Skip to main content

Tag: trials

[9] A Scholar of Makkah [Abdul Azeez Bin Yahyah (240AH)] -How He Prepared Himself before Facing Bishr Al-Mareesiy In Al-Ma’moon’s Presence

Written by Abdullah Jallow on . Posted in Deviated Callers & Individuals, Deviated Groups, Sects and Parties, History of Islam, Scholars of Islam, The Salaf - Pious Predecessors.

Abdul Azeez Bin Yahyah Bin Abdil Azeez Bin Muslim Bin Maymoon Al-Kinaaniy Al-Makkiy Al-Faqee (The jurist and scholar of sound understanding) Ash-Shaafi’ee [240AH] was from the scholars of Makkah; he wrote a treatise (titled) Al-Haydah.

He (rahimahullaah) stated in the beginning of the treatise:

It reached me  whilst I was at Makkah (regarding) what Bishr Bin Ghiyaath Al-Mareesiy proclaimed at Baghdad that the Qur’aan is created and other than it-  (propagating it by way) of propaganda to the people to agree with him and his school of thought; confused the leader of the believers Al-Ma’moon and his Awliyaa [governors, administrators, helpers in his administration etc] and the trial the people were subjected to; entering them into disbelief and misguidance; terrorising the people (i.e. the scholars) and made them afraid of arguing against him (i.e. Bishr); arguing against them (in order to stop them) from refuting him by way of that which will annihilate his speech (that the Qur’aan is created), invalidating his proofs and nullifying his school of thought; and that the believers were hiding themselves in their houses, refraining from the prayer in congregation and the Jumu’ah prayer; fleeing from one land to another out of fear for themselves and their religion; and that many of the ignorant ones and the rabble amongst the people were agreeing with his (i.e. Bishr’s) disbelief and misguidance; entering into bidah and adopting his school of thought out of a desire for the Dunyah and fear of the punishment that was afflicted on those who opposed his school of thought.

Then Abdul Azeez (rahimahullaah) said: My anxiety disturbed (my state of sleep) and my nights were that of sleeplessness; my thoughts abided (i.e. I never stopped thinking about the affair) and my distress and grief was prolonged; so I left my land (i.e. Makkah) whilst turning to Allaah (for aid and assistance); asking Him for safety and (for what I was seeking to) attain until I reach Baghdad. Then I witnessed the ruthlessness regarding the affair (i.e. the fitna at Baghdad), which was twice as much as what reached me (about it whilst I was at Makkah). So I sought refuge with Allaah, invoked Him, humbled myself to Him – out of a fervent desire to reach what is beloved and fleeing away from the cause of fear; humbling myself to Him (with the tears and trembling etc whilst beseeching Him for aid and assistance); stretching my hands to Him (in supplication), asking Him for guidance and to be directed towards good deeds; to be facilitated with the ability to carry out what I was seeking to achieve; to grant me support, look after me and neither to forsake me nor entrust me to myself. And that He facilitates my heart with understanding of His Book and (enable) my tongue to convey it; and that I purify my intention for sake of Allaah and entrust myself to Him; and that He (The Blessed and Most High) makes my responses (to Bishr) swift, strengthen my resolve, embolden my heart, facilitate my heart with understanding of His Book, make my tongue eloquent (upon truth) and gladden my heart (with guidance and acceptance) by way of it, so that I am given discernment in guidance through facilitating me with the ability to carry out (righteous deeds and in attaining what I want to achieve); and that I seek His assistance and help….up until the end of his speech… and how he attended in the presence of Al-Ma’moon, and how his debate took place during which he hindered Bishr from responding (with clear proofs) in everything he was obligated to (give a clear proof, which he could not do); so he (Abdul Azeez) titled the Risaalah (i.e. the one based on the debate with Bishr) ‘Al-Haydah.’

