Skip to main content

A Reminder to Myself and Colleagues Ahead of Preparation Week

Imam al-Barbahārī, may Allah have mercy upon him, said: “Intellect is inborn.”

Al-ʿAllāmah Aḥmad bin Yaḥyā an-Najmī, may Allah have mercy upon him, said:

Meaning, it is brought forth together with the person, and it develops and increases as he grows. So, the intellect starts as something small, then becomes greater together with its possessor. There is no doubt that the intellects vary based on that which Allah bestowed upon every person. And indeed, in the Qur’an, Allah, the Mighty and Majestic, praised the people of sound intellect. [Irshād as-Sārī fī Sharḥ as-Sunnah lil-Barbahārī, p. 155]

It is well known that an individual enters the world devoid of knowledge. However, they possess the inherent capacity to experience sensations such as pain. For instance, when subjected to a pinch, the individual perceives pain as a direct response. This sensation has been present from the moment the soul was instilled within them; nonetheless, it does not equate to knowledge. Additionally, there exists an innate disposition that enables the infant to grasp the mother’s breast and engage in suckling.

Allah, the Mighty and Majestic, said:

وَٱللَّهُ أَخۡرَجَكُم مِّنۢ بُطُونِ أُمَّهَـٰتِكُمۡ لَا تَعۡلَمُونَ شَيۡـًٔ۬ا

And Allah has brought you out from the wombs of your mothers while you know nothing. [An-Naḥl, 16:78]

Following birth, an individual begins to perceive physical objects through sensory experiences. This understanding progressively develops through the process of analogy, or by comparing one entity or circumstance to another. For example, it becomes customary for the mother to lift her child from the cradle when she intends to breastfeed. As this action is repeated, the child comes to understand, through analogy, that being lifted from the cradle signifies the opportunity for breastfeeding.

One may observe the child crying when hungry, remaining quiet when removed from the cradle, and then resuming crying if breastfeeding does not occur thereafter. This illustrates how general knowledge is cultivated through the perception of tangible things and the use of analogy, which is further reinforced by repetition. This process can be described as istiqrāʾ—examination, scrutiny and extrapolation.

Through the observation of tangible objects and the use of analogy, fundamental causes become imprinted in both the mind and the heart. This includes the understanding that existence and non-existence cannot coexist, that a whole is greater than its individual parts, and that an event requires a cause to come into being. What is meant is that a person perceives either through sensory experience or through analogical reasoning based upon sensory input. This understanding remains with an individual throughout their life. However, as one matures, acquires knowledge, engages in reasoning and reflects, their understanding deepens. This growth is facilitated by the multitude of tangible experiences accessible through the senses, which enhance their capacity for analogy and strengthen their intellectual faculties.

When another individual is present in your home, you can ascertain their presence by either observing them or hearing their voice. You may also recognise their presence through tactile sensations or by recognising their scent. Based on your prior experiences, you come to the conclusion that this entity is indeed a human being. The shape, voice or physical object with which you have interacted, along with its scent, all indicate a human being. Furthermore, through additional reasoning, you identify this individual as a specific person. You recognise that the shape, voice, tangible characteristics and scent correspond to that particular individual.

You may leave your room unoccupied and return shortly thereafter to discover that an incident has occurred within it. From your prior reasoning and intellectual assessment, you deduce that an event must have caused this situation. If you seek to understand the underlying reason, you engage in an investigation based upon your earlier deductions. It is possible that a piece of paper has shifted due to a gust of wind. A book may have been placed precariously, and upon observing its fall, you contemplate that its instability, caused by its considerable weight, led it gradually to lean until it ultimately toppled.

Furthermore, if an object was suspended by a frail string that eventually broke, you reflect on the fact that, due to the weight of the object, the string weakened until it eventually snapped completely. If a container holding food was positioned securely but subsequently fell, one might conclude that a mouse, a cat or a similar creature had forcefully jumped onto it, causing the fall.

In the case where a container of light food was removed from atop a table and relocated to another table at a distance, and a monkey was present in the house or nearby, it could be inferred that the monkey was the cause of the movement. Furthermore, if a heavy box was initially placed on the ground but later found in a different location, one would likely assume that a person had entered and moved it, recognising that this individual is alive and capable of such an action.

