Skip to main content

Tag: forbidding evil

A filthy slander of the Haddaadiyyah against Imaam Albaani and Shaikh Rabee repelled by Shaikh Ahmad An-Najmi

Shaikh Ahmad An-Najmi (rahimahullaah) said:

Shaikh Albaani and Shaikh Rabee are neither Murji’ah nor do they agree with the Murji’ah; rather this statement that they are Murjia is a slander…

Listen to audio here:

[Part 2] The Deviated Sects–A Lecture by Shaikh Muhammad Bin Haadi in the Uk (1996)

[Part 2] The Deviated Sects–A Lecture by Shaikh Muhammad Bin Haadi in the Uk (Years Ago)

The Deviated Sects

A Lecture delivered some years ago in the UK by Shaikh Muhammad Bin Haadi (may Allaah preserve him)

Translator

Abu Talhah Dawud Burbank (rahimahullaah)

Download part 2 from the link below:

http://www.sahab.net/forums/index.php?showtopic=143284

 

[Part 1] The Deviated Sects–A Lecture by Shaikh Muhammad Bin Haadi in the Uk (1996)

The Deviated Sects

A Lecture delivered some years ago in the UK by Shaikh Muhammad Bin Haadi (may Allaah preserve him)

Translator

Abu Talhah Dawud Burbank (rahimahullaah)

http://www.sahab.net/forums/index.php?showtopic=143284

Full transcription of this audio: http://transcribedsalafiaudio.com

Brief Observations on Muhammad Qutb’- by Shaikh Rabee and Shaikh Hammaad Al-Ansaari

 In The Name of Allaah The Most Merciful, The Bestower of Mercy

Shaikh Rabee Bin Haadi (may Allaah preserve him)….

  • Muhammad Qutb spoke about Tawheed but with no detail and clarity…..
  • Muhammad Qutb aided in spreading the ideas of his brother Sayyid Qutb– by spreading his brother’s books of bidah and misguidance.
  • No clear report has being received from Muhammad Qutb disapproving of his brother’s innovations and affairs of misguidance.  He shouldered the responsibility of spreading Sayyid Qutb’s books of misguidance and bidah. So if he repented to Allaah and showed regret for spreading those books, he would have made that public; but if not he remains guilty of spreading the misguidance and innovations of his brother. [listen to audio]

Listen to audio here:

 

Shaikh Hammaad Al-Ansaari (rahimahullaah)

Muhammad Quṭb is an Ashʿarī” and he also said, “Muhammad Quṭb, Sayyid Quṭb’s brother, is a dangerous Ashʿarī.” Read full article on this link: http://www.themadkhalis.com/md/articles/muqxd-sayyid-qutb-and-mohammad-qutb-were-asharis.cfm

 

Naveed Ayaaz [Madeenah Dot Con/Islam Nelson– an ally of some of those who defend a Khaarijee-Takfeeree]

In The Name of Allaah, The Most Merciful, The Bestower of Mercy

Al-Allaamah Muhammad Ibn Abdul-Wahhaab al-Wassaabee on Maghraawi

see link for video

http://salaficentre.com/2012/04/shaikh-muhammad-al-wassaabee-on-maghraawee-the-takfeeree-2/

 

To this day the allies of Naveed Ayaaz@ Masjid As-Sunnah (Cheethamhill-Manchester) have not freed themselves from Maghraawi (The Takfeeree-Khaarijeee)]

Articles on Maghraawi (The Takfeeri-Khaarijee)

Revelations on the Doctrines of al-Maghraawi : Part 1

Revelations on the Doctrines of al-Maghraawi : Part 2

Revelations on the Doctrines of al-Maghraawi : Part 3

The Guessers—Described by Imaam Bukhaari and Imaam Nawawi

بِسْمِ اللَّهِ الرَّحْمَٰنِ الرَّحِيمِ

 

Imaam Bukhaari (rahimahullaah) said, ‘Chapter:  Learning about the Laws of Inheritance.  Uqbah Bin Aamir said, ”Learn (the laws of Inheritance) before those who depend on Az-Zan (guessing), namely, those who base their judgment on mere presumption.”[1]

 

Imaam Nawawi (rahimahullaah) stated after this statement of Imaam Bukhaari (rahimahullaah): ”The meaning of this is (that) you should learn from those who possess true precision, expertise and fear of Allaah before they go away (through death) and then there appears a people who speak about knowledge in conformity with the desires of their souls and with presumptions, which have no (clear or unambiguous) proof in the Islamic legislation. [2]


 

[1] [Saheeh Al-Bukhaari. Book of Al-Fara’id (The Laws of Inheritance) Vol 8 Chapter 2. Page 380 (Darussalam)]

[2] Al-Majmoo 1/42

Listen to the Imaams of the Authentic Sunnah and Abandon the TV Debaters

Shaikhul Islaam Ibn Taymiyyah (rahimahullaah) said:

”Refutation against the people of falsehood cannot be comprehensive except when it is in agreement with the (Authentic) Sunnah from every angle.  And if not, the one who conforms to the (Authentic) Sunnah in a particular angle and opposes it from another angle, then those arguing against him will strive (to gain something) from that angle in which he opposed the (authentic) Sunnah, and they will use it as evidence to prove what is in agreement with what they are upon (of falsehood) from those arguments that are in opposition to the (authentic) Sunnah.”  [Source:6/210- درء تعارض العقل والنقل 211]

Three Unrepentant Liars [Abu Usaamah, Al-Arifi (a Comrade of the Deceiver Aasim Al-Hakeem) and Zakir Naik]

In The Name of Allaah, The Most Merciful, The Bestower of Mercy

The reality of lying is to give news of something in opposition to the true state of affairs. This transmission of news is not limited to speech, rather it can be through action, such as making an indication with one’s hand or nodding one’s head and it can be through silence.

