[1] Reminder to the Hizbiyyoon-Deluded Abu Bilal Hanif and his hizbiyyoon friends: Shaikh Rabee Has Still Not Changed His View about the Obstinate Hizbiyyoon at Masjid Sunnah
See Link:
http://safeshare.tv/w/tLftrTwJNQ
A Person suddenly gets preoccupied with something else after sitting down to read the Qur’aan: Is anything wrong with this?
Question:
The questioner asks: If a person holds the Mushaf to read but then he gets preoccupied with another affair; so he returns after a while to (continue) reading. Is there anything (wrong) with that?
Answer:
There is nothing (wrong) with that because this (deed) is a supererogatory act of worship. The performer of a supererogatory act of worship is rewarded, but he (or she) is not sinful if he (or she) abandons it. Hopefully, the one who asked this question will be rewarded (in-shaa-Allaah) because he was determined to carry out an act of worship with this intention (i.e. to recite the Qur’aan). Abu Hurairah (radiyallaahu-anhu) reported that the Messenger of Allaah (sallal-laahu-alayhi-wasallam) said:
Whoever desires to do a good deed then does not do it [i.e. he (or she) is genuinely prevent from doing so) , Allah will write it down as one complete good deed. If he thinks of doing a good deed and then does it, Allah [may He be glorified and exalted] will write it down between ten and seven hundred fold, or many more. If he thinks of doing a bad deed then he does not do it, Allah will write it down as one complete good deed, and if he thinks of it then does it, Allah will write it down as one bad deed.[Saheeh Muslim 131]
[Source: Fadaa’il Al A’maal’ page 10 by Shaikh Muhammad Bin Abdillaah As-Subayyil (rahimahullaah)]
An Advise to Brother Muhammad Tim Humble
In The Name of Allah, The Most Merciful, The Bestower of Mercy.
Tameem Ad-Daari, may Allah be pleased with him, reported that Allah’s Messenger, peace and blessings of Allah be upon him, said: “Indeed, the religion is Naseehah, the religion is Naseehah, the religion is Naseehah; they said: ‘’To who O Messenger of Allah? He said: ‘’To Allah, His Messenger, to the leaders of the Muslims and their common people. [Reported by Muslim]
Al-Allamah Salih Al-Fawzan, may Allah preserve him, said:
The meaning of ‘Naseehah’ is Al-Khulus (purity). It is is said that something is ‘Naasih,’ meaning, it is free from deceit. It is said, ‘Asalun Nasihun’ (Pure Honey) and ‘Labanun Nasihun’ (Pure Milk), meaning, free from deceit and bad mixtures. This how the religion of Islam is, because it is free from every falsehood, deception, cheating, and treachery. It is a pure and unadulterated religion. Similarly, a Muslim’s outward (actions) aligns with their inner (beliefs), reflecting purity and safe from evil manners, treachery, betrayal and other than that. As for the one who cheats, deceives and plots, or his whose outward (actions) contradict their inner (intentions), this trait is not from the religion. The Prophet, peace and blessings of Allah be upon him, encapsulated the religion with Naseehah—purity and sincerity—implying that anything contrary cannot be part of it. [1]
Indeed, it is imperative, brother Muhammad, that we no longer remain silent regarding your situation; we must offer you advice concerning your associations. Furthermore, it is important for you to recognize that Abu Suhaib’s mentor, Ali Al-Halabi Al-Murji al-Mubtadi, is an advocate for Abul Hassan Al-Maribi Al-Ikhwaani Al-Mubtadi. Therefore, one must question why your associate, Abu Ibrahim, expresses admiration for Abu Suhaib, who is fully aware of Ali Al-Halabi’s innovations and his objectionable support for Al-Maribi.
Be with the upright Salafi students in the various centers of Salafiyyah located in the West. These individuals maintain a clear distance from the proponents of innovation and misguidance, including figures such as Abul Hasan Al-Maribi Al-Ikhwaani, Ali Al-Halabi Al-Murji, Muhammad al-Maghraawi At-Takfeeri, Yahyah Al-Hajoori Al-Haddaadi, Yasir Qadhi Al-Ikhwaani, among others.
