Skip to main content

Chapters From The Life of Shaikh Rabee- Excerpts From a Forthcoming Publication

Written by Salafi Dawah Manchester on . Posted in Aqeedah (Creed & Belief), Bid'ah (Innovation), Contemporary Issues, Da'wah - Calling To Islam, Deviated Groups, Sects and Parties, History of Islam, Methodology - 'Manhaj', Morals and Manners - 'Akhlaaq', Pearls of Wisdom, Scholars of Islam, Seeking Knowledge, Worship - 'Ibaadah'.

In The Name of Allah, The Most Merciful, The Bestower of Mercy.

We praise and thank Allah for guiding us to this blessed Salafi Methodology and acquainting us with its scholars in the Muslim lands and their students in the East and the West. To proceed:

When our brother Amjad Khan, may Allah preserve him, visited Kuwait before, he received permission from Shaikh Khalid, may Allah preserve him, to translate this amazing biography of Al-Allamah Rabee Ibn Hadi Al-Mad’khali – may Allah preserve him. Upon receiving this news, we informed Ustadh Abu Tasneem Mushaf Al-Banghali, may Allah preserve him, and some of our elder teachers. By the Tawfeeq of Allah, there are chapters filled with gems that have already been translated and waiting to be edited, then excerpts will be shared online while the book form is prepared. As soon as all the material is ready for formatting, it will be presented to both Shaikh Khalid and our local Mashaayikh, may Allah preserve them, to offer advice and guidance, then Salafipublications will be requested to publish it after being satisfied with it. May Allah bless all our younger teachers and Salafi brothers, especially those who have come forward to help with the editing and proofreading of the translation and preparation due to their love of cooperation upon Bir and Taqwah.

The Seventh Excerpt:

Fusool_Shaikh_Rabee_Chapter_7_Excerpt

[14] Faris Al-Hammadi – [An Observation On a Statement of His Regarding Teaching, Debates, Controversy, Honesty and Sincerity]  

Written by Abdullah Jallow on . Posted in Brotherhood, Contemporary Issues, Da'wah - Calling To Islam, Methodology - 'Manhaj', Morals and Manners - 'Akhlaaq', Purification of The Soul, Refutations.

In The Name of Allah, The Most Merciful, The Bestower of Mercy.

We ask Allah:

اَللَّهُمَّ إِنِّي أَسْأَلُكَ عِلْمًا نَافِعًا, وَ رِزْقًا طَيَّبًا, وَ عَمَلاً مُتَقَبَّل

O Allah, I ask you for beneficial knowledge, a good provision, and deeds that will be accepted. [Sahih Ibn Majah 762]

In this brief article, we aim to expand upon a statement made by Faris Al-Hammadi, as we believe it warrants further discussion in light of the insights provided by the upright scholars. The label of “influencer,” which some have attributed to Faris—regardless of his personal acceptance of this title—carries significant implications. Many individuals tend to view the words and actions of influencers as worthy of emulation or as reflections of an ideal reality. This observation is what drives our desire to delve deeper into this topic, especially at a time when we are witnessing a battle over ideas, opinions, and perspectives. To navigate this landscape safely, it is essential to return to the clarifications of the upright scholars who base their understanding on the Book of Allah and the Sunnah of the Messenger, as interpreted and practiced by the righteous predecessors.

Faris stated:

Faris stated: “Dawah focuses on teaching the core principles and fundamentals of Islam, particularly in matters of belief and practical application”. [End of quote]

Observation:

This is a truthful assertion, but it may be necessary to provide a bit more detail on this matter. At the heart of the core principles lies the crucial difference between a sound and corrupt Aqeedah, a proper commitment to the Sunnah of the Messenger, and the rejection of Bidah. Shaikh Abdullah Al-Bukhari, may Allah protect him, stated: “From that which the people of knowledge have affirmed is that this religion is established on two affairs: clarification of the truth and refuting falsehood and its people.  The affirmation of this becomes manifest to the one who contemplates the statement of Tawheed [لا إله إلا الله] with clarification and by way of explanation. The saying of the slave (i.e. the Muslim)  لا إله is a refutation against falsehood and its people- those who deify others besides Allah. And the statement إلا الله is an affirmation of truth and a clarification of it. It (means) that Allah alone has the right to be worshipped and He has no partner. Likewise, the statement محمد رسول الله is an affirmation of the Messengership of the Prophet, peace and blessings of Allah be upon him, and a refutation against the one who gives him a status above that, thus deifies him; or lowers the rank of his Prophethood and Messengership”. [1]  

Hudhaifah Bin al Yamaan, may Allah be pleased with him, said: People used to ask Allah’s Messenger, peace and blessings of Allah be upon him, about the good times, but I used to ask him about bad times fearing lest they overtake me. I said, ‘O Messenger of Allah! We were in a state of pre-Islamic ignorance and evil, and then Allah brought us this good [time through Islam], is there any evil time after this good one?’ He said, ‘Yes.’ I asked, ‘Will there be a good time again after that evil?’ He said, ‘Yes, but therein will be a hidden evil.’ I asked, ‘What will be the evil hidden therein?’ He said, ‘[That time will witness the rise of] the people who will follow ways other than mine and seek guidance other than mine. You will know [their] good points as well as [their] bad points.’ I asked, ‘Will there be an evil time after this good one?’ He said, ‘Yes. [A time will come] when there will be people standing and inviting at the gates of Hell. Whosoever responds to their call they will throw them into the fire.’ I said, ‘O Messenger of Allah! Describe them for us.’ He said, ‘They will be a people having the same complexion as ours and speaking our language.’ I said, ‘O Messenger of Allah! What do you suggest if I happen to live in that time?’ He said, ‘You should stick to the main body of the Muslims and their leader.’ I said, ‘If they have no [such thing as the] main body and have no leader?’ He said, ‘Separate yourself from all these factions, though you may have to eat the roots of trees [in a jungle] until death comes to you and you are in this state.’’’ [Bukhari and Muslim…. The wording of the above is that of Imam Muslim]

Al-Allamah Salih Al-Fawzan, may Allah protect him, said: 

They used to ask him, peace and blessings of Allah be upon him, about the good related to righteous actions, sound Islamic creed, and dealings, but Hudhaifah used to ask him about the evil times fearing lest they overcome him. Therefore, this is evidence that it is not enough to only learn about good; rather one must know about evil to avoid it. If you do not know about evil, you will come close to falling into it, as the poet said, “I acquaint myself with the evil, not for the sake of evil, but to be safeguarded from it. The one who does not know (the distinction between) evil and good will fall into evil”.

A person must learn about the truth- its proofs and evidences. He must learn and know what falsehood is and the doubts associated with it, so that he can be saved from falsehood and warn people against it. How can he avoid and warn people against it if he is unaware of it? With regards to this, the Qur’an has clarified truth and falsehood- clarified Iman and Kufr, Tawheed and Shirk, and Halaal and Haraam. It has not only clarified Tawheed, Halaal, and truth; rather it clarified that which is in opposition to them so that the Muslims can avoid them. Likewise, the Prophet – in his Sunnah- clarified good and evil, truth and falsehood in all affairs of the religion. The scholars clarified – in their written works- what Tawheed, Shirk, disbelief, and hypocrisy are. They have clarified the belief of Ahlus Sunnah wal Jamaa’ah and the beliefs of the deviated sects, such as the Jahmiyyah, the Mutazilah, the Ashaa-irah…..and others. 

They have clarified the correct and forbidden (deeds) in mutual dealings; clarified the correct (Islamic) marriage, the false and corrupt marriage, and the women forbidden (for one to marry); clarified the (good manners legislated in the Shari’ah) and the evil manners that are in opposition to it. All of this gives the Muslim an insight into his affairs, so that he knows the truth by its evidences, knows what falsehood is and the doubts associated with it so that he can avoid falsehood and tell the people to avoid it. This is why you find in the books of belief: clarification of the belief in Tawheed and the belief of Ahlus Sunnah Wal Jamaa’ah, clarification of the beliefs (that are tantamount) to misguidance, the doubts associated with it and refutation against it, so that the Muslim is not misled by beliefs (that are tantamount to) deviation, false beliefs and deviated schools of thought; and so that the Muslims can be upon a correct understanding with regards to the affairs of their religion and that which is in opposition to it.

Some of the people at present- the majority of them ignorant and amongst them, misguided ones- say, “Do not learn about the false beliefs; suffice yourselves with learning the correct belief only and do not involve yourself in seeking to know the beliefs of the people of misguidance and the refutations against their doubts. Leave this and teach the children of the Muslims the correct belief only. Do not inform them about the statements that are in opposition (to the truth), the doubts and refutation against them”. This one (i.e. the one who makes these statements) is either an ignoramus who knows nothing about knowledge or he is one of those motivated by personal desires- those who want to spread the false schools of thought and their doubts; rather it may be that they say, “It is sufficient for a person to say, ‘I am a Muslim, I am a believer….. a general Islaam suffices, do not say, Ahlus Sunnah wal Jamaa-ah, (do not say), ‘the people of misguidance, schism and differing, do not say this, because it will cause division between the Muslims’”.

These ( statements are tantamount to ) misguidance because Allah [The Mighty and Majestic] has clarified the truth in opposition to falsehood, guidance in opposition to misguidance, and Tawheed in opposition to shirk. Allah [The Mighty and Majestic] has clarified all the affairs of the Religion- a detailed clarification of the affairs related to worship, mutual dealings, and manners. Therefore, this must be clarified so that it is made clear to the people, [and in order] that they can be upon clarity, and so that the true Muslim is distinguished from the so-called Muslim and no deviation and forgery enter into Islam. We must make a distinction between this and that one, so that truth is not confounded with falsehood, and [in order] to distinguish between truth and falsehood, and [between] good and wickedness. We do not suffice ourselves with a general Islam because this is misleading, and it is deception. We warn against this propaganda. The truth must be clarified and distinguished from falsehood, and guidance must be distinguished from misguidance. Hudhaifah used to ask the Prophet about the evil and did not suffice himself by only asking the Prophet about the good. The Prophet affirmed that for him and did not say to him, “Suffice yourself with knowing what good is” rather he affirmed and clarified – for him- the evil that was to occur, so that he may beware and warn others. This is the Sunnah, the path of the Qur’an and that of the Messenger. [2]

The aforementioned scholars clearly articulate the fundamental distinction between truth and falsehood, illuminating their perspectives with precision and clarity.

Faris said: “Debates and controversial issues are not central to dawah”. [End of quote]

Observation:

This statement lacks comprehensiveness for several reasons: if one asserts that Aqeedah and Manhaj must be firmly established at all times, but a teacher may adopt different approaches depending on the specific environment or situation they are in, – following guidance of the righteous predecessors and in consultation with upright contemporary scholars of the Ummah, this understanding remains intact, even though one may encounter various situations where individuals would still consider the teacher’s approach to be contentious or controversial due to specific aspects of the information being conveyed. This is evident as even the most gentle and well-mannered Salafi teacher in any region may face accusations of being controversial from those who oppose the truth, whether out of stubbornness or ignorance, and this can manifest either through overt hostility or more subtle diplomacy. Therefore, the term “controversy” can be inherently ambiguous when applied to Dawah without further elaboration, as it may reflect the subjective perceptions of individuals, particularly when they overlook the comprehensive insights provided by reputable scholars.

Furthermore, Faris, in particular, insults some of those who seek to scrutinise and take a definitive position regarding the Fitna involving Dr. Muhammad Bin Hadi. He views those who approach this issue in a manner he disapproves of as engaging in a foolish pursuit and influenced by Shaytan in this particular matter. Therefore, he perceives their pursuit as more intense than mere controversy; however, this matter has been clarified by scholars such as Al-Allamah Rabee, Al-Allamah Ubaid Bin Abdillah Al-Jabiri, Shaikh Abdullah Al-Bukhari, among others, due to its connection to Dawah, enjoining good and forbidding evil. Despite this, the Salafiyyoon persist in their attendance at study circles. Thus if Faris was referring to a particular incident he has observed, it should be evaluated based on its unique circumstances. Generalising this matter, however, would lead to mere conjecture, as none of us can fully comprehend the diverse situations of all individuals adhering to Sunnah across various regions, which may sometimes require discussion and clarification, and often be misinterpreted as controversial by some.

The scholars always advice us with sound unity and to close all the doors of controversy, but whenever it occurs despite our efforts to avoid them, it does not inherently imply that all parties involved are at fault; rather, it invites us to explore the reasons behind an individual or group becoming the focal point of significant debate, discord, or disapproval. We assess, guided by the insights of scholars, whether this individual or group, often deemed contentious, is traversing the path of truth or misguidance. Should the upright scholars present the proofs to affirm that this individual or group embodies truth, it becomes evident that those who oppose are either truly ignorant of the truth or motivated by their baseless desires or due to misconceptions they carry regarding the need to speak about certain issues to the common people. Al-Allaamah Rabee Bin Hadi Al-Madkhali, may Allah preserve him, was asked, “What do you say about an individual who advises people not to listen to refutations, and when asked why he took this stance, he answered, ‘The person who asked me about this was a common person, and he is unable to recite the Quran properly’. What is your comment on this? May Allah bless you”.

Answer: If he is a layman, he must be taught the Islamic creed and warned against ahlul bidah. Because the majority of ordinary people have become supporters of the people of bidah these days, it is necessary to warn them against (the people of bidah). Say to him, “So and so is on such and such bidah, and you will be harmed if you listen to him”. This is done so that they will not read (his books), listen to his audio tapes, and will be cautious of his statements. This layman needs someone to caution him and remind him of the principle, “This knowledge is religion so look at whom you take your religion from”. During these times, the common people are targeted by the people of bidah, who will tell you, “Do not let them read the books of refutations”. No, No. This will expose them to destruction”. [3]

The Shaikh was also asked: “Is it permitted for us as students of knowledge to be silent about the Mubtadi’ah and to nurture the youth and students on the Salafi path without mentioning the names of the Mubtadi’ah?”

Answer: By Allah, if necessary, the Mubtadi’ah are to be mentioned by their characteristics as well as their names. If so and so has put himself forward for leadership, leading this Ummah and the youth to falsehood, he is to be mentioned by name. If there is a necessity, he must be mentioned by name. In this regard, one of the Salafis in Egypt used to teach, and he would just mention generalities (general descriptions without mentioning names), and the people did not understand these generalities. Following that, he began to openly mention the names of the groups and individuals, so they said, “O Shaykh! Why did you not teach us like this in the beginning?” He said, “I delivered many lessons to you, and I would say this and that (i.e. general descriptions without names)”. They said, “By Allah! We did not understand”. [4]

Al-Allamah Salih Al-Fawzan, may Allah preserve him,  said:

The principle here is about warning against mistakes and deviance after identifying them as such. If the affair necessitates making known the name of an individual among the obstinate opponents so that beguilement does not occur through them, particularly those individuals with deviated views or deviation in behaviour and methodology, and they are well known among the people and a good opinion is held about them, there is no harm in mentioning them by their names and their methodology warned against. The scholars research the science of Jarh Wat-Tadeel and then mention the narrators and the criticism leveled against them. This is not done for the sake of personal (criticism), but rather to advise the Ummah in case they come across affairs from these individuals that are harmful to the Religion or lies against the Messenger [peace and blessings of Allah be upon him]. Therefore, this principle is first and foremost about warning against mistakes. But the person who made such a mistake should not be named if doing so would either do more harm or if there is no benefit in doing so.

If the matter requires that his name be made known to warn the people about his methodology, this is an act of sincere devotion to Allah in worship, an act of sincere devotion to Allah’s Book, an act of sincere devotion to Allah’s Messenger (by following his Sunnah), and an act of sincere advice to Muslim leaders and their common folk, especially if he (the one warned against) is active among the people and they have a positive view of him and buy his books and audio tapes. Therefore, there has to be clarification and warning because silence will be harmful to people. His affair has to be unveiled, however, it must be done as an act of sincere devotion to Allah in worship, an act of sincere devotion to Allah’s Book, an act of sincere devotion to Allah’s Messenger (by following his Sunnah), and an act of sincere advice to Muslim leaders and their common folk, and not for defamation or to satisfy one’s desires. [5]

Indeed, it is well known among Salafis that the aforementioned elucidations provided by the scholars are deemed controversial by the Hizbiyyoon, as well as by those who lack a true understanding of their significance. In light of this matter, we would like to remind Faris that once the scholars have pinpointed errors, issued warnings, and instructed us to heed these cautions, the only course of action remaining is to consult them when confronted with situations that require a careful assessment of benefits and harms regardless of who considers such pursuit controversial or not.

Thirdly, with regards to debate, Imam Muhammad Ibn Salih Al-Uthaymin, may Allah have mercy upon him, stated in Sharh Hilyati Talibil Ilm that if there is a variance between humbling oneself to the truth and humbling oneself to people, precedence is given to humbling oneself to the truth. For instance, if there is a person who reviles the truth and rejoices due to his enmity towards those who follow it, in this case, one should not humble themselves in the presence of this person. Instead, one should remain humble to the truth and engage in debate with this person. Even if they belittle or speak against you, do not be concerned about what they say because the truth must be upheld. [6]

Al-Allamah Rabee Bin Hadi al-Mad’khali, may Allah preserve him, said: Among Ahlul Bidah, there exist Du’aat (callers to their innovations) who should neither be engaged in conversation nor debated with, except in cases of necessity and for a Maslahah (a carefully considered benefit recognized by rightly guided scholars). (In other circumstances), it is impermissible to engage in debate with them. It is impermissible to debate with the Rawaafid if you are weak (in knowledge and character); except for a man who is firmly grounded in knowledge and religion, (well-versed) in citing proofs, smart, and possesses (force and strength to effectively engage in debate using clear proofs without being swayed by doubts). Therefore, if he perceives a benefit in debating them, he may proceed to do so. [وَجَادِلْهُم بِالَّتِي هِيَ أَحْسَنُ – and argue with them in a way that is better].