To be continued InShaaAllaah

[Source: Makkah Fee Hayaatil Ilm Wal Ulamaa’ page 29-30’ by Shaikh Muhammad Baazmool (may Allaah preserve him).  Abridged and slightly paraphrased]

Next Topic: How The Madhab of The Deviant Ashaa’irah and Philosophical Rhetoric Entered Makkah. You can read more about this deviant sect here: http://www.asharis.com/creed/index.cfm

 

What Really was said by Shaykh Ahmad Najmi about Abu Usaamah Dhahabi

Written by Salafi Dawah Manchester on . Posted in Abu Usaamah ad-Dhahabi (Goldie), Articles, Deviated Callers & Individuals, Must Read, Tamyee'.

In The Name of Allaah, The Most Merciful, The Bestower of Mercy

In his deceitful response to the Friday incident, whereby Abu Usaamah came to the wrong masjid (in order to give khutbah) before being ushered out; he put forward an absurd complaint about the fatwa from Shaykh Ahmad an Najmi (rahimahullah) against him, which has been quoted since the incident.

In his usual manner, Abu Usaamah did not quote the full question asked in his youtube published video response; a crime he has committed previously and still not repented from. It is clear that cutting, pasting, twisting and hiding, is habitual for this individual, as anyone with the least bit of experience of his past capers, clearly can attest to. He did the same with regards to Shaikh Rabee’ al Madhkhali and with regards to Ustaadh Abu Khadeejah1.

Let us examine briefly this point Abu Usaamah is trying to make. According to him, Shaikh Ahmad an-Najmi (rahimahullaah) was asked “there is a person in America, he supports Abul Hasan al-Maribi, how should we deal with him?”

To the average listener who does not know, this seems a generalised question, about any person in America (who may support Abul Hasan). And so the cries will come “how can this be applied to Abu Usaamah!”- Well then let us be completely clear… This is not the full question the Shaykh was asked. Once again here we have a classic example of his cutting, pasting and selectively exposing his listeners to only a part of the fatwa; most likely due to the incriminating position he would have put himself in, had he quoted it in its entirety.

Rather the full question is as follows:

“O Shaykh Ahmad we have with us in America a man called Abu Usaamah, who is considered to be from the Du’aat, he aids and supports Abul-Hasan and he calls some noble Salafi brothers ghulaat (extremists), muqallidah (blind followers), and muhqiboon (the people whose religion is the religion of the one they blindly follow), so what is the legislated position from this man and how should we deal with him?’’

The Shaikh response was:

“Your position with him is the same as your position with the People of Innovation. Turn away from him and abandon him.

After reading the full question (and answer) then it is clear to the reader, that his argument falls flat. The Shaykh is most certainly referring to Abu Usaamah. This is yet another attempt to dupe the common people.

When we mention the deception and twisting, of Abu Usaamah, it is not merely lip service. Those who may not have known previously, or do not perhaps understand this deceitful methodology, should no longer be in any doubt. It is clear that he did not complete the question, to hide the truth from his unsuspecting audience.

Why? Because it will clearly manifest the severity of his bid’ah. He hid the specific nature of this question, so a general person will retort those who refute him, with statements such as “you are harsh” or “it wasn’t even him who the Shaykh was talking about”. We have already heard such statements, emanating from those without complete knowledge of the situation. Thus, this is his method of twisting and hiding the truth, by which he continues to pull the wool over the eyes of many innocent and unsuspecting people.

Perhaps his position of “shaykh” to some, that he has carved out through deceit and treachery over they years, will be lost if this reality was made clear to them and Allah knows best.

Playing the victim (yet again) he complained that the Salafis are always quoting this fatwa of Shaikh Ahmad (rahimahullaah) against him, in order to keep reminding the people; and he brands those that listen as “sheep”. Unfortunately for him, his opinion is in opposition to reality. The person who reads the knowledge based refutations against him isn’t a sheep; but has now had the chance to witness the full evidence against Abu Usaamah; something he (Abu Usaamah) tried his utmost to hide, when cutting and pasting from the fatwa.

