Skip to main content

Author: Abdullah Jallow

[4] The danger of deliberately sheltering ahlul bidah, including the haddadiyyah

Al-Allamah Rabee Bin Hadi Al-Mad’khali, may Allah have mercy upon him, quoted Imam As-Sabuni, may Allah have mercy upon him, as follows:

And they [Ahlul Hadith] hated Ahlul-Bid’ah – those who initiated into the religion what is not from it. They neither loved them nor kept company with them. They neither listened to their speech nor sat with them. They neither argued with them about the religion nor debated with them”.

Then Al-Allamah Rabee said:

How is this (the case)? Is this from themselves or guidance from Allah and His Messenger, and that which the pious predecessors were upon? Allah warned against Ahlul Bidah and clarified for us that they are people of desires, and that they follow Mutashaabihaat and abandon the Muhkamaat. Aa’isha, may Allah be pleased with her, said:

The Messenger, peace and blessings of Allah be upon him, recited this ayah:

هُوَ الَّذِي أَنزَلَ عَلَيْكَ الْكِتَابَ مِنْهُ آيَاتٌ مُّحْكَمَاتٌ هُنَّ أُمُّ الْكِتَابِ وَأُخَرُ مُتَشَابِهَاتٌ ۖ فَأَمَّا الَّذِينَ فِي قُلُوبِهِمْ زَيْغٌ فَيَتَّبِعُونَ مَا تَشَابَهَ مِنْهُ ابْتِغَاءَ الْفِتْنَةِ وَابْتِغَاءَ تَأْوِيلِهِ ۗ وَمَا يَعْلَمُ تَأْوِيلَهُ إِلَّا اللَّهُ ۗ وَالرَّاسِخُونَ فِي الْعِلْمِ يَقُولُونَ آمَنَّا بِهِ كُلٌّ مِّنْ عِندِ رَبِّنَا ۗ وَمَا يَذَّكَّرُ إِلَّا أُولُو الْأَلْبَابِ

It is He Who has sent down to you [Muhammad] the Book [this Qur’an]. In it are Verses that are (entirely clear, they are the foundations of the Book [and those are the Verses of Al-Ahkaam (commandments, etc.), Al-Faraa’id (obligatory duties) and Al-Hudud (legal laws for the punishment of thieves, adulterers, etc.)]; and others are Mutashaabihaat (i.e. not entirely clear in what they indicate, so they are to be referred back to the Muhkamaat to be explained]. So, as for those in whose hearts there is a deviation (from the truth) they follow that which is not entirely clear thereof, seeking Al-Fitnah (polytheism and trials, etc.), and seeking for its hidden meanings, but none knows its hidden meanings except Allah. And those who are firmly grounded in knowledge say: ‘’We believe in it; the whole of it (clear and unclear Verses) are from our Lord.” And none receive admonition except men of understanding.’’ [Surah Aal Imraan. Aayah 7]

(Then) she said: The Messenger said: “If you see those who follow thereof that is not entirely clear, then they are those whom Allah has named (as having deviation from the truth) so beware of them”. [Al-Bukhari 4547]

Allah clarified that they [i.e. ahlul bidah] have desires and deviation with them, and that they intend to misguide themselves and other people! They desire trials and intend to misguide the people, and this is why the Messenger mentioned them and described their condition to us. He said:

“And indeed there will appear a people out of my Ummah in whom desires will run through them just as rabies runs through a dog”.

Ahlus Sunnah – no doubt – hate Ahlul bidah and the Imam (As Sabuni) mentioned a number of them that they are all agreed upon hating (Ahlul bidah). However, amongst them (i.e Ahlul bidah) there are du’aat- neither to be sat with nor debated, except in cases of necessity and for a Maslahah, (otherwise), it is not permissible to enter into debate with them. It is not permissible to enter into a specific debate with the Rawaafid if you are weak, except if one is a man who is firmly grounded in knowledge and religion, (very proficient in) establishing evidences, clever and a possessor of (the force and strength that enables him to easily excel in debate with the clear proofs without being affected by doubts), so if he sees a benefit in debating them, he debates them.

وَجَادِلْهُم بِالَّتِي هِيَ أَحْسَنُ

And argue with them in a way that is better.

This is the legislated debate. Allah did not close the door of debate completely, thus, if we have a way of establishing the proofs and to guide the people to good, we follow it. The one who is debated with may not benefit but others may benefit.