This is the legislated debate. Allah did not close the door of debate completely, thus if we have a way of establishing the proof and guiding the people to good, we follow it. The one who is debated with may not benefit but others may benefit. Regarding the weak individual, the answer is no. Even among scholars, there exists one who may be considered weak and another who is misled by Shub’hah (a matter that superficially resembles the truth but is, in fact, false). He may be a scholar, but weak in his character, thus rendering him vulnerable in the presence of Ahlul Bidah, even if they are younger or possess less knowledge than he does”. [7]

The Shaikh also said: 

One who has the ability and experience – able to call to the path of Allah with wisdom and persuade the people of falsehood, he embarks upon calling them (to the truth), whilst not agreeing with them, not sitting with them, and flattering them; but rather he should be a Mujaahid, a caller to the path of Allah, a sincere adviser, enjoining good and forbidding evil. This is the one who embarks upon calling the people of falsehood (to truth) and clarifies the truth to them, so the one who is guided, then alhamdulil laah; but if not, then he has established the proofs which Allah has obligated to the inheritors of the Prophets (i.e. the scholars) to establish. The Prophets were callers to the path of Allah, they invited the unbelievers to (the truth) and called the sinners (to the truth), and you are one of the inheritors of the Prophets, therefore, call these (people to the truth) and establish the proofs against them, but we do not say that this task is for everyone – that every Tom, Dick, and Harry intermingles with ahlul bidah and advise them; rather we say that this is for the people of knowledge, those well established in knowledge, the strong ones. As for those other than them – the ignoramuses and the ones with weak personalities, we warn and tell them to be on guard against the outcomes that descend on the one who is deceived by himself, so he becomes one from ahlul bidah and misguidance. By Allaah we know people from different Arab and Islamic countries who used to be upon good, then they were captured by this trick- meaning, read, read, take the truth and reject falsehood, but he was not seen thereafter except that he was from the villains of ahlul bidah, waging war against Ahlus sunnah, defending the people of falsehood. [8]

Imam Ibn Aqeel [may Allah have mercy upon him] said, “If the truthful ones were to keep silent and the falsifiers speak, then the creation would have relinquished what they have witnessed (of truth) and reject what they have not witnessed.  So when the devout ones desire to revive the Sunnah, the people would reject it and think that it is bidah”. [9]

Al-Allamah Rabee Bin Haadi Al-Mad’khali, may Allah preserve him, said:

The Fitan and doubts are brought forth by Ahlul Bidah Wal Ahwaa [the people of religious innovation and desires], and the call to Allah- to the Book of Allah, adherence to the Book of Allah and the Sunnah – is the call that will unite all the Ummah. All the Fitan, splitting, and (blameworthy) differing emanate from the path of the proponents of falsehood and Fitan. They do not keep quiet, they spread their falsehoods in their newspapers, magazines, and audio tapes, while wishing that the voice of truth should be silent. In their view, the voice of truth is what should be silent and the voice of falsehood should be raised and spread in the earth! Do they remain silent?! The people of falsehood do not remain silent – neither abate nor slow down. They have [ خطط جهنمية -i.e. paths or footsteps leading to the hell fire] which they enforce and thereafter they demand silence from the people of truth! They approach the Salafi methodology and say to you, “This tears apart! This splits!” Rather, the Ahwaa [the bidah, etc] and the Dalaalaat [deeds, views, and beliefs that are tantamount to misguidance] are what splits and tears the Ummah apart, which the people of falsehood are ardent in spreading on the internet at present and places of falsehood in the newspapers, magazines and the schools. They spread their falsehood in every place, but the very thing that is difficult for them is to hear the voice of truth! [10]

Shaikh Shamsuddeen Al-Afghaani [may Allah have mercy upon him] said: Ahlul Bidah are the ones who kindle temptations and disorder. They are chaotic people and are deprived of safety and security.  They are a people of temptation and disturbance as opposed to Ahlul Hadeeth Was-Sunan [i.e. those who steadfastly follow the authentic Ahaadeeth of the Prophet and his Sunnah]. Have they [i.e. the people of Sunnah] committed what the people of bidah and trials have committed?! The people of bidah trespass alongside enmity and Bidah, whilst Ahlus Sunnah respond and defend (the religion). [11]

Faris says: “Teaching often doesn’t attract as many followers or attention, while debates and controversy do”.

Observation:

Firstly, the insights we have shared thus far, drawn from the upright scholars, are more than sufficient. It is essential to discern truth from falsehood, irrespective of whether such distinctions are labeled as controversial. This term may be wielded by those who seek to undermine the efforts of those who advocate for righteousness and denounce wrongdoing. Furthermore, we have emphasised the importance of consulting the scholars.

Secondly, regarding the eagerness with which individuals seek to engage in learning, this enthusiasm is solely Tawfeeq granted by Allah. Thus, we ask Allah:

اَللَّهُمَّ إِنِّي أَسْأَلُكَ عِلْمًا نَافِعًا, وَ رِزْقًا طَيَّبًا, وَ عَمَلاً مُتَقَبَّل

O Allah, I ask you for beneficial knowledge, a good provision, and deeds that will be accepted.

[Sahih Ibn Majah 762]

Finally, Faris says in the context of everything he has stated: “This serves as a test of sincerity and honesty”.

Observation:

There is no doubt that every act of worship is a test of one’s sincerity to Allah, encompassing the aspects of Aqeedah and Manhaj, as well as the refutation of erroneous principles and notions -either in general or specific – when necessary, irrespective of who may subjectively deem them controversial. 

Allah, The Exalted, says:

قُلۡ هَـٰذِهِۦ سَبِيلِىٓ أَدۡعُوٓاْ إِلَى ٱللَّهِ‌ۚ عَلَىٰ بَصِيرَةٍ أَنَا۟ وَمَنِ ٱتَّبَعَنِى‌ۖ وَسُبۡحَـٰنَ ٱللَّهِ وَمَآ أَنَا۟ مِنَ ٱلۡمُشۡرِكِينَ

Say (O Muhammad): “This is my way; I invite unto Allah (i.e. to the Oneness of Allah – Islamic Monotheism) with sure knowledge, I and whosoever follows me (also must invite others to Allah i.e. to the Oneness of Allah – Islamic Monotheism) with sure knowledge. And Glorified and Exalted be Allah (above all that they associate as partners with Him). And I am not of the Mushrikun (polytheists, pagans, idolaters, and disbelievers in the Oneness of Allah; those who worship others along with Allah or set up rivals or partners to Allah).”

[أَدۡعُوٓاْ إِلَى ٱللَّهِ‌ۚ – I invite unto Allah (i.e. to the Oneness of Allah – Islamic Monotheism)]. 

Al-Allamah Saalih Al-Fawzaan, may Allah preserve him, said: 

This part of the Ayah contains a notification regarding sincerity because some people call to themselves. It may be that a person propagates, and delivers lectures and sermons, but his goal is to become apparent to the people [Foonote a] – to receive some status, be praised, and that people gather and become numerous around him. If this is his aim, then he is not a caller to (the path of) Allah; rather he is a caller to himself. The person who abandons Dawah has abandoned a great obligation and the person who is not sincere in Dawah has fallen into great danger because Dawah has to be carried out sincerely for the sake of Allah and the aim should be to establish Allah’s Shariah- to guide and benefit the people, whether you are praised or rebuked. As for some people, when they are not praised and promoted, they abandon Dawah. This is proof that such a caller is not a caller to Allah, rather he only calls to himself. Therefore, the Muslim should be warned that his aim in Dawah should be sincerity, to benefit the people, free them from Shirk and bidah, free them from those affairs that are in opposition to the Shariah, and fulfill what is obligated to him. A large number of people around a person is not proof that such a person is virtuous because some of the Prophets were only followed by a few people. “A Prophet will come on the day of judgment with a few followers and a Prophet will come with no followers”. [Bukhaari 5705]. Therefore, does this mean that such a Prophet is not virtuous? Absolutely not! A person does not look at the large number of people who are present because the Prophet [peace and blessings of Allah be upon him] said to Ali, “If Allah gives guidance to a single man through you, it is better for you than possessing red camels”. [Bukhaari 3009] [12]

Ahlus Sunnah Wal Jamaa’ah are not harmed by those who oppose them. If you are with them- all praise is due to Allah, they are pleased with this because they want good for the people. If you oppose them, you cannot harm them and due to this the Messenger [peace and blessings of Allah be upon him]said, “There will not cease to be a group of my Ummah who will be manifest upon the truth- not harmed by those who forsake them until the command of Allah comes to pass (i.e. the day of judgment) whilst they are upon the (truth)”. The one in opposition does not harm except himself. What is given consideration is not the large numbers; rather what is given consideration is to agree with the truth, even if a small number of people were upon it. And even if in some eras there is only one person (upon truth), he is the one upon truth and he is the Jamaa’ah. The Jamaa’ah does not necessitate large numbers; rather the Jamaa’ah is what is in agreement with the truth – in agreement with the Book and the Sunnah, even if those upon it are few. However, if many come together upon truth, then – all praise is due to Allaah- this is strength; but if the majority oppose it (i.e. the truth), we side with the truth even if only a few are upon it”. [13]

And Allah knows best

[1] المقالات الشرعيّة pages 14-15

[2] An Excerpt from Sharh Hadeeth Innaa Kunnaa Fee Jaahiliyyatin pages 9-12

[3] Fataawa Fadeelah Ash-Shaykh Rabee’ Al-Madkhalee (1/273)

[4] Fataawa Fadeelah Ash-Shaykh Rabee’ Al-Madkhalee (1/277)

[5] Excerpt from “Al-Ajwibah Al Mufeedah”. Question number 66. Page 162

[6] Sharh Hilyati Taalibil Ilm pages 253-254

[7] An Excerpt from “Sharh Aqeedah As-Salaf Ashaab Al-Hadeeth’ pages 301 onwards

[8] An Excerpt from “Awnul Baaree Bi-Bayaan Maa Tadammanahu Sharhus Sunnah Lil-Imaam Al-Barbahaaree”. 2/970-972]

[9] Shifaa As-Sudoor Fee Ziyaaratil Mashaahid Wal-Quboor page: 148

[10] Question number 16. Pages 28-29 in الإجابات الجلية عن القضايا المنهجية – Note: This particular excerpt is found in the second section of the book, titled: كشف الستار عما تحمله بعض الدعوات من أخطار ]

[11] Source: 1/26-27: عداء الماتريدية للعقيدة السلفية –

[12] An Excerpt from ‘I’aanah Al-Mustafeed Bi-Sharhi Kitaab At-Tawheed’ pages 97-98 Publisher: Ar-Risaalah Publishers 1st edition 1428AH (Year 2007). 

[13] An Excerpt from ( لمحة عن الفرق الضالة )– pages 14 -15

Observations On Markaz at-Tawheed (Stoke On Trent) Two Years Ago

Written by faizkara on . Posted in Contemporary Issues, Methodology - 'Manhaj', Morals and Manners - 'Akhlaaq', Refutations.

In The Name of Allah, The Most Merciful, The Bestower of Mercy.

Umar Ibn Al-Khattaab, may Allah be pleased with him, said: “People were (sometimes) judged by the revealing of a Divine revelation during the lifetime of Allah’s Messenger but now there is no longer any more (new revelation). Now we judge you by the deeds you practice publicly, so we will trust and favour the one who does good deeds in front of us, and we will not call him to account about what he is really doing in secret, because Allah will judge him for that; but we will not trust or believe the one who presents to us an evil deed even if he claims that his intentions were good”. (1)

Imaam Abdul-Azeez Bin Baaz, may Allah have mercy upon him, said: “Whoever manifests good, it will be accepted from him and a good suspicion is held about him. And if he manifests evil, it will be held against him and an evil suspicion is held about him”. (2)

We Are Dealing With Specific Individuals at [Markaz Tawheed- Stoke On Trent] With a Severe or (Chronic) Hizbiyyah Syndrome!

Part 1: The Affair of Markaz Tawheed (Stoke On Trent), Greenlane and Ikhwaaniyyah In Manhaj!

Part 2: The Affair of Markaz Tawheed (Stoke On Trent), Greenlane and Ikhwaaniyyah In Manhaj! [Using Statements of Upright Scholars as Smokescreen]

Part 3: The Affair of Markaz Tawheed (Stoke On Trent) and Greenlane: [Exposing Deception of Transmitters Who Fish In Murky Waters Regarding Shaikh Wasiyullaah’s Views On Salafipublications]

[4] The Affair of Markaz Tawheed (Stoke On Trent) and Greenlane: [Hizbiyyoon at Markaz Tawheed Desperately Quote a Rider of The Tamyee Trojan Horse (Ibraaheem Ar-Ruhayli)]

[5] The Affair of Markaz Tawheed (Stoke On Trent) – [Four Brief Observations On Their Desperate Tactics In Defamation That We’re Lacking in Al-Walaa Wal Baraa]

[6] The Affair of Markaz Tawheed: [O Truthful Adherents to Salafiyyah In Stoke On Trent! Neither Participate Nor Spend a Penny In An Event That Will Aid Staunch Soofees to Strengthen Their Bidah and Misguidance]

[7] The Affair of Markaz Tawheed: [After Reality Behind Shaikh Wasiyullaah’s Views Were Unveiled In Doubts Around Dawah (Audio 9), Blazing Hizbiyyoon Parroted Statements of Another Shaikh Fulaan Without An Atom’s Weight of Evidence]

[8] The Affair of Markaz Tawheed: [An Affair Blazing Hizbi or Those Specific Hizbiyyoon Hate to Hear About Refutations of Al-Allaamah Ahmad Bin Yahyah An-Najmi Against Shaikh Bin Jibrin]

[9] The Affair of Markaz Tawheed: [Shaytaan or Urge of The Evil Soul Enticed Insolent Liar (Kadh’dhaabun Ashir) at Markaz Tawheed to Slander Shaikh Abu Khadeejah]

[10.1] The Affair of Markaz Tawheed: [A Principle Regarding Unity, Splitting and Cooperating With Ahlul Bidah]

[10.2] The Affair of Markaz Tawheed: [A Principle Regarding Splitting, Takfeer, Tabdee and Cooperating With Ahlul Bidah!]

[10.3] What is Our Call? A Declaration From Masjid Al-Furqan and Masjid Abi Hurairah to Hizbiyyoon of Markaz Tawheed!

[10.4] The Affair of Markaz Tawheed: [Close Scrutiny of Their Inclination Towards Using Scholars Seen In The Presence of Ahlul Bidah As An Alibi to Co-operate With Ahlul Bidah!

[11] The Affair of Markaz at-Tawheed: [General Statements By Way of Which Reality Is Concealed- Truth Mixed With Falsehood]

Spiteful Slanderers Amongst Blazing Hizbiyyoon – at Markaz Tawheed – Emerge to Make False Accusations Against a Salafi Brother’s Business Dealings

Till When Will You Peddle The Bold-Faced Lie That Issues Between (Masjid al-Furqan/Masjid Abi Hurairah) and Markaz at-Tawheed Is Personal and Not Related to Manhaj?!

[6] You’ve Dropped Many Scholars [Yahyah Al-Hajuri]! [Response to Hizbiyyoon, Deceivers, and Concealers at Markaz at-Tawheed (Stoke On Trent)]- [Conclusion of Part 1 of This Series]

Spiteful Slanderers Amongst Blazing Hizbiyyoon – at Markaz Tawheed – Emerge to Make False Accusations Against a Salafi Brother’s Business Dealings

[1] You’ve Dropped Many Scholars (Faalih Al-Harbi)! [Response to Hizbiyyoon, Deceivers, and Concealers at Markaz at-Tawheed (Stoke On Trent)]

[1.2] You’ve Dropped Many Scholars [Faalih Al-Harbi and Dr Muhammad Bin Haadi]! [Response to Hizbiyyoon, Deceivers, and Concealers at Markaz at-Tawheed (Stoke On Trent)]

[3] You’ve Dropped Many Scholars [Fawzi Al-Bahrayni]! [Response to Hizbiyyoon, Deceivers, and Concealers at Markaz at-Tawheed (Stoke On Trent)]

[4] You’ve Dropped Many Scholars [Ali Al-Halabi and Saleem Al-Hilaali]! [Response to Hizbiyyoon, Deceivers, and Concealers at Markaz at-Tawheed (Stoke On Trent)]

[5] You’ve Dropped Many Scholars [Saalim At-Taweel]! [Response to Hizbiyyoon, Deceivers, and Concealers at Markaz at-Tawheed (Stoke On Trent)]

[6] You’ve Dropped Many Scholars [Yahyah Al-Hajuri]! [Response to Hizbiyyoon, Deceivers, and Concealers at Markaz at-Tawheed (Stoke On Trent)]- [Conclusion of Part 1 of This Series]

[1] Saheeh Al-Bukhaari 2641

[2] An Excerpt from Al-Hulalul Ibreeziyyah Min At-Taleeqaat Al-Baaziyyah Alaa Saheeh Al-Bukhaariy 2/397 footnote 2

An Important Matter to Recall Concerning the Trustworthy People of Your Country

Written by Abdullah Jallow on . Posted in Brotherhood, Contemporary Issues, History of Islam, Methodology - 'Manhaj', Morals and Manners - 'Akhlaaq', Pearls of Wisdom, Purification of The Soul.

In The Name of Allah, The Most Merciful, The Bestower of Mercy.

أتى داود بن علي الأصبهاني إلى صالح بن أحمد بن حنبل وكان بينه وبين صالح بن أحمد حسن (يعني: علاقته به كانت حسنة) فكلم صالحا أن يتلطف له في

الاستئذان على أبيه.

