Skip to main content

Author: Salafi Dawah Manchester

Updated: Question to Sh. Hassan Al-Banna On Women Setting Up Da’wah Groups & Duroos

Written by Salafi Dawah Manchester on . Posted in Da'wah - Calling To Islam, Family & Women, Fatawa-Rulings, Methodology - 'Manhaj', Scholars of Islam, Seeking Knowledge.

Link to Audio: CLICK HERE

Question:

Our Shaykh, the question is: Here in the west, particularly in America, Canada, and Britain, we have well-known Salafee Masaajid, and centers; classes and lectures are held therein with some of the students of knowledge and visiting scholars whenever possible. When this is the case, is it okay for the women who live near to these Salafee centers to establish Da’wah groups distinct from the centers and Masaajid in their areas, in which the people are gathered upon good?

And what is your advice to the women who are the founders of these organizations?

Answer:

It is incumbent that they ask the men and not suffice with their (own) knowledge; because the knowledge of the women is deficient. They have to ask the men. When she has a problem then she must ask (the men) and when there is a matter which is common and easy which everyone knows, then she can speak regarding it. As for in cases of necessity in which there is a question then she is to ask a Shaykh and take from him; either by way of the telephone or when a Shaykh comes to them then she can ask him. The women may have distinct lessons, but it is  a must that scholars supervise them, even if by way of the telephone. And they are to ask them.

However, the woman is not to suffice with herself; because the men have learned and are able to study and travel to the lands and that is not easy for the women. So it is a MUST that she refer to the men.

Perhaps she may say: “I am a Shaykhah!” Huh? You are a Shaykhah? You have studied?
You are (but) a student; a student of knowledge. Allaahul-Musta’aan. May Allaah bless you and may Allaah reward you with good.
Questioner:

May Allaah give you life; may Allaah reward you, our Shaykh.

Shaykh Adds:
The Prophet (upon him be prayers and peace) said: “Convey from me, even if only one verse.” The woman may convey. If you know a verse; you understand it and you act upon it, then mention it to the people. Similarly for the woman; she may speak with it to the people.
HOWEVER, sitting and giving lessons all day and the people coming to her, she does not have the ability to do this. She has other more important matters; (such as) the children; the home; her husband; and so on. They are affairs which every woman knows their value. The role of the woman is great in the cultivation of the children; and Islaam has given her a great station; and that is remaining within the home; and she is (therein) an Ameerah! She cultivates the children upon good. However, she is not like the European woman, doing whatever she wants; no. All of it is within the limits of the Sharee’ah. And may Allaah bless you and reward you with good.

Translated by Raha ibn Donald Batts 

 

 

Hadith: The Old Woman of Bani Israa’eel – As-Saheeha (313)

Written by Salafi Dawah Manchester on . Posted in Aqeedah (Creed & Belief), Da'wah - Calling To Islam.

[AS-SAHEEHAH (no. 313)]:

Aboo Ya’laa reported in his ‘Musnad’ (3/441), and al-Haakim (2/404-405 and 571-572), through three chains from Yoonus ibn Abee Ishaaq: from Aboo Burdah: from Aboo Moosaa who said: ‘The Prophet (sallal-laahu-alayhi-wasallam) came to a bedouin who treated him generously, so he said to him: ‘Come to us.’ So he came to him, Allaah’s Messenger (sallal-laahu-alayhi-wasallam) said [and in one narration: Allaah’s Messenger (sallal-laahu-alayhi-wasallam) stopped off  as a guest with a bedouin, and he treated him generously. So Allaah’s Messenger (sallal-laahu-alayhi-wasallam) said to him: ‘We will remember this, so come to us.’   So later the bedouin came to him, and Allaah’s Messenger (sallal-laahu-alayhi-wasallam) said:

‘Ask for whatever you need.’ so he said: ‘A she-camel with its saddle, and some goats which my wife can milk.’  So Allaah’s Messenger said: ‘Are you unable to be like the old woman of the Banoo Israa.eel?’  [So his Companions said: ‘O Messenger of Allaah! And what does ‘the old woman of the Banoo Israa.eel’ refer to?’

He said: ‘When Moosaa left Egypt at night with the Banoo Israa.eel they lost their way. So he said: ‘What is wrong?’ So their learned men said:[‘We shall tell you.] When death came to Yoosuf he took a solemn agreement from us in Allaah’s Name that we would not depart from Egypt until we carried his body along with us.’ He said: ‘Then who knows the place of his grave?’ [They said: None of us knows where the grave of Yoosuf is, except for ] an old woman of the Banoo Israa.eel. So he sent for her, and she came to him.

He said: ‘Guide me to the grave of Yoosuf.’ She said: [‘No, by Allaah! I will not do so] until you grant me my reward.’ He said: ‘And what reward do you want?’ She said: ‘That I should be with you in Paradise.’ So he disliked to grant her that, but Allaah revealed to him: ‘Grant her her due reward.ý So she went with them to a pond: a place where water gathered, and she said: ‘Drain this water away.’ So they drained it. She said: ‘Dig, and extract the body of Yoosuf.’ So when they lifted it out and placed it upon the ground the path suddenly became bright like the light of day.’

