Skip to main content

[14] Still Waiting! Where’s The Clear Unambiguous Knowledge-Based Shariah Proof for the Tabdee?


بسم الله الرحمن الرحيم

The Messenger of Allāh, peace and blessings of Allāh be upon him, said:

“Indeed Allah is pure and He does not accept, except that which is pure”.

Al-Allamah Salih Al Fawzan, may Allah preserve him, said:

In this hadith he, peace and blessings of Allāh be upon him, described Allāh, The Most High, that He is pure. “Allah is pure”, meaning: Allah is free from all imperfections and deficiencies. He is pure in His Essence, His Names and Attributes, and His Commandments and Prohibitions. Allah is pure in every aspect and imperfection cannot reach Him. Due to this, Allah does not accept actions, statements and intentions except that which is pure. He does not accept filthy statements, actions and intentions. Allah does not accept except what is pure, as Allāh, The Most High, said:

إِلَيْهِ يَصْعَدُ الْكَلِمُ الطَّيِّبُ وَالْعَمَلُ الصَّالِحُ يَرْفَعُهُ

To Him ascend (all) the goodly words. [35:10]

Allah does not accept, except good speech and good actions. As for filthy speech, indeed Allah rejects and hates it, such as lies, backbiting, tale carrying, abuse, false speech and false testimony, and all filthy statements, (such as) shirk and kufr. All of this is filthy speech and does not ascend to Allah, and they are not accepted. [end of quote]

Source: An Excerpt from Al Minhatu Ar-Rabbaaniyyah Fee Sharh Arba’een An-Nawawiyyah page:133-134

Many of us who attended higher education encountered the role psychology plays in public discourse, accountability, self-preservation, and other matters. Sometimes, this occurs at the cost of violating rights, misleading the public, and fostering a victim mentality.  A truthful Muslim does not avoid responsibility out of fear for their status, credibility, reputation, or self-image. Their fear of Allah prevents cognitive dissonance, and they do not believe that remaining silent is less painful than admitting, “I was wrong.”

Being vague, evasive, or changing the subject is a tactic used by those who think that this will allow their supporters to interpret the situation in their favour. This is not politics or media, it is a serious matter related to rulings of the Shariah, which should not be compromised. We are well aware that there are people who know that the dynamics of attention cycles can distract those seeking justice, as well as the fact that, due to information overload, accountability is easily forgotten. They know that public attention shifts quickly, allowing them to wait for the next topic to take over discussions. We’ll not be distracted by those who employ the tactic of “running out the clock”, who think that silence will make their audience and sympathisers feel that their unsupported claims have no real consequences.

Therefore, we’ll continue to demand proof from those who falsely issued the false Tabdee against Shaikh Abu Iyaad, may Allah protect him. We will reiterate the unanswered question and avoid getting sidetracked. If the topic is avoided, we will bring it back, document the conversation, and keep a record of the claims and their lack of evidence. We will treat their silence—in this particular serious issue—as a non-response, without making excuses for the accuser, and we will remind the youth that the claim is still false, excessive, repugnant, and oppressive. This is because unchallenged claims can lead to more harm and perhaps desensitisation. Thus, the perpetrators of false Tabdee should never expect that evasion will solve their problem, for indeed, we’ll continue demanding proof. So, we ask again: Where is the clear, unambiguous proof for the Tabdee against Shaikh Abu Iyaad, may Allah protect him, and the claim that he is a plant?!

Reflections on some statements of Al-Allamah Rabee Bin Hadi Al-Mad’khali [77 of 80]

[1] Still Waiting! Where’s The Clear Unambiguous Knowledge-Based Shariah Proof for the Tabdee?

[2] Still Waiting! Where’s The Clear Unambiguous Knowledge-Based Shariah Proof for the Tabdee?

[3] Still Waiting! Where’s The Clear Unambiguous Knowledge-Based Shariah Proof for the Tabdee

[4] Still Waiting! Where’s The Clear Unambiguous Knowledge-Based Shariah Proof for the Tabdee

[5] Still Waiting! Where’s The Clear Unambiguous Knowledge-Based Shariah Proof for the Tabdee

[6] Still Waiting! Where’s The Clear Unambiguous Knowledge-Based Shariah Proof for the Tabdee

[7] Still Waiting! Where’s The Clear, Unambiguous, Knowledge-Based Shariah Proof for the Tabdee

[8] Still Waiting! Where’s The Clear, Unambiguous, Knowledge-Based Shariah Proof for the Tabdee

[9] Still Waiting! Where’s The Clear, Unambiguous, Knowledge-Based Shariah Proof for the Tabdee

[10] Still Waiting! Where’s The Clear, Unambiguous, Knowledge-Based Shariah Proof for the Tabdee

[11] Still Waiting! Where’s The Clear, Unambiguous, Knowledge-Based Shariah Proof for the Tabdee

[12] Still Waiting! Where’s The Clear, Unambiguous, Knowledge-Based Shariah Proof for the Tabdee

[13] Still Waiting! Where’s The Clear, Unambiguous, Knowledge-Based Shariah Proof for the Tabdee

The False Tabdee Must Be Recanted Because Neither Shariah Nor Sound Intellect Acknowledges That Harm Can Remain

Contemplating Some Reasons Behind Stubbornness After Being Guilty of False Tabdee or Erroneous in Other Matters

A Continued Call for Proof of the Tabdee, Respect for the Scholars, and an End to Anonymous Accounts

 

Share


Related Posts

FOLLOW US


Donate to the Dawah in Manchester

Join the Umrah Trip