Skip to main content

A profound admonition by Ali Ibn Abi Talib

In The Name of Allah, The Most Merciful, The Bestower of Mercy.

Kumayl ibn Ziyad, may Allah have mercy upon him, said: Ali, may Allah be pleased with him, said: “O Kumayl! These hearts are vessels, and the best of them are those that gather the most good. People are of three types: an erudite scholar, a learner upon the path of safety, and the rabble — followers of every haranguer. They have not been granted light through the light of (sound) knowledge, nor have they sought refuge in a strong support”. Then he said: “Fie upon the one who carries the truth without insight! Doubt is kindled in his heart at the first instance when a doubtful matter is presented. He does not know where the truth lies. When he speaks, he errs and does not know that he has erred. He is fascinated with something whose reality he does not know, thus, he is a trial for whoever is put to trial through him”.

Ḥilya al-Awliya 1/79. Tārikh Dimashq 50/255

 

Choosing Certainty Over Conjecture: Qur’anic Lesson in Graceful Discourse

In The Name of Allah, The Most Merciful, The Bestower of Mercy.

Allah [The Most High] said:

سَيَقُولُونَ ثَلَاثَةٌ رَّابِعُهُمْ كَلْبُهُمْ وَيَقُولُونَ خَمْسَةٌ سَادِسُهُمْ كَلْبُهُمْ رَجْمًا بِالْغَيْبِ ۖ وَيَقُولُونَ سَبْعَةٌ وَثَامِنُهُمْ كَلْبُهُمْ ۚ قُل رَّبِّي أَعْلَمُ بِعِدَّتِهِم مَّا يَعْلَمُهُمْ إِلَّا قَلِيلٌ ۗ فَلَا تُمَارِ فِيهِمْ إِلَّا مِرَاءً ظَاهِرًا وَلَا تَسْتَفْتِ فِيهِم مِّنْهُمْ أَحَدًا

[Some] say they were three, the dog being the fourth among them; (others) say they were five, the dog being the sixth, guessing at the unseen; (yet others) say they were seven, the dog being the eighth. Say (O Muhammad): “My Lord knows best their number; none knows them but a few.” So debate not (about their number, etc.) except with the clear proof (which We have revealed to you). And consult not any of them (people of the Scripture) about (the affair of) the people of the Cave. [Al-Kahf 22]

Allah informed us of the differing between the people of the scripture regarding the number of the people of the cave- a differing out of guessing at the unseen, forging statements and speaking about that which they have no knowledge. Some of them said that the people of the cave were three in number and their dog was the fourth, and others said that the people of the cave were five in number and their dog was the sixth. Allah said that these two statements are tantamount to guessing at the unseen, thus this indicates that they are false. Amongst them were those who said that the people of the cave were seven in number and their dog was the eighth. This statement- and Allah knows best- is what is correct because Allah declared the first two statements false but did not declare this third one to be false, indicating that it is correct.

This differing is one that neither carries any benefit nor are the people benefited by knowing the number of the people of the cave. It contains neither a benefit related to religion nor the worldly affairs and that is why Allah stated:

قُل رَّبِّي أَعْلَمُ بِعِدَّتِهِم مَّا يَعْلَمُهُمْ إِلَّا قَلِيلٌ ۗ

Say (O Muhammad):My Lord knows best their number; none knows them but a few]; and they are those who know what is correct and known for being upon what is correct.

فَلَا تُمَارِ فِيهِمْ إِلَّا مِرَاءً ظَاهِرً

So debate not (about their number, etc.) except with the clear proof (which We have revealed to you)] – Meaning, based upon knowledge, certainty and about that which contains benefit. As for debating based on ignorance and guessing at the unseen or about that which has no benefit- either the debater being obstinate or the affair being debated having no benefit- neither any religious nor worldly benefit, such as the number of the people of the cave and what is similar to it, too much debate and continuous research regarding it is a waste of time, and it makes the hearts have a strong love for that which has no benefit.

 وَلَا تَسْتَفْتِ فِيهِم مِّنْهُمْ أَحَدً

And consult not any of them (people of the Scripture, Jews and Christians) about (the affair of) the people of the Cave] – Meaning, because their speech regarding it is based on guessing at the unseen, and conjecture can be of no avail against the truth.

This proves that it is not permissible for a person to issue a verdict when he is not worthy of it- either due to his inability to issue a verdict in that affair or due to fact that he does not care what he says about the affair because he does not possess that fear of Allah that would stop him from speaking about affairs that are unclear to him, which may harm him in the afterlife. Therefore, when it is the case that he has been forbidden from giving verdicts in the likes of this affair, then prohibiting him from giving verdicts is of a greater prohibition. Also this Ayah proves that a person maybe prohibited from giving a verdict in some affair but not in other affairs, so he gives a verdict in that which he is worthy of giving a verdict and not in other affairs because Allah has not prohibited him from giving a verdict completely; rather they were prohibited from giving a verdict regarding the affair of the people of the cave and what is similar to it.

An Excerpt from Tayseer Al-Kareem Ar-Rahmaan Fee Tafseer Kalaam al-Mannaan.

Who admonishes our tongues when we wake up in the morning?!

In The Name of Allah, The Most Merciful, The Bestower of Mercy.

The Messenger of Allah, peace and blessings of Allah be upon him, said: ”When the son of Adam wakes up in the morning, all the limbs humble themselves before the tongue and say: ”Fear Allah for our sake, (for) we are with you; if you are upright, we will be upright; and if you are crooked, we will become crooked.” [1]

The Messenger, peace and blessings of Allah be upon him, also said: ”Whoever can guarantee (the chastity of) what is between his two jaw bones and what is between his two legs (i.e. his mouth, his tongue and his private parts), I guarantee Paradise for him.” [2]

Al-Hasan Bin Salih, may Allah have mercy upon him, said: I thoroughly scrutinised the fear of Allah that presents a person from entering into doubtful matter out of fear of falling into what is forbidden and did not find it more lacking in anything than the tongue”. [3]

Yunus Ibn Ubayd, may Allah have mercy upon him, said: ”Indeed, you see a man fasting a lot, abstaining from the forbidden matters and praying the night prayer, then he testifies to falsehood in the morning.” [4]

In a supplication of the Prophet: [وأسألُك كلمةَ الحقِّ في الرِّضَا والغضب – I ask You (O Allaah) to make me true in speech in times of pleasure and anger] [5]

