Skip to main content

Author: Salafi Dawah Manchester

Muhammad Al-Maaliki- You Included Shaikh Muhammad Bin Haadi in a Statement of yours at Brixton, So Be Honest And Clarify!

Written by Salafi Dawah Manchester on . Posted in Morals and Manners - 'Akhlaaq', Tamyee'.

In The Name of Allaah, The Most Merciful, The Bestower of Mercy

Allaah (The Most High) stated:

يَا أَيُّهَا الَّذِينَ آمَنُوا كُونُوا قَوَّامِينَ بِالْقِسْطِ شُهَدَاءَ لِلَّهِ وَلَوْ عَلَىٰ أَنْفُسِكُمْ أَوِ الْوَالِدَيْنِ وَالْأَقْرَبِينَ ۚ إِنْ يَكُنْ غَنِيًّا أَوْ فَقِيرًا فَاللَّهُ أَوْلَىٰ بِهِمَا ۖ فَلَا تَتَّبِعُوا الْهَوَىٰ أَنْ تَعْدِلُوا ۚ وَإِنْ تَلْوُوا أَوْ تُعْرِضُوا فَإِنَّ اللَّهَ كَانَ بِمَا تَعْمَلُونَ خَبِيرًا

‘’O you who believe! Stand out firmly for justice, as witnesses to Allah; even though it be against yourselves, or your parents, or your kin, be he rich or poor, Allah is a Better Protector to both (than you). So follow not the lusts (of your hearts), lest you may avoid justice, and if you distort your witness or refuse to give it, verily, Allah is Ever Well-Acquainted with what you do.” [4:135]

Indeed, one of Muhammad Al-Maaliki’s blameworthy ways in the UK is that he seeks to slander and silence those brothers in the UK Maraakiz, who criticize the staunch UK followers of the obstinate Mubtadi’ah, Al-Maribi, Al-Halabi and Al-Magraawi. So when asked about those who question Brixton’s Salafiyyah, he responded saying that such people are fame seekers and that one should ask the scholars who visit the Uk, Shaikh Muhammad Bin Haadi included.

Muhammad Al-Maaliki utters slander once again! Firstly: Those who question Brixton’s Salafiyyah do so based on the fact that Brixton’s Admin staunchly defends the Murji Mubtadi Ali Al-Halabi. But Muhammad Al-Maaliki has nothing else to offer as a valid defence other than slanders. There is no doubt that his visits to the UK and blameworthy companionship has gradually established him as one of those in that ‘defense of the indefensible’ racket.

Some brothers are still been castigated for speaking the truth-the likes of Ustaadh Abu Khadeejah, Ustaadh Abu Hakeem and others (may Allaah preserve them) have stood firm and manifested the truth despite being attacked and vilified. But Muhammad Al-Maaliki deliberately ignores the fact that his defense of the indefensible is a spectacular mistake. He deliberately ignores the fact that it is impossible to encourage the staunch UK followers of Al-Maribi, Al-Halabi, Al-Maghraawi to ignore criticisms directed against them, whilst they staunchly defend innovators.

Likewise, Brother Muhammad is infuriated by the fact that he has been unable to provide proofs for his slanders against Al-Markazus Salafi, yet he still claims to be upon the truth. Some brothers believe that Brother Muhammad is sleepwalking towards Tamyi; but even this sleepwalking towards Tamyi should be a stark warning. It is very disturbing that a man claiming fifty years of knowledge and companionship with the scholars has refused to acknowledge reality, even after the scholars have transmitted unambiguous knowledge based proofs against the innovators Al-Halabi, Al-Maribi, Al-Maghraawi and their staunch followers. On the other hand, he is quick to attack and vilify Al-Markazus Salafi for transmitting the knowledge based refutations against the staunch UK followers of these Mubtadi’ah. Likewise, he is not willing to be reminded of the fact that he must bear personal responsibility for sheltering these people, arguing on their behalf based on falsehood and slandering Al-Markazus Salafi?! This is a looming danger that Muhammad is steadily shrinking in on himself-trapping himself behind the staunch UK followers of Maribi, Halabi, Al-Maghraawi and the fallen Jamiat Ahle Hadeeth. His lack of clarity in this affair is echoed in the centres he visits in the UK, whilst he seeks to prevent us from speaking the truth.

