Skip to main content

Judge based on visible evidence- Reminder to Eldad Beck

Written by Abdullah Jallow on . Posted in Contemporary Issues, Methodology - 'Manhaj', Morals and Manners - 'Akhlaaq', Refutations, Sin.

In The Name of Allah, The Most Merciful, The Bestower of Mercy.

Allah said:

يَـٰٓأَيُّہَا ٱلَّذِينَ ءَامَنُواْ كُونُواْ قَوَّٲمِينَ بِٱلۡقِسۡطِ شُہَدَآءَ لِلَّهِ وَلَوۡ عَلَىٰٓ أَنفُسِكُمۡ أَوِ ٱلۡوَٲلِدَيۡنِ وَٱلۡأَقۡرَبِينَ‌ۚ إِن يَكُنۡ غَنِيًّا أَوۡ فَقِيرً۬ا فَٱللَّهُ أَوۡلَىٰ بِہِمَا‌ۖ فَلَا تَتَّبِعُواْ ٱلۡهَوَىٰٓ أَن تَعۡدِلُواْ‌ۚ وَإِن تَلۡوُ ۥۤاْ أَوۡ تُعۡرِضُواْ فَإِنَّ ٱللَّهَ كَانَ بِمَا تَعۡمَلُونَ خَبِيرً۬ا

O you who believe! Stand out firmly for justice, as witnesses to Allah; even though it be against yourselves, or your parents, or your kin, be he rich or poor, Allah is a Better Protector to both (than you). So follow not the lusts (of your hearts), lest you may avoid justice, and if you distort your witness or refuse to give it, verily, Allah is Ever Well-Acquainted with what you do. [An-Nisaa. Ayah 135]

Judge based on visible evidence until something definitive indicates a different conclusion

In the above article, Eldad stated: The deadly attack on December 20 at the Christmas market in the German city of Magdeburg – in which five people were murdered and 235 wounded – sparked a heated public, media, and political debate surrounding the problematic and complex personality of the perpetrator, Saudi doctor Taleb Al-Abdulmohsen. A brief examination of the 50-year-old’s will, left in the car with which he carried out the horrific attack, is sufficient to discern an unstable and inconsistent person, deeply conflicted with himself and his surroundings, who goes to murder innocent people at a Christmas market and bequeaths all his possessions to the Red Cross. [end of quote]

Response: The essence of the issue concerning this individual has been examined. See details on this link: https://salafidawahmanchester.com/2024/12/25/perplexing-to-comprehend-the-psychiatrists-behaviour-particularly-given-his-anti-islam-stance/

Eldad stated: It was convenient for most politicians, journalists, and commentators to cling to the theory that Abdulmohsen was an anti-Islamic Muslim, who spread the messages of the far-right political party Alternative for Germany (AfD), Israeli personalities including Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, and Elon Musk on his X account, to divert attention from the fact that most terrorist attacks on German and European soil in the past 20 years were carried out by Islamists in the name of radical Islam. [end of quote]

Response: Certainly, he was not merely anti-Islamic; he explicitly declared his departure from Islam. Therefore, labeling him as an anti-Islam Muslim is sheer folly, for no true Muslim, regardless of their level of understanding, would ever claim to be both Muslim and anti-Islam. Such a contradiction can only be articulated by someone considered insane in Islamic law, who would not be held accountable, or a desperate philosopher attempting to distort the truth surrounding these two realities. A Muslim can only embody their faith and stand against anything that contradicts Islam, fully aware that Islam denounces both negligence and extremism. Any belief or action that diverges from the teachings of the Qur’an and Sunnah, as practiced by the companions of the Prophet, is marked by either negligence or extremism. Furthermore, the individuals cited by this misguided Abdulmohsen are evaluated independently of his actions. The far-right is assessed based on their words and deeds, whether commendable or not, and Elon Musk is similarly scrutinized for his statements and actions; however, this article does not aim to delve into that. As for Netanyahu, his actions and statements are well known and he is judged accordingly. Read here: https://abuiyaad.com/a/amalekite-genocide-doctrine-gaza

Furthermore, even if Eldad presents specific dates to support the statement that most terrorist attacks on German and European soil in the past 20 years were carried out by Islamists in the name of radical Islam, [Footnote a] it should not overshadow the fact that Abdulmohsen identified himself as a non-Muslim and anti-Islam. This indicates that, despite the misguided actions of some Muslims in the past, our focus should remain on Abdulmohsen as a troubled individual, regardless of his creed. Eldad might be worried about how Abdulmohsen’s actions could reflect on Netanyahu. It’s important to state that we are not suggesting Netanyahu had any role in shaping Abdulmohsen’s behaviour, as we do not have proof to back that up. However, it’s possible that Abdulmohsen admires Netanyahu’s extreme views and distorted reasoning, particularly evident in his genocidal statements. However, there’s no need to link anyone to Netanyahu to further damage his reputation; his own actions are already damning, and his culpability in genocide is as clear as daylight. Read again: https://abuiyaad.com/a/amalekite-genocide-doctrine-gaza

Eldad stated: The attack in Magdeburg allowed the establishment in Germany and Europe to use this extreme and rare case to launch an organized chorus warning of “generalizations against Muslims,” explaining that “the real problem of terrorism lies on the right side of the political map,” that “its roots should be found in the conflict between nationalist Israel and its neighbors,” and that “we must beware of Islamophobia.” [end of quote]

Response: It is certainly perplexing that we have yet to encounter anyone who identifies as an anti-Islam Muslim. Furthermore, this individual, who has chosen a profession aimed at helping the mentally ill, exhibits behaviour that seems more disturbing than that of those he aims to assist. While his case is indeed extreme and unusual, the acts of mass murder and violence he has committed are not entirely out of the ordinary in Europe and America. Although Abdul-Mohsen’s mental condition raises significant concerns, his actions, while horrific, do not surpass the levels of violence seen in America. If the statistics presented in the following article hold true, then despite the evil of Abdul-Mohsen’s deeds, they pale in comparison to the annual occurrences of similar acts in the United States. Read: https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-us-canada-41488081

Thus, it is irrelevant whether there was a coordinated effort to warn against generalisations about Muslims, as it is widely recognised that the overwhelming majority of Muslims reject violence and mass murder. Such actions are typically associated with the Khawarij and those misled by them, driven by unchecked anger rather than clear guidance from authoritative texts. As for the ongoing conflict between Zionist forces and Islamic groups that disregard the counsel of respected scholars on how to engage with Zionists, this is a significant issue, as highlighted by a Saudi prince. Listen here: https://youtu.be/Z3-cWyFcK5w

Islamophobia: Just as it is imperitive to remain vigilant against anti-Semitism when it is unmistakably recognised and not misrepresented for political motives by the Zionists, the far-right factions within Netanyahu’s administration and pro-Zionist lobbies in Europe and America, which may seek to suppress genuine discourse; similarly, it is also imperative to remain vigilant against Islamophobia when it is distinctly identified and not distorted by those entities that exploit it to justify their political motives, such as ISIS and their ilk. [Footnote b]

Eldad stated: “Islamophobe” was the term that was almost automatically attached to the perpetrator, although he was described here and there as an “Islam critic” or “anti-Islamic” – descriptions that seemed to better match the profile of the man, which was constructed based on the content of his X account, the website he managed, and the few rare interviews he gave in recent years. [end of quote]

Response: Eldad needs to be reminded that the labels assigned to this individual, whether “Islamic critic,” “anti-Islam,” or “Islamophobe,” are secondary. What truly matters is that he identifies himself as an apostate. It is surprising that Eldad focuses on labeling him, which reflects a characteristic of the individual, while overlooking the core issue: the individual’s declaration of disbelief. This declaration is the root cause of other issues, such as criticising Islam, which cannot be approached by falsehood from any direction.

Allah said:

إِنَّ ٱلَّذِينَ كَفَرُوا۟ بِٱلذِّكْرِ لَمَّا جَآءَهُمْ وَإِنَّهُۥ لَكِتَٰبٌ عَزِيزٌ
لَّا يَأْتِيهِ ٱلْبَٰطِلُ مِنۢ بَيْنِ يَدَيْهِ وَلَا مِنْ خَلْفِهِۦ تَنزِيلٌ مِّنْ حَكِيمٍ حَمِيدٍ

Verily, those who disbelieved in the Reminder (i.e. the Quran) when it came to them (shall receive the punishment). And verily, it is an honourable respected Book (because it is Allah’s Speech, and He has protected it from corruption, etc.). Falsehood cannot come to it from before it or behind it (it is) sent down by the All-Wise, Worthy of all praise (Allah). [Fussilat 41-42]

وَلَا يَأْتُونَكَ بِمَثَلٍ إِلَّا جِئْنَٰكَ بِٱلْحَقِّ وَأَحْسَنَ تَفْسِيرًا

And they bring no (argument or objection by way of a) similitude (in order to criticise this Qur’ān and oppose your message) except that We bring you the truth and the better explanation thereof (through a similitude that is superior to theirs, provides detail and invalidates their objection). [1]

Allah [The Exalted] said: [ وَكَذَٰلِكَ نُفَصِّلُ الْآيَاتِ وَلِتَسْتَبِينَ سَبِيلُ الْمُجْرِمِينَ – And thus do We explain the signs (to you O Muḥammad) in detail, and so that the way of the criminals may become evident (to you)]. [Al-An’aam. 55] [2]

Imam Ibn Kathir [may Allah have mercy upon him] stated regarding this Ayah:

Allah [The Exalted] stated that just as He explained what was previously explained of the arguments and evidence on the path of guidance and sound judgement, and censured argumentation and stubbornness; likewise He explain the signs (proofs, evidences, lessons), which those being addressed are in need of; [ولتستبين سبيل المجرمين – and so that the way of the criminals may become evident (to you)], Meaning, so that the path of the criminals – those who oppose the Messengers – may become evident”. [3]

Imam At-Tabari [may Allah have mercy upon him] stated regarding the statement of Allah:

[وكذلك نفصل الآيات – And thus do We explain the signs (to you O Muḥammad) in detail]- Meaning, O Muhammad! Just as We have detailed for you in this Surah – from its beginning and introduction up to this point – our proofs and evidences against the idolaters and worshippers of images, and distinguished and clarified it for you; likewise, We explain to you our signs and evidences for every truth denied by the people of falsehood, the sects and other than them, until its truth is distinguished from its falsehood, and its right is distinguished from its wrong. [4]

Eldad stated: If Abdulmohsen had any phobia, imaginary and uncontrollable or real, it was not related to Islam – which he knew very well – but to Germany, to which he immigrated in 2006 as a medical trainee. The accusations he directed at the authorities in Germany regarding the persecution of “Saudi refugees,” whom Abdulmohsen allegedly sought to help, now appear to be an imaginary persecution complex that the perpetrator of the Magdeburg attack developed after creating himself various conflicts and entanglements with the German authorities. [end of quote]

Response: Eldad is once again shifting focus away from the true cause of the disease, rather than just the resulting phobia. Firstly, anyone who accepts Islam and later renounces it is either ignorant, misled, or a hypocrite who feigned belief to mislead the faithful, similar to the hypocrites of the past. Ultimately, guidance rests with Allah, as even some Jewish and Christian scholars who recognised Muhammad’s Prophethood chose to reject him, as Allah stated: [ٱلَّذِينَ ءَاتَيْنَٰهُمُ ٱلْكِتَٰبَ يَعْرِفُونَهُۥ كَمَا يَعْرِفُونَ أَبْنَآءَهُمْ وَإِنَّ فَرِيقًا مِّنْهُمْ لَيَكْتُمُونَ ٱلْحَقَّ وَهُمْ يَعْلَمُونَ – Those to whom We gave the Scripture (Jews and Christians) recognise him (Muhammad) or the Ka’bah at Makkah) as they recongise their sons. But verily, a party of them conceal the truth while they know it – [i.e. the qualities of Muhammad which are written in the Taurat (Torah) and the Injeel (Gospel)]. [Al-Baqarah 146]

Secondly, the takfiris express their disappointment when they differ with Muslim leaders. Then, in their haste and ignorance of the teachings of the Qur’an and Sunnah, they take matters into their own hands, disregarding the fact that authorities are often managing situations in ways that prevent further harm and fulfill the obligations of Muslims during times of weakness. Their actions stem from a rush to judgment, misguidance, and confusion about Islam, despite their claims of supporting it. Similarly, AbdulMohsen, who professes to assist those fleeing Muslim countries and has even migrated to Germany for this purpose, shows a sense of loyalty to that cause. However, it may be that his frustration with the Germans’ perceived inaction or support for those he views as enemies may have driven him to take harmful actions against the very country that welcomed him. There is nothing fictional about the takfiris harming the people they claim to want to help restore the glory of Islam, just as it is not far-fetched for someone to harm those who aided him in declaring his apostasy because he feels they are insufficiently advocating for his cause.

Eldad stated: Those incidents seem now to be the real motivation behind his deep urge for revenge against Germans and Germany than his accusations against Germany and former chancellor, Angela Merkel, of “Islamizing Europe.” If he truly feared the Islamization of Europe under Germany’s leadership, Abdulmohsen could have carried out an attack on a Muslim institution or alternatively at one of the public events surrounding the recent release of Merkel’s memoirs. [end of quote]

Response: Eldad’s insights into Abdul-Mohsen’s real motives will soon be illuminated by a later section of the article, which hints that some have speculated he might be a spy due to his behaviour. For the moment, however, let’s focus on the earlier quote concerning Abdul-Mohsen’s complaints—particularly his belief that German authorities are focusing on the Saudis he wishes to help, rather than his worries about German politicians “Islamizing Europe.” It’s clear that we have touched on this topic to some extent before. Just as takfiris are misled by their distorted views of justice and retribution, despite claiming to act in the interest of those they believe are wronged, it is reasonable to consider that Abdul-Mohsen might feel unsupported by those who initially welcomed him and allowed him to express his dissent. Therefore, if he perceives that others he is trying to help, under the guise of freedom from oppression, are being mistreated by the very authorities that offered him refuge, his frustration could mirror that of the takfiris. They often lash out at everyone, including innocent bystanders who are unaware of political decisions and bilateral relations between nations. Similarly, it is plausible that Abdul-Mohsen has directed his discontent toward the citizens of a secular government that he believes is inadequately responsive to his aspirations in his newly adopted stance of apostasy and so called anti-Islam activism.

