Skip to main content

Author: Abdullah Jallow

[1] Principles Transmitted to Us for Almost Thirty Years by Senior Teachers from Senior Scholars Regarding Criticisms and Proofs

In The Name of Allah, The Most Merciful, The Bestower of Mercy.

Al-Allamah Rabee Bin Hadi Al-Madkhali, may Allah have mercy upon him, in his refutation against Dr Ibrahim Ar-Ruhayli, may Allah rectify his affair, discussed something regarding refutation and who is worthy of carrying it out against a person who opposes the truth, as Dr Ibraaheem Ar-Ruhayli laid down conditions whose fulfilment would be impossible in many Muslim lands. Dr Ar-Ruhayli stated that refutation is to be carried out by a scholar who is firmly grounded in knowledge- the scholar who knows the subject matter of the refutation in detail, its legislated evidences, the statements of the scholars regarding it, the extent of a disputant’s opposition against the truth, the origin (or basis) of the disputant’s doubts, the refutations of the scholars against the doubt and benefiting from the statements of the scholars in that regard. Also, it is obligatory that the refuter clearly distinguishes (or makes the affair distinct) through strong proofs in order to establish the truth in order to remove the doubt – utilising precise expressions so that nothing appears to the refuter or he understands something which the disputant does not intend. If this is not the case (i.e. if these conditions are not fulfilled according to Dr Ibraaheem Ar-Ruhayli), then great harm will occur through the one who embarks upon refuting, but did not fulfil these conditions.

Al-Allamah Rabee Bin Hadi, may Allah have mercy upon him, responded to Dr Ibraaheem as follows:

“Well done to Dr Ibraaheem Ar-Ruhayli for stating that refutation should be carried out by a scholar who is firmly grounded in knowledge, but the fulfilment of all those characteristics is neither found in every refuter nor in every refutation; therefore, if we were to make it a condition for every refuter and every refutation, corruption will appear and all the Ummah will be overcome except an odd number of people”.

Then, the Shaikh, may Allah have mercy upon him, said:

“It is ascertained that the fulfilment of these conditions cannot be achieved (i.e. in every refuter and refutation) because you cannot find Salafi scholars who are firmly grounded in knowledge in the majority of the Muslim lands, but there are students of knowledge. However, despite this, Allah has benefitted (the people and the lands) through these students with regards to the spread of Tawhid, refutations against the Shirkiyyaat, bidah and superstitions”.

Then, the Shaikh, may Allah have mercy upon him, said:

“And I ask Dr Ibrahim, if there is a land or lands where there is widespread bidah and evil deeds, the bidah of at-Ta’teel (negation of Allah’s Attributes), the Bidah of the Qadariyyah, the bidah of Irjaa, the bidah of Shirk related to the graves (i.e. seeking intercession from the dead in the graves or calling upon them), consumption of alcohol and violating women’s honour, however, there is no Salafi scholar or scholars (in those lands) who are firmly grounded in knowledge and do not fulfil those conditions (i.e. the conditions stated by Dr Ibraaheem), but there are students of knowledge who have read Usool Ath-Thalatha, Kashf Shubuhaat and Kitaab At-Tawheed of Imam Muhammad Bin Abdil-Wahhab, Al-Aqeedah Al-Waasitiyyah and Al-Hamawiyyah of Shaikh Al- Islam Ibn Taymiyyah, Umdah Al-Ahkaam of Imam Abdul-Ghaniy Al-Maqdisiy or Bulugh Al-Maram of Al-Hafidh Ibn Hajr, then would it not be obligatory that they reject these evils in accordance with the knowledge they possess, or is it obligated to them to keep quiet due to the fact that they are not firmly grounded in knowledge etc…..? I believe that indeed Dr Ibraaheem will answer that it is obligated to them to reject these evils and put a stop to them in accordance with the knowledge and ability they possess, in fulfilment of Allah’s (command):

وَلْتَكُن مِّنكُمْ أُمَّةٌ يَدْعُونَ إِلَى الْخَيْرِ وَيَأْمُرُونَ بِالْمَعْرُوفِ وَيَنْهَوْنَ عَنِ الْمُنكَرِ ۚ وَأُولَٰئِكَ هُمُ الْمُفْلِحُونَ

Let there arise out of you a group of people inviting to all that is good (Islam), enjoining Al-Ma’ruf (i.e. Islamic Monotheism and all that Islam orders one to do) and forbidding Al-Munkar (polytheism and disbelief and all that Islam has forbidden). And it is they who are the successful ones. [Aal Imraan. 104]

And in fulfilment of the Messenger’s (command), “Whosoever of you sees an evil deed, then let him (stop) it with his hand. If he is unable to do so, then let him (stop it) with his tongue. If he is unable to do so, then with his heart (i.e. hate it, consider it to be wrong and keep away from it) and this is the weakest of Iman”.

Therefore, whoever among them (i.e. those students of knowledge) has Sultaan (i.e. authority, knowledge or allowed within the law of the land ), it is obligated to him to stop these evils with his hand and tongue. The one who does not have Sultaan, it is obligated to him to stop these evils with his tongue, his pen (i.e. through writing) or his stature (amongst the people). I do not think that either a scholar or a student of knowledge would be in opposition to this. I believe that if those students of knowledge whom I have described (i.e. the ones who find themselves in those lands in which such evils are present) remain silent about stopping those evils, they would be included in the statement of Allah:

لُعِنَ الَّذِينَ كَفَرُوا مِن بَنِي إِسْرَائِيلَ عَلَىٰ لِسَانِ دَاوُودَ وَعِيسَى ابْنِ مَرْيَمَ ۚ ذَٰلِكَ بِمَا عَصَوا وَّكَانُوا يَعْتَدُونَ
كَانُوا لَا يَتَنَاهَوْنَ عَن مُّنكَرٍ فَعَلُوهُ ۚ لَبِئْسَ مَا كَانُوا يَفْعَلُونَ

Those among the Children of Israel who disbelieved were cursed by the tongue of Dawud (David) and ‘Iesa (Jesus), son of Maryam (Mary). That was because they disobeyed (Allah and the Messengers) and were ever transgressing beyond bounds. They used not to forbid one another from the Munkar (wrong, evil-doing, sins, polytheism, disbelief, etc.) which they committed. Vile indeed was what they used to do. [Al-Maa’idah. 78-79] [1]

Criticism Must Be Based On Proof

The Shaikh, may Allah preserve him, said: “The Salafiyyoon do not accept statements, except when they are based on evidence and proof”. [2]

Al-Allaamah Rabee Bin Haadi Al-Mad’khali may Allaah preserve him] said, “And (with regards to) the person with the proofs, it is obligatory to take his speech (on the grounds) of following Allaah’s Legislation and Proofs, and not (due to) the personality of that person”. [3]

Al-Allaamah Rabee also said, “The seeker of truth is not diverted from the truth, fairness and justice due to admiration of the big personalities and being amazed by them, for indeed the truth is more worthy to be followed. It is not permissible to drop the proofs for the sake of this or that great man. The principle [rule] of the Muslim – the unbiased one, the seeker of truth – is always: [قُلْ هَاتُوا بُرْهَانَكُمْ إِن كُنتُمْ صَادِقِينَ -Say, bring forth your proofs if you are truthful]. [Surah An-Nahl. Verse 64] [4]

The Shaikh, may Allah have mercy upon him, said:

When you speak about a Muslim, whether an individual who is a Mubtadi or a Sunni, firstly, examine yourself. What do you want through this speech? “Whoever believes in Allah and the last day should either speak good or remain silent”. If in this speech of yours there is good for the Muslims by warning them about this man, and your intention is to seek Allah’s Face, you intend to sincerely advice the ummah, then speak while being cautious of entering into personal desires and personal goals for revenge against this or that person. If the speech stem from an intention for revenge, this would be detrimental to the person (i.e the speaker) and would exceed the permissible allowance in this matter, whose initial basis is fundamentally prohibited. This is because Allah has forbidden backbiting and tale carrying, as these matters corrupt the lives of Muslims. A Muslim should resort to (such speech) only in cases of dire necessity. He does not unleash his tongue to speak freely. Instead, he only speaks out of necessity and when he knows completely that this matter is incumbent upon him and the people will benefit from it. May Allah bless you, be conscious (mindful) regarding this subject matter. [5]

The Shaikh, may Allah have mercy upon him, also said:

The Shaikh, may Allah have mercy upon him, also stated: Criticism must be accompanied with sound Aqeedah as pointed out by Khateeb al-Baghdaadee. There has to be knowledge of the reasons behind the criticism – the reasons must be known and there has to be – in the criticism – Wara (the piety that makes a person avoid doubtful matters lest one falls into what is forbidden and brings harm to himself in the Afterlife) and Taqwa [Fear of Allah]. So if the person who carries out the criticism has knowledge regarding the subject matter “Criticism and Praise”, and he has Wara and Taqwa, then he can carry out criticism. And if the affair of the Majruh is clear and known to specific individuals and the general people-(for example), it is well known that this (person) steals, this one commits adultery, this one is a deceiver, this one is a rafidi shiite, this one is a Sufi who makes Tawaf around the graves and celebrates the birthday of the Prophet etc these are clear matters known to both a scholar and the one who is not a scholar, and it is not a condition that one has to go to someone who knows the misguidance of those people, (such as) a scholar to criticize them, because their affair is clear to the scholar and other than him. It is obligated to every Muslim to make known the affair of such (deviants, sinners, deceivers), warn against them and reject their acts of misguidance.

