In The Name of Allah, The Most Merciful, The Bestower of Mercy.

Narratives of ‘Digital Tyranny’ as Instruments of Destabilisation in Muslim Countries

Abu Hurairah [may Allah be pleased with him] narrated that the Prophet peace and blessings of Allah be upon him] said, “Verily, the leader is a shield behind whom they fight and he protects them. If he commands fear of Allah and justice, he will have a reward. If he commands something else, it will be against him”. [1]

“The leader is a shield”, meaning, he is like a shelter because he prevents the enemy from harming the Muslims, preventing people from (harming) each other, and safeguarding the Muslim nation, and the people fear his authority. “Behind whom they fight”, meaning, they fight next to him against the non-believers (i.e. those non-Muslim nations that declare war against Muslim nations), the insurgents, the Kharijites, and all those who commit corruption and injustice. [2]

Undoubtedly, it is common knowledge that the advent of social media has brought forth a plethora of technological marvels, enabling individuals to engage, connect, and disseminate their creations with a diverse array of individuals hailing from various backgrounds. However, this invaluable medium of communication has regrettably fallen victim to the machinations of unscrupulous, malevolent, and cunning individuals, particularly those who orchestrate and wield influence over the discourse on social media platforms to sow discord within Muslim nations. In a matter of mere moments, they disseminate fabricated information far and wide, effortlessly translating it into numerous languages, both within their own circles and beyond, all under the guise of championing the concept of free speech. Henceforth, those who possess sound comprehension of the final infallible divine revelation do not under any circumstances predicate the notion of free speech upon the opinions of men; instead, they harbour a profound apprehension towards the repercussions of one’s words in both this life and the hereafter. They do not gauge the boundaries of free speech by the confines set forth by social media platforms; rather, they vigilantly shield themselves against any form of discourse that may precipitate ruin in this life and the next. The Messenger, peace and blessings of Allah be upon him, said: “Whoever believes in Allah and the Last Day should not hurt his neighbour, and whoever believes in Allah and the Last Day, should serve his guest generously, and whoever believes in Allah and the Last Day should utter what is good or keep silent.” [3] He also said, “When the son of Adam wakes up in the morning, all the limbs humble themselves before the tongue and say: “Fear Allah for our sake, (for) we are with you; if you are upright, we will be upright; and if you are crooked, we will become crooked”. [4]

Due to the rampant misuse of the privilege of free speech and freedom of expression through various social media networks and platforms, many Muslim authorities have emphasised the imperative of digital sovereignty, irrespective of any opposition they may encounter from tech conglomerates. They firmly believe in their right to restrain the influence of those who endeavour to disrupt the tranquillity of their lands under the guise of freedom, liberty, and free speech. It is abundantly evident to discerning individuals that the internet and social media have revolutionised numerous aspects of our lives, as they wield immense power to shape how people communicate and interact. Furthermore, it is crucial to acknowledge that these platforms can be exploited to manipulate human behaviour and emotions, destabilise nations, and exert an un-Islamic sway over public opinion.

Those who have mastered the art of sophistry, concealment, and misrepresentation proclaim, “Let not the rights of the populace be violated, nor their access to information be curtailed.” Yet, behind this facade of freedom of thought, they cunningly exploit their media platforms to cast a repugnant shadow upon sound beliefs and morality that are firmly grounded in the infallible final divine revelation. They employ captivating slogans and deceptive tactics to distort the true essence of sound beliefs, leading unsuspecting readers and listeners astray from the very truth that should awaken them to their fallacy. They bombard them relentlessly with a deluge of ambiguous information, leaving them ensnared in a perplexing state of doubt. These cunning individuals express their disapproval as Muslim countries and leaders strive for digital independence to safeguard their nations – vociferating, disseminating misinformation, and falsely accusing them of digital tyranny, as the Muslim leaders obstruct their channels of influence through which they sow discord, provoke the gullible, tarnish the morals of the Muslim youth, and undermine the stability of the Muslim countries. They say that Social Media Platforms serve as a gateway to foster communication and enable individuals to explore beyond their immediate cultural boundaries. Nevertheless, this technological advancement has inadvertently provided a platform for certain cunning ideologues, demagogues, militant secularists and liberalists, and instigators to effortlessly reach the susceptible populace in Muslim nations. This unrestricted access has, at times, granted them the power to sway public sentiment and lead astray a multitude of individuals.

Undoubtedly, the unrestricted availability of information often leads to confusion among individuals, making it difficult for them to accurately differentiate between falsehood and truth, clarity and ambiguity. Similar to how the Khawarij (ISIS and other terrorist groups) exploit Social Media Platforms to mislead young Muslims, certain ideologues, demagogues, rabble-rousers and their followers exploit these platforms to corrupt the minds of Muslim youth under the guise of free speech and liberty. Al-Allamah Salih Al-Fawzan, may Allah preserve him, stated, “The social structure of this country (Saudi Arabia) will be destabilised if its security is lost, then where would the Islamic world proceed? Due to this, the adversaries of Islam conspire against this country day and night, as you all know, sometimes scheming to sow seeds of doubt regarding its creed and propagate repugnant views among the offspring of the Muslims to instill idleness, extremism, or taking up arms, wield explosives, or to cause destruction; sometimes by corrupting manners, promoting forbidden activities and desires among the Muslim youth to corrupt their manners and strip them of their religious (convictions) under the guise of freedom of expression and other false statements”. [5]

This is how certain ideologues and their counterparts orchestrate and govern the discourse on social media, exerting their dominance over the dissemination of news to further their own agendas. They display a complete disregard for the number of individuals who may be sacrificed, as long as their own safety remains intact and beyond the reach of any Muslim governments seeking justice. Consequently, it is understandable why certain Muslim governments endeavour to establish provisions to protect their “digital sovereignty” and suppress the corrupt influence wielded by these individuals. They possess the rightful authority to regulate and determine what measures will safeguard the prosperity of their nations and establish the necessary guidelines. Muslim leaders are justified in intervening when certain individuals misuse media outlets to sow discord, disrupt peace, and threaten security. They have the authority to restrict access to these platforms, enforce compliance, and require data to be stored within Muslim territories to prevent any abuse of freedom of speech.

