Skip to main content

A Brief Mention of Noble and Beloved Companion -Mu’aawiyah Ibn Abi Sufyan

In The Name of Allah, The Most Merciful, The Bestower of Mercy.

Al-Allamah Rabee Bin Hadi Al-Mad’khali, may Allah preserve him, stated:

Indeed this illustrious companion of the Messenger [peace and blessing of Allah be upon him] has a high station and status in the sight of the people who follow the authentic Sunnah and the truth. And even before this station and status of his in the sight of the people who follow the authentic Sunnah and truth, he has a high station in the sight of Allaah’s Messenger. And one of those virtues is that he was a companion of the Messenger and a relative of his through marriage ties [i.e. the Messenger married Muaawiyah’s sister, Umm Habeebah], and he was also from the scribes who wrote down the revelation sent down to the believers through the Messenger.

Indeed the Prophet made a great supplication for him. Abdur-Rahmaan Ibn Abee Umayra [may Allaah be pleased with him] reported that the Prophet [peace and blessings of Allah be upon him] said to Mu’aawiyyah [may Allah be pleased with him], “O Allah! Make him a guide, one guided to the (straight path) and guide (others) by way of him”.

Irbaad Ibn Saariyah [may Allaah be pleased with him] said, “I heard the Messenger [peace and blessings of Allaah be upon him] saying, ‘O Allaah! Teach Mu’aawiyyah the Book (i.e. the Qur’aan) and Al-Hisaab (i.e. knowledge of math, arithmetic, accounting etc) and protect him from the punishment’”.

Umm Haram, may Allah be pleased with her, reported that she heard the Prophet, peace and blessings of Allah be upon him, saying, “Paradise will be granted to the first batch of my followers who will undertake a naval expedition”. (Umm Haram added): I said, “O Messenger of Allah! Will I be amongst them?” He replied: “You are amongst them” The Prophet then said, “The first army amongst my followers who will invade Caesar’s city will be forgiven their sins’. I asked, ‘’Will I be one of them, O Messenger of Allah?” He replied: “No”. Al-Hafidh Ibn Hajar [may Allah have mercy upon him] said: “Al-Muhallab [may Allah have mercy upon him] said: This hadeeth contains [an outstanding virtue] of Mu’aawiyyah because he was the first to undertake a naval expedition”.

Muaawiyah has (virtues with regards to performance of great Jihaad in making uppermost the Allah’s statement (or statement) لا إله إلا الله –None has the right to be worshiped except Allaah]; conquests (i.e. in order that mankind may single out Allaah in worship and abandon everything worshiped besides Allaah) and other distinguished virtues. And (from those distinguished virtues of Mu’aawiyyah) are: Mutual tolerance, kindness, forbearance, patience and justice. And if he had nothing else other than the virtue of being a companion of the Messenger, it would have been sufficient for him.

Abdullaah Ibul Mubaarak [may Allaah have mercy upon him] was asked about Mu’aawiyyah, so he said: “What should I say about a man who (when) the Messenger said: [سمع الله لمن حمده (i.e. in the prayer], he said [ربنا ولك الحمد i.e. whilst praying] behind him”. It was said to him (i.e. Abdullaah Ibnul Mubaarak): “Who is more virtuous-him (i.e. Mu’aawiyyah) or Umar Bin Abdul-Azeez?” He said: “The dust that was in Mu‘aawiyah’s nosetrill whilst he was with Allaah’s Messenger is better and more virtuous than Umar Bin Abdul Azeez [may Allah have mercy upon him]! [1]

Narrated Ibn Abee Mulaikah [may Allah have mercy upon him] who said, “Mu’aawiyah [may Allah be pleased with him and his father] offered one rak`’ah of Witr prayer after the `Isha prayer, and at that time a freed slave of Ibn `Abbas [may Allah be pleased with him and his father] was present. He (i.e. the slave) went to Ibn `Abbas (and told him that Mu’aawiyah offered one rak’ah of Witr prayer). Ibn Abbas said, “Leave him, for he was in the company of Allah’s Messenger (ﷺ).” [2]

Narrated Ibn Abi Mulaikah: Somebody said to Ibn Abbas, “Can you speak to the chief of the believers Mu’aawiyah, because he does not pray except one rak’ah as witr?” Ibn `Abbas replied, “He is a Faqih (a learned man with sound understanding and fear of Allah). [3]

Shaikh Al-Islam Ibn Taymiyyah [may Allah have mercy upon him] said:

Indeed, it has been established by way of Mutawaatir transmissions that the Prophet [peace and blessings of Allah be upon him] did give Mu’aawiyah [may Allaah be pleased with him and his father] a position of authority (in an affair) just as he gave authority to others. He (Mu’aawiyah) performed Jihad with the Prophet and was considered trustworthy by the Prophet to write the revelation for him. The Prophet did not accused him of anything with regards to his writing and Umar Ibn Al-Khattab [may Allaah be pleased with him] – who was one of those well informed regarding the affair of men and Allah manifested truth from his tongue and heart – never accused Mu’aawiyah of anything in his position of authority. [4]

Umar Bin Abdil Azeez [may Allah have mercy upon him] and his justice was mentioned in the presence of Al-A’mash [may Allah have mercy upon him], so he said, “Then how about if you lived during the time of Mu’aawiyah [may Allah be pleased with him and his father]? They said, “O Abu Muhammad! Do you mean in his forbearance?” He said, “No, by Allah; rather his justice”. [5]

On the authority of Al-Jarrah Al-Mawsulee [may Allaah have mercy upon him] who said, “I heard a man ask Al-Ma’aafee Bin Imran [may Allah have mercy upon him], saying, ‘O Abu Mas’ud! Where is Umar Bin Abdul Aziz compared to Mu’aawiyah Bin Abee Sufyan?’ I saw him become very angry, then he said, ‘No one can be compared to the companions of Muhammad. Mu’aawiyah [may Allah be pleased with him and his father] is one the Prophet’s scribes, companions, brothers in law and trustees of the revelation revealed to him (i.e. he was trusted by the Prophet to write down the revelation)”. [6]

Some of The Conquests

In the year 22 AH, the Islamic armies proceeded to the lands of Al-Baab to conquer it. Those lands were inhabited by the Turks, and there the commander of the Islamic army, Abdur Rahmaan Ibn Rabee’ah, met the Turkish king Shahr Baraz. He asked Abdur Rahmaan to make peace and showed willingness to participate in the Islamic army to fight the Armenians.

Abdur Rahmaan sent him the commander Saraqah Ibn Amr, so he received Suraaqah and accepted him. Then he wrote to the Khaleefah Umar Ibn Al-Khattaab [may Allah be pleased with him] informing him of the matter, Umar agreed to what he did and as a result of that, a peace treaty was made and no fighting occurred between the Turks and the Muslims; but rather everyone proceeded to the Armenian lands to conquer them and spread Islam there. The Islamic armies marched to conquer the lands in northeastern Persia until the call to the path of Allah spread in those lands after the fall of the Persian empire, which was an impregnable barrier in front of the Islamic armies. As a result of the Islamic conquests, the door was open for the people of those countries and regions to move freely, including the Turks. Contact was made with the Muslims, and the Turks embraced Islam and joined the ranks of the Mujahideen to spread Islam and raise the word of Allah.

During the Khilaafah of Uthmaan Bin Affaan [may Allah be pleased with him], Tabaristan was conquered, and then the Muslims crossed the Jeihon River in the year 31 AH. They went to the lands beyond the river, and many Turks entered the religion of Islam and became defenders of it and participated in Jihad to spread the call to the path of Allaah. The Islamic armies continued to advance in those regions, so Bukhara was conquered during the Khilaafah of Muaawiyah Bin Abee Sufyan [may Allaah be pleased with him and his father], and these victorious armies penetrated until they reached Samarkand. And as soon as the era of the Islamic state appeared, all the countries beyond the river came under the justice of Islamic rule and these peoples lived under a well established Islamic civilization.

The number of Turks in the court of the caliphs and the Abbasid princes increased and they began to assume leadership and administrative positions in the state, they became soldiers, leaders and writers, and were calm and obedient until they gained the ranks. And when Al-Mu’tasim al-Abbaasee took over the caliphate, he opened the doors to Turkish influence and assigned them to the leadership positions of the state and thus they became involved in state affairs, his policy was aimed at reducing the Persian influence, which had free hand in the administration of the Abbasid state since the era of the Al-Ma’moon’s caliphate. Al-Mu’tasim’s interest in the Turkish caused a state of severe discontent between the people and the soldiers. Al-Mu’tasim feared the people’s vengeance so he established a new city, Samarra, about 125 km from Baghdad, where he lived with his soldiers and supporters. Therfeore, since that date, the Turks began to appear in important roles on the stage of Islamic history, until they established a large Islamic state that had strong ties to the successors of the Abbasid state, known as the Seljuk state. [7]

Read: Jihaad in our times and the guidelines of Jihaad according to Islam
https://www.abukhadeejah.com/salafi-shaikh-fawzaan-on-jihaad-in-our-timesand-the-guidelines-of-jihaad-according-to-islam/

The Rafidah: Enemies of The Sahabah

A man asked Imam AbuBakr Ibn Ayyash, may Allah have mercy upon him, “O AbuBakr! Who is considered a Sunni?” He replied, “The one who, when the vain desires (the sects and innovations in religious matters) are mentioned (criticsed), he does not become angry about any of them (being criticised).” [Al-I’tisam 1/106]

Similarities Between The Rafidah and The Followers of The Distorted and Abrogated Religions

Al-Allaamah Rabee Bin Haadi Al-Mad’khali [may Allah preserve him] stated:

Yahud said that leadership is not suitable except for a man from the family of Dawood. The Raafidah say that leadership is not suitable except for a man from the children of Ali Bin Abee Taalib [may Allah be pleased with him]. Yahud delayed the evening prayer until the stars appeared, and the Raafidah also delay it. Yahud distort the (verses and meaning of the) Torah and the Raafidah distort the (verses and meanings of the) Qur’an. Yahud hate Jibreel (peace be upon him) and they say, “He is our enemy amongst the Angels”. A group amongst the Raafidah say that Jibreal made a mistake by giving the revelation to Muhammad (peace and blessings of Allah be upon him], rather, he was sent to Ali. Yahud used to hate the Sahaabah and Raafidah hate the Sahaabah. Nasaaraa innovated many religious holidays and Raafidah (innovated religious holidays) for the days when Umar and Uthmaan [may Allah be pleased with them] were murdered. Nasaaraa make pictures of Eesaa and Maryam (peace be upon them) and place them in their churches- exalt them and prostrate to them. Raafidah make pictures of their Imams, and exalt them; rather they make Sujud to them and to their graves. [8]

