Skip to main content

Author: Abdullah Jallow

Auschwitz – a brief dialogue with Hagay Hacohen

Written by Abdullah Jallow on . Posted in Contemporary Issues, Morals and Manners - 'Akhlaaq'.

In The Name of Allah, The Most Merciful, The Bestower of Mercy.

Abdullah Ibn Amr, may Allah be pleased with him, reported that Allah’s Messenger, peace and blessings of Allah be upon him, said, “Whoever would love to be delivered from Hellfire and admitted into Paradise, let him meet his end while believing in Allah and the last day, and let him treat people as he would love to be treated”. [Ṣaḥiḥ Muslim 1844]

Hagay Hacohen’s article touches on the harrowing history of Auschwitz, therefore, we say without any reservation that those events represent a profound tragedy. The victims of such atrocities deserve our deepest sympathy. As Muslims, we are guided by the teachings of the seal of the Prophets, Muhammad, peace and blessings of Allah be upon him, that we treat others as we wish to be treated ourselves. None of us would wish for our loved ones to endure the horrors faced at Auschwitz. The perpetrators of these crimes, the Nazis, must be condemned for their actions until the end of time. It is also crucial to remember that such atrocities echo in the current suffering of the Palestinian people, who have faced Zionist brutality for over seven decades. Just as we denounce the Nazis for their violence against innocent civilians, we must also speak out against those Zionists as well as any group of Muslims when they harm non-combatants. In our pursuit of justice for all in recent times, we should reflect on the wise words of Prince Turki Al-Faisal, may Allah protect him, which remind us of our duty to reject excess and injustice. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Z3-cWyFcK5w

We understood from Hacohen’s mention of antisemitism that it highlights its role as a driving force behind the persecution of Jews that took place in Germany and beyond. As Muslims, we unequivocally assert that antisemitism is strictly prohibited in the final revelation, and we must actively fight against it, leaving no space for those who perpetrate such hatred. [Footnote a] We equally denounce the extreme violence and land theft perpetrated by Zionists for over 70 years. [Footnote b]

Hagay Hacohen noted in the article:

Comment: It is essential to confront fear, hate speech, rising nationalism, and those who seek to eliminate any group, regardless of their faith—be they Muslims, Jews, Christians, or others. Just as we firmly reject and condemn any non-Jew who advocates for the eradication of any race, we also stand against any Jew who makes statements promoting genocide. This condemnation applies universally; no individual, whether Jew or non-Jew, is exempt. There have been notable Zionist figures, including Netanyahu, whose rhetoric mirrors that of those who incite extreme violence and injustice. We have provided examples of such statements made by certain Zionist leaders in the following links:

https://abuiyaad.com/a/amalekite-genocide-doctrine-gaza

https://abuiyaad.com/a/slaughtering-children-holy-war/print

https://www.abuiyaad.com/a/pharoah-slaughtering-babies

Must take a look at what is happening in their own backyard first

When we commit to the important task of addressing any speech that suggests the destruction of a race, it is essential that we hold accountable all those who make such remarks or encourage others to do so. Our condemnation must be impartial and not self-serving; we should not prioritise our own interests over the rights of others, regardless of whether we can evade consequences through manipulation, concealment, or downplaying the struggles of others to promote our agenda. It is crucial that we do not become overly focused on our own emotions at the cost of others’ rights. We must consistently evaluate our priorities to avoid falling into arrogance or a sense of entitlement that disregards the rights of others, as this can warp our perception of reality and diminish our awareness, open-mindedness, and empathy. Such an attitude only exacerbates violations, conflicts, misunderstandings, and distrust among individuals. This is why the teachings of the Prophet Muhammad, peace and blessings be upon him, remind us to treat others as we wish to be treated ourselves. The events that transpired at Auschwitz are well known and will be constantly condemned. In a parallel vein, the ongoing plight in Palestine, marked by over 70 years of Zionist brutality, will similarly face relentless condemnation. The link provided offers a brief overview of certain atrocities perpetrated by Zionists, both in the past and last year.

North African Jews- Brief dialogue with Ohad Merlin

We unequivocally denounce the atrocities that occurred at Auschwitz, as well as all who seek to oppress the servants of Allah. Our stance on this matter is unwavering. Allah said:

مَنْ قَتَلَ نَفْسًا بِغَيْرِ نَفْسٍ أَوْ فَسَادٍ فِي الْأَرْضِ فَكَأَنَّمَا قَتَلَ النَّاسَ جَمِيعًا وَمَنْ أَحْيَاهَا فَكَأَنَّمَا أَحْيَا النَّاسَ جَمِيعًا

If anyone killed a person not in retaliation of murder, or (and) to spread mischief in the land – it would be as if he killed all mankind, and if anyone saved a life, it would be as if he saved the life of all mankind. [Al-Ma’idah. 32]

Imam As-Sadi, may Allah have mercy upon him, said:

If a person is bold enough to kill someone who does not deserve to be killed, this implies that he does make a distinction between the one he killed and other than him; rather he would commit this act whenever his evil calls him to that. Therefore, his bold attitude that led him to kill is as if he has killed all humankind. On the other hand, if a person saves a life and does not kill – whilst his soul calls him to do so – due to fear of Allah, this is as if he has saved the lives of all humankind because the fear of Allah he possesses stops him killing one who does not deserve to be killed. [1]

Abdullah Bin Mas’ud, may Allah be pleased with him, said that Allah’s Messenger, peace and blessings of Allah be upon him, said, “The first (thing) that will be decided among people on the Day of Judgment will pertain to bloodshed”. [2]

Imam An-Nawawi, may Allah have mercy upon him, said:

This hadith shows the severity of bloodshed and that it will be the first thing that will be judged between people on the Day of Resurrection because of its greatness and extreme danger. This hadith does not contradict the well-known hadith in the Sunan that the first thing a person will be questioned about is the prayer because this hadith is about a matter between Allah and the person, whereas the first hadith (i.e. judgement in matters related to bloodshed) is an affair between the people. [3]

As for those who question why participation in events commemorating historical occurrences is not legislated in the pure Shariah, they may find clarity in the words of Imam Abdul Aziz Bin Baz, may Allah have mercy upon him, as stated below:

Indeed, it has become the custom of many Islamic countries in this era to specify – by way of an order- a period of three days of mourning, or less or more, for the kings and leaders together with the cessation (of work) in government departments and flags flown at half-mast. There is no doubt that this act is contrary to Muhammad’s Shariah… It has been reported in the authentic hadiths – transmitted from Allah’s Messenger, peace and blessings of Allah be upon him, that prohibit specifying days of mourning and cautioning against it, except in the case of a wife because she mourns her husband for four months and ten days. As for other than this in relation to specifying days of mourning, it is not allowed by the Shariah, and there is nothing in the perfected Shariah that allows it to be done for a king, leader, or other than them.

Indeed, during the lifetime of the Prophet, peace and blessings of Allah be upon him, his son Ibrahim, his three daughters and other individuals died, but he did not specify days of mourning for them. During his time, leaders were killed, but he did not specify days of mourning for them, such as Zaid Bin Haritha, Jafar Bin Abi Talib and Abdullah Bin Rawahah.

Then the Prophet, peace and blessings of Allah be upon him, died- and he was the most honorable of the creation, the best of the Prophets, the master of the children of Adam, and the calamity that afflicts humankind because of his death is the greatest of calamities, but the Companions did not specify days of mourning for him. Then Abu Bakr As-Siddiq died – and he is the best of the Companions, and the most honorable of creation after the Prophets, but days of mourning were not specified for him. Then Umar, Uthman and Ali were killed, and they are the best of creation after the Prophets and after Abu Bakr, but days of mourning were not specified for them. And likewise, all the Prophet’s companions passed away, but days of mourning were not specified for them. The Imams of Islam and the leaders of guidance amongst the scholars of the Taabi’in and those after them died, such as Sa’eed Ibn al-Musayyib, Ali Ibn Al-Husayn Zain Al-Aabideen and his son Muhammad Bin Ali, Umar Bin Abdil Azeez, Az-Zuhree, Imaam Abu Haneefah and his two companions, Imaam Maalik Bin Anas, Al-Awzaa’ee, Ath-Thawree, Imaam Ash-Shaafi’ee, Imaam Ahmad Bin Hanbal, Ishaaq Ibn Rahaawayh and other than them amongst the Imaams of knowledge and guidance; but days of mourning were not specified for them. (4)

It is essential to recognise that engaging in events that lack Shariah endorsement and denouncing the offenses perpetrated by either Muslims or non-Muslims are fundamentally distinct matters. Furthermore, abstaining from commemorative events does not imply a rejection of the heinous acts committed; our condemnation of the offenders remains unwavering and unequivocal. However, we refrain from participating in any activities that contradict Shariah principles. Additionally, we are instructed to coexist with non-Muslims in a manner characterised by exemplary conduct. Please refer to the information below.

https://abukhadeejah.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/12/Living-with-Non-Muslims.pdf

http://www.shariah.ws/articles/duviqgl-shaykh-salih-al-fawzan-the-islamic-shariah-provides-security–for-muslims-and-non-muslims-and-those-who-violate-it-are-kh257rijites-who-are-to-be-fought-and-severely-punished.cfm

http://www.shariah.ws/articles/szsumlh-the-foundation-of-muslim-relations-with-non-muslims-who-do-not-show-aggression-and-hostility.cfm

http://www.shariah.ws/articles/nmsdfkp-islam-and-the-muslims-are-free-and-innocent-of-the-kharijite-extremists.cfm

———————————————–

Footnote a:
https://abuiyaad.com/sn/muslims-antisemitism
https://abuiyaad.com/w/antisemitism-ernest-renan
https://abuiyaad.com/a/muhammad-semitic-prophet

Footnote b:

The Promised Land: A Brief Examination from a Religious and Historical Perspective

(1) Tafsir As-Sadi

(2) Sahih Muslim 1678

(3) Sharh Sahih Muslim 11/139

(4) Majmu Fatawa 22/229

North African Jews- Brief dialogue with Ohad Merlin

Written by Abdullah Jallow on . Posted in Contemporary Issues, Morals and Manners - 'Akhlaaq'.