It is truly astonishing to witness the audacity of certain opportunistic ideologues and demagogues who have the nerve to lament about other nations hacking their networks and destabilising their crucial political institutions, all the while being guilty of the very same offense! It is simply mind-boggling how these individuals dare to complain about other nations expanding their influence, exploiting the divisions among their own citizens, and launching attacks on their social fabric based on race, gender, class, and religion when they (themselves) are guilty of perpetrating such crimes! The sheer hypocrisy is astounding! Furthermore, it is astonishing how these individuals have the gall to complain about a strategy being employed to destabilise their own country and exacerbate existing divisions when they are guilty of employing the very same strategy! It is a clear case of double standards and hypocrisy. This is one of their objectives on social media platforms, whilst awaiting the emergence of their pawns and internal plotters, who cunningly propagate slogans in the name of so-called liberty and freedom of expression. Subsequently, the gullible masses fall prey to their deceitful and embellished catchphrases. Both the Khawarij and certain ideologues, demagogues, globalists, and agitators have exploited social media networks and platforms to incite Muslims to take to the streets, thereby causing the ignorant among us to unwittingly dismantle our homelands. Hence, one must not be swayed by the alluring proclamations of these internal conspirators, regardless of how they adorn their rhetoric. Allah says:

وَمِنَ ٱلنَّاسِ مَن يُعۡجِبُكَ قَوۡلُهُ ۥ فِى ٱلۡحَيَوٰةِ ٱلدُّنۡيَا وَيُشۡهِدُ ٱللَّهَ عَلَىٰ مَا فِى قَلۡبِهِۦ وَهُوَ أَلَدُّ ٱلۡخِصَامِ
وَإِذَا تَوَلَّىٰ سَعَىٰ فِى ٱلۡأَرۡضِ لِيُفۡسِدَ فِيهَا وَيُهۡلِكَ ٱلۡحَرۡثَ وَٱلنَّسۡلَ‌ۗ وَٱللَّهُ لَا يُحِبُّ ٱلۡفَسَادَ
وَإِذَا قِيلَ لَهُ ٱتَّقِ ٱللَّهَ أَخَذَتۡهُ ٱلۡعِزَّةُ بِٱلۡإِثۡمِ‌ۚ فَحَسۡبُهُ ۥ جَهَنَّمُ‌ۚ وَلَبِئۡسَ ٱلۡمِهَادُ

And of mankind there is he whose speech may please you (O Muhammad), in this worldly life, and he calls Allah to witness as to that which is in his heart, yet he is the most quarrelsome of the opponents. And when he turns away, his effort in the land is to make mischief therein and to destroy the crops and the cattle, and Allah likes not mischief. And when it is said to him, “Fear Allah”, he is led by arrogance to (more) crime. So enough for him is Hell, and worst indeed is that place to rest! [Al-Baqarah. 204-206]

Despite the elucidations and admonitions provided by the senior Salafi scholars concerning the pernicious nature of the internet, orchestrated by those who exploit it to instigate discord among Muslim nations, certain duplicitous ideologues and demagogues are expeditious in their condemnation of Muslim governments when they expunge certain prominent video-sharing and microblogging platforms. Imagine the potential harm that could arise when corrupt individuals and troublemakers are given unrestricted access to a Muslim nation with approximately 34 million internet subscribers, 33 million users on various social media platforms, and 12 million individuals on a microblogging platform. It is truly heartening for believers when Muslim authorities take decisive action to shut down any network that promotes discord, violence, and chaos under the guise of peaceful protest and freedom of speech. The protection of the religion, lives, mental well-being, dignity, and resources of the Muslim community should always take precedence over financial gain, opinions that go against Islamic teachings, the supposed right to freedom of expression, and the alleged freedom of peaceful assembly. May Allah bestow more wisdom and firm resolve to the Muslim rulers in the fight against those who manipulate the public through language, gestures, and visuals – overwhelming individuals with content that undermines the morals ordained by Allah and substituting them with ideas that lead to disbelief, polytheism, vain desire, deviance, and corruption under the guise of digital freedom; endorsing wickedness and falsehood through rhetoric, all the while concealing righteousness and truth.

Indeed, it is truly pleasing to the hearts to see some telecommunication companies and phone operators in Muslim countries opting for locally developed apps over foreign ones. This move not only ensures the safety of citizens’ data within the country but also helps in prosecuting those who break the law, particularly those who incite social unrest. The Muslim authorities are to be commended for enhancing cybersecurity, safeguarding personal data, and upholding digital sovereignty to prevent malicious external forces from exploiting the data for their agendas. It is truly fascinating to witness the stark contrast in reactions when non-Muslim nations take measures to safeguard their national security, foreign policy, and economy by imposing restrictions on foreign apps and technologies. These nations recognise the imperative need to shield their internet-connected banks, trading systems, oil and water pipelines, dams, hospitals, and other vital infrastructures. Surprisingly, the naysayers and troublemakers remain conspicuously silent during these endeavours. However, their voices suddenly become amplified and filled with outrage when Muslim nations adopt similar measures. It seems that their discontent stems from the fact that they aspire to exploit social media platforms for purposes of cultural crusade. Nevertheless, certain Muslim nations and leaders have chosen to disregard the rhetoric of these detractors, as they comprehend the inherent risks associated with relying solely on foreign technology. Placing absolute reliance on such matters would entail the management of crucial infrastructure and communication systems that are entirely situated within foreign data centers and subject to foreign laws. Hence, it would be preposterous for anyone to criticise Muslim rulers for their pursuit of digital sovereignty, a path – inShaaAllah- that safeguard Muslim nations.

Similarly, it brings immense joy to one’s heart when some Muslim Governments expound upon the imperative nature of possessing cyber and electronic weaponry. This is because these formidable tools, when strategically employed, possess the capability to neutralise the ballistic missiles of hostile and aggressive proxies of the Rafidah and others during periods of strife, effectively incapacitating their Defence Industry and military command and control networks, thereby rendering the hostile enemy powerless by the Will of Allah. This noble initiative reminds us of the advice of Imam Abdul Azeez Bin Baz, may Allah have mercy upon him, regarding the dangerous causes of weakness. These causes include the negative consequences and implications that arise from weakness in the face of the enemy, as well as delays in taking action. It also involves inclining towards forbidden desires, being preoccupied with distractions that hinder us from the path of Allah and guidance, and lacking preparation in terms of industry and weaponry to effectively combat the enemy. The Imam emphasized the importance of industry in Muslim countries, highlighting the need for preparation and strength to deter enemies. Individuals must be self-sufficient and well-prepared so that enemies are aware of their capabilities and are deterred from aggression. It is also important to maintain physical fitness and avoid excessive luxury, to be ready for any potential conflict. Cooperation between the state and the people is essential in obeying Allah and His Messenger, as well as in making necessary preparations for defense, as stated in the Quran: [وَأَعِدُّوا لَهُمْ مَا اسْتَطَعْتُمْ مِنْ قُوَّةٍ – And make ready against them all you can of power]. [Al-Anfal. 60]

It is obligatory to make physical preparations – to equip ourselves with defensive and military gear, as well as other necessary equipment, to rely solely on what Allah has bestowed upon us and not be dependent on what our adversaries possess. Engaging in combat with the weapons our enemies possess is exceedingly challenging to attain because if the enemy obstructs our access to weaponry, how can we effectively fight in addition to poor insight and insufficient knowledge? [6]

The main duty of carrying out this endeavour rests on the shoulders of Muslim governments and their representatives, not on Hizb at-Tahreer or other extremist factions such as ISIS. The Muslim rulers, may Allah bless them with a firm resolve, have diplomatic relationships with other nations, and we beseech Allah to bless them with triumph in their efforts to protect Islam and the Muslim populace. May Allah pardon our faults and oversights. Ameen.

