Skip to main content

Netanyahu’s Claim of Moral Superiority Scrutinised and Disproved Once More

Written by Abdullah Jallow on . Posted in Basics, Contemporary Issues, Featured, Mental Health, Methodology - 'Manhaj', Morals and Manners - 'Akhlaaq', Purification of The Soul, Qur'aan, Sahaabah, Sin.

In The Name of Allah, The Most Merciful, The Bestower of Mercy.

Netanyahu, your assertion of moral superiority has been rejected once more because of your failure to recognize these texts and your disregard for human life

Allah, The Exalted, said:

وَالَّذِينَ لَا يَدْعُونَ مَعَ اللَّهِ إِلَهًا آخَرَ وَلَا يَقْتُلُونَ النَّفْسَ الَّتِي حَرَّمَ اللَّهُ إِلَّا بِالْحَقِّ وَلَا يَزْنُونَ وَمَنْ يَفْعَلْ ذَلِكَ يَلْقَ أَثَامًا * يُضَاعَفْ لَهُ الْعَذَابُ يَوْمَ الْقِيَامَةِ وَيَخْلُدْ فِيهِ مُهَانًا * إِلَّا مَنْ تَابَ وَآمَنَ وَعَمِلَ عَمَلًا صَالِحًا فَأُولَئِكَ يُبَدِّلُ اللَّهُ سَيِّئَاتِهِمْ حَسَنَاتٍ وَكَانَ اللَّهُ غَفُورًا رَحِيمًا

And those who invoke not any other ilah (god) along with Allah, nor kill such life as Allah has forbidden, except for just cause, nor commit illegal sexual intercourse and whoever does this shall receive the punishment. The torment will be doubled to him on the Day of Resurrection, and he will abide therein in disgrace; Except those who repent and believe (in Islamic Monotheism), and do righteous deeds, for those, Allah will change their sins into good deeds, and Allah is Oft-Forgiving, Most Merciful. [Al-Furqan. 68-70]

Allah said:

وَمَنْ يَقْتُلْ مُؤْمِنًا مُتَعَمِّدًا فَجَزَاؤُهُ جَهَنَّمُ خَالِدًا فِيهَا وَغَضِبَ اللَّهُ عَلَيْهِ وَلَعَنَهُ وَأَعَدَّ لَهُ عَذَابًا عَظِيمًا

And whoever kills a believer intentionally, his recompense is Hell to abide therein, and the Wrath and the Curse of Allah are upon him, and a great punishment is prepared for him]. [Al-Nisaa. 93]

Allah, The Exalted, said:

مَنْ قَتَلَ نَفْسًا بِغَيْرِ نَفْسٍ أَوْ فَسَادٍ فِي الْأَرْضِ فَكَأَنَّمَا قَتَلَ النَّاسَ جَمِيعًا وَمَنْ أَحْيَاهَا فَكَأَنَّمَا أَحْيَا النَّاسَ جَمِيعًا

If anyone killed a person not in retaliation of murder, or (and) to spread mischief in the land – it would be as if he killed all mankind, and if anyone saved a life, it would be as if he saved the life of all mankind. [Al-Maa’idah. 32]

Imam As-Sadi, may Allah have mercy upon him, said:

If a person is bold enough to kill someone who does not deserve to be killed, then this implies that he does make a distinction between the one He killed and other than him; rather he would commit this act whenever his evil calls him to that. Therefore, his bold attitude that led him to kill is as if he has killed all humankind. On the other hand, if a person saves a life and does not kill – whilst his soul calls him to do so – due to fear of Allaah, then this is as if he has saved the lives of all humankind, because the fear of Allaah he possesses stops him killing one who does not deserve to be killed. [Tafsir As-Sadi]

Abdullah Bin Mas’ud, may Allah be pleased with him, said that Allah’s Messenger, peace and blessings of Allah be upon him, said, “The first (thing) that will be decided among people on the Day of Judgment will pertain to bloodshed”. [Sahih Muslim. 1678]

Imam An-Nawawi, may Allah have mercy upon him, said,” This hadith shows the seriousness of bloodshed and that it will be the first thing that will be judged between people on the Day of Resurrection because of its greatness and extreme danger. This hadith does not contradict the well-known hadith in the Sunan that “The first thing a person will be questioned about is the prayer”, because this hadith is regarding a matter between Allah and the person, whereas the first hadith (i.e. judgement in matters related to bloodshed) is between the people”. [Sharh Sahih Muslim. 11/139]

The Messenger, peace and blessings of Allah be upon him, said, “The termination of the world means less to Allah than the killing of a Muslim (i.e. without right)”. [Sahih Al-Jaami 9208]

Amr Ibn Al-Hamiq, may Allah be pleased with him, reported that Allah’s Messenger, peace and blessings of Allah be upon him, said, “Whenever a man promises safety for another man’s life and then kills him, I disavow myself from him even if the victim was an unbeliever”. [Sahih Al-Jami 6103]

Abdullah Bin Amr, may Allah be pleased with him, said that the Prophet, peace and blessings of Allah be upon him, said, “Whoever killed a Mu’ahid (a non-Muslim granted the pledge of protection by the Muslims) shall not smell the fragrance of Paradise though its fragrance can be smelt at a distance of forty years (of traveling)”. [Sahih al-Bukhari 6914]

