Skip to main content

Tag: hizbiyah

A Brief Reminder Regarding Deviant Usaamah Hasan, The Ikhwaanees of Didsbury Masjid And The Stance of The Salafiyyoon Towards Ahlul Bidah

In The Name of Allaah, The Most Merciful, The Bestower of Mercy

We’ve heard Shaikh Abdullaah Al-Bukhaari [hafidhahullaah] many times stating in his audio lectures – and we are quite sure that those students who attend his lessons in person have heard the same – that a Jaahil does not know his limitations, so how can he know the limitations [or status] of others! Suddenly an ignorant group want to declare deviant Usaamah Hasan a scholar! Yes indeed, there are only upright students of knowledge in the West, but not a single scholar; so who amongst the upright and recognised scholars of Ahlus Sunnah has given deviant Usaamah Hasan such a status, title or qualification?! As for the Ikhwaani Didsbury Masjid Committee/Admin, they are well known to the Salafiyyoon of Manchester. And just because Usaamah Hasan refutes individuals at Didsbury Masjid does mean that he is free from deviation, rather deviants refuting other deviants is something well known as stated by Shaikhul Islaam Ibn Taymiyyah [rahimahullaah].

Therefore, Ahlus Sunnah are free from both deviant Usaamah Hasan and the Ikhwaanees of Didsbury. We’ve posted – in this link – refutations against Usaamah Hasan, Didsbury Masjid, the Takfeeris and others. May Allaah guide them or protect the Ummah from their misguidance Aameen.

Some of The Severe Deviations of Usaamah  Hasan

http://www.aqidah.com/creed/articles/eyiig-usamah-hasan-suhaib-hasan-darwinism-and-the-creation-of-man.cfm

 

The Associates of Didsbury Masjid

https://salafidawahmanchester.com/2015/07/1-didsbury-masjid-admin-south-manchester-who-are-their-associates/

https://salafidawahmanchester.com/2015/07/2-didsbury-masjid-admin-south-manchester-they-promote-jamal-al-badawi-an-aqlaani-gives-precedence-to-his-intellect-over-the-ahaadeeth-and-falls-into-philosophical-rhetoric/

https://salafidawahmanchester.com/2015/07/3-didsbury-masjid-admin-south-manchester-they-invite-the-soofi-muhammad-ibn-adam-kathari/

https://salafidawahmanchester.com/2015/07/4-reminder-to-the-hizbiyyoon-of-didsbury-masjid-admin-ustaadh-abu-khadeejah-exposed-the-aqeedah-of-your-ally-muhammad-adam-al-kawthari/

https://salafidawahmanchester.com/2015/07/5-reminder-to-didsbury-masjid-admin-your-deviant-ikhwaani-ally-abu-eesa-niamatullah-praises-abu-ghuddah-another-caller-to-shirk-and-staunch-enemy-of-ahlus-sunnah/

Salafi Position On Jihaad In Syria and Jihaad In Our Times

http://www.abukhadeejah.com/is-there-jihad-in-syria-should-one-go-and-fight-by-salafi-shaikh-abdullaah-al-bukhaaree/

http://www.abukhadeejah.com/salafi-shaikh-fawzaan-on-jihaad-in-our-times-and-the-guidelines-of-jihaad-according-to-islam/

 


 

Dr Ibraaheem Ar-Ruhaylee Sought to Conceal Facts In The Beginning But Allaah Manifested His Affair

In The Name of Allaah, The Most Merciful, The Bestower of Mercy

Shaikh Abdullaah Al-Bukhaari stated that Dr Ibraaheem Ar-Ruhayli used to spread a rumour that Shaikh Ali Naasir Al-Faqeehiy considered him to be upon the truth and that Shaikh Abdullaah Al-Bukhaari was mistaken in his refutation against him (i.e. against Dr Ruhayli).

Dr Ruhayli carried on with this claim for a long time whilst being aware that it was incorrect. He also utilised this claim to diminish and belittle the one who refuted him, but Shaykh Abdullaah Al-Bukhari exercised patience in facing the harm he received from him and those with him. Shaikh Abdullaah used to say that Allaah will manifest the truth even if that was to occur in the near future.