As for the weak one, then no. Even amongst the scholars there is one who is weak and led to be mistaken by Shub’hah. He may be a scholar but his character is weak, so he becomes weak in the presence of Ahlul bidah, even if they are younger than him and lesser in knowledge! Indeed, it has happened to many of those who ascribe to the Sunnah and Hadith due to their weakness and opposition to the methodology of the Salaf. For example: Al Bayhaqqi was from the seniors of Ahlul hadith and their scholars, and was deceived by some of the Ashaa’irah such as Ibn Fawrak and his ilk, so he fell into Ash’ariyyah! How many among the youth- in this era – have been ruined at the hands of Ahlul bidah?! How many youth, middle aged men and graduates from universities have been deceived by Ahlul bidah, thus they fall into their arms?! They are deceived by the parties, thus fall into their arms! Why is this? Because they did not act upon the statement of the Messenger: “If you see those who follow thereof that is not entirely clear, then they are those whom Allah has named [as having deviation (from the truth)] so beware of them”.

The strong one calls Ahlul bidah, he calls the Christians. There has to be dawah in the path of Allah and there has to be strong scholars who disseminate the religion of Allah; and when necessary, they debate so that the proofs are established and benefit one who is to benefit.

An Excerpt from ‘Sharh Aqeedah As-Salaf Ashaab Al-Hadith. pages 301-304′. slightly paraphrased

[2] Still Waiting! Where’s The Clear Unambiguous Knowledge-Based Shariah Proof for the Tabdee?

In The Name of Allāh, The Most Merciful, The Bestower of Mercy.

 

Al-Allamah Salih Al-Fawzan, may Allah preserve him, was asked: We seek (request) from the honorable Shaikh to clarify the stance of the Salaf regarding the Mubtadi’ah, may Allah reward you with good?

Response: Neither did the Salaf declare everyone a Mubtadi nor recklessly apply the term bid‘ah to everyone who opposed or had some opposition to what is correct in the religion. Rather, they described one with bidah who performed an act [of worship, (held a belief or followed a methodology)] for which there is no evidence, seeking nearness to Allah through it – such as a a type of worship that is not legislated by Allāh’s Messenger, peace and blessings of allāh be upon him, due to his statement: “Whoever does an action that is not in accordance with our matter, it will be rejected.” And in another narration: “Whoever introduces into this affair of ours (i.e. practices, beliefs or methodology) that which is not from it, it is rejected”. Therefore, bidah is to initiate something new into the religion (acts of worship, belief, methodology) for which there is no evidence- neither  from Allāh’s Book nor the Sunnah of Allāh’s Messenger, peace and blessings of Allāh be upon him.

This is bid‘ah when it is established that a person has initiated a bidah into the religion and refuses to recant, in this case, the methodology of the Salaf was to boycott and distance from him, nor did they sit with him. This was their methodology, but as I mentioned, after it is established that he is a Mubtadi- after he has been advised, but does not recant his bidah. Then, he is boycotted so that his harm does not extend to those who sit with him or associate with him, and so that people may be warned against the Mubtadi’ah and bidah.

As for exaggeration (or exceeding the limits) in applying the term bidah against everyone who opposes someone’s view, thus, it is said: This person is a Mubtadi! Everyone calls the other a Mubtadi – while he has not initiated anything (new) into the religion, except (merely) because he is in opposition to another person or a group among the groups, then this (person) is not a Mubtadi. Whoever commits a haram or an act of disobedience (in the Shariah), he is called a sinner (or disobedient) person, however, not every sinner is a Mubtadi and not every person who has committed an error is a Mubtadi. This is because a Mubtadi is one who has initiated into the religion that which is not from it, this is the Mubtadi. As for exaggerating (or exceeding the limits) in the application of the term bidah against everyone who opposes a person, this is not correct, for it may be that the one who opposes him is upon what is correct. This (i.e. exaggerating in applying the term bidah or Mubtadi is not from the methodology of the Salaf. [An Excerpt from Ẓāhirat al-tabdīʿ wa-al-tafsīq wa-al-takfīr wa-ḍawābiṭuhā pages 51-53. paraphrased]