The one who does not utter except the truth during anger and pleasure, this is a proof of his strong Iman and that he is in control of his Nafs. [6]

A man said to Salman al-Farisi, may Allah be pleased with him, ”Advise me!” He said: ”Do not speak”. He said, ”I am not able to live amongst the people without speaking.” He said, ”If you speak, then speak the truth or keep silent.” [7]

Disobedience can appear agreeable to a human being, such as Gheebah, Nameemah, self-praise and being quarrelsome – whether uttered blatantly or indirectly, verbally abusing the one you hate, praising the one you love and what is similar to that. The intense urge to engage in these deeds agrees with the soul’s desire, becomes easy for the tongue to move and thus one’s patience weakens, thus, due to this the Messenger, peace and blessings of Allaah be upon him, said to Mu’adh, may Allah be pleased with him, “Restrain your tongue”, so Mu’adh said, “O Messenger of Allah! Will we be held accountable for what we say?’ He said, ‘May your mother be bereaved of you, O Mu’aadh! Is there anything that topples people on their faces – or he said on their noses into the fire- other than the harvest of their tongues?!” [8]

Regarding the statement, “May your mother be bereaved of you, O Mu’adh!” The Arabs used this statement for the purpose of persuasion and exhortation, and they did not intend its apparent meaning, which is “May his mother lose him”, rather what is intended is persuasion and exhortation”. [9]


[1] Sahih at-Tirmidhee Number 2407

[2] Al-Bukhaari. 6474

[3] Siyar 7/368]

[4] Hilyatul Awliyaa 3/20]

[5] https://salafidawahmanchester.com/2021/01/01/o-allaah-let-me-live-if-life-is-good-for-me-and-let-me-die-if-death-is-good-for-me/

[6] Fiqhul Ad’iyah Wal-Adkaar’ parts 3 & 4’ page 167

[7] Jaami Al-Uloom Wal-Hikam page144

[8] Sharh Ar-Risaalah Al-Mughniyah Fis Sukoot Wa Luzoomil Buyoot. Lesson 1. By Shaikh Abdur Razzzaq Al-Badr- may Allah preserve him.

[9] Sharh Al-Arba’een An-Nawawiyyah’ by Imaam Muhammad Ibn Saaleh Al-Uthaymeen (may Allaah have mercy upon him). Hadeeth Number 29, page 295]

One of The Paths of True Facilitators of Reconciliation — Not of the Tale-Carriers

In The Name of Allah, The Most Merciful, The Bestower of Mercy.

The Messenger, peace and blessings of Allah be upon him, said, “A liar is not one who tries to bring reconciliation amongst people and speaks good (in order to avert dispute), or he conveys good”. [Sahih Muslim 2605]

Imam Abdul Azeez Bin Baaz, may Allah have mercy upon him, said:

فهذا يدل على أن المصلح بين الناس ليس بكذاب، الذي يصلح بين الناس: بين القبيلتين، أو بين الأسرتين، أو بين شخصين تنازعا فأصلح بينهما وكذب فإن هذا لا يضره؛ لأنه أراد الإصلاح فإذا أتى إحدى القبيلتين أو إحدى الأسرتين أو أحد الشخصين فقال له قولًا طيبًا عن صاحبه، وأنه يرغب في الصلح، وأنه يثني عليك، وأنه يحب مصالحتك، ثم جاء الآخر وقال له كلامًا طيبًا حتى أصلح بينهما فهذا طيب؛ لأنه لا يضر أحدًا بذلك، ينفع المتنازعين، ولا يضر أحدًا

This shows that the one facilitates reconciliation between the people is not a liar. The one who reconciles between two tribes, two families, or two disputing individuals and lies, this does not harm because he wants rectification. If this mediator speaks favourably about one party, expressing a desire for reconciliation and highlighting the positive attributes of the other, it serves a beneficial purpose. Such actions do not harm anyone; rather, they assist those in conflict and promote resolution. [1]

Al-Allaamah Salih Al-Fawzan, may Allah preserve him, said:

A person should not leave the people in dispute; rather it is incumbent upon him to be eager to bring about conciliation between disputing parties, especially relatives. As for some people-and Allaah’s Protection is sought-they only bring into disputes that which will increase it. This type of person is a shaytaan. Also the one who seeks to bring about conciliation between the people should do that with justice; he should not oppress any of them or judge based on desires”. [2]

As for the tale-carries, they lie to destroy relationships. Read:

Click to access Jihaad_Against_The_Tongue.pdf


[1]https://binbaz.org.sa/fatwas/13189/%D8%B4%D8%B1%D8%AD-%D8%AD%D8%AF%D9%8A%D8%AB-%D8%A7%D9%84%D8%A7%D9%85%D9%88%D8%B1-%D8%A7%D9%84%D8%AA%D9%8A-%D8%B1%D8%AE%D8%B5-%D8%A7%D9%84%D9%83%D8%B0%D8%A8-%D9%81%D9%8A%D9%87%D8%A7#:~:text=%D8%A7%D9%84%D8%AC%D9%88%D8%A7%D8%A8%3A,%D9%84%D8%B2%D9%88%D8%AC%D9%87%D8%A7%22%20%D8%B1%D9%88%D8%A7%D9%87%20%D9%85%D8%B3%D9%84%D9%85%20%D8%A8%D9%87%D8%B0%D9%87%20%D8%A7%D9%84%D8%B2%D9%8A%D8%A7%D8%AF%D8%A9

[2] An Excerpt from ‘Al-Minhatur Rabbaaniyyah Fee Sharh Al-Arba’een. 213-217.

An Example of Tale-Carrying That Led to Severe Consequences For The Perpetrator

In The Name of Allah, The Most Merciful, The Bestower of Mercy.

Abdur-Raḥmān ibn Yazīd ibn Jābir said: Once we were with Rajāʾ ibn Ḥaywah, then we began reminding one another about showing gratitude for (Allah’s) blessings, so he said: ‘There is no one who can truly fulfill gratitude (to Allah) due to blessings’. And behind us there was a man with a cloak over his head, who said: ‘Not even the Amīr al-Muʾminīn)?’ We said: ‘We said: ‘The Amīr al-Muʾminīn has not been mentioned (specifically) here, rather, we are speaking in general — about any person!’ He (Abdur Rahman) said: ‘Our attention was diverted from him, then Rajā turned to notice his presence but could not see him, so he said, ‘The one who was wearing the cloak came to you. If you are called to swear by Allah, swear by Allah (truthfully)’.