So Muhammad Al-Maaliki is asked a simple question: Does he follow the evidences against Brixton?! That is because when he was asked about those who criticize Brixton, he said that we should ask the scholars who come to the UK, including Shaikh Muhammad bin Haadi (may Allaah preserve him). Therefore, if this statement of Muhammad Al-Maaliki was uttered before Shaikh Muhammad Bin Haadi manifested Brixton’s blatant dishonesty, then what is Muhammad’s stance towards Brixton at present?! Likewise, this is the same question we asked him concerning Yahyah Al-Hajoori after he praised him, and it has become manifest that Al-Hajoori is a Haddaadi Mubtadi. But if this statement was uttered after Shaikh Muhammad Bin Haadi manifested Brixton’s dishonesty, then we do not expect an explanation from Muhammad Al-Maaliki, rather we remind him of the statement of Allaah (The Most High):

يَا أَيُّهَا الَّذِينَ آمَنُوا كُونُوا قَوَّامِينَ بِالْقِسْطِ شُهَدَاءَ لِلَّهِ وَلَوْ عَلَىٰ أَنْفُسِكُمْ أَوِ الْوَالِدَيْنِ وَالْأَقْرَبِينَ ۚ إِنْ يَكُنْ غَنِيًّا أَوْ فَقِيرًا فَاللَّهُ أَوْلَىٰ بِهِمَا ۖ فَلَا تَتَّبِعُوا الْهَوَىٰ أَنْ تَعْدِلُوا ۚ وَإِنْ تَلْوُوا أَوْ تُعْرِضُوا فَإِنَّ اللَّهَ كَانَ بِمَا تَعْمَلُونَ خَبِيرًا

‘’O you who believe! Stand out firmly for justice, as witnesses to Allah; even though it be against yourselves, or your parents, or your kin, be he rich or poor, Allah is a Better Protector to both (than you). So follow not the lusts (of your hearts), lest you may avoid justice, and if you distort your witness or refuse to give it, verily, Allah is Ever Well-Acquainted with what you do. [4:135]

Shaikh Muhammad Bin Haadi on Brixton

Shaikh Muhammad Bin Haadi (may Allaah preserve him) stated:

And we hope those errors that have occurred from them (i.e. the brothers at Masjid Ar-Rahmah) will not be repeated by our brothers. This is my advice, and if the errors are repeated, then then it will be hurtful and they will be considered to be blameworthy. And then the end result for these brothers at Masjid Rahmah will be like the end result of that which occurred with those of Brixton Masjid in London! That they ended up with Abul-Hasan, Ali Hasan and those types of people, that which occurred with Abdul-Haqq Baker and whoever was with him such as Abu Haajir and others. They came to me here many times, and I would advise them. And what became apparent is that they are not truthful (laysoo saadiqeen)! These people from Brixton Masjid would sit with me and listen and say “yes” and then go and do the opposite! But this in reality did not harm except themselves! So I advise you with the same that you are truthful, outwardly and inwardly. And in this world you will be treated based upon your outward deeds. So I advise you not to be like these people at the Brixton Markaz for they are NOT truthful people (ghayr saadiqeen), for indeed they would come to me many times and often. I would try to rectify the affairs between them and the brothers in Birmingham (UK) at Salafi Publications. So whatever they (Brixton Masjid) would agree to in these sittings to adhere to, they would exit and abandon all that they agreed to. So I advise you to be truthful upon the correctness and be earnest.

[http://www.salafitalk.com/threads/1018-Masjid-Rahmah-USA-and-Brixton-UK-The-Observations-and-Advice-of-Shaikh-Muhammad-bin-Haadee]

To be continued….In-Shaa-Allaah

Saudi Arabia (The Land of Tawheed)-A Thorn In the throats of the people of Nifaaq and Shiqaaq

Written by Salafi Dawah Manchester on . Posted in Brotherhood.

 Question to Al-Allaamah Saaleh Al-Fawzaan (may Allaah preserve him)

What is your advice to the one who says that this dawlah (state) wages a war against the religion and causes repression against the du’at (callers)?

Answer: The Saudi state ever since it began has always aided the religion and its adherents. And it was not founded except upon this basis. And whatever it does at the moment in spending material wealth to support Muslims in every place, setting up centres and mosques, sending du’at (to other countries), printing books – at the forefront of which is the Noble Qur’an -, opening centres of learning and faculties of knowledge, and its judging by the Islamic Shari’ah (Tahkeemuhaa lish-Sharee’at il-Islaamiyyah), and also setting up a separate body for enjoining the good and forbidding the evil in every city – then all of this is a clear and evident proof of it’s aid to Islam and its adherents. And this is thorn (shajiyyun, lit. grievance, distress) in the throats of the people of hypocrisy (Ahl un-Nifaq) and the people of evil and dissension (Shiqaq). And Allaah is the Aider of His religion even if the pagans and the biased partisans may detest it.

And we do not say that this state is perfect from every single aspect and that it does not have any mistakes. Mistakes occur by every single person and we ask Allaah that he helps this state in correcting its mistakes.

But if this person (who makes such a claim) was to look at his own self, he would find mistakes that would prevent his tongue from speaking about others and make him feel ashamed of looking at others.

