| Imaam Ibn Uthaimeen on The Khawaarij of the Era, The Kharijite Ideologists, the Preachers of Revolution and Destruction |
| Author: Shaikh Ibn Uthaimeen |
see link:
http://www.spubs.com/sps/sp.cfm?subsecID=GRV07&articleID=GRV070021&articlePages=1
The Reality Of Deviant Group ‘Al-Shabaab’ In Somalia
See links:
http://abdurrahman.org/audio/HasanAs-Somaalee/
Shaikhul Islaam Ibn Taymiyyah (rahimahullaah) said:
”Have you not seen that the one who exalts himself with falsehood wishes to give victory to everything he says, even if it is wrong” [Majmoo Al-Fataawaa: 10/292]
The Messenger (sallal-laahu-alayhi-wasallam) said: ”Whoever tells lies about me intentionally then let him take his place in hell.’’
Al-Haafidh Ibn Hajar (rahimahullaah) said: The wisdom behind the severity of telling lies against the Prophet (sallal-laahu-alayhi-wasallam) is clear, for indeed he transmits information from Allaah (The Most High). So whoever lies against him has lied against Allaah….
[For further details see: Dawaabit Ar-Riwaayah Indal Muhadditheen Vol 1 page 134 by Shaikh Raslaan (may Allaah preserve him)]
Abu Eesa’s oppressive tyrannical judgements and playing with the Book of Allaah
See link
http://www.salafis.com/articles/gutdibl-clarifications-evaluating-the-claim-of-salafiyyah-by-abu-eesa-niamatullah.cfm
Reminder:
Al-Allaamah Ubaid Ibn Abdillaah Al-Jabiri (may Allaah preserve him) said:
‘There is none who hid (or hides) behind the Sunnah– the people beguiled by him, gathered around him to learn, adhered to him, became dependent on him and accepted everything he said–except that Allaah will reveal his affair, uncover and expose his concealed state of affairs to specific individuals and to the general public, regarding what was hidden and apparent of his deception, his mixing truth with falsehood, his plots and deceitful practices. Allaah facilitates men of virtue, intelligence, wisdom, strength and exceptional natural ability–possessors of knowledge, skill and sound understanding of the religion–through whom He (Allaah) unveils the affair of that trickster, dubious and deceitful person.” www.sahab.net/home/?p=329
In The Name of Allaah, The Most Merciful, The Bestower of Mercy
Abu Eesa Niamatullah [a slanderous devil] at Al-Maghrib institute attacks Al-Allaamah Rabee Bin Haadee (may Allaah protect him from the envious affiliates of the people of Bidah).
Firstly:
Imaam Ibnul Qayyim (rahimahullaah) said:
”And from the characteristics of the hypocrites is that they conceal the truth and are deceptive towards its people and accuse them with their diseases. They accuse them when they enjoin good, forbid evil and call to Allaah and His Messenger. That is because they (the hypocrites) are people of trials and are mischief makers in the earth. And Allaah has made known to His Messenger and the believers that they (the hypocrites) are mischief makers in the earth. And when the inheritors of the Messenger (sallal-laahu-alayhi-wasallam) call them to the Book of Allaah and to the Sunnah of His Messenger, particularly to that which is unadulterated, they accuse them of innovation and misguidance. And when they see them being ones who abstain from the dunyah, having a fervent desire for the afterlife and traversing the path of obedience to Allaah and His Messenger, they accuse them of falsehood and deception. And when they see them with the truth, they mix it with falsehood and give that out to those of weak intellect–turning it into something repugnant in order to make them flee from it. And if they (the hypocrites) have with them falsehood, they disguise it with the garment of truth and give it out-turning it into something that would be accepted from them. [Source: Tareequl Hijratayn (503)]
Indeed, the slanderous statements of Niamatullah [an affiliate of Al-Maghrib Institute] are based on nothing else but hatred for that which Al-Allaamah Rabee and the Salafiyyoon propagate against their figureheads and organizations of bidah and misguidance. So he unleashes his vile tongue against Shaikh Rabee and the Salafiyyoon—a behaviour similar to that of the hypocrites. Obviously we do not mean that he is a hypocrite in belief; rather this behaviour of his is similar to that of the hypocrites, as Imaam Ibnul Qayyim said: ‘’And when they (i.e. hypocrites) see them (i.e. the people of truth) with the truth, they mix it with falsehood and give that out to those of weak intellect–turning it into something repugnant in order to make them flee from it. And if they (the hypocrites) have with them falsehood, they disguise it with the garment of truth and give it out-turning it into something that would be accepted from them.’’
