Skip to main content

An indispensable battle against the inner-self

Written by Abdullah Jallow on . Posted in Basics, Brotherhood, Contemporary Issues, Methodology - 'Manhaj', Morals and Manners - 'Akhlaaq', Pearls of Wisdom, Purification of The Soul, Scholars of Islam.

In The Name of Allah, The Most Merciful, The Bestower of Mercy.

An indispensable battle against the inner-self (Self-amazement etc)

Abdullah Bin Amr Ibn Al-Aas, may Allah be pleased with him and his father, said: The Prophet, peace and blessings of Allah be upon him, said, “Verily! The people of the hell fire are every [Ja’dhariy – جَعْظَريٍّ], [Jawwaadh – جَوَّاظٍ ], [Mustakbirin-مُسْتَكْبِرٍ ], [Jammaa -جَمَّاع ] and [Mannaa – مَنَّاع ]. And the people of paradise are the [Ad-Du’afaa – الضعفاء ] and the [Maghlooboon-مغلوبون ].

Al-Allamah Zayd Bin Hadi Al-Mad’khali, may Allah have mercy upon him, said:

These nouns are characteristics of the tyrants and haughty people – the people of evil manners who deal badly with those who are close to them and those not closely associated with them- which are the opposites of the characteristics of the weak and oppressed, the lenient, gentle, and good mannered. It appears that the Prophet, peace and blessings of Allah be upon him, encouraged us to adopt the characteristics of the people of Iman —the weak people —while cautioning against the characteristics of the haughty and that one should not exalt himself above the people, not (refuse to) submit to the commands of Allah and His Messenger, and not (refuse to) fulfil the obligations that have been obligated to them by the Shariah. [جَعْظَريٍّ – The one who seeks to be praised for that which is not in him or that which he does not possess]; [جَوَّاظٍ – a wicked sinner]; [مُسْتَكْبِر – one who exalts and raises himself, and is afflicted with self-amazement]; [جَمَّاع – a hoarder] and [مَنَّاع – one who deprives people and is extremely miserly]; [الضعفاء – those who are weak due to humility and are in a weak state in the worldly life] and the [مغلوبون – those who are (unjustifiably) subjugated and suppressed]. [1]

Imaam Sufyaan Ath-Thawree, may Allah have mercy upon him, said:

Beware of what corrupts your deeds, for indeed Riyaa is what corrupts your deeds. If not Riyaa, it may be you being amazed with yourself until it makes you think that you are more virtuous than your brother. It may be that you have not achieved deeds the likes of which he has achieved, and it may be that he has more fear of Allah and righteous deeds than you. And if it is not self-amazement, then beware of loving the praise of the people-loving their praise so that they may honour you due to your deeds and see you as someone of nobility and high status in their hearts. Remembering death a lot is enough to make you have less concern for the things of the worldly life and make you have a fervent desire for the afterlife. A prolonged hope (for the things of this worldly life) is enough as a (means) to having little fear of (Allah) and committing acts of disobedience, and the distress and regret on the Day of Judgment is enough for the one who knows but does not act. [2]

Imam Ibn Al-Qayyim, may Allah have mercy upon him, stated:

Ibn Sad, may Allah have mercy upon him, stated in at Tabaqaat about Umar Ibn Abdul Azeez, may Allah have mercy upon him, “Whenever he delivered a sermon and feared being amazed with himself, he ended it; and whenever he wrote a letter and feared amazement due to it, he tore it. He would say: ”O Allah! I seek refuge with you from the evil of my soul.” [3]

Abu Wahb, may Allah have mercy upon him, said: I asked Ibn Al-Mubarak, may Allah have mercy upon him: “What is pride?” He said: ”It is to mock at the people.”  I asked him about self-amazement; he said: “It is to consider yourself to be in possession of something that none else possess; and I do not know of anything more evil upon the performers of the prayer than self-amazement”. [4]

Masruq, may Allah have mercy upon him, said:

“It is enough as knowledge that a man is fearful of Allah and it is enough as ignorance that a man becomes amazed with his knowledge”. [5]

Imam Abdul Ghaniy Al-Maqdisee, may Allah have mercy upon him, was asked: “Why do you not read from other than a book?” He said: ”I fear self-amazement.” [6]

Imam Ash-Shafi’i, may Allah have mercy upon him, said:

If self-amazement is concealed within your deeds, recall the one whose pleasure you are seeking, which blessings you desire and which outcome you fear. The one who ponders upon this, his actions will become small in his presence. [7]

Al-Allamah Muqbil Bin Hadi Al-Wadi’i, may Allah have mercy upon him, said:

If a person fears being amazed with himself, let him not compare himself with contemporaries; look at Hafidh Ibn Hajr or Al-Hafidh Ibn kathir, Shaikh Al-Islam Ibn Taymiyyah and other than them amongst the Huffaaz. [8]

Mutarrif Bin Abdillah Ash-Shikh-khir, may Allah have mercy upon him, said:

I spend the night and become regretful in morning (i.e. due to missing the night prayer) is more beloved to me that staying up at night (in worship) and reach the morning while being self-amazed. [9]

Imam Adh-Dhahabi, may Allah have mercy upon him, said:

 The one who ascribe piety to himself and is amazed with himself will not be successful. [10]

[1] An Excerpt from “at-Ta’leeqaat Al-Maleehah Alaa Silsilah Al-Ahadith As-Saheehah 1/104

[2] Hilyatul Awliyaa: 6/391

[3] Al Fawaa’id. 225

[4] Siyar 15/395]

[5] Akhlaaqul Ulamaa of Imaam Al-Aajuree: 1/70]

[6] Siyar A’laam Nubulaa 21/449]

[7] Siyar A’lam Nubulaa 10/42

[8] Al-Bashaa’ir Fis-Samaa’i Al-Mubaashir’ page 14. with introduction by Shaikh Muhammad Bin Abdul-Wahhaab Al-Wassaabee, may Allah have mercy upon him.

[9] Siyar A’lam An-Nubula 4/190

[10] Siyar A’lam An-Nubula 4/190

Reflections from some statements of Al-Allamah Rabee Bin Hadi Al-Mad’khali [37 of 80]

Written by faizkara on . Posted in Contemporary Issues, Da'wah - Calling To Islam, Methodology - 'Manhaj', Morals and Manners - 'Akhlaaq', Purification of The Soul, Scholars of Islam, Worship - 'Ibaadah'.

In The Name of Allah, The Most Merciful, The Bestower of Mercy.

The questioner said: Our Shaikh, I love you for the sake of Allah. I am new to true Salafiyyah and I dont know what do at present. Guide me, may Allah bless you.

Response: Establish the prayer, pay the Zakat, and sincerely devote your religion to Allah (alone), the Lord of the worlds; seek knowledge of the Shariah from its fundamental sources, and cooperate with your Salafi brothers upon righteousness and piety to convey this message. Spend in its path if you possess what you can spend to aid it, perform all righteous deeds, fulfill the obligations, learn the pillars of Islam and its regulations, the Salafi methodology – the foundational principles and subsidiary matters within it. This is encompassed in Allah’s statement: [إِلَّا الَّذِينَ ءَامَنُوا وَعَمِلُوا الصَّالِحَاتِ – Except those who believe and do righteous deeds]. [Al-Asr 3]

Therefore, it is obligated to you to (adhere) to true Iman, righteous deeds, and cooperating upon righteousness and piety. [Marhaban Yaa Taalib Al-Ilm 467]

One of the great services of the scholars of Islam

Written by Amjad Khan on . Posted in Brotherhood, Contemporary Issues, Da'wah - Calling To Islam, Methodology - 'Manhaj', Morals and Manners - 'Akhlaaq', Pearls of Wisdom, Purification of The Soul, Scholars of Islam, Worship - 'Ibaadah'.

In The Name of Allaah, The Most Merciful, The Bestower of Mercy.

