Skip to main content

Tag: forbidding evil

Listen to the Imaams of the Authentic Sunnah and Abandon the TV Debaters

Shaikhul Islaam Ibn Taymiyyah (rahimahullaah) said:

”Refutation against the people of falsehood cannot be comprehensive except when it is in agreement with the (Authentic) Sunnah from every angle.  And if not, the one who conforms to the (Authentic) Sunnah in a particular angle and opposes it from another angle, then those arguing against him will strive (to gain something) from that angle in which he opposed the (authentic) Sunnah, and they will use it as evidence to prove what is in agreement with what they are upon (of falsehood) from those arguments that are in opposition to the (authentic) Sunnah.”  [Source:6/210- درء تعارض العقل والنقل 211]

Three Unrepentant Liars [Abu Usaamah, Al-Arifi (a Comrade of the Deceiver Aasim Al-Hakeem) and Zakir Naik]

In The Name of Allaah, The Most Merciful, The Bestower of Mercy

The reality of lying is to give news of something in opposition to the true state of affairs. This transmission of news is not limited to speech, rather it can be through action, such as making an indication with one’s hand or nodding one’s head and it can be through silence.

It is said that the liar is a thief, because the thief deceives you with regards to your wealth and the liar deceives you with regards to your intellect. [Adabud Dunyaa Wal-Deen page: 262]

Indeed, these three liars have not given news in opposition to the real state of affairs due to a mistake or forgetfulness; rather they deliberately lied in order to support their deviated methodologies. They persist upon their lies and are too proud to repent after it has become manifestly clear to them that they are guilty of lying and slander. This lying and slander employed against the Salafiyyoon –by these three deviants and those similar to them– is founded upon malice, deceit, deviation and unfounded evil suspicion towards the people of truth and Salafiyyah.    Al-Allaamah Rabee Bin Haadee Al-Madkhalee (may Allaah preserve him) stated:

”Destructive Good Suspicion is to have a good suspicion of the people of falsehood whether are they disbelievers, innovators or evil (open) sinners. And that which led the disbelievers to belie the Messengers, (harbouring) a severe disbelief in them and their message was due to their evil suspicion towards the people of truth (i.e. the Prophets and their true followers), and having a good suspicion of their forefathers and their religions of falsehood and disbelief.

Ahlul Bidah such as the rawaafid, the khawaarij, the soofiyyah, the murji-a, the qadariyyah and the people of Tahazzub Al-Baatil (false partisanship) are destroyed by good suspicion towards their shuyookh, figureheads and corrupt creeds. On the other hand, they are destroyed by their evil suspicions towards the truth and its people.  [Paraphrased and Abridged: For further details see: [Majmoo Fataawaa Al-Allaamah Rabee: 13/363-364]


Abu Usaama [2012]

On the 25th July 2012, Abu Usaamah gave a video-recorded lecture in which he claimed that he was giving ‘Sincere Advice’.  He claimed that Ustaadh Abu Khadeejah utilised the speech of Imaam Albaanee (rahimahullaah) in a deceitful manner in order to show that Abdur-Rahman Abdul-Khaaliq is an innovator.

This lie became ever more serious when one realizes (as is apparent from the video) that Abu Usamah was holding a printed copy of the blog post in front of his face for most of the lecture, yet he never once read where Ustaadh Abu Khadeejah had said that Shaikh al-Albaanee (rahimahullaah) had made tabdee’ on Abdur-Rahmaan Abdul-Khaaliq or even implied it. In a whole hour and more, not once did Abu Usaamah read this alleged assertion of Abu Khadeejah?

Abu Usaamah stated that he had a copy of Ustaadh Abu Khadeejah’ saved “in case it is taken down”! In that post Ustaadh Abu Khadeejah stated: ”Abdur-Rahmaan Abdul-Khaaliq is the leading figurehead of the group Ihyaa Turaath of Kuwait – he was refuted by numerous major scholars, including the Shaykh, the Muhaddith and Imaam Al-Albaanee (rahimhullaah). He was declared an innovator by the Imaam of Yemen Muqbil bin Haadee (rahimahullaah).”

