Skip to main content

Author: Abdullah Jallow

Chapter: Whoever is given the right of his brother

Written by Abdullah Jallow on . Posted in Contemporary Issues, History of Islam, Methodology - 'Manhaj', Morals and Manners - 'Akhlaaq', Pearls of Wisdom, Prophets, Purification of The Soul, Scholars of Islam, Sin, The Salaf - Pious Predecessors, Worship - 'Ibaadah'.

In The Name of Allah, The Most Merciful, The Bestower of Mercy.

Imam Al-Bukhari, may Allah have mercy upon him, said: Chapter: Whoever is given the right of his brother through a judicial decision

Umm Salamah, may Allah be pleased with her, reported that Allah’s Messenger, peace and blessings of Allah be upon him, said:

“Indeed, I am only a human being and you people (i.e. disputants) come to me with your disputes. And it may be that one of you can present his case more eloquently than the other and I consider him truthful, and judge in his favour. So if I ever judge and give the right of a brother to his brother, then it is a piece of hellfire and let him not take it”.

Some Benefits Derived From This Hadith

The Ummah (i.e. the qualified judges) judge based on what is apparent, however, the judgement of a judge cannot prohibit the lawful and allow the unlawful (i.e. when proven erroneous).

This Hadith contains a refutation against those who say that the Messengers possess knowledge of the unseen.

This hadith also shows that speech can be seen to be true based on what is apparent, but it is truly falsehood with regard to what is hidden within it.

This hadith shows that the one who receives a judgement in his favour is more aware than every other person as to whether he is entitled to it or whether he is a falsifier. So, he takes if entitled or leaves it if he a falsifier because -in reality- a judgement cannot change a matter from what it was in origin (i.e. the original truth in the affair before its distortion or concealment).

This hadith shows the sinfulness of the one who argues based on falsehood until he receives what he wants publicly, whilst he is upon falsehood.

This hadith is proof to show that a scholar can make a mistake and it is a refutation against those who say that every Mujtahid is correct.

This hadith shows that the Mujtahid is forgiven (when he makes a mistake).

Source: An Excerpt From Sahih Al-Bukhari. Kitab Al-Ahkaam (Book of Judgements): Chapter 29. Hadith Number 7181 with Fath Al-Bari

 

Sensible Private Conversation Between Three Salafi Brothers of Different Age Groups

Written by Abdullah Jallow on . Posted in Basics, Brotherhood, Contemporary Issues, Featured, Morals and Manners - 'Akhlaaq'.

In The Name of Allah, The Most Merciful, The Bestower of Mercy.

Etiquette in Private Conversations: Sensible Private Conversation Between Three Salafi Brothers of Different Age Groups

Imam As-Sadi, may Allah have mercy upon him, said:

Make humility the sign by which you are recognised when you sit with the people, fear of Allah should be your protection, and providing guidance to Allah’s servants should be a habit. Be eager to (make) every meeting in which you sit one of goodness–either research into areas of knowledge or religious matters; either directing (others) to a general or specific beneficial affair, mentioning Allah’s blessings or mentioning the superior status of praiseworthy manners and good etiquettes, or warning against that which is detrimental to the well-being of one’s religious or worldly (affairs).

Behave well with the young, the elderly, and your peers. Respect the person who deserves to be acknowledged and respected and treat each of them in the manner they deserve. Even if your speech is about worldly (affairs), use acceptable and good language to put your congregation at ease. Through the meetings of the people, the sensible and determined person accomplishes abundant goodness, and he becomes more beloved to them. This is because he approaches the people with what they approve and statements they desire (i.e. good), and the cornerstone for this is success in seizing control of all affairs presented before them. And these matters become more emphasised on a journey because sitting together is prolonged during a journey and the travellers need someone who revives their hearts with good statements, news of events, and jokes if all of that is true and not too much, and to assist them with the essential affairs of travel. And Allah is the One Who bestows success. [1]

The conversation revolved around wholesome, truthful speech accompanied by statements or expressions that may appear very harsh, coarse, or disrespectful. Thus, it diverts listeners from the objective and main subject matter of the discussion. The first one said:

Fulan’s speech is clear and true, but in my humble opinion it’s somewhat harsh and the tone may appear disrespectful to others. Even though I am aware of circumstances surrounding such expressions, my worry is that those unaware of the complete reality or are emotionally connected to the one being addressed may overlook the facts due to the tone of the speech.”

The second one said:

In my opinion, those words are milder compared to what others have said. I think at least all expressions should be compared before making a final judgement, instead of focusing all scrutiny and criticism on one.

The third one said:

The choice of words can be very difficult sometimes, depending on the situation and the experiences of the speaker or writer, and as we know, no one is infallible; rather, the only one given precision in speech is the final Messenger, peace and blessings of Allah be upon him. Sometimes words shock the listeners more than the truth it conveys. Sometimes the language can be so soft that one wonders whether the speaker intends to speak the truth or is attempting to appease the wrongdoer, whereas he is just being careful. At other times, general statements make everyone cautious of impending harm, so it serves a good purpose. As for harsh speech or one that may appear confrontational, this has taken place between great scholars who desired nothing else but the truth. Read on this link:https://salafidawahmanchester.com/2024/09/26/the-encounter-of-two-renowned-grammarians-ibn-taymiyyah-and-abu-hayyan/

Now what remains in my humble opinion —just as everyone else— we must strive our best to weigh our words carefully. However, regardless of how much we try, our expressions will always be deficient. This always happens after speaking to someone, or when someone contacts you to raise issues—either to say that the words were too soft – in that WhatsApp Group – for the occasion or a bit harsh. And with regards to how one approaches the upright speakers who are known for sound creed and methodology—and this is far removed from Muwazanah, or as some try to say, “taking the good and leaving the evil” in order to listen to Ahlul Bidah or attend their gatherings—as long as the speaker’s speech is correct, backed by clear proofs, and does not oppose the principles of the religion, then even if he sounds coarse, harsh, or appears disrespectful in some aspects, I do my best not to be diverted emotionally and strive to separate the facts from the expression. If I have access to the speaker, either directly or through someone else, I convey my agreement with what is correct without compromise and express my concerns regarding the expression or tone, but I never allow the tone to divert others around me from the facts. Today I came across this Ayah in the morning – a brief Fa’idah from Imam As-Sadi. Allah, The

Most High, said:

الَّذِينَ يَسْتَمِعُونَ الْقَوْلَ فَيَتَّبِعُونَ أَحْسَنَهُ

Those who listen to the Word and follow the best thereof. [Az-Zumar 18]

Imam As-Sadi, may Allah have mercy upon him, said:

وهذا جنس يشمل كل قول فهم يستمعون جنس القول ليميزوا بين ما ينبغي إيثاره مما ينبغي اجتنابه، فلهذا من حزمهم وعقلهم أنهم يتبعون أحسنه، وأحسنه على الإطلاق كلام اللّه وكلام رسوله،

This type includes every speech. They listen to the (specific) speech in order to distinguish between what is befitting (or allowed) to be given precedence and what is befitting to be be avoided. Due to this, from their prudence and intelligence is that they follow the best of it, and the best of all speech – without exception – is Allah’s Speech and the speech of His Messenger. [2]

We ask Allah:

 اللهمَّ كما حسَّنتَ خَلقي فحسِّنْ خُلُقي

O Allah! Just as you have made my physical appearance beautiful, make my manners beautiful.

[1] Nur Al-Basaa’ir Wa Al-Albab Fee Ahkam Al-Ibaadaat Wa Al-Mu‘aamalaat Wa Al-Huquq Wal Al-Aadab. pages 64-65

[2] An Excerpt from Tafsir As-Sadi. paraphrased

 

 

Respectful and Kind Treatment is Neither a One-way Street Nor a Monopoly

Written by Abdullah Jallow on . Posted in Brotherhood, Contemporary Issues, Da'wah - Calling To Islam, Featured, Methodology - 'Manhaj', Morals and Manners - 'Akhlaaq', Pearls of Wisdom, Purification of The Soul, Scholars of Islam, Worship - 'Ibaadah'.

In The Name of Allah, The Most Merciful, The Bestower of Mercy.

Respectful And Kind Treatment Is Neither a One-Way Street Nor a Monopoly, Nor a Subjective Claim On Behalf of Any One of Us. If You label a Man of Sunnah “Mubtadi” Without An Iota of Proof or You Liken Him to Evil Personalities of Misguidance Without Any Proof, He Has The Right to Defend His Honour

Abdullah Bin Amr, may Allah be pleased with him, reported that Allah’s Messenger, peace and blessings of Allah be upon him, said, “Whoever would love to be delivered from Hellfire and admitted into Paradise, let him meet his end whilst believing in Allah and the Last Day, and let him treat people as he would love to be treated”. [(1)]

Imam An-Nawawi, may Allah have mercy upon him, said: This is from the Jawami al-Kalim of the Prophet [i.e. precise speech with a comprehensive meaning] and his amazing wisdom. It is obligatory to pay close attention to this important principle and that a person must not deal with the people except in a way he loves to be dealt with. [(2)]

Al-Allamah Zayd Bin Hadi Al-Madkhali, may Allah have mercy upon him, said: A Muslim is to give consideration to his Muslim brothers in the same way he would give consideration to himself- wishing for them the good he wishes for himself and hates that evil should touch them just as he hates that for himself. The one who loves that the people should approach him with good related to the worldly affairs and affairs related to the Afterlife, then it is obligated on him to do the same for them, so that the statement of the Prophet, “You cannot (truly) believe until you wish for your brother what you wish for yourself” becomes a reality in his personality; and also the statement of the Prophet, “The believer in relation to another believer is like a structure, each part strengthening the other”. And also the statement of the Prophet, “The Muslim is the brother of another Muslim”. Whoever is able to have these characteristics, then indeed he has established Iman (in this affair), good manners and good dealings. [(3)]

