Skip to main content

Author: Abdullah Jallow

[12] O Faris Al-Hammadi! The time has arrived for your deceitful and absurd statements to be unveiled for all to see! [Cautioning Our Beloved Youth Regarding Individuals Whose Statements and Stances Lack Clarity and Precision]

In The Name of Allah, The Most Merciful, The Bestower of Mercy.

Imam Al-Bukhaari [may Allah have mercy upon him] said: Chapter: “Avoiding the use of tricks. And everybody will get the reward according to his intention in Imaan (belief) and other than it”. Umar Ibn Al-Khattab, may Allah be pleased with him, said that the Prophet, peace and blessings of Allah be upon him, said, “The reward of deeds depends upon the intentions, and every person will get the reward according to what he intended. So, whoever emigrates for Allaah and His Messenger, then his emigration will be for Allaah and His Messenger, and whoever emigrates to take a worldly benefit or for a woman to marry, then his emigration will be for what he emigrated for”. [Al-Bukhaari Number 6953]

Imam Abdul Azeez Bin Baaz, may Allah have mercy upon him, said, “Trickery has no place in Ibaadaat or Mu’aamalaat. Thus, it is essential to handle matters through the correct channels”. [1]

While it is not our assertion that general statements are entirely prohibited or devoid of merit in every instance, it is essential to recognise that there are moments when specificity is not just preferred but imperative. How can one justify the absence of detail in situations where clarity is paramount, especially when the speaker resorts to ambiguous language, thereby failing to articulate their position in contexts that demand precision? We reiterate that general speech holds value when appropriate; however, it becomes problematic when the speaker leaves others in a state of uncertainty regarding matters that necessitate transparency, as some may wield vague language as a means of evasion and to shirk accountability. In this regard, Faris alluded to a people (Salafipublications) that is widely reviled by those who disdain detailed elucidation and openness concerning the principles of the Manhaj. He then proceeded to make a nebulous statement: “I disagree with some of the things they say but they are my brothers.” This raises the question of whether Faris was simply expressing disagreement without conviction or if he was apprehensive about engaging in a substantive, knowledge-based dialogue had he chosen to clarify his true intentions. Imam Ibn Al-Qayyim, may Allah have mercy upon him, stated in An-Nuniyyah:

قال ابن القيم: وعـلـيك بالتفصيل والتبيين فالإجمال والإطلاق دون بيان
قد أفسدا هذا الوجود وخبـطا الأذهان والآراء كل زمـان

“It is obligated to you to provide detailed explanations and clarifications, as generalisations and unrestricted (speech) without elaboration (clarification) have corrupted the existence and confused minds and opinions throughout all times”.

As we mentioned in part 11 of this series, unless Faris has retracted his statement or provided clarification—of which we are unaware at the time of writing this article—it is imperative that we remain discerning regarding such sweeping assertions. This is particularly crucial for those of us who have not observed the ambiguities during the years 1993-1995, a period when I and others were not yet guided to this blessed Salafi Manhaj. It was only in the summer of 1995 that Allah bestowed His guidance upon me and others, leading us to embrace this blessed Manhaj.

In this article, we intend to caution our brothers and sisters about the potential pitfalls of ambiguous statements, stances and affiliations, whether they originate from Faris or any future individual claiming allegiance to the Sunnah and its followers. Such vagueness can mislead the unwary observer, fostering misunderstandings and uncertainty regarding various interpretations. Reflecting on the early 1990s, when we were not yet Salafiyyoon, we recall how unclear information surrounding contentious issues often compelled us to rely on our own assumptions, prior knowledge, or personal biases. The ramifications of the Gulf War were strikingly apparent in our conversations, particularly concerning the American military’s deployment in Saudi Arabia, the persistent Algerian civil conflict, and the misplaced fervour that engulfed us with each update from a newsletter published by some students at the university mosque. This publication frequently highlighted the ambushes carried out by the so-called Mujahidin against government forces. Likewise, we had discussions about the influential senior scholars, the rulers, and those we erroneously deemed genuine scholars, such as Salman and Safar, whom we considered steadfast due to their  imprisonment. The confinement of Salam and Safar, a consequence of their own transgressions, was subsequently likened to the imprisonment of Shaikh Al-Islam Ibn Taymiyyah. This comparison was employed to persuade us that only the genuine scholars of our time face imprisonment, akin to the fate of Shaikh Al-Islam. Such uncertainty lingered in our minds until it was later elucidated by the Salafiyyoon, who provided compelling evidence that Shaikh Al-Islam’s imprisonment stemmed from his steadfast defense of the Aqeedah of the Salaf, in stark contrast to Salam and Safar, who were aligned with the Qutubiyyah.

Our situation and that of others – whilst in search of truth of truth among the divergent groups of Bidah- deteriorated further as the lack of sound Aqeedah and Manhaj left individuals grappling with uncertainty, devoid of the immediate sound knowledge-based clarifications provided by the Salafiyyoon. Those who thrived in this murky and ambiguous environment sought to evade responsibility, concealed vital information, and shun commitment. Meanwhile, some deliberately employed ambiguous expressions, relishing the confusion, as it allowed them to sidestep the potential guilt and rejection that might arise when the truth eventually comes to light for the unsuspecting.

That period between 1993 and the beginning of 1995 proved to be exceptionally challenging and perilous in our pursuit of truth, as the ambiguous rhetoric coupled with misleading comparisons obscured our understanding and complicated our ability to contest the notions propagated by different groups. Consequently, we often concluded, particularly in 1994, that conclusive evidence eluded all parties. We observed that in the realm of ambiguity, even the most ludicrous assertions can be articulated by those who prioritised persuasion over truth. However, upon our encounter with the Salafiyyoon, we discovered their communication to be marked by clarity and precision. In the summer of 1995, by the grace of Allah, we were privileged to listen to speakers from Salafipublications whom we now regard as our senior teachers in the West. They eloquently shared their profound insights on a myriad of subjects, encompassing various sects, groups, organisations, and their prominent leaders, as well as the scholars’ perspectives on diverse Manhaj issues. Their reflections on the intricate themes of love and animosity, the perils of hizbiyyah, and the essential call for unity along the Salafi path were delivered with remarkable clarity and resonance. They imparted a wealth of knowledge that surpassed anything we had previously encountered, standing in stark contrast to the general rhetoric that had allowed the wrongdoers to mislead us with their narrow narratives, obscuring the truth to serve their agendas.

Therefore, we earnestly implore our beloved youth to maintain a discerning eye against the seductive nature of ambiguity and uncertainty irrespective of its intensity or the topics it may encompass, for it serves merely as a deceptive tactic designed to obscure the truth. Beware of those who resort to evasive language or vague insinuations to evade the label of dishonesty. Such individuals may offer insufficient descriptions and make nebulous negative remarks, only to withhold further clarification. This calculated reticence is intended to pique the curiosity of others, drawing them into a web of speculation that aligns with the original speaker’s thoughts, thereby securing their unwitting endorsement.

We also encountered individuals who employed vague and ambiguous language concerning unity, often due to their lack of understanding. To appear credible, they resorted to fabricating ideas, filling the voids in their knowledge with platitudes, generic assertions, and unfounded assumptions. Lacking a robust methodology akin to that of the Salafiyyoon at Salafipublications and elsewhere, they produced contradictory and disorganised statements. We once witnessed a single Salafi engaging in debate with them, armed with Sharhus Sunnah and Usoolus Sunnah, ultimately prevailing over all. Following Allah’s grace in 1995, we resolutely rejected any vague, ambiguous, or general discourse from individuals whose circumstances and positions raised doubts, based on their displayed affiliations and associations. Their ambiguous remarks misled many regarding the principles of enjoining good and forbidding evil, particularly concerning rulers, collaboration with various groups and figureheads, and the delicate balance of harm and benefit in the arena of Dawah and cooperation. It was only through Allah’s guidance, facilitated through Salafipublications, that we were steered away from this peril.

Indeed, what we discovered when we first came into contact with Salafiyyoon is that their situation is not a contest of political victories and defeats, where individuals with personal stakes chase a collective aspiration, often at the expense of honesty, clarity, and thorough explanation. These virtues are often neglected or obscured in the name of a larger ambition pursued by the hizbiyyoon. Rather, we noticed that genuine solidarity in Salafiyyah is anchored in a shared robust Aqeedah and Manhaj, and not the deceptive practice of compromise at the expense of what Allah and His Messenger have ordained. This sinful compromise, along with a reluctance to express oneself candidly due to vested interests, reflected the insecurity and timidity of those who sidestepped the challenging truths and responsibilities that this Manhaj demands. Individuals, groups and parties that resorted to such vague communication at the university often feared that clear and honest expression will lead to disagreement from those who refrained from criticising them, resulting in potential criticism. Consequently, they opted for ambiguous language, hoping that others will interpret their “generous ambiguities” in ways that aligned with their perspectives. This approach reflected the mindset of those who lacked courage and prioritised their self-interest. We ask Allah to protect us from this calamity and every other evil until we meet him Aameen.

We conclude this article with several quotes to underscore the significance of clarity. Shaikh Al-Islam Ibn Taymiyyah, may Allah have mercy upon him, said: “It is incumbent that the expression conveys the intended meaning through the appropriate terminology. Should the term be explicit or evident, the objective is achieved. However, if the term possesses dual interpretations—one valid and the other erroneous—the intended meaning must be clarified. In instances where the term suggests a flawed interpretation, it should only be employed with an explanation that mitigates any potential misunderstanding. Furthermore, if the term may mislead certain listeners into grasping an incorrect meaning, it should not be used if it is known to carry such implications, as the primary aim of communication is clarity and understanding. Conversely, if the term accurately reflects the intended meaning but some individuals remain unaware of its significance without any negligence on the speaker’s part, the responsibility lies with the listener, not the speaker”. [2]

Imam Ibn Al-Qayyim, may Allah have mercy upon him, said: “The basis of Banee Adam’s misguidance stems from ‘General Terms’ and ‘Ambiguous Meanings’ (terms, meanings, statements) that can be interpreted as either truth or falsehood when not clearly defined). This issue is exacerbated when they interact with a confused mind, particularly when coupled with misguided desires and enthusiasm. Thus, seek the guidance of the One who stabilises hearts, asking Allah to strengthen your heart in His Religion and protect you from falling into this darkness”. [3]

He, may Allah have mercy upon him, also said: “If the speaker falls short in his clarification and addresses the listener with vague terms that may encompass various interpretations, and the listener remains uncertain of the intended meaning; if this arises from the speaker’s inability, the listener is given from the speaker’s inability rather than his intent. If the speaker possesses the ability and he does not do so while it is obligated to him to do so, he gives the listener from his evil intent”. [4]

We ask Allah:

اللَّهُمَّ أَصْلِحْ لِي دِينِي الَّذِي هُوَ عِصْمَةُ أَمْرِي
وَأَصْلِحْ لِي دُنْيَايَ الَّتِي فِيهَا مَعَاشِي
وَأَصْلِحْ لِي آخِرَتِي الَّتِي فِيهَا مَعَادِي
وَاجْعَلِ الْحَيَاةَ زِيَادَةً لِي فِي كُلِّ خَيْرٍ
وَاجْعَلِ الْمَوْتَ رَاحَةً لِي مِنْ كُلِّ شَرٍّ

O Allah! Rectify my religion for me, which is the safeguard of my affairs; rectify my worldly [affairs], wherein is my livelihood; and rectify my Afterlife to which is my return, and make life for me [as a means of] increase in every good and make death for me as a rest from every evil. [Saheeh Muslim Number: 2720]

To be continued…InShaAllah.


[1]: An Excerpt from “Al-Hulalul Ibreeziyyah Min Ta’leeqaat Al-Baaziyyah Alaa Saheeh Al-Bukhaari’ 4/353. footnote 1”

[2] Ar-Radd Alaa Al-Bakri 702-703

[3] As-Sawaa’iq Al-Mursalah 3/927

[4] As-Sawaa’iq Al-Mussalah 2/503

[11] O Faris Al-Hammadi! The time has arrived for your deceitful and absurd statements to be unveiled for all to see! [An Ambiguous Statement Regarding His Disagreements With Some Salafiyyoon]

In The Name of Allah, The Most Merciful, The Bestower of Mercy.

Allah, The Exalted, said:

يَا أَيُّهَا الَّذِينَ آمَنُوا أَطِيعُوا اللَّهَ وَأَطِيعُوا الرَّسُولَ وَأُولِي الْأَمْرِ مِنْكُمْ فَإِنْ تَنَازَعْتُمْ فِي شَيْءٍ فَرُدُّوهُ إِلَى اللَّهِ وَالرَّسُولِ إِنْ كُنْتُمْ تُؤْمِنُونَ بِاللَّهِ وَالْيَوْمِ الْآخِرِ ذَلِكَ خَيْرٌ وَأَحْسَنُ تَأْوِيلًا

O you who have believed, obey Allāh and obey the Messenger and those in authority over you. And if you disagree among yourselves over anything then refer it back to Allāh and the Messenger if you truly believe in Allāh and the Last Day. That is better (conduct) and (leads to) the most excellent outcome. [1]

وَمَا اخْتَلَفْتُمْ فِيهِ مِنْ شَيْءٍ فَحُكْمُهُ إِلَى اللَّهِ

And in whatsoever you differ, the decision thereof is with Allah (He is the ruling Judge). [2]

The Messenger, peace and blessings of Allah be upon him, said: Shaytaan has despaired of being worshipped in your land (i.e. the Arabian Peninsula); however, he is content to be obeyed in other matters that you may consider trivial in your actions. Therefore, be cautious, for I have left among you that which, if you hold fast to it, will ensure you never go astray: the Book of Allah and the Sunnah of His Prophet. [3]

There are two types of differing: the first pertains to matters for which conclusive evidence exists, necessitating acceptance of the final decision. In such instances, the evidence must be acknowledged, and any opposing statements are to be disregarded. Those who adhere to a viewpoint that contradicts the established evidence are met with disapproval. The second category encompasses issues where conclusive evidence has not been established, leading to a situation where the evidence is either disputed or differing opinions prevail. This scenario falls under the realm of ijtihad, where no disapproval or reprimand is directed at those holding opposing views; instead, guidance is offered to help them understand the perspective that is deemed to carry more weight. [4]

Imam Ibn Al-Qayyim, may Allah have mercy upon him, said, “There is no excuse in the presence of Allah – on the day of judgment – for the one that the Prophetic reports and narrations reached in a subject matter of the religion- which is not opposed by any other texts – if he turns away from them”. [5]

Faris once stated about Salafipublications: “I disagree with some of the things they say but they are my brothers”.

First: We have not received any information regarding the specific points of disagreement that Faris has, whether they pertain to Aqeedah, Manhaj, or Fiqh matters, nor do we know if he has provided clarification supported by evidence. If he has indeed clarified his position with proof or retracted his statement, there would be no need to seek further clarification from him. However, if he has not provided such clarification, he remains in a state of uncertainty. As Salafiyyoon, we collaborate with our counterparts in both the East and the West, and we do not have differences in Aqeedah or Manhaj.

