Skip to main content

Highly abridged account of over 70 years of Palestinian Suffering-Reminder to Steven Drucker

In The Name of Allah, The Most Merciful, The Bestower of Mercy.

The prophet, peace and blessings of Allah be upon him, said that Allah said: “O my servants! I have forbidden oppression for myself, so do not oppress one another”. [Sahih Muslim 2577]

Dear Steven, we have examined the details in your above post, which you describe as significantly condensed. To begin with, in accordance with the prophetic hadith we referenced at the outset of this response, we unequivocally denounce every atrocity perpetrated against Jews, irrespective of the identity of the offender, and we shall persist in our condemnation of any acts of violence against any group of people. We express no hesitations in denouncing anti-Semitism, [Footnote a] whether it occurred in the past or is present today, in any region of the world, when it is distinctly proven to be antisemitism, without exaggeration or manipulation as a political instrument to suppress criticism of the Zionists for their extremely brutal treatment of the Palestinians over the last seven decades. We condemn every instance of alleged injustice against the Jews, whether it involves murder or legitimate grievances of Jews being violated by others. In a similar vein, we would like to remind you of some of the brutal treatment endured by the Palestinians, which merely represent the surface of a much larger issue.

A Few Examples of Historical Zionist Atrocities Against Palestinians

The Deir Yassin Massacre: Took place on April 9, 1948, near Jerusalem, during which between 107 to 254.

Palestinians were massacred at the hands of the extremist “Stern” gang.  The Nasr al-Din Massacre: Took place in April 1948. Al-Lajjun Massacre: Took place on April 13, 1948, in a Palestinian Arab village in the Jenin District, where the Zionist Haganah gang attacked it and killed 13 people.

The Saliha Massacre: Took place in May 1948, during which 75 Palestinians were massacred.

The Abu Shusha Massacre: Took place on May 14, 1948, near the village of Deir Yassin, and claimed the lives of (50) citizens, including women, men, children, and the elderly.

The Beit Daras Massacre: Took place in northeastern Gaza on May 21, 1948.

The Tantura Massacre: Took place on May 22, 1948, in the occupied city of Haifa, and claimed the lives of about (200) Palestinians.

The Lydda Massacre: Took place on July 12, 1948, in the occupied city of Lydda, and resulted in the massacre of about (500) Palestinians, including (150) who were massacred inside the city’s Grand Mosque. The Zionists threw many of them alive into the town’s wells.

The Dawayima Massacre: Took place on October 29, 1948, when a battalion from the terrorist “Lehi” organization led by Moshe Dayan attacked the village and then began searching homes and shooting at its residents. Entire families were exterminated in the massacre, which resulted in the killing of 200 men, women, and children.

The Zionist massacres did not stop after the Nakba of 1948, but rather their frequency, intensity, and brutality increased in light of the use of more lethal and destructive weapons. Among the most prominent of these massacres were: The Sharafat Massacre, which took place in February 1951, in which 11 Palestinians were massacred, and the rest of the village’s people were displaced. The Bethlehem Massacre took place in January 1952, in which 10 Palestinians were massacred. The Qibya Massacre took place on October 14, 1953, in the village of Qibya, east of Jerusalem, during which (67) Palestinians were massacred, most of whom were women and children, and during which 56 homes were destroyed. The Qalqilya Massacre took place on October 10, 1956, when the occupation forces attacked citizens in the city of Qalqilya in the West Bank, during which about seventy citizens were massacred.

The Kafr Qasem Massacre took place on October 29, 1956, in which 49 Palestinians were massacred, including 11 children, when they were all returning home from work. The Khan Yunis Massacre took place on November 3 and 12, 1956, in which between 280 and 500 Palestinians were massacred.

In 1970, Zionist aircraft struck Bahr al-Baqar Primary School and Abu Zaabal factories, killing more than 150 Egyptian students and workers. In 1980, the extremist Jewish organization Kach attempted to blow up Al-Aqsa Mosque, and a shipment of explosives weighing 120 kg was discovered. The Sabra and Shatila massacre took place in September 1982. This massacre lasted three days, and its direct perpetrators were members of the Lebanese Phalange forces allied with the Zionists led by Ariel Sharon. The Ibrahimi Mosque Massacre took place on February 25, 1994, when a Zionist named “Barog Goldstein” stormed the Ibrahimi Mosque in the city of Hebron, and fired bullets and bombs at the worshipers. This massacre resulted in the massacre of 29 Palestinians. The Qana Massacre took place on April 18, 1995. [1]

Recent developments following the October 7 attack by Hamas have drawn significant condemnation from various international organizations regarding the severe retaliation executed by Netanyahu’s military forces. Reports indicate that Netanyahu and his allies have engaged in actions that violate the Genocide Convention, aiming to systematically eliminate the Palestinian population in Gaza. This includes not only killings but also inflicting serious physical and psychological harm, as well as imposing living conditions designed to lead to their physical annihilation. Month after month, the actions of Netanyahu’s military have dehumanised Palestinians in Gaza, treating them as a group devoid of basic human rights and dignity, clearly signaling an intent to eradicate them.
During the height of the conflict, various international organisations reported a harrowing two-month period where the population was under siege, grappling with starvation, displacement, and the threat of annihilation amidst relentless bombardments and crippling restrictions on essential humanitarian aid. Additionally, they highlighted that for several months, the forces under Netanyahu’s command engaged in acts that could be classified as genocidal, fully cognizant of the irreversible damage being inflicted on the Palestinian people in Gaza. This continued despite numerous warnings regarding the dire humanitarian crisis and binding resolutions from international entities demanding that Netanyahu and his associates take immediate action to facilitate the delivery of humanitarian assistance to civilians in Gaza.

They stated in their reports that Netanyahu and his associates have consistently maintained that their actions in Gaza are lawful, claiming justification through their military objective of eliminating Hamas. However, the notion of genocidal intent can exist alongside military objectives and does not have to be the only aim. The context of dispossession, apartheid, and unlawful military occupation in which these actions have taken place has led to a singular, reasonable conclusion: that Netanyahu and his associates intended the physical destruction of Palestinians in Gaza, either in conjunction with or as a means to achieve their military goal of dismantling Hamas. Furthermore, while acknowledging the horrific crimes committed by Hamas and other armed groups on October 7, 2023, including unlawful killings and hostage-taking, it is crucial to understand that these actions cannot justify Netanyahu’s genocidal campaign against the Palestinian people in Gaza. The military response from the Zionist army following the attacks on October 7 has pushed Gaza’s population to the brink of disaster. This relentless offensive has resulted in the deaths of over 42,000 Palestinians, including more than 13,300 children, and has injured upwards of 97,000, with many casualties stemming from direct or indiscriminate attacks that have obliterated entire families. The scale of destruction is unprecedented, occurring at a pace and intensity not witnessed in any other 21st-century conflict, decimating entire cities and devastating essential infrastructure, agricultural lands, and cultural and religious sites. As a result, vast areas of Gaza have become uninhabitable.