He (Abdur Rahman) said: ‘It was not long before a guard of his (i.e. the Amīr al-Muʾminīn) approached him’. He (the Amīr al-Muʾminīn) said: ‘O Rajā! The Amīr al-Muʾminīn is mentioned, and you did not defend him (or support him)?’ He (Rajā) said: ‘O Amīr al-Muʾminīn! What is the matter about?’ He said: ‘You mentioned showing gratitude for (Allah’s) blessings and said: ‘: ‘There is no one who can truly fulfill gratitude (to Allah) due to blessings’ and it was said to you, ‘Not even the Amīr al-Muʾminīn?’ And you said: ‘Amīr al-Muʾminīn is just a man like others!’ Rajāʾ replied: ‘That did not happen'(i.e. you were not specified as the one intended regarding this discussion). He said, ‘By Allah'(i.e. you did not mean this?)

Rajāʾ said: ‘By Allah’. So, he (Amīr al-Muʾminīn) commanded that the man who transmitted the (rumour) be whipped seventy lashes. Then I exited and the man was covered in his own blood. Then he said: ‘You are Rajā ibn Ḥaywah and this happens because of you?!’ He (Rajā) said: ‘Seventy lashes on your back are better than (spilling) a believer’s blood’. Ibn Jābir said: ‘Thereafter, whenever Rajā sat in a gathering, he would say while looking around, ‘Beware of the man who wore the cloak'”. [1] [end of quote]

We all know that this type of behaviour leads to evil consequences- deception among the people, rancour, conflict and animosity, or even transgression. It is an extremely harmful behaviour that destroys the genuine trust, love, compassion and affection between people. Therefore, regardless of a person’s calm demeanor, gentle speech, and soft approach, do not rush to confide in anyone unless you are absolutely certain, as well as the fact that what you are discussing is truth, and not lies, slander, rumour or speculation.

One of the most dangerous people are those who, after knowing that two parties hold strong differing personal opinions, approach both sides under the guise of a sincere or truthful adviser. So, do not involve everyone who approaches as an adviser, for there are people who inquire about one party’s view on a matter and clearly show agreement during conversations, then they approach the other party and transmit speech to them in a manner that would be perceived as an attack.

Therefore, be selective who you involve in your personal disagreements because there are people whose lack of courage and honesty prevents them from speaking the truth and being frank, so they hide their views and go between two people to create conflict while portraying themselves neutral, even if they have already made known their views to the first party, but transmit such a view to the second party solely as the view of the first party, thus, the two parties may harbour suspicion and strong disagreement towards one another, while the transmitter portrays himself or herself as neutral. Therefore, it is important to be cautious regarding whom you speak to, whom you confide in, whom you involve in your personal disagreements, as not everyone who appears righteous is either truly a good adviser, one who truly desires rectification or someone who will stand up for the truth when the going gets tough. You reserve the right to take your time to trust people with regards to your personal affairs regardless of the status of the individual you want to deal with.


[1] Siyar Aʿlām al-Nubalāʾ. 4/561

Admonition to Those—Wherever They May Be—Who Carry Tales to Ruin Relationships

In The Name of Allah, The Most Merciful, The Bestower of Mercy.

Asma Bint Yazid, may Allah be pleased with her, said: The Prophet, peace and blessings of Allah be upon him, said, “Shall I not tell you about the best of you?” They said, “Certainly”. The Prophet said, “Those who, if they are seen, they remind you of Allah. Shall I not tell you about the worst of you?” They said, “Certainly”. The Prophet said, “Those who carry tales and ruin relations between those who loved one another, seeking misery for the innocent.” [1]

“Those who carry tales”. 

Their habit – constantly and always – is to embark upon transmitting corrupt speech.

They do this to sow corruption (or ruin the good relationships between people).

You find two people – two people upon brotherhood and friendship, however due to the endevour of a tale-carrier, he (the tale-carrier) does not cease transmitting speech from this one to that one until an incident occurs between them…[2] [End of quote]

One of the bad behaviours of some people during our teenager years was that they would feign agreement to gain your trust and then transmit your disagreements to someone else whom they knew strongly disagrees with you. This was nothing but treachery regardless of the good character put on by the perpetrator.


[1] al-Adab al-Mufrad 323
[2] https://www.alathar.net/home/esound/index.php?op=codevi&coid=258598 a paraphrased excerpt from a statement of Imam Al-Albani, may Allah have mercy upon him.

Repentance with Responsibility

In The Name of Allah, The Most Merciful, The Bestower of Mercy.

Imam Abdul Azeez Bin Baz, may Allah have mercy upon him, said:

وشروط التوبة ثلاثة: الندم على الماضي مما فعلت ندمًا صادقًا، والإقلاع من الذنوب، ورفضها وتركها مستقبلًا طاعة لله وتعظيمًا له، والعزم الصادق ألا تعود في تلك الذنوب، هذه أمور لا بد منها.
أولا: الندم على الماضي منك والحزن على ما مضى منك.
الثاني: الإقلاع والترك لهذه الذنوب دقيقها وجليلها.
الثالث: العزم الصادق ألا تعود فيها.
فإن كان عندك حقوق للناس، أموال أو دماء أو أعراض فأدها إليهم، هذا أمر رابع من تمام التوبة، عليك أن تؤدي الحقوق التي للناس؛ إن كان قصاصًا تمكن من القصاص إلا أن يسمحوا بالدية، إن كان مالًا ترد إليهم أموالهم إلا أن يسمحوا، إن كان عرضًا كذلك تكلمت في أعراضهم، واغتبتهم تستسمحهم، وإن كان استسماحهم قد يفضي إلى شر فلا مانع من تركه، ولكن تدعو لهم وتستغفر لهم، وتذكرهم بالخير الذي تعلمه منهم في الأماكن التي ذكرتهم فيها بالسوء، ويكون هذا كفارة لهذا.

The conditions of repentance are three: Truthful remorse for past actions, the cessation of sins, and a commitment to avoid them in the future as an act of obedience to Allah and exaltation of Him. There must be a truthful determination not to return to those sins. These three things are essential.