Secondly, neither Salafipublications nor anyone among us serves as the basis for determining truth or falsehood. Imam Sufyan Ibn Uyaynah, may Allah have mercy upon him, said: “The Messenger, peace and blessings of Allah be upon him, serves as the greatest criterion (for both humanity and Jinn), with all matters being submitted to him (for judgment) according to his manners, path, and guidance. Thus, anything that aligns with this is deemed to be the truth, while anything that contradicts it is considered falsehood”. [6]

Shaikh Al-Islam Ibn Taymiyyah, may Allah have mercy upon him, said: “Truth is determined by its alignment with evidence, regardless of the number of supporters or detractors. It is not the truth that is measured by individuals; rather, individuals are measured by the truth. The mere aversion of those who disagree or the affection of those who agree does not indicate the validity or invalidity of a statement”. [7]

Imam Muhammad Ibn Salih al-Uthaymin, may Allah have mercy upon him, said: “Every individual among people may have their statements accepted or rejected, except for the Messenger, peace and blessings of Allah be upon him, due to affirmation of infallibility of the one who legislates. In contrast, others may possess deficiencies in knowledge and understanding that necessitate the evaluation of their statements against the Shariah”. [8]

It is important to recognise that we all make mistakes. However, when someone like Faris expresses disagreement with certain statements made by some Salafiyyoon without providing specific examples, it raises important questions. If the points he disagrees with are insignificant, then his comments hold little value. Conversely, if these statements warrant attention, they should be identified and addressed. Otherwise, simply stating a disagreement lacks any real benefit.

As for Salafipublications, they are known to be dedicated to the pursuit of truth. To this day, Allah has granted their senior teachers profound clarity in both Aqeedah and Manhaj. Renowned scholars such as Al-Allamah Rabee, may Allah preserve him, Al-Allaamah Ubaid Bin Abdillah Al-Jabiri, and Al-Allamah Abdullah Al-Ghudiyan, may Allah have mercy upon them, along with senior students of knowledge from both the East and the West, affirm the authenticity of Salafipublications’ Salafiyyah. This affirmation is as evident as the midday sun. They maintain no connections with Ahlul Bidah or any of their affiliates.

Faris must elucidate his prior statements, should he not have done so already, given that he initially voiced them in public. Nevertheless, irrespective of past events, recent developments have illuminated that the core concern does not reside with Salafipublications itself, but rather with Faris’s apprehensions regarding the positions held by Salafiyyoon on particular issues, especially those about Dr. Muhammad Bin Haadee and his steadfast associate, Shaikh Sulayman Ar-Ruhayli, which we have already highlighted in this series. This recent matter has so deeply unsettled him that he has resorted to openly attacking those who seek transparency concerning Dr. Muhammad Bin Haadee. In a brazen display, he has declared that individuals who approach the matter in what he considers an improper manner are indulging in a foolish pursuit, swayed by Shaytaan. When such a reprehensible assertion is met with stern disapproval and rebuke, the naive and the apologists are quick to claim that we are bad mannered. Indeed, whether or not Faris has clarified his previous statement “I disagree with some of the things they say but they are my brothers”, his perspectives on recent matters have become unmistakably clear. His call to brotherhood should not be based on flattery, rather true brotherhood, companionship, and camaraderie must be anchored in openness, steering clear of ambiguity, vague statements, and evasive comments. Imam Ibn Al-Qayyim, may Allah have mercy upon him, said:

قال ابن القيم: وعـلـيك بالتفصيل والتبيين فالإجمال والإطلاق دون بيان
قد أفسدا هذا الوجود وخبـطا الأذهان والآراء كل زمـان

“It is obligated to you to provide detailed explanations and clarifications, as generalisations and unrestricted (speech) without elaboration (clarification) have corrupted the existence and confused minds and opinions throughout all times”.

Read: The Types of People in the Fitnah of Muḥammad Bin Hādī
https://www.manhaj.com/manhaj/assets/docs/types-of-people-mbh-fitnah.pdf

To be continued…InShaAllah


[1] https://www.thenoblequran.com/q/#/search/4_59

[2] Ash-Shura 10

[3] Sahih Targhib 40

[4] An Excerpt from “Ibaaraat Moohimah”. page 25

[5] An Excerpt from “I’laam Al-Muwaqqi’een” 3/300-301

[6] Jami Li-Akhlaaq Ar-Rawi Wa Aadab As-Sami page 8

[7] Naqd Al-Mantiq 263 by Shaikh Al-Islam Ibn Taymiyyah, may Allah have mercy upon him.

[8] Al-Qawa’id Al-Muthlaa page 86 by Imam Muhammad Ibn Salih al-Uthaymin, may Allah have mercy upon him.

[10] O Faris Al-Hammadi! The time has arrived for your deceitful and absurd statements to be unveiled for all to see! [Examine thoroughly before hastily claiming that proper etiquette has been disregarded in interactions with Faris]

In The Name of Allah, The Most Merciful, The Bestower of Mercy.

Al-Allamah Ubaid Bin Abdillah Al-Jabiri, may Allah have mercy upon him, was asked: If I heard a scholar’s statement in an audio recording or read it in a book that a certain individual is an innovator, yet I did not see any proof, am I obligated to exercise caution regarding this individual and be satisfied that he is an innovator, or should I wait until I obtain evidence of that?

Response: All praise is due to Allah the Lord of all that exists. May Allah send His Salutations of peace and blessings upon our prophet Muhammad, his family, and companions. To proceed: I say: Indeed, Ahlus Sunnah do not issue a judgment on Bidah concerning any individual unless they are fully acquainted with him, thoroughly assess what he follows, and are well-versed in their methodology both in general and in detail. This perspective brings us to two matters:

The first one involves a situation where a scholar or group of scholars has deemed someone an innovator, and this view is not contested by other scholars from Ahlus Sunnah. Bear in mind! I say that others from Ahlus Sunnah do not disagree with him, so we accept their criticism of the individual in question. We accept their speech and exercise caution regarding this individual in question. As long as a Sunni scholar has passed judgment on him – criticised by a Sunni scholar, while the rest of Ahlus Sunnah among the contemporaries of this scholar – his brothers and sons- did not object, his speech must be accepted. This is because this Sunni scholar who issued the criticism did not do so except based on a matter that is clear to him and established upon evidence. This is something about the religion ordained by Allah, and the one who criticises or praises others is aware of their accountability for what he says and the judgment they make. He knows that he is answerable to Allah even before the people question him.

The second one involves a situation where an individual has faced criticism from a scholar or scholars, resulting in a judgment that topples his status, making it obligatory to exercise caution regarding him. However, others have deemed this person trustworthy and aligned with the Sunnah, offering judgments that contradict those of the critics. In such cases, as long as both groups of scholars adhere to the Sunnah and are regarded as trustworthy and people of integrity in our view, we should examine the evidence. This is why they (i.e. the Scholars) say: “The one who knows serves as proof against the one who does not know”. A critic who states that a certain individual is both an innovator and a deviant, while providing evidence from that person’s writings, cassette tapes, or reliable narrators, compels us to accept the critic’s speech and abandon the praise from those who oppose the criticism. This is because the critics have presented evidence that may not be known to others, or because the individuals offering praise may not have encountered (any negative information) about the criticised person; instead, their commendation is based on their prior knowledge and (belief) that the individual adhered to the Sunnah.

Consequently, the individual who has been criticised and against whom evidence has been presented is deemed unreliable, with the proof resting with the one who provided the evidence. It is incumbent upon the one who is in search of truth to adhere to the evidence without deviating to the right or left, nor claiming, “I choose to abstain” because we have not been obligated with this by the Salaf. It is a duty to accept the statements of the one who has established the evidence. A Sunni scholar who defends those criticised is excused, and we uphold his status and honour. We acknowledge the virtues and high status he possesses, by the will of Allah.

A scholar from Ahlus Sunnah is only human. He can become distracted and forgetful, and he may be misled by evil people, or there may have been a time when he viewed someone as trustworthy, only for that person to later be deemed untrustworthy, and this person deceives him. Numerous witnesses can attest to this situation, as many individuals who have lost their credibility due to evidence are, in reality, people who wage war against the Sunnah and its followers.

They come along bearing copies of their books, presenting them to distinguished scholars—individuals revered for their leadership and virtue – while the true nature of this trickster and plotter remains concealed from this noble scholar, who, had he been aware, would have seen this individual’s standing diminish in his eyes. Consequently, the scholar offers commendations based solely on what he has heard. If this book is published, it is circulated by his supporters, who cultivate a favourable image of him. Thus, some contend, “So-and-so has praised him—Al-Albaanee, Ibn Baaz, or Ibn Al-Uthaymeen has lauded this work.” Yet, these scholars are not to be blamed; rather, it is the trickster who has remained shrouded from their view. So, what remains? We establish the evidence against this deceiver, trickster, and plotter based on what is found in his books. We establish the manifest clarifications against him from his books and we say to the one who argues with us, “Take it, this is his speech”. Consequently, it is obligated to you to be fair and be free from that wild and zealous attachment, and from the desires that blind a person. It is obligated to you that your search should be for the truth. [End of quote] [Refer to Arabic text at the end of this article]


Observations

[I] The Shaikh, may Allah have mercy upon him, said: Bear in mind! I say that others from Ahlus Sunnah do not disagree with him, so we accept their criticism of the individual in question. We accept their speech and exercise caution regarding this individual in question. As long as a Sunni scholar has passed judgment on him – criticised by a Sunni scholar, while the rest of Ahlus Sunnah among the contemporaries of this scholar – his brothers and sons- did not object, his speech must be accepted. This is because this Sunni scholar who issued the criticism did not do so except based on a matter that is clear to him and established upon evidence. This is something about the religion ordained by Allah, and the one who criticises or praises others is aware of their accountability for what he says and the judgment they make. He knows that he is answerable to Allah even before the people question him. [End of quote]

Observation: Indeed, before Faris attempts to present excuses for Dr. Muhammad Ibn Haadee or attempts to manipulate the narrative to suggest that the matter is exclusively between Dr. Muhammad and Al-Allaamah Rabee, he must recognise that no prominent senior scholar in the realm of Al-Jarh Wat Ta’deel in our time supports Dr. Muhammad’s Tabdee against those senior students. Not only do they oppose his stance, but they also insistently call upon him to furnish evidence, which he has yet to provide. For instance, Shaikh Abu Iyadh has provided the requests of Shaikh Rabee on link 1 at the end of this article.

Is it considered good etiquette to intervene after scholars have presented their well-founded arguments and then declare oneself a mediator while contradicting established principles? Furthermore, Faris explicitly mentioned that those who engage in this issue in a way he finds unsuitable are acting out of foolishness and are influenced by Shaytaan. Therefore, who truly deserves the label of bad manners: those adhering to the sound principles of Salafiyyah to uphold justice, or Faris, who attacks them?

[II] The Shaikh, may Allah have mercy upon him, said: “In such cases, as long as both groups of scholars adhere to the Sunnah and are regarded as trustworthy and people of integrity in our view, we should examine the evidence. This is why they (i.e. the Scholars) say: “The one who knows serves as proof against the one who does not know”. A critic who states that a certain individual is both an innovator and a deviant, while providing evidence from that person’s writings, cassette tapes, or reliable narrators, compels us to accept the critic’s speech and abandon the praise from those who oppose the criticism. This is because the critics have presented evidence that may not be known to others, or because the individuals offering praise may not have encountered (any negative information) about the criticised person; instead, their commendation is based on their prior knowledge and (belief) that the individual adhered to the Sunnah. Consequently, the individual who has been criticised and against whom evidence has been presented is deemed unreliable, with the proof resting with the one who provided the evidence. It is incumbent upon the one who is in search of truth to adhere to the evidence without deviating to the right or left, nor claiming, “I choose to abstain” because we have not been obligated with this by the Salaf. It is a duty to accept the statements of the one who has established the evidence. A Sunni scholar who defends those criticised is excused, and we uphold his status and honour. We acknowledge the virtues and high status he possesses, by the will of Allah”. [End of quote]

Observation: In this context, Al-Allamah Rabee, Al-Allamah Ubaid, Shaikh Abdullah Al-Bukhari, and others have rejected the Tabdee issued by Dr. Muhammad, and no one is more knowledgeable about this issue than they are. Similarly, the senior students in the West, including those at Spubs and their peers among the senior Tullabul Ilm, are well-informed about this matter and its evidence-based arguments, all of which refute Dr. Muhammad’s Tabdee against these esteemed students of knowledge. Dr. Muhammad’s criticisms lack the necessary evidence to substantiate his Tabdee, which is the basis for the scrutiny he faces. Therefore, why is Faris obscuring this issue and attempting to frame it as a dispute solely between Shaikh Rabee and Dr. Muhammad? Furthermore, he disparages those who seek justice based on thorough knowledge, labeling their pursuit as foolishness or influenced by Shaytaan. This behaviour is a reflection of poor manners; do not be misled into supporting their claims of good conduct, as the height of bad manners is to deny the truth and attack those who seek its clarification.

It is well established among scholars and senior students in the West that those senior students oppressed by Dr Muhammad adhere to Salafiyyah. Their commitment to Salafiyyah is not subject to doubt based on Dr. Muhammad’s conjectures or the Musaafiqah’s desires. Certainty does not simply vanish due to the unfounded doubts that have led Dr. Muhammad to make an erroneous judgment. Does Faris expect us to ignore these issues for the sake of convenience? Remain vigilant and do not hastily conclude that Faris deserves leniency or that the strong criticism aimed at him is a sign of bad manners. As previously stated, what could be worse than bad manners than to hide the truth, misrepresent it, and then attack those who seek clarity?  Is it truly good manners for Faris to come forward and present a distorted view of the real issues at hand? While he promotes the idea of good manners, he lacks the courage to confront Dr. Muhummand about his treatment of those senior students, despite being in the wrong. Therefore, before you rally behind Faris or advocate for a gentle approach towards him, it’s essential to address this issue directly and demand that he takes a definitive stance, rather than resorting to verbal attacks against those seeking justice.