Lastly, if multiple items within a room were rearranged from their original positions into a more organised and aesthetically pleasing arrangement, it would indicate that the individual responsible possesses a level of wisdom connected with the skills necessary to achieve such an arrangement.

If the room was secured from within, and you approached the door, fully aware that no one could have entered after your arrival, yet upon your return, you discovered that the luggage had been rearranged in a manner that was more imaginative and refined than its previous state, you would then consider one of two scenarios.

Either there exists an individual with capabilities that surpass the ordinary, who managed to enter the room through an unconventional means, or there is a being present, alive, knowledgeable and possessing wisdom that exceeds that of any human or other species you have encountered.

Thus, you came to recognise this being’s existence by drawing parallels with the existence of tangible entities that can be sensed, as well as by comprehending the qualities associated with it.

[An Excerpt from Āthār ash-Shaikh al-ʿAllāmah ʿAbdur-Raḥmān bin Yaḥyā al-Muʿallimī, 5/7–11]

The Relevance of This to Education

A child’s present difficulty should not automatically be treated as a complete measure of their ability. The teacher may need to provide the child with further opportunities, different approaches, additional explanation, greater encouragement or simply more time. This does not mean that we ignore weaknesses or pretend that every child is equally capable in every area. Rather, it means that we should be careful about making broad judgements from limited observations. A child may struggle in one area while possessing considerable strengths in another. A child may not yet have discovered an ability because they have not yet been given the opportunity to use it.

Just as the intellect develops through experience, observation, knowledge, reasoning and reflection, a child’s understanding of their own abilities can also develop through experience and opportunity. Our role, therefore, is not merely to judge what a child can do at a particular moment. It is also to help create the conditions in which the child can discover what they are capable of developing. We must teach, encourage, observe and nurture. We must allow children to progress at their own pace while continuing to encourage sincere effort and beneficial ambition.

Ambitions

We must remind pupils that having ambitions is perfectly acceptable, and that those ambitions can change. Children do not have to decide their entire future at a young age. Having one ambition today does not mean that you are failing if you change it tomorrow. We discover new interests as we grow because a person’s abilities may not be immediately obvious.

Also, academic performance at one stage does not determine a person’s entire future. We may struggle in one area while possessing considerable strengths in another. Success in what we do comes from Allah after we have made a sincere effort and sought His assistance. There are many respectable and meaningful forms of work. Careers are journeys rather than necessarily fixed destinations. We do not tell a child, “You must become this,” when speaking about worldly affairs. Rather, we observe and explore their talents as much as we can. Sometimes children hear so much about what they cannot do that they begin to construct an identity around failure.

“I’m bad at maths.”

“I’m not clever.”

“I’m slow.”

“Other children are better than me.”

Thus, those statements can become part of how they see themselves. However, when a teacher identifies a genuine strength and says, in effect, “I see something in you,” the child may begin to look at themselves differently. That is not empty praise. There is a powerful encouragement in saying: “I’ve noticed that you are particularly good at solving practical problems or I’ve noticed that you are good at analysing. Let’s see what happens if you develop that skill.”

This is something the teacher has genuinely observed. It encourages the child without making exaggerated claims about their abilities. Children may not always recognise their own strengths immediately. Sometimes they discover them through experience. Therefore, our responsibility as teachers is to nurture confidence as well as help children discover their strengths. We should all aspire to be teachers who inspire, rather than teachers who look at ability from a narrow angle. A teacher may begin judging a child’s ability based on what he or she believes would necessitate a lack of common sense, while failing to exhaust all reasonable avenues to enable the child’s progress at their own pace.

Above all, we should be careful not to define a child’s potential too narrowly based upon a single weakness, one academic subject or one stage of their development. Sometimes a child does not need someone to tell them what they cannot become. Sometimes they need a teacher who notices what they can do, helps them develop it and gives them the opportunity to discover where that ability may lead. And above all, Allah is the Bestower of success.

Selfless and Loyal Governors Who Served Islam and Its Rulers

Nidham Al-Mulk

He was known as Nidham Al-Mulk, Abu Ali Al-Hasan Bin Ali Bin Ishaq at-Toosee, a devout follower of the religion, wise and knowledgeable, a respected leader, well-versed in the affairs of the state, cheerful and amiable, pious and humble, regularly attending gatherings of scholars and students of the Qur’anic sciences. He established a prestigious school in Baghdad, another in Naysabur, and yet another in Tous. His thirst for knowledge was insatiable, fostering connections among seekers of knowledge, transmitting hadith, and earning a renowned reputation.

