Skip to main content

Tag: evil

[1]Greenlane’s Admin—[Bold Faced Liars; False Claimants to Salafiyyah; Shelterers of Ahlul Bidah & Allies of Naveed Ayaz [IslamNelson/Madeenah.con)]

بسم الله الرحمن الرحيم

———————————————————————————————————————————————————

Imaam Fudayl Ibn Iyaad (Rahimahullaah) said:

”Whoever is approached by a man and he directs him to a Mubtadi, has acted with deception towards Islaam.  Be mindful of entering upon the people of innovation, for indeed they prevent from the haqq.”

———————————————————————————————————————————————————

Greenlane’s Admin [Bold Faced Liars; False Claimants to Salafiyyah and Shelterers of Ahlul Bidah] state on their website as follows: ”GLMCC is committed in providing a service to the community in accordance to the teachings and strict adherence to the Quran and authentic Sunnah with the understanding of the Khulafa Rashideen and Salaf-us-Salih.” [End of Quote]

A Reminder before we briefly shed light on this blatant lie and destructive Plot Against the Pure Salafi Manhaj

Imaam Muhammad Ibn Abdul Wahhaab (rahimahullaah) stated in Ma’saa’ilil Jaahiliyyah [the 120th Mas-alah] They (People of the Pre-Islamic era of ignorance) claimed to follow the Salaf (righteous predecessors), while they clearly opposed and contradicted them.”  Shaikh Saaleh al Fawzaan (may Allaah preserve him) said:

The general (people) among the Jews and the Christians, and the people of misguidance among those who attribute themselves to Islaam claim to follow those believers who preceded them. So the Jews claim that they follow Moosaa (alyahis-salaam) and those who believed in him; the Christians claim that they follow the Messiah (alayhis-salaam) and those who believed in him, and the people of misguidance of this Ummah claim that they follow the Salaf of this Ummah- the Sahaabah, the Taa’bi’een and their followers- and that what they are upon is the way of the Salaf.

It is not that the claim of everyone who claims to be upon the Madhab of the Salaf or upon the methodology of the Salaf is a sound claim, until he makes apparent what he is upon (regarding the) Methodology of the Salaf. So if that conforms to (the Methodology of the Salaf), then he is upon the Methodology of the Salaf; and if it is in opposition, then he is not upon the Methodology of the Salaf, even if he makes that claim.

Every deviated party at present claims to be upon the way of the Salaf, but they are not upon the methodology of the Salaf because the statement of the Prophet (sallal-laahu-alayhi-wasallam) regarding the precise (definition) of the way of the Salaf: ‘those upon that which I and my companions are upon’, is not applicable to them.  This is what it (means) to be upon the methodology of the Salaf. As for the one who is in opposition to this, then he is not upon the methodology of the Salaf, even if he claims that.   The Claim is not what is taken into consideration; rather the reality is what is taken into consideration.  Those who claim Salafiyyah are many, but they must make apparent what they are upon (with regards to the) Methodology of the Salafus Saaleh. If that is in conformity, then it is truth, and if in opposition, they are not upon the Methodology of the Salafus Saaleh.   Likewise, there are those who attribute themselves to the Madhabs of the Four Imaams, whilst being in opposition to the Imaams in Aqeedah; so their ascription is not correct because they oppose (the Imaams) in the most important of affairs and that is Aqeedah. [1] [End of Quote]

Greenlane’s Admin [Bold Faced Liars; False Claimants to Salafiyyah and Shelterers of Ahlul Bidah] claims to be establishing the understanding of the Khulafaa and the Salaf; but the reality is that the Khulafaa and the Salaf neither worked with the people of Bidah nor sheltered those who openly defend figureheads of Bidah. This Admin is an open ally of Ihya Turaath (an organization of Bidah, whose speakers propagate various deviant methodologies]; Al-Maghrib Institute, whose deviation is clear to all the Salafiyyoon-Scholars, students of knowledge and the rest of the Salafiyyoon.

Likewise, this Admin is still sheltering Goldie [Abu Usaamah (the man of bidah)], who is well known to defend three contemporary figureheads of bidah and misguidance [Ali Halabi, Abul Hasan Al-Maribi and Muhammad Al-Maghraawi]. Therefore, is it from the Methodology of  the Khulafaa and the Salaf to co-operate with the people of Bidah or shelter those who defend them! Far removed is the Methodology of the Salaf from this satanic and destructive methodology. Imaam Fudayl Ibn Iyaad (Rahimahullaah) said: ”Whoever is approached by a man and he directs him to a Mubtadi, has acted with deception towards Islaam.  Be mindful of entering upon the people of innovation, for indeed they prevent from the haqq.”  [2]

Ihyaa Turaath: 

See link http://www.salafitalk.net/st/viewmessages.cfm?Forum=9&Topic=5220&srow=21&erow=40

