Skip to main content

Author: Abdullah Jallow

The Ruling on writing the salutation to the Prophet with a [ص ] or with [ص ل ع م ]

Question:

Many people write the salutation to the Prophet with (Saad) or with (Saad, Laam, Ain and Meem) as an abridgement. What is the ruling on this?

Answer:

Some of the scholars have cautioned against this. It is not befitting, and it is falling short in fulfilling the rights of the Prophet, as pointed out by a group of those amongst the scholars—those who author (books) on the subject matter of the science of hadeeth. It is not befitting to limit the (salutation to the Prophet in writing) with Saad, Laam, Aim or with Saad alone; rather it should be written completely [i.e. صلى الله عليه وسلم ]


Al-Markaz As-Salafi

[Source:Al-Fataawaa Wad-Duroos Fil Masjid Al-Haraam of Shaikh Abdullaah Bin Muhammad Bin Humaid: page:140-141]

Shaikh Ubaid Warns Against Saaleh Al-Mughaamisee

Questioner:

Saaleh Ibn Awwaab al Mughaamesee; the Imaam of Masjid Quba, and he has lessons in Tafseer (explanation of the Qur’aan)?

Shaikh Ubaid:

This man is ignorant. I do not advice that knowledge be acquired from him, because he is from those who are not specialized in the knowledge of the Islamic Legislation, with regards to what has reached me (about him). This is the first (affair).

Secondly: The man is a caller to Tasawwuf (i.e. the way of the soofees), and what is indicative of that is (his transmission of that weak and false) story of the deceased and buried (people). And I have refuted it in Sahab (i.e.sahab.net) with the title: At-Taqreeraat Al-Mastoorah. This story’s chain of transmission is perilous. It was obtained from one of the scholars of Tasawwuf—the extremists, and there are loathsome (things) in this story.  So whoever wishes can refer to it.

And it has reached me that he says that it is permissible to cease the call to Tawheed and the warning against shirk for the sake of unity. He was preceded in this (view) by Qaradaawee, and Qaradaawee is a leader in the furthest depths of misguidance, and he is not upon guidance. He has (affairs, views)  of disbelief.  And had he (i.e. Al-Mughaamisee) stated this statement of Qaradaawee, he would have committed disbelief. Na’am.

Therefore, it is obligatory to exercise caution against Mughaamisee—Saaleh Ibn Awwaab—the Imaam of Masjid Quba, just as it is obligatory to exercise caution against Qaradaawee, and to warn against the two men.

Questioner:

Jazaakallaahu Khayran Wabaaraka Feekum Yaa Shaikh As-salaamu alaykum warahmatullaahi wabarakaatuhu

Shaikh Ubaid:

Wa alaykas salaam warahmatullaahi wa barakaatuhu


Al-Markaz As-Salafi

See Arabic Answer of Shaikh Ubaid here:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tH_ar2erh7E

What is the ruling on touching the kabah’s cloth?

This is among the innovations that has no basis. We have been commanded to follow the Messenger of Allaah (sallal-laahu-alayhi-wasallam), (so) follow and do not innovate. ”Indeed in the Messenger of Allah (Muhammad) you have a good example to follow.” [Ahzaab: ayah: 21]. We neither know of the Messenger touching the kabah’s cloth nor his companions, and had it been a good thing, they would have preceded us in it. Therefore, touching the kabah’s cloth or the two walls of the Messenger’s compartment or the netting on it, then all of this is an innovation that has no basis in the Islamic legislation. [Al-Fataawaa Wad-duroos Fil Masjidil Haraam: Shaikh Abdullaah Bin Muhammad Bin Humaid (rahimahullaah): Page 130] 


Al-Markaz As-Salafi

 

Legislated Rankings of Walees For marriage

Let us take a moment to be clear on the legislated ranks of wilaayah in a marriage contract. The following are the order of ranks, each of them being sound-minded adult men of the same religion:

1. Father

2. Grandfather (from the father’s side)

3. Great Grandfather (from the father’s side)

4. Son

5. Grandson

6. Great Grandson

7. Oldest Full Brother

8. Next Oldest Full Brother (and so on…)

9. Oldest Half-Brother (from the Father’s side)

10. Next Oldest Half-Brother (from the Father’s side, and so on…) [1]

11. Oldest son of a Full Brother (Nephew)

12. Next Oldest Son of Full Brother (Nephew)

13. Oldest Son of a Half-Brother from the Father’s side (Nephew)

14. Next Oldest Son of a Half Brother from the Father’s side (Nephew)

15. Grandson of Full Brother (oldest first)

16. Grandson of Half-Brother from the Father’s side (oldest first)

17. Oldest Paternal Uncle

18. Next Oldest Paternal Uncle (and so on…)

19. Oldest Son of Paternal Uncle (Cousin) [2]

20. Next Oldest Son of Paternal Uncle (Cousin, and so on…)

21. Oldest Great (Paternal) Uncle

22. Next Oldest Great (Paternal) Uncle (and so on…) [3]

Important: Each of the above mentioned walees has the right to appoint someone on his behalf to act on his behalf. So in this case, if the father appoints the brother to act as the walee, then he is the official and accepted walee, even in the presence of the grandfather, since the brother is the father’s chosen trustee and takes his place.

After these relatives have been exhausted, then a woman may seek to appoint a walee from outside her family through the Muslim authorities.


From the benefits of this short article is an important review of the rankings of walees for marriage, as quoted below (read the article at the URL above for more benefit): http://www.bakkah.net/en/dont-play-games-with-wilaayah-the-right-of-being-the-walee-for-a-marriage.htm

Part 1: Audio: Shaikh Rabee’s Advice Concerning The Maribi Masjid Committee of Masjid As-Sunnah-Cheethamhill

Firstly: if the Defenders of the innovators (Maribi, Halabi and Maghraawi) at Masjid As-Sunnah Claim that this audio is a scam and deception, then we are quite sure that they can easily contact Shaikh Rabee to proof their claims.  They have many Arab speakers to do that for them.  However, if they are too scared to do so, we will do it for them as soon as we get hold of the Shaikh Inshaa-Allaah.  The defenders of innovators will never be successful, regardless of how deceitful, crafty and dishonest they are!

See link for the advice.  Inshaa-Allaah, more to follow from the Shaikh’s advice

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=H-QChLZppZA&feature=plcp

 Secondly: We remind the obstinate followers and defenders of the innovators (Maribi, Halabi and Maghraawi) in the Masjid As-Sunnah Masjid Committee to refrain from their lies and distortions against Al-Markaz As-Salafi, otherwise, we continue to seek the Aid and Assistance of Allaah in responding to their satanic deceitful methodologies employed in order to prevent us from transmitting the Jarh Mufassar of the scholars against the innovators Maribi, Halabi, Maghraawi and their helpers Abu Usaamah etc.

What is the Ruling On Performing the Adhaan and Iqaamah in the newborn’s ears?–Shaikh Rabee

Answer:

By Allaah, it is weak (i.e. a weak hadeeth). The hadeeth about it is weak, and as long as it is weak we cannot say that it is something either recommended or obligatory, because of the fact that something being recommended is an Islamic ruling and an obligation is even a much greater (Islamic Ruling).

Yes, the Aqeeqah, giving a name (to the child), rubbing a date on the newborn’s palate, all of this is authentic in the Sunnah. As for the Adhaan, it is not established.  It was reported in a weak Hadeeth. [Source: Cassette Titled: Ar-raddu ‘ala ahlil bida’ jihaad]


Translated by: Abu Zainab (Muhammad Al-Hindee)