So in one of the gatherings with Shaykh Rabee in Madeenah and this was in Dhul Qida 1431AH, Dr Ar-Ruhayli repeated this claim (i.e. that Dr Ali Naasir considers Shaikh Abdullaah al-Bukhaari to be mistaken and that he was upon the truth). However, he (i.e. Dr Ar-Ruhayli) was visited with what he did not expect because Shaikh Ali Naasir stated in this same gathering that he said to Shaikh Abdullaah Al-Bukhaari: ‘’Your refutation is good but do not mention Ibraaheem’s name.” When Dr Ibraaheem heard this statement, he was dumbfounded. [Source: Atta-aqqubaatus Sareehatu’ pages 33-34′ by Shaikh Abdullaah Al-Bukhaari]

Shaikh Abu Talhah’s [rahimahullaah] Manhaj – [A Thorn In The Throats of Frustrated Hizbiyyoon, Mu’mayyi’ah And Infiltrators]

In The Name of Allaah, The Most Merciful The Bestower of Mercy

Shaikh Abu Khadeejah (may Allaah preserve him and protect him from the enmity of the people of bidah, hizbiyyah and Tamyee) wrote:  ”In the nineties, when the da’wah was in its infancy, many people left the Salafi Manhaj, preferring the paths of innovation – Dawud (rahimahullaah) saw them come and saw them go, but he would not join them in their opposition. Rather he would advise those who were once with us upon this path of Sunnah, he would show great concern for them so they not be misguided. He would make du’aa for them, and then leave their affair to Allaah, and stop his association with them only for the sake of Allaah. He would not compromise with them, nor praise those who opposed this blessed Manhaj. He was the first person to translate the rudood (refutations) of Shaikh Muqbil, Shaikh al-Albaanee and Shaikh Rabee’ against Jam’iyyah Ihyaa Turaath al-Islaamee – he stemmed and almost cut off their bid’ah in the UK by way of these translations (by the permission of Allaah). Allaah had blessed him with skills of translation that I have not seen equaled in the West, and Allaah knows best.’’  http://www.salafitalk.com/threads/657-Abu-Talhah-Dawud-Burbank-and-his-Wife-have-Died?p=1178#post1178 [End of Quote]

Indeed this above statement of Ustaadh Abu Khadeejah is truth.  Ustaadh Abu Talhah translated the works of the ulamaa in refutation against the Mubtadi’a within the ranks of ihya Turaath, such as the likes of Abdur Rahmaan Abdul Khaaliq. He was also well-known for translating the works of the scholars on various topics needed to clarify the correct positions on Ibaadah, Aqeedah, Manhaj, groups, parties, sects, contemporary deviant organizations, individuals and personalities. The following are some of his works mentioned by Ustaadh Abu Khadeejah (may Allaah preserve him):

Facts about Abu Talhah (rahimahullaah) – A man who defended the Sunnah!

  • FACT: Abu Talhah translated Shaikh Muqbil’s refutations on Abdur-Rahmaan Abdul-Khaaliq and Ihyaa Turaath in 1996, ‘The Blazing Meteor’ series. Download HERE
  • FACT: Abu Talhah translated Shaikh Muqbils’ refutation on Abdullaah as-Sabt of Ihyaa Turaath in 1997.
  • FACT: Abu Talhah translated Shaikh Muqbil’s refutations on Suhaib Hasan and al-Hidaayah in 1997.FACT: Abu Talhah translated Shaikh Rabee’s first critique of Suhaib Hasan and Turaath in 1997 after Hajj.
  • FACT: Abu Talhah translated sections from Shaikh Rabee’s ‘Jamaa’ah Waahidah Laa Jama’aat’ in refutation of the head of Ihyaa Turaath, Abdur-Rahmaan Abdul-Khaaliq in 1998.
  • FACT: Abu Talhah translated portions of Shaikh Abdus-Salaam Burjis’s ‘Mu’amalaat al-Hukaam’ in refutation of the Qutubees and those who called for revolt and revolution in the mid to late 1990′s.
  • FACT: Abu Talhah prevented any amalgamation with Muhammad Suroor after he had read ‘as-Sunnah’ magazine of this takfeeree in the early nineties, and found it to be in contradiction to the Sunnah!
  • FACT: Abu Talhah translated portions of the book ‘al-Qutubiyyah’ in refutation of the Qutubees such as Safar al-Hawaalee and Salmaan al-Awdah who were attacking the major scholars.
  • FACT: Abu Talhah translated the fatwa of Shaikh Ibn Baaz (rahimahullaah) calling the authorities to prevent Safar and Salmaan from delivering lectures, classes and their tapes from being distributed.
  • FACT: Abu Talhah translated many of Shaikh Rabee’s refutations against Syed Qutub and al-Mawdoodee; ‘Manhaj al-Anbiyah’ is point and case.
  • FACT: Abu Talhah translated Shaikh al-Albaanee’s refutations on Ihyaa Turaath and Abdur-Rahmaan Abdul-Khaaliq.

