Skip to main content

Author: Abdullah Jallow

[2] Still Waiting! Where’s The Clear Unambiguous Knowledge-Based Shariah Proof for the Tabdee?

In The Name of Allāh, The Most Merciful, The Bestower of Mercy.

 

Al-Allamah Salih Al-Fawzan, may Allah preserve him, was asked: We seek (request) from the honorable Shaikh to clarify the stance of the Salaf regarding the Mubtadi’ah, may Allah reward you with good?

Response: Neither did the Salaf declare everyone a Mubtadi nor recklessly apply the term bid‘ah to everyone who opposed or had some opposition to what is correct in the religion. Rather, they described one with bidah who performed an act [of worship, (held a belief or followed a methodology)] for which there is no evidence, seeking nearness to Allah through it – such as a a type of worship that is not legislated by Allāh’s Messenger, peace and blessings of allāh be upon him, due to his statement: “Whoever does an action that is not in accordance with our matter, it will be rejected.” And in another narration: “Whoever introduces into this affair of ours (i.e. practices, beliefs or methodology) that which is not from it, it is rejected”. Therefore, bidah is to initiate something new into the religion (acts of worship, belief, methodology) for which there is no evidence- neither  from Allāh’s Book nor the Sunnah of Allāh’s Messenger, peace and blessings of Allāh be upon him.

This is bid‘ah when it is established that a person has initiated a bidah into the religion and refuses to recant, in this case, the methodology of the Salaf was to boycott and distance from him, nor did they sit with him. This was their methodology, but as I mentioned, after it is established that he is a Mubtadi- after he has been advised, but does not recant his bidah. Then, he is boycotted so that his harm does not extend to those who sit with him or associate with him, and so that people may be warned against the Mubtadi’ah and bidah.

As for exaggeration (or exceeding the limits) in applying the term bidah against everyone who opposes someone’s view, thus, it is said: This person is a Mubtadi! Everyone calls the other a Mubtadi – while he has not initiated anything (new) into the religion, except (merely) because he is in opposition to another person or a group among the groups, then this (person) is not a Mubtadi. Whoever commits a haram or an act of disobedience (in the Shariah), he is called a sinner (or disobedient) person, however, not every sinner is a Mubtadi and not every person who has committed an error is a Mubtadi. This is because a Mubtadi is one who has initiated into the religion that which is not from it, this is the Mubtadi. As for exaggerating (or exceeding the limits) in the application of the term bidah against everyone who opposes a person, this is not correct, for it may be that the one who opposes him is upon what is correct. This (i.e. exaggerating in applying the term bidah or Mubtadi is not from the methodology of the Salaf. [An Excerpt from Ẓāhirat al-tabdīʿ wa-al-tafsīq wa-al-takfīr wa-ḍawābiṭuhā pages 51-53. paraphrased]

We have repeatedly asked for clear proof for the Tabdee‘ against Shaikh Abu Iyaad, may Allāh protect him and the Salafiyyoon. Yet instead of presenting unambiguous knowledge based Shariah proofs, we continue to see distractions and side arguments. A wrong was committed, thus, we should not complicate the discussion with excessive quotations, technicalities, and side issues, while the central question remains unanswered, otherwise, the focus then becomes the victim’s tone or response. This in no way means that a victim is not held accountable if they have done something wrong, but how can it be expected at the same time that the victim must endure the transgression of false Tabdee, avoid defending himself, and remain calm, while the one who issued the Tabdee remains silent about it. Is this fair?! So we ask again: “Where is the clear proof for the Tabdee‘ against Shaikh Abu Iyaad?” We will not be distracted from this question. 

https://salafidawahmanchester.com/2026/03/27/painful-memories-about-some-of-those-who-set-ablaze-the-flames-of-transgression-and-false-tabdi/

https://salafidawahmanchester.com/2025/12/16/an-incident-at-fustat-when-status-meets-truth-humility-as-the-scholars-test-and-shield/

 

Remind Your Child or Younger Brother When He’s Always One of Those Who Dives Into Matters Before Elders in WhatsApp Groups

In The Name of Allah, The Most Merciful, The Bestower of Mercy.

The Tuboobiyyaat

Imaam Muhammad Ibn Saaleh Al-Uthaymeen, may Allah have mercy upon him, said:

[الطبوليات ] are those Masaa’il [issues related to the religion] by way of which fame is sought. They are called Tubooliyyaat because it is similar to a Tabl (drum) which has a sound and an echo. So when an odd affair comes to the people and a (person) becomes famous by way of it, it becomes as if it is the sound of a drum.

Sharh Hilyah Talib Al-Ilm. Page 19

[23] Exalt Allah And His Shariah First and Foremost

In The Name of Allah, The Most Merciful, The Bestower of Mercy.

Shaikh Al-Islam Ibn Taymiyyah, may Allah have mercy upon him, said:

If the heart loves Allah and devotes all the religion sincerely to Him, it will not give a share of this love to anyone else, let alone being afflicted with infatuation; but when afflicted with infatuation, this is due to its deficient love of Allah. This is why due to Yusuf’s, peace be upon him, love of Allah and sincerely devoting all the religion to Allah alone, he did not depart from it; rather Allah said:

ڪَذَٲلِكَ لِنَصۡرِفَ عَنۡهُ ٱلسُّوٓءَ وَٱلۡفَحۡشَآءَ‌ۚ إِنَّهُ ۥ مِنۡ عِبَادِنَا ٱلۡمُخۡلَصِينَ

Thus it was, that We might turn away from him evil and illegal sexual intercourse. Surely, he was one of Our chosen, guided slaves.