[Comments: So does Shaikh Salih al-Fawzan agree with the Surooriyyah, Khawarij of the Era in their unrestricted Takfir of the hukkam and Muslim states? And does he portray to the masses that the state is apostate because judgement by the Shari’ah is not to be found there, or because it is not the sole reference point, or that it is being replaced? Rather, his way and methodology is at odds with that of the newly-arisen foolish-minded whose methodology brings about Marxist type revolutions, great upheavals, the shedding of the blood of the innocent and the confiscation of their wealth!! And these words of Shaikh Salih al-Fawzan constitute a “thorn in the throats of the people of hypocrisy (Ahl un-Nifaq) and the people of evil and dissension (Shiqaq)”!! ]

Question: Respected Shaikh, yourself and the your brothers who are Ulamaa in this country are Salafis – and all praise is due to Allaah – and your method in advising the rulers is that of the Sharee’ah and as the Prophet (sallallaahu alaihi wasallam) has explained – and we do not purify over and above Allaah’s estimation of him -, yet there are those who find fault with you due to your neglect in openly rejecting the various oppositions [to the Sharee’ah] that have occurred. And yet others make excuses for you by saying that you are under the control and pressure of the state. So do you have any words of direction of clarification to these people?

Answer: There is no doubt that the rulers – just like people besides them – are not infallible. Advising them is an obligation. However, attacking them in the gatherings and upon the pulpits is considered to be the forbidden form of backbiting. And this evil (munkar) is greater than that which occurred from the ruler since it is backbiting and because of what results from backbiting such as the sowing of the seeds of discord, causing disunity and affecting the progression of da’wah.

Hence what is obligatory is to make sure advice reaches the rulers by sound and trustworthy avenues, not by publicising and causing commotion.

And as for reviling the Scholars of this country, that they do not give advice [to the rulers], or that they are being controlled in their affairs, this is a method by which separation between the Scholars, the youth and the society is desired, until it becomes possible for the mischief-maker to sow the seeds of his evil. This is because when evil suspicions are harboured about the Scholars, trust is no longer placed in them and then the chance is available for the biased partisans to spread their poison.

And I believe that this thought is actually a schemed plot that has come into this country, and those who are behind it are foreign to this country. It is obligatory upon the Muslims to be cautious of it.

[Comments: So will these newly-arisen foolish-minded ones ridicule Shaikh Salih Fawzan for believing in this plot as they have been ridiculing the Salafis for the past decade?! And the spread of Qutubiyyah from the angle and direction of the Ikhwan is what constitutes this schemed plot. Shaikh Saalih al-Fawzaan when he said: “And the end part of that is what we are living in now, the arrival of strange and suspicious ideas in our land in the name of ‘da’wah’ – through the hands of the various groups which are called by various names such as al-Ikhwaan al-Muslimeen, Jamaa’at ut-Tabligh and the Jamaa’ah of such and such. And the goal of all of them is the one and same and that is to drive away the da’wah of Tawheed and to take up is place [with something else]. And in reality, the purpose/intent of these groups is not different from the purpose/intent of those who have preceded them from amongst the enemies of this blessed da’wah – all of them desire to put an end to it. However the difference between them is only with respect to their plans/modes of action. And if not, then if these groups had desired – truthfully – da’wah to Allaah, then why do they overlook and abandon their own countries – from where they are dispatched to us? And yet these same countries are most in need of da’wah and rectification. They overlook their own countries and then they come out to battle against the land of Tawheed, desiring to change its correct course of rectification to one that is twisted – and they desire to deceive its youth and to bring about fitnah and enmity between them…” (Haqeeqat ud-Da’wah ilallaah of Sa’d Abdur-Rahmaan al-Haseen). But these foolish ones have never ceased to ridicule the Salafis on account of the same meanings contained in Shaikh Salih al-Fawzan’s statement above! If they only but knew!]

————————————————————————————————

Source:

http://www.spubs.com/sps/sp.cfm?subsecID=MNJ02&articleID=MNJ020003&articlePages=1

[K] Muhammad Al-Maaliki- still not recanted from that Defamation, Malicious Falsehood and Slander

Written by Salafi Dawah Manchester on . Posted in Uncategorized.

In The Name of Allaah, The Most Merciful, The Bestower of Mercy

In his pathetic and false defence of the staunch followers of Al-Maribi at Masjid As-Sunnah, Brother Muhammad Al-Maaliki uttered an evil slander and malicious falsehood!

Indeed, it is amazing that this person is quick to accuse us of being bad mannered, yet it was very easy for him to utter downright falsehood by claiming that the one who criticised Masjid As-Sunnah’s Admin is similar to a Haddaadi and that he is a Takfeeri of another type, and that he is similar to Abdullaah Ibn Abee Salool [The Head of Nifaaq Al-Akbar]. This is what exited Muhammad Al-Maaliki’s mouth with much ease on that day-without shame and fear- in the name of defending the staunch followers of Al-Maribi Al-Mubtadi. He had no shame in the presence of Allaah, whilst committing this malicious falsehood, slander and misdeed! This was one of his bizarre attempts at trying to make us feel that we were doing something wrong by being stern against the staunch followers of Al-Maribi at Masjid As-Sunnah.

On the other hand, he attempted to manipulate the situation and deflect blame back onto the opponents of Masjid As-Sunnah’s Admin-seeking to play a game with the intellects of his listeners. He knew fully well that he was uttering blatant lies and half-truths in order to deceive-a typical craftsman of propaganda. His quest was not only to utter this massive lie and misdeed, but also to manipulate. He was angry without a valid reason and further plunged himself into thoughtlessness. This is the person who seeks to remind us of good manners, whilst he still feels comfortable with the fact that he has neither recanted from this malicious slander, lie and falsehood, nor has he provided any proofs.