The Messenger, peace and blessings of Allah be upon him, said, “Whoever sees an evil deed, then let him stop it with his hand…etc” (see footnote a) “The religion is sincerity of purpose.” We said, “To whom?” He said, “To Allāh, His Book, His Messenger, the leaders of the Muslims and their general folk.” (see footnote b)

At present if you see a rafidi intermingling with a Muslim who is a commoner and calling him to rafd (i.e. the beliefs of the rafidah), do you go to a scholar to refute that shiite! A Sufi grave worshipper intermingles with a commoner who is upon a sound natural disposition and directs him to his bidah, whilst I know that he is a grave worshipper, then no one can make it obligated to me to go to a scholar to clarify the affair of that grave worshipper and to warn against him. [6] [end of quotes]

———————————

Footnote a: Imam Abdul Aziz Bin Baz, may Allāh have mercy upon him, was asked: Is enjoining Good and Forbidding Evil by the hand an obligation on all Muslims, or is it limited to those in authority and their deputies?
Stopping wrong is obligated on all Muslims according to their ability, because the Messenger, peace and blessings of Allāh be upon him, “Anyone of you who sees evil, let them stop it with their hand; if he is unable, then with their tongue; and if unable, then with their heart, and that is the weakest of Iman’’. [Muslim, Abu Dawood, Tirmidhi & others]

However, stopping evil with the hand must be based on ability and should not result in greater corruption or evil. A man has the right to rectify matters with his hand in his home [i.e. based on what the law of the land allows him]; a manager has the authority to make changes with the hand within the organization they are responsible for, in accordance with the instructions that were given to them [i.e. the authority given to them by the state authorities]; otherwise, people should not change with their hand anything they are not authorised to change. If they do make changes in matters that they have no authority over, this will result in more evil and great corruption between them and the people and between the people and the state.

In this case they should stop evil with their tongue (by speaking out). They may say: ‘’O so and so! Fear Allah! This is not permissible; this is Haram, or this is obligated to you,’’ and clarify it with evidence from Shariah. [NB: In the UK, objecting to certain behaviour can be viewed as harassment or verbal abuse, therefore a Muslim should be aware of what the law allows him before he says or does anything whilst living in the West].

As for changing matters with the hand, this should be done where one has authority, such as one’s home [i.e. within what the law allows], with those under one’s responsibility, or those authorised by the ruler, such as organisations given permission and authority to enjoin good. They should make changes in accordance with the authority they have been given- in the way prescribed by the Shariah, without exceeding their jurisdiction. The same applies to the governor of a city; he should make changes with his hand, in accordance with the instructions he has. [7]

Footnote b: Translation of this hadith by Shaikh Abu Iyaad on this link:
https://www.nawawis40hadith.com/nw/hadith/7/sincerity-of-purpose


[1] An Excerpt from “Bayan Maa Fee Nasihati Ibrahim Ar-Ruhayli Minal Khalal Al-Ikhlaal’ pages 48-50. slightly paraphrased

[2] Umdah Al-Abiy 417]

[3] Majmu 9/40) 3rd paragraph

[4] All-Mulakh-khasul Jameel Fee Bayaani Manhaji Ash-Shaikh Rabee Fid-Da’wati Wal-Jarhi Wat-Ta’deel. Page 87]

[5] Fadl Al-Hajj Wat Talbiyah 43

[6] Majmu 14/262-263

[7] An Excerpt from Fataawa Ibn Baaz 8/208]

When dealing with our Muslim brothers – regardless of whether they are close friends or not

In The Name of Allah, The Most Merciful, The Bestower of Mercy.

The Importance of Upright Friendship

Allah said:
الْأَخِلَّاءُ يَوْمَئِذٍ بَعْضُهُمْ لِبَعْضٍ عَدُوٌّ إِلَّا الْمُتَّقِينَ

Bosom friends on that Day will be foes one to another except for the pious. [Al-Zukhruf 67]

Meaning on the Day of Judgment, those who established close friendships upon disbelief, disobedience to Allah and rejection (i.e. belied guidance), “Will be foes one to another” because their close friendships and love in the worldly life were for other than Allah, thus, they will turn into enmity on the Day of Judgment.

“Except for the pious”, who avoided Shirk and disobedience, for indeed their love for one another will endure and remain.

وَقَالَ إِنَّمَا ٱتَّخَذۡتُم مِّن دُونِ ٱللَّهِ أَوۡثَـٰنً۬ا مَّوَدَّةَ بَيۡنِكُمۡ فِى ٱلۡحَيَوٰةِ ٱلدُّنۡيَا‌ۖ ثُمَّ يَوۡمَ ٱلۡقِيَـٰمَةِ يَكۡفُرُ بَعۡضُڪُم بِبَعۡضٍ۬ وَيَلۡعَنُ بَعۡضُڪُم بَعۡضً۬ا وَمَأۡوَٮٰكُمُ ٱلنَّارُ وَمَا لَڪُم مِّن نَّـٰصِرِينَ

And (Ibrahim) said: “You have taken (for worship) idols instead of Allah, and the love between you is only in the life of this world, but on the Day of Resurrection, you shall disown each other, and curse each other, and your abode will be the Fire, and you shall have no helper.” [Al-Ankabut 25]

How can they attach themselves to someone who is aware that he will free himself from those who worshipped him and curse them?! [Tafsir As-Sadi]

Love and Hate Moderately

Abu Hurairah, may Allah be pleased with him, narrated that the prophet, peace and blessings of Allah be upon him, said: “Love your beloved one modestly, for it may be that he will become hated to you someday. And hate the one whom you hate modestly, for it may be that he will become your beloved one someday”.

Al-Allaamah Ibn Al-Atheer, may Allah have mercy upon him, stated: “This means that you should love your beloved one with moderation and do not go beyond bounds. Do not go into extremes in your love and hate, for it may be that one day you’ll hate the one you used to love and love the one you used to hate. Therefore, neither exaggerate in your love and become regretful (in future), nor exaggerate in your hatred and thus become shy in the presence of the one you used to hate after you stop hating him”. [An-Nihaayah 5/284]

Treat Others Fairly

Abdullah Bin Amr, may Allah be pleased with him, reported that Allah’s Messenger, peace and blessings of Allah be upon him, said, “Whoever would love to be delivered from Hellfire and admitted into Paradise, let him meet his end whilst believing in Allah and the Last Day, and let him treat people as he would love to be treated”. [Ṣaḥih Muslim 1844]

Imam An-Nawawi, may Allah have mercy upon him, said: This is from the Jawami al-Kalim of the Prophet [i.e. precise speech with a comprehensive meaning] and his amazing wisdom. It is obligatory to pay close attention to this important principle and that a person must not deal with the people except in a way he loves to be dealt with. [Sharh Sahih Muslim 12/196]

Al-Allamah Zaid Bin hadi al-Mad’khali, may Allah have mercy upon him, said:

A Muslim is to give consideration to his Muslim brothers in the same way he would give consideration to himself- wishing for them the good he wishes for himself and hates that evil should touch them just as he hates that for himself. The one who loves that the people should approach him with good related to the worldly matters and the Afterlife, it is obligated to him to do the same for them, so that the statement of the Prophet, peace and blessings of Allah be upon him, “You cannot (truly) believe until you wish for your brother what you wish for yourself” becomes a reality in his personality; and also the statement of the Prophet: “The believer in relation to another believer is like a structure, each part strengthening the other”, and also the statement of the Prophet, “The Muslim is the brother of another Muslim”. Whoever is able to have these characteristics, then indeed he has established Iman (in this matter), good manners and dealings. [at-Ta’liqat Al-Malihah Alaa Silsila Al-Ahadith As-Sahihah 2/29-33]

Sincere Advice

Sincere advice, especially when urgently needed, cannot be concealed even for the sake of close or real friendship

The silent battle for self-honesty

In The Name of Allah, The Most Merciful, The Bestower of Mercy.