Furthermore, there is no need to engage with Eldad’s assertion that if Abdul-Muhsen harbored genuine fears regarding the Islamization of Europe under Germany’s guidance, he might have executed an attack on a Muslim institution or during one of the public gatherings linked to the recent unveiling of Merkel’s memoirs. This is predicated on the principle that judgments are formed based on observable evidence unless compelling proof suggests otherwise. What is evident is that Abdul-Muhsen has articulated numerous grievances against the German government, and his actions reflect a desire for retribution against its citizens, akin to how takfiris inflict harm upon Muslim individuals due to their animosity towards Muslim authorities.

Eldad stated: The number of Saudi asylum-seekers in Germany is very low, despite the fact that the annual report of the Federal Office for Migration and Refugees in Germany notes various groups that could have sought asylum in Germany due to their persecution or discrimination by the Saudi authorities, despite the internal reforms process initiated by Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman.

These groups include women, members of religious minorities, the LGBTQ+, community and opposition activists. Did the perpetrator from Magdeburg actually assist his compatriots who sought asylum in Germany? Various testimonies that have emerged on social media since the attack portray Abdulmohsen as a person who was actually in conflict with ex-Muslims, individuals, or organizations representing them. Among other things, he claimed that the German authorities infiltrated organizations of ex-Muslims to spy on them for the benefit of Saudi Arabia. [end of quote]

Response: If Saudi asylum seekers in Germany are few, we anticipate a similar trend in other Western nations. This is primarily because no rational person would abandon the land of Tawhid. Additionally, claims of persecution must be substantiated with concrete evidence, along with the activities of those seeking asylum before their departure. Simply asserting persecution is insufficient. Regarding reforms, we pray that Allah grants all Muslim leaders the wisdom to act in the best interests of Muslims, guided by the Qur’an and the Sunnah as interpreted and practiced by the companions of the Prophet.

Concerning the assertion that Abdul-Mohsen had conflicts with ex-Muslims, whether individuals or organizations, this does not serve as proof that he is anything other than what he claims. People with shared objectives can still disagree on methods. For example, the Khawarij may agree on many issues but still engage in conflict and violence against each other. Similarly, politicians often have differing opinions and arguments, so it is not unusual for individuals to disagree even when they have common goals or collaborate in wrongdoing. As for spying, every country has its own intelligence operations. Regardless of the freedoms afforded to individuals and groups, governments maintain their own means of regulating those freedoms, as the actions of citizens, both domestically and internationally, can impact diplomatic relations and national interests, regardless of whether we agree or disagree with government restrictions and activities.

Eldad stated: However, the confrontations that Abdulmohsen had with ex-Muslims, mainly on social media, raised suspicions among those who were threatened by him that the Saudi doctor was actually an undercover agent of the Saudi authorities, spying on critics of the Saudi regime. The Saudi authorities themselves say that they warned the Germans about Abdulmohsen well before he committed the deadly attack. [end of quote]

Response: In Usul Al-Fiqh, there is a guiding principle that states: “Certainty does not cease to remain due to doubt.”  Consequently, any concerns regarding Abdul-Muhsen’s actions—whether he is a spy or not—are merely speculative until substantiated by solid evidence. It is important to note that he has openly declared himself an apostate, expressing discontent with those who initially supported him in achieving his objectives, ultimately causing harm to their citizens. While he claims to care about the safety of their nation, his actions mirror those of the khawarij, who profess concern for Muslims yet resort to violence against them, driven by grievances against Muslim governments.

Spying: Just as the Zionist regime engages in spying and share intelligence when they see the need to do so, other nations engage in comparable activities. Thus, if the Saudi authorities have indeed reported on Abdul-Muhsen, there is nothing particularly concealed in that action.

Eldad stated: However, as complex as the personality of Abdulmohsen was, the public focus is turning now to the main scandal behind the attack: the German internal security authorities have failed, once again, in preventing terrible bloodshed despite warning signals they received or should have detected. This security inefficiency, and not the assumed political affiliation of the perpetrator for political needs, should indeed be at the center of the discussion, even if Germany is only two months away from a decisive general election.

There is the failure of police security at the site of the attack: after the deadly truck attack at the Christmas market in Berlin eight years ago, carried out by an Islamist and resulting in the murder of 12 men and women, it was decided to enhance security measures around Christmas markets throughout Germany. [end of quote]

Response: We have no comments to offer, as we do not represent any government. Similarly, the remaining observations made by Eldad throughout the article centered on comparable terror incidents in various European nations, particularly the security oversights that may have contributed to these events, Abdul-Muhsen’s backing of the AfD, and the potential implications for this political party. Our goal was to prevent Eldad from misrepresenting Abdul-Muhsen’s self-portrayal and comment on the unfounded suggestions that are based on assumptions or conjectures.

Regarding Eldad’s assertion that the majority of terrorist acts in Europe are perpetrated by Muslims, we want to emphasise that terrorism is a heinous crime, irrespective of the identity of the perpetrators, whether they are individuals, groups, organizations, or political figures. In this context, we also remind Eldad of the ongoing situation in Gaza and the historical context of mass murder associated with Zionist actions.

The History of Zionist Aggression

The Deir Yassin Massacre: Took place on April 9, 1948, near Jerusalem, during which between 107 to 254 Palestinians were massacred at the hands of the extremist “Stern” gang.

The Nasr al-Din Massacre: Took place in April 1948. Al-Lajjun Massacre: Took place on April 13, 1948, in a Palestinian Arab village in the Jenin District, where the Zionist Haganah gang attacked it and killed 13 people.

The Saliha Massacre: Took place in May 1948, during which 75 Palestinians were massacred.

The Abu Shusha Massacre: Took place on May 14, 1948, near the village of Deir Yassin, and claimed the lives of (50) citizens, including women, men, children, and the elderly.

The Beit Daras Massacre: Took place in northeastern Gaza on May 21, 1948.

The Tantura Massacre: Took place on May 22, 1948, in the occupied city of Haifa, and claimed the lives of about (200) Palestinians.

The Lydda Massacre: Took place on July 12, 1948, in the occupied city of Lydda, and resulted in the massacre of about (500) Palestinians, including (150) who were massacred inside the city’s Grand Mosque. The Zionists threw many of them alive into the town’s wells.

The Dawayima Massacre: Took place on October 29, 1948, when a battalion from the terrorist “Lehi” organization led by Moshe Dayan attacked the village and then began searching homes and shooting at its residents. Entire families were exterminated in the massacre, which resulted in the killing of 200 men, women, and children.

The Zionist massacres did not stop after the Nakba of 1948, but rather their frequency, intensity, and brutality increased in light of the use of more lethal and destructive weapons. Among the most prominent of these massacres were: The Sharafat Massacre, which took place in February 1951, in which 11 Palestinians were massacred, and the rest of the village’s people were displaced. The Bethlehem Massacre took place in January 1952, in which 10 Palestinians were massacred. The Qibya Massacre took place on October 14, 1953, in the village of Qibya, east of Jerusalem, during which (67) Palestinians were massacred, most of whom were women and children, and during which 56 homes were destroyed. The Qalqilya Massacre took place on October 10, 1956, when the occupation forces attacked citizens in the city of Qalqilya in the West Bank, during which about seventy citizens were massacred.

The Kafr Qasem Massacre took place on October 29, 1956, in which 49 Palestinians were massacred, including 11 children, when they were all returning home from work. The Khan Yunis Massacre took place on November 3 and 12, 1956, in which between 280 and 500 Palestinians were massacred.

In 1970, Zionist aircraft struck Bahr al-Baqar Primary School and Abu Zaabal factories, killing more than 150 Egyptian students and workers. In 1980, the extremist Jewish organization Kach attempted to blow up Al-Aqsa Mosque, and a shipment of explosives weighing 120 kg was discovered. The Sabra and Shatila massacre took place in September 1982. This massacre lasted three days, and its direct perpetrators were members of the Lebanese Phalange forces allied with the Zionists led by Ariel Sharon. The Ibrahimi Mosque Massacre took place on February 25, 1994, when a Zionist named “Barog Goldstein” stormed the Ibrahimi Mosque in the city of Hebron, and fired bullets and bombs at the worshipers. This massacre resulted in the massacre of 29 Palestinians. The Qana Massacre took place on April 18, 1995. [compiled from various old Arab Newspapers]

It is important to reiterate that this does not imply any lack of condemnation for the murders carried out by Muslim individuals and groups; on the contrary, such acts are unequivocally condemned. Shaikh Abu Iyaad [may Allah preserve him] stated: Upon this, to answer the eternally unanswered question of Piers Morgan, “Do you condemn Hamas?”, we condemn everyone who opposes the Divine Legislation by killing innocent civilians, including non-combatant men, the elderly, women, children, priests, monks and the likes, no matter who they are, Muslim or non-Muslim, whether ISIS, al-Qaeda, Hamas, Boko Haram or Benjamin Mileikowsky, the IDF, Settlers and their likes. https://abuiyaad.com/a/amalekite-genocide-doctrine-gaza

Justifying Genocide and Slaughtering of Women and Children in Holy War: Rabbi Eliyahu Mali

https://abuiyaad.com/a/slaughtering-children-holy-war/print

Just Rules of Fighting in the Sharīʿah of Islām Compared to Genocidal, Ethnic-Cleansing, Tribal-Vengeance

Doctrines and Excesses of Trojan-Horse Muslim Extremists | AbuIyaad.Com
https://abuiyaad.com/a/amalekite-genocide-doctrine-gaza

——————————————————

Footnote a: http://www.islamagainstextremism.com/

Footnote b: https://abuiyaad.com/sn/muslims-antisemitism
https://www.salafisounds.com/the-way-forward-for-muslim-minorities-living-in-an-atmosphere-of-anti-islamic-sentiment-reflections-after-the-massacre-in-new-zealand-by-abu-khadeejah/

[1] https://www.thenoblequran.com/q/#/search/25_33

[2] https://www.thenoblequran.com/q/#/search/6_55%5D

[3] Tafseer Ibn Kathir

[4] Tafseer at-Tabari

Reflections from some statements of Al-Allamah Rabee Bin Hadi Al-Mad’khali [37 of 80]

Written by Abdullah Jallow on . Posted in Contemporary Issues, Da'wah - Calling To Islam, Methodology - 'Manhaj', Morals and Manners - 'Akhlaaq', Pearls of Wisdom, Purification of The Soul, Scholars of Islam, Sin, Worship - 'Ibaadah'.

In The Name of Allah, The Most Merciful, The Bestower of Mercy.

I advise the students of knowledge to be humble wherever they may be – wherever they reside (or) go. The Ummah is not (merely) in need of leaders and figureheads, nor does it want arrogance, pride, self-exaltation and corruption in the earth; instead, they are greatly in need of humble people, the acquiescent and protected ones- those who submit to the truth. Let each person nurture himself or embrace these qualities which the Ummah is in need of (through) those who possess them.

By Allah, they have been afflicted due to the arrogant ones, the haughty ones, and the proponents of (vain) desires; distancing them from the true religion ordained by Allah, dividing, splitting and humiliating them, thus Allah caused them to be subjugated by the (other) nations as a result of these destructive diseases. There is no escape for them except by returning to Allah’s Book and the Sunnah of His Messenger, which – by Allah – requires sincerity, truthfulness, humility, and a complete distance from the (bad) manners that oppose these (good traits), such as pride, arrogance and obstinacy.

Majmu 15/9

Pardon and Retaliation

Written by Abdullah Jallow on . Posted in Basics, Brotherhood, Methodology - 'Manhaj', Morals and Manners - 'Akhlaaq', Pearls of Wisdom, Purification of The Soul, Scholars of Islam, Worship - 'Ibaadah'.

In The Name of Allah, The Most Merciful, The Bestower of Mercy.

