Skip to main content

Author: Abdullah Jallow

“UK Salafis Make Takfeer of one another” (!?!) Has Zakir Naik [Ignorant- Shameless liar] repented from this Slander?!

Al-Allaamah Rabee Bin Haadi Al-Madkhali (may Allaah preserve him) stated:

How numerous are those who tell lies today against the carries of Salafiyyah and its callers! And to what extent do they (spread) rumors carried from them until they reach distant lands! They hinder men from the path of Allaah by way of them and seek crookedness therein, and to aid falsehood, spurious affairs, innovations, affairs that are destructive to the sound creed and methodology and the virtuous manners.

[Source: Al-Awaasim Mimmaa Fee Kutub Sayyid Qutb Minal-Qawaasim page: 4-5]

Now see the following Tweet by Ustaadh Amjad Rafiq (may Allaah preserve him) – regarding Zakir Naik and his blatant jahl rgarding the Aqeedah of Ahlus Sunnah wa’al Jamaa’ – May Allah save us from inventing lies to please the people…

Listen to speech of Ustaadh Abu Khadeejah here: http://ahlulbidahwalhawa.com/2011/12/21/refutation-of-zakir-naik-by-abu-khadeejah/

Salafi Maraakiz–Neither with Maribi [Ikhwaani] Nor With Al-Hajoori [Al-Haddaadi]

Al-Allaamah Muhammad Bin Abdil Wahhaab Al-Wassaabi (may Allaah preserve him) stated:

”Ahlus Sunnah are on the Wasat (i.e. on the just and upright path) between Abul Hasan Al-Maribi’s Tamyee and Al-Hajoori’s harshness.”

 Listen to Arabic lecture here:

scenery of mountain canyon

An Explanation of the Sayings of The Biased-Partisans [Spubs.com]

In The Name of Allaah, The Most Merciful, The Bestower of Mercy

Indeed, we did emphasise the need to visit this website [www.salafipublications.com]; because there are many reoccurring affairs of fitan, which were previously dealt with by the students at Maktabah Salafiyyah from the works of the scholars.

[الحمد لله]….there are many Maraakiz of Salafiyyah in the West—free from the falsehood of the followers of hajoori and halabi—but it is also important that we are well aware of evil plots, devilish insinuations and false accusations of those carrying the views of the Qutubis, Sorooris and Ikhwaanis.

Recently we have seen some of the ignorant liars, slanderers and allies of the innovators–such as the likes of Abu Eesa Niamatullaah—attempting to slander the Salafiyyoon in order to justify his deviated and destructive methodology.  Therefore, it is important that the young Salafi brothers and sisters are well aware of some of those affairs through which the likes of Abu Eesa and others seek to confound truth with falsehood, and in order to promote their deviated views as alternatives to the sound Manhaj positions of the Ulama of Ahlus Sunnah Wal-Jamaa-ah.  The following article is very important indeed and may Allaah grant us Tawfeeq to understand the issues….Aameen…


 

An Explanation of the Sayings of The Biased-Partisans

Muji’ah with the rulers, khawaarij with the Du’aat, Raafidah with the Islamic Groups, Qadariyyah with the Infidels

And What it contains of [Wicked] Falsehoods [And Fanciful Hallucinations]

see link:

http://www.thenoblequran.com/sps/sp.cfm?subsecID=MSC05&articleID=MSC050003&articlePages=1


 

We ask Allaah to reward and preserve the Ulamaa of Ahlus Sunnah.  We ask Allaah to preserve and grant our brothers at Maktabah Salafiyyah the Tawfeeq to carry on defending this blessed Manhajus Salafi in the West.   Aameen.

 

A characteristic of the khawaarij of old and the khawaarij of our era

Al-Allaamah Rabee Bin Haadi Al-Madkhali (may Allaah preserve him) stated:

The khawaarij used to oppose Ali and the Sahaabah- (claiming) that they were the ones in compliance (with the teachings) of Islaam and that the Sahaabah were misguided and had become disbelievers.  It is the same at present as the saying goes, ”history repeats itself’.’ At present-according to the these khawaarij-the scholars of the Sunnah are misguided, worshippers of the rulers, spies, employees, people of feasts and ambiguity…and ….and… other distorted (or defamatory statements of these khawaarij) by way of which they hinder the youth of the Ummah from the truth and from the path of Allaah (تبارك وتعالى).


[Source: الذريعة إلى بيان مقاصد كتاب الشريعة للإمام المحدث أبي بكر محمد بن الحسين الآجري   page: 98. Vol 1; abridged]

The Methodologies of Sayyid Qutb, Hassan Al-Banna and Mawdoodee’- By Shaikh Rabee Bin Haadi

Al-Allaamah Rabee Bin Haadi Al-Madkhali (rahimahullaah) stated:

By Allaah the methodology of Sayyid Qutb, (Hasan) al-Banna and Mawdoodi can never come together (in agreement) with the Salafi Methodology. They can never come together-misguidance and guidance cannot come together; so understand (this) O youth! It is obligated upon you to (adhere) to the methodology of the Salafus Saalih (i.e. the first three pious generations of Islaam-the Sahabah; then those who followed them; then those who followed the followers of the Sahaabah).


[Source: الذريعة إلى بيان مقاصد كتاب الشريعةpage: 97. Vol 1]

[2] Brief Reminder for the Envious-Abusive-Ahmaq [Mourad Al-Jazaa’iri]

Al-Allaamah Rabee Bin Haadi Al-Madkhali (may Allaah preserve him) said:

”By Allaah, the one who speaks ill of Shaikh Ubaid and says that he is a Jaahil; this (person) is one following the path of the devils; he follows the paths of hizbiyyah in speaking ill of the scholars of the Salafi manhaj. Shaikh Ubaid is from the virtuous Salafi scholars and is well known for Wara, Zuhd and speaking truth, may Allaah bless you. And a man who seeks the face of Allaah does not speak ill of him, and we know of these ways (i.e. attacks against the scholars) from the hizbiyyeen.”  http://www.sahab.net/forums/index.php?showtopic=116834

 

Al-Allaamah Saaleh Al-Fawzaan (may Allaah preserve him) said:

None violates the honour of the scholars who are upon the truth, except one of three (people): Either a hypocrite known for (his) hypocrisy, or an evil sinner who hates the scholars because they prevent him from his sinful (acts) of disobedience, or a misguided hizbi who hates the scholars because they neither agree with his hizbiyyah nor with his deviated views. [Al-Ajwibah Al-Mufeedah page 51 and Muhaadaraat Fil Aqeedah Wad-Dawa 2/190]