Skip to main content

Abul-Abbas Naveed Ayaaz [Madeenahdotcom/IslamNelson] Exposed [Part 2]

Shaikh Mohammad bin Haady highlighted several years ago the reality of Madeenahdotcom, in particular the existence of blatant liars amongst them. Perhaps it is such speech of the scholars highlighting their wayward methodology that upsets Naveed Ayaaz to such a degree. Nevertheless it would have been expected that as a grown adult he would have dealt with the refutations upon him with some degree of honour, regrettably that was seeking too much.

Upon apparently realising and recognising the fact that indeed he is unable to respond to the criticisms against him, he has engaged in a despicable act of cowardice in attempting to gain community support for himself. Quite apparently he realised his dubious teaching would not gain him the support required hence he has disgustingly resorted to purposely attempting to involve other innocent individuals into his affair.

The affair has always been linked to Madeenahdotcom and, specifically in our town of Nelson, Naveed Ayaaz and his erroneous methodology. The affair has never been with regards to any Masjid whatsoever! However, disgracefully, Naveed Ayaaz very politically attempts to gain support by stating that I along with others have “….been part of this campaign against myself [Naveed Ayaaz], our Da’wah and the Masjid“.

So I say to this disgraceful individual – who with a pitiful whimper decided to try and rally the community against myself and salafidawalancs – that no-one has ever made an issue regarding the Masjid! We have never mentioned the Masjid in the refutations against Naveed Ayaaz! The affair from beginning to end is related to Naveed Ayaaz’s distorted methodology and has nothing to do with the Masjid! Any clarification or refutation presented on this issue from myself has always been directed at Naveed Ayaaz and Naveed Ayaaz alone! Hence I advise this individual to drop this highly pitiful and degrading act of attempting to rally the congregation to join his defence! He will be refuted upon his incorrect methodology irrelevant of what masjid he may be in! So his embarassing attempt to link this affair to the masjid and get innocent individuals involved in his deteriorating situation is truly degrading and somewhat cringeworthy in reality.

He also then continues to pitifully say regarding me, “He holds our Masjid to be a masjid of Ahlul Bid’ah“. Once again, I remind this individual to have at least some honour and not attempt this whimpering feeble cry to gain support from the community. The issue is NOT about the congregation or the community or the Masjid, we have NOT declared the congregation as innovators! I challenge Naveed Ayaaz to provide evidence that we have declared the average everyday congregation, elders, youth, brothers and sisters ALL as INNOVATORS…which is essentially what his statement would wish to imply to gain support from the community!? The statement is so ridiculous it is beyond belief any sane individual could even utter it, let alone for a so-called graduate to insinuate it in order to disgracefully rally the commoners onside with a general, unrestricted sweeping statement that the masjid has been declared “ahlul-bid’ah”! In reality he is fully aware we have not intended that at any stage with anything we have said.

Scholars have declared the GLM organisation as Hizbee upon evidence, and if the current leadership of the Masjid – I intend IslamNelson – wish to affiliate and ascribe themselves to GLM then they [IslamNelson] are placed alongside them! That is exactly what I told Naveed Ayaaz in a meeting some months ago! That if the Masjid – i.e. IslamNelson currently in essence – is an affiliate of a Hizbee organisation and ascribes itself to it and aids and supports it then it is placed along with that Hizbee organisation….and so that is a decision in the hands of IslamNelson now, not me! If they wish to affiliate to supporters and promoters of al-Maghrib and al-Kauther, magicians and singers [who apparently Naveed Ayaaz and IslamNelson refuted, since they claim to have OPENLY AND PUBLICLY REFUTED THE GLM SHAMBLES “QUR’AN AND I” CONFERENCE, yet none of us have had the pleasure of hearing anything or seeing anything to this day from this apparently very public refutation] then that is their issue to deal with.