Must read on these links articles by Shaikh Abu Iyaad, may Allah preserve him.

Salafi Shaikh Fawzaan on Jihaad in our times and the guidelines of Jihaad according to Islam
https://www.abukhadeejah.com/salafi-shaikh-fawzaan-on-jihaad-in-our-times-and-the-guidelines-of-jihaad-according-to-islam/

The Islamic Shariah on the Foundation of Muslim Relations With Non-Muslims Who Do Not Show Aggression and Hostility
http://www.shariah.ws/articles/szsumlh-the-foundation-of-muslim-relations-with-non-muslims-who-do-not-show-aggression-and-hostility.cfm

Islam and the Muslims Are Free and Innocent of the Kharijite Extremists and the Islamic Shariah Has Come With a Command to Fight Them
http://www.shariah.ws/articles/nmsdfkp-islam-and-the-muslims-are-free-and-innocent-of-the-kharijite-extremists.cfm

[1] Ṣaḥih Muslim 1841

[2] Sharh Sahih Muslim 12/193. Publisher: Daar Al-Kutub al-Ilmiyyah. 1st Edition 1421 AH (2000)]

[3] Al-Bukhaari 6136]

[4] Sahih At-Tirmidhi Number 2407

[5] http://www.alfawzan.af.org.sa/node/2529. paraphrased

[6]https://binbaz.org.sa/discussions/42/%D8%A7%D8%B3%D8%A8%D8%A7%D8%A8-%D8%B6%D8%B9%D9%81-%D8%A7%D9%84%D9%85%D8%B3%D9%84%D9%85%D9%8A%D9%86-%D8%A7%D9%85%D8%A7%D9%85-%D8%B9%D8%AF%D9%88%D9%87%D9%85-%D9%88%D9%88%D8%B3%D8%A7%D9%89%D9%84-%D8%A7%D9%84%D8%B9%D9%84%D8%A7%D8%AC paraphrased

In The Name of Allah, The Most Merciful, The Bestower of |Mercy.

Allah, The Exalted, said:

وَلَا تُجَٰدِلُوٓا۟ أَهْلَ ٱلْكِتَٰبِ إِلَّا بِٱلَّتِى هِىَ أَحْسَنُ إِلَّا ٱلَّذِينَ ظَلَمُوا۟ مِنْهُمْ

And argue not with the people of the Scripture, unless it be in (a way) that is better (with good words and in good manner, inviting them to Islamic Monotheism with Allah revelations), except with such of them as do wrong. [Al-Ankabut 46]

In an opinion piece published in the Jerusalem Post by Louis Rene Beres, the focus was on the threat posed by Jihadist groups following the political changes in Syria. The author explored some of the Jihadists’ beliefs, particularly their interpretation of Jihad. While the writer aimed to highlight the dangers of Jihadist violence, the discussion fell short in providing detailed analysis and clarification on crucial points. Additionally, there was a noticeable lack of comparison between the actions of Jihadists and Netanyahu’s Zionist gang where it might have been relevant. It seems Louis chose not to make this comparison, as the central theme of the piece suggests that the primary issue is Jihadi violence rooted in religious beliefs, as indicated by the title, “Dying to kill Jews, other infidels: The jihadi way to conquer mortality.”

Criticism of the Jihadists and warnings about their approach is correct, as all of them, even those that do not pose an immediate military threat to Muslim governments, are indeed quite dangerous. However, the conversation is missing a clear explanation and clarification of the sacred texts referenced, which allows for various interpretations or may be dismissed by pro-Jihadists as lacking solid evidence. Therefore, we will analyse each statement made by Louis where there might be misunderstandings, misconceptions, ambiguity, exaggeration, or a failure to recognise the similarities in specific contexts between the actions of Jihadists and Zionists.

Louis stated: Following the collapse of Bashar al Assad’s regime in Syria, jihadi terror groups are being refashioned and reconfigured across the Middle East. [end of quote]

Response: It remains unclear what specific research Louis has undertaken or whose findings are being referenced in relation to this development. However, it is widely acknowledged that the proponents of Bidah are adept at seizing opportunities, particularly the Khawarij, in times of political turmoil. The Messenger, peace and blessings of Allah be upon him, said: “There will emerge from the east some people from my nation who recite the Quran, but it will not go beyond their throats. Every time a faction of them emerges it will be cut off”. The Prophet repeated it twenty times, adding, “Every time a faction of them emerges it will be cut off, until the False Messiah emerges from their remnants”. [1] The Messenger, peace and blessings of Allah be upon him, also said: “The Dajjal would be followed by seventy thousand Jews of Isfahan wearing Persian shawls”. [2]

It is, therefore, no astonishment to us when the Khawarij, whom we can also refer to as Jihadists, or certain factions within the Jewish community, such as the Zionists, instigate trials and tribulations.