The context is Aboo Ya’laa’s, and the (bracketed) additions along with the other narrations are al-Haakim’s, and he said; ‘Saheeh’ to the standard of the two Shaikhs, and Ahmad and Ibn Ma’een judged that Yoonus heard the hadeeth ‘There is no marriage except with a guardian’ from Aboo Burdah.’ And adh-Dhahabee agreed.

And I say: It is to the standard of Muslim alone, since al-Bukhaaree did not report any of Yoonus’s narrations in his ‘Saheeh’, but rather in his ‘Juz.ul-Qiraa’ah…..’

Translated by Ustaadh Abu Talhah (may Allaah have mercy upon him and his wife).  This hadeeth was sent to us by brother Haroon As-Salafi (may Allaah preserve him)

Two Leaders Who Gave up Their Leadership in Order to Worship Allaah – As‐Saheehah (no. 2833) of Shaikh al‐Albaanee

Written by Salafi Dawah Manchester on . Posted in Da'wah - Calling To Islam, Morals and Manners - 'Akhlaaq', Purification of The Soul, Worship - 'Ibaadah'.

As‐Saheehah (no. 2833) of Shaikh al‐Albaanee (rahimahullaah):

‘The Banoo Israa’eel appointed a leader  (Khaleefah) to be in charge of them after Moosaa (alayhis-salaam.) So he stood praying above Jerusalem, in the moonlight. So he remembered some things which he had done, and he departed, and he let himself down with a rope. So in the morning the rope was hanging from the mosque, and he had gone. He said: So he went off until he came to a people on the coast. So he found them striking bricks, or making bricks. So he asked them: ‘What do you take for these bricks?’ He said: So they informed him, so he made bricks along with them. So he used to eat from the wages he earned with his hand, and when it was time for Prayer he would stand and pray.

So the workers informed the chief of their town that amongst us there is a man who does such and such. So he sent a message to him, but he refused to go to him. This happened three times. Then he came riding upon his riding-beast. So when he saw him he fled, so he followed him and overtook him. He said: ”Let me speak to you.” He said: So he stood until he spoke to him, and he informed him of his story. So when he informed him that he was a king, and that he had fled from fear and awe of his Lord, he said: ”I think that I will join you.” He said; So he followed him,and the two of then worshipped Allaah until they died at the Rumaylah of Egypt.

Abdullaah said: ‘If I were there I would be able to find their graves, because of the description which Allaah’s Messenger (sallal-laahu-alayhi-wasallam) gave to us.

Reported by al-Bazzaar in his Musnad (4/267/3869), by way of `Amr ibn Abee Qays: from Simaak- meaning Ibn Harb: from al-Qaasim ibn `Abdir-Rahmaan: from his father: from `Abdullaah ibn Mas`ood: from the Prophet; and he said: ”We do not know anyone to have reported it from Simaak: from al-Qaasim except for `Amr; and al-Mas`oodee reported it from Simaak: from `Abdur-Rahmaan: from his father, and he did not mention al-Qaasim.”

I say: The narration of al-Mas`oodee was reported by Ahmad (1/451) and Aboo Ya`laa (9/261/5383), by way of Yazeed ibn Haaroon: al-Mas`oodee related to us: from Simaak ibn Harb: from `Abdur-Rahmaan ibn `Abdillaah: from Ibn Mas`ood who said:…, and he mentioned it.

And the two of them are supported by Qays ibn ar-Rabee`: from Simaak ibn Harb-with it, and he also did not mention al-Qaasim in its chain. This was reported by at-Tabaraanee in al-Mu`jamul-Kabeer (10/216/10370), and in al-Awsat also (2/112/1/6743), and he said:

‘No one reports it from Simaak except Qays ibn ar-Rabee’!

That is what he said! However al-Mas`oodee supported his narration, as did `Amr ibn Abee Qays-as has preceded; and even though he differed with them by mentioning al-Qaasim ibn `Abdir-Rahmaan in the chain; and their narration is more correct, even though they each had something regarding their memorization, however each one strengthens the other; and `Amr ibn Abee Qays-and he is ar-Raazee was truthful (sadooq), but made mistakes-as occurs in ‘at-Taqreeb’. So if he correctly preserved it, then it is possible to say that Simaak heard it from al-Qaasim from his father, then he heard it from his father directly; and perhaps what al-Haythumee did indicates this, as he said (10/219):

‘Reported by al-Bazzaar, and by at-Tabaraanee iin ‘al-Awsat’ and in ‘al-Kabeer’, and its chain is ‘hasan’.’

I say: So he combined the narrations of al-Bazzaar and at-Tabaraanee, despite their differing concerning their narration from Simaak. So it is as if he is indicating that there is no difference which will cause any harm between them.

And before this he brought the narration of Ahmad and Aboo Ya’laa, and he said after it: ‘And their chain contains al-Mas’oodee, and his memory deteriorated.’

And as-Suyootee fell short in ‘al-Jaami’ul-Kabeer’ (no. 6404) when he attributed it to ‘al-Mu`jamul-Kabeer’ alone!!’

The wording of the narration of Ahmad (1/451/4312) is:

‘Whilst a man from those who came before you was in his kingdom he reflected, and he knew that it was going to come to an end for him, and that his situation was preoccupying him away from the worship of his Lord. So he crept away one night and escaped from his castle, and he came to the coast, and he used to make bricks for wages. So he would eat, and he would give what remained in charity…..’ and: ‘… so the two of them worshipped Allaah-the Mighty and Majestic-together. So they supplicated to Allaah to cause them to die together. He said: So they died.’