Shaikh Al-Islam Ibn Taymiyyah, may Allah have mercy upon him, said: Ar-Rafd (i.e. the belief of the raafidah) is the greatest door to (major) hypocrisy and heresy”. [9]

Imam Muhammad Ibn Abdul-Wahhaab, may Allah have mercy upon him, said: “The raafidah are those who rejected the Sunnah of the friend of Ar-Rahmaan [i.e. Ar-Rahmaan (Allaah) and His Friend is Muhammad -peace and blessings of Allah be upon him] and they followed the footsteps of shaytaan in the majority of their affairs”. [10]

Imam Ibn Kathir, may Allah have mercy upon him, said: “They are a forsaken group and a despicable sect that follow ambiguities and abandon the entirely clear affairs that have been determined by the Imams of Islam among the Sahaabah, the Taa’bi’een and those who came after them among the scholars who are (highly) recognised in all eras and regions of the earth.” [11]

They have a festival on the 18th of Dhul Hijja, which they consider to be more virtuous than Eidul Adhaa and Eidul Fitr. They call this festival Eidul Kabeer and it is the festival of Ghadeer Khum. They make fasting on this day a highly recommended and emphasised Sunnah. They  exalt the festival of Nayrooz and it is from the festivals of Persia. Some of them say that to take a bath on the Day of Nayrooz is Sunnah. They have a festival on the 9th of Rabi Al-Awwal and it is the festival on behalf of their forefather (Baaba Shujaa Ad-Deen), and that is Abu LuLu’a the fire worshiper who killed Umar Ibnul Khattaab, may Allah be pleased with him. [12]

Imam Laalikaa’ee, may Allah have mercy upon him, reported that Imam Malik, may Allah have mercy upon him, said: Whoever curses the companions of Allaah’s Messenger has no right to the war booty. Allah [The Mighty and Majestic] says: [لِلۡفُقَرَآءِ ٱلۡمُهَـٰجِرِينَ ٱلَّذِينَ أُخۡرِجُواْ مِن دِيَـٰرِهِمۡ وَأَمۡوَٲلِهِمۡ يَبۡتَغُونَ فَضۡلاً۬ مِّنَ ٱللَّهِ وَرِضۡوَٲنً۬ا – (And there is also a share in this booty) for the poor emigrants, who were expelled from their homes and their property, seeking Bounties from Allah and to please him (Surah Al-Hashr. Aayah 8)]. These are the companions of the Messenger, peace and blessings of Allah be upon him, who migrated with him. Then Allah says: [وَٱلَّذِينَ تَبَوَّءُو ٱلدَّارَ وَٱلۡإِيمَـٰنَ  – And those who, before them, had homes (in Al-Madinah) and had adopted the Faith]. These are the Ansaar.

Then Allah says: [وَٱلَّذِينَ جَآءُو مِنۢ بَعۡدِهِمۡ يَقُولُونَ رَبَّنَا ٱغۡفِرۡ لَنَا وَلِإِخۡوَٲنِنَا – And those who came after them say: Our Lord! Forgive us and our brethren who have preceded us in Faith].

Therefore, the war booty is for these three [categories of people]– whoever curses the companions of the Messenger of Allah is not counted amongst [these people] and he has no right to the war booty. [13]

Imam Abdul Azeez Bin Baz, may Allah have mercy upon him, was asked: Based on the knowledge of your eminence of the history of the Raafidah [Shittes]. What is your position regarding initiating the coming together between Ahlus-Sunnah and between them?

Answer: “The coming together of Ahlus-Sunnah and the Raafidhah is not possible because the beliefs are different. The Belief of the Ahlus-Sunnah wal-Jamaa’ah is to single out Allah alone with worship and sincerely making worship for Allah, The Most Perfect, The Most High, and not to call upon anyone along with Him, neither an Angel drawn close nor a Prophet sent.

And it is Allah who knows the matters of the Unseen. And from the belief of the Ahlus-Sunnah is love of the Companions, may Allaah be pleased with all of them and He is pleased with them ? and to believe that they are the most excellent of the creation of Allaah after the Prophets, and the best of them is Abu Bakr As-Siddeeq, then ‘Umar, then ‘Uthmaan, then ‘Alee, may Allaah be pleased with all of them. And the Raafidhah oppose this, so there is no reconciling between the two [beliefs], just as there is no reconciling between the Jews, the Christians, the idol-worshippers and the Ahlus-Sunnah. So for this reason there is no coming closer between the Raafidhah and between the Ahlus-Sunnah due to the differing beliefs as we have clarified.”

Question: Is it possible/permissible to fight alongside them (i.e. the Raafidhah) against the foreign enemy such as the communists and so on?

Answer: “I don’t see that to be possible/permissible. Rather it is obligatory upon Ahlus-Sunnah to be united and be a single ummah, a singular body and to invite the Raafidhah to adhere to whatever is indicated by the Book of Allah and the Sunnah of the Messenger (may the peace and blessings of Allah be upon him) by way of the Truth. If they cling to that, they will be our brothers and upon us would be to co-operate with them. And so long as they continue upon that which they are upon from hatred of the Companions except for a few of them; so their cursing of As-Siddeeq (Abu Bakr) and ‘Umar and their worship of the household of the Prophet such as ‘Alee, may Allah be pleased with him, and of Fatimah, Hasan and Hussain, and likewise their belief in the twelve Imams that they are infallible and that know the affairs of the Unseen– all this is from the most false of falsehoods; All of this opposes that which Ahlus-Sunnah wal-Jamaa’ah are upon.” [14]

Imam Abudul Azeez Bin Baaz – may Allah have mercy upon him- speak about the Aqeedah of the Raafidah: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3z6gy28pLQw

Leading Figureheads of The Rafidah

Abdullah Bin Sabah

Al-Allaamah Muqbil Bin Haadi al-Waadi’ee [may Allah have mercy upon him] stated:

Abu Ya’laa [may Allah have mercy upon him] reported in his Musnad from Al-Jalaas [may Allah have mercy upon him] who said: I heard Ali [may Allah be pleased with him] saying to Abdullah Bin Saba, “Indeed, there will be thirty liars at the approach of the hour, and you are one of them”. Abdullah Bin Saba had followers and they were called the Saba’iyyoon. They believe that Godhead is with Ali. Ali burnt them with fire during his Khilaafah. Do not think that the followers of Abdullaah Bin Saba have perished, (rather) there is that leader of misguidance, Khomeini, who displays jealousy for Islam, yet he destroys its pillars. Some of the ignorant ones amongst the Muslim Brotherhood (Sect) were deceived by Khumeini, and they used to mention him on the pulpits; but when the Book titled, “Jaa’a Dawrul Majoos” came out, they were shaken. They kept quiet and did not praise Khomeini (anymore). Perhaps the Muslims will take a lesson from the story of Abdullah Bin Saba and be warned against the machinations and filth of the Raafidah because their call is based on deception.

The Saba’iyyoon are the companions of Abdullah Bin Saba, who said to Ali, “You are; you are”- meaning, “You are the deity”. Haafidh Adh-Dhahabi [may Allah have mercy upon him] said: “Abdullah Bin Saba was from the extremists amongst the heretics- misguided and misguiding others”. Ibn Asaakir [may Allah have mercy upon him] said: “He was originally from Yemen; a Jew who manifested Islaam, traveled around the Muslim lands to turn them away from obedience to their leaders and to bring about evil between them, and he entered into Damascus for that reason”.

Al-Mugheerah Bin Sa’eed

Al-Haafidz Adh-Dhahabi [may Allah have mercy upon him] stated in Al-Meezaan and Al-Haafidz Ibn Hajr [may Allah have mercy upon him] stated in Lisaan Al-Meezaan (6/75): “Al-Mugheerah Bin Sa’eed Al-Bajalee Al Koofee- the Raafidi, the liar”.

Ibn Adee [may Allah have mercy upon him] said, “There was none in Kufa more cursed than Al-Mugheerah Bin Saeed due to the falsehood he narrated about Ali [may Allah be pleased with him]. He was always telling lies about the family of the Prophet [peace and blessings of Allah be upon him] and he had no chain of narration for what he narrated”. Al A’mash [may Allah have mercy upon him] asked the heretic Al-Mugheerah Bin Saeed, “Did Ali use to give life to the dead?” He replied, “By the One in whose hand my soul is, had Ali wished, he could have brought Aad and Thamud back to life”.

Ishaaq Bin Muhammad An-Nakha’ee Al-Ahmar

Haafidh Ad-Dhahabee [may Allah have mercy upon him] stated in Al-Meezaan and Ibn Hajr [may Allah have mercy upon him] stated in Lisaanul Meezaan (1/370): “Ishaaq Bin Muhammad An-Nakha’ee Al-Ahmar was a liar and a deviant amongst the Ghulaat (extremists)”.

Al-Khateeb [may Allah have mercy upon him] said: I heard Abdul Waahid Bin Ali Al-Asadee [may Allah have mercy upon him] saying: “Ishaaq Bin Muhammad An-Nakha’ee was upon a filthy school of thought, and he said that Ali [may Allah be pleased with him] is Allah [The Mighty and Majestic]”.

Al-Hasan Bin Yahyaa An-Nawbakh’tee (a) [may Allah have mercy upon him] stated in his book titled Ar-Radd Alal Ghulaat [A refutation against the extremists]: “Ishaaq Bin Muhammad Al-Ahmar claimed that Ali [may Allah be pleased with him] is Allah [Glorified be Allah and free is He from all imperfections] and that Ali manifested himself in Al-Hasan, and then in Al-Husain [may Allah be pleased with them], and that Ali was the one who sent Muhammad [peace and blessings of Allah be upon him] as a Messenger”.

These are some of the fairy tales and lies of the Raafidah and (none) can protect you from these falsehoods except Allah [Glorified be He and free is He from all imperfections]. Therefore, you should hold fast to the Book (of Allaah) and the (authentic) Sunnah of His Messenger, and Allah guides whomsoever He pleases to the straight path. And do not think that these fairy tales have ceased and decreased, (rather) due to these fairy tales, the Raafidah of Iran are still waiting for the emergence of Muhammad Bin Al-Hasan Al-Askari. (b) [15]

(a) Al-Hasan Bin Yahyaa An-Nawbakh’tee [may Allah have mercy upon him] should not be confused with Hasan Ibn Musa An-Nawbakh’tee who was a Shia writer.