So Ustaadh Abu Khadeejah clearly made a careful distinction between the refutation of al-Albaanee and the tabdee’ of Shaikh Muqbil (rahimahumallaah), which Abu Usaamah failed to make mention of throughout his hour long rant…… [Abridged and paraphrased For further details, see: http://www.salafitalk.com/threads/1216-A-Response-to-the-Deceit-of-Abu-Usaamah-Khalifah-and-His-Lying-Tongue]

 


Muhammad al-Arifi The Lying Qutbi & His Deceptive Comrade Asim al-Hakim

http://maktabah-alfawaaid.blogspot.co.uk/2012/12/muhammad-al-arifi-lying-qutbi-his.html?m=1


Zakir Naik—Blatant lies

See Tweet by Ustaadh Amjad Rafiq (may Allaah preserve him)

pic.twitter.com/4ZnN8iOqLO


We seek Allaah protection from the liars amongst mankind and Jinn.. Aaameen

Question: Brixton Masjid Admin and Staunch Affiliates –[Halabiyyoon]—which group do you belong to?!

بِسْمِ اللَّهِ الرَّحْمَٰنِ الرَّحِيمِ

Al-Allaamah Zayd Bin Haadi (may Allaah preserve him) said:

As for the followers of a leader from amongst the people of desires, then in most cases they are of two categories:

The First Category:

Those who possess knowledge, but they harbour evil intentions; so they yield to Satan, desires and the urge of the evil soul. They follow the people of misguidance and oppose the callers to guidance (in that which) Allaah sent His Messenger Muhammad (sallal-laahu-alayhi-wasallam) with.

 

The Second Category:

Their share of knowledge is little, so the people of desires take advantage of them and they become (part) of their group. They convince them that what they call them to is the manifest truth and that what their opponents are upon is falsehood. And they convey to them a huge (number) of affairs that resemble the truth but are falsehood in reality, in order to deceive them and submerge them into misguidance.


[Al-Ajwibah Al-Athariyyah Anil Masaa-il Al-Manhajiyyah–(Khamsoona Su’aalan Wa-Jawaaban: page: 18-19)]

Al-Hajuri: More Evil Than the Haddaadiyyah and ideas of Kharijites Have Penetrated Him and His Followers

Shaykh Rabee said:

Yahya Al-Hajuri Is More Evil Than the Haddaadiyyah and the Ideas of the Kharijites Have Penetrated Him and His Followers

See Link:

http://www.alhajuri.com/articles/wudqlwq-shaykh-rabee-al-hajuri-is-worse-than-the-haddaadiyyah.cfm

Statements of Some of The Kibaarul Ulamaa

In The Name of Allaah, The Most Merciful, The Bestower of Mercy

Al-Allaamah Hammaad Al-Ansaari (rahimahullaah) stated:

“The Sahaabah never differed in Aqeedah; rather the differing (in Aqeedah) took place after them.” [1]


Al-Allaamah Saaleh Al-Luhaydaan (may Allaah preserve him) was asked about the one who says that the sahaabah differed in aqeedah; so he said: [“أستغفر الله  –  none says this except a Mubtadi Daal (i.e. an  innovator, astray one). [2]

Audio


Al-Allaamah Ahmad Bin Yahyah An-Najmi (rahimahullaah) was asked about the one who says that the Sahaabah differed in Aqeedah; so he replied: “The one who says that the sahaabah differed in Aqeedah should support his speech with evidences; otherwise he is a liar, false accuser…. [3]

The Shaikh (rahimahullaah) also said:

Has lying and false accusation been made easy for the utterer (of this statement) to such a level: Falsely accusing the Companions of the Prophet (sallal-laahu-alayhi-wasallaam)?! [4]

The Shaikh (rahimahullaah) also said:

”Indeed this speaker who says that the Sahaabah differed in Aqeedah–it is obligated on him to keep quiet and should be prevented from speaking about Aqeedah; because he is ignorant about it.” [5]

The Shaikh (rahimahullaah) also said:

As for differing in the rulings pertaining to subsidiary issues of (the religion) based on Ijtihaad, then this did occur between the Sahaabah and each of them stated what he saw to be the truth, and none amongst them found fault with anyone. Not a single one of them reproached the one who was in opposition to him; but the aim of this speaker–false accuser–is to pave the way for the differing of hizbiyyah (i.e. to find room– by way of this false claim–for the differing of the people of illegal partisanship against the sound Manhaj positions of the Salafis). And he has established against himself that he is a hizbi…. [6]


Ref 1: Source: Al-Majmoo’ah Fee Tarjimah Al-Allaamah Al-Muhaddith Hammaad Al-Ansaari 2/492: Mas’alah Number 124)

Ref 2: Clarification: The Muta-aalim (Pseudo Shaikh Asim Al-Hakeem) has not been declared an innovator; rather this is a general ruling and not specific to anyone until the evidence is established against such an individual. However, it shows the severity of Asim’s devilish insinuations and ignorance.

Refs 3, 4, 5 & 6; see Al-Fataawa Al-Jaliyyah Vol2: Page: 104–108: question number 63]

 

[1] Salafiyyah In The UK–The Plots of the False Claimants and the Lies of The ignorant Slanderer Mr Zakir Naik

In The Name of Allaah, The Most Merciful, The Bestower of Mercy


Allaah (The Most High) said:

وَلَا تَقۡفُ مَا لَيۡسَ لَكَ بِهِۦ عِلۡمٌ‌ۚ إِنَّ ٱلسَّمۡعَ وَٱلۡبَصَرَ وَٱلۡفُؤَادَ كُلُّ أُوْلَـٰٓٮِٕكَ كَانَ عَنۡهُ مَسۡـُٔولاً۬

And follow not (O man i.e., say not, or do not or witness not, etc.) that of which you have no knowledge (e.g. one’s saying: “I have seen,” while in fact he has not seen, or “I have heard,” while he has not heard). Verily! The hearing, and the sight, and the heart, of each of those you will be questioned (by Allah). [17:36]

Imaam Ibnul Jawzi (rahimahullaah) stated that from the statements of the scholars of Tafseer regarding the meaning of this ayah is that: You do not accuse anyone of something you have no knowledge of; you should not say that you have seen, whilst you haven’t seen; you should not say that you have heard, whilst you haven’t heard; and you should not give false testimony. In this ayah is also a prohibition from looking at haraam; listening to haraam and having conviction in what is impermissible. [For further details, see Zaadul Maseer]


 

This series –In’shaa’Allaah–will unveil the false accusations and blatant lies of the ignorant slanderer Mr Zakir Naik, who claims that the Salafis in the Uk make takfeer of one another.

 

 

Excerpt from main document the reader is urged to read

This document intends to provide a historical background into the Salafee da’wah1, within the context of the numerous fitnahs that have entered into it, that have in reality come from the direction of al-Ikhwaan al-Muslimoon, and whoever was poisoned by them. The reader, inshaa’allaah, will have acquired a wider picture, and a context in which to place whatever is observed today of the various problems, differences and splits within the da’wah, or amongst those who ascribe themselves to Salafiyyah and the Salafee da’wah.

 

No doubt, the last few decades have seen major global events unfolding. The first was the new wave of geo-political strategies of the Kuffaar in the Muslim lands, and parallel to that, was the great upheaval caused – in the last decade specifically and more profoundly – in the Salafee da’wah by the penetration of the Ikhwaan under the disguise and costume of ascription to the “doctrinal Salafiyyah” (aqaa’id). An ascription that was divorced and separated from the practical, manhaj-based, Salafiyyah (manaahij) to which they were actually opposed, due to the false methodologies that they had innovated or imbibed, and which they wished to enter into the Salafees. So their ascription to the doctrinal belief-based aspect of Salafiyyah was the veil by which they entered their foreign, deviated methodologies amongst the unsuspecting Salafees, hoping that no one would suspect them, merely because they held onto the Salafee aqeedah, and would often defend it 2, and this was the veil they used to enter upon the Salafees and the da’wah of Ahl us-Sunnah.

