In The Name of Allah, The Most Merciful, The Bestower of Mercy.
If we refer to English dictionaries to clarify the meaning of “Evangelical,” we find it represented by the term “Evangel,” which signifies gospel or messenger. The corresponding adjective is “Evangelical,” denoting something related to the gospel or Protestantism. Additionally, “Evangelism” refers to the act of spreading the gospel or a zealous commitment to it. The term “Evangelicalism” thus conveys the concept of Evangelical doctrine or the Evangelical movement. [Footnote a]
According to the British Encyclopedia, evangelicalism is defined as “a strict Protestant doctrine focused on the preaching of the Gospel of Jesus Christ, with the Bible serving as the foundation of faith.” This source indicates that evangelicalism is a branch of Protestantism that upholds the inerrancy of the Bible and emphasizes the dissemination of the Gospel. A similar definition can be found in the Christian Faith Dictionary, which states that it is “a term used by Protestants to describe their reform movement as a return to the Gospel, distinguishing them from Catholics and Orthodox Christians.” [Footnote b]
The Evangelical movement: (noun) adopted by the religious renewal movement in England at the beginning of the nineteenth century. This pertains to what is mentioned in their sources.
As for the Arabic language, if we refer to its dictionaries, we find that the term “Evangelical” is derived from the word “Gospel,” which is the Book of God – the Exalted – revealed to Jesus, peace be upon him. The term “Gospel” is derived from “najal,” meaning son and father, and “intajal al-amr” signifies clarity and progression. The previous definitions from both sides reveal a consensus regarding the term “evangelical,” although the meanings differ significantly between the two contexts. For Christians, “evangelical” refers to Protestantism and the dissemination of the Gospel. In contrast, Arabic language sources define “evangelical” as pertaining to the Gospel, which is the book of Jesus (peace be upon him). The distinction between these meanings is substantial. Our focus here is on the association of evangelicalism with the Protestant denomination, as this is the subject of our discussion. Therefore, evangelicalism can be defined as a Protestant sect that adheres to a literal interpretation of the Holy Scriptures. Evangelicals are followers of the evangelical denomination who believe in the inerrancy of the Bible and, at times, in a literal interpretation of the Torah. However, some evangelicals do not subscribe to the belief in the millennial kingdom and do not identify with Christian Zionists. [Footnote c]
The Evangelical movement, in fact, originates from Protestantism, also known as the Reformation, which emerged in the sixteenth century as a response to widespread corruption within the church in various aspects. The first aspect of this corruption was the degradation of religious authority, evident in certain rituals and practices, such as the concepts of transubstantiation and the sale of indulgences.
The second issue pertains to the corruption that has infiltrated secular authority, where popes have competed for power by amassing wealth to achieve luxury. Additionally, there are other factors that will be elaborated on later in a different section of this research. The dire situation that the Christian church found itself in led to a revolution initiated by reformers known as the “Protestants,” a term that signifies their dissent and opposition. As a result of this reformation, certain beliefs that contradicted the established views of the church were introduced, particularly regarding Palestine and the Jewish people. The prevailing belief within the Catholic Church was that Palestine belonged to Christians and that Jews were rejected by Christians due to their denial of Jesus Christ and their role in his crucifixion. However, the Protestant Reformation fundamentally altered these concepts, leading to a new belief system that asserted:
The superiority of the Jewish people over other nations. The Old Testament serves as the foundational reference for Christian doctrine. Ben-Gurion referred to the Christian Bible, stating, “It is the sacred document of the Jews regarding the ownership of Palestine, dating back 3,500 years.” The fulfillment of God’s promise for the return of the Jews to the land of Palestine. The urgency of this return, as it paves the way for the coming of Christ and the establishment of His blessed kingdom for a thousand years.
The reality is that the winds of change in the Christian stance towards Jews began with the emergence of the Protestant movement in the sixteenth century. This movement challenged the Church’s authority to monopolize the interpretation of the Bible and revitalized the biblical texts. Consequently, a literal interpretation of passages concerning Jews began to replace the interpretations established by the Catholic Church. Gradually, perceptions of Jews started to shift, leading to a form of Judaization within Christian Zionism.
A Jewish revival movement emerged from the reformist movements in Europe and Britain, ultimately reaching America. This was made possible by the efforts of advocates and promoters of the movement, such as the English theologian Thomas Brightman and Henry Finch, a member of the British Parliament, who stated in one of his books: “The Jewish people are not merely a scattered minority; they represent a unified nation as a whole. They will return to their homeland and will inhabit every part of the earth as they have done in the past. They will live in peace and remain there forever”. The Jewish revival movement, also known as the “Hebrew Renaissance,” reached its peak during the Puritan era in the seventeenth century. This revival manifested in two distinct forms: The first type consists of religious expressions, which include: A. The use of the Hebrew language for the Bible and in educational curricula. B. The baptism of children with Hebrew names instead of Christian ones. C. The observance of Saturday as a religious celebration for the resurrection of Christ. The second type encompasses political expressions, notably the demand from a group of Puritans for the Torah to serve as the constitution of Britain. [Footnote d]
———————————–
Footnote a: Refer to: Sociology of Religion, p. 240, and Al-Mawrid English-Arabic Dictionary, p. 322. Al-Mawrid English-Arabic Dictionary, p. 322, and Oxford English-Arabic Dictionary, p. 361. Al-Mawrid English-Arabic Dictionary, p. 322. Oxford English-Arabic Dictionary, p. 361.
Footnote b: Encyclopaedia Britanica, Vol. 4, p. 612-613
Footnote c: Refer to: Al-Mu’jam Maqayis Al-Lugha: 544/2, Al-Sihah Dictionary: p. 1024, Al-Misbah Al-Munir: p. 306, Wa Lan Al-Arab: 201/14-202, Al-Qamus Al-Muhit: pp. 1265-1266, and Taj Al-Arous: 128/8, as well as the Al-Mu’jam Al-Wasat: p. 29. .
Footnote d: Refer to the following sources: The Bible and the Sword, page 32, and Non-Jewish Zionism, page 25. 2. For additional information, see Detailed History of the Church, pages 13-14; Insights on the Reformation, pages 30-33; Christian Sects and Denominations, page 121; and An Introduction to Christian Fundamentalism, page 87. In the second chapter of this section, consult pages 118-150. Also, refer to Insights on the Reformation, page 39. As cited in: Newman, Jewish Influence on the Christian Reform Movement, page 190. Additionally, see Non-Jewish Zionism, pages 26-29; Evangelical Fundamentalism, page 37; Christian Zionism in the United States, page 291; and Conservative American Administration, page 69. The Rebirth and Destiny of Israel, p. 100. The Return of the Jews in English Protestant Thought, pp. 29-34 An Introduction to Christian Fundamentalism, p. 92; Evangelical Fundamentalism, p. 37; Christian Zionism in the United States, pp. 291-292 and Conservative American Administration, p. 70. See also: Prophecy and Politics, pp. 155-156. Additionally, refer to: Christianity and the Torah, 92-93. Puritans were those who lived during the reign of Queen Elizabeth and the Stuart dynasty, striving to reform the Church of England by eliminating its rituals and opposing the Catholic beliefs and practices present within it. For further reference, see the Dictionary of Major Religions, page 623. Additionally, consult The Bible and the Sword, page 1/142.
An Excerpt from “Wan-Nasraniyyah As-Suhruniyyah Nash’atuha Wa Ahammu Aqa’idiha” 1/111-115- By Jawharah Bint Muhammad Jam’aan Al-Qahtani.
NB: The information presented in this article is derived from the findings of the researcher. While she has made significant efforts to include numerous references and viewpoints, it is important to acknowledge that no text, apart from the Qur’an and Sunnah, is entirely free from errors, omissions, or lapses in memory on the part of any researcher. The information articulated in the article reflect the researcher’s personal views, and not all assertions can be independently verified by the individual who published this article (Abdullah Jallow). Therefore, those who find the information unsatisfactory are encouraged to conduct additional research or reach out to the author for further clarification. Nonetheless, the existing knowledge regarding Zionism in contemporary times is substantial, particularly in light of over seventy years of oppression faced by the Palestinians.
Verily, the number of months with Allah is twelve months (in a year), so was it ordained by Allah on the Day when He created the heavens and the earth. [at-Tawbah. 36]
Imam As-Sadi, may Allah have mercy upon him, said:
Meaning, well-known months decreed by Allah; [يَوۡمَ خَلَقَ ٱلسَّمَـٰوَٲتِ وَٱلۡأَرۡضَ – on the Day when He created the heavens and the earth]- Meaning, He established the alternation of its nights and days, decreed their time periods and divided them into these twelve months. (1)
Allah, The Exalted, said: [يَسْأَلونَكَ عَنِ الْأَهِلَّةِ قُلْ هِيَ مَوَاقِيتُ لِلنَّاسِ وَالْحَجِّ – They ask you (O Muhammad) about the new moons. Say: These are signs to determine fixed time periods for humankind and for the time of the Hajj]. [Al-Baqarah. 189]
Imam As-Sadi, may Allah have mercy upon him, stated:
Allah – by His Mercy and kindness – placed it in this manner where it alternates. The crescent appears weak at the beginning of the month, gradually increases by the middle of the month and then it decreases until the end of the month. This is how it is in order that people would know the time periods of their acts of worship, such as fasting, the times for the payment of Zakat, and the time of Hajj. And when it is the case that Hajj takes place during specific months that are well known and takes a long time, Allah stated: [وَالْحَجِّ – and for time of Hajj].