(b) They claim that this Hasan Al-Askari is hiding in a tunnel waiting to emerge.
Visit: http://www.shia.bs/


[1] https://rabee.net/%D8%A8%D9%8A%D8%A7%D9%86-%D9%85%D9%86%D8%A7%D9%82%D8%A8-%D9%85%D8%B9%D8%A7%D9%88%D9%8A%D8%A9-%D8%B1%D8%B6%D9%8A-%D8%A7%D9%84%D9%84%D9%87-%D8%B9%D9%86%D9%87-%D9%88%D8%A7%D9%84%D8%B0%D8%A8-%D8%B9/

[2] Saheeh Al-Bukhaari. Number 3764]

[3] Saheeh Al-Bukhaari. Number 3765]

[4] Majmoo Al-Fataawaa 4/472]

[5] As-Sunnah By Al-Khallaal. 1/437]

[6] Ash-Sahree’ah By Imaam Al-Aajuree 5/2466-2467]

[7] An Excerpt from Ad-Dawlah Al-Uthmaaniyyah Awaamil An-Nuhood Wa Asbaab As-Suqoot. Vol 6. Pages 23-24.slightly paraphrased]

[8] An Excerpt from “Man Hum Irhaabiyyoon, Ahum As-Safiyyoon Aw Rawaafid. pages 20-22]

[9] Majmoo Al-Fataawaa 4/428]

[10] Risaalah Fee Ar-Radd  Alaa Ar-raafidah of Shaikh Muhammad Ibn Abdul-Wahhaab: page 5]

[11] Al-Bidaayah Wan-Nihaayah: 5/287]

[12] [شيعة الشيطانpage: 67]

[13] Sharh Usool Al-Ittiqaad Ahlis Sunnah Wal-Jamaa-ah: 7/1268-1269]

[14] Translated by Shaikh Abu Khadejah at salafitalk.net 14/08/2006

[15] An Excerpt from Il’haadul Khomeini Fee Ardil Haramayn. Pages 125-140

The Encounter of Two Renowned Grammarians – Ibn Taymiyyah and Abu Hayyan.

In The Name of Allah, The Most Merciful, The Bestower of Mercy.

وقد بَحَثَ بَحْثًا فَائِضًا فِي الفَرْقِ بَينَ المَدْحِ والحَمْدِ، كَتَبَ كِتَابَةً فَائِقَةً فِي ذلك، وقال : كَانَ شَيْخُنَا إِذَا بَحَثَ فِي مِثْلِ هَذَا أَتَى بِالعَجَبِ العُجَابِ.
ولكنه كما قيل
تَأَلَّقَ البَرْقُ نَجْدِيًّا فَقُلْتُ لَهُ
إِلَيكَ عَنِّي فَإِنِّي عَنْكَ مَشْغُولُ

يعني أنه أي شيخ الإسلام ابن تيمية رحمه الله – مُنْشَغل بما هُوَ أعم من التحقيق في اللغة العربية، وإلا فهو أعني شيخ الإسلام رحمه الله – آية في اللغة العربية، فإنه لما قَدِمَ مصر واجْتَمَعَ بأبي حَيَّانَ المصري الشهير صاحب (البحر المحيط) في التفسير، وكان أبو حَيَّان يثني على شيخ الإسلام ثناء عاطرًا وَيَمْدَحُهُ
بقصَائِدَ عِصَامِيَّة ومن جملة ما يقول فيه:

قَامَ ابْنُ تَيْمِيةَ فِي نَصْرِ شِرْعَتِنَا مَقَامَ سَيِّدِ تَيْمِ إِذْ عَصَتْ مُضَرُ

يعني أبا بكر – رضي الله عنه – يومَ الرِّدَّةِ.

فلما قَدِمَ شيخ الإسلام مِصرَ اجْتَمَعَ بِأَبِي حَيَّانَ وتَنَاظَرَ مَعَهُ فِي مَسْأَلَةٍ نَحْوية،
واحتج عليه أبو حيان بقول سيبويه في كتابه
قال: إن سيبويه قال كذا وكذا، فَكَيْفَ تُخَالِفُهُ؟
فقال له شيخ الإسلام ابن تيمية: وهل سِيبَوَيْهِ نَبِيُّ النَّحْو حَتَّى يُحِبَ عَلَيْنَا
اتباعه ؟!
ثم قال: لقد غَلط في الكِتَابِ في أَكْثَرَ مِنْ ثَمَانِينَ مَوْضِعًا لَا تَعْلَمُهَا أَنت
ولا هو، بعد ذلك أَخَذَ أبو حَيَّان عليه وهَجَاهُ، وَأَنْشَأَ قَصِيدَةً يَهْجُو فيها شيخ
الإسلام ابن تيمية ، نسأل الله العَافِيةَ، عفا الله عنَّا وعَنْهُمْ جَمِيعًا

While speaking about Imam Ibn Al-Qayyim’s, may Allāh have mercy upon him, book “Bada’i Al-Fawa’id”, Imam Muhammad Ibn Salih Al-Uthaymin, may Allāh have mercy upon him, said: Indeed, he conducted an extensive research on the difference between [المَدْحِ] and [الحَمْدِ], and wrote an exceptional written work on the subject. He (Ibn Al-Qayyim) said: “When our Shaikh (i.e Shaikh Al-Islam Ibn Taymiyyah) used to research on the likes of this (topic), he presented (some) of the most amazing of things. However, as it is said: ‘The lightning shone brightly in Najd, and I said to it, ‘Depart from me, for I am preoccupied (with other matters)’”. That is, Shaikh Al-Islam Ibn Taymiyyah, may Allah have mercy on him, was engaged in matters that extend beyond the mere investigation of the Arabic language, but apart from that he was an Ayah (a sign) in the Arabic language. When he arrived in Egypt, he met with Abu Hayyan Al-Misri, may Allāh have mercy upon him, the well-known author of “Al-Bahr Al-Muhit” in Tafsir.  Abu Hayyan used to praise Shaikh Al-Islam with heartfelt (or excellent) commendations and praising him in lines of poetry. From what he said was: “”Ibn Taymiyyah stood in defense of our (Islamic) Shariah in a manner akin to that of Sayyid of Taym, when Mudar rebelled”. (Sayyid Taym) meaning Abu Bakr, may Allah be pleased with him, during the Apostasy Wars.

So, when Shaikh Al-Islam Islam arrived in Egypt, he convened with Abu Hayyan and engaged in a debate (or mutual discussion) with him regarding a grammatical issue. Abu Hayyan cited the words of Sibawayh from his book as evidence, stating, “Sibawayh said so and so; how can you contradict him?” Shaikh al-Islam Ibn Taymiyyah said to him, “Is Sibawayh a  prophet of grammar, thus it is obligated to us to follow him?” He (Shaikh Al-Islam) further said, “He (Sibawayh) has made errors in the book in more than eighty instances, which neither you nor he are aware of”. After this, Abu Hayyan censured and disparaged him (in this affair) – composed a poem in which he disparaged Shaikh al-Islam Ibn Taymiyyah. We ask Allah for wellbeing, and may Allah pardon us and all of them. [Paraphrased]

Sharh Hilya Talib Al-Ilm pages 175-176

Exquisite Equitable Enforcement of Justice

In The Name of Allah, The Most Merciful, The Bestower of Mercy.

Equal Application of the Law On All Those Have Reached The Age of Accountability or Considered Accountable In Islamic Law

Aa’isha, may Allah be pleased with her, reported that the Quraish had been anxious about the Makhzumi woman who had committed theft, and said, “Who will speak to Allah’s Messenger, peace and blessings of Allah be upon him, about her?” They said, “Who dare it, but Usamah, the loved one of Allah’s Messenger?” So Usamah spoke to him. Thereupon Allah’s Messenger said, “Do you intercede regarding one of the punishments prescribed by Allah?” He then stood up and addressed (people) saying, “O people! Those who have gone before you were destroyed, because if any one of high status committed theft amongst them, they spared him; and if anyone of low status committed theft, they inflicted the prescribed punishment upon him. By Allah, if Fatima, daughter of Muhammad, were to steal, I would have her hand cut of”. (1)

“Do you intercede regarding one of the punishments prescribed by Allah?” Meaning, it is not permissible to intercede regarding the divine prescribed punishments.

“Those who have gone before you were destroyed because if any one of high status committed theft amongst them, they spared him; and if anyone of low status committed theft, they inflicted the prescribed punishment upon him”. Meaning, destroyed through punishment due to their sins. They were destroyed due to this matter because they said, “This is a person of high status and it is not possible to cut his hand”. When a person of high status amongst them stole, they let him off, (but) when a person of low status stole, they established the punishment on him, thus the implementation of Allah’s prescribed punishments was carried out based on their desires. In this hadith is proof to show that the nations before us committed theft, and that there was much theft in their midst including the wealthy, the poor, the one of high status and the one of low status.

The Messenger then made an oath – even though he is the righteous and truthful one without making an oath – that “By Allah, if Fatima, daughter of Muhammad, were to steal, I would have her hand cut of”.

O Allah! Send Your Salutations and blessings upon him (i.e. the prophet). This is how justice should be and the manner in which Allah’s rulings are to be applied, and not through desires. He made an oath that if Fatimah – who was of a higher status than that Makhzumi woman, both in nobility and lineage, because she is the leader of the women of paradise, the daughter of Muhammad – stole, he would cut her hand. (2)

Imaam An-Nawawi, may Allah have mercy upon him, stated that Imam Muslim, may Allah have mercy upon him, mentioned narrations in the chapter regarding the forbiddance of interceding in the divine ordained punishments and that this was the cause of the destruction of the Children of Israel. The scholars unanimously agreed that – due to these narrations – interceding in the divine ordained punishments – after the affair has reached the leader – is prohibited. As for before it reaches the leader, most scholars have permitted intercession if the one being interceded for is not an evil person and harmful to the people. As for the sins (or acts of disobedience) for which there are no prescribed punishments, then intercession regarding them is permissible whether the affair has reached the leader or not. Intercession in these affairs is desirable if the one being interceded for is not a harmful person and so on. (3)


[1] Saheeh Muslim. 1688a

[2] An Excerpt from Sharh Riyaadus Saaliheen 6/525-530 By Imam Muhammad Ibn Saalih Al-Uthaymeen (may Allah have mercy upon him)

[3] An Excerpt from ‘Sharh Saheeh Muslim’. 11/155

A Principle In The Qur’an: “Turning Away From What Is Beneficial Is Replaced With Harm”

In The Name of Allah, The Most Merciful, The Bestower of Mercy.

Whoever Abandons What is Beneficial Will Be Put to Trial With What Is Harmful

Imam As-Sadi, may Allaah have mercy upon him, stated:

This is found in a number of verses, that when the polytheists shunned the worship of Ar-Rahmaan (Allah), they were put to trial with the worship of images (idols).

When they displayed haughtiness and claimed that the Messengers were (only) humans (i.e. therefore they are not obliged to follow the Messengers), they were put trial with submission to everything that made (their) intellect and religion unstable.

