Skip to main content

[22] Notification to Ahlul Bidah and The Mumayyi’ah: These Clarifications Are Coming Back!

Written by Abdullah Jallow on . Posted in Articles, Contemporary Issues, Deviated Groups, Sects and Parties, Fitnah, Innovations In Islam (Bidah), Khawaarij, Methodology - 'Manhaj', Morals and Manners - 'Akhlaaq', Purification of The Soul, Qur'aan, Sahaabah, Salafi Mosques & Centres, Scholars of Islam, Sin, The Salaf - Pious Predecessors, Worship - 'Ibaadah'.

In The Name of Allah, The Most Merciful, The Bestower of Mercy.

Allāh, The Most High, said:

أَفَمَن زُيِّنَ لَهُ سُوءُ عَمَلِهِ فَرَآهُ حَسَنًا ۖ فَإِنَّ اللَّهَ يُضِلُّ مَن يَشَاءُ وَيَهْدِي مَن يَشَاءُ ۖ فَلَا تَذْهَبْ نَفْسُكَ عَلَيْهِمْ حَسَرَاتٍ ۚ إِنَّ اللَّهَ عَلِيمٌ بِمَا يَصْنَعُونَ

Is he, then, to whom the evil of his deeds made fair-seeming, so that he considers it as good? Verily, Allah sends astray whom He wills, and guides whom He wills. So destroy not yourself (O Muhammad) in sorrow for them. Truly, Allah is the All-Knower of what they do! [Fatir. 8]

[أَفَمَن زُيِّنَ لَهُ سُوءُ   – Is he, then, to whom the evil of his deeds made fair-seeming].

Meaning, his evil and repugnant deeds have been made fair-seeming to him by shaytan and beautified in his eyes;

[فَرَآهُ حَسَنًا- so that he considers it as good]

Meaning, considers his evil and repugnant deeds to be good like the one whom Allah has guided to the straight path and upright religion, but are the two the same? The first one commits evil deeds, considers truth to be falsehood and falsehood to be truth, and the second person performs good deeds, considers truth to be truth and falsehood to be falsehood. However, guidance is in the hands of Allāh.

 فَإِنَّ اللَّهَ يُضِلُّ مَن يَشَاءُ وَيَهْدِي مَن يَشَاءُ ۖ فَلَا تَذْهَبْ نَفْسُكَ عَلَيْهِمْ حَسَرَاتٍ

Verily, Allah sends astray whom He wills, and guides whom He wills. So destroy not yourself (O Muhammad) in sorrow for them]- Meaning, the misguided ones to whom their evil deeds are made fair-seeming and shaytan hinders them from the truth. There is nothing obligated to you (O Muhammad) except to convey the message and there is nothing on you regarding their guidance, rather Allah is the one who will recompense them for their deeds. [ إِنَّ اللَّهَ عَلِيمٌ بِمَا يَصْنَعُونَ- Truly, Allah is the All-Knower of what they do]. [1]

Ibn Abbas, may Allāh be pleased with him and his father, said:

“This Ayah was revealed concerning Abu Jahl and the idolaters of Makkah”.

Sa’eed Bin Jubair, may Allāh have mercy upon him, said:

“This was revealed concerning the people of Bidah and evil desires”.

Qatadah, may Allāh have mercy upon him, said:

And from them are the kharijites who make lawful the spilling of the blood of the Muslims and confiscating their wealth. As for the Muslims who commit major sins,  they are not from them (i.e. not from those whom the evil of their deeds are made fair-seeming) because they do not declare the major sins to be lawful. The one to whom doubts are made fair-seeming and is submerged in it, and his deeds are made fair-seeming to him, thus, he considers it as good, shaytan makes it fair-seeming to him through whispers”. [ 2]

[1] An Excerpt from Tafsir As-Sadi

[2] Tafsir Al-Baghawi 3/689

Political Islam and Islamists: Convenient and Opportunistic Conceptual Distortions

Written by Abdullah Jallow on . Posted in Articles, Bid'ah (Innovation), Contemporary Issues, Fitnah, Khawaarij, Methodology - 'Manhaj', Morals and Manners - 'Akhlaaq', Refutations.

In The Name of Allah, The Most Merciful, The Bestower of Mercy.

Political Islam and Islamists: Convenient and Opportunistic Conceptual Distortions by Ideologues, Demagogues, and Rabble-Rousers

Allah, The Most High, said:

إِنَّكُمْ لَفِى قَوْلٍ مُّخْتَلِفٍ
يُؤْفَكُ عَنْهُ مَنْ أُفِكَ
قُتِلَ ٱلْخَرَّٰصُونَ
ٱلَّذِينَ هُمْ فِى غَمْرَةٍ سَاهُونَ

Indeed, you are in differing speech (regarding the Prophet and this Qurʾān). Misguided away from it (the Qurʾān) are those who have been misguided (by such speech). (So) cursed be the premeditated liars (who spread doubts and lies regarding Allāh and His signs). Who are immersed in a flood of heedlessness (and ignorance). [Adh-Dhariyat 8-11] [1]

Indeed, some ideologues, demagogues, and provocateurs, under the guise of academic research, employ various terminologies to articulate their own interpretations of the Shariah. Thus, they render judgments that aim to classify groups identifying as Muslim or to critique Islam itself, often relying on partial truths or the distortions and innovated practices of the misguided sects that affiliate with Islam. A notable example of this is the term “Political Islam,” which they often utilise when addressing the Takfiris, Sururis, and other advocates of innovated political activism. Consequently, individuals not fitting this characterisation – in their view – are assigned alternative labels, such as moderates or non-violent extremists. Perhaps the most ludicrous classification is the division of Salafiyyah into Quietists, Politicos, and Jihadists. [Footnote a]

Firstly, the term “Political Islam”, when associated with certain groups, can inadvertently suggest a superficial categorisation, rather than clarifying the distinction between advocates of innovative political activism and the established political framework of the pure Shariah. Thus, the aim here is to transmit some statements of the Salafi scholars regarding Islam and politics.

First, it is essential to recognise that in Islam, the realms of state and religion are intricately intertwined, with no separation between the two. Imam Muhammad Ibn Salih Al-Uthaymeen, may Allah have mercy upon him, said:

The intent behind ‘Separation between religion and Siyaasah’ implies that the ruler can do what he wants according to what he thinks is a means to fulfilling (responsibility) of state affairs, regardless of whether it aligns with Shariah or not; or even what he does is based on the judgement of the religion. This is because separation denotes a distinction between two entities and asigning them specific definitions. Thus, the ruler may pursue what he considers to be beneficial even if it opposes the Shariah. Undoubtedly this is a false and sinfu; statement, as religion and Siyaasah are inherently interconnected; however, what we mean by Siyaasah is the Siyaasah that is based on justice rather than oppression. The religion came to promote well being for the people in their behaviour towards their Lord and with one another. It establishes the Rights of Allah, rights for the people- parents, relatives, wives, and the Muslims at large. Even for non-Muslims, Islam has given them rights that are well known to the scholars.
It establishes the conditions for war and peace, punishments for crimes- some of which are explicitly defined in texts, while others are subject to the discretion of the ruler, as well as other matters that clearly illustrates that Islam, in its entirety, is Siyaasah. The root of the word Siyaasah is Saa’is, referring to one who oversees the welfare of animals, ensuring their well-being and protecting them from harm. This principle is evident when we reflect on the religious matters that Allah has legislated for His servants, which are essential for establishing (a fruitful, stable, orderly, and safe) life; and prohibited actions that will corrupt their circumstances- either affecting everyone or specific individuals. Thus, it can be asserted that the entirety of the religion is Siyaasah. We are certain that anyone who dissociates Siyaasah from the Religion, and implement Siyaasah based on what he sees fit and what he forbids, his Siyaasah is corrupt and will cause more harm than good. If one aspect is rectified based on his dificient opinions, it greatly corrupts from another angle. Therefore, it is incumbent that one reflects on the circumstances of those who base their Siyaasah on their desires and opinions, distancing themselves from the principles of Islam. You will find – after contemplating – that either the entirety of their Siyaasah is corrupt or most of it. If it rectifies a matter from one perspective, it corrupts from another. Consequently, the separation of between Siyaasah and religion is a sinful deed and it is obligated to the one who seeks to rectify himself and others to do so in accordance with Islam.  [2]