First, one must regret past deeds and be sorrowful for what has transpired. Second, there must be a complete abandonment of big and small sins. Third, a truthful resolve not to revert to those sins. If you owe people their rights, whether in the form of wealth, blood, or honour, you give them back their rights. This is the fourth matter that would constitute complete repentance. You must return the rights owed to others. It should be carried out if it involves retribution unless they agree to accept compensation. If it pertains to financial matters, you are required to return their property unless they forgo it. If it is to do with honour- if you have violated their honour- and backbit them, you should seek their forgiveness. However, if seeking their forgiveness may lead to further harm, there is no obstacle to refraining from doing so. Instead, you should supplicate for them, ask for Allah’s forgiveness for them, and mention them with the good you know about them in the places (or instances, situations) you (previously) spoke ill of them and this would be an atonement for your actions. [1] [End of quote] Paraphrased

The Prophet, peace and blessings of Allah be upon him, said: “Whoever has wronged his brother, should ask for his pardon (before his death), as (in the Hereafter) there will be neither a Dinar nor a Dirham. (He should secure pardon in this life) before some of his good deeds are taken and paid to his brother, or, if he has done no good deeds, some of the bad deeds of his brother are taken to be loaded on him (in the Hereafter)”. [Al-Bukhari 6534]

Pride’s Mask

In the clan’s fire, we learned: Refusal to bow, to say forgive me, is no sign of strength— It is weakness in armour’s disguise. Pride that clings to self-image Poisons harmony, Turns apology into a battlefield, And truth into shadow. To shift blame is to weave deceit; To feign remorse is to wound deeper. True honour is humble, Strong enough to bend, Brave enough to repent. Victimhood chains the soul, while arrogance blinds the heart. But apology—sincere, unmasked—Is light, A bridge to mercy, a safeguard for the Hereafter.

Al-Haafidh Ibn Hajr, may Allah have mercy upon him, said: “Diverting from the truth and playing tricks to reject it: what is intended is that when one dispute with another person, he employs every way – other than what is legislated in the Shariah – to play tricks until he takes the rights of his opponent, and by way of this he diverts from the straight path”. [Fat-hul Baaree 1/90]

Al-Haafidh Ibn Rajab, may Allah have mercy upon him, said: “If a man has the ability when arguing – whether it is a dispute in religion or a worldly affair – to defend falsehood and make it appear to the listener that what he says is truth, seek to weaken the truth and present it in the image of falsehood, then this is one of the ugliest of forbidden deeds and vilest traits of hypocrisy (in one’s deeds)”. [Jami Al-Uloom Wal Hikam 1/432]

We ask Allah:
اللهم كما حَسَّنْت خَلْقِي فَحَسِّنْ خُلُقِي

“O Allah! Just as You made my external form beautiful, make my character beautiful as well”.


[1]https://binbaz.org.sa/fatwas/20276/%C2%A0%D8%AA%D9%88%D8%AC%D9%8A%D9%87-%D9%86%D8%B5%D9%8A%D8%AD%D8%A9-%D9%81%D9%8A-%D8%A7%D9%84%D8%AA%D9%88%D8%A8%D8%A9-%D8%A7%D9%84%D9%89-%D8%A7%D9%84%D9%84%D9%87#:~:text=%D9%88%D8%B4%D8%B1%D9%88%D8%B7%20%D8%A7%D9%84%D8%AA%D9%88%D8%A8%D8%A9%20%D8%AB%D9%84%D8%A7%D8%AB%D8%A9%3A%20%D8%A7%D9%84%D9%86%D8%AF%D9%85%20%D8%B9%D9%84%D9%89,%D9%87%D8%B0%D9%87%20%D8%A3%D9%85%D9%88%D8%B1%20%D9%84%D8%A7%20%D8%A8%D8%AF%20%D9%85%D9%86%D9%87%D8%A7

Oppression Is Evil, But Counterfeiting It Is Evil As Well

In The Name of Allah, The Most Merciful, The Bestower of Mercy.

Al-Allamah Salih Al-Fawzan, may Allah preserve him, said:

Dhulm (injustice or oppression) is three types:

The greatest of them is Shirk and why is Shirk referred as (injustice or oppression)? This is because the basis of injustice is to place something in other than its rightful place. And the meaning of Shirk is to devote acts of worship to other than its rightful place and this is the greatest injustice, because when they devoted acts of worship to other than its rightful place and to those who are not deserving of it, they equated the created (beings) to the Creator and a weak one (i.e. a created being) to Al-Qawiy [The One Perfect in Strength (i.e. Allah)], who is not unable to do anything. Therefore, is there any greater injustice after this?

The second type is committed when a person oppresses himself by committing sins. A sinner oppresses himself because he exposes himself to punishment, even though it is obligated to his to save himself and place himself in an appropriate situation, which is to obey Allah.

The third type is committed when a person oppresses others by taking their wealth (unlawfully), backbiting them, spreading tales about them, stealing their wealth, violating their honour through backbiting, tale carrying, slander, shedding their blood through unlawful murder, beating them, inflicting injuries, or degrading them without right.. [1]

Tawus al-Yamani, may Allah have mercy upon him, entered the presence of Hisham ibn Abd al-Malik, addressing him with a grave warning: “Beware of the Day of the Call”. Hisham, said: “What is the Day of the Call?” Tawus replied, the statement of Allah: [فَأَذَّنَ مُؤَذِّنٌ بَيْنَهُمْ أَنْ لَعْنةُ اللَّهِ عَلَى الظَّالِمِينَ – And a caller will call out among them, ‘The curse of Allah is upon the wrongdoers” [Al-A’raf: 44]

At this, Hisham collapsed due to shock! Tawus then said: “This is the humiliation of mere description; how then will it be when faced with the reality?” [2]

Mubarak Abu Hamad, may Allah have mercy upon him, said: “I heard Sufyan Al-Thawri, may Allah have mercy upon him, saying to Ali ibn Al-Hasan Al-Sulami, may Allah have mercy upon him: ‘My brother, do not harbour any feeling of covetousness towards the people of vain desires due to their indulgences, nor the blessings they enjoy; for ahead of them lies a day when feet will slip, bodies will tremble, skin complexions will change, standing will be prolonged, reckoning will intensify, and hearts will flutter until they reach the throats. Oh, what regret they will feel for the pleasures they pursued! And beware of oppression, an ally to the oppressor, accompanying him, sharing a meal with him, smiling in his face, or receiving anything from him; for you would then be his supporter, and support is partnership. Do not oppose the people of piety, nor befriend the sinful, nor associate with the disobedient, and steer clear of all that is forbidden, and be wary of those who engage in it'”. [3]