He found himself in various circumstances, eventually serving as a minister for Sultan Alp Arslan, and later as a minister to his son Malik Shah. He skillfully managed the lands under his authority, resolving grievances, showing kindness to his subjects, and establishing state endowments. The wise elders flocked to him, seeking to be close by his side. He advised Malik Shah to select leaders and governors with good morals, upright religious adherence, and bravery. The impact of this strategy became evident in the future, and one of the chosen leaders was Aq Sanqur, the grandfather of Noor Ad-Deen Mahmood, who governed Aleppo, Diyarbakir, and the Arabian Peninsula. Imam Ibn Kathir said:

“He displayed exceptional conduct and a noble heart. Imaad Ad-Deen Zangi, his son, initiated the Jihad against the Crusaders, followed by Noor Ad-Deen Mahmood. This family laid the groundwork for the triumphs of Salah Ad-Din, Zahir Baybars, and Qalawun over the Crusaders, restoring unity and solidarity in the Islamic world. Similarly, Aq Sunqur al-Barasqi, a leader under Sultan Mahmood, the Seljuk, and the commander of Mosul, dedicated himself to the Jihad against the Crusade”.

Ibn Al-Atheer said about him:

“He was a freed Turkish slave, virtuous, loved the people of knowledge and the righteous, and he saw justice and acted upon it. He was one of the best rulers, used to strictly perform his prayers on time as well as the Tahajjud”.

When Malik Shah assumed control of the state, the military started to become disorganised and began to have more access to the nation’s wealth. They claimed:

“The sultan only stops us from obtaining wealth because of NidhaamAl-Mulk”, leading to great harm for the people. So, he brought this issue to Sultan’s attention and explained the potential consequences, such as weakness, dishonour, vulnerability, the ruin of the country, and the loss of good governance. The Sultan told him: “Do what you believe is best in this matter!” He replied: “I can only act with your orders.” The Sultan responded: “I have entrusted all matters, big and small, to you, so you are like a father”. He then made an oath in the name of Allah about his statement, granted Nidham more power on top of what he already had, and presented him with a new outfit, along with titles, one of which was “The leader, the father”.

Nidham’s competence, bravery, and good behaviour became evident, satisfying the people’s hearts. On one occasion, a helpless woman sought his help, so he paused to converse with her; when one of his guards pushed her away, he openly criticised the guard’s actions, stating, “I only employ you to protect individuals like her, as the rulers and important figures do not require your services.” He then attended to the woman’s needs.

He loved the Islamic sciences, particularly the study of hadith. He used to say: “I know I am not worthy of narrating, but I love being linked to a chain of transmission that carries the hadith of Allah’s Messenger- peace and blessings of Allah be upon him”.

His gatherings were packed with jurists and scholars, as he spent the majority of his day with them. When he was told: “These people distract you from many beneficial things,” he replied: “These people are the beauty of the world and the Hereafter, and it would not have been too much if I made them sit on my head.”

Ibn Al-Athir said about him:

“He was a scholar, devoted to the religion, generous, just, forbearing, pardoned offenders a lot, and preferred silence for prolonged periods. His gatherings were packed with students of the Qur’anic sciences, the jurists, and the Imams of the Muslims, the good and righteous people. He was among the memorisers of the Qur’an and dedicated himself to studying the Mad’hab of Imam Ash-Shaafi’ee. He would only sit in a state of ritual purity (Wudhu) and was never in that state except that he performed prayer. Whenever he heard the call to prayer, he would pause all his activities, and after it ended, he would resume with nothing else but prayer”.

One of the indications of his humility was demonstrated one evening when he was dining with his brother Abu Al-Qaasim, while the Chief of Khurasan and a poor man with an amputated hand were also present. Observing the chief hesitating to eat with the man with the amputated hand, he instructed the chief to relocate, and then he moved close to the man with the amputated hand and ate with him. It was customary for him to offer his food to the poor and move it close to them.