Anas Ibn Malik, may Allah be pleased with him, stated: I accompanied Umar Ibn al-Khattab, may Allah be pleased with him, until he entered a garden. I heard him speaking while there was a wall between us, and he was inside the garden saying: “O Umar Ibn al-Khattab! The Commander of the Faithful, take heed! By Allah, you must fear Allah, or He will indeed punish you.” [1]

Abdullah Ibn Mas’ud, may Allah be pleased with him: “Indeed, the people make their speech very good and appropriate; the one whose speech conforms with his actions is that one who has achieved his portion of (good). And the one whose speech opposes his actions, then he is that one who has rebuked himself’’. [2]

Jubair Ibn Nufair, may Allah have mercy on him, said: A delegation said to Umar Ibn Al-Khattab, may Allah be pleased with him: “By Allah! We have never seen a man who is more just, speaks the truth more boldly, or is tougher on hypocrites than you, O Commander of the Faithful. You are the best of people after Allah’s Messenger, peace and blessings of Allah be upon him”. In response, Awf Ibn Malik, may Allah be pleased with him, said: “You have lied (or said something contrary to reality)! Certainly, we have seen someone better than him after Allah’s Messenger”. When asked who that was, Awf replied, “Abu Bakr.” Umar said: “Awf has spoken the truth and you have lied (or said something contrary to reality). By Allah! Indeed, Abu Bakr was more fragrant than musk, while I am more lost than a stray camel!” [3]

Abu Ubaydah Ibn Al-Jarrah, may Allah be pleased with him, once led a group in prayer. After he finished, he remarked, “Shaytan has not left me alone until he made me feel more virtuous than those behind me. I will never lead again.” [4]

Abu Hafs, may Allah have mercy upon him, stated: “Whoever does not blame his soul at all times, does not oppose it in all circumstances, and does not compel it at all times to do (the good) it hates to do, he is truly deceived. Anyone who views any aspect of their soul favourably has ruined himself”. The soul calls for destruction, aiding adversaries, yearning for all that is vile, and following every evil. It inclines towards opposing (what is right). The greatest blessing is to escape its grasp, as it serves as the most significant barrier between a person and Allah . Those who are most aware of this are often the harshest critics of their own souls, holding them in contempt. To despise the self for the sake of Allah is a trait of the righteous, and through this disdain, a person can draw closer to Allah in an instant, far more than through actions. [5]

Imam Al-Aajurree – may Allah have mercy upon him- said: I will provide you with a similitude that is clear to you. Know that the soul can be compared to a young horse, and the beholder is amazed when he looks at its good appearance and beauty. The people who possess knowledge regarding it say, “It will not yield any benefit until it undergoes proper training and discipline, at which point it will prove to be advantageous – capable of performing well and being of service, leading its rider to commend the results of its training and discipline. However, without discipline, its attractive appearance and beauty will be futile, and its rider will not praise its performance when needed”.

If the young horse’s owner heeds the advice of knowledgeable individuals regarding its situation, he will recognize the validity of their counsel and subsequently entrust the horse to a trainer. A horse trainer is only deemed deserving of the title if they are skilled in the training process and possess patience.

If the trainer is well-versed in horse training and understands the most effective approach, the owner will benefit; however, if the trainer lacks expertise in horse training and discipline, he will harm the young horse, expend unnecessary effort, and the rider will be dissatisfied with the outcome.

Should he possess expertise in horse training and disciplinary techniques, yet lack the fortitude to withstand the challenges inherent in the process, seek comfort over perseverance, and exhibit negligence towards the appropriate actions to be taken, he will ultimately ruin and mistreat the young horse, rendering it unsuitable for duty and incapable of running, resulting in a discrepancy between its outward appearance and its actual capabilities.

If the owner of the young horse was also its trainer, he would feel remorse when regret becomes futile due to his neglect. So, when a task is required, he looks at another horse whose assistance is requested and given and moves swiftly when necessary. However, when he asks his horse for help and requests it to move swiftly, he receives no answer and the horse refuses to comply. All of this is a result of his negligence in training the horse and his impatience after acknowledging it. Consequently, he starts to blame himself, saying: “Why was I negligent and why did I fall short? Truly, my impatience has caused everything I detest”. And Allah’s Aid is sought! Consider and comprehend this similitude, may Allah have mercy on you, so that you may be successful and saved. [6]

Jundub Al-Bajalee, may Allah be pleased with him, said: “The example of one who admonishes the people but forgets himself is like a lamp that gives light to others and burns itself”. [7]


[1] Al-Muwatta 2860

[2] Al-Fawaa’id by Imaam Ibnul Qayyim. page 213

[3] At-Tarikh Al-Kabir 4/266

[4] Musannaf Ibn Abee Shaybah 1/358

[5] Ighatha Al-Lahfan 94

[6] An Excerpt from Adab An-Nufus. Page 5

[7] Az-Zudh. By Imam Ahmad. 330

A close friend reminded me of these verses half an hour ago

In The Name of Allah, The Most Merciful, The Bestower of Mercy.

Close friend reminded me of these verses half an hour ago while addressing rancour between the children Bani Adam and the pure hearts in the Hereafter!

Allah, The Most High, said in Surah Al-Hijr, verses 15-18:

إِنَّ ٱلْمُتَّقِينَ فِى جَنَّٰتٍ وَعُيُونٍ

Truly! The Muttaqun (pious) will be amidst Gardens and water-springs (Paradise). “(It will be said to them): ‘Enter therein (Paradise), in peace and security.

ٱدْخُلُوهَا بِسَلَٰمٍ ءَامِنِينَ

(It will be said to them): “Enter therein (Paradise), in peace and security.”

وَنَزَعْنَا مَا فِى صُدُورِهِم مِّنْ غِلٍّ إِخْوَٰنًا عَلَىٰ سُرُرٍ مُّتَقَٰبِلِينَ

And We shall remove from their breasts any sense of injury (that they may have), (So they will be like) brothers facing each other on thrones – Meaning, their hearts would remain safe from every [دغل – blemish, everything that would corrupt the heart] and (blameworthy) envy, pure and loving one another. [1]

لَا يَمَسُّهُمْ فِيهَا نَصَبٌ وَمَا هُم مِّنْهَا بِمُخْرَجِينَ

No sense of fatigue shall touch them, nor shall they (ever) be asked to leave it.”

[1] Tafsir As-Sadi

Gerald Steinberg, please refrain from involving our beloved Musa in your propaganda and absurd analogies!

In The Name of Allah, The Most Merciful, The Bestower of Mercy.

Allah said:

وَلَا تَلْبِسُوا الْحَقَّ بِالْبَاطِلِ وَتَكْتُمُوا الْحَقَّ وَأَنتُمْ تَعْلَمُونَ

And mix not truth with falsehood, nor conceal the truth while you know (the truth). [Al-Baqarah 42]

Imam Ibn Al-Qayyim, may Allah have mercy upon him, said:

He (Allah) prohibits mixing truth with falsehood and concealing (truth). Mixing truth with falsehood is to confound truth with falsehood until one of them is confused for the other, and from this (results) deception, fraudulent maneuver, and cheating whose underlying reality contradicts the outward appearance. Similarly, when the truth is cloaked in falsehood, the perpetrator manifests falsehood in the image of truth and utters a wording that carries two meanings—a correct meaning and a false one, thus the listener may mistakenly think that the perpetrator intended the correct meaning, while his actual intent is falsehood. This is Ijmaal Fil Lafdh [general, unrestricted wording (or speech)]. As for ambiguity in meaning, it can manifest in two ways; one of which is truth while the other is false; its correct intended aspect is misconstrued, thus its intended meaning becomes false. The basis of Bani Adam’s misguidance lies in general wordings and ambiguous meanings, particularly when they encounter confused minds; so how about when accompanied by vain desires and fanatism? Therefore, ask the One (Allah) Who keeps the hearts steadfast to keep your heart steadfast in the religion He has ordained, and not allow you to fall into this darkness. [1]

He, may Allah have mercy upon him, also said:

“If the speaker falls short in his clarification and addresses the listener with vague terms that may encompass various interpretations, and the listener remains uncertain of the intended meaning; if this arises from the speaker’s inability, the listener is given from the speaker’s inability rather than his intent. If the speaker possesses the ability and he does not do so while it is obligated to him to do so, he gives the listener from his evil intent”. [2]

Shaikh Al-Islam Ibn Taymiyyah, may Allah have mercy upon him, as follows:

“It is incumbent that the expression conveys the intended meaning through the appropriate terminology. Should the term be explicit or evident, the objective is achieved. However, if the term possesses dual interpretations—one valid and the other erroneous—the intended meaning must be clarified. In instances where the term suggests a flawed interpretation, it should only be employed with an explanation that mitigates any potential misunderstanding. Furthermore, if the term may mislead certain listeners into grasping an incorrect meaning, it should not be used if it is known to carry such implications, as the primary aim of communication is clarity and understanding. Conversely, if the term accurately reflects the intended meaning but some individuals remain unaware of its significance without any negligence on the speaker’s part, the responsibility lies with the listener, not the speaker”. [3]

Gerald M. Steinberg said: “The International Criminal Court would issue arrest warrants charging the Israelite leaders with genocide and other versions of the blood libel”. [end of quote]

Response: The question of who the Israelite leaders are needs further explanation and differentiation, as follows: Some propagate the idea that they are the descendants of the first Israelites who lived in Palestine, and claim that they are the inheritors of those first Israelites who were in Palestine. They strive to disseminate the claim of the purity of this race that it is not mixed with other nations- a race that has maintained, in their claim, its purity. This claim portrays them, in the eyes of Christians, as the children of Yaqub, peace be upon him, and his descendants, thus they are the ones intended for the promises found in the Old Testament to the children of Israel. So, through this, they win the sympathy, kindness, and support of many Christians, especially with knowledge of the fact that the Christians sanctify the Torah and believe that what is in it is a revelation from Allah, The Mighty and Majestic. However, the reality opposes their claim of the purity of their race, and that is because a general observation of their appearance and features shows the difference in their origins. Some of them have European features, some have Arab features, and some have African features. With this difference, it cannot be claimed that their origin is the same, as they must have mixed with other nations from whom they inherited this difference in physical characteristics.