In The Name of Allah, The Most Merciful, The Bestower of Mercy.

Allah [The Most High] said:

يَـٰٓأَيُّہَا ٱلَّذِينَ ءَامَنُواْ كُونُواْ قَوَّٲمِينَ بِٱلۡقِسۡطِ شُہَدَآءَ لِلَّهِ وَلَوۡ عَلَىٰٓ أَنفُسِكُمۡ أَوِ ٱلۡوَٲلِدَيۡنِ وَٱلۡأَقۡرَبِينَ‌ۚ إِن يَكُنۡ غَنِيًّا أَوۡ فَقِيرً۬ا فَٱللَّهُ أَوۡلَىٰ بِہِمَا‌ۖ فَلَا تَتَّبِعُواْ ٱلۡهَوَىٰٓ أَن تَعۡدِلُواْ‌ۚ وَإِن تَلۡوُ ۥۤاْ أَوۡ تُعۡرِضُواْ فَإِنَّ ٱللَّهَ كَانَ بِمَا تَعۡمَلُونَ خَبِيرً۬ا

O you who believe! Stand out firmly for justice, as witnesses to Allah; even though it be against yourselves, or your parents, or your kin, be he rich or poor, Allah is a Better Protector to both (than you). So follow not the lusts (of your hearts), lest you may avoid justice, and if you distort your witness or refuse to give it, verily, Allah is Ever Well-Acquainted with what you do. [An-Nisaa. Ayah 135]

In the above article, Ohad Merlin references a Jewish historian to illuminate the profound effects of colonialism and the pervasive antisemitism [Footnote a] of that era, particularly regarding its repercussions for North African Jews. It is equally important to acknowledge that beyond the egregious actions of the Colonialists against the indigenous populations in North Africa and elsewhere, [Footnote b] there existed influential Colonialists among Christian Zionists, wielding significant global political power. These figures later extended their support to Zionist movements in European nations, contributing to the gradual marginalisation of the Palestinians. This complex evolution encompasses various dimensions, some of which are briefly discussed in the following links.

The Initial Rise and Gradual Impact of Christian Zionism on Some European Political Decision-makers

An Overview of Christian Zionism in America Since the Arrival of The Puritans

https://salafidawahmanchester.com/2025/01/13/islamic-identity-crisis-brief-rebuttal-to-samuel-j-hyde/

American Christian Zionists’ Media Initiatives Aimed at Influencing Public Opinion, With a Brief Mention of The Concept of Greater Israel

Nevertheless, regardless of the support that certain notable European Christian Zionists later extended to the Jewish Zionists residing in Europe and in territories governed by the remnants of the Ottoman Empire, we unequivocally condemn any form of injustice or antisemitism encountered by Jews in North Africa and beyond, for injustice must be recognized solely as what it is: an affront to humanity. The Prophet, peace and blessings of Allah be upon him, said that Allah said: “Allah Almighty said: O My servants, I have forbidden injustice for Myself and I have forbidden it among you, so do not oppress one another”. [Ṣaḥiḥ Muslim 2577]

Any factual evidence of oppression faced by North African Jews during that period will be recognized without any embellishment or dramatization. Nonetheless, conversations about the oppression of Jews should also include a reminder of the similar struggles being endured by Palestinians at the hands of Zionists over the last 70 years.

Some Instances of Historical Zionist Brutality Towards Palestinians

The Deir Yassin Massacre: Took place on April 9, 1948, near Jerusalem, during which between 107 to 254 Palestinians were massacred at the hands of the extremist “Stern” gang.

The Nasr al-Din Massacre: Took place in April 1948. Al-Lajjun Massacre: Took place on April 13, 1948, in a Palestinian Arab village in the Jenin District, where the Zionist Haganah gang attacked it and killed 13 people.

The Saliha Massacre: Took place in May 1948, during which 75 Palestinians were massacred.

The Abu Shusha Massacre: Took place on May 14, 1948, near the village of Deir Yassin, and claimed the lives of (50) citizens, including women, men, children, and the elderly.

The Beit Daras Massacre: Took place in northeastern Gaza on May 21, 1948.

The Tantura Massacre: Took place on May 22, 1948, in the occupied city of Haifa, and claimed the lives of about (200) Palestinians.

The Lydda Massacre: Took place on July 12, 1948, in the occupied city of Lydda, and resulted in the massacre of about (500) Palestinians, including (150) who were massacred inside the city’s Grand Mosque. The Zionists threw many of them alive into the town’s wells.

The Dawayima Massacre: Took place on October 29, 1948, when a battalion from the terrorist “Lehi” organization led by Moshe Dayan attacked the village and then began searching homes and shooting at its residents. Entire families were exterminated in the massacre, which resulted in the killing of 200 men, women, and children.

The Zionist massacres did not stop after the Nakba of 1948, but rather their frequency, intensity, and brutality increased in light of the use of more lethal and destructive weapons. Among the most prominent of these massacres were: The Sharafat Massacre, which took place in February 1951, in which 11 Palestinians were massacred, and the rest of the village’s people were displaced. The Bethlehem Massacre took place in January 1952, in which 10 Palestinians were massacred. The Qibya Massacre took place on October 14, 1953, in the village of Qibya, east of Jerusalem, during which (67) Palestinians were massacred, most of whom were women and children, and during which 56 homes were destroyed. The Qalqilya Massacre took place on October 10, 1956, when the occupation forces attacked citizens in the city of Qalqilya in the West Bank, during which about seventy citizens were massacred.

The Kafr Qasem Massacre took place on October 29, 1956, in which 49 Palestinians were massacred, including 11 children, when they were all returning home from work. The Khan Yunis Massacre took place on November 3 and 12, 1956, in which between 280 and 500 Palestinians were massacred.

In 1970, Zionist aircraft struck Bahr al-Baqar Primary School and Abu Zaabal factories, killing more than 150 Egyptian students and workers. In 1980, the extremist Jewish organization Kach attempted to blow up Al-Aqsa Mosque, and a shipment of explosives weighing 120 kg was discovered. The Sabra and Shatila massacre took place in September 1982. This massacre lasted three days, and its direct perpetrators were members of the Lebanese Phalange forces allied with the Zionists led by Ariel Sharon. The Ibrahimi Mosque Massacre took place on February 25, 1994, when a Zionist named “Barog Goldstein” stormed the Ibrahimi Mosque in the city of Hebron, and fired bullets and bombs at the worshipers. This massacre resulted in the massacre of 29 Palestinians. The Qana Massacre took place on April 18, 1995. [Compiled from various old Arab Newspapers]

Recent developments following the October 7 attack by Hamas have drawn significant criticism from various international organizations regarding the severe retaliation executed by Netanyahu’s military forces. Reports indicate that Netanyahu and his allies have engaged in actions that violate the Genocide Convention, aiming to systematically eliminate the Palestinian population in Gaza. This includes not only killings but also inflicting serious physical and psychological harm, as well as imposing living conditions designed to lead to their physical annihilation. Month after month, the actions of Netanyahu’s military have dehumanised Palestinians in Gaza, treating them as a group devoid of basic human rights and dignity, clearly signaling an intent to eradicate them.

During the height of the conflict, various international organisations reported a harrowing two-month period where the population was under siege, grappling with starvation, displacement, and the threat of annihilation amidst relentless bombardments and crippling restrictions on essential humanitarian aid. Additionally, they highlighted that for several months, the forces under Netanyahu’s command engaged in acts that could be classified as genocidal, fully cognizant of the irreversible damage being inflicted on the Palestinian people in Gaza. This continued despite numerous warnings regarding the dire humanitarian crisis and binding resolutions from international entities demanding that Netanyahu and his associates take immediate action to facilitate the delivery of humanitarian assistance to civilians in Gaza.