Secondly:
This slanderous devil has the audacity to describe Al-Allaamah Rabee and the Salafiyyoon as fake salafis who have been exposed by the fitnah; — what is the fitnah intended by this slanderer and why did he use the word Madkhalees?! Indeed, the only people known to use this word in their attacks are the people of hizbiyyah and bidah–those who habour great hatred and enmity towards Al-Allaamah Rabee Bin Haadee Al-Madkhalee (may Allaah protect him from the lies and enmity of this slanderous devil) because he exposes their corrupt views, deviated organizations and figureheads of bidah . This is what angers the likes of this slanderer and others similar to him. They hate Shaikh Rabee and refer to those who transmit his refutations as Madkhalees. However, this slanderous devil revealed his true state of affairs after signing the pledge of mutual co-operation with some of the representatives of the sects of Major Shirk and Bidah. Shaikhul Islaam Ibn Taymiyyah (rahimahullaah) said: ‘’And Imaan is known about a man, just as all the states of his heart are known by way of his (outward) allegiances, enmities, his rejoicing, anger, hunger, thirst, and other such affairs. For these matters have certain outward binding necessities (lawaazim dhaahirah) and the outward matters necessitate inward matters. And this is a matter known, the people know this concerning the one that they have experienced and tested (jarraboohu wamtahinoohu)… [minhaaj-as-sunnah 8/475] [Translation: Salafipublications.com]
Indeed one of the Salaf said: “The one who is silent about the truth is a silent devil, while the one who speaks falsehood is a speaking devil.” [Quoted in Ad-Durar as-Saniyyah’; 8/75-79]
Abu Eesa is a speaking devil whose hatred is directed at one of the major scholars of this era; rather a scholar with recommendations from the Imaams of Ahlus Sunnah in this era, such as the likes of Imaam Al-Albaanee (rahimahullaah), Imaam Bin Baaz (rahimahullaah) and Imam Muhammad Ibn Saaleh Al-Uthaymeen (rahimahullaah). This slanderous devil has no proof to justify his statements, rather he is just another loud mouthed devil who wishes that Al-Allaamah Rabee and the Salafiyyoon should not expose the institutions and figureheads of bidah he is affiliated with. May Allaah guide him or protect us from the manifest falsehood he is upon.
[1]Bursting The Madkhali Myth
Visit http://www.themadkhalis.com/md/categories/shaykh-rabee.cfm
[2] Al-Allaamah Rabee’s Relationship with the scholars and their praises for him–even though Abu Eesa and his affiliates amongst the slanderous devils increase in hatred
http://www.themadkhalis.com/md/articles/ebhen-shaykh-ibn-uthaymin-on-shaykh-rabi-al-madkhali.cfm
To be continued Inshaa-Allaah
In The Name of Allaah, The Most Merciful The Bestower of Mercy
As it is well known to the Salafiyyoon that when the filthy houthi rawaafid of Yemen attacked Dammaaj, the scholars of Ahlus Sunnah [Shaikh Rabee, Shaikh Muhammad Bin Haadi, Shaikh Ubaid Bin Abdillaah Al-Jaabiri and others] called for assistance. Likewise, the Maraakiz of Salafiyyah supplicated for Dammaaj and collected funds to aid the oppressed.