Al-Allamah  Muhammad Amaan Al-Jami, may Allah have mercy upon him, said:

The call to Islam encompasses a variety of domains and procedures. One of its procedures is the establishment of gatherings and conferences where individuals with sound Islamic perspectives and Muslim jurists convene to address contemporary issues. They counter the misconceptions that are disseminated against Islam and the authentic beliefs of Muslims. Furthermore, they elucidate the principles of the Islamic faith across all aspects of life that necessitate explanation—of which there are many—ensuring that individuals possess clarity in both their religious and worldly matters. This endeavour is grounded in the teachings of the Qur’an and the authentic Sunnah, guiding people from the shadows of misguidance into the light of true guidance. There exists no alternative route to escape the darkness of ignorance and (unlawful) pre-Islamic customs except through the comprehension derived from the Book and the Sunnah. This duty has been upheld by the Messengers, from Nuh to Muhammad, peace be upon them. Allah, the Most High, stated:

يَـٰٓأَيُّہَا ٱلنَّبِىُّ إِنَّآ أَرۡسَلۡنَـٰكَ شَـٰهِدً۬ا وَمُبَشِّرً۬ا وَنَذِيرً۬ا
وَدَاعِيًا إِلَى ٱللَّهِ بِإِذۡنِهِۦ وَسِرَاجً۬ا مُّنِيرً۬ا
وَبَشِّرِ ٱلۡمُؤۡمِنِينَ بِأَنَّ لَهُم مِّنَ ٱللَّهِ فَضۡلاً۬ كَبِيرً۬ا

O Prophet (Muhammad)! Verily, We have sent you as witness, and a bearer of glad tidings, and a warner; And as one who invites to Allah [Islamic Monotheism, i.e. to worship none but Allah (Alone)] by His Leave, and as a lamp spreading light (through your instructions from the Qur’an and the Sunnah the legal ways of the Prophet). And announce to the believers (in the Oneness of Allah and in His Messenger Muhammad) the glad tidings, that they will have from Allah a Great Bounty. [33:45-47]

In these three verses, there is a clarification of the job of the noble Messenger Muhammad, peace and blessings of Allah be upon him, and his followers- and that is to call to the path of Allah by the Permission and command of Allah, upon clear sightedness and sure knowledge.

Allah [The Most High] said: [ قُلۡ هَـٰذِهِۦ سَبِيلِىٓ أَدۡعُوٓاْ إِلَى ٱللَّهِ‌ۚ عَلَىٰ بَصِيرَةٍ أَنَا۟ وَمَنِ ٱتَّبَعَنِى‌ۖ – Say (O Muhammad): “This is my way; I invite unto Allah (i.e. to the Oneness of Allah – Islamic Monotheism) with sure knowledge, I and whosoever follows me (also must invite others to Allah i.e. to the Oneness of Allah – Islamic Monotheism) with sure knowledge”]. [12:108]

An excerpt from Nidham Al-Usrah Fil Islam  8-9

[21] The Ascent and Decline of The Ottoman Empire- [Sultan Ahmad (I) rose to the throne at the age of 14]

Written by Abdullah Jallow on . Posted in History of Islam, Morals and Manners - 'Akhlaaq'.

In The Name of Allah, The Most Merciful, The Bestower of Mercy.

Ahmed I – [1012 – 1026 AH / 1603 – 1617 CE] ascended to the throne at the age of 14 following the death of his father, an achievement unmatched by any previous Ottoman sultan at such a young age. The state was in a state of considerable turmoil due to its involvement in the wars against Austria in Europe, the conflict with Persia, and internal revolts in Asia. He continued the military preparations initiated by his father.

Firstly: The War with Austria and European States:

Sultan Ahmad appointed Lala Muhammad Pasha as the Grand Vizier, succeeding the previous Grand Vizier, Hasan Pasha. Lala Muhammad Pasha was a distinguished commander who led the armies that fought in Austria. He focused on strengthening the Ottoman forces, besieging and capturing the fortress of Istragon. Additionally, he engaged in battles against the principalities of Wallachia, Moldavia, and Transylvania, ultimately negotiating peace with them. Upon the death of Lala Pasha, he was succeeded by Kubaji Murad Pasha as Grand Vizier, who had previously commanded one of the army divisions. The Ottoman armies achieved a significant victory over Austria, successfully reclaiming fortified castles from the cities of Yanik, Estragon, Belgrade, and others. Additionally, the forces excelled in their campaign in Hungary, defeating Austria in that region as well. Consequently, this led to Austria’s acceptance of peace negotiations and the payment of a tribute to the Ottoman Empire amounting to two hundred thousand gold ducats. As a result of this treaty, Hungary remained under the dominion of the Ottoman Empire. Naval conflicts occurred between Ottoman ships, Spanish vessels, the Knights of St. John in Malta, and the Italian states, with victories alternating between the opposing sides.

Secondly: Renewal of Privileges:

The state renewed the privileges granted to France and England, as well as the agreement with Poland, which prohibits the Crimean Tatars from encroaching upon Polish territory, while Poland is to prevent the Cossacks from infringing upon the Ottoman Empire. The Netherlands also acquired privileges, which they exploited to introduce tobacco within the Islamic territories. This led to its consumption among soldiers, prompting the mufti to issue a fatwa against it. In response, the soldiers revolted, supported by officials, forcing the scholars to remain silent on the matter. Thus, the soldiers began to follow their desires and oppose the scholars. Foreign, non-believing powers were keen on spreading every forbidden thing among Muslims. Allah, the Exalted, has permitted us to enjoy beneficial and wholesome things while prohibiting harmful substances that can affect our bodies, minds, and wealth. Consequently, scholars—may Allah have mercy on them—issued fatwas declaring the consumption, sale, and purchase of tobacco to be forbidden due to its religious, worldly, social, and health-related harms, which include: [1] It is smoke that neither nourishes nor satisfies hunger. 2. It is detrimental to precious health, and anything harmful in this way is prohibited. 3. It is classified among the forbidden impurities, as Allah said: “And He makes lawful for them the good things and prohibits for them the evil” (Al-A’raf: 157). 4. The smell of smoke is harmful to those who do not use it etc. Scholars cited various pieces of evidence; however, due to the weak educational motivation and the diminished authority of the state responsible for enforcing the laws, insubordination may arise among soldiers and individuals.

Thirdly: The War with the Safavid Shiites (Persians):

Shah Abbas of the Safavid dynasty seized the opportunity presented by the turmoil within the Ottoman Empire and initiated efforts to liberate Persian Iraq. He occupied Tabriz, Ujan, and other regions, ultimately managing to take Baghdad and sites in Najaf, Karbala, and Kufa. During his visit to these sites, he displayed great reverence and veneration. Some historians note that he spent ten days in Najaf, personally attending to the people there. He also imposed severe punishments on the Sunni adversaries of the state, often resorting to execution or blinding. He showed no leniency towards them unless they renounced their perceived heretical beliefs and pledged allegiance to the Shiite faith. [Footnote a]

The Ottoman Empire was compelled to cede to the Safavid Shiite state all the regions, countries, castles, and fortresses that had been conquered by the Ottomans during the reign of Sultan Sulayman, including the city of Baghdad. This marked the first treaty in which the empire relinquished some of its conquests, signaling the onset of decline and weakness, and it was the first agreement that indicated the diminishing power of the Ottoman state.

Shah Abbas I of the Safavid dynasty exhibited an extreme animosity towards the Sunnis. He established connections with Christian monarchs and, in a bid to undermine the Ottoman Empire, the protector of Sunni Islam (at the time). He entered into cooperative agreements with them aimed at destabilizing the foundations of the Sunni Ottoman state and was even willing to make numerous concessions to European nations as a demonstration of his collaboration, driven by his hostility towards the Ottoman Empire. He treated Christians in Iran favorably, in contrast to his treatment of Sunni Muslims. His preferential treatment of Christians led to a revitalization of Christian missionary activities within the country. Additionally, he encouraged European merchants to engage in substantial trade agreements with Iranian traders, transforming Iran into a thriving market for European commerce. His tolerance towards Christians culminated in his decree in 1007 AH / 1598 CE, which prohibited any harm against them and granted them the freedom to move about within the Safavid state. The decree issued by the Shah of the Safavid state stated the following:

From this day forward, citizens of the Christian faith, as well as those who adhere to their religion, are permitted to enter any part of our homeland. No individual shall, under any circumstances, insult them. In light of the amicable and loving relations we maintain with Christian monarchs, Christian merchants are allowed to travel throughout Iran and conduct their business in any area of the country without facing harm from anyone, whether they be a ruler, prince, khan, official, or state subordinate. Furthermore, all goods brought by them for trade shall be exempt from taxation. No individual, regardless of their status, shall interfere with them or impose burdens upon them. Additionally, religious leaders, irrespective of their sects, are prohibited from harming them or engaging in discussions regarding doctrinal beliefs. He extended courtesies to Christians, celebrating their festivals. This treatment of Christians was a strategic move aimed at undermining the Sunni Ottoman Empire. [Footnote b]

Fourthly: Separatist Movements:

During the reign of Sultan Ahmad I, internal movements emerged with the aim of undermining the structure and integrity of the state. Notable among these were the movements led by Jan Bolad, a Kurdish leader, and the governor of Ankara, Qalandar Oglu, as well as the movement of Fakhr al-Din al-Druzi, the grandson of Fakhr al-Din al-Ma’ani I, who had allied with Sultan Salim I upon his entry into Syria in the year 922 AH. These movements caused significant internal unrest, prompting the state to appoint a seasoned minister whose advanced age had endowed him with extensive experience and knowledge, leading to his appointment as Grand Vizier, where he became a crucial support for the young sultan. He successfully defeated the rebels, particularly the Anatolian insurgent Qalandar Oglu, who had been appointed governor of Ankara. The state took decisive action against him, and Grand Vizier Kuyucu Murad Pasha succeeded in purging Anatolia of these insurgents.

The passing of Sultan Ahmad I was marked by his profound piety and dedication to religious duties. He actively managed state affairs and exhibited humility in his attire. Known for his frequent consultations with scholars and leaders, he held a deep affection for the Prophet. During his reign, the practice of sending curtains to the Kabh from Istanbul began in 1617, a tradition that had previously been carried out from Egypt. [Ad-Dawlah al-Uthaniyyah Awamil An-Nuhud Wa Asbab As-Suqut 6/330-334

——————————————————

Footnote a:

http://www.shia.bs/

https://abukhadeejah.com/the-devils-deception-of-the-raafidah-shiah/

Footnote b:

Islam has granted rights to non-Muslims residing in a Muslim state, particularly to Jews and Christians. This is an important aspect to understand. Read below:

http://www.shariah.ws/articles/duviqgl-shaykh-salih-al-fawzan-the-islamic-shariah-provides-security–for-muslims-and-non-muslims-and-those-who-violate-it-are-kh257rijites-who-are-to-be-fought-and-severely-punished.cfm

http://www.shariah.ws/articles/szsumlh-the-foundation-of-muslim-relations-with-non-muslims-who-do-not-show-aggression-and-hostility.cfm

Muslim rulers are likewise permitted to engage in diplomatic relations with leaders of Christian and Jewish faiths, as well as with other non-Muslim entities.

https://abukhadeejah.com/the-life-of-the-muhammad-in-madinah-treaties-conquests-and-his-death/
https://abukhadeejah.com/treaties-with-the-non-muslims-do-they-necessitate-allegiance/
https://abukhadeejah.com/the-prophet-of-islam-would-not-kill-diplomats-ambassadors-emissaries-or-foreign-delegations-even-if-they-were-sent-by-the-worst-of-his-enemies/
https://abukhadeejah.com/having-alliance-with-the-non-muslims-is-of-two-types-misunderstanding-this-affair-leads-people-astray/

Muslim leaders are tasked with implementing these principles to serve the interests of the Muslims, fulfill their sacred duties, and maintain the integrity of the Islamic faith, wheras what is well-known throughout Islamic history is that the Rafidah extend a preferential disposition towards non-Muslims for the purpose of subjecting Sunnis to unjust treatment. This behaviour is a calculated strategy to undermine the Sunnis and promote their heretical beliefs and practices. The Sunnis alone possess the capacity to challenge these erroneous beliefs of the Rafidah and elucidate to non-Muslims the distinctions between Islam and the polytheism propagated by the Rafidah. Read:

https://abuiyaad.com/a/rafidah-treachery-sunnah

https://abuiyaad.com/a/kharijites-rafidah-slaughter-sunnis/print

They said, “We have killed the Messiah, son of Maryam, Allah’s Messenger” Part 1

Written by Abdullah Jallow on . Posted in Aqeedah (Creed & Belief), Basics, Bid'ah (Innovation), Contemporary Issues, Da'wah - Calling To Islam, History of Islam, Methodology - 'Manhaj', Morals and Manners - 'Akhlaaq', Prophets, Purification of The Soul, Refutations, Scholars of Islam, Sin, Worship - 'Ibaadah'.

In The Name of Allah, The Most` Merciful, The Bestower of Mercy.

وَقَوْلِهِمْ إِنَّا قَتَلْنَا الْمَسِيحَ عِيسَى ابْنَ مَرْيَمَ رَسُولَ اللَّهِ وَمَا قَتَلُوهُ وَمَا صَلَبُوهُ وَلَكِنْ شُبِّهَ لَهُمْ وَإِنَّ الَّذِينَ اخْتَلَفُوا فِيهِ لَفِي شَكٍّ مِنْهُ مَا لَهُمْ بِهِ مِنْ عِلْمٍ إِلَّا اتِّبَاعَ الظَّنِّ وَمَا قَتَلُوهُ يَقِينًا
بَل رَّفَعَهُ ٱللَّهُ إِلَيْهِ وَكَانَ ٱللَّهُ عَزِيزًا حَكِيمًا

And [for] their saying, “Indeed, we have killed the Messiah, Jesus, the son of Mary, the messenger of Allah.” And they did not kill him, nor did they crucify him; but the resemblance of ‘Iesa (Jesus) was put over another man (and they killed that man), and those who differ therein are full of doubts. They have no (certain) knowledge, they follow nothing but conjecture. For surely; they killed him not [i.e. ‘Iesa (Jesus), son of Maryam (Mary)]: But Allah raised him [‘Iesa (Jesus)] up (with his body and soul) unto Himself (and he is in the heavens). And Allah is Ever All-Powerful, All-Wise. [An-Nisa 157-158]

[إِنَّا قَتَلْنَا الْمَسِيحَ عِيسَى ابْنَ مَرْيَمَ رَسُولَ اللَّهِ – Indeed, we have killed the Messiah, Jesus, the son of Mary, the messenger of Allah].

Imam Ibn kathir, may Allah have mercy upon him, said: (Meaning):

“We (i.e. the plotters) have killed this one (i.e. Jesus) who claimed this position (or rank) for himself”. This statement was made from the angle of false accusation and mockery, similar to the statement of the polytheists: [يا أيها الذي نزل عليه الذكر إنك لمجنون – O you to whom the Reminder has been revealed, indeed you are insane]. [Al-Hijr 6]

“The Rabis of the Jews (at that time) when Allah sent Isa (Jesus), the son of Mary, with clear signs and guidance, they envied him for the prophethood and the remarkable miracles bestowed upon him. These miracles included healing the blind and the leprous, as well as raising the dead by Allah’s permission. He fashioned a bird from clay, breathed into it, and it became a living bird that flew by Allah’s will, among other miracles that Allah honored him with and manifested through his hands. Despite this, they belied and opposed him, and endeavored to harm him in every possible way unil the Prophet Jesus, peace be upon him, could not reside among them in the town; instead, he and his mother, peace be upon them, frequently traveled. Yet, this was not enough to satisfy them, as they sought the king of Damascus at that time—a man who was a polytheist and a worshiper of celestial bodies, known as the Greeks. They reported to him that there was a man in Jerusalem who was misleading the people and corrupting the king’s subjects. This infuriated the king, prompting him to write to his deputy in Jerusalem, instructing him to take precautions against the mentioned individual, to crucify him, and to place a crown of thorns upon his head, in order to stop harm on the people”…until the point at which Imam Ibn Kathir stated:

“Indeed, Allah has clarified and elucidated the matter in the magnificent Quran, which He revealed to His noble Messenger, supported by miracles, clear signs, and evident proofs. He, (Allah) – [The Most truthful in speech, the Lord of the entire existence, the one who knows the secrets and innermost thoughts, knows the hidden in the heavens and the earth, knows all that has occurred, all that is to occur (and occurring), and all that did not occur and how it would have occurred if it was to occur] – stated: [وما قتلوه وما صلبوه ولكن شبه لهم – And they did not kill him, nor did they crucify him; but the resemblance of ‘Iesa (Jesus) was put over another man (and they killed that man)]. They saw someone resembling him and mistakenly believed it to be him, thus Allah stated: [وإن الذين اختلفوا فيه لفي شك منه ما لهم به من علم إلا اتباع الظن – and those who differ therein are full of doubts. They have no (certain) knowledge, they follow nothing but conjecture]. [وما قتلوه يقينا بل رفعه الله إليه – For surely; they killed him not [i.e. ‘Iesa (Jesus), son of Maryam (Mary)]: But Allah raised him [‘Iesa (Jesus)] up (with his body and soul) unto Himself (and he is in the heavens)]. Meaning, those among the Jews who claimed to have killed him and those among the ignorant Christians who believed the same; all of them are in doubt, confusion, misguidance, and error. Thus, Allah stated: [وما قتلوه يقينا – For surely; they killed him not] – Meaning, they were not certain it was him, but rather were in doubt and delusion. [1]

[وَمَا قَتَلُوهُ وَمَا صَلَبُوهُ وَلَكِنْ شُبِّهَ لَهُمْ – And they did not kill him, nor did they crucify him; but the resemblance of ‘Iesa (Jesus) was put over another man (and they killed that man)].

Shaikh Al-Islam Ibn Taymiyyah, may Allah have mercy upon him, said:

This statement was directed towards the Jews (i.e. those among them who plotted against Isa), and dispraised them for their actions. The Christians were not mentioned because it was those (particular) Jews who were responsible for the crucifixion of the one who was likened to Isa. None of the Christians were present with them; in fact, the disciples were fearful and absent, thus no one among them witnessed the crucifixion. Instead, it was those Jews who informed the people that they have crucified the Messiah. The accounts of His crucifixion that reached both Christians and others originated from those Jews, who were agents of oppression. They were not numerous enough to prevent their agreement on lying”. [2]

Imam Ibn Hazm, may Allah have mercy upon him, said:

The Christians themselves acknowledged that they did not endevour to get hold of his body during the day due to fear of the public; instead, they took him at night after the people had dispersed following the Passover. Furthermore, it is stated that he remained on the cross for only six hours during the day and was taken down shortly thereafter. The crucifixion allegedly occurred in a location distant from the city, in a garden owned by a potter, which is not a recognised site for crucifixions. After all of this, it would be that they established a context to say that his companions would have run off with his body (in secret) and that Maryam Magdalene, a woman among the common people, did not approach the site of the crucifixion but stood at a distance, observing everything as described in their Gospel. This undermines the notion that the crucifixion was reported (and witnessed) by all people (or numerous people) because it appears to be a concealed and colluded event.

At that time, according to the Gospel, the disciples were fearful for their own safety, fled and remained hidden. And that Peter entered the house of Caiaphas the priest during daylight, so he said to him, “Are you one of Jesus’s associates?” However, he denied this and fled the premises; then how about the claim that it was reported by everyone! This is the meaning of the verse [ولكن شبه لهم – but the resemblance of ‘Iesa (Jesus) was put over another man (and they killed that man)], meaning, those wicked individuals who orchestrated this falsehood conspired together and misled their followers into believing that they had crucified and killed him, despite knowing that this was a lie.

It was never the case that everyone reported the [alleged killing of Isa, peace and blessings of Allah be upon him], but even if it were true that they did, then how could it not be possible regarding the fact that every miracle does alter natural phenomena and changes the way senses normally perceive things? If it were indeed the case that everyone saw (or reported) it, then Allah’s statement regarding this event is that He likened another person to Isa, peace and blessings of Allah be upon him, and blocked their perceptions in the manner they perceived it, (so they thought that it was him who was crucified whereas, it was someone else). This event would be comparable to the migration of Prophet Muhammad, peace and blessings of Allah be upon him, at night, during which a hundred men from Quraysh, sought after him, yet Allah concealed their vision from him, preventing them from seeing him. However, as for what is not established based on Allah’s statement that He made something appear in a way that is not what is seen or perceived in reality, it would not be permissible to regard it as such, as it leads to an impossibility. Thus, the changing of nature and natural things from what they are in reality cannot be considered possible unless there is definitive proof from Allah, which must be accepted. [Footnote a] But the reality of something can be misperceived by one or two individuals, as well as a result of insanity or foolishness. However, this cannot happen to an entire group (i.e. the populace).

And regarding Allah’s statement: [وما قتلوه وما صلبوه ولكن شبه لهم – And they did not kill him, nor did they crucify him; but the resemblance of ‘Iesa (Jesus) was put over another man (and they killed that man)]. This is regarding those who say that Isa, peace and blessings of Allah be upon him, was crucified due to blindly following their predecessors among the Christians and Jews. These people were (deceived) based on doubtful (ambiguous) report, as they entered into something false that is made to resemble the truth. The evil elders at that time entered them into this falsehood that was made to resemble the truth. The claimants (those Jews who disbelieved in Isa) told them that they killed and crucified him, while they knew that it was not the case; instead, they secretly conspired to kill and crucify him, preventing public attendance, and subsequently claimed to have killed and buried him to mislead the general populace, who were led to believe the false narrative that was made to resemble the truth. [3]

————————————————————–

Footnote a: The miracles of the Prophets and righteous people who adhered/ adhere to the divine revelation without deviation in creed or worship must not be mistaken for the deceptions of magicians, the people of innovation in religious matters and the devils. Shaikh Al-Islam Ibn Taymiyyah, may Allah have mercy upon him, said:

The Khawariq [Phenomena attributed to something outside the norm] by way of which the devils misguide the children of Adam – such as when the devils take the image of a person who is absent or has passed away and what is similar to this – has misguided many of those who ascribe themselves to the Muslims or to the people of the Scripture. They establish this on two affairs: Firstly, that whoever from whom these khawaariq occurs is a Wali, and according to the term of the Christians he is a Qadees A’dheem – a great saint! Secondly, that the one from whom these khawaariq occurs is therefore infallible, everything he narrates is truth and everything he commands is justice”.

However, it can definitely be the case that neither did a phenomena outside the norm – whether unrelated or related to sound knowledge and piety – occur from such a person nor a phenomena outside the normal related to deeds of the devils; rather the person merely carried out the tricks of the liars and wicked sinners. The tricks of the liars and wicked sinners are numerous indeed, so one thinks that they are amazing events outside the norm, however neither is that the case nor is it something similar to the tricks of the monks. Some people have written books regarding the tricks of the monks, such as the trick reported about one of them changing water into oil- that when the oil is in the interior of the lighthouse, the water gradually reduces and thus the oil floats [or pops up] on the water, so those who are present think that the water has changed into oil. The likes of this affair are numerous from the tricks of those Christians, because all that those Christians possess – those who altered the religion of the Messiah [peace and blessings of Allah be upon him] – of activities that are attributed to something out of the norm are either from the devils or they are tricks, and there’s nothing in them related to the miracles of the righteous people.

Likewise, the deviated people – those who seek to alter the religion of Muhammad – adopt a religion that is not legislated by Allah and His Messenger, then they make it a path of worship and give it precedence over the path that is legislated by Allah and His Messenger. For example, they give precedence to listening to sounds from the tambourines and the shrill flutes over listening to the book of Allah, so one of them goes into a state of ecstasy and a satanic trance through which he becomes muddled up with shaytan until he speaks in a language he does not know. Then when he returns to his senses – just as when a jinn speaks through the tongue of the one who is possessed and after informing the people of that which is in his heart and soul, which is from the shaytan, and the shaytan leaves him -, he cannot repeat what he said at first.

The heretics alter the religion of the Messengers – either the religion of the Messiah or seek to alter the religion of Muhammad, and amongst the likes of such people are the proponents of hearsay, misguidance, the disbelievers, the polytheists, apostates and other than them, such as the likes of Musaylimah the liar, Al-Aswad Al-Unzee, Al-Haarith Ad-Dimashqee, Baabaa Roomee and other than them amongst those who engaged in activities that are considered to be outside the norm [i.e. so called miracles] but [in reality] are related to the deeds of the devils.