But as for the wife of the Azeez, she and her people were polytheists, and due to this she was afflicted with infatuation. [1]

Those people whose hearts are infatuated with images receive the greatest punishment and the smallest reward. This is because if the heart of the one who is infatuated with images continues to be attached and is enslaved, various types of evils, loss and corruption will be gathered for him, which none besides Allah can enumerate. Even if he is safe from committing a major lewd act, the continuous attachment of the heart to the image without committing a lewd act is a greater than the harm that afflicts a person who commits a sin and then repents, thus the effect of that sin ceases to exist in his heart. The greatest aspect of this calamity is when the heart turns away from Allah. This is because when the heart tastes the worship of Allah and being sincere to Him, there will never be anything sweeter than that- neither tastier and enjoyable nor better. A person does not abandon something beloved to him except due to another beloved thing that is more beloved to him, or due to fearing harm. The heart is turned away from a corrupt love by an upright love or due to fearing harm. Allah, The Exalted said about Yusuf, peace be upon him:

ڪَذَٲلِكَ لِنَصۡرِفَ عَنۡهُ ٱلسُّوٓءَ وَٱلۡفَحۡشَآءَ‌ۚ إِنَّهُ ۥ مِنۡ عِبَادِنَا ٱلۡمُخۡلَصِينَ

Thus it was, that We might turn away from him evil and illegal sexual intercourse. Surely, he was one of Our chosen, guided slaves. [Yusuf. 24]

Thus, Allah turned His servant away from that which would plunge one into evil due to inclining towards an image and being attached to it, and turns him away from lewd conduct due to his sincerity to Allah. [2]

Imam Ibn Al-Qayyim, may Allah have mercy upon him, said:

Hearts that are emptied of love for Allah, turned away from Him and seeking remedy from others besides Him, are afflicted with infatuation with images. This is because when the heart is filled with love for Allah and a strong love for meeting Him, this infatuation with images is repelled from it. For this reason, Allah, The Most High, stated about Yusuf, peace be upon him:

كَذَٰلِكَ لِنَصْرِفَ عَنْهُ السُّوءَ وَالْفَحْشَاءَ ۚ إِنَّهُ مِنْ عِبَادِنَا الْمُخْلَصِينَ

Thus it was, that We might turn away from him evil and illegal sexual intercourse. Surely, he was one of Our chosen, guided slaves.

This shows that sincerity is a means to repelling (evil). Because of this, some of the pious predecessors said: “Infatuation is an agitation in empty hearts”. Meaning: emptied of other than what they crave for. [3]

Imam Ibn Al-Jawzi, may Allah have mercy upon him, said:

Quote:

know that desires (vain) desires urges a person towards immediate pleasures without him contemplating its evil consequences and urges him towards short-lived pleasures, even though it is a cause of pain and harm in this life and a barrier to pleasure in the Hereafter. As for a sensible person, he keeps away from pleasures whose result will be pain and desires whose result will be regret. This is enough as praise regarding what sound intellect necessitates and a rebuke against (vain) desires.

A sensible person should know that those who are addicted to lowly desires reach a state in which they no longer enjoy themselves, but at the same time they are unable to abandon those desires because it becomes as if it is a necessity of life. Due to this, you’ll find that alcoholics and sex addicts do not even enjoy a tenth of those desires, rather, they place themselves in a perilous situation that compels them to keep on returning to the act. However, if- based on clear-sightedness- the beautification of those lowly desires cease, a person realises that he has exposed himself to some ruin that is contrary to well-being, a situation of grief instead of happiness, while seeking after pleasure. Thus, he resembles an animal that was led to a trap- neither reached the thing that was utilised to lure it into the trap nor able to escape.

A person should contemplate the fact that a human being was not created to fulfil (vain) desires, instead, he is facilitated (with sound intellect and knowledge based on the divine revelation) to contemplate the consequences of his actions and perform righteous deeds for the Hereafter. An animal receives pleasure through eating, drinking and sexual relaations much more than a human being, while living a life devoid of reflection and concern. Thus, it is drawn towards its desires due to being ignorant of the outcomes of its actions.

A person should contemplate the consequences of (vain) desires because many people are deprived of virtue and find themselves in a state of depravity as a result. Many mistakes violates the honour of a person, leads to an evil mention of him as well as the guilt of sinning due to (vain) desires, yet he still does not give thought to anything else except his desires! The best description regarding him is that of one who finds himself in a tannery, for he does not really notice its smell properly until he exits it and then realises where he was. A sensible person should imagine the dishonour that will come to him due to his desires and the harm that results from those pleasures, for indeed he will see that- in most cases- they occur as result of those desires and pleasures.

A person should contemplate on the honour a person receives due to been given the upper hand and the humiliation found in subjugation, for indeed there is none who overcomes his desires except that his honour is strengthened, and none is subjugated by his desires except that he will find humiliation and subjugation in his soul. A person should contemplate the benefits of opposing one’s (vain) desires due to the commendation attached to it in this worldly life, safety of the soul and safeguard of one’s honour, as well as reward in the Hereafter. [4]

Allahul Musta’aan!