Imam Ibn Al-Qayyim, may Allah have mercy upon him, said: And from the signs of well-being and success is that whenever the slave is increased in his knowledge, he increases in humility and mercy; and whenever he is increased in action, he increases in his fear and caution; and whenever his age is increased, he decreases in eagerness; and whenever he is increased in wealth, he increases in his generosity and spending; and whenever his status and honour is increased, he increases in coming close to the people, in fulfilling their needs and being humble in (their presence). And the signs of wretchedness are: Whenever he is increased in knowledge, he increases in pride and haughtiness; and whenever he is increased in actions, he increases in his boasting, mockery of the people and having a good opinion of himself; and whenever he is increased in his status and honour, he increases in pride and haughtiness. These affairs of [well-being and wretchedness] are a trial and a test from Allah by way of which He puts His slaves to trial. He brings about well-being and wretchedness to a people by way of these affairs. [(4)]

Imam Muhammad Al-Amin Ash-Shanqeetee, may Allah have mercy upon him, said:

Contemplate what the great leader [Muhammad (peace blessings of Allah be upon him)] has been commanded and how he should deal with his society. Allah, The Most High, said:

فَبِمَا رَحْمَةٍ مِّنَ ٱللَّهِ لِنتَ لَهُمْ وَلَوْ كُنتَ فَظًّا غَلِيظَ ٱلْقَلْبِ لَٱنفَضُّوا۟ مِنْ حَوْلِكَ فَٱعْفُ عَنْهُمْ وَٱسْتَغْفِرْ لَهُمْ وَشَاوِرْهُمْ فِى ٱلْأَمْرِ

And by the Mercy of Allah, you dealt with them gently. And had you been severe and harsh-hearted, they would have broken away from about you; so pass over (their faults), and ask (Allah’s) Forgiveness for them; and consult them in the affairs. [Aal Imran. 159]

Contemplate what a person has been commanded and how he should deal with his leader. Allah [The Most High] said:

[يَٰٓأَيُّهَا ٱلَّذِينَ ءَامَنُوٓا۟ أَطِيعُوا۟ ٱللَّهَ وَأَطِيعُوا۟ ٱلرَّسُولَ وَأُو۟لِى ٱلْأَمْرِ مِنكُمْ – O you who believe! Obey Allah and obey the Messenger (Muhammad), and those of you (Muslims) who are in authority]. [An-Nisaa.59] [Footnote a]

Contemplate what a person has been commanded to do (in order to safeguard close members) of his society, such as his children and wife. Allah [The Most High] said:

يَٰٓأَيُّهَا ٱلَّذِينَ ءَامَنُوا۟ قُوٓا۟ أَنفُسَكُمْ وَأَهْلِيكُمْ نَارًا وَقُودُهَا ٱلنَّاسُ وَٱلْحِجَارَةُ عَلَيْهَا مَلَٰٓئِكَةٌ غِلَاظٌ شِدَادٌ لَّا يَعْصُونَ ٱللَّهَ مَآ أَمَرَهُمْ وَيَفْعَلُونَ مَا يُؤْمَرُونَ

O you who believe! Ward off from yourselves and your families a Fire (Hell) whose fuel is men and stones, over which are (appointed) angels stern (and) severe, who disobey not, (from executing) the Commands they receive from Allah, but do that which they are commanded. [at-Tahreem. 6]

Contemplate how (the Qur’an) has informed the person about cautiousness and resoluteness when dealing his (close) social group in particular- that if he comes across what is not befitting, he is commanded to pardon and forgive. Firstly, the Qur’an commands him to be cautious and resolute, and secondly, it commands him to pardon and forgive. Allah [The Most High] said:

يَٰٓأَيُّهَا ٱلَّذِينَ ءَامَنُوٓا۟ إِنَّ مِنْ أَزْوَٰجِكُمْ وَأَوْلَٰدِكُمْ عَدُوًّا لَّكُمْ فَٱحْذَرُوهُمْ وَإِن تَعْفُوا۟ وَتَصْفَحُوا۟ وَتَغْفِرُوا۟ فَإِنَّ ٱللَّهَ غَفُورٌ رَّحِيمٌ

O you who believe! Verily, among your wives and your children there are enemies for you (i.e. may stop you from the obedience of Allah), therefore beware of them! But if you pardon (them) and overlook, and forgive (their faults), then verily, Allah is Oft-Forgiving, Most Merciful. [at-Taghabun. 14]

Contemplate how individuals in society have been commanded to deal with one another in general. Allah (The Most High) said:

إِنَّ ٱللَّهَ يَأْمُرُ بِٱلْعَدْلِ وَٱلْإِحْسَٰنِ وَإِيتَآئِ ذِى ٱلْقُرْبَىٰ وَيَنْهَىٰ عَنِ ٱلْفَحْشَآءِ وَٱلْمُنكَرِ وَٱلْبَغْىِ يَعِظُكُمْ لَعَلَّكُمْ تَذَكَّرُونَ

Verily, Allah enjoins Al-Adl (i.e. justice and worshipping none but Allah Alone – Islamic Monotheism) and Al-Ihsan [i.e. to be patient in performing your duties to Allah, totally for Allah’s sake and in accordance with the Sunnah (legal ways) of the Prophet in a perfect manner], and giving (help) to kith and kin (i.e. all that Allah has ordered you to give them e.g., wealth, visiting, looking after them, or any other kind of help, etc.): and forbids Al-Fahsha’ (i.e. all evil deeds, e.g. illegal sexual acts, disobedience of parents, polytheism, to tell lies, to give false witness, to kill a life without right, etc.), and Al-Munkar (i.e. all that is prohibited by Islamic law: polytheism of every kind, disbelief and every kind of evil deeds, etc.), and Al-Baghy (i.e. all kinds of oppression), He admonishes you, that you may take heed. [An-Nahl. 90]

Allah [The Most High] said: [يَٰٓأَيُّهَا ٱلَّذِينَ ءَامَنُوا۟ ٱجْتَنِبُوا۟ كَثِيرًا مِّنَ ٱلظَّنِّ إِنَّ بَعْضَ ٱلظَّنِّ إِثْمٌ وَلَا تَجَسَّسُوا۟ وَلَا يَغْتَب بَّعْضُكُم بَعْضًا – O you who believe! Avoid much suspicions, indeed some suspicions are sins. And spy not, neither backbite one another.[Al-Hujuraat. 12] [Footnote b]

Allah said:

يَٰٓأَيُّهَا ٱلَّذِينَ ءَامَنُوا۟ لَا يَسْخَرْ قَوْمٌ مِّن قَوْمٍ عَسَىٰٓ أَن يَكُونُوا۟ خَيْرًا مِّنْهُمْ وَلَا نِسَآءٌ مِّن نِّسَآءٍ عَسَىٰٓ أَن يَكُنَّ خَيْرًا مِّنْهُنَّ وَلَا تَلْمِزُوٓا۟ أَنفُسَكُمْ وَلَا تَنَابَزُوا۟ بِٱلْأَلْقَٰبِ بِئْسَ ٱلِٱسْمُ ٱلْفُسُوقُ بَعْدَ ٱلْإِيمَٰنِ وَمَن لَّمْ يَتُبْ فَأُو۟لَٰٓئِكَ هُمُ ٱلظَّٰلِمُونَ

O you who believe! Let not a group scoff at another group, it may be that the latter are better than the former; nor let (some) women scoff at other women, it may be that the latter are better than the former, nor defame one another, nor insult one another by nicknames. How bad is it, to insult one’s brother after having Faith [i.e. to call your Muslim brother (a faithful believer) as: “O sinner”, or “O wicked”, etc.]. And whosoever does not repent, then such are indeed Zalimun (wrong-doers, etc.). [Al-Hujuraat. 11]

Allah said:

وَتَعَاوَنُوا۟ عَلَى ٱلْبِرِّ وَٱلتَّقْوَىٰ وَلَا تَعَاوَنُوا۟ عَلَى ٱلْإِثْمِ وَٱلْعُدْوَٰنِ

Help you one another in Al-Birr and At-Taqwa (virtue, righteousness and piety); but do not help one another in sin and transgression. [Al-Maa’idah. 2] [Footnote c]

Allah said: [إِنَّمَا ٱلْمُؤْمِنُونَ إِخْوَةٌ – The believers are nothing else than brothers (in Islamic religion). [Al-Hujuraat. 10]

Allah said: [وَأَمْرُهُمْ شُورَىٰ بَيْنَهُمْ – And who (conduct) their affairs by mutual consultation. [Ash-Shuraa 38] [Footnote d]

When it is the case that the individuals of a society are not safe – regardless who they may be-from the hostility and enmity of others in their Jinn or human society, and it is the case that every individual is in need of a remedy for this problem whose trial affects everyone, therefore Allah [The Most High] clearly prescribed its remedy in three places in His Book. The remedy for human hostility is that (a person) should turn away from the hostile one and responds to them with what is better. Allah [The Most High] said in Surah Al-A’raf 199: [خُذِ ٱلْعَفْوَ وَأْمُرْ بِٱلْعُرْفِ وَأَعْرِضْ عَنِ ٱلْجَٰهِلِينَ – Show forgiveness, enjoin what is good, and turn away from the foolish (i.e. don’t punish them].

Allah said Surah Al-Muminun 96: [ٱدْفَعْ بِٱلَّتِى هِىَ أَحْسَنُ ٱلسَّيِّئَةَ نَحْنُ أَعْلَمُ بِمَا يَصِفُونَ – Repel evil with that which is better. We are Best-Acquainted with the things they utter].