When Iman was clearly shown to them (i.e. the disbelievers) at the first instance and they recognised it, but then turned away from it, Allah – Glorified be He and free is He from all imperfections- turned away, afflicted and sealed their hearts.  Thus, they did not believe until they perceived the painful punishment.

After the straight path was clarified for them, but they deviated from it by choice and approved the path of deviation in opposition to the path of guidance, they were punished- Allah allowed their hearts to stray (due to their own wrong doing) and became confounded in their path (of misguidance).

When they belittled the signs of Allah and His Messengers, Allah belittled them with a humiliating punishment. When they displayed haughtiness, Allah humiliated them in this life and the next.

When they forbade that Allah’s Name be glorified and mentioned in the Mosques of Allah and strive for their ruin, it was not fitting after that they should enter it except in fear.

وَمِنْهُم مَّنْ عَاهَدَ اللَّـهَ لَئِنْ آتَانَا مِن فَضْلِهِ لَنَصَّدَّقَنَّ وَلَنَكُونَنَّ مِنَ الصَّالِحِينَ
فَلَمَّا آتَاهُم مِّن فَضْلِهِ بَخِلُوا بِهِ وَتَوَلَّوا وَّهُم مُّعْرِ‌ضُونَ
فَأَعْقَبَهُمْ نِفَاقًا فِي قُلُوبِهِمْ إِلَىٰ يَوْمِ يَلْقَوْنَهُ بِمَا أَخْلَفُوا اللَّـهَ مَا وَعَدُوهُ وَبِمَا كَانُوا يَكْذِبُونَ

And of them are some who made a covenant with Allaah (saying): ”If He bestowed on us of His Bounty, we will verily give Sadaqah (Zakat and voluntary charity in Allaah’s cause) and will be certainly among those who are righteous”.  ‘Then when He gave them of His Bounty, they became niggardly [refused to pay the Sadaqah (Zakat or voluntary charity)], and turned away, averse.  So He punished them by putting hypocrisy into their hearts till the Day whereon they shall meet him, because they broke that (covenant with Allaah) which they had promised to Him and because they used to tell lies”. [at-Tawbah. Aayaat 75-77]

The verses that convey this meaning are numerous and in them is that a servant (of Allah) was close to being guided and made to follow the straight path, but then he abandoned it after being acquainted, or he renounced it after following it, thus he is punished and has no right to guidance.  This is a recompense for his actions, as Allah says about the Yahud (i.e. those who knew the truthfulness of Muhammad’s (peace and blessings of Allah be upon him) Messengership, but turned away from it wilfully)]:

وَلَمَّا جَاءَهُمْ رَ‌سُولٌ مِّنْ عِندِ اللَّـهِ مُصَدِّقٌ لِّمَا مَعَهُمْ نَبَذَ فَرِ‌يقٌ مِّنَ الَّذِينَ أُوتُوا الْكِتَابَ كِتَابَ اللَّـهِ وَرَ‌اءَ ظُهُورِ‌هِمْ كَأَنَّهُمْ لَا يَعْلَمُونَ
وَاتَّبَعُوا مَا تَتْلُو الشَّيَاطِينُ عَلَىٰ مُلْكِ سُلَيْمَانَ

And when there came to them a Messenger from Allaah (i.e Muhammad) confirming what was with them, a party of those who were given the Scripture threw away the Book of Allaah behind their backs as if they did not know!  They followed what the (devils) gave out (falsely of the magic) in the lifetime of Sulaymaan.  [Al-Baqarah. Ayaat 101-102]

They abandoned the most sublime, the most beneficial and the most truthful of the Books (i.e. the Qur’aan), thus Allah put them to trial with following that which is the most debased, most untruthful, and most harmful. Those who wage war against Allah and His Messenger abandon spending their wealth in obedience to Allah, and (instead) spend it in obedience to shaytaan.


An Excerpt from ‘Al Qawaa-idul Hisaan Li-tafseer Al Qur’an’ Pages 96-97

An Important Matter to Contemplate Concerning Knowledge and Influence When Muslims Conquered Various Regions

In The Name of Allah, The Most Merciful, The Bestower of Mercy.

Al-Allamah Salih Aala Ash-Shaikh, may Allah preserve him, said:

When the Muslims conquered the different regions of the earth and Islam spread, the affair became as if it started from the non-Arabs, until the people of Persia and other non-Arabs became the scholars and the Imams of the mosques, and people acquired knowledge from them. It is recorded in Islamic history that many non-Arabs led the Muslims in knowledge, in issuing religious verdicts, and in many affairs. Take for example Abu Haneefah, may Allah have mercy on him, who was not an Arab, and Imam Al-Bukhaari, may Allah have mercy on him, and how his book became an upright example, and there’s none amongst the Muslims except that he knows Imam Abu Abdillaah Muhammad Bin Ismaa’eel Al-Bukhaari. Consider other examples – besides Al-Bukhaari and Abu Haneefah – among the Imams of Islam. When Islam came with its implementation, it abolished the differences that were initiated by the people and those non-Arabs became the leaders and Imams of the Arabs; why? Because they carried the religion, raised the banner of pure Islamic monotheism – there is no deity worthy of worship except Allah and Muhammad is the Messenger of Allah, and because there is no distinction in virtue between a non-Arab and an Arab, except through fear of Allah.

When the Muslims disciplined themselves with Islam, there was no dispute between them regarding social class through that pre-Islamic dispute and distinction because neither did they accept leadership nor give precedence to anyone based on this; rather they accepted everyone because people are equal in this affair. Quraysh’s rulership, the Umayyad rulership, and the Abbasid rulership ended; then the rulership of the Mamluks arose and thereafter the rulership of Banee Uthman – meaning in the beginning when it was upright; so the Muslims obeyed them and they became the leaders and rulers because the Muslims saw that there was welfare for the people in doing so. Therefore, class differentiation and its practice were abolished from the beginning; rather no one had any reservation in implementing Islam. So, Islamic history attests to the implementation of this great principle.

[Listen here: https://youtu.be/wRkeYjcJ728?si=xVE-_LmQAkZUwAJC ]

Chapters From The Life of Shaikh Rabee- Excerpts From a Forthcoming Publication

In The Name of Allah, The Most Merciful, The Bestower of Mercy.

We praise and thank Allah for guiding us to this blessed Salafi Methodology and acquainting us with its scholars in the Muslim lands and their students in the East and the West. To proceed:

When our brother Amjad Khan, may Allah preserve him, visited Kuwait before, he received permission from Shaikh Khalid, may Allah preserve him, to translate this amazing biography of Al-Allamah Rabee Ibn Hadi Al-Mad’khali – may Allah preserve him. Upon receiving this news, we informed Ustadh Abu Tasneem Mushaf Al-Banghali, may Allah preserve him, and some of our elder teachers. By the Tawfeeq of Allah, there are chapters filled with gems that have already been translated and waiting to be edited, then excerpts will be shared online while the book form is prepared. As soon as all the material is ready for formatting, it will be presented to both Shaikh Khalid and our local Mashaayikh, may Allah preserve them, to offer advice and guidance, then Salafipublications will be requested to publish it after being satisfied with it. May Allah bless all our younger teachers and Salafi brothers, especially those who have come forward to help with the editing and proofreading of the translation and preparation due to their love of cooperation upon Bir and Taqwah.

The Seventh Excerpt:

Fusool_Shaikh_Rabee_Chapter_7_Excerpt

An Important Matter to Recall Concerning the Trustworthy People of Your Country

In The Name of Allah, The Most Merciful, The Bestower of Mercy.

أتى داود بن علي الأصبهاني إلى صالح بن أحمد بن حنبل وكان بينه وبين صالح بن أحمد حسن (يعني: علاقته به كانت حسنة) فكلم صالحا أن يتلطف له في

الاستئذان على أبيه.

فأتى صالح أباه أحمد بن حنبل) فقال له : رجل سألني أن يأتيك؟

قال: ما اسمه ؟

قال داود

قال : من أين؟

قال: من أهل أصبهان.

قال: أي شيء صناعته ؟

قال : وكان صالح يروغ عن تعريفه إياه. فما زال أبو عبد الله يفحص عنه حتى فطن.

فقال: هذا قد كتب إلي محمد بن يحيى النيسابوري في أمره انه زعم أن القرآن محدث فلا

يقربني.

قال : يا أبت ينتفي من هذا وينكره.

فقال أبو عبد الله (أحمد بن حنبل): محمد بن يحيى أصدق منه لا تأذن له في المصير إلي “.

Dawud Ibn Ali al-Isfahani approached Salih Ibn Ahmad Ibn Hanbal, with whom he had a good relationship. He requested Salih to kindly seek permission for him to visit his father. Salih then went to his father- (Imam Ahmad)- and said: “A man has asked me to come to you.” He (Imam Ahmad) said: “What is his name?” He (Salih) said: “Dawud”. He said: “Where is he from?” He (Salih) said: “He is from the people of Isfahan”. He said: “Has he done anything (i.e. involved in anything wrong)?” Salih hesitated, thus Abu Abdillah (Imam Ahmad) did not cease scrutinising until he realised (who this Dawud is). Then he said: “Muhammad Ibn Yahyah An-Naysaabooree wrote to me concerning the affair of this one (i.e. Dawud) that he claims that the Quran came into existence (created), [a] so he should not come near me (i.e. should not come to me).” Salih said: “O My father! He has disclaimed and rejected this (statement or claim)”. Abu Abdillah (Imam Ahmad) said: “Muhammad Ibn Yahya is more truthful than him; do not grant him permission to approach me”. [1] 

This serves as a reminder to everyone that poor behaviour and the expectation of evading consequences are ineffective when interacting with honest individuals. When you engage in misconduct and continue down that path while simultaneously searching for an escape, it is undeniable that the trustworthy people within your community, where your misdeeds have transpired, possess a deeper understanding of your situation than anyone else. This holds true despite any favourable relationships or positive perceptions you may enjoy in other circles.

Those who place their trust in you, yet remain somewhat oblivious to your true circumstances, are excused. In contrast, astute scholars or seasoned students of knowledge of your homeland will meticulously analyse your strategies with a discerning eye. They possess a keen ability to identify audacious political strategies, duplicitous actions taken for self-serving purposes, the intentional distortion of truths or situations, and the concealment of pertinent information for personal benefit. Furthermore, they recognise the nuanced and indirect assertions of qualifications or merits aimed at self-advancement, the overt and covert persuasion manifested in both dialogue and conduct, whether direct or indirect, as well as the efforts to broker solutions while neglecting to amend past misdeeds through a myriad of tactics.