They stated in their reports that Netanyahu and his associates have consistently maintained that their actions in Gaza are lawful, claiming justification through their military objective of eliminating Hamas. However, the notion of genocidal intent can exist alongside military objectives and does not have to be the only aim. The context of dispossession, apartheid, and unlawful military occupation in which these actions have taken place has led to a singular, reasonable conclusion: that Netanyahu and his associates intended the physical destruction of Palestinians in Gaza, either in conjunction with or as a means to achieve their military goal of dismantling Hamas. Furthermore, while acknowledging the horrific crimes committed by Hamas and other armed groups on October 7, 2023, including unlawful killings and hostage-taking, it is crucial to understand that these actions cannot justify Netanyahu’s genocidal campaign against the Palestinian people in Gaza. The military response from the Zionist army following the attacks on October 7 has pushed Gaza’s population to the brink of disaster. This relentless offensive has resulted in the deaths of over 42,000 Palestinians, including more than 13,300 children, and has injured upwards of 97,000, with many casualties stemming from direct or indiscriminate attacks that have obliterated entire families. The scale of destruction is unprecedented, occurring at a pace and intensity not witnessed in any other 21st-century conflict, decimating entire cities and devastating essential infrastructure, agricultural lands, and cultural and religious sites. As a result, vast areas of Gaza have become uninhabitable.

They also highlighted that Netanyahu’s government created dire living conditions in Gaza, resulting in a lethal combination of malnutrition, hunger, and disease, effectively subjecting Palestinians to a slow and calculated demise. Furthermore, hundreds of Gazans have been subjected to incommunicado detention, torture, and other forms of mistreatment. The total siege imposed on Gaza cut off essential resources such as electricity, water, and fuel. Over nine months during the conflict, Netanyahu’s administration enforced a stifling and illegal blockade, severely restricting access to energy and failing to ensure meaningful humanitarian aid within Gaza. This obstructed the importation and distribution of critical supplies, particularly in the northern regions. Consequently, the already dire humanitarian crisis worsened. The extensive destruction of homes, hospitals, water and sanitation systems, and agricultural land, coupled with mass displacement, led to catastrophic hunger levels and a rapid increase in disease. The effects have been particularly devastating for young children and pregnant or breastfeeding women, with serious long-term health implications.

Through its repeated “evacuation” orders, Netanyahu’s government issued numerous “evacuation” orders, resulting in the displacement of nearly 1.9 million Palestinians—90% of Gaza’s population—into increasingly confined and perilous areas, often under dire conditions, with some individuals being forced to relocate as many as ten times. This relentless cycle of forced displacement rendered countless people unemployed and profoundly traumatised, particularly given that approximately 70% of Gaza’s inhabitants are refugees or descendants of those who were uprooted from their homes during the 1948 Nakba. They stated that Netanyahu’s administration showed a troubling unwillingness to implement measures that could have safeguarded displaced civilians and addressed their fundamental needs, indicating a deliberate choice to ignore their plight. They consistently denied displaced individuals the opportunity to return to their homes in northern Gaza or to seek temporary refuge in other areas of the Occupied Palestinian Territory or lands under Zionist control. This refusal continued to violate the rights of many Palestinians to return to the areas from which they were uprooted in 1948, as recognised by many nations. The administration was fully aware that there were no safe havens for Palestinians in Gaza.

The above information, derived from reports by various international organisations, has faced denial from Zionist factions, despite being evident in daily life. While Ohad Merlin highlights the plight of North African Jews, it pales in comparison to the brutality faced by Palestinians over the past 70 years. It is crucial to remember that the roots of this conflict do not lie with the Palestinians, who did not instigate it, but rather with the colonial figureheads that supported the Zionists in creating the circumstances over 70 years ago. [Footnote c]

We would like to emphasise, once again, the strong insights shared by Prince Turki al-Faisal, may Allah safeguard him, which can be found in the following link: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Z3-cWyFcK5w

In addition, some Zionists figureheads have also employed genocidal rhetoric against Palestinians. [Footnote d]

——————————————-

Footnote a: https://abuiyaad.com/sn/muslims-antisemitism

Footnote b:
https://salafidawahmanchester.com/2024/11/16/the-uncivilised-third-world-and-developing-countries/

Footnote c:
https://salafidawahmanchester.com/2024/11/13/the-initial-rise-and-gradual-impact-of-christian-zionism-on-some-european-political-decision-makers/

An Overview of Christian Zionism in America Since the Arrival of The Puritans

American Christian Zionists’ Media Initiatives Aimed at Influencing Public Opinion, With a Brief Mention of The Concept of Greater Israel

Footnote d:
https://abuiyaad.com/a/slaughtering-children-holy-war/print

https://abuiyaad.com/a/amalekite-genocide-doctrine-gaza

https://www.abuiyaad.com/a/pharoah-slaughtering-babies

Must take a look at what is happening in their own backyard first

Admonition when Shariah schools began to emerge in Baghdad

Written by Abdullah Jallow on . Posted in History of Islam, Methodology - 'Manhaj', Morals and Manners - 'Akhlaaq', Pearls of Wisdom, Purification of The Soul, Scholars of Islam, Worship - 'Ibaadah'.

In The Name of Allah, The Most Merciful, The Bestower of mercy.

Al-Allamah Siddeeq Hasan Khan, may Allah have mercy upon him, stated:

(You) should know that sound knowledge does not contain any harm. Conversely, ignorance does not hold any benefits. This is because every piece of sound knowledge has a benefit that is connected to matters of the Afterlife, the life (in this world), or human perfection. However, in certain sciences, it may be mistakenly assumed that harm can arise or that the knowledge is not beneficial due to a failure to consider the necessary conditions that must be observed in acquiring knowledge and by the scholars, because every branch of knowledge has its boundaries, and these boundaries should not be exceeded. It is erroneous to believe that knowledge can surpass its intended purpose, just as it is incorrect to assume that mainstream medicine can cure all ailments. In reality, certain diseases cannot be cured through (medical) treatment. [I] Among them (the people) is one who thinks that (some specific) knowledge is above its rank, just as one thinks that jurisprudence is the most honourable of all sciences without exception, but this is not the case, as the knowledge of pure Islamic monotheism is more honourable without exception. [II]

Among them is (one) intending through knowledge other than its purpose, such as the one who learns for the sake of wealth or prestige. The purpose of sciences of the religion in and of themselves is not to earn wealth, but rather acquaintance with facts and refining morals. Therefore, he who pursues knowledge of the religion for the sake of professionalism is not a scholar, but rather he is someone who feigns resemblance to the scholars. [III] The scholars of Transoxiana revealed and stated this when they were informed of the construction of schools in Baghdad; so, they held gatherings of religious knowledge and stated: “The people with lofty aspirations and the pure souls used to preoccupy themselves with it, whose goal behind the pursuit of knowledge was because of its nobility and perfection (attained) through it, thus, they came to the scholars to benefit from them and their knowledge. However, if it becomes a means of earning, the mean (vile) and lazy people will approach it and this will be a reason for its disappearance, thus the sciences of wisdom are abandoned, even though they are noble in and of themselves”. [IV] [1]

—————————————————–

[I]https://abukhadeejah.com/what-are-the-principles-of-medicine-with-the-scholars-of-islam/ https://abukhadeejah.com/why-i-post-health-articles-on-my-site-and-top-12-tips-for-cancer-prevention/

[II]Al-Allamah Rabee Bin Haai Al-Mad’khali, may Allah preserve him, stated: The Muslims have to be acquainted with the knowledge of Tawheed and Shirk. Shirk is the gravest sin that can be committed in disobedience to Allah. The Prophets brought the greatest (aspect) of knowledge, and that is the knowledge of Tawheed, and they warned against the greatest wrong-doing, which is to ascribe partners to Allah. [ إِنَّ ٱلشِّرۡكَ لَظُلۡمٌ عَظِيمٌ۬ – Verily! Associating partners to (Allah in worship) is a great wrong indeed]. [Luqman. 13]

This is an affair that many of the callers to Islam have turned away from at present and do not give importance. The knowledge of Tawheed is the first thing they snub and flee from, (and) Shirk is the first thing they decline (to address) when seeking to guide the Ummah. Neither do they warn the people nor caution them against this greatest danger known to mankind [i.e. Shirk]. Tawheed is the greatest (knowledge) brought by Prophets as glad tidings, but they (i.e. many of the callers) do not convey it; rather the greatest affair to them is modern politics. The knowledge of Tawheed is the affair by way of which this Ummah is distinguished. Neither is there anything more impure (i.e. corrupts the heart, deeds, manners, thoughts, ideas, intentions, goals, aims, etc) nor filthier than shirk, so why do we not purity the Ummah from this impurity and filth? Why do those callers to Islam deliberately feign ignorance of this impurity, in which the people wander blindly and belittle its severity, even though there is nothing equal to its (filthiness and impurity)? It is obligated to the Muslims to free themselves from the filth of shirk and sincerely worship Allah alone so that they become the cleanest people and purest [i.e. in creed, deeds, thoughts, views, intentions, goals, aims, etc]. And through this, they will be distinguished [in every virtuous trait]. If the mosques of the Muslims in the Islamic world are filled with graves- even though the Messenger severely cursed those who turn graves into places of worship- and those callers to Islam have not taken any steps to confront this filthy practice, then there can be no betrayal and deception -against the ummah- greater than this.