The Ruler and The Subjects

Allah, The Exalted, said:

إِنَّ ٱللَّهَ يَأۡمُرُكُمۡ أَن تُؤَدُّواْ ٱلۡأَمَـٰنَـٰتِ إِلَىٰٓ أَهۡلِهَا وَإِذَا حَكَمۡتُم بَيۡنَ ٱلنَّاسِ أَن تَحۡكُمُواْ بِٱلۡعَدۡلِ‌ۚ إِنَّ ٱللَّهَ نِعِمَّا يَعِظُكُم بِهِۦۤ‌ۗ إِنَّ ٱللَّهَ كَانَ سَمِيعَۢا بَصِيرً۬ا
يَـٰٓأَيُّہَا ٱلَّذِينَ ءَامَنُوٓاْ أَطِيعُواْ ٱللَّهَ وَأَطِيعُواْ ٱلرَّسُولَ وَأُوْلِى ٱلۡأَمۡرِ مِنكُمۡ‌ۖ فَإِن تَنَـٰزَعۡتُمۡ فِى شَىۡءٍ۬ فَرُدُّوهُ إِلَى ٱللَّهِ وَٱلرَّسُولِ إِن كُنتُمۡ تُؤۡمِنُونَ بِٱللَّهِ وَٱلۡيَوۡمِ ٱلۡأَخِرِ‌ۚ ذَٲلِكَ خَيۡرٌ۬ وَأَحۡسَنُ تَأۡوِيلاً

Verily! Allah commands that you should render back the trusts to those, to whom they are due; and that when you judge between men, you judge with justice. Verily, how excellent is the teaching which He (Allah) gives you! Truly, Allah is Ever All-Hearer, All-Seer. O you who believe! Obey Allah and obey the Messenger (Muhammad), and those of you (Muslims) who are in authority. (And) if you differ in anything amongst yourselves, refer it to Allah and His Messenger, if you believe in Allah and in the Last Day. That is better and more suitable for final determination. [Surah An-Nisaa. Aayaat 58-59]

Imam Muhammad Ibn Salih al-Uthaymeen, may Allah have mercy upon him, said:

The scholars say that the first verse was revealed regarding the rulers – that it is obligated on them to render back the trusts to those whom they are due and that when they judge between the people they do so with justice. And the second verse was revealed regarding those under the ruler’s authority, the armies and other than them- that it is obligated on them to obey the rulers who establish justice in their distributions, rulings, military expeditions and other affairs, except when they command one to commit an act of disobedience to Allah, because there cannot be obedience to the creation in disobedience to Allah. And if they differ in any matter, they should return to the book of Allah and the Sunnah of His Messenger. If the rulers do not do this, then they are only obeyed in that which is in agreement with obedience to Allah and His Messenger, their rights are fulfilled just as Allah and His Messenger commanded and they are aided in righteousness and piety, but not in sin and transgression”. [3]

Siyaasah: Siyaasah means to regulate the affairs of the citizens. It has jurisdiction over the individual’s behaviour and the society as a whole. It involves Islamic jurisprudence through which the rulers are facilitated with knowledge and understanding of the rulings related to looking after the affairs of the state, its set-ups and Shariah principles. [4]

The Discourse Surrounding The Terms Islamist, Fundamentalism etc

In the discourse surrounding the terms “Islamist” and “Islamic Fundamentalism,” some ideologues, demagogues, and provocateurs have crafted their own interpretations. They define an “Islamist” as someone who possesses a profound belief in Islam, particularly one who advocates for the influence of Islam on political frameworks, or proponents of Islamic militancy or radicalism. This characterisation, however, is a blend of both truth and falsehood. If we accept that an “Islamist,” as per these narratives, is an individual who ardently believes in Islam and seeks its integration into governance, such a conviction is indeed commendable in the Sight of Allah. Al-Allamah Rabee Bin Hadi Al-Madkhalee, may Allah safeguard him, stated:

Whoever Allah wishes good for, He grants him understanding of the religion. When this understanding in the religion is mentioned to the people, they understand it to mean the books of Islamic jurisprudence [i.e. the books that discuss the rulings related to prayer, zakat, fasting, marriage etc]. This is a deficient understanding. Fiqh (understanding) – first and foremost – is the understanding of the (sound) creed and Tawheed (i.e. sound Islamic monotheism). This is the highest level of Fiqh because the nobility of knowledge is judged based on the nobility of its subject matter. The best and noblest subject matter is Tawheed, which teaches the people about the Attributes of their Lord and the perfection of His Attributes, about His Oneness, to worship Him (alone) and sincerely establish the religion for His Sake. Therefore, we seek understanding of Tawheed from Allaah’s Book, the (authentic) Sunnah of Allah’s Messenger, peace and blessings of Allah be upon him, and from the understanding of our pious predecessors. We seek understanding in all areas of (Shariah) knowledge – understanding of halal and haram, acts of worship, mutual dealings, sound Islamic politics, economics and in every affair. All these affairs – and all praise and thanks be to Allah – are extensively (found) in the (message) brought by Muhammad, peace and blessings of Allah be upon him. When Fiqh is mentioned, its intended (meaning includes) understanding of every affair that is connected to our religious and worldly affairs, and the foremost of them is the knowledge of Tawheed [Islamic Monotheism]. There is nothing that can do without the knowledge of Tawheed. [5]

However, the crux of the issue lies in their manipulation of terminology for the sake of ideological conflicts, leading to a lack of consistency in their discourse on these issues. This inconsistency often serves their ulterior motives of deception and defamation. On the other hand,  when it aligns with their political ambitions, they label these same people they used to label Islamists as freedom fighters, a tactic observed in regions like Libya and beyond. Therefore, it is incumbent upon us to follow the Shariah definitions articulated by the Salafi Scholars, ensuring a thorough understanding rather than merely echoing the terminology employed by the ideologues who utilise them for their ideological wars.