Louis stated: Though there are evident and substantial differences between these groups, they all share a single overriding objective. This common objective is not geopolitical advantage or national self-determination, but “power over death.” Whatever else differentiates jihadi terror group ideologies and tactics from one another, all Islamist groups seek personal redemption through “sacred violence.” [end of quote]

Response: This why the upright scholars of Islam referred to them as Ahlul Bidah Wal Furqah- the advocates of religious innovation and discord, akin to the factions within Zionism and globalism, which, despite their internal differences, are unified by a singular ambition for dominance at any cost and by any means necessary. It is essential to recognise that the perpetrators of such violence extend beyond these Jihadi factions; the Zionists, too, bear the weight of culpability, having engaged in acts of brutality for over seven decades. While the Jihadists justify their violence through distorted texts and exaggeration, figures like Netanyahu similarly invoke religious texts to legitimise their own acts of aggression. [Footnote a]

Louis stated: In essence, jihadist terror is a convenient form of religious sacrifice. Moreover, the jihadi rallying cry, “We love death,” is common to both Sunni and Shia insurgents. In shrieking this perverse cry, no fundamental differences arise between Hayat Tahrir al-Sham (HTS) in Syria, Houthis in Yemen and Hamas/Fatah in Gaza/West Bank. [end of quote]

Response: Jihadist terror signifies a significant deviation from the authentic teachings and practices of the Prophet, extending beyond the realm of mere religious sacrifice. The pious predecessors revered martyrdom, yet they never resorted to the methods employed by today’s Jihadists. Moreover, the mention of Sunni and Shiite insurgencies merely reflects the phenomenon of khuruj, [Footnote b] regardless of the individual’s declared affiliation. Additionally, the identification with Sunniyyah has become a refuge for Jihadists and others who mislead unsuspecting Muslims, while also being exploited by certain demagogues, ideologues, and sensationalists in the media to tarnish the pristine methodology of the Prophet and his companions. It is imperative to clarify this matter, ensuring that pure Sunniyyah is distinguished from Bidah and the paths of those who advocate for innovation in the religion of Islam. [Footnote c]

The jihadi factions emerging in the West Bank, despite their misguided approach to resisting Zionist forces, are undeniably a direct consequence of the brutalities inflicted by Zionism. The Houthis, characterized as Rafidah and Khawaarij, [Footnote d] alongside Hamas, serve as strategic instruments for the Israeli Right. [Footnote e] While Louis astutely recognises the shared characteristics among these divergent groups and sects, it is essential to acknowledge that the jihadists in Palestine are fundamentally a product of Zionist oppression. Consequently, the turmoil we witness is rooted in Bidah, Zionism, and brutality.

Louis stated: Nonetheless, all jihadi forces seek “martyrdom” in order not to die. This is the case even though virtually all terrorist leaders in Hamas, Hezbollah, Islamic Jihad, Fatah enthusiastically prescribe martyrdom for their followers, but not for themselves. [end of quote]

Response: Martyrdom in Islam transcends the confines of the battlefield. [Footnote f] It is essential to recognize that the pursuit of martyrdom in combat must align with the righteous path established by the Prophet, as interpreted and enacted by the Sahabah. The teachings and rulings concerning jihad are well-documented within Islamic tradition, and they should not be shaped or interpreted through the lens of the actions, rhetoric, or ideologies of contemporary jihadists. [Footnote g]

Historically, monarchs, sultans, and emperors actively participated in battles alongside their troops until the very end. In contrast, contemporary heads of state do not engage in physical combat. The reasons for this shift are widely recognized and do not require further discussion. Furthermore, it is important to note that the Jihadists have no legitimate authority to engage in warfare or issue directives. Rather, they are categorized as Khawarij, extremists who adhere to misguided beliefs and innovations in religion. Similarly, while they conceal themselves and incite others to violence, Zionist leaders also command their military forces to execute operations under the pretext of self-defense and retaliation. This has led their armies to engage in actions that have been labeled as genocide. Jihadists find support primarily among those they have misled through slogans and distorted interpretations of texts. In contrast, Zionists have garnered backing from individuals who either feel a historical sense of guilt for past injustices against Jews or those who align with their geopolitical interests in the Middle East. Additionally, some supporters are motivated by distorted beliefs regarding the coming of the Messiah. This support for Zionist agendas has persisted for many years. [Footnote h]

Louis stated: Despite the easily discoverable commonalities of jihadi terror, the evolution of Palestinian criminal violence against Israel displays a unique historical narrative. The original fraternity of Palestinian terrorist groups contained extraordinarily disparate bedfellows. At that time, Israel’s “liquidation” (the primal term used most frequently in the terrorist lexicon) justified all manner of indiscriminate harms. Virtually every Arab enemy of Israel was urged to join in the obligatory war against “Zionists.” Even Marxists and similarly flagrant “unbelievers” found welcome under the same operational tent. [end of quote]

Response: Similarly, the evolution of criminal violence perpetrated by Zionist settlers against Palestinians presents a distinct historical narrative, despite the readily identifiable similarities between Zionist and Globalist transgressions. Zionist transgression is well-known.

Few Examples of Zionist Aggression

The Deir Yassin Massacre: Took place on April 9, 1948, near Jerusalem, during which between 107 to 254 Palestinians were massacred at the hands of the extremist “Stern” gang.

The Nasr al-Din Massacre: Took place in April 1948. Al-Lajjun Massacre: Took place on April 13, 1948, in a Palestinian Arab village in the Jenin District, where the Zionist Haganah gang attacked it and killed 13 people.

The Saliha Massacre: Took place in May 1948, during which 75 Palestinians were massacred.

The Abu Shusha Massacre: Took place on May 14, 1948, near the village of Deir Yassin, and claimed the lives of (50) citizens, including women, men, children, and the elderly.

The Beit Daras Massacre: Took place in northeastern Gaza on May 21, 1948.

The Tantura Massacre: Took place on May 22, 1948, in the occupied city of Haifa, and claimed the lives of about (200) Palestinians.

The Lydda Massacre: Took place on July 12, 1948, in the occupied city of Lydda, and resulted in the massacre of about (500) Palestinians, including (150) who were massacred inside the city’s Grand Mosque. The Zionists threw many of them alive into the town’s wells.

The Dawayima Massacre: Took place on October 29, 1948, when a battalion from the terrorist “Lehi” organization led by Moshe Dayan attacked the village and then began searching homes and shooting at its residents. Entire families were exterminated in the massacre, which resulted in the killing of 200 men, women, and children.

The Zionist massacres did not stop after the Nakba of 1948, but rather their frequency, intensity, and brutality increased in light of the use of more lethal and destructive weapons. Among the most prominent of these massacres were: The Sharafat Massacre, which took place in February 1951, in which 11 Palestinians were massacred, and the rest of the village’s people were displaced. The Bethlehem Massacre took place in January 1952, in which 10 Palestinians were massacred. The Qibya Massacre took place on October 14, 1953, in the village of Qibya, east of Jerusalem, during which (67) Palestinians were massacred, most of whom were women and children, and during which 56 homes were destroyed. The Qalqilya Massacre took place on October 10, 1956, when the occupation forces attacked citizens in the city of Qalqilya in the West Bank, during which about seventy citizens were massacred.