[III] The Shaikh, may Allah have mercy upon him, stated: “A scholar from Ahlus Sunnah is only human. He can become distracted and forgetful, and he may be misled by evil people, or there may have been a time when he viewed someone as trustworthy, only for that person to later be deemed untrustworthy, and this person deceives him. Numerous witnesses can attest to this situation, as many individuals who have lost their credibility due to evidence are, in reality, people who wage war against the Sunnah and its followers. They come along bearing copies of their books, presenting them to distinguished scholars—individuals revered for their leadership and virtue – while the true nature of this trickster and plotter remains concealed from this noble scholar, who, had he been aware, would have seen this individual’s standing diminish in his eyes. Consequently, the scholar offers commendations based solely on what he has heard. If this book is published, it is circulated by his supporters, who cultivate a favourable image of him. Thus, some contend, “So-and-so has praised him—Al-Albaanee, Ibn Baaz, or Ibn Al-Uthaymeen has lauded this work.” Yet, these scholars are not to be blamed; rather, it is the trickster who has remained shrouded from their view. So, what remains? We establish the evidence against this deceiver, trickster, and plotter based on what is found in his books. We establish the manifest clarifications against him from his books and we say to the one who argues with us, “Take it, this is his speech”. Consequently, it is obligated to you to be fair and be free from that wild and zealous attachment, and from the desires that blind a person. It is obligated to you that your search should be for the truth”. [End of quote]

We reiterate that the senior students whom Dr. Muhummand has labeled with Tabdee continue to uphold Salafiyyah, and no one’s adherence to Salafiyyah should be questioned based on mere speculation or personal desires. Their integrity cannot be challenged without substantial evidence. Faris is so intent on safeguarding his own reputation that he resorts to blocking our Twitter accounts when we shared Shaikh Abu Iyaad’s comprehensive explanation on these issues. However, he shows little concern for the dignity of others—those unjustly targeted by Dr. Muhummand’s harsh ruling of Tabdee. Instead, he shamefully misrepresents the situation as a dispute solely between Dr. Muhummand and Al-Allaamah Rabee, suggesting it should be dismissed. This is merely an attempt to divert attention from the real issue, which is Dr. Muhummand’s flawed judgment of Tabdee. Furthermore, those who have been wronged by Dr. Muhummand are not adversaries of the Sunnah, and anyone who claims otherwise must provide clear proof; otherwise, they are spreading a serious falsehood. Therefore, Dr. Muhummand’s Tabdee must be categorically rejected without any doubt. The true deceivers in this matter are those like Faris, who distort the narrative to imply that the issue pertains only to Dr. Muhummand and Al-Allaamah Rabee. Faris’s misguided statements imply that all responsibilities related to this matter should be disregarded, whether he states this openly or remains silent, unless he offers a proper clarification. See pic 2

To be continued InShaAllah

Link 1: https://x.com/AbuIyaadSP/status/1018974451269033986

Pic 2:


الموقف الصحيح من إختلاف العلماء في الجرح و التعديل لفضيلة الشيخ/ عبيد الجابري حفظه الله

الموقف الصحيح من إختلاف العلماء في الجرح و التعديل لفضيلة الشيخ/ عبيد الجابري حفظه الله

فضيلة الشيخ عبيد بن عبد الله الجابري – حفظه الله –
************************************************** *

الحمد لله رب العالمين ، وصلى الله وسلم على نبينا محمد ، وعلى آله وصحبه أجمعين ، أما بعد ، رداً على السائل الذي قال .. إذا سمعتُ كلام العالم في شريط أو قرأتُ له في كتاب عن شخص ما أنه مبتدع ولم أر منه دليلا على ذلك، فهل يلزمني أن أحْذر من هذا الشخص وأن أقتنع بأنه مبتدع أم أتريّث حتى أجد الدليل على ذلك؟.

أقول فإن أهل السنة لا يحكمون على أحد ببدعة إلا وقد خَبَرُوه وسَبَرُوا ما عنده – تماماً – وعرفوا منهجه – تماماً – جملةً وتفصيلاً، ومن هنا هذه المسألة تستدعي منّا وقفتين:
الوقفة الأولى: فيمن حَكم عليه عالم أو علماء بأنه مبتدع ، ولم يختلف معهم غيرهم ممن هم أهل سنة مثلهم، تفطنوا، أقول : لم يختلف معهم غيرهم فيه ممن هم أهل سنة، فإنا نقبل جرحهم له، فإنا نقبل قولهم ونحذَره ، مادام أنه حَكَم عليه وجَرَحه عالم سني ، ولم يظهر بقية أهل السنة الذين هم أقران هذا العالم من إخوانه وأبنائه العلماء فلابد من قبوله، لأن هذا العالم السني الذي جرح رجلاً : فإنه لم يجرحه إلا بأمر بان له وقام عنده عليه الدليل ،لأن هذا من دين الله، والذي يجرّح أو يُعدّل يعلم أنه مسؤول عما يقول ويفتي به أو يحكم به ويعلم أنه مسؤول من الله تعالى قبل أن يسأله الخلق.

الوقفة الثانية: إذا كان هذا الشخص الذي جرحه عالم أو علماء حكموا عليه بما يُسقطه ويوجب الحذر منه قد خالفهم غيرهم وحكموا بعدالته وأنه على السنة أو غير ذلك من الأحكام المخالفة لأحكام الآخرين المجرحين له، فمادام أن هؤلاء على السنة وهؤلاء على السنة وكلهم أهل ثقة عندهم وذَووا أمانة عندنا ففي هذه الحال ننظر في الدليل، ولهذا قالوا: «من عَلِمَ حُجَّة على من لم يَعْلَم» الجارح قال في فلان من الناس إنه مبتدع منحرفٌ سعيه وأتى بالأدلة مِن كُتب المجروح أو من أشرطته أو من نقل الثقاة عنه، فهذا موجب علينا قبول قوله وترك المعدِّلين الذين خالفوا مَنْ جرَّحه، لأن هؤلاء المجَرِّحين له أتَوا بأدلة خَفِيَتْ على الآخرين لسبب من الأسباب أو أن المعدِّل لم يقرأ ولم يسمع عن ذلك المجرّح، وإنما بنى على سابقِ عِلمِه به، وأنه كان على سنة، فأصبح هذا المجروح الذي أقيم الدليل على جرحه مجروحا والحجة مع من أقام الدليل، وعلى من يطلب الحق أن يتبع الدليل و لا يتلمّس بُنيات الطريق ذات اليمين وذات الشمال، أو يقول أقف بنفسي، فهذا لم نعهده عند السلف، وهذه الأمور تكون فيما لا يسوغ فيه الاجتهاد في أصول العقائد وأصول العبادات، فإن المصير إلى قبول من أقام الدليل واجب حتمي، وذاك العالم السني الذي خالف الجارحين، له عذره، يبقى على مكانته عندنا وعلى حرمته عندنا، ونستشعر أنه له إن شاء الله ما كان عليه من سابقة الفضل وجلالة القدر، هذا وسعه ، والعالم من أهل السنة، السلفي، بَشَرٌ يذهل، ينسى، يكون عُرضة للتلبيس من بطانة سيئة، أو كان قد وَثِقَ بذلك الرجل المجروح فلَبَّسَ عليه، والشواهد على هذا كثيرة، فكثير من السَّـقَط والذين هم في الحقيقة حربٌ على السنة وأهلِها يأتون بنماذج من كتبهم يقرؤونها على علماء أجلّة مشهود لهم بالفضل والإمامة في الدين، ويُخفي ذلك اللعّاب الماكر عن ذلك العالم الجليل الإمام الفذ الجهبذ ما لو عَلِمَه لسقط عنه، فهذا العالم يُزكِّي بناءً على ما سَمِع، فإذا طُبِع الكتاب وانتشر وتناقلته الأيدي وذاع صيته وإذا بالمجادلين يقولون زكَّاه فلان، فلان: الألباني – رحمه الله – ، أو ابن باز – رحمه الله -، أو ابن العثيمين – رحمه الله – ، زكّى هذا الكتاب فهؤلاء العلماء – رحمة الله عليهم – معذورون، ومن التَّبعة سالمون – إن شاء الله تعالى – في الدنيا والآخرة ، وإنما هذا لعَّاب أخفى ولبّس على ذلك العالم، إذن ماذا بقي؟ نقيم على ذلك الملبِّس اللعاب الدساس الماكر مِنْ كُتبه، يقيم عليه البيِّـنة من كتبه، ومن جادلنا فيه نقول خذ، هذا هو قولُه، هل تظن أنه عَرَضهُ بهذه الصورة على من سمَّينا من أهل العلم ومن هو على نفس النهج فأقرُّوه؟ الجواب كلا، إذن يجب عليك أن تكون مُنْصفا متجردا من العاطفة الجياشة المندفعة ومن الهوى الذي يُعمي ويجب عليك أن تكون طُلبتُك الحق، نعم.

الطالب: جزاكم الله خيرا وأحسن الله إليكم، هذا السائل يقول: ما الواجب على عوام السلفيين في دعاة اختلف العلماء في تعديلهم وتجريحهم سواء علموا أخطاءهم أم لم يعلموها؟

الشيخ: أقول لمعشر السلفيين والسلفيات مَنْ بلَغَتْهم مشافهةً هذه المحادثة مني ومَن ستبلغهم عبر من صاغوا الأسئلة وأَلقَوْها علينا، أقول: أنصحكم إن كنتم تحبون الناصحين ألاّ تقبلوا شريطا ولا كتابا إلا ممن عرفتم أنه على السنة مشهودٌ له بذلك واشتهر بها ولم يظهر منه خلاف ذلك، وهذه قاعدة مطَّردة في حياته وبعد موته، فمن مات وهو فيما نحسبه على السنة فهو عندنا عليها ونسأل الله أن يثبته عليها في الآخرة كما ثبته عليها حيا… آمين، هذا أولا.

ثانيا: إذا خفي عليكم أمرُ إنسان اشتهرتْ كتبه وأشرطته وذاع صيته فاسألوا عنه ذوي الخِبْرة به والعارفين بحاله، فإن السنة لا تخفى ولا يخفى أهلها، فالرجل تزكّيه أعماله، تزكّيه أعماله التي هي على السنة، وتشهد عليه بذلك ويذكره الناس بها حيا وميتا، وما تَسَتَّرَ أحدٌ بالسنة وغرّر الناس به حتى التـفُّوا حوله وارتبطوا به وأصبحوا يعوِّلون عليه ويقبلون كل ما يصدر عنه إلاّ فَضحَه الله سبحانه وتعالى وهتك ستره وكشف للخاصة والعامة ما كان يُخفي وما كان يُكنُّ من الغش والتلبيس والمكر والمخادعة، يهيّئ الله رجالا فضلاء فطناء حكماء أقوياء جهابذة ذوي علم وكياسة وفـِقهٍ في الدين يكشف الله بهم ستر ذلكم اللعاب الملبِّس الغشاش، فعليكم إذا بُيِّنَ لكم حال ذلك الإنسان الذي قد ذاع صيته وطبَّق الآفاق وأصبح مرموقا يشار إليه بالبنان، أصبح عليكم الحذر منه مادام أنه حذَّرَ منه أهل العلم والإيمان والذين هم على السنة، فإنهم سيكشفون لكم بالدليل، ولا مانع من استكشاف حال ذلك الإنسان الذي حذَّر منه عالم أو علماء بأدب وحسن أسلوب فإن ذلك العالم سيقول لك: رأيتُ فيه كذا وكذا وفي الكتاب الفلاني كذا وفي الشريط الفلاني كذا وإذا هي أدلة واضحة تكشف لك ما كان يخفيه وأن ذلكم الذي طَبَّق صيته الآفاق وأصبح حديثه مستساغا يُخفي من البدع والمكر ما لا يظهره من السنة.

وأمر ثالث: وهو أن مَنْ عَلِمَ الخطأ وبان له فلا يسوغ له أن يقلِّد عالما خَفِيَ عليه الأمر، وقد قدمت لكم أَمسي أن اجتهادات العلماء غير معصومة، ولهذا لا يجوز أن تُتخذ منهجا، نعم.

من شريط مفرغ بعنوان “ضوابط التعامل مع أهل السنة وأهل الباطل”.

فضيلة الشيخ عبيد بن عبد الله الجابري – حفظه الله –
************************************************** *

الحمد لله رب العالمين ، وصلى الله وسلم على نبينا محمد ، وعلى آله وصحبه أجمعين ، أما بعد ، رداً على السائل الذي قال .. إذا سمعتُ كلام العالم في شريط أو قرأتُ له في كتاب عن شخص ما أنه مبتدع ولم أر منه دليلا على ذلك، فهل يلزمني أن أحْذر من هذا الشخص وأن أقتنع بأنه مبتدع أم أتريّث حتى أجد الدليل على ذلك؟.

أقول فإن أهل السنة لا يحكمون على أحد ببدعة إلا وقد خَبَرُوه وسَبَرُوا ما عنده – تماماً – وعرفوا منهجه – تماماً – جملةً وتفصيلاً، ومن هنا هذه المسألة تستدعي منّا وقفتين:
الوقفة الأولى: فيمن حَكم عليه عالم أو علماء بأنه مبتدع ، ولم يختلف معهم غيرهم ممن هم أهل سنة مثلهم، تفطنوا، أقول : لم يختلف معهم غيرهم فيه ممن هم أهل سنة، فإنا نقبل جرحهم له، فإنا نقبل قولهم ونحذَره ، مادام أنه حَكَم عليه وجَرَحه عالم سني ، ولم يظهر بقية أهل السنة الذين هم أقران هذا العالم من إخوانه وأبنائه العلماء فلابد من قبوله، لأن هذا العالم السني الذي جرح رجلاً : فإنه لم يجرحه إلا بأمر بان له وقام عنده عليه الدليل ،لأن هذا من دين الله، والذي يجرّح أو يُعدّل يعلم أنه مسؤول عما يقول ويفتي به أو يحكم به ويعلم أنه مسؤول من الله تعالى قبل أن يسأله الخلق.

الوقفة الثانية: إذا كان هذا الشخص الذي جرحه عالم أو علماء حكموا عليه بما يُسقطه ويوجب الحذر منه قد خالفهم غيرهم وحكموا بعدالته وأنه على السنة أو غير ذلك من الأحكام المخالفة لأحكام الآخرين المجرحين له، فمادام أن هؤلاء على السنة وهؤلاء على السنة وكلهم أهل ثقة عندهم وذَووا أمانة عندنا ففي هذه الحال ننظر في الدليل، ولهذا قالوا: «من عَلِمَ حُجَّة على من لم يَعْلَم» الجارح قال في فلان من الناس إنه مبتدع منحرفٌ سعيه وأتى بالأدلة مِن كُتب المجروح أو من أشرطته أو من نقل الثقاة عنه، فهذا موجب علينا قبول قوله وترك المعدِّلين الذين خالفوا مَنْ جرَّحه، لأن هؤلاء المجَرِّحين له أتَوا بأدلة خَفِيَتْ على الآخرين لسبب من الأسباب أو أن المعدِّل لم يقرأ ولم يسمع عن ذلك المجرّح، وإنما بنى على سابقِ عِلمِه به، وأنه كان على سنة، فأصبح هذا المجروح الذي أقيم الدليل على جرحه مجروحا والحجة مع من أقام الدليل، وعلى من يطلب الحق أن يتبع الدليل و لا يتلمّس بُنيات الطريق ذات اليمين وذات الشمال، أو يقول أقف بنفسي، فهذا لم نعهده عند السلف، وهذه الأمور تكون فيما لا يسوغ فيه الاجتهاد في أصول العقائد وأصول العبادات، فإن المصير إلى قبول من أقام الدليل واجب حتمي، وذاك العالم السني الذي خالف الجارحين، له عذره، يبقى على مكانته عندنا وعلى حرمته عندنا، ونستشعر أنه له إن شاء الله ما كان عليه من سابقة الفضل وجلالة القدر، هذا وسعه ، والعالم من أهل السنة، السلفي، بَشَرٌ يذهل، ينسى، يكون عُرضة للتلبيس من بطانة سيئة، أو كان قد وَثِقَ بذلك الرجل المجروح فلَبَّسَ عليه، والشواهد على هذا كثيرة، فكثير من السَّـقَط والذين هم في الحقيقة حربٌ على السنة وأهلِها يأتون بنماذج من كتبهم يقرؤونها على علماء أجلّة مشهود لهم بالفضل والإمامة في الدين، ويُخفي ذلك اللعّاب الماكر عن ذلك العالم الجليل الإمام الفذ الجهبذ ما لو عَلِمَه لسقط عنه، فهذا العالم يُزكِّي بناءً على ما سَمِع، فإذا طُبِع الكتاب وانتشر وتناقلته الأيدي وذاع صيته وإذا بالمجادلين يقولون زكَّاه فلان، فلان: الألباني – رحمه الله – ، أو ابن باز – رحمه الله -، أو ابن العثيمين – رحمه الله – ، زكّى هذا الكتاب فهؤلاء العلماء – رحمة الله عليهم – معذورون، ومن التَّبعة سالمون – إن شاء الله تعالى – في الدنيا والآخرة ، وإنما هذا لعَّاب أخفى ولبّس على ذلك العالم، إذن ماذا بقي؟ نقيم على ذلك الملبِّس اللعاب الدساس الماكر مِنْ كُتبه، يقيم عليه البيِّـنة من كتبه، ومن جادلنا فيه نقول خذ، هذا هو قولُه، هل تظن أنه عَرَضهُ بهذه الصورة على من سمَّينا من أهل العلم ومن هو على نفس النهج فأقرُّوه؟ الجواب كلا، إذن يجب عليك أن تكون مُنْصفا متجردا من العاطفة الجياشة المندفعة ومن الهوى الذي يُعمي ويجب عليك أن تكون طُلبتُك الحق، نعم.