Uqbah Ibn Aamir, may Allah be pleased with him, reported that Allah’s Messenger, peace and blessings of Allah be upon him, said, “Whoever meets Allah whilst neither associating anything with Him nor spilling sacred blood will enter Paradise”. [Silsilah As-Sahihah 2923]

The people said to Jundub, may Allah be pleased with him], “Advise us”. He said, “The first thing of the human body to putrefy is the abdomen, so he who can eat nothing but good food [halaal and earned lawfully] should do so, and he who does as much as he can that nothing intervenes between him and paradise by not shedding even a handful of blood [i.e. unlawful killing], should do so”. [Sahih Al-Bukhari 7152]

A man wrote to Ibn Umar, may Allaah be pleased with him and his father, and asked him to write down all knowledge for him; so he replied to him, saying, “Indeed, knowledge is plentiful, but if you are able to meet Allah whilst not shedding people’s blood, not taking their wealth (unlawfully) and violating their honour, then do so”. [Siyar A’lam An-Nubula 3/222]

Prince Turki Al-Faisal, may Allah preserve him, has elucidated this issue in a manner that no Zionist can contest. Listen below:

At present, even Netanyahu’s allies are beginning to disapprove of his callous behaviour. Read below:

https://www.gov.uk/government/news/joint-statement-from-the-leaders-of-the-united-kingdom-france-and-canada-on-the-situation-in-gaza-and-the-west-bank

Read:

The Initial Rise and Gradual Impact of Christian Zionism on Some European Political Decision-makers

The Initial Rise and Gradual Impact of Christian Zionism on Some European Political Decision-makers

An Overview of Christian Zionism in America Since the Arrival of The Puritans

An Overview of Christian Zionism in America Since the Arrival of The Puritans

An absurd analogy presented by American commentator Denis Prager

Written by Abdullah Jallow on . Posted in Contemporary Issues, Morals and Manners - 'Akhlaaq', Purification of The Soul, Refutations, Sin.

In The Name of Allah, The Most Merciful, the Bestower of Mercy.

Allah said:

وَلَا تَلْبِسُوا الْحَقَّ بِالْبَاطِلِ وَتَكْتُمُوا الْحَقَّ وَأَنتُمْ تَعْلَمُونَ

And mix not truth with falsehood, nor conceal the truth while you know (the truth). [Al-Baqarah 42]

Imam Ibn Al-Qayyim, may Allah have mercy upon him, said:

Allah forbade us from mixing truth with falsehood, thus leading to concealment of the truth. Mixing truth with false is by mixing the two until one of them is confused for the other. This is forgery and deceit through which what is made apparent is the opposite of what it is in reality. Similarly, when truth is confounded with falsehood, the culprit manifests falsehood in the image of truth and speaks with a statement that carries two meanings- a correct meaning and false meaning, thus, the listener is under the illusion that the speaker intends the correct meaning, whilst he intends the corrupt meaning. [1]

Denis Prager stated: Gaza starts a war to kill as many Israelis as possible, and what you see on the BBC and sky news, as we see in America, on our TV, is dead Gazans, that’s all you see. I shudder to think if world war II, even World War II, the same media, you would have seen far more dead German civilians than British civilians. But it takes a very, frail moral mind to determine right and wrong by the number of dead. That’s what we are told, “Look at how many Gazans were killed, and how few Israelis”. Well look at how few Brits were killed and how many more Germans were? Does that make the Germans right in world war II? That’s the facile moral thinking that pervades our world. [end of quote]

The aforementioned represents a desperate and an absurd attempt to obscure the truth. Firstly, it is important to note that the conflict was not initiated by the Gazans, but by Hamas’s attack. Secondly, the oppression perpetrated by Zionist forces has been ongoing since 1948 when deceitful Denis was born, involving murder, the seizure of homes, and the displacement of Palestinians, a fact recognised globally. Thirdly, in addition to the genocide being committed at present, the reality remains that the Zionists have been the aggressors since 1948. Thus, drawing a comparison between the casualties of Gazans and those of Germans and Brits is fundamentally flawed, as it mirrors a self-incriminating stance; just as Denis would label the Nazis as aggressors, so too are the Zionists the instigators of continuous aggression since 1948. However, this does not excuse the loss of innocent lives during World War II, whether they were Germans, Brits, or Jews, just as it cannot justify the killing of innocent Palestinians in the name of retaliation and self-defense, nor can Hamas’s actions against civilians be justified. Therefore, the flawed and corrupt moral reasoning is evident in Denis’s rhetoric, which is steeped in false analogies, emotional appeals, sophistry, and simplistic moral reasoning. This mindset has permeated the minds, hearts and souls of many Zionists and their supporters. By generalising the Gazans and employing this absurd analogy, Denis attempts to deceive the observer, even though the truth is as evident as the midday sun. Prince Turki Al-Faisal, may Allah preserve him, has elucidated this issue in a manner that no Zionist can contest. Listen here: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Z3-cWyFcK5w

Also read:

The Initial Rise and Gradual Impact of Christian Zionism on Some European Political Decision-makers – salafidawahmanchester.com/
https://salafidawahmanchester.com/2024/11/13/the-initial-rise-and-gradual-impact-of-christian-zionism-on-some-european-political-decision-makers/

An Overview of Christian Zionism in America Since the Arrival of The Puritans – salafidawahmanchester.com/
https://salafidawahmanchester.com/2024/10/08/an-overview-of-christian-zionism-in-america-since-the-arrival-of-the-puritans/

[1] Bada’i at-Tafsir Al-Jaami Limaa Fassarahu Al-Imaam Ibn Al-Qayyim. 1/124.