فَكَرَمُ الخُلُقِ هو : أنْ يَتَسَامَحَ في موضع التَّسَامُحِ، وَيَأْخُذَ بالعَزْمِ في موضع العزيمة…
ولهذا جاء الدين الإسلامي وسَطًا بينَ التَّسَامُحِ الذي تَضِيعُ به الحقُوقُ، وبين العَزِيمَةِ التي قَدْ تَحْمِلُ على الجَوْرِ ، فنضرب لذلك مَثَلًا بالقَصَاصِ، وهو قَتْلُ
النَّفْسِ بالنَّفْسِ.
وقد انقسمت شرائع بني إسرائيل في القَصَاصِ إِلى قِسْمَيْنِ: قِسْمِ أَوْجَبَ القَتْلَ ولا خيار لأولياء المَقْتُولِ فيه، وهي شَرِيعَةُ التوراة، لأن شريعة التَّوراة تميل
إلى الغِلْظَةِ والشِّدَّةِ.
وقسم آخر أوجب العفو، وقال: إنه إذا قُتِلَ الإنسان عمدًا فالواجب على أَوْلِيَائِهِ التَّسَامُحُ، مع أن الأصل أن شريعة الإنجيل هي شريعة التوراة، وقد قال
الله تعالى: وَكَتَبْنَا عَلَيْهِمْ فِيهَا أَنَّ النَّفْسَ بِالنَّفْسِ ﴾ [المائدة: ٤٥].
فجاءت شريعة الإسلام وسطا، وجُعِلَ الخِيارُ لأولياء المَقْتُولِ، إن شاءوا قَتَلُوا فَصَاصًا ولهم الحق، وإن شاءوا عَفَوا ، وإن شاءوا أَخَذُوا الدِّيةَ، فصار الأمر واسعًا؛ ومَعْلُومٌ أن كُلَّ عاقلٍ يُخَيَّرُ في مثل هذه الأمور سيختارُ ما فيه المصلحة العامة، ويُقَدِّمُها على كل شيء
فمثلاً إذا كان القاتل شِرِّيرًا وكان أولياء المقتول مُحتاجين إلى المال وقالوا: نُرِيدُ الدِّيَةَ، نقول: هذا ليس من الحِكْمَةِ، فَلْيُقْتَلِ القَاتِلُ، وانظروا للمصالح
العامة، وإذا تَرَكْتُمْ شَيْئًا لله عَوَّضَكُم الله خَيْرًا مِنْهُ

Imam Muhammad Ibn Saalih Al-Uthaymeen, may Allah have mercy upon him, expressed in one of his discussions about “the virtue of forgiveness” which is that Islam emphasises forgiveness when appropriate, as well as the necessity of showing determination when needed. It serves as an upright approach between forgiveness that may result in the loss of rights and determination that could lead to oppression. An example of this upright approach can be seen in the matter of Qisaas, which involves life for a life. After mentioning that the laws of the Torah and the Injeel lean towards strictness and leniency respectively, the Imam then stated that the Islamic Shariah established an upright middle ground, allowing the guardians of the victim to choose between seeking the death penalty for the murderer, granting forgiveness, or accepting blood money.

However, it is known that any rational (or sensible) individual who possesses the freedom to choose in such circumstances will opt for what serves the greater good (or is connected to the welfare of all), and prioritise it above all else. For instance, if the murderer is a wicked person and the guardians of the victim require financial compensation and say, “We want blood money”, we respond, “This is not wisdom, so let the criminal be executed and take into account the public interest or the collective welfare. And if you forsake something for the sake of Allah (i.e. in this case, the blood money), Allah will replace it with something better”.

An Excerpt from “Sharh Hilyati Taalibil Ilm” pages 50-51

We appreciate your feedback to improve the paraphrasing of this article. May you all be blessed by Allah.

Noble Prophet Sulayman – Lesson for Brian Blum

Written by Abdullah Jallow on . Posted in Basics, Contemporary Issues, Da'wah - Calling To Islam, History of Islam, Methodology - 'Manhaj', Morals and Manners - 'Akhlaaq', Purification of The Soul, Qur'aan, Worship - 'Ibaadah'.

In The Name of Allah, The Most Merciful, The Bestower of Mercy.

The Noble Prophets of Allah, Among Them the Prophet Sulayman, Serve as The Cornerstone of Judiciousness, Virtuous Moral conduct, Integrity, Justice, Forbearance, And All Other Commendable Attributes

Allah, The Exalted, says:

وَوَهَبْنَا لَهُ إِسْحَاقَ وَيَعْقُوبَ ۚ كُلًّا هَدَيْنَا ۚ وَنُوحًا هَدَيْنَا مِن قَبْلُ ۖ وَمِن ذُرِّيَّتِهِ دَاوُودَ وَسُلَيْمَانَ وَأَيُّوبَ وَيُوسُفَ وَمُوسَىٰ وَهَارُونَ ۚ وَكَذَٰلِكَ نَجْزِي الْمُحْسِنِينَ
وَزَكَرِيَّا وَيَحْيَىٰ وَعِيسَىٰ وَإِلْيَاسَ ۖ كُلٌّ مِّنَ الصَّالِحِينَ
وَإِسْمَاعِيلَ وَالْيَسَعَ وَيُونُسَ وَلُوطًا ۚ وَكُلًّا فَضَّلْنَا عَلَى الْعَالَمِينَ
وَمِنْ آبَائِهِمْ وَذُرِّيَّاتِهِمْ وَإِخْوَانِهِمْ ۖ وَاجْتَبَيْنَاهُمْ وَهَدَيْنَاهُمْ إِلَىٰ صِرَاطٍ مُّسْتَقِيمٍ
ذَٰلِكَ هُدَى اللَّهِ يَهْدِي بِهِ مَن يَشَاءُ مِنْ عِبَادِهِ ۚ وَلَوْ أَشْرَكُوا لَحَبِطَ عَنْهُم مَّا كَانُوا يَعْمَلُونَ
أُولَٰئِكَ الَّذِينَ آتَيْنَاهُمُ الْكِتَابَ وَالْحُكْمَ وَالنُّبُوَّةَ ۚ فَإِن يَكْفُرْ بِهَا هَٰؤُلَاءِ فَقَدْ وَكَّلْنَا بِهَا قَوْمًا لَّيْسُوا بِهَا بِكَافِرِينَ
أُولَٰئِكَ الَّذِينَ هَدَى اللَّهُ ۖ فَبِهُدَاهُمُ اقْتَدِهْ ۗ قُل لَّا أَسْأَلُكُمْ عَلَيْهِ أَجْرًا ۖ إِنْ هُوَ إِلَّا ذِكْرَىٰ لِلْعَالَمِينَ

And We bestowed upon him (i.e. Prophet Ibrahim) Ishaque (Isaac) and Ya’qub (Jacob), each of them We guided, and before him, We guided Nuh (Noah), and among his progeny Dawud (David), Sulaiman (Solomon), Ayub (Job), Yusuf (Joseph), Musa (Moses), and Harun (Aaron). Thus do We reward the good-doers. And Zakariya (Zachariya), and Yahya (John) and ‘Iesa (Jesus) and Iliyas (Elias), each one of them was of the righteous. And Isma’il (Ishmael) and Al-Yas’a (Elisha), and Yunus (Jonah) and Lout (Lot), and each one of them We preferred above the ‘Alamin (mankind and jinns) (of their times). And also some of their fathers and their progeny and their brethren, We chose them, and We guided them to a Straight Path. This is the Guidance of Allah with which He guides whomsoever He will of His slaves. But if they had joined in worship others with Allah, all that they used to do would have been of no benefit to them. They are those whom We gave the Book, Al-Hukm (understanding of the religious laws), and Prophethood. But if these disbelieve therein (the Book, Al-Hukm and Prophethood), then, indeed We have entrusted it to a people (such as the Companions of Prophet Muhammad) who are not disbelievers therein. They are those whom Allah had guided. So follow their guidance. Say: “No reward I ask of you for this (the Qur’an). It is only a reminder for the ‘Alamin (mankind and jinns).” [Al-An’aam. 83-90]

Imam Ibn Al-Qayyim, may Allah have mercy upon him, said:

The Messengers are the most judicious among all of creation without exception, and their followers constitute the next most judicious group. Among the adherents of the scriptures and the great legislated laws, those who follow the Messengers are deemed the most judicious, with Muslims ranking highest among them. Among Muslims, the companions of Muhammad, peace and blessings be upon him, are regarded as the most judicious, followed closely by those who emulate their faith precisely. Furthermore, the people who steadfastly adhere to the authentic Sunnah of the Prophet and the sound reports passed down from him are considered the most judicious within the Muslim Ummah after the companions and those who have followed their example.

The clear proof to demonstrate that the Messengers are the most judicious among the entire creation is that the beneficial knowledge they conveyed, the righteous deeds, and beneficial guidance for both this life and the hereafter, have not been conveyed by others or even something close to it. There is nothing – from any perspective – that emerged from other judicious people that can be compared to what the Messengers conveyed concerning beneficial knowledge, righteous deeds and actions, and the beneficial matters of true well-being in both the present world and the afterlife. Whoever reflects on their life stories, both specific and general, their patience and perseverance, their abstention from the fleeting pleasures of this material world, their fervent desire to seek Allah’s pleasure and the eternal rewards promised in the hereafter, their pure manners, their unparalleled truthfulness among all beings, possessors of the purest hearts and souls, custodians of the greatest trust (namely, divine revelation and prophethood), the most honourable companions one could have, the purest in their inner-most conscience and their private matters, would not doubt that they are the most judicious among Allah’s creation without exception. It is undeniable that those who closely follow their example will inherit a greater share of judiciousness than others. [1]

Brian Blum stated:

Response:

The above statement deserves careful examination. This is crucial because the nations of the Prophets, including some among the Ummah of Muhammad, peace and blessings of Allah be upon him, stray from the right path when they neglect the teachings imparted by the Prophets, as the Prophet Muhammad, peace and blessings of Allah be upon him, stated: “There was not a Prophet sent by Allah to a previous nation except that he had followers and companions who adhered to his Sunnah and followed his commands. However, after them, there arose successors who spoke without acting and acted contrary to what they were commanded. Whoever strives against them with their hand is a believer [Footnote a], whoever strives against them with their tongue is a believer; and whoever strives against them with their heart is a believer. Beyond that, there is no Iman even as small as a mustard seed”. [Sahih Muslim 50]

Indeed, the events that unfolded in the magnificent and unmatched kingdom of noble Prophet Sulayman, peace and blessings of Allah be upon him—a kingdom characterised by pure monotheism and unwavering obedience to Allah—stand in stark contrast to a rulership founded on disbelief in Allah’s final Prophet, Muhammad, and His final revelation, the Qur’an and the Sunnah. The adversaries faced by Prophet Sulayman, peace and blessings of Allah be upon him, were those who rebelled against Allah’s commands, much like the architects of the Zionist State, whose predecessors were also disbelievers in the last revelation. Moreover, regardless of the nation, empire, or state we examine, we will consistently encounter both the righteous and the disobedient.

The kingdom of the noble Sulayman was not governed by those who have corrupted the Scriptures and denied the final revelation. Thus, there is no valid comparison between these two situations; noble Sulayman was a true Muslim, one who submitted fully to Allah and worshipped Him alone, while the Zionists do not submit to Allah, as evidenced by their rejection of the message of Muhammad, peace and blessings of Allah be upon him. Therefore, attempting to link oneself to Sulayman or to equate the circumstances of his magnificent Kingdom of pure monotheism with those of a state built on Zionism is akin to comparing a lush, thriving land to a barren wasteland. To begin, let us take a moment to reflect on this noble, humble, just, and God-fearing Prophet, in contrast to the arrogant individuals among the Zionists who overstep boundaries in the name of self-defense and retaliation. However, this does not necessitate that we remain silent regarding the crimes committed by Hamas or any other group against non-combatants. Read here: https://abuiyaad.com/a/amalekite-genocide-doctrine-gaza

Sulayman’s justice with his subjects, Allah’s creatures and the opponents of pure Islamic monotheism

Allah, The Exalted, said:

وَلَقَدۡ ءَاتَيۡنَا دَاوُ ۥدَ وَسُلَيۡمَـٰنَ عِلۡمً۬ا‌ۖ وَقَالَا ٱلۡحَمۡدُ لِلَّهِ ٱلَّذِى فَضَّلَنَا عَلَىٰ كَثِيرٍ۬ مِّنۡ عِبَادِهِ ٱلۡمُؤۡمِنِينَ
وَوَرِثَ سُلَيۡمَـٰنُ دَاوُ ۥدَ‌ۖ وَقَالَ يَـٰٓأَيُّهَا ٱلنَّاسُ عُلِّمۡنَا مَنطِقَ ٱلطَّيۡرِ وَأُوتِينَا مِن كُلِّ شَىۡءٍ‌ۖ إِنَّ هَـٰذَا لَهُوَ ٱلۡفَضۡلُ ٱلۡمُبِينُ

And indeed We gave knowledge to Dawud (David) and Sulaiman (Solomon), and they both said: “All the praises and thanks be to Allah, Who has preferred us above many of His believing slaves!” And Sulaiman (Solomon) inherited (the knowledge of) Dawud (David). He said: “O mankind! We have been taught the language of birds, and on us have been bestowed all things. This, verily, is an evident grace (from Allah).” [An-Naml. 15-16]

وَحُشِرَ لِسُلَيۡمَـٰنَ جُنُودُهُ ۥ مِنَ ٱلۡجِنِّ وَٱلۡإِنسِ وَٱلطَّيۡرِ فَهُمۡ يُوزَعُونَ
حَتَّىٰٓ إِذَآ أَتَوۡاْ عَلَىٰ وَادِ ٱلنَّمۡلِ قَالَتۡ نَمۡلَةٌ۬ يَـٰٓأَيُّهَا ٱلنَّمۡلُ ٱدۡخُلُواْ مَسَـٰكِنَڪُمۡ لَا يَحۡطِمَنَّكُمۡ سُلَيۡمَـٰنُ وَجُنُودُهُ ۥ وَهُمۡ لَا يَشۡعُرُونَ
فَتَبَسَّمَ ضَاحِكً۬ا مِّن قَوۡلِهَا وَقَالَ رَبِّ أَوۡزِعۡنِىٓ أَنۡ أَشۡكُرَ نِعۡمَتَكَ ٱلَّتِىٓ أَنۡعَمۡتَ عَلَىَّ وَعَلَىٰ وَٲلِدَىَّ وَأَنۡ أَعۡمَلَ صَـٰلِحً۬ا تَرۡضَٮٰهُ وَأَدۡخِلۡنِى بِرَحۡمَتِكَ فِى عِبَادِكَ ٱلصَّـٰلِحِينَ

And there were gathered before Sulaiman (Solomon) his hosts of jinns and men, and birds, and they all were set in battle order (marching forwards). Till, when they came to the valley of the ants, one of the ants said: “O ants! Enter your dwellings, lest Sulaiman (Solomon) and his hosts crush you, while they perceive not.” So he [Sulaiman (Solomon)] smiled, amused at her speech and said: “My Lord! Inspire and bestow upon me the power and ability that I may be grateful for Your Favours which You have bestowed on me and on my parents, and that I may do righteous good deeds that will please You, and admit me by Your Mercy among Your righteous slaves.” [An-Naml. 17-19]

The ant sought an excuse for the army if they would have harmed its colony due to being unaware of their presence and it blamed its colony if they failed to take precaution by not entering their dwelling place. And due to this, Sulaymaan [peace be upon him] smiled because indeed it is something that should bring about amazement and make someone smile.