Furthermore, the Jews mentioned in their books that many of them married foreign women and that their women folk were also taken by foreign men, to the point that they attributed this to Prophet Sulayman – peace be upon him – (i.e. that he married women outside his race). It has also been proven historically that a big nation, the people of the Khazar state, converted to Judaism in the eighth century CE. This nation had previously been pagans, a Turkic Aryan people who inhabited the Central Asian region, and their state, named after themselves as the Khazar state, was located in the region between the Black Sea and the Caspian Sea. It occupies the northern Azerbaijani, Armenian, and Ukrainian regions and the entire South Asian region, up to the borders of Moscow, the capital of Russia. The Caspian Sea was called the Khazar Sea. It is stated in the Jewish Encyclopedia about the Khazars as follows: “The Khazars are a people of Turkish origin, whose life and history are mixed with the beginning of the history of the Jews of Russia. The nomadic tribes of the steppes, on the other hand, forced them to consolidate the foundations of the Khazar kingdom in most parts of southern Russia before the Franks established the Russian monarchy in 855 CE. At this time (855 CE), the Khazar Kingdom was at the height of its power, engaged in constant wars, and at the end of the eighth century, the Khazar king, his nobles, and a large number of his pagan people converted to the Judaism. The Jewish population was large throughout the Khazar province during the period between the 7th and 10th centuries CE, (and) it appears that around the 9th century, all the Khazars had become Jews and that they had converted to Judaism only a short time earlier. Then this country subsequently fell into the hands of the Russians, who occupied it and completely destroyed it, and seized all of its lands. It disappeared from the map of Europe in the thirteenth century CE, and its people were dispersed among the countries of Eastern and Western Europe, and their largest existence in Eastern Europe were Hungary, Poland, Romania, and Russia”. This clearly shows that the Jews who are called Ashkenazi, who are European, have no connection to Prophet Yaqub by lineage. [4]

Nevertheless, it cannot be asserted that there is not a single Jewish individual in the world who is not connected to Yaqub, peace be upon him, by ancestry. If such a connection is proven by any of them, it should not be refuted.

Secondly, the upright leaders of Bani Israel, particularly their Prophets Musa and Harun, peace be upon them, were not oppressors; in fact, Prophets do not engage in oppression. In contrast, Netanyahu and his associates, along with their predecessors, have been the oppressors of the Palestinian people for more than 70 years. Moreover, the Prophets Musa and Harun were not Zionists; they were Muslims whose primary mission was to command the cursed tyrant Fir’awn to worship Allah alone and to stop the oppression of the Children of Israel – the descendants of noble Prophet Yaqub, peace be upon him. Visit: https://www.islammoses.com/im/

Thirdly, the missions of Prophets Musa and Harun, peace be upon them, are entirely separate from Netanyahu and his Zionist associates. They were advocates of Tawhid and true believers, while Netanyahu and his followers promote disbelief following the arrival of the final Messenger, Prophet Muhammad, peace and blessings be upon him. Thus, it is important not to link your agenda, which has rightly been condemned as genocide, to the noble missions of Prophets Musa and Harun, peace be upon them.

 

Gerald said: When Jews worldwide sit around the Seder table and retell the 4,000 year old story of the Exodus from slavery to freedom, we have no doubt about the identities of the heroes and villains. Jacob (aka Israel) and his extended family, later to become the 12 tribes, were invited by Joseph and Pharaoh to settle in Egypt to escape the famine, and they prospered. [end of quote]

Response: The 12 tribes of Bani Israel, who are the descendants of the noble Prophet Yaqub, peace be upon him, entered the land due to the authority given to Prophet Yusuf, peace be upon him, who was a champion of justice and fairness, known for his trustworthiness throughout the land. Because of his piety and commendable patience, Allah elevated his status. Read:

Set me over the storehouses of the land….

Gerald said: But then, their descendants were enslaved for over 200 years, and the reigning Pharaoh, concerned that they would join with Egypt’s enemies, ordered the murder of male Israelite children – a form of genocide. When the slaves cried out, God heard and appointed Moses to lead them out of the house of bondage through 10 plagues that devastated the entire Egyptian population. [end of quote]

Response: The suffering endured by Bani Israel under Fir’awn is widely recognized and doesn’t need further explanation in this article. However, Gerald has undermined his own argument by referencing the violence inflicted upon the children of Israel, as this mirrors the actions of Netanyahu and his associates against the Palestinians over the last 70 years. Beyond the daily occurrences, they also make their intentions clear. Read and listen:

https://abuiyaad.com/a/slaughtering-children-holy-war
https://abuiyaad.com/a/amalekite-genocide-doctrine-gaza
https://www.abuiyaad.com/a/pharoah-slaughtering-babies
https://salafidawahmanchester.com/2025/01/15/must-take-a-look-at-what-is-happening-in-their-own-backyard-first/

We also, without any reservation, denounce any Muslim who participated in the killing of non-combatants and unarmed civilians on October 7, whether under the command of Hamas or other groups. This stance has been clearly articulated by Prince Turkui Al-Faisal, may Allah protect him. Listen here: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Z3-cWyFcK5w

 

Gerald said: Today, if these events transpired, the powerful “human rights” industry, led by the UN and the NGO superpowers (Human Rights Watch and Amnesty) would issue lengthy reports, hold press conferences and publish posts on social media platforms condemning Moses and Aaron as war criminals. The International Criminal Court would issue arrest warrants charging the Israelite leaders with genocide and other versions of the blood libel. Campus mobs under the heading of Students for Justice for Pharaoh (SJP), supported by their “progressive” allies, would be vandalizing buildings, intimidating Israelites (now Jews – descendants from the tribe of Judah), and demanding the return of the runaway slaves to their Egyptian taskmaster. [end of quote]

Response: This is merely a mix of empty talk, nonsense, and unreasonable emotional manipulation. To begin with, it was the same UN, influenced by Christian Zionists, that supported your cause against the Palestinians. [Footnote a] Secondly, it was the honourable Musa and Harun, peace be upon them, along with the Children of Israel, who faced oppression, while Netanyahu and his associates are the current aggressors. Lastly, nothing could have prevented the noble Prophet Musa and Harun from carrying out their mission rooted in pure Tawhid, justice, truthfulness, and fairness. The following verses clearly demonstrates the plan of the Al-Mighty, All-Wise Creator:

And We inspired the mother of Musa (Moses), (saying): “Suckle him [Musa (Moses)], but when you fear for him, then cast him into the river and fear not, nor grieve. Verily! We shall bring him back to you, and shall make him one of (Our) Messengers.” Then the household of Fir’aun (Pharaoh) picked him up, that he might become for them an enemy and a (cause of) grief. Verily! Fir’aun (Pharaoh), Haman and their hosts were sinners. And the wife of Fir’aun (Pharaoh) said: “A comfort of the eye for me and for you. Kill him not, perhaps he may be of benefit to us, or we may adopt him as a son.” And they perceive not (the result of that). And the heart of the mother of Musa (Moses) became empty [from every thought, except the thought of Musa (Moses)]. She was very near to disclose his (case, i.e. the child is her son), had We not strengthened her heart (with Faith), so that she might remain as one of the believers. And she said to his [Musa’s (Moses)] sister: “Follow him.” So she (his sister) watched him from a far place secretly, while they perceived not. And We had already forbidden (other) foster suckling mothers for him, until she (his sister came up and) said: “Shall I direct you to a household who will rear him for you, and sincerely they will look after him in a good manner?” So did We restore him to his mother, that she might be delighted, and that she might not grieve, and that she might know that the Promise of Allah is true. But most of them know not. And when he attained his full strength, and was perfect (in manhood), We bestowed on him Hukman (Prophethood, right judgement of the affairs) and religious knowledge [of the religion of his forefathers i.e. Islamic Monotheism]. And thus do We reward the Muhsinun (i.e. good doers). [Al-Qasas 7-14]

Gerald said: How did this ludicrous inversion of oppressor and oppressed, and of victimizer and victim take place? Who is responsible for erasing, distorting and appropriating the moral principles that distinguish between right and wrong? And, most importantly, how can the modern theater of the absurd be shut down, and the core foundations of morality, embodied in the 1948 Universal Declaration of Human Rights, be restored? TO ANSWER these questions, we begin with the pervasive conspiratorial Jew-hatred anchored in post-Holocaust antisemitism. Its adherents reject any form of Jewish sovereignty in our ancient homeland – the Land of Israel to where the Israelites returned 40 years after leaving Egypt. The essence of today’s “Israel derangement syndrome” – as prominently displayed in the activities of Kenneth Roth, who ran HRW for 30 years, and Agnes Callamard of Amnesty International – is not on “occupation” and settlements that followed the 1967 Six Day War. [end of quote]