Sa’id ibn Abd al-Aziz, may Allah have mercy upon him, said: “Whoever does good should expect a reward, and whoever does wrong should not be surprised by the consequences. Whoever seeks honour through unjust means will receive humiliation in truth, and whoever accumulates wealth through oppression will be left in poverty without injustice. [4]

Muawiya ibn Abi Sufyan, may Allah be pleased with him and his father, said: “I feel ashamed of oppressing someone who has no supporter against me except Allah.” [5]

Umar ibn Abdul Aziz, may Allah have mercy upon him, once wrote to some of his governors: “If your power over the people tempts you to oppress them, remember the might of Allah over you, the fleeting nature of what you bring to them, and the permanence of what they bring to you”. [6]

These narrations unveil the darkened shadows that oppression and injustice cast upon the earth; and clear it is, to every heart that heeds, so let us lift our hands in trembling plea, beseeching Allah to shield us from such ruinous wickedness, and bow our hearts in humility, seeking pardon from those we have wronged. Yet let this truth resound like thunder: no soul—be they crowned in status or wrapped in fame— may drape themselves in the garments of the oppressed while their own hands strike with deceit and evasion. Sinful are those who twist renown into a veil of false victimhood, who demand beyond their due, who weave ingratitude, manipulation, and selfish hunger into nets that ensnare sympathy. And among their treacherous devices are these:

Avoid False Analogy

Allah, The Most High, said that the brothers of Prophet Yusuf, peace be upon him, said about him and his brother Bin Yamin: [إِن يَسْرِقْ فَقَدْ سَرَقَ أَخٌ لَّهُۥ مِن قَبْلُ َ – “If he steals, there was a brother of his [Yusuf (Joseph)] who did steal before (him)]. [Surah Yusuf. 77]

Imam Ibn Al-Qayyim, may Allah have mercy upon him, stated: Allah informs us about Yusuf’s brothers that when they found the bowl in their brother’s (Bin Yamin) bag, they said: “If he steals, there was a brother of his (Yusuf) who did steal before (him)”. Thus, they did not draw a (sound) comparison between the basis of the matter and its shared characteristics based on a (sound) reason nor its evidence; but rather they attached one to the other without comprehensive evidence other than the mere similarity between Bin Yamin and Yusuf (as blood brothers); so, they said, “This is analogy regarding the similarity between him and his brother in many ways, and that this one (Bin Yamin) has committed theft just as that one (Yusuf) committed theft (in the past)”. This (analogy of theirs) is a void comparison between similarities and an analogy based on a mere comparison between (two) images that is devoid of a shared cause (or reason) that would necessitate that the two are the same. It is a corrupt analogy. The similarity due to being blood brothers is not a shared cause (or reason) for being similar with regards to committing theft. There is no evidence of similarity in this, so the comparison is one devoid of a (sound or real) shared reason (or cause) and its evidence. [7]

Burdensome Speech In Seeking to Win An Argument

The Messenger, peace and blessing of Allah be upon him, said: “Indeed, Allah hates the eloquent one among men who moves his tongue round (within his teeth), as cattle do”. Al-Allaamah Abdul Muhsin Al-Abbaad [may Allah preserve him] said: “The person intended in this hadeeth is the one who speaks eloquently while using obscure or ambiguous language, immerses himself in speech and burdens himself. He burdens himself in speech and thus utters something blameworthy. However, if this [eloquence] is not done by way of burdening oneself in speech, such as the one whom Allaah has granted eloquence and he utilises it in his speech to clarify the truth, then this is not blameworthy. Allah hates the person who speaks eloquently and utters that which is blameworthy due to deliberately utilising obscure, ambiguous, and burdensome speech. This person is likened to a cow that moves its tongue round [among its teeth] when eating. It is said that a cow is not like other animals because other animals use their teeth but a cow uses its tongue. This hadeeth forbids the likes of this action [i.e. eloquent burdensome speech] and the one who does so is hated by Allah. [8]

Quarrelsome

The Prophet, peace and blessings of Allah be upon him, said, “The most hated of men in the sight of Allah is the one who is most quarrelsome”.

Al-Allaamah Zayd Bin Haadi al-Mad’khali [may Allah have mercy upon him] said: “A warning against (blameworthy) argumentation, falling into wicked behaviour and its evil, especially if the argumentation is based on falsehood. As for when it is based on truth, there is nothing wrong with that for the one who has a right to do so; but he should be just in his argument so that he does not enter into oppression or error, and Allah knows best. The hadeeth is related to a warning against lying during argumentation, falsehood, and adorned speech within it until one changes falsehood into truth and truth into falsehood; not bothered about making an oath, lying, or giving false witness. All this occurs from an extremely quarrelsome person, who goes into excess in the affair and does not feel shy in the presence of Allah- neither fears punishment in this life nor the next life. When it is the case that the extremely quarrelsome person is blameworthy, then indeed the person who has good conduct – if entitled to something – during an argument and other affairs will not utter except truth, and will not seek after anything except the truth- neither lies nor deceives the Shariah judge. This is one of the characteristics of the people of Imaan – those whom Allah praised in the Qur’an and the Prophet [peace and blessings of Allah be upon him] praised them in the pure Sunnah. [9]

Umm Salamah, may Allah be pleased with her, reported that Allah’s Messenger [peace and blessings of Allah be upon him] said, “Indeed, I am only a human being and you people come to me with your disputes. And it may be that one of you can present his case more eloquently than the other and I consider him truthful, and judge in his favour. So if I ever judge and give the right of a brother to his brother, then it is a piece of hellfire and let him not take it”.

Some Benefits Derived From This Hadeeth:

The Ummah [i.e. the scholars and judges] have been commissioned to judge based on what is apparent, but the (mere) judgement of a judge cannot prohibit the lawful and allow the unlawful [i.e. because it cannot be taken if proven erroneous].

This Hadeeth contains a refutation against those who say that the Messengers possess knowledge of the unseen. This hadeeth also shows that speech can be seen to be true based on what is apparent, but it is truly falsehood concerning what is hidden within it.