‘Abdullaah said: ‘If I were at the Rumaylah of Egypt I could show you their graves, based upon the description given to us by Allaah’s Messenger).’

Translated by Ustaadh Abu Talhah Dawood Burbank (may Allaah have mercy upon him and his wife).

This narration was sent to us by brother Haroon Al-Banghaali (may Allaah reward him)

Mourad Al-Jazaa’iri–Claims devoid of reality in the name of defending an innovator…

Written by Salafi Dawah Manchester on . Posted in Deviated Callers & Individuals, Hadaadis.

In The Name of Allaah, The Most Merciful, The Bestower of MercyAllaah (The Most High) said:

وَمِنَ النَّاسِ مَنْ يُعْجِبُكَ قَوْلُهُ فِي الْحَيَاةِ الدُّنْيَا وَيُشْهِدُ اللَّهَ عَلَىٰ مَا فِي قَلْبِهِ وَهُوَ أَلَدُّ الْخِصَامِ

‘’And of mankind there is he whose speech may please you in this worldly life, and he calls Allah to witness as to that which is in his heart, yet he is the most quarrelsome of the opponents.’’ [Al-Baqarah: Ayah 204]

Imaam as-Saa’di (rahimahullaah) mentions some characteristics of this type of person—that his speech attracts the attention of the listener and seems as if it contains benefit. However, his speech opposes his actions, and when you argue with him, you find him to be from the most difficult, quarrelsome and bigoted amongst the people. Indeed-all praise be to Allaah-the trustworthy Salafi students of knowledge at Al-Maktabah Salafiyyah and elsewhere in the UK have not ceased to continue their war against the people of falsehood.  They carry out this task with evidences from the Book, the Sunnah and understanding of the Salaf, whilst referring to the knowledge based clarifications of the scholars of Ahlus Sunnah in our era.  As for the people of falsehood, they employ lies, slander and claims devoid of reality in their war against the Salafiyyoon.  They employ these satanic tactics when deprived of sound proofs and manifest evidences, in order to confound truth with falsehood.

 

Partners in Evil–Mourad and Al-Hajoori

The Haddaadi innovator [Al-Hajoori] initiated the means to splitting and division through his innovations, yet he accused the Salafiyyoon of causing division and splitting.  Likewise, Mourad blindly defended him and accused the students of knowledge and the UK Salafi Maraakiz of causing division and splitting, as he stated in one of his disgraceful emails: Liars, hypocrites, dividers, two-faced, causers of friction between the scholars and circulators of despicable emails….”  

Mourad is a deluded individual whose false accusations are not founded upon anything else but bigoted partisanship and love of Al-Hajoori Al-Haddaadi Al-Mubtadi.  He harbours extreme hatred against the Salafi Maraakiz and boldly utilizes such blameworthy hatred against those he considers to be Juhhaal -a common word he utters against those he feels are deserving of vilification for transmitting the verdicts of the scholars against Al-Hajoori Al-Haddaadi al-Mubtadi.  Indeed, he rejected the truth and became obstinate upon falsehood, so it is not surprising that he has resorted to such evil behaviour towards some of the Mashaayikh, the students of knowledge and the Maraakiz of Salafiyyah.

Mourad is a deluded fanatic who also accuses the Salafi students and Maraakiz of causing divisions whenever they transmit the verdicts of the scholars against Al-Hajoori Al-Haddaadi Al-Mubtadi, yet it was Hajoori who innovated and when reprimanded he started unleashing his vile speech against Shaikh Ubaid, Shaikh Abdullah Al-Bukhari, Shaikh Muhammad Bin Haadi and even Shaikh Rabee. So who is guilty of causing splits, the innovator or those who repel his innovations?!  Al-Allaamah Zaid Bin Haadi Al-Madkhali (may Allaah preserve him) said: ”The Mubtadi (the innovator) is the reason for the splitting in the ummah; because splitting is connected to innovation and unity is connected to the Sunnah.’’ [End of quote,  Source: Al Ajwibah Al Mukhtasar Alaa  As-ila Al-Ashrati Page43-44]  However, Mourad deliberately refuses to acknowledge the fact that Al-Hajoori is the culprit due to being submerged in desires and unjustified hatred.

 

Mourad Accuses The Students and Maraakiz of blameworthy Blind following

Mourad is a deluded falsifier who also accuses the students and Maraakiz of Salafiyyah of blameworthy blind following, however he deliberately refuses to acknowledge the fact that he has been clinging to Al-Hajoori Al-Haddaadi al-Mubtadi, whilst the evidences against him are manifest to all-scholars, students and the maintainers of the Salafi Maraakiz in the West. Ibn Abdul Barr (rahimahullaah) said: “According to the scholars, Taqleed (i.e. blind adherence) is other than Ittibaa [i.e. adherence to an authentic affair narrated from the Messenger-sallal-laahu-alayhi-wasallam, and obviously with the correct understanding of the Salaf]; because ittibaa is to follow a person based on what is apparent to you of the superiority of his statement and soundness of his school of thought. And Taqleed is that you speak with his statement, whilst you neither know the angle of his speech nor its meaning and you reject speech besides it; or his mistake is made manifest to you, but you follow him and venerate his opposition, whilst the corruptness of his speech is clear to you. This is what is forbidden to speak with in the religion of Allaah.”  [End of Quote: Jaami Bayaan Al-Ilm Wa-Fadlihee: 2/787]