فأتى صالح أباه أحمد بن حنبل) فقال له : رجل سألني أن يأتيك؟

قال: ما اسمه ؟

قال داود

قال : من أين؟

قال: من أهل أصبهان.

قال: أي شيء صناعته ؟

قال : وكان صالح يروغ عن تعريفه إياه. فما زال أبو عبد الله يفحص عنه حتى فطن.

فقال: هذا قد كتب إلي محمد بن يحيى النيسابوري في أمره انه زعم أن القرآن محدث فلا

يقربني.

قال : يا أبت ينتفي من هذا وينكره.

فقال أبو عبد الله (أحمد بن حنبل): محمد بن يحيى أصدق منه لا تأذن له في المصير إلي “.

Dawud Ibn Ali al-Isfahani approached Salih Ibn Ahmad Ibn Hanbal, with whom he had a good relationship. He requested Salih to kindly seek permission for him to visit his father. Salih then went to his father- (Imam Ahmad)- and said: “A man has asked me to come to you.” He (Imam Ahmad) said: “What is his name?” He (Salih) said: “Dawud”. He said: “Where is he from?” He (Salih) said: “He is from the people of Isfahan”. He said: “Has he done anything (i.e. involved in anything wrong)?” Salih hesitated, thus Abu Abdillah (Imam Ahmad) did not cease scrutinising until he realised (who this Dawud is). Then he said: “Muhammad Ibn Yahyah An-Naysaabooree wrote to me concerning the affair of this one (i.e. Dawud) that he claims that the Quran came into existence (created), [a] so he should not come near me (i.e. should not come to me).” Salih said: “O My father! He has disclaimed and rejected this (statement or claim)”. Abu Abdillah (Imam Ahmad) said: “Muhammad Ibn Yahya is more truthful than him; do not grant him permission to approach me”. [1] 

This serves as a reminder to everyone that poor behaviour and the expectation of evading consequences are ineffective when interacting with honest individuals. When you engage in misconduct and continue down that path while simultaneously searching for an escape, it is undeniable that the trustworthy people within your community, where your misdeeds have transpired, possess a deeper understanding of your situation than anyone else. This holds true despite any favourable relationships or positive perceptions you may enjoy in other circles.

Those who place their trust in you, yet remain somewhat oblivious to your true circumstances, are excused. In contrast, astute scholars or seasoned students of knowledge of your homeland will meticulously analyse your strategies with a discerning eye. They possess a keen ability to identify audacious political strategies, duplicitous actions taken for self-serving purposes, the intentional distortion of truths or situations, and the concealment of pertinent information for personal benefit. Furthermore, they recognise the nuanced and indirect assertions of qualifications or merits aimed at self-advancement, the overt and covert persuasion manifested in both dialogue and conduct, whether direct or indirect, as well as the efforts to broker solutions while neglecting to amend past misdeeds through a myriad of tactics.

They are capable of recognising your efforts to control the terms of the discussion and its outcomes, redirecting conversations from topics where you are at a disadvantage to those where you feel more confident. They understand that when your tactics are unwelcome to those who are intimately familiar with you, you tend to shift the dialogue towards a hypothetical pursuit of greater aspirations and benefits. They know that this is a strategy to narrow the conversation and dominate it, rendering the insights of those who genuinely understand your situation insignificant and irrelevant. Likewise, they know that this maneuver of yours involves knowing precisely when to advocate for this limited perspective and when to refrain from doing so. They assess you based on what you express through your words, actions, gestures, and the implications they draw from their long-standing understanding of your situation. Ultimately, though, it is only Allah who truly knows the reality of your affairs. Allah says:

وَأَسِرُّوا قَوْلَكُمْ أَوِ اجْهَرُوا بِهِ ۖ إِنَّهُ عَلِيمٌ بِذَاتِ الصُّدُورِ

أَلَا يَعْلَمُ مَنْ خَلَقَ وَهُوَ اللَّطِيفُ الْخَبِيرُ

And whether you keep your talk secret or disclose it, verily, He is the All-Knower of what is in the breasts (of men). Should not He Who has created know? And He is the Most Kind and Courteous (to His slaves) All-Aware (of everything). [Al-Mulk. 14-15]

If you believe that He is your Creator and the Creator of your hearts and all they contain, how can (anything) be concealed from Him when He made them?! The statement [بِذَاتِ الصُّدُورِ – what is in the breasts (of men)] includes what the breasts carry in terms of beliefs, intentions, love, and hate. [2] 

Similarly, your justifications, diversions, distortions, and avoidance strategies only increase the burden on your conscience and thoughts. Allah states:

 بَلِ ٱلْإِنسَٰنُ عَلَىٰ نَفْسِهِۦ بَصِيرَةٌ

وَلَوْ أَلْقَىٰ مَعَاذِيرَهُۥ

Rather, man, against himself, will be a witness, though he may put forth his excuses (to cover his evil deeds). [Al-Qiyaamah. 14-15]

“Rather, man, against himself, will be a witness” – Meaning, a person is clear proof against himself based on what he does or does not do, and if he comes up with every excuse to exonerate himself of his wrongdoing, it will not benefit him. [3] “Though he may put forth his excuses”– Mujaahid, may Allah have mercy upon him, said, “Even if he disputes it, he remains a witness to it (i.e. his guilt)”. [4]

We ask Allah:

اللهم كما حَسَّنْت خَلْقِي فَحَسِّنْ خُلُقِي  

O Allah! Just as You made my external form beautiful, make my character beautiful as well.

—————————————————-

[a] https://www.salafisounds.com/the-quran-is-the-speech-of-allah-uncreated-and-a-refutation-of-the-opposers-foundations-of-the-sunnah-of-imam-ahmad-bin-hanbal-lesson-19-by-abu-khadeejah-abdul-wahid/

https://abukhadeejah.com/who-first-spoke-with-the-innovation-that-the-speech-of-allaah-is-created-their-isnaad/

[1] Tarikh Baghdad 8/374]

[2] An Excerpt from Badaa’i At-Tafseer Al-Jaami Limaa Fassarahu Al-Imaam Ibnul Qayyim 3/173

[3] An Excerpt from Tafseer Muyassar

[4] Tafseer Ibn Katheer

A Brief Reminder to Those Who Refer to Us as “Super or Extreme Salafis”

Written by Abdullah Jallow on . Posted in Aqeedah (Creed & Belief), Basics, Bid'ah (Innovation), Brotherhood, Contemporary Issues, Da'wah - Calling To Islam, Deviated Callers & Individuals, Deviated Groups, Sects and Parties, Hadaadis, Innovations In Islam (Bidah), Khawaarij, Methodology - 'Manhaj', Morals and Manners - 'Akhlaaq', Purification of The Soul, Refutations, Sahaabah, Salaf As Saalih (Pious Predecessors), Scholars of Islam, Shi'a, Sufis, The Salaf - Pious Predecessors, Worship - 'Ibaadah'.

 In The Name of Allah, The Most Merciful, The Bestower of Mercy.

A Brief Reminder to Those Who Refer to Us as “Super or Extreme Salafis” When We Demand  Clarity Based On The Distinct Methodology of The Pious Predecessors 

You Have Grown Weary of The Detailed Discourse That Delineates The Fine Line Between Truth and Falsehood

 Allah [The Exalted] said:

وَكَذَٰلِكَ نُفَصِّلُ الْآيَاتِ وَلِتَسْتَبِينَ سَبِيلُ الْمُجْرِمِينَ

And thus do We explain the signs (to you O Muḥammad) in detail, and so that the way of the criminals may become evident (to you). [Surah Al-An’aam. Ayah 55] [1]

Imam Ibn Kathir, may Allah have mercy upon him, said, “Allah [The Exalted] stated that just as He explained what was previously explained of the arguments and evidence on the path of guidance and sound judgment, and censured argumentation and stubbornness; likewise, He explains the signs (proofs, evidence, lessons), which those being addressed need; [ولتستبين سبيل المجرمين – and so that the way of the criminals may become evident]- Meaning, so that the path of the criminals – those who oppose the Messengers – may become evident. [2]

Imam Ibn Al-Qayyim, may Allah have mercy upon him, said:

Those who know Allah, His Book, and the religion He has ordained are acquainted with the path of the believers and that of the criminals in detail- the two paths are visible to them, just as a path leading to its destination and the path leading to destruction is made visible. They are the most knowledgeable among the creation- the ones who benefit (the people) the most, the ones with the most useful advice and they are evidence of right guidance. This is why the Sahaabah (companions of the Prophet) have excelled over all those to come after them until the Day of Judgment because they were brought up upon the path of misguidance, Shirk, and the paths leading to destruction, and they knew them in detail; then the Messenger [peace and blessings of Allaah be upon him] came to them and took them out from darkness (and entered them) into complete light- from shirk (polytheism) into Tawheed (pure Islamic Monotheism), from ignorance into knowledge, from misguidance into guidance, from injustice into justice, from confusion and blindness into guidance and clear-sightedness. They knew the worth of that which they received and were triumphant by way of it. They knew the worth of that which was contained in what they received since what is in opposition to the (truth and right guidance) manifests the goodness of what it opposes because affairs are made clear by way of their opposites. So, they (Sahaabah) increased in desire and love of that which they embraced, disliked, and hated that which they had turned away from. And of all the people, they had the most love for Tawheed, Imaan, and Islam, and had the most hatred for that which was in opposition to it. They were the most knowledgeable of the (right) path in detail.

As for those who came after the Sahaabah, among them, is one who was brought up in Islam but knows not what is in opposition to it. Therefore, some of the details of the path of the believers and that of the criminals became confusing to him because confusion occurs due to the weakness of one’s knowledge regarding both paths or one of them, as Umar Ibn Al-Khattaab [may Allah be pleased with him] said, “The robust signposts of Islam will be undone one after the other when a people who grew up in Islam know not what Jaahiliyyah [Pre-Islamic Ignorance] is”. This (statement shows an aspect of) Umar’s perfect knowledge. There is that one who is neither acquainted with the path of the criminals nor has it been made clear to him, or he has doubts and thus thinks that some of their ways are from the ways of the believers. This has occurred in this Ummah in many affairs of Creed, Knowledge, and deeds regarding the path of the criminals, the disbelievers, and the enemies of the Messengers, (which) was brought into the path of the believers by the one who does not know the (detailed distinction between) the path of believers and the path of the criminals, so he called to (this path), excommunicated the one in opposition and declares lawful that which Allah and His Messenger made unlawful, just as what has occurred with many of the people of bidah, such as the Jahmiyyah, the Qadariyyah, the Khawaarij, the Rawaafid and their ilk- among those who initiated a Bidah, called to it and excommunicated those who opposed it.

The people are four categories in this subject matter (i.e. their knowledge of the path of the believers):

The first group is those who know the path of the believers and that of the criminals in detail – in both knowledge and action. They are the most knowledgeable of the creation.

The second group is those who are blind to both paths- those resembling animals. The path of the criminals is presented to them and they follow it.

The third group is those who concern themselves with (seeking) knowledge of the path of the believers and not its opposite- only knows (the path of the criminals) by way of its opposition to the (path of the believers) and in a general way, and that all that is in opposition to the path of the believers is falsehood, even though that is not illustrated to him in detail; rather, turns away when he hears some of that which contradicts the path of the believers and does not preoccupy himself in understanding and knowing its falsity (i.e. by way of learning from the upright people of knowledge). This person is in a state (similar) to one who is safeguarded from following desires- whose heart is neither put at risk nor is he called to (such desires)- as opposed to those who are aware of (such desires) and their souls are inclined towards them, but they strive against it for the Sake of Allah. A letter was written to Umar Ibnul Khattaab [may Allah be pleased with him] and he was asked about this affair, as to which of the two men is the better- a man who is not put at risk by way of desires and does not go through its difficulties, or a man who is urged towards it but abandons it for the Sake of Allah? Umar wrote back saying, “The one who is desirous of sin but abandons it for the Sake of Allah is from ‘those whose hearts Allaah has tested for piety. For them, there is forgiveness and a great reward’”. [Al-Hujuraat. 3]

The fourth group knows the path of evil, Bidah, and kufr in detail and the path of the believers in general. This is the situation of many of those who concern themselves with the beliefs of the previous nations and that of the people of Bidah (proponents of religious innovation). They are acquainted with (these affairs) in detail, but not with what the Messenger came with; rather they are acquainted with it in general even though they may know some of its affairs in detail. Whoever examines their books will see that. Likewise, those who know the paths of evil, oppression, and corruption in detail and are followers of it, if they repent, abandon these (affairs) and return to the path of the pious believers, then their knowledge of it will only be general. They will not be acquainted with it in that detailed manner known to those who spend their lives (studying) its regulations and ways.

The Objective: Indeed, Allah [Glorified be He] loves that one should know the path of His enemies to avoid and hate it, just as the path of His Awliyaa (close friends, allies) should be known and followed. [3]

You Lack The Fortitude and Integrity Essential to Uphold The Sound Creed and Methodology And Counter Deviation

 Imam Al-Barbahaaree, may Allaah have mercy upon him,  said: “Know that leaving the correct path occurs in two ways. Firstly, a man strays from the correct path intending nothing but good, so his error is not to be followed since it leads to destruction. Secondly, a man who deliberately opposes the truth and acts contrary to the Pious ones who came before him, he is astray, leading others astray, a rebellious devil within the Ummah. It is a duty upon those who know of him to warn the people against him and to explain his condition to them so that no one falls into his innovation and is destroyed”.

Al-Allamah Saalih Al-Fawzaan, may Allah preserve him,  commented on the above statement of Imam Barbahaaree [may Allah have mercy upon him] saying: The first man is one who leaves the (correct path) without the intention (to do so), rather he intended good but followed other than the path of good. Striving [alone] is not sufficient, and even if the person has a righteous intention and a good aim, then that must be upon the correct path. Therefore, this (person) is considered mistaken and whoever agrees with him and follows his error will be destroyed because this is a path of destruction even though the (person) did not intend to leave (the correct path); rather his quest was (to reach something) good. This is the state of many of those who initiate newly invented matters in the knowledge of Aqeedah (Creed). This affair is not permissible, and they should not adhere to it. The person is not upon correctness. Allah [The Mighty and Majestic] said: [ وَأَنَّ هَٰذَا صِرَاطِي مُسْتَقِيمًا فَاتَّبِعُوهُ ۖ وَلَا تَتَّبِعُوا السُّبُلَ فَتَفَرَّقَ بِكُمْ عَنْ سَبِيلِهِ – And verily, this is my Straight Path, so follow it, and follow not (other) paths, for they will separate you away from His Path]. [Surah Al-An’aam. Ayah 153]

Therefore, we reject any path that exits us from the Straight Path even if the one who (calls) to it aims for good and has a good intention. We do not follow him in that while he continues upon his error, eventually leading to destruction because whoever abandons the correct path in his journey and takes a path of ruin will be destroyed.

As for the second person, it is the one who intends to leave (the correct path). He knows the truth and that what he embarks upon is falsehood, but he intends to leave the truth with the intention of misguiding the people. So, the intention of the first (person) is to bring about benefit for the people, but he did not follow the correct path. The second (person) intended to misguide the people and turn them away from the correct path. Therefore, this one is a devil because the devils take the people away from the Straight Path. (Allah informs us that) Iblees said: [لَأَقْعُدَنَّ لَهُمْ صِرَاطَكَ الْمُسْتَقِيمَ -Surely, I will sit in wait against them (human beings) on Your Straight Path]. [7:16] So he intends to turn them away from it [i.e. the straight path] and [direct them] towards the deviated paths. The Prophet [peace and blessings of Allah be upon him] gave us an example when he drew a straight line and drew other lines on its sides, he then said about the straight line, “This is the path of Allah” and he said about the other lines, “These are the other paths, and on each path is a devil calling to it”. This is a clear example that agrees with that which the Shaikh (i.e. Imaam Barbahaaree) has stated here. So, the one who takes the people away from the Straight Path (and directs them) to the innovated paths of the innovators (in religious matters) is not one who intends good for them; rather he intends destruction for them. He is a devil, be it that he is a devil from amongst the Jinn or the people. It is obligated to us to be more careful of this (second person) than the first one because this one (i.e. the second) intends to misguide the people.

And regarding the statement of Imaam Barbahaaree: “He is astray, leading others astray, a rebellious devil”, Al-Allaamah Saalih Al-Fawzaan stated: He is misguided and misguiding others- a rebellious devil, a rebel intending to turn the people from the Straight Path.