Response: How can you attempt to distort the narrative and engage in this absurd reversal of oppressor and oppressed, as well as victim and victimizer? Who is accountable for the erasure, distortion, and appropriation of the moral principles that clearly differentiate Zionist propaganda and oppression from the suffering of Palestinians over the last 70 years? Most importantly, how can we put an end to this modern theater of the absurd and challenge the foundational claims of morality that are rooted in the false assertions of Netanyahu regarding land that rightfully does not belong to him and his henchmen? To address these questions, we start with the frequent and exaggerated use of the anti-Semitism card, which is waved every time Netanyahu and his henchmen are justly called out. We denounce anti-Semitism when it is clearly identified and not politicised. The land does not solely belong to you, nor were you its first inhabitants. Therefore, if there is such a thing as “Israel derangement syndrome,” it is merely a fitting label for those who claim ownership of what is not theirs—both from religious and historical viewpoints—while expecting the world to ignore this reality, or else be branded as anti-Semites. Read: https://salafidawahmanchester.com/2024/11/20/the-promised-land-a-brief-examination-from-a-religious-and-historical-perspective/

 

Gerald said: Rather, the successful creation of Israel and its survival remains the core “crime.” The 1947 UN Partition Plan (the original two states for two peoples) and the victory of the Jews over the invading Arab armies were spun into nefarious Zionist plots, aided by the imperialist West. As a result, for them, Israelis have no inherent right of self-defense – all military actions, including after the October 7 atrocities, are automatically and cynically defined as war crimes and worse. In parallel, Palestinian Arabs (aided by UNRWA and the “refugee” industry) are perpetual victims, and any act against the hated Zionists, no matter how brutal, is embraced as “resistance.” In today’s backwards world, the EU, NGO and UN network would denounce the ten plagues as a highly disproportionate use of force, and demand the return of the slaves to their Egyptian owners. [end of quote]

Response: Muslims, Jews, and Christians coexisted peacefully in Palestine before the emergence of the Zionist agenda, without the conflicts we witness today. The injustice faced by the Palestinians is as evident as the midday sun, regardless of whether a two-state solution succeeds or the Zionist movement prevails. It is undeniable that Christian Zionist imperialists have supported you, as we have clearly shown in the references provided in Footnote a. The right to self-defense is a gift from Allah to everyone, and no one should endure oppression; however, you have been the oppressors for over 70 years. The events of October 7 cannot justify the excessive violence and brutality that you have perpetrated for more than a year. We have previously condemned all actions that harmed non-combatants and unarmed civilians on that day, but it is impossible to ignore that the ruthless Netanyahu has exploited this situation to advance his malicious agenda. Please listen again: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Z3-cWyFcK5w

Gerald said: THIS PARTICULAR and obsessive focus on Israel is accompanied by a broader anti-Western, anti-democratic ideology that blames Western colonialism for all of the world’s problems, and automatically assigns victimhood to “the Third World,” Global South, and “people of color.” In this straitjacket of fake history, just as Palestinians are not held accountable for mass murder and barbarism, the same is true for non-Western dictatorships throughout the world. [end of quote]

Response: Those who truly deserve the label of obsession are Netanyahu, his associates, and their predecessors. They relentlessly strive to assert ownership over what is not rightfully theirs and frequently invoke accusations of anti-Semitism against others, especially when their violence escalates. It is important to recognise that Western colonialism is not the root cause of all global issues; rather, it is the lack of Iman and obedience to the final Messenger that lies at the heart of these problems. The Zionists, in particular, exhibit significant disobedience to Allah and His Messenger as they base their claims on outdated and distorted texts. While colonialists are often remembered for their brutality, which stems from their corrupt Iman, the underlying issues in the world can be traced back to defiance against Allah’s commands and those of His Messenger. Imam Ibn Al-Qayyim, may Allah have mercy on him, stated:

“Whoever ponders upon the state of affairs of the world will find that every affair of rectification is due to Tawhid, worshipping Allah alone and obedience to His Messenger (Muhammad). And every evil in the world, trial, affliction, scarcity (in livelihood), being overpowered by an enemy and other than that is due to (our) opposition to the Messenger and the call to other than (the way of) Allah and His Messenger. Whoever truly ponders upon this and examines the state of affairs of the world- since its beginning and until the time Allah will take it away and those upon it- he will realise this affair regarding himself and others, in general and specific (circumstances). And there is no Might or Power except with Allah –The Most High, The Most Great”. [Source: Badaa’i Al-Fawaa’id 3/525-526]

Additionally, before concluding this section, we want to emphasise once more that individuals whether Palestinians or non-Palestinians can never be supported if they harm non-combatants and unarmed civilians. We would like to reiterate the clear statement made by Prince Turki al-Faisal: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Z3-cWyFcK5w

 

Gerald said: Other brutal colonial conquests, such Chinese imperialism as the Muslim takeover of much of Africa and Asia are simply erased. For self-appointed high priests of progressive morality, the worst offenders in any conflict are always the Americans and their allies. This dogma can also be explained as a theme in Christian theology that equates weakness (including victimhood) with morality, and strength with aggressive immorality. Highly distorted interpretations of the laws of war are the direct product of this philosophy. When the human rights propaganda industry is criticized for erasing heinous Palestinian Arab attacks (aggression), the response is to blame Israel, “which relies mainly on force, applied as brutally as deemed necessary.” Moses and Aaron could be accused of the same calumny. [end of quote]

Response: All praise is due to Allah. The Muslims of Africa, including the writer of this response, have been blessed with Islam. The historical presence of Islam in Africa is well-documented, and it is widely recognised that Africans chose Islam willingly, drawn by the exceptional moral principles inherent in this might and infallible path. While it is acknowledged that every conquest may involve errors and shortcomings, it is undeniable that since World War II, no group has endured greater suffering than the Palestinians at the hands of the oppressive Zionist administrations. Although the United States bears some responsibility, it is inaccurate to attribute the entirety of the issue to American actions; however, it is well-established that Zionist lobbies exert significant influence in the U.S. and elsewhere. This is a widely accepted fact, not merely a conspiracy theory. Also, if Christians perceive weakness as synonymous with morality and strength as linked to aggressive immorality, it is equally evident that Zionists often conflate excess and brutality with self-defense. The principles governing warfare cannot be dictated by human whims; rather, they are established by the final infallible divine revelation—the Qur’an and the Sunnah. While the attacks by Arabs on unarmed civilians and non-combatants are unequivocally condemned, it is essential to recognise that the violence and brutality exhibited by Netanyahu’s Zionist forces surpass all others. Thus, to compare the Zionist situation to the noble figures of Musa and Harun, peace be upon them, is a profound misrepresentation, as neither were oppressors nor supporters of oppression; they were indeed noble Prophets of Allah.

 

Gerald stated: Following this non-Jewish model, the polemicist Peter Beinart published a column in the anti-Israel and antisemitic UK Guardian condemning celebrations of Purim for encouraging “Jewish zealotry,” declaring: “As Jews celebrate Purim, let us end the slaughter in Gaza committed in our name.” In a sharp response, UK Chief Rabbi Mervis berated the false presentation of Purim and the “insidious attempt to cast Jewish history and identity as heartless and vengeful.” [end of quote]

Response: We refrain from generalizing all Jews, opting instead to evaluate individuals on their own merits. It is unjust to characterize Jewish history and identity as devoid of compassion, particularly given that many esteemed Prophets and Messengers emerged from the Children of Israel, whose lineage has been previously discussed. Every nation and community has its share of wrongdoers whose actions are often disavowed by some their own people. Just as many Muslims denounce ISIS and other brutal factions, some Jews also openly criticize the inhumane actions of certain Zionist administrations. Consequently, we do not categorize all individuals uniformly, nor do we hastily label someone as anti-Islam simply for critiquing a Muslim based on substantiated evidence of their behaviour. However, figures like Netanyahu and his associates often go to great lengths to brand anyone who rightly critiques them as an anti-Semite, especially when confronted with their genocidal actions.

 

Gerald said: With enough money and PR spin, the plagues and the drowning of Pharaoh’s military force could also be rewritten to falsely portray the Egyptians as victims of crimes against humanity and genocide perpetrated by the Israelites. In an age where history is simply one of many narratives – and the power of political spin machines under the facade of morality can turn heinous terrorists into victims – anything is possible. [end of quote]

Response: This proposal is utterly nonsensical, as Firawn and his misguided followers have been condemned until the Day of Judgment. This truth remains unaltered and is consistently referenced in the final divine revelation.

And he (Fir’awn) and his hosts were arrogant in the land, without right, and they thought that they would never return to Us. So We seized him and his hosts, and We threw them all into the sea (and drowned them). So behold (O Muhammad ) what was the end of the Zalimun [wrong-doers, polytheists and those who disbelieved in the Oneness of their Lord (Allah), or rejected the advice of His Messenger Musa (Moses)]. And We made them leaders inviting to the Fire, and on the Day of Resurrection, they will not be helped. And We made a curse to follow them in this world, and on the Day of Resurrection, they will be among Al-Maqbuhun (those who are prevented to receive Allah’s Mercy or any good, despised or destroyed, etc.) [Al-Qasas. 39-42]

The Fire; they are exposed to it, morning and afternoon, and on the Day when the Hour will be established (it will be said to the angels): “Cause Fir’aun’s (Pharaoh) people to enter the severest torment!” [Al-Ghafir 44]

Therefore, this narrative will remain unchanged. Every text has been distorted, similar to how the Torah and the Injeel have been altered. However, the Qur’an and Sunnah will remain intact and uncorrupted. Consequently, the account found in the Qur’an regarding the tyrannical Fir’awn and his followers will always remain consistent and cannot be misrepresented. Allah stated: [إِنَّا نَحْنُ نَزَّلْنَا ٱلذِّكْرَ وَإِنَّا لَهُۥ لَحَٰفِظُونَ – Verily We: It is We Who have sent down the Dhikr (i.e. the Quran) and surely, We will guard it (from corruption). [Al-Hijr 9]

We ask Allah for truthfulness and sound determination in responding to Gerald and his ilk, and may Allah guide him to Islam Aameen.

