Skip to main content

Criticism Against a Book of Taleeghi Jamaat titled ‘Hayaatus Sahaabah’

In The Name of Allaah, The Most Merciful, The Bestower of Mercy

Imaam Albaani [rahimahullaah] stated that the one who authored this Book [i.e. Hayaatus Sahaabah] is not merely an individual amongst Jamaat At-Tableegh, but he is a figurehead- if not a figurehead of the figureheads. He authored this book and the Jamaa’ah At-Tableegh apply what it guides to. However, this book is compiled in a haphazard manner- the author did not distinguish what is in this book with a mention- first and foremost- of what is narrated from the Messenger [sallal-laahu-alayhi-wasallam] with authentic chains of transmission. That is because the speech of the Messenger is not like the speech of others, even if they [i.e. others] are from the righteous friends of Allaah.

Secondly: The author mentioned many narrations attributed to the Sahaabah [radiyallaahu-anhum]- but when it is the case that he did attribute unauthentic narrations to the Prophet [sallal-laahu-alayhi-wasallam], which the people of knowledge do not consider to be authentic based on the science of Hadeeth,  its chains of transmissions and the biographies of the narrators, then it is most likely that he would mention numerous unauthentic narrations attributed to the actions, methodology and manners of the Sahaabah.  Paraphrased…see full discussion here: Paraphrased…see full discussion here: Imaam_Albaanee

[Listen to audio here:

 

[Part 2] The Deviated Sects–A Lecture by Shaikh Muhammad Bin Haadi in the Uk (1996)

[Part 2] The Deviated Sects–A Lecture by Shaikh Muhammad Bin Haadi in the Uk (Years Ago)

The Deviated Sects

A Lecture delivered some years ago in the UK by Shaikh Muhammad Bin Haadi (may Allaah preserve him)

Translator

Abu Talhah Dawud Burbank (rahimahullaah)

Download part 2 from the link below:

http://www.sahab.net/forums/index.php?showtopic=143284

 

[Part 1] The Deviated Sects–A Lecture by Shaikh Muhammad Bin Haadi in the Uk (1996)

The Deviated Sects

A Lecture delivered some years ago in the UK by Shaikh Muhammad Bin Haadi (may Allaah preserve him)

Translator

Abu Talhah Dawud Burbank (rahimahullaah)

http://www.sahab.net/forums/index.php?showtopic=143284

Full transcription of this audio: http://transcribedsalafiaudio.com

Verdicts of the scholars against Abul Hasan Al-Maribi Al-Mubtadi [An Ally of Masjid As-Sunnah]

In The Name of Allaah, The Most Merciful, The Bestower of Mercy

Al-Allaamah Saaleh Al-Fawzaan (may Allaah preserve him) said: ”Abandon this man (i.e. Abul Hasan) and call to the methodology of Ahlus Sunnah wal-Jamaa-ah.” [Source: Siyaanatus-salafi Min Waswasati Wa-Talbeesaat Ali Al-Halabi: 533]

 

Al-Allaamah Abdullaah Al-Ghudayaan (rahimahullaah) said: ”This man (i.e. Abul Hasan al-Maribi) is subjected to trials and tribulations, (he is) insignificant and foolish.” [Source: Siyaanatus salafi: page: 533]

 

Al-Allaamah Bin Yahyah An-Najmi (rahimahullaah) said: ”Indeed, it has been finally established with me that Abul Hasan is a Mubtadi (innova-tor).” [Source: Siyaanatus-salafi: page: 533]

Imaam Muqbil Bin Haadee Al-Waadi-ee (rahimahullaah) said: ”Be cautious of Abul Hasan….I fear for the Dawah with regards to Abul Hasan.” He (rahimahullaah) also said: ”Abul Hasan is sly. He utilises cleverness and not what is from righteousness, purity and uprightness…..” [Source: Siyaanatus Salafi page: 533]

 

Al-Allaamah Rabee Bin Hadee al-Madkhalee (may Allaah preserve him) said: ”The initial affair with regards to them (i.e. Al-Abul Hasan al-Maribi, Muhammad Hassaan and Abu Ishaaq Al-Huwayni) is that they are ikhwaanees, upon the nurturing of the ikhwaanees.” [Source: Siyaanah: page:534]

 