[1] Majmu Al-Fataawaa 10/135

[2] Al-Ubudiyyah 114-115

[3] at-Tib An-Nabawi. page180

[4] An Except from Dham Al-Hawaa. 36-38

Desire-Based Fatwas for Friends, Allies and Loved Ones

Al-Allamah Siddiq Hasan khan, may Allah have mercy upon him, said:

Abridged and paraphrased as follows;

It is not permissible to issue Fatwa in the Religion ordained by Allah based on personal desire

Neither is it permissible for a Mufti to act upon whichever opinion or view he wishes without first assessing which one is stronger and more correct, nor merely give it consideration because it is an opinion from an Imam or another perspective held by a group, thus, acting based on personal desires from other perspectives and opinions because he sees that the opinion agrees with his wishes and interests. This is forbidden according to the consensus of the scholars.

This is similar to the likes of that which Al-Qadhi Abu al-Walid al-Baji mentioned about some individuals in his era who positioned themselves to give fatwas. One of them would say: “What my friend deserves from me is that if he encounters a legal dispute or needs a fatwa, I provide him with a ruling based on the reports that suit him”. He said: “A person I trust (or consider trustworthy) told me about a situation where a group of muftis provided a ruling that would cause him harm, while he was absent. Then when he returned, he inquired directly. They said to him: ‘We were unaware it was you,’ and then they gave him the alternative opinion that benefited him. He said: “There is no difference among those scholars who are relied upon regarding the prohibition of this conduct.”

In summary, it is not permissible to act or issue fatwas in the religion ordained by Allah based on personal desire, selective choice, or catering to one’s interests, such that a person seeks out the opinion that suits his own aims or the aims of those he loves then acts upon it, gives fatwas with it, and judges by it; while against his opponent he gives the contrary ruling and fatwa. This is one of the most immoral types of immorality and among the gravest of major sins. And Allah is the One whose help is sought. [1]

Imam Ibn Al-Qayyim, may Allah have mercy upon him, said:

It is not permissible for a person to show favouritism towards those who seek his fatwas, such that he gives his father, son, or friend a fatwa on one matter, but gives others a different fatwa out of favouritism. Rather, this undermines his trustworthiness, unless there is a (lawful) reason that necessitates this specific (distinction), other than favouritism.” [2]


[1] Dhakhr al-Muḥtī min Ādāb al-Muftī pages 98-99. 1st Edition 1441 (2020). Publisher: Maktabah at-Tawbah

[2] I’lam Al-Muwaqqi’een 4/161

[3] The danger of deliberately sheltering ahlul bidah, including the haddadiyyah

In The Name of Allah, The Most Merciful, The Bestower of Mercy.

Al-Allamah Rabee Bin Hadi Al-Mad’khalee, may Allah have mercy upon him, said:

“Destructive Good Suspicion” is to have a good suspicion of the people of falsehood whether are they disbelievers, innovators or evil (open) sinners. And that which led the disbelievers to belie the Messengers, (harbouring) a severe disbelief in them and their message was due to their evil suspicion towards the people of truth (i.e. the Prophets and their true followers), and having a good suspicion of their forefathers and their religions of falsehood and disbelief.

Ahlul Bidah such as the Rawaafid, the khawaarij, the soofiyyah, the murji’ah, the qadariyyah and the people of Tahazzub Al-Baatil [false partisanship] are destroyed by good suspicion towards their shuyukh and figureheads, and their corrupt creeds. On the other hand, they are destroyed by their evil suspicions towards the truth and its people. Abul Hasan Al-Maribee and his followers have a share of both this destructive good suspicion and destructive evil suspicion.

Majmu 13/363-364

[22] Exalt Allah And His Shariah First and Foremost

In The Name of Allah, The Most Merciful, The Bestower of Mercy.

Allah, The Most High, said regarding the encounter between Musa, peace be upon him, and the magicians:

قَالُواْ يَـٰمُوسَىٰٓ إِمَّآ أَن تُلۡقِىَ وَإِمَّآ أَن نَّكُونَ أَوَّلَ مَنۡ أَلۡقَىٰ

 قَالَ بَلۡ أَلۡقُواْ‌ۖ فَإِذَا حِبَالُهُمۡ وَعِصِيُّهُمۡ يُخَيَّلُ إِلَيۡهِ مِن سِحۡرِهِمۡ أَنَّہَا تَسۡعَىٰ

فَأَوۡجَسَ فِى نَفۡسِهِۦ خِيفَةً۬ مُّوسَىٰ

قُلۡنَا لَا تَخَفۡ إِنَّكَ أَنتَ ٱلۡأَعۡلَىٰ

وَأَلۡقِ مَا فِى يَمِينِكَ تَلۡقَفۡ مَا صَنَعُوٓاْ‌ۖ إِنَّمَا صَنَعُواْ كَيۡدُ سَـٰحِرٍ۬‌ۖ وَلَا يُفۡلِحُ ٱلسَّاحِرُ حَيۡثُ أَتَىٰ