In the year 485 AH, on Thursday, the tenth of the month of Ramadan, following the time of Iftar, he prayed and then gathered around the meal table with a large group of people. He proceeded to discuss the significance of the location where they had arrived in the lands of Nahawand, recounting the historical events involving the Persians and the Muslims during the era of the Commander of the Faithful, Umar Bin Al-Khattab. He also paid tribute to the notable individuals who had been martyred there, concluding with the words, “Good news to those who follow in their footsteps.”

After completing his Iftar, he made his way back to his tent. Suddenly, a young Daylami [i.e. a person from the Daylan highlands (Iran)] approached him under the guise of asking for something, only to strike him with a weapon instead. He was swiftly taken to the camp, where it was reported that he was the victim of the Ismaa’eeli Shiites’ violence. The tragic incident quickly spread throughout the army, causing an uproar. Upon hearing the news, Sultan Malik Shah arrived in a state of sorrow and tears, spending hours in the company of Nidham Al-Mulk until his passing.

As for the murderer, he had stumbled across the tent, and then his slaves pursued and killed him. Some of his servants said that his last words were: “Do not kill the one who attempted to kill me because indeed I have forgiven him”. Then he uttered the Shahadah and passed away”. Ibn Aqeel said about him:

“He was a sea of sound intelligence, his life was filled with good, a generous and just person, one of the revivers of the signposts of the religion and his era was one of authority for the people of knowledge. He was murdered while on Hajj in Ramadan.

An Excerpt from ‘Ad-Dawlah Al-Uthmaaniyyah Awaamil An-Nuhood Wa Asbaab As-Suqoot. 6/33-38

Universal Welfare As a Priority During the Expansion of Islam

Al-Allamah Salih Aala Ash-Shaikh, may Allah preserve him, said:

When Muslims conquered different regions of the earth and Islam spread, it appeared as though it began with non-Arabs, until Persians and other non-Arabs became scholars and Imams of mosques, and people learned from them.

Many non-Arabs are mentioned in Islamic history as leading the Muslims in knowledge, pronouncing religious verdicts, and in other matters. Consider Abu Haneefah (may Allah have mercy on him), who was not an Arab, and Imam Al-Bukhari (may Allah have mercy on him), whose book became an upright example. There is no Muslim who is not familiar with Imam Abu Abdillah Muhammad bin Isma’eel Al-Bukhaari. And consider the other Imams of Islam besides Al-Bukhari and Abu Haneefah.

Thus, when Islam was implemented, it erased the differences that the people had created. Why, then, did those non-Arabs become the leaders and Imams of the Arabs? That is because they carried the religion, raised the banner of true Islamic monotheism—there is no deity worthy of worship except Allah, and Muhammad is Allah’s Messenger—and because there is no difference in virtue between a non-Arab and an Arab except through fear of Allah.

When Muslims disciplined themselves with Islam, there was no dispute between them regarding social class based on that pre-Islamic dispute and distinction. They did not accept leadership or give precedence to anyone on this basis; rather, they accepted everyone because people are equal in this matter.

The Quraish rulership, the Umayyad, and the Abbasid rulership ended, then the Mamluk rulership arose, followed by the rulership of Banee Uthman—meaning, in the beginning, when it was upright. So the Muslims obeyed them, and they became the leaders and rulers because the Muslims saw that there was welfare for the people in doing so.

As a result, class distinction and its practice were eradicated from the beginning, and no one had any reservations about implementing Islam. Islamic history attests to the application of this magnificent principle.

Listen here: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wRkeYjcJ728 [end of quote]

“They are the basis of every Fasaad and Ifsaad” – By Shaikh Falah Ismaa’eel

The Shaikh, may Allah have mercy upon him, said:

One of the greatest (affairs) that shows their danger is that they will remain and continue to exist until the Day of Judgement. Indeed, they are the basis of every Fasaad [corruption] and Ifsaad [corrupting every matter by removing it from what it is supposed to be] in the earth—the basis of the spread of panic, the undermining of security in the land, and the basis of every deviation from the true methodology. This is because they abandon knowledge and the scholars, having been deceived by their outward deeds.

