Skip to main content

Author: Salafi Dawah Manchester

Statements of Some of The Kibaarul Ulamaa

In The Name of Allaah, The Most Merciful, The Bestower of Mercy

Al-Allaamah Hammaad Al-Ansaari (rahimahullaah) stated:

“The Sahaabah never differed in Aqeedah; rather the differing (in Aqeedah) took place after them.” [1]


Al-Allaamah Saaleh Al-Luhaydaan (may Allaah preserve him) was asked about the one who says that the sahaabah differed in aqeedah; so he said: [“أستغفر الله  –  none says this except a Mubtadi Daal (i.e. an  innovator, astray one). [2]

Audio


Al-Allaamah Ahmad Bin Yahyah An-Najmi (rahimahullaah) was asked about the one who says that the Sahaabah differed in Aqeedah; so he replied: “The one who says that the sahaabah differed in Aqeedah should support his speech with evidences; otherwise he is a liar, false accuser…. [3]

The Shaikh (rahimahullaah) also said:

Has lying and false accusation been made easy for the utterer (of this statement) to such a level: Falsely accusing the Companions of the Prophet (sallal-laahu-alayhi-wasallaam)?! [4]

The Shaikh (rahimahullaah) also said:

”Indeed this speaker who says that the Sahaabah differed in Aqeedah–it is obligated on him to keep quiet and should be prevented from speaking about Aqeedah; because he is ignorant about it.” [5]

The Shaikh (rahimahullaah) also said:

As for differing in the rulings pertaining to subsidiary issues of (the religion) based on Ijtihaad, then this did occur between the Sahaabah and each of them stated what he saw to be the truth, and none amongst them found fault with anyone. Not a single one of them reproached the one who was in opposition to him; but the aim of this speaker–false accuser–is to pave the way for the differing of hizbiyyah (i.e. to find room– by way of this false claim–for the differing of the people of illegal partisanship against the sound Manhaj positions of the Salafis). And he has established against himself that he is a hizbi…. [6]


Ref 1: Source: Al-Majmoo’ah Fee Tarjimah Al-Allaamah Al-Muhaddith Hammaad Al-Ansaari 2/492: Mas’alah Number 124)

Ref 2: Clarification: The Muta-aalim (Pseudo Shaikh Asim Al-Hakeem) has not been declared an innovator; rather this is a general ruling and not specific to anyone until the evidence is established against such an individual. However, it shows the severity of Asim’s devilish insinuations and ignorance.

Refs 3, 4, 5 & 6; see Al-Fataawa Al-Jaliyyah Vol2: Page: 104–108: question number 63]

 

Supplication during a wind storm

  اللَّهُمَّ إِنِّي أَسْأَلُكَ خَيْرَهَا وَخَيْرَ مَا فِيهَا

وَخَيْرَ مَا اُرْسِلَتْ بِهِ

وَأَعُوذُ بِكَ مِنْ شَرِّهَا

وَشَرِّ مَا فِيهَا

وَشَرِّ مَا اُرْسِلَتْ بِهِ

O Allah, I ask You for the good of it, for the good of what it contains, and for the good of what is sent with it. I seek refuge in You from the evil of it, from the evil of what it contains, and from the evil that is sent with it. [ Muslim 2/616]

Al-Athariyyah–Over 50% raised……

@Athariyyah: VISUAL UPDATE

Over 50% raised ~ £355k

Ahlus-Sunnah your du’a & donations are making a difference.Lets continue.

http://t.co/EIOFi2PyPA

We appeal to our brothers and sisters in Manchester to aid Ahlus Sunnah @Al-Athariyyah.  Indeed, imagine the reward for aiding your brothers in establishing a masjid in which the Scholars and students of knowledge will teach Tawheed, the Authentic Sunnah and understanding of the Salafus Saalih (In-Shaa-Allaah)

Jazaakumullaahu khayran, and may Allaah bless your wealth…Aameen

[1] Salafiyyah In The UK–The Plots of the False Claimants and the Lies of The ignorant Slanderer Mr Zakir Naik

In The Name of Allaah, The Most Merciful, The Bestower of Mercy


Allaah (The Most High) said:

وَلَا تَقۡفُ مَا لَيۡسَ لَكَ بِهِۦ عِلۡمٌ‌ۚ إِنَّ ٱلسَّمۡعَ وَٱلۡبَصَرَ وَٱلۡفُؤَادَ كُلُّ أُوْلَـٰٓٮِٕكَ كَانَ عَنۡهُ مَسۡـُٔولاً۬

And follow not (O man i.e., say not, or do not or witness not, etc.) that of which you have no knowledge (e.g. one’s saying: “I have seen,” while in fact he has not seen, or “I have heard,” while he has not heard). Verily! The hearing, and the sight, and the heart, of each of those you will be questioned (by Allah). [17:36]

Imaam Ibnul Jawzi (rahimahullaah) stated that from the statements of the scholars of Tafseer regarding the meaning of this ayah is that: You do not accuse anyone of something you have no knowledge of; you should not say that you have seen, whilst you haven’t seen; you should not say that you have heard, whilst you haven’t heard; and you should not give false testimony. In this ayah is also a prohibition from looking at haraam; listening to haraam and having conviction in what is impermissible. [For further details, see Zaadul Maseer]


 

This series –In’shaa’Allaah–will unveil the false accusations and blatant lies of the ignorant slanderer Mr Zakir Naik, who claims that the Salafis in the Uk make takfeer of one another.