إِنَّ ٱلَّذِينَ يَكۡتُمُونَ مَآ أَنزَلۡنَا مِنَ ٱلۡبَيِّنَـٰتِ وَٱلۡهُدَىٰ مِنۢ بَعۡدِ مَا بَيَّنَّـٰهُ لِلنَّاسِ فِى ٱلۡكِتَـٰبِ‌ۙ أُوْلَـٰٓٮِٕكَ يَلۡعَنُہُمُ ٱللَّهُ وَيَلۡعَنُہُمُ ٱللَّـٰعِنُونَ

Verily, those who conceal the clear proofs, evidences, and the guidance, which We have sent down after We have made it clear for the people in the Book, they are the ones cursed by Allah and cursed by the cursers. [Al-Baqarah. 159]

The greatest clear proof is Tawheed and it is the guidance that will remove the people from shirk. Therefore, O callers to Islam! Fear Allah, safeguard the Muslims from this greatest danger, and raise them to the highest station in this worldly life – the station of Tawheed because there is no station loftier than the station of Tawheed. Tawheed is the greatest station in the entire universe and Shirk is the lowest. [2]

[III] https://salafidawahmanchester.com/2025/01/04/certificates/

[IV] Imam Ibn Al-Jawzi, may Allah have mercy upon him,  said: I saw that solely being preoccupied with studying Fiqh and listening to hadeeth is not enough to rectify the heart, except combined with (the authentic narrations concerning the) softening of the hearts, and looking into the biographies of the pious predecessors. As for knowing Halal and Haram only, it does not have a great strength in softening the heart; rather the softening of the heart is (attained) by mentioning the Ahadith on the subject matter and the stories of the pious predecessors. That is because they (i.e. the pious predecessors) grasped the intent behind narrating, demonstrated the tangible obligated actions by way of them, practical encounter with their meanings, and the goals behind them. And there is nothing that will make you experience this, except after cultivation and experience. That is because I find that the ambition of the majority of the Muhadditheen and the students of hadeeth is (focused on acquiring hadeeth that has the closest chain of transmission from the Prophet and gathering numerous authentic Ahadith on a particular subject matter in the religion. And the majority of the jurists (focus on) the science of debate and that which gives one the upper hand, so how can the heart be softened through these affairs? Indeed, a group of pious predecessors aspired to see that a righteous slave should look to his character and upright guidance and not (merely) the knowledge he has acquired. That is (because) his character and upright guidance are the fruits of his knowledge. So understand this! The students of Hadeeth and Fiqh should combine (seeking after hadeeth and fiqh) with studying the lives of the pious predecessors and the Zuhhaad so that it can be a means to soften the heart. Indeed, books have been compiled regarding the affairs and manners of each one of those well-known outstanding men (of piety). A book has been compiled regarding the affairs of Al-Hasan [Al-Basri], Sufyaan Ath-Thawri, Ibraaheem Bin Ad-ham, Bishr Al-Haafiy, Ahmad Bin Hanbal, Ma’roof and other than them amongst the scholars and the Zuhhaad. [6]

It is necessary that the seekers of Hadeeth should have the most perfect (behaviour, manners, etiquette, etc) amongst the people, be the most humble amongst the people, the greatest in their impartiality and adherence to the religion, the least in (deviating from good conduct) and (being overcome with) anger because they constantly listen to the narrations that gather the excellent manners and etiquettes of Allah’s Messenger [peace and blessings of Allah be upon him], the lives of the virtuous pious predecessors, the path of the scholars of Hadeeth and the virtues of the (pious ones and scholars) who have passed away; so they adhere to the purest and excellent (aspects of those traits, etiquettes, manners, etc) and turn away from the most despised and lowly (traits, behaviour, manners, etiquettes, etc). [7]

[1] An Excerpt from “Abjad Al-Ulum” 1/77-78. slightly paraphrased

[2] An Excerpt from “Marhaban Yaa Taalibal Ilm”. pages 104-106. slightly paraphrased

[3] Sharh Hilya Taalib Al-Ilm..page:22. slightly paraphrased

[4] An Excerpt from ‘Saydul khaatir’ Page 171. Daar Ibn Rajab. 1st edition 2003

[5] Source: An Excerpt from ‘Jaami Bayaan Al-Ilm 1/78. By Al-Khateeb Al-Baghdaadi

Self-destruction

Written by Abdullah Jallow on . Posted in Bid'ah (Innovation), Innovations In Islam (Bidah), Methodology - 'Manhaj', Morals and Manners - 'Akhlaaq', Purification of The Soul, Scholars of Islam, Sin.

In The Name of Allah, The Most Merciful, The Bestower of Mercy.

Imam Ibn Battah, may Allah have mercy upon him, said:

Know, O my brothers! I have pondered over the reason that expelled a people from the Sunnah and the Jama’ah, compelled them to bidah and ignominy, opened up a door of trial to their hearts and prevented them from the light of truth that enables a person to make good judgements; thus, I found that (coming) from two angles: (Unnecessary) research and debate, asking too much concerning that which is of no benefit- (matters that are) neither harmful to an ignoramus nor beneficial to the believer’s understanding. The other (reason) is sitting with (a person) whose Fitnah one is not safe from and (is a cause of) corrupting the heart of the one who accompanies him.

Al-Ibanah Al-Kubra 1/390

Ruling on the statement of a person: “Yaa Rasulal lah”

Written by Abdullah Jallow on . Posted in Aqeedah, Aqeedah (Creed & Belief), Basics, Bid'ah (Innovation), Featured, Innovations In Islam (Bidah), Monotheism - Tawheed, Purification of The Soul, Scholars of Islam, Shirk, Sin, Sufis, Worship - 'Ibaadah'.

In The Name of Allah, The Most Merciful, The Bestower of Mercy.

Question: A Muslim testifies that none has the right to be worshipped except Allah and that Muhammad, peace and blessings of Allah be upon him,  is the Messenger of Allah, but when standing up or sitting down, he says, “Yaa Rasulal lah -O Messenger of Allah!” or “Yaa Abal Qasim – O Abu Qasim!” or “Yaa Abdal Qaadir- O Abdul Qadir!” or what similar to these statements related to Al-Isti’anah [i.e. seeking aid and assistance]. What is the ruling on this?

Answer: A person calling [i.e. invoking] the Messenger of Allah, peace and blessings of Allah be upon him, or other than him, such as Abdul Qadir Al-Jaylaani or Ahmad at-Tijaani,  when standing up or sitting down, and seeking assistance in that [action], or what is similar to this, in order to receive a benefit or repel harm- is a type of Shirk Akbar that was widespread during the pre-Islamic era of ignorance. Allah sent His Messenger, peace and blessings of Allah be upon him, to put an end to it, save the people from it, guide the people to single out Allah in worship and supplication. This is because Al-Isti’aanah [seeking aid and assistance] is an act of worship and whoever performs it for other than Allah is a Mushrik. [Footnote a]

Allah directed and taught His slaves to say:

إِيَّاكَ نَعْبُدُ وَإِيَّاكَ نَسْتَعِينُ

You (Alone) we worship, and You (Alone) we ask for help (for each and everything). [1:5]

Allah said:
وَأَنَّ الْمَسَاجِدَ لِلَّهِ فَلَا تَدْعُوا مَعَ اللَّهِ أَحَدًا

And the mosques are for Allah (Alone), so invoke not anyone along with Allah]. [72:18]

Allah clarified that He (alone) controls harm and benefit; He alone removes harm and bestows blessings; He alone is the one who bestows good upon His slaves and preserves it for them. None can withold what Allaah gives and none can bestow that which Allah withholds. None can prevent what He has decreed and He is able to do all things. Allah said:

وَلَا تَدْعُ مِن دُونِ اللَّهِ مَا لَا يَنفَعُكَ وَلَا يَضُرُّكَ ۖ فَإِن فَعَلْتَ فَإِنَّكَ إِذًا مِّنَ الظَّالِمِينَ
وَإِن يَمْسَسْكَ اللَّهُ بِضُرٍّ فَلَا كَاشِفَ لَهُ إِلَّا هُوَ ۖ وَإِن يُرِدْكَ بِخَيْرٍ فَلَا رَادَّ لِفَضْلِهِ ۚ يُصِيبُ بِهِ مَن يَشَاءُ مِنْ عِبَادِهِ ۚ وَهُوَ الْغَفُورُ الرَّحِيمُ

And invoke not besides Allah, any that will neither profit you, nor hurt you, but if (in case) you did so, you shall certainly be one of the Zalimun (polytheists and wrong-doers). ” And if Allah touches you with hurt, there is none who can remove it but He; and if He intends any good for you, there is none who can repel His Favour which He causes it to reach whomsoever of His slaves He will. And He is the Oft-Forgiving, Most Merciful. [10:106-107]

Allah said:

يُولِجُ اللَّيْلَ فِي النَّهَارِ وَيُولِجُ النَّهَارَ فِي اللَّيْلِ وَسَخَّرَ الشَّمْسَ وَالْقَمَرَ كُلٌّ يَجْرِي لِأَجَلٍ مُّسَمًّى ۚ ذَٰلِكُمُ اللَّهُ رَبُّكُمْ لَهُ الْمُلْكُ ۚ وَالَّذِينَ تَدْعُونَ مِن دُونِهِ مَا يَمْلِكُونَ مِن قِطْمِيرٍ
إِن تَدْعُوهُمْ لَا يَسْمَعُوا دُعَاءَكُمْ وَلَوْ سَمِعُوا مَا اسْتَجَابُوا لَكُمْ ۖ وَيَوْمَ الْقِيَامَةِ يَكْفُرُونَ بِشِرْكِكُمْ ۚ وَلَا يُنَبِّئُكَ مِثْلُ خَبِيرٍ