After the fitnah of the Rawaafid eased a little, Al-Allaamah Rabee (may Allaah preserve him) had several conversations with Yahyah Al-Haddaadi and there was a period of silence about Yahyaa. However, we at the Salafi Centre did not change our position towards Yahyah Al-Haddaadi and this was due to two reasons: firstly, Shaikh Rabee and the rest of the Ulama were silent, so we followed our scholars in their silence. Secondly, none of them made it clear that yahyah al-Haddaadi had recanted from his grave errors, so we also maintained the same stance.
However, Email Shaykh [opportunist bully] decided to start a new campaign of harassment- sending emails and demanding that we come in line with Shaikh Rabee’s and Shaikh Muhammad Bin Haadi’s position because he realised that we were not rushing to declare Al-Hajoori Al-Haddaadi Al-Mubtadi to be upon clarity. Indeed our stance was solely based on the fact that neither did the scholars state that his affair was sound nor that he has recanted from his errors.
However, after the Email Shaykh made several attempts and failed to force us to take his position [i.e. to have a positive view of Al-Hajoori Al-Haddaadi Al-Mubtadi], we asked him to complain to Shaikh Rabee about us -that we were still refusing to be in line with Shaikh Rabee and Shaikh Muhammad concerning the affair of Al-Hajoori Al-Haddaadi Al-Mubtadi. This enraged the Email Shaykh, so he once again fell victim to his usual knee jerk reactions, saying: ‘’Look my brother, I tell you frankly, you are a twister. Yes is only when it suits you, Shaikh Rabee.’’
Reader, look at this behaviour! The opportunist bully really feared exposure of his inadequacy and incompetence. Firstly, he tried to force us to take a position based on nothing, whilst knowing that there was no evidence to suggest that his Haddaadi Shaikh had recanted from his innovations, but on the other hand he was too terrified to phone the scholars and complain to them about us. Secondly, Shaikh Rabee finally spoke and revealed the circumstances behind his period of silence concerning Al-Hajoori Al-Haddaadi Al-Mubtadi. Examine the following:
Student of Damaaj: “O’ Shaykh all that we have heard from you is praise for him. You called him and praised him…”Shaykh Rabee ibn Hadee al-Madkhalee: “By Allaah! Listen to me, by Allaah, I did not say this except that he claimed to have abandoned everything that he said and in order to bring him closer to us, and cause him to become gentle. But all we witnessed up until today are lies, deception and extremism. By Allaah, you see the extremism of the students there. There are no manners with them whatsoever. Go back and tell them this from me. [For further details see link: http://salaficentre.com/2013/05/shaykh-rabee-we-have-remained-patient-for-7-years-with-yahya-al-hajoori/
So this was the reason behind Shaikh Rabee’s silence and it is expected. We all know that the Shaikh (may Allaah preserve him) is well-known for exercising great patience with those who err. We all know that he advised the two Ikhwaani innovators Abdur-Rahmaan Abdul-Khaaliq and Al-Maribi for many years before refuting them. Likewise, he exercised patience with Al-Hajoori Al-Haddaadi for many years.
As for the Email Shaykh, he sought to force and bully us into taking a false position, whilst Shaikh Rabee—who at that time employed softness to aid Al-Hajoori recant from his errors—was not forcing any of the Maraakiz in the West to declare Al-Hajoori free from those grave errors. However at present the Shaikh (may Allaah prolong his life upon goodness) has made his stance very clear against Al-Hajoori Al-Haddaadi Al-Mubtadi after advising him.
Some statements of the Shaikh against Yahyaa Al-Haddaadi Al-Mubtadi
*He (Al-Hajoori) is a haddaadi carrying great danger against the Salafi Dawah.
*He (Al-Hajoori) is from the most harmful (people) towards Salafi dawah and that there is none more harmful than yahyah.