The Kafr Qasem Massacre took place on October 29, 1956, in which 49 Palestinians were massacred, including 11 children, when they were all returning home from work. The Khan Yunis Massacre took place on November 3 and 12, 1956, in which between 280 and 500 Palestinians were massacred.

In 1970, Zionist aircraft struck Bahr al-Baqar Primary School and Abu Zaabal factories, killing more than 150 Egyptian students and workers. In 1980, the extremist Jewish organization Kach attempted to blow up Al-Aqsa Mosque, and a shipment of explosives weighing 120 kg was discovered. The Sabra and Shatila massacre took place in September 1982. This massacre lasted three days, and its direct perpetrators were members of the Lebanese Phalange forces allied with the Zionists led by Ariel Sharon. The Ibrahimi Mosque Massacre took place on February 25, 1994, when a Zionist named “Barog Goldstein” stormed the Ibrahimi Mosque in the city of Hebron, and fired bullets and bombs at the worshipers. This massacre resulted in the massacre of 29 Palestinians. The Qana Massacre took place on April 18, 1995. [3]

There is no doubt that groups have come together, albeit through flawed methods, to challenge Zionists, while Zionists have united various sects and factions to invade Palestine. Today, different Jewish groups exist in Palestine, and nearly all, with a few exceptions, are complicit in the ongoing oppression. Certain Zionists find common ground with various allies, including figures like Tommy Robinson, to advance their objectives. In a similar vein, jihadists, driven by their flawed principles, are anticipated to forge alliances as well. However, Louis has not specified which Marxists have aligned themselves with jihadist factions. The concept of unholy alliances is familiar to those acquainted with Bidah, yet history also reveals instances where Jews collaborated with polytheists in efforts against the final Prophet, Muhammad, peace and blessings of Allah be upon him. Allah said:

أَلَمْ تَرَ إِلَى ٱلَّذِينَ أُوتُوا۟ نَصِيبًا مِّنَ ٱلْكِتَٰبِ يُؤْمِنُونَ بِٱلْجِبْتِ وَٱلطَّٰغُوتِ وَيَقُولُونَ لِلَّذِينَ كَفَرُوا۟ هَٰٓؤُلَآءِ أَهْدَىٰ مِنَ ٱلَّذِينَ ءَامَنُوا۟ سَبِيلًا

Have you not seen those who were given a portion of the Scripture? They believe in Jibt and Taghut and say to the disbelievers that they are better guided as regards the way than the believers (Muslims). [Nisa 51]

Louis stated: Things are now different. The jihadi terrorist fight is now openly oriented to the idea of “holy war” as religious sacrifice. This unhidden orientation is relentless, persistent, and conspicuously barbarous. The October 7, 2023 Hamas rape and murder of Israeli and other noncombatants is the most obvious case in point. In explaining such egregious crimes, history deserves pride of place. [end of quote]

Response: The institution of holy war, or Jihad, within Islam does not endorse the actions described, irrespective of who commits them. A rational individual cannot justify the events of October 7, which targeted non-combatants, nor can they accept any mistreatment of combatants that deviates from the principles outlined in Islamic law. This matter has been thoroughly discussed in the provided link. https://abuiyaad.com/a/amalekite-genocide-doctrine-gaza

While the events of October 7 were undeniably brutal, they pale in comparison to more than seventy years of Zionist violence, both within prison walls and beyond. It is essential to recognize that all acts of atrocity, irrespective of their nature or perpetrator—be it Jihadists, Zionists, globalists, Ba’athists, or others—deserve unequivocal condemnation.

Louis stated: Speaking on official Palestinian Authority TV, on November 7, 2014, a senior Fatah official blessed all Islamic killers of Israelis: “Jerusalem needs blood in order to purify itself of Jews.” Two days later, on November 9, PA television honored these same killers as follows: “Greetings and honor to our heroic martyrs… We stand submissive and humbled by what you gave and sacrificed.” Then on November 14, the PA Ministry of Religious Affairs summarized in Al-Hayat Al-Jadida: “Jerusalem needs sacrifices and blood.” [end of quote]

Response: Violence begets further violence. Should these assertions reflect the belief that non-combatants and unarmed civilians are to be harmed, no individual well-versed in the true essence of Islam would condone such actions. Yet, we find analogous declarations made by Zionists. Explore further on this link: https://salafidawahmanchester.com/2025/01/15/must-take-a-look-at-what-is-happening-in-their-own-backyard-first/

Louis stated: BUT WHO, exactly are these prospective “martyrs?” The deepest roots of jihadi terror originate from cultures that embrace religious views of sacrifice. In these cultures, the purpose of sacrifice extends far beyond any presumed expectations of civic necessity. Rather, this rationale goes to the innermost heart of individual human fear; that is, to the palpable and universal dread of personal death. [end of quote]

Response: The concept of sacrifice within religious contexts transcends mere martyrdom in the battlefield; it permeates every facet of faith, influencing personal conduct and interactions with others. A quintessential illustration of this principle can be found in the lives of Muhammad and his companions. Any deviation from their established path cannot be deemed a true sacrifice; instead, it veers into the realms of extremism or negligence. In Islam, life, death, and sacrifice hold significant meanings, yet they are distinctly separate from the narratives espoused by Jihadists and insurgents. The quest for death driven by extremism aligns with the ideologies of the Khawaarij and the Muta’assibah or Saffakoon among the Jews. “They were a group whose thought was close to that of the Pharisees, but they were very aggressive and believed in assassinating anyone who disagreed with them. They were called Saffaakoon (Those eager to commit Murder). They committed pillage, plunder, and transgressed against everyone who accepts submission to others besides them. Hostility occurred between them and the Pharisees because the Pharisees submitted to the Romans. Some of the researchers consider them to be from the political or nationalistic sects, even though their movement started within a religious framework, but great was their crimes which they committed from one place to another”. [4]

Louis stated: Jihadi enticements are not hard to appreciate. The promised reward for those who sacrifice for jihad is salvation. Says the Qur’an (Sura 2:154): “Do not think that those who are killed in the way of Allah are dead, for indeed they are alive, even though you are not aware.” [end of quote]