The different levels of the scholars of Ijtihad

Written by Abdullah Jallow on . Posted in Contemporary Issues, Featured, Methodology - 'Manhaj', Scholars of Islam, Worship - 'Ibaadah'.

In The Name of Allah, The Most Merciful, The Bestower of Mercy.

The Different Levels of the Scholars of Ijtihad

اجتهد العلماء – رحمهم الله – في تصنيف المجتهدين إلى مراتب أو طبقات متعددة، أوصلها كثير من العلماء إلى خمس مراتب :

المرتبة الأولى: مرتبة المجتهد المستقل، وهو الذي يستقل في اجتهاده بمبادئ أصولية وقواعد عامة ببني عليها فقهه من غير أن يقلد أحداً في أصوله التي بني عليها استنباطه، ومثلوا لهذه المرتبة بفقهاء الصحابة والتابعين وأئمة المذاهب الأربعة وغيرهم ممن عاصرهم أو حاء بعدهم من مشاهير الأئمة.

المرتبة الثانية: مرتبة المجتهد المنتسب وهو الذي يجتهد في الأصول والفروع كأهل المرتبة الأولى، لكنه غير مستقل في اجتهاده، وإنما بيني على أصول إمامه الذي ينتسب إليه فهو تابع له في المبادئ العامة في الاجتهاد مستقل عنه فيما عدا ذلك، وقد يختلف معه في أحكام المسائل الجزئية.

المرتبة الثالثة: مرتبة المجتهد المذهبي وهو المجتهد المقيد، ويسمى أيضاً مجتهد التخريج، وهو الذي عرف قواعد إمامه في الاجتهاد فالتزمها واستطاع من خلالها استباط الأحكام في المسائل الاجتهادية
أي التي لم يرد فيها نص عن إمام مذهبه.

المرتبة الرابعة : مرتبة مجتهد الترجيح أو التنقيح، وهو الذي يقوم بالترجيح بين الآراء المروية في المذهب بناء على قوة الدليل، أو ملائعة التطبيق للعصر. ولا يأتي بقول جديد وإنما يرجح قولاً على آخر، إما لقوة الدليل، أو حسبما يؤدي إليه اجتهاده.

المرتبة الخامسة: مرتبة مجتهد الفتوى وهو الفقيه الحافظ المذهب إمامه ونقله وفهمه في المسائل والمشكلات ولديه قدرة على تمييز الأقوال القوية من الضعيفة، ويفتي الناس بالراجح أو المشهور من المذهب

Source: An-Nahj Al-Aqwaa Fee Arkaan Al-Fatwa pages 26-27. Itroduction by Al-Allamah Abdul Aziz Aala Ash-Shaikh and Al-Allamah Salih Al-Fawzan (may Allah preserve them and other scholars of Ahlus Sunnah).

The Proof Is Given Precedence From The Statements of The Scholars

Imam Ash-Shawkaani, may Allah have mercy upon him, said:

فاعلم أنه إذا وقع الخلاف بين المسلمين في أن هذا الشيء بدعة او غير بدعة ، أو مكروه او غير مكروه ، او محرم او غير محرم ، او غير ذلك ، فقد اتفق المسلمون : سلفهم وخلفهم ، من عصر الصحابة الى عصرنا هذا – وهو القرن الثالث عشر منذ البعثة المحمدية – أن الواجب الاختلاف في أي أمر من أمور الدين بين الأئمة المجتهدين : هو الرد الى كتاب الله سبحانه ، وسنة رسوله الناطق بذلك
الكتاب العزيز ( ٤ : ٥٩ فإن تنازعتم في شيء فردوه إلى الله والرسول ( ومعنى الرد الى الله سبحانه : الرد الى كتابه
ومعنى الرد إلى رسوله ال : الرد الى سنته بعد وفاته وهذا مما لا خلاف فيه بين جميع المسلمين . فإذا قال مجتهد من المجتهدين
هذا حلال . وقال الآخر : هذا حرام : فليس
أحدهما أولى بالحق من الآخر وإن كان اكثر منه علماً ، أو اكبر منه سنا ، او اقدم منه عصراً لأن كل واحد منهما فرد من أفراد عباد الله ، ومتعبد بما في الشريعة المطهرة، مما في كتاب الله وسنة رسوله ، ومطلوب منه ما طلب الله من غيره من العباد . وكثرة علمه وبلوغه درجة الاجتهاد او مجاوزته لها لا يسقط عنه شيئاً من الشرائع التي شرعها الله لعباده ، ولا يخرجه من جملة المكلفين من العباد

Sharh As-Sudoor Bi-Tahreem Raf Al-Quboor pages 1-2

The Student of Knowledge Who Has Reached The Level to Understand Proofs Strives to Follow Proofs to The Best of His Ability

Imam Abdul Aziz Bin Baz, may Allah have mercy upon him, who said:

If a person is a student of knowledge and adheres to the Hanafi Madhab in certain matters that are clear to him to be correct and his Madhab is stronger than other than it; then follows Ash-Shafi’i, Maliki’s, or Ahmad’s in other matters where it appears that their Madhab in those matters is correct based on the proofs, there is no harm in this because a believer wherever Allāh gives him knowledge, he follows the proof and looks to the proof.