*Refute Al-Hajooree and clarify his state of affairs to the Muslims. Do not keep quiet about him.
*The companions of Shaikh Yahyah are people of Fitan….
*His students are ghulaat (extremists)..
[Source: See PDF: Al-Mukhtasar Fee Bayaani ba’di Mukhaalafaat Yahyaa Al-Hajoori Limaa alayhi Ahlul hadeeth wal athar: page 91-92]
We ask Allaah for truthfulness–the Email Shaykh still choses to curse those who transmit the statements of the scholars against Al-Hajoori; rather he fabricate lies against Al-Markaz As-Salafi- [i.e. Takfeeri performs Ruqya in Salafi masjid for £50, and he even appeals to witnesses to confirm his lies]—all in support of a Mubtadi. Inshaa-Allaah there is a bit more to learn about this opportunist bully before his name is revealed Inshaa-Allaah.
We ask Allaah to guide him and his Shaikh or protect us from their obstinacy and falsehood.
To be continued…..Inshaa-Allaah
In The Name of Allaah, The Most Merciful, The Bestower of MercyEmail
Email Shaykh [Murad’ Al-Jazaa’iri] has still not repented from lies -[Ruqya in Salafi Masjid for £50- http://www.salaficentre.com/2013/08/email-shaykh-the-end-to-delusions-and-lying-has-finally-come/]- however he prefers to carry on cursing.
On 23/08/2013 once again Email Shaykh fell victim to his usual knee jerk reaction and unleashes a curse, saying: ‘’May Allaah Almighty curse the liars and expose the hypocrite double standard.’’ Why all this evil desires, unjustified cursing, irrationality and idiocy in defence of Al-Hajoori, Al-Haddaadi, Al-Mubtadi?! Email Shaykh curses without thinking, just as he did with the Ruqya for £50 affair. He has not repented for this shameless lie, yet he still prefers to curse. This is exactly the same behaviour of his Haddaadi Shaikh, because despite his lies, innovations, foul speech and quackery, he said”Whoever says that the Dawah in Dammaaj has changed, then upon him is the curse of Allaah, the angels and all the people.” [Quoted in Al-Qawl Al-Jaliyy Libayaani Maa Ghayyarahu Al-Hajoori Min Da-wati Imaam Al-Waadi-ee: PDF page: 1]
We seek Allaah’s protection from following evil desires.
Latest Posts at Manhaj.com [may Allaah preserve the authors]
|
http://www.manhaj.com/manhaj/articles/ipybg-the-ghuluww-towards-yahyaa-al-haddaadi-part-11.cfm
Also see: 100 Observations against Al Hajoori – Point 13
http://ah-sp.com/2013/07/04/100-observations-against-al-hajoori-point-13/
Reminder:
All praise is to Allaah, we seek His help and His forgiveness. We seek refuge with Allaah from the evil of our own souls and from our bad deeds. Whomsoever Allaah guides will never be led astray, and whosoever Allaah leads astray, no one can guide. We bear witness that there is no god but Allaah, the One, having no partner. And we bear witness that Muhammad is His slave and final Messenger.
SummaryThis post has the full details of the conclusion of the saga of the email shaykh. It makes clear the despicable lies that he attempted to spread, coupled with an example of his inquiring and attempting to entrap and “catch someone out” at any cost – even if it means asking a person “for the sake of Allah” to attest to a lie! All of his actions are for one simple goal – Place doubt on the Salafi Masjid and Masaajid, to taint their exposition of the innovations and misguidance of Yahyah al Haajoori – His Shaykh. By attempting this he seeks discredit anyone and in turn stop them from clarifying the haddadi manhaj of his shaykh; which in actuality, he himself mirrors. Either he is:
|
We will start with the following:
People cling onto a thousand doubts and speculations regarding an affair, whilst deliberately refusing to acknowledge and submit to one truth.