 

 

Excerpt from main document the reader is urged to read

This document intends to provide a historical background into the Salafee da’wah1, within the context of the numerous fitnahs that have entered into it, that have in reality come from the direction of al-Ikhwaan al-Muslimoon, and whoever was poisoned by them. The reader, inshaa’allaah, will have acquired a wider picture, and a context in which to place whatever is observed today of the various problems, differences and splits within the da’wah, or amongst those who ascribe themselves to Salafiyyah and the Salafee da’wah.

 

No doubt, the last few decades have seen major global events unfolding. The first was the new wave of geo-political strategies of the Kuffaar in the Muslim lands, and parallel to that, was the great upheaval caused – in the last decade specifically and more profoundly – in the Salafee da’wah by the penetration of the Ikhwaan under the disguise and costume of ascription to the “doctrinal Salafiyyah” (aqaa’id). An ascription that was divorced and separated from the practical, manhaj-based, Salafiyyah (manaahij) to which they were actually opposed, due to the false methodologies that they had innovated or imbibed, and which they wished to enter into the Salafees. So their ascription to the doctrinal belief-based aspect of Salafiyyah was the veil by which they entered their foreign, deviated methodologies amongst the unsuspecting Salafees, hoping that no one would suspect them, merely because they held onto the Salafee aqeedah, and would often defend it 2, and this was the veil they used to enter upon the Salafees and the da’wah of Ahl us-Sunnah.

 

The merging of these collection of events and occurrences at the one and the same time (during the last decade), led many people ascribing themselves to Salafiyyah to be led to great confusion and to take on a variety of different and separate paths over time, and wander off in every direction – due to the absence of the proliferation of and grounding in the methodologies (manaahij) of the Book and the Sunnah amongst the people.

 

What is of concern in this document is to bring about clarity in the methodologies of the Salaf, because this is what will bring unity amongst those who ascribe themselves to Salafiyyah, bringing about a common perception and outlook with shared understandings and goals, and helping to bring about a walaa and baraa that is based around what it truly ought to be based around, which is the aqaa’id (beliefs), the manaahij (methodologies) and correct Salafee mawaaqif (positions). Unfortunately, there has been a tendency for people to take isolated events or occurrences (such as calamities that have taken place in the lands of the Muslims, non-Muslim aggressions, or specific issues that have taken place with respect to personalities, or people of the knowledge in the da’wah, or issues related to the da’wah), and then to build their whole perception of the da’wah and individuals connected to it, based upon these isolated incidents, issues or occurrences. This led them to become totally out of focus, and lose track of the wider picture. The perceptions created in their minds by way of these isolated affairs, or a collection of unrelated affairs, then led them to see all future issues and developments with these tainted and subjective perceptions, disabling them from seeing everything in its proper perspective. All subsequent occurrences, as they saw them, would feed into and re-inforce these initial (erroneous, subjective) perceptions. This would then also affect their speech and behaviour, making them take positions and hold loyalties or disownments, and direct their emotions of love and and hate, and choose their company and friendship, all upon false criterions and false determinations based upon subjective experiences and limited, narrow viewpoints tied down to one or a few or a collection of issues or events3. What was also a part of the cause for this was the fact that true and real clarity, concerning these tribulations and the methodologies of the Salaf had not emerged then, unlike more recent times.

 

For this reason, this document contains a historical account of the true origins and background to the many problems that have entered the da’wah of Ahl us-Sunnah in recent times – in order to allow the reader to put everything into context. It is hoped that all those who ascribed themselves to the Salafee da’wah at one time or another during the last decade will gain some insights, and will gain a thorough understanding about what has occurred in the da’wah following the Gulf War. This will allow them to appreciate, in retrospect, the clarity that has now emerged concerning the sum whole of this fitnah. It will also allow them to determine the true Scholars, those who are upon the truth, upon the Salafee aqeedah, the Salafee manhaj and those who are traversing upon the Salafee da’wah and implementing it, following the actual manhaj of these Scholars. It is also hoped that these insights allows the true sincere Salafees, who truly desire Salafiyyah, in belief, speech and action, to unite together based upon the clarity that has now emerged by way of the collective statements and clarifications of the Scholars, over the past 8 years or so, in relation to the various methodologies of al-Ikhwaan al-Muslimeen that were disguised as Salafiyyah and which have been exposed and refuted sufficiently.   PDF here: [1] false_methodologies