——————————————

Footnote a:

The Initial Rise and Gradual Impact of Christian Zionism on Some European Political Decision-makers

An Overview of Christian Zionism in America Since the Arrival of The Puritans

American Christian Zionists’ Media Initiatives Aimed at Influencing Public Opinion, With a Brief Mention of The Concept of Greater Israel


[1] As-Sawaa’iq Al-Mursalah 3/927

[2] As-Sawaa’iq Al-Mussalah 2/503

[3] As-Sawaa’iq Al-Mussalah 2/503

[4] An Excerpt from “Diraasaat Al-Adyaan Al-Yahoodiyyah Wan Nasraaniyyah”. Pages 67-70. 6th Edition 1439AH (2018)

Reflections from some statements of Al-Allamah Rabee Bin Hadi Al-Mad’khali – 93

In The Name of Allah, The Most Merciful, The Bestower of Mercy.

He, may Allah have mercy upon him, said:

It is incumbent upon the Ta’ifah Al-Mansurah (the victorious group)- which Allah’s Messenger, peace and blessings of Allah be upon him, stated would remain and triumph, neither harmed by those who betray them nor by those who oppose them until the promise of Allah, The Blessed and Most High, is fulfilled (i.e. the day of Judgement); it is incumbent upon this blessed and good group to establish brotherhood for the sake of Allah, collaborate on righteousness and piety, and diligently strive to maintain the great status of being manifest on the truth- neither harmed by those who betray them nor by those who oppose them. This truth cannot be recognised (or acknowledged) about them except through (their adherence) to the knowledge inherited from Allah’s Prophets and His Messengers, and from the Seal of the Prophets – peace and blessings be upon them. The scholars are the heirs of the Prophets in conveying Allah’s message and delivering His commandments with regards to enjoining good and forbidding evil. There is a great deal of goodness for the Ummah in calling to the path of Allah, enjoining good and forbidding evil. Enjoining good and forbidding evil requires abundant knowledge (with regards to what the person is enjoining or forbidding).

[An Excerpt from “Marhaban Yaa Talibal Ilm”.page 200]

Mathilda, do you remember the “Friendship Song?!”

In The Name of Allah, The Most Merciful, The Bestower of Mercy.

Allah [The Exalted] says:

وَٱلَّذِينَ يَقُولُونَ رَبَّنَا هَبۡ لَنَا مِنۡ أَزۡوَٲجِنَا وَذُرِّيَّـٰتِنَا قُرَّةَ أَعۡيُنٍ۬ وَٱجۡعَلۡنَا لِلۡمُتَّقِينَ إِمَامًا

And those who say: “Our Lord! Bestow on us from our wives and our offspring who will be the comfort of our eyes, and make us leaders for the Muttaqun (the pious people). [Surah al-Furqan. Ayah 74]

Imam Ibn Al-Qayyim, may Allah have mercy upon him, said: They ask Allah to grant them the comfort of the eye by making their wives and offspring obedient to Allah, grant them happiness in their hearts due to being followed by the righteous in obedience and servitude to Allah. [1]

Allah, The Exalted, says:

وَٱلَّذِينَ ءَامَنُواْ وَٱتَّبَعَتۡہُمۡ ذُرِّيَّتُہُم بِإِيمَـٰنٍ أَلۡحَقۡنَا بِہِمۡ ذُرِّيَّتَہُمۡ وَمَآ أَلَتۡنَـٰهُم مِّنۡ عَمَلِهِم مِّن شَىۡءٍ۬‌ۚ كُلُّ ٱمۡرِىِٕۭ بِمَا كَسَبَ رَهِينٌ۬

And those who believe and whose offspring follow them in faith, We will join their offspring with them, and We will not decrease the (reward) for their deeds in anything. Every person is held in pledge (only) for that which he (or she) has earned. [2]

Rational individuals would aspire for what is mentioned in the verses above; however, there are those among the Jews, Muslims and Christians who cultivate a mindset steeped in tyranny and brutality.

First, some Zionists composed a song as “The Friendship Song,” and disseminated by a certain Zionist online news platform before it was subsequently taken down. Below is a passage from this.

“Here the IDF is crossing the line; to annihilate the swastika bearers; in another year there will be nothing there; and we will return safely to our home within a year; we will annihilate them all, and then return to ploughing our fields”. [end of quote]

Hoothies – [Rafidah of Yemen]- Nurture Children Upon Violence and Corruption:

Who Are The Hoothies? Listen here: https://safeshare.tv/x/yTCkBDpiEb

Brainwashing Children And Nurturing Them to Defend The Filth of The Hoothies!

Watch video here: https://english.alarabiya.net/News/gulf/2021/04/24/Videos-surface-online-reportedly-showing-Iran-backed-Houthi-child-soldier-recruitment

ISIS – [Contemporary Khawaarij]

Who Are The Khawaarij? Listen here: The Ideological Origins of Al-Qaeda & ISIS by Shaikh Abu Iyaad, may Allah preserve him:

Who Are The Khawaarij? Listen here: The Ideological Origins of Al-Qaeda & ISIS by Shaikh Abu Iyaad [may Allaah preserve him]:

The far right

Mathilda stated:

Regarding the particular organization identified as Shiite, the creed of the Rafidah Shiites are well known, thus requiring no further explanation. https://abukhadeejah.com/the-devils-deception-of-the-raafidah-shiah/

Concerning the separation of boys and girls, whether advocated by Christians, Jews, or any other groups to promote modesty and deter immorality, no one should face censure for this practice, as it is commendable, much like the encouragement to dress modestly as prescribed by the Creator. For any reasonable observer, the concern shouldn’t revolve around segregation and dress code, as these aspects are unrelated to extremism and radicalisation. Millions of Muslims practice segregation between the two biological sexes and follow the appropriate Islamic dress code, yet they do not advocate for violence, engage in vandalism, or support any form of racist ideology. The real question is whether anyone has violated the laws of the land. If a community – due to their beliefs – prefers – in their own environment or where they are given the choice by others – not to mix with the opposite sex, only a bigot would seek to attack them. [Footnote a] However, if they are forced to free mix, they have a right to explore alternatives, as single-sex educational institutions are available globally, including in the UK. Therefore, as long as individuals are not violating the law or have pursued lawful alternatives, they should not be held accountable. Furthermore, there is no additional statement to be made regarding this group, whether they have breached the law or not, since it is understood that such issues would be addressed between the relevant authorities and the organisation in question. As for Mathilda and the others, they too need to take care of their backyard, as it is there that we discover the genocidal maniac and his accomplices. Read below:

https://abuiyaad.com/a/amalekite-genocide-doctrine-gaza

Must take a look at what is happening in their own backyard first

Netanyahu shoots himself in the foot again!

Allah, The Exalted, says:

إِنَّا نَحۡنُ نُحۡىِ ٱلۡمَوۡتَىٰ وَنَڪۡتُبُ مَا قَدَّمُواْ وَءَاثَـٰرَهُمۡۚ وَكُلَّ شَىۡءٍ أَحۡصَيۡنَـٰهُ فِىٓ إِمَامٍ۬ مُّبِينٍ۬

Verily, We give life to the dead, and We record that which they send before (them), and their traces, and that which they leave behind], and all things We have recorded with numbers (as a record) in a Clear Book. [Yaa Seen. 12]

Imam As-Sadi, may Allah have mercy upon him, said: It is the good and evil outcomes about which they were the cause of its occurrence during their lifetime and after their death, and those deeds that emanated from their statements, deeds, and circumstances. [3]

Footnote a:

Ruling on Intermingling Boys and Girls In Primary School Education – By Imaam Abdul Azeez Bin Baaz


[1] An Excerpt from ‘Ar-Rooh’ pages 487-489

[2] Translator: Shaikh Abu Iyaad [may Allah preserve him]: https://www.thenoblequran.com/q/#/search/52_21

[3] an Excerpt from Tafsir As-Sadi.

Why were they notably reticent about their feelings during disputes?!

In The Name of Allah, The Most Merciful, The Bestower of Mercy.