The Messenger (sallal-laahu-alayhi-wasallam) said: And whoever knowingly argues for falsehood, then he will never be free of Allah’s Anger until he leaves it; and whoever accuses a believer of something that is not true, Allah will make him dwell in flowing pus on the day of judgement…[Saheeh Al-Jaami 6196]

It has also been reported in a hadeeth transmitted by Imaam Bukhaari (rahimahullaah) that the Prophet (sallal-laahu-alayhi-wasallam) was shown some of that which the people are afflicted with of punishment.  He was shown a man lying flat on his back and another man standing over his head with an iron hook. The man standing would put the hook in one side of the man’s mouth and tear off that side of his face to the back (of the neck) and similarly tear his nose from front to back and his eye from front to back. Then he would turn to the other side of the man’s face and do the same. Hardly would he complete that side before the first side was restored to its normal state, then he would go back and did it over again.  The angels who were with the Prophet informed him that the man he saw, the sides of whose mouth, nostrils and eyes were being torn off from front to back; was one who would leave his house in the morning and tells lies that spreads all over the world.

To be continued… In-Shaa-Allaah

[J] Brother Muhammad Al-Maaliki! This Was a Deliberate and Devious Misrepresentation In The Name of Defending Staunch Followers of Al-Maribi (Al-Mubtadi) @ Masjid As-Sunnah

Written by Salafi Dawah Manchester on . Posted in Uncategorized.

In The Name of Allaah, The Most Merciful, The Bestower of Mercy

In his haphazard defence of the staunch followers of Al-Maribi at Masjid As- Sunnah, whilst slandering Al-Markazus Salafi, Brother Muhammad Al-Maaliki stated that we can talk about mistakes but not cause hatred.

This statement was yet another attempt to divert attention from the main issue [i.e. the dispute between Al-Markazus Salafi and Masjid As-Sunnah’s Admin was due to the three contemporary figureheads of Bidah, Al-Maghraawi, Al-Maribi and Al-Halabi etc]. Likewise, this view of Brother Muhammad is a gross misrepresentation of the situation because there is no doubt that the Mubtadi’ah (Al-Maribi, Al-Maghraawi, Al-Halabi etc) are to be hated, refuted and exposed. On the other hand, Masjid As-Sunnah’s Admin have, to this day, persisted in their defense of these three Mubtadi’ah even after some of the Kibaarul Ulama and senior students of knowledge have written numerous, detailed and unambiguous refutations against them.

Therefore, the least expected from brother Muhammad Al-Maaliki is that he should have given precedence to the clear knowledge based clarifications of the scholars and advise Masjid As-Sunnah’s Admin to abandon those obstinate Mubtadi’ah (Al-Maribi, Al-Maghraawi and Al-Halabi)! Is Brother Muhammad unaware of the statement of Imaam Sufyaan Ath-Thawri (rahimahullaah), who stated: “If you loved a man for Allaah and then he innovated in Islaam and you didn’t hate him for it, you never truly loved him for the sake of Allaah.” [1]

Is Brother Muhammad able to justify with proofs and honesty that Masjid As-Sunnah’s Admin are upon truth after persisting upon evil for over ten years?! Is Brother Muhammad able to justify with evidence and honesty that his defense of Masjid As-Sunnah’s Admin was praiseworthy and that we are guilty of spreading hatred, only because we transmitted the knowledge based refutations of the scholars against Masjid Sunnah’s Admin!

Is Brother Muhammad able to justify with proofs and honesty that his defense of Masjid As-Sunnah Admin was praiseworthy, whilst knowing fully well that Al-Maribi is still upon misguidance?! Is brother Muhammad unaware of the statement of Imaam Fudayl Ibn Iyaad (rahimahullaah), who stated: ‘’Had the innovator humbled himself to the Book of Allaah and the Sunnah of His Prophet, he would not have followed his innovation; but he is amazed with his views, so he follows what he invented.’’ [2]

Then why did Brother Muhammad falsely blame us, and why did he slander and falsely accuse us of spreading hatred? Is hatred towards the Mubtadi [Al-Maribi] and his staunch followers a blameworthy affair?!