They are capable of recognising your efforts to control the terms of the discussion and its outcomes, redirecting conversations from topics where you are at a disadvantage to those where you feel more confident. They understand that when your tactics are unwelcome to those who are intimately familiar with you, you tend to shift the dialogue towards a hypothetical pursuit of greater aspirations and benefits. They know that this is a strategy to narrow the conversation and dominate it, rendering the insights of those who genuinely understand your situation insignificant and irrelevant. Likewise, they know that this maneuver of yours involves knowing precisely when to advocate for this limited perspective and when to refrain from doing so. They assess you based on what you express through your words, actions, gestures, and the implications they draw from their long-standing understanding of your situation. Ultimately, though, it is only Allah who truly knows the reality of your affairs. Allah says:

وَأَسِرُّوا قَوْلَكُمْ أَوِ اجْهَرُوا بِهِ ۖ إِنَّهُ عَلِيمٌ بِذَاتِ الصُّدُورِ

أَلَا يَعْلَمُ مَنْ خَلَقَ وَهُوَ اللَّطِيفُ الْخَبِيرُ

And whether you keep your talk secret or disclose it, verily, He is the All-Knower of what is in the breasts (of men). Should not He Who has created know? And He is the Most Kind and Courteous (to His slaves) All-Aware (of everything). [Al-Mulk. 14-15]

If you believe that He is your Creator and the Creator of your hearts and all they contain, how can (anything) be concealed from Him when He made them?! The statement [بِذَاتِ الصُّدُورِ – what is in the breasts (of men)] includes what the breasts carry in terms of beliefs, intentions, love, and hate. [2] 

Similarly, your justifications, diversions, distortions, and avoidance strategies only increase the burden on your conscience and thoughts. Allah states:

 بَلِ ٱلْإِنسَٰنُ عَلَىٰ نَفْسِهِۦ بَصِيرَةٌ

وَلَوْ أَلْقَىٰ مَعَاذِيرَهُۥ

Rather, man, against himself, will be a witness, though he may put forth his excuses (to cover his evil deeds). [Al-Qiyaamah. 14-15]

“Rather, man, against himself, will be a witness” – Meaning, a person is clear proof against himself based on what he does or does not do, and if he comes up with every excuse to exonerate himself of his wrongdoing, it will not benefit him. [3] “Though he may put forth his excuses”– Mujaahid, may Allah have mercy upon him, said, “Even if he disputes it, he remains a witness to it (i.e. his guilt)”. [4]

We ask Allah:

اللهم كما حَسَّنْت خَلْقِي فَحَسِّنْ خُلُقِي  

O Allah! Just as You made my external form beautiful, make my character beautiful as well.

—————————————————-

[a] https://www.salafisounds.com/the-quran-is-the-speech-of-allah-uncreated-and-a-refutation-of-the-opposers-foundations-of-the-sunnah-of-imam-ahmad-bin-hanbal-lesson-19-by-abu-khadeejah-abdul-wahid/

https://abukhadeejah.com/who-first-spoke-with-the-innovation-that-the-speech-of-allaah-is-created-their-isnaad/


[1] Tarikh Baghdad 8/374]

[2] An Excerpt from Badaa’i At-Tafseer Al-Jaami Limaa Fassarahu Al-Imaam Ibnul Qayyim 3/173

[3] An Excerpt from Tafseer Muyassar

[4] Tafseer Ibn Katheer

[1] Figureheads and Groups of Misguidance, Imposters and Deceivers

In The Name of Allah, The Most Merciful, The Bestower of Mercy.

He is known as Al-Husayn Ibn Mansoor Al-Hallaaj, also referred to as Abu Mughith or Abu Abdillah. His ancestry traces back to a fire worshipper from Persia. He was raised in Waasit, although some accounts suggest he spent his formative years in Tastar. His journey led him to Baghdad and subsequently to Makkah, where he resided in the vicinity of Masjid Al-Haraam, enduring both extreme heat and cold. For many years, he lived without shelter, subsisting on minimal food and water during breakfast for an entire year, driven by a commitment to self-discipline and devotion to worship. He often positioned himself on a rock under the intense sun at the mountain of Abu Qubays.

He accompanied several Sufi figureheads, including Junaid Bin Muhammad, Amr Bin Uthmaan Al-Makkee, and Abul Husayn An-Nooree. Al-Khateeb Al-Baghdaadee said: “The Sufis hold differing opinions regarding Al-Hallaaj; many assert that he does not belong to their ranks and should not be associated with their tradition. This (differing) extends to earlier figures such as Abul Abbas Bin Ataa Al-Baghdaadee, Muhammad Bin Khafeef Az-Sheeraazee, and Ibrahim Bin Muhammad An-Nasraabaadhee An-Naysaabooree, who recognised Al-Hallaaj as being on the right path and documented his teachings. Ibn Khafeef even stated, ‘Al-Husayn Bin Mansoor is a learned scholar.’ Abu Abdir Rahman As-Sulamee, whose full name was Muhammad Ibnul Husayn, recounted hearing Ibrahim Ibn Muhammad An-Nasraabaadhee share insights from Al-Hallaaj regarding the soul, subsequently addressing a critic by saying, ‘If there is anyone, after the Prophets and the truthful, who embodies monotheism, it is Al-Hallaaj.’ Furthermore, Abu Abdir Rahmaan noted that he heard Mansoor Bin Abdillah recount Shiblee’s words: ‘Al-Husayn Bin Mansoor and I are essentially the same, except that he manifested himself while I chose to remain concealed.’ Those who denied Al-Hallaaj’s association with the Sufis attributed his actions to sorcery, asserting that his beliefs align with those of heretics”.

Al-Hallaaj’s pronouncements reflected the concept of Hulool, [a] and he composed poetry associated with Sufiyyah. Since his execution, there has been ongoing debate among the people concerning his legacy. However, the rightly guided jurists, Imams, and scholars reached a consensus that he warranted execution by the authorities, deeming him a foolish and concealed disbeliever, as well as a sorcerer. This perspective was similarly held by the majority of early Sufis. Nevertheless, within the Sufi community, there exists a faction—previously mentioned—that idealises his situation, misled by his external demeanour and unable to comprehend the reality of his speech. Initially, he dedicated himself to worship; however, he lacked knowledge, and his practices were not grounded in the authentic divine path that leads to the pleasure and reverence of Allah. Consequently, Al-Hallaaj contributed more to corruption than to reform. Imam Sufyaan Bin Uyaynah, may Allah have mercy upon him, said: “Those among our scholars who fall into corruption bear a resemblance to the Jews, while those among the worshippers who become corrupt resemble the Christians.” This is the reason Al-Hallaaj engaged in the concepts of Hulool and Ittihaad, ultimately aligning himself with the ranks of corruption and deviation. His situation changed, and he traveled to various places, showing people that he was a guide to the way of Allah. It is well-known that he went to India, learned magic, and claimed, “I use it to call people to the way of Allah.” In India, people spoke of him as someone who helps others in tough times. In Khurasan, they called him the special one, while in Persia, he was known as Abu Abdillah, a man who avoided worldly pleasures. In Khuzestan, he was also called Abu Abdillah, the mysterious one who chose to stay away from worldly pleasures.

Al-Khateeb Al-Baghdaadee conveyed through his chain of narration that Al-Hallaaj stated, “The wisdom of both the early and later generations can be distilled into four statements: loving what is exalted, detesting the despicable, adhering to divine revelation, and maintaining a fear of straying.” It is evident that Al-Hallaaj faltered in the latter two aspects, as he neither adhered to the revelation nor maintained steadfastness; instead, he strayed from these principles and ultimately fell into Bidah and misguidance. Abdur Rahmaan As-Sulamee narrated from Amr Bin Uthmaan Al-Makkee, who stated: “While I was strolling through one of the narrow streets of Makkah, reciting the Qur’an alongside Al-Hallaaj, he listened to my recitation and remarked, ‘I can express something akin to this.’ Thus, I chose to distance myself from him.”

Al-Khateeb Al-Baghdaadee reported, “Mas’ud Bin Nasir conveyed to me that Ibn Bakur Az-Sheeraazee mentioned he heard Abu Zur’ah At-Tabaree state, ‘The situation regarding Husayn Bin Mansoor Al-Hallaaj among the populace is one of differing; some have embraced him while others have dismissed him. However, I recall Muhammad Bin Yahyah Ar-Raazee asserting, ‘I heard Amr Bin Uthmaan denouncing Hallaaj, expressing, ‘Had I the means, I would have slain him myself.’ I inquired, ‘What did you discover with the Shaikh?’ He replied, ‘I recited a verse from the Book of Allah, to which Al-Hallaaj responded, ‘I might be able to produce a statement similar to this.'”

Abu Zur’ah At-Tabaree reported, “I heard Abu Yaqub Al-Aqta state, ‘I arranged the marriage of my daughter to Al-Husayn Al-Hallaaj because I observed that he was adhering to the right path and was diligent in his worship. However, it soon became evident to me that he was a magician, a deceiver, and a malevolent disbeliever.'” This union occurred in Makkah, and the wife was Umm Husayn, the daughter of Abee Yaqub Al-Aqta. She gave birth to a son named Ahmad Ibn Al-Husayn Bin Mansur. In his treatise, Abul Qasim Al-Qushayree discusses the topic of “Safeguarding the hearts of the Mashaayikh.” He recounts an incident in which Amr and Ibn Uthmaan visited Al-Hallaaj in Makkah, where they discovered him engaged in writing on sheets of paper. Amr inquired about his activity, to which Al-Hallaaj responded that he was engaged in a contest with the Qur’an. Following this encounter, Amr stated that he supplicated against Al-Hallaaj, resulting in the latter’s subsequent lack of success. Additionally, Amr expressed his disapproval of Abu Yaqub Al-Aqta for marrying his daughter to Al-Hallaaj.

Amr Bin Uthmaan authored numerous treatises in which he denounced Al-Hallaaj and cautioned the populace against him, disseminating these writings to various regions. Meanwhile, Al-Hallaaj roamed the lands, moving in all directions, and began to present himself as a proponent of the path of Allah, employing a variety of deceptive tactics. He persisted in this behaviour until divine retribution was brought upon him—a punishment that is inescapable for those who commit transgressions. Consequently, he was executed in accordance with Islamic law, which is applied solely to those deemed heretical. He intended to challenge the Qur’an in the sacred vicinity of the Ka’bah, the very place where Jibreel delivered the Qur’an, and indeed, Allah says:

وَمَن يُرِدۡ فِيهِ بِإِلۡحَادِۭ بِظُلۡمٍ۬ نُّذِقۡهُ مِنۡ عَذَابٍ أَلِيمٍ۬

And whoever inclines to evil actions therein or to do wrong (i.e. practice polytheism and leave Islamic Monotheism), him We shall cause to taste a painful torment]. [Al-Hajj. 25]

Trickery: Al-Khateeb Al-Bagdaadee narrated that Al-Hallaaj instructed one of his trusted associates to journey to a mountainous region, providing the following guidance: “Demonstrate your commitment to worship, virtue, and self-restraint to the people. Once they are drawn to you, develop their affection and trust, then reveal to them that you have been stricken with blindness. After a period, disclose that you are also crippled. If they rush to offer you assistance, respond by saying, ‘O benevolent individuals! Your efforts will not benefit me.’ Subsequently, inform them that you have had a dream in which you encountered Allah’s Messenger, peace and blessings be upon him, who conveyed to you, ‘You will only find healing through a Qutb [b], who will arrive on a specific day and month, and his characteristics are as follows.’ At that designated time, I [Al-Hallaaj] will present myself to you.”