In the second instance, when these ideologues define the term ‘Islamist’ as equivalent to militancy, radicalism, or terrorism, it is imperative to clarify that no negative connotations should be ascribed to Islam itself. Instead, such actions are predominantly linked to the khawarij and those influenced by their ideologies. It is widely acknowledged that these groups—regardless of whether they are labeled as Islamists or deemed freedom fighters by ideologues when it serves their interests in inciting rebellion against Muslim leaders—distort the teachings of Shariah to pursue their own corrupt objectives. Listen here: https://video.link/w/tr4U [Refer to Footnote b]

As for the term ‘Islamic Fundamentalism’, it often sparks considerable debate among individuals regarding its interpretation. However, it is commonly understood by those who employ it to signify a rigorous adherence to the teachings of the Qur’an and the Shari’ah (Islamic Law). Thus, if this is the connotation that the ideologues associate with ‘Fundamentalism,’ then it is indeed in alignment with the truth if free from exaggeration and negligence. Allah said:

فَلَا وَرَبِّكَ لَا يُؤۡمِنُونَ حَتَّىٰ يُحَكِّمُوكَ فِيمَا شَجَرَ بَيۡنَهُمۡ ثُمَّ لَا يَجِدُواْ فِىٓ أَنفُسِہِمۡ حَرَجً۬ا مِّمَّا قَضَيۡتَ وَيُسَلِّمُواْ تَسۡلِيمً۬ا

But no, by your Lord, they can have no Faith, until they make you (O Muhammad) judge in all disputes between them, and find in themselves no resistance against your decisions, and accept (them) with full submission. [An-Nisaa. 65]

Narrated Abu Musa, may Allah be pleased with him, that the Prophet, peace and blessings of Allah be upon him, said:

My example, and the example of what I have been sent with is that of a man who came to some people and said, O people! I have seen the enemy’s army with my own eyes and I am a plain warner; so protect yourselves!’ Then a group of his people obeyed him and fled at night proceeding stealthily till they were safe, while another group of them disbelieved him and stayed at their places till morning when the army came upon them and killed and ruined them completely. So this is the example of that person who obeys me and follows that truth which I have brought (the Qur’an and the Sunnah), and the example of the one who disobeys me and disbelieves the Truth I have brought”. [Sahih Al-Bukhari. 7283]

Thus, should the ideologues refer to ‘Fundamentalism’ in a manner that aligns with authentic path based on the Qur’ans Sunnah as understood and implemented by the Prophet’s companions, it is indeed commendable. However, if their intention is to denote those who promote violence, then such actions are reminiscent of the kharijites—those who deviate from true teachings, akin to the terrorists and innovators represented by groups like ISIS, Al-Qa’idah, Jabhat An-Nusra, and their counterparts. The principles of sound Islamic methodology shine with the clarity of the midday sun. Those who assert adherence to this methodology, regardless of their stature, are meticulously examined by senior Salafi scholars and their distinguished students. Al-Allamah Rabee Bin Hadi Al-Madkhali, may Allah preserve him, said:

All of you hold onto the Rope of Allah [i.e. The Qur’an and authentic Sunnah]- Allah will aid you in this and make you like the sun; return to the understanding of the righteous predecessors, and it is, as I said to you, transmitted (and established) in your presence. This is a challenge to those who oppose this. We are challenging ahlul bidah wal ahwaa [the proponents of innovation in religious affairs and followers of desires] in their creed and politics. We say, between us and you is the (path, understanding of the) pious predecessors and books (of the pious predecessors). Ahmad [i.e. Imam Ahmad] used to say to the proponents of innovation in religious affairs, “Between us and you are the funerals (i.e. whose funeral will be attended by ahlus sunnah in great numbers)”. We say (i.e. at present), “Between us and you are the books (of the pious predecessors)- the books are present!

Allah said to His Messenger, peace and blessings of Allah be upon him:

قل فَأْتُوا بِالتَّوْرَاةِ فَاتْلُوهَا إِنْ كُنْتُمْ صَادِقِينَ

All food was lawful to the Children of Israel, except what Israel made unlawful for himself before the Taurat (Torah) was revealed. Say (O Muhammad ): “Bring here the Taurat (Torah) and recite it, if you are truthful.

So they bring the Torah and you proof them to be upon falsehood. We bring the books of the pious predecessors – the Qur’an, the Sunnah, the books of Al-Bukhari, Muslim, Abu Dawood, at-Tirmidhi, an-Nasaa’ee, and what was authored by Ahmad and others; we bring them (to prove) those who are on the path of these (pious predecessors) and those who turn away and oppose them. Just as Allaah challenged the Jews to bring the Torah, so the Torah was brought and they were exposed them, (likewise), we challenge these people to bring the books of the pious predecessors, so that the innovator in religious affairs is exposed, and to clarify who the deviants are- whether us or them? Are they able to challenge? Can they open their mouths like this? We fill our mouths with courage – challenge everyone who says that we are upon other than methodology of the pious predecessors. We, by Allaah, call to the methodology of the pious predecessors- to the Book of Allaah and the Sunnah of Allaah’s Messenger, peace and blessings of Allaah be upon him. We use the book of Allah and the Sunnah as proof for our beliefs, our acts of worship, dealings with rulers and their subjects, in dealing with the groups and sects. As for the others, they are upon tricks, deception etc By Allaah, you will not find with them anything but tricks and manipulating the emotions of youth”. [6]

With this, we are not easily manipulated through the convient utilisation of any term by the media, the ideologues, demogogues and rabble-rousers.

——————————————-

Footnote a: https://abukhadeejah.com/a-response-to-western-academics-who-categorise-salafis-into-quietists-politicos-and-jihadists-and-why-this-is-a-false-categorisation/
http://www.salafis.com/index.cfm

Footnote b: https://salafidawahmanchester.com/2021/02/10/believers-bahaviour-towards-muslim-rulers-advise-given-in-private-supplicate-for-them-and-refrain-from-rebellion-so-beware-of-spiteful-foreign-instigators-and-some-dangerous-social-media-networ/

https://salafidawahmanchester.com/2021/02/12/not-a-spring-for-us-rather-its-spring-for-the-unbelievers-i-e-those-unbelievers-who-were-pleased-with-the-trial-and-chaos-in-muslim-lands-by-al-allaamah-saaleh-al-fawzaan/

[1] https://www.thenoblequran.com/q/#/verse/51/8

[2] https://binothaimeen.net/content/7366. Paraphrased]

[3] An Excerpt from at-Taleeq Alaa Siyaasah Ash-Shar’iyyah 16-18

[4] at-Taleeq Alaa As-Siyaasah Ash-Shar’iyyah. 5

[5] Marhaban Yaa Taalibal Ilm. pages 243-244

[6] https://youtu.be/1Rlacl-3GbM?si=GAny9Uq3j0W5ytXW

[2] Notification to Ahlul Bidah and Mumayyi’ah: These Clarifications Are Coming Back!

Written by Abdullah Jallow on . Posted in Articles, Basics, Bid'ah (Innovation), Contemporary Issues, Fitnah, Innovations In Islam (Bidah), Khawaarij, Methodology - 'Manhaj', Purification of The Soul, Refutations, Scholars of Islam, Shi'a, Sin.

In The Name of Allah, The Most Merciful, The Bestower of Mercy.

