Skip to main content

Author: Abdullah Jallow

One of their traits

Written by Abdullah Jallow on . Posted in Articles, Contemporary Issues, Fitnah, Morals and Manners - 'Akhlaaq', Refutations, Scholars of Islam.

In The Name of Allah, The Most Merciful, The Bestower of Mercy.

Al-Allamah Salih Aala Ash-Shaikh, may Allah preserve him, stated:

As for Ikhwaan Al-Muslimeen, (a) what is most evident regarding their Dawah is that they conceal, disguise, fickle and get close to the one they believe will benefit them and not making known their true reality. Among them is one who mingles with some of the scholars and the Mashaayikh for a long time and he (i.e. the Scholar or Shaikh) knows not their reality. He (i.e. this hidden Ikhwaani) makes a statement but hides the opposite. He does not state all (his views, opinions etc).

Source: An excerpt from Al-Fatawaa Al-Muhimmah Fee Tabseer Al-Ummah. Page 180

(a)Read more about Ikhwaan Al-Muslimen on this link http://www.ikhwanis.com/articles/lwakzes-the-ikhwan-muslim-brotherhood-are-from-the-72-sects.cfm

Hizbiyyah

Written by Abdullah Jallow on . Posted in Articles, Basics, Bid'ah (Innovation), Contemporary Issues, Da'wah - Calling To Islam, Featured, History of Islam, Methodology - 'Manhaj', Morals and Manners - 'Akhlaaq', Pearls of Wisdom, Purification of The Soul, Scholars of Islam.

In The Name of Allah, The Most Merciful, The Bestower of Mercy.

Al-Allamah Rabee Bin Hadi Al-Mad’khali, may Allah have mercy upon him, said:

Everyone who opposes the Methodology of the Prophet and His Sunnah (a) is considered part of the misguided groups. Unlawful Partisanship does not require (specific) conditions; Allah referred to past nations as unlawful partisanship groups, and He referred to the Quraysh as an unlawful partisanship group when they united and allied with various groups. They did not have an organisation or anything, thus it is not a condition to be an organisation in order to be (classified) an unlawful partisanship group. However, if this group organises itself, it increases in evil.

Blind (bigoted) allegiance to a specific thought (or idea) that contradicts Allah’s Book and the Messenger’s Sunnah, and (establishing) allegiance and enmity based on it, this is unlawful partisanship, even if not organised.

To adopt a deviant thought (or idea) and gather people around it, this is an unlawful partisanship group, regardless of whether it is organised or not. To adopt a deviant thought (or idea) and gathering people around it, this is an unlawful partisanship group, regardless of whether it is organised or not. As long as they unite for a cause (or behind someone) in opposition to the Quran and Sunnah, this is an unlawful partisanship group. The disbelievers who waged war against the Prophet did not have the organisational structure present today; nevertheless, Allah referred to them as unlawful partisanship groups. How is this so? It is because they banded together for falsehood and fought against the truth. (Allah says):

كذبت قبلهم قوم نوح والأحزاب من بعدهم وهمت كل أمة برسولهم ليأخذوه وجادلوا بالباطل ليدحضوا به الحق

The people of Nuh (Noah) and the confederates after them denied (their Messengers) before these, and every (disbelieving) nation plotted against their Messenger to seize him, and disputed by means of falsehood to refute therewith the truth. [Ghafir Ayah 5]

They are referred to as unlawful partisanship groups due to forming groups. Quraysh gathered the tribes of Ghatafan, Qurayza, and various other tribes, but they were not organised in the form of an organisation. They came together and Allah referred to them as unlawful partisanship groups, thus the Surah (regarding their affair) was named “Surah Al-Ahzab.” Were those unlawful partisanship groups organised (i.e. under an organisation)? It is not a condition that an unlawful partisanship group has to be organised (or under an organisation). If it believes in a false idea – argues, disputes, and allies for the sake of it, this is an unlawful partisanship group. Should this (commitment) become more structured (organised or under an organisation), with the mobilisation of wealth etc, it would undoubtedly deepen its unlawful partisanship and become one of the astray groups. And Allah’s refuge is sought. (1)

Listen to Hizbiyyah Is Not From Salafiyyah By Shaikh Abu Khadeejah – may Allah preserve him.