The individual, who was an associate of Al-Hallaaj, traveled to that region and took up residence there. He dedicated himself to acts of worship, demonstrated piety, and engaged in the recitation of the Qur’an. Over time, the local populace came to trust and admire him. He then revealed to them that he was afflicted with blindness. Subsequently, he disclosed that he had been enduring a chronic illness, prompting the community to earnestly seek a remedy for his condition, though their efforts proved fruitless. He addressed them, saying, “O benevolent people! Your endeavours have yielded no results, and I have seen the Messenger of Allah, peace and blessings be upon him, in a dream. He informed me that my healing lies solely in the hands of a Qutb, who will arrive on a specific day and month.” Consequently, the people began to escort him to the Masjid, honouring him in anticipation of the Qutb’s arrival as he had foretold. After a period, Al-Hallaaj entered the region quietly, clad in a white woolen garment. He proceeded to the Masjid, occupying a designated spot where he engaged in worship, remaining indifferent to those around him. The people recognised him from the description provided by the individual feigning illness, and they approached him, offering greetings and gently touching him (i.e. as a gesture of admiration and respect).

When the designated time arrived, the people informed the one who was feigning illness about the man in the Masjid. He then asked them to describe the individual. After they provided the description, he remarked, “That is the person of whom I was informed in a dream, that my healing lies in his hands. Please take me to him.” They assisted him and positioned him before Al-Hallaaj. He addressed Al-Hallaaj, saying, “O Abu Abdillah! I had a dream in which I saw Allah’s Messenger,” and proceeded to recount his dream. Al-Hallaaj raised his hands in supplication, then spat into his palms and applied the spittle to the man’s face, resulting in the restoration of his sight as if he had never been blind. He then took some of the spittle and applied it to the man’s legs, enabling him to stand and walk before the gathered crowd, including the leaders and dignitaries of the land, as if he had never suffered from any ailment. The onlookers exclaimed, “Allah is the Greatest! Glorified be Allah!” They praised Al-Hallaaj with an adoration that only amplified the falsehood he had presented to them.

Al-Hallaaj remained with them for a period during which they honoured and revered him. As he prepared to leave, he expressed a desire for them to collect substantial wealth on his behalf. He stated, “I do not need worldly possessions; we have attained this level of piety by renouncing such things. However, it is possible that this companion of mine has brothers and friends among the Abdaal [c], who are diligently striving in the path of Allah at Tartus, engaging in pilgrimage and charitable acts, and they require assistance to continue on this journey.” Subsequently, the man who had been suffering from a chronic illness but was now healed, affirmed, “The Shaikh speaks the truth. Allah has restored my sight and granted me health so that I may dedicate my life to serving Allah and performing hajj alongside our virtuous Abdaal brothers.” He then encouraged the people to contribute wealth. Al-Hallaaj departed, while the man remained with the community until they amassed a considerable amount of wealth, including gold and silver. Once the wealth was collected, he delivered a farewell address and left, subsequently reuniting with Al-Hallaaj to share the gathered riches.

An Incident Regarding a Man Who Witnessed Al-Hallaaj’s Tricks

The witness recounted, “I had often heard tales of Al-Hallaaj’s miracles and longed to witness one for myself. Therefore, I approached him and offered my greetings. He inquired, ‘Do you seek something at this moment?’ I replied, ‘I wish for fresh fish.’ He then entered his home and was absent for an hour. Upon his return, he presented me with a fish that was gasping for air, and his two feet covered in mud. He explained, ‘I prayed to Allah, and He instructed me to go to the riverbed to fetch this fish for you. The mud on my feet is from that area.’ I suggested, ‘If you are willing, you may take me to your home so that I can observe and bolster my faith. I will believe in you unless something contrary is revealed to me.’ He responded, ‘Come in.’ Once inside, he locked the door, sat down, and put on an act. I explored the house but found no other access or information, leaving me bewildered by his situation.”

I observed a barrier in my path, which I shook, causing it to yield. Behind it, I discovered a door that provided access. Upon entering, I found myself in a vast orchard filled with a variety of fresh fruits and an abundance of food. There was a large pond teeming with fish of various sizes. I waded into the water and caught one fish, resulting in my feet becoming muddy, similar to the state of his feet. I then approached the door and called out, “Open the door; I trust you.” However, upon noticing my muddy condition, he became alarmed and attempted to attack me. In self-defense, I struck him in the face with the fish and exclaimed, “O enemy of Allah! You have wearied me today.” After managing to escape, I encountered him again a few days later. He greeted me with a smile and warned, “Do not disclose this. I have not seen anyone; otherwise, I would have sent someone to kill you in your sleep.” It became clear to me that he intended to eliminate me if I revealed what I knew, and I chose to remain silent until he was ultimately crucified. [An Excerpt from Al-Bidaayah Wan-Nihaayah. 11/132-137]

An Explanation Concerning The Khawaariq [Phenomena ascribed to occurrences that transcend the ordinary or typical] and The Deceivers – By Shaikh Al-Islam Ibn Taymiyyah

The Khawaariq, through which the devils lead astray the children of Adam, manifest in various forms, such as when devils assume the likeness of an individual who is either absent or deceased, among other similar instances. This phenomenon has misled numerous individuals who identify as Muslims or as adherents of the Scriptures. Their beliefs are founded on two main points: Firstly, they assert that anyone from whom these khawaariq arise is a Wali, and in Christian terminology, is regarded as a Qadees A’dheem, or a great saint. Secondly, they claim that such individuals are infallible, meaning that all they convey is the truth and all their directives are just. It is entirely possible that an individual did not exhibit any phenomena that deviate from the norm—whether or not it is connected to sound knowledge and piety—or any extraordinary occurrences associated with malevolent deeds. Instead, the individual may have simply engaged in the deceptions characteristic of liars and wicked sinners. The deceptions employed by such individuals are indeed numerous, leading observers to mistakenly perceive them as remarkable events that defy the ordinary. However, this is not the case, nor do these deceptions resemble those attributed to monks. Several authors have documented the tricks of monks, including an account of one who purportedly transformed water into oil. In this instance, as the oil accumulates within the lighthouse, the water level diminishes, causing the oil to rise, thereby misleading onlookers into believing that the water has been converted into oil. Numerous similar instances exist among the deceptions of certain Christians, as all that these individuals—who have distorted the teachings of the Messiah (peace and blessings of Allah be upon him)—claim to be extraordinary are either the work of devils or mere tricks, devoid of any connection to the miracles performed by the righteous.

Similarly, the deviated people – those who seek to change the teachings of Muhammad, peace and blessings of Allah be upon him, engage in practices that are not sanctioned by Allah and His Messenger. They establish these practices as a form of worship, prioritising them over the divinely ordained path. For instance, they may choose to prioritise the sounds of tambourines and high-pitched flutes over the recitation of Allah’s Book. This leads individuals into a state of ecstasy and a trance influenced by Shaytaan, resulting in them speaking in an unfamiliar language. Upon regaining their composure—much like a possessed individual who, under the influence of a jinn, reveals the thoughts and feelings instilled by shaytaan—they find themselves unable to recall their initial utterances. The heretics seek to substitute the teachings of the Messengers, whether they pertain to the religion of the Messiah or that of Muhammad, peace and blessings of Allah be upon them. Among these individuals are those who advocate for heretical beliefs, lead others astray, and include disbelievers, polytheists, apostates, and others. Notable figures among them are Musaylimah the liar, Al-Aswad Al-Unzee, Al-Haarith Ad-Dimashqee, Baba Rumi, and others who have engaged in actions deemed to be from the Khawaariq, often misrepresented as miracles, but which are, in truth, associated with the works of devils.

The tricksters are abundant and do not possess the status of Awliyaa of Allah. Their purported extraordinary actions, which deviate from the norm, are often linked to the malevolent practices of soothsayers and magicians, or they are simply deceptive tricks. Unlike those who are aligned with demonic forces, these individuals intentionally fabricate lies and engage in deceit. Among them are those who mislead others into believing that their actions are miraculous, akin to those of the righteous, while some are fully aware that their deeds stem from diabolical influences, yet they persist in these actions to fulfill their own objectives.

The purpose of this discourse is to highlight that numerous activities deemed unconventional, often referred to as miracles, may actually stem from satanic influences or deceptive practices. This leads individuals to mistakenly believe they are witnessing genuine miracles performed by virtuous individuals. In truth, actions rooted in Shirk and malevolent behavior can only originate from demonic forces. This includes instances where individuals invoke celestial bodies, call upon deceased or absent persons, make oaths using obscure phrases with unknown meanings, or utilise names associated with devils. Additionally, seeking assistance through immoral actions and oppression results in deeds that, while appearing extraordinary, are ultimately from the devils.

The righteous have miracles similar to those of the pious individuals within this Ummah, the disciples of the Messiah, and others who follow the authentic and unaltered faith of the Messiah. However, the presence of miracles in the lives of these righteous individuals does not imply that they are infallible like the Prophets, peace and blessings of Allah be upon them. A righteous person, referred to as a Wali, may indeed exhibit miraculous abilities, yet they can still err in their thoughts, perceptions, or interpretations of what they hear, see, or understand from the revealed Scripture.