Shaikh Muhammad Bin Haadee (may Allaah preserve him) said: ”Indeed, many of the salafi brothers are aware of the condition of this man (i.e. Abul Hasan Al-Maribi); rather at present he is with the groups of illegal partisanship, and he says, he says and he says of that which is recorded in his cassettes. And he used to reject these (affairs) the day before, but today he came with them with his own tongue. We ask Allaah for wellbeing and safety. He now speaks with the affairs he used to reject from the callers to illegal partisanship the day before….until the Shaikh said: ‘’I know him (i.e. Abul Hasan), he does not feel ashamed of telling lies.” [Source: Siyaanatus salafi:page:535]

 

Al-Allaamah Ubaid Bin Abdillaah Al-Jaabiriy (may Allaah preserve him) said: ”This man (i.e. Abul Hasan) is an ikhwaanee….” [Source: Siyaanatus salafi: page:534]

Will Naveed Ayaaz/IslamNelson/Masjid Sunnah EVER Censor the Racist Secret Agent? All Shame Lost…

As regrettable as it may be to realise, as saddening as it may be to hear, the racist secret agent working on behalf of Naveed Ayaaz, IslamNelson and Masjid Sunnah has crawled out from the stench-filled sewage works once again.

As we mentioned previously, it is the secret racist agent himself who writes on behalf of Naveed Ayaaz and his affiliates and defends them, if Naveed Ayaaz and co. do not wish for a racist secret coward to be publicly representing them as their legal team, then all it simply requires is for them to publicly declare their innocence of him and declare his activities as null and void…however, clearly they have encountered undue difficulties and complications in doing so.

Perhaps something to ponder over; why would anyone remain silent on a racist undercover agent who publicly associates himself to you and writes on your behalf? Would the logical and obvious course of action not be to clearly and openly declare your innocence of such a degraded character attaching his name to yours?

Quite apparently, logical and obvious courses of action that any sane individual would engage in are unacceptable in this situation, since if Naveed Ayaaz, IslamNelson and Masjid Sunnah did openly declare their innocence of him, therefore rendering his activities null and void, that would be damaging to them…since the secret racist is the last line of feeble defence being presented for defenders of Hizbees and innovators. [In fact, there is one more stupendous and ridiculous humiliation on their part still to come…although it would have been thought an undercover secret racist would be the icing upon the humiliation they themselves would bring upon themselves, it is not quite…indeed, what is yet to be exposed are top secret clandestine Twitter accounts! Multiple secret twitter accounts set up to respond to us! That will be discussed shortly in an upcoming article to highlight the absolute and utter degradation such defenders of Hizbees have fallen into].

What an absolute and utter humiliation. They have had to resort to allowing [by remaining silent and allowing him to attach himself to them] a secret racist to write on their behalf whilst they conveniently, quietly remain silent on his activities as if oblivious to them [!], they clearly are not oblivious since we have informed them.

In any case, it would appear they have crossed their proverbial wires. In the recent cowardly email sent from the undercover email address, (he may well have the faked library card by now too, so beware), he states that a question put forth in one of their gatherings was specifically regarding our brother Abdullah Jallow of Salaficentre and myself. The difficulty with such a claim is that Abu Bilal who was the actual questioner himself in the video [!] has REJECTED this claim of the racist secret agent! Perhaps the racist should have “seeked” to co-ordinate his activities with a little more precision to harmonise them with the “official line” of Abu Bilal the one who put forth the question!

We therefore have a situation where Abu Bilal of Masjid Sunnah himself has declared the racist undercover agent who works on their behalf [even if they claim they do not know him, he still works on their behalf in defence of them] as a LIAR! Truly it is amazing the levels of disgrace and degradation defenders of Hizbees and innovators fall into…is it really such a burden to cling onto Salafiyyah?!