Allah [The Most High] made it more evident that this divine remedy cuts off this satanic ailment and He also made it more (evident) that this divine (remedy) is not bestowed upon every person, except a person who has been granted in abundance and a great portion (of the happiness in the Hereafter). Allah [The Most High] said:

ٱدْفَعْ بِٱلَّتِى هِىَ أَحْسَنُ فَإِذَا ٱلَّذِى بَيْنَكَ وَبَيْنَهُۥ عَدَٰوَةٌ كَأَنَّهُۥ وَلِىٌّ حَمِيمٌ
وَمَا يُلَقَّىٰهَآ إِلَّا ٱلَّذِينَ صَبَرُوا۟ وَمَا يُلَقَّىٰهَآ إِلَّا ذُو حَظٍّ عَظِيمٍ

Repel (the evil) with one which is better (i.e. Allah ordered the faithful believers to be patient at the time of anger, and to excuse those who treat them badly), then verily! he, between whom and you there was enmity, (will become) as though he was a close friend. But none is granted it (the above quality) except those who are patient, and none is granted it except the owner of the great portion (of the happiness in the Hereafter i.e. Paradise and in this world of a high moral character)” [Fussilat. 34-35]

And there is no remedy against a devil amongst the Jinn except through seeking refuge with Allah. Allah [The Most High] said: [وَإِمَّا يَنزَغَنَّكَ مِنَ ٱلشَّيْطَٰنِ نَزْغٌ فَٱسْتَعِذْ بِٱللَّهِ إِنَّهُۥ سَمِيعٌ عَلِيمٌ – And if an evil whisper comes to you from Shaitan (Satan) then seek refuge with Allah. Verily, He is All-Hearer, All-Knower]. [Al-A’raf 200]

Allah [The Most High] said Surah Al-Muminun 97-98]:

وَقُل رَّبِّ أَعُوذُ بِكَ مِنْ هَمَزَٰتِ ٱلشَّيَٰطِينِ
وَأَعُوذُ بِكَ رَبِّ أَن يَحْضُرُونِ

And say: “My Lord! I seek refuge with You from the whisperings (suggestions) of the Shayatin (devils). “And I seek refuge with You, My Lord! lest they may attend (or come near) me.”

Allah [The Most High] said:

وَإِمَّا يَنزَغَنَّكَ مِنَ ٱلشَّيْطَٰنِ نَزْغٌ فَٱسْتَعِذْ بِٱللَّهِ إِنَّهُۥ هُوَ ٱلسَّمِيعُ ٱلْعَلِيمُ

And if an evil whisper from Shaitan (Satan) tries to turn you away (O Muhammad) (from doing good, etc.), then seek refuge in Allah. Verily, He is the All-Hearer, the All-Knower. [Fussilat, 36] [An Excerpt from ‘Al-Islam Deenun Kaamilun. Pages: 10-12]

———————————————-

Footnote a:

Believer’s Bahaviour Towards Muslim Rulers – [Supplicates For Them….]

Footnote b:

Imam As-Sadi, may Allah have mercy upon him, said: Allah [The Most High] has forbidden much evil suspicion towards the believers because some suspicions are sins, such as the suspicion devoid of reality and factual evidence, and the suspicion accompanied by much forbidden speech and action, for indeed the settlement of evil suspicion in the heart does not restrict the one (in whose heart is that evil suspicion) only to that; rather, he does not cease until he utters and does that which is not permissible. [Tafseer As-Sadi]

Imam Muhammad Ibn Salih Al-Uthaymeen, may Allah have mercy upon him, said: Not every suspicion is a sin and there is no harm regarding the suspicion that is based on clear indications regarding the validity of a matter. As for mere assumption, it is not permissible. For example, if a man – who is known to be upright – is seen with a woman by another man, it not permissible to accuse him that the woman he is seen with is a stranger because this is the type of suspicion that is tantamount to sin. [Fataawaa Islaamiyyah 4/537]

Spying: The Prophet, peace and blessings of Allah be upon him, said, “Whoever listens to the talk of some people who do not like him (to listen) or they run away from him, then molten lead will be poured into his ears on the Day of Resurrection”. [Sahih Al-Bukhaari Number 7042].

Al-Allaamah Saleh Al-Fawzan, may Allah preserve him, said, “This is a severe threat, so one should not listen to the speech of the people if they do not want anyone to know what they are talking about”. [An Excerpt from It’haaf At-Tullaab Bi-Sharhi Mandhoomah Al-Aadaab. page 149]

Al-Allamah Zayd Bin Hadi Al-Mad’khalee, may Allah have mercy upon him, said:

It may be that two or more people gather to speak about a particular affair that concerns them, and they do not want anyone else to know about it; but then a person or more than one person becomes an obstacle by listening to their speech and [wants] to know what they are talking about, whilst they are not pleased with that. This is an act of transgression and foolishness – that a person involves himself into something that does not concern him. And from the perfection of a person’s Islam is to leave that which does not concern him. However, there is an exception to this prohibition such as when a person listens into the speech of those who are focused or (involved) in seeking to breach the state of safety and security of the Muslims”. [An Excerpt from ‘Awnul Ahadis Samad Sharh Al-Adabil Mufrad’ 3/281]

Backbiting: Abu Hurairah, may Allah be pleased with him, narrated that the Messenger of Allah, peace and blessings of Allah be upon him, said, ‘’Do you know what backbiting is?’’ They (i.e. the Sahaabah) replied Allah and his Messenger know best’’; he said said, “It is to mention your brother what he dislikes’’. Someone asked, ‘’What if what I said is true?’’ He replied, “If what you said about him is true you have backbitten him, and if it is not true you have slandered him’’. [Muslim]

When is speaking about someone behind his back not considered backbiting? It is not considered backbiting when a person makes a complaint about an oppressor to a person who has the ability to stop the oppression; when seeking help to stop an evil- by making that known to the person who has the ability to stop the evil; when seeking for a fatwa; when warning the Muslims so that they are not deceived; when mentioning a person who commits his evil openly or one who calls to bidah and when identifying someone with a physical defect, whilst not intending defamation. [Subul As-Salaam. 4/553]

Footnote c: Imam Ibn Al-Qayyim, may Allah have mercy upon him, said: This verse contains all the Masaalih (things that will bring about benefit and repel harm) for the servants of Allah in their worldly affairs and in the Hereafter – amongst themselves or reharding their relationship with their Lord. This is because every servant of Allah finds himself within two circumstances and obligations – either to fulfil the obligations owed to Allah or the obligations owed to Allah’s creation. As for the obligations owed to the creation, they include (righteous) association, companionship, aiding one another in Allah loves and obedience to Allah, and that is the goal behind one’s search for happiness and success in the afterlife. There can be no happiness in the afterlife except through Bir and Taqwaa because it is basis of all affairs of the religion. [An Excerpt from Bada’i at-Tafsir Al-Jaami Limaa Fassarahu Al-Imam Ibn Al-Qayyim Al-Jawziyyah. 1/307. Publisher: Daar Ibn Al-Jawziyyah 2nd Edition. 1431AH]

Footnote d: Consultation: Al-Hasan al-Basree [may Allah have mercy upon him] said: “By Allah! Never have a people sought advice except that they were guided to the best of what was available to them.” Then he recited [the statement of Allaah]: [وَأَمۡرُهُمۡ شُورَىٰ بَيۡنَہُمۡ – And (the Believers) who (conduct) their affairs by mutual consultation].

Al-Allamah Zaid Bin Haadee Al-Mad’khalee [may Allah have mercy upon him] said: Allah [The Mighty and Majestic] commanded His Messenger Muhammad [peace and blessings of Allah be upon him] to consult his companions in some affairs. Allah [Glorified be He and free is He from all imperfections] said: [وَشَاوِرۡهُمۡ فِى ٱلۡأَمۡرِ‌ۖ فَإِذَا عَزَمۡتَ فَتَوَكَّلۡ عَلَى ٱللَّهِ‌ۚ – and consult them in the affairs. Then when you have taken a decision, put your trust in Allah.

He [i.e. the Messenger] is the example to be followed by the Ummah, therefore when it is the case that Allah commanded him to consult his companions, then there is even a greater reason that the Muslims are in need of consultation amongst themselves. When a difficulty that is related to a Muslim’s religious and worldly affairs occurs, then indeed it is fitting that he consults someone whom he considers reliable, wise, truthful and sincere. He examines [the advice] given by that person, then he makes a choice – either to take that advice or decides not to take it based on what he is satisfied with, in relation to his personal affairs.

The hadeeth places emphasis on the fact that consultation guides to the best outcomes, and due to this it is said: ”The one who consults [others] does not regret [thereafter InShaaAllaah] and the one who performs Istikhaarah will not fail [to achieve good]”. Both Istikhaarah and consultation are legislated and a lot of good is achieved by way of them, as opposed to when affairs are pursued in a rigid and haphazard manner, for indeed this might lead to regret and harm. [An Excerpt from ‘Awnul Ahadis Samad Sharh Al-Adab Al-Mufrad’ 1/285]

[1] Ṣaḥih Muslim 1844]
[2] Sharh Sahih Muslim 12/196
[3] at-Ta’leeqaat Al-Maleehah Alaa Silsilati Al-Ahaadeeth As-Saheehah. 2/29-33
[4] Al-Fawaa’d. page: 228

What’s Known Over Past Thirty Years: Reasoned Pursuit of Clarity

Written by Abdullah Jallow on . Posted in Basics, Contemporary Issues, Da'wah - Calling To Islam, Fatawa-Rulings, Featured, Methodology - 'Manhaj', Pearls of Wisdom, Purification of The Soul, Scholars of Islam, Worship - 'Ibaadah'.

In The Name of Allah, The Most Merciful, The Bestower of Mercy.

Different Levels of The Scholars of Ijtihad

المرتبة الأولى: مرتبة المجتهد المستقل، وهو الذي يستقل في اجتهاده بمبادئ أصولية وقواعد عامة يبني عليها فقهه من غير أن يقلد أحداً في أصوله التي بني عليها استنباطه، ومثلوا لهذه المرتبة بفقهاء الصحابة والتابعين وأئمة المذاهب الأربعة وغيرهم ممن عاصرهم أو جاء بعدهم من مشاهير الأئمة

المرتبة الثانية: مرتبة المجتهد المنتسب وهو الذي يجتهد في الأصول والفروع كأهل المرتبة الأولى، لكنه غير مستقل في اجتهاده، وإنما يبني على أصول إمامه الذي ينتسب إليه فهو تابع له في المبادئ العامة في الاجتهاد مستقل عنه فيما عدا ذلك، وقد يختلف معه في أحكام المسائل الجزئية

المرتبة الثالثة: مرتبة المجتهد المذهبي وهو المجتهد المقيد، ويسمى أيضاً مجتهد التخريج، وهو الذي عرف قواعد إمامه في الاجتهاد فالتزمها واستطاع من خلالها استباط الأحكام في المسائل الاجتهادية
أي التي لم يرد فيها نص عن إمام مذهبه.