Is the harshness we have shown Al-Maribi, Al-Halabi and Al-Maghraawi praiseworthy or not?! Are we not following the path of those contemporary Salafi scholars who have refuted these obstinate innovators of today?! Indeed, is this harshness towards innovators not from the way of the Salaf?! Abu Qilaabah (rahimahullaah) said: “Neither sit with the people of desires (i.e. people of bidah) nor argue with them, for indeed I do not feel secure that they will plunge you in their misguidance, or bewilder you regarding what (i.e. the truth) you already know.” [3]

Salaam bin Abee Mutee said: A man from the people of bidah said to Ayyoub (i.e. Ayyoob As-Sakhtiyaanee): ‘O Abu- Bakr! Can I ask you about a word? [He (i.e. Salaam)] said: “So I saw him (i.e. Ayyoub) gesturing with his hand, whilst saying: ”’Not even half a word; not even half a word!”[4]

Yahya Ibn Abee Katheer (rahimahullaah) said: ”If you meet a person of innovation on a road, then take another one.” [5]

Sallaam Ibn Abee Mutee (rahimahullaah) said: ”A man from the people of desires said to Ayyoub As-Sakhtiyaanee: ”O Abaa-Bakr, I want to ask you about some statement”, so Ayyoub walked away and started gesturing with his finger, saying: ”Not even half a statement.” [6]

Therefore, we ask Brother Muhammad Al-Maaliki: Are you censuring us for warning and distancing ourselves from the contemporary innovators (Al-Maribi, Al-Halabi and Al-Maghraawi) and those who deliberately carry and spread their dangerous Shubuhaat?!

Are you falsely accusing us of spreading blameworthy hatred in order to shield the staunch followers of the Mubtadi’ah (Al-Maribi, Al-Halabi, Al-Maghraawi) at Masjid As-Sunnah?! Indeed, this view of yours is a false one; rather it is a deliberate and devious misrepresentation. Do you want us to love those who defend Mubtadi’ah?! Or is it that you don’t want to hear what will destroy your illusions about the Haal of Masjid As-Sunnah’s Admin?

Brother Muhammad! We must strive to be honest, especially if it is regarding an affair one finds very difficult to be honest about. We cannot lie to ourselves or against other people just because the truth might require action, and action requires courage by the Tawfeeq of Allaah (The Most High). There was no need to stir the emotions of your listeners and slander Al-Markazus Salafi.

We cannot follow the path of the hizbiyyoon of Masjid As-Sunnah’s Admin, who deliberately shun the knowledge based refutations of the scholars against the innovators. They keep on telling big lies and repeating it, whist hoping that the people will eventually come to believe it. However, lies can only be maintained for some time because it has become manifestly clear to all the Maraakiz of Salafiyyah that these people are staunch defenders of the contemporary Mubtadi’ah [Al-Halabi (Murji Mubatdi); Al-Maribi (Ikhwaani Mubtadi); Al-Maghraawi (Takfeeri Mubtadi)], even though those who love the lie will persist upon it, except those whom Allaah guides.

Therefore, brother Muhammad, it is better that you abandon the illusion that Masjid As-Sunnah’s Admin was defended based on truth. This illusion cannot stand in the face of the mountains of evidences against the Mubtadi’ah they still defend. And Allaah knows best.

To be continued In-Shaa-Allaah

————————————————————————

[1]http://maktabah-alfawaaid.blogspot.co.uk/2013/03/ath-thawree-if-you-loved-man-for-allaah.html)

[2][AdhTadzkirah Fil Wadh: page:97]

[3] [Al-Ibaanah369]

[4][Al-Ibaanah of Ibn Battah 482]

[5][Reported by Imaam Al-Aajuree in Ash-Sharee-ah 1/458]

[6][Reported by Imaam Al-Aajuree in Ash-Sharee-ah 1/440]

[I] Brother Muhammad Al-Maaliki’s Premeditated Fraudulent Claim to Leniency In The name of Defending Staunch Followers of Al-Maribi @ Masjid As-Sunnah, but claims that he is being oppressed and slandered!

Written by Salafi Dawah Manchester on . Posted in Brotherhood, Methodology - 'Manhaj', Tamyee'.

In The Name of Allaah, The Most Merciful, The Bestower of Mercy

In his defence of the obstinate hizbiyyoon of Masjid As-Sunnah, Muhammad Al-Maaliki utilised slander against Al-Markazus Salafi, and on the other hand he utilised emotional rhetoric in order to divert the attention of his listeners from the main issues [i.e. the basis of the dispute between Al-Markazus Salafi and Masjid As-Sunnah’s Admin for the past ten years is due to the Mubtadi’ah (Al-Maghraawi, Al-Maribi etc)]. Likewise, Muhammad sought to convince his listeners by mentioning a statement of truth but desiring falsehood by way of it. So in his defence of the staunch followers of the Mubtadi’ah at Masjid As-Sunnah, Muhammad stated that we need to know the way to defend the religion and that we have to utilize leniency.

Firstly: All praise is due to Allaah, the well-known Maraakiz of Salafiyyah in the West are well aware of some of those who deliberately ignore the detailed knowledge based clarifications of the scholars against the contemporary Mubtadi’ah (Al-Halabi, Al-Maghraawi, Al-Maribi, Al-Hajoori etc), whilst on the other hand they openly attack those who disseminate such refutations.