Abu Bilal informed me personally in an unplanned meeting in Bolton that the question the racist is now referring to, WAS NOT SPECIFIC TO ANYONE, RATHER IT WAS GENERAL! This meeting was documented in an article “Catastrophe of Logic: Concealed Identities Marooned” , the exact excerpt from that article, “He also clarified through his speech that this miskeen of limited intellectual means has actually lied in his emails in certain places; for example the claim that our brother Abdullah was being referred to in a question concerning “certain people posting articles on the web and causing discord”. Abu Bilal declared this to be completely incorrect and false and clarified that it was simply a general question put forward that he innocently read out not intending any one particular individual. Allaahu Akbar, certainly that will be a blow to the already depleted intellectual facilities of the miskeen cowardly individual known as “dawa man”….even his own “people” are abandoning him in terms of clarifying to us that he lied in his attempt to associate questions and answers to specific individuals and that they do not endorse his views!” See screenshot, indeed it was Abu Bilal as the questioner:

image

An interesting point to note, initially the racist was “all guns blazing” that the question was about our noble brother Abdullah from Gambia [the brother who this disgusting racist racially abused in his emails], now all of a sudden – miraculously, roughly two years later after the question was asked, he decides that actually I, Abu Muadh Taqweem, was actually also – by the way – intended in that question! Perhaps next week when he develops a problem and hatred toward someone else he will send another email stating, “such and such was intended too in the question”, [!] until eventually if the family donkey ever crossed him, we will receive an email informing us that the donkey was intended too in the question [!].

No wonder the great scholars would say such and such is “more misguided than his family donkey”…that would be the least that can be said of the racist defender of Naveed Ayaaz and hizbees.

Therefore, in brief and simplistic language so that the racist may understand, his OWN people have declared him a LIAR!

Hence, as it is said, with that being the case, there really is not much more to be said upon his latest claim[!]

@AbuMuadhTaqweem

Are the Refutations upon Naveed Ayaaz/IslamNelson “Fair”?

In recent times a series of refutations have been directed at Naveed Ayaaz [Madeenahdotcom] and IslamNelson as a response to their initial outlandish crazed tweeting [mostly beginning on 09/03/14] regarding the Salaficentre, SalafiPublications [although they were too cowardly to actually specify the name], Abu Iyaad and myself.

I have received some communications regarding the refutations over the course of the previous week or so. May Allah reward the individuals who communicated in a polite and appropriate manner and offered their opinions. In any case, we will now summarise the affair thus far in order to highlight the completely fair and accurate nature of the refutations upon Naveed Ayaaz and his affiliates. I would advise everyone to examine the evidences carefully and follow the links prior to forming opinions, may Allah have mercy on you.

The previous article “Naveed Ayaaz’s Secretive Abuse of the Salafis Exposed” highlighted the disgraceful comments of Abul-Abbas Naveed Ayaaz toward the Salafis. It was based upon the “official statement” Naveed Ayaaz himself released and distributed, his own comments that he himself wrote were discussed. Please see below a screenshot of the official statement that was distributed by IslamNelson, written by Naveed Ayaaz himself:

naveed-ayaaz

As for the statement Naveed Ayaaz made regarding Abu Iyaad and the du’aat that they are “Super Salafis”, that is based upon a verified witness testimony of a brother [Nasser Hussain] who Naveed Ayaaz insisted on visiting and speaking to just last month. If Naveed Ayaaz wishes to declare the brother who testified as a liar and claim he never ever uttered the hate-filled envious words “Super-Salafis” then he is welcome to present that to us, and in reality it will just become another evidence upon his lying. Quite clearly Naveed Ayaaz will not do that since he very obviously did utter such nonsense and he is fully aware of that.

I would say this to my brothers and sisters; Naveed Ayaaz, Naman Yasin and IslamNelson have evidently fallen into “victim-syndrome” whereby they wish to portray themselves as the innocent victimised individuals in this affair all of a sudden [!]. The reality is far from that – boisterous, shameless slander using their twitter account, Naman Yasin – the Islamnelson Dawahman – texting me to boisterously claim that everything is coming out in the open! A statement from Naveed Ayaaz that has been proven to contain lies [unless of course the various witnesses testifying all happen to be liars and only Naveed Ayaaz and IslamNelson are the honourable and trustworthy [!], the seal upon that being that even one of Naveed Ayaaz’s own allies and sympathisers has testified to his lying! Please see:

http://safeshare.tv/w/VRxXFdEBAY

Hence, perhaps it would be worthwile everyone taking note that it was indeed IslamNelson who disgracefully began the abuse directed at myself and others [view timeline of IslamNelson, unless they have deleted them now!], Abu Mus’ab Naman Yasin who shamelessly tweeted against Abu Iyaad claiming his visit and advice etc was all “mere P.R.” apparently [!], Naveed Ayaaz who decided that SalafiPublications, Salaficentre, myself and other Salafis are out there to “cause chaos”… the Salafis have responded to free themselves of the accusations – apparently that is unacceptable for some strange reason?