Nevertheless, the answer to this doubt is very simple. We will continue to quote this fatwa, and we will continue to warn against him; so long as he continues spreading false principles in the issues of Jarh Wat-Tadeel2. How ironic it is, that Shaikh Rabee’, whom he holds a huge disdain for, so simply and clearly outlines a precise rebuttal of this Ma’ribi3-esque statement:

”And they (i.e. the people of baatil and fitan) do not keep quiet- they spread their falsehoods in their newspapers, magazines and audio tapes, while wishing that the voice of truth should be silent. In their view, the voice of truth is what should be silent and the voice of falsehood should be raised and spread in the earth! Do they remain silent?! The people of falsehood do not remain silent- they neither abate nor slow down. They have [ خطط جهنمية -i.e. paths or footsteps leading to the hell fire] which they enforce and thereafter they demand silence from the people of truth!” [Source: Source: Question number 16; Page 28-29 in الإجابات الجلية عن القضايا المنهجية]

References

  1. See article for further details: Few Decietful Acts and Lies http://www.salaficentre.com/2015/12/few-deceitful-acts-and-lies-backfired-on-abu-usaamah-in-public-but-still-no-public-repentance/
  2. http://www.abukhadeejah.com/al-jarh-wat-tadeel-and-the-corrupt-principles-of-abu-usamah-khalifah-part-1/
  3. The individual from Ma’rib who revived the innovations of his precursors to fight AhluSunnah—see here: http://spubs.com > Deviated Callers

page01  page02page03

Be Warned O Gullible and Naive One! [A Man Became Misguided After Marrying a Woman Who Was Staunch On Bidah!]

Written by Abdullah Jallow on . Posted in Da'wah - Calling To Islam.

Imaam Dhahabee (rahimahullaah) stated that Salamah Bin Alqamah relates from Ibn Seereen (rahimahullaah) who said: Imraan Ibn Hattaan married a khaarijiyyah (a female khaarijite) and said, ‘’I will bring her back’’ (i.e. make her leave her misguidance). Ibn Seereen (rahimahullaah) said: ‘’However, she converted him to her way.’’

———————————————————————————————————-

[Source: Hukm Ash-Sharee’ah Fee Az-zawaaj Min Ash-Shee’ah. Page: 27. Also see Siyar Alaam An-Nubulaa 4/214]

[Part One- Unveiling The Deceit of The Hizbiyyoon of Luton (Sponsees of the deviants of Ihyaa Turaath) Against The Correct Stances Regarding Ihyaa Turaath and Their Utilising Scholars Without Proofs In order To Hide Their Misguidance

Written by Salafi Dawah Manchester on . Posted in Deviated Groups, Sects and Parties, Methodology - 'Manhaj', Scholars of Islam, Tamyee'.

http://salaficentre.com/2014/12/shaikh-muhammad-bin-haadi-conferences-organized-by-hizbiyyoon-and-attended-by-those-mashaayikh-considered-to-be-upon-the-sunnah/

http://salaficentre.com/2016/01/1-unveiling-the-deceit-of-the-hizbiyyoon-luton-and-other-sponsees-of-ihyaa-turaath-through-some-very-beneficial-and-precise-principles-concerning-the-differing-of-the-scholars-on-jarh-wat-tadeel-t/

http://salaficentre.com/2016/01/2-unveiling-the-deceit-of-the-hizbiyyoon-luton-and-other-sponsees-of-ihyaa-turaath-through-some-very-beneficial-and-precise-principles-concerning-the-differing-of-the-scholars-on-jarh-wat-tadeel-t/

http://salaficentre.com/2016/01/3-unveiling-the-deceit-of-the-hizbiyyoon-luton-and-other-sponsees-of-ihyaa-turaath-through-some-very-beneficial-and-precise-principles-concerning-the-differing-of-the-scholars-on-jarh-wat-tadeel-t/

http://salaficentre.com/2016/01/4-unveiling-the-deceit-of-the-hizbiyyoon-luton-and-other-sponsees-of-ihyaa-turaath-through-some-very-beneficial-and-precise-principles-concerning-the-differing-of-the-scholars-on-jarh-wat-tadeel-t/

http://salaficentre.com/2016/01/5-after-acquainting-oneself-with-the-principles-mentioned-by-shaikh-ubaid-posts-1-4-now-let-us-see-whether-we-can-blindly-follow-anyone-who-has-a-good-opinion-of-ihyaa-turaath/