Al-Allamah Rabee Bin Haadi Al-Madkhalee, may Allah have mercy upon him, said:

By Allah! Islam and the Muslims are not ruined except by these categories of (people) amongst the people of bidah and misguidance- the khawarij and those similar to them, and those who are worse, such as the rawaafid. The rawaafid are worse than the khawarij, and Ikhwaan al-Muslimoon (i.e. the sect -the Muslim brotherhood in Egypt and elsewhere) ally with them and they say: “They (rawaafid) are our brothers; the differing between us and them is like the differing between (Imaam) Maalik and (Imaam) Shaafi’ee” meaning: “The differing between us (i.e. Ikhwaan Muslimoon) and them (i.e. rawaafid shiites) is based on ijtihad, and if Imaam (Maalik) and (Imaam) Shafee’ee differ in (some) affairs, they are all rewarded; and if we (ikhwaan al-muslimoon) differ with the rawaafid shiites, then us and them are rewarded”.

O deceivers! The rawaafid (shiites) revile the Sahaabah and declare them disbelievers; they revile the wives of the Messenger, peace and blessings of Allah be upon him; they say that the Qur’an is distorted; they have shir’kiyyaat (beliefs and acts of major polytheism) and they deify the leaders of the Prophet’s family. So does all of this not harm them (i.e. harm their claim to Islam)? Is this not irjaa?! (i.e. O Ikhwaanis! Is this alliance of yours with the rawaafid and that the differing between you and them is like the differing between Imaams Maalik and Shaafi’ee not Ir’jaa?!) [Adh-Dhari’ah 1/162]

Al-Allamah Salih Al-Fawzaan, may Allah preserve him, stated:

The wars that take place between the Muslims and the splitting are only brought about by the people of desires, such as the Khawaarij, the Mutazilah and other than them! The people of desires are the ones who cause the fitnah—the Mutazilah, the khawaarij, the Rawaafid (Shiites) and other than them. Fitnah does not occur except from them and as a result of them. Who murdered Uthmaan (radiyallaahu-anhu)? Who murdered Ali (radiyallaahu-anahu)? Who were the ones that ignited the fitnah between the Muslims thereafter? It was no one else other than those people of desires. Who misled Al-Mamoon and those rulers who came after him to put Ahlus Sunnah to trial, until their Imaam Ahmad Bin Hanbal (rahimahullaah) was beaten and imprisoned? It was no one else other than the people of desires. Who brought about the imprisonment of Shaikhul Islaam Ibn Taymiyyah (rahimahullaah) until he died in prison? It was no one else other than those people of desires! It is upon us to be cautious of these people because the end result of their fitnah leads to the splitting of the unity of the Muslims, rebellion against the Muslim rulers and splitting the Jamaa-ah of the Muslims, so that they become divergent groups and parties, which is the opposite of being one united Ummah. Paraphrased… listen to audio on this link: https://salafidawahmanchester.com/2016/02/reminder-ahlul-ahwaa-i-e-the-people-of-bidah-are-the-ones-who-start-the-wars/

Also read on this link at by Shaikh Abu Iyaad, may Allah preserve him

http://www.ikhwanis.com/index.cfm

The Sab’iyyah, Raafidah and Khaarijiyyah: Historical and Contemporary Interplay Between Rafd and Khaarijiyyah: http://www.ikhwanis.com/articles/fqfejnx-the-sabiyyah-raafidah-and-khaarijiyyah.cfm

Shaikh Shamsuddeen Al-Afghaanee, may Allah have mercy upon him, said:

Ahlul Bidah are the ones who kindle trials and disorder.  They are a chaotic people and are deprived of safety and security.  They are a people of trials and disturbance as opposed to Ahlul Hadeeth Was-Sunan (i.e. those who steadfastly follow the ahaadeeth of the Prophet and his Sunnah). Have they (i.e. the people of Sunnah) committed what the people of bidah and trials have committed?! The people of bidah trespass- alongside enmity and innovation- whilst Ahlus Sunnah respond and defend (the religion).

عداء الماتريدية للعقيدة السلفية
1/26-27

Sins are Major and Minor – Shaykh Fawzaan

Written by Amjad Khan on . Posted in Aqeedah (Creed & Belief), Articles, Basics, Khawaarij, Repentance, Sin.

إِن تَجۡتَنِبُواْ كَبَآئِرَ مَا تُنۡهَوۡنَ عَنۡهُ نُكَفِّرۡ عَنكُمۡ سَيِّـَٔاتِكُمۡ وَنُدۡخِلۡكُم مُّدۡخَلًا كَرِيمًا

If you avoid the great sins which you are forbidden to do, We shall remit from you your (small) sins, and admit you to a Noble Entrance (i.e. Paradise). An-Nisa’ 4:31

Allah’s statement contains a clear indication that sins are of different types: major and minor. Whoever avoids the major sins, Allah will pardon and forgive their minor sins. This is a promise from Allah, Subhanahu wa Ta’ala.

وَنُدۡخِلۡكُم مُّدۡخَلًا كَرِيمًا

and admit you to a Noble Entrance (i.e. Paradise). An-Nisa’ 4:31

This too is a promise from Allah. Within this verse lies a refutation of the methodology of the Khawarij and the Mu’tazilah, who claim that the perpetrator of a major sin exits the fold of Islam. In contrast, the methodology of Ahlus-Sunnah is the truth—balanced, far removed from extremism, negligence, exaggeration (ghuloo) and transgression in the religion.

ٱلَّذِينَ يَجۡتَنِبُونَ كَبَٰٓئِرَ ٱلۡإِثۡمِ وَٱلۡفَوَٰحِشَ إِلَّا ٱللَّمَمَۚ إِنَّ رَبَّكَ وَٰسِعُ ٱلۡمَغۡفِرَةِۚ

Those who avoid great sins (see the Quran, Verses: 6:152, 153) and Al-Fawahish (illegal sexual intercourse, etc.) except the small faults, verily, your Lord is of vast forgiveness. An-Najm 53:32

This verse is one of the evidences that sins are categorised as major and minor.

كَبَٰٓئِرَ ٱلۡإِثۡمِ

Major sins; refers to the various acts of disobedience which reach the level of a major sin.

Al-Fawahish is the plural of Faahishah and refers to sins that are especially abhorrent and repulsive.

His statement – the Most High – إِلَّا ٱللَّمَمَۚ (except the small faults) refers to minor sins, which are expiated through various means, including:

• Abstaining from major sins, as mentioned in the verse.

• Performing the five daily prayers.

• Enduring calamities that befall a person—such as illness, disease, grief, and the loss of loved ones.

• Even something as small as a Muslim being pricked by a thorn, as is reported in the Hadith.¹

All of these affairs expiate minor sins, this is from the favours of Allah.

Additionally, He the Most High, said in another verse in Surah ash-Shoora,


وَٱلَّذِينَ يَجۡتَنِبُونَ كَبَٰٓئِرَ ٱلۡإِثۡمِ وَٱلۡفَوَٰحِشَ وَإِذَا مَا غَضِبُواْ هُمۡ يَغۡفِرُونَ

And those who avoid the greater sins, and Al-Fawahish (illegal sexual intercourse, etc.), and when they are angry, they forgive Ash-Shura 42:37

This verse is another proof that sins are distinguished as major and minor.

Shaykh Fawzaan’s Sharh Kitab Al-Kabaa’ir pgs. 13-15

  1. Bukhari 5640, Muslim 2572

Reflections on some statements of Al-Allamah Rabee Bin Hadi Al-Mad’khali [80]

Written by Abdullah Jallow on . Posted in Contemporary Issues, Deviated Groups, Sects and Parties, Innovations In Islam (Bidah), Khawaarij, Methodology - 'Manhaj', Refutations.