Due to this, the first thing Abdullah Ibn Abbas, may Allah be pleased with him and his father, discredited them with was that there was not a single Companion of Allah’s Messenger, peace and blessings of Allah be upon him, amongst them. The Companions are the original source of knowledge; it is neither permissible for anyone to emerge and take a position in religious matters except through them, nor to acquire knowledge except from them. This is because they are the most knowledgeable regarding that which Allah and His Messenger intend by way of the texts.

And that which is worthy that one should be aware of—in order to be acquainted with their danger—is that which Allah’s Messenger, peace and blessings of Allah be upon him, wished if he were to meet them, and what he described regarding what he would do to them. He would have slaughtered them in a manner similar to the manner in which Aad and Thamud were slaughtered, even though they [i.e. Khawarij] are from the Ummah and the people of the Qiblah. [Footnote a]

This is especially so when one recalls the statement of Allah’s Messenger about dogs: “Had dogs not been a community amongst the communities, I would have commanded that all of them be killed.” [Sahih Al-Jami 9452]

Therefore, a sensible person compares and ponders regarding what the Messenger of guidance and mercy wished to do to these Khawaarij—despite their (devotion) in worship, prayer, fasting and recitation of the Qur’an—as opposed to what he forbade himself and others from doing to dogs.

Indeed, this is a great proof regarding the danger posed by the continuation of this thought and this type of people in the Ummah, because they weaken the Ummah and preoccupy it. [1]

A Brief Reminder From The Hadith

“Had dogs not been a community amongst the communities, I would have commanded that all of them be killed”. [Sahih Al-Jami 9452]

Al-Khattaabee—may Allah have mercy upon him—said:

The meaning of this statement is that the Prophet—peace and blessings of Allah be upon him—hated that a community amongst the communities and a species amongst the creation would disappear until all of them cease to exist. This is because there is not a creature from Allah’s creatures except that there is some wisdom behind their existence and some welfare.

So, when this is the case regarding this matter, and there is no way of killing all of them, then kill the evil ones amongst them—the black ones—and leave the others, so that you benefit from them as guard dogs. (2)

NB: The other dogs which one is allowed to keep are: the hunting dog, the farm dog, the one utilised for herding livestock, or the guard dog.

Abdullah Ibn Umar—may Allah be pleased with him and his father—said: Allah’s Messenger—peace and blessings of Allah be upon him—said, “Whoever keeps a dog, except a dog for herding livestock or a dog that is trained for hunting, two qiraats will be deducted from his reward each day.” [Al-Bukhari 5163 and Muslim 1574]

Imaam Muhammad Ibn Salih Al-Uthaymeen—may Allah have mercy upon him—said:

Due to this, if a house is located in the middle of the city, then there is no need to have a dog to guard it. Therefore, to have a dog for this reason in such circumstances is unlawful and impermissible, and it takes away one or two qiraats from a person’s reward each day.
However, if the house is located in the countryside and no one is present, then it is allowed to have a dog to guard the house and the people residing in it. To guard the people of a household is more important than guarding livestock or crops. (3)

___________________

Footnote a: The Methodology of Ahlus Sunnah In Their Combat Against The Khawaarij: They are to be fought by the Muslim ruler https://salafidawahmanchester.com/2011/10/24/shaikh-fawzaan-the-methodology-of-ahlus-sunnah-in-their-combat-against-the-khawaarij/


[1] An Excerpt from Naz’at at-Takfeer. pages 24-25
[2]An Excerpt from Ma’alim As-Sunan 4/132
[3] An Excerpt from Majmu Fatawa Ibn Uthaymeen 4/246

If you see a man supplicating for or against the ruler

Imam Al-Barbahaaree, may Allah have mercy upon him, said:

“And if you see a man supplicating against the ruler, then know that he is a person of desires (deviant inclinations). And if you see a man supplicating for the ruler’s righteousness, then know that he is a person of the Sunnah, if Allah wills.” (1)

Imam Ahmad Ibn Hanbal, may Allah have mercy upon him, said:

“I hold that the leader of the believers is to be obeyed (in good) in private and public, in my times of hardship and ease, in my times of enthusiasm and when I dislike doing something (i.e. something that’s not unlawful, but one does not like to do it, however he must do it in obedience to the ruler), and when others are given precedence over me. Indeed, I supplicate to Allah – night and day – for him to be successful and guided”. [2]