الطالب: جزاكم الله خيرا وأحسن الله إليكم، هذا السائل يقول: ما الواجب على عوام السلفيين في دعاة اختلف العلماء في تعديلهم وتجريحهم سواء علموا أخطاءهم أم لم يعلموها؟

الشيخ: أقول لمعشر السلفيين والسلفيات مَنْ بلَغَتْهم مشافهةً هذه المحادثة مني ومَن ستبلغهم عبر من صاغوا الأسئلة وأَلقَوْها علينا، أقول: أنصحكم إن كنتم تحبون الناصحين ألاّ تقبلوا شريطا ولا كتابا إلا ممن عرفتم أنه على السنة مشهودٌ له بذلك واشتهر بها ولم يظهر منه خلاف ذلك، وهذه قاعدة مطَّردة في حياته وبعد موته، فمن مات وهو فيما نحسبه على السنة فهو عندنا عليها ونسأل الله أن يثبته عليها في الآخرة كما ثبته عليها حيا… آمين، هذا أولا.

ثانيا: إذا خفي عليكم أمرُ إنسان اشتهرتْ كتبه وأشرطته وذاع صيته فاسألوا عنه ذوي الخِبْرة به والعارفين بحاله، فإن السنة لا تخفى ولا يخفى أهلها، فالرجل تزكّيه أعماله، تزكّيه أعماله التي هي على السنة، وتشهد عليه بذلك ويذكره الناس بها حيا وميتا، وما تَسَتَّرَ أحدٌ بالسنة وغرّر الناس به حتى التـفُّوا حوله وارتبطوا به وأصبحوا يعوِّلون عليه ويقبلون كل ما يصدر عنه إلاّ فَضحَه الله سبحانه وتعالى وهتك ستره وكشف للخاصة والعامة ما كان يُخفي وما كان يُكنُّ من الغش والتلبيس والمكر والمخادعة، يهيّئ الله رجالا فضلاء فطناء حكماء أقوياء جهابذة ذوي علم وكياسة وفـِقهٍ في الدين يكشف الله بهم ستر ذلكم اللعاب الملبِّس الغشاش، فعليكم إذا بُيِّنَ لكم حال ذلك الإنسان الذي قد ذاع صيته وطبَّق الآفاق وأصبح مرموقا يشار إليه بالبنان، أصبح عليكم الحذر منه مادام أنه حذَّرَ منه أهل العلم والإيمان والذين هم على السنة، فإنهم سيكشفون لكم بالدليل، ولا مانع من استكشاف حال ذلك الإنسان الذي حذَّر منه عالم أو علماء بأدب وحسن أسلوب فإن ذلك العالم سيقول لك: رأيتُ فيه كذا وكذا وفي الكتاب الفلاني كذا وفي الشريط الفلاني كذا وإذا هي أدلة واضحة تكشف لك ما كان يخفيه وأن ذلكم الذي طَبَّق صيته الآفاق وأصبح حديثه مستساغا يُخفي من البدع والمكر ما لا يظهره من السنة.

وأمر ثالث: وهو أن مَنْ عَلِمَ الخطأ وبان له فلا يسوغ له أن يقلِّد عالما خَفِيَ عليه الأمر، وقد قدمت لكم أَمسي أن اجتهادات العلماء غير معصومة، ولهذا لا يجوز أن تُتخذ منهجا، نعم.

من شريط مفرغ بعنوان “ضوابط التعامل مع أهل السنة وأهل الباطل”.

[9] O Faris Al-Hammadi! The time has arrived for your deceitful and absurd statements to be unveiled for all to see! [Brother, did you advise Faris privately prior to rebuking him?]

In The Name of Allah, The Most Merciful, The Bestower of Mercy.

Al-Allaamah Muqbil Bin Haadee Al-Waadi’ee, may Allah have mercy upon him, was asked: “What is the difference between criticism and advice?”

Response: The difference between criticism and advice is that advice can be in private between the one advising and the one being advised, and it can be with gentleness and mildness. 

فَقُولَا لَهُ قَوْلًا لَّيِّنًا لَّعَلَّهُ يَتَذَكَّرُ أَوْ يَخْشَىٰ 

And speak to him (i.e. Fir’awn) mildly, perhaps he may accept admonition or fear Allah]. [Taa Haa. 44]

As for criticism, it can be recorded in books and mentioned in councils (sittings), and our predecessors, may Allah have mercy on them, combined between the two. Imam Adh-Dhahabi, may Allah have mercy upon him, said, “Ratan, and who is Ratan? (i.e. Ratan Bin Abdillah Al-Hindi)? A liar amongst the big liars who claimed that he accompanied the Prophet after six years has elapsed”.

Imam Ash-Shafi’ee said, may Allāh have mercy upon him, said: “The narration on the authority of Haram Bin Uthman is Haraam (forbidden)”.

When Suwayd Bin Sa’eed narrated, “He who is infatuated, abstains, conceals (his infatuation) and then dies, he dies as a martyr”, Yahya Bin Ma’een said, “If I had a horse and a spear, I would have carried out a military expedition against Suwayd”.

Aban Ibn Abi Ayyash was a Zahid, a devout worshipper, and a virtuous person, but he used to mix up in his transmission of hadith. Shu’bah was asked to refrain from (speaking) about Aban Ibn Abi Ayyash, so he said, “I will see (or wait)”. Then he advised him saying, “Indeed, (this affair is) religion, I can’t except to speak about Aban Ibn Abi Ayyash”. (1)

Imam Al-Albaanee, may Allah have mercy upon him, was asked: The statement of some people or the stipulation of some of them is that it is more correct that advice must be given before refutations are printed- a copy must be sent to the one refuted so that it can be looked into. They say this is from the methodology of the pious predecessors.

Response: This is not a prerequisite, but if feasible and it is hoped that affinity would be established through this approach – to avoid publicising the matter, then it is undoubtedly a good thing. However, as for making it a prerequisite first and foremost, and a general prerequisite, there is no wisdom in this at all. As we all know, people are like the gold and silver mines, therefore, if you are aware that someone is aligned with us on the right path and is receptive to advice, then you write to him without exposing their mistakes. From your perspective, this is considered beneficial. However, it is important to note that this is not a prerequisite, and even if it were, it would be practically impossible to fully implement. How would you obtain their contact information and establish correspondence? Moreover, can you guarantee a response from them? These aspects are purely speculative. Fulfilling this condition is extremely challenging, hence it is not regarded as a prerequisite. [2]

Imam Abdul Azeez Bin Baz, may Allah have mercy upon him, was asked, “When should advice be given in private or openly?”

Response: The person giving advice does what is best. If he determines that it is more beneficial to advise discreetly, they do so secretly. Conversely, if he believes it is more beneficial to offer advice openly, he does so openly. However, if the sin occurs in secret, the advice can only be given privately. If he is aware of his brother’s sins in secret, he offers advice in secret and does not expose him. On the other hand, if the sin is committed openly and witnessed by others, such as someone consuming alcohol at a gathering, it is necessary to openly express disapproval. Similarly, if someone encourages others to engage in alcohol consumption or to fornicate, he should address them by saying, “O my brother! This behaviour is not permissible. [3]

Al-Allamah Rabee Bin Haadi Al-Mad’khali, may Allah preserve him, was asked: “Our Shaikh, one of the affairs that have become circulated and have aroused an intense feeling among the Salafis, is that there are people who claim that advice is obligatory before warning. Is there a statement you can give in this matter?”

Response: I answered this question before – may Allah bless you. We have been put to trial with these types of affairs, so you find a person spreading falsehoods, lies, and slander against others- both about individuals and in general; and if you give him advice or (respond with) criticism or something, he says, “Why did they not warn me, why did they not advise me, and why did they not explain to me”. Corrupt excuses. We seek from these people to repent to Allah and return to the truth with complete good manners and humility, and to leave such excuses. Assume that this one made a mistake and did not speak, and did not advise you, then (still) return to the truth and reprimand him thereafter. As for spreading (trouble) amongst the people and persisting in your falsehood and mistakes, and saying, “They did not do and they did”, this is empty talk. It is obligated to a believer to return to Allah (in obedience, repentance, etc). You publish your mistakes in books, tapes, etc. If you hid your mistakes and committed them in the darkness of your house – (known only to) you and Allah, then this person discovers you, he would have advised you – between you and him. As for disseminating your statements and (publicising) deeds in the world, then someone comes and publishes- meaning, replies to you (or rebuts you), there is nothing wrong with this -May Allah bless you. Leave these excuses that (arise) from many of the people of falsehood who are rebellious in falsehood and stubbornness. [4]

Faris has taken to social media with an unrestrained fervour, expressing his opinions without a hint of trepidation or discretion for quite some time. This prompted us to address some of his doubts, deceptions, insults, and misrepresentations outlined in posts 1 to 8. The insights shared by the senior scholars are more than sufficient for those genuinely seeking clarity, while they serve as a harsh reality check for those attempting to dilute the sound methodology surrounding this issue. Had Faris chosen to keep his misguided notions to himself, we would have offered him counsel in private. However, his belief in the validity of his erroneous views, which he feels compelled him to broadcast publicly, warrants nothing less than a public admonishment.

To be continued…InShaAllah


[1] Ghaarah Al-Ashritah 1/71

[2] Silsilah Al-Hudaa Wan-Noor. Number 63

[3] Majallah Al-Islaah. (Number 17/241). Date: 23/6/1993

[4]https://rabee.net/alfatawi/%D8%B4%D9%8A%D8%AE%D9%86%D8%A7-%D9%85%D9%86-%D8%A7%D9%84%D8%A3%D9%85%D9%88%D8%B1-%D8%A7%D9%84%D8%AA%D9%8A-%D8%B5%D8%A7%D8%B1%D8%AA-%D8%AA%D8%B1%D9%88%D8%AC-%D9%88%D8%B5%D8%A7%D8%B1%D8%AA-%D8%B9%D8%B7/

Considerations to keep in mind when initiating and responding to greetings of Salaam

In The Name of Allah, The Most Merciful, The Bestower of Mercy.

The Messenger, peace and blessings of Allah be upon him, said: Whoever says “As-Salamu Alaykum” will receive ten good deeds. If one says, “As-Salaamu Alaykum Wa Ramatullah”, they will be granted twenty good deeds. If one says, “As-Salaamu Alaykum Wa Rahmatullahi Wabarakatuhu”, they will earn thirty good deeds. [1]

A man approached the Prophet, peace and blessings of Allah be upon him, and greeted him with “As-Salaamu Alaykum”. The Prophet responded to the greeting and the man took a seat. The Prophet then said: “Ten (good deeds)”. Then another individual arrived and said, “As-Salaamu Alaykum Wa Rahmatullah”. The Prophet replied and the man sat down, to which the Prophet said: “Twenty (good deeds).” Then (a third) person came and greeted, “As-Salaamu Alaykum Wa Rahmatullaahi Wa Barakatuhu”. The Prophet responded, and after the man sat, he said: “Thirty (good deeds).” [2]

Abu Hurairah, may Allah be pleased with him, said: Allah’s Messenger, peace and blessings of Allah be upon him, said, “The younger should greet the older one, the riding person should greet the walking one, and the walking one should greet the sitting one, and the small number of persons should greet the large number of persons.” [3]

Thirdly, have you not come across the Ayah:
مَن جَآءَ بِٱلۡحَسَنَةِ فَلَهُ ۥ عَشۡرُ أَمۡثَالِهَا‌ۖ

Whoever brings a good deed shall have ten times the like thereof to his credit. [Al-An’aam. 160] – Meaning, whether in speech or action, whether apparent or concealed, pertaining to the rights of Allah or the rights of the creation, “shall have ten times the like thereof”. This is the minimum level of its increase. [4]

By starting the Salaam and choosing different phrases, we can earn either 10, 20, or 30 good deeds InShaAllah. Additionally, every good deed you perform is automatically valued at 10 good deeds. With this in mind, who would want to wait for someone else to greet them first?!

It Is Obligatory to Reply to Salaam

Shaikh Abdus Salaam Burgess, may Allah have mercy upon him, said:

Imam Ibn Abdul-Barr, may Allah have mercy upon him, said: The obligation of returning the Islamic greeting is (found in the) statement:

وَإِذَا حُيِّيتُم بِتَحِيَّةٍ فَحَيُّوا بِأَحْسَنَ مِنْهَا أَوْ رُدُّوهَا

”When you are greeted with a greeting, greet in return with what is better than it, or (at least) return it equally.” [An-Nisa 86]

Imam Ibn Kathir, may Allah have mercy upon him, said: To give the Islamic greeting is voluntary and it is an obligation to return it. This is what all the scholars say- that it is obligated to the one who is given the salaam to reply and he has sinned if he does not reply because he has opposed Allah’s command. The abandonment of returning the Islamic greeting is an evil and ugly deed and many people have been afflicted with it in this era. They are prevented from it due to pride and self-amazement. So, we gently say to all of them, ”Who are you?! From what did you come from?” Allah says:

مِنۡ أَىِّ شَىۡءٍ خَلَقَهُ ۥ
مِن نُّطۡفَةٍ خَلَقَهُ ۥ فَقَدَّرَهُ ۥ

From what thing did He create him? From Nutfah (male and female semen drops) He created him and then set him in due proportion. [Abasa. 17-18]

Are you greater in status than the Messenger, peace and blessings of Allah be upon him! Indeed he returned the Islamic greeting of the young, the old, the free person, and the slave, and he also greeted them. We ask Allah for guidance and success for all. Also when a person is leaving a gathering and gives the Salaam, it is obligatory to reply to him. [5]

Extend Equal Respect to All When Initiating or Responding to Greetings

Abdullah Bin Amr, may Allah be pleased with him, said: A man asked the Prophet, peace and blessings of Allah be upon him: “What sort of deeds or (what qualities of) Islam are good?” The Prophet replied, “To feed (the poor) and greet those whom you know and those whom you do not Know”. [6]

Abdullah Ibn Mas’ud, may Allah be pleased with him, said: Allah’s Messenger, peace and blessings of Allah be upon him, said: “Verily, among the signs of the Hour, is that a man would not give another man Salaam except due to being acquainted with him”. [7]

“Verily, during the approach of the hour, the greeting will only be given to one who is specifically (known to the one who gives the greeting). [8]

As-Sa’khawee, may Allah have mercy upon him, said: “The greeting of the select few refers to those whom one chooses to greet, whether due to their prominence or for reasons such as desiring (something) or out of fear“. [9]

We ask Allah:

اللهم كما حَسَّنْت خَلْقِي فَحَسِّنْ خُلُقِي
“O Allah! Just as You made my external form beautiful, make my character beautiful as well”.

