He knows you well when He created you from the earth [Adam], and when you were fetuses in your mothers’ wombs. So ascribe not purity to yourselves. He knows best him who fears Allah and keeps his duty to Him. [An-Najm. 32]
Imam As-Sadi, may Allah have mercy upon him, said:
Weakness is present and witnessed from you since the time Allah created you from the earth [i.e. the origin of your father (Adam- peace be upon him)] and whilst you were in the wombs of your mothers. Even though Allah places strength in you to perform what you have been commanded, however, you have not ceased being weak. [فَلَا تُزَكُّوا أَنفُسَكُمْ – So ascribe not purity to yourselves]- Meaning: Do not address the people about (yourself) by way of praise. [هُوَ أَعْلَمُ بِمَنِ اتَّقَىٰ- He (Allaah) knows best him who fears Allah and keep his duty to Him]- Meaning: Because indeed fear of Allah is situated in the heart and Allah (alone) is the One acquainted with its (true reality). [1]
O you who believe! Let not a group scoff at another group, it may be that the latter are better than the former; nor let (some) women scoff at other women, it may be that the latter are better than the former. [Al-Hujurat. 11]
Al-Allamah Salih al-Fawzan, may Allah preserve him, stated:
Scoffing at Muslims is not permissible, rather a Muslim has status. A Muslim has rights that Allah has given and to be fulfilled by other Muslims, which cannot be violated. Therefore, it is not permissible to scoff at a Muslim or make fun of him. It may be that the one you scoff at is better than you in the sight of Allah. Therefore, do not scoff at people regardless of how poor they may be, regardless of what their appearance may be concerning their clothing or physical appearance. This is because the Prophet, peace and blessings of Allah be upon him, said, “Many a person with dishevelled hair and covered with dust is turned away from the doors (whereas) were he to swear by Allah (about something), Allah will fulfil it”. [a] This person is a close friend among the close friends of Allah and were he to swear by Allah (about something), Allah would make it happen due to his high status in the sight of Allah, even though he is driven away from the doors. If he intercedes (for someone), his intercession will not be accepted; if he is absent, he is not missed, but he is a great one in the sight of Allah. So do not scoff at a believer whatever his status is, for indeed a believer is noble in the sight of Allah [Glorified and Exalted be He]. A believer has a station. has rights (that are not to be violated) and status in the sight of Allah. [2]
Imam An-Nawawi, may Allah have mercy upon him, said:
This type of person is one whom the people drive away from their doors in humiliation, but he is someone that if he were to swear by Allah about something, Allah will make it happen as an honour for him- by answering his request and safeguarding him from sin with regards to his oath. This is due to his great station in the sight of Allah [The Exalted], even though he is someone despised in the sight of the people. It is said that the meaning of [الْقَسَمِ in this hadeeth is (الدُّعَاءُ – supplication) and (إِبْرَارُهُ ) means (إِجَابَتُهُ -the response to the supplication)]. [3]
We ask Allah not to allow us to be deceived by the good opinions people hold about us, as Imam Al-Qahtaanee, may Allah have mercy upon him, said:
“And You (Allah) have placed love for me within the hearts….And the affection from You is through mercy and kindness….And You have spread – amongst the people – good about me… And conceal my acts of disobedience from their eyes…And you have made my good mention amongst the people common (or widespread)…until you made them all my brothers….By Allaah, if they knew the repugnance of my secret affairs (or inner self)….The one who meets me would have refused to give me Salaams…And they would have turned away from me and loath my companionship…And I would have brought disgrace upon myself after being honoured…But you conceal my faults and deficiencies…And you dealt with my sins and transgression with forbearance (i.e. gave me the opportunity to repent)…So all praise and commendations- by way of my thoughts, limbs, and tongue- is Yours…. [4]
[1] An Excerpt from “Tafseer As-Sadi”
[2] An Excerpt from “It’haaf at-Tullaab Bi-Sharh Mandhumah Al-Aadab. 101-102
[a] Sahih Muslim. Number 2662. Kitaab Al-Bir Was-Silah Wal Aadab
[3] An Excerpt from “Sharh Saheeh Muslim” Vol 15-16’ page 144’ publisher: Daar Kutub Al-Ilmiyyah’ 1st ed. (1421AH- Year 2000)]
[4] Refer to first lines of Al-Qahtaanee’s Nooniyyah
In The Name of Allah, The Most Merciful, The Bestower of Mercy.
Imam Ibn Battah, may Allah have mercy upon him, said:
Know, O my brothers! I have pondered over the reason that expelled a people from the Sunnah and the Jama’ah, compelled them to bidah and ignominy, opened up a door of trial to their hearts and prevented them from the light of truth that enables a person to make good judgements; thus, I found that (coming) from two angles: (Unnecessary) research and debate, asking too much concerning that which is of no benefit- (matters that are) neither harmful to an ignoramus nor beneficial to the believer’s understanding. The other (reason) is sitting with (a person) whose Fitnah one is not safe from and (is a cause of) corrupting the heart of the one who accompanies him.
In The Name of Allah, The Most Merciful, The Bestower of Mercy.
Question: A Muslim testifies that none has the right to be worshipped except Allah and that Muhammad, peace and blessings of Allah be upon him, is the Messenger of Allah, but when standing up or sitting down, he says, “Yaa Rasulal lah -O Messenger of Allah!” or “Yaa Abal Qasim – O Abu Qasim!” or “Yaa Abdal Qaadir- O Abdul Qadir!” or what similar to these statements related to Al-Isti’anah [i.e. seeking aid and assistance]. What is the ruling on this?