All praise be to Allaah, the Salafi students and the Maraakiz of salafiyyah have not defended Al-Hajoori after his innovations and calamities were made manifest; rather Mourad defends him to this day and  curses some of those who transmitted the verdicts of the scholars against Al-Hajoori Al-Haddaadi. Deviant Mourad and Al-Hajoori are amazed with themselves and that is why uttering sinful statements, slander and deceit has been much easier for them than submitting to the truth.  This is exactly what Al-Hajoori is upon because despite his destructive innovations, [see here http://www.alhajuri.com/index.cfm] he boldly proclaimed: ”Whoever says that the Dawah in Dammaaj has changed, then upon him is the curse of Allaah, the angels and all the people.” [Quoted in Al-Qawl Al-Jaliyy Libayaani Maa Ghayyarahu Al-Hajoori Min Da-wati Imaam Al-Waadi-ee: PDF page: 1]

The Messenger (sallal-laahu-alayhi-wasallam) said: ”three things destroy: The greed that is obeyed, the desires that are followed and a person being amazed with his own opinion.” [Silsilah Al-hadeeth as-saheehah: Number: 1802: 4/412-416]

Shaikh Raslaan (may Allaah preserve him) said: “This (i.e. these three affairs) are never in harmony with a (person’s) complete return to the command of the Prophet (may Allah’s peace be upon him). The Shaikh also said: Indeed the great religion of Islaam is founded upon knowledge and not ignorance; but when a person is amazed with himself and his opinion, and when splitting occurs in the Ummah in the big affairs of knowledge and every foolish one formulates his own independent judgment, there comes about an uncontrollable chaos and it then proceeds upon a path that has no halter, and it becomes an affair of trial, corruption, confusion and deviation, and an affair in which truth is confounded with falsehood…” [For further details see: Ash-Shi-aaraat Wahdahaa Laa Takfee: pages: 35 and 39 Footnote 1]

 

A Gradual Process of Deterioration in the name of defending Hajoori Al-Haddaadi

We seek Allaah’s Protection from persisting upon error after its clarification.  Instead of humbling himself to the truth, Mourad persisted upon falsehood and made false claims devoid of reality.  Examine the following statements of Mourad:

[1] Mourad said: ”Praise be to ALLAH Almighty that he made me a person who does his utmost not to make injustice to others, and also he made me, not to be loyal only to Salafia, the scholars and the true Salafi.” [Date:  Tue, 31 Jul 2007]

Comment: Mourad commits injustice by sheltering an innovator[Al-Hajoori]  and waged war against those who refuted Al-Hajoor’s innovations. So is this behaviour of his loyalty to salafiyyah, the scholars and the true salafis?! How do you judge O Mourad!

 

[2]Mourad said: ‘’From the beginning of this fitnah, I have always followed the advises of the Scholars, and looked to the proof to find out who is wrong and who is right, and I will continue to do so. [21/12/2011]

Comment: Is Mourad following the advises of the scholars at present?!  Where are his knowledge based clarifications to free Al-Hajoori from his innovations;rather mourad speaks with his desires and ignorance.

 

[3] Mourad said: ‘’The Noble Shaikh Yahya is NOT Ma-asoom, if he make mistake and we will all make mistake in some point in our life, He should be advised with evidence and kindness.’’  [21/12/2011]

Comment: The evidences have been established on both Al-Hajoori and Mourad, but they have persisted upon obstinacy.  Yahyah persisted upon falsehood and transgression for 7 years and has been advised; likewise Mourad has persisted upon falsehood after yahyah was declared an innovator based on manifest proofs. 

 

[4] Mourad said: I am NOT with anyone but the SCHOLARS, Shaikh Yahya does NOT take the blame of the wrong doer, if anyone has an issue with someone who oppressed him or slandered him, he should take it up with him and refer the issue to the scholars if it is NOT solved.’’  [22/12/2011] 

Comment: Mourad is not with the scholars, rather he is with Al-Hajoori.  Mourad himself slanders the Mashaayikh and suggests that Shaikh Rabee listens to Al-Hajoori’s advise .  Likewise, Mourad claims that Al-Hajoori is not responsible for the evil of the wrong doer; see here: http://salaficentre.com/2013/07/yahya-al-hajoori-the-weak-seeking-aid-form-the-weak-to-refute-the-scholars-of-ahl-us-sunnah/

Mourad Lying is Haraam akhi–have some shyness in Allaah’s presence…

 

Mourad said:  ‘’ Bazmool is a treacherous double standard person.’’ [08/10/2013]

Comment:  That is because Shaikh Ahmad spoke against Al-Hajoori and praised Shaikh Firkoos and Shaikh Muhammad Al-Imaam; so Mourad decided to unleash his vile statements and slanders against Shaikh Ahmad.  Rather you have slandered the Shaikh in the name of defending an innovator.  The Messenger (sallal-laahu-alayhi-wasallam) said: ”If you have no shyness, then do as you please.”