Part 3: To Abandon Innovations, Hizbiyyah (Partisanship), Differing, Sectarianism, and Establishing the Call to Unity: Imām Ahmad bin Hanbal’s Usūl As-Sunnah (The Foundations of the Sunnah) with the explanation of Shaikh An-Najmi.

——————————————

(a) Shaikh Rabee: Establishment of Proof in Declaring a Person to be an Innovator https://abukhadeejah.com/shaikh-rabee-establishment-of-proof-in-declaring-a-person-to-be-an-innovator/

(1) Paraphrased https://rabee.net/alfatawi/%D9%85%D8%A7-%D9%85%D8%B9%D9%86%D9%89-%D8%A7%D9%84%D8%AD%D8%B2%D8%A8%D9%8A%D8%A9%D8%9F-%D9%88%D9%85%D8%A7-%D9%85%D8%B9%D9%86%D9%89-%D8%A3%D9%86-%D9%81%D9%84%D8%A7%D9%86-%D8%B9%D9%86%D8%AF%D9%87-%D8%AD/

Reminder to Sons of My Household: Avoid Over-stringency, Adhere to Precise Principles and Careful Deliberation

Written by Abdullah Jallow on . Posted in Articles, Contemporary Issues, Da'wah - Calling To Islam, Methodology - 'Manhaj', Morals and Manners - 'Akhlaaq', Purification of The Soul, Scholars of Islam, Worship - 'Ibaadah'.

In The Name of Allah, The Most Merciful, The Bestower of Mercy.

The Messenger, peace and blessings of Allah be upon him, said:

“The over-stringent ones are destroyed”.

Imam An-Nawawi, may Allah have mercy upon him, said: The over-stringent ones are those who look too deeply (into affairs) and are excessive- those who exceed the Hudood (prescribed legislated Shariah boundaries) in their statements and actions”. [1]

Imam Muhammad Ibn Salih Al-Uthaymeen, may Allah have mercy upon him, said that:

This applies to both speech and actions, and that in most cases some people in this state may become self-amazed and arrogant. [2]

The Messenger, peace and blessings of Allah be upon him, said:

“Beware of Ghuluw (extremism exaggeration, or excessive zeal) in religion, for those who came before you were destroyed due to extremism in religion”. [3]

Shaikh Al-Islam Ibn Taymiyyah, may Allah have mercy on him, said:

“Ghuluw is the act of exceeding the limit in something, by either praising or criticizing (dispraising) something beyond what it truly deserves, and similar actions.” [4]

Shaikh Al-Islam Ibn Taymiyyah said, may Allah have mercy upon him, said:

“A person must have (sound) comprehensive fundamental principles to which the branches of a subject matter are referred back to in order to speak based on knowledge and justice; then he knows how those branches of the subject matter are established (or the way in which they are impacted by the sound comprehensive principles), otherwise, he will remain upon lies and ignorance in the branches and upon ignorance and oppression in the comprehensive fundamental principles, thus great corruption occurs”. [5]

Shaikh Al-Islam Ibn Taymiyyah, may Allah have mercy upon him, said:

When it is the case that the (true) followers of the Prophets are people of knowledge and justice, then the speech of the people of Islam and the Sunnah about the disbelievers and people of bidah is to be (carried out) with knowledge and justice, and not conjecture and the soul’s desire. And due to this, the Prophet, peace and blessings of Allah be upon him, said: “Judges are three types; one will go to Paradise and two to Hell. A man who knows the truth and judges based on it will enter paradise; a man who knows the truth but judges based on the opposite of it will enter the fire, and a man who judges for the people based on ignorance will enter the fire”.