They also highlighted that Netanyahu’s government created dire living conditions in Gaza, resulting in a lethal combination of malnutrition, hunger, and disease, effectively subjecting Palestinians to a slow and calculated demise. Furthermore, hundreds of Gazans have been subjected to incommunicado detention, torture, and other forms of mistreatment. The total siege imposed on Gaza cut off essential resources such as electricity, water, and fuel. Over nine months during the conflict, Netanyahu’s administration enforced a stifling and illegal blockade, severely restricting access to energy and failing to ensure meaningful humanitarian aid within Gaza. This obstructed the importation and distribution of critical supplies, particularly in the northern regions. Consequently, the already dire humanitarian crisis worsened. The extensive destruction of homes, hospitals, water and sanitation systems, and agricultural land, coupled with mass displacement, led to catastrophic hunger levels and a rapid increase in disease. The effects have been particularly devastating for young children and pregnant or breastfeeding women, with serious long-term health implications.

Through its repeated “evacuatio” orders, Netanyahu’s government issued numerous “evacuation” orders, resulting in the displacement of nearly 1.9 million Palestinians—90% of Gaza’s population—into increasingly confined and perilous areas, often under dire conditions, with some individuals being forced to relocate as many as ten times. This relentless cycle of forced displacement rendered countless people unemployed and profoundly traumatised, particularly given that approximately 70% of Gaza’s inhabitants are refugees or descendants of those who were uprooted from their homes during the 1948 Nakba. They stated that Netanyahu’s administration showed a troubling unwillingness to implement measures that could have safeguarded displaced civilians and addressed their fundamental needs, indicating a deliberate choice to ignore their plight. They consistently denied displaced individuals the opportunity to return to their homes in northern Gaza or to seek temporary refuge in other areas of the Occupied Palestinian Territory or lands under Zionist control. This refusal continued to violate the rights of many Palestinians to return to the areas from which they were uprooted in 1948, as recognised by many nations. The administration was fully aware that there were no safe havens for Palestinians in Gaza.

The above information, derived from reports by various international organisations, has faced denial from Zionist factions, despite being evident in daily life. Furthermore, while Jane’s article highlights barbaric actions, it pales in comparison to the brutality faced by Palestinians over the past 70 years. It is crucial to remember that the roots of this conflict do not lie with the Palestinians, who did not instigate it, but rather with the colonial figureheads that supported the Zionists in creating the circumstances over 70 years ago. [Footnote b]

We would like to emphasise, once again, the strong insights shared by Prince Turki al-Faisal, may Allah safeguard him, which can be found in the following link: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Z3-cWyFcK5w

In addition, some Zionists figureheads have also employed genocidal rhetoric against Palestinians. [Footnote c]

————————————————————

Footnote a:
https://abuiyaad.com/sn/muslims-antisemitism
https://abuiyaad.com/w/antisemitism-ernest-renan

Footnote b:

The Initial Rise and Gradual Impact of Christian Zionism on Some European Political Decision-makers

An Overview of Christian Zionism in America Since the Arrival of The Puritans


https://salafidawahmanchester.com/2024/11/15/american-christian-zionists-media-initiatives-aimed-at-influencing-public-opinion-with-a-brief-mention-of-the-concept-of-greater-israel/

Footnote c:
https://abuiyaad.com/a/slaughtering-children-holy-war/print
https://abuiyaad.com/a/amalekite-genocide-doctrine-gaza
https://www.abuiyaad.com/a/pharoah-slaughtering-babies
https://salafidawahmanchester.com/2025/01/15/must-take-a-look-at-what-is-happening-in-their-own-backyard-first/


[1] Compiled from various old Arab Newspapers

[36] Ascent and Decline of The Ottoman Empire

In The Name of Allah, The Most Merciful, The Bestower of Mercy.

Sultan Abdul Hamid I

continued……..

Medhat Pasha was accused of murdering Sultan Abdul Aziz. Sultan Abdul Hamid established a committee to investigate the matter and subsequently brought the accused to trial, where they were found guilty. Medhat Pasha was sentenced to death, but Sultan Abdul Hamid intervened, reducing the sentence to imprisonment. He was then exiled to Hijaz, where the military prison was located.

The constitution established a separation of powers in appearance rather than in reality. Additionally, the changes made to the governance system under it were simply transformative; (but) no one considered reducing the sultan’s sovereignty. The constitution also established that the Sultan was not answerable to anyone for his actions. As a result, the constitution was linked to him personally. He had the sole power to appoint and remove ministers, negotiate treaties, declare war, and create peace agreements. He served as the supreme commander of the military and could issue all laws in various areas without needing parliament’s approval. Moreover, the extensive powers given to the sultan by the constitution restricted the Prime Minister’s authority, relegating him to a minor role in governance. The constitution stated that members of parliament have the freedom to express their opinions and vote, and they could only be prosecuted if they violated the council’s laws. It designated Ottoman Turkish as the official language of the state for discussions in all sessions. It also specified that voting could be in private or public depending on the circumstances, and that the House of Representatives must approve the budget without interference from the sultan.

Regarding individual rights, the constitution declared that Ottomanism is the official policy of the state within the framework of the principle of equality established by regulations. The constitution granted Ottoman status to all citizens of the state, regardless of their religion, and emphasised personal freedom. It stated that all Ottomans are equal before the law and entitled to the same rights while being subject to the same duties. Additionally, the constitution affirmed the independence of the judiciary, allowing non-Muslims to refer to their own religious courts for matters related to their religious affairs.

Sultan Abdul Hamid ordered the implementation of the constitution and the holding of general elections, which were the first of their kind in Ottoman history. These elections resulted in the representation of Muslims with 71 seats, Christians with 44 seats, and Jews with 4 seats. The first Ottoman Parliament convened on March 29, 1877 (1294 AH), with the Senate consisting of 26 appointed members, including 21 Muslims, while the House of Representatives had 120 members. Some Arab representatives played a significant role, but the duration of the Assembly was short. Before the Assembly could hold its second session, on February 13, 1878 (1296 AH), the representatives requested that three ministers appear before the Assembly to defend themselves against the accusations made against them. However, Sultan Abdul Hamid decided to dissolve the Assembly and ordered the representatives to return to their countries, exiling and removing the prominent ones. Thus, the total duration of the Assembly during its first and second sessions was twelve months and twenty-five days. This Assembly was not called to meet again for thirty years, during which the Assembly hall was never opened even once.

Sultan Abdul Hamid was forced to announce the constitution due to pressure from the Masons led by Medhat Pasha. Therefore, when he had the chance, he suspended the council. He was against democracy and constitutional rule, which in Ottoman terms is known as (conditionality), meaning the ruler’s powers are limited. He viewed this as a Western idea and opposed those who advocated for it, particularly Medhat Pasha. He criticised his minister by saying: “He only saw the benefits of constitutional rule in Europe, but he did not study the reasons for this conditionality or its other effects. Medical prescriptions do not work for every patient or every constitution. I believe that the principles of conditionality are not suitable for every nation or every cultural environment. I once thought it was beneficial, but now I am convinced of its harm”.