Keep in mind during the summer months when we enjoy sitting at outdoor cafes:
https://salafidawahmanchester.com/2024/04/12/some-rights-of-the-road-when-we-decide-to-sit-outside-cafes-or-the-masjid-especially-during-summer/


[1] Sahih Targhib 2711

[2] Sahih Abi Dawud 5195

[3] Al-Bukhari 6232

[4] An from Tafsir “As-Sadi”

[5]An Excerpt from ‘Al-Ilaam Bi-Ba’di Ahkaam As-Salaam’: 11-12

[6] Al-Bukhari 12

[7] Silsilah As-Sahihah 2/147

[8] Silsilah As-Sahihah 647

[9] Al-Qana’ah Feemaa Yahsunu Al-I’haatah Bihi Min Ash’raat As-Saa’ah 87

[1] Figureheads and Groups of Misguidance, Imposters and Deceivers

In The Name of Allah, The Most Merciful, The Bestower of Mercy.

He is known as Al-Husayn Ibn Mansoor Al-Hallaaj, also referred to as Abu Mughith or Abu Abdillah. His ancestry traces back to a fire worshipper from Persia. He was raised in Waasit, although some accounts suggest he spent his formative years in Tastar. His journey led him to Baghdad and subsequently to Makkah, where he resided in the vicinity of Masjid Al-Haraam, enduring both extreme heat and cold. For many years, he lived without shelter, subsisting on minimal food and water during breakfast for an entire year, driven by a commitment to self-discipline and devotion to worship. He often positioned himself on a rock under the intense sun at the mountain of Abu Qubays.

He accompanied several Sufi figureheads, including Junaid Bin Muhammad, Amr Bin Uthmaan Al-Makkee, and Abul Husayn An-Nooree. Al-Khateeb Al-Baghdaadee said: “The Sufis hold differing opinions regarding Al-Hallaaj; many assert that he does not belong to their ranks and should not be associated with their tradition. This (differing) extends to earlier figures such as Abul Abbas Bin Ataa Al-Baghdaadee, Muhammad Bin Khafeef Az-Sheeraazee, and Ibrahim Bin Muhammad An-Nasraabaadhee An-Naysaabooree, who recognised Al-Hallaaj as being on the right path and documented his teachings. Ibn Khafeef even stated, ‘Al-Husayn Bin Mansoor is a learned scholar.’ Abu Abdir Rahman As-Sulamee, whose full name was Muhammad Ibnul Husayn, recounted hearing Ibrahim Ibn Muhammad An-Nasraabaadhee share insights from Al-Hallaaj regarding the soul, subsequently addressing a critic by saying, ‘If there is anyone, after the Prophets and the truthful, who embodies monotheism, it is Al-Hallaaj.’ Furthermore, Abu Abdir Rahmaan noted that he heard Mansoor Bin Abdillah recount Shiblee’s words: ‘Al-Husayn Bin Mansoor and I are essentially the same, except that he manifested himself while I chose to remain concealed.’ Those who denied Al-Hallaaj’s association with the Sufis attributed his actions to sorcery, asserting that his beliefs align with those of heretics”.

Al-Hallaaj’s pronouncements reflected the concept of Hulool, [a] and he composed poetry associated with Sufiyyah. Since his execution, there has been ongoing debate among the people concerning his legacy. However, the rightly guided jurists, Imams, and scholars reached a consensus that he warranted execution by the authorities, deeming him a foolish and concealed disbeliever, as well as a sorcerer. This perspective was similarly held by the majority of early Sufis. Nevertheless, within the Sufi community, there exists a faction—previously mentioned—that idealises his situation, misled by his external demeanour and unable to comprehend the reality of his speech. Initially, he dedicated himself to worship; however, he lacked knowledge, and his practices were not grounded in the authentic divine path that leads to the pleasure and reverence of Allah. Consequently, Al-Hallaaj contributed more to corruption than to reform. Imam Sufyaan Bin Uyaynah, may Allah have mercy upon him, said: “Those among our scholars who fall into corruption bear a resemblance to the Jews, while those among the worshippers who become corrupt resemble the Christians.” This is the reason Al-Hallaaj engaged in the concepts of Hulool and Ittihaad, ultimately aligning himself with the ranks of corruption and deviation. His situation changed, and he traveled to various places, showing people that he was a guide to the way of Allah. It is well-known that he went to India, learned magic, and claimed, “I use it to call people to the way of Allah.” In India, people spoke of him as someone who helps others in tough times. In Khurasan, they called him the special one, while in Persia, he was known as Abu Abdillah, a man who avoided worldly pleasures. In Khuzestan, he was also called Abu Abdillah, the mysterious one who chose to stay away from worldly pleasures.

Al-Khateeb Al-Baghdaadee conveyed through his chain of narration that Al-Hallaaj stated, “The wisdom of both the early and later generations can be distilled into four statements: loving what is exalted, detesting the despicable, adhering to divine revelation, and maintaining a fear of straying.” It is evident that Al-Hallaaj faltered in the latter two aspects, as he neither adhered to the revelation nor maintained steadfastness; instead, he strayed from these principles and ultimately fell into Bidah and misguidance. Abdur Rahmaan As-Sulamee narrated from Amr Bin Uthmaan Al-Makkee, who stated: “While I was strolling through one of the narrow streets of Makkah, reciting the Qur’an alongside Al-Hallaaj, he listened to my recitation and remarked, ‘I can express something akin to this.’ Thus, I chose to distance myself from him.”

Al-Khateeb Al-Baghdaadee reported, “Mas’ud Bin Nasir conveyed to me that Ibn Bakur Az-Sheeraazee mentioned he heard Abu Zur’ah At-Tabaree state, ‘The situation regarding Husayn Bin Mansoor Al-Hallaaj among the populace is one of differing; some have embraced him while others have dismissed him. However, I recall Muhammad Bin Yahyah Ar-Raazee asserting, ‘I heard Amr Bin Uthmaan denouncing Hallaaj, expressing, ‘Had I the means, I would have slain him myself.’ I inquired, ‘What did you discover with the Shaikh?’ He replied, ‘I recited a verse from the Book of Allah, to which Al-Hallaaj responded, ‘I might be able to produce a statement similar to this.'”

Abu Zur’ah At-Tabaree reported, “I heard Abu Yaqub Al-Aqta state, ‘I arranged the marriage of my daughter to Al-Husayn Al-Hallaaj because I observed that he was adhering to the right path and was diligent in his worship. However, it soon became evident to me that he was a magician, a deceiver, and a malevolent disbeliever.'” This union occurred in Makkah, and the wife was Umm Husayn, the daughter of Abee Yaqub Al-Aqta. She gave birth to a son named Ahmad Ibn Al-Husayn Bin Mansur. In his treatise, Abul Qasim Al-Qushayree discusses the topic of “Safeguarding the hearts of the Mashaayikh.” He recounts an incident in which Amr and Ibn Uthmaan visited Al-Hallaaj in Makkah, where they discovered him engaged in writing on sheets of paper. Amr inquired about his activity, to which Al-Hallaaj responded that he was engaged in a contest with the Qur’an. Following this encounter, Amr stated that he supplicated against Al-Hallaaj, resulting in the latter’s subsequent lack of success. Additionally, Amr expressed his disapproval of Abu Yaqub Al-Aqta for marrying his daughter to Al-Hallaaj.

Amr Bin Uthmaan authored numerous treatises in which he denounced Al-Hallaaj and cautioned the populace against him, disseminating these writings to various regions. Meanwhile, Al-Hallaaj roamed the lands, moving in all directions, and began to present himself as a proponent of the path of Allah, employing a variety of deceptive tactics. He persisted in this behaviour until divine retribution was brought upon him—a punishment that is inescapable for those who commit transgressions. Consequently, he was executed in accordance with Islamic law, which is applied solely to those deemed heretical. He intended to challenge the Qur’an in the sacred vicinity of the Ka’bah, the very place where Jibreel delivered the Qur’an, and indeed, Allah says:

وَمَن يُرِدۡ فِيهِ بِإِلۡحَادِۭ بِظُلۡمٍ۬ نُّذِقۡهُ مِنۡ عَذَابٍ أَلِيمٍ۬

And whoever inclines to evil actions therein or to do wrong (i.e. practice polytheism and leave Islamic Monotheism), him We shall cause to taste a painful torment]. [Al-Hajj. 25]

Trickery: Al-Khateeb Al-Bagdaadee narrated that Al-Hallaaj instructed one of his trusted associates to journey to a mountainous region, providing the following guidance: “Demonstrate your commitment to worship, virtue, and self-restraint to the people. Once they are drawn to you, develop their affection and trust, then reveal to them that you have been stricken with blindness. After a period, disclose that you are also crippled. If they rush to offer you assistance, respond by saying, ‘O benevolent individuals! Your efforts will not benefit me.’ Subsequently, inform them that you have had a dream in which you encountered Allah’s Messenger, peace and blessings be upon him, who conveyed to you, ‘You will only find healing through a Qutb [b], who will arrive on a specific day and month, and his characteristics are as follows.’ At that designated time, I [Al-Hallaaj] will present myself to you.”

The individual, who was an associate of Al-Hallaaj, traveled to that region and took up residence there. He dedicated himself to acts of worship, demonstrated piety, and engaged in the recitation of the Qur’an. Over time, the local populace came to trust and admire him. He then revealed to them that he was afflicted with blindness. Subsequently, he disclosed that he had been enduring a chronic illness, prompting the community to earnestly seek a remedy for his condition, though their efforts proved fruitless. He addressed them, saying, “O benevolent people! Your endeavours have yielded no results, and I have seen the Messenger of Allah, peace and blessings be upon him, in a dream. He informed me that my healing lies solely in the hands of a Qutb, who will arrive on a specific day and month.” Consequently, the people began to escort him to the Masjid, honouring him in anticipation of the Qutb’s arrival as he had foretold. After a period, Al-Hallaaj entered the region quietly, clad in a white woolen garment. He proceeded to the Masjid, occupying a designated spot where he engaged in worship, remaining indifferent to those around him. The people recognised him from the description provided by the individual feigning illness, and they approached him, offering greetings and gently touching him (i.e. as a gesture of admiration and respect).

When the designated time arrived, the people informed the one who was feigning illness about the man in the Masjid. He then asked them to describe the individual. After they provided the description, he remarked, “That is the person of whom I was informed in a dream, that my healing lies in his hands. Please take me to him.” They assisted him and positioned him before Al-Hallaaj. He addressed Al-Hallaaj, saying, “O Abu Abdillah! I had a dream in which I saw Allah’s Messenger,” and proceeded to recount his dream. Al-Hallaaj raised his hands in supplication, then spat into his palms and applied the spittle to the man’s face, resulting in the restoration of his sight as if he had never been blind. He then took some of the spittle and applied it to the man’s legs, enabling him to stand and walk before the gathered crowd, including the leaders and dignitaries of the land, as if he had never suffered from any ailment. The onlookers exclaimed, “Allah is the Greatest! Glorified be Allah!” They praised Al-Hallaaj with an adoration that only amplified the falsehood he had presented to them.

Al-Hallaaj remained with them for a period during which they honoured and revered him. As he prepared to leave, he expressed a desire for them to collect substantial wealth on his behalf. He stated, “I do not need worldly possessions; we have attained this level of piety by renouncing such things. However, it is possible that this companion of mine has brothers and friends among the Abdaal [c], who are diligently striving in the path of Allah at Tartus, engaging in pilgrimage and charitable acts, and they require assistance to continue on this journey.” Subsequently, the man who had been suffering from a chronic illness but was now healed, affirmed, “The Shaikh speaks the truth. Allah has restored my sight and granted me health so that I may dedicate my life to serving Allah and performing hajj alongside our virtuous Abdaal brothers.” He then encouraged the people to contribute wealth. Al-Hallaaj departed, while the man remained with the community until they amassed a considerable amount of wealth, including gold and silver. Once the wealth was collected, he delivered a farewell address and left, subsequently reuniting with Al-Hallaaj to share the gathered riches.

An Incident Regarding a Man Who Witnessed Al-Hallaaj’s Tricks

The witness recounted, “I had often heard tales of Al-Hallaaj’s miracles and longed to witness one for myself. Therefore, I approached him and offered my greetings. He inquired, ‘Do you seek something at this moment?’ I replied, ‘I wish for fresh fish.’ He then entered his home and was absent for an hour. Upon his return, he presented me with a fish that was gasping for air, and his two feet covered in mud. He explained, ‘I prayed to Allah, and He instructed me to go to the riverbed to fetch this fish for you. The mud on my feet is from that area.’ I suggested, ‘If you are willing, you may take me to your home so that I can observe and bolster my faith. I will believe in you unless something contrary is revealed to me.’ He responded, ‘Come in.’ Once inside, he locked the door, sat down, and put on an act. I explored the house but found no other access or information, leaving me bewildered by his situation.”

I observed a barrier in my path, which I shook, causing it to yield. Behind it, I discovered a door that provided access. Upon entering, I found myself in a vast orchard filled with a variety of fresh fruits and an abundance of food. There was a large pond teeming with fish of various sizes. I waded into the water and caught one fish, resulting in my feet becoming muddy, similar to the state of his feet. I then approached the door and called out, “Open the door; I trust you.” However, upon noticing my muddy condition, he became alarmed and attempted to attack me. In self-defense, I struck him in the face with the fish and exclaimed, “O enemy of Allah! You have wearied me today.” After managing to escape, I encountered him again a few days later. He greeted me with a smile and warned, “Do not disclose this. I have not seen anyone; otherwise, I would have sent someone to kill you in your sleep.” It became clear to me that he intended to eliminate me if I revealed what I knew, and I chose to remain silent until he was ultimately crucified. [An Excerpt from Al-Bidaayah Wan-Nihaayah. 11/132-137]

An Explanation Concerning The Khawaariq [Phenomena ascribed to occurrences that transcend the ordinary or typical] and The Deceivers – By Shaikh Al-Islam Ibn Taymiyyah

The Khawaariq, through which the devils lead astray the children of Adam, manifest in various forms, such as when devils assume the likeness of an individual who is either absent or deceased, among other similar instances. This phenomenon has misled numerous individuals who identify as Muslims or as adherents of the Scriptures. Their beliefs are founded on two main points: Firstly, they assert that anyone from whom these khawaariq arise is a Wali, and in Christian terminology, is regarded as a Qadees A’dheem, or a great saint. Secondly, they claim that such individuals are infallible, meaning that all they convey is the truth and all their directives are just. It is entirely possible that an individual did not exhibit any phenomena that deviate from the norm—whether or not it is connected to sound knowledge and piety—or any extraordinary occurrences associated with malevolent deeds. Instead, the individual may have simply engaged in the deceptions characteristic of liars and wicked sinners. The deceptions employed by such individuals are indeed numerous, leading observers to mistakenly perceive them as remarkable events that defy the ordinary. However, this is not the case, nor do these deceptions resemble those attributed to monks. Several authors have documented the tricks of monks, including an account of one who purportedly transformed water into oil. In this instance, as the oil accumulates within the lighthouse, the water level diminishes, causing the oil to rise, thereby misleading onlookers into believing that the water has been converted into oil. Numerous similar instances exist among the deceptions of certain Christians, as all that these individuals—who have distorted the teachings of the Messiah (peace and blessings of Allah be upon him)—claim to be extraordinary are either the work of devils or mere tricks, devoid of any connection to the miracles performed by the righteous.