So, what is established with proof, it is obligatory to adhere to it, regardless of whether it aligns with the Madhab of Shafi’i, Abu Hanifa, Maliki, Ahmad, or any other scholars. The important thing is that it must agree with the proof – substantiated by a verse or a noble sound hadith from the Messenger of Allah, peace and blessings of Allāh be upon him.

However, as for following whims or personal desires, then no. Playing about – sometimes this and other times that (arbitrarily between opinions), this is not permissible. But it is incumbent upon him to seek to know the proof and asking the people of knowledge regarding what is difficult for him. If he knows the proof, acquainted with the proof that this madhab in this issue is more valid while another is more valid in a different matter, there is no harm in this; otherwise, he should consult the scholars, seek their verdicts guidance, and act according to what they guide him to based on knowledge.

https://binbaz.org.sa/fatwas/8426/%D8%AD%D9%83%D9%85-%D8%A7%D9%84%D8%AA%D9%86%D9%82%D9%84-%D8%A8%D9%8A%D9%86-%D8%A7%D9%84%D9%85%D8%B0%D8%A7%D9%87%D8%A8-%D8%A7%D9%84%D9%81%D9%82%D9%87%D9%8A%D8%A9

Seeking out the most elderly and senior scholars

Written by Salafi Dawah Manchester on . Posted in Basics, Brotherhood, Contemporary Issues, Da'wah - Calling To Islam, Fatawa-Rulings, Methodology - 'Manhaj', Morals and Manners - 'Akhlaaq', Purification of The Soul.

In The Name of Allah, The Most Merciful, The Bestower of Mercy.

The question: This questioner, Ahmad Kashuqah from Amman, Jordan, says: O revered Shaikh, when the statements of the scholars differ regarding the ruling on a particular issue—some saying it is Makruh (disliked), some say it is Haraam (unlawful) and some say Laa Yajuz (it is not allowed), is the verdict Haraam the best of these statements and is this always the case? And if they differ regarding a matter being allowed, recommended and that there is no harm regarding it, is the verdict recommended the best statement, and is this always the case?

Response: There is a detail clarification regarding this matter. It is incumbent upon the one seeking a verdict to examine the matter [ويتحرى من هو أقرب إلى الخير والعلم والفضل وأقرب إلى إصابة الحق – and carefully seek for the one closest to goodness, knowledge and virtue, and closer to reaching the truth] in order to follow their fatwa. If one exercises caution, while the matter is a situation where this one says “haraam”, that one says “It is not Haraam”, he exercises caution and leaves it. This would be better. The Prophet, peace and blessings of Allah be upon him, said: “Leave that which makes you doubt for that which does not make you doubt.” [a] “So whoever took caution regarding the ambiguous matters has absolved himself regarding his religion and his honour”.[b]

However, if he is able, he carefully seeks until he knows [من هو أكثر علمًا، ومن هو أكثر ورعًا، ومن هو أقرب إلى الصواب – who has more knowledge, has more of that fear of Allah that makes a person abandon doubtful matters out of fear of falling into Haram, and the one who is closer to reaching what is correct] in order to follow his statement and so that his heart is at ease, similar to what the Prophet, peace and blessings of Allah be upon him, said: “Consult your heart”. [c] Righteousness is that about which the soul feels tranquil and the heart feels tranquil. If faced with differing fatwas, if the Fatwa differs, a believer examines and contemplates, and he is not hasty; [يتحرى من هو أقرب إلى الناس للإصابة من أهل العلم والبصيرة والورع والذي يرجح في قلبه أنه أقرب إلى الخير وأقرب إلى إصابة الحق – he seeks among the people of knowledge the one closest to reaching the truth, the possessors of clear-sightedness and that fear of Allah that makes a person avoid doubtful matters out of fear of falling into what is forbidden – the one his heart considers to be closer to good and closer to reaching the truth].

