Stop Oppressing The Women – by Ustaadh Abu Abdillaah Hasan as-Sumaali (may Allaah preserve him)
Link
Tag: sins
Cursed is the one who approaches his wife in her…..
The Messenger of Allaah (sallal-laahu alayhi wasallam) said:
”Cursed is he who approaches a woman (i.e. his wife) in the anus.” [1]
The messenger (sallal-laahu- alayhi wasallam) said:
”Indeed Allah is not shy of the truth. Do not have intercourse with women (i.e. your wives) in their anuses.” [2]
——————————————————————————————————————————————————————-
[1]Reported by Imaam Ahmad 2/479.Saheeh al Jaami no: 5865
[2] Reported by Imam Nasaa-ee, Ibn Maajah and others. Authenticated by Imaam Al Albaanee in Saheeh al Jaami No: 933, 934, 1852, 7711
Al-Allaamah Muqbil Bin Haadi (rahimahullaah) on the Journalists
Al-Allaamah Muqbil bin Haadi (rahimahullaah) said:
In the majority of cases the journalists are capricious; so they praise the rulers in order to be given wealth. And it may be that they accept the realities, whilst launching attacks against the people of knowledge (i.e. the scholars). Therefore, a person should be principled and truthful, and he should not care who opposes him. But if he is capricious, then the people will not be at ease with his newspaper because it becomes that of lies and (also) its articles.
——————————————-
[تحفة المجيب 229 page:229]
Brief Observations on Muhammad Qutb’- by Shaikh Rabee and Shaikh Hammaad Al-Ansaari
In The Name of Allaah The Most Merciful, The Bestower of Mercy
Shaikh Rabee Bin Haadi (may Allaah preserve him)….
- Muhammad Qutb spoke about Tawheed but with no detail and clarity…..
- Muhammad Qutb aided in spreading the ideas of his brother Sayyid Qutb– by spreading his brother’s books of bidah and misguidance.
- No clear report has being received from Muhammad Qutb disapproving of his brother’s innovations and affairs of misguidance. He shouldered the responsibility of spreading Sayyid Qutb’s books of misguidance and bidah. So if he repented to Allaah and showed regret for spreading those books, he would have made that public; but if not he remains guilty of spreading the misguidance and innovations of his brother. [listen to audio]
Listen to audio here:
Shaikh Hammaad Al-Ansaari (rahimahullaah)
“Muhammad Quṭb is an Ashʿarī” and he also said, “Muhammad Quṭb, Sayyid Quṭb’s brother, is a dangerous Ashʿarī.” Read full article on this link: http://www.themadkhalis.com/md/articles/muqxd-sayyid-qutb-and-mohammad-qutb-were-asharis.cfm
What is Fusooq—Shaikh Fawzaan (may Allaah preserve him) explains…
Question:
Concerning the statement of Allaah (The Most High): [وَكَرَّهَ إِلَيْكُمُ الْكُفْرَ وَالْفُسُوقَ وَالْعِصْيَان] – ”And has made disbelief, wickedness and disobedience (to Allah and His Messenger) hateful to you.” [Al-Hujuraat. Ayah 7] Al-Fusooq and Al-Faasiqoon have been mentioned several times in the Qur’aan and the Sunnah, so what is Fusooq and how can a Muslim be careful of becoming from a people who are Faasiqeen?
Answer:
Concerning Allaah’s (The Most High) statement: [وَكَرَّهَ إِلَيْكُمُ الْكُفْرَ وَالْفُسُوقَ وَالْعِصْيَان]- ”And has made disbelief, wickedness and disobedience (to Allah and His Messenger) hateful to you”; He (Glorified Be He) mentioned the three types of acts of disobedience in this noble Ayah:
(A) The type of disobedience that removes a person from the fold of Islaam, such as Kufr (Akbar) and Shirk (Akbar). [Ref 1]
(B) The major type of disobedience which is lesser than Kufr (Akbar) and Shirk (Akbar) and it does not remove a person from the Religion but it decreases one’s Imaan—a manifest decrease–; such as fornication, theft, drinking alcohol and other than that of the major sins. They are referred to as Fusooq (wicked deeds) and the person who commits them is referred to as a Faasiq (wicked sinner) because Fisq means removing oneself from obedience to Allaah (The Mighty and Majestic].