Similarly, the deviated people – those who seek to change the teachings of Muhammad, peace and blessings of Allah be upon him, engage in practices that are not sanctioned by Allah and His Messenger. They establish these practices as a form of worship, prioritising them over the divinely ordained path. For instance, they may choose to prioritise the sounds of tambourines and high-pitched flutes over the recitation of Allah’s Book. This leads individuals into a state of ecstasy and a trance influenced by Shaytaan, resulting in them speaking in an unfamiliar language. Upon regaining their composure—much like a possessed individual who, under the influence of a jinn, reveals the thoughts and feelings instilled by shaytaan—they find themselves unable to recall their initial utterances. The heretics seek to substitute the teachings of the Messengers, whether they pertain to the religion of the Messiah or that of Muhammad, peace and blessings of Allah be upon them. Among these individuals are those who advocate for heretical beliefs, lead others astray, and include disbelievers, polytheists, apostates, and others. Notable figures among them are Musaylimah the liar, Al-Aswad Al-Unzee, Al-Haarith Ad-Dimashqee, Baba Rumi, and others who have engaged in actions deemed to be from the Khawaariq, often misrepresented as miracles, but which are, in truth, associated with the works of devils.

The tricksters are abundant and do not possess the status of Awliyaa of Allah. Their purported extraordinary actions, which deviate from the norm, are often linked to the malevolent practices of soothsayers and magicians, or they are simply deceptive tricks. Unlike those who are aligned with demonic forces, these individuals intentionally fabricate lies and engage in deceit. Among them are those who mislead others into believing that their actions are miraculous, akin to those of the righteous, while some are fully aware that their deeds stem from diabolical influences, yet they persist in these actions to fulfill their own objectives.

The purpose of this discourse is to highlight that numerous activities deemed unconventional, often referred to as miracles, may actually stem from satanic influences or deceptive practices. This leads individuals to mistakenly believe they are witnessing genuine miracles performed by virtuous individuals. In truth, actions rooted in Shirk and malevolent behavior can only originate from demonic forces. This includes instances where individuals invoke celestial bodies, call upon deceased or absent persons, make oaths using obscure phrases with unknown meanings, or utilise names associated with devils. Additionally, seeking assistance through immoral actions and oppression results in deeds that, while appearing extraordinary, are ultimately from the devils.

The righteous have miracles similar to those of the pious individuals within this Ummah, the disciples of the Messiah, and others who follow the authentic and unaltered faith of the Messiah. However, the presence of miracles in the lives of these righteous individuals does not imply that they are infallible like the Prophets, peace and blessings of Allah be upon them. A righteous person, referred to as a Wali, may indeed exhibit miraculous abilities, yet they can still err in their thoughts, perceptions, or interpretations of what they hear, see, or understand from the revealed Scripture.

Consequently, the assertions made by individuals other than the Prophets may be accepted or dismissed (based on the available evidence). In contrast, it is incumbent upon individuals to sincerely affirm all that the Prophets have communicated concerning matters of the unseen and to comply with their commands. Therefore, Allah has obligated that a person must believe in all that the Prophets have conveyed, while there is no obligation to accept the statements of others. Allah states:

قُولُوٓاْ ءَامَنَّا بِٱللَّهِ وَمَآ أُنزِلَ إِلَيۡنَا وَمَآ أُنزِلَ إِلَىٰٓ إِبۡرَٲهِـۧمَ وَإِسۡمَـٰعِيلَ وَإِسۡحَـٰقَ وَيَعۡقُوبَ وَٱلۡأَسۡبَاطِ وَمَآ أُوتِىَ مُوسَىٰ وَعِيسَىٰ وَمَآ أُوتِىَ ٱلنَّبِيُّونَ مِن رَّبِّهِمۡ لَا نُفَرِّقُ بَيۡنَ أَحَدٍ۬ مِّنۡهُمۡ وَنَحۡنُ لَهُ ۥ مُسۡلِمُونَ

Say (O Muslims), “We believe in Allah and that which has been sent down to us and that which has been sent down to Ibrahim (Abraham), Isma’il (Ishmael), Ishaque (Isaac), Ya’qub (Jacob), and to Al-Asbat [the twelve sons of Ya’qub (Jacob)], and that which has been given to Musa (Moses) and ‘Iesa (Jesus), and that which has been given to the Prophets from their Lord. We make no distinction between any of them, and to Him we have submitted (in Islam).” [Al-Baqarah. 136]

Allah, The Exalted, says:
لَّيۡسَ ٱلۡبِرَّ أَن تُوَلُّواْ وُجُوهَكُمۡ قِبَلَ ٱلۡمَشۡرِقِ وَٱلۡمَغۡرِبِ وَلَـٰكِنَّ ٱلۡبِرَّ مَنۡ ءَامَنَ بِٱللَّهِ وَٱلۡيَوۡمِ ٱلۡأَخِرِ وَٱلۡمَلَـٰٓٮِٕڪَةِ وَٱلۡكِتَـٰبِ وَٱلنَّبِيِّـۧنَ

It is not Al-Birr (piety, righteousness, and each and every act of obedience to Allah, etc.) that you turn your faces towards east and (or) west (in prayers); but Al-Birr is (the quality of) the one who believes in Allah, the Last Day, the Angels, the Book, the Prophets. [Al-Baqarah 177]

The Muslims unanimously agree that anyone who denies the Prophethood of even a single Prophet, whose Prophethood is well-known, is considered a disbeliever or an apostate. There is no differentiation among the Prophets; one cannot accept some while rejecting others. Allah says:

إِنَّ ٱلَّذِينَ يَكۡفُرُونَ بِٱللَّهِ وَرُسُلِهِۦ وَيُرِيدُونَ أَن يُفَرِّقُواْ بَيۡنَ ٱللَّهِ وَرُسُلِهِۦ وَيَقُولُونَ نُؤۡمِنُ بِبَعۡضٍ۬ وَنَڪۡفُرُ بِبَعۡضٍ۬ وَيُرِيدُونَ أَن يَتَّخِذُواْ بَيۡنَ ذَٲلِكَ سَبِيلاً
أُوْلَـٰٓٮِٕكَ هُمُ ٱلۡكَـٰفِرُونَ حَقًّ۬اۚ وَأَعۡتَدۡنَا لِلۡكَـٰفِرِينَ عَذَابً۬ا مُّهِينً۬ا

Verily, those who disbelieve in Allah and His Messengers and wish to make distinction between Allah and His Messengers (by believing in Allah and disbelieving in His Messengers) saying, “We believe in some but reject others,” and wish to adopt a way in between. They are in truth disbelievers. And We have prepared for the disbelievers a humiliating torment. [An-Nisaa. 150-151] [An Excerpt from “Al-Jawaabus Saheeh Liman Baddala Deen Al-Maseeh”. Vol 1. 284-287]

Al-Allamah Rabee Bin Hadi Al-Mad’khali, may Allah preserve him, stated:

Among the Dajjaals – liars – whom the Messenger of Allah, peace and blessings be upon him, cautioned against were Musaylimah the Liar from Yamaamah and Al-Aswad Al-Unzi, both of whom falsely claimed prophethood. Consequently, a significant number of Arabs turned away from Islam; thus, Allah brought about their destruction, along with others, and their trial concluded through the swords wielded by the companions of the Messenger of Allah. Among the liars who claimed prophethood was Mukhtar Bin Abee Ubayd Ath-Thaqafee, the liar regarding whom the Messenger remarked, “A liar will emerge from Thaqeef and bloodshedder”. [d] The liar referred to was Al-Mukhtaar, while the bloodshedder was al-Hajjaaj. Among those who asserted prophethood were Al-Harith, known as the liar, and Ghulaam Ahmad Al-Qadiyaanee Al-Hindee, who garnered a following spread across the globe, claiming that prophethood continues to this day. Each lair is accompanied by other malevolent liars, akin to their leader.

Among the liars was the Jew, the wicked Abdullah Ibn Saba, who falsely professed to be a Muslim and incited numerous individuals against the Rightly Guided Caliph Uthmaan Bin Affaan, may Allah be pleased with him, ultimately leading to his martyrdom during that trial. He is recognised as the originator of the Raafidha Shiite doctrine and its abhorrent principles, which include an exaggerated reverence for the family of the Prophet, to the extent of deifying them. Many adherents regard Ali, may Allah be pleased with him, as an object of worship, asserting that he was designated by the Prophet as his successor in leadership. Such claims are fabrications; they also assert that Ali will return to enact vengeance upon Abu Bakr and Umar, may Allah be pleased with them, as well as five hundred Caliphs from the Banee Umayyah and Banee Abbas. This nefarious individual, Ibn Saba, instigated the disparagement of the Prophet’s companions and other matters related to the trial he initiated, which heretics propagate and firmly uphold, alongside the leaders of the Raafidha—those deceivers who inundate the world with lies and slanders. Their belief system is fundamentally rooted in lies and misguidance.

Among the prominent figures of Bidah and misguidance, including Jahm Bin Safwaan, leaders of the Khawaarij, the Mutazilah, the Huloolee Sufis, and grave worshippers such as Nidhaam Al-Mutazilee, Hallaaj the heretic, Ibn Arabi the heretic, Ibn Sab’een, At-Tilimsaanee, and others among the heretics – liars who concealed themselves within Islam, infiltrating the ranks of the people of Tasawwuf, as this group has proven to be a fertile ground for such individuals. Similarly, the Raafidah provides ample space for the heretics.

Among the liars in this era: The political leaders, including secularists and Baathists (Arab Nationalists), and many people who promote enticing slogans under the banner of Islam, such as Islamic socialism, Islamic democracy, and the call Wahdatul Adyan, along with various other erroneous assertions made in Islam’s name. These claims emerge from groups that profess to elevate Islam and aim to restore the Islamic Ummah to its former greatness; however, their actions only serve to lead people further into misguidance and ignorance, and we seek refuge in Allah.

This presents a more severe danger to the people and the youth, therefore, it is obligated to the Muslims and the students of knowledge to exercise utmost vigilance regarding such people. They must alert the Muslim community to their schemes and intentions, as well as expose their hidden agendas. Furthermore, Muslims should steadfastly adhere to the teachings of the Qur’an and the Sunnah of the Prophet, emulating the Salafus Saaleh (pious predecessors) in their beliefs, methodologies, loyalty, and disassociation. Therefore, Muslims should engage with these individuals in the same manner as the Salafus Saaleh—by exercising caution, issuing warnings, revealing their concealed matters, and highlighting their shortcomings, all in the interest of safeguarding the religion and providing sincere counsel to the Muslims.

Concerning the ongoing struggle between those who uphold the truth and those who support falsehood throughout history and across various locations, it is essential to recognise that the truth will ultimately prevail, as promised by Allah. The religion He has established will triumph, and the followers of truth will gain superiority over those who propagate falsehood. It is inevitable that falsehood and its proponents will face defeat and ultimately fail. Consequently, it is imperative for the followers of truth—specifically the pure Ahlus Sunnah—to remain steadfast and resilient. They must diligently engage in all efforts that support the religion ordained by Allah, encompassing its beliefs, commands, prohibitions, rulings, and methodologies. Furthermore, they should ensure that the truth is upheld against falsehood in all its manifestations, whether it be outright disbelief, hypocrisy disguised as Islam, overt innovations, or innovations that masquerade as Islamic.

Allah, The Exalted, says:
هو الذي أرسل رسوله بالهدى ودين الحق ليظهره على الدين كله ولو كره المشركون

It is He Who has sent His Messenger (Muhammad) with guidance and the religion of truth (Islam), to make it superior over all religions even though the Mushrikun (polytheists, pagans, idolaters, disbelievers in the Oneness of Allah) hate (it)]. [at-Tawbah. 33]

Ahlul Ahwaa (the people of vain desires) share a common animosity with them, therefore, there is nothing else other than that the followers of truth must utilise the prescribed methods to actualise this promise, which is a duty of the scholars of Ahlus Sunnah. Wherever the adherents of the Salafi methodology and their students are or wherever they go, it is obligated to them step up and support one another to raise the truth, Tawheed, and Sunnah, and subdue Bidah, misguidance, and doubts; establishing Allah’s evidence against all the various misguided individuals and exposing the reality of deceivers and impostors. They should know that their adversaries have escalated their schemes and strategies, particularly in their efforts to silence many among Ahlus Sunnah and the adherents of truth, thereby preventing them from challenging falsehood disguised as truth. This category of people among the adherents of falsehood is more dangerous at employing deceit, duplicity, and feigning possession of qualities they do not actually have; as the Messenger, remarked, “The one who claims to possess what he does not is akin to the one who wears two garments of falsehood.” [e]

We find them as ones foremost in extolling the people of falsehood, making their affair appealing (or pleasing), while simultaneously being the most vehement in disparaging the followers of truth and its advocates. They have established corrupt principles to support falsehood and those who adhere to misguided methodologies, waging war against the proponents of truth through the formulation of schemes and abhorrent actions, manifesting their animosity towards the followers of truth, and hastening – without boredom and tiredness- to instruct the youth to resist the advocates of truth, striving diligently to bolster falsehood and undermine its adherents. We beseech Allah, the Exalted, to elevate His Word and guide these individuals or to relieve the Ummah from their evil. Indeed, our Lord is responsive to supplication. May Allah’s peace and blessings be upon our Master Muhammad, his family, and companions until the Day of Judgment.

https://rabee.net/audio/%D8%AE%D8%B7%D9%88%D8%B1%D8%A9-%D8%A7%D9%84%D9%83%D8%B0%D8%A8-%D9%88%D8%A2%D8%AB%D8%A7%D8%B1%D9%87-%D8%A7%D9%84%D8%B3%D9%8A%D8%A6%D8%A9-%D9%88%D9%85%D9%88%D9%82%D9%81-%D8%A7%D9%84%D8%A5%D8%B3%D9%84/

Read:: The Reality Of Sufi Shaikhs By Shaikh Abu Khadeejah- may Allah preserve him: https://www.salafisounds.com/the-reality-of-sufi-shaikhs-by-abu-khadeejah/


[a] Hulool: https://www.salafitalk.net/st/viewmessages.cfm?Forum=8&Topic=3528

[b] What is a Qutb according to the heretical Sufis? A Qutb is a so-called saint or Sufi leader who has a divine relationship with Allah. He transmits knowledge which makes him the axis of the Sufi path and he is not known.

[c] Who are the Abdaal according to the heretical Sufis? They are the so-called seven Awliya and each of them controls one of the seven continents of the world.

[d] Sahih Muslim 2545

[e] Sahih Muslim 2129

Some of the Motivations for Clinging to Falsehood When the Truth Is Clarified By Another Person

In The Name of Allah, The Most Merciful, The Bestower of Mercy.

Imam Ibn Al-Qayyim, may Allah have mercy upon him, said:

Ignorance: This particular reason predominantly overwhelms the majority of people, as the one ignorant of something will exhibit hostility towards it and its adherents. Furthermore, if such an individual harbours animosity towards the one who presents the truth and feels envy, the intensity of this hostility escalates. When this animosity extends to those he holds dear, his traditions, his nurturers, the customs of his ancestors, and those he cherishes and reveres, the intensity increases even further. Additionally, if he possesses a misguided belief that the truth poses a threat to his status, honour, aspirations, and objectives, the intensity reaches a peak. Moreover, if he fears for himself, his wealth, and his standing in the eyes of his companions, family, and people—similar to the situation faced by Heraclius, the Christian king in the Levant during the time of Allah’s Messenger—this reason intensifies even more. Heraclius was aware of the truth and had a desire to embrace Islam; however, due to the disobedience of his people, he feared for his safety and ultimately chose disbelief over the clear guidance presented to him.