The ant knew Sulayman’s affair and that of his army, exalted Sulayman’s authority and excused them if they crushed its colony because that would have occurred unintentionally. Sulayman heard the ant’s speech and understood it, so he smiled due to being amazed by the ant’s eloquence, [good] advice and fine expression. This is how the Prophets were – perfect manners and expressing their amazement in the right circumstances. They do not laugh; rather they smile just as the Messenger [Muhammad (peace and blessings of Allah be upon him)] mostly used to smile, for indeed a loud burst of laughter is an indication of feeble mindedness and bad manners.

On the other hand, the one who does not become amazed by what should amaze a person, then this is an indication of ill-humour and haughtiness, and the Messengers of Allah are free from that. Allah said: [وَتَفَقَّدَ ٱلطَّيۡرَ -He (i.e. Sulayman) inspected the birds]: This shows his perfect determination and jurisdiction, and the way in which he – himself – administered both the small and big affairs to the extent that he was not inattentive to this affair, which was to inspect the birds and find out whether all of them were present or any of them were not. This is the meaning of the verse. There is proof for those who say that he inspected the birds in order to see where the hoopoe, so that it guides him regarding the farness or closeness of where water could be found, as they claimed about the hoopoe that it could see water under a dense surface of land, because there is no proof for this statement; but rather the sound intellectual and textual proofs demonstrates it falsity.

As for the sound intellectual proof, it is known by way of experience, the norm and what is clearly seen that these animals were all present and none of them had a vision that was beyond what they naturally possessed that made them see water under a dense surface of land. If this was the case, Allah would have mentioned it, because it would have been one of the greatest signs. As for the textual proof, if this was the meaning intended, the text would have been, “He looked for the hoopoe so that it searched water for him”, but when he could not find him, he would uttered what he did, or, “He looked for the hoopoe” or, “He searched for him” or expressions the like thereof. Rather he inspected the birds to find out which ones were present and which ones were absent, and whether they were in the places he specifically designated for them.

Also, neither was Sulayman [peace be upon him] in need of water nor in dire need of water to the extent that he required the expertise of the hoopoe, because he had the devils and extremely strong jinn (who were subjugated to his service) who could have dig out water for him regardless its depth. Allah subjugated the wind to him, whose morning (stride from sunrise till mid noon) was a month’s (journey), and its afternoon (stride from the midday decline of the sun to sunset) was a month’s (journey i.e. in one day he could travel two months’ journey). Then, why – with all this – would he have been in need of the hoopoe?! [فَقَالَ مَا لِىَ لَآ أَرَى ٱلۡهُدۡهُدَ أَمۡ ڪَانَ مِنَ ٱلۡغَآٮِٕبِينَ – and he said: What is the matter that I see not the hoopoe? Or is he among the absentees?] – Meaning, is that I cannot see him because of me being unaware of his presence due to it being hidden among these numerous different groups, or because – with neither my permission nor command – it is absent?

So, he (Sulayman) got angry and issued a threat of punishment, and said: [لَأُعَذِّبَنَّهُ ۥ عَذَابً۬ا شَدِيدًا – I will surely punish him with a severe punishment]- Meaning, but will kill it.

[أَوۡ لَأَاْذۡبَحَنَّهُ ۥۤ أَوۡ لَيَأۡتِيَنِّى بِسُلۡطَـٰنٍ۬ مُّبِينٍ۬ – or slaughter it, unless it brings me a clear reason]- Meaning, a clear proof for being absent. This shows Sulayman’s perfect Wara [i.e. being fearful of falling into a doubtful matter that would lead to harm in the Hereafter] and equity because he did not merely make an oath to punish or kill the hoopoe, as that can only be done if a sin or wrong doing was committed. It may be that there was a clear excuse for its absence, therefore he made this exception, because of his Wara (i.e. being careful of entering into a doubtful matter – out of fear of Allah – and thus do something blameworthy that will affect you in the afterlife) and sound perception.

[فَمَكَثَ غَيۡرَ بَعِيدٍ۬ – But the hoopoe stayed not long]. This shows the manner in which his troops venerated him and maintained them his command, to the extent that this hoopoe that was absent due to a valid excuse did not stay away for long time; so it said to Sulyaman (i.e. after returning): [ أَحَطتُ بِمَا لَمۡ تُحِطۡ بِهِۦ – I have grasped (the knowledge of a thing) which you have not grasped]- Meaning, I have knowledge of something that you do not have, even though you possess vast knowledge and your elevated station in affairs of knowledge.

[وَجِئۡتُكَ مِن سَبَإِۭ – and I have come to you from Saba’ (Sheba)]- Meaning, a well-known tribe in Yemen, [بِنَبَإٍ۬ يَقِينٍ – with true news]-Meaning, news based on certainty.

Then the hoopoe explained the news and said: [ إِنِّى وَجَدتُّ ٱمۡرَأَةً۬ تَمۡلِڪُهُمۡ- I found a woman ruling over them]- Meaning, ruling over Saba, and she is a woman: [وَأُوتِيَتۡ مِن ڪُلِّ شَىۡءٍ۬ – and she has been given all things]- Meaning, the things given to kings, such as wealth, weapons, armies, fortresses, citadels etc. [وَلَهَا عَرۡشٌ عَظِيمٌ۬ – and she has a great throne]- Meaning, a throne on which she sits – huge and magnificent throne. The great size of the throne shows greatness of the kingdom, the strength of authority and the numerous men who were consultees.

[وَجَدتُّهَا وَقَوۡمَهَا يَسۡجُدُونَ لِلشَّمۡسِ مِن دُونِ ٱللَّهِ – I found her and her people worshipping the sun instead of Allah] – Meaning, they were polytheists who worshipped the sun.

[وَزَيَّنَ لَهُمُ ٱلشَّيۡطَـٰنُ أَعۡمَـٰلَهُمۡ – and Shaitan (Satan) has made their deeds fair-seeming to them]- Meaning, so they thought that what they were upon is truth. [فَصَدَّهُمۡ عَنِ ٱلسَّبِيلِ فَهُمۡ لَا يَهۡتَدُونَ – and has barred them from (Allah’s) Way, so they have no guidance]- Meaning, because the one who thinks that what he is upon is truth, then there is not expectation that he will be guided until he changes his creed. Then it said: [أَلَّا يَسۡجُدُواْ لِلَّهِ ٱلَّذِى يُخۡرِجُ ٱلۡخَبۡءَ فِى ٱلسَّمَـٰوَٲتِ وَٱلۡأَرۡضِ – For what reason would they not prostrate before (i.e. worship) Who brings to light what is hidden in the heavens and the earth]- Meaning, Allah knows what is hidden and concealed in all regions of the heavens and o f the earth – the smallest creatures, the seeds and all that is hidden in the hearts. He brings to light what is hidden on earth and in heaven by sending rain and make plants to grow, and He will bring to light what is hidden in the earth when (He commands the angel to blow) the trumpet and the dead exit from the earth, so that they are recompensed for their deeds. [وَيَعۡلَمُ مَا تُخۡفُونَ وَمَا تُعۡلِنُونَ – and knows what you conceal and what you reveal].

[ٱللَّهُ لَآ إِلَـٰهَ إِلَّا هُوَ – Allah, none has the right to be worshipped but He]- Meaning, worship, turning repentantly, humility and love (as an act of worship) is not to be devoted to anyone besides Allah – the one and only true object of worship, because He alone possesses perfect attributes [free from all weakness, deficiencies, co-equals, shortcoming] and because He grants all blessings which necessitates that He alone is to be worshipped. [رَبُّ ٱلۡعَرۡشِ ٱلۡعَظِيمِ – the Lord of the Supreme Throne!] – Meaning, which is the roof of above all the creation and encompasses the earth and heavens. The King, who possesses this mighty authority and might [without any co-equal, weakness, likeness, shortcoming, deficiencies] is the one to whom (humankind and jinn) must humble themselves, prostrate and bow in His presence. So, the hoopoe was saved from punishment when he related this great news, and Sulayman was amazed regarding why this was hidden from him. So, due to his sound intelligence and judiciousness, he stated – whilst seeking to ascertain the news:

سَنَنظُرُ أَصَدَقۡتَ أَمۡ كُنتَ مِنَ ٱلۡكَـٰذِبِينَ
ٱذۡهَب بِّكِتَـٰبِى هَـٰذَا فَأَلۡقِهۡ إِلَيۡہِمۡ ثُمَّ تَوَلَّ عَنۡہُمۡ فَٱنظُرۡ مَاذَا يَرۡجِعُونَ

We shall see whether you speak the truth or you are (one) of the liars. Go you with this letter of mine, and deliver it to them, then draw back from them, and see what (answer) they return.

So, it (the hoopoe) departed with the letter and delivered it.

The Queen, may Allah have mercy upon her, Receives Prophet Sulaymaan’s, peace be upon him, Letter

Allah stated that when she (the Queen) received Sulaymaan’s letter, she said to her people:

[ يَـٰٓأَيُّہَا ٱلۡمَلَؤُاْ إِنِّىٓ أُلۡقِىَ إِلَىَّ كِتَـٰبٌ۬ كَرِيمٌ – O chiefs! Verily! Here is delivered to me a noble letter]- Meaning, a letter of great stature from the greatest kings of the earth. Then she made known the content of the letter and said:

إِنَّهُ ۥ مِن سُلَيۡمَـٰنَ وَإِنَّهُ ۥ بِسۡمِ ٱللَّهِ ٱلرَّحۡمَـٰنِ ٱلرَّحِيمِ
أَلَّا تَعۡلُواْ عَلَىَّ وَأۡتُونِى مُسۡلِمِينَ

Verily! It is from Sulaiman (Solomon), and verily! It (reads): In the Name of Allah, the Most Beneficent, the Most Merciful; be you not exalted against me, but come to me as Muslims (true believers who submit to Allah with full submission).

Meaning, do not attempt to make yourself superior to me; but rather bring yourself under my authority, submit to my commands and come to me as Muslims. This is very a precise statement together with a perfect clarification, because indeed it included forbidding them from being haughty towards him and persisting upon that state of theirs, commanded them to submit to his command, come under his authority, come to him and called them to Islam. This shows that it is recommended to begin with the Basmalah “In the name of Allah, the Most Merciful, The Bestower of (special Mercy to the believers)” in Books, and writing one’s name in the first line of the letter.

And due to her determination and sound intellect, she gathered the senior people of her nation state and the (important) men of her kingdom, and said: [يَـٰٓأَيُّہَا ٱلۡمَلَؤُاْ أَفۡتُونِى فِىٓ أَمۡرِى – O chiefs! Advise me in (this) case of mine]- Meaning, tell me what I should respond with- should we obey him and submit or what else should we do?

[مَا ڪُنتُ قَاطِعَةً أَمۡرًا حَتَّىٰ تَشۡہَدُونِ – I decide no case till you are present with me]- Meaning, I do not a make a final decision on an affair except after consulting you. [مَا ڪُنتُ قَاطِعَةً أَمۡرًا حَتَّىٰ تَشۡہَدُونِ – They said: We have great strength, and great ability for war]- Meaning, if you reject speech and refuse to obey him, then indeed we are strong enough to fight. It appeared that this view is what they were ready to act upon and it would have been the cause of their destruction if finalised; but also they did not make a final decision on that; rather they said: [وَٱلۡأَمۡرُ إِلَيۡكِ – but you (i.e. the Queen) are in command]- Meaning, the final decision is yours; because they knew that she possessed sound intelligence and determination, and one who was sincere to them. [فَٱنظُرِى مَاذَا تَأۡمُرِينَ – so think over what you will command]- Meaning, look into the matter, reflect and then decide. So, she said to them – whilst being satisfied with what they said and clarifying the evil outcomes of fighting -[إِنَّ ٱلۡمُلُوكَ إِذَا دَخَلُواْ قَرۡيَةً أَفۡسَدُوهَا – Verily! Kings, when they enter a town (country), they despoil it]- Meaning, killing, capturing, pillaging and destroying its homes; [وَجَعَلُوٓاْ أَعِزَّةَ أَهۡلِهَآ أَذِلَّةً۬‌ۖ – and make the most honourable amongst its people low]- Meaning, they make the noble leaders among the lowest, therefore the decision to fight is not an upright one; but also I am not going to obey him before learning more about him, send someone who would unveil his affair to me and ponder upon it, so that we would be upon clear-sightedness regarding his affair. Then she said: [وَإِنِّى مُرۡسِلَةٌ إِلَيۡہِم بِهَدِيَّةٍ۬ فَنَاظِرَةُۢ بِمَ يَرۡجِعُ ٱلۡمُرۡسَلُونَ – But verily! I am going to send him a present, and see with what (answer) the messengers return]- Meaning, whether he would continue to hold onto his view or become dazzled due to the present and change his view; (find out) about his state of affairs and that of his armies.

