Skip to main content

Seal the month of Ramadhaan with Repentance (Tawbah) – Shaykh Uthaymeen

Repentance (Tawbah)

My brothers

Seal and finish the month of Ramadhaan with repentance to Allah from sins and turn to him in repentance with actions which please him for indeed man is not free from making mistakes and shortcomings and every son of Adam commits errors and the best of those who make mistakes are the ones who repent.

Continue reading

Allowance of Eating During Day in Ramadhaan When Breaking Fast Due to A Legislated Reason – Shaykh Uthaymeen

بسم الله الرحمن الرحيم

Question: Is it allowed for the one who breaks his fast during the day in Ramadhan due to a legislated sharia excuse to (continue) eating and drinking for the rest of the day?

Shaykh Uthaymeen  answered:

It is permissible for him to eat and drink because he broke his fast due to a legislated sharia reason. If he breaks the fast due to a legislated sharia reason, then the prohibition from eating on that day ceases in his case, and it becomes permissible for him to eat and drink; as opposed to the man who breaks his fast without a (legislated shiria reason), for indeed we make it binding on him to refrain (from food and drink), even if it is binding on him to make it up (as well). Therefore, it is obligatory to pay attention to the difference between these two affairs.

” مجموع فتاوى الشيخ ابن عثيمين ” ( 19 / السؤال رقم 60 )

Who are Ahlul Hadith – Shaykh Rabee’ b. Haadi

Excerpts from the full article – taken from Salafipublications.

  • They are those who proceed upon the way of the Companions and those who followed them in righteousness, in clinging to the Book and the Sunnah, biting onto that with their molar teeth, and letting them (i.e., the Qur’aan and the Sunnah) take precedence over any statement or code and conduct – whether in belief, or acts of worship such as dealings and transactions, mannerisms, politics or social life…

 

  • They are those who are observant and lie in wait for every group that has deviated from the way of Islaam, like the Jahmees and the Mu’tazilees and the Khawaarij and the Rawaafidh and the Murji’ah and the Qadriyyah and all of those who have deviated from the way of Allaah and have followed their desires in every time and place – they not affected by the reproach of the blamers, in the cause of Allaah
  • They are the group that the Messenger of Allaah has praised and commended in his saying, “There will not cease to be a group from my Ummah manifest and upon the truth not being harmed by those who forsake them neither by those who oppose them until the hour is established.” [1]
  • They are the Saved Sect firm upon that which the Messenger and his Companions were upon, those who have been distinguished and defined by the Messenger of Allaah when he mentioned that this Ummah shall divide into seventy three sects all going to the Hell-fire except one and it was said, “Who are they, O Messenger of Allaah?” He said, “They are those who are upon that which I and my Comapnions are upon.”
  • And this is not something we say in exageration or a mere claim, but verily we speak a reality that the text of the Qur’aan and the Sunnah bears witness to, which history bears witness to, and to which their (i.e., the Ahlul-Hadeeth’s) statements, their state of affairs, their writings and works also bear witness to. They are those who put before their eyes the statement of Allaah: And hold fast, all of you together, to the rope of Allaah. [2]….

 

  • They are the most staunch in distancing themselves from opposing the command of the Messenger and the most distant from fitnah…

 

Full article here: http://www.spubs.com/sps/sp.cfm?subsecID=SLF01&articleID=SLF010003&articlePages=1

Abu Eesa’s Niamtullah’s Croissant Episode, leads him to mock Ahlus Sunnah

We have seen time and again, those who harbor hatred for Ahlus Sunnah, jumping aboard anything they believe they can use to gain some plus points with their followers, in their attempt to garner fame and belittle the Salafis.

This has been the case time and again over the years with Abu Eesa Niamtullah of al Maghrib institute, who attempts to pull the wool over the eyes of his followers by taking the supposed “higher ground” in terms of understanding. This was in reference to Abu Hakeem Bilaal Davies merely explaining the origins of the croissant, to which Abu Eesa wrote:

niamatullah

Watch: http://safeshare.tv/w/NqVaiKHizb

However maybe if he had indeed listened to the recording properly and thoroughly first, without attempting to mock that which wasn’t present, then it would have spared us from having to clarify his silliness. Alas it seems some people lack intellect and so to make it as easy and as simple as possible, so that he can “understand” what was meant by the video, Ustaadh Abu Hakeem Bilal Davis (hafidahullah), responding regarding the issue of the “Croissant.”

The reader will see how Abu Eesa Niamatullah and other than him have purposely blown the issue out of proportion just to attack the Salafis, and blur the truth for the common people. This blurring the lines between truth and falsehood is well known from him and his past here in which he attempted to take people to his beloved Shaykh Kehlan, as well as harbor those who attack the scholars of Sunnah – more details here.

