Tag: Truth
[Part 1] The Deviated Sects–A Lecture by Shaikh Muhammad Bin Haadi in the Uk (1996)
The Deviated Sects
A Lecture delivered some years ago in the UK by Shaikh Muhammad Bin Haadi (may Allaah preserve him)
Translator
Abu Talhah Dawud Burbank (rahimahullaah)
http://www.sahab.net/forums/index.php?showtopic=143284
Full transcription of this audio: http://transcribedsalafiaudio.com
What is Fusooq—Shaikh Fawzaan (may Allaah preserve him) explains…
Question:
Concerning the statement of Allaah (The Most High): [وَكَرَّهَ إِلَيْكُمُ الْكُفْرَ وَالْفُسُوقَ وَالْعِصْيَان] – ”And has made disbelief, wickedness and disobedience (to Allah and His Messenger) hateful to you.” [Al-Hujuraat. Ayah 7] Al-Fusooq and Al-Faasiqoon have been mentioned several times in the Qur’aan and the Sunnah, so what is Fusooq and how can a Muslim be careful of becoming from a people who are Faasiqeen?
Answer:
Concerning Allaah’s (The Most High) statement: [وَكَرَّهَ إِلَيْكُمُ الْكُفْرَ وَالْفُسُوقَ وَالْعِصْيَان]- ”And has made disbelief, wickedness and disobedience (to Allah and His Messenger) hateful to you”; He (Glorified Be He) mentioned the three types of acts of disobedience in this noble Ayah:
(A) The type of disobedience that removes a person from the fold of Islaam, such as Kufr (Akbar) and Shirk (Akbar). [Ref 1]
(B) The major type of disobedience which is lesser than Kufr (Akbar) and Shirk (Akbar) and it does not remove a person from the Religion but it decreases one’s Imaan—a manifest decrease–; such as fornication, theft, drinking alcohol and other than that of the major sins. They are referred to as Fusooq (wicked deeds) and the person who commits them is referred to as a Faasiq (wicked sinner) because Fisq means removing oneself from obedience to Allaah (The Mighty and Majestic].
(C) Then He (The Most High) mentioned the type of disobedience that is lesser than the major sins and are not tantamount to Fisq, and they are the minor sins.
So Allaah (Glorified Be He) informed (us) that He has made all these three types of disobedience hateful to the people of Imaan and make them have a love for the various types of acts of obedience and righteous actions that draws them close to their Lord.
[Source: Al-Muntaqaa Min Fataawaa Fadeelatish Shaikh Saaleh Al-Fawzaan Vol 1 page 244. Fatwa Number 142]
[Ref 1] NB: To declare that a Muslim has left the fold of Islaam is the responsibility of the rightly guided scholars and not other than them. Regarding the principles of Takfeer, visit link: http://www.salafipublications.com/sps/sp.cfm?secID=MNJ&subsecID=MNJ09&loadpage=displaysubsection.cfm
[Arabic] Status of the scholars in Islaam–by Shaikh Muhammad Bin Haadi (hafidha-hullaah)
http://www.sahab.net/forums/index.php?showtopic=142860
Al-Allaamah Rabee Bin Haadi Al-Madkhali (hafidha-hullaah) says about Shaikh Zayd (rahimahullaah):
Shaikh Rabee (hafidha-hullaah) said:
بسم الله الرّحمن الرّحيم قبل أنْ نبدأ في الدّرس
ادعوا اللهَ للشَّيخِ زيد المدخليّ رحمه اللهُ، انتقلَ إلى رحمةِ اللهِ ـ إنْ شاء الله ـ
فادعوا اللهَ له،
فقد كان جبلاً في السُّنّة، وفي الدَّعوةِ إلى اللهِ تبارك وتعالى
Supplicate to Allaah for him; Indeed he was a mountain in the Sunnah and in calling to Allaah (The Blessed and Exalted)
ونسأل اللهَ أنْ يُخلفهُ بخير. آمين،
ادعوا اللهَ جميعًا بارك اللهُ فيكم
http://www.sahab.net/forums/index.php?showtopic=142862
Listen to the Imaams of the Authentic Sunnah and Abandon the TV Debaters
Shaikhul Islaam Ibn Taymiyyah (rahimahullaah) said:
”Refutation against the people of falsehood cannot be comprehensive except when it is in agreement with the (Authentic) Sunnah from every angle. And if not, the one who conforms to the (Authentic) Sunnah in a particular angle and opposes it from another angle, then those arguing against him will strive (to gain something) from that angle in which he opposed the (authentic) Sunnah, and they will use it as evidence to prove what is in agreement with what they are upon (of falsehood) from those arguments that are in opposition to the (authentic) Sunnah.” [Source:6/210- درء تعارض العقل والنقل 211]
Statements of Some of The Kibaarul Ulamaa
In The Name of Allaah, The Most Merciful, The Bestower of Mercy
Al-Allaamah Hammaad Al-Ansaari (rahimahullaah) stated:
“The Sahaabah never differed in Aqeedah; rather the differing (in Aqeedah) took place after them.” [1]
Al-Allaamah Saaleh Al-Luhaydaan (may Allaah preserve him) was asked about the one who says that the sahaabah differed in aqeedah; so he said: [“أستغفر الله – none says this except a Mubtadi Daal (i.e. an innovator, astray one). [2]
Audio
Al-Allaamah Ahmad Bin Yahyah An-Najmi (rahimahullaah) was asked about the one who says that the Sahaabah differed in Aqeedah; so he replied: “The one who says that the sahaabah differed in Aqeedah should support his speech with evidences; otherwise he is a liar, false accuser…. [3]
The Shaikh (rahimahullaah) also said:
Has lying and false accusation been made easy for the utterer (of this statement) to such a level: Falsely accusing the Companions of the Prophet (sallal-laahu-alayhi-wasallaam)?! [4]
The Shaikh (rahimahullaah) also said:
”Indeed this speaker who says that the Sahaabah differed in Aqeedah–it is obligated on him to keep quiet and should be prevented from speaking about Aqeedah; because he is ignorant about it.” [5]
The Shaikh (rahimahullaah) also said:
As for differing in the rulings pertaining to subsidiary issues of (the religion) based on Ijtihaad, then this did occur between the Sahaabah and each of them stated what he saw to be the truth, and none amongst them found fault with anyone. Not a single one of them reproached the one who was in opposition to him; but the aim of this speaker–false accuser–is to pave the way for the differing of hizbiyyah (i.e. to find room– by way of this false claim–for the differing of the people of illegal partisanship against the sound Manhaj positions of the Salafis). And he has established against himself that he is a hizbi…. [6]
Ref 1: Source: Al-Majmoo’ah Fee Tarjimah Al-Allaamah Al-Muhaddith Hammaad Al-Ansaari 2/492: Mas’alah Number 124)
Ref 2: Clarification: The Muta-aalim (Pseudo Shaikh Asim Al-Hakeem) has not been declared an innovator; rather this is a general ruling and not specific to anyone until the evidence is established against such an individual. However, it shows the severity of Asim’s devilish insinuations and ignorance.
Refs 3, 4, 5 & 6; see Al-Fataawa Al-Jaliyyah Vol2: Page: 104–108: question number 63]
Mr Zakir Naik’s blatant lies and ignorance…
In The Name of Allaah, The Most Merciful, The Bestower of Mercy
Shaikhul Islaam Ibn Taymiyyah (rahimahullaah) said:
”A person must possess sound general fundamental principles (from the Qur’an and Sunnah) to which he refers the subsidiary issues of the religion, in order that he may speak with knowledge and justice. After this, he has to know how the subsidiary issues of the religion are (established from those general fundamental principles of the religion), and if not, he will remain upon lies and ignorance in the subsidiary issues and upon ignorance and oppression in the general fundamental principles, thus giving birth to great corruption.’’ [Minhaajus Sunnah: 5/83]
See Tweet by Ustaadh Amjad Rafiq (may Allaah preserve him)
Listen to speech of Ustaadh Abu Khadeejah here:
http://ahlulbidahwalhawa.com/2011/12/21/refutation-of-zakir-naik-by-abu-khadeejah/