The sultan had his reasons for this, including the poor handling by the proponents of the constitution in their initial response to the sultan’s ideas. For instance: The government requested the sultan, at the time of announcing the constitution, to sign some decisions, including the appointment of Christian governors in provinces where most of the population is Muslim, and a decision to accept Christian students into the Ottoman military academy, which is the backbone of the Ottoman army. The sultan refused to sign, and all that Medhat Pasha – the minister – could say to the sultan was: “Our aim in announcing the constitution is to end the tyranny of the palace, and Your Majesty must understand your duties”.

One of the reasons Sultan Abdul Hamid rejected the constitutional thought is: The Ottoman Empire is a state that unites various peoples, and constitutionalism in such a state means the death of the original element in the country. Is there even one Indian representative in the English Parliament? Is there even one Algerian representative in the French Parliament?

He did not change his stance on constitutional rule in his state; even after he was deposed, people began to practice constitutional governance. He said: “What happened when I announced the conditionality? Did debts decrease? Did roads, ports, and schools increase? Are the laws now more rational and logical? ! Is personal security now established? Are the people more prosperous? Have deaths decreased and births increased? Is global public opinion now more in our favor than before? A beneficial medicine can become a deadly poison if it is in the hands of those who are not doctors or do not know how to use it properly. I am truly sorry, as events have shown the truth of my words”. He indicates that his stance on constitutional rule is not fixed; if the circumstances in which he governs change, so will his perspective on constitutional governance. In this he states: “It should not be assumed that my thoughts and beliefs are always against the rule based on the principles of conditionality”.

An Excerpt from ‘Ad-Dawlah Al-Uthmaaniyyah Awaamil An-Nuhood Wa Asbaab As-Suqoot. 6/446-449

[35] Ascent and Decline of The Ottoman Empire

In The Name of Allah, The Most Merciful, The Bestower of Mercy.

Sultan Abdul Hamid I

Continued..

He was appointed to the caliphate following his brother Murad, on Thursday, 11 Sha’ban 1293 AH (31 August 1876), at which time he was thirty-four years old. The ministers, dignitaries, and senior officials from both civilian and military sectors were present at the ceremony in the Tuwaiq Palace. Cannons were fired throughout the empire in celebration of this occasion, and decorations were displayed across all areas of Istanbul for three days. The Grand Vizier sent telegrams to countries around the world to inform them of this event. He appointed Mehmed Pasha as Grand Vizier, and then on December 23, 1293 AH (1876), he announced a constitution that guarantees civil liberties. It established the principle of parliamentary governance. According to this constitution, the parliament was composed of two chambers: the House of Representatives, or Envoys, and the Senate or Council of Elders.

He faced the hardhandedness of the ministers at the onset of his reign, alongside the intensification of their Westernisation policies led by the Young Ottomans Society, which included the educated elite influenced by the West. This group was manipulated by Masonic hands to serve their objectives. The extent of the ministers’ despotism was such that Mehmed Pasha, in his capacity as the head of the Young Ottomans, wrote to Sultan Abdul Hamid at the beginning of his rule (1877): “Our intention in declaring the constitution was solely to eliminate despotism, to clarify Your Majesty’s rights and obligations, to define the roles of ministers, and to ensure the freedom and rights of all individuals, so that the country may advance to higher levels of progress. I will obey your command as long as it does not contradict the interests of the nation.” He stated: “I found that Medhat Pasha appointed himself as a ruler and guardian, and in his dealings, he was far from constitutionalism and closer to despotism”

Medhat Pasha and his Masonic associates were known to indulge in alcohol. Sultan Abdul Hamid noted in his memoirs: “It is well-known that the intellectuals and poets of that era gathered on the evening of the issuance of the Basic Law decree at Medhat Pasha’s palace, not to discuss state matters, but rather to engage in expressions of gratitude and revelry, while consuming wine. Medhat Pasha had been a heavy drinker since his youth, a fact well recognised. The intoxication from the wine coincided with the exhilaration brought about by the announcement of the Basic Law. When Medhat Pasha rose from the dining table, he leaned on the arms of others to avoid falling. As he washed his hands, he addressed his brother-in-law, Tosun Pasha, while his tongue was swaying in his mouth due to the effects of the alcohol: ‘O Pasha! Who can now, after all that I have achieved, remove me from my position? Who? Tell me, how many years will I remain in this supreme position?’ Tosun Pasha responded by saying: ‘If you continue in this manner, it will not be more than a week’. Medhat Pasha, during his private drinking gatherings, would divulge the most sensitive state secrets, and these secrets would spread the following day among the people of Istanbul. One night, Medhat Pasha spoke of his intention to declare a republic in the Ottoman Empire, stating that he would become the President of the new Ottoman Republic, and then its Emperor. This was reminiscent of what had occurred with Napoleon III in France”. [Footnote a]

An Excerpt from ‘Ad-Dawlah Al-Uthmaaniyyah Awaamil An-Nuhood Wa Asbaab As-Suqoot. 6/444-446

Footnote a: The reference to this individual’s alcohol consumption and inebriation is not something we can confirm; rather, the burden of proof lies with the author who made this claim. Given that this is a historical text, readers are encouraged to conduct further research on the subject. Our role is simply to relay what is presented in the historical narrative provided by the author, and we have not encountered any evidence to support or refute the assertions made by the author. Therefore, we withhold judgment regarding him in this context until definitive evidence is presented to us. Similarly, we have no proof to substantiate his involvement in masonic activities; therefore, it is the responsibility of the reader to conduct further investigation.

 

Clapping and Whistling

In The Name of Allah, The Most Merciful, The Bestower of Mercy

Imam Muhammad Ibn Abdil-Wahhab, may Allah have mercy upon him, said: “They (i.e. the pre-Islamic people of ignorance) carried out worship by whistling and clapping their hands”.

Al-Allamah Salih Al-Fawzan, may Allah preserve him, said:

From the affairs (i.e. practices) of the pre-Islamic era of ignorance which Allah’s Messenger, peace and blessings of Allah be upon him, opposed was that they carried out worship – seeking closeness to Allah- through whistling and clapping. Allah, The Most High said:

وَمَا كَانَ صَلاَتُهُمْ عِندَ الْبَيْتِ إِلاَّ مُكَاء وَتَصْدِيَةً َ

And their prayer at the House (Ka’bah) was nothing but whistling and clapping of hands [Al-Anfal 35]

Meaning, the polytheists did not seek closeness to Allah at the noble kabah, except through whistling and clapping. Al-Mukaa means whistling and Tasdeeyah means clapping with the two hands and palms. They used to do this at the House of Allah and called it prayer- seeking nearness to Allah, Glorified and Exalted be He, by through it. This is from the [matters] that the devils among mankind and jinn made fair seeming to them. This is because worship cannot be (carried out) except through that which Allah has legislated; it is Tawqeefiyyah (i.e. established based on the texts of the Shariah). A person should not initiate anything (i.e. acts of worship) or take it from someone else, while it is not legislated by Allah to be established as worship, nor does it have any origin in the Islamic legislation. And from this, the prohibition of these two traits -whistling and clapping- can be established, even if a person does not intend to perform worship through them, because there is resemblance to the polytheists in that.