And when it is the case that the one who judges between the people in (matters) of wealth, blood [i.e. murder cases etc] and honour will enter the hell fire if he is not a just scholar, then what about the one who passes judgements without knowledge, such being the case with ahlul bidah, on religions, the fundamental principles of Iman, affairs of knowledge related to Allah, His Names, Attributes and Actions, and the lofty affairs of knowledge?!” [6]

An Example of Those People of Knowledge Whose Knowledge Had An Effect On Them

Imam Ibn Al-Jawzi, may Allah have mercy upon him, said:

I have met the Mashayikh; their circumstances were different and their stations of knowledge varied. The most beneficial of them for me in companionship was the scholar who acted upon his knowledge, even though there were others more knowledgeable than him.

I met Abdul Wahhab Al-Anmaatee, who adhered to the principles of the pious predecessors. Backbiting was not heard in his gatherings (a) nor did he seek any reward for sharing hadith. Whenever I read to him the hadiths related to Raqaa’iq, he would weep and his tears would flow continuously. As a young person at that time, his weeping profoundly affected my heart. He embodied the characteristics of the scholars whose descriptions we had heard in the reports.

I met Abu Mansur Al-Jawaaleeqee, who was notably quiet and very meticulous in his speech. Even when asked about a clear matter, which some of his young students would quickly answer, he paused to ensure accuracy. He fasted and kept quiet a lot. I benefited from these two men more than I benefitted from others. I understood from this situation that guidance through action is more effective than verbal instruction. The truly impoverished one is the person who spends their life acquiring knowledge without applying it, missing out on the pleasures of this world and the goodness of the hereafter, ultimately proceeding as one bankrupt in deeds with strong proofs against him. [7]

Respect all the scholars and benefit from them, but seek out the most elderly and senior scholars

Seeking out the most elderly and senior scholars

[1] Sharh Saheeh Muslim. 16/180

[2] https://alathar.net/home/esound/index.php?op=codevi&coid=126682

[3] Sahih Al-Jami 2680

[4] Iqtidaa As-Siraat Al-Mustaqeem 1/289

[5] Al-Majmoo Al-Fataawaa 19/203

[6] Al-Jawaabus Sahih 1/107-108

[7] Saydul Khaatir. page 138]

 

A Balanced Approach to Marriage Between Relatives and Hereditary Diseases

Written by Abdullah Jallow on . Posted in Articles, Basics, Contemporary Issues, Family & Women, Fatawa-Rulings, Featured, Islamic Jurisprudence - 'Fiqh', Marriage (Nikkah), Mental Health, Methodology - 'Manhaj', Morals and Manners - 'Akhlaaq', Pearls of Wisdom, Purification of The Soul, Scholars of Islam, Worship - 'Ibaadah'.

In The Name of Allah, The Most Merciful, The Bestower of Mercy.

Imam Abdul Aziz Bin Baz, may Allah have mercy upon him, was asked:

يا سماحة الشيخ

We have heard that indeed there is danger in marrying relatives as I want to marry off one of my children. Is there any hadith regarding this? May Allah reward you.

Answer: There is no danger therein. What is said (regarding this) is an error. There is no danger in marrying relatives, rather, it is good. The Prophet, peace and blessings of Allah be upon him, married from his relatives. Umm Salamah was from his relatives, Aisha was from his relatives, and Umm Habiba was from his relatives. All of them are from Quraysh, all from his tribe. There is no harm in that. Ali married Fatimah, the daughter of the Prophet, peace and blessings of Allah be upon him, who was the daughter of his cousin (i.e. The Prophet, peace and blessings be upon him). Uthman married the Prophet’s daughters, Ruqayyah and Umm Kulthum (i.e. after of them died he married the other). Abu Al Aas Ibn Ar-Rabee married the Prophet’s fourth daughter, Zainab, and all of them were cousins. There is no harm in this. [1]

The Imam, may Allah have mercy upon him, was also asked: Some people would not marry the daughter of their uncle out of fear that the children might be born with deformities. Does this negate the perfection (completeness) of (one’s) belief in pure Islamic monotheism?