Ali Halabi:

See Links

http://salafitalk.net/st/viewtopics.cfm?Forum=33

http://www.manhaj.com/manhaj/categories/kp-the-false-principles-of-ali-hasan-al-halabi.cfm

Abul Hasan Al-Maribi:

See Link

http://salaficentre.com/2014/04/verdicts-of-the-scholars-against-abul-hasan-al-maribi-al-mubtadi-an-ally-of-masjid-as-sunnah/

Muhammad Al-Maghraawi:

See Article: Revelations on the Doctrines of al-Maghraawi [Salafipublications.com]

Revelations on the Doctrines of al-Maghraawi : Part 1

Revelations on the Doctrines of al-Maghraawi : Part 2

Revelations on the Doctrines of al-Maghraawi : Part 3

Abu Usaamah:

http://www.salafitalk.com/threads/1216-A-Response-to-the-Deceit-of-Abu-Usaamah-Khalifah-and-His-Lying-Tongue

 

To be continued…In-Shaa-Allaah

—————————————————————————————————————————————

[1] Abridged and slightly paraphrased..see Sharh- Ma’saa’ilil Jaahiliyyah of Sheikh Fawzaan (Page: 295-296)]

[2]Taareekh Dimashq (6/263)

[5] Imaam Ash-Shaafi’ee said “It is better for a man to be put to trial…”

Yoonus Ibn Abdil A’laa (rahimahullaah) said, ”I heard Ash-Shaafi’ee (rahimahullaah) saying, ”It is better for a man to be put to trial with everything that Allaah has forbidden except Shirk than looking into (or engaging himself in) philosophical rhetoric; for indeed I have come across affairs from the people of philosophical rhetoric, which I never thought I would come across (i.e. the deviations of the people of philosophical rhetoric).

———————————–

[Aqeedah Ash-Shaafi’ee. Page: 86]

(2) Reality of Masjid Al Furqan’s admin: A Further Example of the Manhaj of Mixing Haqq & Baatil

 In The Name of Allaah, The Most Merciful, The Bestower of Mercy

Allaah (The Most High) said:

وَلَا تُجَـٰدِلۡ عَنِ ٱلَّذِينَ يَخۡتَانُونَ أَنفُسَہُمۡ‌ۚ إِنَّ ٱللَّهَ لَا يُحِبُّ مَن كَانَ خَوَّانًا أَثِيمً۬ا

يَسۡتَخۡفُونَ مِنَ ٱلنَّاسِ وَلَا يَسۡتَخۡفُونَ مِنَ ٱللَّهِ وَهُوَ مَعَهُمۡ إِذۡ يُبَيِّتُونَ مَا لَا يَرۡضَىٰ مِنَ ٱلۡقَوۡلِ‌ۚ وَكَانَ ٱللَّهُ بِمَا يَعۡمَلُونَ مُحِيطًا

هَـٰٓأَنتُمۡ هَـٰٓؤُلَآءِ جَـٰدَلۡتُمۡ عَنۡہُمۡ فِى ٱلۡحَيَوٰةِ ٱلدُّنۡيَا فَمَن يُجَـٰدِلُ ٱللَّهَ عَنۡہُمۡ يَوۡمَ ٱلۡقِيَـٰمَةِ أَم مَّن يَكُونُ عَلَيۡہِمۡ وَڪِيلاً۬

And argue not on behalf of those who deceive themselves. Verily, Allah does not like anyone who is a betrayer of his trust, and indulges in crime. They may hide (their crimes) from men, but they cannot hide (them) from Allah, for He is with them (by His Knowledge), when they plot by night in words that He does not approve, and Allah ever encompasses what they do. Lo! You are those who have argued for them in the life of this world, but who will argue for them on the Day of Resurrection against Allah, or who will then be their defender? [4:7-9]

Al-Allaamah Rabee Bin Haadi Al-Madkhali (may Allaah preserve him) said: Whoever (deliberately) defends them (i.e. the innovators, people of falsehood etc) and argues on their behalf with falsehood, then he among those more deserving of the (above) statement of Allaah. [End of Quote] [1]

We had previously mentioned the confused state in which Masjid al Furqan of Rusholme (Manchester) finds itself in regards to it’s call and methodology- (http://salaficentre.com/2014/08/1-the-reality-of-masjid-al-furqaans-admin-rusholme-manchester-allies-of-goldie-abu-usamah/)

As the article made clear then, we see the likes of Abu Usaamah ad-Dhahabi invited there; a man whose hatred for the salafiyoon is deep and who defends the innovators (the likes of Al Magharawi, Al Ma’ribi, etc); then at the same time they arrange tele-links with those whom from which they hide their true state of affairs.

Another clear example of this hypocrisy of action, confusion in manhaj and deliberate attempts to confuse and pull the wool over the eyes of the people is found in their public library.