And (with regards) to clapping, the Prophet, peace and blessings of Allah be upon him,  specifically permitted it for the women when there is a need, such as informing the Imam (i.e. by clapping) if he makes a mistake in the prayer. And that is because of the Fitna – if men are present- that may take place from her voice. It is neither permissible for a man to imitate the unbelievers nor a women by way of clapping. If it the case that clapping is not permissible for men out of necessity with regards to informing the Imam when he makes a mistake in the prayer, rather he informs the Imam by way of Tasbeeh [i.e. saying سبحان الله], then it not being allowed when there is no necessity is even a stronger reason. In this there is rebuttal against those men who whistle in the gatherings in resemblance to the disbelievers.

Source: An Excerpt from Sharh Masaa’il Al-Jaahiliyyah. Page:104-105. Slightly paraphrased

Three motives behind genocide

In The Name of Allah, The Most Merciful, The Bestower of Mercy.

فَلَمَّا جَآءَهُم بِٱلۡحَقِّ مِنۡ عِندِنَا قَالُواْ ٱقۡتُلُوٓاْ أَبۡنَآءَ ٱلَّذِينَ ءَامَنُواْ مَعَهُ ۥ وَٱسۡتَحۡيُواْ نِسَآءَهُمۡۚ وَمَا ڪَيۡدُ ٱلۡكَـٰفِرِينَ إِلَّا فِى ضَلَـٰلٍ۬

Then, when he brought them the Truth from Us, they said: “Kill the sons of those who believe with him and let their women live”, but the plots of disbelievers are nothing but errors!” [Surah Ghaafir Ayah]

Qatadah, may Allah have mercy upon him, stated: “This is different from the first killing (i.e. previous occasion when the sons of Bani Israel were killed) because Fir’awn did cease from killing, but after Allah sent Prophet Musa, peace and blessings of Allah be upon him, he resumed the killing. [1]

At first, the (killing was aimed at) stopping the emergence of a man like Musa, or an act designed to demoralise Bani Israa’eel and reduce their numbers, or both. As for the second (killing), it was to demoralise this nation so that they would consider Musa, peace be upon him, as a bad omen. [2]


[1] Tafseer Al-Baghawi
[2] Ibn Katheer

[34] The Ascent and Decline of the Ottoman Empire

In The Name of Allah, The Most Merciful, The Bestower of Mercy.

Sultan Abdul Hamid I

Continued..

Firstly, his visit to Europe with his uncle Sultan Abdul Aziz:

Sultan Abdul Aziz traveled to Europe accompanied by a high-ranking Ottoman delegation, which included Prince Abdul Hamid. He presented himself to the Europeans in simple attire, reflecting his virtuous character. He had prepared for this journey through extensive readings, demonstrating a keen insight and judgment regarding the things he observed in the West. The Ottoman delegation met with prominent political figures of that era in Europe, such as Napoleon III in France, Queen Victoria in England, Leopold II in Belgium, Wilhelm I in Germany, and Franz Joseph in Austria. This journey followed his earlier visit with Sultan Abdul Aziz to Egypt, where he became aware of the deceptive allure of European glamour and the adoption of European formalities, which led Egypt into debt due to the extravagant spending of Khedive Ismail Pasha, who sought to transform Egypt into a part of Europe.

His trip to Europe lasted from June 21 to August 7, 1867. The Ottoman delegation visited France, England, Belgium, and the Austro-Hungarian Empire. During this European trip, Abdul Hamid’s perspective broadened significantly, influencing his entire reign thereafter. The key aspects that impacted him included:

1: European life with its peculiar lifestyles, diverse ethics, and formalities.

2: Industrial and military advancements, particularly in the French and German ground forces, as well as the British naval forces.

3: The intricacies of global politics.

The influence of European powers on the policies of the Ottoman Empire, particularly the impact of Napoleon III on his uncle, Sultan Abdul Aziz, and the pressure exerted by Napoleon for him to support Minister Ali Pasha, despite Sultan Abdulaziz’s insistence that he was not under the influence of any foreign power.

During this journey, he came to the realisation that France is a nation of leisure, England is characterised by wealth, agriculture, and industry, while Germany represents order, military strength, and administration. His admiration for Germany was profound, leading him to entrust the training of the Ottoman army to them once he ascended to the throne. This journey significantly influenced Abdul Hamid, prompting him to focus on incorporating modern inventions into his state across various sectors, including education, industry, communication, and military affairs. Notable examples of this include his purchase of submarines, a new military technology at the time, his personal investment in bringing the telegraph to his country, the establishment of modern schools that included contemporary sciences, the introduction of the first automobile and bicycle, and the adoption of the metric system. However, he firmly opposed the spread of Western thought within his nation.

His journey to Europe also influenced his policy of independence towards Europe; he was not known to be swayed by any European ruler, regardless of their friendship or the closeness between their country and the Ottoman Empire. During this trip, he was particularly struck by the discussions that Grand Vizier Fuad Pasha was having with various European leaders.

During this journey, Fuad Pasha was asked, “What is the price for the island of Crete?” He replied, “It is the same price at which we acquired it”. This indicated that the Ottomans fought for 27 years to retain control over Crete. Fuad Pasha was also asked, “Which is the strongest nation in the world today?” He responded, “The strongest nation at present is the Ottoman Empire, as you are undermining it from the outside while we are doing so from within. Neither of us has succeeded in its destruction”. He learned from this the lesson of the ability to silence the forces that sought to destroy the Ottoman Empire, and he also acquired the skill of political dialogue, in which he later excelled. At the time of this journey, he was 25 years old.

An Excerpt from ‘Ad-Dawlah Al-Uthmaaniyyah Awaamil An-Nuhood Wa Asbaab As-Suqoot. 6/442-444

[1] The Mali Empire before arrival of the oppressive and greedy French colonialists

In The Name of Allah, The Most Merciful, The Bestower of Mercy.

What prompted us to start this series was an incredible and repugnant nonsense uttered by a French ideologue who says that Africa should show gratitude to France! Gratitude for what exactly? For 147 years of plundering, violence, oppression, exploitation, cruelty, theft, and arrogance? This is why none deserves Imam As-Sadi’s, may Allah have mercy on him, rebuke against the oppressors more than the French Colonialists. He said: “What kind of progress is this? A progress that turns its people into vicious wild animals, marked by oppression, annihilation, and the colonisation of weaker nations while stripping them of their rights?” He also noted that their so-called development is disconnected from submission to Allah and the religion He ordained, leading to harm and resulting in savagery and barbarism, with outcomes that bring about destruction, ruin, and unparalleled evils. [1]

The Mali Empire Prior to The Arrival of The French Colonialists

At its zenith, the Mali Empire encompassed the territory spanning from the Sahara Desert to the coastal forests, incorporating present-day Senegal, southern Mauritania, Mali, northern Burkina Faso, western Niger, the Gambia, Guinea-Bissau, Guinea, the Ivory Coast, and northern Ghana. This Kingdom has been extensively examined in historical research, leading to a variety of discussions and interpretations among Arab historians who contributed their insights and perspectives. Notably, the geographical attributes of the Kingdom of Mali, including its location and demographic characteristics, have attracted considerable interest from Arab Muslim travelers and geographers in their accounts. The kingdom was acknowledged by certain Arab communities, especially in Egypt, as the territory of Takrur. However, it is important to note that this term specifically pertains to a distinct area within the Sultanate of Mali, as indicated by the title of the rulers of Mali, who were referred to as the kings of Takrur.