Answer: Many among the people of knowledge have clarified these matters , and that indeed a person should choose a suitable spouse for their offspring to the extent that some of the Fuqaha said: “The best is that one marries a non-relative, rather than the daughter of his uncle”. This is a mistake and it has no basis, whether it is the daughter of his paternal uncle or not the daughter of his paternal uncle, the daughter of his maternal uncle or not the daughter of his maternal uncle. The Prophet, peace and blessings be upon him, married the daughter of his uncle.

But, one should examine (give thought or consideration) that if the woman comes from a family that is afflicted with hereditary defects, mental illness, or physical deformities, he should not marry (someone among) them from the angle of employing the means of precaution, because this could bring you hereditary (issues). Diseases can be passed down – by the will of Allah- to the child, the grandchild and the daughter’s child. If this (such and such) family is well-known to have hereditary diseases that affect the children, he should avoid (marrying into such family). And if nothing is known about the family (i.e. regarding hereditary diseases), he marries (someone) among them. These matters that are known – (through experience, observation etc) regarding what is passed down do occur. Due to this, scholars and physicians advise that one examines (pays attention) to these matters. [2]

[1]Paraphrased:https://binbaz.org.sa/fatwas/8826/%D8%AD%D9%83%D9%85-%D8%A7%D9%84%D8%B2%D9%88%D8%A7%D8%AC-%D9%85%D9%86-%D8%A7%D9%84%D8%A7%D9%82%D8%A7%D8%B1%D8%A8

[2]Paraphrased:https://binbaz.org.sa/fatwas/2565/%D8%AD%D9%83%D9%85-%D8%AA%D8%B1%D9%83-%D8%A7%D9%84%D8%B2%D9%88%D8%A7%D8%AC-%D9%85%D9%86-%D8%A7%D9%84%D8%A7%D9%82%D8%A7%D8%B1%D8%A8-%D8%AE%D8%B4%D9%8A%D8%A9-%D8%A7%D9%84%D8%A7%D9%85%D8%B1%D8%A7%D8%B6

Brief Scrutiny of The Term “Radical Islam”

Written by Abdullah Jallow on . Posted in Articles, Basics, Contemporary Issues, Methodology - 'Manhaj', Morals and Manners - 'Akhlaaq', Refutations.

In The Name of Allah, The Most Merciful, The Bestower of Mercy.

Allah, The Most High, said:

وَكَذَٰلِكَ جَعَلْنَاكُمْ أُمَّةً وَسَطًا لِّتَكُونُوا شُهَدَاءَ عَلَى النَّاسِ وَيَكُونَ الرَّسُولُ عَلَيْكُمْ شَهِيدًا ۗ وَمَا جَعَلْنَا الْقِبْلَةَ الَّتِي كُنتَ عَلَيْهَا إِلَّا لِنَعْلَمَ مَن يَتَّبِعُ الرَّسُولَ مِمَّن يَنقَلِبُ عَلَىٰ عَقِبَيْهِ ۚ وَإِن كَانَتْ لَكَبِيرَةً إِلَّا عَلَى الَّذِينَ هَدَى اللَّهُ ۗ وَمَا كَانَ اللَّهُ لِيُضِيعَ إِيمَانَكُمْ ۚ إِنَّ اللَّهَ بِالنَّاسِ لَرَءُوفٌ رَّحِيمٌ

Thus We have made you [true Muslims – real believers of Islamic Monotheism, true followers of Prophet Muhammad and his Sunnah (legal ways)], a Wasat (just) (and the best) nation, that you be witnesses over mankind and the Messenger (Muhammad) be a witness over you. [Al-Baqarah 143]

Radical Islam

PDF Link: Radical_Islam1

Reflections on some statements of Al-Allamah Rabee Bin Hadi Al-Mad’khali [102]

Written by Abdullah Jallow on . Posted in Articles, Basics, Contemporary Issues, Da'wah - Calling To Islam, Methodology - 'Manhaj', Morals and Manners - 'Akhlaaq', Pearls of Wisdom, Purification of The Soul, Salaf As Saalih (Pious Predecessors), Scholars of Islam, Seeking Knowledge, The Salaf - Pious Predecessors, Worship - 'Ibaadah'.