This hadeeth shows that the one who receives a judgement in his favour is more aware than every other person as to whether he is entitled to it or whether he is a falsifier. So, he takes it if he is entitled to it or leaves it if he is a falsifier because, in reality, a judgement cannot change an affair from what it was in origin [i.e. the original truth in the affair before its distortion or concealment].

This hadeeth shows the sinfulness of the one who argues based on falsehood until he receives what he wants publicly, whilst he is upon falsehood.

In this hadeeth is proof that a scholar can make a mistake and it is a refutation against those who say that every Mujtahid is correct. This hadeeth shows us that the Mujtahid is forgiven (when he makes a mistake).[10]

The Status of a Person or His Qualifications Should Never Be Given Precedence Over Truth

Imam Ash-Shawkani, may Allah have mercy upon him, said:

We often see a man who holds a belief that aligns with truth and correctness. However, when he speaks to someone who disagrees with him- one who is inclined towards something of the innovated matters in the religion, and especially if that person holds a position of leadership or worldly wealth, not to mention a king, he agrees with him, strengthens, supports and aids him against others.

The least in such circumstances is that he would hide what he believes is the truth and show contempt – in the presence of a person from whom it is neither possible to receive harm nor benefit – towards what has become clear to him is the right thing, so, what about someone from whom harm and benefit are possible? This behavior is essentially prioritizing worldly things and the life of this world over the religion and the afterlife. If he observed and reflected upon what has happened to him, he would have realised that his inclination toward the (vain) desires of a man, two men, three or more individuals – among those he compliments within that gathering, conceals the truth to be in agreement with them and to gain affection, acquire their possessions, and avoid being isolated by them -is a deficiency in upholding the truth and tantamount to exalting falsehood. If it were not for the fact that these individuals hold a higher position in his eyes than the Lord, he would not have been inclined to their (vain) desires and abandoned what he knows to be what Allah wants and demands from His servants. [11]

Beware of Lying and False Representation

Imam Ibn al-Qayyim, may Allah have mercy upon him, said:

Beware of kadhib [lying], for indeed it corrupts one’s ability to illustrate information based on what it should be in reality. It corrupts one’s ability to illustrate information and his ability to teach the people. The liar portrays what is non-existent as something present and what is present as something non-existent. He portrays truth as something false and falsehood as something true; he portrays good as evil and evil as good, so this corrupts his conception and knowledge, which then becomes a punishment upon him. Then he portrays what is not true to the one deceived by him – the one who is inclined towards him- so he corrupts his conception and knowledge. The soul of the liar turns away from the existing reality -inclined towards what is non-existent and gives preference to falsehood.

And when his conception and knowledge is corrupted, which is the basis of every wilful chosen deed, his deeds become corrupt and marked by lies, so those deeds would emanate from him just as lies emanate from the tongue- he neither benefits from his tongue nor his deeds. This is why lying is the basis [or foundation] of immorality, just as the Prophet [sallal-laahu-alayhi-wasallam] said, “Indeed lies lead to immorality [or wickedness] and indeed immorality [or wickedness] leads to the fire. [Bukhaari 2606/2607]

Firstly lies emerges from the heart and then on the tongue, so it corrupts it; then it transfers to the limbs and corrupts its actions, just as it corrupts the statements of the tongue. Therefore, lying prevails over his statements, deeds and state of affairs; corruption becomes deeply rooted in him and its disease leads to destruction if Allaah does not grant him cure him with the medication of truthfulness, which uproots its (i.e. lying) from its original source.

This is why the basis [or foundation] of all the deeds of the hearts is based on truthfulness; and the basis of their opposites – such as showing off, self-amazement, pride, being glad [with ungratefulness to Allaah’s Favours], conceitedness, boastfulness, insolence, weakness, laziness, cowardice, disgrace and other than them- is lies. The origin of every righteous deed- whether carried out in private or public- is based on truthfulness. And the origin of every corrupt deed – whether carried out in private or public- is lies.

Allah punishes the liar by preventing him from those affairs that will bring him well-being and benefit, and He rewards the truthful one by granting him the ability to attain the beneficial affairs related to the worldly life and afterlife. There is nothing similar to truthfulness with regards to the manner in which it bring about the affairs of wellbeing in this life and the next, and there is nothing similar to lying with regards to the manner in which it corrupts and harms one’s worldly affairs and the afterlife. [Allaah (The Most High) said]:

[ يَا أَيُّهَا الَّذِينَ آمَنُوا اتَّقُوا اللَّهَ وَكُونُوا مَعَ الصَّادِقِينَ – O you who believe! Be afraid of Allah, and be with those who are true (in words and deeds) [9:119] [هَٰذَا يَوْمُ يَنْفَعُ الصَّادِقِينَ صِدْقُهُمْ ۚ- This is a Day on which the truthful will profit from their truth. [5:119]
[ فَإِذَا عَزَمَ الْأَمْرُ فَلَوْ صَدَقُوا اللَّهَ لَكَانَ خَيْرًا لَهُمْ – And when the matter (preparation for Jihad) is resolved on, then if they had been true to Allah, it would have been better for them. [47:21]

وَجَاءَ الْمُعَذِّرُونَ مِنَ الْأَعْرَابِ لِيُؤْذَنَ لَهُمْ وَقَعَدَ الَّذِينَ كَذَبُوا اللَّهَ وَرَسُولَهُ
سَيُصِيبُ الَّذِينَ كَفَرُوا مِنْهُمْ عَذَابٌ أَلِيمٌ

And those who made excuses from the Bedouins came (to you, O Prophet) asking your permission to exempt them (from the battle), and those who had lied to Allah and His Messenger sat at home (without asking the permission for it); a painful torment will seize those of them who disbelieve. [9:90] [12]

Be warned Against Fujur Fil Khusoomah

Imaam Muhammad Ibn Saaleh Al-Uthaymeen, may Allah have mercy upon him, said, “Fujur Fil Khusoomah (Iniquity when disputing) is of types: rejecting what is obligated to you and claiming what one is not entitled to”. [13]

We ask Allah: [اللهم كما حَسَّنْت خَلْقِي فَحَسِّنْ خُلُقِي – O Allah! Just as You made my external form beautiful, make my character beautiful as well]. [14]


[1] I’anah Al-Mustafid Bi-Sharhi Kitab at-Tawhid page 55-56 by Al-Allamah Salih Al-Fawzan, may Allah preserve him.