The various tribes within the population of Mali exhibited considerable diversity, shaped by the languages and dialects of adjacent groups. The Fulani refer to these tribes as “Mali,” while the Berber language identifies them as “Milet,” and in Arabic, they are known as “Millal.” In the Hausa language, they are called “N’kudi.” As for the precise etymology of the term “Mandé”, it is ambiguous; some theories propose that it originates from “Mandi,” which translates to “the city” or “the capital,” suggesting that these individuals are the inhabitants of urban areas. In the Mandé language, “Mali” is interpreted as “where the king resides.”

Arab geographers and travelers, along with their successors, did not offer a detailed description of the boundaries of the Mali Kingdom. Nevertheless, its borders were situated within the regions south of the Sahara, which were commonly referred to by these geographers and travelers as the lands of Sudan. This area is vast and varied, extending northward to the territories of the Berbers, southward to the plains, eastward to Abyssinia, and bordered by the ocean to the west. The region is categorized into three segments: Eastern Sudan, Central Sudan, and Western Sudan. The Mali Kingdom is located in Western Sudan, spanning approximately three hundred miles along one of the Niger River’s branches, adjacent to the former kingdom to the north.

The kingdom underwent considerable territorial growth over the centuries. Its boundaries stretched from the Atlantic Ocean in the west to the Borno area, currently part of Nigeria, in the east, and from the northernmost reaches of Morocco in the south to the ocean in the southern regions. At the zenith of its influence, the kingdom included areas that are now recognized as Senegal, Gambia, Mauritania, and the modern Republic of Mali. The kingdom was divided into five distinct regions, each governed by the Mansa or Sultan of Mali, whose central authority was located in Benbi or Bemba. To the west of Mali lay the Sosso region, specifically in Kanyaga. The Ghana region was situated to the west of Sosso, reaching the shores of the Atlantic Ocean and containing gold mines that attracted traders from Silhamasa and northern Morocco. The Kokiya region was positioned to the east of Mali, with its center in Kokiya, approximately a month and a half’s journey from Ghana, west of present-day Nigeria. Adjacent to Kokiya was the Takrur region, which had its base established in Takrur.

The introduction of Islam to the Kingdom of Mali occurred prior to the arrival of the Almoravids in West Africa, largely due to the longstanding trade relations between the northern and western regions of the continent. Given that West Africa is largely a cohesive region, it is essential to recognise that trade, despite facing various obstacles, played a significant role in the exchange of new and productive discourses. So, who was the first among the kings of Mali to embrace Islam? Some historians assert that once the land of Mali experienced a severe drought in a particular year, threatening the crops and livestock. In response, the king sought the counsel of a respected Muslim elder known for his piety. The elder prayed with the king for rain, which subsequently fell, but only after the scholar had first urged the king to convert to Islam. The king acepted Islam, dismantled the idols, which subsequently led to the conversion of his heirs and close companions, while the majority of his subjects continued to practice polytheism, resulting in a bifurcation of governance between Muslims and non-Muslims from that time forward. Furthermore, it has been reported that the region of Mali once endured successive years of drought, prompting the populace to make cattle sacrifices in their desperate appeals for rain, nearly exhausting their livestock without any alleviation of their plight. During this period, a Muslim visitor, who was engaged in reciting the Quran and imparting teachings of the Sunnah, was present at the royal court. The king conveyed his worries to this guest, who counseled him that by believing in Allah, recognizing His oneness, accepting Muhammad, peace and blessings of Allah be upon him, as His messenger, and adhering to the principles of Islam, he might find hope for relief. Islam was already known to the king when he chose to adopt it. There existed Muslims who engaged in the recitation of the Quran, imparted the teachings of the Prophet, and diligently disseminated the Islamic message. In many instances, the growth of Islam was characterised not by coercion but by persuasion, a hallmark of its appeal as a faith that resonates with sound human nature. Additionally, the Mandinka, the architects of the Mali Empire, emerged as some of the most fervent advocates of Islam in West Africa.

The rulers of Mali by the close of the eleventh century had accepted Islam, and the expansion of the Mali Empire throughout different areas of West Africa was intricately linked to the dissemination of Islam and the formation of its institutions, such as mosques and educational establishments. Furthermore, there was a deliberate initiative to attract scholars and religious figures to Mali in order to further the Islamic mission and enhance educational opportunities. Muslim scholars held a significant position in Mali, as the Kingdom of Mali not only embraced Islam and endeavored to implement its teachings and sciences but also actively promoted it among the inhabitants of West Africa. The role it played in the dissemination of Islam is considered one of the most crucial phases in the spread of Islam across the continent, as it was closely linked to the call for the faith.

The primary guideline for succession to the throne in Mali involved the selection of the eldest son of the deceased sultan. Nevertheless, adherence to a strictly linear order of descent was not obligatory. It was permissible for brothers to succeed each other, provided that the age hierarchy was maintained, even if they were not the eldest. Additionally, it was not uncommon for the sons of sisters or daughters to inherit the throne, a practice that was prevalent in various African kingdoms throughout West Africa and in the Nile Valley among the Nubian populations. This principle was observable in the Ghana Empire and was similarly practiced in the smaller Sudanese kingdoms, irrespective of whether they were governed by indigenous Sudanese or Berber leaders. Al-Qalqashandi remarked on this tradition, noting, “According to the custom of the non-Arabs regarding the inheritance by daughters and granddaughters.” Ibn Battuta further elaborated on this custom, recounting his observations in the city of Takda, where the sons of the sultan’s sister held power, as well as in the city of Walata. At times, the reins of power may slip from their grasp, leading to the throne being usurped by an individual outside the ruling families, as occurred with Al-Sundaki following the death of Musa II.

The rulers of the Mali Empire wielded absolute power over the empire’s governance. Their duties encompassed ensuring the security and justice of their subjects, as well as convening regular consultations in the palace courtyard to evaluate the welfare of the populace and to enforce their decrees. The vice-king, referred to as “Fanja,” played a crucial role in the administration, supported by ministers, senior officials, and advisors. It was common for the vice-king to be the king’s son. Ministers, known as “Sundaki,” often included individuals who had previously been enslaved by the sultans but had since gained their freedom. In terms of administrative organization, the term “dojo” denoted a village, which constituted the fundamental unit of governance. Cities, formed from multiple villages, were called “Diyamana,” signifying provinces or kingdoms. This administrative framework appears to have been shaped by the tribal traditions of the Mandinka, the original founders of the Islamic Kingdom of Mali. The designation “Mansa” was also employed and associated with the provincial governors and village leaders. Typically, the individual responsible for overseeing provincial matters arrives in the village shortly after the chief and may exercise authority on his behalf.