The amazing factor in all of this is that it was all completely unprovoked! No tweet, no article, no message was sent from SalafiPublications, nor Salaficentre, nor Abu Iyaad, nor myself refuting or mentioning IslamNelson, or Naveed Ayaaz to instigate this affair! It was a twitter exchange between IslamNelson and some of our german brothers…it really is not our issue now that IslamNelson upon their evil suspicion decided it must have been an organised initiation of tweets with them and so they pre-empted by directing their slander against everyone else too!

All previous articles are based upon testimony and factual evidence [IslamNelson tweets, posters they promote, witness testimonies etc], there is nothing that is simply “rumour”. The secret racist is reality, his emails are available and present and real. The Hizbees of Masjid Sunnah cut the phone line on Shaikh Rabee’, that is real, the actual recording of the lecture is available once we replaced the communications [see here], Naveed Ayaaz lecturing with deviants and increasing numbers for them with absolutely no clarification of their errors as scholars specify as a rule [Madeenahdotcon/Naveed Ayaaz are FULLY AWARE of that since they posted the video regarding Shaikh Zaid al-Madkhaly’s رحمه الله on the issue!], that is a fact.

As difficult as it may be for some to accept the truth, the reality is, the truth it is.

Perhaps Naveed Ayaaz, Naman Yasin and IslamNelson should have remembered, [as Naman Yasin is all too aware]… do not throw stones at others, if your own house is made of glass.

It would appear we have a genuine case of ضربني وبكى – سبقني و اشتكى

He hit me [first] then cried [himself]….then preceded me and complained!

@AbuMuadhTaqweem

 

Which Solution does Ridiculous Naveed Ayaaz [Madeenah Dot Con/Islaam Nelson] desire for Us?!

In The Name of Allaah The Most Merciful, The Bestower of Mercy

Ridiculous Naveed Ayaaz stated: ”I have learnt that such individuals, and their peers in Birmingham, do not desire a solution….” [See full statement here: salafidawahmanchester.com/?p=12607 ]

Question to Shaikh Zaid Bin Haadee al-Madkhalee (rahimahullah):

Is there a difference between the verdict against a person that he is from Ahlul Bidah and the verdict that he is a Mubtadi (innovator)? And does the verdict against a person that he is not a Salafi or that he is a hizbi necessitate that he is a Mubtadi (innovator)? Can you please shed light on this affair?

Answer:

Firstly, you should know:

Indeed Ahlus Sunnah are people who possess fear of Allaah.  They neither make Takfeer, Tafseeq (i.e. declare a person a sinner) and Tabdee (declare a person an innovator) except against the one who deserves it based on the evidences in the Book and the Sunnah, and the understanding of the pious predecessors of this Ummah.

Secondly, you should know:

The people of desires and misguidance are (categorized into) those who are followed and those who follow; Indeed, those who are followed are the ones who set up the various principles of innovation and they call to their innovation and misguidance, and they will carry their burden of sins and the burden of the sins of those whom they misguided without knowledge, as it is clearly stated in the Qur’aan and the Sunnah.

As for the followers of a leader from amongst the people of desires, then in most cases they are of two categories:

The First Category:

Those who possess knowledge, but they harbour evil intentions; so they yield to Satan, desires and the urge of the evil soul. They follow the people of misguidance and oppose the callers to guidance (in that which) Allaah sent His Messenger Muhammad (sallal-laahu-alayhi-wasallam) with.

The Second Category:

Their share of knowledge is little, so the people of desires take advantage of them and they become (part) of their group. They convince them that what they call them to is the manifest truth and that what their opponents are upon is falsehood. And they convey to them a huge (number) of shubuhaat, in order to deceive them and submerge them into misguidance.  As for those who are followed—those who set up the principles of bidah and call the people to their bidah and misguidance–then indeed they are attributed to the bidah they innovated and call the people to, and for them there is no honour.