20140814_000652000_iOS

Their library carries the books of Sayid Qutb- Namely Fi dhilaal al Quran (in the shade of the Qur’an). Not one copy but two!

Now many will be acquainted with the destructive ideology propagated by this “thinker” and revolutionary; an ideology of bloodshed and revolution, which the ummah is suffering the consequences of to this very day. But as for those who require further information then the following article can make that clear:

http://www.spubs.com/sps/sp.cfm?subsecID=NDV01&articleID=NDV010007&articlePages=1

http://www.spubs.com/sps/sp.cfm?subsecID=NDV01&articleID=NDV010008&articlePages=1

Furthermore here is a list of brief observations of the Scholars On Sayyid Qutb:

Imaam Abdul-Azeez Bin Baaz (rahimahullaah) said:

”He (i.e. Sayyid Qutub) is lost (with regards to) Tafseer.” [3]

Imaam Albaani (rahimahullaah) said:

”He (i.e. Sayyid Qutub) does not possess an understanding of Islaam based on its (sound) fundamental principles and subsidiary issues.” [4]

Imaam Muhammad Ibn Saaleh Al-Uthaymeen (rahimahullaah) said:

”Shaikh Abdullaah Duwaish and Shaikh Rabee have observations on Sayyid Qutb’s Tafseer, so whoever wants to refer to (those observations) can do so.” [5]

Al-Allaamah Saaleh Al-Luhaydaan (may Allaah preserve him) said:

”The books of Sayyid Qutb are filled with affairs that are in opposition to (sound) Islamic Creed.” [6]

Al-Allaamah Rabee Bin Haadi (may Allaah preserve him) stated after mentioning a few books of sayyid Qutub:

”They gather the major innovations in them.” [7]

The above mentioned book is a tafseer written by Sayid Qutb and carries the basis and hall marks of that ideology. It is a tafseer which as Shaykh Anjaree (may Allah preserve him) explained is a tafseer based on “thinking and literal interpretation”; not on the hadeeth and the sunnah.

So what is Masjid Al Furqan doing when it has made that book freely available to any member of the congregation! A book which is one of the cornerstones of the ikhwaani thought and methodology, sits comfortably on their shelves whilst at the same time they are supposedly inviting and arranging links with scholars!

So the admin of Masjid al Furqan (Rusholme Manchester) are clearly attempting to mix between truth and falsehood. On one hand these books that carry the destructive ideologies and propagate the dawa of Sayid Qutb are on the shelves of Masjid Al Furqan; whilst on the other the admin arranges links with sound scholars to blur the people’s vision and hide the reality of their manhaj from the common people.

Ponder upon this statement of Shaikh Saaleh Al-Fawzaan (may Allaah preserve him) said:  ”Yes, separation between the truth and the falsehood; this is correct. We make a distinction between truth and the falsehood and (also between) the people of truth and the people of falsehood. We are going to refute (the people of falsehood), and the Scholars refuted (the people of falsehood). This is not for the purpose of causing division; this is to gather the people upon the truth, because with people remaining upon misguidance and upon the speech of falsehood, then this causes division between the Muslims. As for clarifying the truth for the people, so they can gather upon it, then this is the da’wah towards unity, not the da’wah towards separation. The da’wah towards separation is when it is said, ‘The people of falsehood are not to be refuted.’ This is the da’wah to division if they only gave thought.”[8] [End of quote]

This is the Dawah of Masjid Al-Furqan! They seek to hide their reality; promote Goldie (a man of bidah) and the Books of Sayyid Qutb (the Imaam of the Takfeeris of this Era). Therefore, it is very clear that the events of Masjid Al-Furqan are not to be attended because they defend the man of bidah Goldie and promote the Books of the blood thirsty Khaariji Terrorist Sayyid Qutb.

It will be interesting to see if these books are taken down permanently, the ideology within them refuted and the haqq made clear. Or whether whilst it suits they will be removed up until they can be re-placed there and left to misguide another generation of youth.

And we seek refuge in Allah from such a calamity. And Allah knows best.

To be continued…In-Shaa-Allaah

———————————————————–

1 Source: المحجة البيضاءpage 33]

3: (p.3); Ref 4 (p.6); Ref 5: (p.9); Ref 6: (p.17); Ref 7: (p. 27)] Source: Fataawaa Al-Ulamaa Fee Sayyid Qutb.