It is imperative, dear brother Muhammad, that we address your situation without further delay and offer you advice regarding your associations. Firstly, we have observed your collaboration with the Administrator of Greenlane Masjid, whose affiliation with hizbiyyah is well-established. This organisation is known for providing support to proponents of Bidah and has ties with the notorious organization Ihya Turaath. Furthermore, they are connected to Yasir Qadhi, whose deviations are well known to to Salafi scholars in Saudi Arabia and to Salafis in the West. Brother Muhammad (may Allah safeguard you), do you truly wish to align yourself with such individuals, despite their evident deviations? It is crucial to reflect on this matter, as companionship holds significant weight in our faith. The Messenger, peace and blessings of Allah be upon him, stated:
“A person is upon the religion of his companion; therefore, each of you should consider whom he chooses to befriend”.
Secondly, brother Muhammad, your associate Abu Ibraheem Husnayn endorses Abu Suhaib Bassam, a devoted follower and student of the Murji Mubtadi Ali Al-Halabi. Refer to link: http://salaficentre.com/2015/07/o-abu-ibraheem-hussayn-do-you-recommend-abu-suhaib-bassaam-a-student-and-admirer-of-ali-al-halabi-al-murji-al-mubtadi-and-consider-him-amongst-those-upon-the-balanced-path/
It is important to recognise, Brother Muhammad, that the Salafiyyoon have established a notable presence in the UK. Nevertheless, there exist numerous individuals who falsely claim affiliation, as well as those who do not prioritise their associations. Your associate, Abu Ibraheem, has made a significant mistake by endorsing a student of the obstinate Mubtadi Ali Al-Halabi. Refer to link: http://salaficentre.com/2013/02/the-false-principles-of-ali-hasan-al-halabi-the-innovator/
It is important to note that Abu Suhaib’s teacher, Ali Al-Halabi Al-Murji al-Mubtadi, is known for his defense of Abul Hassan Al-Maribi Al-Ikhwaani Al-Mubtadi. Therefore, one must question why your associate, Abu Ibraheem, expresses admiration for Abu Suhaib, who is fully cognizant of Ali Al-Halabi’s controversial positions and his questionable support for Al-Maribi. Refer to link: http://salaficentre.com/2014/04/verdicts-of-the-scholars-against-abul-hasan-al-maribi-al-mubtadi-an-ally-of-masjid-as-sunnah/
It is obligatory, brother Muhammad, to adopt the correct Salafi perspective regarding bidah and Hizbiyyah, which compels us to address the mistakes of your associate Abu Ibraheem openly. Imam As-Sa’di, may Allah have mercy upon him, said: “A man is upon the religion of his companion; therefore, one should carefully consider whom they choose as a close friend. Regardless of the accolades and respect one may receive from others, individuals are ultimately assessed by the company they keep. Thus, it is important for a person to take pride in associating with the most virtuous individuals while remaining cautious of those who are evil. A righteous companion resembles a seller of musk; he either shares some with you or leaves you with a pleasant fragrance. Conversely, an evil companion is akin to a blacksmith; he either scorches you or leaves you with an unpleasant odor. And Allaah knows best”. [2]
We have no other choice but to advise both you and Abu Ibraheem to distance yourselves from individuals associated with the leaders of Tahazzub and bidah, including those like Abu Subaib who supports the Mubtadi Ali al-Halabi. We beseech Allah (The Most High) to bestow upon both you and Abu Ibraheem the guidance necessary to understand the clear and unequivocal evidence pertaining to this mighty Manhajus Salaf, and to protect you from the doubts propagated by the hizbiyyoon and the proponents of Tamyi. Aameen.
[1] An Excerpt from Minhatur-Rabbaaniyyah Fee Sharhi Ar-ba’een An-Nawawiyyah: page: 112]
[2] An Excerpt from Noorul Basaa-ir Wal-Albaab Fee Ahkaamil Ibaadaat Wal-Mu-aamalaat Wal-Huqooq Wal-Aadaab: page: 66]
[1] O Abu Mussab Wajdi Akkari! This is Shaikh Rabee and the Scholars Praise of him
In The Name of Allaah, The Most Merciful, The Bestower of Mercy
—————————————————————————————————————–
This is a refutation of the doubt-mongers such as Abdullah al-Farsee, Abu Usaamah Khaleefah, Abu Mussab Wajdi Akkari and many others who use numerous methods varying in their sophistication to either make explicit accusations or to mere insinuations against Shaykh Rabee in particular and those scholars more generally who have played an instrumental role in exposing the many fake claimants to Salafiyyah who have emerged over the last two decades in order to further the cause of al-Ikhwan al-Muslimeen within Salafi audiences.