As for the followers of the people of desires, it is as I have stated that they are of two categories in most cases. They are to be called to the Sunnah and to cling to it, and that they (should) reject the bidah they have been deceived by and have yielded to. And if they respond to the call of truth through knowledge and action, and reject that which the people of desires and innovation call them to, then this is what is desired and it is a praiseworthy aim. If they reject the advice of the advisers and bargain with falsehood at the expense of truth, and give preference to innovation over the Sunnah, then they deserve to be assigned the term innovator.

[For further details, see Al-Ajwibah Al-Athariyyah Anil Masaa-il Al-Manhajiyyah, Khamsoona Su’aalan Wa-Jawaaban: page: 18-19:]


 So we say to ridiculous Naveed: This is the solution! It is what we have established based on the verdicts of the scholars against the three figure heads of Bidah and Dalaalah [Halabi, Maghraawi, Maribi], and their staunch follower Abu Usaamah.  As for those who are deceived by Masjid As-Sunnah’s admin, we will do our best to refer them to the students of knowledge whenever they seek clarification, and may Allaah free them from the deceptions of  the dishonest hizbiyyoon.  Aameen.

[الْحَمْدُ لِلَّهِ]—we neither established our stances based on the reckless methodology of the Hajaawirah nor the repugnant hizbiyyah of Ihyaa Turaath, Greenlane, Al-Maghrib Institute, Suhaib Hasan and their associates; rather we only followed the verdicts of the scholars of Ahlul Athar- founded upon the knowledge based proofs against Ma’ribi, Halabi, Maghraawi and their staunch follower Abu Usaamah.

Likewise, after Masjid As-Sunnah’s admin persisted upon misguidance and obstinacy, and proclaimed their support for Halabi, Maghraawi and Maribi, we followed the verdict of Al-Allaamah Rabee Bin Haadi Al-Madkhali (may Allaah preserve him) against them. [Video: http://salaficentre.com/2012/06/verdict-upon-masjid-as-sunnah-committee-in-manchester-shaikh-rabees-tele-link-in-2003-2/

Therefore, neither should Naveed turn a blind eye to the facts nor expect us to follow his false assumptions and desires. Neither can the solution be based on the desires and false assumptions of those who are ignorant of the precise methodology of Ahlus Sunnah Wal-Jamaa’ah in dealing with the innovators and their staunch followers, nor can it be based on the solutions of those who attack the people of Salafiyyah and do not differentiate between the upright-knowledge based stances of Ahlus Sunnah Wal Jamaa’ah from the corrupt, deceitful and false stances of the Mu-mayyi-een.

How very revealing is Naveed Ayaaz’s true state of affairs! He has the audacity to accuse the Salafiyyoon of not having a desire for a solution, yet he shows no shame in allying himself with a people who have persisted in their defence of three foremost figure heads of ahlul ahwaa wal-bidah(people of deisres and bid’ah)!  How very revealing it is of him, that Naveed Ayaaz is very eager to make silly and slanderous remarks against the Salafiyyoon, yet he expects to be considered a serious and responsible graduate! Indeed, Naveed must grow up and refrain from uttering such slanderous and absurd accusations. As Ibn Abdi Rabbihi (rahimahullaah) said: ”Choosing speech is more difficult than authorship, and indeed it is said: The choice of a man (in speech) is in harmony with his intellect.” [Source: quoted by Shaikh Muhammad Bin Umar Saalim Baazmool in Manhajul Bahthi Al-Ilmiy Wa-Kitaabah Fee Uloom Ash-Sharee-ah: page: 17]

And Allaah knows best

Note: We do not declare anyone an innovator or a Kaafir, except those whom our scholars have declared to kuffaar or innovators.


For those who do not know, then see the verdicts of the scholars on:

  • Halabi

http://salaficentre.com/2012/07/the-mufti-shaykh-ghudyaan-shaykh-fawzaan-and-shaykh-bakr-abu-zayd-on-grave-mistakes-of-halabi/

http://www.manhaj.com/manhaj/categories/kp-the-false-principles-of-ali-hasan-al-halabi.cfm

http://salaficentre.com/2013/03/the-categories-of-people-in-the-fitna-of-halabi-al-mubtadi-a-question-to-brixton/

  • Maribi

http://salaficentre.com/2012/08/verdict-against-abu-usaama-and-verdicts-against-his-shaikh-al-maribi-both-treated-like-ahlul-bidah/