المرتبة الرابعة : مرتبة مجتهد الترجيح أو التنقيح، وهو الذي يقوم بالترجيح بين الآراء المروية في المذهب بناء على قوة الدليل، أو ملائعة التطبيق للعصر. ولا يأتي بقول جديد وإنما يرجح قولاً على آخر، إما لقوة الدليل، أو حسبما يؤدي إليه اجتهاده.

المرتبة الخامسة: مرتبة مجتهد الفتوى وهو الفقيه الحافظ المذهب إمامه ونقله وفهمه في المسائل والمشكلات ولديه قدرة على تمييز الأقوال القوية من الضعيفة، ويفتي الناس بالراجح أو المشهور من المذهب

An-Nahj Al-Aqwaa Fee Arkaan Al-Fatwa pages 26-27. Introduction by Al-Allamah Abdul Aziz Aala Ash-Shaikh, may Allah have mercy upon him, and Al-Allamah Salih Al-Fawzan, may Allah preserve him.

 

Responsible Behaviour When Following Proofs or Seeking Guidance From Upright People of Knowledge

Imam Abdul Aziz Bin Baz, may Allah have mercy upon him, said:

If a person is a student of knowledge and adheres to the Hanafi Madhab in certain matters that are clear to him to be correct, and his Madhab is stronger than other than it; then follows Ash-Shafi’i, Malik’s, or Ahmad’s in other matters where it appears that their Madhab in those matters are correct based on the proofs, there is no harm in this because a believer, wherever Allāh gives him knowledge, he follows the proof and looks to the proof. So, what is established with proof, it is obligatory to adhere to it, regardless of whether it aligns with the Madhab of Shafi’i, Abu Hanifa, Malik, Ahmad, or any other scholars. The important thing is that it must agree with the proof – substantiated by a verse or a noble sound hadith from Allah’s Messenger, peace and blessings of Allāh be upon him.

However, as for following whims or personal desires, then no. Playing about – sometimes this and other times that (arbitrarily between opinions), this is not permissible. But it is incumbent upon him to seek to know the proof and asking the people of knowledge regarding what is difficult for him. If he knows the proof, acquainted with the proof that this madhab in this issue is more valid while another is more valid in a different matter, there is no harm in this; otherwise, he should consult the scholars, seek their verdicts, and act according to what they guide him to based on knowledge. [1]

Question: If I ask a scholar and he gives me a verdict, is it impermissible to ask other than him? Also, the brother says: I present these two questions because I have heard them from some of the Mashayikh who give verdicts to the people, since I am not fully convinced by their responses. Firstly, it is said that if you ask a scholar and he gives you a verdict, you should follow what he says and not seek another verdict (a verdict from other than him). Is this correct, or am I able to ask until my heart is assured?

The response: This is incorrect, instead, it is obligated to the questioner to strive to ask until they find peace in their heart. They should seek -among the people of Shariah knowledge – for the [الأعلم فالأعلم – those more knowledgeable in levels of knowledge] and [والأورع فالأورع – those known to possess more Wara (fear of Allah that makes a person stay away from doubtful matters out of fearing of falling into something forbidden)] until his heart is at ease that the verdict is correct, appropriate and in accordance with the Shariah, as the Prophet, peace and blessings of Allah be upon him, stated, “Righteousness (birr) is good morality, and wrongdoing is that which wavers in your soul and which you dislike people finding out about.” He , peace and blessings of Allah be upon him, said: “Consult your heart. Righteousness is that about which the soul feels tranquil and the heart feels tranquil, and wrongdoing is that which wavers in the soul and moves to and fro in the breast even though people again and again have given you their legal opinion [in its favor].” [I] A believer seeks knowledge and understanding in the religion, and asks the people of knowledge until his heart is at ease that the verdict aligns with the Shariah based on his ability and how far he can strive.

Question: With regards to the student of knowledge, if someone approaches him for a verdict and it is known that the individual has already sought a verdict from someone else, is the student permitted to respond to this request for a verdict.

The Shaikh responded: There is no objection (or hindrance), but the mufti must diligently seek out the Shariah proofs and should not be lackadaisical. He should refer to the Quran and the Sunnah to provide the questioner with what he knows of Allah’s Shariah- the Book of Allah and the Sunnah of the Prophet, peace and blessings of Allah be upon him. He should not be lackadaisical (or approach the matter lightly), instead it is obligated to him to strive and investigate thoroughly so that he only issues rulings based on insight and knowledge. If a questioner asks him a question, while he knows that he has asked someone else, there is no objection (or hindrance). If he is asked, he says: “What did so-and-so say?” This is so that he would be able to either agree or disagree with the previous response. There is no harm in this. The companions used to do this, asking those who asked them (questions): “What did so-and-so say?” He (the questioner) said: “So and so says”, then he (i.e. the one asked the question) either says that he is in agreement with the verdict or he opposes it and says: “The verdict is such and such”.

Question: What if he refrains from giving a ruling, does that constitute concealment of knowledge?

The Shaikh said: If he knows that the verdict is false, it is tantamount to concealment of knowledge. However, if it is based on Ijtihad, investigation, and opinion, then there is no issue. [2] [Paraphrased] [II]

Another question: In light of verdicts and giving verdicts, many of our brothers ask about a single topic from more than one student of knowledge, and they may encounter differing opinions. What guidance do you offer to those who ask questions, should they be satisfied with the response of one individual, or can they ask this one and that one until they reach their desire (understanding or goal)?

If the Fatwa does not reassure the questioner’s heart, while he intends good, knowledge, and Al-Wara (i.e. his intention is the fear of Allah that keeps a person from doubtful matters lest they fall into what is forbidden), there is no harm. He asks until his heart is assured with the proof and that this is the Shariah ruling. However, if his intention is driven by personal desire, that is not permissible. If he is seeking what agrees with his desires, this is not permissible; instead, it is incumbent upon him to strive to know the truth based on its proof until his heart is assured and seek for those he believes to be closer to good conduct and knowledge among the scholars of fatwa- seeking a verdict from one regarding whom his heart is at ease with that they are closer to knowledge of the truth.

He searches for the people of knowledge and when seeking their verdicts – from whom he thinks is most closer to reaching the truth. Thus, he gives importance to assurance and to reach the truth, and not seeking for what agrees with his desire. The one who asks questions to this one and that one so that his heart is at ease and upon tranquility with the verdict based on its proof, there is no harm on him in doing so because this is part of seeking confirmation of the truth. [3] [Paraphrased]

The question: This questioner, Ahmad Kashuqah from Amman, Jordan, says: O revered Shaikh, when the statements of the scholars differ regarding the ruling on a particular issue—some saying it is Makruh (disliked), some say it is Haraam (unlawful) and some say Laa Yajuz (it is not allowed), is the verdict Haraam the best of these statements and is this always the case? And if they differ regarding a matter being allowed, recommended and that there is no harm regarding it, is the verdict recommended the best statement, and is this always the case?

Response: There is a detail clarification regarding this matter. It is incumbent upon the one seeking a verdict to examine the matter, [ويتحرى من هو أقرب إلى الخير والعلم والفضل وأقرب إلى إصابة الحق – and he (carefully) seeks out the one who is closer to goodness, knowledge, and virtue, and closer to attaining the truth] in order to follow their fatwa. If one exercises caution, while the matter is a situation where this one says “haraam”, that one says “It is not Haraam”, he exercises caution and leaves it. This would be better. The Prophet, peace and blessings of Allah be upon him, said: “Leave that which makes you doubt for that which does not make you doubt.” “So whoever took caution regarding the ambiguous matters has absolved himself regarding his religion and his honour”.

However, if he is able, he carefully seeks until he knows [من هو أكثر علمًا، ومن هو أكثر ورعًا، ومن هو أقرب إلى الصواب – who has more knowledge, has more of that fear of Allah that makes a person abandon doubtful matters out of fear of falling into Haram, and the one who is closer to reaching what is correct] in order to follow his statement and so that his heart is at ease, similar to what the Prophet, peace and blessings of Allah be upon him, said: “Consult your heart”. [c] Righteousness is that about which the soul feels tranquil and the heart feels tranquil. If faced with differing fatwas, if the Fatwa differs, a believer examines and contemplates, and he is not hasty;

[يتحرى من هو أقرب إلى الناس للإصابة من أهل العلم والبصيرة والورع والذي يرجح في قلبه أنه أقرب إلى الخير وأقرب إلى إصابة الحق – he seeks among the people of knowledge the one closest to reaching the truth, the possessors of clear-sightedness and that fear of Allah that makes a person avoid doubtful matters out of fear of falling into what is forbidden – the one his heart considers to be closer to good and closer to reaching the truth].

Similarly, in matters of recommendation, if there is disagreement regarding whether something is recommended or permissible, one should carefully consider the opinions. If his heart holds an overwhelming inclination -based on what is apparent – towards the statement of the one who says that the matter is recommended, he should act on the recommendation. If your heart is at ease that the matter is permissible only, it should be treated as permissible. The goal (intent) regarding all of this is that the one who seeks fatwa or the listener should examine and contemplate without haste, he examines the situation and circumstances of the Muftis, and he examines what is closer to good in terms of them having that fear of Allah that makes a person avoid doubtful matters out of fear of falling into Haram, their careful pursuit of the truth, and their good reputation, among other things. [end of quote] [4] Paraphrased] [end of quotes]

In saying all this, Taqleed has its precise place. Al-Allamah Salih Al-Fawzan, may Allah have mercy upon him, stated on this link that the layperson or the beginner in the path of knowledge has no option but to make Taqleed because they do not have the ability to make Ijtihad, so they make Taqleed of the people of knowledge, as Allah said:

فَسْـَٔلُوٓا۟ أَهْلَ ٱلذِّكْرِ إِن كُنتُمْ لَا تَعْلَمُونَ

Ask Ahl Adh-Dhikr (the people of Shariah knowledge) if you do not know. [4] [Paraphrased]
———————————————————

[I] https://www.nawawis40hadith.com/nw/hadith/27/righteousness-and-sin
[II] https://abukhadeejah.com/differing-where-there-is-room-for-ijtihad-should-not-damage-our-unity/

Tolerated Differing and Impermissible Differing in Islam: The Great Imāms of Sunnah did not declare those who differed with them in the affairs of permissible ijtihād to be astray and they did not make binding upon others their own opinions.