—————————————————————————————————————–
Shaykh Rabee’ bin Haadee al-Madkhalee played an instrumental role in exposing the Heretical Ash’aris and Mu’tazilis who brought the poison of fikr into this Ummah, combining it with the methodologies of organizational secrecy such as those of Jamal al-Din al-Afghani al-Baatinee. Just as the Shaykh has an instrumental role in refuting the Raafidah, the Sufees, the Khawaarij, the Modernists and other than them from the variuos opposers to the Book and the Sunnah. He was supported by the other Major Scholars in all the major issues of aqidah and manhaj with respect to which he refuted those heretical innovators, their institutions, parties and organizations.
Those scholars include Imaam al-Albaani, Imaam Ibn Baz, Imaam Ibn Uthaymeen, Imaam Muqbil bin Haadee, Shaykh Saalih al-Fawzaan, Shaykh Ahmad al-Najmee, Shaykh Saalih al-Luhaydaan and many others. There are people present today whose hearts are filled with hatred and resentment because their symbolic figureheads were spoken of or because their organizations and institutions which harbour evil partisanship and have oppositions to the Salafi aqidah and methodology were spoken of. And thus every faction has a reason for hatred of this Shaykh because he refuted the Jahmite Ash’aris of Egypt, the Sufees, the Khawarij and Takfiris, the Modernists and Liberalists, the Ikhwanis, the Tablighis and the enemies of the da’wah of Tawhid in general.
These people try to spread doubts and misconceptions not unlike the doubts and misconceptions spread by the Jahmiyyah against Shaykh al-Islam Ibn Taymiyyah (rahimahullaah) – like for like (and that is the subject of an entire book). In this article we present another item of evidence indicating that Shaykh Rabee’ holds an honourable and praiseworthy position with other Scholars, in addition to the multitudes of other evidences on this website.
This is a refutation of the doubt-mongers such as Abdullah al-Farsee, Abu Usaamah Khaleefah, Abu Mussab Wajdi Akkari and many others who use numerous methods varying in their sophistication to either make explicit accusations or to mere insinuations against Shaykh Rabee in particular and those scholars more generally who have played an instrumental role in exposing the many fake claimants to Salafiyyah who have emerged over the last two decades in order to further the cause of al-Ikhwan al-Muslimeen within Salafi audiences. See article here: http://www.themadkhalis.com/md/articles/zdgbo-shaykh-saalih-al-fawzaans-support-and-praise-of-shaykh-rabees-refutation-of-hasan-al-maalikee.cfm
The Scholars praise of Shaikh Rabee
A Reminder for Abu Mussab, Abdullah Al-Farsee, Abu Usama and others. See link:
http://salafitalk.net/st/viewmessages.cfm?Forum=6&Topic=5527
———————————————–
To be continued…In-Shaa-Allaah
Abu Ibraheem (Husnayn) Recommends The Student of a Murji Mubtadi
In The Name of Allaah, The Most Merciful, The Bestower of Mercy
Imaam Barbahaaree (rahimahullaah) said: ‘He who loves the deeds of a people, good or bad, is just like the one who commits them'[1]
Shaikh Saaleh Al-Fawzaan (hafidha-hullaah) commented saying:
He who loves the deeds of a people is just like one who commits them; so if those (deeds) are good he gets a reward similar to theirs, and if those (deeds) are bad he bears the burden and sin similar to theirs. We seek Allaah’s refuge from that!
And due to this, it has been reported concerning the one who wishes to be like the scholar who teaches the people good, that he will get a reward similar to that of (that Scholar). And the one who wishes to be like the rich person who spends his wealth in the path of Allah, (then) he will receive a reward similar to that of (that rich person) in accordance to his intention.