  • Maghraawi

http://salaficentre.com/2014/04/naveed-ayaaz-madeenah-comislam-nelson-an-ally-of-some-of-those-who-defend-a-khaarijee-takfeeree/

  • Refuting falsehood

http://www.manhaj.com/manhaj/articles/utjea-shaykh-saalih-al-fawzaan-the-true-and-real-fitnah-is-leaving-alone-the-people-of-falsehood-and-evil-and-remaining-silent-about-them.cfm

And to conclude then a reminder for Naveed to be mindful of this! http://salaficentre.com/2013/03/shaikh-abdullaah-al-bukhaari-re

 

Brief Observations on Muhammad Qutb’- by Shaikh Rabee and Shaikh Hammaad Al-Ansaari

 In The Name of Allaah The Most Merciful, The Bestower of Mercy

Shaikh Rabee Bin Haadi (may Allaah preserve him)….

  • Muhammad Qutb spoke about Tawheed but with no detail and clarity…..
  • Muhammad Qutb aided in spreading the ideas of his brother Sayyid Qutb– by spreading his brother’s books of bidah and misguidance.
  • No clear report has being received from Muhammad Qutb disapproving of his brother’s innovations and affairs of misguidance.  He shouldered the responsibility of spreading Sayyid Qutb’s books of misguidance and bidah. So if he repented to Allaah and showed regret for spreading those books, he would have made that public; but if not he remains guilty of spreading the misguidance and innovations of his brother. [listen to audio]

Listen to audio here:

 

Shaikh Hammaad Al-Ansaari (rahimahullaah)

Muhammad Quṭb is an Ashʿarī” and he also said, “Muhammad Quṭb, Sayyid Quṭb’s brother, is a dangerous Ashʿarī.” Read full article on this link: http://www.themadkhalis.com/md/articles/muqxd-sayyid-qutb-and-mohammad-qutb-were-asharis.cfm

 

Naveed Ayaaz [Madeenah Dot Con/Islam Nelson– an ally of some of those who defend a Khaarijee-Takfeeree]

In The Name of Allaah, The Most Merciful, The Bestower of Mercy

Al-Allaamah Muhammad Ibn Abdul-Wahhaab al-Wassaabee on Maghraawi

see link for video

http://salaficentre.com/2012/04/shaikh-muhammad-al-wassaabee-on-maghraawee-the-takfeeree-2/

 

To this day the allies of Naveed Ayaaz@ Masjid As-Sunnah (Cheethamhill-Manchester) have not freed themselves from Maghraawi (The Takfeeree-Khaarijeee)]

Articles on Maghraawi (The Takfeeri-Khaarijee)

Revelations on the Doctrines of al-Maghraawi : Part 1

Revelations on the Doctrines of al-Maghraawi : Part 2

Revelations on the Doctrines of al-Maghraawi : Part 3

Abul-Abbas Naveed Ayaaz [Madeenahdotcom/IslamNelson] Exposed [Part 2]

Shaikh Mohammad bin Haady highlighted several years ago the reality of Madeenahdotcom, in particular the existence of blatant liars amongst them. Perhaps it is such speech of the scholars highlighting their wayward methodology that upsets Naveed Ayaaz to such a degree. Nevertheless it would have been expected that as a grown adult he would have dealt with the refutations upon him with some degree of honour, regrettably that was seeking too much.

Upon apparently realising and recognising the fact that indeed he is unable to respond to the criticisms against him, he has engaged in a despicable act of cowardice in attempting to gain community support for himself. Quite apparently he realised his dubious teaching would not gain him the support required hence he has disgustingly resorted to purposely attempting to involve other innocent individuals into his affair.

The affair has always been linked to Madeenahdotcom and, specifically in our town of Nelson, Naveed Ayaaz and his erroneous methodology. The affair has never been with regards to any Masjid whatsoever! However, disgracefully, Naveed Ayaaz very politically attempts to gain support by stating that I along with others have “….been part of this campaign against myself [Naveed Ayaaz], our Da’wah and the Masjid“.