As for the tricksters, they are numerous and they are not Awliyaa of Allah. Their so called amazing activities that are outside the norm- if not related to the satanic deeds of the soothsayers and the magicians – a just tricks. They deliberately lie and deceive unlike those connected to the devils, because amongst them is he who deceives, so one thinks that what he does is from the miracles of the righteous people, just as amongst them is one who knows that what he does is from the devils, but he does so in order to achieve his goals.

The intent behind this discussion is that many of the activities that are considered to be outside of the norm [i.e. so called miracles] are either satanic deeds or tricks, so one thinks that they are the true miracles of the righteous people, for indeed that which whose cause is based on Shirk and wicked deeds can only be from the devils, such as when a person associates partners with Allah by invoking the stars, or invokes a person- whether such a person is dead or absent, or he makes an oath through unknown words and statements whose meanings are not known, or he knows that they are names of devils, or seeks aid through lewd conduct and oppression, then such deeds – considered to be outside of the norm that emanates from this – are from the devils.

The righteous people have miracles such as the miracles of the pious people of this Ummah [may Allah have mercy upon them], the miracles of the disciples of the Messiah [may the peace and blessings of Allah be upon the Messiah, and may Allah have mercy upon the disciples] and other than them amongst those who were upon the correct and unaltered religion of the Messiah. However, the occurrence of miracles at the hands of the righteous people does not necessitate that they are infallible like the Prophets [peace and blessings of Allah be upon them]; rather it maybe that a righteous man- a Wali – has miracles, but despite this he mixes up by error and makes a mistake in that which he thinks or what he is made to hear or see, or what he sees, or what he understands from the revealed Scripture. And because of this, the statements of those other than the Prophets [peace and blessings of Allah be upon them] can either be accepted or rejected [i.e. based on evidence], but as for the Prophets [peace and blessings of Allah be upon them], it is obligated on a person to affirm truthfully everything they have related regarding the affairs of the unseen and obey them in everything they command. And due to this, Allaah [The Exalted] obligated on a person to believe in everything the Prophets [peace and blessings of Allaah be upon them] brought and did not obligate on a person to believe in everything that comes from others.

Allaah [The Exalted] said:

قُولُوٓاْ ءَامَنَّا بِٱللَّهِ وَمَآ أُنزِلَ إِلَيۡنَا وَمَآ أُنزِلَ إِلَىٰٓ إِبۡرَٲهِـۧمَ وَإِسۡمَـٰعِيلَ وَإِسۡحَـٰقَ وَيَعۡقُوبَ وَٱلۡأَسۡبَاطِ وَمَآ أُوتِىَ مُوسَىٰ وَعِيسَىٰ وَمَآ أُوتِىَ ٱلنَّبِيُّونَ مِن رَّبِّهِمۡ لَا نُفَرِّقُ بَيۡنَ أَحَدٍ۬ مِّنۡهُمۡ وَنَحۡنُ لَهُ ۥ مُسۡلِمُونَ

Say (O Muslims), “We believe in Allah and that which has been sent down to us and that which has been sent down to Ibrahim (Abraham), Isma’il (Ishmael), Ishaque (Isaac), Ya’qub (Jacob), and to Al-Asbat [the twelve sons of Ya’qub (Jacob)], and that which has been given to Musa (Moses) and ‘Iesa (Jesus), and that which has been given to the Prophets from their Lord. We make no distinction between any of them, and to Him we have submitted (in Islam).” [Surah Al-Baqarah. Aayah 136]

Allah [The Exalted] said:
لَّيۡسَ ٱلۡبِرَّ أَن تُوَلُّواْ وُجُوهَكُمۡ قِبَلَ ٱلۡمَشۡرِقِ وَٱلۡمَغۡرِبِ وَلَـٰكِنَّ ٱلۡبِرَّ مَنۡ ءَامَنَ بِٱللَّهِ وَٱلۡيَوۡمِ ٱلۡأَخِرِ وَٱلۡمَلَـٰٓٮِٕڪَةِ وَٱلۡكِتَـٰبِ وَٱلنَّبِيِّـۧنَ

It is not Al-Birr (piety, righteousness, and each and every act of obedience to Allah, etc.) that you turn your faces towards east and (or) west (in prayers); but Al-Birr is (the quality of) the one who believes in Allah, the Last Day, the Angels, the Book, the Prophets. [Al-Baqarah. 177]

And because of this the Muslims are all in agreement that the one who disbelieved in a single Prophet whose Prophethood is well known, then he is a disbeliever- an apostate. There is no distinction between one Prophet from the other- by believing in some and disbelieving in others. Allah said:

إِنَّ ٱلَّذِينَ يَكۡفُرُونَ بِٱللَّهِ وَرُسُلِهِۦ وَيُرِيدُونَ أَن يُفَرِّقُواْ بَيۡنَ ٱللَّهِ وَرُسُلِهِۦ وَيَقُولُونَ نُؤۡمِنُ بِبَعۡضٍ۬ وَنَڪۡفُرُ بِبَعۡضٍ۬ وَيُرِيدُونَ أَن يَتَّخِذُواْ بَيۡنَ ذَٲلِكَ سَبِيلاً
أُوْلَـٰٓٮِٕكَ هُمُ ٱلۡكَـٰفِرُونَ حَقًّ۬ا‌ۚ وَأَعۡتَدۡنَا لِلۡكَـٰفِرِينَ عَذَابً۬ا مُّهِينً۬ا

Verily, those who disbelieve in Allah and His Messengers and wish to make distinction between Allah and His Messengers (by believing in Allah and disbelieving in His Messengers) saying, “We believe in some but reject others,” and wish to adopt a way in between. They are in truth disbelievers. And We have prepared for the disbelievers a humiliating torment. [Surah An-Nisaa. Aayaat 150-151] [4]

Listen here: [Lesson 39] The Miracles of the Righteous Worshippers (Awliyā) – Followed by Manhaj Q&A – The ‘Aqīdah of Imām Muhammad ibn ‘Abdil-Wahhāb – By Shaikh Abu Khadeejah – Masjid Bin Bāz – London: https://www.salafisounds.com/lesson-39-the-miracles-of-the-righteous-worshippers-awliya-followed-by-manhaj-qa-the-aqidah-of-imam-muhammad-ibn-abdil-wahhab-by-abu-khadeejah-masjid-bin-baz-london/

Read: The Status of Jesus In Islam – By Shaikh Abu Khadeejah- may Allah preserve him.

https://abukhadeejah.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/06/Jesus-in-Islam-2016.pdf

[1] Tafsir Ibn kathir

[2] Al-Jawab as-Sahih Liman Baddala Deen Al-Masih 4/33-34

[3] An Excerpt from Al-Faslu Fil Milal Wal Ahwa wan-Nihal 1/57-64

[4] Al-Jawab as-Sahih Liman Baddala Deen Al-Masih. 1/284-287

Reflections from some statements of Al-Allamah Rabee Bin Hadi Al-Mad’khali [36 of 80]

Written by Abdullah Jallow on . Posted in Da'wah - Calling To Islam, Methodology - 'Manhaj', Morals and Manners - 'Akhlaaq', Pearls of Wisdom, Purification of The Soul, Scholars of Islam, Shirk, Worship - 'Ibaadah'.

In The Name of Allah, The Most Merciful, The Bestower of Mercy.

O youth! It is obligated to you to adhere to the true path of Allah which Muhammad was sent with, implemented and conveyed by his companions, and adopted by those who followed them exactly in faith, and followed by the victorious group that adheres to Allah’s Book and the Sunnah of Allah’s Messenger. You must endure various forms of hardship, challenges, and difficulties in the path of steadfastness upon this truth and in conveying it. You must adhere to these (matters). The religion has become strange, (as) the Prophet stated: “Islam began as something strange and will return to being strange as it once was, so Toobaa (paradise, salvation) is for the strangers”. [a]

Numerous are the people of Bidah! It is greatly regrettable that they boast about this multitude, while Allah, The Exalted, said:

وَإِن تُطِعْ أَكْثَرَ مَن فِى ٱلْأَرْضِ يُضِلُّوكَ عَن سَبِيلِ ٱللَّهِ

And if you obey most of those on earth, they will mislead you from the way of Allah. [Al-An’am 116]

Thus, the criterion is not based on quantity, whether large or small, but rather on what was conveyed by Muhammad, which distinguishes between truth and falsehood, guidance and misguidance, polytheism and monotheism, as well as Sunnah and Bidah. [Marhaban Yaa Talib Al-Ilm page 457]

———————————————————————————–

[a]  https://salafidawahmanchester.com/2024/09/09/the-strangers/   https://salafidawahmanchester.com/2024/09/10/2-the-strangers/

[3] The Strangers

[2] The virtue of saving a life – [Reminder to those denying Zionist War Crimes]

Written by Abdullah Jallow on . Posted in Contemporary Issues, Morals and Manners - 'Akhlaaq', Refutations, Sin.