This would NOT mean that we have declared everyone A MUBTADI’! [INNOVATOR]. Ahlus Sunnah do not label individuals in masses recklessly as innovators no matter how much Naveed Ayaaz would desire we did, and that is why he and his colleagues have made concerted efforts for months to extract a “fatwa” from me that the people of the masjid are all innovators [!], that it is a masjid of “ahlul-bid’ah” in a generalised and unrestricted sense incorporating all attendees! ….clearly they have received nothing, and will not, since it is ridiculous beyond belief that I or anyone will make any such tabdee’! This is not the way of ahlus-Sunnah!

So once again, we see this awful and embarassing attempt made by Naveed Ayaaz to try to gain support from the commoners! We do not declare common people as innovators, rather we openly invite the community to attend our lessons at SalafiDawaLancs, it hardly makes any sense for us to declare everyone as innovators then send texts warmly inviting those same people to the lessons to come and sit alongside us!?

So I say in conclusion: Naveed Ayaaz have some shame and you alone face your issues on your methodology with honour – if indeed that is possible, not pitifully making woeful degrading attempts to gain sympathy from the community. This has nothing to do with the Masjid and the elders, youngsters, brothers and sisters of the community…this is about your corrupt methodology and your “IslamNelson” who have involved themselves of their own free will, since you are the so-called student who is supposed to be trusted to teach the people. If people have been advised not to teach at that masjid it is due to you and your corrupt ways and your colleagues, not the elders or youngsters or anyone else! It is IslamNelson that has attacked the Salafis publicly initially on tweets, and you with your pitiful statement, not the elders or youngsters, brothers and sisters of the community besides you!

Answer to yourself and your wayward methodology if indeed you are able, and if you are not able then continue to disgrace yourself – with what are essentially lies implied through your carefully chosen political terminology – that the Salafis make tabdee’ [declare as innovators] of everyone!

@AbuMuadhTaqweem

Abul-Abbas Naveed Ayaaz [Madeenahdotcom/IslamNelson] Exposed [Part 1]

The great scholar al-Imam ibn Qayyim al-Jawziyyah [751H] stated: “Know that Allah sent His Messenger Mohammad صلى الله عليه و سلم [at a time when] the people of the Earth were in a greater need for the Revelation than the rain from the sky, [and in greater need for it] than the rays of light from the Sun that remove the darkness of the pitch black nights; so their need for it was the greatest of need, superior to all other needs, for indeed there is no life for the hearts nor happiness nor security except through knowing their Lord…” [paraphrased from مختصر الصواعق المرسلة على الجهمية والمعطلة p3/4]

Indeed how true are such words, for certainly there is no serenity, no peace or tranquility for the hearts except in attaching them to Allah عز و جل, and such attachment is attained through knowledge of our Creator, knowledge of His beautiful and perfect names and attributes, knowledge of that which the Messenger صلى الله عليه و سلم was sent with and taught; all upon the understanding of the Salaf of this Ummah.

It is from the great blessing of Allah that Salafiyyah has become established in the U.K. in several regions with Salafi centres and masaajid present all around the country, teaching the pure religion, free of extremism or negligence, free of restrictions or compromise – upon such a basis, and recognising the importance of it, we have actively engaged in teaching Salafiyyah in the Nelson area and elsewhere for several years now by the blessing of Allah, the earliest public lessons beginning in 2007.

In current times – as regrettable as it may be – an individual by the name of Abul-Abbas Naveed Ayaaz of the refuted Madeenahdotcom who have liars amongst them as stated by one of the scholars – Shaikh Mohammad bin Haady – has taken it upon himself to distance himself from the Salafis [hence no connection or relationship with the Salafis of Manchester at SalafiCentre, or Bradford Albaseerah, or Bolton Al-Huda, or Stoke-on-Trent Al-Furqan], and instead he holds relations with hizbee defenders of innovators such as those at Masjid Sunnah of Manchester as an example [the individuals who cut the phone-line to stop one of the scholars of the Sunnah of our time Shaikh Rabee’ bin Haady from delivering a lecture and have fought against the Salafi Dawah in Manchester for over a decade, instead supporting deviants such as Abul-Hasan al-Ma’riby].