 

The merging of these collection of events and occurrences at the one and the same time (during the last decade), led many people ascribing themselves to Salafiyyah to be led to great confusion and to take on a variety of different and separate paths over time, and wander off in every direction – due to the absence of the proliferation of and grounding in the methodologies (manaahij) of the Book and the Sunnah amongst the people.

 

What is of concern in this document is to bring about clarity in the methodologies of the Salaf, because this is what will bring unity amongst those who ascribe themselves to Salafiyyah, bringing about a common perception and outlook with shared understandings and goals, and helping to bring about a walaa and baraa that is based around what it truly ought to be based around, which is the aqaa’id (beliefs), the manaahij (methodologies) and correct Salafee mawaaqif (positions). Unfortunately, there has been a tendency for people to take isolated events or occurrences (such as calamities that have taken place in the lands of the Muslims, non-Muslim aggressions, or specific issues that have taken place with respect to personalities, or people of the knowledge in the da’wah, or issues related to the da’wah), and then to build their whole perception of the da’wah and individuals connected to it, based upon these isolated incidents, issues or occurrences. This led them to become totally out of focus, and lose track of the wider picture. The perceptions created in their minds by way of these isolated affairs, or a collection of unrelated affairs, then led them to see all future issues and developments with these tainted and subjective perceptions, disabling them from seeing everything in its proper perspective. All subsequent occurrences, as they saw them, would feed into and re-inforce these initial (erroneous, subjective) perceptions. This would then also affect their speech and behaviour, making them take positions and hold loyalties or disownments, and direct their emotions of love and and hate, and choose their company and friendship, all upon false criterions and false determinations based upon subjective experiences and limited, narrow viewpoints tied down to one or a few or a collection of issues or events3. What was also a part of the cause for this was the fact that true and real clarity, concerning these tribulations and the methodologies of the Salaf had not emerged then, unlike more recent times.

 

For this reason, this document contains a historical account of the true origins and background to the many problems that have entered the da’wah of Ahl us-Sunnah in recent times – in order to allow the reader to put everything into context. It is hoped that all those who ascribed themselves to the Salafee da’wah at one time or another during the last decade will gain some insights, and will gain a thorough understanding about what has occurred in the da’wah following the Gulf War. This will allow them to appreciate, in retrospect, the clarity that has now emerged concerning the sum whole of this fitnah. It will also allow them to determine the true Scholars, those who are upon the truth, upon the Salafee aqeedah, the Salafee manhaj and those who are traversing upon the Salafee da’wah and implementing it, following the actual manhaj of these Scholars. It is also hoped that these insights allows the true sincere Salafees, who truly desire Salafiyyah, in belief, speech and action, to unite together based upon the clarity that has now emerged by way of the collective statements and clarifications of the Scholars, over the past 8 years or so, in relation to the various methodologies of al-Ikhwaan al-Muslimeen that were disguised as Salafiyyah and which have been exposed and refuted sufficiently.   PDF here: [1] false_methodologies


 

Source: http://salafipublications.com/sps/ under the title: The Effects of the Methodologies of al-Ikhwaan al-Muslimeen Upon The Path of Salafiyyah [A Historical Review and Analysis]

Mr Zakir Naik’s blatant lies and ignorance…

In The Name of Allaah, The Most Merciful, The Bestower of Mercy

Shaikhul Islaam Ibn Taymiyyah (rahimahullaah) said:

”A person must possess sound general fundamental principles (from the Qur’an and Sunnah) to which he refers the subsidiary issues of the religion, in order that he may speak with knowledge and justice. After this, he has to know how the subsidiary issues of the religion are (established from those general fundamental principles of the religion), and if not, he will remain upon lies and ignorance in the subsidiary issues and upon ignorance and oppression in the general fundamental principles, thus giving birth to great corruption.’’ [Minhaajus Sunnah: 5/83]

 

See Tweet by Ustaadh Amjad Rafiq (may Allaah preserve him)

pic.twitter.com/4ZnN8iOqLO

Listen to speech of Ustaadh Abu Khadeejah here:

http://ahlulbidahwalhawa.com/2011/12/21/refutation-of-zakir-naik-by-abu-khadeejah/