(C) Then He (The Most High) mentioned the type of disobedience that is lesser than the major sins and are not tantamount to Fisq, and they are the minor sins.
So Allaah (Glorified Be He) informed (us) that He has made all these three types of disobedience hateful to the people of Imaan and make them have a love for the various types of acts of obedience and righteous actions that draws them close to their Lord.
[Source: Al-Muntaqaa Min Fataawaa Fadeelatish Shaikh Saaleh Al-Fawzaan Vol 1 page 244. Fatwa Number 142]
[Ref 1] NB: To declare that a Muslim has left the fold of Islaam is the responsibility of the rightly guided scholars and not other than them. Regarding the principles of Takfeer, visit link: http://www.salafipublications.com/sps/sp.cfm?secID=MNJ&subsecID=MNJ09&loadpage=displaysubsection.cfm
[3] O Mancunian Youth! Listen to the Advice of Shaikh Saaleh Al-Fawzaan and not those who propagate the views of the Kilaabun Naar
Shaikh Saaleh Al-Fawzaan (may Allaah preserve him) stated:
Quote:
The khawaarij were not misguided and misguiding others with their intellects and fear of Allaah, except that they disassociated themselves from the scholars and depended on their own understanding and that of those similar to them. They took instructions from one another, and thus they caused harm to themselves and to the ummah. This is the result of disassociating from the scholars.
Quote:
So do not forsake the scholars, rather it is obligated on you to receive them with acceptance. Take from them and submit your questions to them as long as they are alive amongst you. Neither depend on your understanding nor that of the ignorant ones and the fake scholars–those who have not studied under the people of knowledge; rather they are either self-taught or taught by those similar to them. The path of these ones and that of those who take from them is error, because they approached knowledge through other than its correct course.
Quote:
Many of the youth have forsaken the scholars and do not take from them. The great trial and tribulation that came about from this has been seen, when someone appeared making claims of jihaad and that of knowledge, so there came about ruin, terror and killing in the land. This is the result of keeping away from the scholars. That is because those ones kept away from the scholars and went to those like them from amongst the callers to misguidance and the people of deviated views. So they brainwashed and informed them of these views. This is the result of disassociating from the scholars, the society, the Jamaa-ah of the Muslims and their leader.
Quote:
Be warned against the callers to misguidance–those who prey on the youth and cut them off from their families and society, and inform them of confused views, and thus you find a young man disassociating himself from the state and his family. Then he distances himself from the mosques, the Friday and the five daily prayers. Then his whereabouts become unknown, until the reporters make an announcement about him being arrested or killed. This is the result of heedlessness and the actions of those youth who do not accept advice.
[Source: Tawjeehaat Muhimmah Li-Shabaabil Ummah: By Shaikh Saaleh Al-Fawzaan]
See full article here: http://salaficentre.com/2012/10/updated-guidance-for-the-youth-of-the-ummah-shaikh-saaleh-al-fawzaan/
Three Unrepentant Liars [Abu Usaamah, Al-Arifi (a Comrade of the Deceiver Aasim Al-Hakeem) and Zakir Naik]
In The Name of Allaah, The Most Merciful, The Bestower of Mercy
The reality of lying is to give news of something in opposition to the true state of affairs. This transmission of news is not limited to speech, rather it can be through action, such as making an indication with one’s hand or nodding one’s head and it can be through silence.
It is said that the liar is a thief, because the thief deceives you with regards to your wealth and the liar deceives you with regards to your intellect. [Adabud Dunyaa Wal-Deen page: 262]
Indeed, these three liars have not given news in opposition to the real state of affairs due to a mistake or forgetfulness; rather they deliberately lied in order to support their deviated methodologies. They persist upon their lies and are too proud to repent after it has become manifestly clear to them that they are guilty of lying and slander. This lying and slander employed against the Salafiyyoon –by these three deviants and those similar to them– is founded upon malice, deceit, deviation and unfounded evil suspicion towards the people of truth and Salafiyyah. Al-Allaamah Rabee Bin Haadee Al-Madkhalee (may Allaah preserve him) stated:
”Destructive Good Suspicion is to have a good suspicion of the people of falsehood whether are they disbelievers, innovators or evil (open) sinners. And that which led the disbelievers to belie the Messengers, (harbouring) a severe disbelief in them and their message was due to their evil suspicion towards the people of truth (i.e. the Prophets and their true followers), and having a good suspicion of their forefathers and their religions of falsehood and disbelief.