Recently, this individual Naveed Ayaaz released a statement [9/3/14] wherein he put forth a series of events and accusations portrayed as facts when indeed reality does not testify to their accurateness [some of which have already been comprehensively exposed as lies, such as his claim that I attempted to turn the guest Imam for Ramadhan “against the masjid” on Eid Day]. He indicates he engaged in such action due to a “whatsapp picture refutation and some tweets” that were circulating at the time.

I personally, upon reading the somewhat “emotional” statement filled with an apparently sympathy-seeking narration of “events” – whilst at the same time virtually completely void of any evidence-based argument or proof Allahul-Musta’an, did not deem any great need to reply to such absurdity and time-wasting activity, and instead continued upon teaching and busying the people with beneficial knowledge, such as our regular Friday evening Tafsir classes from the book of Shaikh al-‘Uthaymeen. In the meantime however, some of our noble German Salafi brothers were engaged in refuting the wayward methodology of Abul-Abbas Naveed and his associates…this leads to the first crucial point:

This whole affair began as an exchange of tweets between IslamNelson and our brothers of the “WegderSalaf” account, on the evening of Saturday 8th March approximately 22:00, something that was completely and utterly unkown to me upon its beginning…then a picture became widespead of Naveed Ayaaz – on Sunday 9th March – lecturing with those who invite magicians, singers and innovators – a picture [in its original format] that was initially sent out publicly by a Salafi brother from London without any knowledge from myself or the Manchester brothers weeks prior to that date! The picture of 9th March was a simple alteration of the original that had been in circulation for weeks already.

Considering the above facts, why and for what reason IslamNelson decided to mention my name and why Abul-Abbas Naveed decided to write about me is still a bewildering unresolved conundrum [I, nor anyone else, have ever mentioned IslamNelson in any public capacity prior to their initial public “outburst” against us via Twitter, so it is baffling why they would wish to publicly disgrace themselves and provoke the Salafis initially? Perhaps this is a fine example of what evil suspicion has done to them, as Naveed Ayaaz claims in his slanderous fashion that “we are working behind the scenes” against them?!].

Their whole exchange of tweets was between themselves [IslamNelson] and their crazed tweeting Dawah-Man Abu Mus’ab Naman Yasin [who may well actually be the IslamNelson tweeter anyway, although they may decide to conceal the identity of who landed IslamNelson in all this mess through mindless, crazed provocative tweeting[!] and our German brothers and their dawah account “Wegdersalaf”… despite the nonsense directed at me from IslamNelson, I did not personally respond to them at all, yet they continued tweeted mentioning all types of falsehood that they will be held accountable upon and proofs will be requested in due course insha’Allah.

It seems they are under some deluded suspicion-ridden thought that anyone who refutes their reality of co-operation with innovators and hizbees in Manchester and elsewhere, then they must be receiving instruction from myself, so let them take that evil suspicion and keep it to themselves and their likes. I will now make clear that I had no knowledge of the affair when it began over Twitter [I was only made aware after the initial tweets were exchanged of what had occurred], if they wish to make accusations otherwise then let them bring forth their evidence.

I have personally only once publicly written to clarify the errors of Naveed Ayaaz by name and that was several months ago when he refused to publicly sincerely advise the people and refute the GLM deviated conference even though in private he admitted and ackowledged its incorrectness, since then I have not engaged in any public article or tweeting regarding him by name whatsoever, instead we have busied ouselves with the Salafi Dawah in Nelson, teaching freely without restrictions; hence the pitiful claim that I am at fault for recent occurrences is an absurd fantasy regrettably for him. It would have been better and more beneficial for him and IslamNelson to not provoke or incite any affair with disgraceful public tweets to our German brothers at “Wegdersalaf”, however that was their decision and they have received their due response to date. [We are lead to believe that in actual fact it is only one individual who tweets from the IslamNelson account mostly, so if they wish to identify him and exclude themselves they are free to do so, but otherwise the tweets emanated from their dawah account hence the whole of IslamNelson is implicated].