[1] https://binbaz.org.sa/fatwas/8426/%D8%AD%D9%83%D9%85-%D8%A7%D9%84%D8%AA%D9%86%D9%82%D9%84-%D8%A8%D9%8A%D9%86-%D8%A7%D9%84%D9%85%D8%B0%D8%A7%D9%87%D8%A8-%D8%A7%D9%84%D9%81%D9%82%D9%87%D9%8A%D8%A9

 

[2]

هل إذا سألت عالماً وأفتاني فلا يجوز سؤال غيره؟
السؤال: أيضاً يقول الأخ المؤمن: هذان سؤالان أعرضهما لأنني سمعتهما من بعض المشايخ الذين قد يفتون للناس، ونظراً لأنني لم أطمأن إليهما سألت عنهما.
الأول: يقال: إذا سألت عالماً فأفتاك فنفذ ما قاله لك ولا تستفت غيره، فهل هذا صحيح أو أنني أستطيع السؤال حتى يطمئن قلبي؟
الجواب: ليس هذا بصحيح، بل ينبغي للسائل أن يجتهد في السؤال حتى يطمئن قلبه، ويتحرى الأعلم فالأعلم والأورع فالأورع من أهل العلم حتى يطمئن قلبه إلى أن الفتوى صحيحة وأنها مناسبة وموافقة للشرع، كما قال النبي ﷺ: البر حسن الخلق، والإثم ما حاك في نفسك وكرهت أن يطلع عليه الناس ويقول ﷺ: استفت قلبك، البر ما اطمأنت إليه النفس واطمئن إليه القلب والإثم ما حاك في النفس، وتردد في الصدر، وإن أفتاك الناس وأفتوك.
فالمؤمن يطلب العلم ويتفقه في الدين ويسأل أهل العلم حتى يطمئن قلبه إلى أن الفتوى موافقة للشرع، حسب اجتهاده وطاقته.
المقدم: طيب بالنسبة لطالب العلم إذا أتاه شخص ليستفتيه وعلم منه أن قد استفتى شخصاً قبله، هل له أن يجيبه على هذا الاستفتاء؟
الشيخ: لا مانع، لكن على المفتي أن يتحرى الأدلة الشرعية، وألا يتساهل، أن يتحرى الكتاب والسنة فيعطي السائل ما يعلمه من شرع الله؛ كتاب الله وسنة النبي ﷺ ولا يتساهل، بل ينبغي له الاجتهاد والتحري حتى لا يفتي إلا عن بصيرة وعن علم.
وإذا سأله سائل يعلم أنه قد سأل غيره فلا مانع، وإن سأله قال: ماذا قال لك فلان؟ حتى يستطيع بذلك إما أن يوافقه أو يخالفه فلا بأس.
كان الصحابة قد يفعلون هذا، قد يفعلون هذا يسألون من سألهم: ماذا قال لك فلان؟ يقول: قال فلان، فيقول: هو على فتواه، وقد يخالفه فيقول: الفتوى كذا والفتوى كذا. نعم.
المقدم: طيب لو امتنع عن فتواه، هل يعتبر ذلك من كتمان العلم؟
الشيخ: إن كان يعلم أن الفتوى باطلة يكون من كتمان العلم، أما إذا كان بالاجتهاد والتحري والرأي فلا بأس

https://binbaz.org.sa/fatwas/5402/%D9%87%D9%84-%D8%A7%D8%B0%D8%A7-%D8%B3%D8%A7%D9%84%D8%AA-%D8%B9%D8%A7%D9%84%D9%85%D8%A7-%D9%88%D8%A7%D9%81%D8%AA%D8%A7%D9%86%D9%8A-%D9%81%D9%84%D8%A7-%D9%8A%D8%AC%D9%88%D8%B2-%D8%B3%D9%88%D8%A7%D9%84-%D8%BA%D9%8A%D8%B1%D9%87#:~:text=%D8%A7%D9%84%D8%AC%D9%88%D8%A7%D8%A8%3A%20%D9%84%D9%8A%D8%B3%20%D9%87%D8%B0%D8%A7%20%D8%A8%D8%B5%D8%AD%D9%8A%D8%AD%D8%8C%20%D8%A8%D9%84,%D8%A7%D9%84%D8%A8%D8%B1%20%D9%85%D8%A7%20%D8%A7%D8%B7%D9%85%D8%A3%D9%86%D8%AA%20%D8%A5%D9%84%D9%8A%D9%87%20%D8%A7%D9%84%D9%86%D9%81%D8%B3

 

[3]

حكم سؤال أكثر من عالم لاتباع المستفتي هواه
بمناسبة الفتوى والاستفتاء سماحة الشيخ؛ كثير من إخواننا يسأل عن موضوع واحد أكثر من طالب علم، ولربما وجد اختلافًا في القول، فما هو توجيهكم لأولئك الذين يسألون، هل يكتفون بسؤال شخص واحد؟ أم يسألون هذا، وذاك حتى يصلوا إلى مبتغاهم؟
إذا كان السائل لم يطمئن قلبه للفتوى، وهو قصده الخير، وقصده العلم، قصده الورع؛ فلا حرج، يسأل حتى يطمئن قلبه للدليل، وأن هذا هو الحكم الشرعي، أما إذا كان يقصد الهوى هذا لا يجوز، إذا كان يطلب ما يوافق هواه هذا لا يجوز، لكن عليه أن يجتهد في أن يعرف الحق بدليله؛ حتى يطمئن قلبه للفتوى، ويتحرى من يظنهم أقرب إلى الخير، وأقرب إلى العلم من أهل الفتوى يعني: يستفتي من يطمئن قلبه إلى أنه أقرب إلى معرفة الحق، يتحرى في أهل العلم، وفي استفتائهم من يظن، ويغلب على ظنه أنه أقرب إلى إصابة الحق، فهو يهتم بالطمأنينة، وإصابة الحق لا بما يوافق هواه، فالذي يسأل هذا وهذا لينشرح صدره، وليطمئن إلى الفتوى بدليلها؛ نرجو أن لا حرج عليه؛ لأن هذا من باب التثبت في الحق.
المقدم: جزاكم الله خيرًا.

https://binbaz.org.sa/fatwas/16116/%D8%AD%D9%83%D9%85-%D8%B3%D9%88%D8%A7%D9%84-%D8%A7%D9%83%D8%AB%D8%B1-%D9%85%D9%86-%D8%B9%D8%A7%D9%84%D9%85-%D9%84%D8%A7%D8%AA%D8%A8%D8%A7%D8%B9-%D8%A7%D9%84%D9%85%D8%B3%D8%AA%D9%81%D8%AA%D9%8A-%D9%87%D9%88%D8%A7%D9%87

 

[4]

السؤال: هذا السائل أحمد كشوقة من الأردن عمان يقول: سماحة الشيخ: إذا اختلفت أقوال العلماء في حكم مسألة ما، فمنهم من قال: مكروه، ومنهم من قال: حرام، ومنهم من قال: لا يجوز، فهل أحسن القول في هذه الأحكام هو الحرام؟ وهل هذا دائمًا؟ وإذا اختلفوا على مسألة بأنها جائزة مستحبة لا بأس بها فهل الأحسن القول هو الاستحباب؟ وهل هذا دائمًا، وجهونا بهذا مأجورين؟
الجواب: هذا فيه تفصيل على المستفتي أن ينظر في الأمر، ويتحرى من هو أقرب إلى الخير والعلم والفضل وأقرب إلى إصابة الحق حتى يأخذ بفتواه، وإذا احتاط والمسألة: هذا يقول: حرام، وهذا يقول: ليس بحرام، واحتاط وترك ذلك فهذا حسن؛ لقول النبي ﷺ: دع ما يريبك إلى ما لا يريبك من اتقى الشبهات فقد استبرأ لدينه وعرضه ولكن إذا تيسر له أن يتحرى حتى يعرف من هو أكثر علمًا، ومن هو أكثر ورعًا، ومن هو أقرب إلى الصواب حتى يأخذ بقوله، حتى يطمئن قلبه، مثلما قال ﷺ: استفت قلبك البر ما اطمأنت إليه النفس واطمأن إليه القلب، إذا اختلفت عليه الفتاوى، إذا اختلفت الفتوى فالمؤمن ينظر ويتأمل ولا يعجل، يتحرى من هو أقرب إلى الناس للإصابة من أهل العلم والبصيرة والورع والذي يرجح في قلبه أنه أقرب إلى الخير وأقرب إلى إصابة الحق، وهكذا في الاستحباب إذا اختلفوا هذا سنة أو مباح يتحرى، فإذا غلب على قلبه واطمأن قلبه إلى قول من قال: إنه مستحب، عمل عمل المستحب، وإذا اطمأن قلبك إلى أنه مباح فقط عامله معاملة المباح.
والمقصود من هذا كله أن المستفتي أو السامع ينظر ويتأمل ولا يعجل، وينظر حال المفتين وأحوالهم، وينظر ما هو أقرب إلى الخير من جهة ورعهم ومن جهة تحريهم الحق، ومن جهة سمعتهم الحسنة، إلى غير ذلك

https://binbaz.org.sa/fatwas/8821/%D9%85%D9%88%D9%82%D9%81-%D8%A7%D9%84%D9%85%D8%B3%D8%AA%D9%81%D8%AA%D9%8A-%D8%A7%D8%B0%D8%A7-%D8%A7%D8%AE%D8%AA%D9%84%D9%81%D8%AA-%D8%A7%D9%82%D9%88%D8%A7%D9%84-%D8%A7%D9%84%D9%85%D9%81%D8%AA%D9%8A%D9%86

[5] https://www.alfawzan.af.org.sa/ar/node/15726

An Incident Between AbuBakr And Rabee’ah: A Lesson In Maturity, Fair Play, Accountability, And Responsibility During Disagreement

Written by Abdullah Jallow on . Posted in Basics, Brotherhood, Featured, History of Islam, Methodology - 'Manhaj', Morals and Manners - 'Akhlaaq', Pearls of Wisdom, Purification of The Soul, Repentance, Sahaabah, Salaf As Saalih (Pious Predecessors), Scholars of Islam, The Salaf - Pious Predecessors, Worship - 'Ibaadah'.