In The Name of Allah, The Most Merciful, The Bestower of Mercy.

The Shaikh, may Allah have mercy upon him, said:

O brothers! I advise you to follow the path of the pious predecessors in learning, manners, and Dawah; neither being over-stringent nor extreme.

Adh-Dhari’ah 3/214

Reflections from some statements of Al Allamah Rabee Bin Hadi Al-Mad’khali [101]

Written by Abdullah Jallow on . Posted in Articles, Basics, Brotherhood, Contemporary Issues, Fitnah, Methodology - 'Manhaj', Morals and Manners - 'Akhlaaq', Purification of The Soul, Scholars of Islam, Sin, Worship - 'Ibaadah'.

In The Name of Allah, The Most Merciful, The Bestower of Mercy.

The Shaikh, may Allah have mercy upon him, said:

If your brother makes a mistake, advise him gently and present proof and evidence for Allah to benefit him through that. But as for sitting and waiting for so and so to make a mistake, then smearing here and there that so-and-so did such-and-such, these are the ways of the devils, not the ways of the Salafis.

Bahjah Al-Qari 107

Propagandists in the Guise of Advice and Dawah on Twitter Find These Reiterated Clarifications Bitter to Swallow

Written by Abdullah Jallow on . Posted in Articles, Basics, Contemporary Issues, Methodology - 'Manhaj', Morals and Manners - 'Akhlaaq', Purification of The Soul.

In The Name of Allah, The Most Merciful, The Bestower of Mercy.

 

The Plans and Plots to Harass Others Through General or Ambiguous Statements

Whenever they desperately seek to intimidate others with vague, general or ambiguous statements of this or that important personality under the guise of knowledge or advice, we say to them: Imam Ibn Al-Qayyim, may Allah have mercy upon him, stated:

  وعـلـيك بالتفصيل والتبيين فالإجمال والإطلاق دون بيان
قد أفسدا هذا الوجود وخبـطا الأذهان والآراء كل زمـان

“It is obligated to you to provide detailed explanations and clarifications, as generalisations and unrestricted (speech) without elaboration (clarification) have corrupted the existence and confused minds and opinions throughout all times”.

Al-Allamah Salih Al-Fawzan, may Allah preserve him, stated:

There has to be a detailed explanation. The one who is not proficient in giving details should keep quiet because benefit is not acquired from his speech. And every time an error occurs, its cause is due to an absence of detailed explanation regarding truth and falsehood. There has to be detailed explanation and distinction and not mix-up. Indeed, it may be that there is something of truth and falsehood in an opponent’s statement, so all of it is neither deemed to be false nor true; rather there has to be a distinction between its truth and falsehood. All of it is neither rejected nor accepted; rather a distinction is made regarding the truth and what is correct and the falsehood and error in it. And if you are not proficient in giving details, then you should not enter into this field. [1]

 

The Plan and Plot to Use The Status of The People of Knowledge to Force Others to Accept Their Views Without Proof

When they desperately seek to force others by utilising the status of the people of knowledge, whether through propaganda or by pursuing specific agendas, and insist in repeating the same claims without any clear proof, we say to them: Imam Muhammad Ibn Salih Al-Uthaymin, may Allah have mercy upon him, said:

Pay attention to this principle; it is a very beneficial principle: “The statements of scholars are not (merely) utilised as proof, but proof is (provided) for them (to substantiate them)”. Due to this if one says, “So-and-so said such-and-such”, we respond: “Where is his proof, so that we establish our acts of worship based upon the guidance of the Messenger, peace and blessings be upon him”. O noble brother, who intends to come to Allah’s House (the Kabah) and the Masjid of His Prophet, peace and blessings of Allah be upon him, take note of this. There is no one among the creation besides Allah’s Messenger whose speech is never proof against Allah’s servants regardless of his status. Regardless of his status in the sight of his people, he is not a proof with regards to Allah’s Speech and the speech of His Messenger. Lend an ear to the verse:

فإن تنازعتم في شيء فردوه إلى الله والرسول إن كنتم تؤمنون بالله واليوم الآخر

And if you disagree among yourselves over anything then refer it back to Allāh and the Messenger if you truly believe in Allāh and the Last Day. [An-Nisaa 59] https://www.thenoblequran.com/q/#/search/4_59

Therefore, anyone who wants that one to be referred back to be someone other than the Messenger; anyone who wants the thing to refer back to be other than the Book and the Sunnah, then indeed he has not believed in Allah and the Last Day. This is because Allah said:

إن كنتم تؤمنون بالله واليوم الآخر ذلك خير وأحسن تأويلا

if you truly believe in Allāh and the Last Day. That is better (conduct) and (leads to) the most excellent outcome. [An-Nisaa 59] https://www.thenoblequran.com/q/#/search/4_59

That is better at present and “That is better (conduct) and (leads to) the most excellent outcome”- meaning, its final result is the best in the Afterlife. And in whatsoever you differ, the decision thereof is with Allah (He is the ruling Judge). Allah made it known (clarified for us) saying:

ردوه إلى الله والرسول إن كنتم تؤمنون بالله واليوم الآخر

Refer it back to Allāh and the Messenger if you truly believe in Allāh and the Last Day.

And on the day of resurrection, Allah will not ask you: “What did you respond to so and so”, rather He will say: “What response did you give to the Messengers?” [2]

 

The Plot and Plan to Overcome Others With Numerous Statements, Either Through Evasion, Exaggeration or In a Haphazard Manner, Showing That Their Goal Is Not to Reach The Truth.

When they desperately seek to overcome others with numerous claims, exaggerations about this or that individual or matter, engaging in psychological projection, desperately transmitting any new statement they think might be useful to them in their useless pursuit to overcome others, or providing them with a deceptive sense of victory by initiating doubt or ambiguities among people, or at the very gives them time to evade responsibility, conceal their objectives and blame others, we say to them:

Imam Ibn Al-Qayyim, may Allah have mercy upon him, said, “The loftiest ambition in pursuit of knowledge is to acquire knowledge from the Qur’an and the Sunnah- to be granted understanding by Allah [i.e. blessed to acquire sound knowledge and act upon it] and through the Sunnah of the Messenger, and acquaint oneself with the boundaries of the revelation [i.e. neither going into excess nor being lackadaisical]. And the most baseless ambition of the students of knowledge is to confine their ambitions in following the bizarre affairs and that which has neither occurred nor has it been revealed, or acquainting (oneself) with the differences of opinion and pursuing the statements of the scholars, whilst having no ambition to acquaint oneself with what is correct among those statements. Little is there to benefit from the knowledge of these people”. [3]

 

The Pursuit of Concessions Without Justification and Seeking to Force Others to Accept Their Views

When they seek after concessions to evade responsibility, we say to them:

Imam Ash-Shaatibe, may Allah have mercy upon him, stated regarding the attitude of the unjustified pursuit of concessions: “This arises from following one’s desires. Desire leads to a too easygoing attitude and the pursuit of concessions for oneself and others. So, you see him adopting that for himself or passing that judgment for his relative or friend, which he would not do for another person due to the desire of that relative and friend”. [4]

Imam Ash-Shaatibee, may Allah have mercy upon him] also said, “If a Mukallaf [i.e. the sane one who has reached the age when the obligations of the Shariah are obligated on him or her] seeks after concessions in the Madhabs in every affair that is difficult for him and every statement that agrees with his desires, then he will remove himself from the firm handhold of piety and persist upon the pursuit of desires”. [5]

 

Pursuit of Odd Matters and Refuse to Adhere to Clarity

When they seek after the odd matters and refuse to adhere to clarity, we say to them:

Ibrahim Ibn Abee Ablah (died 152AH – may Allah have mercy upon him) said, “He who carries the odd affairs of knowledge carries a lot of evil”. [6]

Abdur Rahman Bin Mahdi (died 198AH – may Allah have mercy upon him) said, “The one who pursues the odd affairs of knowledge cannot be an Imam in knowledge”. [7]

Imam Ash-Shaatibee [may Allaah have mercy upon him] said, “If desires enter (a person), it leads to following the ambiguous matters out of being eager to prevail and become victorious through establishing excuses in issues related to difference of opinion (or differing); but rather it leads to splitting, disharmony, enmity, and hatred due to the different desires and lack of (sound) agreement; however, the Shariah came to curtail (vain) desires completely. If some of the premises of the evidence were not established except through desires, it would not result except in following desires and that is contrary to the Shariah, and opposing the Shariah is not from the Shariah at all. Therefore, following desires concerning what one may regard to be adherence to the Shariah is tantamount to misguidance.”. [8]

[1] An Excerpt from “at-Ta-leeqaat Al-Mukhtasar Alaa Al-Qaseedah an-Nooniyyah” 1/216

[2] https://www.alathar.net/home/esound/index.php?op=codevi&coid=116826 [A paraphrased excerpt]

[3] An Excerpt from Al-Fawaa’id. Page 99

[4] Al-Muwaafaqaat. 5/84

[5] Al-Muwaafaqaat. 3/123

[6] Siyar A’laam An-Nubula 6/324

[7] At-Tamheed 1/64 by Ibn Abdil Barr

[8] Al-Muwaafaqaat 5/221

“Excavating for Influence” – Brief Observation into Goals Behind the Recovery of Forefathers’ Artefacts

Written by Abdullah Jallow on . Posted in Aqeedah, Aqeedah (Creed & Belief), Articles, Contemporary Issues, Methodology - 'Manhaj', Monotheism - Tawheed, Morals and Manners - 'Akhlaaq', Purification of The Soul, Refutations, Scholars of Islam.

In The Name of Allah, The Most Merciful, The Bestower of Mercy.

Al-Allamah Rabee Bin Haadee al-Madkhalee, may Allah have mercy upon him, stated:

The attention given to artefacts (or relics) – in this era – in the manner pursued by the Archaeologists was not known during the era of the Prophet’s companions, may Allah be pleased with them, and the pious predecessors, may Allah have mercy upon them, but rather the Muslims blindly followed the Europeans and Americans whose greatest goal in studying artefacts (or relics) in the land of the Muslims is to revive (the traits of) pre-Islamic nationalism, such as Pharaonism, (Pan) Babylonianism, Phoenicianism etc. And they succeeded to a great extent in actualising many of these goals, thus arose – in the Muslim lands – the (traits) of pre-Islamic national pride and taking pride in these nationalisms.

Indeed, I am amazed by the example of yours [i.e. the person the Shaikh was refuting] regarding the towns of (Prophet) Salih and Ukhdud, which are places (that earned) Allah’s anger!! Imam Al-Bukhari, may Allah have mercy upon him, said, “Abdullah Bin Muhammad Al-Jufee narrated to us that Abdur Razzaaq narrated to them from Az-Zuhree who narrated from Salim, who narrated from Ibn Umar, may Allah be pleased with him and his father, who said, ‘When the Prophet, peace and blessings of Allah be upon him, passed by Al-Hijr, he said, ‘Do not enter the dwelling places of those people who were unjust to themselves unless you enter in a weeping state lest the same calamity as of theirs should befall you’. Then he covered his head and made his speed fast till he crossed the valley”. Yahyah Bin Bukayr narrated to us who said that Malik narrated to us from Abdullah Bin Deenaar who reported from Ibn Umar, who said, “Allah’s Messenger, peace and blessings of Allah be upon him, said to his companions who were at Al-Hijr, ‘Do not enter upon these people who are being punished, except in a weeping state, lest the same calamity as of theirs should befall you'”. [Al-Bukhari. 4419 and 4420]