It is said that the liar is a thief, because the thief deceives you with regards to your wealth and the liar deceives you with regards to your intellect. [Adabud Dunyaa Wal-Deen page: 262]

Indeed, these three liars have not given news in opposition to the real state of affairs due to a mistake or forgetfulness; rather they deliberately lied in order to support their deviated methodologies. They persist upon their lies and are too proud to repent after it has become manifestly clear to them that they are guilty of lying and slander. This lying and slander employed against the Salafiyyoon –by these three deviants and those similar to them– is founded upon malice, deceit, deviation and unfounded evil suspicion towards the people of truth and Salafiyyah.    Al-Allaamah Rabee Bin Haadee Al-Madkhalee (may Allaah preserve him) stated:

”Destructive Good Suspicion is to have a good suspicion of the people of falsehood whether are they disbelievers, innovators or evil (open) sinners. And that which led the disbelievers to belie the Messengers, (harbouring) a severe disbelief in them and their message was due to their evil suspicion towards the people of truth (i.e. the Prophets and their true followers), and having a good suspicion of their forefathers and their religions of falsehood and disbelief.

Ahlul Bidah such as the rawaafid, the khawaarij, the soofiyyah, the murji-a, the qadariyyah and the people of Tahazzub Al-Baatil (false partisanship) are destroyed by good suspicion towards their shuyookh, figureheads and corrupt creeds. On the other hand, they are destroyed by their evil suspicions towards the truth and its people.  [Paraphrased and Abridged: For further details see: [Majmoo Fataawaa Al-Allaamah Rabee: 13/363-364]


Abu Usaama [2012]

On the 25th July 2012, Abu Usaamah gave a video-recorded lecture in which he claimed that he was giving ‘Sincere Advice’.  He claimed that Ustaadh Abu Khadeejah utilised the speech of Imaam Albaanee (rahimahullaah) in a deceitful manner in order to show that Abdur-Rahman Abdul-Khaaliq is an innovator.

This lie became ever more serious when one realizes (as is apparent from the video) that Abu Usamah was holding a printed copy of the blog post in front of his face for most of the lecture, yet he never once read where Ustaadh Abu Khadeejah had said that Shaikh al-Albaanee (rahimahullaah) had made tabdee’ on Abdur-Rahmaan Abdul-Khaaliq or even implied it. In a whole hour and more, not once did Abu Usaamah read this alleged assertion of Abu Khadeejah?

Abu Usaamah stated that he had a copy of Ustaadh Abu Khadeejah’ saved “in case it is taken down”! In that post Ustaadh Abu Khadeejah stated: ”Abdur-Rahmaan Abdul-Khaaliq is the leading figurehead of the group Ihyaa Turaath of Kuwait – he was refuted by numerous major scholars, including the Shaykh, the Muhaddith and Imaam Al-Albaanee (rahimhullaah). He was declared an innovator by the Imaam of Yemen Muqbil bin Haadee (rahimahullaah).”

So Ustaadh Abu Khadeejah clearly made a careful distinction between the refutation of al-Albaanee and the tabdee’ of Shaikh Muqbil (rahimahumallaah), which Abu Usaamah failed to make mention of throughout his hour long rant…… [Abridged and paraphrased For further details, see: http://www.salafitalk.com/threads/1216-A-Response-to-the-Deceit-of-Abu-Usaamah-Khalifah-and-His-Lying-Tongue]

 


Muhammad al-Arifi The Lying Qutbi & His Deceptive Comrade Asim al-Hakim

http://maktabah-alfawaaid.blogspot.co.uk/2012/12/muhammad-al-arifi-lying-qutbi-his.html?m=1


Zakir Naik—Blatant lies

See Tweet by Ustaadh Amjad Rafiq (may Allaah preserve him)

pic.twitter.com/4ZnN8iOqLO


We seek Allaah protection from the liars amongst mankind and Jinn.. Aaameen

Question: Brixton Masjid Admin and Staunch Affiliates –[Halabiyyoon]—which group do you belong to?!

بِسْمِ اللَّهِ الرَّحْمَٰنِ الرَّحِيمِ

Al-Allaamah Zayd Bin Haadi (may Allaah preserve him) said:

As for the followers of a leader from amongst the people of desires, then in most cases they are of two categories:

The First Category:

Those who possess knowledge, but they harbour evil intentions; so they yield to Satan, desires and the urge of the evil soul. They follow the people of misguidance and oppose the callers to guidance (in that which) Allaah sent His Messenger Muhammad (sallal-laahu-alayhi-wasallam) with.

 

The Second Category:

Their share of knowledge is little, so the people of desires take advantage of them and they become (part) of their group. They convince them that what they call them to is the manifest truth and that what their opponents are upon is falsehood. And they convey to them a huge (number) of affairs that resemble the truth but are falsehood in reality, in order to deceive them and submerge them into misguidance.


[Al-Ajwibah Al-Athariyyah Anil Masaa-il Al-Manhajiyyah–(Khamsoona Su’aalan Wa-Jawaaban: page: 18-19)]