In The Name of Allah, The Most Merciful, The Bestower of Mercy.

Rabee’ah Al-Aslami, may Allah be pleased with him, narrated:

I used to serve Allah’s Messenger, peace and blessings of Allah be upon him, so he gave me a piece of land and gave Abu Bakr, may Allah be pleased with him, a piece of land. Then, the worldly life came and we argued over a bunch of palm trees. Abu Bakr said, “It is in my piece of land” and I said, “It is in my piece of land!” There was an exchange of words between Abu Bakr and myself, then Abu Bakr said something to me that I disliked and he regretted that. He said to me, “O Rabee’ah! Say in return to me what I said to you so that it becomes a retribution”. I said, “I will not do so!” Abu Bakr said, “Say it, or I will call Allah’s Messenger on you!’ I said, “I will not do so”. Abu Bakr abandoned the piece of land and went to the Prophet, peace and blessings of Allah be upon him, while I followed him. The people from (the tribe of) Aslam came and said, “May Allah have mercy upon Abu Bakr! Why would he call Allah’s Messenger on you when he has said to you what he has said?” I said, “Do you know who that is? That is Abu Bakr -the Truthful! He is the one who was in the Cave with the Prophet and the elder of the Muslims! So beware that he turns around and see you helping me against him and it makes him angry, then Allah’s Messenger comes along and become angry because of Abu Bakr’s anger, and then Allah becomes angry due to their anger, thus, Rabee’ah is destroyed!” They said, “So what do you want us to do?” I said, “Go back to where you came from”.

Abu Bakr went to Allah’s Messenger and I followed him by myself and continued until he got to the Prophet and informed him of our conversation as it happened. He (the Prophet) raised his head to me and said, “O Rabee’ah! What is going on between you and As-Siddeeq?” I said, “O Allah’s Messenger! This happened and that happened, so he said something to me that I disliked, and he told me to say the same thing back to him so that it be would be a retribution”. Allah’s Messenger said, “Do not return his comment to him, rather say ‘May Allah forgive you O Abu Bakr! May Allah forgive you O Abu Bakr!’ Thus, Abu Bakr turned his face and began to cry”

Al-Allamah Zaid Bin Hadi Al-Mad’khali, may Allah have mercy upon him, said:

This hadith contains an amazing story from which we can take an exhortation and a lesson. Firstly, it is a proof regarding the purity of the hearts of the Sahabah towards one another, and that when disagreement occurred between them regarding a worldly matter, they did not boycott one another – neither harboured resentment nor hatred; rather one gave sincere advice to the other.

This story shows that the Sahabah were people of fair play and justice, and they feared falling into disobedience and evil deeds. If punishment was legislated for an evil deed, they wished that such punishment is received in this worldly life and not the afterlife. This story shows the virtue of AbuBakr – his status in the eyes of the Sahabah,  the Prophet and in the sight of Allah, for indeed the Prophet used to hold him in high regard and raised him to his rightful status, as Allah stated in the Qur’an:

إِذۡ هُمَا فِى ٱلۡغَارِ إِذۡ يَقُولُ لِصَـٰحِبِهِۦ لَا تَحۡزَنۡ إِنَّ ٱللَّهَ مَعَنَا‌ۖ

The second of two, when they were in the cave, and he [Muhammad] said to his companion [Abu Bakr], “Be not sad [or afraid], surely Allah is with us”. [at-Tawbah. 40]

AbuBakr was the Prophet’s companion in the cave. He is the most virtuous person in the Ummah after the Prophet based on the consensus of Ahlus Sunnah Wal Jama’ah – past and present. Indeed, the Prophet said to some of his companions regarding AbuBakr, “Would you not leave my companion for me” – meaning AbuBakr [i.e. refrain from annoying or harming AbuBakr.] [Al-Bukhari 3661]

This story shows the virtue of being forgiving and pardoning the one who wrongs you when you are able to do so and based on benefit, for indeed being forgiving, and pardoning others will not increase you in anything except honour and a higher status in the sight of Allah.

This story also shows that the companions of the Prophet were not infallible. Mistakes did occur from them unintentionally, but they were a people whom Allah favoured with the companionship of the Prophet and they did not persist upon mistakes as it is seen in this story. Indeed, disagreement did occur between them, but they humbled themselves to the truth- neither repelled the truth with falsehood nor indulged in oppression; rather they hastened to Allah’s Messenger to resolve the (disagreements) that occurred between them. The Messenger resolved those issues and all of them were pleased with the judgement and submitted with full submission.

This story shows the virtue of supplicating for others, especially for the one who wronged you. So, you supplicate for him that [Allah] rectifies his affairs and forgives him, for indeed you have an angel who says, “Aameen and may Allah grant you the same”. Therefore, one should be eager for this!

This story shows that to fulfil the rights of the people in this worldly life is better than leaving the matter until the day of judgement when none will  pardon another person, even if such person is the closest relative to him.

This story shows the virtue of Rabee’ah Al-Aslami who advised his companions that neither should they be his supporters nor argue on his behalf against AbuBakr because he knew the status of AbuBakr in the sight of Allah and the Messenger.

What do we derive as benefit from this story:

We should pardon and maintain love for one another when disagreement occurs between us regarding a matter of the Dunyaa. A person should be eager to give people their rights and also seek the forgiveness of the one he disputed with.

An Excerpt from at-Taleeqaat Al-Malihah Alaa Silsilah Al-Ahadith as-Sahihah 1/42-44.

O you who believe! Be not like those who annoyed Musa

Written by Abdullah Jallow on . Posted in Aqeedah, Morals and Manners - 'Akhlaaq', Purification of The Soul, Qur'aan, Worship - 'Ibaadah'.

In The Name of Allah, The Most Merciful, The Bestower of Mercy.

Musa, peace be upon him, was a very shy man and used to cover his body completely. No part of his skin was seen due to shyness. So, he was hurt by those amongst the children of Israel who said:

“He covers his body in this way only because of some defect in his skin- either leprosy or scrotal hernia, or he has some other defect”.

Allah wished to free Musa, peace be upon him, from that which they said about him; so one day whilst he was in seclusion, he took off his clothes and put them on a stone and started taking a bath. When he finished the bath, he moved towards his clothes to take them, but the stone fled with his clothes. Musa picked up his stick and ran after the stone saying: ‘O stone! My clothes’ until he reached a group of the children of Israel who saw him without [clothes], and found him the best of that which Allah had created, and Allah freed him from what they had accused him of. They said: “By Allah! Nothing is wrong with Musa”. The stone stopped there, so Musa took his and put on them, and thereafter started hitting the stone with his stick. By Allah, the stone still has some traces of the hitting- three, four or five marks. This was what Allah referred to in His statement:

 يَـٰٓأَيُّہَا ٱلَّذِينَ ءَامَنُواْ لَا تَكُونُواْ كَٱلَّذِينَ ءَاذَوۡاْ مُوسَىٰ فَبَرَّأَهُ ٱللَّهُ مِمَّا قَالُواْۚ وَكَانَ عِندَ ٱللَّهِ وَجِيہً۬ا

O you who believe! Be not like those who annoyed Musa (Moses), but Allah cleared him of that which they alleged, and he was honourable in the sight of Allah.[Al-Ahzab. 69]

Al-Allamah Zaid Bin Hadi al-Mad’khali, may Allah have mercy upon him, said:

This hadith (reports) one of the most amazing stories – a story through which Allah raised the status of Musa, peace be upon him. In this hadith, there is a clarification regarding the fact that the Messengers and the Prophets were put to trial at the hands of the evil ones in  their nations, so they exercised patience whilst facing harm, received abundant reward from Allah, The Mighty and Majestic, and carried on propagating Allah’s message. Indeed, the Messenger, peace and blessings of Allah be upon him, informed us that Musa, peace be upon him, was harmed by Bani Israa’eel but he exercised patience. In this hadith, there is proof to show that the miracles of the Messengers and Prophets are affirmed. And with regards to this particular miracle, the stone- an inanimate object – moved and fled with the thobe; then Musa, peace be upon him, was finally able to catch up with it. He hit it several times and left a mark on it. This is the great miracle that has been mentioned in this hadith.

Source: An Excerpt from at-Taleeqaat al-Malihah Alaa Silsilah Al-Ahadith As-Sahihah 1/135

Reflections on some statements of Al-Allamah Rabee Bin Hadi Al-Mad’khali – [112]

Written by Abdullah Jallow on . Posted in Articles, Bid'ah (Innovation), Brotherhood, Contemporary Issues, Da'wah - Calling To Islam, Deviated Callers & Individuals, Deviated Groups, Sects and Parties, Innovations In Islam (Bidah), Methodology - 'Manhaj', Morals and Manners - 'Akhlaaq', Purification of The Soul, Refutations, Scholars of Islam, Sin, Worship - 'Ibaadah'.

In The Name of Allah, The Most Merciful, The Bestower of Mercy.

The Shaikh, may Allah have mercy upon him, said:

Wherever those who adhere to the Salafi methodology and its students are or wherever they go, it is incumbent upon them to step up and aid one another to raise the word of truth, Tawhid and Sunnah; subdue Bidah, misguidance and doubts; establish Allah’s proofs against all the various misguided people, make known the reality of the liars and fakers. They should know that the opponents of truth have reached the highest level of plotting and planning, and from that is their preoccupation with the task of silencing many amongst Ahlus Sunnah and those who adhere to truth- restraining them from confronting the falsehood that is covered in the garb of truth. This category of people amongst those who adhere to falsehood are more severe in employing lies, duplicity and pretending to possess that which they do not possess. Thus, they are as the Messenger, peace and blessings of Allah be upon him, stated:

“The one who pretends that he has been given what he has not been given, is just like the (false) one who wears two garments of falsehood”.

We find them as ones who praise the people of falsehood the most and making their affair appear pleasing, while they are the most severe in speaking ill against those who adhere to the truth and its callers. Indeed, they have set up corrupt principles to aid falsehood and those who adhere to misguided methodologies- waging war against those who adhere to truth by devising plots and repugnant things, manifesting their hatred and enmity against those who adhere to truth and hastening – without boredom and tiredness – to instruct the youth to oppose the people of truth, striving hard to aid falsehood and to topple those who adhere to truth.