And regarding the statement of Imaam Barbahaaree, “It is a duty upon those who know of him to warn the people against him and to explain his condition to them so that no one falls into his innovation and is destroyed”, Al-Allaamah Saalih Al-Fawzaan commented on the above statement, saying: It is not permissible to keep quiet about this one who leaves the truth intentionally; rather it is obligatory to unveil his affair and uncover his vileness until the people are warned about him. And it is not to be said that the people are free to hold views, freedom of speech and respecting the views of others, as say present with regards to [having] respect for the views of others. The affair is not about views; [rather] the affair is about Ittibaa [i.e. following the authentic proofs narrated from the Messenger accompanied with the understanding of the pious predecessors]. Allah has outlined a clear path for us, and He told us to adhere to it, when He [Glorified be He] stated: [وَأَنَّ هَٰذَا صِرَاطِي مُسْتَقِيمًا فَاتَّبِعُوهُ] ‘And verily, this is my Straight Path, so follow it’ [6:153]

If any person comes to us and wants us to leave this straight path, firstly we reject his statement. Secondly, we clarify and warn the people against him and we do not keep quiet about him; because if we keep quiet about him, the people will be deceived by him, especially if he is an eloquent person with (skillful) writing and education because the people will be deceived by him and will say, “This one is competent, this one is from the thinkers” as is taking place today. Therefore, the affair is very dangerous, and regarding this is a reason to refute the one in opposition, as opposed to what those who say, “Abandon the refutations, leave the people, everyone has his views and have respect for him”. By way of this (so-called) respect for the views and freedom of speech, the Ummah will be destroyed. The Salaf (pious predecessors) did not keep quiet about the likes of these people; rather they exposed and refuted them due to their knowledge of the danger upon Ummah. We do not keep quiet about their evil; rather that which Allah has revealed must be clarified, otherwise, we will be from those who conceal the truth-those whom Allah spoke of (saying): [إِنَّ الَّذِينَ يَكْتُمُونَ مَا أَنْزَلْنَا مِنَ الْبَيِّنَاتِ وَالْهُدَىٰ مِنْ بَعْدِ مَا بَيَّنَّاهُ لِلنَّاسِ فِي الْكِتَابِ ۙ أُولَٰئِكَ يَلْعَنُهُمُ اللَّهُ وَيَلْعَنُهُمُ اللَّاعِنُونَ – Verily, those who conceal the clear proofs, evidences and the guidance, which We have sent down, after We have made it clear for the people in the Book, they are the ones cursed by Allaah and cursed by the cursers].'[2:159]

The affair is not limited to the innovator, rather it is extended to the one who keeps quiet about him (i.e. the one who deliberately keeps quiet whilst being aware about him). Rebuke and punishment (i.e. warning) are extended to him because it is obligatory to clarify. [4]

Your Love and Hate Towards Engaging With Ahlul Bidah Are Weak, Unstable, or Corrupt

 Imam As-Saaboonee, may Allah have mercy upon him, said:

 They (Ahlul Hadith) hate Ahlul Bid’ah – those who initiate into the religion what is not from it. They neither love them nor keep company with them. They neither listen to their speech nor sit with them. They neither argue with them about the religion nor debate with them”.

 Al-Allamah Rabee Bin Haadee Al-Mad’khali, may Allah preserve him, stated:

Is this from themselves (their understanding), or is it guidance from Allah and His Messenger, as well as the practices of the righteous predecessors? Allah, Glorified and Exalted be He, has cautioned us against Ahlul Bidah, making it clear that they are people driven by their desires and that they follow the Mutashaabihaat while neglecting the Muhkamaat. Aa’isha, may Allah be pleased with her, reported that the Messenger, peace and blessings of Allah be upon him, recited this verse:

هُوَ الَّذِي أَنزَلَ عَلَيْكَ الْكِتَابَ مِنْهُ آيَاتٌ مُّحْكَمَاتٌ هُنَّ أُمُّ الْكِتَابِ وَأُخَرُ مُتَشَابِهَاتٌ ۖ فَأَمَّا الَّذِينَ فِي قُلُوبِهِمْ زَيْغٌ فَيَتَّبِعُونَ مَا تَشَابَهَ مِنْهُ ابْتِغَاءَ الْفِتْنَةِ وَابْتِغَاءَ تَأْوِيلِهِ ۗ وَمَا يَعْلَمُ تَأْوِيلَهُ إِلَّا اللَّهُ ۗ وَالرَّاسِخُونَ فِي الْعِلْمِ يَقُولُونَ آمَنَّا بِهِ كُلٌّ مِّنْ عِندِ رَبِّنَا ۗ وَمَا يَذَّكَّرُ إِلَّا أُولُو الْأَلْبَابِ

It is He Who has sent down to you [Muhammad] the Book [this Qur’an]. In it are Verses that are (entirely clear, they are the foundations of the Book [and those are the Verses of Al-Ahkaam (commandments, etc.), Al-Faraa’id (obligatory duties), and Al-Hudood (legal laws for the punishment of thieves, adulterers, etc.)]; and others are Mutashaabihaat (i.e. not entirely clear in what they indicate, so they are to be referred back to the Muhkamaat to be explained]. So, as for those in whose hearts there is a deviation (from the truth) they follow that which is not entirely clear thereof, seeking Al-Fitnah (polytheism and trials, etc.), and seeking for its hidden meanings, but none knows its hidden meanings except Allaah. And those who are firmly grounded in knowledge say: ‘’We believe in it; the whole of it (clear and unclear Verses) are from our Lord.” And none receive admonition except men of understanding.’’ [Aal Imraan. 7]

She said: The Messenger said, “If you see those who follow thereof that is not entirely clear, then they are those whom Allah has named [as having deviation (from the truth)] so beware of them”. [Al-Bukhaari 4547]

Allah has made it clear that they harbour (misguided, vain) desires and deviations, and that they intend to mislead both themselves and others. They seek trials and aim to misguide the people, which is why the Messenger has addressed them and elucidated their state. He stated, “Indeed, there will emerge a group from my Ummah in whom desires will flow as rabies flows in a dog.” Ahlul Sunnah undoubtedly detests Ahlul Bidah, and Imam As-Saaboonee has noted that senior scholars of Ahlul Hadith unanimously share this sentiment. However, among Ahlul Bidah, there exist Du’aat (callers to their innovations) who should neither be engaged in conversation nor debated with, except in cases of necessity and for a Maslahah (a carefully considered benefit recognized by rightly guided scholars). (In other circumstances), it is impermissible to engage in debate with them.

It is impermissible to debate with the Rawaafid if you are weak (in knowledge and character); except for a man who is firmly grounded in knowledge and religion, (well-versed) in citing proofs, smart, and possesses (force and strength to effectively engage in debate using clear proofs without being swayed by doubts). Therefore, if he perceives a benefit in debating them, he may proceed to do so. [وَجَادِلْهُم بِالَّتِي هِيَ أَحْسَنُ – and argue with them in a way that is better].

This is the legislated debate. Allah did not close the door of debate completely, thus if we have a way of establishing the proof and guiding the people to good, we follow it. The one who is debated with may not benefit but others may benefit. Regarding the weak individual, the answer is no. Even among scholars, there exists one who may be considered weak and another who is misled by Shub’hah (a matter that superficially resembles the truth but is, in fact, false). He may be a scholar, but weak in his character, thus rendering him vulnerable in the presence of Ahlul Bidah, even if they are younger or possess less knowledge than he does. This has occurred to many who ascribe to the Sunnah and Hadith due to their weakness and opposition to the methodology of the pious predecessors. For example is Al Bayhaqqi, who was from the seniors of Ahlul Hadith and their scholars, yet he was misled by certain Ashaa’irah, such as Ibn Fawrak and his associates, ultimately led him into Ash’ariyyah. How many young individuals in this current era have faced ruin at the hands of Ahlul Bidah!

How many youths, middle-aged men and university graduates have fallen victim to the deceptions of Ahlul Bidah, thereby becoming ensnared in their influence?! They are deceived by the groups (i.e. deviated groups), thus leading them to succumb (to these falsehoods). This is because they did not act upon the Messenger’s statement: “If you see those who follow thereof that is not entirely clear, then they are those whom Allah has named (as having deviation), so beware of them”.  The resolute individual calls Ahlul Bidah, the Christians. There has to be Dawah in the path of Allah and strong scholars who can convey the religion ordained by Allah. When necessary, they debate so that the proofs are established and benefit one who is to benefit. [5]

You Lack The Sound Foundational Principles Necessary For Accurately Evaluating, Recognising, and Classifying Errors, While Also Being Perplexed About The Clear and Detailed distinction Between The Path of Ahlus Sunnah and that of Ahlul Bidah

 Al-Allaamah Rabee Bin Haadee Al-Madkhali [may Allah preserve him] said:

After speaking about those who make Takfir based on falsehood (a) amongst the different factions of the Jahmiyah (b), the Khawaarij (c), the Rawaafid and the Qadariyyah (d), and the reason behind such Takfir, Shaikh Al-Islaam Ibn Taymiyyah, may Allah have mercy upon him, said: “On the opposite side of these people who make Takfir based on falsehood, there are people who do not know the creed of Ahlus Sunnah Wal-Jamaa’ah as it should be, or they know some and are ignorant of some. Perhaps what they know of it, they do not clarify for the people, rather they conceal it. Neither do they forbid Bidah nor censure Ahlul Bidah and punish them; rather, they may censure speech related to the Sunnah and the fundamental principles of the religion – completely – and would not differentiate between what Ahlus Sunnah Wal Jamaa’ah say and what Ahlul Bidah Wal-Furqah say, or they would affirm all their differing Madhabs (creeds, paths) like how the scholars would affirm the different opinions related to affairs of Ijtihaad regarding which difference of opinion is justified. (e) This path has overwhelmed many of the Murji’ah, some of the jurists, those pursuing the path of asceticism, and the philosophers, just as it has overwhelmed – first and foremost – many of the people of desires and rhetoric. Both these paths are perverted, outside the Book [i.e. The Qur’an] and the Sunnah”.

After quoting the above statement from Shaikh Al-Islam Ibn Taymiyyah, Al-Allaamah Rabee Bin Haadi Al-Mad’khali said, “I say, may Allah have mercy on Ibn Tamiyyah. Indeed, he clarified the situation of the people of his era and those before them, then what if he saw the situation of many amongst the Al-Jamaa’aat Al-Hizbiyyah Wal-Bid’iyyah (The Groups of Illegal Partisanship and Bidah (f) who ascribe themselves to Ahlus Sunnah Wal-Jamaa’ah and take cover behind them – in particular – to promote their falsehoods?! What if he saw them whilst they have gathered between the Madhabs (creeds paths) of the two groups- the khawaarij and those who follow their way in pronouncing Takfir in the subject matter of Al-Haakimiyyah (g) and the way of the Mur’ji’ah (h) in the manner they approach the affair of people who are upon the big and numerous innovations in religious affairs, and equating innovation in religion to those affairs of the religion in which Ijtihaad is justified, whose people are rewarded alongside a refutation against their mistakes! In the view of these people, the leaders of Misguidance and Bidah are like the Imams of Guidance and Sunnah”. (i) [6]

Shaikh Al-Islam Ibn Taymiyah continued: “Rather what is obligatory is to clarify that which Allah sent His Messengers with and (revealed) in His Books- propagate that which the Messengers brought from Allah and fulfill the covenant which Allah took from the scholars. Therefore, it is obligatory to know that which the Messengers brought, believe in it, propagate it, call to it, strive with it, weigh up all that which the people embark upon – [statements, actions, religious fundamentals and subsidiary issues pertaining to the apparent actions of the Limbs and affairs related to actions of the heart]- under the Book of Allah and the Sunnah of His Messenger, neither following desires [through] customs, a school of law, a religious order, a leader or a predecessor, nor following conjecture through a weak hadeeth or corrupt analogy, regardless whether it is an analogy that offers some degree of certainty or not, or blindly following someone who it is not obligated to follow his statement and action because Allah -in His Book – has censured those who follow conjecture and that which their souls desire, whilst they abandon following that which came to them from their Lord of Guidance”. [7]

 

You Are Filled With Fear of Returning to The Noble Path of Pious Predecessors to Adjudicate All affairs.

 Al-Allaamah Rabee Bin Haadi Al-Madkhalee, may Allaah preserve him, stated:

All of you hold onto the Rope of Allaah [i.e. The Qur’an and authentic Sunnah]- Allaah will aid you in this and make you like the sun; return to the understanding of the righteous predecessors, and it is, as I said to you, transmitted (and established) in your presence. This is a challenge to those who oppose this. We are challenging Ahlul Bidah Wal Ahwaa (the proponents of innovation in religious matters and followers of vain desires) in their creed and politics. We say, between us and you is the (path, understanding of the) pious predecessors and books (of the pious predecessors). Ahmad [i.e. Imaam Ahmad] used to say to the proponents of innovation in religious affairs, “Between us and you are the funerals (i.e. whose funeral will be attended by Ahlus Sunnah in great numbers)”. We say (i.e. at present), “Between us and you are the books (of the pious predecessors)- the books are present! Allah said to His Messenger: [قل فَأْتُوا بِالتَّوْرَاةِ فَاتْلُوهَا إِنْ كُنْتُمْ صَادِقِينَ – All food was lawful to the Children of Israel, except what Israel made unlawful for himself before the Taurat (Torah) was revealed. Say (O Muhammad ): “Bring here the Taurat (Torah) and recite it, if you are truthful]. So they present the Torah and you prove them to be upon falsehood.

We bring the books of the pious predecessors – the Qur’an, the Sunnah, the books of Al-Bukhari, Muslim, Abu Dawood, at-Tirmidhi, an-Nasaa’ee, and what was authored by Ahmad and others; we bring them (to prove) those who are on the path of these (pious predecessors) and those who turn away and oppose them. Just as Allah challenged the Jews to bring the Torah, so the Torah was brought and they were exposed them; (likewise), we challenge these people to bring the books of the pious predecessors, so that the innovator in religious affairs is exposed, and to clarify who the deviants are- whether us or them? Are they able to challenge? Can they open their mouths like this? We fill our mouths with courage – challenge everyone who says that we are upon other than the methodology of the pious predecessors. We, by Allaah, call to the methodology of the pious predecessors- to the Book of Allaah and the Sunnah of Allah’s Messenger, peace and blessings of Allah be upon him. We use the book of Allaah and the Sunnah as proof for our beliefs, our acts of worship, our dealings with rulers and their subjects, in dealing with the groups and sects. As for the others, they are upon tricks, deception, etc By Allah, you will not find with them anything but tricks and manipulating the emotions of youth. [8]

Ibn Aqeel, may Allah have mercy upon him, said: If the truthful ones were to keep silent and the falsifiers speak, then the creation would have relinquished what they have witnessed (of truth) and rejected what they have not witnessed. So when the devout one desires to revive the Prophetic path, the people would reject it and think that it innovation in religion. [9]

You Are Filled With Fear and Unease at The Prospect of Being Isolated and Attacked When They Hold Onto Clarity Regardless of The Large Numbers of People In Opposition

 Imaam Abu Shaamah, may Allah have mercy upon him, said: “When the command to adhere to the Jamaa’ah (the main body) is (mentioned), then the intent behind it is to adhere to the truth, even if those who follow it are few and those who oppose it are numerous. That is because the truth is that which the first Jamaa’ah was upon- the Prophet [peace and blessings of Allaah be upon him] and his companions [may Allah be pleased with them]- and one does not give consideration to the numerous people of falsehood”. [10]

 Imam Abdul Azeez Bin Baaz, may Allah have mercy upon him,  said:

Let every Muslim be careful of being deceived by the great numbers [of people upon such and such idea, view, belief, way of life, etc], whilst saying, “Indeed, the people have become such and such, and have become accustomed to such and such, so I am with them”. This is a great calamity, for indeed many people of the past were destroyed due to this [i.e. blindly following the majority]. Therefore, O sensible one! It is obligated on you to examine yourself; take account of yourself and adhere to the truth, even if the people abandon it. Beware of what Allaah has forbidden, even if the people do it, for indeed the truth is more worthy of being followed, just as Allaah [The Most High] said: [وَإِنْ تُطِعْ أَكْثَرَ مَنْ فِي الْأَرْضِ يُضِلُّوكَ عَنْ سَبِيلِ اللَّه ِ -And if you obey most of those on earth, they will mislead you far away from Allah’s Path. [Surah Al An-aam Ayah 116]

And Allah [The Most High] said: [ وَمَآ أَڪۡثَرُ ٱلنَّاسِ وَلَوۡ حَرَصۡتَ بِمُؤۡمِنِينَ-And most of mankind will not believe even if you desire it eagerly]. [Surah Yusuf Ayah 103] [11]

Al-Allaamah Muqbil Bin Haadee Al-Waadi’ee, may Allah have mercy upon him, said:

If numbers are the scale by way of which you judge, then the majority are mostly blameworthy; and if persuasive speech and eloquence is the scale by way of which you judge, then indeed Allah described the Munaafiqoon that they have tongues that utter beautiful speech. Allah said: [وَإِن يَقُولُواْ تَسۡمَعۡ لِقَوۡلِهِمۡ – And when they speak, you listen to their words]. [Al-Munaafiqoon. 4]

Therefore, what is given consideration is that one knows the people of truth by their characteristics – that they call to the Book of Allah and the Sunnah of Allah’s Messenger [peace and blessings of Allah be upon him, his family, and companions], and they neither desire reward from the people nor seeking to be thanked. [12]

Al-Allamah Salih Al-Fawzan, may Allah preserve him, stated:

A large number of people around a person is not proof that such a person is virtuous because some of the Prophets were only followed by a few people. “A Prophet will come on the day of judgment with a few followers and a Prophet will come with no followers”. [Bukhaari 5705]. Therefore, does this mean that such a Prophet is not virtuous? Absolutely not! A person does not look at the large number of people who are present because the Prophet [peace and blessings of Allah be upon him] said to Ali, “If Allah gives guidance to a single man through you, it is better for you than possessing red camels”. [Bukhaari 3009]

The Shaikh, may Allah preserve him, also stated, “Ahlus Sunnah Wal Jamaa’ah is not harmed by those who oppose them. If you are with them- all praise is due to Allah, they are pleased with this because indeed they want good for the people. If you oppose them, you cannot harm them and due to this the Messenger, peace and blessings of Allah be upon him, said, “There will not cease to be a group of my Ummah who will be manifest upon the truth- not harmed by those who forsake them until the command of Allaah comes to pass (i.e. the day of judgment) whilst they are (still) upon that (truth)”. The one in opposition does not harm except himself. What is given consideration is not the great numbers; rather what is given consideration is to agree with the truth, even if a small number of people were upon it. And even if in some eras there is only one person (upon truth), then he is the one upon truth and he is the Jamaa’ah. The Jamaa’ah does not necessitate great numbers; rather the Jamaa’ah is what is in agreement with the truth – in agreement with the Book and the Sunnah, even if those upon it are few. However, if many come together and (upon) truth, then – all praise is due to Allah- this is strength. But if the majority oppose it (i.e. the truth), then we side with the truth even if only a few are upon it”. [13]