This is the case of the despicable saga of the email Shaykh. He has spent the last few days (of Ramadhaan) battling us (and maybe himself, with the number of times he has invoked the curse of Allah upon himself) with lies, slander and outlandish claims. All this in his burning desire to spread suspicion and rancour between the salafis, in Manchester, Birmingham, the UK, and wherever his emails can reach.
Yet one of the claims which underpins his entire attack against the Salafi Masjid has now been laid bare to waste; shattering his delusional dreams of putting up any truthful defence of his shaykh (al-Hajoori), and attacking the salafis who follow the clear verdicts of the scholars.
The email shaykh has continuously written that the Salafi Masjid “brought a takfeeri to the masjid, to do ruqiyah and charge £50 for it.” He later went onto challenge al-Markaz as-Salafi in an act of ridicule to make mubaahala about this (and other) issues stating “May Allah curse me if I am a liar or lying.”
We at Al Markaz as Salafi knew without a doubt that this statement of his was born out of two things: [Ghulluww] Excessiveness and exaggeration in speech; and rage… rage that his lies were being made clear and rage that his public doubt-filled defence of Al-Hajoori al-haddadi and rejection of the verdicts of Shaykh Rabee’ and Shaykh Ubaid, were being made clear to the people against his wishes; rage at the fact that the reputation he so desperately wished to advertise as a defender and “pillar”[!] of Salafiyyah in Manchester and elsewhere was now slowly but surely deteriorating into the foul-smelling waste rubble of a demolished building rather than a “pillar”!
So due to his persistent lying and transgression, we decided to respond and clarify that his statements were lies, all in the hope that he would recant, make tawbah openly (as he was sending these emails out to whoever he wished), and return to the sound positions of the scholars.
Alas… no such thing materialised, and the email shaykh’s irrationality, delusions of grandeur and boiling blood got the better of him and he continued and persisted upon a delusional lie that a takfeeri was brought to al-Markaz as-Salafi to make ruqiyah in the masjid and charge £50! He cited some individuals who would bear witness to this (fictional) “fact” for him…
So Alhamdulillaah, these witnesses bore witness… they attested to the truth. And so we would like to share with the readers their testimony. We have removed their names, because we understand that the general reader may not even know them. Rather the aim behind this is so that the reader should understand the great lengths this person goes to in lying and twisting, to harm the only Salafi Masjid in his vicinity; and by extension al-Hajoori (albeit on a micro scale).
Below is their response to his desperate appeal to them, to bear witness to the fact that his fictional event (a takfeeri, brought to the masjid by the committee, to do ruqiah in the masjid and charge £50):
Witness 1 (may Allah reward him)
Email 1
your email below dated 24th May 2009, appears to be factually correct from what i remember of the incident. You mentioned (ruqiah man) was staying (and I add he was actually also doing the Ruqiya) in Levenshulme, this was because the committee of the Masjid did not allow us to organise for him to stay and do the Ruqiya in the flat above the Masjid.
This is the first email and was followed by a reply from the email shaykh to him asking direct questions.
My brother (name removed);
I know that, he was staying in levenshume but initially he came to the Masjid, prayed there and the committee new about him and (brother 1) – to the best of my knowledge was coordinating with him, I say this because I was in the same invite when he phoned (brother 2) from Longsight and said what I mentioned in my email, in addition (brother 1) and others have mentioned that (brother 3) and (brother 4) recommended him, thus I did not lie about them, yet the liars they want to make people to believe that, they had no knowledge of the matter what so ever. My noble brother (name removed again but he is referring to the witness) I ask you for Allaah Almighty sake, were the committee aware of the ruqiyah or not. and did he not stay at the least sometimes or one night in the Masjid. or at the least he came to the Masjid, was (brother 1) not aware of him via (brother 3)
We will look at and examine this in detail shortly by the permission of Allaah. But to continue then the witness replied with the following.