Answer: A person calling [i.e. invoking] the Messenger of Allah, peace and blessings of Allah be upon him, or other than him, such as Abdul Qadir Al-Jaylaani or Ahmad at-Tijaani, when standing up or sitting down, and seeking assistance in that [action], or what is similar to this, in order to receive a benefit or repel harm- is a type of Shirk Akbar that was widespread during the pre-Islamic era of ignorance. Allah sent His Messenger, peace and blessings of Allah be upon him, to put an end to it, save the people from it, guide the people to single out Allah in worship and supplication. This is because Al-Isti’aanah [seeking aid and assistance] is an act of worship and whoever performs it for other than Allah is a Mushrik. [Footnote a]
Allah directed and taught His slaves to say:
إِيَّاكَ نَعْبُدُ وَإِيَّاكَ نَسْتَعِينُ
You (Alone) we worship, and You (Alone) we ask for help (for each and everything). [1:5]
Allah said:
وَأَنَّ الْمَسَاجِدَ لِلَّهِ فَلَا تَدْعُوا مَعَ اللَّهِ أَحَدًا
And the mosques are for Allah (Alone), so invoke not anyone along with Allah]. [72:18]
Allah clarified that He (alone) controls harm and benefit; He alone removes harm and bestows blessings; He alone is the one who bestows good upon His slaves and preserves it for them. None can withold what Allaah gives and none can bestow that which Allah withholds. None can prevent what He has decreed and He is able to do all things. Allah said:
And invoke not besides Allah, any that will neither profit you, nor hurt you, but if (in case) you did so, you shall certainly be one of the Zalimun (polytheists and wrong-doers). ” And if Allah touches you with hurt, there is none who can remove it but He; and if He intends any good for you, there is none who can repel His Favour which He causes it to reach whomsoever of His slaves He will. And He is the Oft-Forgiving, Most Merciful. [10:106-107]
He merges the night into the day (i.e. the decrease in the hours of the night are added to the hours of the day), and He merges the day into the night (i.e. the decrease in the hours of the day are added to the hours of the night). And He has subjected the sun and the moon, each runs its course for a term appointed. Such is Allah your Lord; His is the kingdom. And those, whom you invoke or call upon instead of Him, own not even a Qitmir (the thin membrane over the date-stone). If you invoke (or call upon) them, they hear not your call, and if (in case) they were to hear, they could not grant it (your request) to you. And on the Day of Resurrection, they will disown your worshipping them. And none can inform you (O Muhammad) like Him Who is the All-Knower (of each and everything). [35:13-14]
And who is more astray than one who calls (invokes) besides Allah, such as will not answer him till the Day of Resurrection, and who are (even) unaware of their calls (invocations) to them? And when mankind are gathered (on the Day of Resurrection), they (false deities) will become enemies for them and will deny their worshipping. [46:5-6]
And whoever invokes (or worships), besides Allah, any other ilah (god), of whom he has no proof, then his reckoning is only with his Lord. Surely! Al-Kafirun (the disbelievers in Allah and in the Oneness of Allah, polytheists, pagans, idolaters, etc.) will not be successful. [23:117]
In these verses, Allah stated that it is disbelief and polytheism to invoke others besides Him. He informed (us) that there is none more astray than the one who invokes others besides Him.
The Prophet, peace and blessings of Allah be upon him, said to Ibn Abbas, may Allah be pleased with him and his father:
وإذا سألت فاسأل الله، وإذا استعنت فاستعن بالله
If you ask (i.e. supplicate), then ask Allah. And if you seek help, seek help from Allaah. [Sahih Al-Jami 7957]
The Prophet, peace and blessings of Allah be upon him, also said:
الدعاء هو العبادة
Supplication is the core of worship. [Sahih Al-Jami 3407]
Fatawa Al-Lajnah Ad-Da’imah 1/163
—————-
Footnote a:
Ibn Taymiyyah on Shirk and the Excuse of Ignorance | AbuIyaad.Com
https://abuiyaad.com/a/ibn-taymiyyah-shirk-excuse-of-ignorance
Manhaj.Com | excuse of ignorance
https://www.manhaj.com/manhaj/tags/excuse-of-ignorance.cfm
And they bring no (argument or objection by way of a) similitude (in order to criticise this Qur’ān and oppose your message) except that We bring you the truth and the better explanation thereof (through a similitude that is superior to theirs, provides detail and invalidates their objection). https://www.thenoblequran.com/q/#/search/25_33
Irfan Fard has once again embarked on his campaign of malicious defamation, linking the noble term “Islamic” with the abhorrent concept of terrorism, all while being granted a platform by those with Zionist affiliations. It is hardly surprising that such a charlatan finds support among individuals who would perceive Islam as a barrier to their own misguided beliefs and the distortion of the true path of the Prophets. Irfan’s actions stem from a desire to promote an alternative governance system, one that stands in stark contrast to that of the Rafidah. His animosity is not rooted in a quest for the establishment of Allah’s laws, but rather in a relentless pursuit of worldly power and recognition, masquerading as a commitment to justice. True justice can only be derived from the Qur’an and Sunnah, as interpreted and practiced by the Prophet’s companions. Neither the Rafidah nor the self-serving ambitions of Irfan, supported by Zionist interests, can offer a legitimate foundation for justice. Therefore, we once again present the link where Shaikh Abu Khadeejah, may Allah preserve him, eloquently and unequivocally demonstrates that terrorism can never be aligned with Islam, despite Irfan’s persistent slander. Following this, we will outline the motivations behind the actions of slanderers and deceivers, particularly those who harbour a deep-seated animosity towards the authentic Islamic terms. Read: https://abukhadeejah.com/terrorism-is-never-islamic-a-refutation-of-terrorism-based-on-the-texts-of-the-quran-and-sunnah-and-the-sayings-of-the-scholars-ebook/
Individuals like Irfan engage in a systematic approach to create the illusion of reality by affirming, reiterating, and disseminating falsehoods across various contexts. This strategy, while demanding persistence, gradually influences those who either hold misconceptions about the subject or lack detailed knowledge. This tactic mirrors the methods employed by politicians advocating for their agendas, akin to the repetitive techniques used in advertising to promote products. When founded on falsehoods, such repetition can insidiously embed ideas into the subconscious, eventually morphing them into beliefs and accepted truths. Once these inaccuracies are established as truths through continuous repetition, they proliferate among the public with little scrutiny, particularly when the actions of individuals associated with a targeted group are misrepresented in relation to the distorted idea. Irfan exemplifies this when he addresses the heretical Rafidah by linking their actions to the term “Islamic” and subsequently associating it with terrorism. Similarly, some other websites present their own distortions of Islam in varied ways, conveying different narratives. Thus, while the platforms and methods may differ, the underlying goal remains consistent: a relentless effort to distort truth into falsehood without substantiation, thereby shaping perceptions of reality. This process of transforming falsehood into perceived truth through repetition poses a significant threat to societal understanding. Consequently, the vast array of media content available today, along with its varied formats, timings, and presenters, has the potential to reshape long-held convictions among individuals.