Then she sent a gift to Sulayman to be delivered by the intelligent ones and those men of sound opinion among her people; but when they came to Sulyaman with the present, he said – whilst rejecting this initiative of theirs and manifested his anger due their failure in responding to what he sought after – [أَتُمِدُّونَنِ بِمَالٍ۬ فَمَآ ءَاتَٮٰنِۦَ ٱللَّهُ خَيۡرٌ۬ مِّمَّآ ءَاتَٮٰكُم – Will you help me in wealth? What Allah has given me is better than that which He has given you!] – Meaning, neither is your present of significance to me nor am I happy with it, because Allah has given me what suffices and to be in need of it. [بَلۡ أَنتُم بِہَدِيَّتِكُمۡ تَفۡرَحُونَ – Nay, you rejoice in your gift!]- Meaning, because of your love for this worldly life and the little you have in comparison to what Allah has bestowed on me. Then Sulaymaan advised the messenger of the Queen, but did not do so in writing, because of what he noticed that the messenger was of sound intelligence and would convey his message just as he stated. He said: [ٱرۡجِعۡ إِلَيۡہِمۡ فَلَنَأۡتِيَنَّهُم بِجُنُودٍ۬ لَّا قِبَلَ لَهُم بِہَا وَلَنُخۡرِجَنَّہُم مِّنۡہَآ أَذِلَّةً۬ وَهُمۡ صَـٰغِرُونَ – Go back to them. We verily shall come to them with hosts that they cannot resist, and we shall drive them out from there in disgrace, and they will be abased].

So the messenger of the Queen returned, delivered Sulayman’s message and that they get ready to go to Sulayman. Sulayman knew that they would come to him, so he said to the jinn and humans who were in his presence: [قَالَ يَـٰٓأَيُّہَا ٱلۡمَلَؤُاْ أَيُّكُمۡ يَأۡتِينِى بِعَرۡشِہَا قَبۡلَ أَن يَأۡتُونِى مُسۡلِمِينَ – He said: “O chiefs! Which of you can bring me her throne before they come to me surrendering themselves in obedience?]

[ قَالَ عِفۡرِيتٌ۬ مِّنَ ٱلۡجِنِّ أَنَا۟ ءَاتِيكَ بِهِۦ قَبۡلَ أَن تَقُومَ مِن مَّقَامِكَ‌ۖ وَإِنِّى عَلَيۡهِ لَقَوِىٌّ أَمِينٌ۬ – An Ifrit (strong) from the jinns said: “I will bring it to you before you rise from your place (council). And verily, I am indeed strong, and trustworthy for such work]. [قَالَ عِفۡرِيتٌ۬ مِّنَ ٱلۡجِنِّ – An Ifrit (strong) from the jinns said]. An Ifreet is an extremely strong and forceful one (amongst the Jinn). And what is apparent here is that at that Sulayman was in Sham at the time, so the distance between him and Saba was a period of four months journey- two months to go there and two months to return; however regardless of this, the Ifreet said, “I take it upon myself to bring it – regardless of its big size and heftiness, and regardless of its distance- before you can rise from your (council). Customarily, the councils take a long time and they take most of the forenoon- about one third of the day. This is the mostly the time period of councils, but it may take lesser or more than that. So, there was a subject of this great King (Sulaymaan) who was bestowed with the power and ability to do what was greater than the offer of the Ifreet. Allaah said: [قَالَ ٱلَّذِى عِندَهُ ۥ عِلۡمٌ۬ مِّنَ ٱلۡكِتَـٰبِ أَنَا۟ ءَاتِيكَ بِهِۦ قَبۡلَ أَن يَرۡتَدَّ إِلَيۡكَ طَرۡفُكَ‌ۚ – One with whom was knowledge of the Scripture said: “I will bring it to you within the twinkling of an eye!] The Qur’aan commentators stated that he was man – a scholar and righteous in the presence of Sulyamaan, and he was called Aaif Ibn Barkhiyaa. He knew Allaah’s Greatest Name through which Allaah responds and gives when invoked and asked.

Allah said that he said: [أَنَا۟ ءَاتِيكَ بِهِۦ قَبۡلَ أَن يَرۡتَدَّ إِلَيۡكَ طَرۡفُكَ‌ۚ – I will bring it to you within the twinkling of an eye!]- Meaning, by invoking Allaah with that Name. And Allaah knows best as to whether this is what is intended or that this person had knowledge of the scripture through which he was able to bring something that was far away and attain what was very difficult to attain (by the will of Allaah).

Sulyamaan’s Reaction When He Saw The Throne of Bilqees In His Presence

Allah [The Exalted] said:

فَلَمَّا رَءَاهُ مُسۡتَقِرًّا عِندَهُ ۥ قَالَ هَـٰذَا مِن فَضۡلِ رَبِّى لِيَبۡلُوَنِىٓ ءَأَشۡكُرُ أَمۡ أَكۡفُرُ‌ۖ وَمَن شَكَرَ فَإِنَّمَا يَشۡكُرُ لِنَفۡسِهِۦ‌ۖ وَمَن كَفَرَ فَإِنَّ رَبِّى غَنِىٌّ۬ كَرِيمٌ۬

Then when he (Sulayman) saw it (Bilqees’s Throne) placed before him, he said: “This is by the Grace of my Lord to test me whether I am grateful or ungrateful! And whoever is grateful, truly, his gratitude is for (the good of) his ownself, and whoever is ungrateful, (he is ungrateful only for the loss of his ownself). Certainly! My Lord is Rich (Free of all wants), Bountiful]. [فَلَمَّا رَءَاهُ مُسۡتَقِرًّا عِندَهُ – Then when he (Sulayman) saw it (Bilqees’s Throne) placed before him], he praised Allaah [The Exalted] for ability placed at his disposal, his kingdom and the affairs facilitated for him. Then he said: [هَـٰذَا مِن فَضۡلِ رَبِّى لِيَبۡلُوَنِىٓ ءَأَشۡكُرُ أَمۡ أَكۡفُرُ‌ۖ – This is by the Grace of my Lord to test me whether I am grateful or ungrateful!]- Meaning, to test me by way of of it. He was not beguiled kingdom, authority and power as is the habit of the ignorant kings (See footnote f); rather he knew that this was a test from his Lord, so he was scared of not being thankful for these blessings.

Then he clarified that being grateful to Allah does not benefit Allah; rather its benefits returns to the grateful one; so he said: [وَمَن شَكَرَ فَإِنَّمَا يَشۡكُرُ لِنَفۡسِهِۦ‌ۖ وَمَن كَفَرَ فَإِنَّ رَبِّى غَنِىٌّ۬ كَرِيمٌ۬- and whoever is ungrateful, (he is ungrateful only for the loss of his ownself). Certainly! My Lord is Rich (Free of all wants), Bountiful]- Meaning, Allah is not in need of a person’s deeds, and He is generous, bestows abundant good that to both a grateful person and an ungrateful person, except that being grateful for the blessings He bestows leads to more blessings and being ungrateful leads to its decrease.
When Bilqees arrived, Sulayman said to those who were with him:

[ نَكِّرُواْ لَهَا عَرۡشَہَا نَنظُرۡ أَتَہۡتَدِىٓ أَمۡ تَكُونُ مِنَ ٱلَّذِينَ لَا يَہۡتَدُونَ – Disguise her throne for her that we may see whether she will be guided (to recognise her throne), or she will be one of those not guided]- Meaning, alter her throne by adding something to it and removing something from it, in order to test her intelligence- to see whether she will be guided to what is correct, so that it is established that she possesses intelligence and discernment that makes her worthy of being a queen; [أَمۡ تَكُونُ مِنَ ٱلَّذِينَ لَا يَہۡتَدُونَ – or she will be one of those not guided].

[فَلَمَّا جَآءَتۡ قِيلَ أَهَـٰكَذَا عَرۡشُكِ‌ۖ قَالَتۡ كَأَنَّهُ ۥ هُوَ‌ۚ وَأُوتِينَا ٱلۡعِلۡمَ مِن قَبۡلِهَا وَكُنَّا مُسۡلِمِينَ – So when she came, it was said (to her): “Is your throne like this?” She said: “(It is) as though it were the very same.” And [Sulaiman (Solomon) said]: “Knowledge was bestowed on us before her, and we were submitted to Allah (as Muslims)]- Meaning, when she came, Sulayman showed her the throne and the last time she saw it was in her country; so it was said to her: [أَهَـٰكَذَا عَرۡشُكِ‌ۖ – she was asked: Is your throne like this?)? Meaning, it is established with us that you have a great throne, so it similar to this throne we have presented to you? She said, replied, [كَأَنَّهُ ۥ هُوَ‌ۚ – “(It is) as though it were the very same]. This shows her intelligence and discernment, for she did not say, “It is”, due to the presence of changes and disguises to it, nor did she reject that it was hers, because she was acquainted with it. Therefore, she made statements that could apply and be in agreement with what is true in both cases. Sulayman manifested his admiration regarding how she was guided to what is correct and her intelligence, and he thanked Allaah for granting him that which is greater than this. He said: [وَأُوتِينَا ٱلۡعِلۡمَ مِن قَبۡلِهَا – Knowledge was bestowed on us before her]- Meaning, guidance, intelligence and determination before this; [وَكُنَّا مُسۡلِمِينَ -and we were submitted to Allah (as Muslims)].

Allah [The Exalted] said: [وَصَدَّهَا مَا كَانَت تَّعۡبُدُ مِن دُونِ ٱللَّهِ‌ۖ إِنَّہَا كَانَتۡ مِن قَوۡمٍ۬ كَـٰفِرِينَ – And that which she used to worship besides Allah has prevented her (from Islam), for she was of a disbelieving people]- Meaning, prevented from Islam, even though she had the intelligence and discernment by way of which she can distinguish truth from falsehood; however, false creeds takes away the clear-sightedness of the hearts; [إِنَّہَا كَانَتۡ مِن قَوۡمٍ۬ كَـٰفِرِينَ – for she was of a disbelieving people]- Meaning, she remained on their religion due to the fact that in order for an individual to disassociate from the people of a (false) religion (i.e. a religion other than Islam), it occurs when he is able to notice their misguidance and error, and this is very rare. This is why it is not strange that she did carried on in a state of Kufr (disbelief).

Sulayman Showed Her Superiority, Authority and Power

Allah [The Exalted] said:

قِيلَ لَهَا ٱدۡخُلِى ٱلصَّرۡحَ‌ۖ فَلَمَّا رَأَتۡهُ حَسِبَتۡهُ لُجَّةً۬ وَكَشَفَتۡ عَن سَاقَيۡهَا‌ۚ قَالَ إِنَّهُ ۥ صَرۡحٌ۬ مُّمَرَّدٌ۬ مِّن قَوَارِيرَ‌ۗ قَالَتۡ رَبِّ إِنِّى ظَلَمۡتُ نَفۡسِى وَأَسۡلَمۡتُ مَعَ سُلَيۡمَـٰنَ لِلَّهِ رَبِّ ٱلۡعَـٰلَمِينَ

It was said to her: “Enter As-Sarh” [(a glass surface with water underneath it) or a palace], but when she saw it, she thought it was a pool, and she (tucked up her clothes) uncovering her legs, Sulaiman (Solomon) said: “Verily, it is Sarh [(a glass surface with water underneath it) or a palace] paved smooth with slab of glass.” She said: “My Lord! Verily, I have wronged myself, and I submit (in Islam, together with Sulaiman (Solomon), to Allah, the Lord of the ‘Alamin (mankind, jinns and all that exists”.

[قِيلَ لَهَا ٱدۡخُلِى ٱلصَّرۡحَ‌ۖ فَلَمَّا رَأَتۡهُ حَسِبَتۡهُ لُجَّةً۬ – It was said to her: “Enter As-Sarh” [(a glass surface with water underneath it) or a palace]: This shows her intelligence and good conduct, because she did not refuse to enter the place she was commanded to enter, because she was aware of the fact that was only done to treat her honourably, and that Sulayman’s Kingdom and administration established based on wisdom, so there was no doubt in her heart about anything evil after witnessing what she witnessed.

[وَكَشَفَتۡ عَن سَاقَيۡهَا‌ۚ قَالَ إِنَّهُ ۥ صَرۡحٌ۬ مُّمَرَّدٌ۬ مِّن قَوَارِيرَ‌ۗ – but when she saw it, she thought it was a pool, and she (tucked up her clothes) uncovering her legs, Sulaiman (Solomon) said: “Verily, it is Sarh [(a glass surface with water underneath it) or a palace] paved smooth with slab of glass”.]- Meaning, there is no need to lift up your garment and thus uncover your ankles.

So, after meeting Sulayman and witnessed what she witnessed, knew about his Prophethood and Messengership, she repented and abandoned her disbelief. She said:  [قَالَتۡ رَبِّ إِنِّى ظَلَمۡتُ نَفۡسِى وَأَسۡلَمۡتُ مَعَ سُلَيۡمَـٰنَ لِلَّهِ رَبِّ ٱلۡعَـٰلَمِينَ – My Lord! Verily, I have wronged myself, and I submit (in Islam, together with Sulaiman (Solomon), to Allah, the Lord of the ‘Alamin (mankind, jinns and all that exists].