Response: Firstly, Jihadi enticements are easy to appreciate by those who do not understand the conditions of Jihad nor the creed and methodology of the pious predecessors, nor are they honestly clarified by those demagogues, ideologues and rabble-rousers who know what Islam truly stands for, but they deceitfully use the Jihadists to slander or blame Islam. The promise of reward in Jihad is not for the one who enters into it with ignorance and transgression. This verse is free from the extremism and misguidance of the Jihadists, instead was revealed regarding those who performed Jihad in obedience and adherence to the Sunnah of the Messenger, and it is something hoped by all those who embark upon Jihad when the Muslim rulers call them to Jihad after its conditions are met. For further clarity, we’ll quote the translation of the verse from the noble Qur’an by Al-Allamah Taqiyuddin Al-Hilali and Dr Muhsin Khan, may Allah have mercy upon them, as well as the commentary by Imam al-Baghawi, may Allah have mercy upon him. Allah said:

وَلَا تَقُولُوا۟ لِمَن يُقْتَلُ فِى سَبِيلِ ٱللَّهِ أَمْوَٰتٌۢ بَلْ أَحْيَآءٌ وَلَٰكِن لَّا تَشْعُرُونَ

And say not of those who are killed in the Way of Allah, “They are dead.” Nay, they are living, but you perceive (it) not. [Al-Baqarah 154]

The verse was revealed concerning the martyrs of Badr, who numbered fourteen individuals—six from the Emigrants and eight from the Helpers. People would often say that those who were killed in the path of Allah had passed away, leaving behind the comforts and pleasures of this world. In response, Allah, Almighty revealed the following:

ولا تقولوا لمن يقتل في سبيل الله أموات بل أحياء ولكن لا تشعرون

And say not of those who are killed in the Way of Allah, “They are dead.” Nay, they are living, but you perceive (it) not.

Similarly, Allah stated regarding the martyrs of Uhud:

وَلَا تَحْسَبَنَّ ٱلَّذِينَ قُتِلُوا۟ فِى سَبِيلِ ٱللَّهِ أَمْوَٰتًۢا بَلْ أَحْيَآءٌ عِندَ رَبِّهِمْ يُرْزَقُونَ

Think not of those who are killed in the Way of Allah as dead. Nay, they are alive, with their Lord, and they have provision. [Aal Imran 169]

Imam Al-Hasan Al-Basri, may Allah have mercy upon him, said: The martyrs are alive in the presence of Allah, and their sustenance is presented to their souls, bringing them joy, just as the torment is shown to the souls of the people of Pharaoh morning and evening, causing them distress. [5]

This verse, therefore, cannot be appropriated by Jihadists, as it was revealed concerning individuals who engaged in Jihad rooted in the authentic tenets of the faith, rather than the misguided innovations and deviations espoused by the Khawarij and Jihadists. Reflect on this once more. https://abukhadeejah.com/salafi-shaikh-fawzaan-on-jihaad-in-our-times-and-the-guidelines-of-jihaad-according-to-islam/

Louis stated: In the Islamist Middle East, where theological doctrine divides humankind into the dar al-Islam (world of Islam) and the dar al-harb (world of war), acts of terror against “unbelievers” have long been defended as an expression of sacredness. For jihadi fighters, individual sacrifice ultimately derives from a feverishly hoped-for conquest of personal death. By adopting atavistic practices, the jihadist expects to achieve an otherwise unattainable immortality. Usually, there is also the expectation of a variety of more sensual or lascivious seductive benefits. [end of quote]

Response: This assertion can only be articulated by one of three individuals: either one who wishes to misrepresent Islam, or someone who intentionally disseminates half-truths, or perhaps an individual merely echoing what they have heard without true understanding, feigning knowledge they do not possess. Firstly, humanity is categorised as Allah has ordained, into believers in Him and the Messengers and those who either disbelieve in Allah and the Messengers, or those who disbelieve in His Messengers. Allah said:

هُوَ ٱلَّذِى خَلَقَكُمْ فَمِنكُمْ كَافِرٌ وَمِنكُم مُّؤْمِنٌ وَٱللَّهُ بِمَا تَعْمَلُونَ بَصِيرٌ

He it is Who created you, then some of you are disbelievers and some of you are believers. And Allah is All-Seer of what you do.

Secondly, territories are classified into three distinct categories: Dar Al-Islam, Dar Al-Kufr, and Dar Al-Harb, with not every Dar Al-Kufr qualifying as Dar Al-Harb. It is a well-established fact among those who engage in the study circles of scholars and their students that a clear distinction is made between “dar al-harb [a territory in conflict with Muslims]” and “dar al-kufr [a territory of disbelief].” Dar al-kufr refers to a region governed by disbelievers, who enforce their own laws and systems. In contrast, dar al-harb denotes a territory ruled by disbelievers, devoid of any treaty, covenant, or peace agreement with Muslim governments. A land may be classified as “dar kufr” yet not as “dar harb” if a covenant or peace agreement exists between Muslims and that territory, stipulating a mutual commitment to avoid conflict until it becomes unavoidable. [Footnote i]

Without a clear understanding of the distinctions between Darul Kufr, Darul Harb, and Darul Islam, the insidious narratives propagated by deceitful writers, demagogues, ideologues, and jihadists would flourish unchecked. These jihadists exploit their misleading narratives, weaving together selective verses to misrepresent their violent actions against both non-Muslims and fellow Muslims. Meanwhile, unscrupulous writers seek to depict Islam as a faith bent on the annihilation of non-believers. In this context, the proponents of Bidah serve as instruments for these manipulative figures. The aspirations for conquest and martyrdom cannot be built upon Bidah, no matter how it is cloaked in the guise of sacredness or promises of eternal rewards. It was imperative that Louis elucidate the definitions of Darul Kufr, Darul Islam, and Darul Harb, emphasising that only legitimate rulers, equipped with the authority of governance, possess the right to declare war or peace in Islam—not jihadists or insurgents. Furthermore, any individual who identifies as a Muslim and breaches a covenant established by Muslim leaders with other nations commits a grave sin; should they harm a non-Muslim under a pact of safety, the consequences are well known. The Prophet, peace and blessings of Allah be upon him, said: “Whoever killed a Mu’ahid (a person who is granted the pledge of protection by the Muslims) shall not smell the fragrance of Paradise though its fragrance can be smelt at a distance of forty years (of traveling)”. [6]

Louis stated: For jihadists, there are certain aspects of sacrificial terror that ought never to be overlooked. This two-sided nature of terror/sacrifice – the sacrifice of “The Jew” and the reciprocal sacrifice of “The Martyr” – is explicitly codified, within the Charter of Hamas and elsewhere, as a “religious problem.” Always, for the Islamist terrorist, the true enemy is “The Jew,” not “The Israeli.” [end of quote]