We have repeatedly asked for clear proof for the Tabdee‘ against Shaikh Abu Iyaad, may Allāh protect him and the Salafiyyoon. Yet instead of presenting unambiguous knowledge based Shariah proofs, we continue to see distractions and side arguments. A wrong was committed, thus, we should not complicate the discussion with excessive quotations, technicalities, and side issues, while the central question remains unanswered, otherwise, the focus then becomes the victim’s tone or response. This in no way means that a victim is not held accountable if they have done something wrong, but how can it be expected at the same time that the victim must endure the transgression of false Tabdee, avoid defending himself, and remain calm, while the one who issued the Tabdee remains silent about it. Is this fair?! So we ask again: “Where is the clear proof for the Tabdee‘ against Shaikh Abu Iyaad?” We will not be distracted from this question. 

https://salafidawahmanchester.com/2026/03/27/painful-memories-about-some-of-those-who-set-ablaze-the-flames-of-transgression-and-false-tabdi/

https://salafidawahmanchester.com/2025/12/16/an-incident-at-fustat-when-status-meets-truth-humility-as-the-scholars-test-and-shield/

 

Remind Your Child or Younger Brother When He’s Always One of Those Who Dives Into Matters Before Elders in WhatsApp Groups

In The Name of Allah, The Most Merciful, The Bestower of Mercy.

The Tuboobiyyaat

Imaam Muhammad Ibn Saaleh Al-Uthaymeen, may Allah have mercy upon him, said:

[الطبوليات ] are those Masaa’il [issues related to the religion] by way of which fame is sought. They are called Tubooliyyaat because it is similar to a Tabl (drum) which has a sound and an echo. So when an odd affair comes to the people and a (person) becomes famous by way of it, it becomes as if it is the sound of a drum.

Sharh Hilyah Talib Al-Ilm. Page 19

[23] Exalt Allah And His Shariah First and Foremost

In The Name of Allah, The Most Merciful, The Bestower of Mercy.

Shaikh Al-Islam Ibn Taymiyyah, may Allah have mercy upon him, said:

If the heart loves Allah and devotes all the religion sincerely to Him, it will not give a share of this love to anyone else, let alone being afflicted with infatuation; but when afflicted with infatuation, this is due to its deficient love of Allah. This is why due to Yusuf’s, peace be upon him, love of Allah and sincerely devoting all the religion to Allah alone, he did not depart from it; rather Allah said:

ڪَذَٲلِكَ لِنَصۡرِفَ عَنۡهُ ٱلسُّوٓءَ وَٱلۡفَحۡشَآءَ‌ۚ إِنَّهُ ۥ مِنۡ عِبَادِنَا ٱلۡمُخۡلَصِينَ

Thus it was, that We might turn away from him evil and illegal sexual intercourse. Surely, he was one of Our chosen, guided slaves.

But as for the wife of the Azeez, she and her people were polytheists, and due to this she was afflicted with infatuation. [1]

Those people whose hearts are infatuated with images receive the greatest punishment and the smallest reward. This is because if the heart of the one who is infatuated with images continues to be attached and is enslaved, various types of evils, loss and corruption will be gathered for him, which none besides Allah can enumerate. Even if he is safe from committing a major lewd act, the continuous attachment of the heart to the image without committing a lewd act is a greater than the harm that afflicts a person who commits a sin and then repents, thus the effect of that sin ceases to exist in his heart. The greatest aspect of this calamity is when the heart turns away from Allah. This is because when the heart tastes the worship of Allah and being sincere to Him, there will never be anything sweeter than that- neither tastier and enjoyable nor better. A person does not abandon something beloved to him except due to another beloved thing that is more beloved to him, or due to fearing harm. The heart is turned away from a corrupt love by an upright love or due to fearing harm. Allah, The Exalted said about Yusuf, peace be upon him:

ڪَذَٲلِكَ لِنَصۡرِفَ عَنۡهُ ٱلسُّوٓءَ وَٱلۡفَحۡشَآءَ‌ۚ إِنَّهُ ۥ مِنۡ عِبَادِنَا ٱلۡمُخۡلَصِينَ

Thus it was, that We might turn away from him evil and illegal sexual intercourse. Surely, he was one of Our chosen, guided slaves. [Yusuf. 24]

Thus, Allah turned His servant away from that which would plunge one into evil due to inclining towards an image and being attached to it, and turns him away from lewd conduct due to his sincerity to Allah. [2]

