Skip to main content

Author: Abdullah Jallow

Thanking Allaah [The Most High] when we are relieved of the Fitnah of the wicked heads of bidah

Salamah Bin Shubaib (rahimahullaah) said, ‘’I was once with Abdur-Razzaaq As-San’aanee (rahimahullaah), then (news) of the death of Abdul Majeed reached us; so he said, ‘’All praise is due to Allaah, who relieved the Ummah of Muhammad [sallal-laahu-alayhi-sallam] of Abdul Majeed Ibn Abdil Azeez . [siyar a’laam an-nubulaa 9/435]

This Abdul Majeed Ibn Abdil Azeez Ibn Abee Ruwaad was a figurehead of Ir’jaa.

———————————————————————–

What is Irjaa? See following articles at www.salafipublications.com

[1] The Issues Pertaining to Imaan and Refutation of the Murji’ah.
Author: Imaam al-Asbahani
Article ID : GSC050003 

[2] Shaikh ul-Islam on the Increase and Decrease of Iman
Author: Shaikh ul-Islam Ibn Taymiyah
Source: Kitab ul-Iman
Article ID : GSC050001 

 

[3] Kufr Occurs by Beliefs, Statements and Actions
Article ID : GSC050004

 

[4]Kufr Can Occur Without Believing in Kufr or Desiring It
Article ID : GSC050005 

[5] Kufr Can Occur Without Istihlaal or Juhood
Author: Abu Iyaad
Article ID : GSC050006

 

 

The Messenger commanded his Ummah to distinguish the Du’afaa from the Thiqaat

The Messenger (sallal-laahu-alayhi-wasallam) said:

فإنه من يعش منكم فسيرى اختلافا، فعليكم بسنتي

‘’Indeed the one who lives long amongst you will see differences; so upon you is to (adhere) to my Sunnah.’’

Imaam Abu Haatim (rahimahullaah) said: This is clear evidence that the Messenger (sallal-laahu-alayhi-sallam) commanded his Ummah to know the Du’afaa amongst them and (distinguish) them from the Thiqaat. That is because the Sunnah cannot be adhered to alongside the lies and falsehood mixed with it, except by way of knowing the Du’afaa and (distinguishing them) from the Thiqaat.

[Source: Muqaddimah Kitaab Al-Majrooheem Minal Muhadditheen of Imaam Ibn Hibbaan (rahimahullaah) Page: 66]

 

 

[2002]-A Testimony To Ustaadh Abu Khadeejah’s Leniency and Goodwill Towards Fatwa-online/Madeenah.com for The Sake of Brotherhood

Aboo Zakee (Troid) wrote on Salafitalk.net in 2002

As salaamu ‘alaykum wa rahmatullaah,

When fatwa-online first came on the scene (around 2000), salafipublications.com, troid.org (and others) were amongst the most vigorous in promoting the fatwa-online site, the initiative to develop a fatwa based website for the Muslims was something well-received, emails and announcements were regularly forwarded on the TROID and SP mailing lists and there was evidently clear cooperation with this da’wah effort on the part of SP and TROID. In fact, one might say that these two websites (that preceded Fatwa Online) helped to popularise the fatwa website and showed complete cooperation with this effort at its onset and the praise is for Allaah.

In terms of who/how fatwa-online aligns itself with, I remember a situation many years ago. Around the year 2000 we found one of our articles on their website, we kindly requested that it be referenced to www.troid.org and that it be left intact and. We received a response from the admin of Fatwa Online who mentioned that he didn’t want to ref. troid.org as it may hinder their efforts in reaching a broader audience (since troid.org was/is a site, wal-hamdulillaah that openly discusses the issue of salafiyyah and the term salafee was problematic in this wide-ranged approach).  As much as we respected his effort, we wished to insist upon the referencing/terminology being left intact but before being insistant, we sought the intercession of our brother, Abu Khadeejah, lecturer at Masjid as-Salafi – Birmingham. So he advised us with a sound advice towards cooperation and good ties, he said:

“For the sake of the da’wah, let the issue go (release your insistence, even though you don’t agree), wallaahi, the brother (Fatwa Online admin.) is a beautiful brother, you would love him if you met him.”

So we benefited from this advice by understanding

– Despite disagreeing, the concern from our brother Abu Khadeejah was to maintain good ties (with fatwa online), good cooperation and he sought to mend ties, first and foremost
– That one doesn’t always have to hold his position; he may let it go for the overall good (even if he doesn’t agree)

– That even though troid.org and salafipublications.com were diligent in referencing fatwa online, promoting their content, adding links to their sites etc. and the cooperation wasn’t reciprocated, there was still nothing but respect for the work of the brother (at Fatwa Online) and overall good thoughts

So this is the manner in which we found those at Maktabah Salafiyyah for Fatwa-Online and we accepted this advice and let the issue go. Despite not wanting to ref/affiliate troid.org, as the years passed, the open referencing and affiliation of Green Lane Masjid increased (amongst others) and I think this is an important point, as time was taken to promote the da’wah of those hosting the likes of Yaasir Qadhee and Abu Usaamah (and one can check the threads on Green Lane for a large listing of problems) to the exclusion of Masjid as-Salafi and many of the du’aat in the UK known for their Salafiyyah. In fact if one were to search the yahoogroup for fatwa online, one would find 26 emails referencing green lane and 1 referencing salafipublications, both organisations are in the same city, one known for salafiyyah, the other known for hizbiyyah,  so there is no doubt as to where their allegiances lie.

Years later, I finally met with an individual involved with fatwa online. In having discussions with him we found that the conversations often and quickly turned to the issues of Abu Khadeejah, Maktabah Salafiyyah and focusing negatively on their efforts, efforts which we see as the most consistent and most clear in spreading the salafee da’wah and connecting the people to their Scholars in the West dating back more than 15  years!

