Skip to main content

[Arabic Audio] Shaikh Raslaan (hafidha-hullaah) speaks about Al-Allaamah Al-Faqeeh Zayd Ibn Haadi (rahimaullaah)

In this speech Shaikh Raslaan (hafidha-hullaah) quotes beautiful and detailed statements of Zayd (rahimahullaah) found in his explanations of Lum’atul Ittiqaad and Usool Ath-Thalaatha… etc

Audio

Al-Allaamah Rabee Bin Haadi Al-Madkhali (hafidha-hullaah) says about Shaikh Zayd (rahimahullaah):

Shaikh Rabee (hafidha-hullaah) said:


بسم الله الرّحمن الرّحيم قبل أنْ نبدأ في الدّرس

ادعوا اللهَ للشَّيخِ زيد المدخليّ رحمه اللهُ، انتقلَ إلى رحمةِ اللهِ ـ إنْ شاء الله ـ

فادعوا اللهَ له،

فقد كان جبلاً في السُّنّة، وفي الدَّعوةِ إلى اللهِ تبارك وتعالى

Supplicate to Allaah for him; Indeed he was a mountain in the Sunnah and in calling to Allaah (The Blessed and Exalted)

ونسأل اللهَ أنْ يُخلفهُ بخير. آمين،

ادعوا اللهَ جميعًا بارك اللهُ فيكم


 

http://www.sahab.net/forums/index.php?showtopic=142862

A Reminder for all the Salafi Maraakiz—Fear Allaah (The Most High)

بِسْمِ اللَّهِ الرَّحْمَٰنِ الرَّحِيمِ

Ustaadh Amjad Rafiq (may Allaah preserve him and keep him steadfast) wrote:

”The reader should also note that there are those in the West, mingling in the ranks of the Salafis, harbouring sympathy for Yahya al-Hajuri. They withheld their tongues from al-Hajuri but work intrigues to undermine their Salafi brothers and cause dissension. One should beware of this type of faction, for they are intending for the da’wah the same as what al-Hajuri brought upon the da’wah in Yemen. They wish for the Salafi Maraakiz to be undermined and to fall for whatever desires they have and pursue.” [End of quote: see link: alhajuri.com/?dbeusoq  pic.twitter.com/3B3LuBSxbI]

So if you are from those engaged in running the affairs of the Maraakiz or from those who believe that they understand the refutations of the scholars against Hajoori, then fear Allaah (The Most High).  Be very vigilant regarding your companionship.  Neither are you to entertain nor conceal any affair of falsehood from the likes of these people.  Fear Allaah and do not fear the blame of the blamers.  Seek the Aid and Assistance of Allaah in transmitting the refutations of the scholars against the Hajaawira and may Allaah bless you.

 

 

 

Statements of Some of The Kibaarul Ulamaa

In The Name of Allaah, The Most Merciful, The Bestower of Mercy

Al-Allaamah Hammaad Al-Ansaari (rahimahullaah) stated:

“The Sahaabah never differed in Aqeedah; rather the differing (in Aqeedah) took place after them.” [1]


Al-Allaamah Saaleh Al-Luhaydaan (may Allaah preserve him) was asked about the one who says that the sahaabah differed in aqeedah; so he said: [“أستغفر الله  –  none says this except a Mubtadi Daal (i.e. an  innovator, astray one). [2]

Audio


Al-Allaamah Ahmad Bin Yahyah An-Najmi (rahimahullaah) was asked about the one who says that the Sahaabah differed in Aqeedah; so he replied: “The one who says that the sahaabah differed in Aqeedah should support his speech with evidences; otherwise he is a liar, false accuser…. [3]

The Shaikh (rahimahullaah) also said:

Has lying and false accusation been made easy for the utterer (of this statement) to such a level: Falsely accusing the Companions of the Prophet (sallal-laahu-alayhi-wasallaam)?! [4]

The Shaikh (rahimahullaah) also said:

”Indeed this speaker who says that the Sahaabah differed in Aqeedah–it is obligated on him to keep quiet and should be prevented from speaking about Aqeedah; because he is ignorant about it.” [5]

The Shaikh (rahimahullaah) also said:

As for differing in the rulings pertaining to subsidiary issues of (the religion) based on Ijtihaad, then this did occur between the Sahaabah and each of them stated what he saw to be the truth, and none amongst them found fault with anyone. Not a single one of them reproached the one who was in opposition to him; but the aim of this speaker–false accuser–is to pave the way for the differing of hizbiyyah (i.e. to find room– by way of this false claim–for the differing of the people of illegal partisanship against the sound Manhaj positions of the Salafis). And he has established against himself that he is a hizbi…. [6]


Ref 1: Source: Al-Majmoo’ah Fee Tarjimah Al-Allaamah Al-Muhaddith Hammaad Al-Ansaari 2/492: Mas’alah Number 124)

Ref 2: Clarification: The Muta-aalim (Pseudo Shaikh Asim Al-Hakeem) has not been declared an innovator; rather this is a general ruling and not specific to anyone until the evidence is established against such an individual. However, it shows the severity of Asim’s devilish insinuations and ignorance.

Refs 3, 4, 5 & 6; see Al-Fataawa Al-Jaliyyah Vol2: Page: 104–108: question number 63]

 

An Explanation of the Sayings of The Biased-Partisans [Spubs.com]

In The Name of Allaah, The Most Merciful, The Bestower of Mercy

Indeed, we did emphasise the need to visit this website [www.salafipublications.com]; because there are many reoccurring affairs of fitan, which were previously dealt with by the students at Maktabah Salafiyyah from the works of the scholars.

[الحمد لله]….there are many Maraakiz of Salafiyyah in the West—free from the falsehood of the followers of hajoori and halabi—but it is also important that we are well aware of evil plots, devilish insinuations and false accusations of those carrying the views of the Qutubis, Sorooris and Ikhwaanis.

Recently we have seen some of the ignorant liars, slanderers and allies of the innovators–such as the likes of Abu Eesa Niamatullaah—attempting to slander the Salafiyyoon in order to justify his deviated and destructive methodology.  Therefore, it is important that the young Salafi brothers and sisters are well aware of some of those affairs through which the likes of Abu Eesa and others seek to confound truth with falsehood, and in order to promote their deviated views as alternatives to the sound Manhaj positions of the Ulama of Ahlus Sunnah Wal-Jamaa-ah.  The following article is very important indeed and may Allaah grant us Tawfeeq to understand the issues….Aameen…


 

An Explanation of the Sayings of The Biased-Partisans

Muji’ah with the rulers, khawaarij with the Du’aat, Raafidah with the Islamic Groups, Qadariyyah with the Infidels

And What it contains of [Wicked] Falsehoods [And Fanciful Hallucinations]

see link:

http://www.thenoblequran.com/sps/sp.cfm?subsecID=MSC05&articleID=MSC050003&articlePages=1


 

We ask Allaah to reward and preserve the Ulamaa of Ahlus Sunnah.  We ask Allaah to preserve and grant our brothers at Maktabah Salafiyyah the Tawfeeq to carry on defending this blessed Manhajus Salafi in the West.   Aameen.

 

Sayyid Qutb is no doubt a reviver; rather a reviver of the Major innovations

Allaamah Rabee Bin Haadi Al-Madkhalee (may Allaah preserve him) stated:

Indeed the fitna of this man and those with him is the fitna of this era. It is the severest fitna in this era because it confounds (truth with falsehood through the true) Salafi methodology.  Beware of them O brothers! They have affairs of deception, adulteration, plotting and trickery, which are not known except to Allaah. They preoccupy themselves mostly with (setting up) traps for the Salafi youth.  They neither give concern to inviting the Christians and Jews nor the rawaafid (shiites) and the soofees to the true methodology. And why is this (the case)? Because the one who is deprived of (something) cannot give it (to others).