Email 2
I will try to answer as complete as possible from what I remember. I don’t have any ulterior motives in this affair, as I am well aware how responsible I was for this mistake – May Allah forgive me – so all I can do know is answer the question and pray to Allah it is resolved quickly and completely. Alhumdullilah all of us have learnt now that the best Ruqiyaa is that which is done by ourselves and on/by our own family members.
In response to the direct questions:
Yes the committee become aware when (name removed) and I approached them, and they did not allow it in the Masjid. Since then I believe questions were also asked to the Scholars about this affair, and maybe the brothers can provide all the details (hence i have copied in the Masjid email in if they wish to respond)
No he did not stay in the Masjid. Not even one night, as the committee had not allowed it, and hence the house in Levenshume had been organised. That is were he stayed all of the time as far as I am aware, and I have no knowledge to imply otherwise.
Yes he came to the Masjid to pray, when I brought him there while he was up in north Manchester. If I remember correctly, we prayed and left without hardly any interaction.
When the brothers as a committee decided he should not stay in the flat above the Masjid, then Yes, I believe (name removed) did make the necessary investigations to locate the house in Levenshume. I then organised the logistics of his stay.
The remaining section of the email is not relevant, but we have pasted it in here anyway.
Yes I believe (name removed) become aware of him via (name removed), who initially had taken members of his own family to him in London.
But from what I remember, (name removed) did not know him, and was only aware of him when (name removed) went to him for advice.
I also remember when (name removed) initially mentioned him, there was confusion if he meant another brother who did Ruqiya in London also called (we have deleted the statement of his name and links, as we do not wish to promote this man)
I have copied in the Masjid email for transparency, so if I have made a mistake, anyone is free to rectify or clarify my responses above.
May Allah forgive us for our mistakes & help us all resolve this matter with the greatest of ease, and unite all of the Salafi’s upon the Haqq.
Then first let us start by praising Allah the Most High – who is Ar-Raqeeb [The Ever Watchful Guardian] over everything. And may He reward this brother for his clear honesty, and preserve him upon the Sunnah.
Indeed the reader can see clearly that the email shaykh’s claim (that the masjid brought a takfeeri to do rukia and charge £50) has been shattered by the most credible and prominent witness that he himself called upon! However even when his initial appeal for testimony was answered with “You mentioned (ruqiah man) was staying (and I add he was actually also doing the Ruqiya) in Levenshulme, this was because the committee of the Masjid did not allow us to organise for him to stay and do the Ruqiya in the flat above the Masjid…” the email shaykh was still not satisfied!
Dear readers… look at this desperate attempt to squeeze blood from a stone –
“I know that, he was staying in Levenshume but initially he came to the Masjid…
I ask you for Allaah Almighty sake, were the committee aware of the ruqiyah or not. and did he not stay at the least sometimes or one night in the Masjid. or at the least he came to the Masjid, was (brother 1) not aware of him via (brother 3)”
What kind of sickness is this?! He has his answer (that the man made rukia in levenshulme and NOT in the Salafi Masjid) yet tries his utmost to squeeze out anything to indicate some wrong doing! And to compound it he says “I ask you for the sake of Allah”(!?). So we say – asks him for the sake of Allah for what?! To Lie? What kind of madness and evil is this?!
Alhamdulil-laah the brother did reply to him, and in fact he further clarified everything, and with Allah lies all success!
“they did not allow it in the Masjid”
“No he did not stay in the Masjid. Not even one night, as the committee had not allowed it”
“I then organised the logistics of his stay.”
“when i brought him there… we prayed and left without hardly any interaction.”
And in this one fell swoop his star defence witness became a star prosecution witness against him! By the blessing of Allah he spoke the truth. So now we will move onto the second witness, not to complicate the matter further and waste our time.
Witness 2 – (may Allah reward him)
I bear witness to the fact that this conversation took place in the email; that I did ring the man (the man who made ruqyah) and his son said he was residing in Levenshulme. And as everyone knows the masjid is in Cheetham Hill, not Levenshume.