Likewise, the opposite of this is (with regards) to the one who wishes to be like the criminal and the people of sin, (and) wishes to be their partners in sin or give support to their views and hold it to be true, (then) he is like them even if he did not commit an act similar to theirs, (but) solely (due to the fact that) he held their views to be correct and took their side.[end of quote][2]
Abu Ibraheem (Husnayn) recommends Abu Suhaib Bassam- a student and staunch supporter of the Murji Mubtadi, Ali Al-Halabi. When this Abu Suhaib entered the city of Manchester, he proceeded for Dawah with the followers of Al-Halabi Al-Murji Al-Mubtadi, Al-Maghraawi At-Takfeeri Al-Mubtadi and and Al-Maribi Al-Ikhwaani al-Mubtadi at Masjid As-Sunnah [Cheethamhill].
Abu Suhaib is well aware of the detail refutations of the Scholars against Halabi and his innovations, however he takes pride in defending Al-Halabi and openly keeping the company Al-Halabi’s staunch followers. Abu Suhaib is afflicted with a corrupt Walaa Wal Baraa in this affair of Al-Halabi, even though he portray himself as one who fights all bidah. In one of his lectures he stated that ”Every Bidah is Misguidance”; but what prevents him from openly refuting the innovations of Ali Al-Halabi Al-Murji al-Mubtadi?!
Also in that same lecture, Abu Suhaib quoted the statement of Ibn Mas’ood (radiyallaahu-anhu) as follows: ”Follow and do not innovate, and hold unto the old affair for you have been sufficed.” He (Abu Suhaib) even questioned the proponents of Bidah Hasanah, asking them whether they are stupid or stubborn for holding onto this erroneous view! However, Abu Suhaib refrains from openly denouncing Al-Halabi and his innovations, even though the innovations of Ali Al-Halabi are also from the affairs of misguidance. Imaam Sufyaan Ath-Thawri (rahimahullaah) stated:
“If you loved a man for Allaah and then he innovated in Islaam and you didn’t hate him for it, you never truly loved him for Allaah.” (http://maktabah-alfawaaid.blogspot.co.uk/2013/03/ath-thawree-if-you-loved-man-for-allaah.html)
So we say to Abu Ibraheem Husnayn: Do you promote the staunch supporters of Mubtadi’ah and consider them to be upon the balanced path?! How can the staunch followers of Mubtadi’ah be considered as such, rather the people upon the balanced path are those who abandon the obstinate figureheads of bidah and their staunch followers. They reject the shubuhaat of the figureheads of bidah and their staunch followers at Masjid As-Sunnah (Manchester), Masjid Al-Ghurabaa (Luton), Masjid Ibn Taymiyyah (Brixton), Masjid Al-Furqan (Manchester) and other people of hizbiyyah.
Reminder To Abu Ibraaheem About What The Balnaced Path Is
Shaikh Muhammad Bin Saalim Baazmool (may Allaah preserve him) stated:
It is widely known about some of the people that Al [ٱلۡوُسۡطَ] is only that which occupies the middle position between two things, and they do not call to attention the other meaning of this word, as mentioned in the Magnificent Qur’aan and the Prophetic Sunnah. [ٱلۡوُسۡطَ ] in the Islamic legislation is that which is ‘Superior.’ [Allaah (The Most High)] said: said:
حَـٰفِظُواْ عَلَى ٱلصَّلَوَٲتِ وَٱلصَّلَوٰةِ ٱلۡوُسۡطَىٰ
Guard strictly (five obligatory) As-Salawaat (the prayers) especially the Salatul Wustaa (the Asr prayer) [2:238] [ٱلۡوُسۡطَىٰ]; meaning: the best, most excellent etc.
And [Allaah (The Most High)] said:
مِنۡ أَوۡسَطِ مَا تُطۡعِمُونَ أَهۡلِيكُمۡ
[مِنۡ أَوۡسَطِ ] [On the scale] of the average of that which you feed your own families” [5:89] That is: The best and most just.
And [Allaah (The Most High)] said:
وَكَذَٲلِكَ جَعَلۡنَـٰكُمۡ أُمَّةً۬ وَسَطً۬ا
Thus We have made you [أُمَّةً۬ وَسَطً۬ا] [2:143]
That is: the best and most upright.