The Kingdom of Mali established various institutions to manage its governance, with the judicial system holding a position of utmost significance, recognized as both a noble and demanding responsibility under the Sultan’s oversight. The empire maintained a powerful military, with the army constituting the second most crucial labor force in the region. This emphasis on military prowess can be traced back to the time of Sundiata, who achieved a significant victory over rival tribes during the Battle of Kabriya.

The military force of the Mali Empire reached its zenith during the rule of Mansa Musa, establishing itself as the most powerful military entity in West Sudan. Several Malian monarchs granted territories to military nobles, generously endowing them with nearly fifty thousand mithqals of gold each year, alongside provisions of horses and textiles for their uniforms and urban development. The primary responsibilities of the army included protecting the nation from external aggressions and ensuring internal stability. Military leaders enjoyed a high status within the political hierarchy, and the army was organized into two distinct divisions, each overseen by a commander appointed by the king. The Northern Army, commanded by Farhan Sur, was stationed in the city of Diara in the Kanbaja region. Conversely, the Southern Army was headquartered in the Sangaran region, led by Diyon Sandaki. The armament of the Malian military comprised spears, swords, staffs, crossbows, lances, and pins crafted from the Inos tree, complemented by shields made from the hide of the Lamta animal, which possessed the durability to endure spear thrusts, sword blows, and crossbow projectiles.

The economic life and the foundations of its economy included agriculture, industry, and trade. Agricultural methods and irrigation techniques: Agriculture served as a fundamental pillar of the Kingdom’s economy; however, it did not receive significant attention due to the populace’s inclination towards trade. Consequently, there was a lack of innovation in agricultural practices and irrigation methods, coupled with a deficiency in agricultural tools. As a result, agriculture did not experience widespread development, particularly in trade-centric regions, and there was no substantial class of farmers, except for a few individuals tied to the land. Agriculture flourished more in cities located along riverbanks than in inland areas, primarily due to the former’s fertile lands. For instance, the Gambia River benefited from heavy rainfall throughout its course, resulting in the deposition of rich alluvial soil along its banks. The tools traditionally employed by farmers were characterised by their simplicity, including a small-handled hoe, a spade, and a knife, alongside the practice of fallow farming.

Regarding irrigation methods, initially, irrigation was achieved through artificial means, particularly evident in desert oases and along the banks of the Niger and Senegal rivers. In addition to relying on rainfall alongside watercourses during the rainy season, they were keen on cultivating areas located along riverbanks. However, due to the influx of resources into the kingdom, the land was utilized more effectively, leading to the expansion of agriculture in mountainous and interior regions. This development prompted them to enhance irrigation techniques, resulting in the emergence of various agricultural patterns based on regional characteristics. For instance, rain-fed agriculture was prevalent in lowland areas, while permanent farming using hoes and spades was practiced in forested regions. As they expanded their agricultural activities into the interior areas, they resorted to drilling wells for irrigation. Some of these wells are of the artesian type, which involved digging until reaching solid rock, which was then broken with picks and axes to release water.

The most significant agricultural products in the region were vegetables, with the kingdom being renowned for cultivating a variety of them, including okra, onions, garlic, eggplants, and cabbage. Additionally, wild molokhia was present, along with a plant known as qafi, which resembles taro and is used to make porridge. The stems of this plant were also utilised to create dishes and utensils for eating, and it played a role in their daily meals. In terms of fruits, their availability was limited, with fig trees being among the most prominent cultivated fruits, alongside trees that bear fruits resembling cucumbers. The influence of Arab Islamic presence was notably evident in the agricultural sector, particularly concerning crops. This was illustrated by the introduction of new agricultural products to the kingdom from Arab Islamic countries. Historical accounts suggest that cotton seeds were brought to West Sudan from North Africa, and it is attributed to the Muslim king Sandiana (Mari Hatta) the introduction of cotton cultivation in the kingdom, as he promoted agricultural policies within the region. In addition to agricultural wealth, the kingdom also possessed a significant livestock resource, comprising both domesticated and wild animals. The domesticated animals, which were raised in households, included sheep, goats, cattle, and camels. The inhabitants utilised their meat for sustenance and crafted clothing from their wool and hair. However, their sheep and goats often lacked proper grazing areas, as they primarily foraged in refuse sites. Notably, a single goat could give birth to seven or eight offspring at a time.

Wild animals include deer, lions, tigers, giraffes, zebras, and buffalo. Evidence of the presence of giraffes in the kingdom was demonstrated by their being sent as a gift from Sultan Mansa Zata to Sultan Abu Salim al-Barini. Additionally, giraffes were abundant in the land of Takrur, where they were frequently captured and slaughtered like cattle. The kingdom was known for its horses, particularly the Akadian breed, and its livestock included cattle, sheep, and camels. Among these animals, there were some of poor physique and small stature. The kingdom lacked purebred horses, which they imported from North Africa. These horses were primarily used by the king’s entourage during their movements within the city, as well as by merchants on their various journeys. The prices of these horses were quite high, making them accessible only to the wealthy class. Additionally, camels were considered one of the most significant livestock due to their remarkable ability to endure the hardships of travel and withstand salty water. They played a crucial role in the dissemination of education and Islamic beliefs to the regions of Sudan. Furthermore, buffaloes were prevalent in the deserts, where they were hunted similarly to wild game. The hunters would capture the young from their mothers and raise them at home. When they intended to hunt buffaloes, they would take one of them to the hunting area, allowing the others to see and become familiar with it.

The forests were home to a vast number of elephants, whose tusks were utilised in the ivory trade. These elephants were characterised by their wild nature, being untamed. The method of capturing them involved men laying out a type of paper, along with bait and branches, near a water source. They would then hide, and once the elephants approached to drink, they would become intoxicated and fall. Subsequently, the hunters would emerge with large spears to kill the elephants, with the primary objective being to obtain their tusks. They were were hunted in the neighboring lands of the non-Muslims.