He merges the night into the day (i.e. the decrease in the hours of the night are added to the hours of the day), and He merges the day into the night (i.e. the decrease in the hours of the day are added to the hours of the night). And He has subjected the sun and the moon, each runs its course for a term appointed. Such is Allah your Lord; His is the kingdom. And those, whom you invoke or call upon instead of Him, own not even a Qitmir (the thin membrane over the date-stone). If you invoke (or call upon) them, they hear not your call, and if (in case) they were to hear, they could not grant it (your request) to you. And on the Day of Resurrection, they will disown your worshipping them.  And none can inform you (O Muhammad) like Him Who is the All-Knower (of each and everything). [35:13-14]

Allah said:
وَمَنْ أَضَلُّ مِمَّن يَدْعُو مِن دُونِ اللَّهِ مَن لَّا يَسْتَجِيبُ لَهُ إِلَىٰ يَوْمِ الْقِيَامَةِ وَهُمْ عَن دُعَائِهِمْ غَافِلُونَ
وَإِذَا حُشِرَ النَّاسُ كَانُوا لَهُمْ أَعْدَاءً وَكَانُوا بِعِبَادَتِهِمْ كَافِرِينَ

And who is more astray than one who calls (invokes) besides Allah, such as will not answer him till the Day of Resurrection, and who are (even) unaware of their calls (invocations) to them? And when mankind are gathered (on the Day of Resurrection), they (false deities) will become enemies for them and will deny their worshipping. [46:5-6]

Allah said:

وَمَن يَدْعُ مَعَ اللَّهِ إِلَٰهًا آخَرَ لَا بُرْهَانَ لَهُ بِهِ فَإِنَّمَا حِسَابُهُ عِندَ رَبِّهِ ۚ إِنَّهُ لَا يُفْلِحُ الْكَافِرُونَ

And whoever invokes (or worships), besides Allah, any other ilah (god), of whom he has no proof, then his reckoning is only with his Lord. Surely! Al-Kafirun (the disbelievers in Allah and in the Oneness of Allah, polytheists, pagans, idolaters, etc.) will not be successful. [23:117]

In these verses, Allah stated that it is disbelief and polytheism to invoke others besides Him. He informed (us) that there is none more astray than the one who invokes others besides Him.
The Prophet, peace and blessings of Allah be upon him, said to Ibn Abbas, may Allah be pleased with him and his father:

وإذا سألت فاسأل الله، وإذا استعنت فاستعن بالله

If you ask (i.e. supplicate), then ask Allah. And if you seek help, seek help from Allaah. [Sahih Al-Jami 7957]

The Prophet, peace and blessings of Allah be upon him, also said:

الدعاء هو العبادة

Supplication is the core of worship. [Sahih Al-Jami 3407]

Fatawa Al-Lajnah Ad-Da’imah 1/163
—————-

Footnote a:

Ibn Taymiyyah on Shirk and the Excuse of Ignorance | AbuIyaad.Com
https://abuiyaad.com/a/ibn-taymiyyah-shirk-excuse-of-ignorance

Manhaj.Com | excuse of ignorance
https://www.manhaj.com/manhaj/tags/excuse-of-ignorance.cfm

http://www.manhaj.com/manhaj/articles/xwouo-takfir-and-the-excuse-of-ignorance-shaykh-ibn-uthaymeen.cfm

http://www.spubs.com/sps/sp.cfm?secID=MNJ&subsecID=MNJ09&loadpage=displaysubsection.cfm

What motivates Irfan Fard – at Jerusalem Post – to repeat his slander against the term Islamic?

Written by Abdullah Jallow on . Posted in Contemporary Issues, Methodology - 'Manhaj', Morals and Manners - 'Akhlaaq', Refutations, Sin.

In The Name of Allah, The Most Merciful, The Bestower of Mercy.

Allah said:

وَلَا يَأْتُونَكَ بِمَثَلٍ إِلَّا جِئْنَٰكَ بِٱلْحَقِّ وَأَحْسَنَ تَفْسِيرًا

And they bring no (argument or objection by way of a) similitude (in order to criticise this Qur’ān and oppose your message) except that We bring you the truth and the better explanation thereof (through a similitude that is superior to theirs, provides detail and invalidates their objection). https://www.thenoblequran.com/q/#/search/25_33

Irfan Fard embarked on his campaign of malicious defamation, linking the noble term “Islamic” with the abhorrent concept of terrorism, all while being granted a platform by those with Netanyahu’s Zionist affiliatiates. It is hardly surprising that such a charlatan finds support among individuals who would perceive Islam as a barrier to their own misguided beliefs and the distortion of the true path of the Prophets. Irfan’s actions stem from a desire to promote an alternative governance system, one that stands in stark contrast to that of the Rafidah. His animosity is not rooted in a quest for the establishment of Allah’s laws, but rather in a relentless pursuit of worldly power and recognition, masquerading as a commitment to justice. True justice can only be derived from the Qur’an and Sunnah, as interpreted and practiced by the Prophet’s companions. Neither the Rafidah nor the self-serving ambitions of Irfan, supported by Zionist interests, can offer a legitimate foundation for justice. Therefore, we once again present the link where Shaikh Abu Khadeejah, may Allah preserve him, eloquently and unequivocally demonstrates that terrorism can never be aligned with Islam, despite Irfan’s persistent slander. Following this, we will outline the motivations behind the actions of slanderers and deceivers, particularly those who harbour a deep-seated animosity towards the authentic Islamic terms. Read: https://abukhadeejah.com/terrorism-is-never-islamic-a-refutation-of-terrorism-based-on-the-texts-of-the-quran-and-sunnah-and-the-sayings-of-the-scholars-ebook/

Individuals like Irfan engage in a systematic approach to create the illusion of reality by affirming, reiterating, and disseminating falsehoods across various contexts. This strategy, while demanding persistence, gradually influences those who either hold misconceptions about the subject or lack detailed knowledge. This tactic mirrors the methods employed by politicians advocating for their agendas, akin to the repetitive techniques used in advertising to promote products. When founded on falsehoods, such repetition can insidiously embed ideas into the subconscious, eventually morphing them into beliefs and accepted truths. Once these inaccuracies are established as truths through continuous repetition, they proliferate among the public with little scrutiny, particularly when the actions of individuals associated with a targeted group are misrepresented in relation to the distorted idea. Irfan exemplifies this when he addresses the heretical Rafidah by linking their actions to the term “Islamic” and subsequently associating it with terrorism. Similarly, some other websites present their own distortions of Islam in varied ways, conveying different narratives. Thus, while the platforms and methods may differ, the underlying goal remains consistent: a relentless effort to distort truth into falsehood without substantiation, thereby shaping perceptions of reality. This process of transforming falsehood into perceived truth through repetition poses a significant threat to societal understanding. Consequently, the vast array of media content available today, along with its varied formats, timings, and presenters, has the potential to reshape long-held convictions among individuals.

The impact of this phenomenon is particularly significant for a generation whose perspectives are molded by ideologues, demagogues, and provocateurs masquerading as journalists and commentators. The act of repetition of falsehood wields considerable power over cognitive boundaries, hindering the sound understanding or justified dissenting viewpoints. The intellect remains ensnared by this influence until it achieves liberation through a conscious detachment from its origins, thereby allowing reason to prevail: discerning acceptance and rejection based on the tenets of sound rigorous validation.

Advocates of falsehood, such as Irfan and the Rafidah, do not only seek to reshape ideas and manipulate thought processes but they also alter the very foundations of sound creed and methodology of the Prophets, which poses a serious concern. Even more alarming is the transformation of falsehood, solidified through repeated assertions over time, into doctrines, beliefs and methodologies that future generations come to accept. This results in a scenario where truth is misidentified as falsehood, leading to a distortion or misunderstanding of Islamic principles and terms. We recall a maternal uncle, may Allah have mercy on him, who was a journalist in Gambia, renowned for his eloquence and commitment to truth. His pursuit of issues significantly influenced our understanding of contemporary matters. However, after being guided to the Sunnah, we recognised the importance of grounding our judgments on the sound principles of verification and ascertainment as taught by the Salafi Scholars, may Allah have mercy on them, instead of blindly following anyone else, regardless of their eloquence and convincing arguments. Thus, when the misguided Irfan attempts to link terrorism with the term Islamic—an association as distant as the heavens from the earth—we clearly perceive the desperation within him to connect two entirely unrelated concepts. May Allah guide him or disfigure his deceitful tongue. Amin.