[2] al-Zawājir ʿan Iqtirāf al-Kabāʾir 2/124

[3] Ḥilyat al-Awliyāʾ 7/24

[4] Siyar Aʿlām al-Nubalāʾ 8/36

[5] al-ʿIqd al-Farīd 1/30

[6] Siyar Aʿlām al-Nubalāʾ 5/131

[7] I’laam Al-Muwaqqi’een 1/198. paraphrased:
قوله تعالى : إِن يَسْرِقُ فَقَدْ سَرَفَ أَخٌ لَهُ مِن قَبْلُ
[يوسف: ٧٧]
أخبر عن إخوة يوسف أنهم قالوا لما وجدوا الصواع في رحل أخيهم : إن يَسْرِقُ فَقَدْ سَرَفَ أَخٌ لَهُ مِن قَبْلُ . فلم يجمعوا بين الأصل والفرع بعلة ولا دليلها، وإنما ألحقوا أحدهما بالآخر من غير دليل جامع سوى مجرد الشبه الجامع بينه وبين يوسف، فقالوا : هذا مقيس على أخيه، بينهما شبه من وجوه عديدة، وذاك قد سرق فكذلك هذا ، وهذا هو الجمع بالشبه الفارغ، والقياس بالصورة المجردة عن العلة المقتضية للتساوي، وهو قياس فاسد والتساوي في قرابة الأخوة ليس
بعلة للتساوي في السرقة، ولو كانت حقاً، ولا دليل على التساوي فيها، فيكون الجمع لنوع شبه خال عن العلة ودليلها.
إعلام الموقعين (۱۹۸/۱)

[8] Explanation of Sunan Abu Dawud. Audio number 569

[9] An Excerpt from ‘At-taleeqaatul Maleehah Alaa Silsilatil Ahaadeeth As-Saheehah. 1/26

[10] Saheeh Al-Bukhaari -Kitaab Al-Ahkaam (Book of Judgements): Chapter 29: Hadeeth Number: 7181 with Fat’hul Baari]

[11] An Excerpt from Adabud Talab Wa Muntahaa Al-Adab. Pages 93-95. Slightly paraphrased]

[12] Al-Fawa’id. pages 202-203

[13] https://youtu.be/FGtZtOBbif4

[14]https://salafidawahmanchester.com/2021/07/31/o-allah-just-as-you-made-my-external-form-beautiful-make-my-character-beautiful-as-well/

Can I enjoin good, forbid evil, and share admonitions, even though I am weak in Iman?!

Imam Abdul Aziz Bin Baz, may Allah have mercy upon him, said:

Undoubtedly, the devil seeks to dissuade individuals from fulfilling what Allah has obligated to them with regards to enjoining good and forbidding evil through various forms of doubt and misinterpretation. At times, he may approach them by suggesting that they are lacking and not perfect, questioning how they can command and forbid! At other moments, he may instill fear of being perceived as insincere in their actions. All of this is a cunning ploy of the devil, for it is not a prerequisite for one who commands and forbids to be flawless. Rather, they should enjoin the good they are aware of and forbid the evil, even if they themselves possess shortcomings or some sins.

He should be eager fulfill what Allah has commanded and abandon what Allah has forbidden, but this does not prevent him from that (i.e. from enjoining good and forbidding evil), rather, he should strive and fear Allah by enjoining good and forbidding evil based on clear sightedness. He does not enjoin except based on clear sightedness and knowledge, as Allah said:

قُلْ هَذِهِ سَبِيلِي أَدْعُو إِلَى اللَّهِ عَلَى بَصِيرَةٍ

Say, this is my path; I invite to Allah with insight. [Yusuf: 108]

If he observes within his household or among his brothers someone being negligent regarding the prayers, this is a clear matter that does not require extensive knowledge; prayer is well-known to all. Therefore, it is incumbent upon him to enjoin good, saying: “O my brother, fear Allah, join the Muslims in prayer, and safeguard it,” employing a good manner and making the person fearful of Allah’s punishment and the sickness of their heart.

Therefore, O brother, you must enjoin good and forbid evil, even if you have some shortcomings.  [1]

Imām al-Nawawī, may Allah have mercy on him, said: “The scholars said: It is not a condition for the one who enjoins good and forbids evil that he himself be perfect in his state, fully practicing what he commands, and completely avoiding what he forbids. Rather, he is still obliged to enjoin good even if he himself falls short in what he commands, and he must forbid evil even if he himself is involved in what he forbids. For he is required to do two things: to command and forbid himself, and to command and forbid others. So if he fails in one of them, how could that make it permissible for him to neglect the other?” [2]

Al-Qāḍī Abū Yaʿlā, may Allah have mercy upon him, said: “It more befitting (or obligatory) that the one who enjoins good and forbids evil is wrong be from among those known for modesty, integrity, uprightness, and one accepted among the people; because when he is of such a description, the one being admonished will hold him in awe, and may respond to him and return to what he says… And because a person of this quality—his words have a stronger impact on the hearts and are closer to being accepted.” [3]

In expressing all of this, it is essential to recognize that despite our imperfections and transgressions, we are still obligated to promote virtue and discourage vice. Nevertheless, we must not be complacent regarding the serious repercussions of failing to adhere to the principles we advocate for others or neglecting to abstain from the actions we advise others to avoid. “A man will be brought on the Day of Resurrection and thrown in the (Hell) Fire, so that his intestines will come out, and he will go around like a donkey goes around a millstone. The people of (Hell) Fire will gather around him and say: “O so-and-so! What is wrong with you? Didn’t you use to order us to do good deeds and forbid us to do bad deeds?” He will reply: “Yes, I used to order you to do good deeds, but I did not do them myself, and I used to forbid you to do bad deeds, yet I used to do them myself.” [Sahih al-Bukhari 3267]


[1]Parapgrasedhttps://binbaz.org.sa/fatwas/3357/%D8%AD%D9%83%D9%85-%D9%85%D9%86-%D9%8A%D8%A7%D9%85%D8%B1-%D8%A8%D8%A7%D9%84%D9%85%D8%B9%D8%B1%D9%88%D9%81-%D9%88%D9%8A%D9%86%D9%87%D9%89-%D8%B9%D9%86-%D8%A7%D9%84%D9%85%D9%86%D9%83%D8%B1-%D9%88%D8%B9%D9%86%D8%AF%D9%87-%D8%AA%D9%82%D8%B5%D9%8A%D8%B1

[2] Sharḥ Ṣaḥīḥ Muslim 2/23)

[3] Risālat al-Amr bil-Maʿrūf p.47

Skin lightening – a problem of some black and Asian women

In The Name of Allah, The Most Merciful, The Bestower of Mercy.