Imam Ibn Al-Qayyim, may Allah have mercy upon him, said:

Hearts that are emptied of love for Allah, turned away from Him and seeking remedy from others besides Him, are afflicted with infatuation with images. This is because when the heart is filled with love for Allah and a strong love for meeting Him, this infatuation with images is repelled from it. For this reason, Allah, The Most High, stated about Yusuf, peace be upon him:

كَذَٰلِكَ لِنَصْرِفَ عَنْهُ السُّوءَ وَالْفَحْشَاءَ ۚ إِنَّهُ مِنْ عِبَادِنَا الْمُخْلَصِينَ

Thus it was, that We might turn away from him evil and illegal sexual intercourse. Surely, he was one of Our chosen, guided slaves.

This shows that sincerity is a means to repelling (evil). Because of this, some of the pious predecessors said: “Infatuation is an agitation in empty hearts”. Meaning: emptied of other than what they crave for. [3]

Imam Ibn Al-Jawzi, may Allah have mercy upon him, said:

Quote:

know that desires (vain) desires urges a person towards immediate pleasures without him contemplating its evil consequences and urges him towards short-lived pleasures, even though it is a cause of pain and harm in this life and a barrier to pleasure in the Hereafter. As for a sensible person, he keeps away from pleasures whose result will be pain and desires whose result will be regret. This is enough as praise regarding what sound intellect necessitates and a rebuke against (vain) desires.

A sensible person should know that those who are addicted to lowly desires reach a state in which they no longer enjoy themselves, but at the same time they are unable to abandon those desires because it becomes as if it is a necessity of life. Due to this, you’ll find that alcoholics and sex addicts do not even enjoy a tenth of those desires, rather, they place themselves in a perilous situation that compels them to keep on returning to the act. However, if- based on clear-sightedness- the beautification of those lowly desires cease, a person realises that he has exposed himself to some ruin that is contrary to well-being, a situation of grief instead of happiness, while seeking after pleasure. Thus, he resembles an animal that was led to a trap- neither reached the thing that was utilised to lure it into the trap nor able to escape.

A person should contemplate the fact that a human being was not created to fulfil (vain) desires, instead, he is facilitated (with sound intellect and knowledge based on the divine revelation) to contemplate the consequences of his actions and perform righteous deeds for the Hereafter. An animal receives pleasure through eating, drinking and sexual relaations much more than a human being, while living a life devoid of reflection and concern. Thus, it is drawn towards its desires due to being ignorant of the outcomes of its actions.

A person should contemplate the consequences of (vain) desires because many people are deprived of virtue and find themselves in a state of depravity as a result. Many mistakes violates the honour of a person, leads to an evil mention of him as well as the guilt of sinning due to (vain) desires, yet he still does not give thought to anything else except his desires! The best description regarding him is that of one who finds himself in a tannery, for he does not really notice its smell properly until he exits it and then realises where he was. A sensible person should imagine the dishonour that will come to him due to his desires and the harm that results from those pleasures, for indeed he will see that- in most cases- they occur as result of those desires and pleasures.

A person should contemplate on the honour a person receives due to been given the upper hand and the humiliation found in subjugation, for indeed there is none who overcomes his desires except that his honour is strengthened, and none is subjugated by his desires except that he will find humiliation and subjugation in his soul. A person should contemplate the benefits of opposing one’s (vain) desires due to the commendation attached to it in this worldly life, safety of the soul and safeguard of one’s honour, as well as reward in the Hereafter. [4]

Allahul Musta’aan!


[1] Majmu Al-Fataawaa 10/135

[2] Al-Ubudiyyah 114-115

[3] at-Tib An-Nabawi. page180

[4] An Except from Dham Al-Hawaa. 36-38

Desire-Based Fatwas for Friends, Allies and Loved Ones

In The Name of Allāh, The Most Merciful, The Bestower of Mercy.

Al-Allamah Siddiq Hasan khan, may Allah have mercy upon him, said:

Abridged and paraphrased as follows;

It is not permissible to issue Fatwa in the Religion ordained by Allah based on personal desire

Neither is it permissible for a Mufti to act upon whichever opinion or view he wishes without first assessing which one is stronger and more correct, nor merely give it consideration because it is an opinion from an Imam or another perspective held by a group, thus, acting based on personal desires from other perspectives and opinions because he sees that the opinion agrees with his wishes and interests. This is forbidden according to the consensus of the scholars.