This article by Irfan, to which we are responding, also makes a sweeping claim that Islamic countries share a significant responsibility for fostering the harmful ideology represented by Khumeini. Irfan again uses the term “Islamic” to refer to Muslim nations in the context of Iran’s actions, suggesting that these countries are also culpable. However, he fails to specify which countries support the Rafidah or which ones oppose their activities. Furthermore, it raises the question: which Muslim nation actually endorses the Rafidah’s beliefs and propagates their destructive methods? Historically, scholars of Islam, both past and present, have unequivocally condemned the Rafidah, not out of a struggle for power, but due to a fundamental distinction between sound and corrupt beliefs. In contrast, Irfan’s concerns about the Rafidah seem rooted in a power struggle and a desire for an alternative system that aligns with his vain desires. He has been given a platform by Zionist interests to pursue authority, driven by a lack of fear of Allah, which is what typically restrains a believer from chasing after leadership, regardless of the outcome. Read here: https://salafidawahmanchester.com/2025/01/14/a-sad-reality/

The upright Scholars of Islam and their students effectively counter the claims of the Rafidah from and their affiliates. [Footnote a] Rather than resorting to vague and misleading generalizations, an honest and fair-minded individual would clearly differentiate between those who endorse the actions of the Rafidah and those who challenge and denounce them. Additionally, it is important to recognise that all Muslim nations maintain diplomatic relations with other countries, regardless of the situation. This practice was established by the Prophet, peace and blessings be upon him, to promote the common good and mitigate the threats posed by adversaries. [Footnote b]

Political opportunism will not earn one the pleasure of Allah in the afterlife. True success comes from dedicating oneself to singling out Allah in worship and following the Sunnah of His Messenger. What makes Irfan’s actions even more troubling is his disparagement of the term Islamic in his quest for selfish worldly gains and a desperate grab for power. At the very least, Irfan should hold back from attacking the term Islamic, as we cannot prevent him from his conflict with the Rafidah, which is driven not by genuine faith but by an unquenchable thirst for authority. The Messenger, peace and blessings of Allah be upon him, said: “If Adam’s son had a valley full of gold, he would like to have two valleys, for nothing fills his mouth except dust. And Allah forgives him who repents to Him”. [Al-Bukhari 6439]

Previous posts:

Irfan Fard, with his insidious rhetoric, once more uses Zionist platform to link the term “Islamic” with terrorism

Defiling the term Islamic – A bone to pick with Erfan Fard

—————————————————–

Footnote a:
https://salafidawahmanchester.com/2025/01/05/sunni-shia-divide-a-brief-rebuttal-to-david-ben-basat-at-the-jerusalem-post/

Footnote b:

The Life of the Muhammad in Madinah: Treaties, Conquests and his Death (Islam 1.11)


https://abukhadeejah.com/treaties-with-the-non-muslims-do-they-necessitate-allegiance/

Only the most wicked remain on the earth at the end of time

Written by Abdullah Jallow on . Posted in Morals and Manners - 'Akhlaaq', Purification of The Soul, Sin.

In The Name of Allah, The Most Merciful, The Bestower of Mercy.

Imam Muhammad Ibn Salih Al-Uthaymeen, may Allah have mercy upon him, was asked:

We are seeking an answer for this question regarding how to reconcile the hadiths: “There will not ceased to be a group amongst my Ummah upon the truth – manifest; neither harmed by those who forsake them nor by those who oppose them until Allah’s Command comes to pass” and the hadith “The hour (i.e. day of Judgement) will not be established except in the midst of the most evil people”.

Response: All praise be to Allah, Lord of the worlds, and may Allah’s peace and blessings be upon our Prophet Muhammad, and all his family and companions. Neither is it possible for the Qur’an to contradict itself nor is it possible for the authentic Sunnah that was reported from Allah’s Messenger, peace and blessings of Allah be upon him, to contradict itself, nor is it possible for the authentic Sunnah to contradict the Qur’an vice versa. Neither is it possible for the Qur’an and the Sunnah to contradict (what the true reality is and should be) nor is it possible for the Qur’an and authentic Sunnah to contradict sound intellect. This is because the Qur’an is the speech of Allah, and Allah [The Exalted] said:

 أَفَلَا يَتَدَبَّرُونَ ٱلۡقُرۡءَانَ‌ۚ وَلَوۡ كَانَ مِنۡ عِندِ غَيۡرِ ٱللَّهِ لَوَجَدُواْ فِيهِ ٱخۡتِلَـٰفً۬ا ڪَثِيرً۬ا

Do they not then consider the Quran carefully? Had it been from other than Allah, they would surely have found therein much contradictions]. [An-Nisaa. 82]

This is because Allah’s speech is (perfect) truth and truth can never contradict itself. Also, the same applies to the authentic Prophetic Sunnah, it is (perfect) truth and can never contradict itself. Thus, based on this principle, we proceed to answer the question. The Messenger’s statement, “There will not cease to be a group amongst my Ummah upon the truth- manifest; neither harmed by those who forsake them nor those who oppose them until Allah’s Command come to pass”, and in another report, “Until the hour (i.e. Day of Judgement) is established”. The intent behind the phrase Amrullaah (Allah’s Command) in this hadith is when the believers and pious friends of Allah pass away- when the day of Judgement is very close. (As for the hadith), “The hour will not be established except upon the most evil people”, this means that when the believers and the pious die, only the most evil people will remain, and upon them the Hour will be established.

[Nur Ala a Ad-Darb. Number 272]

Story tellers

Written by Abdullah Jallow on . Posted in Bid'ah (Innovation), Morals and Manners - 'Akhlaaq', Sin.

In The Name of Allah, The Most Merciful, The Bestower of Mercy.

Imam As-Suyuti, may Allah have mercy upon him, said:

When it is the case that exhortations are primarily aimed at the general populace, the ignorant storytellers discovered a way to achieve their objectives. Consequently, their bidah persisted until the situation escalated to concerning levels. Thus, they engendered evil outcomes in relation to their actions, statements, and goals.

كتاب القصاص والمذكرين

page 290

A message from a war criminal to the world – [Engaging in a dialogue with Jane Kiel]

Written by Abdullah Jallow on . Posted in Contemporary Issues, Morals and Manners - 'Akhlaaq'.

In The Name of Allah, The Most Merciful, Ther Bestower of Mercy.

Allah, The Exalted, said:

مَنْ قَتَلَ نَفْسًا بِغَيْرِ نَفْسٍ أَوْ فَسَادٍ فِي الْأَرْضِ فَكَأَنَّمَا قَتَلَ النَّاسَ جَمِيعًا وَمَنْ أَحْيَاهَا فَكَأَنَّمَا أَحْيَا النَّاسَ جَمِيعًا

If anyone killed a person not in retaliation of murder, or (and) to spread mischief in the land – it would be as if he killed all mankind, and if anyone saved a life, it would be as if he saved the life of all mankind. [Al-Ma’idah. 32]

Imam As-Sadi, may Allah have mercy upon him, said:

If a person is bold enough to kill someone who does not deserve to be killed, this implies that he does make a distinction between the one he killed and other than him; rather he would commit this act whenever his evil calls him to that. Therefore, his bold attitude that led him to kill is as if he has killed all humankind. On the other hand, if a person saves a life and does not kill – whilst his soul calls him to do so – due to fear of Allah, this is as if he has saved the lives of all humankind because the fear of Allah he possesses stops him killing one who does not deserve to be killed. [An Excerpt from Tafsir As-Sadi]

We shall commence by addressing the title of Jane’s article in the following manner: Opinion: A message from a war criminal to the world – [Engaging in a dialogue with Jane Kiel]

The above article titled, “A message from a terrorist to the world”, written by Jane Kiel presents a troubling account of violence inflicted by armed Palestinians on innocent civilians. If the writer’s portrayal is accurate, it undeniably represents a despicable act that deserves condemnation from anyone with a shred of compassion. However, it is equally crucial to acknowledge the actions of the Zionist forces over the past seven decades, which have surpassed the limits of human imagination in their severity. Just as the writer highlights the traumatic experiences faced by civilians in the Zionist State, it is essential to also shed light on the prolonged suffering endured by Palestinians for over 70 years, culminating in the recent conflict in Gaza.

Some Instances of Historical Zionist Brutality Towards Palestinians

The Deir Yassin Massacre: Took place on April 9, 1948, near Jerusalem, during which between 107 to 254 Palestinians were massacred at the hands of the extremist “Stern” gang.

The Nasr al-Din Massacre: Took place in April 1948. Al-Lajjun Massacre: Took place on April 13, 1948, in a Palestinian Arab village in the Jenin District, where the Zionist Haganah gang attacked it and killed 13 people.

The Saliha Massacre: Took place in May 1948, during which 75 Palestinians were massacred.

The Abu Shusha Massacre: Took place on May 14, 1948, near the village of Deir Yassin, and claimed the lives of (50) citizens, including women, men, children, and the elderly.

The Beit Daras Massacre: Took place in northeastern Gaza on May 21, 1948.

The Tantura Massacre: Took place on May 22, 1948, in the occupied city of Haifa, and claimed the lives of about (200) Palestinians.

The Lydda Massacre: Took place on July 12, 1948, in the occupied city of Lydda, and resulted in the massacre of about (500) Palestinians, including (150) who were massacred inside the city’s Grand Mosque. The Zionists threw many of them alive into the town’s wells.

The Dawayima Massacre: Took place on October 29, 1948, when a battalion from the terrorist “Lehi” organization led by Moshe Dayan attacked the village and then began searching homes and shooting at its residents. Entire families were exterminated in the massacre, which resulted in the killing of 200 men, women, and children.

The Zionist massacres did not stop after the Nakba of 1948, but rather their frequency, intensity, and brutality increased in light of the use of more lethal and destructive weapons. Among the most prominent of these massacres were: The Sharafat Massacre, which took place in February 1951, in which 11 Palestinians were massacred, and the rest of the village’s people were displaced. The Bethlehem Massacre took place in January 1952, in which 10 Palestinians were massacred. The Qibya Massacre took place on October 14, 1953, in the village of Qibya, east of Jerusalem, during which (67) Palestinians were massacred, most of whom were women and children, and during which 56 homes were destroyed. The Qalqilya Massacre took place on October 10, 1956, when the occupation forces attacked citizens in the city of Qalqilya in the West Bank, during which about seventy citizens were massacred.