In the industrial sector, the Kingdom of Mali was endowed with significant mineral wealth, which served as a cornerstone for its economy, primarily comprising gold, salt, and copper. Gold held the foremost position among these raw materials, followed by salt and copper. Salt, in particular, was valued just after gold and was concentrated in several regions, with Taghaza being the most renowned for its production or south of Morocco, near the Atlantic Ocean, thus designating Taghaza as a populated area rich in salt mines resembling marble quarries. The salt extracted from this region was transported both within and beyond West Sudan and was regarded as one of the finest types of salt. In addition to the well-known saltworks of Taghaza, there were also the saltworks of Krenouga. The extraction of salt involved digging tunnels in the ground to a depth of approximately two cubits or less, where it was cut similarly to stone. The salt came in various colours, including white, gray, and red. Copper ranked in importance just after gold and salt, due to its critical demand in military industries, adornments, and the manufacturing of utensils. This metal was mined from Takkanda through a process of excavation. Consequently, copper played a significant role alongside the aforementioned minerals, and the region was also known for other mineral resources. Iron is another significant metal, with its mines widely distributed in western Sudan. In addition to this, there were other raw materials such as lead, kohl, and tin; however, these materials were not as prevalent. Similarly, alum and kohl were considered primary materials, with alum being one of the essential components in dye production. The Islamic Kingdom of Mali was known for its industrial system. In the villages, there were numerous artisans and craftsmen, particularly in the city of Timbuktu, which housed many workshops. Among the most important crafts that flourished in the Kingdom of Mali were: Carpentry, which thrived significantly due to the availability of abatis wood, as well as pottery and ceramics. This craft was one of the most common in the kingdom, with residents focusing on pottery making, creating household items such as containers for milk. Additionally, leatherworking was practiced by a group known as the cobblers. Blacksmithing also received considerable attention in the kingdom, along with mining, which was one of the most vital crafts due to the importance of metals in the country’s economy.

The commercial centers in Mali experienced significant growth, which characterised the kingdom and led to the emergence of numerous trading cities located on both sides of the Sahara Desert. This was particularly evident in areas traversed by caravans crossing the desert, which served as stable hubs for merchants responsible for transporting and distributing various goods. Among the most notable centers are Ghadames, a city in the Maghreb region adjacent to Sudan, and Tawat, situated in the southwestern part of the Algerian desert, which is part of the larger African Sahara. Another important center was Argelan, located in the central Moroccan desert, described as a city inhabited by the Miassir tribes and wealthy traders who would travel to the lands of Ghana and Wankara. On the southern side of the Sahara, there was Walata, recognised as the last city of the ancient region of Shinqit (modern-day Mauritania), founded in the first century of the Hijra. Its inhabitants were of Arab descent. This city, as well as Timbuktu, which was considered one of the most significant commercial centers in the Islamic Kingdom of Mali. The name Timbuktu is believed to originate from an elderly woman, as caravans of the Tuareg would stop to drink from a well in the desert. A woman named (Boktu) resided by this well, and her name has remained unchanged over time. This location is situated at the southern edges of the Sahara Desert in northern Mali, near the bend of the Niger River. Java is recognized as a significant commercial center due to its position on the left bank of the Niger River, connected to the Tamas Valley that descends from the heart of the desert. Mademke is also considered an important trading hub, attracting merchants from both the East and the West. This influx is attributed to the stability and security that characterised the area, which experienced an improvement in its economic conditions, evolved into one of the most vital commercial markets until the late 10th century AH, corresponding to the 16th century. [2]

To be continued InShaAllah.


[1] Excerpt from Al-Adillah al-Qawaatiq Wal-Baraaheen Fee Ib’taal Usool al-Mul’hideen 44]

[2] Excerpt from the Arabic source: “The Kingdom of Mali During The Reign of Mansa Musa” pages 1-30

The best in the pre-Islamic period and the best in Islam

In The Name of Allah, The Most Merciful, The Bestower of Mercy.

Abu Hurayrah, may Allah be pleased with him, narrated: Allah’s Messenger, peace and blessings of Allah be upon him, was asked, “Who is the most honourable amongst the people?” He said, “The one who fears Allah the most”. They said, “We are not asking you about this”. He said, “Then the most honourable amongst the people is Yusuf, Allah’s Prophet, the son of Allah’s Prophet, the son of Allah’s Prophet, the son of Allah’s Khaleel”. They said, “We are not asking you about this”. He said, “So you are asking me about the Arabs’ descent; the people are of different descents and those who were best in the pre-Islamic period are the best in Islam, if they acquire (sound) understanding of (religious knowledge)”.

Al-Allamah Zayd Bin Hadi Al-Mad’khali, may Allah have mercy upon, said:

In this hadith, it is legislated for the one to whom something related to the religion is hidden that he asks, and the scholar is the one who is asked. The Prophet, peace and blessings of Allaah be upon him, is the foremost teacher and the one who conveys the religion (ordained) by Allah. His companions used to ask him that which they wanted to understand in order to act upon it.This hadith is proof that the companions of the Prophet asked about matters related to their religion in order to acquire understanding of the religion. Knowledge- as it is said – is based on questions and answers. In this hadith there is proof (regarding) the virtue of Taqwah, as Allah, The Mighty and Majestic, said: [إِنَّ أَڪۡرَمَكُمۡ عِندَ ٱللَّهِ أَتۡقَٮٰكُمۡ‌ۚ– The most honourable of you in the sight of Allaah are those who fear Allaah the most]. Taqwa (fear of Allah) gathers every good because it is clearly manifested in the fulfilment of commands, keeping away from prohibitions, declaring lawful what is lawful and declaring unlawful what is unlawful – inwardly (in one’s heart) and apparent (on one’s actions), and adherence to the (Qur’an, the Sunnah, the Straight path etc).

In this hadith there is proof regarding the virtue of Yusuf, peace be upon him, and his fathers because the Prophet, peace and blessings of Allah be upon him, mentioned them.

In this hadith there is proof regarding the humility of the Prophet because he made known to them the virtue of his brother- the noble Prophet – Yusuf.

In this hadith there is proof regarding the virtue of the Arabs if they possess understanding of the religion of Islam and learn the religion, for indeed the noble Qur’an was sent down in the language of the Arab, thus, if they acquire understanding of the religion, they will be able to convey it in Allah’s earth. This is what happened in this Ummah of Muhammad, for indeed when he was sent, he called the Arabs to Iman until a great Ummah was established who were able to perform Jihad and give Dawah in the path of Allah. So, they dispersed in the earth after acquiring understanding of their religion from Allah’s Messenger and spread it in the regions of the earth- propagating, teaching, performing Jihad and judging between the people, until Allah (gave Islam the upper hand) almost everywhere in the world through them, and this was a favour bestowed on them by Allah.

In this hadith there is proof regarding the virtue of Fiqh in the religion and that the one who acquires understanding of the religion – with a good intention- in order to remove ignorance from himself, act based on the understanding in the Islamic religion and spread it in the earth, he has a great reward and station in the sight of Allah. And Allah knows best.