We ask Allah:

 اللَّهُمَّ إِنِّي أَسْأَلُكَ الثَّبَاتَ فِي الْأَمْرِ، وَالْعَزِيمَةَ عَلَى الرُّشْدِ

O Allah! Indeed, I ask You for steadfastness in this affair (regarding sound adherence to the religion) and firm resolve to adhere to the path of guidance. [14]

 

اللّهُـمَّ رَبَّ جِـبْرائيل ، وَميكـائيل ، وَإِسْـرافيل، فاطِـرَ السَّمواتِ وَالأَرْض ، عالـِمَ الغَيْـبِ وَالشَّهـادَةِ أَنْـتَ تَحْـكمُ بَيْـنَ عِبـادِكَ فيـما كانوا فيهِ يَخْتَلِفـون. اهدِنـي لِمـا اخْتُـلِفَ فيـهِ مِنَ الْحَـقِّ بِإِذْنِك ، إِنَّـكَ تَهْـدي مَنْ تَشـاءُ إِلى صِراطٍ مُسْتَقـيم

O Allah! Lord of Jibraa’eel, Meekaa’eel, and Israafeel, Creator of the heavens and the Earth, The Knower of the seen and the unseen. You judge between Your slaves regarding in that which they differ. Guide me to the truth regarding that in which there is differing, by Your Will. Verily, You guide whomever you will to the straight path. [15]

 

اللَّهُمَّ بِعِلْمِكَ الْغَيْبَ وَقُدْرَتِكَ عَلَى الْخَلْقِ أَحْيِنِي مَا عَلِمْتَ الْحَيَاةَ خَيْراً لِي وَتَوَفَّنِي إِذَا عَلِمْتَ الْوَفَاةَ خَيْراً لِي، اللَّهُمَّ إِنِّي أَسْأَلُكَ خَشْيَتَكَ فِي الْغَيْبِ وَالشَّهَادَةِ، وَأَسْأَلُكَ كَلِمَةَ الْحَقِّ فِي الرِّضَا وَالْغَضَبِ، وَأَسْأَلُكَ الْقَصْدَ فِي الْغِنَى وَالْفَقْرِ، وَأَسْأَلُكَ نَعِيماً لَا يَنْفَذُ، وَأَسْأَلُكَ قُرَّةَ عَيْنٍ لَا تَنْقَطِعُ، وَأَسْأَلُكَ الرِّضِا بَعْدَ الْقَضَاءِ، وَأَسْأَلُكَ بَرْدَ الْعَيْشِ بَعْدَ الْمَوْتِ، وَأَسْأَلُكَ لَذَّةَ النَّظَرِ إِلَى وَجْهِكَ وَالشَّوْقَ إِلَى لِقَائِكَ فِي غَيْرِ ضَرَّاءَ مُضِرَّةٍ وَلَا فِتْنَةٍ مُضِلَّةٍ، اللَّهُمَّ زَيِّنَّا بِزِينَةِ الْإِيمَانِ

وَاجْعَلْنَا هُدَاةً مُهْتَدِينَ

O Allah! By Your Knowledge of the unseen and by Your Power over creation, let me live if life is good for me, and let me die if death is good for me; O Allah! I ask You to grant me (the blessing of having) fear of You in private and public, and I ask You (to make me utter) a statement of truth in times of contentment and anger, and I ask You for moderation when in a state of wealth and poverty, and I ask you for blessings that never ceases, and I ask You for the coolness of my eye that never ends, and I ask You (to make me pleased) after (Your) decree; and I ask You for a life of (ease, comfort, tranquillity, etc) after death; I ask You for the delight of looking at Your Face (i.e. in the Hereafter) and yearning to meet You without any harm and misleading trials (coming upon me). O Allah! Adorn us with the adornment of Iman, and make us (from those who are) guided and guiding (others). [16]

 

اللَّهُمَّ أَصْلِحْ لِي دِينِي الَّذِي هُوَ عِصْمَةُ أَمْرِي

وَأَصْلِحْ لِي دُنْيَايَ الَّتِي فِيهَا مَعَاشِي

 وَأَصْلِحْ لِي آخِرَتِي الَّتِي فِيهَا مَعَادِي

 وَاجْعَلِ الْحَيَاةَ زِيَادَةً لِي فِي كُلِّ خَيْرٍ

 وَاجْعَلِ الْمَوْتَ رَاحَةً لِي مِنْ كُلِّ شَرٍّ

 O Allah! Rectify my religion for me, which is the safeguard of my affairs; rectify my worldly [affairs], wherein is my livelihood; and rectify my Afterlife to which is my return; and make life for me [as a means of] increase in every good and make death for me as a rest from every evil. [17]

 ———————————

 Footnotes:

 [a] What is Takfeer? Read here by Shaikh Abu Khadeejah: https://abukhadeejah.com/no-muslim-leaves-islam-unless-he-does-something-that-nullifies-it/

 [b] Who are the Jahmiyah? https://www.aqidah.com/creed/articles/xiyvh-the-first-deniers-of-allaahs-speech-a-chain-of-evil-narrators.cfm

 [c] https://abukhadeejah.com/isis-in-iraq-syria-ibn-kathir-died-774-ah-if-the-khawaarij-ever-gained-strength-in-iraq-and-syria-there-would-be-mass-killing/

 [d] Who are the Rawafid and Qadariyyah? https://abukhadeejah.com/the-devils-deception-of-the-raafidah-shiah/ http://www.aqidah.com/creed/articles/hxnhe-the-splitting-of-the-muslim-ummah-part-3.cfm

 [e] What is Ijtihaad: https://www.abukhadeejah.com/tolerated-differing-and-impermissible-differing-in-islaam/ ]

 [f] What is Hizbiyyah – illegal partisanship:

https://salafidawahmanchester.com/2015/03/a-precise-definition-of-hizbiyyah-by-shaikh-rabee-may-allaah-preserve-him/ ]

https://salafidawahmanchester.com/2019/01/what-is-the-meaning-of-hizbiyyah-and-what-is-the-ruling-upon-it-shaykh-ubaid-al-jaabiree/

 [g] What is Al-Haakimiyyah?

http://www.salafipublications.com/sps/sp.cfm?secID=MNJ&subsecID=MNJ07&loadpage=displaysubsection.cfm

 [h] Who are the Murji’ah?

http://www.sahihalbukhari.com/sps/sp.cfm?secID=GSC&subsecID=GSC05&loadpage=displaysubsection.cfm

 [i] Read this article by Shaikh Abu Iyaadh: http://www.themadkhalis.com/md/series/the-false-comparison-between-hadith-giants-ibn-hajar-an-nawawi-and-20th-century-ignoramuses.cfm

 https://www.abukhadeejah.com/shaikh-rabees-advice-on-interacting-with-ahlul-bidah-in-the-west/

 Who Are The Salafis

 http://www.salafis.com/index.cfm

 What is Salafism? Download the free eBook and read about the most important aspects of Salafiyyah.

 https://www.abukhadeejah.com/what-is-salafism-and-salafiyyah/

 What is our da’wah, the call to Salafiyyah? The defining features

 https://www.abukhadeejah.com/what-is-our-dawah-the-call-to-salafiyyah-the-defining-features/

 A response to Western academics who categorise Salafis into Quietists, Politicos and Jihadists – and why this is a false categorisation

 https://www.abukhadeejah.com/a-response-to-western-academics-who-categorise-salafis-into-quietists-politicos-and-jihadists-and-why-this-is-a-false-categorisation/

Shaikh Rabee’s Relationship with the scholars and their praises for him–even though Abu Eesa and his affiliates amongst the slanderous devils increase in hatred

http://www.themadkhalis.com/md/articles/hyulz-the-relationship-between-shaykh-rabee-al-madkhali-and-the-major-scholars-part-1.cfm

http://www.themadkhalis.com/md/articles/bqouy-the-relationship-between-shaykh-rabee-al-madkhali-and-the-major-scholars-part-2.cfm

 

The Madkhali Myth

http://www.themadkhalis.com/md/categories/shaykh-rabee.cfm

Why Shaikh Rabee is Attacked?

http://www.themadkhalis.com/md/articles/epluy-shaykh-ibn-uthaymin-the-people-began-to-tarnish-shaykh-rabee-with-faults-after-he-spoke-about-some-of-their-symbolic-figureheads.cfm

Salafi Scholars Praise Shaikh Rabee

https://video.link/w/aDhc?src=syt

Is Shaikh Rabee’ Ibn Haadee A Great Scholar Of This Era?

https://www.abukhadeejah.com/is-shaikh-rabee-ibn-haadee-a-great-scholar-of-this-era/

[1]: Translation by Shaikh Abu Iyaad: https://www.thenoblequran.com/q/#/search/6_55%5D

[2]: Tafseer ibn Katheer

[3]: An Excerpt from ‘Al-Fawaa’d pages 167-180

[4]: An Excerpt from It’haaful Qaaree Bitta’liqaat Alaa Sharhis Sunnah Lil Imaam Barbahaaree, Vol 1, page: 110-115

[5] An Excerpt from “Sharh Aqeedah As-Salaf Ashaab Al-Hadeeth’ pages 301 onwards

[6] An Excerpt from “Al-Mahajjatul Baydaa Fee Himaayatis Suunatil Gharraa Min Zallaati Ahlil Akhtaa’i Wa Zayghi Ahlil Ahwaa” 117-118

[7] Majmoo Al-Fataawaa 12/467-468

[8]  https://youtu.be/mxXSfKh_sjw paraphrased

[9] Shifaa As-Sudoor Fee Ziyaaratil Mashaahid Wal-Quboor page 148

[10] Al-Baa’ith Alaa Inkaaril Bid’ah Wal-Hawaadith’ page 22

[11] An Excerpt from ‘Majmoo Al-Fataawaa 12/ 412

[12] قم المعاند – 2/547

[13] An Excerpt from ( لمحة عن الفرق الضالة )– pages 14 -15

[14]  Irwaa al-Ghaleel 1/115

[15] Saheeh Muslim 770

[16] As-Saheehah Number 1301

[17] Sahih Muslim. 2720]

 

 

 

[12] O Faris Al-Hammadi! The time has arrived for your deceitful and absurd statements to be unveiled for all to see! [Cautioning Our Beloved Youth Regarding Individuals Whose Statements and Stances Lack Clarity and Precision]

Written by Abdullah Jallow on . Posted in Brotherhood, Contemporary Issues, Methodology - 'Manhaj', Morals and Manners - 'Akhlaaq', Refutations.

In The Name of Allah, The Most Merciful, The Bestower of Mercy.

Imam Al-Bukhaari [may Allah have mercy upon him] said: Chapter: “Avoiding the use of tricks. And everybody will get the reward according to his intention in Imaan (belief) and other than it”. Umar Ibn Al-Khattab, may Allah be pleased with him, said that the Prophet, peace and blessings of Allah be upon him, said, “The reward of deeds depends upon the intentions, and every person will get the reward according to what he intended. So, whoever emigrates for Allaah and His Messenger, then his emigration will be for Allaah and His Messenger, and whoever emigrates to take a worldly benefit or for a woman to marry, then his emigration will be for what he emigrated for”. [Al-Bukhaari Number 6953]

Imam Abdul Azeez Bin Baaz, may Allah have mercy upon him, said, “Trickery has no place in Ibaadaat or Mu’aamalaat. Thus, it is essential to handle matters through the correct channels”. [1]

While it is not our assertion that general statements are entirely prohibited or devoid of merit in every instance, it is essential to recognise that there are moments when specificity is not just preferred but imperative. How can one justify the absence of detail in situations where clarity is paramount, especially when the speaker resorts to ambiguous language, thereby failing to articulate their position in contexts that demand precision? We reiterate that general speech holds value when appropriate; however, it becomes problematic when the speaker leaves others in a state of uncertainty regarding matters that necessitate transparency, as some may wield vague language as a means of evasion and to shirk accountability. In this regard, Faris alluded to a people (Salafipublications) that is widely reviled by those who disdain detailed elucidation and openness concerning the principles of the Manhaj. He then proceeded to make a nebulous statement: “I disagree with some of the things they say but they are my brothers.” This raises the question of whether Faris was simply expressing disagreement without conviction or if he was apprehensive about engaging in a substantive, knowledge-based dialogue had he chosen to clarify his true intentions. Imam Ibn Al-Qayyim, may Allah have mercy upon him, stated in An-Nuniyyah:

قال ابن القيم: وعـلـيك بالتفصيل والتبيين فالإجمال والإطلاق دون بيان
قد أفسدا هذا الوجود وخبـطا الأذهان والآراء كل زمـان

“It is obligated to you to provide detailed explanations and clarifications, as generalisations and unrestricted (speech) without elaboration (clarification) have corrupted the existence and confused minds and opinions throughout all times”.

As we mentioned in part 11 of this series, unless Faris has retracted his statement or provided clarification—of which we are unaware at the time of writing this article—it is imperative that we remain discerning regarding such sweeping assertions. This is particularly crucial for those of us who have not observed the ambiguities during the years 1993-1995, a period when I and others were not yet guided to this blessed Salafi Manhaj. It was only in the summer of 1995 that Allah bestowed His guidance upon me and others, leading us to embrace this blessed Manhaj.

In this article, we intend to caution our brothers and sisters about the potential pitfalls of ambiguous statements, stances and affiliations, whether they originate from Faris or any future individual claiming allegiance to the Sunnah and its followers. Such vagueness can mislead the unwary observer, fostering misunderstandings and uncertainty regarding various interpretations. Reflecting on the early 1990s, when we were not yet Salafiyyoon, we recall how unclear information surrounding contentious issues often compelled us to rely on our own assumptions, prior knowledge, or personal biases. The ramifications of the Gulf War were strikingly apparent in our conversations, particularly concerning the American military’s deployment in Saudi Arabia, the persistent Algerian civil conflict, and the misplaced fervour that engulfed us with each update from a newsletter published by some students at the university mosque. This publication frequently highlighted the ambushes carried out by the so-called Mujahidin against government forces. Likewise, we had discussions about the influential senior scholars, the rulers, and those we erroneously deemed genuine scholars, such as Salman and Safar, whom we considered steadfast due to their  imprisonment. The confinement of Salam and Safar, a consequence of their own transgressions, was subsequently likened to the imprisonment of Shaikh Al-Islam Ibn Taymiyyah. This comparison was employed to persuade us that only the genuine scholars of our time face imprisonment, akin to the fate of Shaikh Al-Islam. Such uncertainty lingered in our minds until it was later elucidated by the Salafiyyoon, who provided compelling evidence that Shaikh Al-Islam’s imprisonment stemmed from his steadfast defense of the Aqeedah of the Salaf, in stark contrast to Salam and Safar, who were aligned with the Qutubiyyah.

Our situation and that of others – whilst in search of truth of truth among the divergent groups of Bidah- deteriorated further as the lack of sound Aqeedah and Manhaj left individuals grappling with uncertainty, devoid of the immediate sound knowledge-based clarifications provided by the Salafiyyoon. Those who thrived in this murky and ambiguous environment sought to evade responsibility, concealed vital information, and shun commitment. Meanwhile, some deliberately employed ambiguous expressions, relishing the confusion, as it allowed them to sidestep the potential guilt and rejection that might arise when the truth eventually comes to light for the unsuspecting.

That period between 1993 and the beginning of 1995 proved to be exceptionally challenging and perilous in our pursuit of truth, as the ambiguous rhetoric coupled with misleading comparisons obscured our understanding and complicated our ability to contest the notions propagated by different groups. Consequently, we often concluded, particularly in 1994, that conclusive evidence eluded all parties. We observed that in the realm of ambiguity, even the most ludicrous assertions can be articulated by those who prioritised persuasion over truth. However, upon our encounter with the Salafiyyoon, we discovered their communication to be marked by clarity and precision. In the summer of 1995, by the grace of Allah, we were privileged to listen to speakers from Salafipublications whom we now regard as our senior teachers in the West. They eloquently shared their profound insights on a myriad of subjects, encompassing various sects, groups, organisations, and their prominent leaders, as well as the scholars’ perspectives on diverse Manhaj issues. Their reflections on the intricate themes of love and animosity, the perils of hizbiyyah, and the essential call for unity along the Salafi path were delivered with remarkable clarity and resonance. They imparted a wealth of knowledge that surpassed anything we had previously encountered, standing in stark contrast to the general rhetoric that had allowed the wrongdoers to mislead us with their narrow narratives, obscuring the truth to serve their agendas.

Therefore, we earnestly implore our beloved youth to maintain a discerning eye against the seductive nature of ambiguity and uncertainty irrespective of its intensity or the topics it may encompass, for it serves merely as a deceptive tactic designed to obscure the truth. Beware of those who resort to evasive language or vague insinuations to evade the label of dishonesty. Such individuals may offer insufficient descriptions and make nebulous negative remarks, only to withhold further clarification. This calculated reticence is intended to pique the curiosity of others, drawing them into a web of speculation that aligns with the original speaker’s thoughts, thereby securing their unwitting endorsement.