Furthermore, based on the the phases of the moon people become acquainted with the times for the payment of unpaid debts, rental time periods, the time period of Iddah (i.e. the time period a woman has to wait before remarrying after divorce or after the death of a husband), the time period of pregnancy and other matters that are related to people’s needs. Therefore, Allah has made it a means determining time periods that is known to everyone-young and old, knowledgeable and ignorant. If time periods were determined by way of the solar calendar, none would be acquainted with it except a very few amongst the people. (2)
Ibn Umar, Allah be pleased with him and his father] reported Allah’s Messenger, peace and blessings of Allah be upon him, stated, “The month is thus and thus and thus (i. e. pointing with his fingers thrice), and he held back his thumb at the third time (in order to show that it can also consist of twenty-nine days)”. [Sahih Muslim 1080]
Imam Muhammad Ibn Salih Al-Uthaymeen, may Allah have mercy upon him, was asked:
Some people say: “We do not use the Gregorian date before the Hijri date due to having loyalty (to other than Islam) and to aid (another religion), but rather the Gregorian date is more accurate than the Hijri calendar in terms of what they see”, and that “Most countries use this calendar.”
Response: Be patient, my brother! The crescent moon is the basis (for determining the monthly time periods) for all human beings. Read the statement of Allah, The Exalted: [ يَسْأَلونَكَ عَنِ الْأَهِلَّةِ قُلْ هِيَ مَوَاقِيتُ لِلنَّاسِ وَالْحَجِّ – They ask you (O Muhammad) about the new moons. Say: These are signs to determine fixed time periods for humankind and for the time of the Hajj]- Meaning, for all people.
And read the statement of Allah, The Exalted:
إِنَّ عِدَّةَ الشُّهُورِ عِنْدَ اللَّهِ اثْنَا عَشَرَ شَهْراً فِي كِتَابِ اللَّهِ يَوْمَ خَلَقَ السَّمَاوَاتِ وَالْأَرْضَ مِنْهَا أَرْبَعَةٌ حُرُمٌ
Verily, the number of months with Allah is twelve months (in a year), so was it ordained by Allah on the Day when He created the heavens and the earth; of them four are Sacred…] [at-Tawbah. 36]
Therefore, it was ordained by Allah on the Day when He created the heavens and the earth; of them four are Sacred, (i.e. the 1st, the 7th, the 11th and the 12th months of the Islamic calendar). The months are determined by the crescent moon and this is why the Prophet, peace and blessings of Allah be upon him, explained that the four (sacred ones among the 12) are Rajab Dhul Qidah, Dhul Hijjah and Muharram, and this is the basis of the matter. The months used by the people at present – months determined based on conjecture- are not established on a (sound) basis. If they were based on the sighting of the Buruj (a great number of distant big stars), their basis would have been based on the Buruj which is clear in the sky, well known and their times are known, however, they (i.e. the non-Islamic months)are based on conjecture and do not have a basis at all due to the fact that some are twenty-eight days and some of them thirty-one.
However, if we find ourselves in difficult circumstances and it becomes necessary to mention the Gregorian date, why do we have to alternate from the Arabic Hijri date – the one based on the Shariah – to this date that is based on conjecture and has no foundation?! We are very able to use the Arabic date and then say, “Corresponding to such and such date (i.e. in the Gregorian date)” given that when many Islamic countries were colonised by the unbelievers, they changed the date to their own- enslaving and humiliating the society. You understand, so we say, if we find ourselves in difficult circumstances and it becomes necessary to mention the Gregorian date, let it be first that the Arabic Hijri date – the one based on the Shariah – is mentioned, then we say, “Corresponding to such and such”. (3)
If anyone killed a person not in retaliation of murder, or (and) to spread mischief in the land – it would be as if he killed all mankind, and if anyone saved a life, it would be as if he saved the life of all mankind. [Al-Ma’idah. 32]
Imam As-Sadi, may Allah have mercy upon him, said:
If a person is bold enough to kill someone who does not deserve to be killed, this implies that he does make a distinction between the one he killed and other than him; rather he would commit this act whenever his evil calls him to that. Therefore, his bold attitude that led him to kill is as if he has killed all humankind. On the other hand, if a person saves a life and does not kill – whilst his soul calls him to do so – due to fear of Allah, this is as if he has saved the lives of all humankind because the fear of Allah he possesses stops him killing one who does not deserve to be killed. [1]
Jane stated: “Israel is not a political issue; Israel is a Biblical issue – because this is God’s nation, and the Jewish people are His people”. [end of quote]
Response: The pious among the Children of Israel, as mentioned in the unadulterated Torah and Injeel, are recognized. Therefore, the reference to the Children of Israel in these scriptures pertains to a Biblical context rather than Zionism, as noble Musa and other Prophets of Bani Israel were not Zionists. Furthermore, we are all servants of Allah, and any nation that adheres to the sound teachings of His Prophets and Messengers honoured in His Sight. However, those who reject the message after the arrival of any Prophet or Messenger cannot be His chosen nation. A significant portion of Bani Israel turned away from the noble Prophet Eesa and the final Prophet, Muhammad, peace and blessings of Allah be upon him, along with all the other Prophets. Visit website: https://www.islammoses.com/im/
Regarding the statement that Israel is not a political matter, it seems that Jane may either be discussing modern politics and Zionism or referring to the unaltered teachings of the Torah and Injeel as practiced by the noble Prophets of Bani Israel. If her focus is on current events and what is termed the state of Israel, it is clear that its foundation is built upon misinterpreted texts and the principles of Zionism. Conversely, if she is alluding to the guidance of the ancient Prophets of Bani Israel, it is evident that their leadership and guidance was rooted in piety across all aspects of life. The Prophet, peace and blessings of Allah be upon him, said: “Bani Isra’eel used to be ruled and guided by prophets. Whenever a prophet died, another would take over his place. There will be no prophet after me, but there will be Caliphs who will increase in number.” The people asked, “O Allah’s Messenger! What do you order us (to do)?” He said, “Obey the one who will be given the pledge of allegiance first. Fulfil their (i.e. the Caliphs) rights, for Allah will ask them about (any shortcoming) in ruling those Allah has put under their guardianship.” [Sahih Al-Bukhari 3455]
Imam Ibn Hajr, may Allah have mercy upon him, said, “Whenever corruption appeared amongst them, Allah sent a Prophet to rectify their affairs and put an end to that which they changed in the rulings of the Torah”. [2]
Jane stated: Whether you are living in Finland, Venezuela, Belgium, America, Argentina or Japan – it doesn’t matter where you’re living; there is not one person or family who goes through life without extreme hardship, pain and trauma. Whether it’s an ugly divorce, being sick with cancer, betrayal, bankruptcy, accident, major surgery, the loss of a child, the loss of a loved one, abuse or rape, whatever it is, people are suffering the same in Israel. [end of quote]
Response: No matter our location, we all encounter life’s challenges and shifts in circumstances. For over seventy years, Palestinians have endured profound suffering. This acknowledgment does not diminish the pain experienced by others, whether Jewish or non-Jewish. However, it is undeniable that since the conclusion of the Second World War, no group has faced greater hardship and adversity than the Palestinians under successive Zionist administrations.
Jane stated: Whatever hardship you are going through that is breaking you to the core and has you weeping on the floor or not being able to get out of bed – whether you are living in Australia or Norway, no matter what you can possibly go through of horrific things in your life, we all suffer in some manner. It is a common denominator of our mortality on this earth. [end of quote]
Response: This statement holds true universally, yet no group has faced greater oppression and brutality since the Second World War than the Palestinians, subjected to the actions of successive Zionist administrations.
Jane stated: Now imagine, on top of whatever hardship you are going through anywhere around the world, you are being told by the whole world that you are “illegally occupying” your homeland. [end of quote]
Response: This above statement aligns perfectly with our expectations as Jane began to weave her narrative. The land is not the eternal possession of either the Zionists or Bani Israel. Read below:
https://salafidawahmanchester.com/2024/11/20/the-promised-land-a-brief-examination-from-a-religious-and-historical-perspective/
Jane stated: You are occupying someone else’s “country” that actually is non-existent – geopolitical fiction, actually, and for that fictional reason, it’s okay to murder you. For that same reason, you, your child, wife, or husband are brutally butchered in your home, run down while waiting at a bus stop, murdered in front of a supermarket, or shot while sitting on a bus. [end of quote]
Response: You are occupying territory that was previously home to inhabitants long before the noble Yusha Bin Nun, peace be upon him, arrived with a group of the upright believers, not the Zionists. This land is not imaginary or nonexistent; it is a tangible reality. Please take a moment to read the information below once more: https://salafidawahmanchester.com/2024/11/20/the-promised-land-a-brief-examination-from-a-religious-and-historical-perspective/
The act of murdering non-combatants and unarmed civilians, irrespective of the location or the identity of the perpetrator—be they Muslim, Jew, or Christian—has been unequivocally denounced in the verse we referenced, along with its interpretation by Imam As-Sadi at the outset of this brief article.