Secondly: Muhammad Al-Maaliki is terribly negligent with regards to his stances towards the stanch followers of Al-Maribi at Masjid As-Sunnah; rather he passionately defended them, whilst claiming that the way to defend the religion is by way of leniency! There is no doubt that leniency is an important affair, so let us first benefit from this statement of Imaam Shanqeeti (rahimahullaah), who stated: ‘’Harshness in a place where leniency should be is idiocy and an offence. Leniency in a place where harshness should be is weakness and apathy. If it is said: Apply leniency, say: Leniency should be in its place and the leniency of a young man in other than its place is ignorance.” [Al-Islaam Deenu Kaamilu pages 10-12]

How amazing was brother Muhammad’s implementation of leniency on that day?! He deliberately embarked upon a premeditated and fraudulent mission to defend the staunch followers of Al-Maribi at Masjid As-Sunnah after being well aware of the fact that some of the Kibaarul Ulama and the senior students of knowledge have studied the affairs in detail and written detailed unambiguous clarifications on the issues surrounding the innovator Al-Maribi and his staunch followers. And to make matters worse, he offered no evidence to support his stances; rather he terribly failed after seeking to bully and slander us-hoping that his aggressive behaviour would either silence us or compel us to accept his premeditated fraudulent appeals for leniency-all in the name of defending staunch followers of Al-Maribi at Masjid as-Sunnah. So be mindful of this trickery, as Al-Allaamah Rabee Bin Haadi (may Allaah preserve him) said:

”(You) find the likes of this lack of honesty today! There is that one who approaches two disputing parties-one group upon truth and the other upon falsehood; so he misguides all of them and does not give greater weight to the truth. He manifests a new doctrine which he considers to be the balance path, whilst it is falsehood and sophistry in and of itself. This category of people is a dangerous trend and their foundation is lying and deception.  [دحر إفتراءات ] [Footnote in page 191]

Shaikh Abul Abbaas Aadil Ibn Mansoor (may Allaah preserve him) said that Al’Allaamah Rabee Bin Haadi (may Allaah preserve him) said:

If you are a weak believer, then do not betray your brother because betrayal is opposed to the characteristic of the Taa’ifatul Mansoorah (i.e. the aided and victorious group). And that is because to betray the person (upon) the truth returns (as) harm against the betrayer and the one affected by his (act) of betrayal. Do not make your weakness a methodology!   Do not make your weakness (a claim to) wisdom! Do not make your weakness (a claim) to common sense, cautiousness and hesitation (i.e. a claim of common sense, cautiousness and hesitation that cannot be justified when you are required to stand firm)… http://www.sahab.net/forums/index.php?showtopic=149391

Brother Muhammad deliberately ignored the knowledge based proofs, slandered Al-Markazus Salafi and passionately defended the staunch followers of Al-Maribi at Masjid As-Sunnah-all in the name of leniency! His claim to leniency in those circumstances was nothing else but a premeditated fraud by way of which he sought to vent his anger on Al-Markazus Salafi.

He deliberately turned a blind eye to the realities of Masjid As-Sunnah’s Masjid Admin; rather he deliberately allowed the Admin to blur his vision with false praise and utilised him to give out recommendation for them, and even for Goldie-a man whom Al-Allaamah Ahmad Bin Yahyah An-Najmi declared one to be treated the same as Ahlul Bidah. Brothers, let this be a serious reminder to all of us and be warned against exaggerated or false praise. Shaikh Raslaan (may Allaah preserve him) said about his father (rahimahullaah): ”You taught me that a rebuke of truth is more honorable for me than a praise of falsehood. And that the reproach of a truthful person is better for me than the praise of a liar.” Source: Dawaabit Ar-Riwaayatu Indal Muhadditheen: page: 7 vol: 1]

How amazing was Brother Muhammad’s affair on that day! The staunch followers of Al-Maribi at Masjid As-Sunnah praised him, and he deliberately allowed them to utilise him in their war against the Salafiyyoon of Al-Markazus Salafi-those same staunch followers of Al-Maribi, who openly declared their allegiance to an innovator and hatred for Shaikh Rabee- yet brother Muhammad has the audacity to claim that he is now being slandered and oppressed. And to this day- (over a 1000days) – he has not recanted from this behaviour nor has he apologised for slandering Al-Markazus Salafi. We ask Allaah for Sidq. Aameen.

To be continued…In-Shaa-Allaah

[H] Brother Muhammad Al-Maaliki’s prolonged silence about…..!

Written by Salafi Dawah Manchester on . Posted in Brotherhood, Methodology - 'Manhaj', Tamyee'.

Brother Muhammad Al-Maaliki’s prolonged silence about the innovator Al-Maribi cannot be accepted. He actively aids Al-Maribi’s staunch followers at Masjid As-Sunnah and continue slandering the Salaficentre, yet he expects us to deliberately turn a blind eye to this blatant falsehood.

Verdicts of the scholars on Al-Maribi

http://salaficentre.com/2014/04/verdicts-of-the-scholars-against-abul-hasan-al-maribi-al-mubtadi-an-ally-of-masjid-as-sunnah/

[F] Muhammad Al-Maaliki said: Who says that Ahlul Bidah will not enter Jannah?!

Written by Salafi Dawah Manchester on . Posted in Methodology - 'Manhaj', Tamyee'.