So (what) they mostly preoccupy themselves with is to corrupt the righteous people and those whom Allaah has guided to the way of the Lord of the Worlds.  Most of (what) they preoccupy themselves with at present in the world is to set traps for the Salafi youth and they wear a counterfeit Salafi gown so that they are able to tear it (i.e. the true guidance) apart and distance it from this (true) methodology.

They utilize various ways to defame the scholars of this (true) methodology and this methodology itself, and Allaah’s Protection is sought! They brandish the methodology of Sayyid Qutb even though within it there is insult against the prophets; even though within it there is Takfeer against some of the Sahaabah and even though within it there is Takfeer against the ummah….; creeds of misguidance—the creed of hulool, wahdatul wujood, nullification of Allaah’s Attributes and the (innovated speech that the) Qur’aan is created.  All these affairs (of misguidance committed by Sayyid Qutb)- in their view-does not negate revival, for according to them he is a Mujaddid (reviver)!!

We say: Yes, he is a Mujaddid, but a Mujaddid of every major bidah, (such as) the school of thought of the khawaarij, the rawaafid, the murjia, the jabariyyah and the soofiyyah. He revived all of them, and between us (Salafis) and them (i.e. the followers of Sayyid Qutb) are the books of Sayyid Qutb and his writings (as a witness).

According to them this is the Mujaddid and an Imaam for whose sake they (establish) alliances (with those who agree with them) and enmity (towards those who oppose them). So what calamity upon Islaam can be more severe than this calamity?


[Source: الذريعة إلى بيان مقاصد كتاب الشريعة للإمام المحدث أبي بكر محمد بن الحسين الآجري   pages: 112-113; Vol 1, abridged]

 

[1] Salafiyyah In The UK–The Plots of the False Claimants and the Lies of The ignorant Slanderer Mr Zakir Naik

In The Name of Allaah, The Most Merciful, The Bestower of Mercy


Allaah (The Most High) said:

وَلَا تَقۡفُ مَا لَيۡسَ لَكَ بِهِۦ عِلۡمٌ‌ۚ إِنَّ ٱلسَّمۡعَ وَٱلۡبَصَرَ وَٱلۡفُؤَادَ كُلُّ أُوْلَـٰٓٮِٕكَ كَانَ عَنۡهُ مَسۡـُٔولاً۬

And follow not (O man i.e., say not, or do not or witness not, etc.) that of which you have no knowledge (e.g. one’s saying: “I have seen,” while in fact he has not seen, or “I have heard,” while he has not heard). Verily! The hearing, and the sight, and the heart, of each of those you will be questioned (by Allah). [17:36]

Imaam Ibnul Jawzi (rahimahullaah) stated that from the statements of the scholars of Tafseer regarding the meaning of this ayah is that: You do not accuse anyone of something you have no knowledge of; you should not say that you have seen, whilst you haven’t seen; you should not say that you have heard, whilst you haven’t heard; and you should not give false testimony. In this ayah is also a prohibition from looking at haraam; listening to haraam and having conviction in what is impermissible. [For further details, see Zaadul Maseer]


 

This series –In’shaa’Allaah–will unveil the false accusations and blatant lies of the ignorant slanderer Mr Zakir Naik, who claims that the Salafis in the Uk make takfeer of one another.

 

 

Excerpt from main document the reader is urged to read

This document intends to provide a historical background into the Salafee da’wah1, within the context of the numerous fitnahs that have entered into it, that have in reality come from the direction of al-Ikhwaan al-Muslimoon, and whoever was poisoned by them. The reader, inshaa’allaah, will have acquired a wider picture, and a context in which to place whatever is observed today of the various problems, differences and splits within the da’wah, or amongst those who ascribe themselves to Salafiyyah and the Salafee da’wah.