Please see the map below to show the difference between Cheetham Hill and Levenshulme in Manchester
We hope that this clarifies that Cheetham Hill and Levenshulme are two separate places.
And so we can see the lengths this defender of al-Hajoori goes to attack, slander and discredit the Salafi Masjid…all in the name of his fantasy land, mentally disturbed “truth!” Even his own witnesses whom he was appealing to in a last ditch attempt to prove a fantasy, have attested to the truth of the situation. This has shown the disgraceful and disgusting big lie that he was attempting to spread – has this man no shame?!, the purpose of which was to put shubuhaat in the hearts of the people, and credit himself thereby justifying his erroneous position towards (his Shaykh) al-Haajori.
That lie has turned out to be exactly what is… a fallacy! There was no “rukia in the masjid, by a takfeeri for £50”.
However we at al-Markaz as Salafi wish to bring a further witness in this whole affair… and that witness is non-other than the email shaykh himself?! Now although we do not believe he is a credible witness anyway (due to his excessive lying), then he had written this part of his “report” in 2009, so it shows the record he himself kept of the event.
Witness 3 – email shaykh
He wrote (we have again blotted the name of the brother who is witness 2). It reads as follows (we have deleted all the excess and put “etc” – please bear with it):
Sent: Sunday, 24 May 2009, 13:20
On Saturday my noble brother ——- from ——– came to visit me… (etc)
I asked (the brother) to phone, my friend’s house in London… (etc)
(etc)…. then (brother) phones the guy in Manchester, and he spoke to his son and his son said that he dad is with a guest and they were staying in Levenshulme.
So in a nutshell, after his “investigations” he concluded that this takfeeri, doing ruqiyah, was residing in Levenshulme (south Manchester); whereas the masjid is in cheetham hill – i.e. north Manchester. The email shaykh writes that this man was residing and making ruqiyah there… not as he incessantly now seems to repeat… “takfeeri do ruqiyah in the masjid and charge £50”.
So can this man making ruqiyah, be in two places at once? Or does the email shaykh not know the difference between Levenshulme and Cheetham Hill (click here for google maps)? Perhaps it is his quest of making a reality out of a fictitious event that has blinded him… There is no doubt then that this man is an evil and persistent liar.
Let us put the investigator out of his misery… yes they were in Levenshulme and yes they were doing ruqiyah in Levenshulme– NOT in Al-Markaz as-Salafi – Cheetham Hill.
O’ email shaykh… why do you continue lying that they were in the Salafi masjid in Cheetham Hill?! Can you not read your own writing? This blindness has been inspired by injustice and rage… so it is better that he fears Allaah and stops lying. Indeed (unjustified) anger is a disease of the heart born out of corruption of intention (paraphrased from Shaykh al Islam ibn Taymiyyah – “Diseases of The Heart and their Cures”).
So without factual evidence and him having contradicted himself… can we now expect a tawbah (repentence) from him? An open retraction in full perhaps?
Or is this his “Wallahi I never said it” Abu Usaamah-esque moment?
So we say that this person is in one of two states and there isn’t a third makaan (place) for him. Either he is:
Either way such an individual is not to be trusted–he deliberately lies, plots, conspires and works with half-truth and fallacies. He has deliberately lied and slandered to suit his own goals! So if he does that with this affair then what about all the rest of his accusations!? We cannot take anything from this man when he has now proven himself an unjust irrational liar and a fanatical defender of an innovator and haddaadi (Yahyah al Hajoori).
May Allaah guide him and protect us from the disgraceful falsehood that has plunged him into depths of unjustified rancour, anger, delusion, hatred and persistent lying… “The person tells the truth until he is recorded as truthful, and tells lies until he is recorded as a liar”.
We are awaiting his open full tawbah… and to Allaah belongs all bestowal of the means to guidance and good deeds.