Allah says in His Quran:

يَـٰٓأَيُّہَا ٱلَّذِينَ ءَامَنُوٓاْ إِن جَآءَكُمۡ فَاسِقُۢ بِنَبَإٍ۬ فَتَبَيَّنُوٓاْ أَن تُصِيبُواْ قَوۡمَۢا بِجَهَـٰلَةٍ۬ فَتُصۡبِحُواْ عَلَىٰ مَا فَعَلۡتُمۡ نَـٰدِمِينَ

O you who believe! If a rebellious evil person comes to you with a news, verify it, lest you harm people in ignorance, and afterwards you become regretful to what you have done. [Qur’an 49:6]

Abu Hakeem, may Allah protect him, has never claimed that eating a Crossaint is ‘haram’. Listen to the audio again carefully!

Secondly, this lecture was given under the context of the lecture entitled: “The Origins of Christmas.” and hence was given as an example to show some the origins of things that we are familiar with today and then to go on and show the origin of the rituals practiced by Christians in Christmas. He was merely making the point that knowing the origin of something can makes ones perception change.

Only a shameful liar would claim otherwise.

“You only need to prod him once and the “pathological hatred” he harbours (whilst accusing others of it) pours out like water out of a jug, and that which he accuses the Salafis of (of unjust rulings on people), pours out freely, without hindrance from his heart and soul with the ferociousness of a lion, yet the thought and intelligence of a domestic turkey” www.salafis.com

We await your public Tawbah: http://www.salafis.com/articles/puesiwh-1st-open-letter-to-abu-eesa-niamatullah-to-make-tawbah-to-allaah-and-apologise-for-his-slanders.cfm

Read more about Abu Eesa Niamatullah:

[1] http://www.salafis.com/articles/bejkozd-evaluating-the-claim-of-salafiyyah-by-abu-eesa-niamatullah.cfm

[2] http://www.salafis.com/articles/sbnafnr-evaluating-the-claim-of-salafiyyah-by-abu-eesa-niamatullah.cfm

[3] http://www.salafis.com/articles/gutdibl-clarifications-evaluating-the-claim-of-salafiyyah-by-abu-eesa-niamatullah.cfm

[4] http://www.salafis.com/articles/yqxfcbi-evaluating-the-claim-of-salafiyyah-by-abu-eesa-niamatullah.cfm

[2] Brief Reminder for the Envious-Abusive-Ahmaq [Mourad Al-Jazaa’iri]

Al-Allaamah Rabee Bin Haadi Al-Madkhali (may Allaah preserve him) said:

”By Allaah, the one who speaks ill of Shaikh Ubaid and says that he is a Jaahil; this (person) is one following the path of the devils; he follows the paths of hizbiyyah in speaking ill of the scholars of the Salafi manhaj. Shaikh Ubaid is from the virtuous Salafi scholars and is well known for Wara, Zuhd and speaking truth, may Allaah bless you. And a man who seeks the face of Allaah does not speak ill of him, and we know of these ways (i.e. attacks against the scholars) from the hizbiyyeen.”  http://www.sahab.net/forums/index.php?showtopic=116834

 

Al-Allaamah Saaleh Al-Fawzaan (may Allaah preserve him) said:

None violates the honour of the scholars who are upon the truth, except one of three (people): Either a hypocrite known for (his) hypocrisy, or an evil sinner who hates the scholars because they prevent him from his sinful (acts) of disobedience, or a misguided hizbi who hates the scholars because they neither agree with his hizbiyyah nor with his deviated views. [Al-Ajwibah Al-Mufeedah page 51 and Muhaadaraat Fil Aqeedah Wad-Dawa 2/190]

Some New Arabic Books by Al-Allaamah Ubaid Al-Jaabiri (my Allaah preserve him)

In The Name of Allaah, The Most Merciful, The Bestower of Mercy

Below are five new Arabic Books of Al-Allaamah Ubaid Al-Jaabiri to add to your library!

 

التقرير الأحمد بشرح أصول السنة للإمام أحمد

قطع اللجاجة بشرح صحيح المقدمة من سنن ابن ماجه

مجموعة الرسائل الجابرية في مسائل علمية وفق الكتاب والسنة

الطيب الجني على شرح السنة للإمام المزني رحمه الله

إتحاف البشر بمكانة ولي الأمر في الكتاب وصحيح الخبر

We ask Allaah to preserve the Shaikh and protect him from the vile tongues of the people of ghuluww…Aameem

Yusuf Estes – The Dusseldorf 1250 Con Exposed (PDF)

In the Name of Allah, the Most Gracious, the Most Merciful…
As-Salaamu ‘alaykum wa rahmatullaah.
If you believed that 1,000 or 1,250 Germans accepted Islam after a certain preacher’s lecture…

Continue reading

The severest type of miserliness….

”The severest level of miserliness is that a person is miserly towards himself despite being in need; for how many a miser has wealth and falls ill, but he does not seek medication.  He yearns for something but miserliness prevents him from (getting it).”

[Mukhtasar Minhaaj Al-Qaasideen of Imaam Ibn Qudaamah Al-Maqdisee (rahimahullaah) page 218]