The impact of this phenomenon is particularly significant for a generation whose perspectives are molded by ideologues, demagogues, and provocateurs masquerading as journalists and commentators. The act of repetition of falsehood wields considerable power over cognitive boundaries, hindering the sound understanding or justified dissenting viewpoints. The intellect remains ensnared by this influence until it achieves liberation through a conscious detachment from its origins, thereby allowing reason to prevail: discerning acceptance and rejection based on the tenets of sound rigorous validation.
Advocates of falsehood, such as Irfan and the Rafidah, do not only seek to reshape ideas and manipulate thought processes but they also alter the very foundations of sound creed and methodology of the Prophets, which poses a serious concern. Even more alarming is the transformation of falsehood, solidified through repeated assertions over time, into doctrines, beliefs and methodologies that future generations come to accept. This results in a scenario where truth is misidentified as falsehood, leading to a distortion or misunderstanding of Islamic principles and terms. We recall a maternal uncle, may Allah have mercy on him, who was a journalist in Gambia, renowned for his eloquence and commitment to truth. His pursuit of issues significantly influenced our understanding of contemporary matters. However, after being guided to the Sunnah, we recognised the importance of grounding our judgments on the sound principles of verification and ascertainment as taught by the Salafi Scholars, may Allah have mercy on them, instead of blindly following anyone else, regardless of their eloquence and convincing arguments. Thus, when the misguided Irfan attempts to link terrorism with the term Islamic—an association as distant as the heavens from the earth—we clearly perceive the desperation within him to connect two entirely unrelated concepts. May Allah guide him or disfigure his deceitful tongue. Amin.
This article by Irfan, to which we are responding, also makes a sweeping claim that Islamic countries share a significant responsibility for fostering the harmful ideology represented by Khumeini. Irfan again uses the term "Islamic" to refer to Muslim nations in the context of Iran's actions, suggesting that these countries are also culpable. However, he fails to specify which countries support the Rafidah or which ones oppose their activities. Furthermore, it raises the question: which Muslim nation actually endorses the Rafidah's beliefs and propagates their destructive methods? Historically, scholars of Islam, both past and present, have unequivocally condemned the Rafidah, not out of a struggle for power, but due to a fundamental distinction between sound and corrupt beliefs. In contrast, Irfan's concerns about the Rafidah seem rooted in a power struggle and a desire for an alternative system that aligns with his vain desires. He has been given a platform by Zionist interests to pursue authority, driven by a lack of fear of Allah, which is what typically restrains a believer from chasing after leadership, regardless of the outcome. Read here: https://salafidawahmanchester.com/2025/01/14/a-sad-reality/
The upright Scholars of Islam and their students effectively counter the claims of the Rafidah from and their affiliates. [Footnote a] Rather than resorting to vague and misleading generalizations, an honest and fair-minded individual would clearly differentiate between those who endorse the actions of the Rafidah and those who challenge and denounce them. Additionally, it is important to recognise that all Muslim nations maintain diplomatic relations with other countries, regardless of the situation. This practice was established by the Prophet, peace and blessings be upon him, to promote the common good and mitigate the threats posed by adversaries. [Footnote b]
Political opportunism will not earn one the pleasure of Allah in the afterlife. True success comes from dedicating oneself to singling out Allah in worship and following the Sunnah of His Messenger. What makes Irfan’s actions even more troubling is his disparagement of the term Islamic in his quest for selfish worldly gains and a desperate grab for power. At the very least, Irfan should hold back from attacking the term Islamic, as we cannot prevent him from his conflict with the Rafidah, which is driven not by genuine faith but by an unquenchable thirst for authority. The Messenger, peace and blessings of Allah be upon him, said: “If Adam’s son had a valley full of gold, he would like to have two valleys, for nothing fills his mouth except dust. And Allah forgives him who repents to Him”. [Al-Bukhari 6439]
In The Name of Allah, The Most Merciful, The Bestower of Mercy.
Imam Muhammad Ibn Salih Al-Uthaymeen, may Allah have mercy upon him, was asked:
We are seeking an answer for this question regarding how to reconcile the hadiths: “There will not ceased to be a group amongst my Ummah upon the truth – manifest; neither harmed by those who forsake them nor by those who oppose them until Allah’s Command comes to pass” and the hadith “The hour (i.e. day of Judgement) will not be established except in the midst of the most evil people”.
Response: All praise be to Allah, Lord of the worlds, and may Allah’s peace and blessings be upon our Prophet Muhammad, and all his family and companions. Neither is it possible for the Qur’an to contradict itself nor is it possible for the authentic Sunnah that was reported from Allah’s Messenger, peace and blessings of Allah be upon him, to contradict itself, nor is it possible for the authentic Sunnah to contradict the Qur’an vice versa. Neither is it possible for the Qur’an and the Sunnah to contradict (what the true reality is and should be) nor is it possible for the Qur’an and authentic Sunnah to contradict sound intellect. This is because the Qur’an is the speech of Allah, and Allah [The Exalted] said:
Do they not then consider the Quran carefully? Had it been from other than Allah, they would surely have found therein much contradictions]. [An-Nisaa. 82]
This is because Allah’s speech is (perfect) truth and truth can never contradict itself. Also, the same applies to the authentic Prophetic Sunnah, it is (perfect) truth and can never contradict itself. Thus, based on this principle, we proceed to answer the question. The Messenger’s statement, “There will not cease to be a group amongst my Ummah upon the truth- manifest; neither harmed by those who forsake them nor those who oppose them until Allah’s Command come to pass”, and in another report, “Until the hour (i.e. Day of Judgement) is established”. The intent behind the phrase Amrullaah (Allah’s Command) in this hadith is when the believers and pious friends of Allah pass away- when the day of Judgement is very close. (As for the hadith), “The hour will not be established except upon the most evil people”, this means that when the believers and the pious die, only the most evil people will remain, and upon them the Hour will be established.