Jane stated: The worst things people can experience happen to Israeli civilians – but why? The most horrific terror attacks that you can possibly imagine continue to happen – buses and cafes are being blown up, people are being stoned as they drive in their vehicles – which has just happened three days in a row, and a toddler was actually injured here in Israel. Countless thousands and thousands of rockets, missiles, and drones are flying into Israel as her enemies continue their efforts to murder you and anyone else who calls Israel their home. [end of quote]
Response: Violence begets violence, and malevolence fosters more malevolence. The actions of the Zionists have devastated Gaza, leaving it in ruins and resulting in the deaths of tens of thousands under the guise of retaliation and self-defense—an assertion that no rational individual can endorse. This cycle of aggression is bound to escalate, tragically impacting innocent lives who bear the brunt of the horrors inflicted by Hamas on civilians and non-combatants on October 7th, as well as the disproportionate response from the Zionists. Furthermore, this is compounded by their ongoing land appropriation and brutality towards the Palestinians over the past seven decades. We once again share the poignant statement from Prince Turki Al-Faisal, may Allah protect him. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Z3-cWyFcK5w
Furthermore, allow me to present a glimpse into the historical context of Zionist violence:
The Deir Yassin Massacre: Took place on April 9, 1948, near Jerusalem, during which between 107 to 254 Palestinians were massacred at the hands of the extremist “Stern” gang.
The Nasr al-Din Massacre: Took place in April 1948. Al-Lajjun Massacre: Took place on April 13, 1948, in a Palestinian Arab village in the Jenin District, where the Zionist Haganah gang attacked it and killed 13 people.
The Saliha Massacre: Took place in May 1948, during which 75 Palestinians were massacred.
The Abu Shusha Massacre: Took place on May 14, 1948, near the village of Deir Yassin, and claimed the lives of (50) citizens, including women, men, children, and the elderly.
The Beit Daras Massacre: Took place in northeastern Gaza on May 21, 1948.
The Tantura Massacre: Took place on May 22, 1948, in the occupied city of Haifa, and claimed the lives of about (200) Palestinians.
The Lydda Massacre: Took place on July 12, 1948, in the occupied city of Lydda, and resulted in the massacre of about (500) Palestinians, including (150) who were massacred inside the city’s Grand Mosque. The Zionists threw many of them alive into the town’s wells.
The Dawayima Massacre: Took place on October 29, 1948, when a battalion from the terrorist “Lehi” organization led by Moshe Dayan attacked the village and then began searching homes and shooting at its residents. Entire families were exterminated in the massacre, which resulted in the killing of 200 men, women, and children.
The Zionist massacres did not stop after the Nakba of 1948, but rather their frequency, intensity, and brutality increased in light of the use of more lethal and destructive weapons. Among the most prominent of these massacres were: The Sharafat Massacre, which took place in February 1951, in which 11 Palestinians were massacred, and the rest of the village’s people were displaced. The Bethlehem Massacre took place in January 1952, in which 10 Palestinians were massacred. The Qibya Massacre took place on October 14, 1953, in the village of Qibya, east of Jerusalem, during which (67) Palestinians were massacred, most of whom were women and children, and during which 56 homes were destroyed. The Qalqilya Massacre took place on October 10, 1956, when the occupation forces attacked citizens in the city of Qalqilya in the West Bank, during which about seventy citizens were massacred.
The Kafr Qasem Massacre took place on October 29, 1956, in which 49 Palestinians were massacred, including 11 children, when they were all returning home from work. The Khan Yunis Massacre took place on November 3 and 12, 1956, in which between 280 and 500 Palestinians were massacred.
In 1970, Zionist aircraft struck Bahr al-Baqar Primary School and Abu Zaabal factories, killing more than 150 Egyptian students and workers. In 1980, the extremist Jewish organization Kach attempted to blow up Al-Aqsa Mosque, and a shipment of explosives weighing 120 kg was discovered. The Sabra and Shatila massacre took place in September 1982. This massacre lasted three days, and its direct perpetrators were members of the Lebanese Phalange forces allied with the Zionists led by Ariel Sharon. The Ibrahimi Mosque Massacre took place on February 25, 1994, when a Zionist named “Barog Goldstein” stormed the Ibrahimi Mosque in the city of Hebron, and fired bullets and bombs at the worshipers. This massacre resulted in the massacre of 29 Palestinians. The Qana Massacre took place on April 18, 1995. [2]
Jane stated: It is horrific when you have to run for your life into bomb shelters, and old ladies living on the fourth floors of apartments that do not have an elevator – are not being able to come down to get into a bomb shelter. Imagine the terror as you bring your toddlers out in the middle of the night, running for cover as you try to shield their tender lives, because numerous countries are firing missiles, drones and rockets – all because they want to kill you just for you being Jewish and living in your own country. [end of quote]
Response: The plight of those who have been forced to flee for their lives for more than seventy years even more harrowing, especially when confronted by a Zionist army. It is indeed tragic that elderly women must navigate life on the fourth floor without elevators, unable to reach bomb shelters. Now, consider the even graver situation of those Palestinian elderly women who are left vulnerable to deadly Zionist airstrikes, with no refuge in sight. We can picture the sheer terror of a parent carrying a toddler through the chaos of the night, desperately seeking safety to protect their precious child. Now, amplify that fear to encompass the Palestinian toddlers who are exposed to the devastating impact of Zionist bombs, and the horror they experience when their families are obliterated without any shelter. We must reiterate to Jane that violence begets violence. Those who identify with Islam and target non-combatants and unarmed civilians deserve unequivocal condemnation. However, the strongest denunciation should be directed at the successive Zionist administrations and their military forces, who have perpetuated a campaign of terror for over seventy years. Additionally, the claim that the land belongs solely to one group has already been addressed on this link: https://salafidawahmanchester.com/2024/11/20/the-promised-land-a-brief-examination-from-a-religious-and-historical-perspective/
Jane stated: The more subtle battles you face each day are things like your manufactured or homemade products being boycotted just for living in Judea and Samaria. In the political arena, your leaders are being named as war criminals when they are just defending you and your country. Then you have to watch millions of people walking in protests on the streets of cities all across the world while calling for the annihilation of you and your wife and your children, your grandchildren – staring in unbelief as you watch them walking and chanting in the streets as they call for robust support of these modern-day Nazis. [end of quote]
Response: We have consistently expressed our disapproval of sensationalism; it is imperative that we engage in discussions grounded in facts rather than resorting to dramatization and appealing for sympathy at the cost of fairness. The decision for any state or organization to boycott the Zionist government is a personal choice, irrespective of an individual’s circumstances under the Zionist administration. Read:
In the realm of politics, few groups have a more storied legacy of political support than the Zionists. [Footnote a] Furthermore, the leaders within the Zionist movement bear responsibility for the accusations leveled against them, irrespective of those they profess to protect. The right to self-defense and retaliation does not excuse acts of aggression and violence; indeed, it is even more troubling when such conduct is endorsed by declarations from Zionist figures. Read below:
Jane stated: However, the air is silent because there is not one word of shock, outrage, or anger for the hostages of October 7, 2023, to be released. In Israel, there are survivors among your people who have gone through the horrors of the Holocaust – and against all they endured, these brave souls came back as prophecies were fulfilled. Today, we see the Jewish people come home to their ancestral homeland with connections that reach back to thousands of years. Then the October 7 massacre happened, and some of those survivors perished at the hands of this new generation of Nazis.
This event in Israel was the biggest onslaught against the Jewish people since World War Two happened. Your soul feels violated as you are forced to watch people glorify and celebrate that horrific day, and on top of that – the world expects you to show restraint to feed your enemies and give them water and electricity to the people who are cheering when your people are being murdered. [end of quote]
Response: Netanyahu and Hamas share culpability for this malevolence, despite the fact that Hamas was absent when the Zionists initiated their acts of brutality more than seventy years ago. Nevertheless, Hamas serves as a strategic instrument for the Zionists.
https://www.abuiyaad.com/w/hamas-israeli-right
Those who endured the horrors of the Holocaust and have recently faced violence deserve our compassion, and it is imperative to clarify that no one should justify acts of violence that target non-combatants and unarmed civilians, regardless of their background as Holocaust survivors or otherwise. Such acts of brutality are unequivocally condemned. However, we must also consider the plight of the thousands of Palestinians whose families—spanning three or four generations—have been decimated by Zionist bombings. What of those Palestinians whose legacy is one of displacement and profound suffering passed down through generations? While the events of October 7th are rightly condemned and should never be repeated, we must also reflect on the more grievous reality: the deaths of tens of thousands of Palestinians over the past year. Furthermore, what implications are you suggesting regarding access to electricity and water? We shall refrain from commenting on your statement, as this issue has been widely discussed globally, and anyone with a sense of decency understands the moral complexities involved.