The Kafr Qasem Massacre took place on October 29, 1956, in which 49 Palestinians were massacred, including 11 children, when they were all returning home from work. The Khan Yunis Massacre took place on November 3 and 12, 1956, in which between 280 and 500 Palestinians were massacred.

In 1970, Zionist aircraft struck Bahr al-Baqar Primary School and Abu Zaabal factories, killing more than 150 Egyptian students and workers. In 1980, the extremist Jewish organization Kach attempted to blow up Al-Aqsa Mosque, and a shipment of explosives weighing 120 kg was discovered. The Sabra and Shatila massacre took place in September 1982. This massacre lasted three days, and its direct perpetrators were members of the Lebanese Phalange forces allied with the Zionists led by Ariel Sharon. The Ibrahimi Mosque Massacre took place on February 25, 1994, when a Zionist named “Barog Goldstein” stormed the Ibrahimi Mosque in the city of Hebron, and fired bullets and bombs at the worshipers. This massacre resulted in the massacre of 29 Palestinians. The Qana Massacre took place on April 18, 1995. [1]

Recent developments following the October 7 attack by Hamas have drawn significant criticism from various international organizations regarding the severe retaliation executed by Netanyahu’s military forces. Reports indicate that Netanyahu and his allies have engaged in actions that violate the Genocide Convention, aiming to systematically eliminate the Palestinian population in Gaza. This includes not only killings but also inflicting serious physical and psychological harm, as well as imposing living conditions designed to lead to their physical annihilation. Month after month, the actions of Netanyahu’s military have dehumanised Palestinians in Gaza, treating them as a group devoid of basic human rights and dignity, clearly signaling an intent to eradicate them.

During the height of the conflict, various international organisations reported a harrowing two-month period where the population was under siege, grappling with starvation, displacement, and the threat of annihilation amidst relentless bombardments and crippling restrictions on essential humanitarian aid. Additionally, they highlighted that for several months, the forces under Netanyahu’s command engaged in acts that could be classified as genocidal, fully cognizant of the irreversible damage being inflicted on the Palestinian people in Gaza. This continued despite numerous warnings regarding the dire humanitarian crisis and binding resolutions from international entities demanding that Netanyahu and his associates take immediate action to facilitate the delivery of humanitarian assistance to civilians in Gaza.

They stated in their reports that Netanyahu and his associates have consistently maintained that their actions in Gaza are lawful, claiming justification through their military objective of eliminating Hamas. However, the notion of genocidal intent can exist alongside military objectives and does not have to be the only aim. The context of dispossession, apartheid, and unlawful military occupation in which these actions have taken place has led to a singular, reasonable conclusion: that Netanyahu and his associates intended the physical destruction of Palestinians in Gaza, either in conjunction with or as a means to achieve their military goal of dismantling Hamas. Furthermore, while acknowledging the horrific crimes committed by Hamas and other armed groups on October 7, 2023, including unlawful killings and hostage-taking, it is crucial to understand that these actions cannot justify Netanyahu’s genocidal campaign against the Palestinian people in Gaza. The military response from the Zionist army following the attacks on October 7 has pushed Gaza’s population to the brink of disaster. This relentless offensive has resulted in the deaths of over 42,000 Palestinians, including more than 13,300 children, and has injured upwards of 97,000, with many casualties stemming from direct or indiscriminate attacks that have obliterated entire families. The scale of destruction is unprecedented, occurring at a pace and intensity not witnessed in any other 21st-century conflict, decimating entire cities and devastating essential infrastructure, agricultural lands, and cultural and religious sites. As a result, vast areas of Gaza have become uninhabitable.

They also highlighted that Netanyahu’s government created dire living conditions in Gaza, resulting in a lethal combination of malnutrition, hunger, and disease, effectively subjecting Palestinians to a slow and calculated demise. Furthermore, hundreds of Gazans have been subjected to incommunicado detention, torture, and other forms of mistreatment. The total siege imposed on Gaza cut off essential resources such as electricity, water, and fuel. Over nine months during the conflict, Netanyahu’s administration enforced a stifling and illegal blockade, severely restricting access to energy and failing to ensure meaningful humanitarian aid within Gaza. This obstructed the importation and distribution of critical supplies, particularly in the northern regions. Consequently, the already dire humanitarian crisis worsened. The extensive destruction of homes, hospitals, water and sanitation systems, and agricultural land, coupled with mass displacement, led to catastrophic hunger levels and a rapid increase in disease. The effects have been particularly devastating for young children and pregnant or breastfeeding women, with serious long-term health implications.

Through its repeated “evacuatio” orders, Netanyahu’s government issued numerous “evacuation” orders, resulting in the displacement of nearly 1.9 million Palestinians—90% of Gaza’s population—into increasingly confined and perilous areas, often under dire conditions, with some individuals being forced to relocate as many as ten times. This relentless cycle of forced displacement rendered countless people unemployed and profoundly traumatised, particularly given that approximately 70% of Gaza’s inhabitants are refugees or descendants of those who were uprooted from their homes during the 1948 Nakba. They stated that Netanyahu’s administration showed a troubling unwillingness to implement measures that could have safeguarded displaced civilians and addressed their fundamental needs, indicating a deliberate choice to ignore their plight. They consistently denied displaced individuals the opportunity to return to their homes in northern Gaza or to seek temporary refuge in other areas of the Occupied Palestinian Territory or lands under Zionist control. This refusal continued to violate the rights of many Palestinians to return to the areas from which they were uprooted in 1948, as recognised by many nations. The administration was fully aware that there were no safe havens for Palestinians in Gaza.

The above information, derived from reports by various international organisations, has faced denial from Zionist factions, despite being evident in daily life. Furthermore, while Jane’s article highlights barbaric actions, it pales in comparison to the brutality faced by Palestinians over the past 70 years. It is crucial to remember that the roots of this conflict do not lie with the Palestinians, who did not instigate it, but rather with the colonial figureheads that supported the Zionists in creating the circumstances over 70 years ago. [Footnote a]

We would like to emphasise, once again, the strong insights shared by Prince Turki al-Faisal, may Allah safeguard him, which can be found in the following link: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Z3-cWyFcK5w

In addition, some Zionists figureheads have also employed genocidal rhetoric against Palestinians. [Footnote b]

——————————————-

Footnote a:

The Initial Rise and Gradual Impact of Christian Zionism on Some European Political Decision-makers

An Overview of Christian Zionism in America Since the Arrival of The Puritans

American Christian Zionists’ Media Initiatives Aimed at Influencing Public Opinion, With a Brief Mention of The Concept of Greater Israel

Footnote b:

https://abuiyaad.com/a/slaughtering-children-holy-war/print

https://abuiyaad.com/a/amalekite-genocide-doctrine-gaza

https://www.abuiyaad.com/a/pharoah-slaughtering-babies

Must take a look at what is happening in their own backyard first

[1] Compiled from various old Arab Newspapers

[26] The Ascent and Decline of The Ottoman Empire

Written by Abdullah Jallow on . Posted in History of Islam, Morals and Manners - 'Akhlaaq'.

In The Name of Allah, The Most Merciful, The Bestower of Mercy.

Sultan Salim III

He ascended to power following the death of his uncle, Abdul Hamid I, in 1203 AH / 1788 CE, marking the beginning of a new phase in the conflict between the Ottoman Empire and its adversaries. He initiated efforts to revive the morale of his troops, drawing upon the historical achievements of the Ottoman state and its heroic deeds. During his accession to the throne, the Sultan delivered an impassioned speech to the state leaders, highlighting the victories of the Ottoman armies over their enemies in the past. He addressed the reasons for their recent defeats, attributing them to a departure from their faith and a failure to adhere to their book and the teachings of their Prophet. He urged them to embrace sacrifice and strive against their foes, to rely on Allah, obey their leaders, and to resist the enemies who had seized Muslim lands and killed or imprisoned thousands, until the state could reclaim Crimea from them.

His fervor for Jihad: [Footnote a]

His eagerness for Jihad compelled him to dismiss the peace initiatives proposed by the ambassadors from Spain, France, and Prussia. He directed the Grand Vizier, Yusuf Pasha, to undertake the necessary preparations to confront the state’s adversaries. He acknowledged the suffering endured by his people due to the ongoing defeats faced by the Ottoman Empire. In a bid to mitigate the rising anger and dissatisfaction, he rejected the peace proposals and resolved to personally lead an army towards the Danube. Additionally, he raised the soldiers’ salaries and offered extra bonuses that surpassed those provided during his predecessor’s rule. He understood the importance of fortifying his position by appointing his long-time associate, Hussain Pasha al-Karidli, as the commander of the Ottoman fleet. He reassigned the former commander, Hassan Pasha, to lead the land forces in Moldavia and appointed him as the governor of Ismail, while also entrusting him with the mission of reclaiming Ozi and advancing overland towards Crimea. The shifts in military leadership were influenced by various factors. On one side, Commander Hasan Pasha was in disagreement with Grand Vizier Yusuf Pasha, as he felt that declaring war on Russia was poorly timed and that comprehensive preparations were essential before engaging in battle. Conversely, the failure of the Ottoman army, under Hasan Pasha’s leadership, to recover Ozi within the stipulated timeframe adversely affected the Sultan’s morale, leading him to contemplate a change in command. Nevertheless, the most logical explanation for this decision was that the new commander was a close confidant of the Sultan, which provided a solid foundation for his appointment as Grand Vizier and bolstered his position against both internal and external threats.