In The Name of Allah, The Most Merciful, The Bestower of Mercy.
Imam As-Suyuti, may Allah have mercy upon him, said:
When it is the case that exhortations are primarily aimed at the general populace, the ignorant storytellers discovered a way to achieve their objectives. Consequently, their bidah persisted until the situation escalated to concerning levels. Thus, they engendered evil outcomes in relation to their actions, statements, and goals.
They want to extinguish Allah’s Light with their mouths [i.e. the Qur’an, the pure Islamic monotheism, and the guidance Allah sent Muhammad with] but Allah will not allow it except that His Light should be perfected even though the disbelievers hate (it). [at-Tawbah 32]
Imam Ibn Kathir, may Allah have mercy upon him, said: They wish to destroy the guidance and religion of truth that Allah gave His Messenger through their arguments and fabrications, so their example in this is that of someone who attempts to put out the light of the sun or the moon by blowing at them, but this (person) can never succeed in doing so. [Tafsir Ibn Kathir]
Hatred has already appeared from their mouths, and what their breasts conceal is greater. [Aal Imran 118]
Irfan has once again sought to sully the noble reputation of Islam by linking the term “Islamic” with acts of terrorism, all while pursuing a personal vendetta against the heretical Rafidah under the pretense of promoting virtue and prohibiting vice. It is abundantly clear that their discord with the Rafidah is rooted in a struggle for political dominance, stemming from the Rafidah’s rebellion against their historical leader. Consequently, neither faction is genuinely concerned with adhering to the Sunnah of the Prophet, peace and blessings be upon him. The Rafidah aim to propagate their deviations from the Sunnah, while Irfan and his associates strive to dismantle the Rafidah’s influence and reclaim their former political authority in Iran. Both groups stand apart from the true essence of Islam and the Muslim community, as their pursuits are driven by selfish ambitions, positions of power, and their own misguided paths. The Rafidah cloak their deviations in the guise of Islam, whereas Irfan and his followers masquerade their actions as a fight against extremism. In this way, the Rawaafid exploit Islam to advance their Shirk and fabricated ideologies, while Irfan and his ilk use the banner of combating terrorism to tarnish and undermine Islamic principles. Just as we challenge the Rawaafid, we must also confront Irfan and his associates, urging them to disentangle their personal political aspirations from the sacred matters of Islam under the guise of combating extremism. The Ummah of Muhammad does not require their political stratagems or conflicts with the Rafidah, as both factions remain ensnared in misguidance.
Irfan and his associates must refrain from their hollow rhetoric and unworthy ambitions. If they feel the need to associate acts of terrorism with specific individuals based on solid evidence, they ought to ensure that their allegations are aimed at those individuals and their ideologies. Should they be convinced that the Rafidah are involved in such acts of terror, let their references be directed towards them, rather than casting a shadow over the term Islamic. This principle should be universally applicable to any group or organization that partakes in such despicable actions. Your persistent denigration of terms related to Islam indicates either profound ignorance or a deliberate intent to tarnish its reputation, perhaps as a tool for those who wish to undermine the faith. May Allah bestow guidance upon Irfan, or render his slanderous words ineffective. “Terrorism is never Islamic” as Shaikh Abu Khadeejah, may Allah preserve him, clarified. Must read: https://abukhadeejah.com/terrorism-is-never-islamic-a-refutation-of-terrorism-based-on-the-texts-of-the-quran-and-sunnah-and-the-sayings-of-the-scholars-ebook/
And mix not truth with falsehood, nor conceal the truth while you know (the truth). [Al-Baqarah 42]
Imam Ibn Al-Qayyim, may Allah have mercy upon him, said:
He (Allah) prohibits mixing truth with falsehood and concealing (truth). Mixing truth with falsehood is to confound truth with falsehood until one of them is confused for the other, and from this (results) deception, fraudulent maneuver, and cheating whose underlying reality contradicts the outward appearance. Similarly, when the truth is cloaked in falsehood, the perpetrator manifests falsehood in the image of truth and utters a wording that carries two meanings—a correct meaning and a false one, thus the listener may mistakenly think that the perpetrator intended the correct meaning, while his actual intent is falsehood. This is Ijmaal Fil Lafdh [general, unrestricted wording (or speech)]. As for ambiguity in meaning, it can manifest in two ways; one of which is truth while the other is false; its correct intended aspect is misconstrued, thus its intended meaning becomes false. The basis of Bani Adam’s misguidance lies in general wordings and ambiguous meanings, particularly when they encounter confused minds; so how about when accompanied by vain desires and fanatism? Therefore, ask the One (Allah) Who keeps the hearts steadfast to keep your heart steadfast in the religion He has ordained, and not allow you to fall into this darkness. [1]
Irfan Fard stated:
It has become increasingly prevalent for the misguided actions of certain individuals, groups, and sects to be unjustly attributed to Islam. When a person who identifies as a Muslim engages in reprehensible behaviour, various media outlets, journalists, ideologues, demagogues, rabble-rousers, and even sometimes some who ascribe to Islam – who lack a true understanding of Islam due to their extensive exposure to secular institutions and philosophies—tend to erroneously associate these actions with Islam or Islamic principles. This occurs instead of examining the individual’s personal shortcomings or lack of self-discipline, as well as their deviation from the teachings of the Qur’an and Sunnah as interpreted and practiced by the companions of the Prophet, peace and blessings be upon him. Such a strategy seeks to forge a misleading narrative that conflates the sound and robust Islamic principles, manners and methodology with the aberrations of those whose actions are neither Islamic nor commendable in any context. The ignorance or utter disregard for decency and integrity in discourse is starkly evident in the words of those eager to tarnish the pristine principles of Islam, just as they have previously distorted their own Scriptures and introduced numerous innovations into the path of earlier Prophets. Consequently, they aspire to do the same with Islam, despite being called by Muhammad, peace and blessings be upon him, to submit to the final revelation. After rejecting this divine invitation, they resort to waging an ideological war against Islam through their rhetoric, as Allah stated:
They intend to put out the Light of Allah (i.e. the religion of Islam, this Quran, and Prophet Muhammad) with their mouths. But Allah will complete His Light even though the disbelievers hate (it). He it is Who has sent His Messenger (Muhammad) with guidance and the religion of truth (Islamic Monotheism) to make it victorious over all (other) religions even though the (polytheists, pagans, idolaters, and disbelievers in the Oneness of Allah and in His Messenger Muhammed) hate (it). [As-Saff. 8-9]
O people of the Scripture! Now has come to you Our Messenger (Muhammad) explaining to you much of that which you used to hide from the Scripture and passing over (i.e. leaving out without explaining) much. Indeed, there has come to you from Allah a light (Prophet Muhammad) and a plain Book (this Quran). Wherewith Allah guides all those who seek His Good Pleasure to ways of peace, and He brings them out of darkness by His Will unto light and guides them to a Straight Way (Islamic Monotheism). [Al-Ma’idah 15-16]
The animosity many of them harbour stems from the final divine revelation that has unveiled their concealed intentions and misinterpretations. In response, they engage in a relentless ideological campaign against Islam, attempting to associate it with elements that would tarnish its noble reputation. Terrorism can never be aligned with the essence of Islam; indeed, no pure path of the Prophets can ever be linked to such heinous acts. How can one claim that terrorism is both prohibited in Islam and yet somehow Islamic? Such a statement reveals either profound ignorance or a blatant deceit, a mere facade of intellectual dishonesty. Many of these misguided notions trace back to the French King, Louis IX, who, during his crusade against the Muslims of Egypt in 1250, was captured and later ransomed. During his imprisonment, he contemplated strategies to undermine Islam and its followers, inspired by dark forces to pursue two primary objectives: first, to shift the conflict from the battlefield to one of ideological and cultural dominance; and second, to prepare the West to corrupt the beliefs of Muslims and distort the true image of Islam across the globe. [2]
It remains unclear what Erfan’s religious beliefs or ideological stance may be. However, by carelessly linking terrorism to the term Islamic, one can only conclude that he is either woefully uninformed and should refrain from discussing such matters to spare us from his distasteful ignorance, or he is a fervent ideologue whose pent-up frustrations manifest in deceptive rhetoric. This is precisely one of the paths Erfan Fard has chosen by associating terrorism with the term Islamic, rather than explicitly identifying the specific terrorist actions and holding accountable those who either misrepresent their motives under the guise of Islam or are misled by the rhetoric of extremist factions. Terrorism is not a product of Islam and can never be so, regardless of how often Erfan perpetuates this absurd and treacherous falsehood. He may continue to write until his ink runs dry, his keyboard shatters, or his fingertips are stained with the remnants of his words, yet none of this will impede the dissemination of true Islam, no matter the depth of his disdain. Read: http://www.islamagainstextremism.com/
Finally, as for the Rafidah, whether those from Iran, Yemen, Iraq or Lebanon, their affair is well known and there is no need to elaborate on their affair. Read:
If anyone killed a person not in retaliation of murder, or (and) to spread mischief in the land – it would be as if he killed all mankind, and if anyone saved a life, it would be as if he saved the life of all mankind. [Al-Ma’idah. 32]
Imam As-Sadi, may Allah have mercy upon him, said:
If a person is bold enough to kill someone who does not deserve to be killed, this implies that he does make a distinction between the one he killed and other than him; rather he would commit this act whenever his evil calls him to that. Therefore, his bold attitude that led him to kill is as if he has killed all humankind. On the other hand, if a person saves a life and does not kill – whilst his soul calls him to do so – due to fear of Allah, this is as if he has saved the lives of all humankind because the fear of Allah he possesses stops him killing one who does not deserve to be killed. [Tafsir As-Sadi]
Africans under Belgian King Leopold II, Jews under Nazis, and some other narratives
Numerous voices have emerged, some advocating and others contesting, the estimated number of Jews who perished under Nazi rule, much like the varying figures proposed regarding the toll of King Leopold’s colonial endeavors on African lives. Whether the figure stands at 6 million Jews, more or less, or 10 million Africans, again subject to debate, the loss of even a single life, judged by any standard other than divine law, is a profound injustice. Both the Nazis and colonial powers have drenched their hands in blood, as have many throughout history. Thus, the onus of research falls upon you to ascertain the true number of Jews lost to Nazi atrocities and the Africans who suffered under King Leopold’s brutal regime. Yet, the scourge of violence and oppression persists in our current age. Conflicts among Africans often arise from tribal animosities or are exacerbated by neocolonial interventions, where the greed of exploiters incites turmoil in African and Asian nations. In a similar vein, with the backing of Christian Zionists, [Footnote a] the Zionist movement has inflicted suffering and death upon Palestinians for over seven decades. The architects of these atrocities, the mass murderers and genocidal perpetrators of our time, are but the modern-day heirs to the violent legacies of ancient wrongdoers. The echoes of the Rwandan genocide and other conflicts resonate, yet it is essential to remember that Europe itself has a history steeped in brutal wars before it sought to export its violence through centuries of colonialism. Once again, we reiterate that these contemporary perpetrators are merely the successors of the ancient bloodshed. Herein lie examples of those who have historically reveled in violence.