http://salaficentre.com/2016/01/6-after-acquainting-oneself-with-the-principles-mentioned-by-shaikh-ubaid-posts-1-4-now-let-us-see-whether-we-can-blindly-follow-anyone-who-has-a-good-opinion-of-ihyaa-turaath-based-on-what-he-kn/

http://salaficentre.com/2016/01/7-after-acquainting-oneself-with-the-principles-mentioned-by-shaikh-ubaid-posts-1-4-let-us-listen-to-the-muhaddith-of-yemen-muqbil-bin-haadi-rahimahullaah/

http://salaficentre.com/2016/01/8-after-acquainting-oneself-with-the-principles-mentioned-by-shaikh-ubaid-posts-1-4-let-us-listen-to-shaikh-ubaid/

http://salaficentre.com/2016/01/9-after-acquainting-oneself-with-the-principles-mentioned-by-shaikh-ubaid-posts-1-4-let-us-listen-to-shaikh-muhammad-baazmools-reply-regarding-the-false-accusation-that-shaikh-rabee-comp/

http://salaficentre.com/2016/01/10-after-acquainting-oneself-with-the-principles-mentioned-by-shaikh-ubaid-posts-1-4-let-us-listen-to-shaikh-rabees-speech-regarding-those-who-turn-away-from-the-clear-proofs-and-utilise/

In-Shaa-Allaah Part 2 of this series will be based on acquainting ourselves with deviant individuals of Ihyaa Turaath and their statements of misguidance in affairs of Manhaj and Aqeedah, so that it may become very clear that Shaikh Abdur Razzaaq Al-Badr’s unawareness of the true reality of Ihya Turaath cannot be taken into consideration as an excuse to promote Ihya Turaath or to turn a blind eye to the reality, rather a seeker of truth seeks after the clear proofs, as Shaikh Ubaid stated: The one who knows of a mistake and it is clear to him, then it is not permissible for him to blindly follow a scholar to whom an affair is hidden. And indeed you already heard yesterday that the scholars are not infallible in their Ijtihaadaat. Therefore, it is not permissible to adopt them (i.e. the mistakes of the scholars) as a methodology (to follow).

http://salaficentre.com/2015/05/a-misunderstanding-regarding-the-statement-laa-inkaar-fee-masaail-al-khilaaf-there-should-be-no-repudiation-in-the-affairs-of-khilaaf-i-e-differing/

 

 

A Trait of Ahlul Bidah- They Pass Judgements in the Deen without Knowledge

Written by Abdullah Jallow on . Posted in Da'wah - Calling To Islam, Deviated Groups, Sects and Parties, Methodology - 'Manhaj', Scholars of Islam, Worship - 'Ibaadah'.

Shaikhul Islaam Ibn Taymiyyah ( rahimahullah ) said:

When it is the case that the (true) followers of the Prophets are people of knowledge and justice, then the speech of the people of Islaam and the Sunnah about the disbelievers and people of bidah is (carried out) with knowledge and justice and not with conjecture and the soul’s desire. And due to this, the Prophet (sallal-laahu-alayhi wasallam) said: Judges are of three types, one of whom will go to Paradise and two to Hell. A man who knows the truth and judges with it will enter paradise; a man who knows the truth but judges with the opposite of it will enter the fire, and a man who judges for the people based on ignorance will enter the fire.’’ [Reported by Imaam Abu Dawud and others]

And when it is the case that the one who judges between the people in (affairs) of wealth, blood (i.e. murder cases, injury etc.) and honour will enter the hell fire if he is not a just scholar, then what about the one who passes judgements without knowledge-such being the case with ahlul bidah-on religions, the Usool of Imaan, affairs of knowledge related to Allaah, His Names, Attributes and Actions, and the lofty affairs of knowledge.’’

——————————————–—————-

[Al-Jawaabus Saheeh 1/107-108]

Story Telling -An Evil Affair That Grips Many during Times of Fitan, So Beware!

Written by Amjad Khan on . Posted in Morals and Manners - 'Akhlaaq', Scholars of Islam, The Salaf - Pious Predecessors.