This is what Allah has related to us regarding the Queen of Saba and what took place between her and Sulaymaan. And that which is other than this story are from the narrations of the people of the previous scriptures (i.e. Jews and Christians) and they have no relationship with the explanation of Allah’s statements. They are affairs we cannot ascertain based on well-known evidence from the infallible Messenger Muhammad [peace and blessings of Allah be upon him]. All the narrations or the majority of them are not reported from him, therefore, we should be very firm in turning away from them and not put them in the explanation of the Qur’an. And Allah knows best. [2]

Therefore, we remind Brian that the Qur’an highlights the noble qualities of Prophet Sulayman Bin Dawud, such as his justice, fear of Allah, and wisdom. He treated the Hoopoe fairly, and the ants recognized his just nature, knowing he would never harm them. His fair treatment of the Queen led her to abandon polytheism. In contrast, the actions of Netanyahu’s army towards the Palestinians starkly differ from the Prophet’s example, as the brutality of Zionist forces has been evident for over seventy years. However, this does not excuse the actions of Hamas against innocent civilians under Netanyahu’s government. Read again: https://abuiyaad.com/a/amalekite-genocide-doctrine-gaza

Regarding your internal issues, they stem from your own sins and transgressions, a truth that applies to all nations, including Muslims. Imam Ibn Al-Qayyim, may Allah have mercy on him, stated:

Whoever ponders upon the state of affairs of the world will find that every affair of rectification is due to Tawheed, singling out Allah in worship and obedience to His Messenger (Muhammad). And every evil in the world, trial, affliction, scarcity (in livelihood), being overpowered by an enemy and other than that is due to (our) opposition to the Messenger and the call to other than (the way of) Allah and His Messenger. Whoever truly ponders upon this and examines the state of affairs of the world- since its beginning and until the time Allaah will take it away and those upon it- he will realise this affair regarding himself and others, in general and specific (circumstances). And there is no Might or Power except with Allah –The Most High, The Most Great. [3]

Regarding the Israa’eeliyyaat, which refers to the accounts from the people of the abrogated Scriptures—namely Jews and Christians, they are categorised by knowledgeable scholars of Islam into three distinct groups. First, there are those reports that align with the teachings of the Qur’an and the authentic Sunnah, so they are accepted as true. Second, there are accounts that contradict the Qur’an and Sunnah, which are therefore rejected and deemed false. Lastly, some reports neither receive confirmation nor denial from the Qur’an and Sunnah; these remain in a state of uncertainty, and scholars refrain from labeling them as true or false. For further insights, you can refer to the article by Imam Abdul Azeez Bin Baaz, may Allah have mercy upon him, on this topic. [Footnote b]

The Trial

As for the trial noble Prophet Sulayman, peace and blessings of Allah be upon him, faced, Allah, The Exalted, said:

وَلَقَدْ فَتَنَّا سُلَيْمَٰنَ وَأَلْقَيْنَا عَلَىٰ كُرْسِيِّهِۦ جَسَدًا ثُمَّ أَنَابَ

And, indeed We did try Sulaiman (Solomon) and We placed on his throne Jasadan (a devil, so he lost his kingdom for a while) but he did return (to his throne and kingdom by the Grace of Allah and he did return) to Allah with obedience and in repentance. [Qur’an 38:34]

Imam Muhammad Ibn Salih al-Uthaymeen, may Allah have mercy upon him, examined the views mentioned regarding this trial. He said about one of them: The narrative begins with the account based on a narration of the people of the Scripture regarding the loss of a king’s dominion, attributed to his marriage to a woman he desired, who was an idolater. It portrays both Prophet Dawud and Sulayman, peace and blessings of Allah be upon them, as individuals consumed by their passions for women. Dawud, as previously claimed, sought to marry a woman who was already married, despite having ninety-nine wives, aiming to reach a total of one hundred. Sulayman, on the other hand, is said to have fallen in love with a woman who secretly worshipped an idol in his household, unknown to him, thus transforming his home into a place of disbelief and polytheism without his awareness. This assertion is categorically dismissed as false, for if she had indeed been an unbeliever, Allah would have made that clear, as He did with the wives of Prophet Nuh and Lut, peace be upon both Nuh and Lut.

The control of his kingdom (as it is claimed) depended on his finger ring, which he removed when he intended to relieve himself, placing it with his wife, known as the Trustworthy, as was his custom. However, a Jinn appeared to her in the guise of Sulayman and took the ring from her. This narrative suggests that the king’s authority resides in his ring. When he wishes to enter the restroom, he removes it, but I don’t know the reason for him removing it. The name Sulayman does not contain any lofty Name of Allah, which raises the question of why one would be cautious about entering the toilet with something (i.e. an item) that does not have the name of Allah on it. Furthermore, he places the ring with his wife, referred to as the trustworthy one, as per his usual practice. This also casts doubt on the authenticity of the story. Firstly, how can a king’s power be confined to a ring? Secondly, if his authority is indeed linked to the ring, how could he carelessly leave it with a woman? One might argue that she is trustworthy, but what evidence supports this claim?!

Subsequently, a jinn appeared in the guise of Sulayman and took the ring from her. Once the ring was in his possession, he became Sulayman, as the kingship is associated with the ring. Allah said: [وَأَلْقَيْنَا عَلَىٰ كُرْسِيِّهِۦ جَسَدًا – and We placed on his throne Jasadan (a devil, so he lost his kingdom for a while)]. A certain jinn, known as Sakhr or by another name, took a seat on Sulayman’s throne, surrounded by birds and other creatures. When Sulayman appeared in a different form, he saw the jinn on his throne and declared to the people, “I am Sulayman.” However, the people did not recognise him and insisted that he was not Sulayman, urging him to step back, as the true Sulyaman was the one seated on the royal throne, while he was not. This led to a profound sense of regret for him, but he eventually repented. It is important to note that this situation involved a physical body placed on his throne; some scholars suggest it was a devil. Regardless, it is essential to consider the context of the king’s ring and the fact that he had given it to his wife, from whom the jinn had taken it (as it is claimed).

It is stated that Allah, the Exalted, placed a body upon the throne during the absence of Sulyaman, as he was not always present on the throne. However, Allah allowed a devil to take his place, managing the affairs of the kingdom. Then when Sulayman returned to his seat, he found the devil preoccupied with the governance and was unable to dislodge him from the throne or assume control over the state matters. He realised that he was being tested and that Allah had permitted this devil to challenge him. This interpretation is held by some scholars, and it has been narrated from Ibn Abbas, may Allah be pleased with him, that it was indeed a devil. However, it is well-known that Ibn Abbas used to acquire much reports from the Israa’eeliyyaat and this may be one of those instances. The author emphasises that this incident occurred because the power was contained within the ring, which the devil had taken from the trusted woman, subsequently claiming to be Sulayman while seated on the throne. This is one perspective.
The second perspective is that Allah allowed a devil to take control without the use of the ring. This devil sat on the throne and began to manage the affairs of the state, usurping authority from Sulayman, as he was not always present on the throne.

The third assertion is that the body represents the offspring through which Allah tested Sulayman when he declared, “I will visit ninety women tonight, and each will bear a son who will fight in the path of Allah.” He swore to have sexual relations with ninety women (i.e. his wives), and that each woman would give birth to a son who would fight for the sake of Allah. The angel advised him to say, “If Allah wills,” but he did not do so, relying instead on his own determination to fulfill his intentions. So, he fulfilled what he wanted and had sexual relations with ninety women (i.e. his wives); however, what Allah wanted is that it would not come to fruition, which was for each woman to bear a son who would fight in the path of Allah. Instead, one of them gave birth to a half-human being, so that both Sulayman and others would understand that matters are in Allah’s hands. One interpreter suggests that this child represents the body, as it is not fully formed—a half-human. How could this being, placed upon the throne, be a trial for Sulayman?

Another interpretation posits that the statement “and We placed on his throne Jasadan (a devil, so he lost his kingdom for a while)” refers to Sulayman himself, indicating that he was tested. The meaning is that he was placed on the throne in a state of being a body, which lacks the ability to think or govern. This implies that Allah deprived Sulayman of the reasoning necessary to manage his kingdom, rendering him incapable of sound judgment. Thus, the term “body” refers to Sulayman himself, suggesting that the statement indicates his inability to govern effectively, akin to a body without a soul. This interpretation also aligns with the fact that Allah can strip a person of their intellect and judgment, leaving them as a body devoid of soul. It is well known that a great kingdom, such as that of Sulayman, would experience instability and disruption in the absence of its ruler.

There are four interpretations regarding the statement: “and We placed on his throne Jasadan (a devil, so he lost his kingdom for a while)”. The author’s assertion (i.e. about the woman) is undoubtedly false. The suggestion that the body refers to a son is seemingly weak. We are left with two interpretations: the first posits that a devil was placed upon Sulayman’s throne, thereby taking control of the kingdom’s affairs; the second suggests that Sulayman himself was deprived by Allah of the ability to think and manage the kingdom, rendering him incapable of governance. Among these, the first interpretation appears more plausible linguistically, implying that the entity placed upon the throne is distinct from Sulayman. However, the second interpretation is closer in meaning, indicating that when Allah removes a person’s mental capability and authority, they are akin to a mere body. Regardless, the turmoil that befell Sulayman, whether through the casting of a body upon his throne or the presence of devil, it is undoubtedly a significant trial. [4]

May Allah’s peace and blessings be upon Prophet Sulayman and all the Prophets.

———————————–

Footnote a:

Imam Abdul Azeez Bin Baaz, may Allah have mercy upon him, was asked: Is enjoining good and forbidding evil by the hand obligated to all Muslims, or is it limited to those in authority and their deputies?

Response: Stopping wrong is obligated to all Muslims according to their ability because the Messenger, peace and blessings of allah be upon him, said: “If any of you who sees evil, let them stop it with their hand; if not able, then with their tongue; and if not able, then with their heart, and that is the weakest of Iman’’. [Muslim, Abu Dawood, Tirmidhi & others]

However, stopping evil by the hand must be based on ability and should not result in greater corruption or evil. A man has the right to rectify matters with his hand in his home [i.e. based on what the law of the land allows him]; a manager has the authority to make changes with the hand within the organization they are responsible for, in accordance with the instructions that were given to them [i.e. the authority given to them by the state authorities]; otherwise, people should not change with their hand anything they are not authorised to change. If they do make changes in matters that they have no authority over, this will result in more evil and great corruption between them and the people and between the people and the state.

In this case they should stop evil with their tongue (by speaking out). They may say: ‘’O such and such! Fear Allah! This is not permissible; this is Haram, or This is obligated on you,’’ and clarify it with evidence from Shariah. [NB: In the UK, objecting to certain behaviour can be viewed as harassment or verbal abuse, therefore a Muslim should be aware of what the law allows him before he says or does anything whilst living in the West].

As for changing matters with the hand, this should be done where one has authority, such as one’s home [i.e. within what the law allows], with those under one’s responsibility, or those authorized by the ruler, such as organizations given permission and authority to enjoin Good. They should make changes in accordance with the authority they have been given- in the way prescribed by the Shariah, without exceeding their jurisdiction. The same applies to the governor of a city; he should make changes with his hand, in accordance with the instructions he has. [Fataawa Ibn Baaz 8/208]

Footnote b:

https://binbaz.org.sa/audios/1323/%D8%AD%D9%83%D9%85-%D8%A7%D9%84%D8%A7%D8%B3%D8%B1%D8%A7%D9%89%D9%8A%D9%84%D9%8A%D8%A7%D8%AA

[1] An Excerpt from As-Sawaa’iq Al-Mursalah 4/1514

[2] An Excerpt from ‘Badaa’i At-Tafseer Al-Jaami Limaa Fassarahu Al-Imaam Ibnul Qayyim Al-Jawziyyah’ 2/ 279-282

[3] Bada’i Al-Fawa’id 3/525-526

[4] https://alathar.net/home/esound/index.php?op=codevi&coid=211655 paraphrased

All in the fire except one

Written by Abdullah Jallow on . Posted in Aqeedah (Creed & Belief), Basics, Bid'ah (Innovation), Brotherhood, Contemporary Issues, Da'wah - Calling To Islam, Deviated Groups, Sects and Parties, Fatawa-Rulings, Hadaadis, Innovations In Islam (Bidah), Jahannam (Hell Fire), Jannah (Paradise), Khawaarij, Methodology - 'Manhaj', Monotheism - Tawheed, Morals and Manners - 'Akhlaaq', Pearls of Wisdom, Purification of The Soul, Repentance, Sahaabah, Scholars of Islam, Shi'a, Shirk, Sin, Sufis, The Salaf - Pious Predecessors, Worship - 'Ibaadah'.

In The Name of Allah, The Most Merciful, The Bestower of Mercy.

Imam Abdul Aziz Bin Baz, may Allah have mercy upon him, was asked: “What is the intent behind the statement of the Messenger, peace and blessings of Allah be upon him, statement when he spoke about the Ummah in the hadith: “All of them (the sects) are in the fire except one” and what is that one?. Also, will all the other 72 (deviant) sects be in the fire for eternity? Benefit us”.

Response: The prophet, peace and blessings of Allah be upon him, said, “The Jews split into 71 sects, meaning all of them are astray and their affair ruined, except one. The Christians split into 72 sects, meaning all of them are astray and their affair ruined, except one. And this Ummah will split into 73 sects- all of them in the fire, except one. This one group is Ahlus Sunnah Wal Jamaa’ah [those who firmly adhere to the authentic Prophetic Sunnah and are united upon that] – the companions of the Prophet and those who follow them exactly in faith, the adherents to pure Islamic monotheism and sound faith.