The Tyrants of Aad
Allah stated that Prophet Hud, peace be upon him, said to his people: [وَإِذَا بَطَشۡتُم بَطَشۡتُمۡ جَبَّارِينَ – And when you seize, seize you as tyrants]– Meaning, when you want to attack with a whip or sword, you attack like tyrants, completely overpowering and being savagely violent – neither compassionate nor aim to discipline (within justice as commanded by Allah), nor contemplating on the consequences. (1) Allah gave them great strength and it was obligated to them to use this strength in obedience to Allah, but they became boastful and haughty, and they said: [مَنۡ أَشَدُّ مِنَّا قُوَّةًۖ – Who is mightier than us in strength? (Fussilat. 15], and they utilised their strength in disobedience to Allah, fruitlessly and foolishly, thus, their Prophet forbade them from that. (2) Their Prophet forbade them from that because it was done out of oppression. (3)
Verily, Fir’aun (Pharaoh) exalted himself in the land and made its people sects, weakening (oppressing) a group (i.e. Children of Israel) among them, killing their sons, and letting their females live. Verily, he was of the Mufsideen [i.e. those who commit great sins and crimes, oppressors, tyrants, etc.] [Al-Qasas. 4]
Cursed were the makers of the Ditch- the large ditch with the fire, given fuel (in abundance); when they sat around it, watching what they had (ordered to be done) to the believers, who they resented for no reason other than belief in Allah- The Almighty, the Praiseworthy, the One to Whom belongs the kingdom of the heavens and earth. And Allah is a Witness over all things. [Al-Buruj. 4-9]
[قُتِلَ أَصۡحَـٰبُ ٱلۡأُخۡدُودِ – Cursed were the makers of the Ditch]: This is an invocation against them to be destroyed. The makers of the ditch were disbelievers and there lived amongst them believers, so they wanted to force the believers to accept their religion, but the believers refused. They dug a ditch in the ground, kindled fire in it, sat around it, oppressed the believers and exposed them to the fire; so whoever responded to their orders was released and whoever held onto their faith was casted in the fire. This is an intense act of waging war against Allah and the believers, so Allah cursed, destroyed and promised them punishment, saying: [قُتِلَ أَصۡحَـٰبُ ٱلۡأُخۡدُودِ – Cursed were the makers of the ditch].
Then Allah explained about the ditch and its makers, saying:
The large ditch with the fire, given fuel (in abundance); when they sat around it, watching what they had (ordered to be done) to the believers.
This is one of the greatest types of despotism and hardheartedness, because they combined between their disbelief in Allah’s signs and willfully denied them, waging war against the believers, tortured them with this agonising torture and were present to witness the believers being casted in the fire. And reality is that they resented the believers for no reason other than a characteristic for which they are to be praised and through which depended their happiness (in this life and the next), which is that they were believers in Allah -The Almighty, The Praiseworthy. (4)
Hajjaj Bin Yusuf Ath-Thaqafee
After Abdullah Bin Zubayr, may Allah be pleased with him and his father, was murdered, Al-Hajjaaj sent someone to Asma [bint Abu Bakr (may Allah be pleased with her), Abdullah’s mother] to come to him, but she refused to come. He again sent the messenger to her with the message that she must come, otherwise he would bring her forcibly by dragging her by her hair, but she again refused and said: By Allah, I will not come to you until you send one to me who would drag me by pulling my hair. So, he said: Bring me my shoes. He put on his shoes and walked on quickly puffed up with vanity and pride until he came to her and said: How do you find what I have done with the enemy of Allah? She said: I find that you wronged him in this world, whereas he has ruined your afterlife. It has been conveyed to me that you used to call him (Abdullah B. Zubair) as the son of one having two belts. By Allah, I am indeed (a woman) of two belts. One is that with the help of which I used to suspend high the food of Allah’s Messenger (ﷺ) and that of Abu Bakr (making it out of the reach) of animals and, so far as the second belt is concerned, that is the belt which no woman can dispense with. Verily Allah’s Messenger (ﷺ) told us that in Thaqif, there would be born a great liar and great murderer. The liar we have seen, and as far as the murderer is concerned, I do not find anyone else besides you. He (Hajjaj) stood up and did not give any reply to her. [Sahih Muslim 2545]
The Mongols
In the year 656 AH/1258 CE, Artughal’s son, Uthman, was born and it is to whom the Ottoman Empire was attributed. It was the year in which the Mongols, led by Hulagu, carried out a military expedition against Baghdad – the capital of the Ottoman Caliphate – which led to catastrophic events and great calamities. Imaam Ibn Katheer [may Allaah have mercy upon him] stated, “They (i.e. the Mongols) killed everyone they were able to kill, including men, women, boys, Shaikhs, the elderly and the young men. Many people entered the wells, the habitats of wild animals and the gutters, and they hid for days without appearing. A group of people would gather in the inns and shut the doors, but the Tartars either opened the doors by breaking them or setting them on fire; then they pursued the people who fled to the highest places and killed them on the rooftops until blood flowed in the alleys. Indeed to Allaah we belong and to Him we shall return! Likewise, in the local mosques and the big central mosques, no one escaped from them except the Jewish and Christian citizens of the Muslim land, and those who sought refuge with them”. (5)
American Colonialists