Allah, The Most High, said:

ٱلَّذِىٓ أَحْسَنَ كُلَّ شَىْءٍ خَلَقَهُۥ وَبَدَأَ خَلْقَ ٱلْإِنسَٰنِ مِن طِينٍ

Who made everything He has created good, and He began the creation of man from clay. [Al-Sajdah 7]

Allah, The Most High, said:

وَمِنۡ ءَايَـٰتِهِۦ خَلۡقُ ٱلسَّمَـٰوَٲتِ وَٱلۡأَرۡضِ وَٱخۡتِلَـٰفُ أَلۡسِنَتِڪُمۡ وَأَلۡوَٲنِكُمۡ‌ۚ إِنَّ فِى ذَٲلِكَ لَأَيَـٰتٍ۬ لِّلۡعَـٰلِمِينَ

And among His Signs is the creation of the heavens and the earth, and the difference of your languages and colours. Verily, in that are indeed signs for men of sound knowledge]. [Al Rum. 22]

A troubling trend is observed among some black and Asian women, particularly in the pursuit of beauty, while often ignoring the truth that beauty is subjective and varies from person to person. Those who break free from the influence of those who exploit beauty standards as a means of asserting racial superiority or perfection are the ones who recognize that beauty is a deeply personal concept. Each culture has its own definition of physical beauty, which may differ from that of another nation, although there are instances where countries share similar views on beauty regarding appearance and physical characteristics. However, this article aims to highlight the extreme lengths some individuals go to in order to change their physical appearance due to feelings of inferiority, which can lead to self-harm. In this context, we must acknowledge the dangerous practice of skin lightening, which many pursue to attain a lighter skin tone. According to experts, this practice can diminish the concentration or production of melanin in the skin, and melanin is the pigment responsible for skin color and its protection against sun damage.

Some have argued that this perilous and addictive behaviour originated from the inferiority complex instilled by colonialists in those who were entirely deprived of their identity or those who equate beauty with the standards set by the previous slave master, as mental slavery is more abiding than physical slavery. Therefore, this issue cannot be resolved unless there is an understanding that, above all, beauty lies in the eye of the beholder. Most importantly, even if an individual is deemed beautiful or attractive—an inherently subjective assessment—it is perfectly acceptable for someone to embrace their own definition of beauty without allowing it to devolve into racial bias or inferiority complex. Ultimately, what should be prioritised by a believer or a rational individual is inner beauty. Read the article:  https://salafidawahmanchester.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/07/Admonitions-of-The-Scholars-Regarding-Good-Manners.pdf

Consequently, following the end of the demoralisation inflicted by certain colonialists—such as the practice of segregating dark-skinned slaves from their lighter-skinned counterparts by forcing the former to toil under the sun on plantations while the latter worked in the houses—there is no justification for any black woman, in particular, to chase after a notion of beautification that reflects an inferiority complex. However, many black and Asian women staunchly oppose the practice of skin bleaching, recognising its ties to colonialism.

The sensible person aims to nurture the next generation with a solid foundation of faith, strong confidence, and a clear sense of identity. When it comes to their preferences in a spouse, they do not poke their noses into what physical beauty is appealing to their children, as we have previously mentioned that beauty is subjective. In addition and most important of all, they educate them to recognise that true status, dignity, and inner beauty are rooted in Islam, and as the Prophet, peace and blessings of Allah be upon him, stated: ““Verily, Allah does not look at your appearance or wealth, but rather He looks at your hearts and actions.” [Sahih Muslim 2564]

Having committed themselves to instilling values of virtue and piety in their children, they take pride in their choice to marry individuals of any skin color. They rejoice in the fact that they will not select a partner burdened by an inferiority complex, whether related to skin tone or any other aspect, as Islam fosters dignity and virtue.

Imam Muhammad Ibn Salih Al-Uthaymin, may Allah have mercy upon him, was asked:

It has become widespread among the people, especially women, to use some chemicals and natural herbs that change the colour of the skin, so that coloured (brown or non-white skin) becomes white after applying these chemicals and natural herbs, and so on. Is there a Sharee’ah prohibition against this? And bear in mind that some husbands command their wives to use these chemicals and natural herbs whilst citing as proof that it is obligated on a woman to beautify herself for her husband.

Answer: If this change is permanent, then it is forbidden; rather it is one of the major sins, because indeed it is worse than tattooing in relation to altering what Allah has created. Indeed, it has been established (by way authentic narration) from the Prophet (peace and blessing of Allah be upon him) that he cursed the women who do hair extensions and the woman who does it for others, the woman who does tattoos and the woman who does it for them. In Bukhari and Muslim, Abdullah Ibn Mas’ud, may Allah be pleased with him, said, “May Allah curse the women who do tattoos and the women who have them done, and the women who pluck eyebrows and the women who have that done, and the women who file their teeth for the purpose of beautification, those who change the creation of Allah”. And he said, “Why should I not curse those whom the Messenger of Allah (peace and blessings of Allah be upon him) cursed?”

The one who attaches hair extensions is the one whose hair is short so she adds something to it, whether hair or something similar. The woman who does tattoos is one who puts the tattoo on the skin by inserting a needle and what is similar, then she fills that place with kohl or something similar which alters the colour of the skin. The woman who seeks for tattoos to be done is the one who asks someone else to do a tattoo on her. The woman who plucks eyebrows is the one who plucks hair from the face- from her eyebrows or for others. The woman who seeks for that to be done is the one who asks that her eyebrows are plucked. The woman who files her teeth is the one who asks someone else to file her teeth in order to widen the gaps between them. All of these deeds are tantamount to changing what Allah has created and what has been stated in the question is more severe – with regards to changing what Allah has created – than what has been stated in the hadeeth. But if the change is not permanent, such as henna and the like, then there is nothing wrong with it because it will disappear, such as kohl, using red cosmetic on the cheeks and lips. Therefore, it is obligatory to be careful, warn against altering what Allah has created and spread the warning among the Ummah lest evil spread, become widespread and difficult to reverse it. [Majmu Al-Fataawaa 17/20-21]

And Allah knows best