فَأُلۡقِىَ ٱلسَّحَرَةُ سُجَّدً۬ا قَالُوٓاْ ءَامَنَّا بِرَبِّ هَـٰرُونَ وَمُوسَىٰ

قَالَ ءَامَنتُمۡ لَهُ ۥ قَبۡلَ أَنۡ ءَاذَنَ لَكُمۡ‌ۖ إِنَّهُ ۥ لَكَبِيرُكُمُ ٱلَّذِى عَلَّمَكُمُ ٱلسِّحۡرَ‌ۖ فَلَأُقَطِّعَنَّ أَيۡدِيَكُمۡ وَأَرۡجُلَكُم مِّنۡ خِلَـٰفٍ۬ وَلَأُصَلِّبَنَّكُمۡ فِى جُذُوعِ ٱلنَّخۡلِ وَلَتَعۡلَمُنَّ أَيُّنَآ أَشَدُّ عَذَابً۬ا وَأَبۡقَىٰ

قَالُواْ لَن نُّؤۡثِرَكَ عَلَىٰ مَا جَآءَنَا مِنَ ٱلۡبَيِّنَـٰتِ وَٱلَّذِى فَطَرَنَا‌ۖ فَٱقۡضِ مَآ أَنتَ قَاضٍ‌ۖ إِنَّمَا تَقۡضِى هَـٰذِهِ ٱلۡحَيَوٰةَ ٱلدُّنۡيَآ

إِنَّآ ءَامَنَّا بِرَبِّنَا لِيَغۡفِرَ لَنَا خَطَـٰيَـٰنَا وَمَآ أَكۡرَهۡتَنَا عَلَيۡهِ مِنَ ٱلسِّحۡرِ‌ۗ وَٱللَّهُ خَيۡرٌ۬ وَأَبۡقَىٰٓ

They said: “O Musa! Either you throw first or we be the first to throw?” [Musa] said: “Nay, throw you (first)!” Then behold, their ropes and their sticks, by their magic, appeared to him as though they moved fast. So Musa conceived a fear in himself. We (Allah) said: “Fear not! Surely, you will have the upper hand. “And throw that which is in your right hand! It will swallow up that which they have made. That which they have made is only a magician’s trick, and the magician will never be successful, no matter whatever amount (of skill) he may attain.” So the magicians fell down prostrate. They said: “We believe in the Lord of Harun and Musa.” [Fir’aun (Pharaoh)] said: “Believe you in him [Musa (Moses)] before I give you permission? Verily! He is your chief who taught you magic. So I will surely cut off your hands and feet on opposite sides, and I will surely crucify you on the trunks of date-palms, and you shall surely know which of us [I (Fir’aun – Pharaoh) or the Lord of Musa (Allah)] can give the severe and more lasting torment.” They said: “We prefer you not over the clear signs that have come to us, and to Him (Allah) Who created us. So decree whatever you desire to decree, for you can only decree (regarding) this life of the world. “Verily! We have believed in our Lord, that He may forgive us our faults, and the magic to which you did compel us. And Allah is better as regards reward in comparison to your [Fir’aun’s] reward, and more lasting (as regards punishment in comparison to your punishment).” [Taa Haa. 65-73]

قَالُواْ لَن نُّؤۡثِرَكَ عَلَىٰ مَا جَآءَنَا مِنَ ٱلۡبَيِّنَـٰتِ وَٱلَّذِى فَطَرَنَا‌ۖ

They said: “We prefer you not over the clear signs that have come to us, and to Him (Allah) Who created us…

Meaning, we do not prefer you over what we have been promised of reward and the closeness to that which we have been shown clear signs, showing that Allah alone is the Lord and true deity to be worshipped- The Most Great, The Only Magnificent One – and every other thing that is worshipped besides Allah and considered as a lord is false. It is not possible that we will prefer you over the One who created and brought us into existence prior to our  state of non-existence; therefore:

فَٱقۡضِ مَآ أَنتَ قَاضٍ‌ۖ إِنَّمَا تَقۡضِى هَـٰذِهِ ٱلۡحَيَوٰةَ ٱلدُّنۡيَآ

“decree whatever you desire to decree, for you can only decree (regarding) this life of the world”…

Meaning: do what you promise us, that you will cut off our hands and feet, and crucify us, because it will come to an end regardless of its severity in this worldly life and cannot harm us thereafter when compared to Allah’s punishment for the one who persist upon disbelief, for indeed the punishment will be great and continuous.

This seemed to be their reply to Fir’awn when he said to them:

وَلَتَعۡلَمُنَّ أَيُّنَآ أَشَدُّ عَذَابً۬ا وَأَبۡقَىٰ

“And you shall surely know which of us (I (Fir’aun) or the Lord of Musa (Allah) can give the severe and more lasting torment”.

The statement of the magicians shows that it is incumbent upon a sensible person to compare the enjoyment of this life with the enjoyment of the afterlife, and compare the punishment in this life to punishment in the afterlife.

Then Allah said that the magicians said:

إِنَّآ ءَامَنَّا بِرَبِّنَا لِيَغۡفِرَ لَنَا خَطَـٰيَـٰنَا ۗ

“Verily! We have believed in our Lord, that He may forgive us our faults”…

Meaning: so that Allah may forgive us our disbelief and sins, because Iman expiates disbelief, and repentance wipes away one’s previous sins.