Jane stated: So, think about your circumstances – no matter what hardship you’re going through around the world, you don’t have to endure such horror and abuse. Can you imagine – no – unless you live here, you can’t. Millions of Israelis have PTSD; they are deeply traumatized. Such is the very soul of Israel, with so much pain and grief. [end of quote]
Response: Certainly, it is essential for us to reflect on our situations and extend our compassion to every non-combatant and unarmed civilian, irrespective of their faith or social standing, who has faced oppression or violence. Our hearts go out to all those caught in the turmoil instigated by Netanyahu and Hamas, whether they identify as Jews, Christians, or Muslims. The impact of this trauma will undoubtedly resonate among non-combatants on both sides, a reality that Prince Turki al-Faisal unequivocally denounces. Let us take a moment to listen once more. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Z3-cWyFcK5w
Jane stated: But for such a time as this – you – good, loving, history-understanding people, and especially Christians – the Bible-believing people who understand the truth, the facts, the history – you are obligated for such a time as this to stand up and speak up like Queen Esther did for her nation, the Jewish people who are constantly forced to defend their very existence, and their right to live in the great nation of Israel.
Israel has to constantly defend why they are demolishing the homes of terrorists who have murdered Jews, while on the other side of the coin, you watch YOUR government (and many others around the world) pouring hundreds of millions of dollars into arch-terrorist Abu Mazen/ Mahmoud Abbas – a terrorist in a suit – who is paying a reward to the vile terrorists who are murdering Jewish children and adults. [end of quote]
Response: Those who uphold the truth do so without bias in their defense of it. We shall unite to condemn wrongdoing and champion justice, grounded in the final and infallible divine revelation. This is not a matter of seeking assistance at the cost of fairness, irrespective of the audience being addressed. Truth should not be selectively presented to undermine the rights of others or manipulated through the rhetoric of propagandists among Christian Zionists or various political lobbies worldwide. Instead, it must be conveyed and substantiated through concrete evidence, which have been observed over the past 70 years of oppression. The Jewish community, like any other, has at times faced persecution for their steadfast commitment to the truth during the presence of their Prophets, while at other times they have borne the repercussions of their misdeeds. A nation’s greatness is not defined by its identity or a purported special status in the Sight of Allah; rather, it is their actions, whether in alignment with or in defiance of divine revelation, that truly reflect their moral standing. Allah said:
And We decreed for the Children of Israel in the Scripture, that indeed you would do mischief on the earth twice and you will become tyrants and extremely arrogant! [Al-Israa. Ayah 4]- Meaning, “We have declared, made a covenant with them and told them in their book that corruption will certainly occur from them on earth twice through committing sins, showing ingratitude to Allah for His Blessings, exalting themselves on earth and being arrogant therein; and that when one of these two (occasions) come to pass, Allah will give power to their enemies and take revenge on them, and this is an admonition and warning to them so that they may return to obedience and take heed”. [a]
So, when the promise came for the first of the two, We sent against you slaves of Ours given to terrible warfare. They entered the very innermost parts of your homes. And it was a promise (completely) fulfilled. [Al-Israa. Ayah 5] –
Meaning, the first of the two occasions during which they become corrupt; if such corruption occurred among them, We sent on you – by way of our all-encompassing divine will and decree- recompense (punishment) at the hands of those people with courage, large numbers, and armed, so, Allah gave them victory over you. They killed you, took your children away, plundered your wealth, invaded and destroyed your homes, entered the Sacred Masjid (Baytul Maqdis), and violated it. It must happen due to a reason from themselves. The Qur’an commentators differed regarding the identity of these people who were sent to overpower them, but they agreed that they were unbelievers. Either they were from the people of Iraq, the Arabian Peninsula, or elsewhere, whom Allah gave (the strength) to overpower the Children of Israel when their sins became rife, they abandoned much of their Shariah, and transgressed in the land. [b]
Then We gave you once again, a return of victory over them. And We helped you with wealth and children and made you more numerous in manpower. [Al-Israa. Ayah 6] –
Meaning, (gave you victory) against those who overpowered you, so you expelled them from your land; increased your sustenance and number, and gave you strength over them because of your righteous deeds and submission to Allah. [c]
(And We said): ‘If you do good, you do good for your own selves, and if you do evil, then it is (to your own selves).’ Then when the later promise came to pass (We enabled your enemies) to put sorrow on your faces (by conquering and enslaving you) and to enter the Mosque (of Jerusalem), as they had entered it the first time, and to destroy everything they came upon with utter destruction. [Al-Israa. Ayah 7] [d]
“If you do good, you do good for your own selves” because the benefit will return to you, even in this world [before the hereafter] as you witnessed when he aided you against your enemies. “And if you do evil, then it is [to your ownselves]”, meaning, the harm will return upon yourselves, as Allāh showed you by empowering the enemies [against you]. [e]
“Then when the later promise came to pass”– meaning, the next time you spread corruption on earth, we make your enemies overpower you. “to put sorrow on your faces (by conquering and enslaving you)”- Meaning, given victory over you, capture you, and enter the Sacred Masjid as they entered it the first time, and what is meant by the Mosque is Baytul Maqdis. “and to destroy everything they came upon with utter destruction”- Meaning, destroy your homes, Masjids and crops. [f]
(Thereafter Allāh said): ‘Perhaps your Lord may show mercy to you (if you repent), but if you return (to your sinful ways), then We shall return (to punishment). And we have made Hell an enclosure for the disbelievers. [Al-Israa. Ayah 8] [g]
Within these verses (Al-Israa 7) (al-Israa 8) is a warning to this Ummah (of Muhammad) against committing acts of disobedience lest what afflicted the Children of Israel afflict them as well. The Sunnah (way, rule) of Allāh is one, it does not change or become altered. Whoever looks [and reflects] upon the empowerment of the disbelievers and oppressors over the Muslims will come to know that this was due to their sins, as a punishment to them. [And also to make them realise] that if they enact and establish the Book of Allāh and the Sunnah of His Messenger, He will grant them firm authority in the land and aid them against their enemies. [h] [End of quote]
However, no matter the consequences endured by Jews, Muslims, Christians, or any other group, such circumstances do not excuse the actions of wrongdoers during these events. It is widely recognized that those who retaliate or seek vengeance against a collective often include individuals who will engage in excessive violence, an act that has never been endorsed by any Prophet of Allah. Consequently, those who take the lives of innocent Jews must be deemed malevolent, and their heinous actions should be unequivocally condemned. Likewise, Jews who perpetrate similar acts deserve condemnation without hesitation, even if they attempt to invoke the specter of anti-Semitism, as is often the tactic employed by Netanyahu and his associates to deflect accountability for their atrocities against Palestinians.
Jane stated: In order to seek the release of Israel’s precious and innocent civilians and soldiers who were kidnapped and dragged into the dungeons in Gaza, Israel has been forced to release cold-blooded terrorists who blew up cafes, blew up buses, and murdered Jews in the most heinous ways possible. [end of quote]
Response: We reiterate our call to avoid sensationalism and instead advocate for discourse grounded in truth. Every human life holds immense value, as highlighted by the verse from the Qur’an at the outset of this article. The abduction of innocent civilians has been unequivocally denounced by Prince Turki Al-Faisal, irrespective of whether they are confined in opulent residences or dark dungeons. The act of kidnapping is reprehensible in itself, even if the victim is treated with undue reverence. Yet, we must also consider the Palestinian prisoners who have been released in dire health, sharing harrowing stories of torture and brutality inflicted by Zionist prison guards. The destruction of buses and cafes is a despicable act, regardless of the victims, but even more egregious is the systematic eradication of three generations of Palestinians, transforming Gaza into a landscape of devastation visible to all.
Jane stated: Meanwhile, the world only mentions that they are Palestinian prisoners – who are “victims” in their own right and refuse to share the real reason they are prisoners, with terrible stories of the gruesome terror attacks they have committed. Where is the moral compass for the rest of the world when there are still hostages left inside Gaza being brutalized, tortured, and starved? All this while the world only cares about Israel, no longer letting aid into the Gaza Strip to feed the terror organization called Hamas.