This is similar to the likes of that which Al-Qadhi Abu al-Walid al-Baji mentioned about some individuals in his era who positioned themselves to give fatwas. One of them would say: “What my friend deserves from me is that if he encounters a legal dispute or needs a fatwa, I provide him with a ruling based on the reports that suit him”. He said: “A person I trust (or consider trustworthy) told me about a situation where a group of muftis provided a ruling that would cause him harm, while he was absent. Then when he returned, he inquired directly. They said to him: ‘We were unaware it was you,’ and then they gave him the alternative opinion that benefited him. He said: “There is no difference among those scholars who are relied upon regarding the prohibition of this conduct.”

In summary, it is not permissible to act or issue fatwas in the religion ordained by Allah based on personal desire, selective choice, or catering to one’s interests, such that a person seeks out the opinion that suits his own aims or the aims of those he loves then acts upon it, gives fatwas with it, and judges by it; while against his opponent he gives the contrary ruling and fatwa. This is one of the most immoral types of immorality and among the gravest of major sins. And Allah is the One whose help is sought.

Dhakhr al-Muḥtī min Ādāb al-Muftī pages 98-99. 1st Edition 1441 (2020). Publisher: Maktabah at-Tawbah

[2] Issues Related to Fatwa – Pay Close Attention to Safeguard Yourself in This era

In The Name of Allah, The Most Merciful, The Bestower of Mercy.

Allah’s Messenger, peace and blessings of Allah be upon him, said:

Judges are three types: one will go to Paradise and two to Hell. A man who knows the truth and judges with it will enter paradise; a man who knows the truth but judges with the opposite of it will enter the fire, and a man who judges for the people based on ignorance will enter the fire. [1]

Amr Bin Al-Aas, may Allah be pleased with him, narrated that he heard Allah’s Messenger, peace and blessings of Allah be upon him, saying: “If a Mujtahid gives a verdict according to the best of his knowledge and his verdict is correct, he will receive a double reward, and if he gives a verdict according to the best of his knowledge and his verdict is wrong, even then he will get a reward”. [2]

A Mujtahid is not deprived of reward. The judgement of a non-Mujtahid is different from that of a Mujtahid. Shaikh Al-Islam Ibn Taymiyyah, may Allah have mercy upon him, said that the one who speaks about the religion without knowledge and out of ignorance (is guilty of) lying and sinning. The one who intentionally speaks to oppose the truth is threatened with entry into the fire of hell, as opposed to the one who speaks based on permissible Ijtihad, for indeed he strives, fears Allah as much as he is able, desires to seek knowledge as much as he was able, speaks for the sake of Allah, knows the stronger proof and speaks based on that. This person is given two rewards if he is correct; but if he is mistaken, he receives one reward. A Mujtahid can be correct or mistaken. [3]


[1] Abu Dawud 3573
[2] al-Bukhari Number 7352
[3] Arba’una Haditha Fee Usul Al-Fiqh. pages 32-33

[3] The danger of deliberately sheltering ahlul bidah, including the haddadiyyah

In The Name of Allah, The Most Merciful, The Bestower of Mercy.

Al-Allamah Rabee Bin Hadi Al-Mad’khalee, may Allah have mercy upon him, said:

“Destructive Good Suspicion” is to have a good suspicion of the people of falsehood whether are they disbelievers, innovators or evil (open) sinners. And that which led the disbelievers to belie the Messengers, (harbouring) a severe disbelief in them and their message was due to their evil suspicion towards the people of truth (i.e. the Prophets and their true followers), and having a good suspicion of their forefathers and their religions of falsehood and disbelief.

Ahlul Bidah such as the Rawaafid, the khawaarij, the soofiyyah, the murji’ah, the qadariyyah and the people of Tahazzub Al-Baatil [false partisanship] are destroyed by good suspicion towards their shuyukh and figureheads, and their corrupt creeds. On the other hand, they are destroyed by their evil suspicions towards the truth and its people. Abul Hasan Al-Maribee and his followers have a share of both this destructive good suspicion and destructive evil suspicion.

Majmu 13/363-364

[22] Exalt Allah And His Shariah First and Foremost

In The Name of Allah, The Most Merciful, The Bestower of Mercy.