[8] http://www.salafitalk.net/st/viewmessages.cfm?Forum=9&Topic=12352

Suicide Bombing does not produce any benefit for the Muslims! Shaikh Uthaymeen (rahimahullaah)

And this action (i.e. suicide bombing) will provoke malice and bitterness in his heart to such an extent that he (i.e. the Non- Muslim) may seek to wreak havoc upon the Muslims. This is what is found from the practice of the Jews with the people of Palestine ­ so when one of the Palestinian blows himself up and kills six or seven people, then in retaliation they take sixty or more. So this does not produce any benefit for the Muslims, and does not benefit those amongst whose ranks explosives are detonated. [Translation from salafipublications.com]

Listen to audio here:

http://safeshare.tv/w/KwWjIvBKOk

[2] Lets share these reminders and benefits from Shaikh Ramzaan Al-Haajiriy (may Allaah preserve him)

Shaikh Ramzaan (may Allaah preserve him) stated:

When the Scholars of Sunnah clarified the truth with its proofs, the haal (state of affairs) of the people of desires was exposed.

When they urged towards adherence to the Jamaa-ah and the Sunnah, the haal (state of affairs) of the people of splitting and innovation became apparent.

When they clarified the (true) state of Jihaad, the difference between it and corruption became apparent.

When they clarified the state of affairs (regarding) bidah and its people, and the correct stance against them (i.e. the people of bidah), the Sunni and the Bid’ee became manifest to the people after what they (the people) have been living in for a long period of time, and after (a period in which) they used to equate the callers to bidah with the callers to the Sunnah.

————————————————————————–

[Asbaab Ihtiwaa Al-Khawaarij Li-Ba’di Abnaa-inaa. page 11]

The khawaarij have various characteristics and from them are…..

Shaikhul Islaam Ibn Taymiyyah (rahimahullaah) said:

And likewise the khawaarij are a people of the sword and fighting. Their opposition to the Jamaa’ah became clear when they fought the people.  As for today many of the people do not know them (i.e. due to their characteristics being different etc).

———————————–

[An-Nubuwwaat 1/139]

The severest Fitnah in this Era!

Shaikh Rabee Bin Haadi (may Allaah preserve him) said:

”Indeed, the Fitnah of this man (1) and those with him is the Fitnah of this era. It is the severest fitnah in this era; because it (falsely) wears the garb of the Salafi Methodology (i.e. falsely attributes itself to Salafiyyah) (2)

A Reply to the Doubts of Qutubiyyah on Ascription to the Sunnah and Salafiyyah

http://www.spubs.com/sps/sp.cfm?subsecID=SLF01&articleID=SLF010004&articlePages=1

———————————————————-

(1) Sayyid Qutb

(2) [الذريعة إلى بيان مقاصد كتاب الشريعة Vol 1. Page: 112]

Imaam Barbahaaree speaks about the khawaarij (terrorists)

Imaam Barbahaaree (rahimahullaah) stated in Sharh- As Sunnah:

‘It is permissible to fight the Khawaarij if they attack the wealth of the Muslims, or the Muslims and their families, but if they are dispersed, then the Muslim Ruler is not to seek after them, nor are their wounded to be killed, nor is booty taken from them, nor may those taken captive be killed, nor are those who flee to be pursued.’

Shaikh Saaleh Al-Fawzaan (may Allaah preserve him) said:

And regarding the saying of Imaam Barbahaaree (rahimahullaah): ‘It is permissible to fight the Khawaarij if they attack the wealth of the Muslims, or the Muslims and their families;’ because the Prophet (sallal-laahu-alayhi-wasallam) commanded that they are to be fought, and because Ali (radiyallaahu-anhu) fought them when they attacked and killed Abdullaah Ibn Khabbaab al Arrat and ripped open the stomach of his pregnant wife.  So Ameerul Mumineen Ali (radiyallaahu-anhu) decided to fight them as they brought about a good reason to be fought against.

And regarding the saying of Imaam Barbahaaree (rahimahullaah): ‘But if they are dispersed, then the Muslim leader is not to seek after them’ If they desist from fighting, the ruler is not to chase them, nor carry out a military expedition against them, as long as they do not commit acts of transgression.  And no doubt they are misguided and are to be advised in hope that they may return (repentant) and are not fought.

And regarding the saying of Imaam Barbahaaree (rahimahullaah): ‘Nor are their wounded to be killed’; because the evil of the injured person is curtailed.

And regarding the saying of Imaam Barbahaaree (rahimahullaah): ‘Nor is booty to be taken from them’, meaning: their wealth is not to be taken as war booty; because it is the wealth of the Muslims.

And regarding the saying of Imaam Barbahaaree (rahimahullaah): ‘Nor may those taken captive be killed’ because they are Muslims, and by being injured and taken as captive their evil is curtailed.

And regarding the saying of Imaam Barbahaaree (rahimahullaah): ‘Nor are those who flee to be pursued’.  If they flee, the leader is to leave them alone and not go after them as their evil is curtailed.

————————————————————————————————————————

[Abridged: Source: (It-haaful Qaaree Bitta’liqaat Alaa Sharhus Sunnah Lil Imaam Barbahaaree) by Sheikh Saaleh al-Fawzaan (hafidha-hullaah) (page: 240-242, Vol: 1)]