Apparently, that’s more important to the world than the hostages who are still held in Gaza, all the families who are mourning their loved ones, or all the families who have lost a precious one in terror attacks even before or after October 7. We had one yesterday where terrorists were firing into the vehicle of an 18-year-old man who was shot in his arm. [end of quote]
Response: Your assertion that “the world” perceives these individuals as innocent suggests a universal consensus. Yet, without specific details regarding the crimes attributed to each prisoner, we cannot engage in conjecture about their classification as terrorists. Should you provide the particulars of their offenses, it is clear that Prince Turki Al-Faisal has unequivocally denounced all acts of terrorism committed in the name of Islam, as well as those framed as resistance or self-defense. Consequently, it cannot be said that the entire world views them merely as prisoners, especially when their actions are scrutinized by figures like Prince Turki Al-Faisal, who holds firm stances against both Hamas and Zionist actions. The moral compass remains consistent among those who value truth and fairness, as they do not adhere to double standards. Furthermore, the plight of innocent hostages and victims on both sides has also drawn condemnation from Prince Turki Al-Faisal. Thus, the claim that no one cares about the suffering of one side is sensationalist, and it is unacceptable to justify the suffering of Palestinian children under the pretense of punishing Hamas. We extend our sympathies to all those grieving for their loved ones, whether they are in the hands of Hamas or the Zionists, and we empathize with all who have endured pain due to the actions of both parties. However, it is the successive Zionist administrations that warrant the most condemnation for their relentless campaign of brutality over the past seventy years.
Jane stated: So again, let me repeat – whatever trauma, hardship, devastation, or grief you are going through, people are going through the same here in Israel, but on top of that, they have all the rest of these horrible and unjust issues to deal with on a daily basis. Let that sink in for just a moment because unless you live here, you can’t imagine what it’s like. So, for such a time as this, we are called to “comfort, comfort My people” and to stand united with Israel, the nation that God singled out from all the nations. He put the borders down and His Name down on this piece of land. God said, “I will plant them here, never to be uprooted again.” But uprooting and annihilation is what the world wants, they want to divide the Holy Land for their own profit, they dare to touch the apple of God’s eye, and they are okay with the murder and the slaughter of the Jewish people. Rockets, shootings, ramming attacks with cars and trucks, stabbing, axe attacks, machete attacks, bombings – you name it – it happens here. And yet, the world has more sympathy for these modern-day Nazis and their supporters – shame on you! And I want to encourage you as we just celebrated Purim: Stand with Israel, stand for truth, stand for justice, come against the lies when you see your government is supporting Mahmoud Abbas – a terrorist in a suit, or when you see your government is supporting UNWRA who is doing nothing good – nothing but indoctrinating children with hatred towards the Jewish people and they becoming the next generation of Hamas terrorists. UNWRA workers are Hamas terrorists! [end of quote]
Response: Indeed, it is essential for us to contemplate the anguish experienced by individuals across the globe, irrespective of their nationality, ethnicity, or faith. The Palestinian people, in particular, endure daily hardships that are unparalleled in the aftermath of the Second World War. Let us take a moment to truly grasp this reality; unless we have lived under the oppressive conditions imposed by Zionist forces, we cannot fully comprehend their suffering. In these challenging times, we are called to extend our compassion to our Palestinian brothers and sisters, as well as to all those who have faced adversity at the hands of both Zionists and Hamas, as eloquently expressed by Prince Turki Al Faisal. Regarding the notion of being a nation chosen by God until the end of time, this belief stems from a misinterpretation of sacred texts, which the final revelation contradicts, indicating that the idea of being the sole chosen people – until the end of time – among all nations is unfounded.
The violence, including shootings, vehicular assaults, stabbings, and axe attacks, is a manifestation of the turmoil instigated by Zionists since their brutal treatment of Palestinians, their expulsion from ancestral lands, and the appropriation of territory under the guise of a divine entitlement. Historically, Jews and Muslims coexisted harmoniously in this region before the advent of the Zionist agenda. Therefore, our compassion must encompass all victims affected by the circumstances fostered by Zionist actions and the tactics employed by Hamas, which have only exacerbated the crisis. The true disgrace lies with those who instigated this chaos and those who respond in a manner that makes the situation worse. We refuse to align ourselves with Israel or any party based on falsehoods, unfounded claims, or sensational narratives; instead, we will uphold the truth as expressed by Prince Faisal Al-Turki. We stand firmly against the killing of children and non-combatants, regardless of their faith—be it Muslim, Jew, Christian, or otherwise. Allah said:
O you who believe! Stand out firmly for justice, as witnesses to Allah; even though it be against yourselves, or your parents, or your kin, be he rich or poor, Allah is a Better Protector to both (than you). So follow not the lusts (of your hearts), lest you may avoid justice, and if you distort your witness or refuse to give it, verily, Allah is Ever Well-Acquainted with what you do. [An-Nisaa. 135]
[d, e, g & h]: Translator: Shaikh Abu Iyaad [may Allah preserve him]:
https://www.thenoblequran.com/q/#/verse/17/7
https://www.thenoblequran.com/q/#/verse/17/8
https://www.jpost.com/opinion/article-804356
In The Name of Allah, The Most Merciful, The Bestower of Mercy.
Imam Abdul Aziz Bin Baz, may Allah have mercy upon him, was asked: This questioner from the Republic of Egypt says: What should be the stance of the brothers regarding the fasting in the month of Ramadan when the sighting of the crescent moon vary from one country to another and across other Islamic countries? May Allah reward you with good.
Answer: It is correct that each people of a country has its own sighting. Every country has its own sighting. If the people of Egypt fast based on their sighting, the people of Sham based on their sighting and the people of Morocco based on their sighting, there is no harm. However, if it is easy (possible) for them to fast based on a single sighting, it would be more preferable and better; if that is made easy (possible) due to the statement of the Prophet, peace and blessings of Allah be upon him, “Fast when you see it, and break your fast when you see it.” This applies to the entire Ummah. Thus, if it is made easy (or possible) for them to fast based on the sighting of Saudi Arabia or another Islamic nation that judges by Allah’s Sharia, establishes Allah’s commands, and this sighting is confirmed by witnesses, but not calculations, there is no harm; this is better. If they all fast based on a single sighting, this is better due to the general proofs.
However, if that is not easy (i.e. it is impossible or unfacilitated), and the regions and countries are distant, while each people of a country fast based on their own sighting, there is no harm . This is the position that carries the greatest weight according to a group of scholars. The Committee of Senior Scholars have studied this matter and they hold that there is no hindrance (or obstacle) with regards to every country acting upon their own sighting if it is not made easy (i.e. not possible) for them to establish the prayer (i.e. Eid prayer) based on a single sighting. As for calculating the start and end of Ramadan, it is not permissible. The obligation is to act upon the sighting because the Prophet, peace and blessings of Allah be upon him, said: “Fast when you see it (the moon) and break your fast when you see it. If the moon is obscured (or concealed due to cloud cover or not seen), complete the month (as 30 days)”. It is not permissible to depend on calculation to affirm (or confirm) the month of Ramadan- neither its beginning nor its end, nor the month of Dhul Hijjah. The obligation is to act upon the sighting, and if the cresecent is not sighted when the (new) month is about to enter, then complete Shabah (as 30 days). If the crescent is not sighted when the month of Ramadan is about to end, complete Ramadan as 30 days. This is what is obligated to all Muslims wherever they may be. [1]
Imam Muhammad Ibn Salih Al-Uthaymin, may Allah have mercy upon him, said:
If it is established that the crescent has been sighted in a place among the Muslim countries based on how the Sharia clarifies regarding its sighting, it is obligatory to act accordingly. (If) your country does not adhere to this, it is not permissible for you to publicly express your disagreement due to the trial, chaos and dispute it would cause. Instead, if able when the crescent moon of Ramadan is sighted, you begin the fast discreetly and break your fast discreetly when the crescent of Shawwaal is sighted. As for openly opposing, this is not permissible and it is not something Islam has commanded. [2]
In The Name of Allah, The Most Merciful, The Bestower of Mercy.
We praise and thank Allah for guiding us to this blessed Salafi Methodology and acquainting us with its scholars in the Muslim lands and their students in the East and the West. To proceed:
When our brother Amjad Khan, may Allah preserve him, visited Kuwait before, he received permission from Shaikh Khalid, may Allah preserve him, to translate this amazing biography of Al-Allamah Rabee Ibn Hadi Al-Mad’khali – may Allah preserve him. Upon receiving this news, we informed Ustadh Abu Tasneem Mushaf Al-Banghali, may Allah preserve him, and some of our elder teachers. By the Tawfeeq of Allah, there are chapters filled with gems that have already been translated and waiting to be edited, then excerpts will be shared online while the book form is prepared. As soon as all the material is ready for formatting, it will be presented to both Shaikh Khalid and our local Mashaayikh, may Allah preserve them, to offer advice and guidance, then Salafipublications will be requested to publish it after being satisfied with it. May Allah bless all our younger teachers and Salafi brothers, especially those who have come forward to help with the editing and proofreading of the translation and preparation due to their love of cooperation upon Bir and Taqwah.
In The Name of Allah, The Most Merciful, The Bestower of Mercy.