He was in a situation that required him to face his enemies. To handle this, he gave his Grand Vizier, Yusuf Pasha, the task of managing Wallachia and protecting Belgrade from possible threats in the Kuban region. The goal was to stir up the Caucasus against Russia and help the Ottoman Empire take back Crimea. The Grand Vizier felt motivated by the Sultan’s trust in him and was confident that success was near as he aimed to achieve the goals set by the state.

The Defeat of the Ottoman Armies: Russian and Austrian troops bolstered their defenses and gathered their forces near Belgrade and Moldavia. The Grand Vizier could not drive the enemies away from Belgrade, resulting in the Sultan replacing him with Hasan Pasha. Yusuf Pasha faced a series of defeats against the Russian general Suvorov and the Austrian commander Coburg.

The Sultan was set on taking back Crimea and defeating his enemies. He knew he needed to rebuild the army and instructed the Grand Vizier to take action for military growth and reforms. He also planned to send troops to the battlefield. To aid these efforts, he wanted to create a friendship treaty with Sweden, promising to pay certain amounts each year for ten years in return for Sweden’s support against Russia from the north. Both sides agreed to keep working together in the war against Russia and not to sign any peace deal with others without informing each other.

European countries had different views on these treaties: Russia was in favour of the treaty because it was influenced by Selim III to keep fighting, worried it might also be targeted by Russia. France opposed the treaty since it did not fit with its political goals. Britain had a mixed stance; it accepted the treaty and wanted a strong Ottoman Empire but did not want to support the Ottomans against Russia or Austria. This behavior from European nations is understandable, as their relationships with the Ottoman Empire were driven by self-interest. Even those who wanted a strong Ottoman presence did so not out of goodwill, but to achieve political aims related to the balance of power in Europe and to safeguard their economic interests, both in the Ottoman Empire and beyond.

The Sultan remained optimistic about his mission, despite the challenges posed by European events affecting the empire’s policies and its presence in Europe. He believed that with effective leadership, his army could succeed. As a result, he ordered the mobilisation of forces through Moldavia and Wallachia, advancing his troops to the River Rimnik, close to Nema’s borders. However, the Russian and Austrian armies unexpectedly attacked the Ottoman forces, achieving a significant victory. This battle, known as the Battle of Yozza or Rimnik, took place by the river and had serious consequences for the Ottoman Empire. It hindered their military organisation and led to a series of defeats, forcing a retreat towards the eastern Danube. This allowed the Austrians to lift the siege of Belgrade, paving the way for allied forces to push the Ottomans out of Europe.

The Crusades against the Ottoman territories in late 1789 were some of the most destructive events in the border areas between the two sides. As a result, the time after these battles saw two main developments. First, there was an increase in diplomatic efforts and religious and political movements in Europe that indicated a looming threat. This led stronger nations to push for peace and call for an end to the fighting between the Ottoman Empire and Russia. At the same time, the French Revolution was approaching, and its effects were becoming more apparent across Europe. This situation created a strong feeling among European countries, including Russia, that it was time to show support for the Ottoman Empire, fueled by concerns over the rising Napoleonic revolution and France’s influence in Europe.

The second aspect focuses on the new military actions and changes that arose from the repeated losses faced by the Ottoman Empire before and after the Battle of Yozgat. These defeats caused frustration and anger among the people, prompting demands for reform and the removal of the Grand Vizier. As time went on, the Ottoman state continued to weaken due to further defeats. With the French Revolution, European nations saw the need to form a treaty with the Ottoman Empire to unite against Napoleon’s expansion and the French interests that threatened their own goals in Ottoman lands. This diplomatic effort led to the signing of the important Treaty of Zsitvatorok on the 22nd of Dhul-Hijjah in the year 1205 AH, which corresponds to August 4, 1791 CE. After achieving their goal, they faced the second stage, which was to stop the Ottoman-Russian war. Without this, the situation in Europe would be at risk due to Napoleon’s adventures or Russia’s dominance over the Ottoman Empire, posing a threat to Europe. The events affecting the Ottoman Empire weakened its power and impacted its campaigns in Europe. This put them in a position where they were willing to agree to any terms for peace. These events aided the mediators, who, after negotiations with both Russia and the Ottoman Empire, managed to sign a peace treaty in the city of Iași on January 9, 1792.

One important part of this treaty was the exchange of prisoners of war. It also allowed people from their home country, who were living abroad due to political issues, to choose whether to go back home or stay where they were. The Ottoman Empire gave Russia the port of Azov, the Crimean lands, the Taman Peninsula, and the areas of Koyan, Yessentuki, and the regions between the Bug and Dniester rivers, with the last month marking the border between the two nations. In exchange, Russia returned the areas of Bessarabia, Akkerman, Kili, and Ismail to the Ottoman Empire, provided that the Ottoman state would not tax the people of Bessarabia and would not ask for war reparations or similar payments from Russia. The Sublime Porte also banned its people from attacking Russian territories like Tiflis and Katelina, as well as Russian ships in the Mediterranean, and agreed to pay for any damages caused by its subjects. The treaty effectively ended the Russo-Turkish War and achieved the objectives of European nations, primarily halting the conflict during a period when Europe was grappling with the upheaval of the Napoleonic Wars and fearing its impact on their governance. Consequently, the hopes of the Ottoman Empire were dashed, along with the loss of territories under its influence, leading to the Black Sea falling under Russian control. Ottoman ports such as Azov, Odessa, and Sevastopol became bases for the Russian fleet, while major river mouths like the Danube, Bug, Dniester, and Prut were placed under Russian navigation authority. Thus, this treaty significantly reduced the territorial extent of the Ottoman Empire in Europe and simultaneously conferred a legal status of concession regarding its gains to its adversaries.

European nations took significant steps that contributed to the break up of the Ottoman Empire in the region, effectively bringing an end to numerous projects advocated by intellectuals. For centuries, European thinkers had opposed the Ottoman state, while Crusader forces, colonial powers, and Jewish interests worked diligently and systematically towards their common goal. It resembled a global consortium where European founders exchanged glances of agreement; despite their differences, they united in their animosity towards the Ottomans, each eager to undermine, destroy, and absorb the empire.

The Treaty of Bucharest may have temporarily halted the Russo-Ottoman confrontations, but it essentially marked the beginning of a more tragic decline than the previous one. Following the cessation of hostilities, Salim III focused on internal reforms, initiating the restructuring of the military to eliminate the Janissaries, who had become a source of unrest. He sought to emulate Europe, which had advanced significantly, emphasizing shipbuilding and weaponry, particularly cannons in the French style, while also witnessing the early stages of Western military education during his reign. The Sultan’s initiatives for reform and the establishment of the new military corps provoked the Janissaries, who were supported by the notables against the new system. Although the Sultan issued a decree to abolish the new military structure, the rebels opted to depose the caliph, leading to the ascension of his cousin, Mustafa IV, who was controlled by those who appointed him to the throne. Subsequently, imperial decrees were issued to dismantle the new system along with all associated schools, institutions, and reforms. Despite these measures, his reign faced significant challenges that ultimately resulted in his overthrow.

The French Crusader Invasion of the Ottoman State in Egypt (1213 AH / 1798 AD): The enemies of Islam took advantage of the decline of the Ottoman Empire, with France exploiting this weakness by launching its famous campaign led by Napoleon Bonaparte. This campaign echoed the French Revolution and was influenced by its revolutionary ideas. Napoleon was accompanied by a significant number of French intellectuals, totaling 122. The intellectual influences on these people were predominantly shaped by the French efforts to reform the Catholic Church and their opposition to Protestant reform movements since the early sixteenth century. Prior to their arrival in the East, they were also impacted by the ideas of Rousseau, Voltaire, and Montesquieu, prominent thinkers of the French Revolution, who were associated with Jewish Masonic lodges and advocated for principles such as liberty, fraternity, and equality. These concepts collectively oppose religion and its derived ideas. Therefore, it is simplistic to accept the historical narrative that the primary aim of this campaign was solely to undermine British interests in the East, as such a goal would not necessitate the mobilisation of a vast number of intellectuals. Alongside this, there was the ambition to establish a French empire in the East to satisfy the aspirations of the bourgeois class that had risen to power after the revolution, as well as to appease the Church, which, despite suffering some setbacks from the revolution that diminished its influence in France, continued to wield significant power over many French citizens and played a crucial role in bolstering French influence in its colonies and the Islamic East. Thus, the objectives of the campaign were a complex amalgamation of various interests.

An Excerpt from Ad-Dawlah al-Uthaniyyah Awamil An-Nuhud Wa Asbab As-Suqut 6/352-360

Footnote a:

https://abukhadeejah.com/salafi-shaikh-fawzaan-on-jihaad-in-our-times-and-the-guidelines-of-jihaad-according-to-islam/