In The Name of Allah, The Most Merciful, The Bestower of Mercy.

Allah, The Exalted, said:

مَنْ قَتَلَ نَفْسًا بِغَيْرِ نَفْسٍ أَوْ فَسَادٍ فِي الْأَرْضِ فَكَأَنَّمَا قَتَلَ النَّاسَ جَمِيعًا وَمَنْ أَحْيَاهَا فَكَأَنَّمَا أَحْيَا النَّاسَ جَمِيعًا

If anyone killed a person not in retaliation of murder, or (and) to spread mischief in the land – it would be as if he killed all mankind, and if anyone saved a life, it would be as if he saved the life of all mankind. [Al-Ma’idah. 32]

Imam As-Sadi, may Allah have mercy upon him, said:

If a person is bold enough to kill someone who does not deserve to be killed, this implies that he does make a distinction between the one he killed and other than him; rather he would commit this act whenever his evil calls him to that. Therefore, his bold attitude that led him to kill is as if he has killed all humankind. On the other hand, if a person saves a life and does not kill – whilst his soul calls him to do so – due to fear of Allah, this is as if he has saved the lives of all humankind because the fear of Allah he possesses stops him killing one who does not deserve to be killed. [An Excerpt from Tafsir As-Sadi]

In the above article from the Jerusalem Post, the author/s convey their strong disagreement with what they perceive as an exaggerated death toll of Palestinians and raise concerns about the transparency of Gaza’s health authorities in differentiating between combatants and non-combatants. Firstly, nevertheless, even if the statistics provided by various international organizations and Gaza officials contain mistakes, it does not lessen the tragedy of a single innocent life lost. Moreover, it does not change the fact that for more than 70 years, Palestinians have endured violence and oppression at the hands of Zionists, culminating in recent experiences of displacement, starvation, and death. Therefore, while it is crucial to report accurate information—especially in an age rife with misinformation, ideological conflicts, and propaganda—the primary concern for anyone with a sense of justice should be the urgent need to alleviate the suffering of the Palestinian people.

Various organisations have recorded observations as follows:

Third, it is universally acknowledged that the actions taken by Hamas against unarmed civilians and non-combatants on October 7 are indefensible and are condemned unequivocally. “Upon this, to answer the eternally unanswered question of Piers Morgan, “Do you condemn Hamas?”, we condemn everyone who opposes the Divine Legislation by killing innocent civilians, including non-combatant men, the elderly, women, children, priests, monks and the likes, no matter who they are, Muslim or non-Muslim, whether ISIS, al-Qaeda, Hamas, Boko Haram or Benjamin Mileikowsky, the IDF, Settlers and their likes. Our condemnation is on the basis that such actions are unjust and oppose Divine Legislation and not because of the race or ethnicity or religion of the perpetrators, and thus we are able to maintain moral consistency and integrity. This is unlike Western politicians who are able to swiftly condemn Russia’s invasion of Ukraine, and support Ukraine (the invaded and occupied in this case) with money and weapons for resistance, but unwilling to condemn the genocide and ethnic cleansing of Gazans, while supporting the Mileikowsky regime with bombs, missiles and military hardware to facilitate the execution of that genocide and ethnic cleansing. https://abuiyaad.com/a/amalekite-genocide-doctrine-gaza

Hamas must be condemned permanently for what they did, however, none can justify what Netanyahu’s army is doing under the guise of self-defense and retaliation. The reality of the situation is clear: the actions of the Zionist army under Netanyahu’s leadership amount to war crimes, and this is evident to all. Furthermore, the rhetoric employed by certain Zionist leaders, including Netanyahu himself, is telling and cannot be overlooked.

https://abuiyaad.com/a/amalekite-genocide-doctrine-gaza
https://www.abuiyaad.com/w/hamas-israeli-right
https://abuiyaad.com/a/slaughtering-children-holy-war/print
https://www.abuiyaad.com/a/pharoah-slaughtering-babies

Introspection concerning the internal (hidden) adversary

Written by Abdullah Jallow on . Posted in Mental Health, Methodology - 'Manhaj', Morals and Manners - 'Akhlaaq', Pearls of Wisdom, Purification of The Soul, Repentance, Scholars of Islam, Sin, Worship - 'Ibaadah', Zuhd (Abstinence).

In The Name of Allah, The Most Merciful, The Bestower of Mercy.

Allah, The Most High, says:

وَٱلَّذِينَ جَـٰهَدُواْ فِينَا لَنَہۡدِيَنَّہُمۡ سُبُلَنَا‌ۚ

As for those who strive hard in Us (Our Cause), We will surely guide them to Our Paths (i.e. Allah’s Religion – Islamic Monotheism)] [29:69]

Imam Ibn Al-Qayyim, may Allah have mercy upon him, said:

“Junaid, may Allah have mercy upon him, said: ‘Those who strive against their (vain) desires through repentance, Allah will guide them to the paths of sincerity. It is not possible to strive against the enemy in the open, except for the one who strives against these enemies inwardly. Thus, whoever is aided against them, he will be victorious against his enemy and whoever is made to be overcome by them, his enemy will be made victorious over him'”. [1]

Imam Ibn Al-Jawzi, may Allah have mercy upon, said:

Beware that (vain) desires urges an individuals to seek immediate gratification without contemplating its evil repercussions – urges one towards fleeting pleasures, despite the fact that it is a cause of pain and harm in this life and an obstruction to pleasure in the afterlife. In contrast, a sensible individual refrains from indulging in pleasures that ultimately yield pain and desires that lead to regret. This serves as a sufficient commendation of what a sound mind dictates and a rebuke against (vain) desires.

Beware that desires can dominate an individual across various domains of study, exits them them from the boundaries of sound reasoning and leading them into behaviour that resemble foolishness. It may infiltrate the realm of knowledge, causing a person to contradict what sound knowledge commands, or it may enter into Zuhd, resulting in a tendency towards Riyaa (showoff, ostentation).

A sensible individual should know that those who succumb to base desires ultimately find themselves in a condition where enjoyment eludes them. Simultaneously, they become incapable of relinquishing these desires, as they begin to perceive them as a necessity of life. Consequently, one observes that individuals struggling with alcoholism and sexual addiction derive minimal satisfaction from their pursuits, yet they find themselves ensnared in a dangerous cycle that compels them to repeatedly engage in these behaviours. However, when one attains clarity of vision and the allure of these base desires diminishes, it becomes evident that they have subjected themselves to a form of destruction that contradicts their well-being—resulting in sorrow and suffering rather than joy in their quest for pleasure. In this regard, they resemble an animal ensnared in a trap, having neither attained the bait that lured them nor the ability to escape.

One should contemplate the fact that humans were not created (solely) to satisfy their desires; instead, they have been endowed with (the capacity for sound knowledge, derived from divine revelation and untainted perception), to consider the repercussions of their actions and to engage in virtuous conduct for the sake of the Afterlife. An animal derives pleasure from eating, drinking, and mating to a greater extent than humans, yet they lead lives that lack reflection and awareness. Consequently, it is driven by its desires, remaining oblivious to the consequences of its actions.

One should reflect on the repercussions of (vain) desires, as many individuals are stripped of their virtues and descend into a state of moral decay as a result. Consider the various types of food that can lead to illness stemming from (unchecked) cravings. Furthermore, how many errors tarnish a person’s honour, resulting in a evil reputation and the burden of guilt from transgressions driven by (vain) desires, yet the individual remains fixated solely on those desires? The most fitting analogy for such a person is that of someone in a tannery; they remain oblivious to the unpleasant odour until they leave, at which point they become acutely aware of where they were.