I will also highlight, that despite not having any involvement in the beginning of this affair over Twitter, all those who have and continue to refute Naveed Ayaaz upon evidence are correct to do so in order that the common people are not decieved by his wayward methodology, hence I am fully supportive of our German brothers, Salaficentre and others in refuting this wayward individual, and now Shaikh Mohammad Baazmool حفظه الله has advised accordingly regarding the erroneous methodology of Naveed Ayaaz too.

Part 2 will follow insha’Allah; I will discuss the completely dumbfounding cowardice Naveed Ayaaz engaged in attempting to gain the support of the community in his case against myself and @SALAFIDAWALANCS as well as the Salafis elsewhere. The carefully planned terminology in his emotional statement will be highlighted to show the disgusting levels of political deception such defenders of Hizbees [with a racist among them!] are willing to engage in to achieve their objectives in opposing the Salafis.

@AbuMuadhTaqweem

[1] Reminder for the Arab Youth who still speaks with confusion and speculation regarding Takfeer

In The Name of Allaah, The Most Merciful, The Bestower of Mercy

Allaah (The Most High) said:

 قُلْ إِنَّمَا حَرَّمَ رَبِّيَ الْفَوَاحِشَ مَا ظَهَرَ مِنْهَا وَمَا بَطَنَ وَالْإِثْمَ وَالْبَغْيَ بِغَيْرِ الْحَقِّ وَأَنْ تُشْرِكُوا بِاللَّهِ مَا لَمْ يُنَزِّلْ بِهِ سُلْطَانًا وَأَنْ تَقُولُوا عَلَى اللَّهِ مَا لَا تَعْلَمُونَ

Say (O Muhammad): “(But) the things that my Lord has indeed forbidden are Al-Fawahish (great evil sins, every kind of unlawful sexual intercourse, etc.) whether committed openly or secretly, sins (of all kinds), unrighteous oppression, joining partners (in worship) with Allah for which He has given no authority, and saying things about Allah of which you have no knowledge.” [7:33]

Main topic, see  PDF:  Shaykh Abdul-Azeez ar-Raajihee on Secular Laws, Changing the Whole of the Deen, and the Accusation of Irjaa’ Against Ahl us-Sunnah


Prepared by the students @ al-Maktabah as-Salafiyyah Birmingham (may Allaah protect us and them from fitan)

“UK Salafis Make Takfeer of one another” (!?!) Has Zakir Naik [Ignorant- Shameless liar] repented from this Slander?!

Al-Allaamah Rabee Bin Haadi Al-Madkhali (may Allaah preserve him) stated:

How numerous are those who tell lies today against the carries of Salafiyyah and its callers! And to what extent do they (spread) rumors carried from them until they reach distant lands! They hinder men from the path of Allaah by way of them and seek crookedness therein, and to aid falsehood, spurious affairs, innovations, affairs that are destructive to the sound creed and methodology and the virtuous manners.

[Source: Al-Awaasim Mimmaa Fee Kutub Sayyid Qutb Minal-Qawaasim page: 4-5]

Now see the following Tweet by Ustaadh Amjad Rafiq (may Allaah preserve him) – regarding Zakir Naik and his blatant jahl rgarding the Aqeedah of Ahlus Sunnah wa’al Jamaa’ – May Allah save us from inventing lies to please the people…

Listen to speech of Ustaadh Abu Khadeejah here: http://ahlulbidahwalhawa.com/2011/12/21/refutation-of-zakir-naik-by-abu-khadeejah/

Al-Hajuri: More Evil Than the Haddaadiyyah and ideas of Kharijites Have Penetrated Him and His Followers

Shaykh Rabee said:

Yahya Al-Hajuri Is More Evil Than the Haddaadiyyah and the Ideas of the Kharijites Have Penetrated Him and His Followers