وَمَآ أَكۡرَهۡتَنَا عَلَيۡهِ مِنَ ٱلسِّحۡرِ

“And the magic to which you did compel us”..

Meaning: forgive us the sin of sorcery through which we opposed the truth.

This shows that they did not have a choice in what they did, rather Firawn compelled them. And that which is apparent – and Allah knows best – is that when Musa, peace be upon him, admonished them saying:

وَيۡلَكُمۡ لَا تَفۡتَرُواْ عَلَى ٱللَّهِ ڪَذِبً۬ا فَيُسۡحِتَكُم بِعَذَابٍ۬‌ۖ وَقَدۡ خَابَ مَنِ ٱفۡتَرَىٰ

“Woe unto you! Invent not a lie against Allah, lest He should destroy you completely by a torment. And surely, he who invents a lie (against Allah) will fail miserably”, it did have an effect on them and this is why they debated (regarding whether Musa was upon truth or not), but Fir’awn compelled and forced them to commit their plot. This is why they said what Firawn said before they arrived:

إِنۡ هَـٰذَٲنِ لَسَـٰحِرَٲنِ يُرِيدَانِ أَن يُخۡرِجَاكُم مِّنۡ أَرۡضِكُم بِسِحۡرِهِمَا وَيَذۡهَبَا بِطَرِيقَتِكُمُ ٱلۡمُثۡلَى

Verily! These are two magicians (i.e. Musa and Harun). Their object is to drive you out from your land with magic, and overcome your chiefs and nobles.

So they did that which was made up and forced on them. And maybe what settled in their hearts regarding hatred of opposing the truth with falsehood is that which earned them Allah’s Mercy, Iman and the ability to repent.

وَٱللَّهُ خَيۡرٌ۬ وَأَبۡقَىٰٓ

“And Allah is better as regards reward in comparison to your [Fir’aun’s] reward, and more lasting”.

Meaning: better as reward than what you promised us of status and rank, more lasting in reward and generosity, as opposed to what you [Firawn] say that “And you shall surely know which of us [I (Fir’aun – Pharaoh) or the Lord of Musa (Allah)] can give the severe and more lasting torment]- Meaning, he [Firawn] meant that his punishment is more severe and lasting than Allaah’s punishment.

An Excerpt from Tafseer As-Sadi. Slightly paraphrased

[2] The danger of deliberately sheltering ahlul bidah, including the haddadiyyah

In The Name of Allah, The Most Merciful, The Bestower of Mercy.

Al-Allamah Salih Al-Fawzaan, may Allah preserve him, said:

It is not permissible to exalt and praise the Mubtadi’ah even if they have some truth with them. This is because raising and praising them will spread their bidah and places them amongst the sincere ones-those who are taken as examples amongst the distinguished men of this Ummah. The Salaf warned against trusting the Mubtadi’ah – praising them and their gatherings. In this regard, Asad Ibn Musa, may Allah have mercy upon him, said:

“Beware of being a brother of the innovator (by association) or a companion of his, or one whom you sit with. For indeed it has been narrated that ‘whoever sits with a person of bidah has left the protection of Allah and is entrusted to himself. Whoever proceeds towards a person of bidah has proceeded towards the destruction of Islam”.

The Mubtadi’ah must be warned against and kept away from, even if they have some truth with them. Indeed, the most astray are not devoid of something of the truth, but as long as they have with them bidah, opposition and sinful views, it is not permissible to praise and exalt them. It is impermissible to not have an objection towards their bidah because in this is spreading of bidah and belittling the Sunnah; and through this the Mubtadi will emerge and become a guide for the Ummah.

As for the consideration that he has something of the truth, this does not justify praising him. This is to a far greater extent against that which is of overriding benefit and it is known with regards to a principle of the religion that averting harm takes precedence over seeking that which is of benefit.

And with regards to showing animosity to a Mubtadi, the harm that is averted from the Ummah is weightier than what he has of benefit. And had we adhered to this concept, no one would have been judged to be misguided and declared a Mubtadi. This is because there is not a Mubtadi, except that he has with him some of that which is from the truth and adherence to the Sunnah. The Mubtadi (may) neither be a disbeliever nor is he in opposition to all the Islamic legislation; rather he is either a Mubtadi in some or most of the affairs. However, if the bidah is particularly to do with Creed and Methodology, it is (more) dangerous because it will become an example (to follow), Bidah will spread and the Mubtadi’ah will become active in spreading their Bidah.

Therefore, the one who praises the Mubtadi’ah and makes their affair obscure to the people through what they have with them of truth, he is one of two (people): He is either one ignorant of the methodology of the pious predecessors and their stance against the Mubtadi’ah, while it is neither permissible for this ignorant one to speak nor is it permissible for the Muslims to listen to him; or he is one who has an objection to the truth because he knows the danger of Bidah  and the Mubtadi’ah, but he is one who has an objection and wishes to spread Bidah. Nevertheless, this is a dangerous matter and it is not permissible to be lackadaisical with regards to bidah and its people, whatever that may be.

An Excerpt from booklet titled “at-Tabdee wat-Tafseeq Wat Takfeer” page: 72-73

red flame

[1] Brief reminders regarding traits of the Haddadiyyah

In The Name of Allah, The Most Merciful, The Bestower of Mercy.