A sensible individual ought to consider the disgrace that may arise from (vain) desires and the detrimental effects stemming from such pleasures, for they will realise that, in many instances, these consequences are directly linked to those desires and pleasures.

One should reflect on (the presence of) others, ponder and get a hint the potential (evil) outcomes. This reflection will reveal the culpability associated with actions that one might be guilty of. One should contemplate those pleasures, as (sound) reasoning will make them realises that they are merely (fleeting) desires and a situation of blindness. One should contemplate the honour a person receives due to being given the upper hand versus the degradation associated with yielding to one’s desires. The one who overcomes their (vain) desires will strengthen their honour, while the one who succumbs to their desires will not find except humiliation and subjugation in the soul. One should contemplate the benefits of resisting (base) desires, including the respect garnered in this life, the preservation of one’s soul and honour, as well as the rewards that await in the hereafter. [2]

The Jihad of a Lifetime Against Four Things!

[1] An Excerpt from “Al-Fawa’id” page 97
[2] An Excerpt from “Dham Al-Hawa 36-38

Brief Reminder to Ohad Merlin- [The Mighty Declaration “Allahu Akbar” is free from the Hoothies]

Written by Abdullah Jallow on . Posted in Aqeedah (Creed & Belief), Basics, Bid'ah (Innovation), Contemporary Issues, Da'wah - Calling To Islam, Deviated Groups, Sects and Parties, Methodology - 'Manhaj', Monotheism - Tawheed, Morals and Manners - 'Akhlaaq', Refutations, Shi'a.

In The Name of Allah, The Most Merciful, The Bestower of Mercy.

Allah, The Exalted, says:

وَقُلِ ٱلْحَمْدُ لِلَّهِ ٱلَّذِى لَمْ يَتَّخِذْ وَلَدًا وَلَمْ يَكُن لَّهُۥ شَرِيكٌ فِى ٱلْمُلْكِ وَلَمْ يَكُن لَّهُۥ وَلِىٌّ مِّنَ ٱلذُّلِّ وَكَبِّرْهُ تَكْبِيرًۢا

And say: “All the praises and thanks be to Allah, Who has not begotten a son (nor an offspring), and Who has no partner in (His) Dominion, nor He is low to have a Wali (helper, protector or supporter). And magnify Him with all the magnificence, [Allahu-Akbar (Allah is the Most Great)].” [Al-Israa 111]

[وَكَبِّرْهُ تَكْبِيراً – And magnify Him with all the magnificence, [Allahu-Akbar (Allah is the Most Great)]- Meaning: Proclaim His greatness and magnificence through His great and mighty attributes, praising Him with His perfect Names, glorifying Him through His perfect and pure actions (free from all imperfections), and exalting and venerating Him by worshipping Him alone without ascribing any partner to him, and devoting all the religion sincerely to Him. [1]

Imam Muhammad Ibn Salih Al-Uthaymeen, may Allah have mercy upon him, said:

The meaning is that Allah is greater than all things in His Essence, Names, Attributes, and all that this statement encompasses. Allah, the Mighty and Majestic, says:

وَمَا قَدَرُوا۟ ٱللَّهَ حَقَّ قَدْرِهِۦ وَٱلْأَرْضُ جَمِيعًا قَبْضَتُهُۥ يَوْمَ ٱلْقِيَٰمَةِ وَٱلسَّمَٰوَٰتُ مَطْوِيَّٰتٌۢ بِيَمِينِهِۦ

They made not a just estimate of Allah such as is due to Him. And on the Day of Resurrection the whole of the earth will be grasped by His Hand and the heavens will be rolled up in His Right Hand. [Az-Zumar. 67]

Allah says:

يَوْمَ نَطْوِى ٱلسَّمَآءَ كَطَىِّ ٱلسِّجِلِّ لِلْكُتُبِ كَمَا بَدَأْنَآ أَوَّلَ خَلْقٍ نُّعِيدُهُۥ وَعْدًا عَلَيْنَآ إِنَّا كُنَّا فَٰعِلِينَ

And (remember) the Day when We shall roll up the heavens like a scroll rolled up for books, as We began the first creation, We shall repeat it, (it is) a promise binding upon Us. Truly, We shall do it. [Al-Anbiya 104] –

The one whose greatness is as such is greater than everything. [2]

In the above article, Ohad Merlin has pointed out certain aspects concerning the Hoothies, but since individuals like him do not adhere to the true Islamic Monotheism taught by the final Messenger, they are unlikely to tackle the most crucial issues surrounding the Hoothies beyond their hollow slogans. However, this does not imply that Zionists will evade criticism, as both groups are guilty of transgression. The mighty declaration “Allahu Akbar” stands in stark contrast to the actions and beliefs espoused by both the Houthis and the Zionists. The Houthis, characterised by their devotion to garve worship and disdain for the Prophet’s companions, embody a transgressive narrative marked by violence and bloodshed. Similarly, the Zionists, who reject the teachings of the final Prophet, are equally culpable, their actions stained by the atrocities of genocide. [Footnote a]

The Hoothies spend their days and nights in futile cursing, and shouting “Allahu Akbar,” while contradicting the very essence of this mighty declaration by turning to the worship of others besides Allah. Their journey strays far from true Islam, veering instead into grave worship and harboring animosity towards the companions of the Prophet, peace and blessings be upon him. They align themselves as pawns and partners with the Rafidah of Iran.[Footnote b]

As for anti-Semitism, it has already been discussed, emphasising its unequivocal rejection within Islam. https://abuiyaad.com/sn/muslims-antisemitism

However, it’s essential to ensure that this rejection does not serve as a pretext to suppress candid and open dialogue, nor to hinder the presentation of concrete evidence regarding the atrocities committed by Zionists. The declaration of Allahu Akbar stands untainted by the influences of the Houthis, as it remains free from the taint of anti-Semitism and Zionism alike. Both groups, driven by an insatiable thirst for power, have engaged in acts of aggression. For over seventy years, Zionists have relentlessly pursued dominance, inflicting suffering, displacement, and humiliation upon the Palestinian people. Similarly, the Houthis have perpetrated violence against the Sunni community in Dammaj and have been implicated in various war crimes. The Houthis manipulate the verses of the Qur’an, while Zionists reference outdated scriptures to justify their acts of aggression. Read:https://abuiyaad.com/a/amalekite-genocide-doctrine-gaza

——————————————–

Footnote a:

https://abuiyaad.com/a/amalekite-genocide-doctrine-gaza
http://www.shia.bs/articles/qewdmkj-houthi-shia-criminal-aggression-and-war-crimes-reported-in-the-press.cfm

Footnote b:

http://www.shia.bs/

Uncovering the Hidden Realities of Hizbollah: Part 5 – The Hoothees in Yemen:

http://www.shia.bs/articles/ehexeoc-uncovering-the-hidden-realities-of-hizbollah-part-5.cfm

[1] An Excerpt from “Tafsir as-Sadi”

[2] https://alathar.net/home/esound/index.php?op=codevi&coid=96700

Sagacity, Selflessness, and Self-restraint of Our Pious Predecessors

Written by Abdullah Jallow on . Posted in Methodology - 'Manhaj', Morals and Manners - 'Akhlaaq', Pearls of Wisdom, Purification of The Soul, Worship - 'Ibaadah'.

In The Name of Allah, The Most Merciful, The Bestower of Mercy.