See Link:

http://www.alhajuri.com/articles/wudqlwq-shaykh-rabee-al-hajuri-is-worse-than-the-haddaadiyyah.cfm

Statements of Some of The Kibaarul Ulamaa

In The Name of Allaah, The Most Merciful, The Bestower of Mercy

Al-Allaamah Hammaad Al-Ansaari (rahimahullaah) stated:

“The Sahaabah never differed in Aqeedah; rather the differing (in Aqeedah) took place after them.” [1]


Al-Allaamah Saaleh Al-Luhaydaan (may Allaah preserve him) was asked about the one who says that the sahaabah differed in aqeedah; so he said: [“أستغفر الله  –  none says this except a Mubtadi Daal (i.e. an  innovator, astray one). [2]

Audio


Al-Allaamah Ahmad Bin Yahyah An-Najmi (rahimahullaah) was asked about the one who says that the Sahaabah differed in Aqeedah; so he replied: “The one who says that the sahaabah differed in Aqeedah should support his speech with evidences; otherwise he is a liar, false accuser…. [3]

The Shaikh (rahimahullaah) also said:

Has lying and false accusation been made easy for the utterer (of this statement) to such a level: Falsely accusing the Companions of the Prophet (sallal-laahu-alayhi-wasallaam)?! [4]

The Shaikh (rahimahullaah) also said:

”Indeed this speaker who says that the Sahaabah differed in Aqeedah–it is obligated on him to keep quiet and should be prevented from speaking about Aqeedah; because he is ignorant about it.” [5]

The Shaikh (rahimahullaah) also said:

As for differing in the rulings pertaining to subsidiary issues of (the religion) based on Ijtihaad, then this did occur between the Sahaabah and each of them stated what he saw to be the truth, and none amongst them found fault with anyone. Not a single one of them reproached the one who was in opposition to him; but the aim of this speaker–false accuser–is to pave the way for the differing of hizbiyyah (i.e. to find room– by way of this false claim–for the differing of the people of illegal partisanship against the sound Manhaj positions of the Salafis). And he has established against himself that he is a hizbi…. [6]


Ref 1: Source: Al-Majmoo’ah Fee Tarjimah Al-Allaamah Al-Muhaddith Hammaad Al-Ansaari 2/492: Mas’alah Number 124)

Ref 2: Clarification: The Muta-aalim (Pseudo Shaikh Asim Al-Hakeem) has not been declared an innovator; rather this is a general ruling and not specific to anyone until the evidence is established against such an individual. However, it shows the severity of Asim’s devilish insinuations and ignorance.

Refs 3, 4, 5 & 6; see Al-Fataawa Al-Jaliyyah Vol2: Page: 104–108: question number 63]

 

An Explanation of the Sayings of The Biased-Partisans [Spubs.com]

In The Name of Allaah, The Most Merciful, The Bestower of Mercy

Indeed, we did emphasise the need to visit this website [www.salafipublications.com]; because there are many reoccurring affairs of fitan, which were previously dealt with by the students at Maktabah Salafiyyah from the works of the scholars.

[الحمد لله]….there are many Maraakiz of Salafiyyah in the West—free from the falsehood of the followers of hajoori and halabi—but it is also important that we are well aware of evil plots, devilish insinuations and false accusations of those carrying the views of the Qutubis, Sorooris and Ikhwaanis.