Books Do Not And Have Never Replaced Shuyukh and Younger Teachers

Written by Abdullah Jallow on . Posted in Brotherhood, Contemporary Issues, Featured, Methodology - 'Manhaj', Morals and Manners - 'Akhlaaq', Purification of The Soul, Worship - 'Ibaadah'.

In The Name of Allah, The Most Merciful, The Bestower of Mercy.

Books Do Not And Have Never Replaced Shuyukh and Younger Teachers; Never a Point of Confusion Among Salafiyyun Nor Has Ever Been For The Past 30 Years or More.

Imam Al-Barbahari, may Allah have mercy upon him, said:

“And know, may Allah have mercy upon you that knowledge is not in being able to narrate much and in having many books, rather the scholar is the one who follows the knowledge and the Sunnah, even if his knowledge and his books are limited, and whoever opposes the Book and the Sunnah, he is a proponent of Bidah, even if he narrates much and has many books”.

Al-Allamah Rabee Bin Haadi al-Madkhali, may Allah preserve him, stated:

He [Al-Barbahari] sees that the abundance of books and knowledge is not a criterion for the required knowledge of Shariah. Knowledge is what benefits; even if this scholar has little knowledge and few books, he will benefit from his knowledge and it is benefited from with regards to belief, methodology, and application. This is the knowledge that counts in the Sight of Allah- the knowledge He loves, loves, and praises its possessors. Allah said: 

إِنَّمَا يَخْشَى ٱللَّهَ مِنْ عِبَادِهِ ٱلْعُلَمَٰٓؤُا۟ إِنَّ ٱللَّهَ عَزِيزٌ غَفُورٌ 

It is only those who have knowledge among His slaves that fear Allah]. [35:28]

Hence they [the scholars] said, “Knowledge is to fear Allah”. If one with a lot of knowledge does not fear Allah, he is not a scholar and his knowledge has no value because it is a source of evil to him. The Qur’an is proof for or against you, so evil is the state of that scholar- I seek refuge in Allah – who is under the threat of punishment. The Quran is proof against you, the Sunnah is proof against you and knowledge is proof against you, and Allah’s refuge is sought. He may have many books, but he is misguided. He may have a lot of knowledge of the Arabic language, Tafseer, Hadith, and so on, but he is misguided. This is the knowledge that harms and does not benefit, and it is from this that we seek Allah’s protection, and Allah’s Messenger taught us to seek (Allah’s) protection against it. However, knowledge (in and of itself) is beneficial, so if there is a lot of knowledge and books, it is very good, and there are Imams who have abundant knowledge and many books. If the two are combined: a lot of knowledge and many books, it is desirable; and if devoid of benefitting from this knowledge (i.e. due to misguidance or not acting upon it), then neither an abundance of books or knowledge is beneficial, for it is a source of evil on the person. This is why (Allah stated that) some Prophets said: [وَمَآ أُرِيدُ أَنْ أُخَالِفَكُمْ إِلَىٰ مَآ أَنْهَىٰكُمْ عَنْهُ – I wish not, in contradiction to you, to do that which I forbid you]. [11:88]

Allah said:

أَتَأْمُرُونَ ٱلنَّاسَ بِٱلْبِرِّ وَتَنسَوْنَ أَنفُسَكُمْ وَأَنتُمْ تَتْلُونَ ٱلْكِتَٰبَ أَفَلَا تَعْقِلُونَ

Do you order righteousness of the people and forget yourselves while you recite the Scripture? Then will you not reason? [2:44]

Allah said:

يَـٰٓأَيُّہَا ٱلَّذِينَ ءَامَنُواْ لِمَ تَقُولُونَ مَا لَا تَفۡعَلُونَ

ڪَبُرَ مَقۡتًا عِندَ ٱللَّهِ أَن تَقُولُواْ مَا لَا تَفۡعَلُونَ

O you who believe! Why do you say that which you do not do? Most hateful it is with Allah that you say that which you do not do. [As-Saff.2-3]

Some people are merely speakers and they do not act, therefore, a Muslim must combine statements and deeds so that his actions confirm his statements. He calls to belief and believes, and calls to action and acts. This is beneficial knowledge, calling to the Sunnah and adhering to it, fighting Bidah and being serious about fighting it, and being one of the people who are most distant from it. [1]

Al-Allamah Salih Al-Fawzan,may Allah preserve him, said:

Learning from books without referring to the scholars! This is a path of deviation, and many have deviated because of it. He (i.e. the person) will either misunderstand what is in the books or understands in a way other than what is intended because it has not been explained and made clear to him. The author (of the book) may be deviated in his views or knowledge and fills it (i.e. the book) with mistakes in affairs of knowledge. Then this ignorant youth reads and adopts it. Therefore, the books are not to be solely depended upon. And even if the books are sound, you will not be able to understand by merely seeking after it (i.e. reading). The khawaarij were not misguided and misguiding others with their intellects and fear of Allaah, except that they disassociated themselves from the scholars and depended on their own understanding and that of those like them. They took instructions from one another, and thus they caused harm to themselves and to the Ummah. This is the result of disassociating from the scholars. [2]

Imaam Muhammad Bin Salih Al-Uthaymin, may Allah have mercy upon him, said that from that which is incumbent upon a student of knowledge to comply with is that he acquires knowledge directly from the Shaikhs, for indeed he will reach -by way of that- several benefits as follows:

The path to acquiring knowledge will be shortened for him instead of moving from one book to another whilst trying to find out the view that carries more weight (in a particular subject matter) and the reason behind it; also trying to find out the weak view in (that particular subject matter) and the reason behind it. Instead of going through all this, the teacher will give him what he seeks after through an easy path, present to him – two, three or more than three – different views of the people of knowledge together with a clarification of the view that carries more weight and the proof. Indeed, there is no doubt that this is beneficial (or advantageous) for the student.

He will be facilitated with the ability to grasp a subject matter quickly, because when the student of knowledge reads to a scholar, he will grasp the subject matter many times quicker than when he reads books (on his own). This is because when he reads books, he may come across difficult and obscure statements (or expressions), so he needs contemplation and repetition, which requires time and effort, and he may understand those statements wrongly and then act upon them.

Close connection (or attachment) between the students of knowledge and the erudite scholars- junior people of knowledge attached to senior people of knowledge.

These are from the benefits of acquiring knowledge directly from the Shaikhs; but as mentioned earlier, it is obligated on a person to choose a scholar who is reliable, trustworthy and strong – one who has real knowledge and understanding and not superficial knowledge; truthful and firm in fulfilling what is entrusted to him and known for fulfilling acts of worship, for indeed a student follows the footsteps of his teacher. [3]

Al-Allamah Ubaid Bin Abdillah Al-Jabiri, may Allah preserve him, was asked: Is it permissible for the one who seeks knowledge from some Shaikh – by way of books and audios – to say to him [i.e. the Shaikh], “Our Shaikh” and thus he becomes a Shaikh of his?

Answer: There’s no harm in considering someone as one’s Shaikh, but I bring your attention to the fact that there are two ways of acquiring knowledge. The first path is seeking knowledge in person and sitting to acquire knowledge from the scholar directly- sitting in his presence, learn good manners from him and good Tarbiyah. This is the ideal way and the loftiest. This is the way of the Sahaabah in acquiring knowledge from their Prophet [peace and blessings of Allaah be upon him]- those who were with him in Madeenah and those who traveled to him. They acquired knowledge directly from the Prophet and taught their people. Likewise, this is how the Taabi’oon acquired knowledge from the Sahaabah- took knowledge (directly) from the Sahaabah, especially the seniors. Likewise, those who followed the Taabi’een did the same up to this era of ours. This is the correct and loftiest path of acquiring knowledge from a Shaikh.

The second path is to acquire knowledge from books and audios. There is no harm in this and it benefits, but it does not contain that which is found in the first method; rather it is for a woman and the one who is unable because of the difficulty in reaching the Shaikh due to distance, for one may not be able to sit in the presence of a scholar even in his own country. Not all women are able-some of them are sometimes able and unable at other times, and some are not able. So, these people benefit [i.e. from the books & tapes], but also they are not advised to enter into challenging (or very difficult) issues related to differences of opinion between the scholars; rather they entrust those affairs to the people of knowledge. And whoever is a teacher – one who gives instructions in knowledge (i.e. nurtures others) or an Imaam of a Masjid in his city district or town, we advise him to be at the service of the people and that he takes those questions of theirs which he is able to answer and respond to them in his city district. And those questions that carry a difference of opinion and require investigation, he offers his services to the people by sending those questions to the people of knowledge and taking answers from them. This is a good service with regards to the Muslim helping another Muslim. [paraphrased] Listen to audio here: https://safeshare.tv/x/aIVf6vxUqh8#

Imam Muhammad Ibn Salih al-Uthaymin, may Allah have mercy upon him, was asked: “How does a student of knowledge combine between the lessons of Sharia colleges with the lessons of scholars in mosques?”

Answer: I cannot answer this, because everyone knows himself, but I can say that if the regular university lessons clash with the lessons of the scholars, I think a person should be keen on the university lessons if he is to succeed because the period of study at the university is short. And as you now know that positions of leadership in Dawah, education, administration and headship are based on certificates. If a person does not have a certificate, no weight will be given to him regardless of the level of his knowledge. If a student of knowledge seeks knowledge at the university in order to obtain a certificate with which he can reach leadership positions, then this is a good intention and there is nothing in it that would be tantamount to seeking knowledge for other than the sake of Allah in his intention. This is why if two people are presented: one of them has a university degree and the second does not have a certificate, and the second is more knowledgeable than the first, the one who has a certificate is given priority in leadership positions. Therefore, I see that if the lessons in the Sharia colleges clash with the lessons in the Mosques, the student gives precedence to university studies; but if there is no clash, then studying in mosques is compatible with studying at university. The affair is clear that it is possible to combine this and this, given that studying in mosques has now become easy, because most of those who study in mosques have a recorder that records their lectures, the students’ questions and answers. Therefore, if a person takes some of these audio tapes and listens to them in his spare time, it is as if he has not missed anything. [4]

Imam Abdul Aziz Bin Baz, may Allah have mercy upon him, was asked: The questioner mentions that he is a fifteen-year-old young man and wants to seek Islamic knowledge, so what is your advice? What are the things that he must do and fulfil? He says: Bearing in mind that our city has few callers to Islam and students of knowledge.