Response: Terrorism, regardless of the target—be it a Muslim, Christian, Jew, Israeli [Footnote j], Hindu, or any individual—is unequivocally denounced. The identity of the perpetrator, whether a Zionist, Muslim, Christian, or any other, holds no significance in the face of such heinous acts. This is why when certain segments of the biased media persistently inquired about the condemnation of Hamas for the attacks on October 7th, the discerning senior students of knowledge unequivocally articulated Islam’s firm position against all who perpetrate such heinous acts, stating: “Our condemnation is on the basis that such actions are unjust and oppose Divine Legislation and not because of the race or ethnicity or religion of the perpetrators, and thus we are able to maintain moral consistency and integrity. This is unlike Western politicians who are able to swiftly condemn Russia’s invasion of Ukraine, and support Ukraine (the invaded and occupied in this case) with money and weapons for resistance, but unwilling to condemn the genocide and ethnic cleansing of Gazans, while supporting the Mileikowsky regime with bombs, missiles and military hardware to facilitate the execution of that genocide and ethnic cleansing”. [7]

Louis stated: Earlier, Yasser Arafat’s appointed clergy, preaching on the Temple Mount, affirmed an immutable religious precept: “Palestinians spearhead Allah’s war against the Jews. The dead shall not rise, until the Palestinians shall kill all the Jews….” [end of quote]

Response: Should such a declaration be made, despite the absence of concrete evidence or citation from Louis, it remains utterly intolerable and deserving of condemnation, akin to the abhorrent genocidal rhetoric espoused by Netanyahu and other Zionist figures, which is rightly denounced by all individuals possessing a modicum of decency.

Louis stated: Today, when jihadists of any type plan specific tactics of suicide terrorism – that is, when leaders give orders from Turkey, Qatar, Lebanon, Yemen, etc. for “believers” to make sacrifices of themselves – they leave nothing about immortality to chance. Because dying in the act of killing “infidels,” “apostates,” and “unbelievers” is certain to buy freedom from the penalty of dying, these jihadists can conquer mortality by killing themselves. [end of quote]

Response: It is important to avoid ambiguity in discussions like these. Louis should explicitly state which orders were issued for specific incidents. While it is true that terrorism exists in various countries, including those mentioned, we must refrain from vague statements or speculation. What we can assert with certainty is that since 1948, Zionists have engaged in acts of terrorism, as previously noted, under the supervision of their leaders. However, this acknowledgment does not mean we should ignore the atrocities committed by Muslims against unarmed civilians and non-combatants in Palestine or elsewhere. Regarding the sacrifices mentioned, Louis has not provided specific details or evidence about who issued these orders, making it difficult to discuss them further. Claims about killing infidels, apostates, and unbelievers have already been discussed under the subject matter of war and peace. Additionally, discussions about mortality in the afterlife is affirmed because every believer in Allah and His final Messenger is granted eternal life in paradise, even some of them face punishment for sins lesser than major polytheism and disbelief. Conversely, disbelievers face eternal consequences. Furthermore, we have already referenced the meaning of verse [2:154], emphasising those who genuinely adhere to its teachings, rather than interpreting it through the lens of the jihadi narrative that Louis briefly mentions, without clearly differentiating it from the legitimate jihad prescribed in Islam.

Louis stated: IT’S A grand and incomparable bargain, one that deserves much closer note in Jerusalem (and Washington). For Palestinian jihadists in particular, homicide-suicide represents not only the transient “death” of heroic Muslims, but also the required annihilation of a religiously despised Jewish state. Accordingly, the promised bargain is a “win-win” for all jihadi “warriors.” [end of quote]

Response: It’s important to recognize that jihad comes with its own set of rules, and those who break them are responsible for their actions. Additionally, it’s crucial to understand that violence often leads to more violence. While the actions taken by some Palestinians in their struggle against Zionism may seem extreme, it’s essential to consider the far more egregious reality of the 70-year occupation and the suffering endured by the Palestinian people.

Louis stated: Root problem of terror in the Middle East

Though not yet widely understood, the root terrorism problem in the Middle East is jihadi death-fear and the consequent compulsion to sacrifice certain despised “others.” In turn, this often-overriding compulsion stems from the doctrinal belief that killing unbelievers and being killed by unbelievers represents the best available path to personal immortality. [end of quote]

Response: Contemporary terrorism stems from various factors, but at its core lies a lack of genuine devotion rooted in the pure teachings of the prophets. Before the desire for death arises in this context, it is essential that certain ideas take shape, even if those beliefs are often distorted or misapplied. It is not only irrational but also deeply troubling to suggest that the act of killing non-believers is the ultimate route to achieving personal immortality. This perspective overlooks the fundamental truth that Allah created both believers and non-believers, and it is solely His authority to determine who lives and who dies. This narrative should not be propagated based on extremist motivations but should reflect the understanding of the Sahaabah. The Prophet engaged with Jews, Christians, and polytheists, adhering strictly to the commands of his Lord. Additionally, another significant issue is the ongoing brutality faced by Palestinians at the hands of Zionists for over 70 years, who deny them dignity and the right to self-determination. The events leading up to 1948 were also instigated over many years by Christian Zionists to serve their agenda. [Footnote k]

Louis stated: To counter such belief, Israel must think in terms of desacralizing its relentless Islamist adversary and convincing him/her that ritualistic murders of Jews will lead not to paradise and limitless lascivious pleasures, but, as the Qur’an also says, to untold “terrors of the grave.” [end of quote]

Response: The unspoken horrors of the afterlife await those whom Allah has chosen to punish. However, the faithful believer in Allah and His final Messenger shall ultimately find their way to paradise, even if they face retribution for sins that are not as grave as major polytheism or disbelief. In stark contrast, the disbeliever in Allah or His Messenger, or a disbeliever in both of them, is destined to dwell in the flames for eternity. It is quite remarkable that Louis chose not to elaborate on the Islamic teachings regarding the verses misinterpreted by extremists, nor did he seek to liberate Islam from such a misguided approach. Instead, he merely alludes to the repercussions of malevolent actions in the Barsakh. Thus, Louis selectively quoted what served the interests of the Zionists, failing to discern between truth and falsehood in every matter, and did not challenge the Zionists for their misdeeds in the article we are addressing, unless such critiques have been articulated elsewhere unbeknownst to us.

Louis stated: For all jihadi terrorists, the violence-based struggle against Israel and America has never been about land, “settlements” or “self-determination.” Always, it has been about God and immortality. In this regard, Israel and the United States should be reminded that there can be no greater “political” power on earth than “power over death.” This is the case even though any such ultimate power is obviously a contradiction in terms.