 

Finally: On 17/10/2013 Mourad sent an email containing much frustration and too comical to quoted in this article. So one realizes why Shaikh Rabee warns against this self-amazed idiot when he became obstinate, foul-mouthed and deceitful. This is the Email Shaikh Mourad Al-Jazaa’ri! He is filled with false claims and deception, which he utilizes in the name of defending and finding excuses for a Haddaadi innovator.   Remember these words once again…..

Allaah (The Most High) said:

وَمِنَ النَّاسِ مَنْ يُعْجِبُكَ قَوْلُهُ فِي الْحَيَاةِ الدُّنْيَا وَيُشْهِدُ اللَّهَ عَلَىٰ مَا فِي قَلْبِهِ وَهُوَ أَلَدُّ الْخِصَامِ

‘’And of mankind there is he whose speech may please you in this worldly life, and he calls Allah to witness as to that which is in his heart, yet he is the most quarrelsome of the opponents.’’ [Al-Baqarah: Ayah 204]

Imaam as-Saa’di (rahimahullaah) mentions some characteristics of this type of person—that his speech attracts the attention of the listener and seems as if it contains benefit. However, his speech opposes his actions, and when you argue with him, you find him to be from the most difficult, quarrelsome and bigoted amongst the people.

May Allaah guide Mourad or protect us from his falsehod and foolishness…Aameen

 

 

 

 

“Be with those who are truthful…” – Abandoning the Hajoori Fanatic Mourad al Jazaa’iri

Written by Salafi Dawah Manchester on . Posted in Hadaadis, Methodology - 'Manhaj'.

All praise is due to Allaah, Lord of mankind, Jinn and all that exists. And may Allaah’s salutations of peace and blessings be upon our noble Prophet Muhammad, his family and companions. To proceed: Allaah (The Mighty and Majestic) stated:

يَا أَيُّهَا الَّذِينَ آمَنُوا اتَّقُوا اللَّهَ وَكُونُوا مَعَ الصَّادِقِينَ

“O you who believe! Be afraid of Allah, and be with those who are truthful’’ [9:119]

”Be with those who are truthful” in their statements, actions and state of affairs. Those whose statements are truthful, and their actions and state of affairs are not except truth—free from negligence and laxity, safe from evil goals and gathered upon sincerity (to Allaah) and a sincere intention; for indeed truthfulness leads to righteousness and righteousness leads to paradise. [See Tafseer of Imaam as-Saa’di]

The reason for this clarification is so that there remains no doubt in Mourad’s heart and mind that I am totally free from his blameworthy stances. I made it known to him few months ago to refer to Shaikh Rabee and address his concerns regarding the affair of Al-Hajoori. However, in one of Mourad’s recent emails dated 12/12/1434 (12/10/2013) -which was filled with much weak arguments against those who oppose Al-Hajoori–he stated: ”Our brother Naeem from Stoke – May Allaah rectify him and open his heart to consider my honest advice to him”

Firstly: What advise does Mourad want me to take into consideration…? Verily! I seek the protection of Allaah from abandoning the knowledge based refutations of the scholars and fall into the evil path of the hajaawira.    

Secondly: Imaam Sufyaan Ath-Thawri (rahimahullaah) stated: “If you loved a man for Allaah and then he innovated in Islaam and you didn’t hate him for it, you never truly loved him for Allaah.” (http://maktabah-alfawaaid.blogspot.co.uk/2013/03/ath-thawree-if-you-loved-man-for-allaah.html)

Verily! There is no shame or blame on an individual when he returns to correctness after falling into error. Al-Hajoori has innovated and persisted upon falsehood, yet Mourad, you have persisted upon a futile defence of him whilst waging a blameworthy war against those who have accepted the knowledge based refutations. It was/is incumbent upon you to abandon this innovator, and not persist upon this grave error. Therefore a reminder again from Imaam Sufyaan Ath-Thawri (rahimahullaah): “If you loved a man for Allaah and then he innovated in Islaam and you didn’t hate him for it, you never truly loved him for Allaah.” So just as it is not befitting that you maintain ties with this innovator (al-Hajoori), likewise it is not befitting that I should maintain any ties with you whilst you persist upon defending this Haddaadi. His errors are well documented and clear and (if it requires more proof) then you can see here: http://www.alhajuri.com/index.cfm

Perhaps some people may say:”Mourad benefited you in the past.”… then my answer to them is this:

“What Allaah decreed of past events have elapsed…. and Allaah does not cause the good deeds to be lost, but at present Mourad is persistent in his defence of an innovator, and I will not have any associations with a person who knowingly defends an innovator and attacks those who clarify the truth from the scholars and students after the evils of such an innovator have been made manifestly clear.”

So return to the truth! It is not befitting for a Muslim that he clings to error after its clarification! It is not befitting for a Muslim that he defends any innovator….let alone Yahyah Al-Hajoori Al-Haddaadi?!

I sincerely advise you to stop attacking the Mashaayikh, the students of knowledge and the Maraakiz for the sake of defending Al-Hajoori. Return to correctness and this will be better for you; but if you persist upon this path, then know that neither you nor Al-Hajoori are able to harm the truth, its scholars and adherents in the least.