Response: We advise him to seek knowledge in the schools -intermediate and secondary- opened by the government, or the institutes of knowledge. He strives to reach them (or enroll). And if they have gatherings of knowledge by the judges or others, he attends the gatherings of knowledge if it is available at night or during the day- combining this and this. He enrolls in regular schools and makes an effort. He reads to the scholars in his township if they have gatherings of knowledge at night or during the day- attend the gatherings, benefit and strive hard to memorize the Noble Qur’an and memorize beneficial books, such as Kitab at-Tawhid, Kishf Ash-Shubuhat, Thalaathah Al-Usul and Qawaa’id Al-Arba’ah by Shaikh Al-Islam Muhammad Bin Abdil Wahhab, may Allah have mercy upon him, and also Al-Aqeedah Al-Waasitiyyah by Shaikh Al-Islaam Ibn Taymiyyah, may Allah have mercy upon him.  These are good books that are important to memorise. And books like An-Nawawi’s forty hadeeth and its completion by Ibn Rajab’s Khamseen Hadeeth Min Jawaami Al-Kalim. He memorises these great and beneficial hadiths. In any case, the advice for this young man is that he strive to seek knowledge in regular schools, and from the Shaikhs if he has someone from the Shaikhs to read to in the gatherings of knowledge. [5]

The Aim Should Be Rectification of The Soul 

Ibn Qutaybah, may Allah have mercy upon him, said:

In the past, a student of knowledge used to listen in order to know, (endeavoured) to know in order to act and sought understanding of the religion ordained by Allah in order to benefit (himself) and others. (However), it has now become the case that a student of knowledge listens to accumulate, accumulates to be mentioned and memorises to outdo (others) and boast. [6]

Imam Ibn Al-Qayyim, may Allah have mercy upon him, said:

At-Takaathur means to compete one another in piling up something by way of mutual rivalry, but Allah did not mention the thing that is piled up, therefore the meaning is general. Everything a person competes in – other than obedience to Allah, obedience to the Messenger and that which benefits a person’s Afterlife – by way of mutual rivalry is included in this affair. It enters into every matter, such as wealth, status, leadership, women and speaking; or knowledge, especially when it is not utilised as proof; also collecting books, writing books, engaging in the discussion of numerous topics of the religion, categorising and initiating it. At-Takaathur occurs when a person seeks to amass more than others and this is blameworthy, except in that which earns a person Allah’s love, pleasure and reward, because seeking more than others in this affair is competition in good and to excel one another. [7] [end of quotes]

All praise and thanks be to Allah, what is mentioned above has never been a matter of confusion or ambiguity for the past 30 years. This is because we have never met any Salafi who holds that simply having books is enough, as everyone understands the importance of sitting with scholars in person or learning from their trusted students- in the East or the West. None of us were confused and still not in doubt – about the basis or secondary sources of knowledge. If someone is known to cling to books in isolation, neglecting the gatherings of knowledge or relying solely on their own understanding, then that presents a different situation. Right now, those among us who have never travelled to study, such as myself, are still living in the West and doing what we have always done for the past 30 years by the Tawfiq of Allah – reading and attending the study circles of the well known students of the scholars. Learning continues by the grace of Allāh and to this day many Salafis continue to travel to the land of the Muslims to seek knowledge from the Mashayikh. In addition, even though many of the senior Scholars have passed away, their senior students remain in both the East and the West.

[1] Awn al-Baaree Bi-Bayaan Maa Tadammanahu Sharh As-Sunnah Lil-Imaam Al-Barbahaaree 2/688-689

[2] Tawjeehaat Mihimmah Li-Shabab Al-Ummah. Page 7

[3] Sharh Hilyati Taalibil Ilm. pages 105-106. slightly paraphrased.

[4] Majmu Fatawaa 26/161-162

[5] https://binbaz.org.sa/fatwas/16293/%D8%A8%D9%8A%D8%A7%D9%86-%D9%83%D9%8A%D9%81%D9%8A%D8%A9-%D8%B7%D9%84%D8%A8-%D8%A7%D9%84%D8%B9%D9%84%D9%85

[6] Al-Ikhtilaf Fee Al-Lafdh 18. [Quote was shared by one of my colleagues at school – Abu Zakariyyah (Abdul Malik Al-Congoli, Al-Ifreeqee) – may Allah preserve him]

[7] An Excerpt from Al-Fawaa’id. Pages 58-59

 

Be considerate of others’ feelings: eat or politely refrain, but don’t criticise, frown, or belittle

Written by Abdullah Jallow on . Posted in History of Islam, Methodology - 'Manhaj', Morals and Manners - 'Akhlaaq', Pearls of Wisdom, Prophets, Purification of The Soul, Sahaabah, Scholars of Islam, The Salaf - Pious Predecessors, Worship - 'Ibaadah'.

In The Name of Allah, The Most Merciful, The Bestower of Mercy.

Abu Hurairah, may Allah be pleased with him, said: The Prophet, peace and blessings of Allaah be upon him, never criticised any food, but he would eat it if he liked it; otherwise he would leave it”. [al-Bukhaari 3563]

Meaning, he never criticised food that was permissible to eat, but as for forbidden food, he used to criticise, dispraise and forbid one from eating it.

Imaam An-Nawawi [may Allaah have mercy upon him] said, “One of the etiquettes of dealing with food is that one does not criticize it, such as saying, ‘Salty, sour, insufficient salt, coarse, need more such and such, not well cooked and what is similar to (these descriptions). [1]

Imaam Abdul Azeez Bin Baaz, may Allah have mercy upon him, said:

“This is from his [i.e. the Messenger’s] noble manners. He would neither say that it is salty nor the opposite of it.

Question: What if one says the food is such and such in order to warn (or notify the people)?

Answer: There is no harm in doing so, for warning (or notifying) is something else because it is done to educate (people about food etc). [2]

Ibn Umar, may Allah be pleased with and his father, reported that there were some people with Allah’s Prophet, peace and blessings of Allah be upon him, from among his Companions, Sa’d, may Allah be pleased with him, being one of them. There was brought to them the flesh of the lizard when a lady amongst the wives of Allah’s Prophet said: “It is the flesh of the lizard”. Thus, Allah’s Messenger said, “Eat, for it is lawful, but it is not my diet”. [3]

Abdullah Bin Abbas, may Allah be pleased with him and his father, reported:

I and Khalid Bin Al-Walid went to the apartment of Maimunah, may Allah be pleased with her, along with Allah’s Messenger, peace and blessings of Allah be upon him, and there was presented to him a roasted lizard. Allah’s Messenger stretched his hand towards it, then some of the women who had been in the house of Maimunah said, “Inform Allah’s Messenger what he intends to eat”. Allah’s Messenger lifted his hand. I said, “Messenger of Allah! Is it forbidden?” He said, “No. It is not found in the land of my people, and I feel that I have no liking for it”. Khalid said, “I then chewed and ate it, while, Allaah’s Messenger was looking (at me)”. [4]

[1] An Excerpt from Fath Al-Bari. Chapter 21: ‘The Prophet Never Criticised Food’. 9/678. Publisher: Dar As-Salam, 1st Edition 1421AH (Year 2000)

[2] Al-Hulal Al-Ibreeziyyah Min at-Taleeqaat Al-Baaziyyah Alaa Saheih Al-Bukhari 3/120’ footnote 2.

[3&4] http://www.sahihmuslim.com/sps/smm/sahihmuslim.cfm?scn=dspchaptersfull&ChapterID=823&BookID=21]

The Detriment of Lingering Bad Habits

Written by Abdullah Jallow on . Posted in Fitnah, History of Islam, Methodology - 'Manhaj', Monotheism - Tawheed, Morals and Manners - 'Akhlaaq', Prophets, Purification of The Soul, Qur'aan, Scholars of Islam, Shirk, Sin.

In The Name of Allah, The Most Merciful. The Bestower of Mercy.

Allah, The Most High, said:

فَمَا آمَنَ لِمُوسَىٰ إِلَّا ذُرِّيَّةٌ مِّن قَوْمِهِ عَلَىٰ خَوْفٍ مِّن فِرْعَوْنَ وَمَلَئِهِمْ أَن يَفْتِنَهُمْ ۚ وَإِنَّ فِرْعَوْنَ لَعَالٍ فِي الْأَرْضِ وَإِنَّهُ لَمِنَ الْمُسْرِفِينَ

But none believed in Musa (Moses) except the offspring of his people, because of the fear of Fir’aun (Pharaoh) and his chiefs, lest they should persecute them; and verily, Fir’aun (Pharaoh) was arrogant tyrant on the earth, he was indeed one of the Musrifun (polytheists, sinners and transgressors, those who give up the truth and follow the evil, and commit all kinds of great sins). [Yunus 83]

“But none believed in Musa except the offspring of his people”.

Meaning: Youth from the Children of Israel, (who) exercised patience ( in a state of) fear due to the firm Iman in their hearts.

“Because of the fear of Firaun and his chiefs lest they should persecute them” by (turning them) away from their religion (i.e. from Musa’s message of Tawhid).

“And verily, Firaun was an arrogant tyrant on the earth”.

He had  Qahr and Ghalabah in the land – (complete dominion over others in a manner that presented no chance for the oppressed to resist and prevailing with injustice) – thus their fear of his vengeance was justified, especially that “he was indeed one of the musrifeen”– Meaning, those who encroach the limits imposed by Allah through rebellion and transgression.

Old Habits Die Hard

And the wisdom – Allah knows best – behind the fact that only a small group of youth from his people believed in Musa is because the young people are more receptive to the truth and quicker to submit to it. This is unlike the elders and others who were raised upon disbelief. Because of the deeply rooted corrupt beliefs in their hearts, they are often further from the truth than others. 

An Excerpt from Tafseer As-Sadi