In The Name of Allaah, The Most Merciful, The Bestower of Mercy

Imaam Ibnul Qayyim (rahimahullaah) said:

”It is incumbent upon you that (you) detail (affairs) and make a distinction, for unrestricted and general (speech) without clarification has already corrupted the existence and trampled upon the intellects and opinions in every era.”

Shaikh Saaleh Al-Fawzaan (may Allaah preserve him) stated:

There has to be detailed explanation. The one who is not proficient in detailing (an affair) should keep quiet because benefit is not acquired from his speech. And every time error occurs, its cause is due to an absence of detailed explanation between truth and falsehood. So there has to be detailed explanation and distinction and an absence of mixing up (affairs).

Indeed, it may be that there is something of truth and falsehood in an opponent’s statement, so all of it is neither deemed to be false nor truth, rather a distinction is to be made between its truth and falsehood. Therefore, all of it is neither rejected nor accepted; rather a distinction is made between truth and correctness and the falsehood and error in it. And if you are not proficient in detailing (an affair), then you should not enter into this arena. [End of quote. Source: At-Ta’leeqaat Al-Mukhtasar Alaa Al-Qaseedah an-Nooniyyah: Vol: 1 (page: 216)

Indeed, even though Muhammad Al-Maaliki deliberately allowed himself to be blinded and deafened by the flattery, propaganda and lies of the Hizbiyyoon, which led him to utter much nonsense, however – out of good suspicion, even though Muhammad deserves very little- we think that the ranting and raving that overwhelmed him was the result of his failure to detail this important affair. Therefore, we remind ourselves of the following in order to clarify any doubt that may have been disseminated due to Muhammad Al-Maaliki’s lack of detail on that day.

 Bidah Al-Mukaffirah and Bidah al-Mufassiqah

Bidah Al-Mukaffirah: It is the Bidah that is tantamount to disbelief. Al-Allaamah Rabee Bin Haadi Al-Madkhali (may Allaah preserve him) was asked whether there is a difference between Bidah Al-Mukaffirah and Bidah Al-Mufassiqah; so Shaikh said that there is Bidah Mukaffirah, such as rejecting the Ruyah (i.e. denying that the believers will see Allaah in the afterlife); rejecting Allaah’s Uluww [i.e. denying that Allaah is above his creation –Allaah ascended over the Throne in a way that benefits his majesty)]; invoking other than Allaah; offering slaughtered sacrifice (i.e. animals) to other than Allaah etc. These are affairs of Bidah Al-Mukaffirah (the bidah that is tantamount to disbelief).

But we do not make Takfeer of the people who commit this type of Bidah until we establish the proofs against them. That is because some of them (i.e. the people who fall into these affairs) carry doubts and are far away from the era of Prophethood and its light (i.e. guidance). So they fall into the likes these innovations.

Rejecting the Ruyah is disbelief; rejecting Allaah’s Uluww is disbelief; the saying that the Qur’aan is created is disbelief-major disbelief. But this person, -[who testifies that none has the right to be worshipped except Allaah and that Muhammad is the messenger of Allaah, and he prays,  observes fasting, wants paradise and believes in that] -received the doubts of the people of falsehood, so he falls into the likes of these affairs (i.e. these innovations that are tantamount to disbelief). So we say to him: You have fallen into disbelief and the evidence is this and this, and we clarify for him.  So if Allaah grants him Tawfeeq and he returns to the truth, then all praise is due to Allaah. But if not, we declare him a disbeliever after establishing the proofs against him.

As for Bidah Al-Mufassiqah it is other than this (i.e. it is not at the level of that which is tantamount to disbelief)…. [Abridged and paraphrased, see www.rabee.net/ar/questions.php?cat=26&id=484 ]

On the other hand, who are those qualified to make Takfeer?

Question: O Respected Shaykh, who is the murtadd (apostate)? We hope for you to define it in a clear manner, for sometimes the judgement of apostasy can be made upon a person while there is some doubt that he had.

 

Shaykh Salih al-Fawzaan: “The judgement of apostasy and expelling someone from the religion is only appropriate for the people of knowledge who are firmly grounded in knowledge, and they are the judges in the various Sharee’ah law courts, and those who are able of giving legal verdicts. And this is just like the other matters, and it is not the right of every person, or from the right of those who are learning, or those who ascribe themselves to knowledge, but who have deficiency in understanding. It is not appropriate for them to make judgements of apostasy (upon others). Since, mischief will arise from this, and sometimes a Muslim might be judged as an apostate but he is not actually so. And the takfir of a Muslim who has not committed one of the nullifications of Islaam contains great danger. Whoever says to his brother “O Kaafir” or “O Faasiq, and he is not like that, then the words will fall back upon the one who said them. Hence, the ones who actually judge with apostasy are the legislative judges and those who are able and fit for giving legal verdicts. And as for those who enforce the judgements they are the leaders of the Muslims (wullaat al-amr). As for whatever is other than this, then it is mere confusion.”