Advice was sent to you a few months ago to seek clarification from Shaikh Rabee; but Allaah knows best whether you heeded that advice. Your state of affairs at present is very bad because you have persisted in sheltering an innovator worse than Al-Halabi and Al-Maribi, as Shaikh Rabee said: ‘’There is none more harmful than Yahyah.’’

Contemplate and do not allow the great deceiver (shaytaan) to deceive you. Your recent mention of my name in your email should leave no doubt in your mind that my stance towards the hajaawira is very clear, and it is the same as that of the rest of the Maraakiz.

So be informed that I am totally in agreement with Al-Allaamah Rabee Bin Haadi, Al-Allaamah Ubaid Bin Abdillaah Al-Jaabiri, Al-Allaamah Muhammad Bin Haadi Al-Madkhali and the rest of the Mashaayikh against the hajaawirah. I am in agreement with the students of knowledge in the various Maraakiz of Salafiyyah, such as Abu Hakeem, Abu Khadeejah, Abu Idrees, Abu Iyaad, Abdul-Ilaah, Uwais Taweel, Abu Mu-aadh Taqweem Aslam and others- against Al-Hajoori. I am totally in agreement with the Committees of all the Salafi Maraakiz that signed this document http://salaficentre.com/2013/05/a-united-word-from-ahlus-sunnah-in-britain-regarding-yahyah-al-hajooree/ against Al-Hajoori.

So let it be known to everyone that I am free from Mourad al-Jazaa’iri until he abandons his futile defence of Al-Hajoori. I will not engage in any communications in debating or arguing over this affair with you whatsoever in any capacity, rather all that is required is that you alter your ways and return to the truth. I therefore will not accept any attempts to waste my time and do not mention me in your emails until you return to the truth and abandon the hajaawira. May Allaah rectify the affairs and unite the hearts upon truth. And Allaah knows best.

Naeem Bashir

Mourad al-Jazaa’iri the Hajoori Fanatic,”Email Shaykh” Disgraced by His Own Arrogance

Written by Salafi Dawah Manchester on . Posted in Brotherhood, Da'wah - Calling To Islam, Hadaadis, Morals and Manners - 'Akhlaaq', Refutations.

After a lengthy period of arrogance and opposition to the truth Mourad al-Jazaa’iri of Manchester has finally been exposed for the deviations he is upon, for the infatuated and corrupted blind following of his Shaikh al-Hajoori that caused him to attack all those that spoke the truth, at the heads of them the likes of Shaikh ‘Ubayd al-Jabiry.  Shaikh Rabee’ has now clearly advised that this individual be warned against, and that is what will be done.

We will take this opportunity to councel the somewhat deluded “E-mail Shaykh” with his very own words! Only recently on 20th October he stated in yet another email in what can only be described as a delusional threat, “Very Important and Final Warning” [!], after having informed the readers that the affair is “important” and indeed “final”[!] he continued to say:

“I am asking anybody whom I advised and he rejected the advice, and whom I have promised to refute you and expose your game and corrupted way, to repent to Allaah Almighty, send me an email and we will take it from there, save your face from being humiliated because you have opposed the Haq.”

We would highlight several issues here:

1 – Those whom he thinks he “advised” did not reject advice, rather what they were asked to do in effect was abandon the actual true and sincere advice of the scholars and follow his corrupt advice and his Shaykh al-Hajoori…that is what was rejected by them.

2 – The bold and magnificent “threats” of promises to refute people who oppose him and al-Hajoori only highlight the deluded state the “E-Mail Shaykh” Mourad al-Jazaa’iri is upon…it is he himself who has been refuted and his corruption and games exposed culminating in Shaikh Rabee’ stating he be warned against, not that he himself will refute others[!].

3 – Apparently the “repentance” has to be sent to Mourad al-Jazaa’iri via email [naturally], in order to save face?! Avoid humiliation!? For those who are upright in recognizing the corruption of al-Hajoori and his number one supporter in Manchester there was never anything to save face from, there was never any question of humiliation. Those who opposed the truth and instead attacked the likes of Shaikh Rabee’ claiming he has made a “wrong” statement against al-Hajoori, as well as the Salafi Centre of Manchester, Spubs of Birmingham and others who supported the truth, as well as the students [Abu Khadeejah and Abu Muadh Taqweem Aslam], and our brother Abu Mu-aawiyyah Abdullah Jallow with slanderous statements and lies…indeed such opposers to the truth are the ones in need of openly repenting and avoiding the humiliation of persistence upon falsehood.

It would appear that Mourad al-Jazaa’iri’s own words are applicable to himself rather than anyone else, he should proceed with caution after having promised to refute himself and expose the corruption and games….since he is the one who has rejected the advice of Shaikh Rabee’ and others!

Yet we will not request that Mourad al-Jazaa’iri send us an email with his repentance, we are not deluded into thinking we are the “Court House” of Manchester – as Mourad al-Jazaa’iri seems to think he is [!] -, rather we will advise the deluded E-Mail Shaykh to repent sincerely to Allah fulfilling the conditions of repentance and to cease his attacks upon the scholars, the salafi centres and students….up until that time we will carry out the advice of the noble Shaikh Rabee’ may Allah preserve him.