The intent behind this is to understand that [الوسطية] in the religious context is that which is ‘best’ and the ‘Justice in the Religion’—(and it is) to follow that which Allaah (The Mighty)and Magestic) has commanded and keep away from that which He has forbidden. As for the explanation of [الوسطية] in the religious context with a meaning other than this meaning, it is (founded upon something) ready to crumble. It is a mirage which a thirsty one considers water (i.e. an illusion). [3]
Question Abu Ibraheem (Husnayn): Can it be said that a Murji Mubtadi Ali Al-Halabi and his staunch followers are upon the middle path? Rather the scholars have established with clear proofs that Ali al-Halabi is a Murji and an extreme Mumayyi. Ali Al-Halabi innovated principles in order to accommodate innovators such as Al-Maghraawi and Al-Maribi into the ranks of Ahlus Sunnah. So where is the balance in Ali Al-Halabi’s Manhaj and why do you associate with his staunch supporter Abu Suhaib Bassam? Be warned against giving recommendations based on ignorance or desires! Indeed, either you are confused about Abu Suhaib’s corrupt alliance or you are like him. Ponder upon this Tazkiyah from Ali Al-Halabi Al-Murji al-Mubtadi to Abu Suhaib Bassam:
Praise be to Allah, and the benediction and salutation on the Messenger of Allah on his progeny and his companions and those who follow him After that: Verily our brother in the cause of Allah, Abu Sohaib Bassam Abul Haj is from among our brothers from the salafiyyun known with us for the propagation of faith to Allah’s book and the Sunnah upon the manhaj of the salaf, refuting the deviated people of innovation. May Allah grant us the right aptitude and every virtue returns to Him.[End of Quote—original Tazkiyah in Arabic available on the net]
In the above Tazkiyah Ali al-Halabi says that Abu Suhaib refutes the people of deviation! So why has Abu Suhaib refrained from refuting the innovations of Ali Al-Halabi after the scholars have clearly established that Ali Al-Halabi has innovated. Imaam Sufyaan Ath-Thawri (rahimahullaah) stated: “If you loved a man for Allaah and then he innovated in Islaam and you didn’t hate him for it, you never truly loved him for Allaah.” (http://maktabah-alfawaaid.blogspot.co.uk/2013/03/ath-thawree-if-you-loved-man-for-allaah.html)
Abu Ibraaheem: Akhi refrain from speaking without proof, for indeed it is a great sin. Allaah (The Most High) said:
وَلَا تَقْفُ مَا لَيْسَ لَكَ بِهِ عِلْمٌ ۚ إِنَّ السَّمْعَ وَالْبَصَرَ وَالْفُؤَادَ كُلُّ أُولَٰئِكَ كَانَ عَنْهُ مَسْئُولًا
And follow not (O man i.e., say not, or do not or witness not, etc.) that of which you have no knowledge (e.g. one’s saying: “I have seen,” while in fact he has not seen, or “I have heard,” while he has not heard). Verily! The hearing, and the sight, and the heart, of each of those you will be questioned (by Allah). [17:36]
And be remnded once again what Imaam Al-Barbahaari’s (rahimahullaah) stated: He who loves the deeds of a people is just like one who commits them; so if those (deeds) are good he gets a reward similar to theirs, and if those (deeds) are bad he bears the burden and sin similar to theirs. We seek Allaah’s refuge from that!
We ask Allaah to distance you from the company of those who defend and shelter Mubtadi’ah and grant you tawfeeq to find the balanced path and its people. Aameen.
The False Principles of Ali Hasan Al-Halabi (The Innovator)
http://salaficentre.com/2013/02/the-false-principles-of-ali-hasan-al-halabi-the-innovator/
—————————————————————————————————-
[1][Source: Translated by Aboo Talhah Daawood Burbank (hafidha-hullaah), Explanation of the Creed]
[2][Source: (It-haaful Qaaree Bitta’liqaat Alaa Sharhis Sunnah Lil Imaam Barbahaaree; Vol: 2, page: 113-114)]
[3] Source: Al Haqeeqatus Shar-iyyah Fee Tafseeril Qur’aanil Adheem Was-Sunnatin Nabawiyyati page: 186]
[3] Using the office phone and taking a rest at work without permission
Question:
What is the ruling with regards to taking out time at work whether that is little or a lot, and also the ruling with regards to using the work telephone (for personal use)?