Ibn Umar (radiyallaahu-anhumaa) said:

There was neither story telling in the time of the Messenger (sallal-laahu-alayhi-wasallam) nor in the time of Abu Bakr (radiyallaahu-anhu), neither in the time of Umar (radiyallaahu-anhu) nor in the time of Uthmaan (radiyallaahu-anhu); rather story telling started in the time of Fitan.” (i.e. during the times of trials and tribulations).

————————————————————————–

Source:

صحيح موارد الظمآن إلى زوائد ابن حبان

By Imaam Albaani (rahimahullaah) Vol 1: Chapter 19, page 134

 

 

One of Fir’awn’s Many Evils – [He called to evil and debated as one upon truth]

Written by Amjad Khan on . Posted in Deviated Callers & Individuals.

Allaah (The Most High) said: [وَڪَذَٲلِكَ زُيِّنَ لِفِرۡعَوۡنَ سُوٓءُ عَمَلِهِ – Thus it was made fair-seeming, in Fir’aun’s (Pharaoh) eyes, the evil of his deeds]

Evil deeds were made fair seeming to him, so shaytaan did not cease to make it fair seeming to him, whilst he called to it and beautified it, until he saw it as something good.  He called to it and debated (in a manner) like those upon truth, whilst he was from the greatest of the corrupters.

[وَصُدَّ عَنِ ٱلسَّبِيلِۚ   – And he was hindered from the path” of truth, due to the falsehood that was made fair seeming to him. [وَمَا ڪَيۡدُ فِرۡعَوۡنَ] ”And the plot of Fir’aun (Pharaoh)]–the one who  wanted to plot against the truth and give a false impression to the people that he was the one upon truth, and that Moosaa was upon falsehood—[ إِلَّا فِى تَبَابٍ – led to nothing but loss]; That is: (complete) loss and waste.  It benefited him in nothing except wretchedness in this world and in the Hereafter.

————————————————————————————————————

[For further details, see Tayseer Al-Kareem Ar-Rahmaan Fee Tafseer Kalaam Al-Mannaan]

Imaam Abdul Azeez Bin Baaz Rebutted the Innovator Abdur-Rahmaan Abdul Khaaliq, For Slandering and Belittling the Saudi Ulama

Written by Salafi Dawah Manchester on . Posted in Brotherhood, Da'wah - Calling To Islam, Deviated Callers & Individuals, Fatawa-Rulings, Methodology - 'Manhaj', Refutations, Scholars of Islam, Tamyee'.

In The Name of Allaah, The Most Merciful, The Bestower of Mercy

The Mubtadi Abdur-Rahmaan Abdul khaaliq (may Allaah guide him) stated:

Indeed the group of scholars in Saudi are in a (state) of complete blindness and ignorance regarding the new problems and their Salafiyyah is Taqleediyyah (i.e. Salafiyyah based on blind following) and it is not worthy of anything.

Imaam Abdul-Azeez Bin Baaz (rahimahullaah) responded:

This speech is false, for indeed the scholars of Saudi are acquainted with the problems of the era and indeed they have written a lot about it, and I am from them- Bi hamdil laah! Indeed they have written in that regard that which cannot be counted (i.e. numerous) and they- Bi Hamdil laah- are among those who are the most knowledgeable of the Madhab of Ahlus Sunnah Wal-Jamaa’ah and they follow that which the Salafus Saaleh followed in the subject matter of Tawheed, Asmaa Was-Sifaat, the subject matter of warning against bidah and in all the abwaab (areas of knowledge. Read -if you are ignorant- the Majmoo’ah of Ibn Qaasim (Ad-Durar As-Saniyyah) and the Fataawaa of our Shaikh Muhammad Bin Ibraaheem (rahimahullaah). Read what we have written in that regard (i.e. the affairs of the era) in our Fataawaa and our books are widespread among the people.