As for the other 72 sects that have been threatened with the fire, among them is one who is a disbeliever (a), among them is one who is a sinner and among them is one about whom it is established with clear evidence that he is an innovator in religious affairs. So, the one – among them – that dies in a state of disbelief (b) will be in the fire for eternity, the one that dies in a state of adherence to religious innovation that is lesser than major disbelief (c) or sins is under the will of Allah, while still threatened with the fire. So, based on this it is known that not all of them are disbelievers, but rather among them is a disbeliever and other than him among the sinners and the innovators in religious affairs. [1]

May Allah bless and reward our beloved brother Zulfikaar for sharing the Arabic text Imam Ibn Baz’s clarification Aameen

——————————————–

[a and b]: NB: Takfeer – declaring that a Muslim left the fold of Islaam is a judgement that can only be given by the upright scholars and none else.  https://www.manhaj.com/manhaj/articles/obkwf-takfir-and-the-excuse-of-ignorance-shaykh-saalih-al-fawzaan.cfm

[c]: NB: All innovations in the religion are evil, but there are those that exit a person from the fold of Islam (Bida’atul Mukaffirah) and those that do not exit a person from the fold of Islam (Bida’atul Mufassiqah). Al-Allamah Rabee Bin Hadi Al-Mad’khalee [may Allaah preserve him] was asked whether there is a difference between Bidah Al-Mukaffirah and Bidah Al-Mufassiqah; so he replied that there is Bidah Mukaffirah, such as rejecting the Ruyah (i.e. denying that the believers will see Allaah in the afterlife); rejecting Allaah’s Uluww [i.e. denying that Allaah is above his creation –Allaah ascended over the Throne in a way that benefits his majesty)]; invoking other than Allaah; offering slaughtered sacrifice (i.e. animals) to other than Allaah etc. These are affairs of Bidah Al-Mukaffirah (the bidah that is tantamount to disbelief). But we do not make Takfeer of the people who commit this type of Bidah until we establish the proofs against them. That is because some of them (i.e. the people who fall into these affairs) carry doubts and are far away from the era of Prophethood and its light (i.e. guidance). So they fall into the likes these innovations. Rejecting the Ruyah is disbelief; rejecting Allaah’s Uluww is disbelief; the saying that the Qur’aan is created is disbelief-major disbelief. But this person, -[who testifies that none has the right to be worshipped except Allaah and that Muhammad is the messenger of Allaah, and he prays, observes fasting, wants paradise and believes in that] -received the doubts of the people of falsehood, so he falls into the likes of these affairs (i.e. these innovations that are tantamount to disbelief). So we say to him: You have fallen into disbelief and the evidence is this and this, and we clarify for him. So if Allaah grants him Tawfeeq and he returns to the truth, then all praise is due to Allaah. But if not, we declare him a disbeliever after establishing the proofs against him. As for Bidah Al-Mufassiqah it is other than this (i.e. it is not at the level of that which is tantamount to disbelief)…
[A paraphrased excerpt. see www.rabee.net/ar/questions.php?cat=26&id=484 ]

[1]: paraphrased. see link below
https://binbaz.org.sa/fatwas/17308/%D8%A7%D9%84%D9%85%D8%B1%D8%A7%D8%AF-%D8%A8%D9%82%D9%88%D9%84%D9%87-%EF%B7%BA-%D9%83%D9%84%D9%87%D9%85-%D9%81%D9%8A-%D8%A7%D9%84%D9%86%D8%A7%D8%B1-%D8%A7%D9%84%D8%A7-%D9%88%D8%A7%D8%AD%D8%AF%D8%A9

 

Had a tongue cleaner over 1400 years ago

Written by Abdullah Jallow on . Posted in Contemporary Issues, Da'wah - Calling To Islam, History of Islam, Methodology - 'Manhaj', Morals and Manners - 'Akhlaaq', Purification of The Soul, Worship - 'Ibaadah'.

In The Name of Allah, The Most Merciful, The Bestower of Mercy.

Abu Burda narrated, “My father [Abu Musa – may Allah be pleased with him] said: “I came to the Prophet [peace and blessings of Allah be upon him] and saw him carrying a Siwaak in his hand and cleaning his teeth, saying, ‘U’, ‘U’, as if he was retching while the Siwaak was in his mouth”.

It is legislated to use the Siwaak on the tongue for a longer time. As for the teeth, what is more desired is that the Siwaak is made to come into contact with them widthways – across the mouth. Siwaak is not specified for use on the teeth only. (1)

Listen here: The Virtues Of The Siwaak By Shaikh Abu Khadeejah [may Allaah preserve him]: https://www.salafisounds.com/the-virtues-of-the-siwaak-by-abu-khadeejah/

[1] Sahih Al-Bukhari. Number 244. Excerpt from ‘Faithful Bari 1/462-463. Publisher: Daarus Salaam 1st edition 1421AH (2000)]

Sharing a principle with well wishers who innocently share “Jumu’ah Mubarak”

Written by Abdullah Jallow on . Posted in Basics, Bid'ah (Innovation), Contemporary Issues, Da'wah - Calling To Islam, Innovations In Islam (Bidah), Methodology - 'Manhaj', Morals and Manners - 'Akhlaaq', Purification of The Soul, Scholars of Islam, Uncategorized, Worship - 'Ibaadah'.

In The Name of Allah, The Most Merciful, The Bestower of Mercy.

A Principle to Share With Well Wishes Who Innocently Share Unauthentic Supplications or Congratulate With “Jumu’ah Mubarak”

Acts of Worship Must Fulfil Two Conditions

Al-Allamah Abdul Muhsin Al-Abbad, may Allah preserve him, said:

Al-Allamah Abdul Muhsin Al-Abbad, may Allah preserve him, said: “The initial ruling regarding acts of worship is that neither are they permissible nor legislated, except when there is proof to show that they are legislated by Allah and His Messenger; otherwise they are included in the statement of Allah: [أَمۡ لَهُمۡ شُرَڪَـٰٓؤُاْ شَرَعُواْ لَهُم مِّنَ ٱلدِّينِ مَا لَمۡ يَأۡذَنۢ بِهِ ٱللَّهُ‌ۚ – Or have they partners with Allah (false gods), who have instituted for them a religion which Allah has not allowed?!]” 

Two conditions must be fulfilled for an act of worship to be accepted; the first of the two conditions is that the act of worship must be done sincerely for Allah, and secondly the act of worship must be in agreement with the Sunnah of the Messenger, peace and blessings of Allah be upon him. The act of worship has to be done sincerely for the sake of Allah (alone) and no one is to be associated as a partner with Allah in worship. The act of worship must be done in conformity with what the Messenger conveyed (the Qur’an and the Sunnah). This is what the Shahadah (لا إله إلا الله محمدا رسول الله) necessitates. (لا إله إلا الله) necessitates that acts of worship must be carried out sincerely for the sake of Allah alone; and (محمدا رسول الله) necessitates that acts of worship must be carried out in conformity with what was revealed to the noble Messenger. Therefore, Allah is not to be worshipped with bidah, newly invented matters in Religion, and evil acts, for which Allah [The Most High] has sent down no authority; rather acts of worship must conform with the Sunnah of the noble Messenger. If any of these two conditions or both of them are not fulfilled, the act of worship will be rejected by Allah [The Mighty and Majestic] says: [وَقَدِمۡنَآ إِلَىٰ مَا عَمِلُواْ مِنۡ عَمَلٍ۬ فَجَعَلۡنَـٰهُ هَبَآءً۬ مَّنثُورً – And We shall turn to whatever deeds they disbelievers, polytheists] did, and We shall make such deeds as scattered floating particles of dust] [Soorah Al-Furqaan. Ayah 23]

The noble Messenger said: [مَنْ أَحْدَثَ فِي أَمْرِنَا هَذَا مَا لَيْسَ مِنْهُ فَهُوَ رَدٌ- He who innovates something in this matter of ours [i.e., Islam] that is not of it will have it rejected [by Allah].”[Sahih Al-Bukhari. Number 2697] [Sahih Muslim. Number 1718] 

And in another wording of this hadeeth in Saheeh Muslim the Prophet said: [مَنْ عَمِلَ عَمَلًا لَيْسَ عَلَيْهِ أَمْرُنَا فَهُوَ رَد – He who does an act (of worship) which we have not commanded (i.e. not commanded by the Prophet), will have it rejected].


The Prophet, peace and blessings of Allah be upon him, said:

فَإِنَّهُ مَنْ يَعِشْ مِنْكُمْ فَسَيَرَى اخْتِلَافًا كَثِيرًا، فَعَلَيْكُمْ بِسُنَّتِي وَسُنَّةِ الْخُلَفَاءِ الرَّاشِدِينَ الْمَهْدِيينَ، عَضُّوا عَلَيْهَا بِالنَّوَاجِذِ، وَإِيَّاكُمْ وَمُحْدَثَاتِ الْأُمُورِ؛ فَإِنَّ كُلَّ بِدْعَةٍ ضَلَالَةٌ

Verily he lives long among you will see a lot of differing, so you must keep to my Sunnah and the Sunnah of the Khulafa Ar-Rashidun [the rightly guided caliphs]. Adhere to it with your molar teeth (i.e. adhere to it firmly). And beware of newly invented matters [in the religion], for every newly invented matter [in the religion] is a bidah [innovation in the religion], and every bidah is misguidance. [Abu Dawood. Number 4607] [Tirmidhee. Number 2676] [1]

The Danger of Bidah (Innovating beliefs and acts of worship) in Islam 

Al-Allamah Rabee Bin Hadi Al-Mad’khali, may Allāh preserve him, said:

The Prophet, peace and blessings of Allāh be upon him, said: [وشر الأمور محدثاتها – The worst of all affairs are the newly invented matters in the religion]. The Prophet said this when there was no Mubtadi (innovator in the religion) present. He warned against it because Allah informed him that many from this Ummah will be misguided, split (into deviant sects) and follow the (misguided) paths of those who came before them (the misguided Jews and Christians). Allah informed the Prophet and he conveyed these realities to the Ummah. Thus due to the Prophet’s enmity against innovation in religious matters, his hatred for it and due to fearing for his Ummah regarding it, he warned them against it in every or most of his khutbahs. He described it as the worst of all affairs (in the religion) وشر الأمور محدثاتها -The worst of all affairs are the newly invented matters (in the religion). [2]

Supplication is a great act of devotion to Allah and a lofty act of worship (performed) by a Muslim within the confines of the noble Messenger’s guidance and adherence to his Sunnah. This is because the best and perfect guidance is the guidance of Muhammad, peace and blessings of Allāh be upon him. Indeed, the Prophet used to say – on every Jumu’ah- whilst addressing the people, “To proceed; indeed the most truthful speech is the Book of Allah and the best of guidance is the guidance of Muhammad . The worst of all affairs are the newly invented matters (in the religion), for every newly invented matter (in the religion) is Bidah, every Bidah is misguidance and every (act of misguidance will lead to the) fire”. Therefore, it is obligated to a Muslim that he is very careful of the newly invented matters in the religion, and that he adheres to the guidance of the leader of the Prophets and Messengers  (Muhammad – peace and blessings of Allāh be upon him).

The guidance of the Messenger in matters related to supplications is a perfect guidance and there’s no deficiency in them. The Prophet did not leave any good and benefit related to supplications; rather he (clarified and explained) the affair perfectly and fulfilled its obligation, just as he did in all aspects of the religion. He did not die until Allah revealed: [ٱلۡيَوۡمَ أَكۡمَلۡتُ لَكُمۡ دِينَكُمۡ وَأَتۡمَمۡتُ عَلَيۡكُمۡ نِعۡمَتِى وَرَضِيتُ لَكُمُ ٱلۡإِسۡلَـٰمَ دِينً۬ا‌ۚ – This day, I have perfected your religion for you, completed My Favour upon you, and have chosen for you Islam as your religion]. [Al-Ma’idah. 3]

Whoever contemplates the guidance of the Prophet in matters related to supplications will find that they are perfect guidance- sufficient and perfect, and there is no deficiency in it. He clarified and made known – to the Ummah- supplications that are to be performed at specific times, specific places and in specific circumstances. He made very clear the distinction between those supplications that can be performed – in general – without any restriction to a specific time, place or situation, and those that are restricted to specific times, places and situations.

The established and authentic supplications of the Prophet deals with all the circumstances of the people – in times of happiness, sorrow, physical wellbeing, illness, bliss, calamity, when one is traveling or not traveling, and other than that. He guided his Ummah – in this affair- to all good and to that which they should say in all circumstances. He did not abandon any supplication that would get a person close to Allah – that which will lead a person to happiness in this life and the next; rather, he clarified and made it known to his Ummah – completely and perfectly. How can this not be the case when it is the fact that he said, “Allah did not send a Prophet except that it was obligated to him to guide his followers to what he knew was good for them and warn them against what he knew was bad for them”.

Indeed, it is amazing that some of the common people abandon the authentic supplications that are gathered in many of the books – the well-known authentic books – and then accept the supplications that are newly invented, innovated (in the religion) and  initiated by some of the Mutakallifeen (i.e. those figureheads who pretend and fabricate things) and written by some of the Mutakharriseen (i.e. those figureheads who lie, engage in falsehood through which they seek to obliterate the truth and speak about Allah without knowledge). They do not rely on the Qur’an and the Sunnah, and do not  give consideration to the guidance of the best person in this Ummah (Muhammad). Thus, they preoccupy the people with this, turn them away from the Sunan (authentic practices of the Prophet) and plunge them into Bidah. Regarding this affair, some of the pious predecessors said, “A people do not innovate a newly invented matter in their religion, except that Allah removes something similar to it from their Sunnah, and then it does not return to them until the day of judgment”.