So I say to this disgraceful individual – who with a pitiful whimper decided to try and rally the community against myself and salafidawalancs – that no-one has ever made an issue regarding the Masjid! We have never mentioned the Masjid in the refutations against Naveed Ayaaz! The affair from beginning to end is related to Naveed Ayaaz’s distorted methodology and has nothing to do with the Masjid! Any clarification or refutation presented on this issue from myself has always been directed at Naveed Ayaaz and Naveed Ayaaz alone! Hence I advise this individual to drop this highly pitiful and degrading act of attempting to rally the congregation to join his defence! He will be refuted upon his incorrect methodology irrelevant of what masjid he may be in! So his embarassing attempt to link this affair to the masjid and get innocent individuals involved in his deteriorating situation is truly degrading and somewhat cringeworthy in reality.

He also then continues to pitifully say regarding me, “He holds our Masjid to be a masjid of Ahlul Bid’ah“. Once again, I remind this individual to have at least some honour and not attempt this whimpering feeble cry to gain support from the community. The issue is NOT about the congregation or the community or the Masjid, we have NOT declared the congregation as innovators! I challenge Naveed Ayaaz to provide evidence that we have declared the average everyday congregation, elders, youth, brothers and sisters ALL as INNOVATORS…which is essentially what his statement would wish to imply to gain support from the community!? The statement is so ridiculous it is beyond belief any sane individual could even utter it, let alone for a so-called graduate to insinuate it in order to disgracefully rally the commoners onside with a general, unrestricted sweeping statement that the masjid has been declared “ahlul-bid’ah”! In reality he is fully aware we have not intended that at any stage with anything we have said.

Scholars have declared the GLM organisation as Hizbee upon evidence, and if the current leadership of the Masjid – I intend IslamNelson – wish to affiliate and ascribe themselves to GLM then they [IslamNelson] are placed alongside them! That is exactly what I told Naveed Ayaaz in a meeting some months ago! That if the Masjid – i.e. IslamNelson currently in essence – is an affiliate of a Hizbee organisation and ascribes itself to it and aids and supports it then it is placed along with that Hizbee organisation….and so that is a decision in the hands of IslamNelson now, not me! If they wish to affiliate to supporters and promoters of al-Maghrib and al-Kauther, magicians and singers [who apparently Naveed Ayaaz and IslamNelson refuted, since they claim to have OPENLY AND PUBLICLY REFUTED THE GLM SHAMBLES “QUR’AN AND I” CONFERENCE, yet none of us have had the pleasure of hearing anything or seeing anything to this day from this apparently very public refutation] then that is their issue to deal with.

This would NOT mean that we have declared everyone A MUBTADI’! [INNOVATOR]. Ahlus Sunnah do not label individuals in masses recklessly as innovators no matter how much Naveed Ayaaz would desire we did, and that is why he and his colleagues have made concerted efforts for months to extract a “fatwa” from me that the people of the masjid are all innovators [!], that it is a masjid of “ahlul-bid’ah” in a generalised and unrestricted sense incorporating all attendees! ….clearly they have received nothing, and will not, since it is ridiculous beyond belief that I or anyone will make any such tabdee’! This is not the way of ahlus-Sunnah!

So once again, we see this awful and embarassing attempt made by Naveed Ayaaz to try to gain support from the commoners! We do not declare common people as innovators, rather we openly invite the community to attend our lessons at SalafiDawaLancs, it hardly makes any sense for us to declare everyone as innovators then send texts warmly inviting those same people to the lessons to come and sit alongside us!?

So I say in conclusion: Naveed Ayaaz have some shame and you alone face your issues on your methodology with honour – if indeed that is possible, not pitifully making woeful degrading attempts to gain sympathy from the community. This has nothing to do with the Masjid and the elders, youngsters, brothers and sisters of the community…this is about your corrupt methodology and your “IslamNelson” who have involved themselves of their own free will, since you are the so-called student who is supposed to be trusted to teach the people. If people have been advised not to teach at that masjid it is due to you and your corrupt ways and your colleagues, not the elders or youngsters or anyone else! It is IslamNelson that has attacked the Salafis publicly initially on tweets, and you with your pitiful statement, not the elders or youngsters, brothers and sisters of the community besides you!

Answer to yourself and your wayward methodology if indeed you are able, and if you are not able then continue to disgrace yourself – with what are essentially lies implied through your carefully chosen political terminology – that the Salafis make tabdee’ [declare as innovators] of everyone!

@AbuMuadhTaqweem