim 2/616]
Ahlus-Sunnah your du’a & donations are making a difference.Lets continue.
http://t.co/EIOFi2PyPA
We appeal to our brothers and sisters in Manchester to aid Ahlus Sunnah @Al-Athariyyah. Indeed, imagine the reward for aiding your brothers in establishing a masjid in which the Scholars and students of knowledge will teach Tawheed, the Authentic Sunnah and understanding of the Salafus Saalih (In-Shaa-Allaah)
Jazaakumullaahu khayran, and may Allaah bless your wealth…Aameen