Envy: This is one of the most significant causes because it is deeply rooted within the soul. The individual who harbours envy perceives that the person he envies possesses virtues or has been given what he does not possess; consequently, this envy hinders his ability to accept and comply. Iblees was unable to prostrate to Adam, peace be upon him, solely due to envy, for upon witnessing Adam’s elevation and the virtues bestowed upon him, he opted for disbelief instead of faith, despite having been in the company of angels. This same affliction obstructed the Yahud from accepting Isa, the son of Maryam, peace be upon him and his mother, even though they were fully aware that he was a Messenger of Allah, sent with undeniable signs and guidance. Nevertheless, their envy led them to reject faith and embrace disbelief, despite being a community that included Rabbis, scholars, ascetics, judges, kings, and rulers. [1]

Al-Allamah Abdur Rahman Ibn Yahyah Al-Mu’allimee, may Allah have mercy upon him, said:

Opposing desires through action in pursuit of truth is a clear matter, given the inherent obligations and challenges it presents. This situation can be examined from various perspectives:

An individual considers that accepting the truth implies recognising that he has previously adhered to falsehood. That is because a person is raised within a particular religion, creed, way or views imparted by their mentors and teacher, which they have long regarded as the truth; then when eventually becomes evident to him that these beliefs are erroneous, he finds it challenging to acknowledge, just as when he his ancestors or those he follows follow a way and its falsity is made known to him. This is because he considers that their shortcomings would also mean confronting his own, and an acknowledgement of their misguidance or errors necessitates his own.

It is possible that his attachment to falsehood provided him with status, recognition, and financial support, making it challenging for him to admit this, as doing so would result in the loss of all those benefits.

It may be that a person is in a state of ignorance or falsehood until another individual presents clear evidence that illuminates the truth for him, thus he considers that accepting such evidence implies his deficiency and that it was that (other) person who guided him. Due to this, we observe that while some individuals who are regarded as knowledgeable can readily admit their errors when these become apparent through their own investigations, they often struggle to accept such corrections when pointed out by others.

When another person clarifies the truth for him, he considers that accepting this truth requires recognising the clarifier’s virtue, knowledge, and accuracy, thus this would become great in the eyes of the people, leading many to follow him. So, you will find some individuals who are regarded as knowledgeable are eager to prove the errors of other scholars, even resorting to falsehoods driven by envy and a desire to diminish their standing among the people.

To oppose desires for the sake of the truth -in affairs of knowledge and creed- can indeed be difficult to accomplish, therefore it requires research and contemplation. In this regard, one needs to ask the scholars and benefit from them, adhering to the fear of Allah, and seeking the Tawfeeq of Allah and guidance. (2)


[1] An Excerpt from “Hidaayah Al-Hayaaraa Fee Ajwibah Al-Yahud Wan-Nasaaraa”. pages 17-19

[2] An excerpt from “At-Tankeel Bimaa Fee Ta’need Al-Kawthariy Minal Baatil” 2/180-181 with the checking of Imam Albaanee, may Allah have mercy upon him.

Part 8: O Faris Al-Hammadi! The time has arrived for your deceitful and absurd statements to be unveiled for all to see! [Self-styled Peacemaker and Deceiver]

In The Name of Allāh, The Most Merciful, The Bestower of Mercy.

Allāh, The Exalted, says:

وَإِن طَآٮِٕفَتَانِ مِنَ ٱلۡمُؤۡمِنِينَ ٱقۡتَتَلُواْ فَأَصۡلِحُواْ بَيۡنَہُمَا‌ۖ فَإِنۢ بَغَتۡ إِحۡدَٮٰهُمَا عَلَى ٱلۡأُخۡرَىٰ فَقَـٰتِلُواْ ٱلَّتِى تَبۡغِى حَتَّىٰ تَفِىٓءَ إِلَىٰٓ أَمۡرِ ٱللَّهِ‌ۚ فَإِن فَآءَتۡ فَأَصۡلِحُواْ بَيۡنَہُمَا بِٱلۡعَدۡلِ وَأَقۡسِطُوٓاْ‌ۖ إِنَّ ٱللَّهَ يُحِبُّ ٱلۡمُقۡسِطِينَ
إِنَّمَا ٱلۡمُؤۡمِنُونَ إِخۡوَةٌ۬ فَأَصۡلِحُواْ بَيۡنَ أَخَوَيۡكُمۡ‌ۚ وَٱتَّقُواْ ٱللَّهَ لَعَلَّكُمۡ تُرۡحَمُونَ

If two parties among the believers should fight (each other), then make settlement between them (through the Book of Allāh). But if one of them revolts against the other (and refuses compliance with the judgement of Allāh’s Book), then fight you (all) against the one that revolts until it complies with the command of Allāh. Then if it complies (by returning to truth), then make reconciliation between them (by making the transgressing party abide by) justice and act justly (between them). Verily, Allāh loves those who are just. The believers are but brothers (to one another in Islām), so make reconciliation between your brothers (individuals or parties) (if they differ or fight). And fear Allāh (in all of your affairs by not opposing His command and not disobeying Him) that you may receive mercy. [1]

In this discourse, we shall present a selection of insights from Imam Ibn Al-Qayyim concerning reconciliation amidst conflict.

Quote: “Allah commanded the reconciliation between the two warring factions initially. However, if one side oppresses the other, then the obligation shifts to fighting against the transgressor rather than seeking peace, as they are unjust. Attempting to reconcile in the face of such injustice undermines the rights of the oppressed group. Many unjust individuals who claim to be peacemakers often mediate between the powerful oppressor and the weak victim in a way that favours the powerful, believing they have achieved harmony, while in reality, they deny the oppressed their rightful claims. This is injustice; rather, the wronged party should be allowed to reclaim their rights. They can then be asked, with their consent, to forgo a portion of their rights without favouritism towards those in power, ensuring that there is no coercion involved in favouring others”.

Quote: “A reconciliation that permits the forbidden and prohibits the permissible is akin to an agreement that forbids a lawful act, allows an unlawful act, enslaves a free person, alters lineage, waives an obligation, suspends a punishment, or inflicts injustice on a third party. The permissible reconciliation among Muslims is one that is based on Allāh’s Pleasure and the satisfaction of both parties involved (based on justice). This represents the most just and rightful form of settlement, grounded in knowledge and fairness. The mediator should be well-informed about the circumstances, aware of their responsibilities, and committed to justice. The merit of this role is even greater than that of the (voluntary) fasting and prayer of a person, as the Prophet, peace and blessings of Allāh be upon him, said: ‘Shall I not inform you of something more excellent in degree than (voluntary) fasting, prayer and almsgiving?’ The people replied: ‘Certainly O Prophet of Allah!’ He said: “It is working for reconciliation between people, and spoiling it is the shaver (destruction)”. [Abu Dawud 4919]

The Prophet, peace and blessings of Allah be upon him, said: “Whoever has wronged his brother, should ask for his pardon (before his death), as (in the Hereafter) there will be neither a Dinar nor a Dirham. (He should secure pardon in this life) before some of his good deeds are taken and paid to his brother, or, if he has done no good deeds, some of the bad deeds of his brother are taken to be loaded on him (in the Hereafter). [Al-Bukhari 6534] [2] [End of quotes]

Observations: “A reconciliation that permits the forbidden and prohibits the permissible is akin to an agreement that forbids a lawful act, allows an unlawful act, enslaves a free person, alters lineage, waives an obligation, suspends a punishment, or inflicts injustice on a third party”. [End of quote]

Deceitful Faris navigates this situation in a manner that will absolve Dr Muhammad Bin Hadi from a binding obligation, thereby perpetrating injustice upon others. He further distorts the narrative by insinuating that the dispute is between Al-Allamah Rabee and Dr. Muhammad Bin Hadi. [3] Notably absent from Faris’s discourse is the crucial obligation that Dr Muhammad Bin Hadi bears to retract the unfounded Tabdee against those senior students, thus willfully overlooking the rightful claim of these senior students to be exonerated from such a reprehensible and erroneous judgement. The duplicitous Faris is not only warned against engaging in such deceit but is also urged to refrain lest this lead him to make judgements based on personal desires. May Allah safeguard us and him from such calamity. The Prophet, peace and blessings of Allah be upon him, said: “The judges are three: one will go to Paradise and two to Hell. A man who knows the truth and judges with it will enter paradise; a man who knows the truth but judges with the opposite of it will enter the fire, and a man who judges for the people based on ignorance will enter the fire”. [Abu Dawud 3573]

Indeed, Al-Allamah Rabee, may Allah protect him, Al-Allamah Ubaid Bin Abdillah Al-Jabiri, may Allah bestow His mercy upon him, and Shaikh Abdullah Al-Bukhari, may Allah protect him, resolutely opposed this injustice and categorically denounced Dr Muhammad’s conduct. Notably, Al-Allaamah Rabee explicitly called for evidence to substantiate the claims of Tabdee against those senior students. Yet, Faris, the self-styled peacemaker and deceiver, attempts to distort the narrative by suggesting that the matter is between Dr Muhammad and Al-Allaamah Rabee and that it must be buried, even though the core issue revolves around the retraction of an unfounded Tabdee. Faris has blatantly failed to clarify this crucial point. Allah, The Exalted, said:

وَإِن تَلۡوُ ۥۤاْ أَوۡ تُعۡرِضُواْ فَإِنَّ ٱللَّهَ كَانَ بِمَا تَعۡمَلُونَ خَبِيرً۬ا

And if you distort your witness or refuse to give it, verily, Allah is Ever Well-Acquainted with what you do.

Imam Ibn Al-Qayyim, may Allah have mercy upon him, said:

Allah, Glorified be He and free is He from all imperfections, mentions two reasons that will inevitably lead to the concealment of truth, then He warned against them and issued a threat: the first of them is distortion and the second is to turn away from giving truthful witness. That is because when a proof that supports the truth is manifested and the one who wants to repel it finds no way of doing so, he refrains from mentioning it and thus becomes a silent devil, and sometimes he distorts it. Distortion is of two types -distorting words and meanings. Distorting words occur when one utters a word in a context in which it does not establish the truth – either adding to the word, omitting something from it, or substituting it with something else to the extent that the listener is made to believe something, whilst something else is intended, just as the Yahood [i.e. those Yahood who disbelieved in the Prophet and hated him in Madeenah] used to distort words when giving Salaam to the Prophet [i.e. saying As-Saamu Alayka (death be upon you), instead of saying Assalaamu alaykum)]. This is one type of distortion. The second type of distortion is related to meanings – distorting the wording, giving it an interpretation that is not intended by the one who uttered it and pretending not to know its unintended meaning; or dropping other meanings intended by it. Allah, The Exalted, says: [وَإِن تَلۡوُ ۥۤاْ أَوۡ تُعۡرِضُواْ فَإِنَّ ٱللَّهَ كَانَ بِمَا تَعۡمَلُونَ خَبِيرً۬ا – and if you distort your witness or refuse to give it, verily, Allah is Ever Well-Acquainted with what you do]. [4]

Read: Al-Allamah Rabee Challenges Dr. Muhammad to provide his proofs:

https://twitter.com/AbuIyaadSP/status/1018974451269033986/photo/1

Read: Documents and Resources to Counter The Doubts of The Musafiqah:
https://www.manhaj.com/manhaj/print.cfm?uyryh

To be continued…InShaAllah


[1] https://www.thenoblequran.com/q/#/verse/49/9
https://www.thenoblequran.com/q/#/verse/49/10

[2] Excerpts from “I’laam al-Muwaqqi’een 1/84-86

[3] Faris’s deceitful tweet:

[4] An Excerpt from ‘Badaa’i At-Tafseer Al-Jaami Limaa Fassarahu Al-Imaam Ibn Al-Qayyim. 1/300-303

Thoughtful Reflection, Consultation, and Wisdom from Elders are Essential as the Young Man Starts to Value His Own Perspectives In Dawah

In The Name of Allah, The Most Merciful, The Bestower of Mercy.

Allah, The Exalted, informs us of one of the requests of His noble Prophet Musa, peace be upon him, made after being commanded to call Fir’awn to Tawheed:

وَيَسِّرۡ لِىٓ أَمۡرِى

“And ease my task for me”.

In the explanation of this Ayah, Imam As-Sadi, may Allah have mercy upon him, said: Meaning, “Grant me ease in every affair I pursue and every path I intend to follow, whilst calling to your guidance; and lighten the difficulties in front of me”. The caller is granted ease when he approaches all affairs in the appropriate manner, addresses every person based on what they should be addressed with, and calls them through a path that is easier for them to understand to enable them to accept his speech. [1]

O beloved youth! Exercise caution when considering mere opinions, preferences, and aversions in matters of Dawah that necessitate careful deliberation and comprehensive inquiry. When you engage with others and share your experiences from various countries, noting the distinct demeanour of the people of Sunnah, who exhibit a serene and composed nature, and whose discourse on particular issues may not be as prevalent as in your homeland, be mindful – due to your youthful perspective, limited experience, and minimal engagement- of insisting that such an approach should be universally adopted or asserted in every situation. We offer this gentle reminder for your consideration if you find anything useful in it:

The Dawah of Ahlus Sunnah, flourishing across various regions of the globe, remains unified in its core principles, emphasising Tawheed and Ittibaa as derived from the Qur’an and Sunnah, interpreted and practiced by the pious predecessors. Additionally, all Salafiyyoon ardently advocate for adherence to the noble conduct exemplified by the Messenger and the pious predecessors. This shared commitment is consistently echoed in their Duroos, khutab, and conferences. However, one must not anticipate leniency in all approaches, particularly in the face of the relentless efforts of those who propagate Bidah, who tirelessly disseminate doubts and engage with the masses through their extensive resources and networks. Therefore, we cannot waver in our proactive stance regarding specific Manhaj issues and our resolute declarations! Have you not been informed of the affair of two individuals?!

One individual expressed his discontent when the names of the prominent figures associated with Bidah were brought to light, asserting, “During my time in Riyadh, I attended the lectures of Al-Allamah Salih Al-Fawzan, and I never heard him mention any names.” In response, we inquired, “Does this imply that the Shaikh has never identified the proponents of Ahlul Bidah, and should we then accept your assertion as a definitive principle?” To substantiate our point, we presented him with the Shaikh’s book “Bayaan Li-Ba’di Akh’taa Al-Kuttaab,” along with excerpts from “Al-Ajwibah Al-Mufeedah.” [a] Following this, he fell silent, neither conceding nor disputing our claims, thus bringing the discussion to a close.

The second dude grew weary of the ongoing clarifications directed at Greenlane and remarked, “Why do you persist in beating a dead horse?” In an unexpected turn, Greenlane found themselves bolstered by the support of Dr. Wasiyullah Abbas, leading this individual to reconsider his stance, as he recognised that those actively engaged in the Rudood had justifiable motives for their actions. He claimed that his assertion “Why do you persist in beating a dead horse” was echoed by an informed individual regarding Dawah. So, we informed him that even if this is exactly what he heard from that good and reliable individual, there is no doubt that he is unaware of the true ramifications of silence in these circumstances because he lacked comprehensive insight into our daily affairs. Despite his persistent insistence and frequent reiteration of his perspective, we chose to disregard his claims, fully aware that those with far greater knowledge of the circumstances—more informed than both him and the individual from whom he relayed his information—were addressing the issue under the guidance of Al-Allaamah Rabee, may Allah preserve him, and Al-Allaamah Ubaid Bin Abdillah Al-Jabiri, may Allah have mercy upon him.