[End of Quote]

This was part of Ustaadh Abu Talhah’s methodology, which he learnt from the Ulama of Salafiyyah, and this is the same methodology he died upon (rahimahullaah). The Imaam of Jarh Wat-Tadeel in our era Al-Allaamah Rabee Bin Haadee and others are witnesses to this fact.

*Ustaadh Abu Talhah (rahimahullaah) was neither upon the methodology of the Qutubiyyah and Surooriyyah nor that of the Haddaadiyyah.

*Ustaadh Abu Talhah (rahimahullaah) was neither upon the methodology of Al-Maghraawi nor that of Al-Maribi, Halabi and Al-Hajoori.

*Ustaadh Abu Talhah (rahimahullaah) was not upon the erroneous views of Bilaal Philips, Abu Muslimah, Abu Usaamah, Shadeed Muhammad, Ali Tameemi, Zaraboozo and others.

*Ustaadh Abu Talhah (rahimahullaah) was neither upon the innovations of Ikhwaan al-Muslimeen and Hasan al-Banna nor that of Jamaat At-Tableegh and Muhammad Ilyaas.

*Ustaadh Abu Talhah (rahimahullaah) neither rejected the Jarh Mufassar of the scholars in order to defend figureheads and personalities of bidah nor spoke with Al-Muwaazanah to accommodate the groups, sects and figureheads of Bidah.

*Ustaadh Abu Talhah (rahimahullaah) neither promoted the false principle “We do not disparage but we only correct mistakes’’ nor the other false principle “Let’s not make our differing about someone else a reason for differing amongst ourselves.’’

*Ustaadh Abu Talhah (rahimahullaah) neither brought doubts in the narrations of the trustworthy narrators nor did he differentiate between Aqeedah and Manhaj in order to destroy the clear boundaries between the Salafi Methodology and the false methodologies.

*Ustaadh Abu Talhah (rahimahullaah) neither called to political parties nor the evil and false view that the Salaf differed in Aqeedah—an ignorant view of Aasim Al-Hakeem the Pseudo Shaikh.

*Ustaadh Abu Talhah neither reviled the scholars of Ahlus Sunnah in this time and make the people flee from them nor did he defend those who call the Sahaabah Ghuthaa-iyyah.

*Ustaadh Abu Talhah (rahimahullaah) neither called the people to accept the misguided sects, parties and organizations into the domain of Ahlus Sunnah nor did he call to the unity of religions.

*Ustaadh Abu Talhah (rahimahullaah) never defended the principles that are now been propagated by likes of Ibraaheem Ruhayli.

*Ustaadh Abu Talhah applied Imtihaan by way of the Ulama of the Sunnah in this era, such as the likes of Shaikh Bin Baaz, Shaikh Uthaymeen, Shaikh Albaani, Shaikh Fawzaan, Shaikh Rabee, Shaikh Ubaid, Shaikh Muqbil and others.  So, whoever spoke well of them, loved them and followed what they stated with Daleel, Abu Talhah was pleased with him.  And whoever spoke ill of them, then Abu Talhah was distant from them. May Allaah have mercy upon all of us, the scholars and students of knowledge Aameen.


 

Naveed Ayaaz [Abul Abbaas] and Associates:[Beware of Gatherings Attended By Naveed and His Companions- Those Affiliated to Well-Known Hizbiyyoon]

In The Name of Allaah, The Most Merciful, The Bestower of  Mercy

Muhammadi Masjid Admin are affiliates of the fallen Jamiat Ahle Hadeeth UK and Companions of Naveed Ayaaz [Abul Abbaas].

The Reality of Markaz Jamiat Ahle Hadeeth: 

http://www.salafitalk.net/st/viewmessages.cfm?Forum=9&Topic=3384

 

The Manhaj of Naveed Ayaaz [Abul Abbaas] in a Nutshell

https://safeshare.tv/submit?url=https%3A%2F%2Fyoutu.be%2F2Ed8MpsWeUo

 

A Clarification Regarding Abdul Qaadir and Luton – Companions of Naveed Ayaaz [Abul Abbaas]

https://safeshare.tv/submit?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.youtube.com%2Fwatch%3Fv%3Dfr1vCaHhf98

 

A Clarification Regarding Greenlane’s Admin – The Companions of Naveed Ayaaz [Abul Abbaas]

http://www.abukhadeejah.com/?p=2292

 

Our Well-Known Stance Against The Khaarijites [Terrorists] and Other Treacherous People In The West

Unity is Based on Book and Sunnah! An Insightful Statement of Ustaadh Abu Khadeejah During Eedul Fitr Khutbah

Unity is based on the Book and the Sunnah and not bidah. We do not look for a common enemy and unite against him… because as soon as we overcome him, we will start to fight amongst ourselves. 