The reason our clan and tribe elders were notably reticent about their feelings when not required to speak or provide testimony during disputes

Abu Hurairah, may Allah be pleased with him, reported that Allah’s Messenger, peace and blessings of Allah be upon him, said, “Indeed, from the perfection of a person’s Islam is leaving that which is of no concern to him”. [Hassan Hadith. Reported by Imaam Tirmidhi and others]

فمن حُسن إسلام المرء تركه ما لا يعنيه، التَّدخل فيما لا يعنيه قد يُسبب مشاكل، فمن حُسن إسلام المرء، ومن حُسن إيمانه، ومن حُسن سيرته: عدم التَّدخل فيما لا يعنيه،
فالإنسان إذا ابتعد عمَّا لا يعنيه، ولم يدخل في مشاكل الناس، ولا في سؤال فلانٍ وفلانٍ عمَّا لا يعنيه، فهذا هو من كمال إيمانه؛ لأنه قد يدخل في شيءٍ يضره، أو يُشوش على غيره، أو يُسبب فتنة

Imam Abdul Aziz Bin Baz, may Allah have mercy upon him, said: From the perfection of a person’s Islam is to leave what does not concern him. Interfering with what does not concern him may cause problems. From the perfection of a person’s Islam, from the perfection of his Imaan, and from the perfection of his conduct is not to interfere in what does not concern him. Therefore, if a person distances himself from what does not concern him- neither interferes with people’s problems nor asks so-and-so about what does not concern him, this is from the perfection of his Iman, because indeed he may enter into something that either harms him or confuses others, or causes trial.

https://binbaz.org.sa/audios/156/6–%D9%85%D9%86-%D8%AD%D8%AF%D9%8A%D8%AB-%D9%85%D9%86-%D8%AD%D8%B3%D9%86-%D8%A7%D8%B3%D9%84%D8%A7%D9%85-%D8%A7%D9%84%D9%85%D8%B1%D8%A1-%D8%AA%D8%B1%D9%83%D9%87-%D9%85%D8%A7-%D9%84%D8%A7-%D9%8A%D8%B9%D9%86%D9%8A%D9%87

Hearts and souls caught in the grip of forbidden images face serious consequences

In The Name of Allah, The Most Merciful, The Bestower of Mercy.

Shaikh Al-Islam Ibn Taymiyyah, may Allah have mercy upon him, said:

If the heart loves Allah and devotes all the religion sincerely to Him, it will not give a share of this love to anyone else, let alone being afflicted with infatuation; but when afflicted with infatuation, this is due to its deficient love of Allah. This is why due to Yusuf’s, peace be upon him, love of Allah and sincerely devoting all the religion to Allah alone, he did not depart from it; rather Allah said:

ڪَذَٲلِكَ لِنَصۡرِفَ عَنۡهُ ٱلسُّوٓءَ وَٱلۡفَحۡشَآءَ‌ۚ إِنَّهُ ۥ مِنۡ عِبَادِنَا ٱلۡمُخۡلَصِينَ

Thus it was, that We might turn away from him evil and illegal sexual intercourse. Surely, he was one of Our chosen, guided slaves.

But as for the wife of the Azeez, she and her people were polytheists, and due to this she was afflicted with infatuation. [1]

Those people whose hearts are infatuated with images receive the greatest punishment and the smallest reward. This is because if the heart of the one who is infatuated with images continues to be attached and is enslaved, various types of evils, loss and corruption will be gathered for him, which none besides Allah can enumerate. Even if he is safe from committing a major lewd act, the continuous attachment of the heart to the image without committing a lewd act is a greater than the harm that afflicts a person who commits a sin and then repents, thus the effect of that sin ceases to exist in his heart. The greatest aspect of this calamity is when the heart turns away from Allah. This is because when the heart tastes the worship of Allah and being sincere to Him, there will never be anything sweeter than that- neither tastier and enjoyable nor better. A person does not abandon something beloved to him except due to another beloved thing that is more beloved to him, or due to fearing harm. The heart is turned away from a corrupt love by an upright love or due to fearing harm. Allah, The Exalted said about Yusuf, peace be upon him:

ڪَذَٲلِكَ لِنَصۡرِفَ عَنۡهُ ٱلسُّوٓءَ وَٱلۡفَحۡشَآءَ‌ۚ إِنَّهُ ۥ مِنۡ عِبَادِنَا ٱلۡمُخۡلَصِينَ

Thus it was, that We might turn away from him evil and illegal sexual intercourse. Surely, he was one of Our chosen, guided slaves. [Yusuf. 24]

Thus, Allah turned His servant away from that which would plunge one into evil due to inclining towards an image and being attached to it, and turns him away from lewd conduct due to his sincerity to Allah. [2]

Imam Ibn Al-Qayyim, may Allah have mercy upon him, said:

Hearts that are emptied of love for Allah, turned away from Him and seeking remedy from others besides Him, are afflicted with infatuation with images. This is because when the heart is filled with love for Allah and a strong love for meeting Him, this infatuation with images is repelled from it. For this reason, Allah, The Most High, stated about Yusuf, peace be upon him:

كَذَٰلِكَ لِنَصْرِفَ عَنْهُ السُّوءَ وَالْفَحْشَاءَ ۚ إِنَّهُ مِنْ عِبَادِنَا الْمُخْلَصِينَ

Thus it was, that We might turn away from him evil and illegal sexual intercourse. Surely, he was one of Our chosen, guided slaves.

This shows that sincerity is a means to repelling (evil). Because of this, some of the pious predecessors said: “Infatuation is an agitation in empty hearts”. Meaning: emptied of other than what they crave for. [3]

Imam Ibn Al-Jawzi, may Allah have mercy upon him, said:

Quote:

know that desires (vain) desires urges a person towards immediate pleasures without him contemplating its evil consequences and urges him towards short-lived pleasures, even though it is a cause of pain and harm in this life and a barrier to pleasure in the Hereafter. As for a sensible person, he keeps away from pleasures whose result will be pain and desires whose result will be regret. This is enough as praise regarding what sound intellect necessitates and a rebuke against (vain) desires.

A sensible person should know that those who are addicted to lowly desires reach a state in which they no longer enjoy themselves, but at the same time they are unable to abandon those desires because it becomes as if it is a necessity of life. Due to this, you’ll find that alcoholics and sex addicts do not even enjoy a tenth of those desires, rather, they place themselves in a perilous situation that compels them to keep on returning to the act. However, if- based on clear-sightedness- the beautification of those lowly desires cease, a person realises that he has exposed himself to some ruin that is contrary to well-being, a situation of grief instead of happiness, while seeking after pleasure. Thus, he resembles an animal that was led to a trap- neither reached the thing that was utilised to lure it into the trap nor able to escape.

A person should contemplate the fact that a human being was not created to fulfil (vain) desires, instead, he is facilitated (with sound intellect and knowledge based on the divine revelation) to contemplate the consequences of his actions and perform righteous deeds for the Hereafter. An animal receives pleasure through eating, drinking and sexual relaations much more than a human being, while living a life devoid of reflection and concern. Thus, it is drawn towards its desires due to being ignorant of the outcomes of its actions.

A person should contemplate the consequences of (vain) desires because many people are deprived of virtue and find themselves in a state of depravity as a result. Many mistakes violates the honour of a person, leads to an evil mention of him as well as the guilt of sinning due to (vain) desires, yet he still does not give thought to anything else except his desires! The best description regarding him is that of one who finds himself in a tannery, for he does not really notice its smell properly until he exits it and then realises where he was. A sensible person should imagine the dishonour that will come to him due to his desires and the harm that results from those pleasures, for indeed he will see that- in most cases- they occur as result of those desires and pleasures.

A person should contemplate on the honour a person receives due to been given the upper hand and the humiliation found in subjugation, for indeed there is none who overcomes his desires except that his honour is strengthened, and none is subjugated by his desires except that he will find humiliation and subjugation in his soul. A person should contemplate the benefits of opposing one’s (vain) desires due to the commendation attached to it in this worldly life, safety of the soul and safeguard of one’s honour, as well as reward in the Hereafter. [4]

Allahul Musta’aan!


[1] Majmu Al-Fataawaa 10/135

[2] Al-Ubudiyyah 114-115

[3] at-Tib An-Nabawi. page180

[4] An Except from Dham Al-Hawaa. 36-38

Simple Solution to The Vehement Greed Witnessed During Tariff Disputes Between Nations

In The Name of Allah, The Most Merciful, The Bestowed of Mercy.

Allah, The Most High, said:

وَلَا يَحْسَبَنَّ ٱلَّذِينَ يَبْخَلُونَ بِمَآ ءَاتَىٰهُمُ ٱللَّهُ مِن فَضْلِهِۦ هُوَ خَيْرًا لَّهُم بَلْ هُوَ شَرٌّ لَّهُمْ سَيُطَوَّقُونَ مَا بَخِلُوا۟ بِهِۦ يَوْمَ ٱلْقِيَٰمَةِ وَلِلَّهِ مِيرَٰثُ ٱلسَّمَٰوَٰتِ وَٱلْأَرْضِ وَٱللَّهُ بِمَا تَعْمَلُونَ خَبِيرٌ

And let not those who covetously withhold of that which Allah has bestowed on them of His Bounty (Wealth) think that it is good for them. Nay, it will be worse for them; the things which they covetously withheld shall be tied to their necks like a collar on the Day of Resurrection. And to Allah belongs the heritage of the heavens and the earth; and Allah is Well-Acquainted with all that you do. [Aal Imran 180]

ٱلَّذِينَ يَبْخَلُونَ وَيَأْمُرُونَ ٱلنَّاسَ بِٱلْبُخْلِ وَيَكْتُمُونَ مَآ ءَاتَىٰهُمُ ٱللَّهُ مِن فَضْلِهِۦ وَأَعْتَدْنَا لِلْكَٰفِرِينَ عَذَابًا مُّهِينًا

Those who are miserly and enjoin miserliness on other men and hide what Allah has bestowed upon them of His Bounties. And We have prepared for the disbelievers a disgraceful torment. [An-Nisaa 37]