Al-Allamah Rabee Bin Hadi Al-Mad’khali, may Allah have mercy upon him, said:

It is important to note that some overexcited youth may study the books of the predecessors, but not proficient in applying what is sound from the narrations, thus, they apply them in other than their appropriate place. Therefore, it is essential to consult scholars on how to implement them because if one embarks upon applying some things incorrectly, he may harm himself, harm Islam and the Muslims.

This issue occurred in the past, as some overexcited youth among the new and old Haddadiyyah focused on narrations (of the predecessors), while not memorising (and understanding) the Quran. They focused on the narrations of the predecessors, while among the narrations of predecessors, there are those that are authentic and those that are unauthentic.

When they (predecessors) hold a consensus on a matter, it is obligatory to accept it; however, in cases of disagreement, their statements must be referred back to the Quran and the Sunnah of the Prophet. If a particular statement is not reliably attributed to so and so, it should not be accepted, and if it is reliably attributed to him, (but) contradicts (what is sound), it should be rejected. This is how these matters should be. They require Fiqh (sound understanding). The Haddadiyyah used to memorise the narrations of the predecessors, and Ahlus Sunnah were the first people they wage a war against, attacking them through their hysterical reading (of those narrations), turned against the scholars and sought to topple them one after the other until targeting (Shaikh Al-Islam) Ibn Taymiyyah. This trend has resurfaced through attacks against scholars and attempting to topple them while clinging to various narrations, some of which are authentic and others not, without grasping their intended meanings (or goals). [Marhaban Yaa Talib Al-Ilm 459-460]

Read: https://salafidawahmanchester.com/2026/03/27/painful-memories-about-some-of-those-who-set-ablaze-the-flames-of-transgression-and-false-tabdi/

[1] The danger of deliberately sheltering ahlul bidah, including the haddadiyyah

In The Name of Allah, The Most Merciful, the Bestower of mercy.

“Allah has cursed the one who shelters a Muhdith”.

Al-Allamah Salih Al-Fawzan, may Allah preserve him, stated:

The word Muhdith pronounced with a kasrah under the Daal means a culprit, perpetrator; and pronounced with a Fat-hah on the Daal (Muhdath) means an affair innovated in the religion, sheltering and being pleased with it”. [1]

Imam Abdul Azeez Bin Baz, may Allah have mercy upon him, said:

Meaning: those who shelter Ahlul Bidah Wal Ma’aasee – the people of Bidah and disobedience and aid them; those who stop the one who establishes the legislated Islamic punishment against the innovator [i.e. such as preventing the Muslim ruler from punishing the innovator or the scholar who refutes him]; those who establish Bidah and support it. [2]

Imam Muhammad Bin Salih al-Uthaymin, may Allah have mercy upon him, said:

“This bidah includes that of the Jahmiyyah, the Mutazilah and others. So, whoever shelters an innovator is cursed and likewise the one who aids him. In this is a warning against Bidah and newly invented matters in the religion. The Prophet said: “Beware of newly invented matters in the religion, for every innovation [in religious affairs] is misguidance”. The apparent meaning of this hadith [is that this is the case regarding bidah], even if it is a small bidah. [3]

Imam Al-Awzaa’ee, may Allah have mercy upon him, said:

O Muslims! Fear Allaah, accept the advice of the sincere advisers and the admonition of the admonishers. know that this knowledge is religion, so beware of what you do, from whom you take your religion, the one you follow and the one with whom your religion is safe, because indeed all the proponents of religious innovation are all falsifiers, liars and sinners. They are not cautious – neither do they pay attention nor do they fear, and together with that they are not to be trusted that they would not distort what you hear.

They say what they do not know with regards to what they disapprove and when proclaiming their lies; but Allaah (knows, hears and sees) what they do. Therefore, be cautious of them, trust them not, reject them and avoid them, because indeed this is what your earlier scholars did and commanded, and likewise the righteous ones who came thereafter.

Be careful of opposing Allah and being the means to destroying the religion He has ordained – breaking its commands and prohibitions, nullifying and weakening it by respecting the innovators in religious affairs and those who initiate that which is not from the religion, because you know what has been transmitted (i.e. the prohibitions) about respecting or exalting them. And what can be greater respect and exaltation than acquiring your religion from them- following and believing them, drawing close to them and assisting them in enticing the ones they entice and woo to their views and the religion (i.e. religious innovations) they follow. This is sufficient to be regarded as associates of theirs in what they do. [4]


[1] Al-Mulakh’khas Fee Sharhi Kitaab At-tawheed. page 97

[2] An Excerpt from at-Taleeqaat Al-Baaziyyah Alaa Ar-Rasaa’il Al-Aqadiyyah. pages 250-251

[3] Al-Qawlul Mufeed Alaa Kitaab At-tawheed. 1/222

[4] Taareekh Dimashq 6/361

[4] Brief Biographies of Some Prominent Contemporary Scholars – Al-Allamah Hasan ibn Abdil Wahhab Marzuq al-Bannah

In The Name of Allāh, The Most Merciful, The Bestower of Mercy.