In the ongoing reconfiguration of Islamist terror groups following Bashar Assad’s fall in Syria, all of these groups will share a presumed stake in expanding terror violence. Going forward, therefore, Israeli planners will need to factor such adversarial commonality into their counter-terrorism protocols. Pertinent decision-makers will need to understand that transient name changes of regional jihadi organizations are of secondary significance. Whatever the apparent differences between HTS and its predecessors, all groups will continue to embrace terrorism as religious sacrifice. [end of quote]

Response: The ongoing struggle marked by violence stems from the relentless force of Zionism, which has subjected the Palestinian people to suffering for over seven decades. This is compounded by the destructive influence of kharijism, which spills blood across both Muslim and non-Muslim territories, alongside the insatiable greed and hubris of globalism and neocolonialism that have supplanted traditional colonial practices. The concepts of God and immortality have become mere slogans, wielded to rationalise heinous acts. However, Allah, His Messengers, and the divine truth of His religion remain untouched by the machinations of Zionists, kharijites, and globalists. The cycle of murder and devastation is a direct consequence of straying from the path of obedience to Allah and His Messenger.

Imam Ibn Al-Qayyim articulated this profound truth:

Whoever ponders upon the state of affairs of the world will find that every affair of rectification is due to Tawheed, singling out Allah in worship and obedience to His Messenger (Muhammad). And every evil in the world, trial, affliction, scarcity (in livelihood), being overpowered by an enemy and other than that is due to (our) opposition to the Messenger and the call to other than (the way of) Allah and His Messenger. Whoever truly ponders upon this and examines the state of affairs of the world- since its beginning and until the time Allah will take it away and those upon it- he will realise this affair regarding himself and others, in general and specific (circumstances). And there is no Might or Power except with Allah –The Most High, The Most Great. [8]

Louis stated: In the ongoing reconfiguration of Islamist terror groups following Bashar Assad’s fall in Syria, all of these groups will share a presumed stake in expanding terror violence. Going forward, therefore, Israeli planners will need to factor such adversarial commonality into their counter-terrorism protocols. Pertinent decision-makers will need to understand that transient name changes of regional jihadi organizations are of secondary significance. Whatever the apparent differences between HTS and its predecessors, all groups will continue to embrace terrorism as religious sacrifice. [end of quote]

Response: The emergence of present day kharijites and Jihadists, with their varied slogans and affiliations, is an inevitable phenomenon, much like the persistent brutality, land appropriation, and propaganda associated with Zionism. While the jihadi factions in Syria are a relatively recent development, the oppressive actions of Zionists have been a longstanding issue for over seven decades. We denounce all forms of violence and extremism. Perhaps, one of the most compelling admonitions on this subject comes from Prince Turki Al-Faisal, may Allah protect him. Listen: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Z3-cWyFcK5w

And Allah knows best

——————————————————-

Footnote a:
https://abuiyaad.com/a/amalekite-genocide-doctrine-gaza
https://abuiyaad.com/a/slaughtering-children-holy-war/print
https://www.abuiyaad.com/a/pharoah-slaughtering-babies

Footnote b:
https://www.sahihmuslim.com/sps/sp.cfm?subsecID=MNJ16&articleID=MNJ160002&pfriend=

The Islamic Condemnation of Extremism and Terrorism. An eBook presentation for non-Muslims and for Da’wah.

The Khawarij Past and Present: ISIS Daesh in Iraq & Syria: Ibn Kathir (died 774 AH): If The Khawarij Ever Gained Strength in Iraq and Syria, There Would Be Mass Killing

Why do these militant Khawārij look upon the rest of humankind and see them as worthless scum who can be killed without regard?

Footnote c:
https://salafidawahmanchester.com/2025/01/05/sunni-shia-divide-a-brief-rebuttal-to-david-ben-basat-at-the-jerusalem-post/

Footnote d:

Who Are The Militant Hoothees?! They Are The Raafidah of Yemen!

Footnote e:
https://www.abuiyaad.com/w/hamas-israeli-right

Footnote f: The martyrs are of five kinds: one who dies of plague; one who dies of stomach ailment; one who is drowned; one who is buried under debris and one who dies fighting in the way of Allah. [Sahih Muslim 1914

Footnote g:

Salafi Shaikh Fawzaan on Jihad in our times and the guidelines of Jihad according to Islam

Footnote h:
https://salafidawahmanchester.com/2024/11/13/the-initial-rise-and-gradual-impact-of-christian-zionism-on-some-european-political-decision-makers/

https://salafidawahmanchester.com/2024/10/08/an-overview-of-christian-zionism-in-america-since-the-arrival-of-the-puritans/

American Christian Zionists’ Media Initiatives Aimed at Influencing Public Opinion, With a Brief Mention of The Concept of Greater Israel

Footnote i:

The Life of the Muhammad in Madinah: Treaties, Conquests and his Death (Islam 1.11)

Are Treaties With The Jews, the State of ‘Israel’ and other Non-Muslims Permitted? Is it Allegiance? Is it Apostasy?

Footnote j: http://www.shariah.ws/articles/duviqgl-shaykh-salih-al-fawzan-the-islamic-shariah-provides-security–for-muslims-and-non-muslims-and-those-who-violate-it-are-kh257rijites-who-are-to-be-fought-and-severely-punished.cfm

http://www.shariah.ws/articles/szsumlh-the-foundation-of-muslim-relations-with-non-muslims-who-do-not-show-aggression-and-hostility.cfm

http://www.shariah.ws/articles/nmsdfkp-islam-and-the-muslims-are-free-and-innocent-of-the-kharijite-extremists.cfm

Footnote k: https://salafidawahmanchester.com/2024/11/13/the-initial-rise-and-gradual-impact-of-christian-zionism-on-some-european-political-decision-makers/

https://salafidawahmanchester.com/2024/10/08/an-overview-of-christian-zionism-in-america-since-the-arrival-of-the-puritans/

American Christian Zionists’ Media Initiatives Aimed at Influencing Public Opinion, With a Brief Mention of The Concept of Greater Israel

[1] Sahih Ibn Majah 174

[2] Sahih Muslim 2944

[3] Compiled from various old Arab Newspapers

[4] Al-Faslu Fil Milal Wal-Ahwaa Wan-Nihal. 1/177-179 By Ibn Hazm. Publisher: Daar Al Jeel 1405AH.

[5] Tafsir Al-Baghawi

[6] Sahih al-Bukhari 6914

[7]https://abuiyaad.com/a/amalekite-genocide-doctrine-gaza

[8] Badaa’i Al-Fawaa’id 3/525-526]