There is no doubt that what he (i.e. Abdur-Rahmaan Abdul Khaaliq) said about the scholars of Saudi is not correct- it is a mistake and a munkar (evil affair). It is obligatory upon you (i.e. Abdul Khaaliq) to recant from that and announce that in the newspapers in Kuwait and Saudi. We ask Allaah for guidance- for ourselves and you- and a return to the truth and steadfastness upon it. Indeed He (Allaah) is the best of those who are asked. [Source: Al-Majoo 8/242]

Shared by Abu Haleemah Naeem Bashir [Masjid al-Furqan (stoke)]

Abu Mu’aawiyah (Abdullah Al-Gambi)

[4]Does Hizbi (Abu Bilal Hanif-Marriage Maker) fear Allaah with regards to who he befriends and accompany? Be warned against falling into Abu Bilal’s Trap because he’ll give your daughters to Hizbiyyoon in Marriage- those who keep the company of Mubtadi’h and their staunch followers

Written by Salafi Dawah Manchester on . Posted in Da'wah - Calling To Islam, Deviated Callers & Individuals, Deviated Groups, Sects and Parties, Tamyee'.

In The Name of Allaah, The Most Merciful, The Bestower of Mercy

A man said to Al-Hasan [Al-Basri (rahimahullaah)]: I have a daughter and she has been sought for marriage; so to whom should I give her in marriage? He (Al-Hasan) said: Marry her to the one who fears Allaah, for he will be kind to her if he loves her. And he will not oppress her when he is angry with her. [1]

Brothers and sisters, may Allaah protect us all and our children from ahlul bidah and the obstinate hizbiyyoon. Does a hizbi fear Allaah (The Most High) by distancing himself from all Mubtadi’ah? Indeed, the hizbies defend innovators and this is what we witness from the obstinate followers of Al-Maribi, Al-Halabi and Al-Maghraawi at Masjid As-Sunnah (Cheethamhill) and elsewhere. They defend those who innovate in the religion of Allaah, even though they know that the Prophet (sallal-laahu-alayhi-wasallam) said: The worst of all affairs are the newly invented matters (in the religion) and every newly invented matter (in the religion) is a bidah and every bidah is misguidance.’’

Therefore, brothers and sisters will any Salafi be pleased that the Hizbiyyoon of ‘Sunnah Marriages UK’ [The headless chicken Abu Bilal Hanif] get involved in finding husbands for their daughters and wives for their sons?! See links: http://salaficentre.com/2015/07/abu-bilal-hanif-marriage-maker-is-a-deviant-hizbi-with-the-hizbiyyoon-of-masjid-as-sunnah-so-do-you-want-him-to-find-female-hizbies-for-your-sons-and-male-hizbies-for-your-daughters/ http://salaficentre.com/2015/07/1-reminder-to-the-hizbiyyoon-deluded-abu-bilal-hanif-and-his-hizbiyyoon-friends-shaikh-rabee-has-still-not-changed-his-view-about-the-obstinate-hizbiyyoon-at-masjid-sunnah/

Shaikhul Islaam Ibn Taymiyyah (rahimahullaah) said: If he (i.e. the man) is persistent upon sin, he is not to be married to, because some the pious predecessors said: ‘’He who marries his precious one (i.e. daughter) to an evil doer, then indeed he has severed her womb’’[2]

NB: Who are Abu Bilal’s (Marriage Maker) friends and allies? His friends and allies are the the hizbiyyoon of Masjid Al-Furqan (Rushlome) and the Hizbiyyoon of Masjid As-Sunnah (Cheethamhill)

——————————————————————————–

[1] [Source: Kitaab Uyoonul Akhbaar. Page: 308. Vol 3-4]

[2]Source: Hukm Ash-Sharee-ah Fee Az-zawaaj Min Ash-Shee-ah. Page: 27 and 57]

[2] Shaikh Rabee’s Recent Advise to the Salafiyyoon Neither Exonerates Nor Benefits Abu Bilal Hanif-the Headless Chicken Hizbi and WhatsApp Stalker of Masjid As-Sunnah [Cheethamhill (Manchester)]

Written by Salafi Dawah Manchester on . Posted in Brotherhood, Da'wah - Calling To Islam, Methodology - 'Manhaj', Refutations, Tamyee'.