Follow Allaah’s Path and Do Not Follow Bidah and Shubuhaat- By Imaam Mujaahid [rahimahullaah]

In The Name of Allaah, The Most Merciful, The Bestower of Mercy

Allaah [The Most High] said:

وَأَنَّ هَـٰذَا صِرَٲطِى مُسۡتَقِيمً۬ا فَٱتَّبِعُوهُ‌ۖ وَلَا تَتَّبِعُواْ ٱلسُّبُلَ فَتَفَرَّقَ بِكُمۡ عَن سَبِيلِهِۦ‌ۚ ذَٲلِكُمۡ وَصَّٮٰكُم بِهِۦ لَعَلَّڪُمۡ تَتَّقُونَ

And verily, this is my Straight Path, so follow it, and follow not [other] paths, for they will separate you away from His Path. This He has ordained for you that you may become Al-Muttaqun [the pious] [6:153]

Abu Nu’aym [rahimahullaah] reported with his chain of transmission from Mujaahid [rahimahullaah] regarding the statement of Allaah: [وَلَا تَتَّبِعُواْ ٱلسُّبُلَ فَتَفَرَّقَ بِكُمۡ عَن سَبِيلِهِ – And follow not [other] paths, for they will separate you away from His Path], that it means: [Do not follow] Bidah [i.e. innovations in religion] and Shubuhaat  [i.e. affairs that are made to resemble truth but are falsehood in reality].


[Source: Al-Hilya 3/293. Abridged and slightly paraphrased]

O MCR Hizbies! Why Do You Attach the Youth to The Figureheads of Bidah- [Sayyid Qutb, Hasan Al-Bannah, Al-Maribi, Al-Maghraawi etc]- and Their Books?

Shaikh Saaleh Al-Fawzaan [may Allaah preserve him] said:

And all praises and thanks be to Allaah, there are scholars of the Sunnah and upright [scholars].  Allaah [Glorified be He and free is He from all imperfections] has not [left you in a state to have] a need of the evil scholars and the books of misguidance, whilst we have authentic books.  Therefore, we hold onto the [upright scholars and authentic books] -neither go to the scholars of misguidance nor the innovators, nor to the books that are mixed [with falsehood].  All praises and thanks be to Allaah, we have good books and scholars, so we hold onto the scholars and the authentic books.


[Source: Al-Ijaabaatul Muhimmah 1/144-145. Abridged and slightly paraphrased]

Salaficentre-By the Grace of Allaah-Not Guilty of Causing Disunity, For They Do Not Defend a Single Figurehead of Bidah In the Dunyah! But MCR Hizbies Find Lame Excuses For Takfeeri Figureheads, Such as Sayyid Qutb and Al-Maghraawi

Who is Sayyid Qutb

http://www.sayyidqutb.com/index.cfm

http://www.salafipublications.com/sps/sp.cfm?subsecID=ndv01&articleID=NDV010009&articlePages=1

http://www.salafipublications.com/sps/sp.cfm?subsecID=NDV01&articleID=NDV010008&pfriend=

http://www.spubs.com/sps/sp.cfm?subsecID=ndv01&articleID=NDV010007&articlePages=1

Who is Muhammad Al-Maghraawi

http://salafipublications.com/sps/sp.cfm?subsecID=GRV08&articleID=GRV080001&articlePages=1

http://salafipublications.com/sps/sp.cfm?subsecID=GRV08&articleID=GRV080002&articlePages=1

http://www.salafipublications.com/sps/sp.cfm?subsecID=GRV08&articleID=GRV080003&articlePages=1

 

Reality Check for Some Mancunian Hizbiyyoon [Illegal Partisans]: Is It Possible to Refute and Shun a Terrorist Without Refuting and Shunning Sayyid Qutb?!