Recently we have seen some of the ignorant liars, slanderers and allies of the innovators–such as the likes of Abu Eesa Niamatullaah—attempting to slander the Salafiyyoon in order to justify his deviated and destructive methodology.  Therefore, it is important that the young Salafi brothers and sisters are well aware of some of those affairs through which the likes of Abu Eesa and others seek to confound truth with falsehood, and in order to promote their deviated views as alternatives to the sound Manhaj positions of the Ulama of Ahlus Sunnah Wal-Jamaa-ah.  The following article is very important indeed and may Allaah grant us Tawfeeq to understand the issues….Aameen…


 

An Explanation of the Sayings of The Biased-Partisans

Muji’ah with the rulers, khawaarij with the Du’aat, Raafidah with the Islamic Groups, Qadariyyah with the Infidels

And What it contains of [Wicked] Falsehoods [And Fanciful Hallucinations]

see link:

http://www.thenoblequran.com/sps/sp.cfm?subsecID=MSC05&articleID=MSC050003&articlePages=1


 

We ask Allaah to reward and preserve the Ulamaa of Ahlus Sunnah.  We ask Allaah to preserve and grant our brothers at Maktabah Salafiyyah the Tawfeeq to carry on defending this blessed Manhajus Salafi in the West.   Aameen.

 

[1] Salafiyyah In The UK–The Plots of the False Claimants and the Lies of The ignorant Slanderer Mr Zakir Naik

In The Name of Allaah, The Most Merciful, The Bestower of Mercy


Allaah (The Most High) said:

وَلَا تَقۡفُ مَا لَيۡسَ لَكَ بِهِۦ عِلۡمٌ‌ۚ إِنَّ ٱلسَّمۡعَ وَٱلۡبَصَرَ وَٱلۡفُؤَادَ كُلُّ أُوْلَـٰٓٮِٕكَ كَانَ عَنۡهُ مَسۡـُٔولاً۬

And follow not (O man i.e., say not, or do not or witness not, etc.) that of which you have no knowledge (e.g. one’s saying: “I have seen,” while in fact he has not seen, or “I have heard,” while he has not heard). Verily! The hearing, and the sight, and the heart, of each of those you will be questioned (by Allah). [17:36]

Imaam Ibnul Jawzi (rahimahullaah) stated that from the statements of the scholars of Tafseer regarding the meaning of this ayah is that: You do not accuse anyone of something you have no knowledge of; you should not say that you have seen, whilst you haven’t seen; you should not say that you have heard, whilst you haven’t heard; and you should not give false testimony. In this ayah is also a prohibition from looking at haraam; listening to haraam and having conviction in what is impermissible. [For further details, see Zaadul Maseer]


 

This series –In’shaa’Allaah–will unveil the false accusations and blatant lies of the ignorant slanderer Mr Zakir Naik, who claims that the Salafis in the Uk make takfeer of one another.

 

 

Excerpt from main document the reader is urged to read

This document intends to provide a historical background into the Salafee da’wah1, within the context of the numerous fitnahs that have entered into it, that have in reality come from the direction of al-Ikhwaan al-Muslimoon, and whoever was poisoned by them. The reader, inshaa’allaah, will have acquired a wider picture, and a context in which to place whatever is observed today of the various problems, differences and splits within the da’wah, or amongst those who ascribe themselves to Salafiyyah and the Salafee da’wah.

 

No doubt, the last few decades have seen major global events unfolding. The first was the new wave of geo-political strategies of the Kuffaar in the Muslim lands, and parallel to that, was the great upheaval caused – in the last decade specifically and more profoundly – in the Salafee da’wah by the penetration of the Ikhwaan under the disguise and costume of ascription to the “doctrinal Salafiyyah” (aqaa’id). An ascription that was divorced and separated from the practical, manhaj-based, Salafiyyah (manaahij) to which they were actually opposed, due to the false methodologies that they had innovated or imbibed, and which they wished to enter into the Salafees. So their ascription to the doctrinal belief-based aspect of Salafiyyah was the veil by which they entered their foreign, deviated methodologies amongst the unsuspecting Salafees, hoping that no one would suspect them, merely because they held onto the Salafee aqeedah, and would often defend it 2, and this was the veil they used to enter upon the Salafees and the da’wah of Ahl us-Sunnah.

 

The merging of these collection of events and occurrences at the one and the same time (during the last decade), led many people ascribing themselves to Salafiyyah to be led to great confusion and to take on a variety of different and separate paths over time, and wander off in every direction – due to the absence of the proliferation of and grounding in the methodologies (manaahij) of the Book and the Sunnah amongst the people.