Question: Some of the students of knowledge are a bit lax towards applying the word of apostasy (riddah) to a Muslim, and this person might sometimes be asked by the Muslims to carry out the hadd punishment for apostasy – when the Sultaan does not carry it out – upon the one they consider deserves it, the one who has been judged with apostasy.

Shaykh Salih al-Fawzaan: “Meting out the punishments is only appropriate for the leader of the Muslims and it is not for every person to establish the punishment, since confusion, and corruption necessarily follows from this, and also the cutting off of the society, tribulations and provocations occur. Establishing the punishments is appropriate (i.e. befits only) to the Muslim leader. The Prophet (sallallaahu alaihi wasallam) said, “Pardon each other for the punishments that are between you, but when the execution of the punishment reaches the [authority of the] Sultaan, then Allaah curses both the one who seeks intercession and the one who grants the intercession [i.e. to revoke the punishment].

And from the responsibilities of the Sultaan in Islaam, and from those matters that befit him is the establishment of the punishments after they have been established legislatively, via the Sharee’ah law courts, upon the one who fell into the crime for which the legislator has designated a specific punishment, such as for stealing. So what has been said is that establishing the punishments (i.e. meting them out) is from the rights of the Sultaan, and when the Muslims do not have a Sultaan amongst them, then they should just suffice with commanding the good and forbidding the evil, and calling to Allaah, the Might and Majestic, with wisdom, good admonition and arguing with that which is best. And it is not permissible for individuals (in the society) to establish the hudood, since that, as we have mentioned, will bring about chaos, and also provocations, and tribulations will arise, and this contains greater corruption than it contains rectification. And from amongst the Sharee’ah principles that are submitted to is, “Repelling the harmful things takes precedence over bringing about the beneficial things. http://www.spubs.com/sps/sp.cfm?subsecID=MNJ09&articleID=MNJ090004&articlePages=1

Finally: Muhammad Al-Maaliki’s statement should not make one heedless of the severity of bidah and its people, even if the bidah is not the one that is tantamount to disbelief. He should have detailed this affair, but obviously he was overwhelmed by that ranting and raving, and flattered by the false praise showered on him by the Hizbiyyoon of Masjid As-Sunnah, which caused him to neglect this important clarification. So do not become negligent like Muhammad Al-Maaliki. Bidah is a serious affair. The following is brief reminder from an article at www.salafipublications.com, as follows…..

Linguistically bid’ah (innovation) means ‘a newly invented matter’. The Sharee’ah definition of bid’ah is: “A newly invented way [beliefs or action] in the religion, in imitation of the Sharee’ah (prescribed Law), by which nearness to Allaah is sought, [but] not being supported by any authentic proof – neither in its foundations, nor in the manner in which it is performed.” Al-I’tisaam of ash-Shaatibee (1/37).

The Messenger of Allaah (sallallaahu alaihi wasallam) said: “Every innovation is misguidance and going astray” Reported by Abu Daawood (no. 4607), at-Tirmidhee (no. 2676) and it is saheeh. Ibn Hajr authenticated it Takhreej Ahaadeeth Ibn ul-Haajib (1/137).

And he (sallallaahu alaihi wasallam) also said: “… and every innovation is misguidance and all misguidance is in the Hellfire.” Reported by an-Nasaa’ee (1/224) from Jaabir bin Abdullaah and it is saheeh as declared by Shaikh ul-Islaam Ibn Taymiyyah in Majmoo’ ul-Fataawaa (3/58).

The Messenger (sallallaahu alaihi wasallam) also warned against the People of Innovation, from befriending, supporting or taking from them saying: “Whoever innovates or accommodates an innovator then upon him is the curse of Allaah, His Angels and the whole of mankind.” Reported by Bukhaaree (12/41) and Muslim (9/140)

And in his footsteps, we find the Noble Companions and the Taabi’een after them warning from the danger of innovations upon the Ummah, its people and their unity, since it is innovations which have divided the Ummah and split it asunder.

Ibn Abbaas (d. 68H) said: “Indeed the most detestable of things to Allaah are the innovations.” Reported by al-Bayhaqee in as-Sunan al-Kubraa (4/316)

Ibn Umar (d. 84H) said: “Every innovation is misguidance, even if the people see it as something good.” Reported by Abu Shaamah (no. 39)

Imaam Muhammad Ibn Saaleh Al-Uthaymeen (rahimahullaah) said: Do not learn from Ahlul Bidah (The people of religious innovations)…see link: http://salaficentre.com/2014/08/do-not-learn-from-ahlul-bidah-even-in-affairs-other-than-aqeedah-shaikh-uthaymeen-rahimahullaah/

Therefore, Muhammad Al-Maaliki should fear Allaah (The Most High) and stopped being a stooge of the UK Hizbiyyoon. He should fear Allaah and stop defending the staunch followers of the Mubtadi’ah [Al-Halabi (Murji Mubtadi); Al-Maghraawi (Takfeeri Mubtadi); Al-Maribi (Ikhwaani Mubtadi) and Al-Hajoori (Haddaadi Mubtadi).

To be continued…In-Shaa-Allaah