Allah, The Most High, said regarding the encounter between Musa, peace be upon him, and the magicians:

قَالُواْ يَـٰمُوسَىٰٓ إِمَّآ أَن تُلۡقِىَ وَإِمَّآ أَن نَّكُونَ أَوَّلَ مَنۡ أَلۡقَىٰ

 قَالَ بَلۡ أَلۡقُواْ‌ۖ فَإِذَا حِبَالُهُمۡ وَعِصِيُّهُمۡ يُخَيَّلُ إِلَيۡهِ مِن سِحۡرِهِمۡ أَنَّہَا تَسۡعَىٰ

فَأَوۡجَسَ فِى نَفۡسِهِۦ خِيفَةً۬ مُّوسَىٰ

قُلۡنَا لَا تَخَفۡ إِنَّكَ أَنتَ ٱلۡأَعۡلَىٰ

وَأَلۡقِ مَا فِى يَمِينِكَ تَلۡقَفۡ مَا صَنَعُوٓاْ‌ۖ إِنَّمَا صَنَعُواْ كَيۡدُ سَـٰحِرٍ۬‌ۖ وَلَا يُفۡلِحُ ٱلسَّاحِرُ حَيۡثُ أَتَىٰ

فَأُلۡقِىَ ٱلسَّحَرَةُ سُجَّدً۬ا قَالُوٓاْ ءَامَنَّا بِرَبِّ هَـٰرُونَ وَمُوسَىٰ

قَالَ ءَامَنتُمۡ لَهُ ۥ قَبۡلَ أَنۡ ءَاذَنَ لَكُمۡ‌ۖ إِنَّهُ ۥ لَكَبِيرُكُمُ ٱلَّذِى عَلَّمَكُمُ ٱلسِّحۡرَ‌ۖ فَلَأُقَطِّعَنَّ أَيۡدِيَكُمۡ وَأَرۡجُلَكُم مِّنۡ خِلَـٰفٍ۬ وَلَأُصَلِّبَنَّكُمۡ فِى جُذُوعِ ٱلنَّخۡلِ وَلَتَعۡلَمُنَّ أَيُّنَآ أَشَدُّ عَذَابً۬ا وَأَبۡقَىٰ

قَالُواْ لَن نُّؤۡثِرَكَ عَلَىٰ مَا جَآءَنَا مِنَ ٱلۡبَيِّنَـٰتِ وَٱلَّذِى فَطَرَنَا‌ۖ فَٱقۡضِ مَآ أَنتَ قَاضٍ‌ۖ إِنَّمَا تَقۡضِى هَـٰذِهِ ٱلۡحَيَوٰةَ ٱلدُّنۡيَآ

إِنَّآ ءَامَنَّا بِرَبِّنَا لِيَغۡفِرَ لَنَا خَطَـٰيَـٰنَا وَمَآ أَكۡرَهۡتَنَا عَلَيۡهِ مِنَ ٱلسِّحۡرِ‌ۗ وَٱللَّهُ خَيۡرٌ۬ وَأَبۡقَىٰٓ

They said: “O Musa! Either you throw first or we be the first to throw?” [Musa] said: “Nay, throw you (first)!” Then behold, their ropes and their sticks, by their magic, appeared to him as though they moved fast. So Musa conceived a fear in himself. We (Allah) said: “Fear not! Surely, you will have the upper hand. “And throw that which is in your right hand! It will swallow up that which they have made. That which they have made is only a magician’s trick, and the magician will never be successful, no matter whatever amount (of skill) he may attain.” So the magicians fell down prostrate. They said: “We believe in the Lord of Harun and Musa.” [Fir’aun (Pharaoh)] said: “Believe you in him [Musa (Moses)] before I give you permission? Verily! He is your chief who taught you magic. So I will surely cut off your hands and feet on opposite sides, and I will surely crucify you on the trunks of date-palms, and you shall surely know which of us [I (Fir’aun – Pharaoh) or the Lord of Musa (Allah)] can give the severe and more lasting torment.” They said: “We prefer you not over the clear signs that have come to us, and to Him (Allah) Who created us. So decree whatever you desire to decree, for you can only decree (regarding) this life of the world. “Verily! We have believed in our Lord, that He may forgive us our faults, and the magic to which you did compel us. And Allah is better as regards reward in comparison to your [Fir’aun’s] reward, and more lasting (as regards punishment in comparison to your punishment).” [Taa Haa. 65-73]