The evidence (or testimony for the main subject matter in this hadith) is that the people are of different descents. The best of them during the Pre-Islamic era are the best in Islam if they possess (sound) understanding (in the religion). Therefore, whoever was from the good people during the Pre-Islamic era and acted that way amongst the people, then Allah blessed them to accept Islam and they acquire understanding, they’ll be the best people because they had a good basis which Islam increased in good and perfection. [1]

The Messenger said: Indeed, Allah has removed from you the pride of the pre-Islamic period and its boasting about ancestors. One is only a pious believer or a wretched sinner. You are sons of Adam and Adam (was created from) dust. Let the people abandon boasting about their ancestors, for they are merely fuel in Jahannam; or they will become more insignificant in (the sight of) Allah than the beetle which rolls dung with its nose. [2]

The Messenger, peace and blessings of Allah be upon him, said, “Whoever is held back by his deeds, his lineage will not push him forward”. [3]

Imam An-Nawawi, may Allah have mercy upon him, said, “Its meaning is that the one whose deeds are deficient and he does not catch up with the performers of (good) deeds, it is obligated to him not to crown himself with nobility of lineage and the virtues of his forefathers, while he is lagging behind in (performing good) deeds”. [4]


[1] An Excerpt from at -Taleeqaat Al-Maleehah Alaa Silsilah Al-Ahaadith As-Saheehah. 1/34-35

[2] Sahih Abi Dawud 5116

[3] & [4] Saheeh Muslim…part of hadeeth in ‘The Book Pertaining to the Remembrance of Allah, Supplication, Repentance and Seeking Forgiveness. Sharh Saheeh Muslim: Hadith Number 2699 17/18

[33] The Ascent and Decline of The Ottoman Empire

In The Name of Allah, The Most Merciful, The Bestower of Mercy.

Allah said:

وَلَا تَقْفُ مَا لَيْسَ لَكَ بِهِۦ عِلْمٌ إِنَّ ٱلسَّمْعَ وَٱلْبَصَرَ وَٱلْفُؤَادَ كُلُّ أُو۟لَٰٓئِكَ كَانَ عَنْهُ مَسْـُٔولًا

And follow not (O man i.e., say not, or do not or witness not, etc.) that of which you have no knowledge (e.g. one’s saying: “I have seen,” while in fact he has not seen, or “I have heard,” while he has not heard). Verily! The hearing, and the sight, and the heart, of each of those you will be questioned (by Allah). [Al-Isra 36]

Prior to delving into the biography of Sultan Abdul Hamid I, the author briefly touched upon the life of Sultan Murad V. However, we have chosen to omit his biography from this series due to certain negative claims associated with him that we cannot verify. Given that this matter pertains to the honour of a Muslim, we are obliged to withhold any information regarding his life until we can confirm the veracity of these allegations. It is undeniable that the decline of the Ottoman Empire brought about numerous unfavorable transformations, yet attributing these specific changes to any individual necessitates concrete evidence. Now, let us proceed with the biography of Sultan Abdul Hamid I.

Sultan Abdul Hamid I [1293 – 1326 AH / 1876 – 1909]

He was the thirty-fourth sultan of the Ottoman Empire. He ascended to the throne at the age of thirty-four, having been born on the 16th of Sha’ban in the year 1258 AH (1842). His mother passed away when he was just ten years old. Subsequently, his father’s second wife, who was unable to bear children, took on the responsibility of raising him. She strove to fulfill the role of a mother, showing him with affection and even bequeathing her inheritance to him. He was profoundly influenced by her nurturing, admiring her dignity, piety, and calm demeanor. This upbringing left a lasting impact on his character throughout his life.

He received a structured education at the royal palace, guided by a select group of the most renowned scholars of his time (within the empire), both in knowledge and character. He studied the Arabic and Persian languages, delved into history, developed a passion for literature, and explored Tasawwuf. (I) He also composed some poetry in Ottoman Turkish. He trained in weaponry, mastering the use of the sword and achieving accuracy with a pistol. He maintained his physical fitness and showed a keen interest in global politics, closely following news related to his country with exceptional attention to detail and rare precision.

An Excerpt from ‘Ad-Dawlah Al-Uthmaaniyyah Awaamil An-Nuhood Wa Asbaab As-Suqoot. 6/441

[I] The Sufism practiced during the some periods of the Ottoman era is extensively recorded. While the author did not elaborate on the extent to which this Sultan engaged with Sufiyyah, we can infer that if his understanding aligned with contemporary Sufiyyah, there would be significant concerns regarding this practice. However, if his approach mirrored that of the early Sufis, we can glean insights into his practices from the information shared in the link by Shaikh Abu Iyaad, may Allah protect him. http://www.ibntaymiyyah.com/articles/dgfil-the-origin-of-the-sufis-is-from-basrah-iraq.cfm

To be continued…InShaAllah

Reflections on some statements of Al-Allamah Rabee Bin Hadi Al-Mad’khali [78 of 80]

In The Name of Allah, The Most Merciful, The Bestower of Mercy

One of the greatest characteristics of Islam is the fulfilment of contracts and promises, even towards non-Muslims. Among the characteristics of the believers is the avoidance of betrayal and treachery. There is a story about Al-Mughirah Ibn Shu’bah, may Allah be pleased with him, who accompanied a group of polytheists during their time of disbelief, while they traveled to Egypt for trade and acquired wealth. Then they spent the night there, thus, he attacked and killed them, and took their wealth. He came to Prophet, peace and blessings of Allah be upon him, as a Muslim, presented the wealth and narrated the incident to him. The Prophet, peace and blessings of Allah be upon him, said: “As for your Islam, we accept it; however, the wealth is that of treachery, and we have no need for it.” This is because it was acquired through treachery. Islam does not permit treachery under any circumstances.

Another incident: There was a treaty between the Romans and the Muslims, then as this treaty approached its end, Mu’awiyah, may Allah be pleased with him, proceeded with his army, stating: “Once the time of the treaty ends, we’ll launch an attack on the enemy”. An old man mounted his horse, shouting, “Allahu Akbar! Fulfilment and not treachery! Allahu Akbar! Fulfilment and not treacheryl!” Mu’awiyah, may Allah be pleased with him, asked him (about it), so he said: “I heard Allah’s Messenger, peace and blessings of Allah be upon him, say, ‘When one has covenant with people, he must not strengthen or loosen it till its term comes to an end or he brings it to an end in agreement with them (to make both the parties equal)'”. So Mu’awiyah stopped.

Treachery and betrayal are not permissible (to be perpetrated against) unbelievers, despite them being upon misguidance. Acts of destruction and devastation in this manner are not permissible because they result in the killing of women, children, and innocent people, and it does not harm the enemy. Indeed, the enemy rejoice about it (i.e. such actions) to tarnish the image of Islam and its adherents, and it is exploited by the media to oppose Islam and give Islam an image darker than the corrupt religions. This is what results from the actions of these people (i.e. the terrorists) against Islam and the Muslims. It is incumbent upon the Muslims to serve as role models of truthfulness, lofty manners, fulfilment (of covenants) and trustworthiness, and be distant from what contradict these characteristics, such as treachery, betrayal, lies, and bloodshed which does not benefit Islam, rather it harms it. [Paraphrased]

An Excerpt from the link below:

https://rabee.net/%D8%A7%D9%84%D8%AE%D9%8A%D8%A7%D9%86%D8%A7%D8%AA-%D9%88%D8%A7%D9%84%D8%BA%D8%AF%D8%B1-%D9%85%D9%86-%D8%B4%D8%B1-%D8%A3%D9%86%D9%88%D8%A7%D8%B9-%D8%A7%D9%84%D9%81%D8%B3%D8%A7%D8%AF-%D9%81%D9%8A-%D8%A7/