We also encountered individuals who employed vague and ambiguous language concerning unity, often due to their lack of understanding. To appear credible, they resorted to fabricating ideas, filling the voids in their knowledge with platitudes, generic assertions, and unfounded assumptions. Lacking a robust methodology akin to that of the Salafiyyoon at Salafipublications and elsewhere, they produced contradictory and disorganised statements. We once witnessed a single Salafi engaging in debate with them, armed with Sharhus Sunnah and Usoolus Sunnah, ultimately prevailing over all. Following Allah’s grace in 1995, we resolutely rejected any vague, ambiguous, or general discourse from individuals whose circumstances and positions raised doubts, based on their displayed affiliations and associations. Their ambiguous remarks misled many regarding the principles of enjoining good and forbidding evil, particularly concerning rulers, collaboration with various groups and figureheads, and the delicate balance of harm and benefit in the arena of Dawah and cooperation. It was only through Allah’s guidance, facilitated through Salafipublications, that we were steered away from this peril.

Indeed, what we discovered when we first came into contact with Salafiyyoon is that their situation is not a contest of political victories and defeats, where individuals with personal stakes chase a collective aspiration, often at the expense of honesty, clarity, and thorough explanation. These virtues are often neglected or obscured in the name of a larger ambition pursued by the hizbiyyoon. Rather, we noticed that genuine solidarity in Salafiyyah is anchored in a shared robust Aqeedah and Manhaj, and not the deceptive practice of compromise at the expense of what Allah and His Messenger have ordained. This sinful compromise, along with a reluctance to express oneself candidly due to vested interests, reflected the insecurity and timidity of those who sidestepped the challenging truths and responsibilities that this Manhaj demands. Individuals, groups and parties that resorted to such vague communication at the university often feared that clear and honest expression will lead to disagreement from those who refrained from criticising them, resulting in potential criticism. Consequently, they opted for ambiguous language, hoping that others will interpret their “generous ambiguities” in ways that aligned with their perspectives. This approach reflected the mindset of those who lacked courage and prioritised their self-interest. We ask Allah to protect us from this calamity and every other evil until we meet him Aameen.

We conclude this article with several quotes to underscore the significance of clarity. Shaikh Al-Islam Ibn Taymiyyah, may Allah have mercy upon him, said: “It is incumbent that the expression conveys the intended meaning through the appropriate terminology. Should the term be explicit or evident, the objective is achieved. However, if the term possesses dual interpretations—one valid and the other erroneous—the intended meaning must be clarified. In instances where the term suggests a flawed interpretation, it should only be employed with an explanation that mitigates any potential misunderstanding. Furthermore, if the term may mislead certain listeners into grasping an incorrect meaning, it should not be used if it is known to carry such implications, as the primary aim of communication is clarity and understanding. Conversely, if the term accurately reflects the intended meaning but some individuals remain unaware of its significance without any negligence on the speaker’s part, the responsibility lies with the listener, not the speaker”. [2]

Imam Ibn Al-Qayyim, may Allah have mercy upon him, said: “The basis of Banee Adam’s misguidance stems from ‘General Terms’ and ‘Ambiguous Meanings’ (terms, meanings, statements) that can be interpreted as either truth or falsehood when not clearly defined). This issue is exacerbated when they interact with a confused mind, particularly when coupled with misguided desires and enthusiasm. Thus, seek the guidance of the One who stabilises hearts, asking Allah to strengthen your heart in His Religion and protect you from falling into this darkness”. [3]

He, may Allah have mercy upon him, also said: “If the speaker falls short in his clarification and addresses the listener with vague terms that may encompass various interpretations, and the listener remains uncertain of the intended meaning; if this arises from the speaker’s inability, the listener is given from the speaker’s inability rather than his intent. If the speaker possesses the ability and he does not do so while it is obligated to him to do so, he gives the listener from his evil intent”. [4]

We ask Allah:

اللَّهُمَّ أَصْلِحْ لِي دِينِي الَّذِي هُوَ عِصْمَةُ أَمْرِي
وَأَصْلِحْ لِي دُنْيَايَ الَّتِي فِيهَا مَعَاشِي
وَأَصْلِحْ لِي آخِرَتِي الَّتِي فِيهَا مَعَادِي
وَاجْعَلِ الْحَيَاةَ زِيَادَةً لِي فِي كُلِّ خَيْرٍ
وَاجْعَلِ الْمَوْتَ رَاحَةً لِي مِنْ كُلِّ شَرٍّ

O Allah! Rectify my religion for me, which is the safeguard of my affairs; rectify my worldly [affairs], wherein is my livelihood; and rectify my Afterlife to which is my return, and make life for me [as a means of] increase in every good and make death for me as a rest from every evil. [Saheeh Muslim Number: 2720]

To be continued…InShaAllah.

[1]: An Excerpt from “Al-Hulalul Ibreeziyyah Min Ta’leeqaat Al-Baaziyyah Alaa Saheeh Al-Bukhaari’ 4/353. footnote 1”

[2] Ar-Radd Alaa Al-Bakri 702-703

[3] As-Sawaa’iq Al-Mursalah 3/927

[4] As-Sawaa’iq Al-Mussalah 2/503

[11] O Faris Al-Hammadi! The time has arrived for your deceitful and absurd statements to be unveiled for all to see! [An Ambiguous Statement Regarding His Disagreements With Some Salafiyyoon]

Written by Abdullah Jallow on . Posted in Brotherhood, Contemporary Issues, Da'wah - Calling To Islam, Methodology - 'Manhaj', Morals and Manners - 'Akhlaaq', Refutations.

In The Name of Allah, The Most Merciful, The Bestower of Mercy.

Allah, The Exalted, said:

يَا أَيُّهَا الَّذِينَ آمَنُوا أَطِيعُوا اللَّهَ وَأَطِيعُوا الرَّسُولَ وَأُولِي الْأَمْرِ مِنْكُمْ فَإِنْ تَنَازَعْتُمْ فِي شَيْءٍ فَرُدُّوهُ إِلَى اللَّهِ وَالرَّسُولِ إِنْ كُنْتُمْ تُؤْمِنُونَ بِاللَّهِ وَالْيَوْمِ الْآخِرِ ذَلِكَ خَيْرٌ وَأَحْسَنُ تَأْوِيلًا

O you who have believed, obey Allāh and obey the Messenger and those in authority over you. And if you disagree among yourselves over anything then refer it back to Allāh and the Messenger if you truly believe in Allāh and the Last Day. That is better (conduct) and (leads to) the most excellent outcome. [1]

وَمَا اخْتَلَفْتُمْ فِيهِ مِنْ شَيْءٍ فَحُكْمُهُ إِلَى اللَّهِ

And in whatsoever you differ, the decision thereof is with Allah (He is the ruling Judge). [2]

The Messenger, peace and blessings of Allah be upon him, said: Shaytaan has despaired of being worshipped in your land (i.e. the Arabian Peninsula); however, he is content to be obeyed in other matters that you may consider trivial in your actions. Therefore, be cautious, for I have left among you that which, if you hold fast to it, will ensure you never go astray: the Book of Allah and the Sunnah of His Prophet. [3]

There are two types of differing: the first pertains to matters for which conclusive evidence exists, necessitating acceptance of the final decision. In such instances, the evidence must be acknowledged, and any opposing statements are to be disregarded. Those who adhere to a viewpoint that contradicts the established evidence are met with disapproval. The second category encompasses issues where conclusive evidence has not been established, leading to a situation where the evidence is either disputed or differing opinions prevail. This scenario falls under the realm of ijtihad, where no disapproval or reprimand is directed at those holding opposing views; instead, guidance is offered to help them understand the perspective that is deemed to carry more weight. [4]

Imam Ibn Al-Qayyim, may Allah have mercy upon him, said, “There is no excuse in the presence of Allah – on the day of judgment – for the one that the Prophetic reports and narrations reached in a subject matter of the religion- which is not opposed by any other texts – if he turns away from them”. [5]

Faris once stated about Salafipublications: “I disagree with some of the things they say but they are my brothers”.

First: We have not received any information regarding the specific points of disagreement that Faris has, whether they pertain to Aqeedah, Manhaj, or Fiqh matters, nor do we know if he has provided clarification supported by evidence. If he has indeed clarified his position with proof or retracted his statement, there would be no need to seek further clarification from him. However, if he has not provided such clarification, he remains in a state of uncertainty. As Salafiyyoon, we collaborate with our counterparts in both the East and the West, and we do not have differences in Aqeedah or Manhaj.

Secondly, neither Salafipublications nor anyone among us serves as the basis for determining truth or falsehood. Imam Sufyan Ibn Uyaynah, may Allah have mercy upon him, said: “The Messenger, peace and blessings of Allah be upon him, serves as the greatest criterion (for both humanity and Jinn), with all matters being submitted to him (for judgment) according to his manners, path, and guidance. Thus, anything that aligns with this is deemed to be the truth, while anything that contradicts it is considered falsehood”. [6]

Shaikh Al-Islam Ibn Taymiyyah, may Allah have mercy upon him, said: “Truth is determined by its alignment with evidence, regardless of the number of supporters or detractors. It is not the truth that is measured by individuals; rather, individuals are measured by the truth. The mere aversion of those who disagree or the affection of those who agree does not indicate the validity or invalidity of a statement”. [7]

Imam Muhammad Ibn Salih al-Uthaymin, may Allah have mercy upon him, said: “Every individual among people may have their statements accepted or rejected, except for the Messenger, peace and blessings of Allah be upon him, due to affirmation of infallibility of the one who legislates. In contrast, others may possess deficiencies in knowledge and understanding that necessitate the evaluation of their statements against the Shariah”. [8]

It is important to recognise that we all make mistakes. However, when someone like Faris expresses disagreement with certain statements made by some Salafiyyoon without providing specific examples, it raises important questions. If the points he disagrees with are insignificant, then his comments hold little value. Conversely, if these statements warrant attention, they should be identified and addressed. Otherwise, simply stating a disagreement lacks any real benefit.

As for Salafipublications, they are known to be dedicated to the pursuit of truth. To this day, Allah has granted their senior teachers profound clarity in both Aqeedah and Manhaj. Renowned scholars such as Al-Allamah Rabee, may Allah preserve him, Al-Allaamah Ubaid Bin Abdillah Al-Jabiri, and Al-Allamah Abdullah Al-Ghudiyan, may Allah have mercy upon them, along with senior students of knowledge from both the East and the West, affirm the authenticity of Salafipublications’ Salafiyyah. This affirmation is as evident as the midday sun. They maintain no connections with Ahlul Bidah or any of their affiliates.

Faris must elucidate his prior statements, should he not have done so already, given that he initially voiced them in public. Nevertheless, irrespective of past events, recent developments have illuminated that the core concern does not reside with Salafipublications itself, but rather with Faris’s apprehensions regarding the positions held by Salafiyyoon on particular issues, especially those about Dr. Muhammad Bin Haadee and his steadfast associate, Shaikh Sulayman Ar-Ruhayli, which we have already highlighted in this series. This recent matter has so deeply unsettled him that he has resorted to openly attacking those who seek transparency concerning Dr. Muhammad Bin Haadee. In a brazen display, he has declared that individuals who approach the matter in what he considers an improper manner are indulging in a foolish pursuit, swayed by Shaytaan. When such a reprehensible assertion is met with stern disapproval and rebuke, the naive and the apologists are quick to claim that we are bad mannered. Indeed, whether or not Faris has clarified his previous statement “I disagree with some of the things they say but they are my brothers”, his perspectives on recent matters have become unmistakably clear. His call to brotherhood should not be based on flattery, rather true brotherhood, companionship, and camaraderie must be anchored in openness, steering clear of ambiguity, vague statements, and evasive comments. Imam Ibn Al-Qayyim, may Allah have mercy upon him, said:

قال ابن القيم: وعـلـيك بالتفصيل والتبيين فالإجمال والإطلاق دون بيان
قد أفسدا هذا الوجود وخبـطا الأذهان والآراء كل زمـان

“It is obligated to you to provide detailed explanations and clarifications, as generalisations and unrestricted (speech) without elaboration (clarification) have corrupted the existence and confused minds and opinions throughout all times”.

Read: The Types of People in the Fitnah of Muḥammad Bin Hādī
https://www.manhaj.com/manhaj/assets/docs/types-of-people-mbh-fitnah.pdf

To be continued…InShaAllah

[1] https://www.thenoblequran.com/q/#/search/4_59

[2] Ash-Shura 10

[3] Sahih Targhib 40

[4] An Excerpt from “Ibaaraat Moohimah”. page 25

[5] An Excerpt from “I’laam Al-Muwaqqi’een” 3/300-301

[6] Jami Li-Akhlaaq Ar-Rawi Wa Aadab As-Sami page 8

[7] Naqd Al-Mantiq 263 by Shaikh Al-Islam Ibn Taymiyyah, may Allah have mercy upon him.

[8] Al-Qawa’id Al-Muthlaa page 86 by Imam Muhammad Ibn Salih al-Uthaymin, may Allah have mercy upon him.

[10] O Faris Al-Hammadi! The time has arrived for your deceitful and absurd statements to be unveiled for all to see! [Examine thoroughly before hastily claiming that proper etiquette has been disregarded in interactions with Faris]

Written by Abdullah Jallow on . Posted in Brotherhood, Methodology - 'Manhaj', Morals and Manners - 'Akhlaaq', Refutations, Scholars of Islam, Uncategorized, Worship - 'Ibaadah'.

In The Name of Allah, The Most Merciful, The Bestower of Mercy.

Al-Allamah Ubaid Bin Abdillah Al-Jabiri, may Allah have mercy upon him, was asked: If I heard a scholar’s statement in an audio recording or read it in a book that a certain individual is an innovator, yet I did not see any proof, am I obligated to exercise caution regarding this individual and be satisfied that he is an innovator, or should I wait until I obtain evidence of that?

Response: All praise is due to Allah the Lord of all that exists. May Allah send His Salutations of peace and blessings upon our prophet Muhammad, his family, and companions. To proceed: I say: Indeed, Ahlus Sunnah do not issue a judgment on Bidah concerning any individual unless they are fully acquainted with him, thoroughly assess what he follows, and are well-versed in their methodology both in general and in detail. This perspective brings us to two matters:

The first one involves a situation where a scholar or group of scholars has deemed someone an innovator, and this view is not contested by other scholars from Ahlus Sunnah. Bear in mind! I say that others from Ahlus Sunnah do not disagree with him, so we accept their criticism of the individual in question. We accept their speech and exercise caution regarding this individual in question. As long as a Sunni scholar has passed judgment on him – criticised by a Sunni scholar, while the rest of Ahlus Sunnah among the contemporaries of this scholar – his brothers and sons- did not object, his speech must be accepted. This is because this Sunni scholar who issued the criticism did not do so except based on a matter that is clear to him and established upon evidence. This is something about the religion ordained by Allah, and the one who criticises or praises others is aware of their accountability for what he says and the judgment they make. He knows that he is answerable to Allah even before the people question him.

The second one involves a situation where an individual has faced criticism from a scholar or scholars, resulting in a judgment that topples his status, making it obligatory to exercise caution regarding him. However, others have deemed this person trustworthy and aligned with the Sunnah, offering judgments that contradict those of the critics. In such cases, as long as both groups of scholars adhere to the Sunnah and are regarded as trustworthy and people of integrity in our view, we should examine the evidence. This is why they (i.e. the Scholars) say: “The one who knows serves as proof against the one who does not know”. A critic who states that a certain individual is both an innovator and a deviant, while providing evidence from that person’s writings, cassette tapes, or reliable narrators, compels us to accept the critic’s speech and abandon the praise from those who oppose the criticism. This is because the critics have presented evidence that may not be known to others, or because the individuals offering praise may not have encountered (any negative information) about the criticised person; instead, their commendation is based on their prior knowledge and (belief) that the individual adhered to the Sunnah.

Consequently, the individual who has been criticised and against whom evidence has been presented is deemed unreliable, with the proof resting with the one who provided the evidence. It is incumbent upon the one who is in search of truth to adhere to the evidence without deviating to the right or left, nor claiming, “I choose to abstain” because we have not been obligated with this by the Salaf. It is a duty to accept the statements of the one who has established the evidence. A Sunni scholar who defends those criticised is excused, and we uphold his status and honour. We acknowledge the virtues and high status he possesses, by the will of Allah.

A scholar from Ahlus Sunnah is only human. He can become distracted and forgetful, and he may be misled by evil people, or there may have been a time when he viewed someone as trustworthy, only for that person to later be deemed untrustworthy, and this person deceives him. Numerous witnesses can attest to this situation, as many individuals who have lost their credibility due to evidence are, in reality, people who wage war against the Sunnah and its followers.

They come along bearing copies of their books, presenting them to distinguished scholars—individuals revered for their leadership and virtue – while the true nature of this trickster and plotter remains concealed from this noble scholar, who, had he been aware, would have seen this individual’s standing diminish in his eyes. Consequently, the scholar offers commendations based solely on what he has heard. If this book is published, it is circulated by his supporters, who cultivate a favourable image of him. Thus, some contend, “So-and-so has praised him—Al-Albaanee, Ibn Baaz, or Ibn Al-Uthaymeen has lauded this work.” Yet, these scholars are not to be blamed; rather, it is the trickster who has remained shrouded from their view. So, what remains? We establish the evidence against this deceiver, trickster, and plotter based on what is found in his books. We establish the manifest clarifications against him from his books and we say to the one who argues with us, “Take it, this is his speech”. Consequently, it is obligated to you to be fair and be free from that wild and zealous attachment, and from the desires that blind a person. It is obligated to you that your search should be for the truth. [End of quote] [Refer to Arabic text at the end of this article]

Observations

[I] The Shaikh, may Allah have mercy upon him, said: Bear in mind! I say that others from Ahlus Sunnah do not disagree with him, so we accept their criticism of the individual in question. We accept their speech and exercise caution regarding this individual in question. As long as a Sunni scholar has passed judgment on him – criticised by a Sunni scholar, while the rest of Ahlus Sunnah among the contemporaries of this scholar – his brothers and sons- did not object, his speech must be accepted. This is because this Sunni scholar who issued the criticism did not do so except based on a matter that is clear to him and established upon evidence. This is something about the religion ordained by Allah, and the one who criticises or praises others is aware of their accountability for what he says and the judgment they make. He knows that he is answerable to Allah even before the people question him. [End of quote]

Observation: Indeed, before Faris attempts to present excuses for Dr. Muhammad Ibn Haadee or attempts to manipulate the narrative to suggest that the matter is exclusively between Dr. Muhammad and Al-Allaamah Rabee, he must recognise that no prominent senior scholar in the realm of Al-Jarh Wat Ta’deel in our time supports Dr. Muhammad’s Tabdee against those senior students. Not only do they oppose his stance, but they also insistently call upon him to furnish evidence, which he has yet to provide. For instance, Shaikh Abu Iyadh has provided the requests of Shaikh Rabee on link 1 at the end of this article.