How can it be permissible for a  Muslim who knows the virtue of the Messenger, his status and sincere advice to the Ummah, but then he abandons the Messenger’s guidance and his great and blessed supplications, and then accepts the supplications and the books of these Mutakharriseen and Mutakallifeen. Allāh, The Most High, says:

[ادْعُوا رَبَّكُمْ تَضَرُّعًا وَخُفْيَةً ۚ إِنَّهُ لَا يُحِبُّ الْمُعْتَدِينَ – Invoke your Lord with humility and in secret. He likes not the aggressors]. [Al-A’raf 55]

Regarding the statement of Allah: [إِنَّهُ لَا يُحِبُّ الْمُعْتَدِينَ – He likes not the aggressors], Imam Al-Qurtubi, may Allāh have mercy upon him, – in his Tafsir – mentioned a number of different types of aggression in this subject matter, and one of them is when one supplicates through that which is not found in the Qur’an and the Sunnah – words that are deficient and are in the form of rhymes, and found in pamphlets, which neither have any origin (in the Qur’an and authentic Sunnah) nor based (on the Qur’an and Sunnah). Then he (i.e. the initiator or innovator of these supplications) adopts them as his slogan and abandons that which the Messenger used as supplications. 

The most dangerous this affair can be is that some of these supplications are mixed with wordings that are tantamount to disbelief and polytheism. Indeed, what is obligated to every Muslim is that he is extremely careful of the likes of these supplications that have been invented by some of the misguided Shaikhs and the leaders of misguidance, thus they hinder people – by way of them – from the guidance of the Prophet and turn them away from his Sunnah. So, they go astray and deviate many people, and deviate from the right path. Indeed, the smart Muslim should pose a question in this affair regarding that which led these people to innovate these supplications and fabricated these acts which they devote themselves to permanently, despite the fact that they contain misguidance and falsehood. One will not find an answer, except that what these people want is to eat the wealth of the people unlawfully, increase their followers and devotees. Mu’aadh Bin Jabal, may Allāh be pleased with him,  said: “In the times after you, there would be trials in which wealth would be abundant and the Qur’an would be easy so much so that every believer, hypocrite, man, woman, young, grown up, slave and free man will learn it. Then a man might say, ‘What happened to the people that they do not follow me while I read the Quran? They are not going to follow me until I innovate for them other than it’. So, beware of that which is innovated (in religion), for whatever is innovated is misguidance’’’.  [Abu Dawud. 4611]

Therefore, it is obligated to a Muslim to be extremely cautious of these people, adhere to the Sunnah and follow the path of its followers, for in that there is safety and success. [3]

Jumu’ah Mubarak On a Friday

Al-Allamah Salih Al-Fawzan, may Allāh preserve him, was asked: What is the ruling on the statement of a Muslim to another Muslim “Jumu’ah Mubarak through text messages or in forums every Friday? 

The Shaikh responded: This practice has no basis (in the Qur’an and the Sunnah) and is considered an innovation in the religion. It is not permissible to offer congratulations on Friday, as there is no evidence supporting this practice, nor is it part of the actions of the Salaf (i.e. pious predecessors -the Sahabah and their well known followers). It is an innovation in religion, and those who engage in such practices are currently utilising mobile phones and the internet to promote innovations – in religion -in this manner.

 

[1] An Excerpt from أثر العبادات في حياة المسلم pages 3-31
[1] Adh-Dhari’ah ilaa Bayan Maqasid Kitab ash-Shariah 1/219
[2] An Excerpt from Fiqh Al-Ad’iyah Wal Adkaar. 3/363-366

An indispensable battle against the inner-self

Written by Abdullah Jallow on . Posted in Basics, Brotherhood, Contemporary Issues, Methodology - 'Manhaj', Morals and Manners - 'Akhlaaq', Pearls of Wisdom, Purification of The Soul, Scholars of Islam.

In The Name of Allah, The Most Merciful, The Bestower of Mercy.

An indispensable battle against the inner-self (Self-amazement etc)

Abdullah Bin Amr Ibn Al-Aas, may Allah be pleased with him and his father, said: The Prophet, peace and blessings of Allah be upon him, said, “Verily! The people of the hell fire are every [Ja’dhariy – جَعْظَريٍّ], [Jawwaadh – جَوَّاظٍ ], [Mustakbirin-مُسْتَكْبِرٍ ], [Jammaa -جَمَّاع ] and [Mannaa – مَنَّاع ]. And the people of paradise are the [Ad-Du’afaa – الضعفاء ] and the [Maghlooboon-مغلوبون ].

Al-Allamah Zayd Bin Hadi Al-Mad’khali, may Allah have mercy upon him, said:

These nouns are characteristics of the tyrants and haughty people – the people of evil manners who deal badly with those who are close to them and those not closely associated with them- which are the opposites of the characteristics of the weak and oppressed, the lenient, gentle, and good mannered. It appears that the Prophet, peace and blessings of Allah be upon him, encouraged us to adopt the characteristics of the people of Iman —the weak people —while cautioning against the characteristics of the haughty and that one should not exalt himself above the people, not (refuse to) submit to the commands of Allah and His Messenger, and not (refuse to) fulfil the obligations that have been obligated to them by the Shariah. [جَعْظَريٍّ – The one who seeks to be praised for that which is not in him or that which he does not possess]; [جَوَّاظٍ – a wicked sinner]; [مُسْتَكْبِر – one who exalts and raises himself, and is afflicted with self-amazement]; [جَمَّاع – a hoarder] and [مَنَّاع – one who deprives people and is extremely miserly]; [الضعفاء – those who are weak due to humility and are in a weak state in the worldly life] and the [مغلوبون – those who are (unjustifiably) subjugated and suppressed]. [1]

Imaam Sufyaan Ath-Thawree, may Allah have mercy upon him, said:

Beware of what corrupts your deeds, for indeed Riyaa is what corrupts your deeds. If not Riyaa, it may be you being amazed with yourself until it makes you think that you are more virtuous than your brother. It may be that you have not achieved deeds the likes of which he has achieved, and it may be that he has more fear of Allah and righteous deeds than you. And if it is not self-amazement, then beware of loving the praise of the people-loving their praise so that they may honour you due to your deeds and see you as someone of nobility and high status in their hearts. Remembering death a lot is enough to make you have less concern for the things of the worldly life and make you have a fervent desire for the afterlife. A prolonged hope (for the things of this worldly life) is enough as a (means) to having little fear of (Allah) and committing acts of disobedience, and the distress and regret on the Day of Judgment is enough for the one who knows but does not act. [2]

Imam Ibn Al-Qayyim, may Allah have mercy upon him, stated:

Ibn Sad, may Allah have mercy upon him, stated in at Tabaqaat about Umar Ibn Abdul Azeez, may Allah have mercy upon him, “Whenever he delivered a sermon and feared being amazed with himself, he ended it; and whenever he wrote a letter and feared amazement due to it, he tore it. He would say: ”O Allah! I seek refuge with you from the evil of my soul.” [3]

Abu Wahb, may Allah have mercy upon him, said: I asked Ibn Al-Mubarak, may Allah have mercy upon him: “What is pride?” He said: ”It is to mock at the people.”  I asked him about self-amazement; he said: “It is to consider yourself to be in possession of something that none else possess; and I do not know of anything more evil upon the performers of the prayer than self-amazement”. [4]

Masruq, may Allah have mercy upon him, said:

“It is enough as knowledge that a man is fearful of Allah and it is enough as ignorance that a man becomes amazed with his knowledge”. [5]

Imam Abdul Ghaniy Al-Maqdisee, may Allah have mercy upon him, was asked: “Why do you not read from other than a book?” He said: ”I fear self-amazement.” [6]

Imam Ash-Shafi’i, may Allah have mercy upon him, said:

If self-amazement is concealed within your deeds, recall the one whose pleasure you are seeking, which blessings you desire and which outcome you fear. The one who ponders upon this, his actions will become small in his presence. [7]

Al-Allamah Muqbil Bin Hadi Al-Wadi’i, may Allah have mercy upon him, said:

If a person fears being amazed with himself, let him not compare himself with contemporaries; look at Hafidh Ibn Hajr or Al-Hafidh Ibn kathir, Shaikh Al-Islam Ibn Taymiyyah and other than them amongst the Huffaaz. [8]

Mutarrif Bin Abdillah Ash-Shikh-khir, may Allah have mercy upon him, said:

I spend the night and become regretful in morning (i.e. due to missing the night prayer) is more beloved to me that staying up at night (in worship) and reach the morning while being self-amazed. [9]

Imam Adh-Dhahabi, may Allah have mercy upon him, said:

 The one who ascribe piety to himself and is amazed with himself will not be successful. [10]

[1] An Excerpt from “at-Ta’leeqaat Al-Maleehah Alaa Silsilah Al-Ahadith As-Saheehah 1/104

[2] Hilyatul Awliyaa: 6/391

[3] Al Fawaa’id. 225

[4] Siyar 15/395]

[5] Akhlaaqul Ulamaa of Imaam Al-Aajuree: 1/70]

[6] Siyar A’laam Nubulaa 21/449]

[7] Siyar A’lam Nubulaa 10/42

[8] Al-Bashaa’ir Fis-Samaa’i Al-Mubaashir’ page 14. with introduction by Shaikh Muhammad Bin Abdul-Wahhaab Al-Wassaabee, may Allah have mercy upon him.

[9] Siyar A’lam An-Nubula 4/190

[10] Siyar A’lam An-Nubula 4/190

Reflections from some statements of Al-Allamah Rabee Bin Hadi Al-Mad’khali [37 of 80]

Written by faizkara on . Posted in Contemporary Issues, Da'wah - Calling To Islam, Methodology - 'Manhaj', Morals and Manners - 'Akhlaaq', Purification of The Soul, Scholars of Islam, Worship - 'Ibaadah'.

In The Name of Allah, The Most Merciful, The Bestower of Mercy.

The questioner said: Our Shaikh, I love you for the sake of Allah. I am new to true Salafiyyah and I dont know what do at present. Guide me, may Allah bless you.

Response: Establish the prayer, pay the Zakat, and sincerely devote your religion to Allah (alone), the Lord of the worlds; seek knowledge of the Shariah from its fundamental sources, and cooperate with your Salafi brothers upon righteousness and piety to convey this message. Spend in its path if you possess what you can spend to aid it, perform all righteous deeds, fulfill the obligations, learn the pillars of Islam and its regulations, the Salafi methodology – the foundational principles and subsidiary matters within it. This is encompassed in Allah’s statement: [إِلَّا الَّذِينَ ءَامَنُوا وَعَمِلُوا الصَّالِحَاتِ – Except those who believe and do righteous deeds]. [Al-Asr 3]

Therefore, it is obligated to you to (adhere) to true Iman, righteous deeds, and cooperating upon righteousness and piety. [Marhaban Yaa Taalib Al-Ilm 467]

One of the great services of the scholars of Islam

Written by Amjad Khan on . Posted in Brotherhood, Contemporary Issues, Da'wah - Calling To Islam, Methodology - 'Manhaj', Morals and Manners - 'Akhlaaq', Pearls of Wisdom, Purification of The Soul, Scholars of Islam, Worship - 'Ibaadah'.

In The Name of Allaah, The Most Merciful, The Bestower of Mercy.

Al-Allamah  Muhammad Amaan Al-Jami, may Allah have mercy upon him, said:

The call to Islam encompasses a variety of domains and procedures. One of its procedures is the establishment of gatherings and conferences where individuals with sound Islamic perspectives and Muslim jurists convene to address contemporary issues. They counter the misconceptions that are disseminated against Islam and the authentic beliefs of Muslims. Furthermore, they elucidate the principles of the Islamic faith across all aspects of life that necessitate explanation—of which there are many—ensuring that individuals possess clarity in both their religious and worldly matters. This endeavour is grounded in the teachings of the Qur’an and the authentic Sunnah, guiding people from the shadows of misguidance into the light of true guidance. There exists no alternative route to escape the darkness of ignorance and (unlawful) pre-Islamic customs except through the comprehension derived from the Book and the Sunnah. This duty has been upheld by the Messengers, from Nuh to Muhammad, peace be upon them. Allah, the Most High, stated:

يَـٰٓأَيُّہَا ٱلنَّبِىُّ إِنَّآ أَرۡسَلۡنَـٰكَ شَـٰهِدً۬ا وَمُبَشِّرً۬ا وَنَذِيرً۬ا
وَدَاعِيًا إِلَى ٱللَّهِ بِإِذۡنِهِۦ وَسِرَاجً۬ا مُّنِيرً۬ا
وَبَشِّرِ ٱلۡمُؤۡمِنِينَ بِأَنَّ لَهُم مِّنَ ٱللَّهِ فَضۡلاً۬ كَبِيرً۬ا

O Prophet (Muhammad)! Verily, We have sent you as witness, and a bearer of glad tidings, and a warner; And as one who invites to Allah [Islamic Monotheism, i.e. to worship none but Allah (Alone)] by His Leave, and as a lamp spreading light (through your instructions from the Qur’an and the Sunnah the legal ways of the Prophet). And announce to the believers (in the Oneness of Allah and in His Messenger Muhammad) the glad tidings, that they will have from Allah a Great Bounty. [33:45-47]

In these three verses, there is a clarification of the job of the noble Messenger Muhammad, peace and blessings of Allah be upon him, and his followers- and that is to call to the path of Allah by the Permission and command of Allah, upon clear sightedness and sure knowledge.

Allah [The Most High] said: [ قُلۡ هَـٰذِهِۦ سَبِيلِىٓ أَدۡعُوٓاْ إِلَى ٱللَّهِ‌ۚ عَلَىٰ بَصِيرَةٍ أَنَا۟ وَمَنِ ٱتَّبَعَنِى‌ۖ – Say (O Muhammad): “This is my way; I invite unto Allah (i.e. to the Oneness of Allah – Islamic Monotheism) with sure knowledge, I and whosoever follows me (also must invite others to Allah i.e. to the Oneness of Allah – Islamic Monotheism) with sure knowledge”]. [12:108]

An excerpt from Nidham Al-Usrah Fil Islam  8-9