 

What is of concern in this document is to bring about clarity in the methodologies of the Salaf, because this is what will bring unity amongst those who ascribe themselves to Salafiyyah, bringing about a common perception and outlook with shared understandings and goals, and helping to bring about a walaa and baraa that is based around what it truly ought to be based around, which is the aqaa’id (beliefs), the manaahij (methodologies) and correct Salafee mawaaqif (positions). Unfortunately, there has been a tendency for people to take isolated events or occurrences (such as calamities that have taken place in the lands of the Muslims, non-Muslim aggressions, or specific issues that have taken place with respect to personalities, or people of the knowledge in the da’wah, or issues related to the da’wah), and then to build their whole perception of the da’wah and individuals connected to it, based upon these isolated incidents, issues or occurrences. This led them to become totally out of focus, and lose track of the wider picture. The perceptions created in their minds by way of these isolated affairs, or a collection of unrelated affairs, then led them to see all future issues and developments with these tainted and subjective perceptions, disabling them from seeing everything in its proper perspective. All subsequent occurrences, as they saw them, would feed into and re-inforce these initial (erroneous, subjective) perceptions. This would then also affect their speech and behaviour, making them take positions and hold loyalties or disownments, and direct their emotions of love and and hate, and choose their company and friendship, all upon false criterions and false determinations based upon subjective experiences and limited, narrow viewpoints tied down to one or a few or a collection of issues or events3. What was also a part of the cause for this was the fact that true and real clarity, concerning these tribulations and the methodologies of the Salaf had not emerged then, unlike more recent times.

 

For this reason, this document contains a historical account of the true origins and background to the many problems that have entered the da’wah of Ahl us-Sunnah in recent times – in order to allow the reader to put everything into context. It is hoped that all those who ascribed themselves to the Salafee da’wah at one time or another during the last decade will gain some insights, and will gain a thorough understanding about what has occurred in the da’wah following the Gulf War. This will allow them to appreciate, in retrospect, the clarity that has now emerged concerning the sum whole of this fitnah. It will also allow them to determine the true Scholars, those who are upon the truth, upon the Salafee aqeedah, the Salafee manhaj and those who are traversing upon the Salafee da’wah and implementing it, following the actual manhaj of these Scholars. It is also hoped that these insights allows the true sincere Salafees, who truly desire Salafiyyah, in belief, speech and action, to unite together based upon the clarity that has now emerged by way of the collective statements and clarifications of the Scholars, over the past 8 years or so, in relation to the various methodologies of al-Ikhwaan al-Muslimeen that were disguised as Salafiyyah and which have been exposed and refuted sufficiently.   PDF here: [1] false_methodologies


 

Source: http://salafipublications.com/sps/ under the title: The Effects of the Methodologies of al-Ikhwaan al-Muslimeen Upon The Path of Salafiyyah [A Historical Review and Analysis]

Mr Zakir Naik’s blatant lies and ignorance…

In The Name of Allaah, The Most Merciful, The Bestower of Mercy

Shaikhul Islaam Ibn Taymiyyah (rahimahullaah) said:

”A person must possess sound general fundamental principles (from the Qur’an and Sunnah) to which he refers the subsidiary issues of the religion, in order that he may speak with knowledge and justice. After this, he has to know how the subsidiary issues of the religion are (established from those general fundamental principles of the religion), and if not, he will remain upon lies and ignorance in the subsidiary issues and upon ignorance and oppression in the general fundamental principles, thus giving birth to great corruption.’’ [Minhaajus Sunnah: 5/83]

 

See Tweet by Ustaadh Amjad Rafiq (may Allaah preserve him)

pic.twitter.com/4ZnN8iOqLO

Listen to speech of Ustaadh Abu Khadeejah here:

http://ahlulbidahwalhawa.com/2011/12/21/refutation-of-zakir-naik-by-abu-khadeejah/