We praise and thank Allah for guiding us to this blessed Salafi Methodology and acquainting us with its scholars in the Muslim lands and their students in the East and the West. To proceed:
When our brother Amjad Khan, may Allah preserve him, visited Kuwait before, he received permission from Shaikh Khalid, may Allah preserve him, to translate this amazing biography of Al-Allamah Rabee Ibn Hadi Al-Mad’khali – may Allah preserve him. Upon receiving this news, we informed Ustadh Abu Tasneem Mushaf Al-Banghali, may Allah preserve him, and some of our elder teachers. By the Tawfeeq of Allah, there are chapters filled with gems that have already been translated and waiting to be edited, then excerpts will be shared online while the book form is prepared. As soon as all the material is ready for formatting, it will be presented to both Shaikh Khalid and our local Mashaayikh, may Allah preserve them, to offer advice and guidance, then Salafipublications will be requested to publish it after being satisfied with it. May Allah bless all our younger teachers and Salafi brothers, especially those who have come forward to help with the editing and proofreading of the translation and preparation due to their love of cooperation upon Bir and Taqwah.
And hold fast, all of you together, to the Rope of Allah (i.e. the Qur’an, the Sunnah and all affairs of the religion), and be not divided among yourselves, and remember Allah’s Favour on you, for you were enemies one to another but He joined your hearts together, so that, by His Grace, you became brethren (in Islamic Faith). (Aal Imran 103)
Similarly I command them to give sincere advice to one another; for indeed the religion is (based) on sincere advice. It is an obligation to give sincere advice to the righteous, the wicked sinner, the young, the old, the rich and the poor; and not that it is given to a group and not another group, or a society and not another society. Indeed it is an obligation to give sincere advice to the whole world.
In The Name of Allah, The Most Merciful, The Bestower of Mercy.
When the Muslims realised that the state equated them with Christians and Jews, replacing the principles of their sacred law with Christian regulations, and discarding their traditional attire in favour of that of the Christians, they felt a profound sense of discontent. They also perceived that Rashid’s government seemed to prioritise the interests of the Christians. This led to a significant backlash among the Muslims, prompting the Sultan and his officials to recognise the necessity of the removal of Rashid in light of the public outrage and their fear of a potential uprising from the Muslim community. [Footnote a]
The dismissal of Rashid Pasha did not halt the movement towards Westernization, which continued to import more systems and laws from the West, as the groundwork had already been laid and the doors opened for such changes. Although the opposition to Rashid Pasha and his constitution succeeded in removing him from power in 1841, he returned four years later in 1845, supported by a group of Freemasons who were focused on promoting secular transformation. Subsequently, he resumed his position as Grand Vizier in 1846, only to be dismissed again in 1858.[Footnote b]
The situation deteriorated significantly, prompting state officials to seriously consider change and reform. They found themselves with no option but to adopt the European model of reform and the Western approach to change that had begun to be implemented. This was particularly evident given that many of these officials had been sent abroad for political representation or military studies, especially in the absence of an Islamic reformer capable of restoring order and countering the advocates of intellectual invasion by embracing a serious reform based on Islamic principles. As the Turkish writer Professor Naji Bafal stated, the absence of a significant intellectual leader or a genuine social reformer in the Ottoman Empire for three to four centuries allowed superficial diplomats, captivated by the West, to take the stage. This led to a loss of spirit, a decline in intellect, a weakening of will, and a prevalence of imitation, resulting in a general state of paralysis. The ideas of intellectual invasion have spread among the majority of Turkish politicians and their governors, who have embraced Westernization and a departure from religious values. Notably, when the Iraqi scholar Al-Alusi visited the governor of Kirkuk, Ali Pasha, in 1267 AH, he praised him for his affection towards scholars, his respect for them, and his virtuous character. He then said, “It appears that he is not morally corrupt nor does he adopt any of the new Western ideologies, as I have not heard him mention anything about London or Paris in conversation! It is a blessing for the people of this region that their governor is free from such a stigma, a rarity in these unfortunate times!”
The reformist movement in the Ottoman Empire continued to strive for dominance across various sectors and institutions.
In any case, the key features of the Ottoman reform and renewal efforts revolved around three significant points: adopting Western practices concerning military organization and armament, as well as governance and administration, and steering Ottoman society towards a secular framework. The trend towards centralization of power in Istanbul and the provinces. The year of the issuance of the Kalkhanah script marked a significant event in European circles, as noted by a French missionary who stated: “The year 1839 was a remarkable one for French expansion in Turkey. It marked the beginning of reforms and the onset of organizational changes. As clergy, we will begin to take advantage of this timid liberalism and initiate a missionary effort for Catholic education.” Mr. Etienne, who led this mission, remarked, “This is our first opportunity to strengthen the triumph of faith that we will impart, especially since the Quran prohibits (Christian) teachings.” The first missionary group, consisting of seven clergymen, traveled to Istanbul on November 21, 1839. By the end of 1840, the sisters had established a home for orphans and classrooms, with the number of students reaching 230. By 1842, this figure had increased to 500. [Footnote c]
An Excerpt from ‘Ad-Dawlah Al-Uthmaaniyyah Awaamil An-Nuhood Wa Asbaab As-Suqoot. 6/420-422
Footnote a: Leaders are responsible for the welfare of the subjects and must strive to understand the situations of their people, as Imam Ibn Hajr, may Allah have mercy on him, stated: “It is incumbent upon a ruler to have a person who unveils to him the circumstances of the people in private, and this person should be trustworthy, reliable, smart and sensible, because calamity befalls a reliable ruler due to accepting speech of one who is not trustworthy”. [Fat’hul Baaree 14/234-236. Publisher: Daarus Salaam. 1st edition 1421AH (2000)] Nonetheless, if the leader fails in this regard, on does not embark upon rebellion. Read:
Footnote b: Changing officials is carried out with the intention of serving the public’s best interests. Imam Muhammad Ibn Salih Al-Uthaymin, may Allah have mercy upon him, said: “It maybe that a person is suitable for this specific job and not suitable for that job, therefore, it is obligatory to appoint- in every job – the one who is more suitable. Similarly, with regards to specific appointments, such as the position of headteacher and other than it, rather we can even say – if we wished – this in relation to a person’s responsibility in looking after the affairs of his family, that if he wants to give responsibility to his young children, he chooses the one who is more suitable. He does not choose – for example – the older one just because he is older; rather he chooses the one who is more suitable because it may be that the young one among his children is more suitable than those older than him”.
The Imam, may Allah have mercy upon him, also stated, “It is obligated to the ruler to appoint both the young and the older – appoint for a job the one who is more suitable and the one who will fulfil the requirements of this job. This necessitates fulfillment of trusts. As for the one who appoints someone who is close to him or his relatives or a noble person due to his nobility or because he has a high qualification, such as a doctorate and what is similar to that, and he is either untrustworthy or not suitable for the job, this is not permissible”.
The Imam, may Allah have mercy upon him, also stated: “If he were to say, “I am not able to know them by their characteristics. Are these certificates not the closest way to (judge) the competence of a person?” We say, “Yes, but if we find this man is untrustworthy or not suitable for job, it is obligatory to remove him and replace him with someone who is more suitable because this is necessary rulership, as Umar Ibn Al-Khattab and other than him amongst the Khulafaa, may Allah be pleased with them, removed those who were not suitable. Umar applied this principle in the khilaafah. He feared dishonour after his death, thus, he did not appoint a specific person, except that he said, ‘If Abu Ubaydah, may Allah be pleased with him, was alive, I would have given him the affair because the Prophet, peace and blessings of Allah be upon him, said, ‘The trustworthy man of this Ummah is Abu Ubaydah’”. [At-Taleeq Alaa As-Siyaasah Ash-Shar’iyyah. Page 24-26]
It’s important to note that a ruler’s failure in their duties does not justify rebellion. Instead, scholars and those in positions of influence must follow the guidance of the Shariah to offer sincere advice. Read:
Footnote c: The way in which the remnants of the empire were slowly undermined by foreign influences serves as a reminder of the risks associated with complacency, a point emphasised by the upright and insightful scholars of the Ummah. Al-Allamah Rabee Bin Hadi Al-Mad’khali, may Allah preserve him, said:
So it is not permissible for the Ulamaa to remain heedless of their plans (i.e. the enemies of Islaam), their actions, their publications, their missionary activities and their various calls (to the Muslims). And also the various poisons they are infusing – which are in opposition to the Qur’an and the Messenger (sallallaahu alayhi wasallam) and his Sunnah. And nor of what plans they have for (the destruction of) the beliefs and methodologies of Islaam. It is not permissible either, to remain heedless of their concentrated efforts to Christianize or secularize the Muslim youth. And along with that, the Muslim youth and the students are not able to oppose this plan and strategy. Rather it is necessary that the distinguished Ulamaa – those who are experienced and shrewd – it is for such people, in all the places to undertake this duty. So it is obligatory for some of the intelligent and ingenious people from the field of Aqeedah to be mobilised for opposing these plans. And likewise it is a must that the intelligent and distinguished from amongst the specialists in the Sunnah – that they be mobilised for the refutation of these and similarly the eminent and distinguished from amongst those in the fields of Orientalism for the refutation of the plans of the Orientalists.” (Ahl ul-Hadeeth, p.102)
He also says: “I myself believe that it is a benefit – rather it is of necessity – that we know what the enemies are planning for us, and that it is necessary for us to prepare (ourselves in strength) to destroy their plans. However, I do not exaggerate in this matter, rather my view is the view of our Ulamaa and they have all agreed upon this – that amongst the obligatory matters there are some that are Fard Ain and others that are Fard Kifaayah – and even if knowing the state of the enemies is harmful – it is still necessary for us to know it – but it is treated as Fard Kifaayah. When some attend to it, then the harm is removed from the rest” up until he said: “So I consider that there is no criticism for the Ulamaa and the students of knowledge who take great concern for preserving the Sharee’ah of Allah – in terms of the Book, the Sunnah and its understanding – for this is one of the duties of the Kifaayah actions. And I believe that these people are more superior, noble, truthful and of more benefit to Islam than those who are weak in their knowledge of the religion of Allaah or those who have no share in acquainting themselves with it.”