قَالُواْ لَن نُّؤۡثِرَكَ عَلَىٰ مَا جَآءَنَا مِنَ ٱلۡبَيِّنَـٰتِ وَٱلَّذِى فَطَرَنَا‌ۖ

They said: “We prefer you not over the clear signs that have come to us, and to Him (Allah) Who created us…

Meaning, we do not prefer you over what we have been promised of reward and the closeness to that which we have been shown clear signs, showing that Allah alone is the Lord and true deity to be worshipped- The Most Great, The Only Magnificent One – and every other thing that is worshipped besides Allah and considered as a lord is false. It is not possible that we will prefer you over the One who created and brought us into existence prior to our  state of non-existence; therefore:

فَٱقۡضِ مَآ أَنتَ قَاضٍ‌ۖ إِنَّمَا تَقۡضِى هَـٰذِهِ ٱلۡحَيَوٰةَ ٱلدُّنۡيَآ

“decree whatever you desire to decree, for you can only decree (regarding) this life of the world”…

Meaning: do what you promise us, that you will cut off our hands and feet, and crucify us, because it will come to an end regardless of its severity in this worldly life and cannot harm us thereafter when compared to Allah’s punishment for the one who persist upon disbelief, for indeed the punishment will be great and continuous.

This seemed to be their reply to Fir’awn when he said to them:

وَلَتَعۡلَمُنَّ أَيُّنَآ أَشَدُّ عَذَابً۬ا وَأَبۡقَىٰ

“And you shall surely know which of us (I (Fir’aun) or the Lord of Musa (Allah) can give the severe and more lasting torment”.

The statement of the magicians shows that it is incumbent upon a sensible person to compare the enjoyment of this life with the enjoyment of the afterlife, and compare the punishment in this life to punishment in the afterlife.

Then Allah said that the magicians said:

إِنَّآ ءَامَنَّا بِرَبِّنَا لِيَغۡفِرَ لَنَا خَطَـٰيَـٰنَا ۗ

“Verily! We have believed in our Lord, that He may forgive us our faults”…

Meaning: so that Allah may forgive us our disbelief and sins, because Iman expiates disbelief, and repentance wipes away one’s previous sins.

وَمَآ أَكۡرَهۡتَنَا عَلَيۡهِ مِنَ ٱلسِّحۡرِ

“And the magic to which you did compel us”..

Meaning: forgive us the sin of sorcery through which we opposed the truth.

This shows that they did not have a choice in what they did, rather Firawn compelled them. And that which is apparent – and Allah knows best – is that when Musa, peace be upon him, admonished them saying:

وَيۡلَكُمۡ لَا تَفۡتَرُواْ عَلَى ٱللَّهِ ڪَذِبً۬ا فَيُسۡحِتَكُم بِعَذَابٍ۬‌ۖ وَقَدۡ خَابَ مَنِ ٱفۡتَرَىٰ

“Woe unto you! Invent not a lie against Allah, lest He should destroy you completely by a torment. And surely, he who invents a lie (against Allah) will fail miserably”, it did have an effect on them and this is why they debated (regarding whether Musa was upon truth or not), but Fir’awn compelled and forced them to commit their plot. This is why they said what Firawn said before they arrived:

إِنۡ هَـٰذَٲنِ لَسَـٰحِرَٲنِ يُرِيدَانِ أَن يُخۡرِجَاكُم مِّنۡ أَرۡضِكُم بِسِحۡرِهِمَا وَيَذۡهَبَا بِطَرِيقَتِكُمُ ٱلۡمُثۡلَى

Verily! These are two magicians (i.e. Musa and Harun). Their object is to drive you out from your land with magic, and overcome your chiefs and nobles.

So they did that which was made up and forced on them. And maybe what settled in their hearts regarding hatred of opposing the truth with falsehood is that which earned them Allah’s Mercy, Iman and the ability to repent.

وَٱللَّهُ خَيۡرٌ۬ وَأَبۡقَىٰٓ

“And Allah is better as regards reward in comparison to your [Fir’aun’s] reward, and more lasting”.

Meaning: better as reward than what you promised us of status and rank, more lasting in reward and generosity, as opposed to what you [Firawn] say that “And you shall surely know which of us [I (Fir’aun – Pharaoh) or the Lord of Musa (Allah)] can give the severe and more lasting torment]- Meaning, he [Firawn] meant that his punishment is more severe and lasting than Allaah’s punishment.