Is it considered good etiquette to intervene after scholars have presented their well-founded arguments and then declare oneself a mediator while contradicting established principles? Furthermore, Faris explicitly mentioned that those who engage in this issue in a way he finds unsuitable are acting out of foolishness and are influenced by Shaytaan. Therefore, who truly deserves the label of bad manners: those adhering to the sound principles of Salafiyyah to uphold justice, or Faris, who attacks them?

[II] The Shaikh, may Allah have mercy upon him, said: “In such cases, as long as both groups of scholars adhere to the Sunnah and are regarded as trustworthy and people of integrity in our view, we should examine the evidence. This is why they (i.e. the Scholars) say: “The one who knows serves as proof against the one who does not know”. A critic who states that a certain individual is both an innovator and a deviant, while providing evidence from that person’s writings, cassette tapes, or reliable narrators, compels us to accept the critic’s speech and abandon the praise from those who oppose the criticism. This is because the critics have presented evidence that may not be known to others, or because the individuals offering praise may not have encountered (any negative information) about the criticised person; instead, their commendation is based on their prior knowledge and (belief) that the individual adhered to the Sunnah. Consequently, the individual who has been criticised and against whom evidence has been presented is deemed unreliable, with the proof resting with the one who provided the evidence. It is incumbent upon the one who is in search of truth to adhere to the evidence without deviating to the right or left, nor claiming, “I choose to abstain” because we have not been obligated with this by the Salaf. It is a duty to accept the statements of the one who has established the evidence. A Sunni scholar who defends those criticised is excused, and we uphold his status and honour. We acknowledge the virtues and high status he possesses, by the will of Allah”. [End of quote]

Observation: In this context, Al-Allamah Rabee, Al-Allamah Ubaid, Shaikh Abdullah Al-Bukhari, and others have rejected the Tabdee issued by Dr. Muhammad, and no one is more knowledgeable about this issue than they are. Similarly, the senior students in the West, including those at Spubs and their peers among the senior Tullabul Ilm, are well-informed about this matter and its evidence-based arguments, all of which refute Dr. Muhammad’s Tabdee against these esteemed students of knowledge. Dr. Muhammad’s criticisms lack the necessary evidence to substantiate his Tabdee, which is the basis for the scrutiny he faces. Therefore, why is Faris obscuring this issue and attempting to frame it as a dispute solely between Shaikh Rabee and Dr. Muhammad? Furthermore, he disparages those who seek justice based on thorough knowledge, labeling their pursuit as foolishness or influenced by Shaytaan. This behaviour is a reflection of poor manners; do not be misled into supporting their claims of good conduct, as the height of bad manners is to deny the truth and attack those who seek its clarification.

It is well established among scholars and senior students in the West that those senior students oppressed by Dr Muhammad adhere to Salafiyyah. Their commitment to Salafiyyah is not subject to doubt based on Dr. Muhammad’s conjectures or the Musaafiqah’s desires. Certainty does not simply vanish due to the unfounded doubts that have led Dr. Muhammad to make an erroneous judgment. Does Faris expect us to ignore these issues for the sake of convenience? Remain vigilant and do not hastily conclude that Faris deserves leniency or that the strong criticism aimed at him is a sign of bad manners. As previously stated, what could be worse than bad manners than to hide the truth, misrepresent it, and then attack those who seek clarity?  Is it truly good manners for Faris to come forward and present a distorted view of the real issues at hand? While he promotes the idea of good manners, he lacks the courage to confront Dr. Muhummand about his treatment of those senior students, despite being in the wrong. Therefore, before you rally behind Faris or advocate for a gentle approach towards him, it’s essential to address this issue directly and demand that he takes a definitive stance, rather than resorting to verbal attacks against those seeking justice.

[III] The Shaikh, may Allah have mercy upon him, stated: “A scholar from Ahlus Sunnah is only human. He can become distracted and forgetful, and he may be misled by evil people, or there may have been a time when he viewed someone as trustworthy, only for that person to later be deemed untrustworthy, and this person deceives him. Numerous witnesses can attest to this situation, as many individuals who have lost their credibility due to evidence are, in reality, people who wage war against the Sunnah and its followers. They come along bearing copies of their books, presenting them to distinguished scholars—individuals revered for their leadership and virtue – while the true nature of this trickster and plotter remains concealed from this noble scholar, who, had he been aware, would have seen this individual’s standing diminish in his eyes. Consequently, the scholar offers commendations based solely on what he has heard. If this book is published, it is circulated by his supporters, who cultivate a favourable image of him. Thus, some contend, “So-and-so has praised him—Al-Albaanee, Ibn Baaz, or Ibn Al-Uthaymeen has lauded this work.” Yet, these scholars are not to be blamed; rather, it is the trickster who has remained shrouded from their view. So, what remains? We establish the evidence against this deceiver, trickster, and plotter based on what is found in his books. We establish the manifest clarifications against him from his books and we say to the one who argues with us, “Take it, this is his speech”. Consequently, it is obligated to you to be fair and be free from that wild and zealous attachment, and from the desires that blind a person. It is obligated to you that your search should be for the truth”. [End of quote]

We reiterate that the senior students whom Dr. Muhummand has labeled with Tabdee continue to uphold Salafiyyah, and no one’s adherence to Salafiyyah should be questioned based on mere speculation or personal desires. Their integrity cannot be challenged without substantial evidence. Faris is so intent on safeguarding his own reputation that he resorts to blocking our Twitter accounts when we shared Shaikh Abu Iyaad’s comprehensive explanation on these issues. However, he shows little concern for the dignity of others—those unjustly targeted by Dr. Muhummand’s harsh ruling of Tabdee. Instead, he shamefully misrepresents the situation as a dispute solely between Dr. Muhummand and Al-Allaamah Rabee, suggesting it should be dismissed. This is merely an attempt to divert attention from the real issue, which is Dr. Muhummand’s flawed judgment of Tabdee. Furthermore, those who have been wronged by Dr. Muhummand are not adversaries of the Sunnah, and anyone who claims otherwise must provide clear proof; otherwise, they are spreading a serious falsehood. Therefore, Dr. Muhummand’s Tabdee must be categorically rejected without any doubt. The true deceivers in this matter are those like Faris, who distort the narrative to imply that the issue pertains only to Dr. Muhummand and Al-Allaamah Rabee. Faris’s misguided statements imply that all responsibilities related to this matter should be disregarded, whether he states this openly or remains silent, unless he offers a proper clarification. See pic 2

To be continued InShaAllah

Link 1: https://x.com/AbuIyaadSP/status/1018974451269033986

Pic 2:

الموقف الصحيح من إختلاف العلماء في الجرح و التعديل لفضيلة الشيخ/ عبيد الجابري حفظه الله

الموقف الصحيح من إختلاف العلماء في الجرح و التعديل لفضيلة الشيخ/ عبيد الجابري حفظه الله

فضيلة الشيخ عبيد بن عبد الله الجابري – حفظه الله –
************************************************** *

الحمد لله رب العالمين ، وصلى الله وسلم على نبينا محمد ، وعلى آله وصحبه أجمعين ، أما بعد ، رداً على السائل الذي قال .. إذا سمعتُ كلام العالم في شريط أو قرأتُ له في كتاب عن شخص ما أنه مبتدع ولم أر منه دليلا على ذلك، فهل يلزمني أن أحْذر من هذا الشخص وأن أقتنع بأنه مبتدع أم أتريّث حتى أجد الدليل على ذلك؟.

أقول فإن أهل السنة لا يحكمون على أحد ببدعة إلا وقد خَبَرُوه وسَبَرُوا ما عنده – تماماً – وعرفوا منهجه – تماماً – جملةً وتفصيلاً، ومن هنا هذه المسألة تستدعي منّا وقفتين:
الوقفة الأولى: فيمن حَكم عليه عالم أو علماء بأنه مبتدع ، ولم يختلف معهم غيرهم ممن هم أهل سنة مثلهم، تفطنوا، أقول : لم يختلف معهم غيرهم فيه ممن هم أهل سنة، فإنا نقبل جرحهم له، فإنا نقبل قولهم ونحذَره ، مادام أنه حَكَم عليه وجَرَحه عالم سني ، ولم يظهر بقية أهل السنة الذين هم أقران هذا العالم من إخوانه وأبنائه العلماء فلابد من قبوله، لأن هذا العالم السني الذي جرح رجلاً : فإنه لم يجرحه إلا بأمر بان له وقام عنده عليه الدليل ،لأن هذا من دين الله، والذي يجرّح أو يُعدّل يعلم أنه مسؤول عما يقول ويفتي به أو يحكم به ويعلم أنه مسؤول من الله تعالى قبل أن يسأله الخلق.

الوقفة الثانية: إذا كان هذا الشخص الذي جرحه عالم أو علماء حكموا عليه بما يُسقطه ويوجب الحذر منه قد خالفهم غيرهم وحكموا بعدالته وأنه على السنة أو غير ذلك من الأحكام المخالفة لأحكام الآخرين المجرحين له، فمادام أن هؤلاء على السنة وهؤلاء على السنة وكلهم أهل ثقة عندهم وذَووا أمانة عندنا ففي هذه الحال ننظر في الدليل، ولهذا قالوا: «من عَلِمَ حُجَّة على من لم يَعْلَم» الجارح قال في فلان من الناس إنه مبتدع منحرفٌ سعيه وأتى بالأدلة مِن كُتب المجروح أو من أشرطته أو من نقل الثقاة عنه، فهذا موجب علينا قبول قوله وترك المعدِّلين الذين خالفوا مَنْ جرَّحه، لأن هؤلاء المجَرِّحين له أتَوا بأدلة خَفِيَتْ على الآخرين لسبب من الأسباب أو أن المعدِّل لم يقرأ ولم يسمع عن ذلك المجرّح، وإنما بنى على سابقِ عِلمِه به، وأنه كان على سنة، فأصبح هذا المجروح الذي أقيم الدليل على جرحه مجروحا والحجة مع من أقام الدليل، وعلى من يطلب الحق أن يتبع الدليل و لا يتلمّس بُنيات الطريق ذات اليمين وذات الشمال، أو يقول أقف بنفسي، فهذا لم نعهده عند السلف، وهذه الأمور تكون فيما لا يسوغ فيه الاجتهاد في أصول العقائد وأصول العبادات، فإن المصير إلى قبول من أقام الدليل واجب حتمي، وذاك العالم السني الذي خالف الجارحين، له عذره، يبقى على مكانته عندنا وعلى حرمته عندنا، ونستشعر أنه له إن شاء الله ما كان عليه من سابقة الفضل وجلالة القدر، هذا وسعه ، والعالم من أهل السنة، السلفي، بَشَرٌ يذهل، ينسى، يكون عُرضة للتلبيس من بطانة سيئة، أو كان قد وَثِقَ بذلك الرجل المجروح فلَبَّسَ عليه، والشواهد على هذا كثيرة، فكثير من السَّـقَط والذين هم في الحقيقة حربٌ على السنة وأهلِها يأتون بنماذج من كتبهم يقرؤونها على علماء أجلّة مشهود لهم بالفضل والإمامة في الدين، ويُخفي ذلك اللعّاب الماكر عن ذلك العالم الجليل الإمام الفذ الجهبذ ما لو عَلِمَه لسقط عنه، فهذا العالم يُزكِّي بناءً على ما سَمِع، فإذا طُبِع الكتاب وانتشر وتناقلته الأيدي وذاع صيته وإذا بالمجادلين يقولون زكَّاه فلان، فلان: الألباني – رحمه الله – ، أو ابن باز – رحمه الله -، أو ابن العثيمين – رحمه الله – ، زكّى هذا الكتاب فهؤلاء العلماء – رحمة الله عليهم – معذورون، ومن التَّبعة سالمون – إن شاء الله تعالى – في الدنيا والآخرة ، وإنما هذا لعَّاب أخفى ولبّس على ذلك العالم، إذن ماذا بقي؟ نقيم على ذلك الملبِّس اللعاب الدساس الماكر مِنْ كُتبه، يقيم عليه البيِّـنة من كتبه، ومن جادلنا فيه نقول خذ، هذا هو قولُه، هل تظن أنه عَرَضهُ بهذه الصورة على من سمَّينا من أهل العلم ومن هو على نفس النهج فأقرُّوه؟ الجواب كلا، إذن يجب عليك أن تكون مُنْصفا متجردا من العاطفة الجياشة المندفعة ومن الهوى الذي يُعمي ويجب عليك أن تكون طُلبتُك الحق، نعم.

الطالب: جزاكم الله خيرا وأحسن الله إليكم، هذا السائل يقول: ما الواجب على عوام السلفيين في دعاة اختلف العلماء في تعديلهم وتجريحهم سواء علموا أخطاءهم أم لم يعلموها؟

الشيخ: أقول لمعشر السلفيين والسلفيات مَنْ بلَغَتْهم مشافهةً هذه المحادثة مني ومَن ستبلغهم عبر من صاغوا الأسئلة وأَلقَوْها علينا، أقول: أنصحكم إن كنتم تحبون الناصحين ألاّ تقبلوا شريطا ولا كتابا إلا ممن عرفتم أنه على السنة مشهودٌ له بذلك واشتهر بها ولم يظهر منه خلاف ذلك، وهذه قاعدة مطَّردة في حياته وبعد موته، فمن مات وهو فيما نحسبه على السنة فهو عندنا عليها ونسأل الله أن يثبته عليها في الآخرة كما ثبته عليها حيا… آمين، هذا أولا.

ثانيا: إذا خفي عليكم أمرُ إنسان اشتهرتْ كتبه وأشرطته وذاع صيته فاسألوا عنه ذوي الخِبْرة به والعارفين بحاله، فإن السنة لا تخفى ولا يخفى أهلها، فالرجل تزكّيه أعماله، تزكّيه أعماله التي هي على السنة، وتشهد عليه بذلك ويذكره الناس بها حيا وميتا، وما تَسَتَّرَ أحدٌ بالسنة وغرّر الناس به حتى التـفُّوا حوله وارتبطوا به وأصبحوا يعوِّلون عليه ويقبلون كل ما يصدر عنه إلاّ فَضحَه الله سبحانه وتعالى وهتك ستره وكشف للخاصة والعامة ما كان يُخفي وما كان يُكنُّ من الغش والتلبيس والمكر والمخادعة، يهيّئ الله رجالا فضلاء فطناء حكماء أقوياء جهابذة ذوي علم وكياسة وفـِقهٍ في الدين يكشف الله بهم ستر ذلكم اللعاب الملبِّس الغشاش، فعليكم إذا بُيِّنَ لكم حال ذلك الإنسان الذي قد ذاع صيته وطبَّق الآفاق وأصبح مرموقا يشار إليه بالبنان، أصبح عليكم الحذر منه مادام أنه حذَّرَ منه أهل العلم والإيمان والذين هم على السنة، فإنهم سيكشفون لكم بالدليل، ولا مانع من استكشاف حال ذلك الإنسان الذي حذَّر منه عالم أو علماء بأدب وحسن أسلوب فإن ذلك العالم سيقول لك: رأيتُ فيه كذا وكذا وفي الكتاب الفلاني كذا وفي الشريط الفلاني كذا وإذا هي أدلة واضحة تكشف لك ما كان يخفيه وأن ذلكم الذي طَبَّق صيته الآفاق وأصبح حديثه مستساغا يُخفي من البدع والمكر ما لا يظهره من السنة.

وأمر ثالث: وهو أن مَنْ عَلِمَ الخطأ وبان له فلا يسوغ له أن يقلِّد عالما خَفِيَ عليه الأمر، وقد قدمت لكم أَمسي أن اجتهادات العلماء غير معصومة، ولهذا لا يجوز أن تُتخذ منهجا، نعم.

من شريط مفرغ بعنوان “ضوابط التعامل مع أهل السنة وأهل الباطل”.

فضيلة الشيخ عبيد بن عبد الله الجابري – حفظه الله –
************************************************** *

الحمد لله رب العالمين ، وصلى الله وسلم على نبينا محمد ، وعلى آله وصحبه أجمعين ، أما بعد ، رداً على السائل الذي قال .. إذا سمعتُ كلام العالم في شريط أو قرأتُ له في كتاب عن شخص ما أنه مبتدع ولم أر منه دليلا على ذلك، فهل يلزمني أن أحْذر من هذا الشخص وأن أقتنع بأنه مبتدع أم أتريّث حتى أجد الدليل على ذلك؟.