Ahlul Bidah such as the rawaafid, the khawaarij, the soofiyyah, the murji-a, the qadariyyah and the people of Tahazzub Al-Baatil (false partisanship) are destroyed by good suspicion towards their shuyookh, figureheads and corrupt creeds. On the other hand, they are destroyed by their evil suspicions towards the truth and its people. [Paraphrased and Abridged: For further details see: [Majmoo Fataawaa Al-Allaamah Rabee: 13/363-364]
Abu Usaama [2012]
On the 25th July 2012, Abu Usaamah gave a video-recorded lecture in which he claimed that he was giving ‘Sincere Advice’. He claimed that Ustaadh Abu Khadeejah utilised the speech of Imaam Albaanee (rahimahullaah) in a deceitful manner in order to show that Abdur-Rahman Abdul-Khaaliq is an innovator.
This lie became ever more serious when one realizes (as is apparent from the video) that Abu Usamah was holding a printed copy of the blog post in front of his face for most of the lecture, yet he never once read where Ustaadh Abu Khadeejah had said that Shaikh al-Albaanee (rahimahullaah) had made tabdee’ on Abdur-Rahmaan Abdul-Khaaliq or even implied it. In a whole hour and more, not once did Abu Usaamah read this alleged assertion of Abu Khadeejah?
Abu Usaamah stated that he had a copy of Ustaadh Abu Khadeejah’ saved “in case it is taken down”! In that post Ustaadh Abu Khadeejah stated: ”Abdur-Rahmaan Abdul-Khaaliq is the leading figurehead of the group Ihyaa Turaath of Kuwait – he was refuted by numerous major scholars, including the Shaykh, the Muhaddith and Imaam Al-Albaanee (rahimhullaah). He was declared an innovator by the Imaam of Yemen Muqbil bin Haadee (rahimahullaah).”
So Ustaadh Abu Khadeejah clearly made a careful distinction between the refutation of al-Albaanee and the tabdee’ of Shaikh Muqbil (rahimahumallaah), which Abu Usaamah failed to make mention of throughout his hour long rant…… [Abridged and paraphrased For further details, see: http://www.salafitalk.com/threads/1216-A-Response-to-the-Deceit-of-Abu-Usaamah-Khalifah-and-His-Lying-Tongue]
Muhammad al-Arifi The Lying Qutbi & His Deceptive Comrade Asim al-Hakim
http://maktabah-alfawaaid.blogspot.co.uk/2012/12/muhammad-al-arifi-lying-qutbi-his.html?m=1
Zakir Naik—Blatant lies
See Tweet by Ustaadh Amjad Rafiq (may Allaah preserve him)
We seek Allaah protection from the liars amongst mankind and Jinn.. Aaameen
Hajuri makes takfeer of Qabeel and tries to defend himself
See Link
http://alhajuri.com/articles/wrtsnno-yahya-al-hajuri-his-takfir-of-qabeel-son-of-adam-and-his-fabrications-in-trying-to-defend-himself.cfm
Every Mubtadi is debased; but Brixton defends Ali Halabi Al-Mubtadi
Sufyaan Bin Uyaynah (rahimahullaah) said: ”Every person of bidah is debased.” He stated (concerning the statement of Allaah): [وَكَذَٲلِكَ نَجۡزِى ٱلۡمُفۡتَرِينَ] ”Thus do We recompense those who invent lies”; that: ”It (applies) to every inventor of lies and innovator (in the religion) until the day of judgement.” [Hilyatul Awliyaa 7/28]
This short statement of Imaam Sufyaan Bin Uyaynah (rahimahullaah) was sent to us by our Salafi brother Yasir (KSA). May Allaah reward him and grant all of us firmness upon the Sunnah..Aameem.
We decided to post it as a reminder, so that the sensible person can clearly see Brixton’s reality, because they are allied with Ali Al-Halabi –a persistent-obstinate innovator; rather a liar who has been caught cutting and pasting the statements of the scholars in order to promote his deviations and escape rebuke for his crimes committed against the pure Salafi Manhaj. [See a series of articles on this website titled: Halabi’s Long Journey parts 1-7]