 

Source: http://salafipublications.com/sps/ under the title: The Effects of the Methodologies of al-Ikhwaan al-Muslimeen Upon The Path of Salafiyyah [A Historical Review and Analysis]

Mr Zakir Naik’s blatant lies and ignorance…

In The Name of Allaah, The Most Merciful, The Bestower of Mercy

Shaikhul Islaam Ibn Taymiyyah (rahimahullaah) said:

”A person must possess sound general fundamental principles (from the Qur’an and Sunnah) to which he refers the subsidiary issues of the religion, in order that he may speak with knowledge and justice. After this, he has to know how the subsidiary issues of the religion are (established from those general fundamental principles of the religion), and if not, he will remain upon lies and ignorance in the subsidiary issues and upon ignorance and oppression in the general fundamental principles, thus giving birth to great corruption.’’ [Minhaajus Sunnah: 5/83]

 

See Tweet by Ustaadh Amjad Rafiq (may Allaah preserve him)

pic.twitter.com/4ZnN8iOqLO

Listen to speech of Ustaadh Abu Khadeejah here:

http://ahlulbidahwalhawa.com/2011/12/21/refutation-of-zakir-naik-by-abu-khadeejah/

Abu Eesa’s Niamtullah’s Croissant Episode, leads him to mock Ahlus Sunnah

We have seen time and again, those who harbor hatred for Ahlus Sunnah, jumping aboard anything they believe they can use to gain some plus points with their followers, in their attempt to garner fame and belittle the Salafis.

This has been the case time and again over the years with Abu Eesa Niamtullah of al Maghrib institute, who attempts to pull the wool over the eyes of his followers by taking the supposed “higher ground” in terms of understanding. This was in reference to Abu Hakeem Bilaal Davies merely explaining the origins of the croissant, to which Abu Eesa wrote:

niamatullah

Watch: http://safeshare.tv/w/NqVaiKHizb

However maybe if he had indeed listened to the recording properly and thoroughly first, without attempting to mock that which wasn’t present, then it would have spared us from having to clarify his silliness. Alas it seems some people lack intellect and so to make it as easy and as simple as possible, so that he can “understand” what was meant by the video, Ustaadh Abu Hakeem Bilal Davis (hafidahullah), responding regarding the issue of the “Croissant.”

The reader will see how Abu Eesa Niamatullah and other than him have purposely blown the issue out of proportion just to attack the Salafis, and blur the truth for the common people. This blurring the lines between truth and falsehood is well known from him and his past here in which he attempted to take people to his beloved Shaykh Kehlan, as well as harbor those who attack the scholars of Sunnah – more details here.

Allah says in His Quran:

يَـٰٓأَيُّہَا ٱلَّذِينَ ءَامَنُوٓاْ إِن جَآءَكُمۡ فَاسِقُۢ بِنَبَإٍ۬ فَتَبَيَّنُوٓاْ أَن تُصِيبُواْ قَوۡمَۢا بِجَهَـٰلَةٍ۬ فَتُصۡبِحُواْ عَلَىٰ مَا فَعَلۡتُمۡ نَـٰدِمِينَ

O you who believe! If a rebellious evil person comes to you with a news, verify it, lest you harm people in ignorance, and afterwards you become regretful to what you have done. [Qur’an 49:6]

Abu Hakeem, may Allah protect him, has never claimed that eating a Crossaint is ‘haram’. Listen to the audio again carefully!

Secondly, this lecture was given under the context of the lecture entitled: “The Origins of Christmas.” and hence was given as an example to show some the origins of things that we are familiar with today and then to go on and show the origin of the rituals practiced by Christians in Christmas. He was merely making the point that knowing the origin of something can makes ones perception change.

Only a shameful liar would claim otherwise.

“You only need to prod him once and the “pathological hatred” he harbours (whilst accusing others of it) pours out like water out of a jug, and that which he accuses the Salafis of (of unjust rulings on people), pours out freely, without hindrance from his heart and soul with the ferociousness of a lion, yet the thought and intelligence of a domestic turkey” www.salafis.com

We await your public Tawbah: http://www.salafis.com/articles/puesiwh-1st-open-letter-to-abu-eesa-niamatullah-to-make-tawbah-to-allaah-and-apologise-for-his-slanders.cfm

Read more about Abu Eesa Niamatullah:

[1] http://www.salafis.com/articles/bejkozd-evaluating-the-claim-of-salafiyyah-by-abu-eesa-niamatullah.cfm

[2] http://www.salafis.com/articles/sbnafnr-evaluating-the-claim-of-salafiyyah-by-abu-eesa-niamatullah.cfm

[3] http://www.salafis.com/articles/gutdibl-clarifications-evaluating-the-claim-of-salafiyyah-by-abu-eesa-niamatullah.cfm

[4] http://www.salafis.com/articles/yqxfcbi-evaluating-the-claim-of-salafiyyah-by-abu-eesa-niamatullah.cfm