An Excerpt from Tafseer As-Sadi. Slightly paraphrased

[7] Exemplary Dealings of The Pious Predecessors With their Leaders

In The Name of Allah, The Most Merciful, The Bestower of Mercy.

Sufyan Bin Uyaynah, may Allah have mercy upon him, said: When Umar bin Abdil Aziz, may Allah have mercy upon him, was appointed the khaleefah, he reached out to Muhammad Bin Kab, Rajaa Bin Haywah, and Salim Bin Abdillah, may Allah have mercy upon them, saying: “You witness the trial I face and it has fallen upon me, therefore, what do you advise?” Muhammad Bin Kab said, “Regard the elderly as your own father, treat the youth as your brother, and care for the young ones as your own children; therefore, be good to your father, maintain strong bonds with your brother, and be compassionate towards your child”. Rajaa said, “Wish for the people what you wish for yourself, detest for them what you detest for yourself, and interact with them in a manner that you would appreciate in return.” Salim said, “Focus on one matter by diminishing the desires of worldly life and let your natural inclination lead you to contemplate death.” Umar proclaimed, “Laa Hawla Walaa Quwwata Illaa Billaah”. [1]

Imaam Abdul Azeez Bin Baaz [may Allah have mercy upon him] was asked: “The worst scholars are those who approach (visit) the rulers”. What is the level of authenticity of this hadith?

Response: I do not know about its authenticity, and if it were authentic, then it would imply an evil visit. If it is authentic, then it signifies a visit driven by vain desires, material wealth, and alignment with falsehood. (But), if the scholars neglect the rulers, they will become corrupt. If the scholars neglect the rulers and isolate them, the state of affairs will become corrupted, and the rights of the people will be violated. Therefore, goodness and Maslahah (i.e. what will bring about welfare and repel harm) is that the scholars visit and guide the rulers, and the rulers seek Tawjeeh (guidance) from them, Irshaad (the upright path to follow in all affairs), advise them regarding the avoidance of injustice, support the oppressed, and prevention of injustice against them, just as the scholars -from the time of the companions to the present day ours- visit them. As for the scholars abandoning and boycotting the rulers, and not visiting them, this is wrong – a blunder, and only those who do not know public welfare would suggest such a course of action. [paraphrased] [2]


[1] An Excerpt from Al-Bidaayah Wan-Nihaayah. Vol 9. Pages 193-202. Publisher: Maktabah Al-Ma’aarif and Daar ibn Hazm. 9th Edition. 1414 AH (1994)

[2]

ما صحة حديث: شرار العلماء الذين يأتون إلى الأمراء؟
الجواب:
ما أعرف له صحة، ولو صح فالمقصود زيارتهم الخبيثة، لو صح، فالمراد بالزيارة التي للشهوة، والمال، والموافقة على الباطل.
وإذا أهمل العلماء الأمراء؛ فسدوا، إذا أهمل العلماء الأمراء، وانزووا عنهم؛ فسد الأمر، وضاعت الحقوق، فالمصلحة، والخير في أن يزورهم العلماء، ويرشدوهم، ويطلبوا منهم التوجيه، والإرشاد، والنصيحة عن الظلم، ونصر المظلومين، وإزالة الظلم عنهم، كما زارهم العلماء سابقًا من عهد الصحابة إلى يومنا هذا.
أما كون العلماء يتركونهم، ويهجرونهم، ولا يزورونهم؛ فهذا خطأ، هذا غلط، لا يقوله إلا الجهلة الذين لا يعرفون المصالح العامة

https://binbaz.org.sa/fatwas/1913/%D8%A7%D9%84%D8%AD%D9%83%D9%85-%D8%B9%D9%84%D9%89-%D8%AD%D8%AF%D9%8A%D8%AB-%D8%B4%D8%B1%D8%A7%D8%B1-%D8%A7%D9%84%D8%B9%D9%84%D9%85%D8%A7%D8%A1-%D8%A7%D9%84%D8%B0%D9%8A%D9%86-%D9%8A%D8%A7%D8%AA%D9%88%D9%86-%D8%A7%D9%84%D8%A7%D9%85%D8%B1%D8%A7%D8%A1