Answer:
You are entrusted with the work you do and Allaah (Glorified Be He and free is He from all imperfections) stated:
يَا أَيُّهَا الَّذِينَ آمَنُوا لَا تَخُونُوا اللَّهَ وَالرَّسُولَ وَتَخُونُوا أَمَانَاتِكُمْ وَأَنتُمْ تَعْلَمُونَ
O you who believe! Betray not Allah and His Messenger, nor betray knowingly your Amanat (things entrusted to you, and all the duties which Allah has ordained for you). [8:27]
It is betrayal to take from that which you are entrusted (without permission), even if your boss excuses you. That is because maybe he is not the one in charge of this (i.e. he is not the one with the authority to excuse you). But if he is the one in charge and gives you permission (to take time out), there is no harm in taking it.
As for the work telephone or other things, it is better to refrain from using them out fear of falling into some unlawful. However, if (using the office phone for personal use) is something known amongst everyone in the office (i.e. known to both employer and employees) and no one says anything about it (i.e. objects), there is no harm using it InshaaAllaah.
——————————————————————————————–
[Source: Fadaa’il al Amaal’ pages 7-8, by Shaikh Muhammad Bin Abdullaah As-Subayyil (rahimahullaah)]
[2] Working with a person whose wealth is Haraam and eating his food: Is this permissible?
Question:
What is the ruling on the following: Working with a person whose provision is Haraam and eating his food during occasions?
Answer:
If it is ascertained that all his wealth is haraam, it is not permissible to eat (his food). But if some haraam enters his wealth and there is also some halaal in it, there is no harm eating (his food) because you do not know whether the food is from the halaal or haraam aspect of his wealth. The basis of this affair is that it is allowed to eat InshaaAllaah because the Prophet (sallal-laahu-alayhi-wasallam) ate from the food of the Yahood.
—————————————————————————————-
[Source: Fadaa’il al Amaal’ page: 7; by Shaikh Muhammad Bin Abdillaah As-Subayyil (rahimahullaah)]
Shaikh Fawzaan says: This is what they want apparently [i.e. differing and excusing one another in Issues of Aqeedah] and this is not permissible!
Question:
This questioner says: Assalaamu akaykum wa rahmatullaahi wa barakaatuhu, some callers put forward a principle, they say that indeed it (brings about) unity: “We unite upon that which we agree and pardon each other in that which we disagree in.”
Answer:
If this agreement is (already) in Aqeedah, then yes (we can excuse each other in other issues besides Aqeedah) as differing may occur in the subsidiary issues. The Mujtahid’s (ijtihaad) is taken when he’s correct and (the ijtihad) is abandoned if he opposes what is correct. So if there is agreement on the Aqeedah and the differing is only in Fiqh and subsidiary issues then (this affair is looked at from another) an angle. [1]
However if this differing is in Aqeedah, then upon what can we agree?! We cannot agree on anything. This is what they want apparently (i.e. excuse one another in Aqeedah issues) and this is not permissible. [2]
————————————————————————————————————–
[2] http://www.alfawzan.af.org.sa/node/14191
[Reminder: Deviant Murad Al-Jazaa’iri Curses Those Who Reject a Haddaadi Mubtadi and Claims that Shaikh Rabee is Blindly Followed!]
http://salaficentre.com/2013/10/partners-in-false-and-excessive-speech-yahyah-al-haddaadi-and-mourad-al-jazaairi/
Al-Allaamah Saaleh Al-Fawzaan and Al-Allaamah Muqbil Bin Haadi Spoke about Kitaab At-Tawheed; So Do Not Give Any Consideration to the Opinions of the Entertainers, Comedians and the People of Bidah Who Wish to Devalue the Status of Kitaab At-Tawheed
In The Name of Allaah, The Most Merciful, The Bestower of Mercy
Kitaab At-Tawheed Written by Imaam Muhammad Bin Abdul Wahhaab (rahimahullaah)
Al-Allaamah Saaleh Al-Fawzaan (may Allaah preserve him) said about Kitaab at-Tawheed:
This is from the most precious books that have been written in the subject matter of Tawheed because it is based on the Book (of Allaah) and the Sunnah of the Messenger (sallal-laahu-alayhi-wasallam). [1]
Al-Allaamah Muqbil Bin Haadi (rahimahullaah) said: From the upright books a Muslim cannot do without is Fat-hul Majeed Sharh Kitaab At-Tawheed. [2]
——————————————————————————–
[1] Source: I’aanah Al-Mustafeed Sharh Kitaab At-Tawheed 1/18]
[2] Source: Al-Muqtarah Fee Ajwibah Ba’di As’ilah Al-Mustalah’ page 138]