The two Prophetic reports show the danger of entering the places of those who incurred Allah’s anger and He destroyed them due to their disbelief, denial of the prophets and their message. The Prophet did not permit entry into them except for one who fears Allah and fears His punishment, so he enters when in need while weeping. It is feared for the one who enters the dwellings of those who were punished that he would be afflicted with the punishment that afflicted them. It is legislated for the one who approaches those dwellings to go past quickly while covering his face to follow the example of Allah’s Messenger, peace and blessings of Allah be upon him. Do the Muslim possess understanding – and amongst them the Archeologists and those who encourage them – of what is in this Prophetic guidance that came from one who does not speak out of his own desires [i.e. the Prophet -peace and blessings of Allah be upon him]? Also, Allah’s Messenger, peace and blessings of Allah be upon him, legislated for the one who goes past the valleys of Muhassar to hurry because Allah destroyed the people of the Elephant over there [i.e. the story of the people of the Elephant – Surah Al-Feel].

Therefore, those who excavate the artefacts (relics) of the people of Aad, Thamud, the Ashaab Al-Ukhdud, the Pharoanic and Babylonian artefacts (or relics), do they act based on the guidance of Allah’s Messenger, or do they blindly follow the enemies of Allah who set up partnership of exploration for them from the artefacts (or relics) of the destroyed nations in order to entice (them) towards (traits) of pre-Islamic ignorance. Indeed, I and other than myself have read the numerous boasting of Muslims or those who ascribe to Islam, such as the statement of some of them, “O Misree (i.e. Egyptian)! Be proud of the builders of your glory when people were sleeping”. He boasts about the Pharoanic artefacts (relics) such as the pyramids and other than them. (1)

Why Ponder Upon The Story of The Nations of Old?

Imam Ibn Al-Qayyim, may Allah have mercy upon him, stated:

Allah, The Most High, said: [قَدْ خَلَتْ مِنْ قَبْلِكُمْ سُنَنٌ فَسِيرُوا فِي الْأَرْضِ فَانْظُرُوا كَيْفَ كَانَ عَاقِبَةُ الْمُكَذِّبِينَ – Many similar mishaps [troubles, problems] of life were faced by nations that have passed away before you, so travel through the earth, and see what was the end of those who disbelieved]. [Aal Imran. 137]

Indeed, there were nations like yourselves before you, so look to their evil end. You have to know that the reason behind their evil end was due to their disbelief in the revelations of Allah and disbelief in Allah’s Messengers. They were the forefathers and you are the descendants. The main affair that connects you to each other is your disbelief and the ruling on that disbelief is destruction. (2)

Imam Muhammad Bin Salih Al-Uthaymeen, may Allah have mercy upon him, said: If it is said, “What is the benefit in narrating to us the stories of the destroyed nations despite the fact that this Ummah will not be completely destroyed in a manner similar to the destruction of the previous nations before it?'”.

The Answer: Indeed, this has two benefits: The first benefit is a clarification of Allah’s blessings upon us that the occurrence of a complete destruction is removed from us, and that were it not for Allah’s Benevolence we would have been deserving of it. Second, the likeness of the punishment they received may occur in the hereafter for the one who did what they did, if punishment was not received in the worldly life. And this may be understood from the statement of Allah: “Such is the Seizure of your Lord when He seizes the population of towns while they are doing wrong. Verily, His Seizure is painful and severe. Indeed in that (there) is a sure lesson for those who fear the torment of the Hereafter.” So what is apparent from this verse is that what is similar to the punishment they received will happen in the Hereafter, and Allah knows best. (3)

[1] Baraa’atus Sahaabah Al-Akhyaar Min At-Tabarruk Bil Amaakin Wal-Aalathaar. Pages 11-14. Slightly paraphrased
[2] I’laam Al-Muwaqqi-een: 1/181
[3] Al-Muntaqaa Min Fawaa’d Fawaa’d 123-124