Abdullah ibn Amr, may Allah be pleased with him, reported that the Messenger of Allah, peace and blessings of Allah be upon him, said, “Beware of greed, for it was only greed that destroyed those before you. It commanded them to be miserly and they did so. It commanded them to sever their family ties and they did so. It commanded them to behave wickedly and they did so”. [1]

Allah [The Exalted] said:
وَيْلٌ لِّلْمُطَفِّفِينَ
الَّذِينَ إِذَا اكْتَالُوا عَلَى النَّاسِ يَسْتَوْفُونَ
وَإِذَا كَالُوهُمْ أَو وَّزَنُوهُمْ يُخْسِرُونَ
أَلَا يَظُنُّ أُولَٰئِكَ أَنَّهُم مَّبْعُوثُونَ
لِيَوْمٍ عَظِيمٍ
يَوْمَ يَقُومُ النَّاسُ لِرَبِّ الْعَالَمِينَ

Woe to Al-Mutaffifin [those who give less in measure and weight (decrease the rights of others)], those who, when they have to receive by measure from men, demand full measure, and when they have to give by measure or weight to men, give less than due. Think they not that they will be resurrected (for reckoning), on a Great Day, the Day when (all) mankind will stand before the Lord of the ‘Alamin (mankind, jinns and all that exists)? [Al-Mutaffifeen. 1-7]

وَيْلٌ

“Woe” is a word of punishment and threat of divine vengeance to those who give less in measure. Allah explained who the Mutaffifeen are in his statement:

الَّذِينَ إِذَا اكْتَالُوا عَلَى النَّاسِ يَسْتَوْفُونَ

“Those who, when they have to receive by measure from people, demand full measure”.

Meaning, they take from them in full what is established to be their due and demand in full without any loss.

وَإِذَا كَالُوهُمْ أَو وَّزَنُوهُمْ يُخْسِرُونَ

“And when they have to give by measure or weight to people, give less than what is due”.

Meaning, when they give the people what they are entitled to by way of measure or weight, they give them less- either by giving short measure or weight, or by not giving the full measure or weight, or by not filling the measuring or weighing equipment and what is similar that. This is tantamount to stealing the people’s wealth and not being fair to them. If this is the threat of divine vengeance against those who give short measure and short weight, then those who take people’s wealth by force or by stealing are more deserving of this threat than those who give short measure and short weight.

This noble verse shows that just as a person takes from the people what he is entitled to, it is also obligated on him to give them everything they are entitled to – whether related to wealth or mutual dealings; rather included in the generality of this Ayah are proofs and statements, because indeed what usually takes place between those engaged in argumentation and discussion is that each of them is eager to establish his proofs, therefore, it is obligated on a person also to make known the proofs possessed by the other person and examine the proofs of the other person just as he examines his own proofs.

In relation to this affair, the justice of a person is known as opposed to whether he is afflicted with bigotry, his humility as opposed to being haughty, his common sense as opposed to foolish behaviour. We ask Allah bestow on us every good.

Then Allah issued a threat to those who give short measure, stated with amazement regarding their state of affairs and their persistence upon what they are doing. Allah said:

أَلَا يَظُنُّ أُولَٰئِكَ أَنَّهُم مَّبْعُوثُونَ
لِيَوْمٍ عَظِيمٍ
يَوْمَ يَقُومُ النَّاسُ لِرَبِّ الْعَالَمِينَ

“Think they not that they will be resurrected (for reckoning), on a Great Day, the Day when (all) mankind will stand before the Lord of all that exists”.

Meaning, what makes them dare to give short measure is because they do not believe in the Last Day, otherwise had they believed in it and known that they will stand before Allah to give account – whether related to something small or big, they would stopped and repent.

Allah, The Exalted, said in Surah Hud verse 88 that Prophet Shu’aib, peace be upon him, said to his people:

يَا قَوْمِ أَرَأَيْتُمْ إِن كُنتُ عَلَىٰ بَيِّنَةٍ مِّن رَّبِّي

“O my people! Tell me, if I have a clear evidence from my Lord”.

Meaning: I am upon certainty and tranquility regarding the correctness of (the Message) I have brought.

وَرَزَقَنِي مِنْهُ رِزْقًا حَسَنًا

“And He (Allah) has given me a good sustenance from Himself”.

Meaning: Allah has given me various types of wealth.

وَمَا أُرِيدُ أَنْ أُخَالِفَكُمْ إِلَىٰ مَا أَنْهَاكُمْ عَنْهُ

“I wish not, in contradiction to you, to do that which I forbid you”.

Meaning: I do not wish to forbid you, yet I myself do the same and eventually you will charge me for doing so, instead I will not forbid you from a matter except that I will be the first person to hasten to abandon it.

إِنْ أُرِيدُ إِلَّا الْإِصْلَاحَ مَا اسْتَطَعْتُ

“I only desire reform so far as I am able, to the best of my power”.

Meaning: I do not have any other intentions other than to rectify your circumtances and the things that are of benefit to you. Because this statement of Prophet Shu’aib, peace be upon him, contains something that may indicate attributing piety to himself, he repels it with the statement:

وَمَا تَوْفِيقِي إِلَّا بِاللَّهِ

“And my guidance cannot come except from Allah”.

Meaning: The ability I have to do good and to refrain from evil is a bestowal from Allah [The Most High] and it is neither due to my strength nor power.

عَلَيْهِ تَوَكَّلْتُ وَإِلَيْهِ أُنِيبُ
“in Him I trust and unto Him I repent”.

Meaning: I rely on Allah in all my affairs and suffice myself with Him. I turn to Allah in all types of worship (through which) He has commanded me to draw close to Him by performing good deeds. Through these two matters- seeking aid and assistance from Allah, turning to Him in repentance, complete submission and obedience-  a person’s circumstances become upright, as Allah  [The Most High] said in another verse:

فَاعْبُدْهُ وَتَوَكَّلْ عَلَيْهِ

“So worship Him (O Muhammad) and put your trust in Him”. [2]

We ask Allah:
اللَّهُمَّ اقْسِمْ لَنَا مِنْ خَشْيَتِكَ مَا يَحُولُ بَيْنَنَا وَبَيْنَ مَعَاصِيكَ وَمِنْ طَاعَتِكَ مَا تُبَلِّغُنَا بِهِ جَنَّتَكَ وَمِنَ الْيَقِينِ مَا تُهَوِّنُ بِهِ عَلَيْنَا مُصِيبَاتِ الدُّنْيَا وَمَتِّعْنَا بِأَسْمَاعِنَا وَأَبْصَارِنَا وَقُوَّتِنَا مَا أَحْيَيْتَنَا وَاجْعَلْهُ الْوَارِثَ مِنَّا وَاجْعَلْ ثَأْرَنَا عَلَى مَنْ ظَلَمَنَا وَانْصُرْنَا عَلَى مَنْ عَادَانَا وَلاَ تَجْعَلْ مُصِيبَتَنَا فِي دِينِنَا وَلاَ تَجْعَلِ الدُّنْيَا أَكْبَرَ هَمِّنَا وَلاَ مَبْلَغَ عِلْمِنَا وَلاَ تُسَلِّطْ عَلَيْنَا مَنْ لاَ يَرْحَمُنَ
وَلاَ تَجْعَلِ الدُّنْيَا أَكْبَرَ هَمِّنَا وَلاَ مَبْلَغَ عِلْمِنَا

Do not make the Dunyah our greatest concern. [3]

Al-Allamah Al-Mubarakfuri may Allah have mercy upon him, stated in his explanation of this supplication that it means: “Do not make wealth and status our greatest goal or the reason behind our grief, rather direct our greatest goal or the reason behind our grief towards the deeds of the afterlife. [4]

اللَّهُمَّ إِنِّي أَعُوذُ بِكَ مِنَ الْبُخْلِ، وَأَعُوذُ بِكَ مِنَ الْجُبْنِ، وَأَعُوذُ بِكَ مِنْ أَنْ نُرَدَّ إِلَى أَرْذَلِ الْعُمُرِ، وَأَعُوذُ بِكَ مِنْ فِتْنَةِ الدُّنْيَا، وَعَذَابِ الْقَبْرِ

O Allah! I seek refuge with You from miserliness, and seek refuge with You from cowardice, and seek refuge with You from being brought back to (senile) old age, and seek refuge with You from the affliction of the world and from the punishment in the grave. [5]

Imam Ibn Al-Qayyim, may Allah have mercy upon him, stated in Ad Da’u Wad Dawa regarding some of the sins inherited from the destroyed nations of the past, and among them:

“Taking more than one is entitled to is a legacy from the people of Shu’ayb, peace be upon him. The corruption and arrogance displayed on earth are inherited from the people of Pharaoh, and the pride and tyranny are legacies from the people of Prophet Hud, peace be upon him. Thus, the sinner is adorned in the garments of these nations, which are enemies of Allah”. [Ad-Da’u Wad Dawa’u. page 142]


[1] Sahih Abee Dawud 1698

[2] An Excerpt from Tafseer As-Sadi

[3]Sahheeh at-Tirmidhee 3502

[4] Tuhfah Al-Ahwadhee 9/475-477

[5] Al-Bukhari 6390