See Link: Shaikh Abdullah Al-Bukhaari rebuked deviant Abdul-Malik Ramadhaani for claiming that some people restrict the scholars to a few people
http://safeshare.tv/v/ss568e97fec59c0
Ibn Abdi Rabbihi (rahimahullaah) said:
”Choosing speech is more difficult than authorship, and indeed it is said: The choice of a man (in speech) is in harmony with his intellect. [1]
Here are a few articles selected at random to show the fact that the Salafis utilise the works of the Salafi Scholars where needed in the subject matter being discussed.
Shaikh Uthaymeen
Shaikh Bin Baaz
Shaikh Fawzaan
Shaikh Abdullah Ghudayyaan
Shaikh Abdul Muhsin
Shaikh Albaani
——————————————————————————————–
[1] Source: quoted by Shaikh Muhammad Bin Umar Saalim Baazmool in Manhajul Bahthi Al-Ilmiy Wa-Kitaabah Fee Uloom Ash-Sharee-ah: page: 17]
Shaikh Muhammad Baazmool (may Allaah preserve him) stated:
And whenever you find the statement of a Muhaq’qiq Scholar being utilized as proof by a person of bidah and falsehood in seeking to establish his falsehood and you refer that statement back to its original source, you will not find except that this (person of falsehood) did cut off and separate some part of it from another part. [Source: Wasaa’il Ahlil Baatil Fee Taqreeri Baatilihim’ page: 63]
http://salaficentre.com/2013/12/shaykhul-islaam-ibn-taymiyyah-i-regret-loosing/
http://salaficentre.com/2014/08/preserve-your-salah-tongue-and-heart-an-advice-from-the-messenger-sallal-laahu-alayhi-wasallam/
To oppose one’s desires for the sake of the truth in affairs of knowledge and creed can be difficult, so it requires research and contemplation. Also in facing such difficulty one is in need of asking the scholars and benefitting from them. So with regards to what has been stated about a person’s acknowledgement of the truth and the difficulty in doing so, he should cling to piety, whilst seeking the Tawfeeq of Allaah and guidance. [Slightly Paraphrased and abridged…for further details, see: At-Tankeel Bimaa Fee Ta’need Al-Kawthariy Minal Baatil. Vol 2. Page: 180-181. with the checking of Imaam Albaanee (rahimahullaah)]
Fourthly: Envy: It may be that when another person clarifies the truth for him, he sees that by acknowledging such truth, it would necessitate an acknowledgement of the clarifier’s virtue, knowledge and correctness due to that clarification; so this may become great in the eyes of the people and they begin to follow him. So you will find some of those who attribute themselves to knowledge being eager to prove the mistakes of other scholars even if that is done by way of falsehood due to envy and seeking to diminish their status amongst the people. [Source: At-Tankeel Bimaa Fee Ta’need Al-Kawthariy Minal Baatil. Vol 2, Page: 180-181’ with the checking of Imaam Albaanee (rahimahullaah). Abridged and slightly paraphrased]
Thirdly: Pride: It may be that a person is upon ignorance or falsehood, so another person comes along and clarifies the proofs for him, but he sees that by acknowledging such proofs, it would necessitate that he is deficient and that it was such a person who guided him. And due to this, we find that it is not difficult for some of those who attribute themselves to knowledge to acknowledge their mistakes when it becomes manifests to them in their researches and studies, but it becomes difficult upon them when others clarify such mistakes for them. [Source: At-Tankeel Bimaa Fee Ta’need Al-Kawthariy Minal Baatil. Vol 2, Page: 180-181’ with the checking of Imaam Albaanee (rahimahullaah). Abridged and slightly paraphrased]