Similarly, in matters of recommendation, if there is disagreement regarding whether something is recommended or permissible, one should carefully consider the opinions. If his heart holds an overwhelming inclination -based on what is apparent – towards the statement of the one who says that the matter is recommended, he should act on the recommendation. If your heart is at ease that the matter is permissible only, it should be treated as permissible. The goal (intent) regarding all of this is that the one who seeks fatwa or the listener should examine and contemplate without haste, he examines the situation and circumstances of the Muftis, and he examines what is closer to good in terms of them having that fear of Allah that makes a person avoid doubtful matters out of fear of falling into Haram, their careful pursuit of the truth, and their good reputation, among other things. [end of quote]

———————————————————————————-

Footnotes:

[a] https://www.nawawis40hadith.com/nw/hadith/11/leaving-doubt
[b] https://www.nawawis40hadith.com/nw/hadith/6/the-doubtful-matters
[c] https://www.nawawis40hadith.com/nw/hadith/27/righteousness-and-sin
[d] https://www.alfawzan.af.org.sa/ar/node/15726

السؤال: هذا السائل أحمد كشوقة من الأردن عمان يقول: سماحة الشيخ: إذا اختلفت أقوال العلماء في حكم مسألة ما، فمنهم من قال: مكروه، ومنهم من قال: حرام، ومنهم من قال: لا يجوز، فهل أحسن القول في هذه الأحكام هو الحرام؟ وهل هذا دائمًا؟ وإذا اختلفوا على مسألة بأنها جائزة مستحبة لا بأس بها فهل الأحسن القول هو الاستحباب؟ وهل هذا دائمًا، وجهونا بهذا مأجورين؟

الجواب: هذا فيه تفصيل على المستفتي أن ينظر في الأمر، ويتحرى من هو أقرب إلى الخير والعلم والفضل وأقرب إلى إصابة الحق حتى يأخذ بفتواه، وإذا احتاط والمسألة: هذا يقول: حرام، وهذا يقول: ليس بحرام، واحتاط وترك ذلك فهذا حسن؛ لقول النبي ﷺ: دع ما يريبك إلى ما لا يريبك من اتقى الشبهات فقد استبرأ لدينه وعرضه ولكن إذا تيسر له أن يتحرى حتى يعرف من هو أكثر علمًا، ومن هو أكثر ورعًا، ومن هو أقرب إلى الصواب حتى يأخذ بقوله، حتى يطمئن قلبه، مثلما قال ﷺ: استفت قلبك البر ما اطمأنت إليه النفس واطمأن إليه القلب، إذا اختلفت عليه الفتاوى، إذا اختلفت الفتوى فالمؤمن ينظر ويتأمل ولا يعجل، يتحرى من هو أقرب إلى الناس للإصابة من أهل العلم والبصيرة والورع والذي يرجح في قلبه أنه أقرب إلى الخير وأقرب إلى إصابة الحق، وهكذا في الاستحباب إذا اختلفوا هذا سنة أو مباح يتحرى، فإذا غلب على قلبه واطمأن قلبه إلى قول من قال: إنه مستحب، عمل عمل المستحب، وإذا اطمأن قلبك إلى أنه مباح فقط عامله معاملة المباح.
والمقصود من هذا كله أن المستفتي أو السامع ينظر ويتأمل ولا يعجل، وينظر حال المفتين وأحوالهم، وينظر ما هو أقرب إلى الخير من جهة ورعهم ومن جهة تحريهم الحق، ومن جهة سمعتهم الحسنة، إلى غير ذلك

https://binbaz.org.sa/fatwas/8821/%D9%85%D9%88%D9%82%D9%81-%D8%A7%D9%84%D9%85%D8%B3%D8%AA%D9%81%D8%AA%D9%8A-%D8%A7%D8%B0%D8%A7-%D8%A7%D8%AE%D8%AA%D9%84%D9%81%D8%AA-%D8%A7%D9%82%D9%88%D8%A7%D9%84-%D8%A7%D9%84%D9%85%D9%81%D8%AA%D9%8A%D9%86

Hasten

Written by Abdullah Jallow on . Posted in Aqeedah (Creed & Belief), Bid'ah (Innovation), Contemporary Issues, Da'wah - Calling To Islam, Methodology - 'Manhaj', Morals and Manners - 'Akhlaaq', Purification of The Soul, Scholars of Islam, Shirk, Sin, Worship - 'Ibaadah'.

In The Name of Allah, The Most Merciful, The Bestower of Mercy.

The Messenger, peace and blessings of Allah be upon him, said: “Hasten in doing good deeds (before you are overtaken) because there will be trials (temptation) which would be like a part of the night. (During it) a man would be a Muslim in the morning and an unbeliever in the evening or he would be a believer in the evening and an unbeliever in the morning, and would sell his religion for worldly goods”. [1]

Al-Allamah Saalih Al-Fawzan, may Allah preserve him, stated:

He wakes up in the morning as a believer with Iman but by the end of the evening he deviates and becomes a disbeliever, or a believer in the evening and a disbeliever in the morning. What is the cause? “Sells his religion for some worldly goods”. This is proof that the materialistic world is one of the temptations, – the adornments of the worldly life and the things such as food, drinks, transportation, mansions, castles, status, etc -thus a person abandons their religion of Islam. A person may be so consumed by their desires and love for material possessions that they abandon their religion of Islam. Allah has warned us about the allure and deception of the worldly life. Instead, we should only take what is necessary from this life to fulfill our obligations to Allah. As for just going along and forgetting about the Hereafter, this itself is destruction. [2]

Allaamah Rabee Bin Hadi Al-Mad’khali, may Allah preserve him, said:

Yes, a man may embrace truth and then vanish from sight, only to reappear as a disbeliever or a misguided innovator in religious matters! This is nothing short of humiliation! He used to claim that he is upon goodness, a possessor of knowledge, and adherence to the truth, but then he succumbs to disbelief – either major or minor. This is a disgrace, and we seek Allah’s protection. How many individuals have been brought low and exposed through a trial (temptation)?! You become aware of them, their deceitful assertions are laid bare, and their true reality is revealed to you. [3]

The Shaikh also said: A believer always fears that his situation will change. It has been reported from Aa’isha and Anas, may Allah pleased with them, that the Messenger, peace and blessings of Allah be upon him, often (supplicated): [يَا مُقَلِّبَ الْقُلُوبِ ثَبِّتْ قَلْبِى عَلَى دِينِكَ – O turner of the hearts (Allaah)! Keep my heart firm upon your religion]. [Aa’isha or Anas] asked, “O Allah’s Messenger! We believe in you and what has been revealed to you, so do you fear for us?” He said, “Yes, indeed the hearts are between two fingers among the fingers of Allah and He turns them how He pleases”. By Allah! This is (true) understanding, that a person does not feel safe about himself, for indeed Satan flows through the human being like blood. Therefore, a person should guard his heart, intellect, and deeds ardently more than he guards his wealth and honour. Whoever is given authority to look after his affairs is obligated to guard his heart before everything else.

رَبَّنَا لَا تُزِغْ قُلُوبَنَا بَعْدَ إِذْ هَدَيْتَنَا وَهَبْ لَنَا مِن لَّدُنكَ رَحْمَةً ۚ إِنَّكَ أَنتَ الْوَهَّابُ

Our Lord! Let not our hearts deviate (from the truth) after You have guided us, and grant us mercy from You. Truly, You are the Bestower]. [ Surah Aal Imraan’ Aayah 8] [4]

We ask Allah:

اللَّهُمَّ بِعِلْمِكَ الْغَيْبَ وَقُدْرَتِكَ عَلَى الْخَلْقِ أَحْيِنِي مَا عَلِمْتَ الْحَيَاةَ خَيْراً لِي وَتَوَفَّنِي إِذَا عَلِمْتَ الْوَفَاةَ خَيْراً لِي، اللَّهُمَّ إِنِّي أَسْأَلُكَ خَشْيَتَكَ فِي الْغَيْبِ وَالشَّهَادَةِ، وَأَسْأَلُكَ كَلِمَةَ الْحَقِّ فِي الرِّضَا وَالْغَضَبِ، وَأَسْأَلُكَ الْقَصْدَ فِي الْغِنَى وَالْفَقْرِ، وَأَسْأَلُكَ نَعِيماً لَا يَنْفَذُ، وَأَسْأَلُكَ قُرَّةَ عَيْنٍ لَا تَنْقَطِعُ، وَأَسْأَلُكَ الرِّضِا بَعْدَ الْقَضَاءِ، وَأَسْأَلُكَ بَرْدَ الْعَيْشِ بَعْدَ الْمَوْتِ، وَأَسْأَلُكَ لَذَّةَ النَّظَرِ إِلَى وَجْهِكَ وَالشَّوْقَ إِلَى لِقَائِكَ فِي غَيْرِ ضَرَّاءَ مُضِرَّةٍ وَلَا فِتْنَةٍ مُضِلَّةٍ، اللَّهُمَّ زَيِّنَّا بِزِينَةِ الْإِيمَانِ
وَاجْعَلْنَا هُدَاةً مُهْتَدِينَ

O Allah! By Your Knowledge of the unseen and by Your Power over creation, let me live if life is good for me, and let me die if death is good for me; O Allah! I ask You to grant me (the blessing of having) fear of You in private and public, and I ask You (to make me utter) a statement of truth in times of contentment and anger, and I ask You for moderation when in a state of wealth and poverty, and I ask you for blessings that never ceases, and I ask You for the coolness of my eye that never ends, and I ask You (to make me pleased) after (Your) decree; and I ask You for a life of (ease, comfort, tranquillity, etc) after death; I ask You for the delight of looking at Your Face (i.e. in the Hereafter) and yearning to meet You without any harm and misleading trials (coming upon me). O Allah! Adorn us with the adornment of Iman, and make us (from those who are) guided and guiding (others). [5]

اللَّهُمَّ أَصْلِحْ لِي دِينِي الَّذِي هُوَ عِصْمَةُ أَمْرِي
وَأَصْلِحْ لِي دُنْيَايَ الَّتِي فِيهَا مَعَاشِي
وَأَصْلِحْ لِي آخِرَتِي الَّتِي فِيهَا مَعَادِي
وَاجْعَلِ الْحَيَاةَ زِيَادَةً لِي فِي كُلِّ خَيْرٍ
وَاجْعَلِ الْمَوْتَ رَاحَةً لِي مِنْ كُلِّ شَرٍّ

O Allah! Rectify my religion for me, which is the safeguard of my affairs; rectify my worldly [affairs], wherein is my livelihood; and rectify my Afterlife to which is my return, and make life for me [as a means of] increase in every good and make death for me as a rest from every evil. [6]

[1] Sahih Muslim 118

[2] An Excerpt from Sharh Kitaab Al-Fitan Wal-Hawaadith Lil-Imaam Muhammad Bin Abdillaah Wahhaab. pages 11-12