In one instance, I had breakfast with one of the representatives of fatwa online in which it was the first time we met, the conversation turned quickly  to speaking about Abu Khadeejah this and Abu Khadeejah that…and when we had barely met! I just remembered years early, how Abu khadeejah how spoken so well of the same individual, protecting his honour and encouraging us with cooperation and good thoughts wallaahul musta’aan.

So we respected our brothers and their efforts in giving da’wah, we gave them our attention and listened to what they had to say and we did not find except that their contention (with Maktabah Salafiyyah) seemed personal and misplaced and that is was a debacle that they would support and promote Green Lane Masjid and speak against Masjid as-Salafi. Lastly, there should be no doubt in anyoneýs mind that Maktabah Salafiyyah (and TROID for that matter) sought to cooperate with Fatwa Online for many years, turning a blind eye to much, until it became something no longer possible due to the allegiances they (Fatwa Online) attached themselves too.  We ask Allaah for safety, ameen.

http://www.salafitalk.net/st/viewmessages.cfm?Forum=9&Topic=7567

Reminder: A series of refutations by Ustaadh Amjad Rafiq Against The Maghrib Institute Deviant [Abu Eesa Niamatullah]

http://www.salafis.com/articles/bejkozd-evaluating-the-claim-of-salafiyyah-by-abu-eesa-niamatullah.cfm

http://www.salafis.com/articles/sbnafnr-evaluating-the-claim-of-salafiyyah-by-abu-eesa-niamatullah.cfm

http://www.salafis.com/articles/gutdibl-clarifications-evaluating-the-claim-of-salafiyyah-by-abu-eesa-niamatullah.cfm

http://www.salafis.com/articles/yqxfcbi-evaluating-the-claim-of-salafiyyah-by-abu-eesa-niamatullah.cfm

http://salaficentre.com/2013/08/abu-eesa-niamatullah-a-slanderous-devil-and-affiliate-of-al-maghrib-institute/

Some of those who seek to creep in the Salafi Masaajid or Centres! What is their stance towards Navid Ayaz at present?

The Prophet (sallal laahu alayhi-sallam) was clear with everyone regarding his call. When he arrived in Madeenah -at that vicinity of Masjid Quba (i.e. which he later built as the first Masjid)- he disseminated the call with its clarity and purity; so it made the hypocrites conceal themselves and they did not receive it except by manifesting Islaam, whilst surely hiding what they hid (i.e. disbelief in their hearts). This is likewise the habit of the people of falsehood; they do not make apparent what they (truly) believe. As for the people of clarity, they are people who openly proclaim (what they truly believe); so beware of the people who hide. [End of quote; Source: Wudooh Al-Manhaj As-Salafi. Page 13. By Shaikh Ramzaan]

Obviously, we do not mean that the likes of these people- those who seek to creep in some of the Salaficentres-are Munaafiqoon; rather the intent here is that they still have not made their affair clear. Their affair is still cloudy and there is no public statement from them, showing their stance against Madeenah.com and Navid Ayaz.

Is there anything unclear about Navid’s Manhaj at present? So what is their stance towards Navid at present? That is because few years ago they-those seeking to creep in some of the salaficentres at present- were quick to find lame excuses for Navid and as a result they received a rebuke for such deceitful acts. However, since then some members of Al-Markazus Salafi’s Masjid Committee and some elder brothers in Birmingham- who knew of the affair- have only witnessed a blameworthy silence from the likes of these people.

Indeed, it would be easy for a truthful person to make his affair very clear, especially with regards to one’s stances towards Madeenah.com and Navid Ayaz. It would be easy for such a person to declare his innocence from Madeenah.com and Navid Ayaz, as well as apologize for the fitnah they caused for the Salafiyyoon when Madeenah.com first started their disgraceful campaign against the well-known Salafi students in the West-those who are well-known to Shaikh Rabee, Shaikh Ubaid, Shaikh Muhammad Bin Haadi and others.

See here: All about Navid

http://salaficentre.com/2014/06/naveed-ayaz-madeenah-dot-con-and-greenlane-masjid-o-you-who-believe-why-do-you-say-that-which-you-do-not-do/

 

Can any Salafi Masjid Committee or Centre trust the likes of these people?!

Can you trust a person who knows the knowledge based proofs and the blameworthy stances of Saalim At-Taweel, yet he endorses those who passionately defend Saalim?! Your twitter account should not be utilized to promote the likes of these people. Be wise! Do not stain your hands, or involve in something about which you may have to explain yourself in future, even though it is avoidable at present.

Creeping in the Salafi Masaajid or Centres!

Be alert! Do not endorse anyone for teaching positions in your Salafi Masaajid or Centres except those who are well-known for clarity. If any individual was involved with Madeenah.com, Jamiat Ahle Hadeeth and others similar to them then do not be naïve about his affair; rather consult those elder Salafi brothers who have witnessed and dealt with the events at the time.

A Masjid Committee should not resemble a Coalition or Trade Union!

Never have a Masjid Committee similar to a Coalition or a Trade Union

This one Semi-Takfeeri and expects his views to be tolerated and that he is to be consulted!

This one never gives precedence to sound Manhaj stances over the desires of his tribe or clan and does not care too much about clarity, but expects to be consulted in serious affairs!

This one is allied to some ex-member of the Masjid committee and causes problems, but still expects no one to challenge his bad behaviour, and expects to be consulted!

This one holds the Masjid to ransom because of his contributions!

This one knows the haqq, but does not speak due to fear of losing numbers!