He was born in Cairo (which is the capital of Egypt) on the 22nd of October in the year 1925. He has four sons and daughters.

The Shaikh was raised in a Muslim household which closely implemented the pillars of Islam. His father — the noble Shaikh Abdul Wahhab Marzuq Al Banna, may Allah have mercy on him — was initially upon the creed and methodology of the Asha’irah. Then Allah guided him to the sound and pure creed and methodology of the pious predecessors, and by the permission of Allah, this is what he died upon. May Allah have mercy on him.

Then Allah favoured Shaikh Hasan’s brother — the noble Shaikh Muhammad Abdul Wahhab Al Bannah — with an opportunity to work at the Ministry of Endowments in Egypt, and by the permission of Allah, he was able to establish a committee called Jama’ah Al-Ansar As Sunnah Al Muhamadiyah. The president of this group was none other than the noble Shaikh Muhammad Hamid Al Faqee. At this time, this was the only group in Egypt calling to the creed of Ahlus Sunnah wal Jama’ah. They used to call the people to Tawheed and to purify their worship from all forms of shirk.

However, there were also various deviant groups in Egypt at that time — foremost among them was Al-Ikhwan Al-Muslimeen. All of them opposed Jama’ah Al-Ansar As Sunnah Al Muhamadiyah due to their firm adherence to the methodology of Ahlus Sunnah wal Jama’ah. The opposition to these noble brothers, and in some instances it even reached the level of animosity and hatred, was due to the methodology of Ahlus Sunnah wal Jama’ah.

Allah gave his noble brother — Shaikh Muhammad Al Banna — success, and he aided these brothers, along with the help of another special and virtuous brother who was a colleague of his at his job, the noble Shaikh Muhammad Sadiq. Neither of these two knew about Salafiyah prior to this, but Shaikh Muhammad Sadiq had a very unyielding love for knowledge. He was also a very proficient poet.

They were both in search of a group who were upon the pure teachings of the methodology and creed of Ahlus Sunnah wal Jama’ah. Subsequently, they visited a particular group of individuals who were apparently upon the Qur’an and the Sunnah of Muhammad, peace and blessings of Allāh be upon him. This group professed to be upon the Qur’an and Sunnah and waging war against the people of bid’ah, but in reality they were upon the methodology of the Ash’ariyah, who distort Allāh’s Attributes, calling to it and spreading it amongst the people.

When his (Shaikh Hasan’s) brother and his companion recognised this, they came across a book authored by Muhammad Ahmad Abdus Salaam Ash Shuqayri, who was from the scholars of Ahlus Sunnah wal Jama’ah, called Al Qawl Jaliy Fee Hukmi at-Tawasul Bi an-Nabi Wal Walee, and the book Adab Qiratul Qur’an Alal Mayyit. So they contacted the Shaikh, visited him, and became very well acquainted with him. He introduced them to Jama’ah al-Ansar As Sunnah Al Muhamadiyah, who had a small place adjacent to the villa of A’bideen.

However, the people around them were not too fond of them or what they were propagating about Tawheed, mainly because the truth was completely in opposition to their creed. They were few in number, but when the Shaikh’s brother (i.e. Shaikh Hasan’s brother — Muhammad ibn Abdul Wahhab al-Bannah) and his companion went to visit these brothers, they were pleased with what they saw, just as his brother and his companion were pleased with what they saw, heard, and witnessed of the lectures being presented about Tawheed, which were delivered by Shaikh Abdul Aziz Ibn Rashid At Tamimi An Najdi from the scholars of those who ascribe themselves to Salafiyah.

He was living in Egypt at the time and has many well-known compilations, as well as his brother for the sake of Allah, Abdullah Ibn Yabis An Najdi, from the Salafi scholars. So Shaikh Muhammad and his companion met with Shaikh Muhammad Hamad Al Faqee. They were overjoyed to meet him, and they found, by meeting him, what they were looking for, which was clarification of the correct religion and the most important matters, which was the creed and methodology of Ahlus Sunnah wal Jama’ah.

They began to learn the books and references which the scholars refer to. One of the most influential scholars from whom they learned was Muhammad Munayir Ad Damashqi. The moment they began to learn, they increased in their diligence and desire to learn more. They attended all the lectures of Muhammad Hamid Al Faqee, who frequently travelled to the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia and was beloved to His Eminence, King Abdul Aziz ibn Sa’ud (Rahimahullah).

The Shaikh had a well-known reputation with the scholars there and a close connection with them. They used to make him responsible for reviewing certain books relating to Tawheed and Sunnah and publishing them through his publishing company in the city of A’bideen in Cairo. He would review them, publish them, and send them back to Saudi Arabia.

Soon after, Shaikh Muhammad Bin Abdil Wahhab al-Bannah (Shaikh Hasan’s brother) and his companion began to call to the religion of Allah throughout Egypt, travelling throughout the local cities giving da’wah to the religion of Allah. In the process of this, their love, brotherhood, and companionship increased for the sake of Allah.

Shaikh Muhammad also directed his attention towards his family, guiding, teaching, and educating them. He began with his father — may Allah have mercy on him — by advising him to adhere firmly to the creed of Ahlus Sunnah wal Jama’ah. His father, who had obtained a bachelor’s degree from Al-Azhar University, did not know any creed except that of the Asha’irah, in spite of his knowledge of other aspects of the religion.