What was the predicament of this individual who succumbed to ennui amidst crucial clarifications? He gradually distanced himself, overwhelmed by tedium. Initially, when Fawzi al-Bahrayni found himself forsaken by the senior teachers in the UK, this individual remarked, “A relative of mine conversed with Fawzi, and he has denied the claims made against him.” Subsequently, Al-Allamah Rabee delivered a vigorous rebuttal to Fawzi, yet this individual remained silent, neither conceding nor expressing dissent. His opinionated demeanour and self-proclaimed understanding of the matters at hand, coupled with his entitlement to personal preferences, prevented him from embracing humility. When the turmoil of the Musafiqah emerged, he aligned himself with the defenders of the Musafiqah. Thus, one must exercise caution against the perils of being opinionated, particularly when lacking a foundation of sound principles and driven solely by personal inclinations.

There existed individuals whose demeanour was marked by a touch of naivety or an eagerness that bordered on the impulsive. Upon stepping beyond their familiar confines and encountering the exhilarating and demanding realms of learning and Dawah, they mistakenly believed that the pearls of wisdom they had received were universally applicable, simply because they originated from a wise man. Thus, they would often proclaim, “I consulted with this wise individual, and he believes the matter should be approached in this manner.” Our response was, “The individual you consulted cannot be held accountable, as his insights were based solely on the limited information you provided regarding the daily circumstances. Should he be available and willing, we would gladly elucidate the nuances you unintentionally overlooked due to your lack of awareness. Otherwise, the counsel you have relayed from him cannot be effectively applied to this particular scenario”. These individuals, in their sincerity, would respond, ‘Indeed, please present the situation with all pertinent details,’ and from this openness, much good has emerged to this day. Therefore, it is essential to recognise that while opinions may hold value, the ultimate resolution rests with those who possess a comprehensive understanding of the matter and its real-world implications.

As for the individual who found himself ensnared by ennui concerning Rudud, only to subsequently embrace the Trojan horse of the Musafiqah, we are reminded of the profound words of Shaikh Al-Islam Ibn Taymiyyah, may Allah’s mercy be upon him: “A person must have (sound) comprehensive fundamental principles to which the branches of a subject matter are referred back so that he speaks based on knowledge and justice; then he knows how those branches of the subject matter are established (or how they are impacted by the sound comprehensive principles), otherwise, he will remain upon lies and ignorance in the branches and ignorance and oppression in the sound comprehensive fundamental principles, thus great corruption occurs”. [2]

So, we ask Allah:

يَا حَيُّ يَا قَيُّومُ بِرَحْمَتِكَ أَسْتَغيثُ أَصْلِحْ لِي شَأْنِيَ كُلَّهُ وَلاَ تَكِلْنِي إِلَى نَفْسِي طَرْفَةَ عَيْنٍ

O Ever Living! O The Self Subsisting, Upon Whom Everything Depends! By Your mercy I seek assistance; rectify for me all of my affairs and do not leave me to myself, even for the blink of an eye]. [3]

————————————————–

[a] Al-Allamah Salih Al-Fawzaan [may Allah preserve him] said: The principle here is about warning against mistakes and deviance after identifying them as such. If the affair necessitates making known the name of an individual among the obstinate opponents so that beguilement does not occur through them, particularly those individuals with deviated views or deviation in behaviour and methodology, and they are well known among the people and a good opinion is held about them, there is no harm in mentioning them by their names and their methodology warned against. The scholars research the science of Jarh Wat-Tadeel and then mention the narrators and the criticism leveled against them. This is not done for the sake of personal (criticism), but rather to advise the Ummah in case they come across affairs from these individuals that are harmful to the Religion or lies against the Messenger [peace and blessings of Allah be upon him]. Therefore, this principle is first and foremost about warning against mistakes. But the person who made such a mistake should not be named if doing so would either do more harm or if there is no benefit in doing so.

If the matter requires that his name be made known to warn the people about his methodology, this is an act of sincere devotion to Allah in worship, an act of sincere devotion to Allah’s Book, an act of sincere devotion to Allah’s Messenger (by following his Sunnah), and an act of sincere advice to Muslim leaders and their common folk, especially if he (the one warned against) is active among the people and they have a positive view of him and buy his books and audio tapes. Therefore, there has to be clarification and warning because silence will be harmful to people. His affair has to be unveiled, however, it must be done as an act of sincere devotion to Allah in worship, an act of sincere devotion to Allah’s Book, an act of sincere devotion to Allah’s Messenger (by following his Sunnah), and an act of sincere advice to Muslim leaders and their common folk, and not for defamation or to satisfy one’s desires. [4]


[1] An Excerpt from Tafsir As-Sadi

[2] Majmoo Al-Fataawaa 19/203 & Minhaj As-Sunnah 5/83

[3] Silsilah As-Saheehah Number 227

[4] An Excerpt from “Al-Ajwibah Al Mufeedah”. Question number 66. Page 162

Brief Observation On Elon Musk’s Proposal “The second thing is to change the education so that a new generation of murderers is not created”

In The Name of Allah, The Most Merciful, The Bestower of Mercy.

Allah [The Exalted] said:

وَإِذَا قُلۡتُمۡ فَٱعۡدِلُواْ وَلَوۡ ڪَانَ ذَا قُرۡبَىٰ‌ۖ

And when you testify, be just, even if (it concerns) a near relative. [1]

Imaam As-Sadi [may Allah preserve him] stated: When you testify by way of a statement to judge between people, differentiate between them in a discourse, and speak regarding matters and circumstances, be just in your speech, adhere to truthfulness regarding those you love and those you hate, be fair and do not conceal what needs to be made clear because it is forbidden and tantamount to injustice to divert (from justice and fairness) when speaking against the one you hate. [2]

When Elon Musk visited the Zionists in Palestine recently, he expressed his thoughts about the blueprint for prosperity after the current conflict ends. He said, “And then the second thing is to change the education so that a new generation of murderers is not created”. [End of quote]

First, no rational person would support Hamas or any other group that attacks some of the defenceless civilians and non-combatants under Netanyahu’s Zionist/Far-right government, if this comment was made in light of such transgression. Shaikh Abu Iyad, may Allah preserve him, stated: “We condemn everyone who opposes the Divine Legislation by killing innocent civilians, including non-combatant men, the elderly, women, children, priests, monks, and the likes, no matter who they are, Muslim or non-Muslim, whether ISIS, al-Qaeda, Hamas, Boko Haram or Benjamin Mileikowsky, the IDF, Settlers, and their likes. Our condemnation is on the basis that such actions are unjust and oppose Divine Legislation and not because of the race or ethnicity or religion of the perpetrators, and thus we are able to maintain moral consistency and integrity”. https://abuiyaad.com/a/amalekite-genocide-doctrine-gaza

Second, no group needs more education than the Zionist supporters of Netanyahu’s Zionist/far-right regime, given their inclination towards mass murder and racism, as well as their justification of transgressions committed under the guise of self-defence. Recently, Zionist Netanyahu quoted the abrogated Hebrew Bible and the destruction of Amalak to try and justify the murder of defenceless women and children in Gaza. Read here: https://abuiyaad.com/a/amalekite-genocide-doctrine-gaza

Netanyahu’s son, Yair Netanyahu, stated on Facebook in 2018: “There will not be peace in here until 1. All the Jews leave the land of Israel. 2. All the Muslims leave the land of Israel. I prefer the second”.

When rebuked for this vile arrogance, he increased in arrogance saying, “Why are people who have been calling for years to evacuate the settlers and establish a Palestinian state free of Jews shocked by this post?” When Facebook deleted his post, he shared a screenshot of the original post and rebuked them, saying: “thought police”. He was then blocked for 24 hours over his violation of Facebook’s community guidelines.

 

In 2006, the Zionist Prime Minister Ehud Olmert said, “Israeli lives are worth more than Palestinian ones”.

The Independent Newspaper

 

In 2012, the Zionist Interior Minister Eli Yishai said, “The goal of the operation is to send Gaza back to the Middle Ages. Only then will Israel be calm for 40 years”.

 

In 2021  the Zionist far-right Finance Minister Bezalel Smotrich said, “You are here by mistake because Ben Gurion didn’t finish the job and throw you out in 1948”.

The times of Israel

 

Female Zionist, Tally Gotliv – a Zionist lawyer, politician, and a member of the Knesset for the Likud party of Zionist Netanyahu- stated recently on X (twitter) regarding retaliation: “Jericho Missile! Jericho Missile! Strategic alert. Before considering the introduction of forces. Doomsday weapon! This is my opinion. May God preserve all our strength”.

 

Ben Gvir Itamar- a Zionist lawyer, far-right politician, the Minister of National Security since 2022, a member of the Knesset, and leader of Otzma Yehudit – stated on X (Twitter): “As long as Hamas does not release the hostages, the only thing that needs to enter Gaza are hundreds of tons of explosives from the airforce, not an ounce of humanitarian aid”

Indeed, whoever carries out research will neither forget nor become oblivious to the fact that the conflict since 1948 stems from the Zionist movement and the consequences of its paramilitary actions in Palestine. This situation was established in part because of Zionist terrorist groups like Lehi, Haganah, and Irgun. These terrorist groups were responsible for the Nakba, the migration of the Palestinian people from their homeland, as well as sabotage, and attacks on civilian infrastructure, railways, and airfields. Furthermore, these terrorist groups and their commanders assimilated into the Zionist state when it declared independence. In addition to the Palestinian people, the British Mandate in Palestine was the target of these terrorist attacks. As one of the first significant acts of terrorism in the Middle East’s modern history, the King David Hotel bombing in Jerusalem in 1946 was a prime example. Therefore, the priority must be to educate and deradicalise Zionists and their adherents because, before their rise to power, Jews and Muslims coexisted despite the latter’s practice of a path that is considered abrogated in the Sight of Allah.

The poem, titled “The Friendship Song,” was shared by some Zionist online news outlet before being removed. Here is an excerpt from it:

Here the IDF is crossing the line

To annihilate the swastika bearers

In another year there will be nothing there

And we will return safely to our home within a year

We will annihilate them all

And then return to ploughing our fields

Recently, Zionist Arieh King, deputy mayor of Jerusalem, stated in a deleted tweet regarding some Palestinian non-combatant males detained by the Zionist army for interrogation to determine their Hamas affiliation:

There is no need to comment on his statement that the arrested non-combatant Palestinians are subhuman because we know who is behaving like spotted hyenas on a rampage and slaying nearly over 30000 Palestinians at present, including children. However, we will comment on both his statements referring to those non-combatants as ants and his statement “To protest the memory of Amalek, we will not forget.”

Indeed, even the ants during the time of Prophet Sulayman, peace be upon him and his father, knew that they would not be oppressed. Allah says:

وَحُشِرَ لِسُلَيۡمَـٰنَ جُنُودُهُ ۥ مِنَ ٱلۡجِنِّ وَٱلۡإِنسِ وَٱلطَّيۡرِ فَهُمۡ يُوزَعُونَ
حَتَّىٰٓ إِذَآ أَتَوۡاْ عَلَىٰ وَادِ ٱلنَّمۡلِ قَالَتۡ نَمۡلَةٌ۬ يَـٰٓأَيُّهَا ٱلنَّمۡلُ ٱدۡخُلُواْ مَسَـٰكِنَڪُمۡ لَا يَحۡطِمَنَّكُمۡ سُلَيۡمَـٰنُ وَجُنُودُهُ ۥ وَهُمۡ لَا يَشۡعُرُونَ
فَتَبَسَّمَ ضَاحِكً۬ا مِّن قَوۡلِهَا وَقَالَ رَبِّ أَوۡزِعۡنِىٓ أَنۡ أَشۡكُرَ نِعۡمَتَكَ ٱلَّتِىٓ أَنۡعَمۡتَ عَلَىَّ وَعَلَىٰ وَٲلِدَىَّ وَأَنۡ أَعۡمَلَ صَـٰلِحً۬ا تَرۡضَٮٰهُ وَأَدۡخِلۡنِى بِرَحۡمَتِكَ فِى عِبَادِكَ ٱلصَّـٰلِحِينَ

And there were gathered before Sulaiman (Solomon) his hosts of jinns and men, and birds, and they all were set in battle order (marching forwards). Till, when they came to the valley of the ants, one of the ants said: “O ants! Enter your dwellings, lest Sulaiman (Solomon) and his hosts crush you, while they perceive not.” So he [Sulaiman (Solomon)] smiled, amused at her speech, and said: “My Lord! Inspire and bestow upon me the power and ability that I may be grateful for Your Favours which You have bestowed on me and my parents, and that I may do righteous good deeds that will please You, and admit me by Your Mercy among Your righteous slaves.” [Surah An-Naml. Ayaat 17-19]

The ant sought an excuse for (Sulayman’s) army if they would have harmed its colony because they were unaware of their presence, and it blamed its colony if they failed to take safeguards by not entering their dwelling place. Sulaymaan [peace be upon him] smiled as a result of this because it is something that should amaze and make someone smile. [3] The ant knew Sulaymaan’s affair and that of his army, exalted Sulaymaan’s authority, and excused them if they crushed its colony because that would have occurred unintentionally. Sulaymaan heard the ant’s speech and understood it, so he smiled due to being amazed by the ant’s eloquence, advice, and fine expression. [4]

Indeed, this is only one of the Prophets’ and Messengers’ remarkable manners. They never intended to hurt anyone; rather, even those small animals (the ants) were assured that Prophet Sulayman [peace be upon him] and his subjects would not harm them intentionally- neither in speech nor deed. Compare this to the attitude of Zionists, who make a speech calling for mass murder and then launch a purposeful bombing campaign to kill thousands of noncombatant Palestinians, whilst certain that the innocent victims will include thousands of children. Compare how the ant advised its colony to enter their dwellings to avoid being unintentionally harmed by Prophet Sulaymaan’s army to how the Zionist army tells non-combatant Palestinians to relocate to this or that area for safety, then conflict begins in the same area they designated as a safe-haven. As a result, Elon Musk must remember that Zionists require more education and deradicalization than anyone else.

As for Mr. King’s statement “To protest the memory of Amalek, we will not forget”, this link contains its appropriate response. https://abuiyaad.com/a/amalekite-genocide-doctrine-gaza

 

Read articles by Shaikh Abu Iyaad [may Allah preserve him]:

Professor of Jewish Studies David J Wasserstein: How Islam Saved the Jews

https://abuiyaad.com/a/how-islam-saved-jews

The Just and Kind Dealings of the Prophet (ﷺ) with the Jews
https://abuiyaad.com/a/prophet-dealings-jews


[1] Translator: Shaikh Abu Iyaad. NobleQur’an

[2] An Excerpt from Tafseer as-Sadi. Slightly paraphrased

[3] An Excerpt from ‘Badaa’i At-Tafseer Al-Jaami Limaa Fassarahu Al-Imaam Ibnul Qayyim Al-Jawziyyah’ 2/279-282)

[4] An Excerpt from Tafseer As-Sadi