Consequently, the assertions made by individuals other than the Prophets may be accepted or dismissed (based on the available evidence). In contrast, it is incumbent upon individuals to sincerely affirm all that the Prophets have communicated concerning matters of the unseen and to comply with their commands. Therefore, Allah has obligated that a person must believe in all that the Prophets have conveyed, while there is no obligation to accept the statements of others. Allah states:

قُولُوٓاْ ءَامَنَّا بِٱللَّهِ وَمَآ أُنزِلَ إِلَيۡنَا وَمَآ أُنزِلَ إِلَىٰٓ إِبۡرَٲهِـۧمَ وَإِسۡمَـٰعِيلَ وَإِسۡحَـٰقَ وَيَعۡقُوبَ وَٱلۡأَسۡبَاطِ وَمَآ أُوتِىَ مُوسَىٰ وَعِيسَىٰ وَمَآ أُوتِىَ ٱلنَّبِيُّونَ مِن رَّبِّهِمۡ لَا نُفَرِّقُ بَيۡنَ أَحَدٍ۬ مِّنۡهُمۡ وَنَحۡنُ لَهُ ۥ مُسۡلِمُونَ

Say (O Muslims), “We believe in Allah and that which has been sent down to us and that which has been sent down to Ibrahim (Abraham), Isma’il (Ishmael), Ishaque (Isaac), Ya’qub (Jacob), and to Al-Asbat [the twelve sons of Ya’qub (Jacob)], and that which has been given to Musa (Moses) and ‘Iesa (Jesus), and that which has been given to the Prophets from their Lord. We make no distinction between any of them, and to Him we have submitted (in Islam).” [Al-Baqarah. 136]

Allah, The Exalted, says:
لَّيۡسَ ٱلۡبِرَّ أَن تُوَلُّواْ وُجُوهَكُمۡ قِبَلَ ٱلۡمَشۡرِقِ وَٱلۡمَغۡرِبِ وَلَـٰكِنَّ ٱلۡبِرَّ مَنۡ ءَامَنَ بِٱللَّهِ وَٱلۡيَوۡمِ ٱلۡأَخِرِ وَٱلۡمَلَـٰٓٮِٕڪَةِ وَٱلۡكِتَـٰبِ وَٱلنَّبِيِّـۧنَ

It is not Al-Birr (piety, righteousness, and each and every act of obedience to Allah, etc.) that you turn your faces towards east and (or) west (in prayers); but Al-Birr is (the quality of) the one who believes in Allah, the Last Day, the Angels, the Book, the Prophets. [Al-Baqarah 177]

The Muslims unanimously agree that anyone who denies the Prophethood of even a single Prophet, whose Prophethood is well-known, is considered a disbeliever or an apostate. There is no differentiation among the Prophets; one cannot accept some while rejecting others. Allah says:

إِنَّ ٱلَّذِينَ يَكۡفُرُونَ بِٱللَّهِ وَرُسُلِهِۦ وَيُرِيدُونَ أَن يُفَرِّقُواْ بَيۡنَ ٱللَّهِ وَرُسُلِهِۦ وَيَقُولُونَ نُؤۡمِنُ بِبَعۡضٍ۬ وَنَڪۡفُرُ بِبَعۡضٍ۬ وَيُرِيدُونَ أَن يَتَّخِذُواْ بَيۡنَ ذَٲلِكَ سَبِيلاً
أُوْلَـٰٓٮِٕكَ هُمُ ٱلۡكَـٰفِرُونَ حَقًّ۬اۚ وَأَعۡتَدۡنَا لِلۡكَـٰفِرِينَ عَذَابً۬ا مُّهِينً۬ا

Verily, those who disbelieve in Allah and His Messengers and wish to make distinction between Allah and His Messengers (by believing in Allah and disbelieving in His Messengers) saying, “We believe in some but reject others,” and wish to adopt a way in between. They are in truth disbelievers. And We have prepared for the disbelievers a humiliating torment. [An-Nisaa. 150-151] [An Excerpt from “Al-Jawaabus Saheeh Liman Baddala Deen Al-Maseeh”. Vol 1. 284-287]

Al-Allamah Rabee Bin Hadi Al-Mad’khali, may Allah preserve him, stated:

Among the Dajjaals – liars – whom the Messenger of Allah, peace and blessings be upon him, cautioned against were Musaylimah the Liar from Yamaamah and Al-Aswad Al-Unzi, both of whom falsely claimed prophethood. Consequently, a significant number of Arabs turned away from Islam; thus, Allah brought about their destruction, along with others, and their trial concluded through the swords wielded by the companions of the Messenger of Allah. Among the liars who claimed prophethood was Mukhtar Bin Abee Ubayd Ath-Thaqafee, the liar regarding whom the Messenger remarked, “A liar will emerge from Thaqeef and bloodshedder”. [d] The liar referred to was Al-Mukhtaar, while the bloodshedder was al-Hajjaaj. Among those who asserted prophethood were Al-Harith, known as the liar, and Ghulaam Ahmad Al-Qadiyaanee Al-Hindee, who garnered a following spread across the globe, claiming that prophethood continues to this day. Each lair is accompanied by other malevolent liars, akin to their leader.

Among the liars was the Jew, the wicked Abdullah Ibn Saba, who falsely professed to be a Muslim and incited numerous individuals against the Rightly Guided Caliph Uthmaan Bin Affaan, may Allah be pleased with him, ultimately leading to his martyrdom during that trial. He is recognised as the originator of the Raafidha Shiite doctrine and its abhorrent principles, which include an exaggerated reverence for the family of the Prophet, to the extent of deifying them. Many adherents regard Ali, may Allah be pleased with him, as an object of worship, asserting that he was designated by the Prophet as his successor in leadership. Such claims are fabrications; they also assert that Ali will return to enact vengeance upon Abu Bakr and Umar, may Allah be pleased with them, as well as five hundred Caliphs from the Banee Umayyah and Banee Abbas. This nefarious individual, Ibn Saba, instigated the disparagement of the Prophet’s companions and other matters related to the trial he initiated, which heretics propagate and firmly uphold, alongside the leaders of the Raafidha—those deceivers who inundate the world with lies and slanders. Their belief system is fundamentally rooted in lies and misguidance.

Among the prominent figures of Bidah and misguidance, including Jahm Bin Safwaan, leaders of the Khawaarij, the Mutazilah, the Huloolee Sufis, and grave worshippers such as Nidhaam Al-Mutazilee, Hallaaj the heretic, Ibn Arabi the heretic, Ibn Sab’een, At-Tilimsaanee, and others among the heretics – liars who concealed themselves within Islam, infiltrating the ranks of the people of Tasawwuf, as this group has proven to be a fertile ground for such individuals. Similarly, the Raafidah provides ample space for the heretics.

Among the liars in this era: The political leaders, including secularists and Baathists (Arab Nationalists), and many people who promote enticing slogans under the banner of Islam, such as Islamic socialism, Islamic democracy, and the call Wahdatul Adyan, along with various other erroneous assertions made in Islam’s name. These claims emerge from groups that profess to elevate Islam and aim to restore the Islamic Ummah to its former greatness; however, their actions only serve to lead people further into misguidance and ignorance, and we seek refuge in Allah.

This presents a more severe danger to the people and the youth, therefore, it is obligated to the Muslims and the students of knowledge to exercise utmost vigilance regarding such people. They must alert the Muslim community to their schemes and intentions, as well as expose their hidden agendas. Furthermore, Muslims should steadfastly adhere to the teachings of the Qur’an and the Sunnah of the Prophet, emulating the Salafus Saaleh (pious predecessors) in their beliefs, methodologies, loyalty, and disassociation. Therefore, Muslims should engage with these individuals in the same manner as the Salafus Saaleh—by exercising caution, issuing warnings, revealing their concealed matters, and highlighting their shortcomings, all in the interest of safeguarding the religion and providing sincere counsel to the Muslims.

Concerning the ongoing struggle between those who uphold the truth and those who support falsehood throughout history and across various locations, it is essential to recognise that the truth will ultimately prevail, as promised by Allah. The religion He has established will triumph, and the followers of truth will gain superiority over those who propagate falsehood. It is inevitable that falsehood and its proponents will face defeat and ultimately fail. Consequently, it is imperative for the followers of truth—specifically the pure Ahlus Sunnah—to remain steadfast and resilient. They must diligently engage in all efforts that support the religion ordained by Allah, encompassing its beliefs, commands, prohibitions, rulings, and methodologies. Furthermore, they should ensure that the truth is upheld against falsehood in all its manifestations, whether it be outright disbelief, hypocrisy disguised as Islam, overt innovations, or innovations that masquerade as Islamic.

Allah, The Exalted, says:
هو الذي أرسل رسوله بالهدى ودين الحق ليظهره على الدين كله ولو كره المشركون

It is He Who has sent His Messenger (Muhammad) with guidance and the religion of truth (Islam), to make it superior over all religions even though the Mushrikun (polytheists, pagans, idolaters, disbelievers in the Oneness of Allah) hate (it)]. [at-Tawbah. 33]

Ahlul Ahwaa (the people of vain desires) share a common animosity with them, therefore, there is nothing else other than that the followers of truth must utilise the prescribed methods to actualise this promise, which is a duty of the scholars of Ahlus Sunnah. Wherever the adherents of the Salafi methodology and their students are or wherever they go, it is obligated to them step up and support one another to raise the truth, Tawheed, and Sunnah, and subdue Bidah, misguidance, and doubts; establishing Allah’s evidence against all the various misguided individuals and exposing the reality of deceivers and impostors. They should know that their adversaries have escalated their schemes and strategies, particularly in their efforts to silence many among Ahlus Sunnah and the adherents of truth, thereby preventing them from challenging falsehood disguised as truth. This category of people among the adherents of falsehood is more dangerous at employing deceit, duplicity, and feigning possession of qualities they do not actually have; as the Messenger, remarked, “The one who claims to possess what he does not is akin to the one who wears two garments of falsehood.” [e]

We find them as ones foremost in extolling the people of falsehood, making their affair appealing (or pleasing), while simultaneously being the most vehement in disparaging the followers of truth and its advocates. They have established corrupt principles to support falsehood and those who adhere to misguided methodologies, waging war against the proponents of truth through the formulation of schemes and abhorrent actions, manifesting their animosity towards the followers of truth, and hastening – without boredom and tiredness- to instruct the youth to resist the advocates of truth, striving diligently to bolster falsehood and undermine its adherents. We beseech Allah, the Exalted, to elevate His Word and guide these individuals or to relieve the Ummah from their evil. Indeed, our Lord is responsive to supplication. May Allah’s peace and blessings be upon our Master Muhammad, his family, and companions until the Day of Judgment.

https://rabee.net/audio/%D8%AE%D8%B7%D9%88%D8%B1%D8%A9-%D8%A7%D9%84%D9%83%D8%B0%D8%A8-%D9%88%D8%A2%D8%AB%D8%A7%D8%B1%D9%87-%D8%A7%D9%84%D8%B3%D9%8A%D8%A6%D8%A9-%D9%88%D9%85%D9%88%D9%82%D9%81-%D8%A7%D9%84%D8%A5%D8%B3%D9%84/

Read:: The Reality Of Sufi Shaikhs By Shaikh Abu Khadeejah- may Allah preserve him: https://www.salafisounds.com/the-reality-of-sufi-shaikhs-by-abu-khadeejah/


[a] Hulool: https://www.salafitalk.net/st/viewmessages.cfm?Forum=8&Topic=3528

[b] What is a Qutb according to the heretical Sufis? A Qutb is a so-called saint or Sufi leader who has a divine relationship with Allah. He transmits knowledge which makes him the axis of the Sufi path and he is not known.