[3] An Excerpt from ‘Adh-Dharee’ah Ilaa Bayaan Maqaasid Kitaab Ash-Sharee’ah – 1/200-202

[4] An Excerpt from Marhaban Yaa Taalibal Ilm’ pages 75-76

[5]https://salafidawahmanchester.com/2021/01/01/o-allaah-let-me-live-if-life-is-good-for-me-and-let-me-die-if-death-is-good-for-me/

[6]https://salafidawahmanchester.com/2020/12/29/o-allaah-rectify-my-religion-for-me-which-the-safeguard-of-my-affairs-a-tremendous-supplication/

[2] No hesitation to block or unfollow when we encounter this on social media

Written by Abdullah Jallow on . Posted in Contemporary Issues, Morals and Manners - 'Akhlaaq'.

In The Name of Allah, The Most Merciful, The Bestower of Mercy.

Allah, The Exalted, said:

وَمَن يَكْسِبْ خَطِيٓـَٔةً أَوْ إِثْمًا ثُمَّ يَرْمِ بِهِۦ بَرِيٓـًٔا فَقَدِ ٱحْتَمَلَ بُهْتَٰنًا وَإِثْمًا مُّبِينًا

And whoever earns a fault or a sin and then throws it on to someone innocent, he has indeed burdened himself with falsehood and a manifest sin. [An-Nisaa 112]

This phenomenon is increasingly prevalent on social media, masquerading as a call to promote virtue and denounce vice. Therefore, upon encountering such conduct online, it is wise to distance yourself from such accounts, irrespective of their identity. Do not engage with individuals who have succumbed to a mindset of desperation, seeking to deflect responsibility onto others, as they fear confronting the truth of their own failures and negligence. This conduct is not merely an unconscious defense stemming from ignorance; rather, it is a manifestation of egomania. The justifications they provide, shifting blame for their shortcomings onto external circumstances, serve only as a feeble diversion. Rather than withdrawing from one’s reprehensible pursuits, many of these people capitalise on the good suspicion held about them by followers on social media, relentlessly assailing others and depicting them as malicious adversaries intent on their downfall. Consequently, this creates an insurmountable obstacle to any reformative initiatives aimed at recognising, articulating, and tackling the root causes of their bad behavior. Thus, they persist in projecting their failures onto others and seeking to evade the confrontation of their own feelings. After close scrutiny of many of these accounts hiding behind the claim of enjoining good and forbidding evil, we found that their focus lies not in engaging in frank dialogue, but rather in safeguarding their self-image and alleviating feelings of anxiety, shame, inadequacy, or guilt. The verse cited at the beginning of this article clearly illustrates the malevolence of such conduct, as making false accusations, especially when the accuser is guilty of what he utters, is a grave sin.

Social media has unveiled the sordid nature of this behaviour among numerous individuals, whose arguments are often rooted in deceit or self-delusion. This has become increasingly troubling, as many users of social media struggle to confront their own flaws and admit their mistakes, despite the fact that to err is human. Instead, they prefer to unjustly cast their shortcomings onto others. Thus, it is wise to refrain viewing the posts of these people or engaging in dialogue with those who exhibit such behaviour. Nevertheless, this will not alter their situation. Umar Ibn Al-Khattab, may Allah be pleased with him, said:

”People were (sometimes) judged by the revealing of a Divine Inspiration during the lifetime of Allah’s Messenger, but now there is no longer any more (new revelation). Now we judge you by the deeds you practice publicly, so we will trust and favour the one who does good deeds in front of us, and we will not call him to account about what he is really doing in secret, for Allah will judge him for that; but we will not trust or believe the one who presents to us with an evil deed even if he claims that his intentions were good.’’ [Sahih Al-Bukhari. 2641]

Imam Abdul Aziz Bin Baz, may Allah have mercy upon him, said: “Whoever manifests good, it will be accepted from him and a good suspicion is held about him. And if he manifests evil, it will be held against him and an evil suspicion is held about him”. [1]

We ask Allah: [اللهم كما حَسَّنْت خَلْقِي فَحَسِّنْ خُلُقِي – O Allah! Just as You made my external form beautiful, make my character beautiful as well].

[1] An Excerpt from Al-Hulalul Ibreeziyyah Min At-Taleeqaat Al-Baaziyyah Alaa Sahih Al-Bukhari 2/397. Footnote 1

[1] No hesitation to block or unfollow when we encounter this on social media

Written by Abdullah Jallow on . Posted in Contemporary Issues, Methodology - 'Manhaj', Morals and Manners - 'Akhlaaq', Scholars of Islam.

In The Name of Allah, The Most Merciful, The Bestower of Mercy.