In The Name of Allah, The Most Merciful, The Bestower of Mercy.

The Shaikh, may Allah preserve him, stated about Sayyid Qutb:

Indeed, the Fitnah of this man and those with him is the Fitnah of this era. It is the severest fitnah in this era because it (falsely) wears the garb of the Salafi Methodology (i.e. falsely attributes itself to Salafiyyah).

Adh-Dhari’ah ilaa Bayaan Maqasid Kitab Ash-Shariah 1/112

Reflections from some statements of Al-Allamah Rabee Bin Hadi Al-Mad’khali [44 of 80]

Written by Abdullah Jallow on . Posted in Basics, Bid'ah (Innovation), Contemporary Issues, Da'wah - Calling To Islam, Khawaarij, Methodology - 'Manhaj', Morals and Manners - 'Akhlaaq', Pearls of Wisdom, Purification of The Soul, Qur'aan, Sahaabah, Salaf As Saalih (Pious Predecessors), Scholars of Islam, The Salaf - Pious Predecessors, Worship - 'Ibaadah'.

In The Name of Allah, The Most Merciful, The Bestower of Mercy.

By Allah! The Ummah will not be removed from its problems, humiliation and the degradation they are living in except through returning to the Book of Allah, the Sunnah of the Messenger and the understanding of the pious predecessors, (when dealing) with the Khawaarij and other than them. Al-Aajuriy said: “The scholars—past and present—do not differ that the khawarij are an evil people, disobedient to Allah and His Messenger, even if they pray, fast and strive in acts of worship”.

Adh-Dhari’ah ilaa Bayan Maqasid Kitaab Ash-Shari’ah 1/97

The danger of Mubtadi’ah

Written by faizkara on . Posted in Bid'ah (Innovation), Deviated Groups, Sects and Parties, Hadaadis, Innovations In Islam (Bidah), Khawaarij, Pearls of Wisdom, Shi'a, Sufis.

In The Name of Allah, The Most Merciful, The Bestower of Mercy.

Imam Ibn al-Qayyim, may Allah have mercy upon him, said:

The Fitna (instigated) by a Mubtadi undermines the foundation of the religion, while the Fitna of a sinner pertains to forbidden desires. Unlike a sinner, the Mubtadi obstructs people’s path to the straight path, hinders them from it, invalidates the message delivered by the Messenger, and obstructs (access) to rewards in the Afterlife. Conversely, a sinner’s journey (towards attaining rewards) is delayed by his sins.

An Excerpt from Ad-Daa’u Wad- Dawaa. page 206

Some So-called or Distorted Indicators of Extremism and Terrorism

Written by Abdullah Jallow on . Posted in Basics, Contemporary Issues, Da'wah - Calling To Islam, Khawaarij, Methodology - 'Manhaj', Morals and Manners - 'Akhlaaq', Refutations, Sin.

In The Name of Allah, The Most Merciful, The Bestower of Mercy.

Allah, The Exalted, said:

وَلَا تَلْبِسُوا الْحَقَّ بِالْبَاطِلِ وَتَكْتُمُوا الْحَقَّ وَأَنتُمْ تَعْلَمُونَ

And mix not truth with falsehood, nor conceal the truth while you know (the truth). [Al-Baqarah 42]

Imam Ibn Al-Qayyim, may Allah have mercy upon him, said:

He (Allah) prohibits mixing truth with falsehood and concealing (truth). Mixing truth with falsehood is to confound truth with falsehood until one of them is confused for the other, and from this (results) deception, fraudulent maneuver, and cheating whose underlying reality contradicts the outward appearance. Similarly, when the truth is cloaked in falsehood, the perpetrator manifests falsehood in the image of truth and utters a wording that carries two meanings—a correct meaning and a false one, thus the listener may mistakenly think that the perpetrator intended the correct meaning, while his actual intent is falsehood. This is Ijmaal Fil Lafdh [general, unrestricted wording (or speech)]. As for ambiguity in meaning, it can manifest in two ways; one of which is truth while the other is false; its correct intended aspect is misconstrued, thus its intended meaning becomes false. The basis of Bani Adam’s misguidance lies in general wordings and ambiguous meanings, particularly when they encounter confused minds; so how about when accompanied by vain desires and fanatism? Therefore, ask the One (Allah) Who keeps the hearts steadfast to keep your heart steadfast in the religion He has ordained, and not allow you to fall into this darkness. [1]

It is increasingly common for the actions of a few individuals to be unfairly associated with Islam as a whole. When a Muslim engages in prohibited behaviour, certain media outlets and journalists often choose to highlight irrelevant aspects of their beliefs rather than recognizing the individual’s personal failings or lack of self-control. This tactic aims to create a misleading narrative that equates sound Islamic principles and practices with extremism. For instance, you might hear comments like, “Before committing these heinous acts, he began to adopt Islamic dress, grow a beard, and voice his opposition to music, drugs, and alcohol, while also expressing strong views on the situation in Gaza.” Such statements serve only to distort the truth and perpetuate harmful stereotypes. Furthermore, through this narrative, they aim to imply that these are indicators of extremism and that they played a role in the perpetrator’s crimes, whether directly or indirectly. First and foremost, we must remind them that the One (Allah) who prohibited all intoxicants, also instructed His Messenger to instruct all Muslim men to grow their beards and trim their mustaches, and forbade music and other vices. He (Allah) is also the same One who declared it unlawful to harm innocent individuals, regardless of their faith, and prohibited vigilantism. [Footnote a] Thus, the issue that these deceivers attempt to complicate and misinterpret is quite straightforward: a person who embodies commendable qualities yet engages in criminal behaviour is merely someone who has followed certain directives while neglecting others, despite the fact that all commands and prohibitions originate from a single source.

Countless Muslims abstain from intoxicants and immoral behaviours, including murder, fully aware that these actions are strictly prohibited by their Creator. If the act of growing a beard or opposing music and alcohol were inherently linked to violence, then millions of Muslims would commit murder and other violent acts. However, this is far from the truth; these matters are not related. In reality, anyone who takes an innocent life, even under the guise of an Islamic justification, has crossed a significant line in their interpretation of promoting good and preventing evil. It is essential to understand that certain aspects of promoting good and preventing evil is primarily assigned to rulers and designated authorities, such as law enforcement. Furthermore, Individuals are obligated to promote good and prevent evil only within the framework of Islamic law and in accordance with the agreements they hold with both Muslim and non-Muslim nations while coexisting peacefully.

Saudi erudite scholar Imam Abdul Aziz Bin Baz, may Allah have mercy upon him, was asked:

“Is enjoining good and forbidding evil by the hand obligated to all Muslims, or is it limited to those in authority and their deputies?”

Response: Stopping wrong is obligated to all Muslims according to their ability because the Messenger, peace and blessings of Allah be upon him, said: “Anyone of you who sees evil, let them stop it with their hand; if not able, then with their tongue, and if not able, then with his heart, and that is the weakest of faith”. [Muslim, Abu Dawood, Tirmidhi & others]

However, stopping evil by the hand must be based on ability and should not result in greater corruption or evil. A man has the right to rectify matters with his hand in his home [i.e. based on what the law of the land allows him]; a manager has the authority to make changes within the organisation they are responsible for, in accordance with the instructions given to them [i.e. the authority given to them by the state authorities], otherwise, people should not stop anything they are not authorised to stop. If they make changes in matters that they have no authority over, this will result in more evil and great corruption between them and the people and between the people and the state.