Aa’isha, may Allah be pleased with her, said that the Prophet, peace and blessings of Allah be upon him, said to her, “O Aisha! Were your people (i.e. the Quraish) not close to the Pre-Islamic Period of Ignorance, I would have had the Ka`ba demolished and would have included in it the portion which had been left, and would have made it at a level with the ground and would have made two doors for it, one towards the east and the other towards the west, and then by doing this it would have been built on the foundations laid by Ibrahim, peace be upon him”. This was what urged Ibn-Az-Zubair [may Allah be pleased with him] to demolish the Ka’ba. Jazz said, “I saw Ibn-Az-Zubair when he demolished and rebuilt the Ka`ba and included in it a portion of Al-Hijr (the unroofed portion of Ka`ba which is at present in the form of a compound towards the northwest of the Ka`ba). I saw the original foundations of Abraham which were of stones resembling the humps of camels.” So Jarir asked Yazid, “Where was the place of those stones?” Jazz said, “I will just now show it to you.” So Jarir accompanied Yazid and entered Al-Hijr, and Jazz pointed to a place and said, “Here it is.” Jarir said, “It appeared to me about six cubits from Al-Hijr or so.” [1]

Aa’isha, may Allah be pleased with her, said that she heard Allah’s Messenger, peace and blessings of Allah be upon him, saying, “If your people had not been recent converts to Islam, I would have spent the treasure of the Kabah in the way of Allah and would have constructed its door just on the level of the ground and would have encompassed in it the space of Hijr”. [2]

This hadith provides evidence for the principles of Islamic rulings. One of these principles is that when beneficial matters conflict or when a beneficial matter conflicts with a harmful matter, and it is not possible to both pursue what is beneficial and abandon the harm, then the most important matter should be prioritised. The Prophet, peace and blessings of Allah be upon him, informed us that although demolishing the Kabah and returning it to its foundations laid by Ibraaheem, peace be upon him, had a benefit, there was a greater harm associated with it. This harm was the fear of Fitnah among those who had recently accepted Islam due to their belief regarding the virtue of the Kabah, and any alteration to it would have been seen as a significant event. Therefore, the Prophet chose to leave the Kabah as it was. Among them (i.e. principles of the Islamic rulings) is the leader’s consideration of the well-being of his subjects and his caution in avoiding actions that may harm them in religious or worldly matters. However, this does not apply to matters related to the Shariah, such as collecting Zakat, implementing punishments, and similar matters. Among them (i.e. principles of the Islamic rulings) is to foster unity among people, safeguarding them (from division and discord), and not engage in actions that would drive them away or repel them, as long as he does not abandon an affair of the Shariah, as mentioned earlier. [3]

Allah, The Exalted,  says:

وَلَا تَسُبُّوا۟ ٱلَّذِينَ يَدْعُونَ مِن دُونِ ٱللَّهِ فَيَسُبُّوا۟ ٱللَّهَ عَدْوًۢا بِغَيْرِ عِلْمٍ كَذَٰلِكَ زَيَّنَّا لِكُلِّ أُمَّةٍ عَمَلَهُمْ ثُمَّ إِلَىٰ رَبِّهِم مَّرْجِعُهُمْ فَيُنَبِّئُهُم بِمَا كَانُوا۟ يَعْمَلُونَ

And do not insult those whom they (disbelievers) worship besides Allah, lest they insult Allah wrongfully without knowledge. Thus, We have made fair-seeming to each people its own doings; then to their Lord is their return and He shall then inform them of all that they used to do. [Al-An’aam. 108]

Allah forbids the believers from an affair that is permissible; rather, (in and of itself or with regards to its basis), it is legislated (in the Shariah), and that is to revile the false deities of the polytheists – who have adopted idols and falsehood gods (for worship) besides Allah- which a believer reviles as act of worship to draw closer to Allah; however, since this revilement is a way for the polytheists to revile the Lord of the Worlds, whose Greatness must be freed from all defects, evils, revilement, and slander, Allah forbade cursing the (false) gods of the polytheists because they defend their (false) religion and are fanatical toward it. In this noble verse, there is evidence of the Shariah principle, which is that “means are considered based on the matters they achieve, and that the means that will lead to something forbidden are forbidden, even if they are permissible in origin”. [4]

Al-Allamah Rabee Bin Haadee al-Madkhali [may Allah preserve him] said:

Uthman [may Allah be pleased with him] was one of those who restrained the people from bloodshed the most as well as that of the people who violated his honour. Shaikh Al-Islaam Ibn Taymiyyah [may Allah have mercy upon him] said, “What is well known through successive numerous narrations is that Uthman [may Allah be pleased with him] was one of those who restrained the people from bloodshed the most, exercised patience the most regarding the affair of those who violated his honour and those who made a determined attempt to shed his blood, so they besieged him and endeavoured to kill him, and he knew their desire to kill him. The Muslims came to him from every place to help him and indicated to him to fight the besiegers, but he commanded them to refrain from fighting and commanded those who obeyed him not to fight. He said to his slaves, ‘Whoever restrains his hand is freed’. It was said to him, ‘Will you go to Makkah?’ He said, ‘I will not be amongst those who commit evil in the sacred house’. Then it was said to him, ‘Will you not go to Syria?’ He said, ‘I will not leave my place of Hijrah (i.e. Madinah)’. Then it was said to him, ‘Fight them’, he said, ‘I will not be the first in the Ummah of Muhammad [peace and blessings of Allah be upon him] to unleash the sword after the departure of Muhammad’. Uthman’s patience until he was murdered is one of his greatest virtues in the sight of Muslims”. [5]

Imam Ibn Al-Qayyim [may Allah have mercy upon him] said:

“Upon realising that he would face death based on his observations of the events and signs, Uthman [may Allah be pleased with him] chose not to engage in fighting or self-defence to prevent conflict among the Muslims. He preferred to be killed rather than (initiating) fighting between Muslims”. [6]

When Mahmud Ibn Subuktikeen [may Allah have mercy upon him] whose army conquered India, wanted to break the biggest idol to which the Hindus travel from every region and spent enormous wealth to establish manifestations of polytheism, the Indians offered him a lot of money to leave the idol. Some of the Muslim rulers advised him to take the wealth and refrain from destroying the idol, but he said, “It is more beloved to me that it is said to me on the day of judgment “Where is Mahmud who broke the idol”, rather than, “Where is Mahmud who left the idol for the sake of what he received from this worldly wealth?” So, he broke the idol and found in it far more jewels, pearls, gold, and precious stones than what they offered him”. [7]

Al-Andalus (Spain), was conquered in the year 92 AH by the forces led by Tariq Bin Ziyad, a protégé of Musa Bin Nusayr, during the caliphate of Al Walid Bin Abdil Malik. Following the successful conquest, Tariq communicated with Musa Bin Nusayr to inform him of the event. However, Musa experienced a sense of jealousy regarding this significant achievement attributed to Tariq. He subsequently wrote to Al-Walid to report the conquest and cautioned Tariq, as the latter had entered Spain without prior authorisation. Musa instructed Tariq to refrain from advancing beyond his current position until they could meet. Musa then hastened with his army into Spain, accompanied by Habib Bin Abee Ubaidah Al-Fahriy. Upon their meeting, Tariq expressed, “I am indeed your protégé, and this conquest is yours.” [8]

[1] Sahih Al-Bukhari. Number 1586

[2] Sahih Muslim 1333]

[3] Paraphrased: Refer to the Arabic text below:
في هذا الحديث دليل القواعد من الأحكام، منها إذا تعارضت المصالح أو تعارضت مصلحة ومفسدة وتعذر الجمع بين فعل المصلحة وترك المفسدة بدىء بالأهم لأن النبي ﷺ أخبر أن نقض الكعبة وردها إلى ما كانت عليه من قواعد إبراهيم مصلحة ولكن تعارضه مفسدة أعظم منه وهي خوف فتنة بعض من أسلم قريباً وذلك لما كانوا يعتقدونه من فضل الكعبة فيرون تغييرها عظيماً فتركها ، ومنها فكر ولي الأمر في مصالح رعيته واجتنابه ما يخاف منه تولد ضرر عليهم في دين أو دنيا إلا الأمور الشرعية كأخذ الزكاة وإقامة الحدود ونحو ذلك، ومنها تألف قلوب الرعية وحسن
بانة حياطتهم وأن لا ينفروا ولا يتعرض لما يخاف تنفيرهم بسببه ما لم يكن فيه ترك أمر شرعي كما سبق

Sharh Saheeh Muslim By Imaam An-Nawawi. 9/75-76. Publiasher: Dar Kotub Ilmiyyah. 1st Ed 1421AH (2000)

[4] An Excerpt from “Tafseer As-Sadi”

[5]: An Excerpt from Al-Mukhtaaraat Al-Bahiyyah Min Kutub Shaikhil Islaam Ibn Taymiyyah. Page 296. Slightly paraphrased

[6] الطُّرُقُ الْحُكميَّة- page 30

[7] Al-Bidaayah Wan-Nihaayah 12/22-23

[8] An Excerpt from “Tarikh Al-Islam” 2/254-256