He didn’t initially agree with or accept the call to the creed of Ahlus Sunnah, so he took Shaikh Muhammad to his grandfather, who was from the major scholars in Al-Azhar, but he was also of the Ash’ari methodology. And all praise is for Allah, Allah guided his grandfather to the correct Tawheed and methodology, and he began to weep because of what he had forfeited previously in his life and was so ignorant of for so many years.

Then Shaikh Muhammad directed his attention towards his mother — may Allah have mercy upon her — and other siblings, calling them to Tawheed. Allah guided all to this blessing and virtue. Therefore, the first teacher and guide to the Sunnah for Shaikh Hasan and his family was his brother — Muhammad Bin Abdil Wahhab al-Bannah.

Shaikh Hasan was immensely influenced by the Salafi Da’wah and began to read some of the books his brother introduced to him. Later on, he met Shaikh Muhammad Hamid Al Faqee and some of the other scholars involved in the da’wah in Egypt. He came to love them and frequented their lectures and admonitions.

Allah guided his heart to become acquainted with various sciences and matters of the religion which he would have never known had it not been for the bounty of Allah. So his brother is his Shaikh and teacher, as he played a major role in his guidance and removing some of the many burdens and difficulties of his life and the lives of his family due to being guided.

His mother would prepare food for them, and he would carry it to the lecture halls and circles of knowledge and sit far away from the crowd. When his brother and Muhammad Sadiq would finish teaching, he would get lunch for them after Salatul Dhuhr. Then the Shaikh would read to them from the various sciences, and the most important of these sciences was Tawheed.

Then he would read from the books of Seerah, then they would pray Asr and continue reading until Maghrib. Anytime he (Shaikh Hasan) had a question about a matter, he would find the details of it with his brother, and this increased his love for him. It also made him closer to him because he guided him away from the most corrupt and deviant creed which had affected so many of the youth during that time.

Then after the death of Muhammad Hamid Al Faqee, Shaikh Abdur Razaq Al Afifi took his place.

Shaikh Hasan used to travel to see him and at times travel with him and help prepare his lessons for him. And from those who were with them was Shaikh Abdul Aziz Ibn Rashid An Najdi, from the scholars of Saudi Arabia who was living in Egypt at the time. Shaikh Hasan would attend his lessons while in Iskandariyah, as well as visit him at his house on many occasions.

When he travelled to Makkah, Shaikh Hasan would travel and attend his lessons and admonitions. Then Allah decreed that Shaikh Abdur Razaq would be one of his teachers in the University in Riyadh. He would meet him when he came to visit his kids while he was teaching in the Islamic University in Madinah.

And Shaikh Abdur Razaq would teach even in the presence of His Eminence, King Abdul Aziz ibn Sa’ud, and his brother would also attend these lessons along with the other scholars. His brother was chosen to teach at the institute of knowledge in Saudi Arabia (which was the school of many like Shaikh Muhammad Aman Al Jami, Shaikh Muhammad Ibn Salih Al Uthaymeen, and others). So he left Cairo with his family to be a teacher in Riyadh.

Then His Eminence, the noble Shaikh Abdul Aziz Ibn Baz, was appointed president of the Islamic University of Madinah, and he learned about my brother in Riyadh, and they established companionship, love, and a strong sense of brotherhood for one another. Then Shaikh Abdur Razaq and Shaikh Ibn Baz’s relationship strengthened to the point that Shaikh Abdur Razaq was appointed Shaikh Ibn Baz’s wakil in the department of Fatawa, Da’wah wal Irshaad.

Allah gave him Tawfeeq, and both the scholars and students of knowledge established a great deal of reverence and respect for him due to his knowledge and virtue.

Shaikh Hasan also met Shaikh Muhammad Al Madani Malukhiyah, who was also from the people of knowledge, creed, and methodology. He met Shaikh Abdur Rahman Al Wakil, who preceded Shaikh Abdur Razaq after his demise. He travelled to Russia and was responsible for guiding many there to Islam and the correct creed and methodology. He was also responsible for writing many refutations against the Sufis. These are some of the most beneficial compilations Shaikh Hasan benefited from tremendously.

He also had the opportunity to meet Shaikh Muhammad Khaleel Harras, attended many of his lessons, and travelled with him on many occasions while he was calling to this da’wah. He would ask him about issues related to certain ahadeeth which were falsely interpreted by the Mu’tazilah.

Then Allah chose his brother — Shaikh Muhammad Bin Abdil Wahhab al-Bannah — to be a teacher at King Abdul Aziz University in Saudi Arabia, in the department for higher learning, more specifically the department of creed and methodology.

Then Muhammad Abdul Majeed assumed leadership of Jama’ah, and at this time, Shaikh Hasan would give da’wah in the local mosques, khutbahs, and lectures about Tawheed.

Then Allah willed that Shaikh Ibn Baz requested of him to teach at the Islamic University in Madinah. His brother clarified to the Shaikh that his creed is correct and that his methodology is the methodology of Ahlus Sunnah wal Jama’ah.

Originally transmitted from salafitalk.net  Minor editorial revisions were made for readability and consistency, including occasional adjustment of first-person references for clarity, without altering the intended meaning.