In The Name of Allaah, The Most Merciful, The Bestower of Mercy

——————————————————————————————————————

Headless Chicken-Abu Bilal Hanif (Marriage Maker)-

This is why you find him running around on behalf of the hizbiyyoon and actively seeking to spread their shubuhaat, but ends up with nothing!

——————————————————————————————————————

Shaikh Rabee (may Allaah preserve him) gave a general advise to the Salafiyyoon. However, Abu Bilal Hanif the deluded WhatsApp Stalker and stooge of the Hizbiyyoon cannot understand that it does not benefit him (a WhatsApp stalker and stooge of the hizbiyyoon of Masjid as-Sunnah and elsewhere). Shaikh Rabee’s (may Allaah preserve him) advice does not benefit the staunch followers of Al-Maribi, Al-Halabi and Al-Maghraawi at Masjid As-Sunnah. So let us remind deluded Abu Bilal once again about the mockery his friends at Masjid As-Sunnah are guilty of when they cut the phone line whilst Shaikh Rabee (may Allaah preserve him) was giving sincere advice to those people who wanted to abandon the deviant Masjid Committee of Masjid As-Sunnah [i.e. the staunch followers of Al-Maribi, such as Abu Shurayh Al-Libi, Abu Umaamah Al-Libi, Abu Abdillah Akram Sharghaawi and others] see here: http://safeshare.tv/w/tLftrTwJNQ

What benefit is there in Shaikh Rabee’s recent advice for deluded Abu Bilal?! Shaikh Rabee (may Allaah preserve him) did not tell the Salafiyyoon to co-operate with the followers of Al-Maribi, Al-Halabi and Al-Maghraawi at Masjid As-Sunnah- those who utilise Abu Bilal Hanif as their Shubuhaat WhatsApp Stalker. Indeed, it is an utter disgrace that this Abu Bilal, who is in his late 40s, allows others to play football with his intellect. Who told him that this advice of the Shaikh has anything to do with him and his friends at Masjid As-Sunnah?! Is Abu Bilal Hanif so deluded that he now utilises Shaikh Rabee’s advice to promote his deviations and deliberately turn away from the specific verdicts of the Shaikh against the Mubtadi’ah (Al-Halabi, Al-Maghraawi and Al-Maribi)?!

So who is deceiving himself and deliberately seeking to depict Salafiyyah as hizbiyyah, and hizbiyyah as Salafiyyah- the followers of the Mubtadi’ah or those who accept the verdicts of the scholars against the Mubtadi’ah!

Who is making a mockery of himself- those who follow the verdicts of the scholars against the Mubtadi’ah, or Abu Bilal Hanif,?! He insults his intellect by thinking that Shaikh Rabee’s advise will benefit him whilst he is a pathetic promoter of Mubtadi’ah and their staunch followers?!

Who is a hizbi- those who reject the Mubtadi’ah and their staunch followers or those who are willing Hizbi WhatsApp Stalkers on behalf of Masjid as-Sunnah and other hizbiyyoon?!

Indeed, it is extremely sad that Abu Bilal Hanif, a man in his late 40s cannot still realize that he is a calamity upon himself. He deludes himself and denies reality, so he misleads himself, misrepresents and disowns what he knows to be true. He lies to himself and refuses to acknowledge reality. It is as if he wants to protect his mind against anxiety by diminishing awareness. This will undoubtedly produce a blind spot- a place of blocked attention and self-deception.

The likes of Abu Bilal find it hard to embrace the specific detailed evidences produced by the Salafi scholars against the Mubtadi’ah, so he desperately seeks to repress or re-interpret it. He has developed the habit to switch off, turn a blind eye or deceive himself to such an extent that it has severely limited his understanding.  This is why you find him running around on behalf of the hizbiyyoon like a headless chicken-actively seeking to spread the shubuhaat of the followers of the Mubtadi’ah but ends up with nothing!

So who is the hizbi, the one running around like a headless chicken on behalf of the obstinate hizbiyyoon or those who abandon the Mubtadi’ah and their staunch followers? Abu Bilal finds it hard to refrain from portraying himself as one drowned in pathetic fallacy and a stooge of the hizbiyyoon. May Allaah guide him. Aameen

And Allaah knows best

————————————————————————————-