Ustaadh Abu Khadeejah informs of Mourad Al-Jazaa-iri [Email Shaykh (Hajoori Fanatic)]

Written by Salafi Dawah Manchester on . Posted in Brotherhood, Da'wah - Calling To Islam, Deviated Callers & Individuals, Hadaadis, Refutations, Scholars of Islam.

In The Name of Allaah, The Most Merciful, The Bestower of Mercy

The brothers at Al-Markaz As-Salafi (Manchester) complained to Ustaadh Abu Khadeejah when Mourad became adamant in his oppressive behaviour, extremism, arrogance, exaggerations, false defence of the hajaawira, doubts and attacks against some of the Mashaayikh; so Ustaadh (may Allaah preserve him) replied, saying:

I pray you are well and in strength of Imaan, may Allāh preserve you upon the Sunnah.

Muraad’s call is to himself – he uses the veil of Salafiyyah and radd upon the Mukhaalif as his claim to be a vanguard of Salafiyyah, but he is (in reality) affected by a type of extremism that is contrary to the correct understanding of the principles of Salafiyyah– and this goes back some years.

He is a conspiracist who believes he has ‘ability and skills’ that no one in the UK possesses. He operates with a ‘cloak and dagger’ manhaj–if he sees even a crack where he can cause discord (even in affairs of tolerated ijtihaad), he turns it into a huge fitnah. I truly believe he is an ignorant loud-mouth who likes attention, good or bad (he doesn’t mind). I also believe, based upon his actions that he lacks sincerity. I remember his ignorance coming to the surface when he accused SPubs of wahdatul-adyaan several years ago. Tawbah? Not a chance! – He doesn’t know the meaning of what it means to be humble!

I believe I’ve known him longer than all of you – Allaah knows best– from Jimas days. I can truly say that this man is a person who has rancour and hatred for anyone who does not give him limelight, good or bad–as long as he is at the centre of attention. Swallowing his pride is close to impossible! This is how he works: Step 1: Prove that he’s a vanguard and protector of the da’wah – how? Refute the Shi’ah, the soofees, HT, and the Hizbees (Turaath etc). Step 2: Use that as the stage to gather youth around him. Step 3: Once these youth are convinced that Muraad is the “true” defender of salafiyyah, he informs them of the Salafis who are “really under cover hizbees” against whom he has “hidden files” that one day he will expose for the world to see! Step 4: Get these youth to start the campaign. Step 5: Play the victim, “I am calling to the truth and these people don’t want it, so they oppose me” – so his campaign goes into high gear, and so on.

So best thing, tell the people he’s an ignoramus who feigns knowledge and uses his enmity against the Ahlul-Bid’ah as a launch-pad against the Salafis – same as the Haddaadiyyah! Not a single Salafi student of knowledge in the UK [i.e. those in the various Maraakiz known for their lessons, dawah efforts and connection with the scholars] has been with this foolish man for many years! That says a lot itself!

Al-Allaamah Rabee Bin Haadi Al-Madkhali (may Allaah preserve him) stated:

”Warn against Mourad Jaza’iree from Manchester: That he speaks ill of Shaikh Ubaid & Shaikh Bukhaaree & defends Hajooree.”

 

[2] [Repelling the lies of Ali Halabi and his misguided party]

Written by Salafi Dawah Manchester on . Posted in Ali Hassan Al Halabi, Deviated Callers & Individuals, Methodology - 'Manhaj', Scholars of Islam.

In The Name of Allaah, The Most Merciful, The Bestower of Mercy

These are testimonies of the truthful and righteous Imaams of the Sunnah, which can neither be affected by the slanders of the sinful ones nor by the lies of the evil ones, such as the likes of Ali Al-Halabi—the ignoramus—and his misguided party.  How many fabrications and lies do they have against Ahlus Sunnah in general and against Shaikh Rabee in particular!  And from those (fabrications and lies of theirs ) is that they accuse Shaikh Rabee of ignorance, self-contradictory, having changes in his (Manhaj) and other lies which they have perpetrated upon the path of the people of desires.  When they became unable to confront the clear proofs and manifest evidences, they resorted to these despicable and disgraceful paths.  By Allaah they have lied, for indeed the senior scholars have testified a lot for Shaikh Rabee that he is a possessor of knowledge and that he is well grounded in it; and that he is an upright person; steadfast; an aider of the Salafi Creed and a defender of those who call to the Salafi Creed; and that he is a person who repels falsehood and its people with manifest evidences.

The writer (may Allaah preserve him) said:

Our Shaikh Rabee has been praised by his teachers and brothers; they have described him with great and noble characteristics, and from those descriptions is that he upon the path of the pious predecessors – in creed and action.

 

 

His Shaikh, Al-Allaamah Ubaidullaah Ar-Rahmaani Al-Mubaarakfooree (rahimahullah) said: “He (i.e. Shaikh Rabee) has sat and conversed with me regarding the affairs of knowledge. He also came to Mubaarakfoor several times and met me in my house, and indeed I found him to be in possession of abundant knowledge and great virtue–a person possessing sound understanding and an upright nature upon the path of the pious predecessors (may Allaah be pleased with them) in creed and action; a follower of the Book and the Sunnah; a supporter and defender  of the Book and Sunnah–harsh against the people of innovations and desires, and a rebutter of the blind followers…..up until the Shaikh Al-Mubaarakfooree said: ‘’May Allaah bless him (i.e. Shaikh Rabee) in his knowledge and gratify the Muslims with a long life span for him.