The 13 American colonies’ population grew from about 2,000 to 2.4 million between 1625 and 1775 while displacing Native Americans from eastern North America. After the colonies declared independence in 1776 from Great Britain and formed the US, the settlers started to move west, clashing with and eradicating the Apache, Cherokee, Cheyenne, Chinook, Navajo and Sioux tribes. Some of the names today are sadly used for American warfare helicopters and ubiquitous sport utility vehicles. The national holiday, Thanksgiving, celebrated in November, is traced to the 1620s when European settlers invited Native Americans to a feast. The settlers later killed the population and gave thanks to God for allowing them to slaughter the “savages.” The surviving descendants of Native American tribes live in poverty on federally recognized Indian reservations across the US. Almost 100 million indigenous people in the Western Hemisphere have been killed or died prematurely because of the Europeans and their descendants in five centuries, according to David E. Stannard in his book, American Holocaust: The Conquest of the New World. Around 12 million indigenous people died within present US geographical boundaries between 1492 and 1900, according to Russell Thornton in American Indian Holocaust and Survival: A Population History since 1492. Despite having unalienable rights — life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness – as enshrined in the American Declaration of Independence, not all in the new colonies were considered equal. The colonies had a system of slavery, which European settlers carried as a practice into the Americas from the Old World, despite English Protestants praising themselves as Puritans. A conservative estimate of 35 million men, women and children were brought from Africa to the New World between the 16th and 19th centuries. Around 12.5 million of those brought to North America were used as free labor in fields and worked under grueling conditions, according to the Trans-Atlantic Slave Trade Database. The systematic repression of Africans continues to the present day in the US government application of laws, health and education. (6)
Colonialists and The Atlantic Slave Trade: By Shaikh Abu Khadeejah [may Allaah preserve him]: https://video.link/w/Qbaub https://video.link/w/lUZtb
Colonialists In Australia: Professor Lyndall Ryan and her research team has found that there were at least 270 frontier massacres over 140 years of Australian history, as part of a state-sanctioned and organised attempts to eradicate First Nations people. For Ryan’s work, a massacre is defined as the deliberate killing of six or more defenceless people in one operation. If you investigate some of these massacres in depth you can see how systematic they were. Ryan’s work is in no means comprehensive as many massacres were not documented and many others covered up. Because of colonial genocidal actions like state-sanctioned massacres, the First Nations population went from an estimated 1-1.5 million before invasion to less than 100,000 by the early 1900s. (7)
Finally, it is essential to reflect upon the tragic events that have unfolded in Palestine, a situation that has persisted for over seventy years. While we acknowledge the instances of violence perpetrated by Zionist forces, we must also unequivocally denounce any acts of violence committed by Muslims against unarmed civilians and non-combatants who identify with Judaism.
The History of Zionist Aggression
The Deir Yassin Massacre: Took place on April 9, 1948, near Jerusalem, during which between 107 to 254 Palestinians were massacred at the hands of the extremist “Stern” gang.
The Nasr al-Din Massacre: Took place in April 1948. Al-Lajjun Massacre: Took place on April 13, 1948, in a Palestinian Arab village in the Jenin District, where the Zionist Haganah gang attacked it and killed 13 people.
The Saliha Massacre: Took place in May 1948, during which 75 Palestinians were massacred.
The Abu Shusha Massacre: Took place on May 14, 1948, near the village of Deir Yassin, and claimed the lives of (50) citizens, including women, men, children, and the elderly.
The Beit Daras Massacre: Took place in northeastern Gaza on May 21, 1948.
The Tantura Massacre: Took place on May 22, 1948, in the occupied city of Haifa, and claimed the lives of about (200) Palestinians.
The Lydda Massacre: Took place on July 12, 1948, in the occupied city of Lydda, and resulted in the massacre of about (500) Palestinians, including (150) who were massacred inside the city’s Grand Mosque. The Zionists threw many of them alive into the town’s wells.
The Dawayima Massacre: Took place on October 29, 1948, when a battalion from the terrorist “Lehi” organization led by Moshe Dayan attacked the village and then began searching homes and shooting at its residents. Entire families were exterminated in the massacre, which resulted in the killing of 200 men, women, and children.
The Zionist massacres did not stop after the Nakba of 1948, but rather their frequency, intensity, and brutality increased in light of the use of more lethal and destructive weapons. Among the most prominent of these massacres were: The Sharafat Massacre, which took place in February 1951, in which 11 Palestinians were massacred, and the rest of the village’s people were displaced. The Bethlehem Massacre took place in January 1952, in which 10 Palestinians were massacred. The Qibya Massacre took place on October 14, 1953, in the village of Qibya, east of Jerusalem, during which (67) Palestinians were massacred, most of whom were women and children, and during which 56 homes were destroyed. The Qalqilya Massacre took place on October 10, 1956, when the occupation forces attacked citizens in the city of Qalqilya in the West Bank, during which about seventy citizens were massacred.
The Kafr Qasem Massacre took place on October 29, 1956, in which 49 Palestinians were massacred, including 11 children, when they were all returning home from work. The Khan Yunis Massacre took place on November 3 and 12, 1956, in which between 280 and 500 Palestinians were massacred.
In 1970, Zionist aircraft struck Bahr al-Baqar Primary School and Abu Zaabal factories, killing more than 150 Egyptian students and workers. In 1980, the extremist Jewish organization Kach attempted to blow up Al-Aqsa Mosque, and a shipment of explosives weighing 120 kg was discovered. The Sabra and Shatila massacre took place in September 1982. This massacre lasted three days, and its direct perpetrators were members of the Lebanese Phalange forces allied with the Zionists led by Ariel Sharon. The Ibrahimi Mosque Massacre took place on February 25, 1994, when a Zionist named “Barog Goldstein” stormed the Ibrahimi Mosque in the city of Hebron, and fired bullets and bombs at the worshipers. This massacre resulted in the massacre of 29 Palestinians. The Qana Massacre took place on April 18, 1995. [8]
Listen to what Prince Turki Al-Faisal – may Allah preserve him- said about the Zionists and Hamas:
In The Name of Allah, The Most Merciful, The Bestower of Mercy.