An excerpt from an article at www.salafipublications.com titled: The Salafis and Looking into the Affairs of the Ummah]
O you who believe! Intoxicants (all kinds of alcoholic drinks), gambling, Al-Ansab , and Al-Azlam (arrows for seeking luck or decision) are an abomination of Shaitan‘s (Satan) handiwork. So avoid (strictly all) that (abomination) in order that you may be successful . Shaitan (Satan) wants only to excite enmity and hatred between you with intoxicants (alcoholic drinks) and gambling, and hinder you from the remembrance of Allah and from As-Salat (the prayer). So, will you not then abstain? And obey Allah and the Messenger (Muhammad ), and beware (of even coming near to drinking or gambling or Al-Ansab, or Al-Azlam, etc.) and fear Allah. Then if you turn away, you should know that it is Our Messenger’s duty to convey (the Message) in the clearest way. [Al-Maa’idah. 90-92]
Abdullah Ibn Umar, may Allah be pleased with him, said that Allah’s Messenger, peace and blessings of Allah be upon him, said, “Allah has cursed alcohol, the one who drinks it, the one who pours it, the one who sells it, the one who buys it, the one who squeezes (the grapes etc), the one for whom it is squeezed, the one who carries it and the one to whom it is carried.” [Sahih Abi Dawud 3674]
Anas Bin Malik, may Allah be pleased with him, said: Allah’s Messenger, peace and blessings of Allah be upon him, said, “Allaah cursed ten with regard to alcohol: the one who squeezes (i.e. the thing used to make it], the one for whom it is squeezed, the one who drinks it, the one who carries it, the one to whom it is carried, the one who pours it, the one who sells it and consumes its price, the one who buys it and the one for whom it is bought”. [Tirmidhi 1295]
The Messenger of Allah, peace and blessings of Allah be upon him, said: “Indeed, a people from my Ummah will drink alcohol, [and] give it other than its [real] name”.
Al-Allamah Zaid Bin Hadi al-Mad’khali, may Allah have mercy upon him, said: “This hadith contains a Prophetic miracle in relation to the information given by the Prophet about a matter of the unseen and that this will definitely occur. What the Prophet stated that alcohol will be given a name other than its real name will definitely occur. Indeed – in our era – alcohol has been given another name to deceive the people and urge them towards it, such as the name Mashrub Ruhi [i.e. (The sprightly drink or the drink that makes you lively), instead of giving its real name Khamr (i.e. alcohol) as it is said, Al-Khamru Takh’murul Aql – Alcohol veils (or obscures) the intellect]. And they have given it other names as well but it does not isolate it from the fact that it is khamr [alcohol] and it is forbidden”. [1]
Ibn Umar said: The Messenger forbade [two matters related to eating and drinking]: sitting at a table where alcohol is consumed and a man who eats whilst lying on his stomach.
Allamah Zaid Bin Hadi al-Mad’khali, may Allah have mercu upon him, said:
In this hadith, there is guidance regarding the manners of eating food, because these two deeds are not from good manners. Firstly, sitting at a table where alcohol is consumed: It is not permissible for a Muslim to sit at a table where alcohol is consumed, because alcohol is the mother of all evil and a person is not safe [in such a situation]. The least sin regarding this affair is that one has shown approval to the one who consumes alcohol at a table. Secondly, regarding the [deed of] a man who eats whilst lying down on his stomach, it has been reported in a narration that the Messenger said about lying on one’s stomach whilst sleeping, “Indeed, it is a way of lying down that Allah hates”. [Sahih Al-Jami 2271]
It is not permissible for a man to lie on his stomach, rather he should lie down on his back, or on his right side and that is noblest manner of lying down, or on his left side and there is no harm in that. [2]
Read articles on the links: Huge Global Study in the Lancet: There Is No Safe Limit in the Consumption of Alcohol (And the Prohibition of Alcohol in the Qur’an):
Muslim Attitudes to Alcohol and Intoxicants: The effect upon societies and individuals:
https://www.abukhadeejah.com/muslim-attitudes-to-alcohol-and-other-intoxicants-and-their-apparent-effects-upon-societies-islam-4-4/
The Dangerous Effects of Drugs & Alcohol in Society in Light of the Quran & Sunnah:
https://www.abukhadeejah.com/the-evil-effects-of-drugs-alcohol-in-society-in-light-of-the-quraan-sunnah/
WHY DO MUSLIMS NOT DRINK ALCOHOL? A brief explanation of the wisdoms behind Islam’s prohibition of alcohol and its benefit to society:
In The Name of Allah, The Most Merciful, The Bestower of Mercy.
Origins of Christian Zionism
Since our research is about “fundamentalism” in the West, it is important to clarify this term in their sources, then clarify it in Arabic books, as this is the primary language of research. If we refer to “fundamentalism” in English dictionaries, we find that it is expressed as “fundamentalism,” meaning “foundation” and “origin.” A “fundamentalist” is one who adheres to a return to the literal origins of the Bible. Fundamentalism is: A Protestant doctrine that emerged in the twentieth century, affirming the infallibility of the Bible not only in matters of faith and morality, but also in everything related to history and other matters of the unseen, such as the story of creation, the birth of Christ from the Virgin Mary, his second coming into the world, and the bodily resurrection. [Footnote a]
In Arabic language dictionaries, the term “fundamentalism” is derived from the root of a thing, which refers to its foundation or the source from which it originates, as in the phrase “the root of the law.” The foundations of sciences are the principles upon which judgments are based, and the term used to refer to this is “fundamentalist.” Both languages converge in their meanings of foundation, principle, and rule. While Arabic offers a broader range of connotations compared to English, the latter emphasizes the literal inerrancy of the Bible, a concept particularly associated with Christianity in general and Protestantism in particular. Regarding the British Encyclopedia, it defines fundamentalism as: “A conservative movement within American Protestantism that emerged in the nineteenth century, emphasizing essential tenets of Christianity, including literal interpretation, absolute inerrancy of the Bible, the imminent physical return of Christ, the virgin birth, resurrection, and atonement.” According to this source, fundamentalism is a Protestant doctrine that asserts the literal inerrancy of the Bible, as claimed by its adherents, along with the second coming of Christ. [Footnote b]
Regarding Western scholars, there is a divergence in their descriptions of fundamentalism. Some argue that it is a reaction against liberalism, secularism, and Darwinism, aimed at affirming the inerrancy of the Bible and addressing beliefs related to the Second Coming of Christ, as well as the crucifixion and redemption of humanity from sin, according to their perspective. Others contend that it originated as a form of Anglo-American millennialism prior to World War I, but later evolved into a movement opposing modernity. [Footnote c]
The focus on the second coming of Christ (peace be upon him) is more pronounced than ever. As for Arab writers, some have defined it as a movement characterized by rigidity and inflexibility, opposing any form of progress or innovation. Thus, fundamentalism can be categorized into two concepts: the first is a notion present in Islamic thought, referring to a return to the original source. The second concept is a contemporary Western interpretation that equates fundamentalism with extremism, rigidity, and strict adherence to religious laws and traditions, applicable to both Christianity and Islam. This understanding is perhaps the most prevalent and recognized in today’s media. Generally, the term “fundamentalism” is associated with views, stances, and religious judgments that reflect inflexibility, fanaticism, and a sense of superiority, often characterized by an overwhelming reliance on literal textual authority. In this context, it encompasses all religions; however, the focus of this research is on the term “Christian fundamentalism.” This term refers to the strict religious movements concerning matters of faith and ethics, which uphold a literal interpretation of the Bible in both its Old and New Testaments. These movements believe that the scriptures provide guidance for all aspects of life, including political affairs, particularly prophecies that allude to future events leading to the restoration of Israel and the second coming of Christ. [Footnote d]
The Christian fundamentalists are the Protestants who believe in the inerrancy of the Bible, interpret it literally, and assert the necessity of the geographical existence of “Israel” in “Palestine” as a prerequisite for the Second Coming of Christ. This fundamentalist perspective has evolved to the point where it views Western civilization as fundamentally Greek, Roman, and Jewish, rather than solely a Greek and Roman heritage. Consequently, this development has led to the characterization of the Protestant Reformation as a “Hebraic Jewish revival.” Christian fundamentalists emphasize a central theme in their interpretation of the Old Testament: “Israel” and its people, chosen by God as a sacred entity. They advocate for its defense against adversaries and support its cause, alongside the belief in its eternal claim to the Promised Land. These fundamentalists adhere strictly to the literal interpretation of texts, shaping their religious outlook to assert that the “Israel” mentioned in the Old Testament refers to contemporary “Israel” in “Palestine.” They view the establishment of the “State of Israel” in “Palestine” in 1948 as a fulfillment of biblical prophecy and a sign of the imminent second coming of Christ.