 
Al-Allaamah Abdul-Azeez Bin Baaz (rahimahullaah)

When one of the students of knowledge said to Al-Allaamah Abdul-Azeez Bin Baaz: ‘’O Shaikh! Shaikh Rabee speaks ill of such and such, and he speaks ill of the callers;” so Al-Allaamah Bin Baaz replied to him, saying: ‘’Fear Allaah, the man (i.e. Shaikh Rabee) is an Imaam in the Sunnah.”
Al-Allaamah Bin Baaz also said: “Shaikh Rabee is from the best of Ahlus Sunnah Wal Jamaa’ah and it is well known that he is from Ahlus Sunnah. His writings and statements are well known.

 

 

 

Shaikh Rabee’s Shaikh Al-Allaamah Ahmad Bin Yahyah An-Najmi (rahimahullaah) said: ‘’Shaikh Rabee is a mujaahid and may Allaah reward him. I am jealous of him due to his jihaad in spreading the Sunnah and in subduing bidah and its people, and due to his concern for the Sunnah and its dissemination in every way he is able….

 

 

Al-Allaamah Muhammad Bin Abdullaah As-Subayyil (rahimahullah) said: His (i.e. Shaikh Rabee) is the Salafi creed and he is from the best of the people, and none speaks against him except a person of desires and illegal partisanship.

 
Al Allaamah Muhammad Bin Saalih al Uthaymeen (rahimahullaah) said: Shaikh Rabee is from the scholars of the Sunnah and the people of good. His creed is sound and his Manhaj is upright.

 
Al Allaamah Muqbil Bin Haadi al Waadi’ee (rahimahullaah) said: Shaikh Rabee is a sign from the signs of Allaah with regards to his (i.e. Shaikh Rabee’s) knowledge about the people of illegal partisanship; but not like the Iranian signs–the Dajjaaleen (i.e. the liars/imposters of the iranian shee-ah raafidah with their claims to supreme religious leadership despite being callers to major shirk–worship of the dead, graves, shrines, tombs; cursing the companions and other filthy beliefs)

 

 

To be continued….Inshaa-Allaah

[Abridged and paraphrased, for further details see link:  http://www.sahab.net/forums/index.php?showtopic=140420]

————————————————————————————————————————————————————

Reminder:

In 2002 Brixton Admin clung to the Jordanians, whilst they defended the Ikhwaani innovator Al-Maribi.  Once again Brixton Admin are openly defending Ali Al-Halabi after he innovated in the Religion of Allaah (The Most High).  The articles on this link http://salafitalk.net/st/viewmessages.cfm?Forum=21&Topic=468 will show the reader the affair of Brixton’s Admin from the early days.  On the other hand, the article is enough as a warning to all of us, regarding the danger of persisting upon falsehood and turning away from truth after clarification is given to distinguish between the two.

Finally, see this article as a reminder http://salaficentre.com/2013/10/5-o-you-who-believe-answer-allaah-and-his-messenger/ and may Allaah return Brixton to the truth and free their hearts from the traps of the innovators– Ali Halabi, Abul Hasan Al-Maribi and Muhammad Al-Maghraawi.

 

 

[1] Introduction: [Repelling the lies of Ali Al-Halabi and his misguided party]

Written by Salafi Dawah Manchester on . Posted in Ali Hassan Al Halabi, Da'wah - Calling To Islam, Deviated Callers & Individuals, Deviated Groups, Sects and Parties, Innovations In Islam (Bidah), Morals and Manners - 'Akhlaaq', Refutations, Scholars of Islam.

All praise is due to Allaah, and may (Allaah’s) salutations of peace and blessings be upon the noblest of the Prophets and the Messengers—our Prophet Muhammad—and upon his family and companions.  These are testimonies of the truthful and righteous Imaams of the Sunnah, which can neither be affected by the slanders of the sinful ones nor by the lies of the evil ones, such as the likes of Ali Al-Halabi—the ignoramus—and his misguided party.  How many fabrications and lies do they have against Ahlus Sunnah in general and against Shaikh Rabee in particular!  And from those (fabrications and lies of theirs ) is that they accuse Shaikh Rabee of ignorance, self-contradictory, having changes in his (Manhaj) and other lies which they have perpetrated upon the path of the people of desires.  When they became unable to confront the clear proofs and manifest evidences, they resorted to these despicable and disgraceful paths.  By Allaah they have lied, for indeed the senior scholars have testified a lot for Shaikh Rabee that he is a possessor of knowledge and that he is well grounded in it; and that he is an upright person; steadfast; an aider of the Salafi Creed and a defender of those who call to the Salafi Creed; and that he is a person who repels falsehood and its people with manifest evidences.

——————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————-

[Paraphrased and abridged: for further details, see link:

http://www.sahab.net/forums/index.php?showtopic=140420

Posted by Ahmad Bin Yahyah Az-Zahraani (may Allaah preserve him)]

Next post: The statements of the scholars about Shaikh Rabee (may Allaah preserve him)