In the Name of Allaah, The Most Merciful, The Bestower of Mercy

Reality Check for Those Who Come Out to Denounce the Evil Acts of The Terrorists; Yet  They Recommend the Books of Sayyid Qutb To the Youth

Shaikh Rabee Bin Haadi (may Allaah preserve him) said:

Then the political groups came in this era, [whilst] being affected- to some extent-by the creed and methodologies of this sect [i.e. the khawaarij]. And for this reason, they do not give importance to [other affairs] besides politics. They neither give concern to rectifying the state of affairs of the Ummah though [sound] Creed and Knowledge nor do they reflect upon returning the Ummah to the Book and the Sunnah, and to steadfastness and righteousness which the Salafus Saaleh were upon in every aspect of the Religion. Rather they [i.e. these political groups] increase the Ummah in corruption-in creed and manners. So, you see them giving allegiance to the people of Bidah and misguidance.

They wage war against those people who [truly] follow the Qur’aan and the Sunnah, and those scholars who truly adhere to the Qur’aan and the Sunnah. They utter false opinions and slogans regarding the affair of ahlul bidah wad-dalaalah [i.e. the people of bidah and misguidance] and their books. And amongst them [i.e. those deviants whom the illegal partisans give a good image] is Sayyid Qutb and his followers- Sayyid Qutb, the one who embarked upon the methodology of the Khawaarij, the Rawaafid, the Mu’tazilah and the Jahmiyyah in creed, methodology and politics, especially in the subject matter of Takfeer. According to him [i.e. sayyid Qutb] all human societies are societies of Pre-Islamic ignorance and that the Muslim Ummah is upon the severest state of apostasy and Pre-Islamic ignorance. Then the path of the Baatiniyyah was added to this [i.e. this methodology of Sayyid Qutb], such as assassinations and explosions [i.e. by way of terrorist acts] etc. And his followers attribute themselves to the Salafi Methodology, which is a mighty plot against the [true and upright] Salafi leaders. [So] when you come to know this, then you will know that the Salafi Methodology is free from this [type] of Takfeer, [the evil act of causing] explosions and destruction, and the people of this treacherous [act]. [Source: Man Humul Irhaabiyyoon’ pages 104-105. Abridged and slightly paraphrased]

 

Reality Check for Those Who Spread Ikhwaani and Other False Principles Amongst the Youth, saying: Read and Take What Is Good from The Books of Sayyid Qutb and Hasan Al-Banna, and Abandon Their Errors

Shaikh Saaleh Al-Fawzaan [may Allaah preserve him] said:

It is not permissible to exalt and praise the innovators even if they have some truth with them. That is because raising and praising them will spread their bidah and place them amongst the sincere ones-those who are taken as examples amongst distinguished men of this Ummah. The Salaf warned against having trust for the innovators, (warned against) praising them and their gatherings.

In this regard, Asad Ibn Musa (rahimahullaah) wrote:” Beware of being a brother of the innovator (by association) or a companion of his, or one whom you sit with; for indeed it has been narrated that ‘Whoever sits with a person of innovation has left the protection of Allaah and is entrusted to himself’.

The innovators must be warned against and kept away from even if they have some truth with them. Indeed, the most astray are not devoid of some truth, but if they have with them innovation, opposition and sinful views, it is not permissible to praise and exalt them. It is impermissible to not have an objection against their innovation because this spreads bidah, belittles the Sunnah and by way of this the innovator will emerge and become a guide for the Ummah.

As for giving consideration (to the fact) that the innovation has some truth, this does not justify praising him. This is -to a far greater extent- against what is of overriding benefit and it is known in relation to a principle in the religion that averting harm takes precedence over seeking that which is of benefit. And with regards to having hatred for the innovator, the harm that is averted from the Ummah is weightier than the benefit possessed by the innovator. And had we adhered to this concept (i.e. praising the innovator because he has some truth with him), then no one would have been judged to be misguided and declared an innovator. That is because there is not an innovator except that he has some truth and adherence to the Sunnah. The innovator (may) neither be a disbeliever nor be in opposition to all the Islamic legislation; rather he is either an innovator in some or most of the affairs. However, if the innovation is particularly related to affairs of Creed and Methodology, then the affair is dangerous indeed because it will become an example (to be followed); innovation will spread and the innovators will become active in spreading their innovation. hisNevertheless, this is a dangerous affair and it is not permissible to be lackadaisical with regards to innovation and its people, whatever that may be.  [Source: At-Tabdee Wat-Tafseeq Wat Takfeer. Page: 72-76. Abridged and slightly paraphrased]

Who is Sayyid Qutb

 http://www.spubs.com/sps/sp.cfm?subsecID=NDV01&articleID=NDV010008&articlePages=1