Abdus Samad Bin Yazid Al-Baghdadi, may Allah have mercy upon him, said: I heard Al-Fudayl Bin Iyaad, may Allah have mercy upon him, saying, “If I had a supplication that would be accepted, I would not make it except for the leader”. It was said to him, “O father of Ali! Why is that?” He said, “When I make it for myself, it would be only for me, but if I make it for the leader, the rectification (or righteousness) of the leader would consequently result in the rectification of the people and the country”. It was said to him, “O father of Ali! How is that? Explain this to us”. He said, “As for the wellbeing of the land, if the people are safe from the ruler’s tyranny, they will develop abandoned areas and settle in the land. And with regards to the rectification of the people, one observes the affair of a people among the ignoramuses and says, ‘They have been distracted by the pursuit of livelihood rather than seeking what will benefit them with regards to learning the Qur’an and other things’. So, he gathers them together in a house – fifty in number, less or more, and says to a man, ‘You have what will make your affair upright and teach these people their religion’. Then you’ll see what Allah, The Mighty and Majestic, brings forth from among them that would make the land righteous (and prosperous, thrive, flourish, etc) and that would return to them (i.e. they’ll receive its benefits). This would be the rectification of the people and the country”. Imam Ibn Al-Mubarak, may Allah have mercy upon him, kissed Imam Fudayl’s forehead and said, “O teacher of goodness! Who else (i.e. among us) would be able to (say or do) this better than you?!” [3]


[1] Sharh As-Sunnah 127

[2] Al-Bidaayah Wan-Nihaayah 14/413

[3] Hilyah Al-Awliya 8/91

Khuruj Principle of a Student of Knowledge Uprooted and Demolished by Imam Muhammad Ibn Salih Al-Uthaymin

Question: One of the students of knowledge says that it is permissible to make Khuruj against a sinful ruler, but with two conditions: firstly, the ability to do so and secondly being certain that the harm will be lesser than the benefit, and he says that this is the methodology of the pious predecessors…..

The beautiful response of the Imam, rahimahullah, here:

The Imam, may Allah have mercy upon him, also said:

Regardless of the type of fusuq, it is not permissible to revolt against the rulers. Whatever it may be, even if they kill, drink alcohol, commit adultery, or engage in sodomy, it is not permissible to rebel against them, because the Messenger said [that rebellion is only justified upon seeing] “clear, manifest disbelief” (kufran bawāhan): something explicit and unambiguous, leaving no room for interpretation or doubt.

For if the matter is open to interpretation or doubt, then perhaps those who committed what appears to be manifest disbelief did so out of ignorance or through an erroneous interpretation. For this reason, Shaykh al-Islam Ibn Taymiyyah, may Allah have mercy on him, said in his al-Risālah al-Mardīniyyah that Imam Ahmad, may Allah have mercy on him, held that the doctrine of al-Ma’mun and those like him that the Qur’an is created is disbelief. Yet he did not declare al-Ma’mun himself to be a disbeliever; rather, he would supplicate for him and ask Allah to have mercy upon him.

This is what Shaykh al-Islam Ibn Taymiyyah, may Allah have mercy on him, said. Therefore, it must be manifest and unequivocal, with no possibility of interpretation, ignorance, or anything similar. (Paraphrased)

https://alathar.net/home/esound/index.php?op=codevi&coid=30545

Demonstrations, and Revolting Against Rulers – By Al-Allamah Rabee Bin Hadi Al-Mad’khali

Al-Allamah Rabee Bin Hadi Al-Mad’khali, may Allah have mercy upon him, said:

فإن الإسلام لِكمال هديه وكمال حِكمته يمنع الخروج على الحكام وما

يؤدي إلى الخروج، ويأمر بالنصيحة والموعظة الحسنة النافعة بالطرق

الحكيمة البعيدة عن الإفساد والمفاسد

For indeed, Islam – due to the perfection of its guidance and wisdom, prohibits revolting against rulers and that which leads to revolt. It commands sincere advice, fine, beneficial admonition, through wise methods that are far removed from Ifsaad (causing corruption) and Fasaad (corruption).

كلمة عن الأحداث والمظاهرات والخروج على الحكام

كلمة عن الأحداث والمظاهرات والخروج على الحكام.