وَمِنَ ٱلنَّاسِ مَن يُعْجِبُكَ قَوْلُهُۥ فِى ٱلْحَيَوٰةِ ٱلدُّنْيَا وَيُشْهِدُ ٱللَّهَ عَلَىٰ مَا فِى قَلْبِهِۦ وَهُوَ أَلَدُّ ٱلْخِصَامِ

And of mankind there is he whose speech may please you (O Muhammad), in this worldly life, and he calls Allah to witness as to that which is in his heart, yet he is the most quarrelsome of the opponents. [Al-Baqarah. 204]

“And of mankind there is he whose speech may please you in this worldly life”- Meaning, the one who hears his speech is pleased when he speaks and he thinks that he has uttered beneficial speech. He emphasises what he says and he calls Allah to witness as to that which is in his heart; states that Allah knows that what is in his heart agrees with what he says, even though he is lying regarding what he says because his speech contradicts his deeds. His speech would have agreed with his deeds had he being truthful, because this the case regarding the believers- those who are not hypocrites. And due to this, Allah said: [وَهُوَ أَلَدُّ ٱلْخِصَامِ – yet he is the most quarrelsome of the opponents]-Meaning, when you disagree with him, you’ll find him to be the most quarrelsome, bigoted and difficult person to deal with, as well as the ugly characteristics that results from this behaviour, which are the opposite of the manners of the believers- those who make ease their way, submit to the truth and pardon people. [1]

Al-Hafidh Ibn Hajar, may Allah have mercy upon him, said: Fujur Fil Khusumah (Immorality during dispute) is to turn away from the truth and the trickery employed to reject it. This implies that when one engages in a dispute, he resort to all unlegislated (means) and using tricks to take the opponent’s rightful claim, thereby straying from the straight path. [2]

Imam Muhammad Ibn Salih al-Uthaymin, may Allah have mercy upon him, said: Immorality (during) dispute is two types: the first is to claim what does not belong to oneself, and the second is to deny what is obligated to him (or what is rightfully owed). [3] When he disputes with another person regarding (an owed) right, he behaves immorally. The meaning of Fujur (immoral behaviour) is deception, rejecting what is obligated to him or claiming what does not belong to them. [4]

The Imam also said:

O student of knowledge! It is obligated to you to abandon (blameworthy) debate and argumentation because debate and argumentation is a means to cutting off the path to what is correct, makes a person speak to give the upper hand to himself. Even if the truth is made clear to him, you will find him either rejecting it or misconstruing the truth -out of disliking it- to give himself the upper hand and compel his opponent to accept his statement. Therefore, if you notice (blameworthy) debate and argumentation from your brother when the truth is very clear, but he does not follow it, flee from him like you would flee from a lion, and say, “I do not have anything other than the truth I have mentioned to you”. [5]

Imam Al-Barbahaaree, may Allah have mercy upon him, said: Al-Hasan (al-Basree) said, “The wise man does not argue or seek to overcome with stratagem rather he propagates his wisdom. If it is accepted, he praises Allah and if it is rejected he praises Allah”. [Sharh As-Sunnah]

Al-Allamah Salih Al-Fawzan, may Allah have mercy upon him, said:

Quotes:

The wise man is the one who posses wisdom, and wisdom is to place something in its place. Similarly, the wise one means the one with understanding.

He does not debate (with) a fruitless debate that is devoid of benefit.

He propagates his knowledge and if accepted he praises Allah. This is what is sought after.  If it is not accepted, he is absolved of his responsibility and the proof is conveyed.

“He praises Allah” because he established and conveyed the proof, and fulfilled what is required of him, and the guiding of the hearts is in the hands of Allah. (6)

People who fully and truly understood the great significance of time
https://salafidawahmanchester.com/2025/01/04/people-who-fully-and-truly-understood-the-great-significance-of-time/

[1]An Excerpt from Tafsir as-Sadi. slightly paraphrased

[2]Fat’hul Bari 1/90

[3]https://alathar.net/home/esound/index.php?op=codevi&coid=214183#:~:text=%D9%88%D8%A7%D9%84%D8%B1%D8%A7%D8%A8%D8%B9%D8%A9%3A%20(%20%D8%A5%D8%B0%D8%A7%20%D8%AE%D8%A7%D8%B5%D9%85%20%D9%81%D8%AC%D8%B1%20),%D8%A3%D9%86%20%D9%8A%D9%86%D9%83%D8%B1%20%D9%85%D8%A7%20%D9%8A%D8%AC%D8%A8%20%D8%B9%D9%84%D9%8A%D9%87

[4]https://alathar.net/home/esound/index.php?op=codevi&coid=39323

[5]An Excerpt from Sharh Hilyah Talib Al-Ilm page 246

[6] An Excerpt from It’haf Al-Qari Bitta’liqaat Alaa Sharh As- Sunnah Lil Imam Barbahaaree. 2/265-266

Reflections on some statements of Al-Allamah Rabee Bin Hadi Al-Mad’khali [80]

Written by Abdullah Jallow on . Posted in Contemporary Issues, Deviated Groups, Sects and Parties, Innovations In Islam (Bidah), Khawaarij, Methodology - 'Manhaj', Refutations.

In The Name of Allah, The Most Merciful, The Bestower of Mercy.

The Shaikh, may Allah preserve him, stated about Sayyid Qutb:

Indeed, the Fitnah of this man and those with him is the Fitnah of this era. It is the severest fitnah in this era because it (falsely) wears the garb of the Salafi Methodology (i.e. falsely attributes itself to Salafiyyah).

Adh-Dhari’ah ilaa Bayaan Maqasid Kitab Ash-Shariah 1/112