In this case they should stop evil with their tongue, saying “O so and so! Fear Allah! This is not permissible, this is Haraam, or this is obligated to you”, and clarify it with evidence from Shariah. [Footnote b] As for changing matters with the hand, this should be done where one has authority, such as one’s home [i.e. within what the law allows], with those under one’s responsibility, or those authorised by the ruler, such as organisations given permission and authority to enjoin good. They should make changes in accordance with the authority they have been given- in the way prescribed by the Shariah, without exceeding their jurisdiction. The same applies to the governor of a city, he should make changes with his hand, in accordance with the instructions he has been given by the state. [2]

Behaviour Towards non-Muslims

Imam Muhammad Ibn Salih Al-Uthaymin, may Allah have mercy upon him, addressed the appropriate conduct for interacting with non-Muslims during a tele-link on July 28, 2000, saying:

Likewise I invite you to have respect for those people who have the right that they should be respected, from those between you and whom there is and agreement (of protection) [i.e. Non-Muslims]. For the land which you are living is such that there is an agreement between you and them. If this were not the case they would have killed you or expelled you. So preserve this agreement, and do not prove treacherous to it, since treachery is a sign of the hypocrites, and it is not from the way of the Believers.

And know that it is authentically reported from the Prophet that he said, “Whoever kills one who is under and agreement of protection will not smell the fragrance of Paradise.”

Do not be fooled by those sayings of the foolish people : those who say : ‘Those people are Non-Muslims, so their wealth is lawful for us [i.e. to misappropriate or take by way of murder and killing].’ For by Allah – this is a lie. A lie about Allah’s Religion, and a lie in Islamic societies.

So we may not say that it is lawful to be treacherous towards people whom we have an agreement with. O my brothers. O youth. O Muslims. Be truthful in your buying and selling, and renting, and leasing, and in all mutual transactions. Because truthfulness is from the characteristics of the Believers, and Allah – the Most High – has commanded truthfulness – in the saying of Allah – the Most High – “O you who believe – fear and keep you duty to Allah and be with the truthful”.

And the Prophet encouraged truthfulness and said : “Adhere to truthfulness, because truthfulness leads to goodness, and goodness leads to Paradise; and a person will continue to be truthful, and strive to be truthful until he will be written down with Allah as a truthful person“.

And he warned against falsehood, and said : “Beware of falsehood, because falsehood leads to wickedness, and wickedness leads to the Fire. And a person will continue lying, and striving to lie until he is written down with Allah as a great liar.”

O my brother Muslims. O youth. Be true in your sayings with your brothers, and with those Non-Muslims whom you live along with – so that you will be inviters to the Religion of Islam, by your actions and in reality. So how many people there are who first entered into Islam because of the behaviour and manners of the Muslims, and their truthfulness, and their being true in their dealings. [3]

Imam Muhammad Ibn Salih Al-Uhaymin, may Allah have mercy on him, clearly articulated that it is a grave betrayal to infringe upon the blood, honour, and property of non-Muslims. This raises an important question: how does this relate to the rejection of vices like alcohol, gambling, music, or the obligation to grow a beard? [Footnote c] Abstaining from such vices is a personal commitment to obeying one’s Lord, while respecting the lives of others is a fundamental right owed to all of Allah’s servants, irrespective of their lifestyle choices. Disapproving of others’ behaviors does not justify taking the law into one’s own hands; Islam is a protector of all, including those who do not share the same faith. However, when it comes to vices like intoxicants, music, gambling, and others, it is unequivocally stated that these are prohibited in Islam. It is also important to emphasise that no rational Muslim believes they have the right to harm those who partake in these activities. Such views are only held by the khawarij. [Footnote d]

Sadly, biased and misleading journalists often attempt to link the rejection of these vices to terrorism. If this were true, how do we explain the millions of Muslims who avoid these vices while coexisting peacefully with non-Muslims in both Muslim-majority and non-Muslim countries? Instead of fabricating this tenuous connection to further their ideological agenda against Islam, it would be more constructive for them to consider the individual’s circumstances—whether they are struggling with mental health issues, have been misled by terrorists who distort religious teachings, or are acting out of personal grievances.

As for the situation in Gaza and the ongoing aggression from Zionist forces, it is a matter of deep concern that resonates with both Muslims and non-Muslims alike, who universally denounce such acts of violence. However, an informed Muslim recognises that the events unfolding in Gaza do not excuse or rationalise any negative actions against non-Muslims elsewhere, nor do they justify the targeting of unarmed civilians and non-combatants under Netanyahu’s leadership. We stand firmly against all forms of violence and brutality, regardless of the perpetrator, whether it be Zionists, Hamas, or any other group. Read: https://abuiyaad.com/a/amalekite-genocide-doctrine-gaza

——————————————————-

Footnote a: 

http://www.shariah.ws/articles/duviqgl-shaykh-salih-al-fawzan-the-islamic-shariah-provides-security–for-muslims-and-non-muslims-and-those-who-violate-it-are-kh257rijites-who-are-to-be-fought-and-severely-punished.cfm

http://www.shariah.ws/articles/szsumlh-the-foundation-of-muslim-relations-with-non-muslims-who-do-not-show-aggression-and-hostility.cfm

http://www.shariah.ws/articles/nmsdfkp-islam-and-the-muslims-are-free-and-innocent-of-the-kharijite-extremists.cfm

http://www.islamagainstextremism.com/

Footnote b:

In the UK, objecting to certain behaviour can be viewed as harassment or verbal abuse, therefore a Muslim should be aware of what the law allows him before he says or does anything whilst living in the West].

Footnote c:

https://abukhadeejah.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/10/Muslim-Attitudes-to-Alcohol-and-Intoxicants-The-effect-upon-societies-and-individuals-Islam-4.4.pdf

https://abukhadeejah.com/the-evil-effects-of-drugs-alcohol-in-society-in-light-of-the-quraan-sunnah/

http://www.shariah.ws/articles/suokooj-there-is-no-safe-limit-in-the-consumption-of-alcohol-and-the-prohibition-of-alcohol-in-the-quran.cfm

https://abukhadeejah.com/ruling-on-music-and-singing-ibn-baz-albani-ibn-taymiyyah/

https://abukhadeejah.com/music-singing-concerts-islamic-teachings/

Footnote d:

https://www.kharijites.com/kj/

[1] https://salafidawahmanchester.com/2024/12/24/several-considerations-to-bear-in-mind-concerning-ambiguity/
[2] Fataawa Ibn Baaz 8/208
[3] salafipublications

ISIS are called khawarij – Educating Maya Yang

Written by Abdullah Jallow on . Posted in Aqeedah (Creed & Belief), Bid'ah (Innovation), Contemporary Issues, Da'wah - Calling To Islam, Deviated Groups, Sects and Parties, Innovations In Islam (Bidah), Khawaarij, Methodology - 'Manhaj', Morals and Manners - 'Akhlaaq', Refutations, Worship - 'Ibaadah'.

In The Name of Allah, The Most Merciful, The Bestower of Mercy.