 

No doubt, the last few decades have seen major global events unfolding. The first was the new wave of geo-political strategies of the Kuffaar in the Muslim lands, and parallel to that, was the great upheaval caused – in the last decade specifically and more profoundly – in the Salafee da’wah by the penetration of the Ikhwaan under the disguise and costume of ascription to the “doctrinal Salafiyyah” (aqaa’id). An ascription that was divorced and separated from the practical, manhaj-based, Salafiyyah (manaahij) to which they were actually opposed, due to the false methodologies that they had innovated or imbibed, and which they wished to enter into the Salafees. So their ascription to the doctrinal belief-based aspect of Salafiyyah was the veil by which they entered their foreign, deviated methodologies amongst the unsuspecting Salafees, hoping that no one would suspect them, merely because they held onto the Salafee aqeedah, and would often defend it 2, and this was the veil they used to enter upon the Salafees and the da’wah of Ahl us-Sunnah.

 

The merging of these collection of events and occurrences at the one and the same time (during the last decade), led many people ascribing themselves to Salafiyyah to be led to great confusion and to take on a variety of different and separate paths over time, and wander off in every direction – due to the absence of the proliferation of and grounding in the methodologies (manaahij) of the Book and the Sunnah amongst the people.

 

What is of concern in this document is to bring about clarity in the methodologies of the Salaf, because this is what will bring unity amongst those who ascribe themselves to Salafiyyah, bringing about a common perception and outlook with shared understandings and goals, and helping to bring about a walaa and baraa that is based around what it truly ought to be based around, which is the aqaa’id (beliefs), the manaahij (methodologies) and correct Salafee mawaaqif (positions). Unfortunately, there has been a tendency for people to take isolated events or occurrences (such as calamities that have taken place in the lands of the Muslims, non-Muslim aggressions, or specific issues that have taken place with respect to personalities, or people of the knowledge in the da’wah, or issues related to the da’wah), and then to build their whole perception of the da’wah and individuals connected to it, based upon these isolated incidents, issues or occurrences. This led them to become totally out of focus, and lose track of the wider picture. The perceptions created in their minds by way of these isolated affairs, or a collection of unrelated affairs, then led them to see all future issues and developments with these tainted and subjective perceptions, disabling them from seeing everything in its proper perspective. All subsequent occurrences, as they saw them, would feed into and re-inforce these initial (erroneous, subjective) perceptions. This would then also affect their speech and behaviour, making them take positions and hold loyalties or disownments, and direct their emotions of love and and hate, and choose their company and friendship, all upon false criterions and false determinations based upon subjective experiences and limited, narrow viewpoints tied down to one or a few or a collection of issues or events3. What was also a part of the cause for this was the fact that true and real clarity, concerning these tribulations and the methodologies of the Salaf had not emerged then, unlike more recent times.

 

For this reason, this document contains a historical account of the true origins and background to the many problems that have entered the da’wah of Ahl us-Sunnah in recent times – in order to allow the reader to put everything into context. It is hoped that all those who ascribed themselves to the Salafee da’wah at one time or another during the last decade will gain some insights, and will gain a thorough understanding about what has occurred in the da’wah following the Gulf War. This will allow them to appreciate, in retrospect, the clarity that has now emerged concerning the sum whole of this fitnah. It will also allow them to determine the true Scholars, those who are upon the truth, upon the Salafee aqeedah, the Salafee manhaj and those who are traversing upon the Salafee da’wah and implementing it, following the actual manhaj of these Scholars. It is also hoped that these insights allows the true sincere Salafees, who truly desire Salafiyyah, in belief, speech and action, to unite together based upon the clarity that has now emerged by way of the collective statements and clarifications of the Scholars, over the past 8 years or so, in relation to the various methodologies of al-Ikhwaan al-Muslimeen that were disguised as Salafiyyah and which have been exposed and refuted sufficiently.   PDF here: [1] false_methodologies


 

Source: http://salafipublications.com/sps/ under the title: The Effects of the Methodologies of al-Ikhwaan al-Muslimeen Upon The Path of Salafiyyah [A Historical Review and Analysis]