They (People of the era Al-Jahiliyyah) accused the people of the religion of having little understanding and poor Memory. They utilised this argument to determine the falsity of a religion that the people who followed it had little understanding and poor memory, as Allah said that they said: [ بَادِىَ ٱلرَّأۡىِ – And they (too) followed you without thinking]. [Hud 27]
Al-Allamah Salih Al-Fawzan, may Allah preserve him, commented:
Regarding what Allah has stated about the people of Nuh and their saying: “And they (i..e believers) (also) followed you (Nuh) without thinking”- Meaning, the weak ones followed you without thinking, those who possess no understanding. They reviled the followers of the Messengers that they possess neither understanding nor are they well versed in the affairs; and (that) nor do they possess far-sightedness. This is what many among those who have strayed from the right path and the enemies of Allah brag about today. They make fun of the Muslims and their scholars, that they neither possess understanding nor far-sightedness. They seek to diminish the (status of the) scholars with this calumny despite the fact that the scholars of the Muslims are people of clear sightedness and cognizance because they examine (matters) based on Allah’s guidance, command what Allah has commanded and forbid what Allah has forbidden.
Therefore, none diminishes (the status of the) scholars and accuses them of short-sightedness and lack of understanding, except one who shares similarities with the people of Jahiliyyah [Footnote a] and the people of Nuh – those who described the followers of the Messengers with this description, in order to drive the people away from them. This is uttered from the tongues of some of the people today. They say, “These scholars are Ulamaa Hayd Wa Nifaas [i.e. scholars whose knowledge is limited to the rulings pertaining menstruation and post-natal bleeding], Ulamaa Ahkam Al-Istijmar [i.e. scholars whose knowledge is limited to issues pertaining to Istijmaar (i.e. rulings regarding the use of dry objects such as stones, tissue etc, to clean oneself after using the toilet)], Ulamaa Juz’iyyat [i.e. scholars whose knowledge is restricted to some affairs], and that they do not possess knowledge of current affairs”.[Footnote b] The knowledge of current affairs is the subject matter of politics and revolt against the Muslim rulers. [Footnote c] [1]
——————————————
Footnote a: Ibn Abbas, may Allah be pleased with him and his father, said: The Prophet, peace and blessings of Allah be upon him, said, “The most hated people to Allah are three: a person who deviates from right conduct sanctuaries of Makkah and Madinah; a person who seeks that the traditions of the pre-Islamic Period of Ignorance should remain in Islam and a person who seeks to shed somebody’s blood without any right”.
Al-Allamah Zayd Bin Hadi Al-Mad’khali, may Allah have mercy upon him, said:
These three actions are major sins. The first major sin is to stray from good behaviour within the sacred sanctuaries of Makkah and Madinah. This deviation means to abandon the path of truth and embrace falsehood, and promoting falsehood to suppress the truth. Allah, The Mighty and Majestic, has censured those who engage in such misconduct within the sanctuaries of Makkah and Madinah, saying:
And whoever intends evil actions therein or to do wrong, We shall make him taste a painful torment. [Al-Hajj. 25]
Allah has promised them a severe punishment for their evil intentions therein, so what about committing such deeds?! It would indeed be a more severe sin, a more terrifying state, and a harsher punishment. This highlights the sanctity of Makkah and Madinah, chosen by Allah as sacred lands where virtuous acts of worship, like Hajj, are performed – a pillar of Islam. The virtues of these places are countless, with increased rewards for good deeds done there, and surpassing all other lands on earth in virtue.
The second major sin is committed by the individual who wants the practices of the pre-Islamic era of ignorance to remain within Islam, as if he prioritises the evil customs that were followed during that era over Islamic practices, Iman and Ihsan, their virtue and the virtue of the Prophet’s Sunnah. This act constitutes a major sin, as it involves favouring Bidah over the authentic Sunnah that leads to the right path.
The third major sin is shedding the blood of a Muslim without any right, especially when it is done out of oppression and animosity. Shedding the blood of a Muslim is a great crime as the Prophet [peace and blessings of Allah be upon him] said, “The extinction of the entire world is less significant than killing a Muslim (without right)”. He stated regarding the rights of the Kabah, “Great you are and great is your sanctity, but the sanctity of a believer is greater than yours in the Sight of Allah”. Therefore, it is forbidden to transgress against Muslims, both male and female, in the sanctuaries of Makkah and Madinah, as well as in any other place, due to the severe consequences and punishment that follow. [2]
Footnote b: Imam Muhammad Ibn Salih Al-Uthaymin, may Allah have mercy upon him, said:
Some people say that someone who does not grasp current affairs is not a scholar, yet they forget what the Prophet, peace and blessings of Allah be upon him, said, “Whoever Allah wishes good for, He grants them understanding in the religion”. They lose sight of the reality that preoccupying oneself with current affairs distracts a person from understanding the religion and may even keep people from engaging in correct worship, which is to worship Allah alone while devoting one’s heart to Allah, contemplating Allah’s divine revelation (i.e. the Qur’an and the Sunnah) and His universal signs (i.e. the things He has created). In reality, preoccupying the youth with current affairs prevents them from understanding the religion Allah has ordained because the heart is a vessel that does not take another thing when it is filled with something else, thus, it is not possible to fill it with this and that. Being preoccupied with seeking understanding in the religion, fulfilling acts of worship, pure Islamic monotheism, and sincerity are the better to do for the individual than learning about current affairs and what such and such a person is about.
It is possible that one receives knowledge of current affairs through flimsy and fabricated media narrations, or bases knowledge of current affairs on the analysis and speculations of a person. The one engaged in the subject of current affairs may seek to establish an analysis that is far from what the current affairs are or they look into affairs that have been concocted for them by the enemies (regarding) a specific event, but this event turns out to be something else and does not exist at all, thus, all those plans come to naught.
Therefore, it is important that one learns what Islam expects of them- the understanding related to one’s self, rectification of the heart through sound belief and wishing good for the Muslims, and this is related to the understanding of halal, haram, and other affairs of a similar nature. (However), if necessary, one can acquire knowledge about current affairs; but when it comes to matters that haven’t actually happened yet, such as lies, deception, analysis, and speculation, attaching absolute emphasis to it has no foundation. [3]