The Messenger, peace and blessings of Allah be upon him, said:

Verily he lives long among you will see a lot of differing, so you must keep to my Sunnah and to the Sunnah of the Khulafaa ar-Rashideen [the rightly guided caliphs]. Adhere to it with your molar teeth (i.e. adhere to it firmly). And beware of newly invented matters [in the religion], for every newly invented matter [in the religion] is a bidah [innovation in the religion], and every bidah is misguidance. [1]

The Messenger, peace and blessings of Allah be upon him, said:

The Jews divided into seventy-one sects, the Christians divided into seventy-two sects and this Ummah will divide into 73 sect. All of them are in the fire except one. So he was asked, “Who are they [i.e. the saved sect] O Messenger of Allaah?” He said, “Those upon that which I and my companions are upon”. [Footnote a]

Hafs Bin Humaid, may Allah have mercy upon him, said: I said to Abdullah Ibn Al-Mubaarak, may Allah have mercy upon him, “How many sects have this Ummah spilt into?’ He said, “The foundation of the sects are four: the Shia, the Harooriyyah (i.e. khawarij), the Qadariyyah, and the Murji’ah. The Shia split into twenty-two sects, Harooriyyah split into twenty-one sects, the Qadariyyah split into sixteen sects, and the Murji’ah split into thirteen sects”. [2]

After Maya [Footnote b] realises that the term Sunni carries significant weight and that one’s affiliation with it is not taken lightly—especially when it comes to understanding deviant sects and their deviations—we will include a precise statement from Imam Al-Barbahari along with a brief commentary from Al-Allamah Salih al-Fawzan to shed more light on this topic. Additionally, we will provide insights from Al-Allamah Rabee Bin Hadi Al-Mad’khali for further clarification. Imam Barbahaaree [329AH], may Allah have mercy upon him said:

It is not permitted for a man to say, “So and so is a person of the sunnah” until he knows that he combines the characteristics of the Sunnah, so it is not said of him, “a person of the Sunnah” until he combines all the Sunnah.

Al-Allamah Salih Al-Fawzan, may Allah preserve him, commented on the above statement as follows:

Do not give recommended to a person and a praise of him, except based on knowledge, lest the people become deceived by your praise of him, while he is not what (you have stated about him).  So, when his real affair and path is clear to you, his knowledge and steadfastness, you can give him recommendation. As for giving out praise and recommendation whilst not knowing of anything about him, this is a dangerous recommendation through which the people will be deceived by this person. Had only those who give commendations to the people stopped at that (i.e. put it in its proper place), they would not give recommendation, except for one who fulfils the conditions of (receiving) recommendation because recommendation is a witness, thus, if the recommendation is not correct it will be a false witness. And regarding the statement of Imaam Al-Barbahaaree: “until he knows that he combines the characteristics of the Sunnah”. The characteristics of the Sunnah are to be in creed, knowledge and adherence to the (path) of the pious predecessors. But if there is not in him except a single characteristic of the (sunnah), he is not judged to be from Ahlus Sunnah on the basis of a single characteristic or one thing, then what about the one who does not have anything from that? [3]

Al-Al-Allaamah Rabee Bin Hadi Al-Madkhali, may Allah preserve him, was asked: The questioner says: We request a comment from you on this statement: “Indeed both Sunnah and Bidah may be gathered in a man, thus, if the Sunnah is predominant in him, he is a Sunni Salafi. And if bidah is predominant in him, he is an innovator, a misguided one”. Benefit us (i.e. with a comment) and may Allah reward you.

Response: This (statement) is from the [مغالطات-i.e. those misleading statements or affairs that are brought forth for the purpose of deception or sophistry]. There is no doubt that the one in whom Bidah is predominant is an innovator in religious matters, but it is not a condition, for example, that he has thirty (matters) of bidah with him and twenty (matters) of Sunnah, because he may have one bidah with him and thus declared an innovator in religioys matters. Rather the verdict of disbelief may be passed against him. [Footnote c] Because if he adheres to all the Sunnah, but then he says, “Indeed the Qur’an is created”, do we say that the Sunnah is predominant in this (person)? The Salaf (pious predecessors) declared (people) disbelievers due this because the Qur’an is the Speech of Allah and not created. The Salaf held a consensus regarding this. If he says, “I am a Sunni and the Qur’an is created”, we say: ”You are an innovator in religion, a misguided one, rather this innovation of yours is tantamount to disbelief.  Either you recant or else you are a disbeliever.”  We clarify the truth for him and unless he recants, otherwise he is a disbeliever. He rejects the Ruyah (i.e. he rejects the fact that the believers will see Allah on the day of judgement) and says: “I am a Sunni in everything except in this, for I do not believe that Allah will be seen in the Afterlife.” This one (i.e. the person who says this) has belied the Qur’an and the Sunnah.

This principle (i.e. that a person is a Sunni Salafi or an innovator depending whether the Sunnah or Bidah is predominant in him) is false; and how many with a single bidah – among the major bidah- were declared innovators by the Salaf?! Jad Ibn Dirham had two innovations- negation of the attributes of Allah and the statement (i.e. the belief) that the Qur’an is created, whilst he used to pray, observe fasting and worshipped Allah. And how many of Ahlul bidah and the Ubbaad (those dedicated to worship) have numerous (practices) of Sunnah, but alongside this he is an innovator!

Therefore, it is obligated to the Sunni to be solely dedicated to the truth and that his religion (Creed, Methodology and acts of worship) are pure and not stained by anything from the (matters) of bidah. However, if he falls into a Bidah khafiyyah (i.e. an innovation that is obscure or hard to detect), whilst he is desirous of the truth and seeking after it, then if the people were to inform him about it he would recant. So we do not pass the judgement of Tabdee against this person. If he had passed away we ask Allaah to forgive him and we do not pass the verdict of Tabdee against him. If he is alive, we advice him, and unless he accepts (the truth), we pass the verdict of Tabdee against him. [4]

The Shaikh also stated:

All sects of Ahlul Bidah gather truth and falsehood, deny the truth that is with the other sect of Bidah and believes in that which they possess of falsehood. Shaikh Al-Islam Ibn Taymiyyah, may Allah have mercy upon him, said: Allah says:

وَإِذَا قِيلَ لَهُمۡ ءَامِنُواْ بِمَآ أَنزَلَ ٱللَّهُ قَالُواْ نُؤۡمِنُ بِمَآ أُنزِلَ عَلَيۡنَا وَيَكۡفُرُونَ بِمَا وَرَآءَهُ ۥ وَهُوَ ٱلۡحَقُّ مُصَدِّقً۬ا لِّمَا مَعَهُمۡ

And when it is said to them (the Jews), “Believe in what Allah has sent down,” they say, “We believe in what was sent down to us.” And they disbelieve in that which came after it, while it is the truth confirming what is with them]. [Al-Baqarah 91]

The Shaikh also stated: As for the one who falls into an innovation, then he is of categories. he first category: Ahlul-Bid’ah such as the Rawāfid, the Khawārij, the Jahmiyyah, the Qadariyyah, the Mu’tazilah, the Grave-worshipping Sūfīs, the Murji’ah, and whoever is connected to them [in our times] such as al-Ikhwān, at-Tablīgh and those similar to them. For these innovations the Salaf did not make it a condition that the proof be established due to the fact that the ruling upon them is [in accordance to] the innovation. So regarding the Rāfidī, it is said about him, “Innovator (mubtadi’)”. As for the Khārijī, it is said about him, “Innovator”, and so on, regardless of whether the proof is established upon him or not. [5]

This above statement by Al-Allamah Rabee shows that the kahwaarij are Mubtadi’ah, outside the Sunnah and Sunniyyah, and it is well-known that groups like ISIS and Al-Qaeda are offshoots of the Khawarij, thus, they have exited the Sunnah and Sunniyyah.