The term “fundamentalism” in its current intellectual context only emerged in 1910 when a series of twelve volumes was published under the supervision of the Moody Bible Institute in Chicago. This collection, titled “The Fundamentals,” included ninety articles authored by a group of Protestant theologians who opposed modernism. These writings advocated for the acceptance of the Bible as divinely inspired and infallible. The term gained traction in the American press during the 1920s, largely due to the division among churches regarding Darwin’s theory of evolution. In the 1940s, fundamentalists criticized the social policies implemented by President Franklin Roosevelt in response to the economic recession. [Footnote e]
In the 1970s, the fundamentalist movement evolved into a political force with its own organizations and churches. This movement exerts influence on public policies through lobbying efforts directed at the White House and Congress. Additionally, it impacts its followers via newsletters, emails, religious radio and television stations, universities, mobilizing votes during elections, fundraising, and supporting congressional candidates who align with its message. [Footnote f]
[Footnote a]: See: Al-Mawrid, English-Arabic Dictionary, p. 373, and Oxford Ocean English-Arabic Dictionary, p. 423. Sociology of Religion, p. 947. 2) See: Sociology of Religion, p. 240, and For the Sake of Zion, p. 238. See: Sociology of Religion, p. 240, and Al-Mawrid, English-Arabic Dictionary, p. 373, and Oxford Ocean English-Arabic Dictionary, p. 423.
[Footnote b] Encyclopedia of the American Religious Experience, p. 947: Perhaps Curtis Loza examines this topic in his article titled “The Fundamentalism of Our Time,” published in the Democracy magazine, issue 29, eighth year, January 2008, p. 27. For further reference, see: Al-Ma’jam Al-Maqayis Al-Lugha, 1:61; Al-Sihah Dictionary, p. 45; Al-Misbah Al-Munir, p. 14; Al-Qamus Al-Muhit, p. 50; Al-Mu’jam Al-Wajiz, p. 19; and Al-Mu’jam Al-Wasat, p. 20. Encyclopaedia Britannica, Vol. 5, pp. 51-52.
[Footnote c]: Liberalism originates from the term “liberals,” which refers to a political party that emerged in Spain in the early 19th century. It represents a capitalist ideology that emphasizes the freedom of individuals or groups in their beliefs, lifestyles, and political policies concerning states and governments. For further details, refer to the Political Encyclopedia, pages 566-567, and the Encyclopaedia Britannica, volume 13, pages 1017-1022. 2. Secularism is a doctrine aimed at redirecting people’s focus from the afterlife to worldly matters alone. It embodies the concept of non-religiosity or the separation of religion from daily life, arising in response to the dominance of church authorities and the conflict between the church and science. For more information, see the Political Encyclopedia, Encyclopaedia Britannica, volume 1094, pages 179-180, and the development of secularism, pages 21-24, 123-206. 3. Darwinism is a theory in political sociology that applies Charles Darwin’s theory of evolution, positing that survival is determined by the fittest. This theory was presented by British philosopher Herbert Spencer, although it lost much of its influence by the early 20th century. For additional insights, consult the Political Encyclopedia, pages 642-643, and the Encyclopaedia Britannica, volume 3, pages 894-895. 4. For instance, Luis Gaspar in his book “The Fundamentalist Movement” states on page 13, referencing “The Jewish Christ” on page 188, and discusses fundamentalism in divine laws on page 98. 5. Modernity is a broad term that encompasses various doctrines, opinions, and critical practices in religion, literature, architecture, and society. According to Western sources, it originated as a critical movement opposing the traditions of the Roman Catholic Church, emerging in the late 19th century and early 20th century. This movement advocated for a re-interpretation of religion and a reading of religious texts in light of scientific, historical, and philosophical insights, characterized by a rigorous critique of religion and its scriptures.
[Footnote d]: Refer to the historian Ernst Sandin in “The Jewish Messiah,” page 188. 2. Consult Dr. Muhammad Al-Jalband in his work “Fundamentalism and Dialogue with the Other,” page 10. 3. See “Fundamentalism in Divine Laws,” page not specified. 4. Refer to “Christian Zionism” by Abdullah Al-Hassan, page 49. 5. For further information, see “The Religious Dimension,” page 10, and “The Jewish Messiah,” page 188.
[Footnote e]: For further reading, see: The Rise of Protestantism, p. 59; The Day of God, pp. 118-119; and A Treatise on Protestant Fundamentalism, p. 12. 2) Refer to: pp. 246-247. Liensch, Redeeming, as cited in: The Roots of Extremism, p. 69. 3) Consult: The Roots of Extremism, p. 69; The Rise of Protestantism, p. 59; The Jewish Christ, p. 187; For the Sake of Zion, p. 238; and A Treatise on Protestant Fundamentalism, p. 11. 4) Darwin, born in 1809 and deceased in 1882, was an English scientist who established the theory of historical evolution of the organic world. He expanded biological knowledge and addressed practical agricultural issues of his time, incorporating empirical data gathered from his global travels. His book, “On the Origin of Species,” raised fundamental questions regarding the theory of evolution and provided a scientific account of human descent from animal ancestors. He was a dialectical thinker and an atheist. The Political Encyclopedia, 642/2, and the Encyclopaedia Britannica, Vol. 3894: see the Global Arab Encyclopedia, 226/10-228. Franklin D. Roosevelt was born in 1882 and passed away in 1945. He served as the President of the United States starting in 1932, during which he implemented numerous banking and financial reforms in his first term. He transformed the Democratic Party, which he belonged to, into a less conservative alternative to the Republican Party. In 1933, he recognized the Soviet government and was elected for a third term as President. In 1941, he declared war on Germany and established the United Nations, which held its first session in San Francisco in 1945. He continued his presidency for a fourth term in 1944. For further reference, see the Simplified Arab Encyclopedia, 891/11-892, the Political Encyclopedia, 842/2, and the Global Arab Encyclopedia, 335/11-337. For additional information, refer to The Jewish Messiah, pages 187-188, and For the Sake of Zion, page 237. Refer to Christianity, Islam, and Orientalism: p. 260. See: The Religious Dimension: p. 11, and Do Jews Have a Religious or Historical Right in Palestine: pp. 173/2-174. See: The Roots of Extremism: p. 69, The Jewish Messiah: p. 187, and A Treatise on Protestant Fundamentalism: pp. 11-12. Chicago is a major city located in the northeastern part of the state of Illinois, recognized as the second industrial hub in the United States. Its industrial outputs include food products, electrical appliances, and machinery, and it serves as a significant transportation center. Refer to: The Arab World Encyclopedia: pp. 310/14-313.
[Footnote f]: The Congress serves as the legislative authority in the United States, established in 1789. It is composed of two chambers: the Senate and the House of Representatives. Senators are elected directly, with specific requirements including a minimum age of thirty years and American citizenship. In contrast, the House of Representatives elects one member from each state, with the stipulation that representatives must be at least twenty-five years old and residents of the state they represent. The House elects a Speaker, who oversees its functions, including the discussion of the budget prior to its presentation to the Senate. Congress is regarded as the center of power in the United States and is influenced by various Jewish lobbying groups that affect its foreign policy. Refer to: Encyclopedia of Politics: 276/5 See also: Deconstructing America: pp. 41-46; cited from The Jewish Messiah: p. 188.
An Excerpt from “Wan-Nasraniyyah As-Suhruniyyah Nash’atuha Wa Ahammu Aqa’idiha” 1/104-110By Jawharah Bint Muhammad Jam’aan Al-Qahtani.
NB: The information presented in this article is derived from the findings of the researcher. While she has made significant efforts to include numerous references and viewpoints, it is important to acknowledge that no text, apart from the Qur’an and Sunnah, is entirely free from errors, omissions, or lapses in memory on the part of any researcher. The information articulated in the article reflect the researcher’s personal views, and not all assertions can be independently verified by the individual who published this article (Abdullah Jallow). Therefore, those who find the information unsatisfactory are encouraged to conduct additional research or reach out to the author for further clarification. Nonetheless, the existing knowledge regarding Zionism in contemporary times is substantial, particularly in light of over seventy years of oppression faced by the Palestinians.