[c] Who are the Abdaal according to the heretical Sufis? They are the so-called seven Awliya and each of them controls one of the seven continents of the world.

[d] Sahih Muslim 2545

[e] Sahih Muslim 2129

[1] The Position of The Believer Regarding Fitan [Trials, Tests, Tribulations, Turmoils, Temptations] – By the Erudite Scholar (Imam Abdul Aziz Bin Baz)

In The Name of Allah, The Most Merciful, The Bestower of Mercy.

Imam Abdul Aziz Bin Baz, may Allah have mercy upon him, said:

All praise and thanks are due to Allah, the Lord of all worlds, and the (praiseworthy) final outcome is for the righteous. May peace and blessings be upon Muhammad, His servant and messenger, as well as his wives and descendants, all his companions, and those who follow his path until the Day of Judgment. To proceed:

I thank Allah, the Exalted, for the blessing of this gathering with the noble brothers in faith and (our) beloved children. I ask Allah that He makes it a blessed gathering, benefits us all with the knowledge He teaches us, rectifies our hearts and actions, protects us from the evils within ourselves and the consequences of our deeds, supports His religion, elevates His word, improves the conditions of Muslims everywhere, and appoints the best among them over their affairs while shielding them from the worst. Indeed, He is Generous and Gracious. Then I thank the overseers of “Imam Muhammad Bin Saud University” for organising this meeting and I ask Allah to multiply their reward, and grant us all success in matters that rectify our religious and worldly affairs, and everything in which there is a rectification for all the Ummah. Indeed, He is the Generous and Gracious.

Dear brothers and sons in faith, the topic of today’s discussion is the believer’s stance towards trials and tribulations—we seek refuge in Allah from their evil. The Prophet, peace and blessings of Allah be upon him, highlighted their dangers and explained the necessary actions we must take in response, as ordained by his Lord.

What is a Fitna [trial and tribulation]? The term “Fitna” encompasses a wide range of meanings, including associating partners with Allah, which is considered the gravest form of Fitna, as Allah says:

وَقَاتِلُوهُمْ حَتَّى لا تَكُونَ فِتْنَةٌ وَيَكُونَ الدِّينُ كُلُّهُ لِلَّهِ

And fight them until there is no more Fitnah and the religion (worship) will all be for Allah Alone. [Al-Anfal 39] – Meaning, until there is no longer Shirk.

Allah says:

يَسْأَلُونَكَ عَنِ الشَّهْرِ الْحَرَامِ قِتَالٍ فِيهِ قُلْ قِتَالٌ فِيهِ كَبِيرٌ وَصَدٌّ عَنْ سَبِيلِ اللَّهِ وَكُفْرٌ بِهِ وَالْمَسْجِدِ الْحَرَامِ وَإِخْرَاجُ أَهْلِهِ مِنْهُ أَكْبَرُ عِنْدَ اللَّهِ وَالْفِتْنَةُ أَكْبَرُ مِنَ الْقَتْلِ

They ask you concerning fighting in the Sacred Months (i.e. 1st, 7th, 11th and 12th months of the Islamic calendar). Say, “Fighting therein is a great (transgression) but a greater (transgression) with Allah is to prevent mankind from following the Way of Allah, to disbelieve in Him, to prevent access to Al-Masjid-al-Haram (at Makkah), and to drive out its inhabitants, and Al-Fitnah is worse than killing. [Al-Baqarah 217]

Fitna also pertains to punishment and burning, as Allah says:

ذُوقُوا فِتْنَتَكُمْ هَذَا الَّذِي كُنْتُمْ بِهِ تَسْتَعْجِلُونَ

(It will be said): “Taste the torment (of your denial). This is what you would (mockingly) request (from the believers) to be hastened.” https://www.thenoblequran.com/q/#/search/51_14

Allah, the Exalted, says:

إِنَّ الَّذِينَ فَتَنُوا الْمُؤْمِنِينَ وَالْمُؤْمِنَاتِ ثُمَّ لَمْ يَتُوبُوا فَلَهُمْ عَذَابُ جَهَنَّمَ وَلَهُمْ عَذَابُ الْحَرِيقِ

Verily, those who put believing men and believing women to trial (in their religion) (and torture and burn them), and then do not repent, for them is the punishment of Hellfire (for their disbelief), and for them is the punishment of a burning Fire (for burning the believers). https://www.thenoblequran.com/q/#/sura/85/6

What is intended in this verse is punishment and burning. Putting them to trial by punishing them.

The term “fitnah” also refers to tests and trials, as Allah says:

وَنَبْلُوكُمْ بِالشَّرِّ وَالْخَيْرِ فِتْنَةً

And We test you with evil and with good as trial. [Al-Anbiya 35] – Meaning, a trial and test.

Allah says:

إِنَّمَا أَمْوَالُكُمْ وَأَوْلادُكُمْ فِتْنَةٌ

Indeed, your wealth and your children are but a trial” [at-Taghabun: 15]- Meaning, a trial and a trial to make it known who utilises their wealth and children in obedience to Allah, fulfilling their duties and avoiding His prohibitions, versus those who deviate from that and follow their desires.

It also pertains to calamities and punishments, as Allah says:

وَاتَّقُوا فِتْنَةً لا تُصِيبَنَّ الَّذِينَ ظَلَمُوا مِنْكُمْ خَاصَّةً

And fear a trial (of affliction) which does not affect (only) those who have done wrong among you in particular. https://www.thenoblequran.com/q/#/search/8_25

It has been transmitted from by Az-Zubair Ibn Al-Awwam, may Allah be pleased with him, and a group of pious predecessors regarding this turmoil that they stated: “We never thought it would affect us until it happened.” This was triggered by the assassination of Uthman; may Allah be pleased with him. A group of ignorant and oppressive individuals, some of whom misinterpreted the truth and were confused about the situation until they unjustly killed Uthman based on false claims and misguided interpretations.

The turmoil then spread widely and intensified, affecting people who had no connection to it and were not affiliated with the oppressors. This led to the events that transpired between Ali and Mu’aawiyyah, may Allah be pleased with them, as well as the occurrences at the Battle of the Camel and the Battle of Siffin, all stemming from the discord caused by the actions of a group of oppressors against Uthman, may Allah be pleased with him.

Then a group led by Mu’aawiyyah demanded justice for the murder of Uthman, may Allah be pleased with him. They approached Ali, may Allah be pleased with him, who had been given the oath of allegiance by the Muslims as the fourth caliph and a rightly guided leader, requesting the handover of the killers. Ali informed them that the situation did not allow for such an action at that moment, assuring them that he would address the matter later and that he was unable to execute them right away. This led to the turmoil and conflict during the battles of Jamal and Siffin, which are well-documented, prompting some of the early scholars, including Az-Zubair, may Allah be pleased with him, to say that the mentioned verse was revealed concerning these events.

This was the first Fitna that arose among Muslims following the death of their Prophet, peace and blessings of Allah be upon him. It affected a large number of companions and others, resulting in the deaths of notable figures such as Ammar Ibn Yasir, Talha Ibn Ubaydullah—one of the ten promised paradise—and Al-Zubair, also among the ten, may Allah be pleased with them. Many companions and others lost their lives during the battles of Jamal and Siffin due to this Fitna (turmoil). [1]

Must Listen to (read) information on the two links regarding the dispute between the noble companions.

https://abukhadeejah.com/our-dawah-and-the-call-to-salafiyyah-that-stands-the-test-of-time-the-companions-their-virtues-their-differences-those-who-follow-them-and-those-who-oppose-them-part-3/

https://www.salafisounds.com/the-disputes-battles-between-ali-aishah-muawiyyah-the-position-of-the-ahlus-sunnah-sharhus-sunnah-al-barbahari-lesson-by-abu-khadeejah/

 

To be continued…InShaAllah


[1] https://binbaz.org.sa/discussions/55/%D9%85%D9%88%D9%82%D9%81-%D8%A7%D9%84%D9%85%D9%88%D9%85%D9%86-%D9%85%D9%86-%D8%A7%D9%84%D9%81%D8%AA%D9%86

Few Matters That Suffices Regarding The Virtue of The Prophets

In The Name of Allah, The Most Merciful, The Bestower of Mercy.

وقال ابنُ القَيِّمِ: (يَكفي في فَضْلِهم وشَرَفِهم أنَّ اللهَ سُبحانَه وتعالى اختصَّهم بوَحْيِه، وجعَلَهم أُمَناءَ على رسالتِه، وواسِطةً بينه وبين عبادِه، وخَصَّهم بأنواعِ كراماتِه؛ فمنهم من اتخذه خليلًا، ومنهم من كلَّمه تكليمًا، ومنهم من رفعه مكانًا عليًّا على سائرِهم دَرَجاتٍ، ولم يجعَلْ لعبادِه وصولًا إليه إلَّا من طريقِهم، ولا دخولًا إلى جنَّتِه إلَّا خَلْفَهم، ولم يُكرِمْ أحدًا منهم بكرامةٍ إلَّا على أيديهم؛ فهم أقرَبُ الخَلقِ إليه وسيلةً، وأرفَعُهم عنده درجةً، وأحَبُّهم إليه وأكرمُهم عليه، وبالجُملةِ فخَيرُ الدُّنيا والآخرةِ إنما ناله العبادُ على أيديهم، وبهم عُرِفَ اللهُ، وبهم عُبِدَ وأُطيعَ، وبهم حصَلت محابُّه تعالى في الأرضِ

Imam Ibn Al-Qayyim, may Allah have mercy upon him, said:

It is sufficient concerning their virtue and nobility that Allah, Glorified and Exalted be He, specifically chose them for His revelation, made them trustees of His message, the ones through whom Allah’s servants receive His guidance, and specifically favored them with various types of His blessings. Among them are those whom He took as close friends (i.e Ibrahim and Muhammad), those whom He spoke to directly (i.e. Musa and Muhammad), and those whom He raised to high ranks above all others (i.e. Muhammad, Nuh, Ibrahim, Musa, and Isa). He did not ordain a path for His servants to reach His pleasure except through them, nor enter His paradise except behind them. He did not honor any of them (i.e. the people) with a blessing except through their hands. They are the closest of creation to Him as a means of drawing close to Allah, the highest in rank in His presence, and the most beloved and honored by Him. In summary, the best of this world and the Hereafter is only attained by people through them. Through them Allah is known, worshipped and obeyed, and through them Allah’s love is attained on earth.


Source: “Tariq Al-Hijratayn 350”

(Paraphrased)

Your feedback is welcomed to improve this translation.

Jazaakumullaahu