أقول فإن أهل السنة لا يحكمون على أحد ببدعة إلا وقد خَبَرُوه وسَبَرُوا ما عنده – تماماً – وعرفوا منهجه – تماماً – جملةً وتفصيلاً، ومن هنا هذه المسألة تستدعي منّا وقفتين:
الوقفة الأولى: فيمن حَكم عليه عالم أو علماء بأنه مبتدع ، ولم يختلف معهم غيرهم ممن هم أهل سنة مثلهم، تفطنوا، أقول : لم يختلف معهم غيرهم فيه ممن هم أهل سنة، فإنا نقبل جرحهم له، فإنا نقبل قولهم ونحذَره ، مادام أنه حَكَم عليه وجَرَحه عالم سني ، ولم يظهر بقية أهل السنة الذين هم أقران هذا العالم من إخوانه وأبنائه العلماء فلابد من قبوله، لأن هذا العالم السني الذي جرح رجلاً : فإنه لم يجرحه إلا بأمر بان له وقام عنده عليه الدليل ،لأن هذا من دين الله، والذي يجرّح أو يُعدّل يعلم أنه مسؤول عما يقول ويفتي به أو يحكم به ويعلم أنه مسؤول من الله تعالى قبل أن يسأله الخلق.

الوقفة الثانية: إذا كان هذا الشخص الذي جرحه عالم أو علماء حكموا عليه بما يُسقطه ويوجب الحذر منه قد خالفهم غيرهم وحكموا بعدالته وأنه على السنة أو غير ذلك من الأحكام المخالفة لأحكام الآخرين المجرحين له، فمادام أن هؤلاء على السنة وهؤلاء على السنة وكلهم أهل ثقة عندهم وذَووا أمانة عندنا ففي هذه الحال ننظر في الدليل، ولهذا قالوا: «من عَلِمَ حُجَّة على من لم يَعْلَم» الجارح قال في فلان من الناس إنه مبتدع منحرفٌ سعيه وأتى بالأدلة مِن كُتب المجروح أو من أشرطته أو من نقل الثقاة عنه، فهذا موجب علينا قبول قوله وترك المعدِّلين الذين خالفوا مَنْ جرَّحه، لأن هؤلاء المجَرِّحين له أتَوا بأدلة خَفِيَتْ على الآخرين لسبب من الأسباب أو أن المعدِّل لم يقرأ ولم يسمع عن ذلك المجرّح، وإنما بنى على سابقِ عِلمِه به، وأنه كان على سنة، فأصبح هذا المجروح الذي أقيم الدليل على جرحه مجروحا والحجة مع من أقام الدليل، وعلى من يطلب الحق أن يتبع الدليل و لا يتلمّس بُنيات الطريق ذات اليمين وذات الشمال، أو يقول أقف بنفسي، فهذا لم نعهده عند السلف، وهذه الأمور تكون فيما لا يسوغ فيه الاجتهاد في أصول العقائد وأصول العبادات، فإن المصير إلى قبول من أقام الدليل واجب حتمي، وذاك العالم السني الذي خالف الجارحين، له عذره، يبقى على مكانته عندنا وعلى حرمته عندنا، ونستشعر أنه له إن شاء الله ما كان عليه من سابقة الفضل وجلالة القدر، هذا وسعه ، والعالم من أهل السنة، السلفي، بَشَرٌ يذهل، ينسى، يكون عُرضة للتلبيس من بطانة سيئة، أو كان قد وَثِقَ بذلك الرجل المجروح فلَبَّسَ عليه، والشواهد على هذا كثيرة، فكثير من السَّـقَط والذين هم في الحقيقة حربٌ على السنة وأهلِها يأتون بنماذج من كتبهم يقرؤونها على علماء أجلّة مشهود لهم بالفضل والإمامة في الدين، ويُخفي ذلك اللعّاب الماكر عن ذلك العالم الجليل الإمام الفذ الجهبذ ما لو عَلِمَه لسقط عنه، فهذا العالم يُزكِّي بناءً على ما سَمِع، فإذا طُبِع الكتاب وانتشر وتناقلته الأيدي وذاع صيته وإذا بالمجادلين يقولون زكَّاه فلان، فلان: الألباني – رحمه الله – ، أو ابن باز – رحمه الله -، أو ابن العثيمين – رحمه الله – ، زكّى هذا الكتاب فهؤلاء العلماء – رحمة الله عليهم – معذورون، ومن التَّبعة سالمون – إن شاء الله تعالى – في الدنيا والآخرة ، وإنما هذا لعَّاب أخفى ولبّس على ذلك العالم، إذن ماذا بقي؟ نقيم على ذلك الملبِّس اللعاب الدساس الماكر مِنْ كُتبه، يقيم عليه البيِّـنة من كتبه، ومن جادلنا فيه نقول خذ، هذا هو قولُه، هل تظن أنه عَرَضهُ بهذه الصورة على من سمَّينا من أهل العلم ومن هو على نفس النهج فأقرُّوه؟ الجواب كلا، إذن يجب عليك أن تكون مُنْصفا متجردا من العاطفة الجياشة المندفعة ومن الهوى الذي يُعمي ويجب عليك أن تكون طُلبتُك الحق، نعم.

الطالب: جزاكم الله خيرا وأحسن الله إليكم، هذا السائل يقول: ما الواجب على عوام السلفيين في دعاة اختلف العلماء في تعديلهم وتجريحهم سواء علموا أخطاءهم أم لم يعلموها؟

الشيخ: أقول لمعشر السلفيين والسلفيات مَنْ بلَغَتْهم مشافهةً هذه المحادثة مني ومَن ستبلغهم عبر من صاغوا الأسئلة وأَلقَوْها علينا، أقول: أنصحكم إن كنتم تحبون الناصحين ألاّ تقبلوا شريطا ولا كتابا إلا ممن عرفتم أنه على السنة مشهودٌ له بذلك واشتهر بها ولم يظهر منه خلاف ذلك، وهذه قاعدة مطَّردة في حياته وبعد موته، فمن مات وهو فيما نحسبه على السنة فهو عندنا عليها ونسأل الله أن يثبته عليها في الآخرة كما ثبته عليها حيا… آمين، هذا أولا.

ثانيا: إذا خفي عليكم أمرُ إنسان اشتهرتْ كتبه وأشرطته وذاع صيته فاسألوا عنه ذوي الخِبْرة به والعارفين بحاله، فإن السنة لا تخفى ولا يخفى أهلها، فالرجل تزكّيه أعماله، تزكّيه أعماله التي هي على السنة، وتشهد عليه بذلك ويذكره الناس بها حيا وميتا، وما تَسَتَّرَ أحدٌ بالسنة وغرّر الناس به حتى التـفُّوا حوله وارتبطوا به وأصبحوا يعوِّلون عليه ويقبلون كل ما يصدر عنه إلاّ فَضحَه الله سبحانه وتعالى وهتك ستره وكشف للخاصة والعامة ما كان يُخفي وما كان يُكنُّ من الغش والتلبيس والمكر والمخادعة، يهيّئ الله رجالا فضلاء فطناء حكماء أقوياء جهابذة ذوي علم وكياسة وفـِقهٍ في الدين يكشف الله بهم ستر ذلكم اللعاب الملبِّس الغشاش، فعليكم إذا بُيِّنَ لكم حال ذلك الإنسان الذي قد ذاع صيته وطبَّق الآفاق وأصبح مرموقا يشار إليه بالبنان، أصبح عليكم الحذر منه مادام أنه حذَّرَ منه أهل العلم والإيمان والذين هم على السنة، فإنهم سيكشفون لكم بالدليل، ولا مانع من استكشاف حال ذلك الإنسان الذي حذَّر منه عالم أو علماء بأدب وحسن أسلوب فإن ذلك العالم سيقول لك: رأيتُ فيه كذا وكذا وفي الكتاب الفلاني كذا وفي الشريط الفلاني كذا وإذا هي أدلة واضحة تكشف لك ما كان يخفيه وأن ذلكم الذي طَبَّق صيته الآفاق وأصبح حديثه مستساغا يُخفي من البدع والمكر ما لا يظهره من السنة.

وأمر ثالث: وهو أن مَنْ عَلِمَ الخطأ وبان له فلا يسوغ له أن يقلِّد عالما خَفِيَ عليه الأمر، وقد قدمت لكم أَمسي أن اجتهادات العلماء غير معصومة، ولهذا لا يجوز أن تُتخذ منهجا، نعم.

من شريط مفرغ بعنوان “ضوابط التعامل مع أهل السنة وأهل الباطل”.

[9] O Faris Al-Hammadi! The time has arrived for your deceitful and absurd statements to be unveiled for all to see! [Brother, did you advise Faris privately prior to rebuking him?]

Written by Abdullah Jallow on . Posted in Brotherhood, Contemporary Issues, Methodology - 'Manhaj', Morals and Manners - 'Akhlaaq', Purification of The Soul, Refutations, Worship - 'Ibaadah'.

In The Name of Allah, The Most Merciful, The Bestower of Mercy.

Al-Allaamah Muqbil Bin Haadee Al-Waadi’ee, may Allah have mercy upon him, was asked: “What is the difference between criticism and advice?”

Response: The difference between criticism and advice is that advice can be in private between the one advising and the one being advised, and it can be with gentleness and mildness. 

فَقُولَا لَهُ قَوْلًا لَّيِّنًا لَّعَلَّهُ يَتَذَكَّرُ أَوْ يَخْشَىٰ 

And speak to him (i.e. Fir’awn) mildly, perhaps he may accept admonition or fear Allah]. [Taa Haa. 44]

As for criticism, it can be recorded in books and mentioned in councils (sittings), and our predecessors, may Allah have mercy on them, combined between the two. Imam Adh-Dhahabi, may Allah have mercy upon him, said, “Ratan, and who is Ratan? (i.e. Ratan Bin Abdillah Al-Hindi)? A liar amongst the big liars who claimed that he accompanied the Prophet after six years has elapsed”.

Imam Ash-Shafi’ee said, may Allāh have mercy upon him, said: “The narration on the authority of Haram Bin Uthman is Haraam (forbidden)”.

When Suwayd Bin Sa’eed narrated, “He who is infatuated, abstains, conceals (his infatuation) and then dies, he dies as a martyr”, Yahya Bin Ma’een said, “If I had a horse and a spear, I would have carried out a military expedition against Suwayd”.

Aban Ibn Abi Ayyash was a Zahid, a devout worshipper, and a virtuous person, but he used to mix up in his transmission of hadith. Shu’bah was asked to refrain from (speaking) about Aban Ibn Abi Ayyash, so he said, “I will see (or wait)”. Then he advised him saying, “Indeed, (this affair is) religion, I can’t except to speak about Aban Ibn Abi Ayyash”. (1)

Imam Al-Albaanee, may Allah have mercy upon him, was asked: The statement of some people or the stipulation of some of them is that it is more correct that advice must be given before refutations are printed- a copy must be sent to the one refuted so that it can be looked into. They say this is from the methodology of the pious predecessors.

Response: This is not a prerequisite, but if feasible and it is hoped that affinity would be established through this approach – to avoid publicising the matter, then it is undoubtedly a good thing. However, as for making it a prerequisite first and foremost, and a general prerequisite, there is no wisdom in this at all. As we all know, people are like the gold and silver mines, therefore, if you are aware that someone is aligned with us on the right path and is receptive to advice, then you write to him without exposing their mistakes. From your perspective, this is considered beneficial. However, it is important to note that this is not a prerequisite, and even if it were, it would be practically impossible to fully implement. How would you obtain their contact information and establish correspondence? Moreover, can you guarantee a response from them? These aspects are purely speculative. Fulfilling this condition is extremely challenging, hence it is not regarded as a prerequisite. [2]

Imam Abdul Azeez Bin Baz, may Allah have mercy upon him, was asked, “When should advice be given in private or openly?”

Response: The person giving advice does what is best. If he determines that it is more beneficial to advise discreetly, they do so secretly. Conversely, if he believes it is more beneficial to offer advice openly, he does so openly. However, if the sin occurs in secret, the advice can only be given privately. If he is aware of his brother’s sins in secret, he offers advice in secret and does not expose him. On the other hand, if the sin is committed openly and witnessed by others, such as someone consuming alcohol at a gathering, it is necessary to openly express disapproval. Similarly, if someone encourages others to engage in alcohol consumption or to fornicate, he should address them by saying, “O my brother! This behaviour is not permissible. [3]

Al-Allamah Rabee Bin Haadi Al-Mad’khali, may Allah preserve him, was asked: “Our Shaikh, one of the affairs that have become circulated and have aroused an intense feeling among the Salafis, is that there are people who claim that advice is obligatory before warning. Is there a statement you can give in this matter?”

Response: I answered this question before – may Allah bless you. We have been put to trial with these types of affairs, so you find a person spreading falsehoods, lies, and slander against others- both about individuals and in general; and if you give him advice or (respond with) criticism or something, he says, “Why did they not warn me, why did they not advise me, and why did they not explain to me”. Corrupt excuses. We seek from these people to repent to Allah and return to the truth with complete good manners and humility, and to leave such excuses. Assume that this one made a mistake and did not speak, and did not advise you, then (still) return to the truth and reprimand him thereafter. As for spreading (trouble) amongst the people and persisting in your falsehood and mistakes, and saying, “They did not do and they did”, this is empty talk. It is obligated to a believer to return to Allah (in obedience, repentance, etc). You publish your mistakes in books, tapes, etc. If you hid your mistakes and committed them in the darkness of your house – (known only to) you and Allah, then this person discovers you, he would have advised you – between you and him. As for disseminating your statements and (publicising) deeds in the world, then someone comes and publishes- meaning, replies to you (or rebuts you), there is nothing wrong with this -May Allah bless you. Leave these excuses that (arise) from many of the people of falsehood who are rebellious in falsehood and stubbornness. [4]

Faris has taken to social media with an unrestrained fervour, expressing his opinions without a hint of trepidation or discretion for quite some time. This prompted us to address some of his doubts, deceptions, insults, and misrepresentations outlined in posts 1 to 8. The insights shared by the senior scholars are more than sufficient for those genuinely seeking clarity, while they serve as a harsh reality check for those attempting to dilute the sound methodology surrounding this issue. Had Faris chosen to keep his misguided notions to himself, we would have offered him counsel in private. However, his belief in the validity of his erroneous views, which he feels compelled him to broadcast publicly, warrants nothing less than a public admonishment.

To be continued…InShaAllah

[1] Ghaarah Al-Ashritah 1/71

[2] Silsilah Al-Hudaa Wan-Noor. Number 63

[3] Majallah Al-Islaah. (Number 17/241). Date: 23/6/1993

[4]https://rabee.net/alfatawi/%D8%B4%D9%8A%D8%AE%D9%86%D8%A7-%D9%85%D9%86-%D8%A7%D9%84%D8%A3%D9%85%D9%88%D8%B1-%D8%A7%D9%84%D8%AA%D9%8A-%D8%B5%D8%A7%D8%B1%D8%AA-%D8%AA%D8%B1%D9%88%D8%AC-%D9%88%D8%B5%D8%A7%D8%B1%D8%AA-%D8%B9%D8%B7/

We have no time to defend ourselves, rather, we defend the Sunnah- By Al-Allamah Muqbil Bin Haadee

Written by Salafi Dawah Manchester on . Posted in Contemporary Issues, Da'wah - Calling To Islam, Methodology - 'Manhaj', Morals and Manners - 'Akhlaaq', Purification of The Soul, Refutations, Scholars of Islam, Worship - 'Ibaadah'.

In The Name of Allah, The Most Merciful, The Bestower of Mercy.

Al-Allamah Muqbil Bin Haadee al-Waadi’ee, rahimahullaah, said:

“All praise belongs to Allaah, we mention the noble ‘Ulamaa with good, we direct people to them the likes of Shaykh Badee’ ad-Deen al-Bakistaanee as-Sindee, Shaykh al-Albaanee…Shaykh Rabee’ and Ibn Baaz. Our books are full of advising people to sit with those scholars and to benefit from them and their books. As for if you intend (by your question) that there is nothing with us except Tajreeh (refutation) for the people of innovation, then that is correct since they are the ones who initiate it:

لَّا يُحِبُّ ٱللَّهُ ٱلْجَهْرَ بِٱلسُّوٓءِ مِنَ ٱلْقَوْلِ إِلَّا مَن ظُلِمَ وَكَانَ ٱللَّهُ سَمِيعًا عَلِيمًا

 Allah does not like that the evil should be uttered in public except by him who has been wronged. And Allah is Ever All-Hearer, All-Knower.  [Surah an-Nisaa: 148]

So they are the ones who initiate (the revilement) and make people flee from us. So at times they say (about us that we are) ‘people of Takfeer (ejecting people from Islaam).’ And other times they say we are ‘Mutashaddidoon’ (harsh), and they say that we do not know anything from the current affairs. And on occasions they say (about us that) we only know ‘Hadathana wa Akhbarana’ (he narrated to us and he informed us – i.e. knowledge of Hadeeth). And the Prophet (ﷺ) said:  “When two people revile/insult one another, (the sin of) what they say is upon the first one (i.e. the one who initiated it), so long as the wronged one does not transgress.” [Saheeh Muslim (no.2587]

So we are defenders of the Sunnah, not (defenders of) our own selves. We hear people reviling and insulting us but we do not reply to them. The people of Sa’dah authored: ‘The Decisive Speech In Refuting The Slanderer and Liar’ – they are talking about me but I did not reply to them… And we did not refute them – all praise be to Allaah – until the people of Sa’dah died. We have no time to defend ourselves, rather, we defend the Sunnah even if it is by biting with our molar teeth. We will never let anyone speak ill of the Sunnah of the Messenger (ﷺ), whether he is a Shi’ite, a Soofee or from the Muslim Brotherhood. We sacrifice ourselves and our honour for the Sunnah.” Source: [Fadaa’ih wa Nasaa’eh, p.153-155, Shaykh Muqbil b. Haadee al-Waadi’ee, Daar al-Haramain, First Edition, 1419H/1999CE]

Translated by Ustadh Abu Abdillah Bilal Al-Kashmiri – may Allah preserve him.