Must now listen and read on these links regarding ISIS and Al-Qaeda

 

https://abukhadeejah.com/the-evils-of-modern-day-terrorism-and-its-roots-al-qaeda-isis-the-nusra-front-etc/
https://abukhadeejah.com/free-leaflet-combatting-isis-al-qaeda-islamist-insurgencies-worldwide/
https://abukhadeejah.com/isis-in-iraq-syria-ibn-kathir-died-774-ah-if-the-khawaarij-ever-gained-strength-in-iraq-and-syria-there-would-be-mass-killing/

https://islamtees.uk/2020/06/14/a-historical-look-at-the-splitting-of-the-muslim-ummah/

Footnote a:

All in the fire except one

Footnote b: Maya stated in the guardian [Friday 3 January 2025 00.59 GMT

Footnote c:

The Ruling On Takfeer by Shaikh Fawzaan
http://www.spubs.com/sps/sp.cfm?subsecID=MNJ09&articleID=MNJ090004&articlePages=1

[1] Sahih Abi Dawud 4607
[2] Al-Ibaanah by Imam Ibn Battah 1/379-380
[3] It’haf Al-Qaaree Bitta’liqaat Alaa Sharhis Sunnah Lil Imaam Barbahaaree. 2/275-276]
[4] Source:   بهجة القاري بفوائد منهجية ودروس تربوية من كتاب الإعتصام بالكتاب والسنة من صحيح البخاريPages 92-93 Question number 13.
[5 https://abukhadeejah.com/shaikh-rabee-establishment-of-proof-in-declaring-a-person-to-be-an-innovator/

All in the fire except one

Written by Abdullah Jallow on . Posted in Aqeedah (Creed & Belief), Basics, Bid'ah (Innovation), Brotherhood, Contemporary Issues, Da'wah - Calling To Islam, Deviated Groups, Sects and Parties, Fatawa-Rulings, Hadaadis, Innovations In Islam (Bidah), Jahannam (Hell Fire), Jannah (Paradise), Khawaarij, Methodology - 'Manhaj', Monotheism - Tawheed, Morals and Manners - 'Akhlaaq', Pearls of Wisdom, Purification of The Soul, Repentance, Sahaabah, Scholars of Islam, Shi'a, Shirk, Sin, Sufis, The Salaf - Pious Predecessors, Worship - 'Ibaadah'.

In The Name of Allah, The Most Merciful, The Bestower of Mercy.

Imam Abdul Aziz Bin Baz, may Allah have mercy upon him, was asked: “What is the intent behind the statement of the Messenger, peace and blessings of Allah be upon him, statement when he spoke about the Ummah in the hadith: “All of them (the sects) are in the fire except one” and what is that one?. Also, will all the other 72 (deviant) sects be in the fire for eternity? Benefit us”.

Response: The prophet, peace and blessings of Allah be upon him, said, “The Jews split into 71 sects, meaning all of them are astray and their affair ruined, except one. The Christians split into 72 sects, meaning all of them are astray and their affair ruined, except one. And this Ummah will split into 73 sects- all of them in the fire, except one. This one group is Ahlus Sunnah Wal Jamaa’ah [those who firmly adhere to the authentic Prophetic Sunnah and are united upon that] – the companions of the Prophet and those who follow them exactly in faith, the adherents to pure Islamic monotheism and sound faith.

As for the other 72 sects that have been threatened with the fire, among them is one who is a disbeliever (a), among them is one who is a sinner and among them is one about whom it is established with clear evidence that he is an innovator in religious affairs. So, the one – among them – that dies in a state of disbelief (b) will be in the fire for eternity, the one that dies in a state of adherence to religious innovation that is lesser than major disbelief (c) or sins is under the will of Allah, while still threatened with the fire. So, based on this it is known that not all of them are disbelievers, but rather among them is a disbeliever and other than him among the sinners and the innovators in religious affairs. [1]

May Allah bless and reward our beloved brother Zulfikaar for sharing the Arabic text Imam Ibn Baz’s clarification Aameen

——————————————–

[a and b]: NB: Takfeer – declaring that a Muslim left the fold of Islaam is a judgement that can only be given by the upright scholars and none else.  https://www.manhaj.com/manhaj/articles/obkwf-takfir-and-the-excuse-of-ignorance-shaykh-saalih-al-fawzaan.cfm

[c]: NB: All innovations in the religion are evil, but there are those that exit a person from the fold of Islam (Bida’atul Mukaffirah) and those that do not exit a person from the fold of Islam (Bida’atul Mufassiqah). Al-Allamah Rabee Bin Hadi Al-Mad’khalee [may Allaah preserve him] was asked whether there is a difference between Bidah Al-Mukaffirah and Bidah Al-Mufassiqah; so he replied that there is Bidah Mukaffirah, such as rejecting the Ruyah (i.e. denying that the believers will see Allaah in the afterlife); rejecting Allaah’s Uluww [i.e. denying that Allaah is above his creation –Allaah ascended over the Throne in a way that benefits his majesty)]; invoking other than Allaah; offering slaughtered sacrifice (i.e. animals) to other than Allaah etc. These are affairs of Bidah Al-Mukaffirah (the bidah that is tantamount to disbelief). But we do not make Takfeer of the people who commit this type of Bidah until we establish the proofs against them. That is because some of them (i.e. the people who fall into these affairs) carry doubts and are far away from the era of Prophethood and its light (i.e. guidance). So they fall into the likes these innovations. Rejecting the Ruyah is disbelief; rejecting Allaah’s Uluww is disbelief; the saying that the Qur’aan is created is disbelief-major disbelief. But this person, -[who testifies that none has the right to be worshipped except Allaah and that Muhammad is the messenger of Allaah, and he prays, observes fasting, wants paradise and believes in that] -received the doubts of the people of falsehood, so he falls into the likes of these affairs (i.e. these innovations that are tantamount to disbelief). So we say to him: You have fallen into disbelief and the evidence is this and this, and we clarify for him. So if Allaah grants him Tawfeeq and he returns to the truth, then all praise is due to Allaah. But if not, we declare him a disbeliever after establishing the proofs against him. As for Bidah Al-Mufassiqah it is other than this (i.e. it is not at the level of that which is tantamount to disbelief)…
[A paraphrased excerpt. see www.rabee.net/ar/questions.php?cat=26&id=484 ]

[1]: paraphrased. see link below
https://binbaz.org.sa/fatwas/17308/%D8%A7%D9%84%D9%85%D8%B1%D8%A7%D8%AF-%D8%A8%D9%82%D9%88%D9%84%D9%87-%EF%B7%BA-%D9%83%D9%84%D9%87%D9%85-%D9%81%D9%8A-%D8%A7%D9%84%D9%86%D8%A7%D8%B1-%D8%A7%D9%84%D8%A7-%D9%88%D8%A7%D8%AD%D8%AF%D8%A9